Resolution 487-1990
RESOLUTION NO. 487 - 1990
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR/CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD TO EXECUTE A
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR FUNDING FROM A
SUBGRANT AWARD FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, FOR THE MONROE
COUNTY ANTI-DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM, SCHOOL RESOURCE
OFFICER/D.A.R.E. PROGRAM EXPANSION.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Mayor/Chairman of the Board is hereby
authorized to execute a Certificate of Acceptance by and between
the Florida Department of Community Affairs and Monroe County,
concerning a subgrant award in the amount of $56,853.00 for the
School Resource Officer/D.A.R.E. Program Expansion of the Monroe
County Anti-Drug Abuse Program, a copy of same being attached
hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held
on the e:I ~~ day of
tP~f()6tSr
, A.D. 1990.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
of!.~
By
Mayor/Chairman
( S~al )
Attest: DANNY L. KOLHAGE,~lerk
~L:~'1.L;L
'V1H1NnOO 3011N~ '
oiO .'tlIQ ")110
'3~'1H10>\ '1 jJHP10
Db 1 tAd S nUN 06 I
OHOQ3H tlOj 0311;1
I1PPROVED AS TO FORii..f
AND LEGAL SUfFICfENC1'.
nY~~~
mfJ-r!l Olli
~~
~
~.,;:;..
:;f
. ,'j'
.
it
,1~
J
~
"
;,~
''';
"
'..!
11
:t
~
:,\
.~
,~
>
;.:
,'1
~
ii
i
;j
~i
~
.~
I
"
-;
~
BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUBGRANT AWARD
'/
---------------------------------------------
The subgrantee, through its authorized representative,
acknowledges receipt and acceptance of subgrant award number
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-074
in the amount of $56,853
for a project entitled Monroe County Anti-Druq Abuse School
Resource Officer/D.A.R.E. Proqram Expansion
for the period of 10/1/90
through 9/30/91
, in accordance
with the statement of work contained in the subgrant application,
and subject to the Bureau of Public Safety Management's
conditions of aqreement and special conditions governing this
subgrant.
/f/.f/- (
//('~0 C<1L~'-~
Author1zed Off1C1a )
10/24/90
(Date/of'Acceptance
(SEAL )
ATI'EST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
John Stormont - Mayor/Chairman
(Typed Name and Title of Offic~al)
By:
Deputy Clerk
DCA-HS Form 1 (June, 1985)
f1Y
APMOVEDAS TO FORM
AND LEGA S 'FFIClBtCY.
state of Florida
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Emergency Management
Bureau of Public Safety Management
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Bob Martinez
Governor
Thomas G. Pelham
Secretary
Subgrant Award Certificate
Monroe County Board of
Subgrantee: Commissioners
Federal Funds:
$56,853
Date of Award: 9/28/90
Grant Period: From:10/1/90 To: 9/30/91
Project Title:Monroe County Anti-Druq
Abuse School Resource Officer/D.A.R.E.
Proqram Expansion
BGMTF Funds:
State Agency Match:
Local Agency Match:
Total Project Cost:
Program Area:
18,951
$75,804
Grant Number: 91-CJ-28-11-54-01-074
1
Award is hereby made in the amount and for the period shown above of a grant
under Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safety Streets Act of 1968,
P.L. 90-351, as amended, and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, P.L. 100-690,
to the above mentioned subgrantee and subject to any attached standard or
special conditions.
This award is subject to all applicable rules, regulations, and conditions as
contained in the Financial and Administrative guide for grants, Guideline
Manual 7100.1D, Office of Justice Programs, Common Rule for State and Local
Governments and A-87, or OMB Circulars A-110 and A-21, in their entirety.
It is also subject to such further rules, regulations and policies as may be
reasonably prescribed by the State or Federal Government consistent with the
purposes and authorization of P.L. 90-351, as amended, and P.L. 100-690.
This grant shall become effective on the beginning date of the grant period,
provided that within thirty (30) days from the date of award a properly
executed Certificate of Acceptance of Subgrant Award is returned to the Bureau
of Public Safety Management.
~c~---
Authorlzed Offlclal
Gordon L. Guthrie, Director
j?-- 2- g'- j?o
Date
[X]This award is subject to special and/or standard conditions (attached).
BPSM Revised 7-1-79
state of Florida
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Emergency Management
Bureau of Public Safety Management
2740 centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Special Conditions
Grantee (Name of SPA): Bureau of Public Safety Management
Grant Number: 91-CJ-28-11-54-01-074
Grant Title: Monroe County Anti-Drug Abuse School Resource Officer/
D.A.R.E. Program Expansion
In addition to the general conditions applicable to fiscal administration,
the grant is subject to the following special conditions:
Additional Standard Conditions:
1. When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid
solicitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded
in whole or in part with federal money, all grantees receiving federal
funds, including but not limited to state and local governments, shall
clearly state (1) the percentage of the total cost of the program or
project which will be financed with federal money, and (2) the dollar
amount of federal funds for the project or program.
2. All out-of-state or out-of-county grant s~ecified work area travel must
have written approval from Bureau of Pub11c Safety Management prior to
commencement of actual travel.
-----------.- f
\" I ,- 4- i-
.' , " . .. ' ( _ (.- c t ! _
-- -- J
-1--------------------------------------------------------- ------________=\-
... I STATE OF FLORIDA JUL 2 I
I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 1900 I
I DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT I
I BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT BUREAU Or- PUBlIC I
I___________~~~:~~~_~~~:::~::~~_~~~_~~:::~~~:_~~~~:_~:~_~ N~!~~~~~~~}~~~t
IA. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Thanas V.I. Brown
I 1. SUBGRANTEE: NAME: McmrnP ('nl1nt-y Anm; n; c;t-rrlt-nr
Public Service Building
ADDRESS: Winq II. Stock Island
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
DCA-NA FORM 1 (REVISED JANUARY, 1990) I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
Kev West. Florida 33040
TELEPHONE: (305) 294-4641
2.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER:
Bruce Bottqer
Public Service Building
Winq II. Stock Island
NAME:
ADDRESS:
Kev West. Florida 33040
TELEPHONE: (305) 296-1338
3.
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY:
NAME: Monroe Countv Sheriff's Office
ADDRESS: 530 Whitehead Street
Kev West. Florida
33041
TELEPHONE:
(305) 296-2424
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
NAM E :
Denise Froehlich
Langton Associates, Inc.
4244 St. Johns Avenue
ADDRESS:
Jacksonville. Florida
32210
TELEPHONE:
(904) 387-3342
PROJECT TITLE:
Monroe Countv Anti Druq Abuse School Resource Officer/
D.A.R.E. Proqram Expansion
REQUESTED GRANT PERIOD:
FROM
To
10-1-90
$ 56.853
$ 18.951
$ 75,804
Q-30-Ql
FEDERAL SUPPORT REQUESTED:
LOCAL MATCH PROVIDED:
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET:
FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
59-6000749
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA) NUMBER 16.579
BPSM PROJECT NUMBER:
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-074
, I' - - - - -( - - - - - - - - - -.... .. .... .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. -( ,. - .. .. .. , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \
-~--------- -
lB. PROJECT I nvdLEM IDENTIFICATION: THIS SECTION MUSi w_~CRIBE THE I
I SPECIFIC CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROBLEM TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE IMPLEMENT- I
I ING AGENCY. CURRENT DATA MUST BE PRESENTED WHICH DEFINES THE I
.1 NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE TARGETED PROBLEM. I
I I
I START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY I
I ------------------------------------------1
I ---;~-:~~~:a:~:-;:::~~~:-;~:1-6~~~7 (1 ), one of the ways in which the Monroe I
I County Sheriff's Office continues to address the drug problem is through I
I demand reduction education by way of a program in which law enforcement I
I officers participate. This is to be achieved by the expansion of the School I
I Resource Officer/D.A.R.E. Program, which has been in existence in Monroe I
County for one year. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
The drug problem in Monroe County is not isolated in any particular area, age
group or ethnic background. This is evidenced by the fact that in the
numerous enforcement operations undertaken by the Sheriff's Office, those
arrested were fran all walks of life. In the course of the past 1 7 months,
January 1, 1989 through May 31,1990, out of the 7,231 cases worked by the
Sheriff's Office, 672 or 9.29% involved drug related arrests. These figures
do not reflect 1989 figures for the City of Key West where 4,751 calls were
reported.
. Of particular interest relative to Monroe County's drug problem are the
following facts:
Drug smuggling in the Florida Keys is a long standing tradition and
permeates all segments of the local society. It is, and has been a
virtual way of life for a large segment of the permanent and transient
population. Although it is true that most smugglers of any stature are
hane based in Miami, those smugglers must have local support both in
transportation and currency handling. Smuggling, as long as you are a
"conch", is almost ranantic. It is viewed by some local residents who
are considered "honest", as a way of life that adds flavor and glamour to
the Keys.
- The Lower Keys are predaninantly known for smuggling marijuana; the Upper
Keys, cocaine.
55% - 60% of the entire jail population of Monroe County is the direct or
indirect result of drug involvement.
- Monroe County experiences three high profile drug sales locations. In
these neighborhoods closely knit relationships tend to develop because of
drugs, money and trafficking. Cooperation with law enforcement has been
marginal largely due to the family ties and a "Robin Hood" type of
syndrane.
- The most severe indicator of the extent and depth of the problem is that
children in Monroe County's middle schools have been identified as
dealers and carriers.
This existing attitude coupled with the fact that in many homes children do
not receive factual drug infonnation or methods of dealing appropriately with
today's peer pressure, cannot fail to have an influence on the County's most
impressionable citizens, its youth.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
( I
._--------------\
/-------------------------------------------------------
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
B. (Continued)
Statistical evidence is not presently available correlating a direct
relationship between attitudes at home, in the neighborhoods and juvenile drug
activity. Since the S.R.O./D.A.R.E. Program in Monroe County has only been in
existence for one year, a measurement of changes in existing attitudes and how
these relate to the number of juvenile drug related incidences is also not
available. As the program continues, trends in demand reduction and drug
related activity will become observable and will be documented.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\' ----------------------------------------------------------I
---------------
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I----~----------------( .------------------------( -----------------------\
I C. . PROPOSED . ITION '.0 THE TARGETED PROBLEM: I "IS SI N MUST I
I DESCRIBE IN NARRATIVE FORM THE PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO I
,I REDUCE OR ELIMINATE THE TARGETED PROBLEM. THE PLAN MUST INCLUCE HO~ I
I THE REQUESTED FISCAL, PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT RESOURCES WILL BE I
I UTILIZED. IN ADDITION, THIS SECTION SHALL DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT I
I RELATES TO THE OVERALL COUNTYWIDE ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACTIVITIES, INCLUC-I
I ING THE MECHANISM UTILIZED TO ENSURE COORDINATION OF THIS PROJECT I
I WITH OTHER ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACTIVITIES. I
I I
I START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY. I
,-------------------~-----------------------------------------------------1
I CUrrent efforts of dealing with the County's drug problem by the Monroe County I
I Sheriff's Office lie in two primary areas: enforcement and education. I
I Although enforcement is the traditional role, society is coming to realize I
I that enforcement is not slowing or altering the problem. The trafficking in I
I illegal drugs continues to flourish with far-reaching consequences. I
I ' I
I The other arena in which the Sheriff's Office participates in is education. I
I law enforcement has cane to realize that reduction in drug trade can only be I
I affectect by stemming demand, expecially among tanorrow's users. I
I I
I Since the Monroe County School Resource Officer/D.A.R.E. Program has been in I
I place for only one year, there are no statistics available as to the inunediate I
deterrent effects of the program. It is hoped that the results of these I
efforts will becane measurable in 1990-1991 when the 7th grade students (those I
who have participated in the S.R.O. program and have completed the D.A.R.E. I
curriculum as 6th graders) can be surveyed regarding their attitudes and I
involvement with drugs and peer pressure resistance as compared to students I
with no D.A.R.E. Program exposure. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The program is a joint effort of the Monroe County Sheriff's Office and the I
I funroe County School System and has the support of the Anti-Drug Abuse Policy I
I Advisory Board, the Drug Free School Council, the Monroe County Board of I
I County Commissioners and the County's two major municipalities. I
I I
I Through the request for Anti-Drug Abuse Funds, Monroe County Sheriff's Office I
I hopes to expand the S.R.O./D.A.R.E Program by two (2) S.R.O. IS, bringing the I
I total number of officers involved in the program to five (5), and into five I
I (5) additional schools; one (1) high school and four (4) elementary schools. I
I This would bring the total number of schools served to eleven (11) out of I
I thirteen (13) in the county. The number of students benefiting from the I
I program would increase from approximately 4,000 to 7,000. I
I I
I Tb briefly summarize, the S.R.O./D.A.R.E. Program allows the law enforcement I
I officer to influence and educate youth at two levels. The School Resource I
I Officer (S.R.O.), by his regular presence in the school, promotes trust and I
I canmunication between the student and the "cop", between the faculty and the I
I "cop", proliferates the good image of all law enforcement and serves as a I
I deterrent to drug related activities on school premises, thus creating a safer I
I school atmosphere. The S.R.O. is trained in methcds and procedures to relate I
I with and educate his students. The School Resource Officer spends a portion I
I of his time on S.R.O activities and law enforcement education. The maioritv I
I of his time is spent on teaching, implementing and reinforcing the D.A.R.E. II
I Program.
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
If enthusiasm and support shown for the program are indicative of success,
then the S.R.O Program can be claimed to be a winner. Teachers, students andaparents all have embraced the program. Sponsored events have been well
attended and applauded. Schools with S.R.O.' s consider the officers to be a
l:x:mus and benefit to both the students and the canmunity.
(
(
-------------------------------------------\
_-------- I
/---------------------
I C. (Continued) I
r I
I The School Resource Officer Program emphasis is on the following: I
I I
I To perfonn the law enforcement function wi thin the school setting. I
I To identify and prevent through counseling and referral delinquent I
I behavior, including substance abuse. I
I _ To foster a better understanding of the law enforcement function and to I
I develop positive concepts of law enforcement. I
I To develop better appreciation of citizen rights, obligations and I
I responsibilities. I
I To provide assistance and support for crime victims identified wi thin I
I the school setting, including abused children. I
I To promote positive relations between students and law enforcement I
I officers. I
: _ To enhance knowledge of the fundamental concepts and structure of the :
I law. I
I Through the second canponent of the program, D.A.R.E. - Drug Abuse Resistance I
: Education, the S.R.O. helps students recognize and resist the many subtle :
pressures that influence them to experiment with alcohol, marijuana and other
I drugs. In addition, the program strategies and planned activities focus on I
I feelings relating to self-esteem, interpersonal and communication skills, risk I
I assessment, critical thinking, decision making and positive alternatives to I
I drug abuse behavior. "By helping students develop self-management and I
: resisting skills, D.A.R.E. is in the forefront of innovative programs assigned II
I to give young people the facts and to "innoculate" them against peer I
pressure. II 1
I I
: The S.R.O., upon canpletion of the D.A.R.E. instruction training, will teach I
the D.A.R.E. course in each of his assigned schools. The S.R.O. spends the
: majority of his time in his capacity as a D.A.R.E. instructor on the D.A.R.E. \
I curriculum and lesson plans. I
: The D.A.R.E Officer is a volunteer fran the regular ranks of the Monroe County \
I Sheriff's Office. He must have at least two years road patrol experience and I
I preferably have a two year degree in police administration. He must reflect a I
I strong commitment to preventing substance use among young people and have a I
I clean record. I
I I
I In order to qualify for the S.R.O./D.A.R.E. position, the officer must I
I ccmplete School Resource Officer training and an intensive two-week (80 hour) I
I seminar taught by both law enforcement and education agencies certified to I
I teach the D.A.R.E Program. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\_____________________________________________________--------------------1
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
The D.A.R.E training includes: an overview of current drug use prevention
activities, communication and public speaking skills, learning methodology and
classroom behavior management, school/police relationships,
pOlice/parent/community relationships, stages of adolescent chemical
dependency, audiovisual techniques and other teaching aids, program
administration, and sources of supplementary funding.
(
/-------------------------------------------------------------------------}
I
I
1
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C. (Continued)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I, I
I I
I I
I 1.Implementing Project D.A.R.E.: Drug Abuse Resistance Education. U.S. I
I Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. June, 1 988. pg. 1. I
I I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
The D.A.R.E core curriculum targets 5th or 6th grade elementary students who
will be entering junior high the following year. The curriculum consists of
seventeen weekly lessons. Classroom activities emphasize student
participation and role-play activities.
In addition to the D.A.R.E. core curriculum, the D.A.R.E. Officer will conduct
as many visitation lessons in grades K - 4 as his schedule will allow. He
will cover personal safety, obeying the laws, the effects of and differences
between medicines and "drugs".
In Jr. High, the D.A.R.E officer reinforces the lessons of the previously
taught curriculum. The officer will work closely with counseling staff on a
variety of activities and will take part in individual and group discussions
with at-risk students and will attend or sponsor school social activities.
During the course of the day, the D.A.R.E Officer will spend time on the
playground, cafeteria, school assemblies and in general interact with students
informally. He in essence becanes a member of the faculty and a friend they
can trust. In this setting students will feel free to discuss problems at
home and in their communities, ranging from substance abuse, neglect, etc.
The officer will then make referrals to the school or appropriate social
agencies.
The S.R.O./D.A.R.E. Officer also conducts principal/teacher orientations at
the beginning of the school year in order to explain and acquire their support
for the D.A.R.E. curriculum. In this way the administration and teaching
staff can reinforce D.A.R.E. objectives throughout the course of the school
day.
Involvement with parents, C1V1C organizations and the community in general is
also a very important element of the S.R.O. ProgTam. At the outset of student
participation in D.A.R.E., a presentation is made explaining the program and
providing substance abuse infonnation. Ways to improve communication skills
wi thin the family, recognizing and dealing with substance abuse at home, and
community resources available, are some of the topics which are covered.
Meetings are held with interested groups within the community, supplying
infornation and soliciting support for the progTam.
The use of Anti-Drug Abuse Funds will make possible the expansion of what is
an already successful School Resource Officer/D.A.R.E. ProgTam and continue to
support reduction education and anti-drug efforts in Monroe County.
I--~---------------------------------------------------- ---------------\
/0. LIST EACH OBJECTIVE AND ITS ATTENDANT PERFORMANCE MEASURES WHICH I
I WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE LEVEL OF ATTAINMENT FOR EACH I
I' OBJECTIVE. I
I I
I START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY I
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I I
I I
I Objective #1: To increase the number of students in Monroe County benefiting I
I fran the services of the S.R.O. /D.A.R.E. Program. :
I Performance Measures I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
.~,
(
- Document the number of students/schools served in school year 189_ I 90 vs.
'90-'91.
- Document the number of students canpleting the D.A.R.E curriculum.
- Document through monthly activity reports the following:
The number of participating schools
The number of core classes taught
The number of K - 4 classes taught
The number of Jr. High classes taught
The number of abbreviated programs taught
Document the number of students initiating counseling/help sessions
(minor problems).
- Document the number of teacher/school referrals to S.R.O. for counseling
or intervention.
Document S.R.O. referrals to appropriate social service personnel in the
school system or other carmuni ty agencies.
- Document the instances and types of felonies caning to S.R.O. 's attention.
(If at all possible, another officer is actually brought in to make the
arrest. ) Record disposition.
- Document drug related problems or incidents and report the following
data:
Date of incident
Child's age and sex
D.A.R.E. or non-D.A.R.E. student involved
Reason for referral (e.g. possession of an illegal substance, reporting
illegal substance use by a family member, disclosing sexual abuse).
- Document arrests made in drug free school zones.
('
(
I-------------~-~---------------------------------------------------------\
I I
I I
I I
I D. (Continued) I
I I
I I
I Objective #2: To increase community awareness of drugs and drug related I
: problems in the neighborhoods and schools. I
I Perfonnance Measures I
I I
I - IXx::ument the number of PI'A meetings, faculty workshops, parent meetings I
I and types of presentations made to community/civic groups and local I
I attendance.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
: I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I. I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
- IXx::ument parent involvement in the program.
- Document surveys of administrators, teachers, parents and students to
assess satisfaction with impact of S.R.O./D.A.R.E. activities.
- Document S.R.O./D.A.R.E. activities with youth groups such as peer
leaders and Youth Crime Watch.
- IXx::ument invitation to local officials to involve them in S.R.O./D.A.R.E.
graduations.
,
I
(
(
UNIFORM MEASURABLE
PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
Uniform measurable program objectives were developed for the
following specific purpose areas:
1 - Demand Reduction Education,
J - Targeting Domestic Sources,
13 - Identify and Meet Treatment Needs, and
21 _ Urban Enforcement and Prosecution of Street Drug Sales.
These objectives must be included in all grant applications
for funding these specific purpose areas. Additional uniform
objectives may be required upon submission of completed
applications implementing these and other specific purpose areas.
Program descriptions and definitions used for Special
Purpose Area 13 projects are found in state rules known as the
Minimum Standards for A1cohol Prevention and Treatment and Drug
Abuse Treatment and prevention programs (Chapter 10E-16, Florida
Administrative Code). The purpose of the rules is to establish
minimum standards for the above programs that are licensed by the
Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.
SPECIFIC PURPOSE AREA 1: DEMAND REDUCTION EDUCATION
FULL PROGRAM TITLE: DEMAND REDUCTION EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN WHICH
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS PARTICIPATE
Demand reduction education will be limited only to funding
Project DARE grants. project DARE stands for Drug Abuse
Resistance Education. It facilitates law enforcement and
teachers working together to prevent drug use among school
children. Uniformed police officers function as classroom
instructors to deliver a 17 part curriculum to elementary and
middle school students. This semester-long effort equips
students with drug information, methods to enhance self-esteem,
specific analytical and decision-making skills and the motivation
to use them.
For a project DARE Program Brief, contact Tom Bishop in the
Bureau of Public Safety Management (BPSM) at 904/488-0090 or
Suncom 278-0090.
[INSTRUCTIONS: THE FOLLOWING UNIFORM OBJECTIVES MUST BE INCLUDED
IN ALL GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR FUNDING SPECIFIC PURPOSE AREA 1
PROJECTS. THESE OBJECTIVES ARE IN ADDITION TO PROJECT SPECIFIC
MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES DEVELOPED BY THE SUBGRANTEE. SPECIFIC
BASELINE DATA IS TO BE COLLECTED AND APPEAR IN THE APPLICATION IN
DESIGNATED PLACES. BASELINE DATA COVERS THE PREVIOUS SCHOOL YEAR
(AUGUST, 1968 THROUGH JUNE, 1969). SUB GRANTEES WILL ASSESS THEIR
45
(
(
PROGRESS IN ACCOMPLISHING THESE PROGRAM OB3ECTIVES BY TRACKING
PERFORMANCE WITH QUARTERLY PROJECT PERFORMANCE REPORTS AND
REPORTING ON THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES IN THE
ANNUAL/FINAL PROJECT REPORT.]
1. To increase the number of officers assigned to teach drug
abuse resistance education by ~ percent from project
start up through the end of the original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of --l-
officers teaching DARE in school year 1989.
2. To increase the number of schools provided drug abuse
resistance education by 83.3% percent from proj ect start up
through the end of the original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of ~ schools
offering drug resistance education in school year 1989.
3. To increase the number of semesters drug abuse resistance
education is provided by ~percent from project start up
through the end of the orIgInal grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of ~
semesters of drug resistance education provided In school
year 1989.
4. To increase the number of hours drug abuse resistance
education is provided by 66% percent from project start up
through the end of the orIgInal grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a b.aseline of ~Ohours
of drug abuse resistance education provided in scnool year
1989.
5. To increase the number of students provided drug abuse
resistance education by 75% percent from project start up
through the end of the orrgInal grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of ~O
students attending DARE classes in school year 1989.
6. To increase the number of in-service orientations for
teachers by 75% percent from project start up through the
end of the original grant period. The percentage increase
is based upon a baseline of ~ DARE orientations given in
school year 1989.
7. To increase the number of teachers receiving in-service
orientations by ~ percent from project start up through
the end of the original grant period. The percentage
increase is based upon a baseline of 25 teachers
attending DARE orientations in school-year 1989.
8. To increase the number of parent education evenings by 200%
percent from project start up through the end of the ----
original grant period. The percentage increase is based
upon a baseline of ~ parent education evening sessions
held in school year 1989.
46
\
(
(
9. To increase the number of parents receiving substance abuse
information at parent education evening sessions by 400%
percent from project start up through the end of the
original grant period. The percentage increase is based
upon a baseline of~ parents attending parent education
evening sessions he~a ~n school year 1989.
10. To increase the number of DARE community presentations by
200% percent from project start up through the end of the
original grant period. The percentage increase is based
upon a baseline of 10 community presentations given by
officers, educators and volunteers in school year 1989.
SPECIFIC PURPOSE AREA 3: TARGETING DOMESTIC SOURCES
(FORMERLY INCLUDED THE MARIJUANA ERADICATION PURPOSE AREA)
FULL PROGRAM TITLE: PROGRAMS DESIGNED TO TARGET THE DOMESTIC
SOURCES OF CONTROLLED AND ILLEGAL SUBSTANCES,
SUCH AS PRECURSOR CHEMICALS, DIVERTED
PHARMACEUTICALS, CLANDESTINE LABORATORIES AND
CANNABIS CULTIVATION.
[INSTRUCTIONS: THE FOLLOWING UNIFORM OBJECTIVES MUST BE INCLUDED
IN ALL GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR FUNDING SPECIFIC PURPOSE AREA 3
PROJECTS. THESE OBJECTIVES ARE IN ADDITION TO PROJECT SPECIFIC
MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES DEVELOPED BY THE SUBGRANTEE. BASELINE DATA
IS TO BE COLLECTED AND APPEAR IN THE APPLICATION IN DESIGNATED
PLACES. BASELINE DATA COVERS THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR
(JANUARY 1, 1989 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1989). SUBGRANTEES WILL
ASSESS THEIR PROGRESS IN ACCOMPLISHING THESE PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
BY TRACKING PERFORMANCE WITH QUARTERLY PROJECT PERFORMANCE
REPORTS AND REPORTING ON THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES
IN THE ANNUAL/FINAL PROJECT REPORT.]
1. To increase the number of marijuana crop eradication
investigations by percent from project start up through
the end of the original grant period. The percentage
increase is based upon a baseline of marijuana crop
investigations for calendar year 1989.
[INVESTIGATION means a planned tactical undercover or search
and destroy operation, which may result in one or more
arrests. Each operation is a single investigation, while
multiple arrests from a single operation are NOT considered
multiple investigations.]
2. To increase the number of drug marijuana crop investigations
involving other federal, state, and local law enforcement
agencies by percent from project start up through the
end of the original grant period. The percentage increase
is based upon a baseline of multi-jurisdictional
marijuana crop investigations for calendar year 1989.
47
c
(
",.,.-~..._------------------------------ -
, I
1 U
. Ll.I
. C
I -
'.- >
, 0'\ 0
I 1 :z
..- -
If"") ...
I
'1' U
'0 Ll.I 0
I ...J
I 0 ::) g"
. l- e I Ll.I
, Ll.I Vl
I ::c
I U
, 0 Vl "
, 0'1 I ::),
I Z c(
.- 0
0 ~
I ... ...J
co c( ::)
0 ... ..,
Z
~ Ll.I
0 ~ Z
e: Ll.I ::)
La.. ...J ..,
g"
e ~
0 H >-
~ c(
e: en :E:
Ll.I Ll.I
Q.. I-t
... e:
... ~ a.
z > c(
c( ~
e: ...
CJ u e:
al c( c(
::) :E:
Vl
m
Ll.I
La..
z
c(
..,
-----......
1
I
I
I
----------------------------------1
I
I
I
----------------------------------1
,
I
.
----------------------------------1
I
,
I
----------------------------------.
I
,
I
I
----------------------------------1
.
I
1
I
----------------------------------1
I
I
1
I
----------------------------------1
1
,
1
I
----------------------------------1
1
1
I
I
----------------------------------,
x
x
xxx
x
x
x
x
x
xxx
x
x
x
x
xx
xxx
x
x
xx
xxx
xx
xxx
xx
x
x
xxx
x
xxx
x
xxx
xx
x
xx
xx
x
x
xxx
x
x
x
x
x
x
xxxx
x
x
x
x
x
xxx
x
x
xx
x
x xxx
x
x
x
----------------------------------
x
x xxx
xx x
x
----------------------------------
xx
x XXXX xx x x
xx
......--------------------------------------
I I
en
~ ~ ~
en 0 .j..J
;:j :>, '2 -~ 'E
~ ~ '2 j CO
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
Q) ~ en :>, u Iii ~ lis~
"0 rl CO U -.-j l_4 n.
c ~ - ~ > a Q) 00
: ~ rl ~~ (j l_4 .j..J.j..J
.j..J 8' CO _~ _.-j E en ........ .. u en .j..J
Iii ~ c l_4 c~ ::3~E~- ~ j .j..Jl_4
~ ~ 0 E ~~ rlrl~~'2 Iii ~ ~~
~ '2 i ~M Blli~8l_4 ~ ffi Q)l_4
'0 en C C ~ or: 9 ~ (J) -~.-j co Li~ ~ l_4 _
'0 C co rl 0 OQ)en l_40.j..J1.j..J en~' Erl
~co ~ CO~~C~~Q) ::3Ul_4 co .-jCO
'0 (J) - - C C .j..J 0 .j..J -.-j Q) U _Q).c l_4 '0 .. .. en -co ::3 1
).:f p" C en Q) O".-j co -.-j CO.j..J .j..J rl 4-1 U U ~ en l_4 rl ~ I
i~~~~Uj~.j..J.j..Jgai~::3~o.j..Jm:S~rn ~B~ U~ :
I<l; :S .j..J 0 -.-j a co ~ ai 19 '0 '0 ".-j 'g . Q) C l_4 C".-j -.-j co.c co l_4 :>, _ 1
u4-Icenu~~c~::3.j..J.c~~Q).j..JOrlCO.j..JUl_4Q) rl 1
en t! "i ~ -2 ";tJ 8,g n. ~ -~ .j..J t5 ~ ~ ~ 8 'g 8 E lli ~.gJ m ~ 1::: ii ~ 1
UJ co Q)::3 J.l ~ E l_4 C ..j..J l_4 co n. .j..J -.-j co eel
~ ~ 5 en Q) 8 l_4 Q),.:{ a 0 ~ +J ~ g. Q ;:J (J) .c a.o co ~ :>, -s g, ~ g;;::: :
~ Q)3~U~~~U~~B~U~mliiS~~~~~Q)t~~~~.j..J~.j..J.j..J 1
> 'Y ~ co ~ -.-j .c !D en > CO ~ ((j ::3 C Q) l_4 0 l_4 CO _.-j '.-j _.-j I
~ -.-j -.-j -.-j U -.-j rl U l_4 C U '0 rl en Q) Q) ;:::l 3 ~ 0 rl ~ l_4::3 ~ 0 ~ ~ I
t; ~rl~~~U~~"r:m'b~~Cl8~1<l; -rla8P'(J) :l.j..J:l:l :
. c( ~ o~o P.UP.8:I:RU P. (J) (J)(J) ,
LIJ I
.....-----------------------------------------
...
e:
c(
IJ:
U
If)
UJ
~
...
~
>
~
...
u
c(
en
z
o
~
...
1 a. I
~
e:
u
If)
Ll.I
C
.
>-
e:
c(
VI
VI
UJ
U
I.oJ
Z
VI
c(
If)
I.oJ
~
c(
a.
z
o
~
...
c(
:::l
Z
~
...
z
o
U
I.oJ
VI
::J
(
,
(
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------\
IF. PROJ ECT BUDGET SCHEDULE SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER PROCRAM EXPANSION I
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I I FEDERAL I PROJECT I BUOGET CATEGORY !
I BUDGET CATEGORY 1 SUPPORT 1 MATCH I TOTALS I
1--------------------------1--------------1-------------1-----------------1
1 I I I
I 1. SALARIES AND BENEFITS I $48,603 I $16,201 I
I I 1 I
I I I 1
I I I I
1_________________________________________________________________________1
I I I
I I I
I I I
1 -0- I -0- I
1 I I
______________________________________________________-------------------1
I I 1
I 1 I
1 $8,250 I $2,750 I
I I I
I I I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I
I I I
I I 1
I -0- I -0- I
I 1 I
I I I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 1 I
I 1 I
I I I
1 5. DATA PROCESSING I I I
I SERVICES I -0- I -0- I
I I I I
I I 1 I
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I 1
I I I I
1 I I I
I 6. INDI RECT COSTS I -0- I -0- I
I 1 I I
I I I I
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I I I
I I I
I 7. TOTAL PROJECT I I
I COSTS I $56,853 I
I I I
I I I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
2. CONTRACTUAL
SERVICES
3. EXPENSES
4. OPERATING CAPITAL
OUTLAY
$18,951
$64,804
-0-
$11,000
-0-
-0-
-0-
$75,804
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
1 ________________/
\---------------------------------------------------------
(
,{G~--P;~;;~;-B~D~;;-N~;~;~~;~--T~~;-;;~;~~~-~~;;-;;~~~DE A-~~;;~;~~;-----[
I DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT BUDGET BY LINE ITEM CATEGORY, DETAILING I
.1 THE ITEM AND ANTICIPATED COST. EACH CATEGORY MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY I
I DETAILED TO SHOW THE COST RELATIONSHIP TO PROJECT OPERATIONS. I
I I
I START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY I
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------:
I I
I Matching funds for this project will be provided by the Monroe County I,
Sheriff's Office. These funds were generated by the sale of property
I confiscated in drug related operations. The two positions indicated will 'I
I expand the existing number of S.R.O.'s in Monroe County from three (3) to five
I (5) officers.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Schcol Resource Officer/D.A.R.E. Pru:JLdID Expansion
1.
Salaries am Benefits
Salaries:
School Resource Officer
School Resource Officer
$ 25,308
25,308
Salaries Subtotal
$ 50,616
Benefits:
F.I.C.A. (@ 7.65% of Salaries)
Retirement (@20.38% of Salaries)
3,872
10,316
Benefits Subtotal
1 4 , 1 88
'IDI'AL SALARIES AND BENEFITS
$ 64,804
--------
--------
Schcol Resource Officer (S.R.O.)
The School Resource Officer (S.R.O.) is a fully trained law enforcement
officer from the Monroe County Sheriff's Office.
He must have at least two years of road patrol experience and preferably have
a two year degree in police administration. His responsibilities include the
roles of law enforcement officer, educator, counselor, public relations
officer. His duties will include creating lesson plans and teaching the
D.A.R.E. curriculum, attending civic group meetings and other activities
necessary to meet the goals and objectives of this program. In addition, he
will identify and assist with counseling and referral of problem youths and
divert youths from the juvenile system and will promote positive relations
between students and Law Enforcement Officers.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
(
-~------------------------------~--------------'
I--~----------------------- j
G. (Continued)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.
Expenses
Uniforms ($2,000 x 2 officers)
4,000
$
A complete uniform kit for each
officer includes the following:
5 prs. pants @ $30 ea.
5 shirts @ $30 ea.
1 L.S. shirt @ $35 ea.
Tie/Tac - $10/$15
Badge
Vest
Jacket
Hat
Rain Coat
Belt
Holster
Handcuffs/case
Mace/case
4 keepers
Speedloaders/case
P.R. 24/holder
Gun
$ 150
150
35
25
70
350
200
50
50
150
100
100
70
25
50
100
325
$ 2,000
-------
-------
2,840
'IDTAL
S.R.O. Training ($1,420 x 2 officers)
S.R.O. Training per officer
the following:
Tui tion
Per Diem*
includes
500
920
'IDTAL
$ 1,420
-------
-------
* Per Diem includes travel, lodging and food
expenses incurred while attending S.R.O.
training.
I
I
I
I
D.A.R.E. Training ($920 x 2 officers) 1,840 I
I I
I D.A.R.E. Training per officer includes I
I the following: I
I Per Diem* $ 920 I
I I
I . ----- I
I * I
Per Diem includes travel, lodging and I
I
food expenses incurred while attending I
I
D.A.R.E. training. I
I
I I
I I
\____________________________~________________________--------------------1
I---~---------------------------------------------------------------------}
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I, I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
\--------------------------~-~--------------------------------------------1
(
(
G. (Continued)
Expenses (Continued)
D.A.R.E. Educational Materials/Handouts
($1,000 x 2 officers)
$
2,000
D.A.R.E. Certificates ($100 x 2 officers)
200
Finger Print Kits ($60 ea. x 2 officers)
120
TarAL EXPENSES
$ 11,000
---------
---------
SlM-t1\Ry
Salaries and Benefits
Expenses
$ 64,804
11 ,000
'IDrAL PRaJECl' aET
$ 75,804
--------
--------
1-... --:--- -------' ,-- ------{' --------------- ---------"('
I H. ACCEPTANC_, ) AGREE:MENT
I '
~ 'CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT. UPON APPROVAL OF THIS SUBGRANT, THE
'I APPROVED APPLICATION AND THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL
I BECOME BINDING. NON-COMPLIANCE SHALL RESULT IN COSTS BEING
I DISALLOWED.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
4. ApPROVAL OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS. THE BPSM SHALL REVIEW AND I
APPROVE IN WRITING ALL CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS PRIOR TO THE I
ACTUAL EMPLOYMENT OF THE CONSULTING FIRM. ApPROVAL SHALL BE I
BASED UPON THE COMPLIANCE OF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE REQUIRE- I
MENTS OF THE FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR GRANTS, I
GUIDELINES MANUAL 7IOO.IC AND APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES. I
GRANT RECIPIENT AGREEMENT APPROVAL BY THE BPSM DOES NOT I
I CONSTITUTE CONSULTANT AGREEMENT APPROVAL. I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
3.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 287.055, FLORIDA STATUTES. THE
SUBGRANTEE, WHEN APPLICABLE, AGREES TO SATISFY ALL REQUIRE-
MENTS PROVIDED IN SECTION 287.055, FLORIDA STATUTES, KNOWN
AS THE "CONSULTANT'S COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION ACT".
('
(
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------\
!H. ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT I
I (CONTINUED) I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9. COMMENCEMENT OF PROJECTS. IF A PROJECT HAS NOT COMMENCED I
WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT I
AWARD, GRANT RECIPIENTS WILL REPORT BY LETTER THE STEPS I
TAKEN TO INITIATE THE PROJECT, THE REASONS FOR DELAY AND I
THE EXPECTED STARTING DATE. IF, AFTER 90 DAYS FROM THE I
I ACCEPTANCE OF AWARD, PROJECT ACTIVITY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN I
\_____________________________________________________--------------------1
5.
ALLOWABLE COSTS. THE ALLOWABILITY OF COSTS INCURRED UNDER ANY
SUBGRANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL
PRINCIPLES OF ALLOWABILITY AND STANDARDS FOR SELECTED COST
ITEMS SET FORTH IN THE FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR
GRANTS, GUIDELINE MANUAL 7100.1C, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS,
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR No. A-87, "COST
PRINCIPLES ApPLICABLE TO GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS", OR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
CIRCULAR No. A-21, "COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS". ALL PROCEDURES EMPLOYED IN THE USE OF FEDERAL
FUNDS FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF SERVICES, SUPPLIES OR EQUIP-
MENT, MUST BE IN ACCORD WITH ATTACHMENT 0 OF OMB CIRCULAR
No. A-102 OR ATTACHMENT 0 OF OMB CIRCULAR No. A-lID AND
FLORIDA LAW TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT.
6. TRAVEL. ALL TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT FOR OUT-OF-STATE OR OUT-
OF GRANT SPECIFIED-WORK-AREA WILL BE BASED UPON WRITTEN
APPROVAL OF THE BPSM PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ACTUAL TRAVEL.
TRAVEL COST FOR ALL TRAVEL WILL BE REIMBURSED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS, BUT NOT IN EXCESS OF PROVISIONS IN
SECTION 112.061, FLORIDA STATUTES.
7. WRITTEN ApPROVAL OF CHANGES. GRANT RECIPIENTS MUST OBTAIN
APPROVAL FROM THE BPSM FOR MAJOR CHANGES. THESE INCLUDE, BUT
BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: (A) CHANGES IN PROJECT ACTIVITIES,
DESIGNS, OR RESEARCH PLANS SET FORTH IN THE APPROVED APPLICA-
TION; (B) CHANGES IN THE PROJECT DIRECTOR OR KEY PROFESSIONAL
PERSONNEL IDENTIFIED IN THE APPROVED APPLICATION, OR (C) BUDGET
DEVIATIONS THAT DO NOT MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERION:
SUBGRANTEES MAY TRANSFER FUNDS BETWEEN BUDGET CATEGORIES
AS LONG AS THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE TRANSFER (INCREASE OR
DECREASE) DOES NOT EXCEED FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF THE TOTAL
APPROVED BUDGET CATEGORY AND THE TRANSFER IS MADE TO AN
APPROVED BUDGET LINE ITEM. HOWEVER, NO ADDITIONAL
TRANSFERS ABOVE THE 5% CAP MAY BE MADE UNTIL A REVISED
BUDGET HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT. UNDER NO
CIRCUMSTANCES CAN THE CHANGES INCREASE THE TOTAL BUDGETED
AWARD. (PLEASE NOTE TRANSFERS DO NOT ALLOW FOR INCREAS-
ING THE QUANTITATIVE NUMBER OF ITEMS REFLECTED IN ANY
APPROVED BUDGET LINE ITEM, SUCH AS, EQUIPMENT ITEMS IN THE
OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY OR EXPENSE CATEGORIES OR STAFF
POSITIONS IN THE SALARIES AND BENEFITS CATEGORY).
8.
GRANT RECIPIENT FUNDING. THE OBLIGATION OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA TO REIMBURSE GRANT RECIPIENTS FOR INCURRED COST WILL
BE SUBJECT TO THE AVAILABILITY OF ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT FUNDS.
(
(
. I------~------------------------------------------------------------------\
!H.. ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT I
I ' (CONTINUED) I
I I
I HAS NOT BEGUN, A FURTHER STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION DELAY I
I WILL BE SUBMITTED BY THE GRANT RECIPIENT TO THE BPSM. UPON I
I RECEIPT OF THE gO-DAY LETTER, THE BPSM SHALL DETERMINE IF ~HE I
I REASON FOR DELAY IS JUSTIFIED OR CANCEL THE PROJECT AND I
I REOBLIGATE THE FUNDS TO OTHER PROJECT AREAS. THE BPSM, I
I WHERE WARRANTED BY EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES, SHALL EXTEND I
I THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE OF THE PROJECT PAST THE gO-DAY I
I PERIOD, BUT ONLY BY FORMAL WRITTEN AMENDMENT TO THIS AGREEMENT. I
I I
I 10. EXCUSABLE DELAYS. EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO THE DEFAULTS OF I
I CONSULTANTS, THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL NOT BE IN DEFAULT BY I
REASON OF ANY FAILURE IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT IN I
ACCORDANCE WITH ITS TERMS (INCLUDING ANY FAILURE BY THE GRANT I
RECIPIENT TO MAKE PROGRESS IN THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK I
HEREUNDER WHICH ENDANGERS SUCH PERFORMANCE) IF SUCH FAILURE I
ARISES OUT OF CAUSES BEYOND THE CONTROL AND WITHOUT THE FAULT I
OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT. SUCH CAUSES SHALL I
INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT RESTRICTED TO, ACTS OF GOD OR OF THE I
PUBLIC ENEMY, ACTS OF THE GOVERNMENT IN EITHER ITS SOVEREIGN I
OR CONTRATUAL CAPACITY, FIRES, FLOODS, EPIDEMICS, QUARANTINE I
RESTRICTIONS, STRIKES, FREIGHT EMBARGOES, AND UNUSUALLY I
SEVERE WEATHER, BUT IN EVERY CASE THE FAILURE TO PERFORM I
MUST BE BEYOND THE CONTROL AND WITHOUT THE FAULT OR NEGLIGENCE I
OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT. IF THE FAILURE TO PERFORM IS CAUSED I
BY THE FAILURE OF A CONSULTANT TO PERFORM OR MAKE PROGRESS, I
AND IF SUCH FAILURE ARISES OUT OF CAUSES BEYOND THE CONTROL I
OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT AND CONSULTANT, AND WITHOUT THE FAULT I
OR NEGLIGENCE OF EITHER OF THEM, THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL I
NOT BE DEEMED TO BE IN DEFAULT, UNLESS (A) THE SUPPLIES OR I
SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT WERE OBTAINABLE I
FROM OTHER SOURCES, AND (B) THE BPSM SHALL HAVE ORDERED THE I
GRANT RECIPIENT IN WRITING TO PROCURE SUCH SUPPLIES OR I
SERVICES FROM OTHER SOURCES, AND (C) THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL I
HAVE FAILED TO COMPLY REASONABLY WITH SUCH ORDER. UPON REQUEST I
OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT, THE BPSM SHALL ASCERTAIN THE FACTS AND I
EXTENT OF SUCH FAILURE AND, IF IT SHALL BE DETERMINED THAT ANY I
FAILURE TO PERFORM WAS OCCASIONED BY ANY ONE OR MORE OF THE I
SAID CAUSES, THE DELIVERY SCHEDULE SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. I
11.
OBLIGATION OF GRANT RECIPIENT FUNDS. GRANT RECIPIENT FUNDS
MAY NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BE OBLIGATED PRIOR TO THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OR SUBSEQUENT TO THE TERMINATION DATE OF
THE GRANT PERIOD. ONLY PROJECT COSTS INCURRED ON OR AFTER
THE EFFECTIVE DATE AND ON OR PRIOR TO THE TERMINATION DATE OF
THE GRANT RECIPIENT APPLICATION ARE ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT.
A COST IS INCURRED WHEN THE GRANT RECIPIENT'S EMPLOYEE OR
CONSULTANT PERFORMS THE SERVICE REQUIRED, OR WHEN GOODS ARE
RECEIVED BY THE GRANT RECIPIENT, NOTWITHSTANDING THE DATE
OF ORDER.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 12. PERFORMANCE. IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT, NON-COMPLIANCE OR
I VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE GRANT
I RECIPIENT, THE GRANT RECIPIENT'S CONSULTANTS AND SUPPLIERS,
I OR BOTH, THE BPSM SHALL IMPOSE SUCH SANCTIONS AS IT DEEMS I
I APPROPRIATE INCLUDING WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENTS, CANCELLATION, I
\_____________________________________________________--------------------1
/-------------------------------------------------------------------------\
H.. ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT I
(CONTINUED) I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
16. RETENTION OF RECORDS. ALL RECORDS AND FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS I
MUST BE MAINTAINED FOR A MINIMUM PERIOD OF 3 YEARS FROM THE I
DATE OF THE FINAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND BE AVAILABLE FOR I
I AUDIT AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UPON REQUEST OF DULY AUTHORIZED I
I PERSONS. I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
13.
14.
15.
(
c
TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE AGREEMENT IN WHOLE OR IN
PART. IN SUCH AN EVENT, THE BPSM SHALL NOTIFY THE GRANT
RECIPIENT OF SUCH DECISION 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF SUCH SANCTION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL
BE PAID ONLY FOR THOSE SERVICES SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED
PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SUCH SANCTION.
ACCESS TO RECORDS. DCA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE
OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE, OJARS,AND
THE AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OR ANY OF THEIR
DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, SHALL HAVE ACCESS FOR THE
PURPOSE OF AUDIT AND EXAMINATION OF BOOKS, DOCUMENTS, PAPERS,
AND RECORDS OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT, AND TO RELEVANT BOOKS AND
RECORDS OF GRANT RECIPIENT AND CONTRACTORS, AS PROVIDED UNDER
"FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR GRANTS", M7100.1C.
DCA MAY UNILATERALLY CANCEL THIS CONTRACT IF THE CONTRACTOR
REFUSES TO ALLOW PUBLIC ACCESS TO ALL DOCUMENTS, PAPERS,
LETTERS, OR OTHER MATERIAL SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
CHAPTER 119, F.S., AND MADE OR RECEIVED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONTRACT.
AUDIT. ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT CONSTITUTES GRANT
RECIPIENT ASSURANCE THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF OMB CIRCULAR A-128
"AUDITS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS" OR OMB CIRCULAR A-110,
ATTACHMENT F, WILL BE MET. ALL GRANT RECIPIENTS SHALL PROVIDE
AN AUDIT OF THEIR ACTIVITIES ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. FOR ADDI-
TIONAL INFORMATION ON AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, APPLICANTS SHALL
REFER TO THE "FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR GRANTS",
GUIDELINE MANUAL 7100.1C, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS. As A
MINIMUM, A SCHEDULE COMPARING BUDGETED AND ACTUAL SUBGRANT
COSTS IS REQUIRED. FAILURE TO FURNISH AN ACCEPTABLE AUDIT AS
DETERMINED BY THE STATE OR COGNIZANT FEDERAL AUDIT AGENCY
SHALL BE BASIS FOR DENIAL AND REFUND, OR BOTH, OF FEDERAL
FUNDS. FEDERAL FUNDS DETERMINED TO BE MISSPENT ARE SUBJECT
TO REFUND OR OTHER RESOLUTION.
PROCEDURES FOR CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT. ALL CLAIMS FOR REIMBURSE-
MENT OF GRANT RECIPIENT COSTS MUST BE SUBMITTED ON A FORM
(DCA-NA FORM 3 (A-E) OCTOBER 1987) PRESCRIBED AND PROVIDED
BY THE BPSM. CLAIMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED ON A MONTHLY BASIS IN
ORDER TO REMAIN CURRENT ON PROJECT COSTS REPORTING. ALL
CLAIMS REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT FOR OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY
(OCO) ITEMS HAVING A UNIT COST OF $500 OR MORE AND A USEFUL
LIFE OF 1 YEAR OR MORE MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COMPLETED
NON-ExPENDABLE PROPERTY FORM SIGNED BY THE SUBGRANTEES'
PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. IF LOCAL ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES REQUIRES
OCO REPORTING AT A LESSER AMOUNT THAN THE $500, LOCAL
REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE ADHERED TO. REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS SHALL
BE SUBMITTED IN DETAIL SUFFICIENT FOR A PROPER PRE-AUDIT AND
POST-AUDIT THEREOF.
(
(
/-------------------------------------------------------------------------\
I H. A-CCEPTANCE AND AGREEMErlT I
I (CONTINUED)
.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17.
18.
19.
OWNERSHIP OF DATA AND CREATIVE MATERIAL. THE OWNERSHIP OF
MATERIAL, DISCOVERIES, INVENTIONS, AND RESULTS DEVELOPED,
PRODUCED, OR DISCOVERED BY THIS AGREEMENT IS GOVERNED BY
THE TERMS OF OMS CIRCULAR A-102, ATTACHMENT N, PARAGRAPH 8
OR OMS CIRCULAR A-110, ATTACHMENT N, PARAGRAPH 8.
PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL ESTABLISH
AND ADMINISTER A SYSTEM TO CONTROL, PROTECT, PRESERVE, USE,
AND MAINTAIN AND DISPOSE OF ANY PROPERTY FURNISHED IT BY THE
SPSM OR PURCHASED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH FEDERAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN
OMB CIRCULAR A-102, ATTACHMENT N OR OMB CIRCULAR A-110,
ATTACHMENT N. THIS OBLIGATION CONTINUES AS LONG AS THE
PROPERTY IS RETAINED BY THE GRANT RECIPIENT, NOTWITHSTANDING
THE EXPIRATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
DISPUTES AND ApPEALS. ANY DISPUTE, DISAGREEMENT OR QUESTION
OF FACT ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE DECIDED BY THE
BPSM IN WRITING AND SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED TO PARTIES CONCERNED.
A WRITTEN APPEAL SHALL BE MADE WITHIN 21 CALENDAR DAYS TO THE
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, WHOSE
DECISION IS FINAL. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL PROCEED DILI-
GENTLY WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE AGREEMENT AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE BPSM DECISION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT'S
RIGHT TO APPEAL IN THE DEPARTMENT'S DECISION IS CONTAINED IN
CHAPTER 120, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND IN PROCEDURES SET FORTH
IN CHAPTERS 28-5 AND 9-5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. ApPEALS
MUST BE RECEIVED IN WRITING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION OF
THE DECISION. THE WRITTEN APPEAL MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CLERK (AGENCY CLERK).
FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THIS TIME FRAME SHALL CONSTITUTE A
WAIVER OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 120, FLORIDA STATUTES.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
20.
21.
CONFERENCES, INSPECTION OF WORK. CONFERENCES MAY BE HELD AT
THE REQUEST OF ANY PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT. A REPRESENTATIVE
OF THE BPSM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE
ASSISTANCE, OR ALL SHALL BE PRIVILEGED TO VISIT THE SITE FOR
THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF WORK BEING
PERFORMED .AT ANY TIME.
PUBLICATIONS, PRINTING, OR REPORTS.
A.
BEFORE PUBLICATION OR PRINTING, THE FINAL DRAFT OF ANY
REPORT OR REPORTS REQUIRED UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR
PERTAINING TO THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
BPSM FOR REVIEW.
B.
EACH PUBLICATION OR OTHER PRINTED REPORT COVERED BY
PARAGRAPH 21.A ABOVE MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING STATE-
MENTS ON THE COVER PAGE:
( (
I----------------~---------------------------------------
(1)
"THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE BUREAU OF PUBLIC
SAFETY MANAGEMENT, DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN COOPERATION WITH THE BUREAU OF JUSTICE
ASSISTANCE, U.S. DEPARTME~T OF JUSTICE. II
.-------------\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
H.
ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT
(CONTINUED)
(2) liTHE CONCLUSIONS AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS
REPORT ARE THOSE OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT, AND DO
NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THOSE OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA, BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT,
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE OR ANY OTHER AGENCY
OF THE STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. II
22. THE GRANT RECIPIENT AGREES TO UTILIZE ALL NON-EXPENDABLE
PROPERTY FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE PURPOSES DURING ITS USEFUL
LIFE OR REQUEST SPSM DISPOSITION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL
ESTABLISH AND ADMINISTER A SYSTEM TO CONTROL, PROTECT,
PRESERVE, USE, AND MAINTAIN ANY PROPERTY PURCHASED PURSUANT
TO THIS GRANT.
I
23. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. No PERSON SHALL, ON THE GROUNDS I
I OF RACE, CREED, COLOR, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN BE EXCLUDED FROM I
I PARTICIPATION IN, BE REFUSED THE BENEFITS OF, OR BE OTHERWISE I
I SUBJECTED TO DISCRIMINATION UNDER GRANTS AWARDED PURSUANT TO I
I P.L. 89-564, NON-DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ANTI-DRUG I
I ABUSE ACT OF 1988: TITLE IV OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964; I
I SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 AS AMENDED: I
I TITLE IX OF THE EDUCATION AMENDMENTS OF 1972: THE AGE I
I DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1975: AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE I
I NON-DISCRIMINATION REGULATIONS 28 CFR PART 42, SUBPARTS C, I
I D, E, AND G. ANY STATE AGENCY, CITY OR COUNTY RECEIVING I
I $500,000 OR MORE IN FEDERAL ANTI-DRUG ABUSE FUNDS MUST SUBMIT I
I THEIR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PLAN TO THE BPSM. I
I I
I 24. NON-PROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT
I AGREES TO COMPLY WITH EXECUTIVE ORDER 12549, DEBARMENT AND
I SUSPENSION (34 C.F.R., PART 85, SECTION 85.510, PARTICIPANT'S
I RESPONSIBILITIES). THESE PROCEDURES REQUIRE THAT THE GRANT
I RECIPIENT SUBMIT CERTIFICATION THAT IT WILL NOT ENTER INTO
I ANY LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTION WITH A PERSON WHO IS
I DEBARRED, SUSPENDED, DECLARED INELIGIBLE OR VOLUNTARILY
I EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATION IN THIS COVERED TRANSACTION, UNLESS
AUTHORIZED BY THE BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT,
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS.
25. THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S PERFORMANCE AND OBLIGATION TO PAY
UNDER THIS CONTRACT IS CONTINGENT UPON AN ANNUAL APPROPRIATION
BY THE LEGISLATURE.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
.---------------------\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EACH PERSON SHALL FILE THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THIS CERTIFI-I
CATION AND DISCLOSURE FORM, IF APPLICABLE, WITH EACH SUBMISSION I
THAT INITIATES AGENCY CONSIDERATION OF SUCH PERSON FOR AN AWARD I
OF A FEDERAL CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT OF I
$100,000 OR MORE; OR FEDERAL LOAN OF $150,000 OR MORE. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/ --':'"~..:_- - ----. -----( .------------------- -- ---(
. .1 H . ACCEPTANl-.. ,..JD AGRE::a:.MENT .
I (CONTINUED)
I
THE RECIPIENT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 319 OF PUBLIC LAW
101-121 AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE "GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR
NEW RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING; INTERIM FINAL GUIDANCE" PUBLISHED
IN THE DECEMBER 30, 1989, FEDERAL REGISTER.
26.
THIS CERTIFICATION IS A MATERIAL REPRESENTATION OF FACT UPON
WHICH RELIANCE WAS PLACED WHEN THIS TRANSACTION WAS MADE OR
ENTERED INTO. SUBMISSION OF THIS CERTIFICATION IS A PRE-
REQUISITE FOR MAKING OR ENTERING INTO THIS TRANSACTION IMPOSED
BY SECTION 1352, TITLE 31, U.S. CODE. ANY PERSON WHO FAILS TO
FILE THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMIT TO A CIVIL
PENALTY OF NOT LESS THAN $10,000 AND NOT MORE THAN $100,000 FOR
EACH SUCH FAILURE.
THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES, TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNO~:LEDGE
AND BELIEF, THAT:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
(1)
(2)
(3)
No FEDERAL APPROPRIATED FUNDS HAVE BEEN PAID OR WILL BE
PAID TO ANY PERSON FOR INFLUENCING OR ATTEMPTING TO
INFLUENCE AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF ANY FEDERAL AGENCY,
A MEMBER OF CONGRESS, AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF CONGRESS,
OR AN EMPLOYEE OF A MEMBER OF CONGRESS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE AWARDING OF ANY FEDERAL CONTRACT, THE MAKING OF
ANY FEDERAL GRANT, THE MAKING OF ANY FEDERAL LOAN, THE
ENTERING INTO OF ANY RENEWAL, AMENDMENT, OR MODIFICATION
OF ANY FEDERAL CONTRACT, GRANT, LOAN OR COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT.
IF ANY NON-FEDERAL FUNDS HAVE BEEN PAID OR WILL BE PAID TO
ANY PERSON FOR INFLUENCING OR ATTEMPTING TO INFLUENCE AN
OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF ANY FEDERAL AGENCY, A MEMBER OF
CONGRESS, AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF CONGRESS, OR AN
EMPLOYEE OF A MEMBER OF CONGRESS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS
FEDERAL CONTRACT, GRANT, LOAN, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT,
THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT STANDARD FORM
# LLL, "DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES", IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ITS INSTRUCTIONS.
THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE LANGUAGE OF THIS
CERTIFICATION BE INCLUDED IN THE AWARD DOCUMENTS FOR ALL
SUBAWARDS AT ALL TIERS AND THAT ALL SUBRECIPIENTS SHALL
CERTIFY AND DISCLOSE ACCORDINGLY.
(
C:~~~ ~R~~,~~E
(305) 294.4641
September 6, 1990
Mr. John A. Lenaerts, Chief
Bureau of Public Safety Management
Department of Community Affairs
State of Florida
2740 Centerview Drive
The Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
c-
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Pro Tern Wilhelmina Harvey, District 1
Gene Lytton, District 2
Douglas Jones, District 3
Mike Puto, District 4
MAYOR John Stormont, District 5
~ ..
:-:::; ~ f'"'">
...i
~~Cl
.-....)'0'(-..
.. . ,
--,,, r._"",,~""?'~;('.~:n.,._,.. . 1-/1
...--.._1: ,.,,,-_...,...~~~,._....,~_....._1
. ~ '" ^~ ._J~~1:1-._.' .
..... .~.......~---._----
~ -, e
~ .~ =..
RE: Letter of Designation for Signature Authority
Anti-Durg Abuse Act Funds
Dear Mr. Lenaerts:
SEP 18
19sa
:'.: T"'; . ,I.
,
.
!
. <;'!TT j i
.~
This letter is to designate Captain Thomas W. Brown, Monroe
County Administrator, with the signature authority for the fol-
lowing 1990 Anit-Drug Abuse funds.
Monroe County Anti-Drug Abuse Resource Officer/
Drug Awareness Resistance Education Program,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-074i
Pilot Residential/Work Release Program,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-075;
Monroe County Pretrial Services Substance Abuse Program,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-076; and
Program Administration,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-077.
Sincerely, ~
J~:rmont
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
/--~~~------------------r'------------------------~~----------------------\
, IN WITNESS w"~~EOF, THE PARTIES AFFIRM THEY HA.~ EAC AD AND
.
AGREE TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION "H" OF THE AGREEMENT,
THAT THE PARTIES HAVE EACH READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT BY THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED
OFFICERS ON THE DAY, MONTH AND YEAR SET OUT BELOW.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT
BY:~--cff'..~
TITLE:__~o~~~~}~_~U!~~~~_~~r!~~~~________
~~
IWITNESS:------------------------------
I
I
:DATE:-----~:~-~~J:~--------------
I
I
I
I
I S AL 0 $56,853
IFEDERAL FUND L CATED:--------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
OF GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
(COMMISSION CHAIRMAN, MAYOR OR
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE)
Thomas W. Brown
NAME:--------------------------
County Administrator
TITLE:~-~~---------
SIGNA~'- -----------------
DATE: June 26 1990
I ~kI!C\r.r-- ,
I~~S-": 1 ~-: - -,- ---:.- - - ~ -- ------ - --
\ i/!' td12,( .
~. _ ...i_~.!I...'1._LW___'......_________
--------------------------------
ADMINISTRATOR OF
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
Richard D. Roth
NAME---------------------------
Mon~oe unty Sheriff
TITLE:------ -- -----Aii~-
SIGNATURE: -----~-----------
WITNESS:~--~----
DATE:-~2E~-12~-!22Q------------
--------------------------------
PROJECT DIRECTOR
Denise Froehlich
NAME:--------------------------
TITLE:ID~erim-E~QjQ~~~--
SIGNATURE' YJ~-~-~E..<4-t~{:-f':.
'~v1 Ly. ~
WITNESS' 1)itCY" 5-1(..'-z /~''''-
,,!!-- ...;.,=,-- -- ---.,. - ---- --- --
. 7~ i/
DATE:-Juue-2Q_-l~~Q------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/