Resolution 488-1990
RESOLUTION NO. 488 - 1990
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR/CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD TO EXECUTE A
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR FUNDING FROM A
SUBGRANT AWARD FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, FOR THE MONROE
COUNTY ANTI-DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM, PRETRIAL SERVICES
SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Mayor/Chairman of the Board is hereby
authorized to execute a Certificate of Acceptance by and between
the Florida Department of Community Affairs and Monroe County,
concerning a subgrant award in the amount of $35,552.00 for the
Pretrial Services Substance Abuse Program of the Monroe County
Anti-Drug Abuse Program, a copy of same being attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Monroe County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said Board held
on the eli'fi day of ttf;~J~r- , A.D. 1990.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
ok~
By
Mayor/Chairman
(Seal)
Attest: DANNY I.. KOLHAGE, Clerk
-42L, ~~-1/p/
,
'V1,:I"A1NnOO 30HNOW
'10 '~IO ")110
3~'tHlO~ 'l ANNVO
APPROVED AS TO FORi;,r
AND LEGAL SUFFlCIENC".
Ob t LId S nON 06~
OH003H ~Oj 0311.:1
f..
~.~
i.
i',j:,
~:
,
~
.-,
BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF SUBGRANT AWARD
;-,
---------------------------------------------
The subgrantee, through its authorized representative,
acknowledges receipt and acceptance of subgrant award number
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-076
in the amount of $35,552
for a project entitled Monroe County Pretrial Services
Substance Abuse Proqram
for the period of 10/1/90
through 9/30/91
, in accordance
with the statement of work contained in the subgrant application,
and subject to the Bureau of Public Safety Management's
conditions of aqreement and special conditions governing this
subgrant.
10/24/90
(Date' of' Acceptance
(SEAL)
ATIEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
John Stormont - Mayor/Chairman
(Typed Name and Title of Offi~al)
By:
Deputy Clerk
DCA-HS Form 1 (June, 1985)
.<;PPROVEDAS TOFORM
,t1 VD LEGAL SUFFlCIDICY.
qy ~~~~\''v~'
Attorne OffIce
~'-;;_.
state of Florida
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Emergency Management
Bureau of Public Safety Management
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Bob Martinez
Governor
Thomas G. Pelham
Secretary
Subgrant Award Certificate
Monroe County Board of
Subgrantee: Commissioners
Federal Funds:
$35,552
Date of Award: 9/28/90
Grant Period: From:10/1/90 To: 9/30/91
Project Title:Monroe County Pretrial
Services Substance Abuse Proqram
Grant Number: 91-CJ-28-11~54-01-076
BGMTF Funds:
State Agency Match:
Local Agency Match:
Total Project Cost:
Program Area:
11,851
$47,403
13
Award is hereby made in the amount and for the period shown above of a grant
under Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safety Streets Act of 1968,
P.L. 90-351, as amended, and the Anti-Dru~ Abuse Act of 1988, P.L. 100-690,
to the above mentioned subgrantee and SUbJect to any attached standard or
special conditions.
This award is subject to all applicable rules, regulations, and conditions as
contained in the Financial and Administrative guide for grants, Guideline
Manual 7100.1D, Office of Justice Programs, Common Rule for state and Local
Governments and A-87, or OMB Circulars A-110 and A-21, in their entirety.
It is also subject to such further rules, regulations and policies as may be
reasonably prescribed by the State or Federal Government consistent with the
purposes and authorization of P.L. 90-351, as amended, and P.L. 100-690.
This grant shall become effective on the beginning date of the grant period,
provided that within thirty (30) days from the date of award a properly
executed Certificate of Acceptance of Subgrant Award is returned to the Bureau
of Public Safety Management.
~~~~
· Authorized Offlclal
Gordon L. Guthrie, Director
f?-Z.9'-~
Date
[X]This award is subject to special and/or standard conditions (attached).
BPSM Revised 7-1-79
state of Florida
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Emergency Management
Bureau of Public Safety Management
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
Special Conditions
Grantee (Name of SPA): Bureau of Public Safety Management
Grant Number: 91-CJ-28-11-54-01-076
Grant Title: Monroe County Pretrial Services Substance Abuse Program
In addition to the general conditions applicable to fiscal administration,
the grant is subject to the following special conditions:
Additional Standard Conditions:
1. When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid
solicitations, and other documents describing projects or programs funded
in whole or in part with federal money, all grantees receiving federal
funds, including but not limited to state and local governments, shall
clearly state (1) the percentage of the total cost of the program or
project which will be financed with federal money, and (2) the dollar
amount of federal funds for the project or program.
....."'..-~.,....".!..c.,.-..
- . . .~. ',- ,. ,- '."
, ~ :"'" ~ ""-"',
, ( ( ,'""- ----.-.---" '.",' -"'.,,,,._-," _, u, ~__",
1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __________~________ __________________ -- ----...... ..'--.~":-.""- ~.-,," -.---'''....-,---..-i \
-.-- _._,- -..- --,,~ - ,-.-'-
I' . STATE OF FL.ORIDA ':--------.". ",-" -,,,.
, I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ~
I DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT~
I BUREAU OF PUBL.IC SAFETY MANAGEMENT
I SUBGRANT ApPLICATION FOR ANTI-DRUG ABUSE AtT FUNDS
1- ------------------------------------------ ------- ---~--..(;.:.;~::.;.'... ;..:.;,,:;..~~ -~-~- - - ~-
IA. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION ThO-IUS t;. h('o~F'~:;-': "." . :,-!, ;,
I 1. SUBGRANTEE: NAME: f\10nr02 Count...."-.,~~i.Acistr."ltClr j
I Public Service Building
I ADDRESS: \'linCl II Stork Tc;l "lnrl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6. REQUESTED GRANT PERIOD: FROM 1 0-01-90 To 09-10-91 I
I
7 . FEDERAL. SUPPORT REQUESTED: $ 35,552 I
I
8. LOCAL. MATCH PROVIDED: $ 11,851 j
I
9. TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET: $ 47,403. I
I I
I 10. FEDERAL EMPL.OYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 59-6000749 ~
I I
I 11. CATAL.OG OF FEDERAL. ~MESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA) NUMBER 16.579 I
I I
I 12. BPSM PROJ ECT NUMBER: 91-CJ-28-11-54-01-076 I
I I
I OCA-NA FORM 1 (REVISED JANUARY, 1990) I
\_____________________________________________________--------------------1
-.:
TEL.EPHONE:
2.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER:
NAM E:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
3.
IMPL.EMENTING AGENCY:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
4.
PROJECT DIRECTOR:
NAME:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
scp 1" ~
... ',: -:,.
Key West, ?lorida
33040
(305) 294-4641
Bruce Bottqer
Public Service Building
Winq II, Stock Island
Key \oJest, Florida
330~0
(305) 296-1338
~bnroe County Pretrial Services
323 Fleminq Street
Key \'Jest, Florida
(305) 294-7288
Denise Froehlich
Langton Assoc~ates, Inc.
4244 St. Johns Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida
12210
(904) 387-3342
5.
PROJECT TITLE:
Monroe County Pretrial Services Substance Abuse Prmra:n
/------------- ____J ,-----------------------_1 _____ ______________\
18. PROJECT f~ug_EM IDENTIFICATION: THIS SECTION MUST --__AIBE THE I
I SPECIFIC CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROBLEM TO BE ADDRESSED BY THE IMPLEMENT- I
I ING AGENCY. CURRENT DATA MUST BE PRESENTED WHICH DEFINES THE I
I NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE TARGETED PROBLEM. I
I I
I START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY I
I -------------------------------------------------_________1
---------------
I I
I Through the request for Anti-Drug Abuse Funds for Monroe County's Pretrial I
I Services Substance Abuse Program and as cited in Rule #9G-16.007 governing I
I eligible purposes and programs, Monroe County wishes to assist the Pretrial I
I Services Department (Pl'S) in developing a program which would allow Pretrial I
I Services to more closely supervise substance abuse offenders; provide an I
I in-house urinalysis testing program; provide substance abuse education for I
I relevant offenders; provide identification, assessment, referral to treatment, 1
I and case management of substance abusing pretrial offenders. 1
I I
I Fran March 1, 1989 through February 28, 1990, 1, 1 48 defendants were released I
I to the supervision of the Pretrial Services Department. Approximately 185 of 1
I these defendants (13%) had cocaine possession and/or sale charges, while 3% I
I had charges involving other drugs (marijuana in 4 cases, LSD in 1 case, and I
I amphetamines in 1 case). I
I I
I Although almost all of the 185 cocaine-charged defendants were required to I
I suhnit to periodic and randan urinalysis to detect drug use as a condition of I
I their release, less than half actually participated due primarily to the costs I
I involved. Clients were referred to the Monroe County Health Department where I
I they were charged $28 for the urinalysis. In January, PTS was informed that 1
I the charge would be increased to $50, effectively prohibiting all but a few I
I clients fran participating. Pl'S then turned to the local circuit Probation I
I and Parole Office of the State of Florida Department of Corrections. Staff I
I constraints prevented any canprehensive testing of pretrial defendants. Any I
I pretrial defendant who was also on probation was eligible for testing.
I Occasionally other defendants were sporadically accepted for randan tests.
I
I Of the 185 cocaine-charged defendants, 6% failed to comply with release
conditions and were revoked; 3% failed to appear for scheduled court hearings.
I
I
I
I
I
'!he average length of time on supervised release for the 185 cocaine-charged I
I defendants was 2.5 months -- enough time for intervention to make some impact I
I on substance abuse. I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Drug Use Forecasting (IXJF) Data canpiled by the National Institute of Justice
reflects cocaine as the overwhelming drug of choice in the South. The need
for cocaine testing is then clear. As requested by the court, flexibility is
needed to occasionally test for marijuana. The need for amphetamine testing
is based on projections gleaned fran DUF Data and other reports indicating an
increase in amphetamine use nationally. For example, Up Front Drug
Information specialists noted in January, 1990 that, just as cocaine was
introduced and successfully test-marketed in the 1970's before its expansion
in the latter half of that decade and in the 1980's, domestically produced
methamphetamines loans as a potential national drug crisis for the 1 990 ' s. In
addition, a canbination of methamphetamine and crack cocaine has already been
identified as an abused substance in Florida. While it is believed that
cocaine cartels operating in South Florida will not allows "ice" (a very pure
form of methamphetamine being used almost exclusively in Hawaii) to take a
foothold, rural Florida "labs" may provide an underground source of
methamphetamine to South Florida.
(
---~-----------------------------------------------\
1----------------------
" I
B. (Continued)
I I
I I
r The following substance abuse programs are available for adults in Monroe I
I County: I
I I
I Delphos - A private, for-profit, 28-day residential program whose cost I
r (approximately $10,000) makes it prohibitive for almost all criminal I
I defendants. I
' I
I MARC House - A 5-day only detoxification program. I
I I
I Mother's Opportunity for Recovery Program - Targeted strictly for women I
I who are active substance abusers or, who are in early stages of recovery I
I and are pregnant, or mothers of children up to 12 months of age. This I
' program has only 12 outpatient slots. I
I I
I TASC - Is an outpatient program primarily serving post-convJicted I
I offenders (i.e. probationers). The program charges $50 for initial I
I assessment, $120 for 12 required group sessions, plus $10 for each I
I urinalysis - for another $120. Price has prevented the Pretrial Services I
' Program from using this resource to any great extent, although some I
I clients have attended. (The constitutionality of requiring pretrial I
' defendants to pay fees is still being tested in courts with no definitive I
I ruling yet). I
I I
I NA, AA - Meets often and in many locations throughout the county and I
I would be an excellent referral resource for the PTS Substance Abuse I
I Program. I
I I
I Taking cost and availability into consideration, assessment and referral I
I resources are very limited for defendants released to the supervision of the I
I Pretrial Services Program. I
I I
I I
I I
I I
' I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
, I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I, I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
~-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
I-------------r--------( .------------____________( ______________________\
I C. PROPOSED ~___ :ION TO THE TARGETED PROBLEM: THIS SEI I MUST
I DESCRIBE IN NARRATIVE FORM THE PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN TO
I R.EDUCE OR ELIMINATE THE TARGETED PROBLEM. THE PLAN MUST INCLUDE HO~
I THE REQUESTED FISCAL, PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT RESOURCES WILL BE
I UTILIZED. IN ADDITION, THIS SECTION SHALL DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT I
I RELATES TO THE OVERALL COUNTYWIDE ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACTIVITIES, INCLUD-I
lING THE MECHANISM UTILIZED TO ENSURE COORDINATION OF THIS PROJECT I
I WITH OTHER ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACTIVITIES. I
I I
I START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY. I
I - -------------------------~----------------------------I
----------------- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I The addition of a substance abuse counselor to the PTS staff will allow for I
I early intervention, once detection of substance abuse has occured. The I
I immediate initiation of drug education, the availability of counseling through I
I the department, and the monitoring of progress made by defendants ensure that I
I a greater number of clients will begin the rehabilitation process. Improved I
I case management, referral and data collection will be possible when these I
I efforts are coordinated by a substance abuse professional. I
I I
I The substance abuse counselor, with the assistance of staff from the Mental I
I Health Care Clinic of the Lower Keys, will develop a specific protocol for the I
I handling of cases where continued substance abuse is indicated. Pretrial Drug I
I Testing Standards and Goals (as submitted October, 1989 to the National I
I Association of Pretrial Services Agencies) will be taken into consideration. J
I These procedures will be approved by the judiciary. I
I I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Identification, assessment and intervention are key elements in the dealing
with drug addiction. The Pretrial Services Department (PTS) has been
frustrated in its attempts to implement appropriate procedures which would be
in the best interest of the substance abuse defendants released to PTS for
supervision. By providing pretrial substance abuse testing and the addi tion
of a substance abuse counselor to its staff, the department can instigate a
more efficient approach to the development and use of treatment resources
through appropriate client referrals and centralized case management.
The proposed project has the support of the Monroe County Board of
Carmissioners, the Substance Abuse Policy Advisory Board and the 16th Judicial
Circui t Court of Florida.
The elimination of cost as an element of pretrial testing will make the
service available to all defendants referred to the Pretrial Services
Department. Testing results will be available to the courts on a consistent
basis and will aid in developing sentencing strategies. Perhaps more
importantly, the program will make available the services of a substance abuse
counselor for the proper assessment of the individual needs of each defendant.
From this assessment and follow-up services, the rehabilitation process can
begin.
By introducing drug testing technology into the court process, steps are taken
toward imposing controls on drug use by defendants and thereby reducing the
risks of pretrial misconduct posed by the release of substance abusers.
Initial research has demonstrated that close monitoring of a defendant's
drug/alCOhol use, coupled with quick sanctions for violations, can prove
effective in deterring substance abuse and reducing criminal activity.
Defendants will know from the outset that violations will be detected and
sanctions will follow. Therefore, the technique can operate without burdening
the oa~unity with additional risks or prohibitive costs.
(
(
,~
-~------------------------------------------------\
1----------------------- I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
c. (Continued)
The following provides an example of inclusions in such a protocol:
- After the initial testing, releasees will be held accountable for
violations. Testing will be required at least weekly. Failure to
report will be considered just as serious as a positive test. An
appointment will be signed each time a defendant reports so there can be
no confusion or ambiguity about their obligation.
Development of the protocol would take into consideration that relapse
is a part of recovery and should be expected. To deny such an
expectation is not realistic. Inunediate revocation of release for the
first positive urinalysis is counterproductive to the recovery process.
Defendants will know, however, that sanctions will be applied.
Any defendant providing more than two drug-positive urines in thirty
days would be subject to a memo going to the judge having jurisdiction
over the case. The memo would note specific non-compliance with a case
management plan designed to address the problem. As a consequence, the
urinalysis schedule may be increased and intensified, NA attendance may
be made mandatory, drug education class attendance may be made mandatory.
Any further positive tests within the next thirty days would result in
the revocation of release.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Perform urinalysis testing. I
I I
I Provide substance abuse education in a group setting to continued I
I substance-abusing defendants. I
I I
I I
I, I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
f I
I
\----------------------------~-----------------------------------------..--/
Increased testing and more restrictive conditions would also result if
the defendant had more than one positive urinalysis in the next sixty
days or, following that time period, more than one positive urinalysis
in the next ninety days.
Procedures for the release of infonnation to the court, agencies referred to,
probation services, etc., will be developed. Otherwise, all information will
renain confidential and confidentiality statements will be used.
The following is a brief summary of the responsibilities of the substance
abuse counselor:
Complete initial assessment of all drug-charged defendants released to
PI'S .
Design case management plan for each defendant to include urinalysis
schedule, referrals for treatment, etc.
(
,
(
'~
I . - -------~--------. -----------------------------------------------\
-------- -
I i
I ' C. (Continued)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- Monitor defendants' compliance with other conditions of release and
insure their appearance in court through oral and/or written reminders.
- Refer eligible defendants to Florida Department of Corrections Pretrial
Intervention Program and/or other appropriate agencies.
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I j
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I ___________________________________/
\--------------------------------------
. .~. ( f
/__~__~________________.________________________l ,---- ---------------\
10. LIST EACH OBJECTIVE AND ITS ATTENDANT PERFORMANCE MEASURES ~HICH
I ~ILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE LEVfL OF ATTAINMENT FOR EACH
'/ OBJ ECTIVE.
I
/ START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY
I~------------------------------------------------------------------------:
, I
I I
I Objective #1: To integrate drug testing technology into the court proces:3es I
I to control drug use am reduce risks of pretrial misconduct. I
I I
I Perfonnance Measures I
I 1
I - Implement and document initial drug testing for every defendant referred I
I to Pretrial Services during the grant period, as compared to I
I approximately 28 defendants tested in 1989. I
I I
I - Document and review history of test results each time the defendant I
I appears for testing, according to the pericrlic demands of the protocol. I
I I
I - Document court notification of defendants who fail to report for testing I
I as directed. I
I I
I - Document sanctions resulting from positive test results (these will I
I escalate if drug use continues). I
I I
I - Document the number of defendants who fail to comply wi th release I
I conditions or fail to appear for scheduled court hearings vs. 1989 I
I figures. I
I I
I - Document success/failure of the influence weekly drug tes ting of I
I defendants vs. the number of drug-charged defendants who failed to I
I canply with release conditions am were revoked, as well as the number I
I who failed to appear for scheduled court hearings in 1 989. I
I I
I I
I Objective #2: Facilitate a more efficient development and use of treatment I
I resources through appropriate client referrals and centralized I
I case management. I
I I
I Perfonnance l-1easures I
I I
I - J:X:>cument the number of defendants participating in treatment programs as I
I a result of pericrlic testing (compared to 9 referrals made in 1989). I
I I
I - Document the number oAdefendants participating in PTS drug I
I education/counseling group sessions. I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
\ ------------------------------------------------------/
-------------------
/ ~- ,~------------- _"____C --_____________ __________ _C ___ _ _ __
10. LIST EACH OBJECTIVE AND ITS ATTENDANT PERFORMANCE MEASURES
I WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THE LEVEL OF ATTAINMENT FOR EACH
,I OBJ ECTIVE.
I I
1 START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY I
1-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
,--------------\
WHICH I
1
I
QE.i~~!i~~.JU:
To implement
defendents.
diagnostic services for
Performance Measures
Hire
need
a Substance Abuse Counselor that will assess
for special services for each defendent.
the
Refer defendents that require special services.
Document the number of defendents that receive
evaluations and referrals.
, QE.~~!i.~~.-!!.~ :
To implement psychosocial assessments for
defendents.
Performance Measures
Document case histories for each defendent.
Refer defendents that need assistance in dealing with
their psychosocial problems.
Document the number of defendents that receive
referrals.
Obi~~!i~~.-!!.5:
To implement short-term supportive
counseling services for defendents.
Performance Measures
Document the number of defendents which receive
short-term counseling services.
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
~
Refer and document those defendents which
more extensive counseling services.
requlre
(
"
(
"
Treatment Alternatives to street Crime, and Employee Assistance
Programs (EAP programs are not eligible for grant-in-aid
fund ing) .
Community Intervention Programs provide, at a minimum, early
identification, screening, and may include liaison services,
short-term counseling and support services, and referral
services. Treatment Alternatives to street Crime (TASC )
Programs provide for identification, screening, court liaison,
referral and tracking of criminal justice clients with a history
of chemical dependency.
[COMPLETE ONLY PROJECT MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES THAT APPLY TO
INTERVENTION PROGRAM SERVICES PROVIDED TO DRUG OFFENDERS FOR
WHICH THE SUBGRANTEE IS SEEKING GRANT-IN-AID FUNDING; IF YOU
PROVIDE BOTH COMMUNITY INTERVENTION AND TASC PROGRAMMING, PLEASE
COMPLETE TWO SETS OF MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES, ONE OF COMMUNITY
INTERVENTION AND ONE FOR TASC DRUG OFFENDERS.]
Do you provide (Check):
.2L 1)
2)
3 )
Community Intervention Programming
TASC Programming
Both
1. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS ident~fied and
screened by ** percent from project start up through the
end of the orIgInal grant period. The percentage increase
is based upon a baseline of ____ drug offenders receiving
screening services in calendar year 1989.
[Identification means distinguishing specific behaviors and
attitudes associated with at-risk populations and,
screening means obtaining basic background information on a
client and including a brief history and problem
identification]
2. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS receiving
urinanalysis tests by ~ percent through drug
identification and screening services from project start up
through the end of the original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of ~ drug
offenders receiving urinanalysis tests conducted-OY-the
service provider in calendar year 1989.
3. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS receiving
diagnostic services by lillL- percent from project start up
through the end of the original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of -0- drug
offenders receiving diagnostic services in calenaar-year
1989.
** DEPENDS ON ARREST PROJECI'IONS. ALL ARRESTEES ARE SCREENED.
51
(
(
[A diagnostic service is a method or instrument used to
determine the need for special services including
psychological tests, special educational tests, and
psychological and psychiatric evaluations.]
4. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS receiving
psychosocial assessments by 100 percent from project start
up through the end of the orIgInal grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of ~ drug
offenders receiving psychosocial assessments in caIendar
year 1989.
[A psychosocial assessment consists of a history of: the
particular case; chemical dependency; prior treatment
activities; social, economic and family background;
educational and vocational achievements; legal problems;
emotional and mental disturbances; and assessment of HIV
high risk factors.]
5. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS receiving case
management services by 100 percent from project start up
through the end of the original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of ~ drug
offenders receiving case management services in calendar
year 1989.
[Case management means the process of drug offenders
receiving treatment services appropriate to their needs,
either in the program or upon referral. Case management
activities include: assessment, planning, linking,
monitoring, and advocacy of clients.]
6. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS receiving short-
term supportive counseling by 100 percent from project
start up through the end of the original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of -0- drug
offenders receiving short-term counseling services-In
calendar year 1989.
7. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS receiving court
liaison services by 85 percent from project start up
through the end of tne-original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of 28 drug
offenders receiving court liaison services in calendar year
1989.
8. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS referred to
nonresidential drug treatment programs by 95 percent
through drug identification and screening services from
project start up through the end of the original grant
period. The percentage increase is based upon a baseline of
~ drug offenders referred to nonresidential treatment by
tne-serv1ce provider 1n calendar year 1989.
52
(
(
9. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS referred to
residential drug treatment programs by ~ percent through
drug identification and screening services from project
start up through the end of the original grant period. The
percentage increase is based upon a baseline of -0- drug
offenders referred to residential treatment by tne-5ervice
provider in calendar year 1989.
10. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS tracked and
reported upon by ** percent from project start up through
the end of the original grant period. The percentage of
increase is based upon a baseline of ~ drug offenders
tracked and reported upon in calendar year 1989.
[Tracked means following a drug offender and reporting an
offender's progress according to a consent agreement with
the offender. Reports of client progress must be provided
to the criminal justice system or source of referral as
required by state regulation.]
11. To increase the number of drug OFFENDERS successfully
completing intervention programming by 100 percent from
project start up through the end of the original grant
period. The percentage increase is based upon a baseline of
-0- drug offenders successfully completing intervention
programming in calendar year 1989.
[Successful completion means a drug offender in the program
has achieved Client Participation Agreement requirements the
offender is expected to fulfill upon discharge. This
agreement may include actions to be taken if the offender
fails to adhere to the prescribed plan.]
NONRESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS
Nonresidential programs are those that provide a non-live-in
therapeutic environment with a structured schedule of daily and
hourly activities. Nonresidential programs include Day or Night
Treatment and Outpatient Treatment.
Day or Night Treatment provides a structured schedule of
activities a minimum of four (4) days per week and a minimum four
(4) consecutive hours of service each day with an emphasis on
assessment, rehabilitation, treatment and ancillary services and,
depending upon client needs, may include formal school and adult
education programs, job placement and basic living skills.
Outpatient treatment provides individual, group or family
counseling for drug offenders by appointment during scheduled
operating hours with an emphasis on assessment, treatment and
ancillary services.
[COMPLETE ONLY PROJECT MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES THAT APPLY TO
NONRESIDENTIAL PROGRAM SERVICES PROVIDED TO DRUG OFFENDERS FOR
WHICH THE SUBGRANTEE IS SEEKING GRANT-IN-AID FUNDING.]
** DEPENDS ON ARREST PROJECTIONS. ALL ARRESTEES ARE SCREENED.
53
/
\
.,
(
'-
.,,---...------
<.J
LIJ
C
-
.- >
'" 0
I :z
0 -
l"") l-
I
'" <.J
0 W 0
..J
0 ::J a.
.... 0 LIJ
LIJ V1
1 :x: 1-
U
0 V1 Cl
'" ::J
I Z <<
.- 0
0 ...c
r I- ..J
0 < ::J
I- ....,
z
L LIJ
0 L z
0:: LIJ ::J
L&.. ..J ....,
a.
c L
0 .... >-
...c <
0:: V) :l::
LIJ LIJ
Q. ...c
I- 0::
I- ...c a.
z > <<
< ...c
0:: I-
Cl U 0::
en << <
::J :l::
V1
en
LIJ
L&..
z
<
....,
.-----------------------
-----.....
x XX x XX x X
----------------------------------
xxxxx x XX x X
----------------------------------
x XXX
x
xxx
----------------------------------
x XX x XX x X
1----------------------------------
x
xx x XX X
x
----------------------------------
x XX x XX x XX
----------------------------------
x
xx x :><X :><
:><
----------------------------------
x
:><:>< x XX X
x
----------------------------------
:>< :><X :>< :><:>< x XX
----------------------------------
x
xx x :><:>< x
:><
----------------------------------
:><
xx x XX X
x
----------------------------------
.....--------------------------------------
x XX x :><X :>< :><:><
I-
0::
<
:x:
u
V)
Z
o
I ...c I
I-
a.
...c
0::
U
VI
LIJ
Cl
V)
LIJ
...c
I-
...c
>
...c
I-
U
<<
VI
~
...c
I-
...c
>
...c
I-
U
<<
.c
00
OM
ri
~ Q)
~ 00 00 00 U)~U)~
00 ::l Q) 00 ~
Q) ~ ID~ I 8~ ~ ~~
~ UQ) IDoooo ~'8 ~ ~ ~~ ~ 00
CO C :j~~ '"8~ r8 2 ID~ ~ ~~
fl~2 ~~~ 8a ._4 C 00'0 ~ nt
CQ)OO :jljj~ ~>. rd ~ g'e ~ ~8.
8Q) ~~ g~U) ~~ ~ 0. ~Q)M:5 ~~ ~~
rcl '0._4 ~ri tJ'l0 ~ ~
E Q) C rt1 OM CO c: C 00 OM _
'0 ~ O~~ ._4~~~OOQ) C3 Sri
.... U)?- o;j OM 0 ~ rt1 ~ ~ C ~ E::l ~ OM CO
~"~ ~~~~.-4~CooQ)Cm OQ) 0. ~::l
~~ CU Q)O~Q)Q)ECOtJ'l UU .-4u,vS
~m~ ~~~&8a1~~~~~~0.~ ~ ~
<:5 O'riUo~'O~tJ'lQ)Q)~~~::l~ ~ >.-
~ ~OO O~C::lOO~ o~ Q) ~
~ OM 0 ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 00 Q) ,-, ,-,
~3~~wco8,o0'8U,oco,om~~~m~ ~~
~CQ)._4 ~o.m~u~~~,ocoQ)~Um::l~O~
OOOOQ)Q)rt1 ~c cCCQ)U'OC ri~U)e~
oo~oooo'OO'~Q)O'Q)mQ)tJ'l Q)~Q) n.
~~t3!c~~lD~~lD~~~~lDB~~~~~
o>M OM >Q) 0 U OM Q) Q) ri Q) ri ri ._4 ! OM rt1 ri OM ~ ~ 0 ~ R
Q)ri'Ou~~~~~>~~~UooQ)o.gO~~~~
~ < ~~c R~~~~ 8 ~~ U) U)w
~
.....----------------------------------------......
.
>-
0::
<
V)
V)
LIJ
U
LIJ
Z
V)
<
V)
UJ
Cl
<
a.
z
o
~
I-
<
::J
Z
...c
I-
z
o
U
LIJ
V)
:;:)
P.02
(
I----~__.~-~______M~_~~~_____~_~_.--__~.______~__~~-_~--_.~--~--~---------\
IF. PROJ ECT BUOG~T SCHE:DULE Monroe County PTS Substance Abuse Program I
f------M______~____"-___~~.-_~__~~~_.~_~-M_____..__-~~--~-~~----~---------I
I I FEDERAL I PROJECT IBUDGET CATECORY I
I BUDGET CATEGORY I SUPPORT I MATCH I TOTA~S I
r--------~~-------~~--~----l~---~-.-------l~--~-~--~--.-J-~----*-----~-~--J
I I
1. SA~ARIES AND BENEFITS I $2 40 I
I 2,5.00 $ 7,513.00 I
I I
I I I
I___.___~~__-~__"_____~~___~_~__.~____._~~_______~~___~--~--.---~-----~-w-J
I I I
I I I
I 2. CONTRACTUAL I I
I SERVICES I -0- I
I I I
l------~-_.----~-~w---~~~--.-----~~----.----~--~p-~--~---~~----~~--------.I
I I I I
I '. I I I
I 3. EXPENSES I $12,059.00 I $ 4,020.00 J
I I I I
I I I I
l----.~-----~-~--~~-~--~~~--~-~-~~~-~-~.~-~---~~--~~~----~-_._-.-~------..f
I I I
I I I
I I I
I $ 953.00 I $ 318.00 I
I I I
I I I I
I_._____~~~_~~__~~___-~___-~__~____~~~_______~-~-~~--~__~____w_____.-_._~-1
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I 5. DATA PROCESSING I I I
I SERVICES J ~O- I -0- I
I I I I
I I I I
I_____.____~____~___~-__________~____---__._.__~-~~_~.--~~-.-~-.----------l
I I I
I I I
1 I I
I -0- I -0- I
I I I
I I I
I-------~--~-----~-~-----~---~-----------~~----~~-----~~-~---~-----.------I
I I
I I
I 7. TOTAL PROJECT I
I COSTS I
I I
I I I J I
\-_._----------------------~-----~-----~-----~~----_.--~------~-----_._---/
$30,053.00
-0-
-0-
$16,079.00
4. OPERATING CAPITAL
OUTLAY
S 1, 271. 00
-0-
6. INDIRECT COSTS
-0-
$35,552.00
$11,851.00
$47,403.00
P.03
. ( (
/---.-------.---------------------------------------..-------------------.-\
IG. PRO~ECT BUDGET NARRATIVE: THIS SECTION MUST PROVIOf A NARRATIVE I
t DESCRIPTION or THE PROJECT BUDGET BY LINE ITEM CATEGORY, DETAILING
I THE ITEM AND ANTICIPATED COST. EACH CATEGORY MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY
I DETAILED TO SHOW THE COST RELATIONSHIP TO PROJECT OPERATIONS.
I . I
I START BELOW AND USE CONTINUATION PAGES AS NECESSARY I
I - ------------------------------------------------.-1
,-------------------- -- I
I Matching funds for this project will be provided by the Nonroe County Board I
I of County Commissioners, Subgrantee. from the Board of County Commissioners J
I Contingency Funds. The position indicated is newly created for this project I
1 and will result in an increase in personnel. I
I t
I Monroe County Pretrial Services Substance Abuse Program t
I I
I 1. Salarie5 and Benefits I
1 I
I Salaries I
1 I
I 1 Pretrial Substance Abu5e Counselor $22,000 I
I I
I Benefi ts I
I I
I F.I.C.A. @7.65% $1,683 t
I Life and Health Insurance - Lump Sum 2,844 I
1 Retirement (2 mos. @ 15.14%. 10 mos. I
I @ 16.2%) 3,526 I
I I
I Benefits Subtotal 8,053 I
I I
I TOTAL SALARIES AND BENEFITS $30,053 I
I I
I Pretrial Testing Substance Abuse Counselor I
I The qualifications for this position includes a Bachelors Degree in I
I psychology, social work or other related science and one year's I
I experience working with substance abuse clients. The substance abuse j
I counselor will develop and implement protocol and case management plans. I
I He will be responsibile for all phases of assessment, supervision and j
I referral of clients. In addition, he will perform all drug testing j
I and compile all necessary data to comply with the objectives of this t
I program. j
j I
I I
I 2. Expenses I
I I
I Urinalysis Tests: I
I Cocaine/Marijuana I
I (3,600 tests @ $2.25) $8,100 I
I Amphetamines (1.000 tests @ $2.25) 2,250 I
I Test kits (5 kits @$90) '~50 I
I Gloves (dispossb1e-l,OOO @ $1.297 pr) 1,297 I
I Specimen Containers (4,600 @ $.64) 2.944 I
I Phone (installation & monthly costs) 600 I
I Office Supplies - Misc. 438 I
: TOTAL EXPENSES $16,079:
I I
I I
\--~---_._~---_.----~--~-~-----~-_._~---~_.--~-~-------------_.-----~-----I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
\----------.---~---~~~-~-~-~_..~-~~~~~-~.-.~------~~--~--~-_.-._--~---~---I
'I
r
,
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
P.04
(
(
I---~--~._--------_.-_.~--~~..~_.._.-.-~-_...-..~--~~.---..--~-----.~~--.-
G. Continued
3. Operating Capital Outlay (OCO)
Desk
Deslt Chair
2 Office Chairs (@ $35 ea.)
Filing Cabinet/Bookcase
Refrigerator
$
400
200
70
400
201
TOTAL OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY
$ 1,271
SUMMARY
Salaries and Benefits
Expenses
Operating Capital Outlay (QCO)
$30,053
16,079
1,271
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$471403
/--------------
IH. ACCEPTANCE.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
-----{ ------------------------{ ---------------------\
"...- AGREEMENT I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT. UPON APPROVAL OF THIS SUBGRANT, THE
APPROVED APPLICATION AND THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL
BECOME BINDING. NON-COMPLIANCE SHALL RESULT IN COSTS BEING
DISALLOWED.
REPORTS. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL SUBMIT QUARTERLY PROGRESS
REPORTS, DCA-NA FORM 4(A) (OCTOBER 1987), TO THE BUREAU OF
PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT (BPSM) BY JANUARY 31, APRIL 30,
JULY 31, AND OCTOBER 31 COVERING THE SUBGRANT ACTIVITY FOR THE
PREVIOUS QUARTER. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL SUBMIT AN
ANNUAL REPORT TO THE BPSM, DCA-NA FORM 4(A) (OCTOBER 1987),
FOR EACH 12-MONTH PERIOD OF PROJECT OPERATIONS. THIS REPORT
SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BPSM WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE END
OF THE INITIAL 12-MONTH PERIOD. IN ADDITION, IF THE SUBGRANT
AWARD PERIOD EXCEEDS 12 MONTHS, ADDITIONAL QUARTERLY REPORTS
COVERING THE EXTENDED PERIOD MUST BE SUBMITTED AS WELL AS
A FINAL REPORT COVERING THE ENTIRE TIME FRAME OF SUBGRANT
ACTIVITIES WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE END OF THE EXTENDED PERIOD.
THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL SUBMIT MONTHLY FINANCIAL CLAIM
REPORTS, DCA-NA FORM 3(A-E), TO THE BPSM. A FINAL FINANCIAL
CLAIM REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BPSM WITHIN 45 DAYS OF
THE SUBGRANT TERMINATION PERIOD. SUCH CLAIM MUST BE DISTINCTLY
IDENTIFIED AS "FINAL". FAILURE TO SUBMIT THE FINAL FINANCIAL
CLAIM IN THE TIME SPECIFIED CAN RESULT IN FORFEITURE OF THE
FINAL REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM. ALL UNEXPENDED FUNDS REMAINING
WITH THIS GRANT AFTER PAYMENT OF FINAL CLAIM SHALL AUTOMATICALLY
BE DEOBLIGATED AND SHALL REVERT TO THE BPSM FOR OBLIGATION TO
OTHER APPROVED PROGRAMS. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL SUBMIT
OTHER REPORTS AS MAY BE REASONABLY REQUIRED BY THE BPSM.
ALL REQUIRED REPORTS, INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS WILL BE
DISTRIBUTED WITH THE SUBGRANT AWARD.
2. RESPONSIBILITY OF GRANT RECIPIENT. THE GRANT RECIPIENT MUST
ESTABLISH FISCAL CONTROL AND FUND ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES WHICH
ASSURE PROPER DISBURSEMENT AND ACCOUNTING OF SUBGRANT FUNDS
AND REQUIRED NON-FEDERAL EXPENDITURES. ALL MONIES SPENT ON
THIS PROJECT WILL BE DISBURSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS
OF THE PROJECT BUDGET AS SAID BUDGET WAS APPROVED BY THE BPSM.
ALL EXPENDITURES AND COST ACCOUNTING OF FUNDS SHALL CONFORM
TO THE FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR GRANTS, GUIDE-
LINE MANUAL 7100.1C, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, FEDERAL
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULARS A-102 AND A-87, OR
OMB CIRCULARS A-1I0 AND A-21, IN THEIR ENTIRETY. ALL FUNDS
NOT SPENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE SUBJECT
TO REPAYMENT BY THE GRANT RECIPIENT.
3. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 287.055, FLORIDA STATUTES. THE
SUBGRANTEE, WHEN APPLICABLE, AGREES TO SATISFY ALL REQUIRE-
MENTS PROVIDED IN SECTION 287.055, FLORIDA STATUTES, KNOWN
AS THE "CONSULTANT'S COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION ACTIl.
I
4. ApPROVAL OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS. THE BPSM SHALL REVIEW AND I
APPROVE IN WRITING ALL CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS PRIOR TO THE I
ACTUAL EMPLOYMENT OF THE CONSULTING FIRM. ApPROVAL SHALL BE I
BASED UPON THE COMPLIANCE OF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE REQUIRE- I
MENTS OF THE FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR GRANTS, I
GUIDELINES MANUAL 7100.1C AND APPLICABLE STATE STATUTES. I
GRANT RECIPIENT AGREEMENT APPROVAL BY THE BPSM DOES NOT I
I CONSTITUTE CONSULTANT AGREEMENT APPROVAL. I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
(
\,
(
"
/-------------------------------------------------------------------------\
H. ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT
(CONTINUED)
5. ALLOWABLE COSTS. THE ALLOWABILITY OF COSTS INCURRED UNDER ANY
SUBGRANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL
PRINCIPLES OF ALLOWABILITY AND STANDARDS FOR SELECTED COST
ITEMS SET FORTH IN THE FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR
GRANTS, GUIDELINE MANUAL 7100.1C, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS,
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET CIRCULAR No. A-B7, "COST
PRINCIPLES ApPLICABLE TO GRANTS AND CONTRACTS WITH STATE AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS", OR OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
CIRCULAR No. A-21, "COST PRINCIPLES FOR EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS". ALL PROCEDURES EMPLOYED IN THE USE OF FEDERAL
FUNDS FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF SERVICES, SUPPLIES OR EQUIP-
MENT, MUST BE IN ACCORD WITH ATTACHMENT 0 OF OMB CIRCULAR
No. A-102 OR ATTACHMENT 0 OF OMB CIRCULAR No. A-110 AND
FLORIDA LAW TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT.
6. TRAVEL. ALL TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT FOR OUT-OF-STATE OR OUT-
OF GRANT SPECIFIED-WORK-AREA WILL BE BASED UPON WRITTEN
APPROVAL OF THE BPSM PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ACTUAL TRAVEL.
TRAVEL COST FOR ALL TRAVEL WILL BE REIMBURSED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS, BUT NOT IN EXCESS OF PROVISIONS IN
SECTION 112.061, FLORIDA STATUTES.
7. WRITTEN ApPROVAL OF CHANGES. GRANT RECIPIENTS MUST OBTAIN
APPROVAL FROM THE BPSM FOR MAJOR CHANGES. THESE INCLUDE, BUT
BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: (A) CHANGES IN PROJECT ACTIVITIES,
DESIGNS, OR RESEARCH PLANS SET FORTH IN THE APPROVED APPLICA-
TION; (B) CHANGES IN THE PROJECT DIRECTOR OR KEY PROFESSIONAL
PERSONNEL IDENTIFIED IN THE APPROVED APPLICATION, OR (C) BUDGET
DEVIATIONS THAT DO NOT MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9. COMMENCEMENT OF PROJECTS. IF A PROJECT HAS NOT COMMENCED I
WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT I
AWARD, GRANT RECIPIENTS WILL REPORT BY LETTER THE STEPS I
TAKEN TO INITIATE THE PROJECT, THE REASONS FOR DELAY AND I
THE EXPECTED STARTING DATE. IF, AFTER 90 DAYS FROM THE I
ACCEPTANCE OF AWARD, PROJECT ACTIVITY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
SUBGRANTEES MAY TRANSFER FUNDS BETWEEN BUDGET CATEGORIES
AS LONG AS THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE TRANSFER (INCREASE OR
DECREASE) DOES NOT EXCEED FIVE PERCENT (5%) OF THE TOTAL
APPROVED BUDGET CATEGORY AND THE TRANSFER IS MADE TO AN
APPROVED BUDGET LINE ITEM. HOWEVER, NO ADDITIONAL
TRANSFERS ABOVE THE 5% CAP MAY BE MADE UNTIL A REVISED
BUDGET HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT. UNDER NO
CIRCUMSTANCES CAN THE CHANGES INCREASE THE TOTAL BUDGETED
AWARD. (PLEASE NOTE TRANSFERS DO NOT ALLOW FOR INCREAS-
ING THE QUANTITATIVE NUMBER OF ITEMS REFLECTED IN ANY
APPROVED BUDGET LINE ITEM, SUCH AS, EQUIPMENT ITEMS IN THE
OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY OR EXPENSE CATEGORIES OR STAFF
POSITIONS IN THE SALARIES AND BENEFITS CATEGORY).
B.
GRANT RECIPIENT FUNDING. THE OBLIGATION OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA TO REIMBURSE GRANT RECIPIENTS FOR INCURRED COST WILL
BE SUBJECT TO THE AVAILABILITY OF ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT FUNDS.
(
(
/-------------------------------------------------------------------------\
!H. ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT I
I (CONTINUED) I
I I
I HAS NOT BEGUN, A FURTHER STATEMENT OF IMPLEMENTATION DELAY I
WILL BE SUBMITTED BY THE GRANT RECIPIENT TO THE BPSM. UPON I
RECEIPT OF THE gO-DAY LETTER, THE BPSM SHALL DETERMINE IF .THE I
REASON FOR DELAY IS JUSTIFIED OR CANCEL THE PROJECT AND I
REOBLIGATE THE FUNDS TO OTHER PROJECT AREAS. THE BPSM, I
WHERE WARRANTED BY EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES, SHALL EXTEND I
THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE OF THE PROJECT PAST THE 90-DAY I
PERIOD, BUT ONLY BY FORMAL WRITTEN AMENDMENT TO THIS AGREEMENT. I
I
10. EXCUSABLE DELAYS. EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO THE DEFAULTS OF I
CONSULTANTS, THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL NOT BE IN DEFAULT BY I
REASON OF ANY FAILURE IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT IN I
ACCORDANCE WITH ITS TERMS (INCLUDING ANY FAILURE BY THE GRANT I
RECIPIENT TO MAKE PROGRESS IN THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK I
HEREUNDER WHICH ENDANGERS SUCH PERFORMANCE) IF SUCH FAILURE I
ARISES OUT OF CAUSES BEYOND THE CONTROL AND WITHOUT THE FAULT I
OR NEGLIGENCE OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT. SUCH CAUSES SHALL I
INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT RESTRICTED TO, ACTS OF GOD OR OF THE I
PUBLIC ENEMY, ACTS OF THE GOVERNMENT IN EITHER ITS SOVEREIGN I
OR CONTRATUAL CAPACITY, FIRES, FLOODS, EPIDEMICS, QUARANTINE I
RESTRICTIONS, STRIKES, FREIGHT EMBARGOES, AND UNUSUALLY I
SEVERE WEATHER, BUT IN EVERY CASE THE FAILURE TO PERFORM I
MUST BE BEYOND THE CONTROL AND WITHOUT THE FAULT OR NEGLIGENCE I
OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT. IF THE FAILURE TO PERFORM IS CAUSED I
BY THE FAILURE OF A CONSULTANT TO PERFORM OR MAKE PROGRESS, I
AND IF SUCH FAILURE ARISES OUT OF CAUSES BEYOND THE CONTROL I
OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT AND CONSULTANT, AND WITHOUT THE FAULT I
OR NEGLIGENCE OF EITHER OF THEM, THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL I
NOT BE DEEMED TO BE IN DEFAULT, UNLESS (A) THE SUPPLIES OR I
SERVICES TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT WERE OBTAINABLE I
FROM OTHER SOURCES, AND (B) THE BPSM SHALL HAVE ORDERED THE I
GRANT RECIPIENT IN WRITING TO PROCURE SUCH SUPPLIES OR I
SERVICES FROM OTHER SOURCES, AND (C) THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL I
HAVE FAILED TO COMPLY REASONABLY WITH SUCH ORDER. UPON REQUEST I
OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT, THE BPSM SHALL ASCERTAIN THE FACTS AND I
EXTENT OF SUCH FAILURE AND, IF IT SHALL BE DETERMINED THAT ANY I
FAILURE TO PERFORM WAS OCCASIONED BY ANY ONE OR MORE OF THE I
SAID CAUSES, THE DELIVERY SCHEDULE SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. I
I
11. OBLIGATION OF GRANT RECIPIENT FUNDS. GRANT RECIPIENT FUNDS I
MAY NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BE OBLIGATED PRIOR TO THE I
EFFECTIVE DATE OR SUBSEQUENT TO THE TERMINATION DATE OF I
THE GRANT PERIOD. ONLY PROJECT COSTS INCURRED ON OR AFTER I
THE EFFECTIVE DATE AND ON OR PRIOR TO THE TERMINATION DATE OF I
THE GRANT RECIPIENT APPLICATION ARE ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT. I
I A COST IS INCURRED WHEN THE GRANT RECIPIENT'S EMPLOYEE OR I
I CONSULTANT PERFORMS THE SERVICE REQUIRED, OR WHEN GOODS ARE I
I RECEIVED BY THE GRANT RECIPIENT, NOTWITHSTANDING THE DATE I
I OF ORDER. I
I I
I 12. PERFORMANCE. IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT, NON-COMPLIANCE OR I
I VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE GRANT I
I RECIPIENT, THE GRANT RECIPIENT'S CONSULTANTS AND SUPPLIERS, I
I OR BOTH, THE BPSM SHALL IMPOSE SUCH SANCTIONS AS IT DEEMS I
I APPROPRIATE INCLUDING WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENTS, CANCELLATION, I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
(
I
\
/----,---------------------------------------------------------------------\
IH. ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT I
r (CONTINUED) I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
13.
14.
TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF THE AGREEMENT IN WHOLE OR IN
PART. IN SUCH AN EVENT, THE BPSM SHALL NOTIFY THE GRANT
RECIPIENT OF SUCH DECISION 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF SUCH SANCTION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL
BE PAID ONLY FOR THOSE SERVICES SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED
PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SUCH SANCTION.
ACCESS TO RECORDS. DCA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE
OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE, OJARS,AND
THE AUDITOR GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OR ANY OF THEIR
DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES, SHALL HAVE ACCESS FOR THE
PURPOSE OF AUDIT AND EXAMINATION OF BOOKS, DOCUMENTS, PAPERS,
AND RECORDS OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT, AND TO RELEVANT BOOKS AND
RECORDS OF GRANT RECIPIENT AND CONTRACTORS, AS PROVIDED UNDER
"FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR GRANTS", M7100.1C.
DCA MAY UNILATERALLY CANCEL THIS CONTRACT IF THE CONTRACTOR
REFUSES TO ALLOW PUBLIC ACCESS TO ALL DOCUMENTS, PAPERS,
LETTERS, OR OTHER MATERIAL SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
CHAPTER 119, F.S., AND MADE OR RECEIVED BY THE CONTRACTOR IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONTRACT.
AUDIT. ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT CONSTITUTES GRANT
RECIPIENT ASSURANCE THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF OMB CIRCULAR A-128
"AUDITS OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS" OR OMB CIRCULAR A-110,
ATTACHMENT F, WILL BE MET. ALL GRANT RECIPIENTS SHALL PROVIDE
AN AUDIT OF THEIR ACTIVITIES ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. FOR ADDI-
TIONAL INFORMATION ON AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, APPLICANTS SHALL
REFER TO THE "FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE FOR GRANTS",
GUIDELINE MANUAL 7100.le, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS. As A
MINIMUM, A SCHEDULE COMPARING BUDGETED AND ACTUAL SUBGRANT
COSTS IS REQUIRED. FAILURE TO FURNISH AN ACCEPTABLE AUDIT AS
DETERMINED BY THE STATE OR COGNIZANT FEDERAL AUDIT AGENCY
SHALL BE BASIS FOR DENIAL AND REFUND, OR BOTH, OF FEDERAL
FUNDS. FEDERAL FUNDS DETERMINED TO BE MISSPENT ARE SUBJECT
TO REFUND OR OTHER RESOLUTION.
15. PROCEDURES FOR CLAIM REIMBURSEMENT. ALL CLAIMS FOR REIMBURSE-
MENT OF GRANT RECIPIENT COSTS MUST BE SUBMITTED ON A FORM
(DCA-NA FORM 3 (A-E) OCTOBER 1987) PRESCRIBED AND PROVIDED
BY THE BPSM. CLAIMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED ON A MONTHLY BASIS IN
ORDER TO REMAIN CURRENT ON PROJECT COSTS REPORTING. ALL
CLAIMS REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT FOR OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY
(OCO) ITEMS HAVING A UNIT COST OF $500 OR MORE AND A USEFUL
LIFE OF I YEAR OR MORE MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COMPLETED
NON-ExPENDABLE PROPERTY FORM SIGNED BY THE SUBGRANTEES'
PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. IF LOCAL ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES REQUIRES
OCO REPORTING AT A LESSER AMOUNT THAN THE $500, LOCAL
REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE ADHERED TO. REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS SHALL
BE SUBMITTED IN DETAIL SUFFICIENT FOR A PROPER PRE-AUDIT AND
POST-AUDIT THEREOF.
I
16. RETENTION OF RECORDS. ALL RECORDS AND FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS I
MUST BE MAINTAINED FOR A MINIMUM PERIOD OF 3 YEARS FROM THE I
DATE OF THE FINAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND BE AVAILABLE FOR I
AUDIT AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UPON REQUEST OF DULY AUTHORIZED I
PERSONS. I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
(
(,
1--------------------------------------------------------------------_____\
IH. ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT I
I (CONTINUED) I
I I
I I
I 17. OWNERSHIP OF DATA AND CREATIVE MATERIAL. THE OWNERSHIP OF I
I MATERIAL, DISCOVERIES, INVENTIONS, AND RESULTS DEVELOPED, I
I PRODUCED, OR DISCOVERED BY THIS AGREEMENT IS GOVERNED BY I
I THE TERMS OF OMB CIRCULAR A-l02, ATTACHMENT N, PARAGRAPH 8 I
I OR OMS CIRCULAR A-110, ATTACHMENT N, PARAGRAPH 8. I
I I
I 18. PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL ESTABLISH I
I AND ADMINISTER A SYSTEM TO CONTROL, PROTECT, PRESERVE, USE, I
I AND MAINTAIN AND DISPOSE OF ANY PROPERTY FURNISHED IT BY THE I
I BPSM OR PURCHASED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT IN ACCORDANCE I
I WITH FEDERAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS SET FORTH IN I
I OMB CIRCULAR A-l02, ATTACHMENT N OR OMB CIRCULAR A-llO, I
I ATTACHMENT N. THIS OBLIGATION CONTINUES AS LONG AS THE I
I PROPERTY IS RETAINED BY THE GRANT RECIPIENT, NOTWITHSTANDING I
I THE EXPIRATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. I
I I
I 19. DISPUTES AND ApPEALS. ANY DISPUTE, DISAGREEMENT OR QUESTION I
I OF FACT ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE DECIDED BY THE I
I BPSM IN WRITING AND SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED TO PARTIES CONCERNED. I
I A WRITTEN APPEAL SHALL BE MADE WITHIN 21 CALENDAR DAYS TO THE I
I SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, WHOSE I
I DECISION IS FINAL. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL PROCEED DILI- I
I GENTLY WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THE AGREEMENT AND IN I
I ACCORDANCE WITH THE BPSM DECISION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT'S I
I RIGHT TO APPEAL IN THE DEPARTMENT'S DECISION IS CONTAINED IN I
I CHAPTER 120, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND IN PROCEDURES SET FORTH I
I IN CHAPTERS 28-5 AND 9-5, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. ApPEALS I
I MUST BE RECEIVED IN WRITING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF NOTIFICATION OF I
I THE DECISION. THE WRITTEN APPEAL MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE I
I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS CLERK (AGENCY CLERK). I
I FAILURE TO APPEAL WITHIN THIS TIME FRAME SHALL CONSTITUTE A I
I WAIVER OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 120, FLORIDA STATUTES. I
I I
I 20. CONFERENCES, INSPECTION OF WORK. CONFERENCES MAY BE HELD AT I
I THE REQUEST OF ANY PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT. A REPRESENTATIVE I
I OF THE BPSM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ' I
I ASSISTANCE, OR ALL SHALL BE PRIVILEGED TO VISIT THE SITE FOR I
I THE PURPOSE OF INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF WORK BEING I
I PERFORMED ,AT ANY TIME. I
I I
I 21. PUBLICATIONS, PRINTING, OR REPORTS. I
I I
I A. BEFORE PUBLICATION OR PRINTING, THE FINAL DRAFT OF ANY I
I REPORT OR REPORTS REQUIRED UNDER THE AGREEMENT OR I
I PERTAINING TO THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE I
I BPSM FOR REVIEW. I
I I
I B. EACH PUBLICATION OR OTHER PRINTED REPORT COVERED BY I
I PARAGRAPH 21.A ABOVE MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING STATE- I
I MENTS ON THE COVER PAGE: I
I I
I I
I I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------1
(
"
(
,
/--------------------------------------------------------
IH.
I
I
I
22.
23.
-------------\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ACCEPTANCE AND AGREEMENT
(CONTINUED)
(1)
"THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE BUREAU OF PUBLIC
SAFETY MANAGEMENT, DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN COOPERATION WITH THE BUREAU OF JUSTICE
ASSISTANCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
24.
25.
(2)
"THE CONCLUSIONS AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS
REPORT ARE THOSE OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT, AND DO
NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THOSE OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA, BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT,
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE OR ANY OTHER AGENCY
OF THE STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. II
THE GRANT RECIPIENT AGREES TO UTILIZE ALL NON-EXPENDABLE
PROPERTY FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE PURPOSES DURING ITS USEFUL
LIFE OR REQUEST BPSM DISPOSITION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT SHALL
ESTABLISH AND ADMINISTER A SYSTEM TO CONTROL, PROTECT,
PRESERVE, USE, AND MAINTAIN ANY PROPERTY PURCHASED PURSUANT
TO THIS GRANT.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. No PERSON SHALL, ON THE GROUNDS
OF RACE, CREED, COLOR, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN BE EXCLUDED FROM
PARTICIPATION IN, BE REFUSED THE BENEFITS OF, OR BE OTHERWISE
SUBJECTED TO DISCRIMINATION UNDER GRANTS AWARDED PURSUANT TO
P.L. 89-564, NON-DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE ANTI-DRUG
ABUSE ACT OF 1988; TITLE IV OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964;
SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 AS AMENDED;
TITLE IX OF THE EDUCATION AMENDMENTS OF 1972; THE AGE
DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1975; AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
NON-DISCRIMINATION REGULATIONS 28 CFR PART 42, SUBPARTS C,
0, E, AND G. ANY STATE AGENCY, CITY OR COUNTY RECEIVING
$500,000 OR MORE IN FEDERAL ANTI-DRUG ABUSE FUNDS MUST SUBMIT
THEIR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PLAN TO THE BPSM.
NON-PROCUREMENT DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION. THE GRANT RECIPIENT
AGREES TO COMPLY WITH EXECUTIVE ORDER 12549, DEBARMENT AND
SUSPENSION (34 C.F.R., PART 85, SECTION 85.510, PARTICIPANT'S
RESPONSIBILITIES). THESE PROCEDURES REQUIRE THAT THE GRANT
RECIPIENT SUBMIT CERTIFICATION THAT IT WILL NOT ENTER INTO
ANY LOWER TIER COVERED TRANSACTION WITH A PERSON WHO IS
DEBARRED, SUSPENDED, DECLARED INELIGIBLE OR VOLUNTARILY
EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATION IN THIS COVERED TRANSACTION, UNLESS
AUTHORIZED BY THE BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT,
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S PERFORMANCE AND OBLIGATION TO PAY
UNDER THIS CONTRACT IS CONTINGENT UPON AN ANNUAL APPROPRIATION
BY THE LEGISLATURE.
----------------------\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EACH PERSON SHALL FILE THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THIS CERTIFI-I
CATION AND DISCLOSURE FORM, IF APPLICABLE, WITH EACH SUBMISSION I
THAT INITIATES AGENCY CONSIDERATION OF SUCH PERSON FOR AN AWARD I
OF A FEDERAL CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT OF I
$100,000 OR MORE; OR FEDERAL LOAN OF $150,000 OR MORE. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(2) IF ANY NON-FEDERAL FUNDS HAVE BEEN PAID OR WILL BE PAID TO I
ANY PERSON FOR INFLUENCING OR ATTEMPTING TO INFLUENCE AN I
OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF ANY FEDERAL AGENCY, A MEMBER OF I
CONGRESS, AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF CONGRESS, OR AN -I
EMPLOYEE OF A MEMBER OF CONGRESS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS I
FEDERAL CONTRACT, GRANT, LOAN, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, I
I THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL COMPLETE AND SUBMIT STANDARD FORM I
I # LLL, "DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES", IN ACCORDANCE I
I WITH ITS INSTRUCTIONS. I
I I
I (3) THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE LANGUAGE OF THIS I
I CERTIFICATION BE INCLUDED IN THE AWARD DOCUMENTS FOR ALL I
I SUBAWARDS AT ALL TIERS AND THAT ALL SUBRECIPIENTS SHALL I
I CERTIFY AND DISCLOSE ACCORDINGLY. I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/
/------------- ----~ ------------------------~
I H. ACCEPTANC_ ....:> AGREEMENT
I (CONTINUED)
I
!
I
I
I
26.
THE RECIPIENT AGREES TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 319 OF PUBLIC LAW
101-121 AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE "GOVERNMENTWIDE GUIDANCE FOR
NEW RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING; INTERIM FINAL GUIDANCE" PUBLISHED
IN THE DECEMBER 30, 1989, FEDERAL REGISTER.
THIS CERTIFICATION IS A MATERIAL REPRESENTATION OF FACT UPON
WHICH RELIANCE WAS PLACED WHEN THIS TRANSACTION WAS MADE OR
ENTERED INTO. SUBMISSION OF THIS CERTIFICATION IS A PRE-
REQUISITE FOR MAKING OR ENTERING INTO THIS TRANSACTION IMPOSED
BY SECTION 1352, TITLE 31, U.S. CODE. ANY PERSON WHO FAILS TO
FILE THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION SHALL BE SUBMIT TO A CIVIL
PENALTY OF NOT LESS THAN $10,000 AND NOT MORE THAN $100,000 FOR
EACH SUCH FAILURE.
THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES, TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNO~:LEDGE
AND BELIEF, THAT:
(1)
No FEDERAL APPROPRIATED FUNDS HAVE BEEN PAID OR WILL BE
PAID TO ANY PERSON FOR INFLUENCING OR ATTEMPTING TO
INFLUENCE AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF ANY FEDERAL AGENCY,
A MEMBER OF CONGRESS, AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF CONGRESS,
OR AN EMPLOYEE OF A MEMBER OF CONGRESS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE AWARDING OF ANY FEDERAL CONTRACT, THE MAKING OF
ANY FEDERAL GRANT, THE MAKING OF ANY FEDERAL LOAN, THE
ENTERING INTO OF ANY RENEWAL, AMENDMENT, OR MODIFICATION
OF ANY FEDERAL CONTRACT, GRANT, LOAN OR COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT.
(
(
(305) 294,4641
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Pro Tem Wilhelmina Harvey. District 1
Gene Lytton. District 2
Douglas Jones. District 3
Mike Puto. District 4
MAYOR John Stormont, District 5
~~~Df ~~~,~gE
,\
September 6, 1990
-". , . ,". '--. _ c..-......~_
"... -...,. ....
., . '.,'- \, "'L. ...
_-.1'-.'
Mr. John A. Lenaerts, Chief
Bureau of Public Safety Management
Department of Community Affairs
State of Florida
2740 Centerview Drive
The Rhyne Building
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
~. .........
-.:--.......
..........; ':"'1
=~Q
, .
-~Y) ~'I.".~_" i~ 1 V!~:~':~:, :~~_~. .~~ ~_. .j ., ../ J ~
---- ..c."',~-.---i..@~-'J
~,<'_~______._,_~ 1l
~ . i eiJ"
~ -~-=,_.
RE: Letter of Designation for Signature Authority
Anti-Durg Abuse Act Funds
SEP 1 B
1980
Dear Mr. Lenaerts:
,. .:'
~
~
f
_:r~. ~
, :'''If
".
:'.: j '-~ .~:.
;...---..-.."""'...........--..-... ~
This letter is to designate Captain Thomas W. Brown, Monroe
County Administrator, with the signature authority for the fol-
lowing 1990 Anit-Drug Abuse funds.
Monroe County Anti-Drug Abuse Resource Officer/
Drug Awareness Resistance Education Program,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-074j
Pilot Residential/Work Release Program,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-075;
Monroe County Pretrial Services Substance Abuse Program,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-076j and
Program Administration,
91-CJ-28-11-54-01-077.
Sincerely, ~
J~:rmont
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
/---~----------------~~-r-------------------------~----------------------\
I ' \,
. IN WITNESS wn~nEOF, 'THE PARTIES AFFIRM THEY HAVE EAC~ D AND
AGREE TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN SECTION "H" OF THE AGREEMENT,
THAT THE PARTIES HAVE EACH READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND HAVE EXECUTED THIS AGREEMENT BY THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED
OFFICERS ON THE DAY, MONTH AND YEAR SET OUT BELOW.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
BUREAU OF PUBLIC SAFETY MANAGEMENT
By:-~--!f:~-
TITLE:__~o~g~~}~_~u~h~i~_~i~~t~~________
WITNESS:~-~~--------------
DATE:------~:~~-:~~----------
$35,552
FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED:--------------
AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
OF GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
(COMMISSION CHAIRMAN, MAYOR OR
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE)
Thomas W. Brown
NAME:--------------------------
County Administrator
TITLE:~---------
SIGNAT -- -- ----------
WITNESS:--~~~~-----
June 26, 1990
DATE:-------------------------- I
--------------------------------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ADMINISTRATOR OF
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
Theresa Westerfield
NAME---------------------------
Director, Pretrial Svcs.
TITLE:--------------------~----
-V\).'ll~' ij \\.7 l';;U~b-J('\.
SIGNATURE:... ~- - - ---.:-~ -'~-'_':' .\--- --
/ } . ' , . \ '
/ _ 1/ J _
WITNESS. ~t.?'4'r">~~-j c.~4J-K<'< -L
.11 --------------- --
June 26, 1990
DATE:--------------------------
PROJECT DIRECTOR
NAME:-U~ui~~-~~Q~~---------
TITLE: !~ t~~Af!! _~:r:.oj_e_c_t_ p_i_r_e_c_t2!"__
Cl . ..( _ . " J" ·
SIGNA TU RE-:, ..xl....dt~'!. ~~..) - \;;-.'_--2.~. -. .(~f:.
); II .-
WITNESS ..//r,r-t:.-.f'L7 ---', ""t'/ )-7~-~~-
----7~---~?-~---~~----
. t( v
June 26, 1990
I DATE:--------------------------
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------