Item K09
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: Mav 15. 2002
Division:
Growth Management
Bulk Item: Yes --L No
Department: Planning
AGENDA ITEM WORDING:
Approval to amend the project schedule for the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Safety
Improvements Agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
ITEM BACKGROUND:
Monroe County has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the FDOT and the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to provide matching funds for projects on the
Overseas Heritage Trail funded by the FDOT County Incentive Grant Program, and the FDEP has
agreed to the reconstruction and maintenance of existing segments of the Overseas Heritage Trail. The
project schedule will be amended so that design will be completed by September 1, 2002; Construction
will begin by November 1,2002 and the Project will be complete by April 1, 2003.
PREVIOUS REVELANT BOCC ACTION:
May 18, 2000- Resolution 205-2000 to allow the FDEP to design, build, construct the Overseas
Heritage Trail.
June 21, 2001- Board approval ofthe Memorandum of Understanding with FDOT and FDEP for the
design, construction and maintenance of the Overseas Heritage Trail
October 18, 2001-Board approval of the Florida Key Overseas Heritage Trail Safety Project
application to the FDOT County Incentive Grant Program.
February 14, 2002-Board Approval ofthe Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection for the Overseas Heritage Trail Safety Improvements Project.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: Yes
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval
TOTAL COST:
$ 1.055. 950.00
BUDGETED: Yes X_
No
COST TO COUNTY: $ 527,975.00
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes
No X
AMOUNT PER MONTH_ Year
Included
Risk Management _ X_
APPROVED BY: County Arty -1L
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL:
DOCUMENTATION:
,AICP
Not Required_
DISPOSITION:
AGENDA ITEM #--4--7
MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
CONTRACT SUMMARY
Contract with:
Florida DEP
Contract #
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
February 14,2002
April 1, 2003
Contract Purpose/Description:
Florida Ke s Overseas Herita e Trail Safe
Contract Manager: Elizabeth Holloway
(Name)
2500
(Ext. )
Growth Mn t/sto # 11
(Department/Stop #)
for BOCC meetin on
Ma 15,2002
A enda Deadline: A ri129, 2002
CONTRACT COSTS
Total Dollar Value of Contract: $ 1,055,950
Budgeted? Yes/:8J No D Account Codes:
Grant: $ 527,975
County Match: $ 527,975
_ SW?-:ent Year Portion: $ 1,055,950
~~-5J~l' -~~~01-a)Jc6 -5Jj ~LJD
- - -
----
- - -
----
Estimated Ongoing Costs: $Q/yr
(Not included in dollar value above)
ADDITIONAL COSTS
For: 0
(eg. maintenance, utilities, ianitorial, salaries, etcT
CONTRACT REVIEW
Changes
Date In Needed
Division Director :?t'tf~ No
Risk Management + '.00' c~.- YesD N.on .
O.M.B./Purchasing Y esD No~ () ~j t:"t li. t
County Attorney q_ 2'1-C-Z YesD NOp ~~
r-
Comments:
Date Out
lJ., ~~) '(-:..:k
jf --J(i t'
l.... ..:
'0
OMB Form Revised 2/27/01 MCP #2
RESOLUTION NO.
- 2002
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
AUTHORIZING APPROVAL TO AMEND AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
FOR THE DESIGN, PERMITTING, AND CONSTRUCTION
OF THE SAFETY IMPROVEMENT S FOR THE OVERSEAS HERITAGE TRAIL
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has agreed to
design and construct safety improvements to selected sections ofthe Florida Keys Overseas
Heritage Trail State Park.
WHEREAS, upon completion of selected segments of the Trail FDEP will maintain the
Trail as part ofthe Florida Park Service; and
WHEREAS, Monroe County has accepted a grant from the Florida Department of
Transportation County Incentive Grant Program for funding to complete safety improvements
for the Overseas Heritage Trail; and
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, that The County Administrator is hereby authorized to amend the
agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, changing the project
schedule as follows:
DESIGN COMPLETED BY: SEPT 1,2002
CONSTRUCTION BEGIN BY: NOV. 1,2002
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED BY: APRIL 1,2003
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida,
at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 15th day of May, A.D., 2002.
Mayor Charles "Sonny" McCoy
Mayor ProTem Dixie Spehar
Commissioner Murray Nelson
Commissioner Nora Williams
Commissioner George Neugent
(Seal)
Monroe County Board of Commissioners
Attest:
Clerk of Court
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 1 of 21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
FLORIDA KEYS OVERSEAS HERITAGE TRAIL
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
WITH
MONROE COUNTY
This Memorandum of Agreement is made and entered into this day of
2002, by and between the FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
through its Division of Recreation and Parks, hereinafter referred to as the DEP, and the
MONROE COUNTY a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
COUNTY.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the DEP has federal grant funding which may be used for the design of
improvements to selected sections of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail State Park
hereinafter referred to as the TRAIL, within state road right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the DEP upon completion of selected segments of said TRAIL, will operate
and maintain the TRAIL as part of the Florida Park Service; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY has funding which is part of the Florida Department of
Transportation County Incentive Grant Program, which may be used for survey, design, and
construction of improvements to and adjacent to the TRAIL; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY has funding which is part of the Transportation Impact Fees,
which may be used for construction or improvements to and adjacent to the TRAIL; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto mutually recognize the need for entering into an
agreement designating and setting forth the responsibilities of each party.
NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to
flow each to the other, the parties covenant and agree as follows:
1. The DEP shall be responsible, for the design, permitting and construction, as outlined in
Exhibit "1 ". on those portions ofthe TRAIL located across the historic bridges and along
the Department of Transportation right-of-way, or subsequent amended segments ofthe
TRAIL mutually agreed to in writing by both parties.
1
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23,2002
Revised May 15, 2002
Page 2 of21
2. The COUNTY shall be responsible, at no cost to the DEP, for providing the design and
construction funding as outlined in Exhibit "2", for those portions of the TRAIL located
across the historic bridges and along the Department of Transportation right-of-way, or
any other segments ofthe TRAIL as described by Exhibit "1", hereinafter referred to as
the PROJECT,_or subsequent amended segments of the TRAIL mutually agreed to in
writing by both parties.
3. The DEP agrees to undertake the design and construction of the PROJECT in accordance
with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations, and standards.
The DEP shall be responsible for obtaining clearances/permits required for the
construction of the PROJECT from the appropriate permitting authorities. Upon
completion of the PROJECT, the DEP shall certify to the COUNTY that the PROJECT
has been completed in accordance with the applicable standards, statutes, rules and
regulations in writing.
4. The DEP shall perform the PROJECT activities In accordance with the following
schedule:
a) DESIGN COMPLETED BY: SEPT 1, 2002
b) CONSTRUCTION BEGIN BY: NOV. 1,2002
c) CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED BY: APRIL 1, 2003
5. The DEP shall, upon completion of that segment of the TRAIL herein described,
maintain the TRAIL as part of the Florida State Park System as outlined in a separate
maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation.
6. The COUNTY will be entitled at all times to be advised, at its request, as to the status of
work being done by the DEP and ofthe details thereof. Coordination shall be maintained
by the DEP with representatives of the COUNTY. DEP shall provide the COUNTY with
monthly progress reports.
7. This Agreement shall not be renewed. Any extension shall be in writing and executed by
both parties, and shall be subject to the same terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement.
8. Indemnity and Insurance:
A. i) The DEP and the COUNTY are responsible for all personal injury and
property damage attributable to the negligent or wrongful acts of their own representative
officers, employees and agents. Nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of
sovereign immunity as provided in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, as amended from
time to time, or any other laws or agreement providing limitations or claims.
ii) The DEP agrees to include the following indemnification in all contracts
with contractors/subcontractors, consultants/sub consultants, who perform work in
connection with this Agreement:
2
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 3 of 21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15, 2002
"The contractor/consultant shall indemnify, defend, save and hold hannless the DEP and
COUNTY and all of its officers, agents or employees from all suits, actions, claims,
demands, liability of any nature whatsoever arising out of, because of, or due to any
negligent act or occurrence of omission or commission of the contractor, its officers,
agents or employees. Neither the contractor/consultant, nor any of its officers, agents or
employees will be liable under this section for damages arising out of injury or damage to
persons or property directly caused or resulting from the sole negligence of the DEP and
COUNTY or any of its officers, agents or employees."
B. In addition to any other forms of insurance or bonds required under the terms of
the agreement, when it includes construction within the limits of a railroad right-of-way,
the DEP must require its contractor to provide insurance coverage in accordance with
Section 7-13 of the FDOT's Standard Specification for Road and Bridge Construction
(2000), as amended.
9. Compensation and Payment:
A. The DEP agrees that the estimated total project costs are One Million, Fifty Five
Thousand, Nine Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,055, 950.00) as outlined in Exhibit "1".
B. The DEP shall submit one invoice (4 copies) plus supporting documentation
required by the COUNTY to the Project Manager for approval and processing monthly
and/or as agreed upon by the DEP and the COUNTY.
C. The DEP will only be reimbursed for direct costs (this excludes general and
administrative overhead).
D. All costs charged to the PROJECT shall be supported by properly executed
payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts or vouchers evidencing in proper detail the
nature and propriety ofthe charges in accordance with COUNTY purchasing policy.
E. Payment shall be made only after receipt and approval of goods and services.
F. If this Agreement involves units of deliverables, then such units must be received
and accepted in writing by the Contract Manager prior to payments.
G. The COUNTY's obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon
availability of funds.
H. Bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses shall be submitted in
detail sufficient for a proper preaudit and postaudit thereof.
I. Travel costs will not be reimbursed.
J. Records of costs incurred under terms of this Agreement shall be maintained and
made available upon request to the COUNTY at all times during the period of this
Agreement and for three years after final payment is made. Copies of these documents
and records shall be furnished to the COUNTY upon request. Records of costs incurred
3
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 4 of 21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15, 2002
includes the DEP's general accounting records and the project records, together with
supporting documents and records of the DEP and all subcontractors performing work on
the project, and all other records of the DEP and subcontractors considered necessary by
the COUNTY for a proper audit of costs.
K. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a
conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any
goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public
entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit
bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as
a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity
and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount
provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two for a period of36
months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.
10. It is understood between the parties hereto that the TRAIL and associated improvements
covered by this Agreement, which is located on Department of Transportation right-of-
way, may be removed, relocated or otherwise adjusted at any time in the future in order
that the adjacent state road may be widened, altered or otherwise changed and maintained
to meet future criteria or planning of the Florida Department of Transportation.
11. For projects located on the State Highway System, the COUNTY must approve an
consultant and/or contractor scope of services including project budget. DEP shall obtain
COUNTY and FDOT approval of plans and specifications prior to bidding the project.
The COUNTY agrees to provide written review or approval within 45 days, subject to
FDOT review and approval.
12. The DEP must certify that the consultant has been selected in accordance with the
Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act (Section 287.055, Florida Statutes). Contractor
must be prequalified by the COUNTY as required by Section 2 of the FDOT Standard
Specification for Road and Bridge Construction (2000), as amended.
13. This Agreement is subject to termination under any of the following conditions:
A. This Agreement may be canceled by either the COUNTY or the DEP upon sixty
(60) days written notice.
B. If the COUNTY determines that the performance of the DEP is not satisfactory,
the COUNTY shall have the option of (a) immediately terminating the Agreement, or (b)
notifying the DEP of the deficiency with a requirement that the deficiency be corrected
within a specified time, otherwise the Agreement will be terminated at the end of such
time, or (c) taking whatever action is deemed appropriate by the COUNTY.
C. If the COUNTY requires termination of the Agreement for reasons other than
unsatisfactory performance of the DEP, the COUNTY shall notify the DEP of such
4
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 5 of 21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
termination, with instructions to the effective date of termination or specify the stage of
work at which the Agreement is to be terminated.
D. If the Agreement is terminated before performance is completed, the DEP shall be
paid only for that work satisfactorily performed for which costs can be substantiated.
Such payment, however, may not exceed an amount which is the same percentage of the
contract price as the amount of work satisfactorily completed is a percentage of the total
work called for by this Agreement. All work in progress will become the property of the
COUNTY and will be turned over promptly by the DEP.
E. By both parties, thirty (30) calendar days following complete execution by both
parties of an Agreement to terminate this Agreement
14. This Agreement is nontransferable and nonassignable in whole or in part without prior
consent ofthe COUNTY.
15. This Agreement, regardless of where executed, shall be governed by and is constructed
according to the laws of the State of Florida.
16. This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence,
conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein,
and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings
concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document.
Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon
any prior representation or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no
modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall
be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality and
of equal dignity herewith.
17. If any part of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction or by any other legally constituted body having the
jurisdiction to make such determination, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect provided that the part of this Agreement thus invalidated or declared
unenforceable is not material to the intended operation ofthis Agreement.
18. The DEP and the COUNTY agree to enter into good faith negotiations with respect to
any amendment or changes to this Memorandum of Agreement that may be necessary to
provide for continued cooperation for the success of the project. Any modifications to
this Agreement shall be valid when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by
all parties hereto.
19. Pursuant to Section 216.2815, Florida Statues, all records in conjunction with this
Agreement shall be public record and shall be treated in the same manner as other public
records under general law. This Agreement may be unilaterally canceled by the
COUNTY for refusal by the DEP to allow public access to all documents papers, letters,
or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes in conjunction
with this Agreement.
5
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 6 of 21
January 23,2002
Revised May 15,2002
20. An entity or affiliate who has been placed on the discriminatory vendor list may not
submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not
submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public
building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity,
may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or
consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any
public entity.
21. All notices, requests, demands, consents, approvals and other communication which are
required to be served or given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sent by
registered mail or certified U.S. mail, return receipt requested, postage paid, addressed to
the party to receive such notices as follows:
To DEP:
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Division of Recreation and Parks
Bureau of Design and Recreation Services
3540 Thomasville Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32309
Attention: Bureau Chief
To COUNTY:
Monroe County
Growth Management
2798 Overseas Highway
Marathon, FL 33050
Attention: Director of Planning
REMAINDER OF P AGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
6
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
Page 7of21
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these present to be duly executed, the day and year
first above written.
COUNTY OF MONROE, FLORIDA
By Its Board of COUNTY Commissioners
By:
Mayor
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
Approved as to Form and Legality:
~
COUNTY AITORNEY
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
DIVISION OF RECREATION AND PARKS
By:
Director or authorized designee
Approved as to Form and Legality:
DEP AITORNEY
7
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15, 2002
Page 8 of21
8
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
Page 9 of21
EXHIBIT "1"
This exhibit forms an integral part ofthat certain Memorandum of Agreement between the State
of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection and the Monroe County Growth
Management Department, 2798 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 dated
The DEP shall provide survey, design, permitting, and construction of trail improvements and for
the following segments of the Overseas Heritage Trail in accordance with the budget as shown in
the grant application below:
LETTER OF APPLICATION
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM
FLORIDA KEYS OVERSEAS HERITAGE TRAIL SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
(1) Applicant
Monroe County, Florida
Board of County Commissioners
5100 College Road, Public Service Bldg. II
Stock Island, Key West, FL 33040
(2) Proiect Description
The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT) is intended to provide safe non-motorized
transportation to schools and businesses, enhance community recreation opportunities, stimulate
sustainable economic development and enable residents and visitors to enjoy the magnificent
natural and cultural resources along US Highway 1 in Monroe County. The trail will incorporate
cultural features such as Flagler's Historic Bridges and significant environmental elements
unique to the Florida Keys. The trail will act as an economic stimulus for adjacent businesses
and provide safe, convenient recreation and alternative transportation for children and families.
The FKOHT will establish an interconnected linear trail for shared recreational uses and
alternative transportation uses. It will incorporate new construction and reconstructed local
pathways within the state road right of way, and over both the state road and historic bridges, in a
continuous trail from MM 0 (Key West) to MM 106.5 (Key Largo).
The trail will reduce traffic congestion on the state highway by reducing the numbers of local
vehicle trips and by eliminating many of the traffic-slowing effects of vehicle, bicycle and
pedestrian interactions. Trail safety is a main priority in the design and implementation of the
FKOHT. One of the FKOHT project goals is to establish a safe, two-way, non-motorized trail
with safe travel clearances for all trail users. Limit vehicular traffic interaction with trail traffic,
but when interaction must occur, provide warning to both drivers and trail users at all
intersections, maximize separation from U.S. 1 local streets and congested parking areas by
using traffic barriers, signage, striping and crosswalks. These improvements along the length of
U.S. 1 will greatly increase safety for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers.
9
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23,2002
Revised May 15,2002
Page 10 of21
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks (DRP)
will enter into a Maintenance Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
to maintain existing sections of the trail. As part of these responsibilities, the DRP is seeking
assistance through Monroe County to upgrade the existing trail sections in order to provide safe
passage at road crossings and business frontage. In addition, the DRP is seeking to repair
existing sections of pavement where the current path is degraded to the point where it is
dangerous to trail users.
Table 1
Below is a list of the existing bicycle trails the DRP shall be responsible for maintaining. The
list contains the state road, the limits and length of areas to be maintained. Marathon, the Village
of Islands, Islamorada and Key West will coordinate improvements with the City Visioning
process and therefore, the present proposal does not address these incorporated areas.
County State Road From: To: Side of Length Width surface
Section (Local Name) Road (Mile) (Feet) Material
90010 5 AlA Mile Post 0 South 0.700 8.0 Asphalt
(Key West) (MM 3.840) (MM 4.531) Bound
90020 5 Four (4) Star Key Haven South 0.737 8.0 Asphalt
(Stock Island) Rental Road (MM Bound
(MM 4.531) 5.268)
90020 5 Coppit Road Jade Road South 0.900 10.0 Asphalt
(Bi~ Coppit) (MM 9.830) (MMI0.720) Bound
90020 5 Ships Way Cunningham South 1. 061 8.0 Asphalt
(Big Pine Key) (MM 29.890) Lane (MM Bound
30.950)
90020 5 Cunningham Industrial Road South 0.130 4.5 Asphalt
(Big Pine Key) Lane (MM (MM 31.080) Bound
30.950
90060 5 Dickie Way North 4.390 6.0& Asphalt
(Key Largo) (MM 92.190) Bound 8.5
90060 Road Crosswalk South 2.950 6.0 Asphalt
MM 96.580 Bound
90060 Atlantic North 6.830 8.0 Asphalt
Boulevard (MM Bound
99.53
10
90030
Page 11 of21
90030
Industrial Road South Asphalt
MM 31.080 Bound
Parking Lot (MM 47.000) Added at the request ofDEP on
MM 47.000 4/30/2001
7 Mile Parking Mile Marker 48 South 0.924 7.0 Asphalt
Lot (MM Bound
47.030
Mile Marker 48 End of Median South 6.474 8.0 Asphalt
(MM 54.430 Bound
Long Key South Layton North 2.810 6.0& Asphalt
Bridge (MM Drive (MM Bound 9.0
65.570) 68.380)
90040 5
Marathon Ke
90050 5
(Long Key)
(3) Work Prol!ram Number
Pending
(4) Certification from County
Monroe County approval to use County Impact Fees as 50% match.
County Impact Fee Match: $527,974.55
See Attachment B for Monroe County certification.
(5) Details of Proiect
A preliminary survey was conducted to review conditions of existing intersections that pose
potential hazards to the safety of future trail users. The scope of this survey was to identify the
major safety concerns and what can be accomplished quickly to satisfy and improve
relationships with the community, enhance the trail experience on existing sections and improve
safety, thereby reducing potential crashes on the trail.
A more detailed survey addressing individual design criteria for every intersection to be
upgraded will be conducted, along with public and regulatory participation to identify signage
placement, striping and repaving priorities. Proposed are five recommendations based on
preliminary observations that will help establish our commitment to safety on the FKOHT.
a. Sign age
Signage instructing trail users and vehicles of an impending traffic conflict. Figure 1
from the AASHTO Manual, American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials, Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities contains an example of
conflicts found at a typical intersection on U.S. 1. Initially, we intend to review existing
sign location and line of site from each intersection. The cost estimate includes two signs
11
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 12 of21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15, 2002
at each intersection warning vehicles of trail traffic. A third sign will be placed along the
trail reminding trail users to yield to oncoming traffic. Location of signage will be
reviewed and compared with existing signage as to discourage over signage at an
intersection. Great effort will be taken to combine signs or not add signs where they
would create confusion. All signage will adhere to the (MUTCD), Manual of Uniform
Traffic Control Devices. A proposed warning sign depicted as Figure 2 is being
considered by the MUTCD for use on roadways that parallel trails. This sign is
presented in the FDOT Trail Intersection Design Guidelines available from the FDOT
web site.
Figure 1
Figure 22. Example of Adjacent Path Intersection
According to the AASHTO manual, the above represent common conflicts found along
parallel paths at intersections. It is these common conflicts that we hope to address.
12
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
Figure 2
Page 13 of21
"V
The above trail sign is recommended as an advance warning sign for a parallel trail. This
sign is still under review and can be applied for and used with permission from the FHW A.
13
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23,2002
Revised May 15,2002
Page 14 of21
b. Crosswalks
The project will provide crosswalks at each street intersection along the trail where
feasible and necessary. It is proposed to replace poorly visible crosswalks and
add new ones where there are none. For this proposal a one foot wide stripe ten
to 12 feet long will be placed 12 - 24 inches apart. The length of the line will
accommodate the future widening of the trail. Striping may not be necessary at
some intersections due to the lack of traffic. In this case a simple crosswalk
without striping may suffice. An evaluation of stop bars will also be conducted.
A study conducted for the FDOT on making crosswalks safer for pedestrians
recommends advance stop lines (ASL's) in front of crosswalks. The document
published in July, 2000, "Making Crosswalks Safer for Pedestrians", by the
Center for Urban Transportation Research can be found on the FDOT web site.
A closer review of each crossing will determine the need and feasibility for an
ASL. Another critical component to a safe crossing is signalization. The location
of pedestrian crossing signals will be recommended at high volume traffic
locations along the trail.
c. Pavement Markings
The project will provide striping along both sides of the trail along business frontage
where parking facilities and business entrances conflict with trail traffic. The
FKOHT Master plan recommends defining the trail along business frontage for
trail user safety. Presently the trail is undefined in many locations or used as a
parking space. We recommend paving and striping both sides of the trail along
business frontage and adding signage in the form of a painted template warning
vehicles not to park on the trail. Recommendations for barricades or other forms
of landscape barriers and curb islands will be proposed. Colored striping may be
an option in very congested areas.
d. Paving
The project will pave existing trail sections that have degraded and pose a safety concern
and where permitable, widen to accommodate multi-use trail traffic. Sections of
the trail show signs of wear and disruption. It is recommended that these sections
be re-paved to enhance usage of the trail. It is also recommended that repaving
the path along congested sections would greatly enhance visibility of the trail.
e. Road Shoulders
It is proposed that the road shoulder used as a bike path in Big Pine between Avenue A
and 3rd Avenue be painted red to enhance visibility. This proposal should be presented to
the community for review. A study conducted in Lake County Florida for the FDOT
entitled "Evaluation of Red Shoulders as a Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility" was prepared
14
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 15 of 21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
for FDOT in July 1998. The photographs below show the shoulders as they currently
exist in Big Pine, and what the proposed red shoulders appear as in the above referenced
study.
Existing Road Shoulders in Big Pine
Lake County Red Road Shoulders
Future Design Improvements
It is proposed that these safety upgrades be part of a continuing renewed effort to improve trail
safety by using the most up-to-date design recommendations available. Future design
improvements should include landscape barriers, or other attractive barriers, to protect trail users,
trail and curb islands, defined wide ingress and egress aprons, revised parking and line of site
where possible on business frontage, pedestrian signalization, lighting and educational materials
incorporated into FKOHT trail literature.
f. Phases
15
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 16 of 21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
The requested matching funds will be applied to the project phases scheduled for development in
2002 and 2003. These projects will be designed and constructed as one project. Table 2
contains the estimates for each phase.
Table 2. Estimated Project Costs 2001 Throll h 2003
Design I Year
Construction:
CEI I Year
Total
16
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15, 2002
Page 17 of 21
(6) Cost Estimate
Current cost estimates for the scheduled project phases are shown in Table 3, below.
Table 3.
Safety Improvements Cost Estimates
Mile Marker
Miles
STOCK ISLAND BIGCOPPITT
4- 5.4 9.8-10.7
1.5
BIG PINE
29.8 - 31.3
KEY LARGO
106 - 91
TOTALS
No. of Intersections
2
Design I Year
4
7/1/02
12
7/1/02
11
7/1/02
Construction: 1/1/03 1/1/03 1/1103
Repaving 43,999.5 29,333.0 58,666.0
Repaving Red
Shoulders 7,000.0
Striping 11,880.00 7,920.00 15,840.00
Signage 1,200.00 3,600.00 4,950.00
Crosswalks N/A 3,000.00 2,750.00
Sub-Total 57,079.50 43,853.00 89,206.00
CEI I Year 1/1/03 1/1/03 1/1/03
Total
Striping quoted at $ 7,920.00 per mile.
Red Shoulders $ 7,000.00 per mile.
Signage: $ 150.00 per sign
Crosswalks $ 250.00 each
Repaving: $ 29,333.00 per mile
Note:
Estimates based on quotes by Monroe County
Stock Island intersections have pedestrian crossing lights, signage not required.
Layton bike path is marked and crossings at intersections and are marked.
17
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
Page 18 of21
(7) Proiect consistent with FDOT plan and MPO.
Obectives of the 2010 Florida Department of Transportation Long Range Transportation
Plan that will be met by this project include:
Goal 1 - Safe transportation for residents, visitors and commerce.
* Reduce the rate of motor vehicle crashes, fatalities and injuries and bicycle and pedestrian
fatalities and injuries on highways. Traffic signals, signs and pavement markings must be
effective. Special safety considerations are needed for the physically challenged (handicapped)
and elderly and for bicyclists and pedestrians.
* Improve intermodal safety where modes intersect, such as highway or railroad bridges over
waterways and highway-railroad crossings.
Goal4-Travel choices to ensure mobility, sustain the quality of the environment, preserve
community values and reduce energy consumption.
*Reduce dependency on the single occupant vehicle.
*Provide accommodation for transit vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians wherever appropriate
The design and construction of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail along the US 1
corridor is consistent with the Momoe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Goal 301 of the
Momoe County Comprehensive Plan- Traffic Circulation Element has been established "to
provide a safe, convenient, efficient, and environmentally compatible motorized and non-
motorized transportation system for the movement of people and goods in Momoe County."
Goal 1201 directs Momoe County to "provide a recreation and open space system to conserve
valuable natural resources and to provide recreational opportunities adequate to serve the present
and future population of Momoe County, including permanent residents and visitors."
(8) Proiect is located on state highway system.
The project is located on the state designated scenic highway system.
(9) Relevant Information
a) The Florida State Greenways and Trails Division are well documented for creating and
enhancing economic benefits where they are placed. The FKOHT, when developed in
Momoe County, will provide over 100 miles of connections between cities, towns,
residential areas, parks, shopping areas, lodgings and tourist destinations. Because of its
unique characteristics: the year-round sunny, warm climate and the tropical scenic beauty, it
18
FKOHT Safety Improvements Page 19 of 21
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
is expected that the FKOHT will become a world renowned trail. This will serve to attract
trail enthusiasts from a far greater area than is typical and will encourage a significant
volume of use by both resident and tourist populations. Local hotels, restaurants and other
businesses will benefit from this sustainable form of tourist activity through increased
spending on both durable and consumable. Property owners also will benefit, since trails
generally increase the value of properties adjacent to their corridor, particularly where they
pass through residential neighborhoods.
b) The FDEP DRP of Recreation and Parks now manages six state trails as part of the Florida
state park system. None of these trails has the urban setting, destination characteristics or
economic impact potential that the FKOHT will have. The DRP estimates that, in the last
year, the combined 145.5 miles of state trails in the park system contributed approximately
$13.3 million to the local economies in which they are located. It is expected that the annual
economic benefits of the FKOHT will be significantly higher than this amount.
c) The FKOHT is a long-term project. Matching funds from the County Incentive Grant
Program will accelerate the completion of the project and will bring the first phases of
construction into compliance with the County's master plan at a much early date than will be
possible if funding is to be secured through other funding processes.
d) Environmental sensitivity is one of the primary guiding principles of the FKOHT master
plan. Design criteria are included that will assure careful planning and design processes to
protect adjacent sensitive natural resources such as mangroves, seagrasses and intact tropical
hammocks. Cultural resource protection and enhancement is one of the greatest benefits of
the proposed trail. The bridges constructed for Hemy Flagler's railroad in the early 1900's
will be stabilized and adapted to use for the trail to the extent feasible, and maintained as
parts of the Florida state park system for future generations. Three of the bridges are on the
National Register of Historic Structures, and listing of additional bridges may be
accomplished in the future.
e) Traffic volumes on US 1 in Momoe County have increased steadily over the last ten years,
with an associated decline in the Level of Service on sections in more populated areas of the
county. The seasonal influx of travelers combined with a large resident population with no
viable alternatives to automobiles for day-to-day errands result in periods of time when
movement along the corridor becomes highly frustrating and unsafe. The FKOHT is
proposed to be a minimum to-foot wide, average 12-foot wide and occasionally 14-foot
paved bikeway from Key Largo to Key West. This provision of a safe, non-motorized
alternative for residents and visitors traveling along the corridor will significantly benefit the
FDOT goals to encourage intermodal transportation systems, and will result in greatly
improved public safety on the state highway.
Attachments
Attachment A:
Attachment B:
Project Location Map
Certification from the County Fiscal Officer
19
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15, 2002
Page 20 of21
Certification from the County Planning Director
The DEP shall advertise, receive, award and post bids, administer construction contracts and
provide construction administration necessary to complete segments of the TRAIL in compliance
with the approved construction plans, acquire any and all construction permits as required to
complete the TRAIL safety improvements construction, review and approve all invoices and
submit for payment the COUNTY and be responsible for all Public Involvement Activities.
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
20
FKOHT Safety Improvements
January 23, 2002
Revised May 15,2002
Page 21 of21
EXHIBIT "2"
The COUNTY shall accomplish the following:
1. The COUNTY shall provide Five Hundred Twenty Seven Thousand, Nine Hundred
and Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($527,975.00) in funds, resulting from a grant
from the Florida Department of Transportation County Incentive Grant Program, to
be used as payment for proposed safety improvements on the TRAIL.
2. The COUNTY shall also provide matching funds in the amount of One Million
Dollars ($527,975.00) to be used as payment for proposed safety improvements on
the TRAIL.
3. The COUNTY shall pay all invoices, as approved by the DEP, from the above funds.
REMAINDER OF P AGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
21
, .
LETTER OF APPLICATION
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT A TION
COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM
FLORIDA KEYS OVERSEAS HERITAGE TRAIL SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
(1) Applicant Monroe County, Florida
Board of County Commissioners
5100 College Road, Public Service Bldg. II
Stock Island, Key West, FL 33040
(2) Proiect Description
The Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOIIT) is intended to provide safe non-motorized
transportation to schools and businesses, enhance community recreation opportunities, stimulate
sustainable economic development and enable residents and visitors to enjoy the magnificent
natural and cultural resources along US Highway 1 in Monroe County. The trail will incorporate
cultural features such as Flagler's Historic Bridges and significant environmental elements unique
to the Florida Keys. The trail will act as an economic stimulus for adjacent businesses and provide
safe, convenient recreation and alternative transportation for children and families.
The FKOfIT will establish an interconnected linear trail for shared recreational uses and alternative
transportation l.!ses. It will incorporate new construction and reconstructed local pathways within
the state road right of way, and over-both the state road and historic bridges, in a con~inuous trail
from MM 0 (Key West) to MM-I06.5 (Key Largo). - - -
The trail will reduce traffic congestion on the state highway by reducing the numbers of local
vehicle trips and by eliminating many of the traffic-slowing effects of vehicle, bicycle and
pedestrian interactions. Trail safety is a main priority in the design and implementation of the
_ FKOHT. -One of the FKOHT project goals is to establish a safe~ two-way, non-motorized trail with
safe travel clearances for all trail users. Limit vehicular traffic interaction with trail traffic, but
when interaction must occur, provide warning to both drivers_ and trail users at all intersections,
maximize separation from U.S. 1 local streets and congested parking areas by using traffic barriers,
signage. striping and crosswalks. These improver:nen~s along the length of U.S. 1 will greatly
increase s~fety-for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers. - -
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division_of Recreation and Parks (DRP) will
enter into a Maintenance Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) to
maintain existing sections of the trail. As part of these -responsibilities, the DRP is seeking
assistance through Monroe County to upgrade the existing trail sections in order to provide safe
passage at road crossings and business frontage. In addition, the DRP is seeking to repair existing
sections of pavement where the current path is degraded to the point where it is dangerous to trail
users.
1
Table 1
Below is a list of the existing bicycle trails the DRP shall be responsible for maintaining. The list
contains the state road, the limits and length of areas to be maintained. Marathon, the Village of
Islands, Islamorada and Key West will coordinate improvements with the City Visioning process
and therefore, the present proposal does not address these incorporated areas.
County State Road From: To: Side of Length Width surface
Section (Local Name) Road (Mile) (Feet) Material
90010 5 AlA Mile Post 0 South 0.700 8.0 Asphalt
(Key West) (MM 3.840) (MM 4.531) Bound
90020 5 Four (4) Star Key Haven South 0.737 8.0 Asphalt
(Stock Island) Rental Road (MM Bound
(MM 4.531) 5.268)
90020 5 Coppit Road Jade Road South 0.900 10.0 Asphalt
(Big Coppit) (MM 9.830) (MMJO.720) Bound
90020 5 Ships Way Cunningham South 1.061 8.0 Asphalt
(Big Pine Key) (MM 29.890) Lane (MM Bound
30.950)
90020 5 Cunningham Industrial Road South 0.130 4.5 Asphalt
(Big Pine Key) Lane (MM (MM 31.080) Bound
30.950
90030 5 Industrial Road 3ra Street - South _ 0.259 4.5 Asphalt
- (Big Pine Key) _ ~ (MM 31.080) (MM 31.340) -Bound -
- -
90030 S Parking Lot (MM 47.000) _ Add~d at the request of DEP on
(Knights Kev) (MM 47.000) , 4/30/2001
90030 5 7 Mile Parking Mi Ie Marker 48 South 0.924 7.0 Asphalt
(Marathon Key) Lot (MM Bound
-
- 47.030)
90040 5 Mile Marker 48 En~ of Median South 6.474 8.0 Asphalt
(Marathon Kev) tMM 54.430) Bound
90050 5 Long Key South Layton North 2.810 6.0& Asphalt --
(Long Key) Bridge (MM Driv~ (MM Bound 9.0
65.570) - 68.380) -
- - - -
""'-- - --
-
90060 5 Dickie V-lay Road North 4.390 6.0& Asphalt
(Key Largo) (MM 9:L.190) Crosswalk Bound 8.5
(MM 96.580)
90060 5 Road Crosswalk Atlantic Blvd. South 2.950 6.0 Asphalt
- (MM 96.580) (MM 99.53) Bound
(Key Largo)
90060 5 Atlantic Garden Cove North 6.830 8.0 Asphalt
(Key Largo) Boulevard (MM Dr. (MM Bound
99.53) 106.360)
2
(3) Work Pr02ram Number
Pending
(4) Certification from County
Monroe County approval to use County Impact Fees as 50% match.
County Impact Fee Match: $527,974.55
See Attachment B for Monroe County certification.
(5) Details of Proiect
A preliminary survey was conducted to review conditions of existing intersections that pose
potential hazards to the safety of future trail users. The scope of this survey was to identify the
major safety concerns and what can be accomplished quickly to satisfy and improve relationships
with the community, enhance the trail experience on existing sections and improve safety, thereby
reducing potential crashes on the trail.
A more detailed survey addressing individual design criteria for every intersection to be upgraded
will be conducted, along with public and regulatory participation to identify signage placement,
striping and repaving priorities. Proposed are five recommendations based on preliminary
observations that will help establish our commitment to safety on the FKOfIT.
""-
a. Signage
Signage instructing trail users and vehicles of an impending traffic conflict. Figure 1 from-
the - AASIITO Manual, American Association- of Sfate - Highway and Transportation
Officials, Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities contains an example of conflicts
found at a typical intersection on U.S.!. Initially, we intend to review existing sign location
and line of site from each intersection.- _ The cost estimate includes two signs at each
intersection warning vehicles of trail traffic. A third sign will be placed along the trail
reminding trail users to yield to oncoming traffic. Location of signage will be reviewed and
compared with existing signage as to discourage over signage at an intersection. Great
effort will be taken to combine signs or not add signs where they would create confusion.
All signage will adhere to the (MUTCD), Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. _A
proposed warning sign depicted- as Figure 2_ is being considered bYlhe- MUTCD -for use on
roadways that parallel trails. _ This- sign is presented in the FDDT Trail Intersection Design
Guidelines available from the FDOT web-site.
3
Figure 1
Figure 22. Example of Adjacent Path Intersection
According to the AASHTO manual, the above represent common conflicts found along parallel
paths at intersections. It is these common contlicts that we hope to address.
Figure 2
'-'
nt-II 11..1_ ""'..." ........ s.,.
... 11).1 _nOJ tor _in ,.h tiP. u..
IN"'<.......
The above trail sIgn is recommended as an advance waming sign for a parallellrail. This sign is
still under review and can be applied for and used with permission from the FHW A.
4
b. Crosswalks
The project will provide crosswalks at each street intersection along the trail where feasible
and necessary. It is proposed to replace poorly visible crosswalks and add new ones where
there are none. For this proposal a one foot wide stripe ten to 12 feet long will be placed 12
- 24 inches apart. The length of the line will accommodate the future widening of the trail.
Striping may not be necessary at some intersections due to the lack of traffic. In this case a
simple crosswalk without striping may suffice. An evaluation of stop bars will also be
conducted. A study conducted for the FDOT on making crosswalks safer for pedestrians
recommends advance stop lines (ASL's) in front of crosswalks. The document published in
July, 2000, "Making Crosswalks Safer for Pedestrians", by the Center for Urban
Transportation Research can be found on the FOOT web site. A closer review of each
crossing will determine the need and feasibility for an ASL. Another critical component to a
safe crossing is signalization. The location of pedestrian crossing signals will be
recommended at high volume traffic locations along the trail.
c. Pavement Markings
The project will provide striping along both sides of the trail along business frontage where
parking facilities and business entrances conflict with trail traffic. The FKOIIT Master plan
recommends defining the trail along business frontage for trail user safety. Presently the
trail is undefined in many locations or used as a parking space. We recommend paving and
striping both sides of the trail along business frontage and adding signage in the form of a
painted template warning vehicles not to park on the trail. Recommendations for barricades
or_ other forms of landscape barriers and curb islands will be proposed. Colored striping
may be an option in very congested areas. -
. d. Paving
The project will pave existing _trail sections that have degraded and pose a safety concern
and where permitable, widen to -accommodate multi-use trail traffic. Sections- of the lrail
show signs of wear and disruption. It is recommended that these sections b~ re-paved to
enhance usage of the trail. It i~ also recommended that repaving the path along congested
sections would greatly enhance visibility of the trail.
e. Road Shoulders
It is proposed that the road shoulder used as a bike path in Big Pine between A venue - A and
3rd A venue be painted red to enhance visibility. This proposal should be presented to the
community for review. A study conducted in Lake County Florid.a for tl)e FOOT entitled
"Evaluation of Red Shoulders as a Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility" was prepared for FOOT
in July 1998. The photographs below show the shoulders as they currently exist in Big Pine,
- and what the proposed red shoulders appear as in the above referenced study.
5
Existing Road Shoulders in Big Pine
Lake County Red Road Shoulders
Future Design Improvements
It is proposed that these safety upgrades be part of a continuing renewed effort to improve trail
safety by using the most up-to-date design recommendations available. Future design
improvements should include landscape barriers, or other attractive barriers, to protect trail users,
trail and curb islands, defined wide ingress and egress aprons, revised parking and line of site where
possible on business frontage, pedestrian signalization, lighting and educational materials
inco1'1Jorated into FKOHT trail literature.
f. Phases
The requested matching funds will be applied to the project phases scheduled for development in
2002 and 2003. These projects will be designed and constructed as one project. Table 2 contains
the estimates for each ?hase.
Table 2. Estimated Project Costs 2001 Through 2003
Design / Year 7/1/02'. ,:;';"r!t~~
Construction: 1 /1 /03:~ .' c;t . sL '.7.~l8C45'Q!.ja
~. :.:.... p ~-,,,...'!'. ;::~- ~. -:. -:"~~:-.!"-'.: 7"',..:;-..:,_- -:':"'-.::~--::,::t..:it+~
1 /1 /03.'~' c~.. "--$.,,!"i~~f;;:2~61~~
?!.~~..,~..-;'t~~t~ " __ _ ___
~?~~~;-;~~~h,;;~o_,-..c~~'~-" i-..";~~~E~~~t;~~ii
CEI
/ Year
_ Total
6
(6) Cost Estimate
Current cost estimates for the scheduled project phases are shown in Table 3, below.
Table 3.
Safety Improvements Cost Estimates
STOCK ISLAND BIG COPPITT BIG PINE KEY lARGO TOT AlS
Mile Marker 4- 5.4 9.8-10.7 29.8 - 31.3 106 - 91
Miles 1.5 1 2
No. of Intersections 4 12 11
Design / Year 7/1/02 7/1/02 7/1/02
Construction: 1/1/03 1/1/03 1/1/03
Repaving 43,999.5 29,333.0 58,666.0
Repaving Red
Shoulders 7,000.0
Striping 11 ,880.00 7,920.00 15,840.00
Signage 1,200.00 3,600.00 4,950.00
- Crosswalks N/A 3,000.00 2,750.00
Sub-Total 57,079.50 43,853.00 89,206.00
eEl / Year 1/1/03 111/03 1/1/03
Total
Striping quoted at $ 7,920.00 per rriile.
~ed Shoulders $ 7,000.90 per mile. __
Signage: $ 150.00 p~r ~ign _-
Crosswalks $ 250.00 each
Repaving: $ 29,333.00 per mile
Note:
Estimates based on quotes by Monroe County
Stock Island intersections have pedestrian crossing lights, signage not required.
Layton bike path is marked and crossings at intersections and are marked.
7
(7) Proiect consistent with FDOT plan and MPO.
Obectives of the 2010 Florida Department of Transportation Long Range Transportation
Plan that will be met by this project include:
Goal I - Safe transportation for residents, visitors and commerce.
* Reduce the rate of motor vehicle crashes, fatalities and injuries and bicycle and pedestrian
fatalities and injuries on highways. Traffic signals, signs and pavement markings must be effective.
Special safety considerations are needed for the physically challenged (handicapped) and elderly
and for bicyclists and pedestrians.
*lmprove illtermodal safety where modes intersect, such as highway or railroad bridges over
waterways and highway-railroad crossings.
Goal 4-Travel choices to ensure mobility, sustain the quality of the environment, preserve
community values and reduce energy consumption.
*Reduce dependency 011 the single occupant vehicle.
*Provide accommodation for transit vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians wherever appropriate
The design and construction of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail-along the USl
corridor is consistent with the Monroe County 20ro Comprehensive Plan. Goa1301 of the MO!1roe
County Comprehensive Plan- Traffic Circulation Element has been established "to provide a safe, -
convenient, efficient, and environmentally compatible motorized and non-motorized transportation
system for the movement of people and goods in Monroe County." Goal 1201 directs Monroe
County to "provide a recreation and open space system to conserve valuable natural resources and
to provide recreational opportunities adequate to serve the present and future population of Monroe
County; including permanent residents and visito~."
(8)
Proiect is located on state highwav system;
--
The project is located on the state designated scenic highway system.
(9) Relevant Information
a) The Florida State Greenways and Trails Division are well documented for creating and
enhancing economic benefits where they are placed. The FKOIIT, when developed in Monroe -
County, will provide over 100 miles of connections between cities, towns, residential areas,
parks, shopping areas, lodgings and tourist destinations. Because of its unique characteristics:
the year-round sunny, warm climate and the tropical scenic beauty, it is expected that the
FKOIIT will become a world renowned trail. This will serve to attract trail-enthusiasts from a
far greater area than is typical and will encourage a significant volume of use by both resident
8
and tourist populations. Local hotels, restaurants and other businesses will benefit from this
sustainable form of tourist activity through increased spending on both durable and consumable.
Property owners also will benefit, since trails generally increase the value of properties adjacent
to their corridor, particularly where they pass through residential neighborhoods.
b) The FDEP DRP of Recreation and Parks now manages six state trails as part of the Florida state
park system. None of these trails has the urban setting, destination characteristics or economic
impact potential that the FKOIIT will have. The DRP estimates that, in the last year, the
combined 145.5 miles of state trails in the park system contributed approximately $13.3 million
to the local economies in which they are located. It is expected that the annual economic
benefits of the FKOIIT will be significantly higher than this amount.
c) The FKOHT is a long-term project. Matching funds from the County Incentive Grant Program
will accelerate the completion of the project and will bring the first phases of construction into
compliance with the County's master plan at a much early date than will be possible if funding
is to be secured through other funding processes.
d) Environmental sensitivity is one of the primary guiding principles of the FKOfIT master plan.
Design criteria are included that will assure careful planning and design processes to protect
adjacent sensitive natural resources such as mangroves, seagrasses and intact tropical
hammocks. Cultural resource protection and enhancement is one of the greatest benefits of the
proposed trail. The bridges constructed for Henry Flagler's railroad in the early 1900's will be
stabilized and adapted to use for the trail to the extent feasible, and maintained as parts of the
Florida state park system for future generations. Three of the bridges are on the National
Register of Hist'Oric Structures, arid listing of additional bridges may be accompl~shed in the
future.
e) Traffic volumes on US 1 in Monroe County have increased steadily over the last ten years, with
an associated decline in the Level of Service on sections in more populated areas of the county.
The seasonal influx of travelers combined with a large resident population with no viable
alternatives to automobiles for day-to-day errands result in periods or- time when movement
along the corridor becomes highly frustrating and un:;afe. The FKOIIT is proposed to be a
minimum to-foot wide, average 12-foot wide and occasionally 14-foot paved bikeway from
Key Largo to Key West. This provision of a safe, non-motorized alternative for residents and
visitors traveling along the corridor will significantly benefit !he FDOT goals to encourage
intenriodal transP9rtat1on systems, an-d wit! result in greatly Improved public--safety on the state -
highway;
Attachments
Attachment A:
Attachment B:
Project Location Map
Certification from the County Fiscal Officer
Certification from the County Planning Director.
9
t/)
en
c
.c;;
t/)
o
~
u
"E
ra
t/)
"'C
rtl
OJ
.!:
-
.Cij -
~
-t-
...
c
OJ
Et-.
=0
.El c;
-.:.r;
<t ~
:E
.r; 0
.=~
..
"
-
.-x ;:'
;~.:
- ~..:;.",:
2<.j=
. ~
..::;<-
- - -
~~~
==-- :-
~ ~
c.
". 0
.E:iii
~c.
o.._~
...
<C,>~ a::
- ~-:5.,
c:
.c
--.:;
..-..... 01-
. · 'C.'"
u_.
~]:~"C-
.. ~Um,t
:I · ':..c ::
~ g<l'!:!
-ID:J_~ .
o
v_
~_:_-~ .
~.
~
....:
-:::i
t':l
\
,
"r1f
i~
C' 11 ~ ~
= ., ::: =
0: ... ~ I.:: ';
~~~ I'" I.
(I)::::IIX) ! ~
!-
-~
.;L
- ~
~.
'J
~- ~
.:.--=--
-=
:-
:." ~
.-
.C'
U._
:-C'c=
~ .!! ~ ~
-..--:
0- _.
to DI~
;:.....-
uE.Ego
Cle:C'=
-C)ta,..
~uc: C
'C> __
'"utJC~
::::I-'DlGI Cl
IX) c> c.3::
"--e,..
~~e.-CI
~3::iii.E~
=-
z
~
"J ~-. = ~
- ~:;
.- -
=.. ~ ":
:r.
Sr.c -
t..
IS
~
c
;.;
!~
I:
d~
1 r ~
! l: t
~\\~\i
:-'; \ ".
.~-
;,
. -
~
C
lU
E
lU
>
e
c..
E
-
~
V'l
I
~
M
.-- - --; -'7"--'':'___:-.:
';;::::~~~;7..-:.-:::=::-- -::~.:_.
..;.:'- '--
.'-'-- - -
\
_.;..:::.:::....'~-- -.
':":"-, ---=:-:-
~~~i~J~~~:(~;~14tij~,
c"--~::=11"'::c~ cd~:::~:::;;~E:;;::;,~
,fill"." ,--: -,.' ""-&:::;. ~";;,",,o~ ',,-,c
-.. ~=~~'" ~...",,~~- ~.~=~ .
\~. ~n~~~~~~ll1
., 'I ~ -.. · ~ "'~_____ '.
~ ..:~~ ji ~I~~~~i
~ tI' \''''"~~''==='.-~r_.
'~Jf~~~l;-~~i'
, ./ -, .,- -:s-
. "" I /i'" =-.:.
,.' " I ==,,,-..
N~' <i=. I::".;;; '_..' .."~ w.. ". E. ,
' .'. '''''', '-,r-,.... Ii
+.+ '=:~j
--= ,=~
......~:r
-..t:::'j'j
. 11) ~."..
~~.~ a:-
~ ~01i
-- ~ ~rI)~l
=:c~
= Q) 6"
-c YJu-!'
"t:; .~
O-'~e:
"'--c..,
- .0 o.lt
t.c. ~:a
.;.,; --~.~--
g
E
..
r:_
5.~
.,0
Ulll.
z
:J
;;..
~
· r:--
. ".::
· ".:. ~'t
\l ~':
: ~:~
i,:
~.
:J
~
~.=
E:::
~:.
:i c.~
'.'Me .-
,;
j~
-.?"
- ~~~
-
c
(1) &t)-
E-:
c:,...
.~ ~
- oX
< :;
-~
0(6 0
'--
I-~
.. - -. - .
-~J
;... ~
~.
- rf
:':S" '.....
-- ~
r- .~
~ --: 2........ ;..... -
- ~=-\--
~ .; ~~
:." - = a
;r. ':oJ ~
~ ~ ~ :N
=: ~'~k
~. ~. ~ ~ ..c,=:
;::~:.:: -
~_ M ,. (;
-.~~-
"~ :~
:r.
.-.: '.
Sl!e FIgure 8.2,1
-~- .
;:;..-::--~ -~.-.
'--:&~~;.:
"..~.
-
-
~
c
Cl)
E N
Cl) f'
> 0
e -
c.. I
E ~
- 0\
>.
.... ~
~
= ~
en
""0_;_-
t.
:E.!: y."
U<c
-0
III 1lI-
~~~
lXlZIIl
0-
-II>
..
- -
See FIgure e.2.3 in...
L ~
z HI ! I q i
~ lli i I ! I: ! ;
~ .\ ~O\i
;:. 41-", \ o.
'.... .
~
-...-.
O~ '
-:iii~
_~".u-
~':::e "J.
r: ..
:i
:-~E~~-::----,-.:: - ~~:;~
0)'.--;"'---:----' .
,[~,=i; ~ ~
~ ~"C _.~:;; ... Z. :0::
In
"C
m
Q)-
.c:
-
.-
m
...
I-
------ . ....-
---~- ..~ . _.._-
..... "-
c
Q)~
E
CO
OlCZ
=.:
<C ..
~
=~
~"'.CJ
L...e--
~~
,
.
~
I:
~
-
;::.--:;:.::;:.,-
:::ilt\~~:"
'--:~:;"'-
C:~t-:i;t~~~~:-~'
~~?t
~:~~;~:
;.:
.... :I)
2
:..;:"
:./J-
C': =
.E E
..=0
v: ~
:.::. :: N-
..-:: ~ ~ ='"""'-
:..a ~ t.J ~
~::-. ~N\
- >....
~~ ~;-
"'..,1 i:. ~
~ ~._ :::.i!-
~_v":=
::: ~ ::: ~.,~
~=~.~~
<~~::1":
e-
u
...
..
..E
>-E~
.. 0 0
:':::0-
~-(/)
-0-
~ .. ::
.3.8<<
E lMJlS ~I
..
-.l:
u~_
ti.
~.;,~-.--
::;
t.I
~E
.,
'.
..
. .
...
".V
~e.'" .
<c-PJ
-,,~,
,~.'I.'r
See Figure 8,2,'
c
--
.~ ~-5 U)
l- CI 'W; :i
~~~
.!1~
i-!!:~'l
~. c:
-till:
_ III li'i!!"'-' .
~~~lf:":
-~
i:
(I)
....
c:
V
E ~
V
> -
e ~
~ Q.. I
E CO
- 0\
>. N
....
~ ~
~
Cf.)
0- 0- CC.I_
- I/'
_c.- o-
.:: ~ ::-i/ttf:
-~ ~ ~u:J
~~ ~.=-
:: c
!2
<
:.r ~.
-- -
::::~
See FIgure 5,2.6
~ -:.
c.-. ......
A
~ ID:
t ·
1 }:! i
I J J! 1 ~
\:0\-
\ .'. I
'"
...
...
~
:l
01
~
..
~
.
-
#.~*
. .
'....
1.
c
J
J
J'
, .
11
l]
H
..
......:..-.. -.
~~..;.:.:--::: -:.:..
i
r
. .~ ~~~~-4-:
_~..;: 'ii:;~---c
. -<~~~.;_I:-.t-._f
..~;.." . = .
'._=-,::~-=-.~~:,-
.:._-- - - ~;.e:=;...'-.
=;i=:i~
'-=-:.-":-:~:::"<<--EI-
. +, ..~.... '&
'--'-~8r
~~j-;~t! o'
.~-~3i
-a..-I
~=i"l
;::G l'I) ':.
_ =:--c:
.-:; ~ = c
._ ~ 8!
J-. Q,J z&
~ >~1
t.. 0 :U
r':": ..-
...-~...~~
~~~. Eo."o
;i_~~~>~
f-~:;~
-.
~
....
.....
~
01
...
~
..,
-;.
7-
o
'>
~
U
':,
MM 30 . 38
-::.
~ l> -
.; .-
-,i-tft-- ~ ~--. ~ ~
. Qm - -= --:--- ~ <:
-'iii:- . _ _ -- : #_ CI) z
---,;- _'~ :~l~'"::- .~ ~
:s:::<
oUJ
zO::
~_O td
~_c . ,,~_~a::
. .~~~.~-~~~~-=.~~-";::':'~-~
-{~t~.[1~~:~Ei~?:~7=~=~~{.~~~~;t-
~-~ . - .
-----.
-- - ---~....--......
-. -...----
0- .0<_--....,_____
-.--- -..----
--., -------
_._--._----~-
... ._-~........--~-_.- P.......--.--
.._-~- - -- -
~---- '~--.' -.....-
::::: -=..~~.~.~.:::::~_. -. :..-_~~ .~.. -=-
:~ ~ '. ~~~fH~~~~~'-~~---- -=~~~- ::-~~~:..
--'. - -..--~_. -.
". .",... .- -- -
_ ...... __n....._ J"__
._.._~-.~____L......__.__.~..-'- ___,..,_0_______. ._.....---__
._,___,._____~______...o..____.___~.._.. ._ ____ _._.....____
~-..._-..,... -~- ,-. . ~...'._--- -_....,~--",--_.~....~--..-.- -
-.. -- . -----...---- '... ...-.-.--..
...._ .~___ p _ _ '._..,_,_____. ,___~u "......___". ,"
__ _ __. .. _ ... . u._____.__ _ .__"_ .~......... _ __ _
- -....-._-..~_._-.----.----- ...-..--.-.....-._---_._~- ---. -+
. -----_.------....------~_....-. -... -,.~--------- .-....-. --- -- --. -.-
." .._--- _.-..-----_.....---_....----------._--.._~- .-- --~.~
----.--- ------- ------_.........~... -.--------. &........ - ---- - --. - ---
-.f.:~I~~ijJ~~fi~-~I~~~_~~.
-~ :~-~~=;~;:,-~-:- ~~=---;;::~~- - =-= ------.. - ~
"" - , , --
o
"E
ra
U)
-0
-ra
Q)
.c
-
.-
ra
'-
-I-
~ :-.; cr.
'::Q'~::l
..
-
-c:
even
ECD
c:~
Ol~
ell
-.:r;.
~ :;
:::!
~~
I-~
Seo F 'gure 8.2 1 C
~
....
a:i
:: . I Cl
m " . - J :;
, :I
;0; H f j j J. 0\
- rt , i:i:
~ . ' j - I
!' . I
. a 1J
. , O\i
~ .-.* \ :. Ii
- .' \ .
, . . ,i
... .
~_."". ---
-.--'"'- -- .~--
Vol
- -
u C
Cl)
E
Cl)
> 00
- . e M
- c.. 00
E \0
I
- - M
-- \0
- _.~. --.
------ ------ - ---
- ---- - .--
__=-.-:..--._ . ._.. ___. .-_:.;;_:..--_.u...:....~~. ._. ..
- ... -=--:;-.;-:'~:-:=.;-;:' -~-~.~~~~:~_...- :~~::--:~-~-~-_-: -
...
.: ~)
;..
.,
.:: ...
....
=:!!
ClIl
U~-
.._'l:l
=~;
:3~::
._~~.::.
~
~
....
r::c:
C
~
--
:..0
:.lJ"=::
.:; ;:
'5."::
~ -
o u ..
of ..: -0 .!
ftI,g;A.. ID
:r WI -1:1 0\ -..
.,- c~~
"e ~ ,g':c :I .
o~1:.!!
~om~
o
~ "..
:: c ii:
_:r "i u III 01
.c-.:~c ..
"e i .2 " :E '"
OJ:..!!!"l:.!!!,-- 1.1
I-u:rml.l. ---:...
"/3V\'FtCI lI'mNt'/f ~'.I\'U.L
,
- .:II:
CJ >.
=~
'-'
.:=.
::'
'::M-
~~
~ C
=~
:..0
lr. ;..
...
< ':J
'" :..0
':J ~
;..
7- ~
....
J'
~ ....
':J
:- :L -
'-'
< .....
--
'-'
-
< -
- ..;...
:.,
... ~
: ;;
~~
,,'-
- ";:!
:r.
Sell ~Iguro 8.28
CCJ-
O~
-:: ';;' Ul
~ ~~ =?
---
~o
<
~
...
."".....
u!
::)
!!l
c
~
E
~
>
e
c..
E
-
--
.:....
s.. ~ rgu... 6 ~ ~ 2
....
....
I ..
- L i ~
:;; m'l:1 f 1 &.
.. II f I J J~ 1 i;:
- {
~ .
~ :J
." .... \ : 0\ i
~ 1!
lo
- ' . , \ . l)
., .
'- . I'
-
o
-
,
0\
-
.:-_--:..::._-;;-=-:-...~;~~
''-:~':~8~;,,:~~~~=~:;~
--- . ~ --
--~ -~.----.~.;......:
- - ~ .~ .
. - -." ~ ---.
- -~:;~~;.:~~~==-=--~-=- --~._- ~ .--
, - -lC'f=-; -=t::~;.
--' -..~,::::-:-,
". c~~-:~1 ~
- ---... --
--"CIS.!!I'
: :~;~:.Hl! c
: "~-~:~:~~-
,-'. ' =0"
- - ...... u.?
- ,.C "01
,fn;, ~ '2"
.. <~~~
= ~ SjC
"C~
~;: t e!
O>d
~O~!
>.
-
.........;.- .-
f- - u
-_.~- ---..-
-, -~..;.,7 '~_-~-.-_.. -.-.-_
:.; . -.: .:=_-
---~--- - - n7;~~':-;'-"-_
"
'"
- ~ - - ,
g~..,g.
~;ou;
cE~.
".UCl
li:wcna:
-~--~.":":-"-::_~~:::' -~...:.'-~:~:-- -
"----- -- . ~.- ---
--,>, ~ n , "'n~~ c..__ _
-~~~j}':I,IT
~~i.'
-'. ,,-
'iii- -
III..
~<
0..
'"
'- ...
E ~
1:::
11. ~ I'
o~
~~
_Z
~:s
Q.
c.
..
..
~
~
7-
~
.s>
7'.
~
'1- r::
~ oS
YIj ii
oJ C
~. -
.:.: "E
:;:"t-:
~.~ ;!
=~=
-;_0
....!:",.
;- ~~~
~....
:'..-- -
.., -
.~ ~
... .~
:.J-_'
.. '<?
. ,v
,,'Id-,
.q.
'~-
."'d-
,
" 7'L
.~~...
,,'<"'.....
. ..~
, ~
, ."V..;,.,
, ~
,....)~
. ,,<~
"
~
. t
.
..'
.:
c
Q)M
E~
Cg:
C)
u
.~ -
~ :t or-4-
'"
'"
< ~ ~
~ ~
Z_
.-
-
~
~
Gl
.:&::
..
III
::E
.!
~
<
- :or.
.r'o C'
:-~
-
a_
ra
~~
<
See Figure 8,211
~~
= ~
~~
=
~
~ ::..
2~
5-~
- -
'-' := .~
;.;.;.. ....,
;....
;;.,
"
,
,
-
~
.--
::0-
0'1:: '
_';;.Ul
'~ >o=>.
~r:_
ceo
MM 86 ' g~
0-
-'"
"
"':~
Ul"",
=>"
~
.
- ----"- ,- > - '
-:~-1iW.
o. -. ~-:'~=-~-kj~l~T-,:-
.J -l.~--
- .--~
e .:. ;t~" ~~:-:
"_ "'C ...-.-. c.=~_~;
. ~ ~ i ~ lli-f-~'~:~
>. = iii .:.. ~ .'~:
~ ~~ ~~-!t:;~ - -
~ ~ :i.=--~ -
-cts~~~---~-
-'C
_ :'SF
--.....;..-..-
-.;:;--:::-~
cti
::i
..;
C
G)
E
c
C)
.-
<
;.:
;.: ~
F
t:.I
~
~ -. E
.= ...,
..., f
- ~r
'r. .:: ~
l':
< ~ i::; E~
<II
-.
;... :J ~ ~
;, ~
Z '" ::;
-- ~.
'" ~ c:..
~ ;., ~
v .if:.
:- ~
..... .....,
--::: ~ i::. ,-
] - ...
:- ;:::: .~ ~
< ...
-'- -'- 'Z
~
.0
~
-.,
CO2
GI
"-
CD
.a:
..
III
=~
ca CD
~=
t-:E
See Figure 8.2.12
Sel'F':gur('E.~ ._
...
.-
;;: . N
. - . 00
:r: t ] ] !i ; Cl
- 1 f 1 r1 . ~ =
~ .
- i ~ ! ~ I co
L. . t : I u:
~ ...* \ : 0\: I
"
- .J \. I II
'.. . i.J
.
II
.~-~-
U)
-
c
~
E
~ -
> 0
E -
I
c.. 0\
E -
- N
0\
- .
~._-~~-.
_.-=--~-~-: --=-.~~:-,.;~~-. ~~~.:--~-~:~::.: ~~---
_ u_ ...... .. ~
--. ~~ .
~ --~- ---
~~-.;-~~
\
\
.e:
/!iF.
--"-
===
~-
----- .
"E3
."..
'\
\ '?':
.~
?: -
..)""'"
-'I. '....
"=<.
. ....,-: -
\. .,-
'\~
. -~-
'I. -0
'I. V
.~
'\ "ii.
'I. -
-~-
. a:::=.
~
-~ ~.
v~~~
'I.
'I.
~;;~J ::
~.....
-..
Co::':
~~:-.
J!!
'I.
'I.
'I.
'I.
, .
)
c
:.:
~
~
'\
..,
!'
;
.".'"
I/'
....
....
~..
~
~
U)
....
c
o
E
o
>
e
c..
E
-
~ ill f .
H f I J ~ .
"':: . I
... 1 r j I
t ! -
.
'" l . , .
- ... ,-~* \ : 0\ i I
- it
.' \ .
'';''.' .. lJ
...
N
tD
~
o
~
Coo
,I ; ; ·
- ~...:"::
c~=
- .. =
~~~
~~:c
-=~~
..:;u:-
A.
::liE
~ tti :ac:_ LJJ
LJJLJJ"C:CI)
Z a:: ~_ c(
Z.;J. -m
LJJ<LJJc
Q,,~~z
zo~j
::(,)(1) -
o. .A-:
\0
('f)
\Ci
o
-
I
-
o
-
=
'-.- ;
- ---~'-~-
-,
.2
en
::)
-
-
..
.. ~
...
r- :t
- c,.o
-:.I,
.:= ;::: u
:: .~ ~
:: '-' -:;:"
- U ,..= t\-
:r. ~ ~'t
..
< Co) ~.
~
:J ~ ~ t4..
;;-
z ,...., :..
'-' ;.-. :. c..
cr.
~ ;:.., ..
:J ~
:- ~ -
'-' ~
.- < ;,.., ,-
~
2 o.
r- ";!.
< - - z
"-l
~
,,~
'51:=
~-
~~
~~-
~~
~~
~~
'~
~~
Q;Q;l<
Q~Q;
~::"'"I'
'""~~
~l1~~~~"J~,
-,--1::~[~~~-~:~ ..:"~~~-
'. _.~.
._--~'-:'_~-.
. _._- '''':' ;:-
-..:' ~ ~ --,..
,
~,
,
"
~- .~. -".-.,~~:'~~'- ~
.~-:-~.;.
"
"
;....:..
. -- . "._,~ -
f'"i41~2r~r~~~o- f~:-f~
~."'.---"" ..
.~--;-
,
,
0.\'00." UOO.II,\'01J.;lS
"
"
See Figure 8,2.12.
.". ,...
~
;..
C~t-26-01 14:17 Mon~oe County OMS
305 295 4320
r _ 0;,
Monroe COUDt). Board of COUDty Commissioners
Impact Fee Expenditure Request
Section 1 - To be completed by requesttag department
Mquestor: Eliz-AhLTh t61 (~ Title:
Facility ~'llt"1l r:fdl. I Project
Total Project Cost pital only) $: I
D 'on of project r
. 11 ~OI
Impact fee district:=W,-dt., l~es ofServic:eArea: .
Boundaries within project' ee district: Yes LNo _ Type of project: Capital_ Operational ~tcDaIlc:e _
Project start datc!3ID\ /t1f, Useful life of project: I D~ (Must acc:cd S )'QJS to qualify as capilal project) /"
Project serves: Development that existed in 1986 _ started after 1986 L projected beyond current year X
Would project have been needed to maintain level of service standards if DO growth had occ:urrcd since 1986:
-'I p.~
Sectton 2 - PI.wnK review
Reviewer: ~
~~:::"""'- Date: ?/ /.2 /(J/
~ ~ .~ 1/
Pro' eel eli 'ble for'
FUDd: District:
County-Wide
Municipality
District 1 amount (Lowa' Keys)
Distri~ 2 amount (Middle Keys)
District 3 UDOWlt (Upper Keys)
Partial FUDdin $:
~ '52.'1 DJi't.?~
FuU FUIldin $:
Notes:
~-
Date: o/~h"
Section 4 - OMB review
"~'iew<<c ~^ ~<JD T."., '?l0d.~'\-lhr....clnr Da.da/~
Funds availab . es ~ _ Tnmsfer request-prepared: Yes ~o _ Resolution prepared: Yes _ Nu_
Agenda swmnary prepared? Yes <. Project code: - Date of BOCC action: ~
...
OM.II F..,,~ "u--S 7 7~'
, ....~~'
~- L .,1...-
)' t/.. ':
, .
County of Monroe
Growth Manuernent Divisiog
2798 Overseas Highway
Suite 400
Marathon. Florida 33050
Voice: (305) 289-2500
FAX: (305) 289-2536
Board or Count v COmmi~ionel'l
Mayor George Neugent. Disl. 2
Mayor Pro Tern Nora Williams. DiSl. 4
Comm. Charles "Sonny" McCoy. DIsc 3
Comm. Murray Nelson. Dist. 5
Comm. Dixie Spehar. Dist. I
October 24, 200 I
Mr. Gary L Donn. P.E.
Director of Planning and Administration
Florida DOT, District 6
60i South Miami A venue
Miami. FL 33130
Dear Mr. Donn.
This letter is to cenify that the design and construction of the Horida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail along
the USI corridor is consistent with the Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Goal 301 of the
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan- Traffic Circulation Element has been established "to provide a safe,
convenient, efficient. and environmentally compatible motorized and non-motorized transponation system
for the movement of people and goods in Monroe County:' Goal 1201 d.irects Monroe County to "provide
a recreation and open space system to_ conserve valuable natural resources and to provide recreational
opponunifies adequat~ to serv~ .the present and future population of Monroe County, includi.ng permanent
residents and visitors.'. - - -
Sincerely.
'K~~~
K. Marlene Conaway . . )
Director of Planning and Environmental Resou!"Ces
cc: Pete Scalco. Florida Park Service. District 5 Operations