Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem C3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY - ADD ON Meeting Date: July 24. 2002 Division: County Administrator Bulk Item: Yes No~ Department: County Administrator AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Discussion of and guidance from the County Commission in reference to the sale of the Stock Island property to the City of Key West and the pOSSible purchase of additional sites. ITEM BACKGROUND: The Key West Botanical Garden proposed that the City of Key West utilize a Florida Communities Trust Grant for the purpose of purchasing the County's six acres on Stock Island to be then donated to the Botanical Garden. The money from the sale could be utilized from the County to obtain additional properties on Stock Island and Rockland Key for the purpose of providing Fire and EMS facilities, formal state-of-the-art storage, vehicle maintenance facilities, Public Works facilities, etc. It was agreed, as per the attached agenda item from April 2002, that the City would complete an appraisal of the property so the County could determine whether the potentially available funds were sufficient. That has now been done and the City has verbally informed the County that the appraisal number is $1,770,000.00. The grant application is to be submitted by August 1, and the City must identify 50% of the above amount as a match. The City is concerned about obtaining its share of the match and wishes to know the County's feelings. The available properties, as identified by the Botanical Garden are a Stock Island site with an asking price of $1,600,000.00 and a Rockland Key site with an asking price of $1,242,000.00, or a total of $2,842,000.00. If the City pays $1,770,000.00 for the County's site, that leaves a deficit of $1,072,000.00, assuming the asking prices of the two sites can be supported by appraisals. Even if the selling price is lower, there would be a substantial contribution from the County. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: The BOCC instructed that the County retain an open mind until it saw the appraisal amounts to see if there would really be a "wash" in terms of cost. CONTRACT I AGREEMENT CHANGES: Nj A STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion and guidance from the County Commission. TOTAL COST: BUDGETED: Yes No COST TO COUNTY: REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes No AMOUNT PER MONTH_ YR APPROVED BY: County Ally _. OMB/P~'P"Slna -::>. f) ~ Management_ DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ~_~ James L. Roberts, County Administrator DOCUMENTATION: Included x To Follow Not Required DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM # ~ J Revised 2/27/01 IMPLICATIONS OF PROPOSAL BY THE KEY WEST BOTANICAL GARDEN The Key West Botanical Garden has proposed to the Board of County Commissioners that it acquire ownership of the recently vacated County property on Stock Island. At the BOCC meeting in March, 2002, the subject was discussed, including the great attraction for expanding the Botanical Garden and the plans the County has for that site. This report is not intended to be anti of the Botanical Garden proposal. It is, rather, intended to provide for the Board of County Commissioners a discussion of the realities of the proposal including, but not necessarily restricted to, present plans for the Stock Island facility and the issues involved with the proposal. THE COUNTY'S NEEDS The Board of County Commissioners has long seen the approximate six acres of its property on Stock Island as a long-term resource. The needs of the County have been discussed many times. In fact, during the budget discussions in calendar year 2001, leading to the fiscal year 2002 capital budget, the Board of County Commissioners instructed the Administration to include a variety of projects that needed to be accomplished. Indeed, the BOCC allocated funding in the capital plan for these purposes. In summary these issues are as follows: a) There is a great need for records storage space in the County. As the County has progressed in the refurbishing of The Harvey Government Center at Historic Truman School, and the old jail at Jackson Square, 7</ most of the records storage has been lost. In fact, these areas were neither appropriate for adequate records storage nor were they safe. There is a wide variety of types of records that need to be stored not only by the Board of County Commissioners but also by the Constitutional Officers. At present, the existing area of records storage in the Lower Keys totals over 16,000 square feet. In volume, this is over 121,000 cubic feet. These numbers do not include Middle Keys and Upper Keys needs which, to some extent, could be satisfied by a major state of the art records storage facility. The Board of County Commissioners, Clerk of the Court, Court Administration, Property Appraiser, Public Defender, Sheriff, State Attorney, Supervisor of Elections, and Tax Collector all have storage needs. These needs will only increase as time goes by with nowhere currently available to satisfy the needs. Records storage and disposal are covered under State law. Therefore, there is an obligation to maintain certain types of records for different periods of time. For example, the Tax Collector reports that some records must be retained for a period of three to seven years. Others must be retained for a period often to twenty years. Still others have historic significance and probably should be retained forever. The County and all the Constitutional Officers have some requirements in this regard. b) There is a need to establish a new fire rescue/emergency medical services facility on Stock Island, currently, fire rescue operates from an old facility that 2 is scheduled for renovation. Emergency Medical Services are in a very small area in the back of the Bayshore Manor building. In terms of efficiency and the consolidated services program in which paid personnel can respond along with volunteers, it is appropriate that these two major Public Safety functions be co-located at one site. This facility would serve not only unincorporated Monroe County but could be utilized to help protect the major facilities on north Stock Island. c) There has been talk for a number of years of moving the Public Works facilities currently located at Key West International Airport off the airport property and to Stock Island. This would accomplish a number of goals including freeing up airport property for additional commercial usage and revenue. As will be seen later in this report, there is also the opportunity for airport related funding to be of assistance to the County. The Public Works facility could be moved to Stock Island along with the fleet management building. Even though some of what Public Works does is within the City of Key West, much of it is also in the Lower Keys. The Stock Island facility would be a benefit and more centrally located for access. In addition, the Fleet Management program would have an opportunity to develop a state of the art facility that could be more readily available to other agencies. There has been preliminary discussion in reference to expanding the services to the City of Key West, the School Board, Etc. This is not possible at the present location. Even the consultants presently completing 3 the Fleet Management analysis stated that the facility at the Key West International Airport is inadequate. Therefore, the County has major needs that it has been attempting to address for a number of years. The County Stock Island property was seen as a perfect location for those activities. THE KEY WEST BOT ANCIAL GARDEN PROPOSAL There has been much discussion concerning the Key West Botanical Garden proposal in reference to the County's Stock Island property. Unfortunately, some of that discussion has not been based upon accurate information. Within the last few days, an editorial in a local newspaper called the proposal a "land swap." The editorial went on to say that the proposal is for the County to "give six acres of this land to the Botanical Garden." That makes this proposal seem quite easy to accomplish but, in reality, it may be quite difficult. Subsequent to the March, 2002, BOCC meeting, a representative of the Botanical Garden visited the Administrator and staff and reviewed their proposal. Some information was left with staff concerning alternate properties and with limited time available we have developed some questions. A number of questions have been raised by the County with the Florida - Communities Trust. These include: 1. Can FCT grants be used to fund acquisitions where both the buyer and seller are local governments? 2. Can FCT grants to used to buy and improve property for restoration projects of this type? 4 3. Does the presence of asbestos in the buildings effect the property's FCT eligibility? 4. Would a grant of this type be likely to achieve a sufficient score to receive FCT funding? The FCT has not responded to these questions as of this date. It is the Administration's understanding that the proposal is for the City of Key West to purchase the six acres of County property through the use of a Florida Communities Trust grant. As of the preparation of this report, there has been no official contact from the City of Key West concerning this proposal nor any indication as to what the amount of purchase would be. This would have to be determined through appraisals and possibly some negotiations. The assessed value of the property is presently $1.8 million. Since the buildings contain large quantities of friable asbestos and will need to be demolished, the appraisal process may be complicated. The next part of the proposal is that the City of Key West and/or the Botanical Garden obtain a federal Brownfields grant for the purpose of removing the asbestos, demolishing the buildings, and preparing the site for expansion of the adjoining garden. It is not precisely clear at this point who would actually be applying for and implementing the grant. The next part of the proposal suggests that the County take the funds from that transaction and purchase, for its needs, two properties. One is located on Stock Island along Route 1 and the second is located on Rockland Key, near the eastern end. Representatives of the Botanical Garden have apparently spoken with the property owners. The properties are as follows: 5 1. This is a collection of parcels a little under two acres located in unincorporated Monroe County along Route 1. A very quick analysis suggests that this property could be utilized for the fire rescue/emergency medical services facility. The list price is $1,600,000, which equates to $800,000 or more per acre. Of course, there have been no appraisals done by the County and there would need to be at least a Phase One Environmental Assessment prior to purchase. 2. The second property includes three separate parcels on Rockland Key totaling approximately 5.5 acres. This is in the vicinity of the industrial area and the Welcome .Center. The asking price is $1,242,000, which equates to about $225,000 per acre. Once again, the County has conducted no appraisals and a Phase One Environmental Assessment is essential. It also appears as though the property is in the noise area delineated as part of the Navy AICUZ, which is a present subject of discussion on another matter. It is possible that this site is large enough for the Public Works and storage facilities although significantly less convenient for the County and other entities that would wish to utilize the fleet maintenance program. There should also be a noise analysis done since much of the work by County employees will be out in the open and not in buildings. Therefore, it appears as though combining the two parcels would produce an asking price of $2,842,000 for approximately 7.3 acres. This comes to approximately $390,000 per acre. 6 Beginning with an assessed value for the Stock Island property of $1.8 million (plus whatever value might be attributed to the buildings), it does not appear as though there will be a sufficient amount of funds the County can utilize to purchase the two new properties. A V AILABLE MONROE COUNTY FUNDS The County's plan has been to utilize the Stock Island property and to fund improvements primarily from the infrastructure sales tax. To that end, in fiscal year 2004, 2005, and 2006, the Board of County Commissioners has allocated $2.3 million for the fire rescue station/emergency medical services facility/storage facility on Stock Island. In addition, there is approximately $195,000 in the coming year for the rehabilitation of the current fire rescue facility on Stock Island. As the Botanical Garden representative suggests, if they are able to have the buildings demolished, the County could save up to $500,000 in the demolition and asbestos disposal costs. This means that there is somewhere approaching $3 million available in allocated funds to provide these facilities. There is no property acquisition money included and any difference between the purchase price for the County's six acres and the purchase price of the other two properties would have to come from somewhere. One interesting note in reference to the Public Works situation is that there is a chance that if the Public Works facility were moved off the airport, there is the possibility of the airport/F AA to pay $700,000 or more to have that property returned to airport use. In addition, the County is paying $82,000 per year in FAA market rent rate at the airport. Those ad valorem payments would be saved. The airport could bring in as much as 7 $100,000 per year additional revenue if that property were available for airport related commercial use. SUMMARY AND OBSERVATIONS There is no question that the Botanical Garden can become an even more desirable facility in the future than it is now. The question at issue is what are the business aspects for the County in terms of accepting a proposal that has very few facts attached to it. In summary, the following appear to be the major points from the County's perspective: 1. The County has substantial needs for which it has been preparing for many years. Funds are already allocated to fulfill those needs, but not for property acquisition. 2. There has been no formal contact from the City of Key West as of this date. 3. The City of Key West has not applied for a Florida Communities Trust Grant. 4. There are outstanding questions concerning the eligibility of this project for Florida Communities Trust funding. 5. There have been no appraisals done on the Stock Island property and, therefore, its potential purchase value is not known. 6. It is not clear who will apply for the Brownfileds grant, whether it will be granted, and whether it can cover the proposed items suggested. 7. The two properties suggested have price tags that are not supported by appraisals. The County would have to undertake appraisals on both sites. 8 8. The two properties suggested would need environmental assessments to be sure that there are no environmental hazards or contamination. 9. It appears as though, although without appraisals it is difficult to tell, that the amount of funds available from the City of Key West through a Florida Communities Trust grant will not be available for the full price of the two additional properties on Stock Island and Rockland Key. 10. Therefore, it is possible that the County would have to appropriate additional funds for the purchase of those properties. 11. Although the properties in question might ultimately prove to be suitable for the intended uses, they certainly would not be as convenient as the County Stock Island property and the advantages of co-locating County facilities on one site. Therefore, much of the proposal is based on speculation. A suggested approach for the Board of County Commissioners, if it wishes to consider this proposal, is as follows: a) Await a formal statement from the City of Key West of its intention to acquire a Florida Communities Trust grant for the purchase of our Stock Island property. b) If that occurs, have the City of Key West and possibly the County, undertake appraisals to determine the value of the property. c) Once that value is set, begin the process to determine whether the funds would be sufficient to purchase the other two identified properties. d) Initiate appraisals and environmental assessments on the other two properties. 9 e) If there are no problems with the values obtained from the appraisals or the conclusions of the environmental assessments, proceed with a more thorough analysis of the properties for County purposes. t) If all items are satisfactory and the County Commission wishes to continue, proceed with attempts to acquire the two properties. g) During this process, be sure that the County is held harmless from any liability in reference to the structures and property it presently owns on Stock Island. This will, of course, take much more time than is presently considered in the proposal. It is, however, a more prudent way to proceed and provides for the County and the Botanical Garden an opportunity continually to evaluate its position in reference to information that becomes available. The County will incur some costs in reference to appraisals and environmental analyses. Preliminary estimates are between $30,000 _ $50,000. James L. Roberts County Administrator April 17, 2002 10 MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC LmRARY 101485 Overseas Highway Key Largo, FL 33037 TO: Jim Malloch, Community Services Division Director FROM: Norma Kula, Director of Libraries SUBJECT: Start-up Costs for Key West Homework Center DATE: July 19, 2002 I am enclosing a draft of estimated start-up costs for the proposed Homework Center for Poinciana Plaza. The list is not quite complete, as I am waiting for return calls from staff there and elsewhere for estimates on lease costs (other agencies in the Plaza, dealing with the City of Key West, are reportedly paying $1.00 yearly), insurance provisions, and utilities (which are now a part of the Public Works responsibility). I hope to have these figures for you on Monday, and will then send you the modified estimates. Building renovation $ Included here are costs of adding a ramp at the front door, removal of kitchen appliances, widening the bathroom entry, installing a door at the foot of the stairway, installing an awning for the patio, and removal of non-support wall areas. Furnishings: (prices taken from current vendor catalog) Shelving Office furnishings (desk, chair, filing cabinets) Patron table and seating Circulation desk and equipment (computer and stand, barcode scanner, printer) 7,000.00 1,750.00 750.00 1,000.00 3,500.00 Public access computers, stands, printer 11,000.00 (Estimate from Technical Services Department, including installation, lines, etc.) Book return 2,000.00 Book carts 750.00 Materials 11,000.00 (Basic reference and learning software collection) Office Supplies 300.00 Operating Supplies 500.00 TOTAL $ 39,550.00 One additional staff person would be essential for the operation of this center. Key West branch staff could assist that person on a rotational basis. The new staff should be a Librarian, pay grade 8, which would cost approximately $ 43,400 annually in base pay and benefits. I would estimate that if January 1, 2003, was set as the target opening date, the first year's operational costs would be approximately $ 50,000.00 This is based on % of a year, at just over 1/3 the cost of the Big Pine Key Branch, including staff I have not yet had a figure confirmed by the Key West Friends, but earlier conversation indicated that they would be willing to commit $10,000.00 of their annual donation to this project. Additionally, from conversations with Jennifer Hill and Marlene Conaway, it looks as this project would qualify for the use of impact fees in the start-up expenditures. I'll send you the modified estimate on Monday, when I have further figures to work with. If you want more detail at that time, please let me know, and I'll be glad to provide whatever I can. These are still estimates, but they are based on past expenditures, and should be reasonably accurate. >-3 CZl~nCZlt:l:l~ >-3> 0'1 W~ 0 s:: 8 ~g"OS o 0.. Vl Pi. '-+0.. '$. 0..3 ~ 1il *,::1. n 0.. a~. -.0 ~ ::+l n tn -. _. ::i <: _. ~ 0 ::i (JCl (1) tn ...... ::i (') ~ > ~ ~ 1-1 a ~ (1) w ~ o:g _. tn 0 ~ >-+'1-1 ::i (1) ::i (JCl ...... tT:1~ (') 0.. -. ...... -. 1-1 _. ::i 1-1 ::r:: (1) tn (1) ::i ::r:: (1) (1) (') (1) ~ 3 ~ .-+ 1-1 tn CZl ...... _. (1) ~ .-+ 0 tn 0 5 . ::r' ::i ::r:: tn tn W _. Z 'E.. (1) ~ ::i (1) _. ...... (JCl .-+ .-+ .-+ 0.. ::r::~ cr" ::r' -. (1) 0 ::i CZlI-I W (1) (JCl o~ ~ 0 =t> (1) ac1 0 ::i 3 -....J ~ '$. (1) _. ::r:: a N CZl ~ ~.O 0.. 0 ...... ::i _. Vl tn tn '$. .-+ ,-... Rc ~ tn tn 0.. > "0 _. tn (1) .-+ 0.. (') 1-1 _. 0.. _. cr" ::tls:: ..... .-+ (1) .-+ ..... 0..(1) 0 ~ '-' ::1 .-+ ('D ~ S ....- UJ to .-+ 0 ~ ~~~~~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ >n n N ...... Vl...... N N r:::r Vl W ~ ...... 0..0 n -....J "" "" '-0""""""\0 ~ Vl Vl Vl ~~ JV ~ ~W~-....JN ('D Vl 0 v.. 0 \0 ......0......00 0.. v.. '0 W '0 ~ W NOoo ('D wo Vl 0 ~ ~. ...... 0 (j Vl 0 0 '"0 ..... ""l 0.. 3 fr 0 ('D <: 0.. ('D ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ >s;:: 0.. N OOOON 00 0 0 N N ~ s. ~ .-+ ':...:! ':...:! ('D 00 00 ~ (') S 00 00 0'.;. UJ 1-1 ~ (1) 3 ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~z N OOOON 00 0 0 3 0 Vl Vl ~ 9 '0 '0 00 00 g.> -....J -....J 0.. <: ~ ...... 0 1-1 (1) 3 ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ I~ W ......Vl......N-....J Vl W ~ ...... N ~ ~ \O......-....J ~ Vl Vl Vl ~o ~ ~w~-....J'O Vl 0 v.. 0 ~ 00 ...... 0...... 0 00 v.. '0 W '0 0 NOW WO Vl 0 0'1 0 Vl 0 0 07/24/2002 0g:00 3052g53563 V - ~ V) -Jr;) '" * f .Ir1 1! '" ]:> I j> lA i' V\ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ l~ . t. P ~ - ~ l ~ : :: ~ iff ,::> l~ 0. g ~ .v ' ~5 ~ i "'\ C1 1i tA -- ~ ~. f;iii !l ~ >> ~i tJ . #. ~~ ~i r' ~ :\ ~ ,^ ... - IV S~. ~ a = 7$; ! "" i ! fI> i ~ ~ ~~ ... .oN t a '" .' .. ~ ~ .. i " ... 0- -I: ~ (.U 8 - ~ o. 0, '" ... \ ; ;s (\\- - '\lj- \..,r; bo lB l.o ~ ,.1- .. ~ ~ I e . . i ~ '" . .. ... i i ~lt " '" II: ... ... Eo .. If j j i i ! ~ .. '" I , l . ... f. 9 j' " i ",. Ii, 1 1- felf ~ if i il CD .. I: ~ " ,. I' I I , I !"' ;- lis ! <:I _ 1ft! i M I ...... l~~ I .. Is-s I'~ ~ I .. '" i i C>_ Ill;! I a- . I 0 .. ll~ I I;, I IJl>~ If; I fill!:: I ,. I I~~ 188 [ !" - 1~1 I ! '" Q I ~ ii! f I;~ I~' I I .,. 15!~ I~i; I I . !/ li~ I...... CLERK OF COURT i i flJl.lf I .. iG!ili A f l!!.~~~I- l'lmlPi.r a: 1 ~ fi I I I l i j C1/:'"f i '" · &~ i f ~ if i ~ i' t i' fi ! is i i i ~ I Iff IiI ~ i i , 0 I' 6 C 0 i g I~f i il~ii s I u !" I : ~ ~ iil~~~ I i Iii ~ Q ~I!~~ I (> ~ I ! ~!~~! ~ iliii . I _ , , D! I 8 - l!t <> 8~~ ~ :l! _#'# r ... .- I ~ t:1 !.S ~ &lo~8 I I i illii o Q I 0 0 0 ; ilii~ c ~l'!.o~ Co CD ~N. '" !II I it 11 o J. I ~ N ~ t il ~i~ '6- '#- #- tI I '" ~ j . ~ !:! I j ~ i II~~~ I ~ ~I l$~ i ~I i;~ ... 510>0= I .. I <:> ! II .. I .... ; I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I J .. I .., ; I w : ili ~ I .. I e ~ I b &i I ~ ~ j a i II I i I i I ~l J,jj 8 I ~ I I ~I e ~ I ~ . I 0 ~ I ; I _ ~ I j I - ! ~ ; I' ~ I ~! ... M I ~ i s I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ i; I ; ... I <> .. t ... i jj IL I ... - I - 0 i.> ~1i;iD 8 8l I !!! ~ I i ~ 1 ~ ~ :: W I ~::: i ~I ii ~ i ... I - ~ ~ I ~ ~ g . ~ ~ 1ft I ... · I to' -'-0 ... ~ I s ~ ; a I II1l .. -1-0 ij al~~ I ... ~ I ~ p J j I i J I ~ ~ II i ~ b; 11: '",: w ~ I m g I I ~ Zl ~~ mol a ts ~ ;:l;:~ ~ ~Il;' ! w ~JIJvb. (,I :a. ~ 4D ~ .,.,., I ! ""' I ""'.. ... ....... ... ..., CD ~ I Wt # I - 1 ~ m . .. =- lAl~):. !:: '" ~ ; I I ~ ..... . ..J'=:---'- I ~ I ~ 1\ . I - . ! t i ~ Q~"lf 'J11~ [ I ! I I i ~ I PAGE 01/02 I I I ~ I I ~ lP Ifi rJ~ :!! I. t! I!ili- II I ~ I 1- i ~ I ; i!. . -; I I I i Ai I I~ II i:~I..it ~ ii Ii ii ~ I ~ I!: ~ I 'I i I i I I ~ I ~~ I If f I III I -l f ~ I" .. ltO~il -< ii 1 ' .. ' .. : I ! Jim it I ~ I t i I ~ I II< I ile1 .f~ l' ~ tl R ! ~.. ...i I~ fi "I '"ll ~" i~ "/I in .. "-3 If I' j:i I . .. ~ Ad Valorem Miiiage Summary Proposed Fiscal Year 2003 Rollback Millage Taxes per % over $100,000 of Millage Rollback taxable value (Jmncorporated, Dlat 1 (Unincorporated area from Stock Island to Tavernier from Mile Marker 4 to 95) Countywide S"""CfltS 3.7369 4.1878 lower & Middle Keys Fire'" Ambulance 1.5780 1.9093 Planning, Suildfng, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 Parks&Beache& 0.1658 0.1858 Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 Total 6.'f4-S'l 6.9180 Increase per $100,000 of taxable value 12.01% $418.78 $45.09 20.99% $190.93 $33.13 -27.14% $7.22 -$2.69 1~.06% $18.58 $2.00 -0.42% $58.29 -$0.24 12.58% $691.80 $77.N Unlncorporated,Dlst 8 (Mile Marker 95 up US 1 to County line and up 905 to intersection of Ca~ Sound Read) Countywide Services 3.7389 4.1878 12.07% rlre & Ambulance, Dist S 0.5800 0.6413 10.57<'A. Planning, Suilding, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Parks & Beaches 0.1858 0.1858 12.06% Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5829 -0.42% Total ~.1471 5.8500 9.n~ Unir,,;Qrporated. Diet 1 (From Intersection of 905 and Card Sound Road -''P Card Sound Road to the Count, line) Countywide Service& 3.7369 4.1878 12.07% Planning, Building. Cods cor, Fire Marshai 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Panes & 8eaehes 0.1658 0.1858 12.06% Local Rosd Patrol 0.5853 0.5629 -0.42% Total 4.5671 5.0087 l:J.67~ Key West Key Colony Beach, la!amorada, & Marathon County.vlde Service$ 3.7369 4.1878 12.07% Layton Countywide Services Lower & Middle Keys Fire & Ambulance Total 3.7369 1.5780 4.1878 1.9093 12.07% 20.99% 1472% 5.3149 60971 ~0/~0 39t1d ?& .Ltlnm .LI >1t13IJ E99ES6~S0E. $418.78 $64.13 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $565.00 $45.09 $6.13 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $50.29 $418.78 $45.09 $7.22 -$2.69 $18.58 $2.00 $56.29 -$0.24 ~0.87 M4.18 $418.78 $418.78 $190.93 $509 71 $45.09 545.09 $33" 13 $78.22 00:60 ~00ZIPZIL0 rJ o -- I,J--" - -- :E a.. '" "' M 8 ~ ~ .... , E e ~ ~ ~ j o f:. -r 3 I! .. c o .- .. CD - Ol E'" E " o III oil l;>"' c 0 " e- o a.. 0, - "' o ., l!Oi ..a: o CD 1Dl? l;>5 C:E "", 88 e'" C o :E c 1.1 ~ m :J>- ~ ~i >...J o 1.1 l- E ~ ~ ~ '" <( is ~ lis -9 a;c3]! "0 a: .... o o "'... .. CD .. .. CD 0 >- a- ii e :;\11. ii: .. to ~ ~ ~ CD 0 -> i!! a.. &.!! to to 5a: :E is CD ~ to ~a: "0 a: 1.1 l- E ~ ~.2 ~ ~ ~ c: ~ i ... 'CI ~ CD , :iCDc3~ ~.g & :;\<1: ii: 1.1 I- a; E "0 ~ I-a; > - ~ g -tj N"i'-~ ~.!e~-c ~ g.G)o~ ii~ a! u .. ii: &.s to .. 5a: :E ~s III .. ~a: "0 a: &.s to to 5a: :E ~s III to ,!,a: ..!! "0 a: g "" f ., c ~ ~ 0;.. '" ~- ~ ~ g!!i "'. as ~ ;i1. ;i1. ~ c:; .. a) ;j!. ;j!. 0> <'l ~ '7 ~ ~ :! ~ c;; .. .. u .~ CD U) .. ... l l;> C " o o i:i C " u. e ~ .. CD l!! ., C .a 5 <1l ::l 0 8 ~ :! ~ c;; o <D '" 8 an.. le. : ti ;j!. ;j!. ~ ~ q ~ '" "' .... "' '" c;; ~ ~ "' ~ c;; '" .... c:; m N ~- '" .... "":. <<'I. :: ;j!. ;j!. . 2l 'l' N "' .... '" 0> ~ '" c;; "' Ii; ~ ~ c;; '" <D 0> co; U'i, <D '" '" co; .... .... <D ;j!. '" .... ai ;i1. 0> '7 '" .... <'l o '" <:; .... <D '" m ~ .n ;j!. <D c;; 0> '" .... <'l o 0> <:; "' o ,..: o <D co; ;j!. <:; '" ~ <D <D ~ '" C " U. ~ C ., C) a; "0 I- U'i '" ai 8 .n .... .... N .n '" '" (ri '" ;j!. .... .... ~ ;j!. '" cO .... '" <D '" N '" o "' N '" 0> N <D .... "', M ;j!. .... <D g; N N .... .... N "' '" N "' N '" '" <D co; N N oj N ;j!. "' .... ... .... '" '" N '" <D M cO a; "0 '6 " -, "m -, c: '" E ~ ,g C W ~ to ...J 8 o "' '" o o o o ~ ;i1. '" ai ;j!. '" ai 0> .... o "' o c;; M '" o c;; 8 o 0> '" ;j!. '" ~ <D "' N o c;; Ii; N o c;; o 8_ a; N ;i1. o -.0: '7 a; N o c;; "' '" N o c;; "c :J 5 a; ., :I: g ...J '" N '" N al <D '" '" o m <D .... co; "' ;i1. "' N cO ;j!. '" N 0> M N ... '" <D '" .... cO o <D <D <D '" <D .... ;j!. <D .... g; .... o ;!: ... <D '" .... .... cO U'i ~ N .... ;j!. 2l ~ a; N ... .... c;; <D ... "' CD U ~ CD U) .. '" l l;> C " o o 3 o I- ~ m 0 co. 0 "' ~ N .... 0 ~ ;:; ~g .... 0_ #. '" :! ~ 0>::: ,...: N ~ a .. #. i!- :d.~ C? a .. ~ ~ ~ d 0 d c;; ~ 8 2l ~ 8 d c:i d '" "' 0 o '" "' '" ,...: 11)- In III i~ II ~ '7 N Illl I~ I~ I !~!I~ Ln. co II) I .... ~ ~ I I~ I g I~ I -.0: ~ I ~ c;; I c;; i ;j!. ;j!. ;i1. ~ U'i 8 1<:," ~ g , '7 ~ U'i 8 ~ 8 d ci 0 N <D '" "' .... N '" '" N '" .... c:i ci d ~ ~ ~ ~ 'l' comb ~ ~ co c:i ci d '" .... .... N <D .... .... N d ci "' .. u .~ .. U) ii a- 'u 'c " :E 5'~ t:; ~ :E :E ~ "~ "2 u. Q.J c"' m w a; ., .g- '8 '2 U en :::I c:i CD CD :Ecijc ~ :i2 a :2 ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ "[ "! '2 rn 'u CD Ii ~ .~ 5ja:~:a C) N <D ....- ~ <D <D "'. N "'- ;j!. o <D ~ ;j!. 0> N o '" "' N c;; 0> ~ N c;; '" '" '" CO; .... "'. :J I- m :E ., "' o e- " a.. e .. c CD C) E o I- g oj N '" 0> "' <D .... <D tDai c;; 0> "' <D ~ N '" CO; <D <D <0 b .n.n 2l :;-: .n ;j!. N ... 9 ;j!. ;i1. 8l In ~ g ;j!. '" ~ ;j!. ;j!. .... .... ci c? 0> 18 c;; '" '" ~ ~ c;; '" "' <D "' c;; o 0 '" 0 .... '" U1 d '" '" '" CO; 0> N CO; '" .... "' 0 '" ... ai", .... N '" ..; ~ Z ;j!. ;j!. lli '" N '" <D c;; ~ i c;; 8 o c;; <D m Si ~ d o "' .... (; ~ "':0 "' .... o .... ..; ~ Z ;j!. * In N ,...: cr; N ~ c;; o .... .... '" .... "' ~ ~ ~ ci '" 0> .... '" .... '" "lI: ~ tl :s "' is c: ! ,g c w ~ ...J :g .. a.. '" to o a: ~ o ...J tl ~ is 8 c to :; ~ ij oa co ~ ~ ~ C III .!! 8 it' c c ~ 8 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ "0 ~ .~ .:i: CD - CD ~ g .!::: ...J == U. * * .... 0> '" <D M CO; * ;i1. 0> N N ai N N o N '" <D ~ ~ '" N '" 0 5i! ~ N :: * ;j!. ;:I; ~ M g '" .n N 0> ,..: '"' '" In '" " .. '" '"' " '" s '" In nI " nI X .... o '" ~ .... .... o @ N '" <D ":i * 0> "' N * ~ 0> ~ .,; 0> .... Ii; ... <D .... 0> g .... g * '" 0> ... '" .... N N "' '" ~~ '" o o .,; \() r- (D ~ '" '" 0> ~ N "' N .... .... ... 8l N g N CO; "' * * "' co '" ~ g ;j!. '" 0> ~ g: :l: "' "' N 0 (f') N ~ '" '" .,; ~ ~ co~ N III ~ .,; 1ft ,., CD ~ CD '6 ... Sl " .. .. u .. E ~ .. .3 2i wi ... .. CD .!t .!t ~ ~ .. .. U) U) .. "i a- a- u U c c " " :E :E 3 ]j o 0 I- I- s .. Ol ! 01 Ol <I: Ad Valorem Millage Summary Proposed Fiscal Year 2003 Rollback Millage Taxes per % over $100,000 of Millage Rollback taxable value Unincorporated, Oist 1 (Unincorporated area from Stock Island to Tavernier from Mile Marker 4 to 95) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.2319 Lower & Middle Keys Fire & Ambulance 1.5780 1.9093 Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 Total 6.1451 6.9621 13.25% 20.99% -27.14% 12.06% -0.42% 13.30% Unincorporated,Oist 6 (Mile Marker 95 up US 1 to County line and up 905 to intersection of Card Sound Road) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.2319 13.25% Fire & Ambulance, Dist 6 0.5800 0.6413 10.57% Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 12.06% Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 -0.42% Total 5.1471 5.6941 10.63% Unincorporated, Oist 7 (From intersection of 905 and Card Sound Road up Card Sound Road to the County line) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.2319 13.25% Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 12.06% Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 -0.42% Total 4.5671 5.0528 10.63% Key West, Key Colony Beach, Islamorada, & Marathon Countywide Services 3.7369 4.2319 13.25% lay ton Countywide Services Lower & Middle Keys Fire & Ambulance Total 4.2319 1 .9093 6.1412 13.25% 20.99% 15.55% 3.7369 1.5780 5.3149 ,1..0 $423.19 $190.93 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $696.21 $423.19 $64.13 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $569.41 $423.19 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $505.28 $423.19 $423.19 $190.93 $614.12 Increase per $100,000 of taxable value $49.50 $33.13 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $81.70 $49.50 $6.13 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $54. 70 $49.50 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $48.57 $49.50 $49.50 $33.13 $82.63 Issues concerning Florida Keys Coalition of Cities Issue 1: Distribution of constitutional and other shared transportation fuel taxes received by Monroe County (on a countywide basis) to the cities. Background: 1. The Road and Bridge fund is funded from the following sources: · Fund balance forward - Funds carried forward from prior years. Marathon and Islamorada have already addressed the fund balance issue through inter local agreements...As a result ofthese interlocal agreements, the County is spending $969,000 in the Village ofI~da and up to $1 million on Boot Key Bridge. · Constitutional gas tax - Counties receive this reven~or dte acquisition, construction, and maintenance of county roads. The BOCC has recently expressed their desire to include storm water management in all County road projects. Expenses of$1 million per yea~ are anticipated for stormwater rnanagement. · County fuel tax - While counties receive this tax, cities receive a municipal fuel tax as part of the State's municipal revenue sharing program. · Local option gas tax - Cities receive a portion of this tax that is negotiated and established through an interlocal agreement. · Ninth cent fuel tax - Budgeted revenue of $25,000. This revenue source is relatively immaterial. 2. In fiscal year 2002, we anticipate revenue of$5 million and expenses of$9.5 million in this fund. 3. Countywide services funded by gas tax - Social Services transportation, Veteran's Affairs transportation, Engineering Department, Coordination with FDOT and FDEP concerning US 1 and the Overseas Heritage TraiL Response: Municipalities receive gas tax revenue from the State. Sorne gas tax revenue is distributed only to counties. However, the County provides some transportation related countywide services that benefit city residents as well as those that live in Unincorporated Monroe County. The County has had a backlog of projects due to upcorning sewer work, but we are now at a point where expenses are starting to exceed revenues. Also, the County has approximately 30 bridges to maintain. A single bridge would cost rnillions of dollars to replace. Additionally, funds need to be available for hurricane response. Issue 2: Ensuring that the countywide Fine and Forfeiture fund is not used to supplement or duplicate unincorporated area municipal policing. Response: See attached response from the Sheriff. Issue 3: Ensuring that the services provided to the unincorporated areas through the GMSTU taxing authority and the fire districts are funded solely by those districts. Response: The GMSTU and the fire districts are funded primarily through ad valorern taxes, charges for services, and licenses and permits. All of which are collected solely through those districts and can only be used within those districts. In addition, the unincorporated portion of the half-cent sales tax helps to fund the GMSTU. This issue was addressed with the Cities during last year's budget process with the County responding as follows: Background: Prior to fiscal year 2000, the unincorporated portion of the half-cent sales tax was put in the general fund. Utilization of the unincorporated portion of the half-cent sales tax in the general-purpose municipal service taxing district was supported by the cities. Staff Recommendation: Do not move these revenues out of the unincorporated district. Florida Statutes clearly identifies these funds as "derived on behalf of the unincorporated area ". Each of the cities receives a portion of this revenue from the state. JUL-22-02 14,01 FROM, Meso ADMINISTRATION j,lf~riff July 22. 2002 Jim Ru~rts ('uunty Adminil'llmlur Mnnrnc ('uunty I lOO Simonton Streel. Kcy Wes1, Fl. .U040 I )ear Mr. Roherts, ID, PAGE 2 RICH ^ RO D. ROTH · SB mUFF OF MONROE COUNTY 5525 COLLEGE ROAD · KEY WEST, JiI.OUIDA :l3040 (J05) 296-2424 · FAX PUS) 21)2~"070. l-KUU-273-t'<.WS - ---..-------.---..----....-.--.-.....----..---.--.- -- '- -..- -.- ------...-.-...-...-----.-- .__..._-~-- At the July )9, 2()()2 budget workshop, Ron Levy representing the Florida Keys Coalition of (~itics rC4ucstcd clarification on why the Sheriff's Office Regional budget request Klr Llscal year 200:l is grcalt.~r than theSherifrs Oftice tntaJ .ret{ucst in fiscal year .2000. In order to ilIl1~1ratc _ this puint Mr. Levy quult.-d actual and proposcd budget fIgures from the I.aw Enforcement, Jail, iUld Judicii11 fund (III 01). As you :lrc lIWaTe. this fund (.'untains the budgets f()f a substance abuse trcal.ment program, police impact fl.'Cs. puhlic works building maintenance charges. insurance. reserves. and court ::Idministmtinll ch:lrg(.'S. Given that these areas arc either not related to my office or hcynnd my cnnlrul. I willlimil my rcsponse to the changcs in my RegionuJ budget. The budget I'lr all services in fiscal year 2000 was $31,672,724. Uuring lhe hudgct proccss tilr Iiscal year 2001 the County Commission made the decision to change their approach to funding the Sht:rill"s hudget. As a n.-sult, it was split into two categories: Regkmal Scrviecs and MuniciPill Pulicing. This change resulted in approximately 10% oftbc aggrcgate budget being mOvclt inln a scpar~lte line item called municipal policing. The Regional budget ti)r 200 I WdS $2K,() 17.070. 'I 'his budget incorporated a 6% salary increase. The operdting ~Uld capital line items were not increased. The J~e~i()nal budget fe)r 2002 wac; $29,782,601. 'The increase in this budgct is attributable tn a 7% salary increase. The operating and capital line items were not incrC'dsoo. I huvc suhmitted :l propused budgot for fiscal year 2003 which totals $3I,H47.K84_ The budgcl im:urpur&ltcs a sulary incrc&tse of6% and un increase of$251.781 in thc nperuling expense line item. P lC:1SC Icluk..' k/lUW if you rCt{uire further clarification on thiiO is..Clue. Si~~ tfl4 I{ich:lrd I). Rolh Sherifl (lj" MllllroC ( 'uunty ......_..n SI.II.... 21r't;(, \ Iv..""..,., 1I,I:h.....\. r udjnr h..,,".. I.~....II.. .l tltol." 11lIO;I'l"~.:\lN4 . 1-.\\ I:ljl'.) '.1" .t:'..! M;or;olh..n SI~U.." J Ill.' II.,......."" lliK'n....1Y M....~lh"... ......i.I.1 .l.lll!ill 1"1"';) ;'..., .!'&;\(I . FAX (JIIS)1f1!' :',4'17 (..'''.....rA..~ St.atJOII '!"IOIICl O".~r:;o:;a3 "iSh...."y I~J.;"I\",."d... J:lorid;ll :l:lll;l'" (;lC);') IIS3-7n21 . IWII. 1;141:>) H~i..l 'I:ln !lipall.wood StaUo. KKTln (Iv........~ IliKhw., T~vrrnj"l, J:!",l,l" .1..'\117') tlOr,) K~.;I-U II . M l( (.'1(I~) lt5..1-3205 Appropriation Summary by OfficiallDivision Ofcl/Division Name Proposed 03 INC/(DEC) 0/0 Change Adopted 02 Actual 0 I Adopted 0 I CLERK OF COURTS 6,338,374 404,850 6.8% 5,933,524 5,773,958 5,552,869 B.O.C.C. 55,729,158 (7,069,575) -11.3% 62,798,733 22,979,385 54,786,667 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 490,028 40,957 9.1% 449,071 328,957 370,454 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 25,407,203 2,851,932 12.6% 22,555,271 16,640,131 20,866,835 PUBLIC SAFETY 9,224,506 531 , 152 6.1% 8,693,354 8,227,925 8,048,711 PUBLIC WORKS 70,140,151 1,990,601 2.9% 68,149,550 34,738,982 62,085,978 GROWTH MGMT 7,320,727 (447,535), -5.8% 7,768,262 4,246,597 5,742,743 COMMUNITY SERVICES 6,162,194 343,510 5.9% 5,818,684 4,761,013 5,580,572 VETERANS AFFAIRS 576,475 38,935 7.2% 537,540 483,033 503,022 AIRPORTS 5,601,882 26,339 0.5% 5,575,543 3,078,220 4,927,084 COUNTY ATTORNEY 903,063 44,523 5.2% 858,540 798,049 808,291 MEDICAL EXAMINER 552,918 668 0.1% 552,250 315,243 309,891 TRAUMA CARE ADMIN 1,920,039 (93,121) -4.6% ~013,160 533,351 2,127,761 TOC 21,789,406 734,287 3.5% 21,055,119 10,400,430 17,854,500 SHERIFPS BUDGET 42,753,857 3,096,892 7.8% 39,656,965 37,127,500 37,792,144 LAW ENF TRUST FND 1,900 0 0.0% 1,900 796,163 1,900 SUPV OF ELECTIONS 1,~3G,208 45,459 4.6% 984,749 974,382 975,873 TAX COLLECTOR 4,237,564 514,216 13.8% 3,723,348 3,283,886 3,658,027 STATE ATTORNEY 174,208 (19,238) -9.9% 193,446 137,117 151,402 PROPERTY APPRAISER 3,081,874 264,929 9.4% 2,816,945 2,295,671 2,745,080 PUBLIC DEFENDER 270,668 12,767 5.0% 257,901 249,627 246,270 COURT ADMIN 3,417,956 189,105 5.9% 3,228,851 2,520,795 3,120,079 CRIM JUSTICE PROC 76,000 0 0.0% 76,000 73,728 76,000 QUASI-EXTERNAL SERVICES 22,000 0 0.0% 22,000 10,775 22,000 Grand Total: 267,222,359 3,501,653 1.3% 263,720,706 160,774,920 238,354,153 37 EXHIBIT A Analysis of Budget Increase Operating Total Budget Budget Proposed 2002-2003 Total Budget $4,784,723 $4,929,973 Approved 2001-2002 Total Budget 4,542,175 4,670,175 Total Increase $242,548 $259,798 Percent Increase 5.34% 5.56% Amount Percent of Increase Components of Increase: 6% COLA/Merit (plus related benefits) $276,503 Other Operating Increases/Decreases (50,691 ) Transfer from Court Administrator's Budget 16,736 I I II L '1,() ~J~ ~~~ Total Budget Increase $242,548 5.34% MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT BUDGET HISTORY Approved Approved Approved Approved Proposed 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Average Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Increase Clerk to BOCC $830,941 $827,944 $828,375 $878,299 $967,733 Administration 272,350 275,165 273,598 273,700 242,314 Circuit Criminal 513,340 522,894 526,521 549,141 588,143 Circuit Civil 288,683 286,382 290,062 316,435 333,919 Circuit Family 97,010 113,719 104,113 108,137 111,912 Circuit Juvenile 73,914 72,758 76,275 79,180 83,448 Circuit Probate 44,924 43,736 44,604 46,555 48,696 County Criminal 377,841 368,454 382,311 411,528 441,384 County Civil 163,140 159,923 157,582 169,037 183,038 County Traffic 480,299 490,202 505,032 536,445 572,916 Jury Management 57,397 59,878 60,594 62,058 84,999 Recording 281,686 307,349 314,155 333,396 359,058 Records Management 236,153 236,775 239,570 246,289 253,878 Information Systems 430,198 449,372 482,065 531,975 513,285 Total Operating Budget 4,147,876 4,214,551 4,284,857 4,542,175 4,784,723 Debt Service 152,000 152,000 140,000 128,000 145,250 Courthouse Renovation - Office Furnishings 0 75,000 0 0 0 -----.- -----._---- -----------"-- --- ----------- -------_.~ ---- Total Budget $4,299,876 $4,441,551 $4,424,857 $4,670,175 $4,929,973 Annual Increase: Operating Budget 2.89% 1.61% 1.67% 6.01% 5.34% 3.50% Total Budget 6.66% 3.29% -0.38% 5.54% 5.56% 4.14% Position Control 98.0 98.9 98.9 99.9 100.0 Budget Increase History J :: r :~=-----~--:---=--=-___--=-----------------~--II I ~ $3 r r ~ Total I .2 I O~~~i ~ $2 I Budget $1 I C_] $0--'--- I I 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Fiscal Year 10 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY Proposed Approved Proposed 2002-2003 2001-2002 Increase Percent Budget Budget (Decrease) Increase Clerk to BOCC $967,733 $878,299 $89,434 Administration 242,314 273,700 (31,386) Circuit Court Circuit Criminal 588,143 549,141 39,002 Circuit Civil 333,919 316,435 17,484 Circuit Family 111,912 108,137 3,775 Circuit Juvenile 83,448 79,180 4,268 Circuit Probate 48,696 46,555 2,141 Total Circuit Court 1,166,118 1 ,099,448 66,670 County Court County Criminal 441,384 411,528 29,856 County Civil 183,038 169,037 14,001 County Traffic 572,916 536,445 36,471 Total County Court 1,197,338 1,117,010 80,328 Jury Management 84,999 62,058 22,941 Recording 359,058 333,396 25,662 Records Management 253,878 246,289 7,589 Information Systems 513,285 531,975 (18,690) Total Operating Budget 4,784,723 4,542,175 242,548 5.34% Debt Service 145,250 128,000 17,250 Total Budget $4,929,973 $4,670,175 $259,798 5.56% r--- Operating Budget I Distribution by Department for the Fiscal Year 2002-0~ 1.8% 5.1% . Clerk to BOCC . County Court-~l . Administration . Recording I . Jury Management . Records Management l III Circuit Court . Informat. ion Syste.~ms I .----.-------'-~----..---..-..-~-. ------.J 10 ~ ... ... iD 8 ~ ~ I! . c o ..- .. .. - a E"O E " 0'" u1 ~.. 3 g. o ~ uO;- - .. o .. "Om :;a: o .. ~~ c~ "", 88 .'" o C o :Ii : ~ :3 ..2.~ o~= ,.-, o 1il .... ... E '0 ~ ....... > "0 <( is 8 CG ~ GiO~ '0 a: ... '" '" "'"0 :; .. . .. >8- ~.t ~ ~ .. ~ :: ,. . o ,. ! ~ &!! .. .. 5a: ::t is .. ~Gi -,;a: .!! "0 a: )( .. .... ii E '0 ~ ....... > "0 <( g is ~'a~;'; ={;o) ~~ ~ u< .. ~ II .. a_ .. .. 5a: ::t ~!! '" .. -.;a: .!! "0 a: 1il .... :! ~ ~ 0 ~ "0 <( g is ~lB~'; :g.a;o~ >-'D 0 3~ a; d: ~ ~ =a: ::t ~.!! '" .. -.;a: .!! "0 a: s ... 'S .. .. o .. .. u ~ .. Ul .. ... "' ~ c " o U i:j c " ... 11 ~ ~ ~ .Q = ~ ::l 0 a: ~ ! l1l : ~ I ~- Q) ~ I ~. I c;; ~ '" 111- rD- .., .... eo. '" . -.t: -.t: '" .... '" .... .. r--: ;;e ;;e '" .... tr? ~ '" '" '" .., ... oo ei I '" i ~ I _ co I t- g :g i :g ~:Iai ,,:~I~ '-I I .n i I I f1. i ~ I ;! I ig: I ~ '" '" o '" ... .... o ei -.t: "#- 8 ~ 9 :: ~ ~ II) ~ ei '" eo oo '" .., '" Q ~ eo .... M m r.; .- '" .... I"-:.. aD. "#- "#- '" ... 0 ~ N .., ... '" '" .... ~ ei .., Wi co ~ ei '" '" eo M '" oo <D ~ '" ,..; -.t: "i '" (; ~ lil N oo (; ,.: '" '" M -.t: "! '" '" '" ~ co co ... ~ "0 C " ... ... a; c .. CI ... '0 .... l ... .., '" a;; 8 ..,' .... ... N on eo '" <D '" -.t: .... ... . ;f1 I') M .... I') co eo N eo ~ N '" '" '" <D .... 1')_ ;;; -.t: ... '" ei '" '" .... .... N .., eo '" .., N '" I') '" M '" '" a;; N ;f1 .., .... . .... N a:> N I') '" ;;; M ... 'u ~ ~ ~ c .. E ~ o C Ul ~ .. ... o o 8 g '" ;f1 ~ '7 ;f1 '" ei a:> N N o ei I') '" '" ei ~ g N "#- '" '" '" .., '" '" ei Wi '" o ei i I S( I :; ~ I co_ N 1 N I ... i -.t: o ": '7 CD '" '" ei oo a:> '" o ei 'E => iO ... .. :I: ~ ... I') N C> N ... I') ",' I') a:> o ai o '" M oo ;f1 .... o N ;f1 --: eo .... a:> . '" co I') .... M o co a;; co a:> <D .... ~ '" .... ei .... o ~ . '" '" .... .... M ~ 2l ~ ~ '" . ... 0; '" . .. .. u ~ .. Ul .. ... "i >. c " o (.l ;; '0 .... C> 0 .., eo co. .., g N ... ~ 0 .,;u; N C> ... 0_ o I ~ a:>_ '" I "'. I I ~ ! ~ I I -.t: ~ I ~ o ' .. I g ~ I ~ ~ if. ... 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ;ft i!- a:> N . cJ <'I N a:> N .., S ~ o ci i ~ ~ ci 0 0 I') .., 0 o N .., a:> "':&ti .... co .., C> ;f1 ~ #. ~ ~ 8 ~ cD ~ ~ ~ ~ c:i Q 0 '" eo '" .., .... '" '" '" '" '" .... ei 0 Q N .., .., '" '" I') triui ;:;. CD 81 8 ... .... c 0 .., ... '" I '" M I <D Ii I c> I~ ~ I Eo' '" I "#- ~ ~ m m z ,..; "1' ~ ;Da;~ ~ ~ Ui Q 0 0 co .... ... N '" .... ... '" Q 0 .. .. u ~ . Ul ;; Q. U C " ::t -... 2 e en .. ::t :Ii 8" .~ '(!: ... lU "2 en Ul ~~ '2 U .. :i~~~ :i!ta:Q ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~C:-E'u ~ i ce .~ ; 5: ~ :i CI c;;- co ...- ~ c> ... '" N ei eo N '" M ... "'- "#- N '" .0 ";- ~ '" ei :il '" N => .... en :Ii ~ o e- " ~ ... a; c .. CI ... '0 ... ~. a:> N a:> '" .., co .... co CD- ai 0; '" oo co "!. '" '" M eo eo ~ ~ Il'ivi 2l :;: on ;f1 '" ... q ~ ~ c> .... '" .., ~ g -.t: '" ~ ~ ~ .... ... g r? '" '" '" .., ei '" ::? ~ ;1; ei '" oo '" .., o g 8 .... eo ~ ci '" '" N M c> '" M a:> .... oo 0 eo ... flifli .... N a:> . ~ ~ if. a:> '" '" N '" '" o .., .... ... '" co ~ ~ ~ Q '" a; ~ ~ oo ei Q .., ... Q r: "':0 .., .... '" ..... . ~ if. ~ :n ~ ....: M '" ~ Q '" ..... ..... '" ... .., ~ :: ~ '" eo '" ..... '" ... '" ~ ~ i:l ~ o c ~ 8 .2 c Ul ~ .. ... g .. ~ "0 .. o a: ~ i:l :s .. is 8 c .. :& ~ i'! ... '" :s ! i:l is ~ ~ 8 ~ is c " 8 l ~ ~ -< ~ ~ " .. .8- .'l ~ 'E .. 0 " .: ~ :=E ... if. -.t: .... c> '" '" M M ~ If. '" '" N ~ '" '" o '" I') CD ~ "': ~ ~ ... :;: N = if. if. ... I') ~ M GO . '" '" on '" CD II! ... u; ~ N I') '" ~ N ~ if. ~ ~ ~ g g: 3: .., .., '" 0 M N &J ~ ~ ~ N .. '" . x . '6 ... ~ .. . ~ "<l . "C ~ ;; ~ 0 .; .- .. . u u ~ ~ . .. Ul en i; i; Q. CL U U C C " " :Ii ~ ;; ~ '0 0 .... .... o ,., '" on co I') ,.: .... " c> '0 :> '" ~ () .... c " e " '" .. c .. :E ~ N .... '" ;t - 8 ("t') ~ :J ..0 .. o " ~ .. .. o if. '" ~ = if. .... ei l eo ~ vi :.f v1 Q -(J ~ ~~ C \... fl '" ..... Wi . CD .... c> 8 ..... co- oo if. a:> '" . ~ S u q) '- ~ '" '" (; vi 'II) 1 ; ~ Vl 1 .~ ~~ gl ~ on '" ..... .... . 8l N g N M .., "I- '" '" ~ '" '" '" I') vi o \:) ~ 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '":> ~ ~ 4 <t: 'It : 3: '" '" vi .. OJ .. .. ;;, '" < Ad Valorem Millage Summary Proposed Fiscal Year 2003 Rollback Millage Taxes per % over $100,000 of Millage Rollback taxable value Unmcorporated, Dlst 1 (Unincorporated area from Stock Island to Tavemier from Mile Marker 4 to 95) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1878 Lower & Middle Keys Fire & Ambulance 1.5780 1.9093 Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 Total 6.1451 6.9180 12.07% 20.99% -27.14% 12.06% -0.42% 12.58% Unincorporated,Dist 6 (Mile Marker 95 up US 1 to County line and up 905 to intersection of Card Sound Road) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1878 12.07% Fire & Ambulance, Dist 6 0.5800 0.6413 10.57% Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 12.06% local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 -0.42% Total 5.1471 5.6500 9.77% Unincorporated, Dist 7 (From intersection of 905 and Card Sound Road up Card Sound Road to the County line) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1878 12.07% Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 12.06% Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 -0.42% Total 4.5671 5.0087 9.67% Key West, Key Colony Beach, Islamorada, & Marathon Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1878 12.07% Layton Countywide Services Lower & Middle Keys Fire & Ambulance Total 3.736'9 1.5780 5.3149 4.1878 1.9093 6.0971 12.07% 20.99% 14.72% '/ ( /'l $418.78 $190.93 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $691.80 $418.78 $64.13 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $565.00 $418.78 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $500.87 $418.78 $418.78 $190.93 $609.71 Increase per $100,000 of taxable value $45.09 $33.13 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $77.29 $45.09 $6.13 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $50.29 $45.09 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $44.16 $45.09 $45.09 $33.13 $78.22 Ad Valorem Millage Summary Proposed Fiscal Year 2003 Rollback Millage Taxes per % over $100,000 of Millage Rollback taxable value Unincorporated, Dist 1 (Unincorporated area from Stock Island to Tavernier from Mile Marker 4 to 95) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1658 Lower & Middle Keys Fire & Ambulance 1.5780 1.9093 Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 Total 6.1451 6.8960 11.48% 20.99% -27.14% 12.06% -0.42% 12.22% Unincorporated,Dist 6 (Mile Marker 95 up US 1 to County line and up 905 to intersection of Card Sound Road) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1658 11.48% Fire & Ambulance, Dist 6 0.5800 0.6413 10.57% Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 12.06% Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 -0.42% Total 5.1471 5.6280 9.34% Unincorporated, Dist 7 (From intersection of 905 and Card Sound Road up Card Sound Road to the County line) Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1658 11.48% Planning, Building, Code Enf, Fire Marshal 0.0991 0.0722 -27.14% Parks & Beaches 0.1658 0.1858 12.06% Local Road Patrol 0.5653 0.5629 -0.42% Total 4.5671 4.9867 9.19% Key West, Key Colony Beach, Islamorada, & Marathon Countywide Services 3.7369 4.1658 11.48% lay ton Countywide Services Lower & Middle Keys Fire & Ambulance Total 3.7369 1.5780 5.3149 4.1658 1.9093 6.0751 11.48% 20.99% 14.30% $416.58 $190.93 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $689.60 $416.58 $64.13 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $562.80 $416.58 $7.22 $18.58 $56.29 $498.67 $416.58 $416.58 $190.93 $607.51 Increase per $100,000 of taxable value $42.89 $33.13 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $75.09 $42.89 $6.13 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $48.09 $42.89 -$2.69 $2.00 -$0.24 $41.96 $42.89 $42.89 $33.13 $76.02