5th Amendment 02/21/2007
DANNY L. KOLHAGE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DATE:
March 2,2007
TO:
Suzanne A. Hutton
County Attorney
ATTN:
Kathy Peters
Executive Assistant
Pamela G. Hanc~
Deputy Clerk
FROM'
At the February 21,2007, Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted
approval and authorized execution of the Fourth and Fifth Amended Settlement Agreements in
Richard M Osborne & Conch Contrada LC v. Monroe County & Joe Paskalik, CA K OJ-J08
granting another one-year deferral of the proposed development through the end of ROGO Year
1 (July 14, 2007 to July 13, 2008).
Enclosed are two duplicate originals of each of the above-mentioned for your handling.
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact this office.
cc: Finance
File./"
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH ruDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a
Florida Limit<ed Liability Company,
Plaintiffi'Petitioners,
Case No. CA-K-OI-I08
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida;
and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official
capacity as Building Official,
Defendant/Respondents
/
FIFTH AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO CONCH CONTRADA L.C.
Plaintiff CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company ("Conch
Contrada"), and Defendants, MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
("Monroe County"), and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official capacity as Building Official
("Paskalik"), (collectively, the "Parties"), previously resolved their differences which gave rise to
the above-styled action, wherein the parties agreed to settle the matter between them upon the
terms and conditions recited in:
a. The Settlement Agreement dated July 17, 2002, hereinafter "Original Settlement
Agreement," attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
b. The Amended Settlement Agreement dated March 19, 2003, attached hereto as
Exhibit "B".
c. The Second Amended Settlement Agreement (Osborne) dated May 16, 2006
attached as Exhibit "C".
..,
I
d. The Third Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrada, L. C. dated May
16,2006 attached as Exhibit "0".
1. The parties hereby agree to amend the Third Amended Settlement Agreement as
follows:
a. Paragraph La. (paragraph 5 of original Settlement Agreement) is hereby
amended to read:
1. a. Conch Contrada agrees to submit an application for
Amended Conditional Use Order that reflects the intended change in use,
should Conch Contrada decide to develop the subject property with an
alternative use(s). Upon approval of the Amended Conditional Use Order
by the Planning Director, and in accordance with the development orders
referred to in Paragraph 2 of the Original Settlement Agreement, Monroe
County agrees to process promptly upon submittal the application for
building permit by Conch Contrada or its assigns for construction of one
7,500 square foot restaurant, or as an alternative, a 7,500 square foot
medium-intensity, mixed use, retail and/or office/professional use facility in
ROGO Year 16 (July 14, 2007 - July 13, 2008).
b. Paragraph 3. is hereby amended to read:
3. Plaintiff Conch Contrada, in cooperation with Monroe County, will
prepare and submit to the Court pleadings or notice required to address the Fifth
Amended Settlement Agreement. Conch Contrada shall pay any costs incurred as a
result of filing this Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement and any associated
pleadings or notices with the exception that each party shall bear its own attorney's
fees.
2
c. Paragraph 4 is hereby amended to read:
4. All parties acknowledge that the original Settlement Agreement was
entered into for the purpose of settling pending litigation and that this Fifth
Amended Settlement Agreement does not constitute an admission or evidence that
any actions of Monroe County or its employees that Plaintiffs complain of were
unlawful, unconstitutional or deprived Plaintiffs or any others of any rights or
property.
d. Paragraph 5 is hereby amended to read:
5. All other terms of the original Settlement Agreement dated July 17,
2002 and the (first) Amended Settlement Agreement, the Second Amended
Settlement Agreement and the Third Amended Settlement Agreement (Conch
Contrada) shall remain in full force and effect.
e. Paragraph 6 is hereby amended to read:
6. This Fifth Amended Agreement shall not be valid and binding upon
the parties until approved by the Court and incorporated into a Fifth Amended
Final Judgment entered by the Court in these proceedings.
f Paragraph 7. is hereby amended to read:
7. Until this Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement has been approved
by the Court pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the original Settlement
Agreement and Judgment previously entered, and any subsequent approved
amendments or modifications shall remain in full force and effect.
3
A
D
CLE
B~~./{~
'Deputy Clerk
- Ut1;4"~
Signature ofWttness
\,. ~/;'I' Ilnl2fPJ4!:D
Printed Name of Witness
BOARD O. '. C miNTY COMMI. :iSlO RS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORID
By4/1~"-4- ;{Q J (Z~.~
v Mayor/Chairperson
MONROE COUNTY ATTOBNEY
OVED AS T M"
MONROE COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL
BY:~~~
Joseph Paskalik
CONCH CONTRADA, L.C.
By: <::fA ~ ~ "A.J~
Libb evor
::J: .......
= -"
C) 0 =
:z ;t> ..... r-
:::o(""')z :x ;TJ
co -. """ C)
('11 r- =< :;;0
::>: I -q
o. ~ C:l
C)(""): N :;~
~::U?;, -0 ::..-:J
--1\:,' . ::J: crt
:-<:-:l?r C"J
""T1 .;.> ~ 0
f- e, ;7<J
)> Cq 0 t::l
c.n
4
EXHIBIT "A"
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIlE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as TI'UItoe;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.C.. a
Florida Limited Liability Company,
f'lai ntitrsll'etitioners,
Case No. CAK.'()I.I08
v.
. .
.
, .
<':\ ""'1
'"
<- ,';
c-
," J
'" ""
.- !'::-)
:"-J
-", 7";1
=..: ',1
J;'" .~
;,)
'.. :'.1)
... '.i:..J
MONROB COUNTY. a political
subdivision of the Slate of Florida;
and JOSEPH PA!~KAIlK. in his official
capacity as Building Official.
~-; .
. .:-,
Uefendantl Respondenb.
I
,- "
.l> Pi
SETtLEMENT AGREEMENf
~'Iainlilfs RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee ("Osborne"), and CONCH
CONTRAOA, I..C., a Florida Limited .Liability Company ("Conch Contrada"). and
Defendants, MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivisioo of the Slatl: of Florida
C'Monre'e County'), and JOSEPH PASKALlK, in his official capacity as Building
(llTlCia! ("Paskalik"), baving amicably resolved their differences which gave rise 10 this
action, hereby cgrec 10 seul" this matter between them upon the following terms and
conditions:
I. As to Osbome. Monroe County agRXl$: a) that. a Major Conditional Use to
conSlrw:.t a 35.200 sq. ft. mini-storage warehouse: has been approved, with conditions, by
Monroe Counly Planning Commission on January 27, 1997, under Resolution No. PJ-97.
l"CC(,rded at O. R. Book 1446, pages 2205 - 2207; b) that a variance with regard to off-
streel pIIrking, reducing the nwnber of Rlquired parking spaces from 3.0 to 2.5 per 1,000
EXHIBrr
I
fj
'\\i>
. ,
; .....
"
l'd
~ 9SZ _ ~~ ~1""""""" wnH~
Wb"IrIIA ;'J1I/1III?-t;ltI_=
-..".
5<1. n. or tloor area for the proposed mini-storage warehouse was granted by the Monroe
County IPlanning CommisSion on January 17, 1997, under lesolution No. P2-97: and, c)
that both development olders are pnIlICndy VB1.icl and ill full force ud effa;t.
2. As to Conch Conttada,L.C., Monroe County agrees: a) that a Minor
Condititllllll Use Development Older No. 5-99 to construct one 1.500 square tOot
rcSlllulUnt, to relocate an cxiJIing sCWllle treatment liicility, and to locate a shared
drivewa:r, W8II approved, with conditions, by the Planning Difector of Monroe County on
AuguS! 4, 21100. recorded in OR Book 1654. JllIIiles 1591-1595; mut. b) that this
development order is p_t1y valid and in full force and effect.
~i. Notwilhatanding anything in uy of the ~velol'ment o~ !eferred to in
paragraphs I or 2. above (IIIICI, specifically Condition No. I in Conditional Use
Development Order No. 5-99), or any other provision of the Comprehensive Plan or
Ordinances of Monroe County. no building pannit shaI1 be dCllied to either Osborne or
Conc:h C:::ontrada, L.C.. on tbe basis of Monroe County's regulations !elating to non.
l'esidentiial raw of growth or the adoPlion (or lack of adoption) of a non!esldClltia1 permit
allocatiCln system or its equivalent, including, but not limited to, the !egulations set forth
in Monl'QC County Comprehensive Plan Policillll 101.3.1 througb 10\.3.5, and Monroe
County Ordinance No. 032-2001.
4. In ac:cordanee with the development nrders referred to in paragraph I,
above. Monroe County agrees to proocss promptly upon submittal Osborne's application
for building permit for construction of a 35,200 sq. ft. mini-storage WllfIlhouse in ROOO
Year 12 (July 14. 2003,tbrough July 13,20(4).
2
<:'d
_ _. <;CIlF ~ ~T--"" wn>I..
~II~ ~"'-"'I-a
"
.1.
In acoordan<:e with the development order referred to iil paragraph 2,
shove, Monroe County agrees to process promptly Upon. submitllll Conch Contr8da's
applicaUon for building permit for CQl\StruCtioll of Ollll 7,500 square foot restaurant. to
relocate an existing sewagc treabnent facility, and lo locate a shared driYllWllY, in ROOO
Year II (July 14,2002, through July 13.2003),
6. Except as cxprcllSly provided herein, Osborne and Conch Conlrada, L.e.,
Monroe County and PaskaIik, "''\live any daim that IlBCh usertlld or wax capable of
llSsertilli~ in this cause and each shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs of litis
proccc:ding. In pru1icular. and without limitation, Osborne and Conch Contrada, L.C., on
behalf ~,f themselves. their Inc:mbers, bcncfidarlcs and any olhera claiming by or through
Ibeln, waive all o1aims for damages and compensation for denial of due process and
inverse condemnation (also referred to lIS lqJulatol)' or temponil}' laking) arising ti:om
the County's actions and regulations prior lo the date of this Settlement Agreement.
7. The Plaintiffs Osborne and Conch Cootrada, L.e. will prepare and aubmit
to the Court a "Notice of Voluntary DilImissal With Prejudicc" of their present claims
against the Defendants.
8. All panies acknowledge that litis agreement is ",.tc.ed inlo for the purpose
of settling pcndill& litigation and docs nol constitute an admission or evidence that any
actions of Monroe CountY or ita employees that Plaintiffs complain of \W:I'll unlawful,
unconstitutional or deprived Plaintiffs or any others of any rights y.
'/ '.
kaiL"....
Witne5l1
/1 ?
. ,./~
~,' .('1
1.I,;I,I"",;" '.0..;1"1'"
~Il~,~.. ..... .~' _.~...
(Print "lame of Witness)
Charles' y" l:('.oy, Mayor of
Monroe COUIIty
Dated 0'"7-/7~()~
J
E'd
El'J9E '3BZ _ ~"IH :"11 ~ ..n>f~
WWC;1 ~1It ~....cl'lI_R
(j::jL l;{.D /AL.' /)I<-){; If:....
(;?rr~)
Wi~ .'
, .
7 if 'dol ;ts _ ~'.'."'- I 'r; r-
(Print Name of Witness)
1\ ucJu:\;.{:t iLKl.l.l'I'-;
WJtncss. ' ,
ll\ldl~lh:'::.. N\C.h.ut~__
(print Nlunc of Witness)
V'd
~ scpll Paskalik, as Building Official
FOI Mooroc County
Dated 7-1/r #-
Dated ,>-.:IJ.Il~
; ~~~JG'
~h . L.C,
Dated . ,,' -l~
4
~ gsz _ ~~ ~l""A"l.l"""'''
IAfW:OIIt:: '7nlnI7_~1 ~
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a
Florida Limited Liability Company,
Plaintift1Petitioners,
Case No. CA-K-QI-108
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida;
and JOSEPH PASKALIK. in bis official
capacity as JBuilding Official,
DefendantlRespondents
I
AMENDED SRTIT.RMENT AORRRMF.NT
PlaiJ1tiffs RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee ("Osborne"), and CONCH
CONTRADA, L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company ("Conch Contrllda"), and Defendants,
MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("Monroe COWltyU), and
JOSEPH P ASKALlK, in his official capacity as Building Official ("Paskalik"), pllilviously
resolved their differences which gave rise to the above-styled action, wherein the parties agreed
to settle the DIIItter between them upon the tmnS and conditions recited in the Settlement
Agreement dated July 17, 2002, hereinafter "Original Settlement Agreement," attached hereto as
Exhibit "A".
1. The major conlJitional use granted to Osborne to constrUCt a 35,200 square foot
mini-storage warehouse with 84 parking spaces plus 4 handicap spaces during
ROGO Year 12, through the Original Settlement Agreement, shall be amended to
allow an alternate use con sisting of construction of 25,120 square foot credit
union, banking or financial institution office facility requiring 74 parking spaces,
plus 4 handicap parking spaces during ROOO Ye1ll14.
EXHIBIT
18--
2. Notwithstanding anything in any of the development orders referred to in the
Original Settlement AgreemCDt, or any o1her pl'9vision of the Comprehensive
Plan or OMinances of Monroe County, no building permit shall be denied to
Osborne on the basis of Monroe County's regulations relating to non-residential
rate of growth or the adoption (or lack of adoption) of a nonresidential pennit
allocation system or its equivalent, including, but not limited to, the ~ons
set forth in Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Policies 101.3.1 through
101.3.5, and Monroe CoWlty Ordinance No. 032-2001.
3. In accordance with the development orders referred to in paragraph I of the
original Settlement Agreement, Monroe County agrees to process promptly upon
submittal the application for building pennit by Osborne or his assip for
CODStrul:tion of mini-storage warehouse per the Origlna1 Settlement Agreement
during ROOO Year 12 or the alternative 25,120 sq. ft. credit union, banking or
financial institution office facility in ROOO Year 14 (July 14,2005. through July
13, 2006).
4. Except as expressly provided herein, Osborne and Monroe County and Paska1ik,
waive any claim that each asserted or was capable of asserting in this cause and
each shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs of this proc-';ng. In particular,
and without limitation, Osborne, on behalf of i1llelf. their heirs. lIUCC18SDr8,
beneficiaries and any others claiming by or through them, waive all claims for
damages and compensation for denia1 of due process and inverse condemnation
(also referred to as regulatory or temporary taking) arising from the County's
actions and regulations prior to the cIate of this AWe'lded Settlement Agreement.
5. PlaintiffOsbome, in cooperation with Monroe County, will prepare and submit to
the Court pleadings or notice required to ad~ the Amended Settlement
Agreement.
6. All parties acknowledge that the Original Settlement A'greement was entered into
for the purpose of settling pending litigation IIld that this Amended Settlement
Agreement does not constitute an admission or evidence that any actions of
Monroe County or its employees that Plaintiffs Complain of were unlawful,
unconstitutional or deprived Plaintiffs or any others of any rights or property.
7. All other terms of the Original Settlement Agreement dated July 17, 2002, shall
remain in full force and effect.
8. A County Code Enforcement lien currently encumbers the property. This lien
will be addressed in a separate agreement between Osbome and the County.
9. This Amended Agreement shall not be valid and binding upon the parties
until approved by the Court and incorporated into an Amended Final JudlJlllCnt
entered by the Court in these proceedings.
10. Until this Amended Settlement Agreement has been approved by the Court
pursuant to paragraph 9 ebove, the Original Settlement Agreement and Judgment
previously entered and unmodified shall remain in full force and effect.
ATTEST:
DANNY L. KOLHtPE 'C' .""
CLERK: t ~~//: \
~~ .
By: 0..
Deputy Clerk
Dated ----12 3 . I 9 ." ,S
~~~
Printed Name of Witliea
BOARD OF COUN1Y COMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUN1Y
By:~{~;, ;'1 :JiL6)
DUie S r, Mayor
By:
RICHARD. ~ OSBORNE~ Trustee
By:~~
illS -.I~""..
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTII JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR. MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OS80BNE, as Trustee;
and CONCH CONnAnA, L.C., a
Florida Umited Liability CompImy,
Plaintift'lPetiOllllfll,
Case No. CA-K..oI-I08
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a political
tUbdMaioa. oftbe State ofFloridB;
and JOSEPH PASKALIK, in his ofllclal
CIpICity as Building 0fIlciaI,
Defendant/R.espondents
I
SECOND AMRNDED SBTTI .F.MRN'T AC'dtRF.MF.N'I'
Plaintifti RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Ttuatee ("Osborne"), and CONCH CONTRADA,
L.C., a FIoJida Limited Liability Company ("Conch Contrada"), and Deftlndants, MONROE
COUNTY, a politicallUbdiYiaion of the State of Florida ("Monroe Cowtty"), and JOSEPH
P ASKALDC, in his ot1kiaI capacity as Building 0ftlciaI ("PaskaIik"), preWlusIy resolved their
diffinncea which gave rUe to the above-styIed action, wherein the parties agreed to settle the
matter between them upon the terms and conditiOllJ recited in tile Settlement Agreement dated
July 17, 2002. hereinafter "Original Settlement Agreement." attached hereto as Exhibit U A'. On
March 19, 2003, the Board of County COIIIIIIissionen of Monroe Couoty approved the AmeDded
Sett1cm.It Asreement, beni.nafter"Amendad Settlement Aareemem" attached hereto as Exhibit
"B".
Thll parties agree to BD*Id tile (1IDIIDied) &ettlement 881_t as tODows:
1. The Keys Federal Credit Union, as successor in interest to Osborne, has received
through the Amended Settlement ~d MIjor ConditioDaI UlIe Approval to
EXHIBIT
I(L.-
construct a 25,120 square foot credit union, banking or financial institution office
liIciIity requiring 74 parkins spec:es plus 4 handicap parkins spec:es during ROGO
Y_lS.
2. Notwitbstl....iIIg anytbUIg in any of the dewlopment orders ..d'iated to in the
Original or Amended Settlement Asreement, or any other provision of the
ComprebeDsive Plan or Or<li..._ of Monroe County, no building pernBt shall be
denied to Osborne on the bois of Monroe County's regulations relating to non-
residential rate of srowth or the adopcion (or lack of adoptiOll) of a IIOIII'elIident
permit allocation system or ita equivalent, including, but not 1imited to, the
reguIationa set tbrth in Monroe County ComprebeoIive Plan Policies 101.3.1
through 101.3.5, sod Monroe County Ordinanoe No. 032-2001.
3. In aeeordance with the developmenl orders .odb...d to in paragraph I of the
Original Settlement Agreement, Monroe County asr- to process promptly upon
IUbmittaI the applic:ltion fur building permit by Osborne or his IIIisns fur
construction of mini-storage warehouse per the Original Settlement Agreement
duriDgROGO Year 12 or the alternative 25,120 aq. ft. credit mOll, banking or
financial institution office facility in ROOO Y_lS (July 14, 2006, through July
13, 2007).
4. Except 88 expressly provided herein, Osborne sod Monroe County sod PaskaIik,
waive any claim that eadt auerted or wu capBble of asserting in this cause and
each shall bear ita own attoroey's fees sod costs of this proceeding. In particular,
and without IimitlItion, Oabome, on behalf ofit8el( their heir&, IIl1CCes8Of8,
beneficiaries aDd any others claiming by or through them, waive an claims for
d8lllllgll5 and compensation for denial of due process and inverse condemnaIion
(also referred to as regulatory or temporary taking) .arising rrOO'l the County's
actions and regulations prior to the date of this AInended Settlement Agreemmt.
S. plaintilf Osborne, in cooptll1Ition with Monroe County, will prepare and submit to
the Court p\eAtlit1glI or ootiee required to address the AmmIded Settlement
Agreement.
6. All parties aclrnowledge that the 0rigjnaI Settlement Agreement was entered into
for the purpose of settIin8 pending litigation and that this Amended Settlement
Agt -.t does not constitute an admission or evidenee that lIIIY adions of
Monroe County or its employees that PlaintiftS Complain ofwere ~ ..
$ ::: So:
UIlCOIIIlitutional or deprived PIaintil'fs or any otI1ers of any rigbts or ~ ~
(")''- ~
AU other terms of the Original Settlement AgreeIIIent dated July 17, 2oliia@n 1!!'!
"". --' ....
~(;"). ...
. . full "---- and Jr..~ -<..,"'" ....
~m ~~ ~ ~~ ~
.- c;> CO
,.., ~
This Secood Amended Asr-nem 1IhaII11Ot be vaJid and binding upon til" putiea
7.
8.
until approved by the Court and incorporated into an Amended Fmal Judgment
entered by the Court in these pr.,.,..,di.,gs.
9. Until this Second Amended Settlmnent Agreement has been approved by the Court
." __ .. pursuant to Paragraph 8 above, the 0rigina1 ~ Agreement and Judgment
~,~;-;'~'::;OL~'-,.__ -
"i~:;~'>~~;t!J,mously entered and unmodi6ecl shall remain in full Coree and effect.
i..../.~~_ ,,' J. I~\.'i
":J.- .\"'.. ' -;-;':
.'~~.;.'. ..... :;i~~. .... BOARD OF COUNTY
", _",~ '.- ." ..' OFMONROEC
Bjj~Ju..~
Deputy Cferk
By:
SIONERS
-t1
~
CI
..."
o
::0
::0
'"
(")
o
~
~~~~
. tgnatureofWttness
~~sh"~
Printed Name ofWItIIeSS
MONROE COUNfY BtJlLDING omCIAL
By: ~!r;,al ~~4JJ
. 10seph p.oInolilc
KEYS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION as
SUccelIlIOr 8Dd Interest to RICHARD OSBORNE
~~
COUNTY ATTORNEY
FO
. LL GER. JR
Di!l.~"~'!!-'f r-U'F' ATTOfINEY .
IN THE CIR.CUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M OSBORNE. as Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a
Florida Limited Liability Company,
Plaintift7PetitiODel'S,
CaseNo. CA-K-OI-I08
v.
MONROE. COUNTY, a politK:al
8UbdiviIioI1 of the Stele of Florida;
and JOSEPH PASKALIK, in his official
capIICity III BuikIing Official,
Oe&mdantIRespondents
I
TI:IDW! AMENDED !U'lTTr RMRN'I' A{".RRRMRN'I' AS TO CONCH CONTRADA. L C
P1aintitfCONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a Florida Limited LiabiHty Company ("Conch
Contrada"), and DefelIdantJ, MONROE COUNTY, a poInlcallllbdiYillion of the State ofFlorlda
("Monroe County"), and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official capacity as Building Oftlcial
("Paakalik"), (col1ectMly, the "Parties"), previously resolved their ~ which gave rise to
the above-styled action, wherein the parties agreed to settle the lJIlItter between them upon the
terms and conditions recited in JlIII1I8I1Iphs 2, 3, and 5 in the Settlement Asreement dated July 11,
2002, herclnafter "Original Settl~ A8feement, " attached hereto as Exhibit . A'. The
Settlement Agreemant was previoosly amended to provide for a clumge in the conditional use and
to elrtend lthe time period for buildiug permit application and construction of the approved
conditional Ulle.
I. The perIies lIgIW to aIIMIId the (second) Amencled Settlement AaI_....4 as
follows:
a. Paragraph 5 is amended to now read:
EXHIBIT
I D
Conch ContrlIda agrees to submit an app1ication for Amended CoDditiooal
UIIIl Order that reflects the intended c:hanae in use, should Conch Contrada
deeide to develop the subject property with an aItemative Ule(1). Upon
approval of the Amended Conditional UIIIl Order by the P1anniog Director,
and in accordance with the development orders ret1l.Jed to in Paragraph 2
of the OrisinaJ Seltlement AlP eement, Momoe County agrees to proeeIS
promptly upon submittal the application for building permit by Conch
Contrada or iU Uligns for COIIItTUdion of one 7,SOO IqIllll1l foot
restaurant, or II an ahemative, a 7,SOO square foot medium-intenlity,
mixed use, retail and/or offic:e(professionaJ UIIIl fitciHty in ROGO r_lS
(July 14, 2006 - July 13. 2007).
2. The parties further agreed that no provision in thil ~ IhaIl exempt P1aintiff
Conch Contrada LC fiom any requirementl impoled by statute and/or ordinance to
connect to a central eewase Iystem when one becomeI "available" II that term il
defined by IWute and/or ordinance.
3. Plaintiff Conch Contrada, in cooperation with Monroe COUIlty, wiD prepare and
submit to the Court pleadings or notice required to addreu the Amended
SettIemeot Agrwment. Conch Contrada IhaIl pay any com incurred II a remit of
filing thil Second Amended Sett1ement Agreanent and any UIOCiated pIM<li._ or
notices with the exception that each party IhaIl bear ill own attorney'l mes.
4. All parties acknowledge that the originaJ asr-nent was entered into for the
purpollll of IeltIins peoding litigation and that thiI Second Amended Settlement
Ajjreement does not COIIItitute an admillion or evidence that any actiOlll of
Monroe County or ita emp\oyeeI that PIain1:ifti Complaio. of were unlawful,
unconstitutionll1 or deprived PIaintiftls or any others of lilY rigbta or property.
5. AU other terms of the SlIttIement Agreemlll1t dated July 17, 2002, and the(fim)
Amended Settlement agreement which was approved by the Board on or about
May 21, 2003, and the Second Amended Settlemlll1t AgreamllI1t which was
approved by the Board on or about JII1U8J}' 19, 2005, especially as it pertains to
Conch Contrada, L.C., 1ba11 remain in full force and effect.
6. This Ameoded Agreemlll1t shall not be valid IIId binding upon the parties until
approved by the Court IIId incorporated into a Third Amended Final Judgment
7.
entered by the Court in these proceedings. ~
~ <:I It
Until this Third Amended Sett\ement Agl___ has been approved ~~
~r-~ :z:
pursuant to the precedinlJ paragnlPh, the Original SettllllDllllt Agrllelne@ ~ ~
~?i5~
Judgment previously llI1tered, and any lIlJbsequlll1t approved ~g!,;::
.. . '-
-." ~~
r- rr:
)>
modifications shall remain in full force and etrect
BOARD OF CO
MMlSSlONERS
Charles McCoy,
Monroe County
".3..0,"
MONROE COUNTY BLDG. OFFICIAL
ByS2~edd/
-
::K
V1
a
\G
...,
;=
IT!
o
."
C)
::a
;0
,."
,..,
o
:;u
'='
~~v.<y~S.
SignatuJ1l ofWrtiieas - Q "-
" Cindy Sawyer
Printed Name ofWilDe&S
CONCHCONTRAD~
By: ~_..t..&
L" Trevor~ J'l~