Loading...
06/20/2007 Agreement DANNYL. KOLHAGE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Suzanne A. Hutton County Attorney ATTN: FROM: Kathy Peters Executive Assistant Pamela G. Han~ Deputy Clerk V At the June 20, 2007, Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted approval and authorized execution of a Settlement Agreement in Hill Family Investments, Inc. v. Monroe County, Case No. CA P 07-316. Enclosed is the original Settlement Agreement for your handling. Should you have any questions ple'ase do not hesitate to contact this office. cc: Growth Management File./ 11\1 THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA HILL FAMILY INVESTMENTS, INC., A Florida corporation, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 07-CA-141-P v. MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision Of the State of Florida, Defendant. I SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT The Plaintiff Hill Family Investments, Inc., a Florida corporation, and the Defendant, Monroe County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby agree to settle the above-captioned matters as follows: Whereas, the Plaintiff owns the subject property which is a series of parcels having real estate numbers 00502830-000100; 00502870-000000; 00502890-000000; 00502900-000000; 00497620-000000; 00497630-000000; 00497640-000000 and which is located in Commercial Fishing District Five (CFSD-.5); and Whereas the Plaintiff desires to submit an application to amend its major conditional use to construct 11 additional slips in the marina portion of the property; and Whereas the Plaintiff previously convinced the State of Florida, acting through the Administration Commission, to expand the uses in CFSD-5 to include marinas, boat chartering, charter boat fishing, and dock leasing; and 1 Whereas, the settlement agreement between the Plaintiff and the State of Florida was implemented through FAC. 28-20.024; and Whereas the County inadvertently eliminated some of the uses authorized by FAC. 28-20.024 when the County adopted Ordinance 28-1999; and Whereas the inadvertent elimination of permitted uses in CFSD-5 adversl~ly impacts the Plaintiff's Major Conditional Use application; and Whereas the Plaintiff has obtained permits from the Army Corps of Engineers and Florida Department of Environmental Protection which will expire before the County could adopt a glitch bill to restore the uses inadvertently eliminated by Ordinance 28-1999; and Whereas County staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve the Plaintiff's Major Conditional Use application; and Whereas the County has already commenced a comprehensive review of the Monroe County Code to eliminate inadvertent errors and inconsistencies as well as antiquated provisions; and Whereas the parties desire to avoid the uncertainty and expense of further litigation and amicably resolve the above-captioned matter instead; NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1 . The Court shall enter a consent decree under which it is judicially determined that the authorized uses for the Plaintiff's property which is subject to this action shall include those uses approved by the Florida Administration Commission in FAC. 28-20.024 prior to the enactment of Ordinance 28-1999; 2 2~. County staff will schedule the Plaintiffs Major Conditional Use application for hearings before the Development Review Committee and Planning Commission as soon as possible, taking into consideration the notice requirements set forth in the County Code and Florida Statutes; 21. By entering into this agreement, the parties do hereby agree to release each other from any and all claims or potential claims that could have been raised in this litigation; 4. Each party agrees to bear its own costs including attorney's fees. ATTEST: State of Florida County of Monroe For the Plaintiff, Hill Family Investments, Inc. . t~ I . , l }-<t , "-.f Name ,j Title: ,/c,~!u-tl- -, ,~fi fldJ & . L/ '''7 7' {. Date JUN 2 0 2007 Date 3