01/02-28
PURCHASE I SERVICE ORDER
FOR
MONROE COUNTY
To: URS
Re: PSA Agreement, Dated 1-1-02
Purchase Service Order No. 01/02 - 28
Resolution No.
Project Name: Runway Safety Area Feasibility Study - Key West International
Description of Services:
Prepare an Environmental Analysis which advances the information presented in the Runway
Safety Area. This additional analysis will investigate permitting agencies concerns and
requirements. (See attached detailed Scope of Services)
Multiple of Direct Salaries
Lump Sum
x
Days to Complete 450
Reimbursable Expense
Fee this Service Order
$ 119.626.00
Payment for Services shall be in their entirety as per PSO.
Prepared by:
/
>-?~-'7 .,...:? ~~
. / ..~' ,."-
..;,>~/'./' ~ / ""'~
Milford A. Reisert
Date:
6/11/02
Date:
Recommended by:
~~
-~~
--~
Date:
(0-, ?>-OL
CJ CJ
Z >~
:::n ('):--:
~I-:-;
--'.. '
('). j
C) C') .
~; ~o ~.-.~:
A d b --4 r-
pprove y: -< ("'):r:
. ~l>
"'Tl {:)
r r"I
)>
C4.~/.s 's.""'y' M..~y, "'1"'1."
Date:
9';;~/Z-
I I
r-v
<= '"Tl
(::;:)
''0",) I
(/) rr1
T'Tl CJ
--0
N '"Tl
+" 0
::::0
--0 ::;:':1
3: f"ll
N (J
0
CJl ::::0
--" Cl
SCOPE OF SERVICES
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA FEASIBILITY STUDY
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Prepared by
URS Corporation
Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the environmental feasibility of providing a standard
Runway Safety Area (RSA) and additional runway length at the Key West International Airport
(Airport). The intent is to identify potential permitting issues and determine the feasibility to obtain
environmental permits for the proposed development.
The environmental resources of concern will be generally limited to the natural environment (i.e.
mangroves, salt ponds, wetlands, protected species). The poteritial historical resource (concrete
bunkers) adjacent to the airport will be considered.
The study will accomplish the following objectives:
1. Review of existino alternatives that achieve the required RSA (500' wide x 1,000'
beyond each runway end) and additional runway length.
2. Consideration of potential environmental impacts associated with selected
alternatives.
3. Conduct discussions with appropriate regulatory agencies to determine the
feasibility of the proposed developments and likely permit and mitigation
requirements for selected alternatives.
4. Evaluate available mitigation strategies and preparation of mitigation cost
estimates based on selected alternatives.
5. Present the findings and recommendations to the Airport and Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA).
Element 1 - Data Review and Early Project Coordination
1.1 Review relevant reports, information, and technical data related to operational
characteristics of the Critical Aircraft and RSA requirements at the Airport. Review
available information in regards to environmental resources of concern on and in the
immediate vicinity of the Airport.
1.2 Prepare letters and graphics to inform selected regulatory agencies of the study and to
request information and comment.
1.3 Conduct up to three early coordination meetings with Airport representatives, FAA, and
regulatory agencies (i.e. US Army Corps of Engineers, South Florida Water Management
District, Florida Department of Community Affairs, and Florida Department of State _
'Division of Historical Resources) to discuss the purpose of the study and to identify
permit and mitigation issues for consideration in the study. . The purpose of these
meetings. are to explain the intent of the project and obtain preliminary comment and
information from the permitting agencies. 1
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Key West RSA Feasibility Study.doc
Element 2 - Project Impact Determination
Task 2.1 Existino Conditions
2.1 Prepare a brief narrative to describe the following:
a. General airport operations and level of activity.
b. Airfield features and configuration.
c. Environmental setting of airport and immediate vicinity.
Task 2.2 - Proiect Reauirements
2.2.1 Drawing from existing reports, studies, and the recent Airport Master Plan update,
prepare a brief summary of the findings and recommendations related to the Airport's
runway and RSA.
2.2.2 Document the existing and anticipated future balanced field aircraft takeoff and landing
length requirements for the Critical Aircraft using mean maximum temperature during the
hottest month and for a calculated hottest day temperature.
2.2.3 Document the FAA RSA design criteria for the airport based on the Critical Aircraft.
Discuss relevant FAA Orders, Regional Policy memorandums, and guidance regarding
RSA standards and applicability at air carrier airports.
2.2.4 Identify any related development(s) or induced impacts that may also have the potential
to affect the environmental resources of concern.
Task 2.3 - Proiect Alternatives
2.3.1 Review and summarize existing alternatives as presented in available reports, studies,
and the Airport Master Plan update that satisfy the balanced field-length requirements for
the Critical Aircraft and meet current FAA design criteria for standard runway safety
areas. The development of new alternatives is beyond the scope of this study.
2.3.2 Compile from existing reports, studies, and Airport Master Plan update an estimate of
probable construction cost and illustrations for each alternative carried forward from the
previous task item.
2.3.3 Prepare a draft report for review by airport staff. Incorporate comments as necessary.
Task 2.4 - Development Impacts
2.4.1 For each alternative, provide a brief narrative describing and quantifying the potential
impact to environmental resources of concern. The environmental resources of concern Will be
limited to the natural envi(onment, specifically mangrove forests, S;:llt ponds and wetlands,
protected species. The potential historical resource (concrete bunkers) adjacent to the airport' will
be considered. Impacts will generally be quantified by the area (acreage) impacted or the
number of species affected.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Key West RSA Feasibility Study.doc 2
The environmental analysis does not include detailed biological or habitat studies,
detailed surveys for protected species, detailed water quality studies, cultural resource
assessments, and site-specific wetland delineation and surveys. The environmental
analysis does not include consideration of air quality impacts, aircraft noise impacts,
social impacts, or economic impacts. These are customarily addressed in a formal
Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement.
2.4.2 Prepare a matrix comparing environmental impacts of the alternatives.
2.4.3 Prepare a draft report for review by Airport staff and FAA. Incorporate comments as
necessary.
2.4.4 Conduct up to three meetings with Airport representatives, FAA, and appropriate
regulatory agencies to present the alternatives, anticipated impacts, and discuss
permitting and mitigation issues and requirements. The intent of these meetings are to
present more comprehensive information regarding the proposed action and probable
impacts and to solicit specific comment regarding permit requirements.
Element 3 - Mitigation Cost Evaluation
The intent of this phase of the Scope of Services is to identify unavoidable wetland impacts and
possible required mitigation. It is hoped that through early coordination with permitting agencies,
issues related to wetland impacts and their mitigation can be identified at an early stage of the
site development process. Anticipated benefits from this task include early feedback from the
permitting agencies as to the feasibility and practicability of permitting the proposed alternatives;
whether mitigation can be a viable and affordable option and how much additional documentation
might be required for this project to be submitted as a formal permit application. This task is not
intended to be, or produce, a formal permit application.
3.1 Develop candidate mitigation scenarios for the proposed alternatives. Priority shall be
given to developing potential mitigation at the Airport and its environs; if mitigation is
found to be unfeasible or inadequate, then review potential mitigation sites outside the
Airport and possibly on adjacent keys.
3.2 Work tasks shall include coordination with regUlatory and governmental agencies (Le.
SFWMD, ACOE, FDEP, Florida Keys Environmental Restoration Trust Fund, City of Key
West) to identify any mitigation projects known to the agencies that may offer potential
mitigation credit to the Airport if implemented, review of the GIS database developed by
URS for the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study (Le. public lands, conservation areas,
natural areas, areas of exotic infestation, wetlands etc.) and other sources as identified
during the study to generate a list of candidate mitigation sites. Work tasks shall include
data collection and evaluation, landowner contacts, on-site field evaluation of the most
promising candidate sites, and preparation of an overview drawing showing the candidate
mitigation sites and their potential mitigation opportunities.
3.3 'Following development of the candidate mitigation strategies URS shall present the same
to the ACOE, SFWMD and DCA for review and comment. Assumes up to three
meetings with permitting agencies.
3.4 Prepare a summary of probable construction costs and probable mitigation costs for each
alternative.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\Key West RSA Feasibility Study.doc 3
SERVICES SPECIFICALLY NOT INCLUDED
· Formal permit applications for wetland impacts.
· Wetland jurisdictional surveys.
· Development of Construction Plans for wetland mitigation.
· Detailed surveys for protected species.
· Public Involvement Program (i.e workshops, presentations, hearings, etc.)
Element 4 - Report Preparation and FAA Coordination
4.1 Prepare a draft report and submit three copies to the Airport for staff review. Incorporate
comments as necessary.
4.2 Attend one meeting with Airport staff and the FAA to present findings of the agency
coordination effort and mitigation cost evaluation.
4.3 Prepare final report and issue five copies to the Airport for distribution.
'.
C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\K.ey West RSA Feasibility Study.doc 4
~
15
'"
'"
..
""
:l:
l
~
I;
8-
i
."
"
I;
g
'"
i<
..
n..
::rex>
~~~
..
"
Q,
"'..
~...
~ ~
~f;:m
..~
~o
s:_
ex> 0.
"''''
00
...
.. ~
~...
...-
......
<0 co
o>e>
...
~::
~~
. e>
RlN
o>e>
o
o
b
""
r-
r-"
~[
~f
~;
~1
il
gf
..
0;
~N
co
~
co
B~
"'...
..
...
...
f'"
o~
~
N_
8fi
..
ex>
:.-
~Q
~
'!l
S-
"
n
CCt~
;r",,!
iE~il"
"hF
5'-"~
~;~.
~!~!
~5''''''
ca.l;;
fiil
!~l
~I-i
>En
". ~
! ~
~ I;
~ g
f
..
.,
"
:I
"
"
~
~
..
i
en
c:
~
5'
i.
en
c:
~
5'
E
ex>
"'ex>'"
0;
00'"
'"
"'Oex>
... ...
'" '" '"
'" '"
'"
... ...
~
.........
"'00
.. ..
......
'~"
~~
........ ...
~NWW
~-:""A"
O-...lCO.....
0000
.. ..
~~
.. ..
~...~...
ONQJN
..,.W........
....ONtn
.. ..
......
CoCo
~~
..
......... ..
-Wtnw
':..tb':..b1
(rIOO,"
""ONt,n
...
N
'"
'"
'"
'"
en
c:
~
5'
i.
WWWwwwm
:"'WCJWN:"e-
,,~~~C:O!
!BP~~
il~~"".?t.
~!iUil~
!;!-;-~~i
'"' fB'f~~
iH! fj!
8-;;"ll..m
".!!!~ f i-
f ~U'~f"
e iH~~ g
.8-8-8--g
......J
fff~
lilf
~1;-~1
""~~~
:l: Ii ::r!.
lil'"
....Q)CDCDCDCD
....----
CDaooom
CDOOOgt
'" g:~
~t
NNN......O
"'-
::J~~~~g
.. ....
..................
&.rlNWWWCD.
;..,......."':.
g~t~~go
.. ..
!'" ~........
Ut...""....,....ro...
NCD(1I(..)("J~(l)
CII-CDWW(ncn
.. ....
",.............-
CON.l:o...........CO.t..
E~~tB~~
A
'"
NNNNNNNN
:...:,..:,.,:...:........
......WN:...
~~l{~~~i'i
o.o.i~~'030
U~~iB"l
::::::~&.1!-
~~~Iiiif
iU-;";lj~
!!!;p-g:
~~~!!if!
!!.!!.!!...." ~
~~~ t 1
~c~ a
::!: ~ 5l.
&.&.&. ! i
iil ~ !!.
~~~ f ~
. . I c=
fn;:ll:t.~ I
fill
CXI(DCD_N N
---- ....
OOOOm..N
--- N
0000..........,0
"'A ...
...'"
NNNA..
~~~~~o~
..
P-J............... ....
p~~~!'J!'J...9'
gt~t~~~~
~.!Z.............. ~
ww.....,....."....... 0
~(.n"'wo(..)..w
....OJWWO;:l(.nON
.. ..
N...........
!>>~~."..~!"'..?
0I..............~l',,)0'I0
"..CO..........,N~l',,)OJ
....OJWWCD(.nON
'"
~
'"
t~~~ r:;~t;~~ ~!'J!!!
~~~~ :~f"~l iil
.g~ii.I i~ ~t f:!S'~
=:i~ ii rl i~l
i~ ff ;;ll f :, fi
;- f ~ 5" 6 ~~. n
.I~ ~"S~ ~
ii~ iiil 5 I
c>~f & f: f i
!;~ Ii :I
:,h F~
~ is!
f ~!
a:-
rE
~
5'
i.
en
c:
~
5'
i.
en
.c:
~
5'
E
CD"''''
cnl\.)......
"'''''''
"'''''''
'"
A
..
"'ex>
'"
..."''''
- "'-
co...'"
...Jrt.)acn
e>
.........
"''''N...
&..CnNU.
~o~~
.. ..
.!'-J~.......
~3~~~
CII(1IO(1l(1l
.. ...
A'"
..CO
<n'"
.. ..
..........
""IW...(,.)
CII (71 00
.. ..
..."""".......
CIIo,o,o,(1I
.....
00
.. .. .. ..
(A.... N....
(,,~~o.
.....:-."'0>
(.n(7l00
.. ..
,!V:"'..6Ot6'J
~SU;~g
OQlO(.nO
.. ..
AA
"''''
"''''
A
C>
'"
Co
'"
o
...
'"
------l!!
WWWWN:....
pno":l'~!
!U.!i a:-~
AAfiii~c,
::!!~!e..
",,,,5. ...ii';-
"""""" i:l!:U
S U"" r.L"f
if~~!UE
ff.ffi ~!
iBf!-.g~
~!!if~1
I I I!". .-
~ff! f
l<: t
f. ..~
f~
:r
en
c:
~
5'
E
0) CD 0) 1\.)...
o,Co,CCDN
0,00,,,,,,,,,
NNN"'N
~~~~~N
..
...............
~~~P!'J~...
gt:tt~~0
000,0,0,0,0
....
.!-'~........
"'(,.)~""'N"
~gggtJ~~
..
.................
~~~~!'J:"'...
D'"........."Ot....
cnCOCOCOo,CD(()
.....OJQ)CDWNO
A
C.
'"
:>.
0."
~~i
o~l
3:"
=5f.
ili~n
g'
"~"'",
~_ _.0 f" .
~.i.5 r
-.=-t
E
g'
-vs..".
...~iilf
:I. .:r
.. "
-':lI~
E
<liE'
~~: e
o~::se
n
......
-10
m" 0
1::9:g.~
",~2.;I
!lH
~
~h
e.
:rr
0"
c~
~ 0
.. ~
nr-
0"
.. 0-
IO~
F~~
~n"
"-"'
-I
o
-I
>
,...
~
~
m
z
<
Xi
o
z
,,~
" z
"'....
:E>-
.r
!I:=-E;r
IIS"::!CD
~.C>m
J-'~~~
g~~~
N~~~
.,,-
olD
::IF
::j
-<
en
....
c:
c
-<
r-
:>-
lD
o
;0
m
CII
....
;:
:>-
....
m
f iill lfffiif ((Illif,; rIff illil fir iiiiiii
I tjll JIJJjif tttflll lllr f~[Jf. 1ft iliIiJr
fjfl i!!!lfi !!!ilil' III ffIl1 f J Ilfftii
Jf~ "ttiir fff !! !If f If t t If!11 I ~
f fIlII III I J I- II Iff f J
: f !~~ fff f r f !
i ltf . 'lf~
I · lJ
W toICoIW~ www www "
.. !:~ni!: ~CI ~CI nn
!: ~i!: ~8 u~!: !:t!: !:!:tt t ~8 tU
00 WNN_ w.... WUW "
dt t~U~t ~gEttt!: ...... ef
t t!:t !:ttt t ~~~tt~
..
f
1:'&
t tt!: tttttE Etttttt ttt tEtt t tttttt: t:
~ -....-.., -~- --~ ""
tit dU~t Uhttt tttt UEttt i[
t ttt t
...
t Uth t.... ttt i
In<:
g U~ gtltlli:gg ~t:tt~s 8 ggg g ~~tit;~ ~I
.. ...... ~tttE~ ttt:E~fi E.... .. t:::tEs:t
.. tg~ 0" tttc; t
":!Or ~
&h '"
0
t !:tt tEttt!; ttttttt ...... !:tt!: t t!:!:t!:t ;;;
000 m
0000 . ~oo 00 ;; ;; c= .. oo.. .... i
r...
~f[ ;;:
t ...... Cttt!lc tttg~t~ .. .. !:ttt: t tttc:::t t
0000 ot~
.. . w ..
F
tC.. .. ttt&tt ;1-
t 00 tEttEt ttt~ttt ttt tEtt t
......... . ;;OO ~t g t:l oo"
000 r
...
.. ..~
...... .. ttt~Ett gEt ........ ......::;.. -oil
t ......... :ttto: !:
000 0000 000000
.. -..- - ,,- o.- - o.~ ..f
l-
.. .. ..i:
t ...... .. .... -.. .. -.. :::f
~t~ ~tttt~ .ttt8~tt ...... t...... !: tt.t8~t
000 000
..
a
I: .... .. {
00 o.
.. F
8 11
'"
t: o.
g ~ ~l
.. .. .. .. .. ..
0
... ..:--... c~~:; .-!:::t'~ ~ .. .. :--...... ~
; t~~ t;g:tq::~g gt:t~t:t::: t:~e .. "'..........,..
t........ (.100000(.>00..
".. 00 00.. 0 CD~OOUIUO
~
<
5i
~
~~
..~
n
E"!:...
..,....
~~~:
Jo'!l-fr
ilh
fl
:;!
..
~
c
o
""
/:~
;;',,'~i1'~:?:..~i~5t:'l:~::f;':;~;J~F~.' ,OC' ~~"",, ~';.
)..
~;
:;~;~::;;. ';:-"~' '"',-."'~,,i;:ttj,t'<';;4,,~';.:i,lf~i,;
" _A 0> ~'H::,.,."j'>t"'.""T"","U,,",,",,,"_' "''''~it~ 1';""J~~., -;rr::-)_
IKE
INDEPENDENT KOST ESTIMATES .'
P. O. Box 46681
St. Pete Beach
Florida 33741
(727) 367-2910
Ms. Bevette Moore
Business Coordinator
Airports Business Office
3491 S. Roosevelt Boulevard
Key West, Florida 33040
Subject: Key West International Airport
Consultant Fee Assessment
Dear Ms. Moore:
Per our agreement, attached is my assessment of the consultant fees for the proposed
Runway Safety Area Feasibility Study at Key West International Airport. This estimate
covers all tasks which are included in the scope of services for this project.
The estimated consultant fee for the proposed project is $143,420.
I am also attaching an invoice for $750 for my services.
Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions regarding my assessment.
Thank you. for giving me the opportunity to prepare this estimate. If I can be of any
service in the future, please let me know.
Sincerely,
~R.~
Ikars (Ike) A. Cakarnis
Airport Engineer
A~ments
",'" it
:CP'-''''N~jj.~~~!~~~.l!''}~~~''i'{ii'!:J:~1t,,~t~~~:!!Il,.....''F'''~'''' ""'''''1'''!1''',.., '"''''''''''..'If'!1'!''lY''..,pr'!'I'''....''I."T .:'...~'.~''1Il''r.~..T'r .""
. I
June 1 0, 2002
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
RUNWAY SAFETY AREA FEASIBiliTY STUDY
INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY OF CONSULTANT FEE ESTIMATE
1. Data Review & Early Project Coordination
2. Project Impact Determination
3. Mitigation Cost Evaluation
4. Report Preparation & FAA Coordination
5. Project Management
6. Archaeological Survey
7. Direct Costs
TOTAL
$ 15,600
$ 31,370
$ 62,760
$ 11,530
$ 6,060
$ 5,000
$ 11 , 1 00
$ 143,420
1. Data Review & Early Project Coordination
l:W.w:s. .am ,Cgn
Project Qirector 28 $ 150 $ 4,200
Project Manager 48 95 4,560
Senior Planner 40 120 4,800
Planner 16 70 1,120
CADD Technician 8 70 560
CJerical 8 45 360
, 1"OT AL $ 15,600
~-:.~i:~;".,.'i~.,'~'i..':f.'~1~J.'iQi. ,r;:.'-r...';~~~....". _,-,~.""~Y."'~~:'-li;l~~:':~~'~~~~,..,~_,,,,"l'-:~;,.__.,U,+q~ I"
"_ _~~~%~'-.~-~4:~~~';Hi-'ri;~:!'~~T"~;:;":"~:,~';__ . _ __ _ _ __ _ _
..~'"
-;"'" ~
- 2-
2. Project Impact Determinatiqn
H2Ym ~ ~
Project Director 28 $ 150 $ 4,200
Project Manager 82 95 7,790
Senior Planner 116 120 13,920
Planner 40 70 2,800
CADD Technician 20 70 1,400
Oerical 28 45 1,260
TOTAL $ 31,370
3. Mitigation Cost Evaluation
Project Director 28 $ 150 $ 4,200
Project Manager 120 95 11,400
Senior Planner 216 120 25,920
Planner 224 70 15,680
CADD Technician 64- 70 4,480
Oerical 24 45 1,080
TOTAL $ 62,760
4. Report Preparation & FAA Coordination
Project Director 12 $ 150 $ 1,800
Project Manager 28 95 2,660
Senior Planner 32 120 3,840
Planner 16 70 1,120
CADD Technician 16 70 1,120
Oerical 22 45 990
TOTAL $ 11,530
5. Project Management
Project Director 12 $ 150 $ 1,800
Project Manager 24 95 2,280
Senior Planner 12 120 1,440
perical 12 45 540
TOTAL $ 6,060
...,."....,,.,,"''''''7'.'....,,,"''''''.'''''''''.._-,''''.....',''.-'''',..,,,...''''''...-,:8"'.,~...~__'iJ'i"*"-'r",-",,,,,...J~~J!1'~, "f''''' "='''~,,'1''''~'''''''''''''''l'''''' , 'f~""1"'~"f':''''''''''''''''''''' ~,,"..,...,... "",,", """?,.,,.!ll!~
, (~
_\" ...1.
-3-
6. Archaeo~ogical Survey $ 5,000
7. Direct Costs
A. Airline Tickets
Tampa-Key West 9x $200 = $ 1,800
Tampa-Jacksonville 6x 200 = 1,200
Tampa-Tallahassee 6x 200 = 1,200
Miami-Key West 4x 200 = 800
Miami-Jacksonville 3x 400 = 1,200
Miami-Tallahassee 3x 400 = 1,200
Sub-Total $ 7,400
B. Rental Car
11 days x $50/day = $ 550
C. Lodging
1 night x $ 1251night $ 125
D. Meals
3 persons x 10 days x $25/day =$ 750
1 person x 2 days x $351day = 70
Total $ 820
E. TelephonelFAX $ 300
F. Pos~gelFedera1 Express $ 150
. .
G. Reproduction $ 800
H. Office Supplies $ 150
I. Presentation Boards/Graphics $ 500
.I
J. Miscellaneous Expenses $ 300
TOT AL DIRECT COSTS $ 11,100