Item J2
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: 11-20-02
Division: Public Works
Bulk Item: Yes No X
Department: Engineering
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval to reject bids and re-advertise for La Paloma Bridge
Demolition.
ITEM BACKGROUND: The La Paloma Bridge has been the subject of vandalism and is an attractive
nuisance. The Sheriff's Department has requested its removal as well as numerous neighbors. The State
owns the island where the bridge leads and they support the bridge removal project. The following bids
were received on October 8, 2002. lA. LaRocco $224,500, Shoreline Foundation, Inc. $238,400, and
H.E. Goodley $239,500. The 7 Yr Road Plan contains $200,000 for this project, but our estimate is
$170,000.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: On July 30, 2002 bids were opened for the La Paloma
Bridge Demolition project. Only one bid was received in the amount of $252,562.50, therefore a request to
reject the bids and re-advertise was approved at the August 21, 2002 BOCC meeting.
CONTRACVAGREEMENTCHANGES: N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To make changes to the specifications and include an Add Alternate
that would separate the approach fill from the bridge demolition, and rebid.
TOTAL COST: $500.00
BUDGETED: Yes X NO
Account # 102-22506-560630-RO 1302-530498
Cost to County: $500.00
REVENUE PRODUCING: YES
NO X AMOUNT PER MONTH
YEAR
APPROVEDBY, COUD'a ~. /Purchasing_
Item Prepared by: . ~
Da,"dS.Koppel.P.E..Co~6L2 _
DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ~~
De ierce, Division Director
Risk Management
//15/01
.-.J
DOCUMENTATION: Included ~ To Follow
Not Required ~
DISPOSITION:
AGENDA ITEM #
~-
w
u
~
u..
o
~
z
~
'<f-
Xw
UW
t1.I
::>\1)
~z
'0
~~
0<
m-l
:::>
~~
::>
8
w
o
t1.
Z
o
~
o
~
ct.
<
-l
>
W
~
D
<
o
ct.
~~
00
o-l
.. <
- Q..
-<
f--l
<z
NO
g~
NH
~-l
000
~:e
CQW
OD
f-w
'->~
OD
H
~g
<<
D:e
Zo
W-l
~~
<
-l
D
H
CO
I
W
ct.
w
,=
~
~
'->
W
0 I
'->
Z ~ Cl. ~
0
0 10 W 10
CD U) H U)
I
0 w U) W
1-1 >- < >-
CD \.)
U)
W
>-
W
u 8 8 8
~ ~ ~~ ~,
~
..J
'< q-' 0\ co
l- N (Y) (Y)
N N N
~ ~ ~ ~
~ \J
w Z
0 U) H
Z W Z
~ U) 0
U) ~ 1=
w a..
Cl. <
a. ~ 0
Z
Z ::::>
w 0
0 >- u.
\.) w w
\.) ....1 Z
0 0
Cl. 0 ~
< 0 W
....1 ~ Cl.
< u..i 0
I
...; :i U)
Q)
u
-+:
~
o
~
"Vi
c:J
~
U
L
::I
a..
.
VI
~
L
o
+-
u
:>
VI
o
c:
~
'"c:J
c:
c:J
~
L
~
~
\.)
1;;
c:
L
W
~
::J
.t=.
c:
~
~
L
a..
~
~
+-
+-
"e
E
o
\.)
~
en
~
'"c:J
o
~
u..i
:i
.
~
L
~
a..
c:
o
+-
'0
en
'"c:J
c:
c:J
+-
'"c:J
L
~
~
.:Jt.
U
~
Cl.
W
Cl.
1;;
c:
'0 .
8'"'2
'"c:J~
~ u
~x.
~ VI
~ ~
u E
c: ._
~ +-
..a-g
~ c:J
> ~
c:J +-
~ c:J
~'"c:J
:> ~
o~
~+-
'"c:J~
~
1;;'"c:J
.::: ~
VI 'ij
L U
~ ~
.... L
~ ~
..a ~
-a ~
t ~
~ 0
+-..a
'"c:J c:J
c:'"c:J
c:J ~
~;
'c VI
~'"c:J
8-:0
'"c:J=
:0<
'"c:J .
._ VI
~ ~
~~
o ._
>--
Q..L
o 0
u'"c:J
+- c:
u~
~
L'"c:J
L ~
0'"c:J
U c:
-g~
c:J ::I
~U)
.::~
c:J'"c:J
VI ~
.- u
VI .-
.- >
~ c:
+-~
+-
c:J c:J
i:~
~5
:t=u.
L ~
~ 0
u ~
>-+-
..a c:J
f ~
~ ~
~~
H+-
.t=.
c:
~
~
L
a..
u
Ji
::I
a..
~
~
+-
~
o
VI
L
~
..a
E
~
~
L
~
'>
L
~
Q..
::I
U)
~
'Vi
c:J
~
U
L
::I
a..
i-
L
~
~
\.)
1;;
c:
L
W
~
::J
~
en
'"c:J
~
c:
~
Q..
o
'"c:J
ai
Monroe County Engineering Department
MEMORANDUM
TO:
David S. Koppel, P.E.
County Engineer
Berry Rikar~
Engineering bepartment
From:
Date:
October 22, 2002
Subj ect:
La Paloma Bridge Demolition
Rebid was held on October 8, 2002, with three bids being received:
Name
Bid
Percent over Estimate
1.
2.
3.
J. A. LaRocco Enterprise, Inc.
H. E. Goodley
Shoreline Foundation, Inc.
$224,500.00
$239,500.00
$238,400.00
32.3%
41.2%
40.5%
The Engineering Estimate is $169,675.00.
Since the bids are 30% plus over the engineering estimate, I recommend we make some
changes to the specifications and include an Add Alternate that would separate the approach
fill from the bridge demolition, and rebid.
.......
=
Q)
s
.......
~
~
~
Q)
~
b()
=
. ,...
~
Q)
Q)
=
. ,...
b()
=
~
~
=
=
Q
U
Q)
Q
~
=
Q
~
ell
"'0
c:: . i:
o 0
:e~
- ~
e €
Q) ::l
Q8
Q) Q)
~2
'i:: 8
a!;:;E
cu o~
e 01)
~ ~
~~
~~
i:::
..;..,; 0
0:;::
. Q) C1J
0'(.)
0:3
cj
.s
c-
.Q
1ii
'C
c:
:J
o
u..
Q)
.S:
~
o
~
f/)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
'" N '" 0" N '" '" 0 '" 0 '" 0
r-: "," 00 '<t"~ 00 t-" .n ci v:i 00 '<t"
'<t" 00
..~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ \0 - 0 '1
~ ~ ~ ~ - ,.,.,
... ~ N
'1: ~
i:loo
;;
...
Q
E-c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
0 0 0 0 N^ '" 0 00 0" 0 0 0
.n r-: 0" N ....;- ,.,.,^ ..0 '<t"" .n '"
N - 0\"
.. ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - \0 - N '1
~ ~ - ~ ~ ,.,.,
... ~ N
'1: 6'l
i:loo
;;
...
Q
E-c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
0 0 0 6'l 0 0 0 0 0 6'l 6'l 0
0 0" 0 0 0 o^ 0 '" '"
.. 00 '" ",^ ci .n - "," ",^ ~
6'l 6'l 6'l - - 6'l t- 6'l N
... 6'l 6'l - N
'1: 6'l 6'l
i:loo
;;
...
Q
E-c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
'" 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 '"
N 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 t-
'<t" '" 0 0 0 0 t- o 0 0 \0
.n r-: 8" - "," .n ~ .n .n .n 0\"
.. - 6'l ~ - - t- 6'l N \0
.~ 6'l 6'l ~ ~ ~ 6'l -
... 6'l
i:loo
;;
-=
E-c
-;
...
Q
E-c
<<l
'"
'i? 8- <<l
.~ '" 8-
~ is
<<l -0 '"
= ..c <<l 8- !a is
0 .0 ~ <<l -0
:-e :.a '" =
'" 0 !a
:f '" is p., :-8
... is '" c
... ::l -0 is "0 :€
.., t:. -0 !a
.. u !a -0 e
~ '" "0 ~
~ ] c !a II)
<<l :€ Ci e ..:.:
'" ... > c II) u
c E-< c 0 :E ..c: Ci 0
0 ..... 0 e "0 ~ ...
'(i; u II)
.;; 0 II) e '0 e ::::- e
c 8 ]I ~ II) ;;::
e Ci e p., ;:j
0 c C p., '-'
p.. ~ ] !a II) 0 Q) ...: ..c: ...
] 0 c e .~ '<<i Ci .... ~ <8
~ ~ c ... II) <<l
e ~ -0 e ....
~ :.0 !<l 0.0 ..c: :0
8 .;; .;;: -0 p., p.,
II) 0 c II) ~ 'C < p., e
0 c-.;) ~ ~ LIJ >- 0 CO ...: u
...
'= r/J r/J r/J r/J r/J r/J r/J r/J r/J r/J r/J
;;;l o-l o-l o-l o-l o-l o-l o-l o-l o-l o-l o-l
g - - - - - - - - - - -
E! .....; N ...; ~ .,.; -.0 r--: 00 0\ 6 .....;
..
... - -
....
>-
Q)
=0
o
o
C9
u.i
:c
o
8
o
0::::
I1l
..J
~
""')
Q)
1ii
E
~
w
cj
~
N
o
I
C>
::J
<f
T""
~
C1J
C
'::R
co
III
=
'<t"
'::R
co
t'!
....
"f'
'::R
co
ff')
N
ff')