Ordinance 022-1989
Monroe County Commission
...;t
c \':I
-..
r "'"
a....
,
-.l
c.. ~ '--
L.L 0::
-. 0'\ Z
~ Cl
l.L ~
ORDINANCE NO.
022 -1989
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND RATIFYING CERTAIN NEGOTIATED
LAND USE DISTRICT MAP AMENDMENTS ATTACHED AND
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS ORDINANCE;
TRANSMITTING THE AMENDMENTS TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING
AGENCY FOR APPROVAL; PROVIDING THAT, IF ANY AMENDMENTS
ARE DISAPPROVED BY THAT AGENCY, DISAPPROVAL SHALL NOT
AFFECT THE REMAINING AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, due to the designation contained in Chapter 28-20,
Florida
Administrative Code (F.A,C.), all regulations, including the land use district
maps, contained in Volume 3 of the Florida Keys Comprehensive Plan and Land
Development Regulations are "land development regulations" as that phrase is
defined in Florida Statutes (F,S.) 163.3164(22); and
WHEREAS, Section 9.5-511(c), Monroe County Code of Ordinances, provides that
the regulations, including the land use district maps, may be amended or changed
in a process commencing six months after the date the regulations first became
effective and annually thereafter; and
WHEREAS, the first submittal of text amendments to the Monroe County land
development regulations to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA)
pursuant to Chapter 380.0552(9), included certain text changes rejected by the
state land planning agency as not in conformance with Chapter 27F-8, F.A.C.; and
WHEREAS, the DCA's rule 9J-14,006, F.A.C., excluding said rejected text
amendments was subsequently challenged by Monroe County on January 8, 1988,
pursuant to Chapter 120.54, F,S.; and
WHEREAS, the DCA and Monroe County agreed to settle this challenge by
entering into negotiations at the staff level in an effort to reach acceptable
modifications to the amendments to bring them into conformance with the Florida
Keys Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations and Chapter 27F-8,
F. A. C.; and
WHEREAS, during the second-round amendment process, the Monroe County
Planning Commission, sitting as the local planning agency, after due notice and
public participation in the hearing process, reviewed the negotiated land use
district map changes and found such changes consistent with the Monroe County
comprehensive plan and made recommendations concerning such changes to the Monroe
County Board of Commissioners; and
-
...
WHEREAS, during the same second-round amendment process, the Monroe County
Board of Commissioners, after due notice and public participation in the hearing
process, reviewed such recommendations and legislatively acted thereon; and
WHEREAS, F.S. 380.0552(9), requires that the state land planning agency
approve all proposed land use district map changes before such changes may become
effective; and
WHEREAS, the second-round land use district map change process is not
complete; and
WHEREAS, it is desired that the Monroe County Board of Commissioners should
approve, adopt and transmit the negotiated land use district map changes to the
state land planning agency for approval; now, therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Monroe County Board of Commissioners on this 5th day of
July, 1989, does hereby adopt and ratify those negotiated land use district map
amendments, heretofore properly approved pursuant to general law, which are
attached to this ordinance: including, 19, 32, 42, 63, 141, 153, 163, 166, 170,
171, 175, 176, 177, 180, 196, 208, 209, 267, 277, COG-I, ENCH-1, JHT-I. Such land
use district map changes are hereby transmitted to the state land planning agency
for approval or disapproval pursuant to F.S. 380,0552(9). Each negotiated land
use district map amendment is to be considered individually, severally, and
independently of one another.
Section 2. If the state land planning agency shall disapprove any
negotiated land use district map change attached hereto, such disapproval shall in
no way affect the validity of any other negotiated land use district map change.
Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed.
Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, map
change, or provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this
ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity.
Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon receipt of
official notice from the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida
that this ordinance has been filed with said office. Except, however, no
negotiated land use district map amendment to the Monroe County land development
regulations shall be deemed effective until approved by the state land planning
agency.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Monroe County Board of Commissioners of Monroe
County, Florida, at a regular meeting of said board held on the 5th day of July,
A.D. 1989.
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY ////~~
MAYOR/C AIRM
(SEAL)
Attest :DANNY L. KOLHAGE, Clerk
~4fL1~~
C RK
BY
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 19
From: NA & SR-L
To:SR-L & SR
Applicant: Pirates Cove Ltd.
Original Reason for Denial:Does not meet purpose
of SR-L district as applied to NA area and SR as
applied ro SR-L area. No density for mangroves.
Proposed
CountyjDCA
Designation: SR,
NA
Justification: See atthached maps for proposed
new boundary SR-L areas to go the SR to promote
clustering and achieve protection of natural habi-
tat. New comprhensive maps correct Native area
(NA) boundary. NA designation has higher maximum
net density for distrubed areas, and environmental
open space ratios take precedence over district
open space ratios.
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For Suhurban Residential for part of government lot 3 and part of
government lot 5, S31- T66- R28, Sugarlo~ Key MM 20.
1
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 32
From: ISjNA
To:CFA
Applicant:T.I.P.
Original Reason for Denial:Mangroves are intend-
ed to be zoned NA; Mangroves are not suitable for
CFA area; lacks adequate water depth.
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa
tion: CFSD
Justification:Enlarge the existing CFSD area as
shown on attached map to provide CFSD zoning for
the disturbed area immediately adjacent to the
boat slip and area surrounding it; limit vessels
to a draft of 3' feet or less. Reserving remain-
ing area as Native (NA) District.
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial X
approval
Findings:
For Commercial Fishing Village due to the fact that sufficient
Commercial Fishing Special District designations were not implemen-
ted in conjunction with the Commercial Fishing Special District
designation, and that staff will include corrections for the
implementation of the Commercial Fishing Special District
in the next round of map and text amendments; for tract
B, Cudjoe Ocean Shore, section 2-A, Cudjoe Key, MM 23.
2
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 42
From:NAjSS
To:IS
Applicant:Summerland Keys Properties
Original Reason for Denial:Proposed zoning incon
sistent with terrestrial wildlife resource manage-
ment policies of comprehensive plan, and purpose
and definition of IS subdivision.
ProposedCoun-
tyjDCA Designa
tion:West and
east of road to
existing bounda-
ry. (see attach-
ed map.
Justification: Although some of the lots in this
subdivision meet the criteria of a IS subdivision,
quirements. Low density residential development
is consistent with the comprehensive plan policies
for protection of wetlands, mangroves and other
natural resources in the immediate vicinity.
Alternative: 1. West of Niles road-SR
2. East of Niles road-NAjSS or
SS
3. Final determination of Vested
Rights Hearing Officer and BOCC.
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For NA/SR for tracts RR, PP, 00, NN, MM, LL, KK, EE, V, D, T, S,
R, 0, N, M, H, G; for NA/SS/SR for part of government lot 2, RE#
114780; SS for RE# 114780; all located Summerland Key, MM 25.
3
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 63
From:NA
To:SRL
Applicant: Brothers
Original Reason for Denial:Record does not sup-
port change; inconsistent with wildlife management
policies, would not allow clustering. Inconsis-
tent with purpose of SRL district.
Proposed Coun-
tyfDCA Designa-
tion:SS
Justification:SS allows clustering and is consis-
tent with both adjacent NA and IS districts. Desig-
nation promotes use of uplands and allows for rea-
sonable uses on property.
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
y
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For Sparsely Settled for part of government lot 5, Sl-T67-R29,
Big Pine Key, MM 33.
4
First Six Month Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 141
From: SC
To : I S
Applicant: ReevesjLindenmann
Original Reason for Denial:Not a platted
subdivision; roads are not dedicated. Grants a
special privilege, not required for development.
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa-
tion: SR
Justification:With any designation, the one re-
maining empty lot in this unplatted subdivision
would be completed as a single family residence
with use of TDR's or variance.
Alternative: Change IS Text to allow private
roads and metes and bounds subdivision in certain
circumstances.
Recommendation: SR.
Final Action Summary:
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For Improved Subdivision for lots 1-9, Matecumbe Ocean Bay,
Section 2, Lower Matecumbe Key, MM 77.
5
First Six Month Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 153
From: SR, IS &
DR
To: UR
Applicant:Sena
Original Reason for Denial: Inconsistent with pub-
lic facilities element; Grants a special privilege
inconsistent with the purpose of UR district.
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa-
tion: UR all
parcels
Justification:To be consistent with surrounding
neighborhood and allow higher density development,
rezone IS to UR to provide opportunities for aff-
ordable, higher density projects adjacent to the
destination resort districts.
Final Action Summary:
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
x
denial
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For Urban Residential District for the north half lot 3, block 10,
Stratton's Subdivision, Lower Matecumbe, MM 82, and parcel of submerged
land in HawksChannel, and part of lot 2, block 10, and lot 1,
block 10, and part of southwesterly one-half of lot 3, block 10,
and part of lot 4, block 10.
6
First Six Month Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 163
From: SCjIS
To: SC
Applicant:Wiley & Cowell
Original Reason for Denial: Inconsistent with
Principles for Guiding Development re: density.
Grants a special privilege. Inconsistent with pub-
lic facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Inconsistent with purpose of SC district.
Proposed Coun-
tyJDCA Designa-
tion: IS
Justification: Allows for 2500 sq. ft. of commer-
cial on each IS lot. Boundary determination avail-
able for resolution of zone boundary splitting
lots into SC at front and IS in rear.
Alternative: Rezone all lots from IS/SC to sc -
four (4) SFD's lots become non conforming uses.
Recommendation: Rezone all four lots to IS for
consistency.
Final Action Summary:
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For Improved Subdivision District for lots 1 and 2, part of lot
10, parcels A and B, Galen Beach, Windley Key, MM 85.
7
First Six Month Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 166
From: SS
To: SRL
Applicant: Jaffe
Original Reason for Denial:Grants privilege not
common to all lots in this district. Inconsistent
with Principles for Guiding Development re: densi-
ty, shoreline & marine resources and uplands.
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa-
tion: SR-L
Justification:This site is appropriate for SR-L
designation with lower maximum net density bal-
anced against higher allocated density than SS.
SRL zoning provides for low density single family
development to serve as a buffer between high in-
tensity IS area and Native zone.
Final Action Summary:
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
To Suburban Residential Limited District for parcels A an B,
of parts of government lots 3 and 4, S24-T63-R37, Plantation
Key, MM 86.
8
First Six Month Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 170,
171, 175, 176, 177
From SR
To: ACCC/SC
Applicant:John Stormont
Original Reason for Denial:FKCCC opposes
change; the proposed SC1 and SC2 district uses
would conflict with the present SC regulations:
new district definitions and purpose would have to
be created.
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa
tion: SR
Justification:Change to SC, for these lots which
are in a median strip between highway 1 and a sec-
ondary road; expand this rezoning to include many
of the existing commercial uses.
Final Action Summary:
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
approval
x
No Motion
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For Suburban Commercial lots 1-21, block 3, and lots 1-19, block
1, Plantation Beach, Plantation Key, MM 88; and lots 8-10, block
3, northwesterly 300 feet of lot 10, block 3, Key Heights,
section 1, Plantation Key, MM 89; to provide significant redevelopment
opportunities; and with ACCC designation to remain in place.
<}
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 180
From: IS
To: SRIse
Propose Coun
tyjDCA Designa
tion:change to
se and leave SR &
change surrounding
UR district bounda-
ry.
Final Action Summary
Applicant: Woods
Original Reason for Denial:Restoration of previ-
ous zoning rights based on personal hardship. In-
consistent with purpose of se district-entire area
should be reevaluated.
Justification:Surrounding larger tracts should
be UR or SR. A small change in highway dependent
frontage se is consistent with other approved map
changes. Provide reasonable size parcels for af-
fordable housing or UR uses. SR designation al-
lows clustering of development.
Development Review Committee:
x
approval
Planning Commission:
Findings:
denial
x
approval
denial
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
X approval
Of Suburban Commercial District for part of lot 9, Randal Adams
subdivision, Plantation Key, MM 89, only.
10
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 196
From: IS
To: MUjSR
Applicant:Tavanero Air Park
Original Reason for Denial:Does not meet the re-
quirements of MU district. Does not meet the re-
quirements of SR district.
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa-
tion: IS/park &
refuge
Justification:Marinas are an allowed use in IS
district, community park may be zoned for its pro-
tection as Park and Refuge (PR) District.
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For IS/PR for part of plat of Tavernaero known as
community park and marina, Plantation Key, MM 91
11
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment:208j209
From:CFA
To : MU
Applicant:Tropic Vista Inc.
Original Reason for Denial:Inconsistent with
Principles for Guiding Development re: economic de-
velopment/ inconsistent with intent of Section
9.5-141/ elimination of nonconforming uses.
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa-
tion: SC
Justification:Certain CFSD districts are to be
allowed additional commercial uses so long as
principal commercial fishing uses remain.
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For MU for lots 8-11, block 1, Boatman's Colony,
Plantation Key, MM 91.
12
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 267
From: Res.
217-1984/DRI
To: IS
Applicant: Kapelow
Original Reason for Denial:Within HCP ACCC area
and should not be rezoned until HCP study is com-
pleted .
Proposed Coun-
tyjDCA Designa-
tion: Res. 217-
1984/DRI
Justification: Within HCP study area, and should
be addressed in the study for most appropriate zone
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
x
denial
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
For IS for lots 1-5, block 4, Key Largo CIt~ Garden Cove
Plat #1; lots 3-8, block 6, Key Largo City Plat #2,
North Key Largo, State Road 905.
-
04
13
First Six Months Plan Review Map Amendment Negotiations
Amendment: 277
From:NA,SS,SR
To: IS
Applicant:Driscoll
Original Reason for Denial:Does not demonstrate
criteria for zoning error. Does not meet purpose
of IS district.
Proposed Coun
tyjDCA Designa-
tion: NA,SS,SR
Justification:A vested rights hearing has
approved as IS. This rezoning is meant to provide
IS only where housing is proposed and excludes
the golf course and wetlands.
Final Action Summary
Development Review Committee:
denial
x
approval
Planning Commission:
denial
x
approval
Findings:
Board of County Commissioners:
denial X
approval
Findings:
For Improved Subdivision District for that portion of the
north half of S24-T59-R40, and lots 1,2 of S19-T59-R41.
-
<4
14
FILE NO. COG-I
PART I
MAP CHANGE REQUEST
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: Change from: DR
to: UC
APPLICANT: Director of Planning for Jack Dykstra
PROPERTY LOCATION: Vaca Key-Gulfside
Key: Vaca
Mile Marker: +/- 48.2
County Map No:
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Size: +/- 5 acres
Land Conditions: Undeveloped, vegetated land. Disturbed, scarified,
hammock, transition
Improvements: Walkway around boat basin; concrete bulkhead around
island.
NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION:
Adjoining Properties: West--Buccaneer Resort; south-church/commercial
on U.S.I; East--commercial/industrial (marine repair and storage),
1,000' Radius Character: North--open water, east--commercial institutional
government service; South--commercial/ resort;
LAND USE ANALYSIS:
Currently, this property is undeveloped. The state has contracted to
purchase the property and develop a state central permitting center; the county
government center is slated for the site to house the growth management division,
other administrative offices and possibly a community center.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITI'EE COMMENTS:
Agree with planning department recommendation.
PLANNING CCIt1MISSlrn ~ATlOO:
Agree with planning department recommendation.
BOARD OF CCXJNrY CCMUSSlrnERS:
Approval of UC.
-
...
15
FILE NO. ENCH-1
PART 1
HAP CHANGE REQUEST
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: Change from: OS
to: SR
APPLICANT:Director of Planning for Arthur and Betty Lujan
PROPERTY LOCATION:
Key: Enchanted Island
Mile Marker: 6
County Map No: 575
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Size: + 4 acres
Land Conditions: Scarified, vacant, mangrove fringe
Improvements: Acess Road from US Hwy #1
NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION:
Adjoining Properties: None
1,000' Radius Character: SR and IS Residential Neighborhoods
LAND USE ANALYSIS: The current designation is inappropriate due to the existence
of the access road connnecting this property to US Hwy #1, The proposed design-
ation is appropriate and consistent with the purpose of the SR district.
PLANNING DEPAR'lltENT RECOMMENDATION:
Approval from OS to SR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMI'I"I'EE COMMENTS:
DRC recommends approval for SRL
PLANNING CQMMISSlOO ~ATIOO:
Approval (4/0)
BOARD OF CCXJNTY CCX'IMISSlOOERS DECISlOO:
Approval for SR
-
...
16
FILE NO. JHT-1
PART 1
MAP CHANGE REQUEST
STAFF REPORT
REQUEST: Change from: NA
to: IS
APPLICANT: Director of Planning for JHT, Inc.
PROPERTY LOCATION: North Key Largo
Key: Largo
Mile Marker: 2.8 miles north of mile marker 106 on SR 905
County Map No:
SITE DESCRIPTION:
Size: 5.5 acres dry land
Land Conditions: Scarified with a few hammock trees, canal (partially plugged)
abutting Atlantic Ocean.
Improvements: Paved roads, power and water lines, saw cut canal, some auger
holes and 5 foot-high concrete wall along SR 905.
NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION:
Adjoining Properties: North and south--quality hammock, east--Atlantic Ocean,
Pennekamp Park, west--SR 905 and the National Crocodile Wildlife Pre-
serve.
1,000' Radius Character: 80% high quality hammock, 20% ocean (Pennekamp Park).
LAND USE ANALYSIS:
This subdivision meets all requirements within the purpose of the
IS land use district with larger-than-average lots (11,500 square feet
each), existing roads, power, water, and RU-1 lots platted prior to
9/15/86. There was an apparent error in the new land use plan maps as
this subdivision was zoned NA,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMKITIEE COMMENTS:
Concurs with Planning Department recommendation.
PLANNING CCJo1MISSlOO RECX::lllMmDATlOO:
Approval (2/2).
BOARD OF caJli1rY CCHUSSlOOERS DECISlOO:
Approval of IS.
-
""
17
If)~~~~-
c.oUNr..
~ to..........._ Co
t.~1i..,,~ cu/Qi;.;....'"~
~\. .'" \:
, \~....... ......~~Q~
"~~i~~~~",~" ~
~UI!".
1!lannp I. kolb~ge
BRANCH OFFICE
3117 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY
MARATHON, FLORIDA 33050
TEL. (305) 743-9036
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
MONROE COUNTY
500 WHITEHEAD STREET
KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040
TEL. (305) 294-4641
BRANCH OFFICE
P.O. BOX 379
PLANTATION KEY, FLORIDA 33070
TEL. (3051 852-9253
July 14, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mrs. Liz Cloud, Chief
Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws
Department of State
The Capitol
Tallahassee, 'Florida 32301
{J-o a ~7- /3' .-IOj S-
Dear Mrs. Cloud:
Enclosed please find a certified copy of Ordinance
No. 022-1989 adopting and ratifying certain negotiated Land
Use District Map Text Amendments pertaining to the Monroe
County Land Development Regulations~ etc.
This Ordinance was adopted by the Monroe County
Board of County Commissioners at a Special Meeting in formal
session on July 5, 1989.
Please file for record.
Very truly yours,
Danny L. Kolhage
Clerk of the Circuit Court
and ex officio Clerk to the
Board 0 County Commissioners
cc: Mayor Michael Puto
Commissioner Wilhelmina Harvey
Commissioner Douglas Jones
Commissioner Eugene Lytton
Commissioner John Stormont
County Attorney Randy Ludacer
County Administrator Tom Brown
Asst. Co. Admin. Don Craig
File
. ------
P 027 136 125
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAil
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDEO
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
el(
~ N,tct>'-
PO, tate and ZIP ~
Postage
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
,
Return Rece'pt shOWing
to whom and Date Delivered
~
~
<'l
ft
1Il
ll.
ese DER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when addltlona' ~rvlc.. .,. ....... .... ~Ieta Items 3
and 4.
Put y~r address In the" RETU RN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do thll will prevent this
card f40m being returned to you. The return r8CelDt fee will Drovlde vou the nama of the Derlon
dellv~_d to and the date of dellverv. For additional fees the following lervlc.. are available. Consult
postmalter for feel and chllCk box(..) fo, additional aervlce(s) requ..ted. ,
,. 0 Show to whom delivered, d.te, and addr8llee's .ddr.... 2. 0 R..trlcted Dallvery
t (Extrtl chllrge) t t (Extrtl chlU'1Je t
3. Article Addressed to: . 4. Article Number
~c.,~, ~ 9 ~
~ ~&...w.. . ~ Type of Service:
^_ ..:., w 0 Registered
. ~ 9 &., '"'\\.a. ~- 't!CCertifled
~ \~'2. b expreu Mall
CL.\\o.\t.o". \ iii . ~ ~'2."A'\ - AI
01.~ '1
\'2. '!:a
o Insured
o COD
5. Signature - Addressee
X
6.
X
Signature - Agent
btain signature of addressee
or B and DATE DELIVERED,
8. Addressee's Address (ONLYiI
requested and fee paid)
7. Date of Delivery
PS Form 3811, Mar. 1987
* U.S.G.P.O. 1987.1711-288
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
...
DIVISION OF ELECTIONS
Room 1802, The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250
(904) 488-8427
July 18, 1989
Honorable Danny L. Kolhage
Clerk of Circuit Court
Monroe County Courthouse
500 Whitehead Street
Key West, Florida.33046
Attention: Rosalie L. Connolly, Deputy Clerk
Dear Mr. Kolhage:
this
Purs~ant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes,
will acknowledge:
1. Receipt of letter/s of
and certified copy/ies of
County Ordinance(s) # RQ-7.2
July 14, 1989
Monroe
2. Receipt of
relative to:
County Ordinance(s)
(a)
which we have numbered
(b)
which we have numbered
3. We have filed this/tQ~~e ordinances in this office
on July 18, 1989. (2:17 pm)
4. The original/duplicate copy/ies showing the filing date
is/are being returned for your records.
Sincerely,
h~f--
Bureau of Administrative Code
LCI mb
~"'S"''''' '
,,-,' COUNTy ~
r Ii~~ ~>~.c'tiio..-~OG-
)1 (].,;,"~" ",'...1'.....
~~( 8 ...' r~
r~ 1>;......._.../~~c~ 11
~.h"..o ........ .,)1
~!t.~ COUN'" ""v
""",,~:::.:~,,;...."'~
11lannp JL. lKollJage
BRANCH OFFICE
3117 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY
MARATHON. FLORIDA 33050
TEL. (305) 743-9036
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
MONROE COUNTY
500 WHITEHEAD STREET
KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040
TEL. (305) 294-4641
BRANCH OFFICE
P.O. BOX 379
PLANTATION KEY, FLORIDA 33070
TEL. (305) 852-9253
May 21, 1990
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. John Welch
Municipal Code Corporation
Post Office Box 2235
Tallahassee, FL 32304
Dear Mr. Welch:
Enclosed for your handling is a certified copy of
Ordinance No. 022-1989 adopting and ratifying certain nego-
tiated Land Use District Map Amendments pertaining to the
Monroe County Land Development Regulations.
This Ordinance was adopted by the Monroe County
Board of County Commissioners at a Special Meeting in formal
session on July 5, 1989.
Very truly yours,
Danny L. Kolhage
Clerk of the Circuit Court
and ex officio Clerk to the
Board 0 ounty Commissioners
uty Clerk
cc: Dianne Bair,
Growth Management Division
File -2