Loading...
Item T10 EMERGENCY ADD ON BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: Dec. 18-19, 2002 Division: BOCC Bulk Item: No x Department: Distri~t 5 AGENDA ITEM WORDING: State Representative Ken Sorensen has requested that the BOCC adopt a resolution requesting his office to present a bill to the FL House of Representatives to remove the FKAA and the Key Largo Independent Elected Sewer Board from State Statute #120 for their potable water and wastewater activities. ITEM BACKGROUND: Small wastewater districts such as the FKAA and the KLIESB are commonly removed from the requirements of State Statute #120. This process is very time consuming and expensive and impedes the progress of providing timely and cost effective wastewater service throughout the Florida Keys. Appeals and complaints can be handled through the local circuit courts to provide protection for the consumer and is an efficient way to handle disputes. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: CONTRACT AGREEMENT CHANGES: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: TOTAL COST: BUDGETED: Yes No COST TO COUNTY: REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes No AMOUNT PER MONTH YEAR APPROVED BY: County Attorney x. OMB/Purchasing Risk Mgt. DIVISION DIRECTOR ~~ APPROVAL: <:..-- , . (Signature). s: . F. mlS onp.r DOCUMENTATION: Included ~ To follow: Not required: DISPOSITION: Agenda Item # -no OEC-II-02 11,48 FROM,MONROE COUNTY ATTY OFFICE 10,3052823516 PAGE 1/1 Board of County Commissioners RESOWDQN NQJ ..2002 A RESOLunON OF THI! BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA REQUESTING THAT MONROE COUNTY'S STATE LEGISLAnVE DELEGAnON REMOVE FROM THE LEGISLATION ESTABLISHING THE FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY AND THE KEY LARGO WASTEWATER TREATMENT DISTRICT THE REQUIREMENT THAT DECISIONS MADE BY THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF THOSE ENTITIES MUST BE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, FLA. STAT., THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURI!S ACT. WHEREAS, decisions made by the Governing BoardS of the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, Inc. (FKM) and the Key Largo Wastewater District (District) are covered by Chapter 120, FS, the Florida Administrative Procedures Act (Chap. 120); and WHEREASt While Chap. 120 may be admirably suited for decision making by the large well- staffed state agencies, Chap. 120 imposes unduly heavy and time consuming burdens on small local agendes such as the FKAA and the District; and WHEREASt given the urgent ecological necessity of providing centralized sewer service in the FJoridl:l Keys, the citizens and the environment of the Keys are ill served by the delay and waste of staff time Incurred by forcing the FKM and District to operate under Chap. 120; nOIN, therefore BE .rr RESOLVED THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA: Section 1. Hereby requests that the Legislature of the State of Florida delete from the special acts creating the Flotida Keys Aqueduct Authority, Inc. and the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment District any requirement that decision making by the FKM and District must be pursuant to Chap. 120., F.S. Section 2. Hereby directs the Clerk of the Court to send certified copies of this Resolution to Monroe County's legislative delegation PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Floridat at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 18th day of December, 2002. Mayor Spehar Mayor Pro Tem Nelson Commissioner MCCoy COmmissioner Neugent Commissioner Rice (SEAL) Attest: DANNY L.KOLHAGE, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTYt FLORIDA By By Deputy Clerk Mayor/Chairperson jresFKAAKLWW BY statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0120->Section 56: flsenate.gov Page 1 of3 View Statutes Select Year: 12002 ..!rD' Search Statutes Constitution Information ~ L[]bbyist Center ~Information Laws of Florida Order flsenate.gov Welcome Session Comm ittees Senators .!:f The 2002 Florida Statutes Title X PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS 120.56 Challenges to rules.-- Chapter 120 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT View Entire Chapter (1) GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A RULE OR A PROPOSED RULE.-- (a) Any person substantially affected by a rule or a proposed rule may seek an administrative determination of the invalidity of the rule on the ground that the rule is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. (b) The petition seeking an administrative determination must state with particularity the provisions alleged to be invalid with sufficient explanation of the facts or grounds for the alleged invalidity and facts sufficient to show that the person challenging a rule is substantially affected by it, or that the person challenging a proposed rule would be substantially affected by it. (c) The petition shall be filed with the division which shall, immediately upon filing, forward copies to the agency whose rule is challenged, the Department of State, and the committee. Within 10 days after receiving the petition, the division director shall, if the petition complies with the requirements of paragraph (b), assign an administrative law judge who shall conduct a hearing within 30 days thereafter, unless the petition is withdrawn or a continuance is granted by agreement of the parties or for good cause shown. Evidence of good cause includes, but is not limited to, written notice of an agency's decision to modify or withdraw the proposed rule or a written notice from the chair of the committee stating that the committee will consider an objection to the rule at its next scheduled meeting. The failure of an agency to follow the applicable rulemaking procedures or requirements set forth in this chapter shall be presumed to be material; however, the agency may rebut this presumption by showing that the substantial interests of the petitioner and the fairness of the proceedings have not been impaired. (d) Within 30 days after the hearing, the administrative law judge shall render a decision and state the reasons therefor in writing. The division shall forthwith transmit copies of the administrative law judge's decision to the agency, the Department of State, and the committee. (e) Hearings held under this section shall be conducted in the same manner as provided by ss. 120.569 and 120.57, except that the administrative law judge's order shall be final agency action. The petitioner and the agency whose rule is challenged shall be adverse parties. Other substantially affected persons may join the proceedings as intervenors on appropriate terms which shall not unduly delay the proceedings. Failure to proceed under this section shall not constitute failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (2) CHALLENGING PROPOSED RULES; SPECIAL PROVISIONS.-- (a) Any substantially affected person may seek an administrative determination of the invalidity of any proposed rule by filing a petition seeking such a determination with the division within 21 days after the date of publication of the notice required by s. 120.54(3)(a), within 10 days after the final public hearing is held on the proposed rule as provided by s. 120.54(3)(c), within 20 days after the preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs required pursuant to s. http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm? App _ mode=Display _ Statute&Search _ String... 12/11/2002 statutes->View Statutes->2002->Ch0120->Section 56: flsenate.gov Page 2 of3 120.541, if applicable, or within 20 days after the date of publication of the notice required by s. 120.54(3)(d). The petition shall state with particularity the objections to the proposed rule and the reasons that the proposed rule is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. The petitioner has the burden of going forward. The agency then has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the proposed rule is not an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as to the objections raised. Any person who is substantially affected by a change in the proposed rule may seek a determination of the validity of such change. Any person not substantially affected by the proposed rule as initially noticed, but who is substantially affected by the rule as a result of a change, may challenge any provision of the rule and is not limited to challenging the change to the proposed rule. (b) The administrative law judge may declare the proposed rule wholly or partly invalid. The proposed rule or provision of a proposed rule declared invalid shall be withdrawn by the adopting agency and shall not be adopted. No rule shall be filed for adoption until 28 days after the notice required by s. 120.54(3)(a), until 21 days after the notice required by s. 120.54(3)(d), until 14 days after the public hearing, until 21 days after preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs required pursuant to s. 120.541, or until the administrative law judge has rendered a decision, whichever applies. However, the agency may proceed with all other steps in the rulemaking process, including the holding of a factfinding hearing. In the event part of a proposed rule is declared invalid, the adopting agency may, in its sole discretion, withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety. The agency whose proposed rule has been declared invalid in whole or part shall give notice of the decision in the first available issue of the Florida Administrative Weekly. (c) When any substantially affected person seeks determination of the invalidity of a proposed rule pursuant to this section, the proposed rule is not presumed to be valid or invalid. (3) CHALLENGING EXISTING RULES; SPECIAL PROVISIONS.-- (a) A substantially affected person may seek an administrative determination of the invalidity of an existing rule at any time during the existence of the rule. (b) The administrative law judge may declare all or part of a rule invalid. The rule or part thereof declared invalid shall become void when the time for filing an appeal expires. The agency whose rule has been declared invalid in whole or part shall give notice of the decision in the Florida Administrative Weekly in the first available issue after the rule has become void. (4) CHALLENGING AGENCY STATEMENTS DEFINED AS RULES; SPECIAL PROVISIONS.-- (a) Any person substantially affected by an agency statement may seek an administrative determination that the statement violates s. 120.54(1)(a). The petition shall include the text of the statement or a description of the statement and shall state with particularity facts sufficient to show that the statement constitutes a rule under s. 120.52 and that the agency has not adopted the statement by the rulemaking procedure provided by s. 120.54. (b) The administrative law judge may extend the hearing date beyond 30 days after assignment of the case for good cause. If a hearing is held and the petitioner proves the allegations of the petition, the agency shall have the burden of proving that rulemaking is not feasible and practicable under s. 120.54(1)(a). (c) The administrative law judge may determine whether all or part of a statement violates s. 1.20.5~(1)(a). The decision of the administrative law judge shall constitute a final order. The division shall transmit a copy of the final order to the Department of State and the committee. The Department of State shall publish notice of the final order in the first available issue of the Florida Administrative Weekly. (d) When an administrative law judge enters a final order that all or part of an agency statement violates s. 120.54(1)(a), the agency shall immediately discontinue all reliance upon the statement or any substantially similar statement as a basis for agency action. http://www .flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm? App _ mode=Display _ Statute&Search _String... 12/11/2002 statutes->View Statutes->2002->ChOI20->Section 56: flsenate.gov Page 3 of3 (e) Prior to entry of a final order that all or part of an agency statement violates s. l20.54(1)(a), if an agency publishes, pursuant to s. l20.54(3)(a), proposed rules which address the statement and proceeds expeditiously and in good faith to adopt rules which address the statement, the agency shall be permitted to rely upon the statement or a substantially similar statement as a basis for agency action if the statement meets the requirements of s. l20.57(1)(e). If an agency fails to adopt rules which address the statement within 180 days after publishing proposed rules, for purposes of this subsection, a presumption is created that the agency is not acting expeditiously and in good faith to adopt rules. If the agency's proposed rules are challenged pursuant to subsection (2), the l80-day period for adoption of rules is tolled until a final order is entered in that proceeding. (f) All proceedings to determine a violation of s. l20.54(1)(a) shall be brought pursuant to this subsection. A proceeding pursuant to this subsection may be consolidated with a proceeding under any other section of this chapter. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prevent a party whose substantial interests have been determined by an agency action from bringing a proceeding pursuant to s. l20.57(1)(e). (5) CHALLENGING EMERGENCY RULES; SPECIAL PROVISIONS.--Challenges to the validity of an emergency rule shall be subject to the following time schedules in lieu of those established by paragraphs (1)(c) and (d). Within 7 days after receiving the petition, the division director shall, if the petition complies with paragraph (1)(b), assign an administrative law judge, who shall conduct a hearing within 14 days, unless the petition is withdrawn. The administrative law judge shall render a decision within 14 days after the hearing. History.--s. 1, ch. 74-310; s. 5, ch. 75-191; s. 6, ch. 76-131; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 4, ch. 78-425; s. 759, ch. 95-147; s. 16, ch. 96-159; s. 6, ch. 97-176; s. 5, ch. 99-379. W~Jcomf; · Session · Committees · Senators · Information Center. Statutes and Constitution. Lobbyist Information Disclaimer: The information on this system is unverified. The journals or printed bills of the respective chambers should be consulted for official purposes. Copyright @2000-2002 State of Florida. Contact us. Privacy Statement http://www.flsenate.gov/Statuteslindex.cfm?App_ mode=Display _Statute&Search _ String... 12/11/2002