07/08-01
DANNY L. KOLHAGE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DATE:
December 28, 2007
TO:
Peter Horton, Director
Airports
FROM:
Pamela G. Han~
Deputy Clerk U
At the December 19, 2007, Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted
approval and authorized execution of the following:
Purchase/Service Order No. 07/08-01 between Monroe County and URS for the
Marathon Airport ALP Update/Noise Assessment Narrative Report.
Purchase/Service Order No. 07/08-06 between Monroe County and URS for the Key
West Airport Runway Safety Area Improvements Permit additional services.
Enclosed is a copy of each of the above-mentioned for your handling. Should you have
any questions please do not hesitate to contact this office.
cc: County Attorney
Finance
File
PURCHASE / SERVICE ORDER
FOR
MONROE COUNTY
To:
URS
Purchase Service Order No. 07/08-01
Re: PSA Agreement, Dated: 1-1-02
Resolution
Project Name:
MTH - ALP Update/ Noise AssessmentlNarrative Report
Description of Services:
(SEE ATTACHED SCOPE OF SERVICES)
Multiple of Direct Salaries
Lump Sum X
Reimbursable Expense
Days to Complete
365
Fee this Service Order
$102.250.00
Payment for Services shall be in their entirety as per PSO.
Prepared by:
Recommended b
~<-~
Milford A. Reisert
Date:
/cJ1- Z-O;?
Date:
Accepted by:
Approved by: Monroe County Board of
County commit1:1ners
Mayor Charles II nny"
Date:
...-.-7r .....
/} t; ,-.
OCT 0 4 Z007
/!u/cfl I ~ 1
U :\AAA~Receplionist\PSO\07 -08\PSQ-07 -08-0 l.doc
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND FEE ESTIMATE
FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON AIRPORT
ALTERNATIVE AIRFIELD PLANNING ANALYSIS
NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
UPDATE OF AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN
DEVELOPMENT OF ALP NARRATIVE REPORT
August 13, 2007
PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ALTERNATIVE AIRFIELD PLANNING
This Scope of Work describes the immediate need for and proposed actions required to update the
current Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for the Florida Keys Marathon Airport (MTH).
Monroe County proposes to utilize existing paved areas located beyond each end of Runway 7-25 at
MTH to satisfy runway take-off length requirements of Regional Jet aircraft that are currently operated by
Delta Airlines at MTH. At its current length of 5,008, the runway length imposes payload carrying
restrictions upon the airport's single air carrier during the hottest months of the year thereby requiring the
limitation of passenger and baggage. These payload restrictions severely limit the economic viability of
Delta's scheduled service to the air traveling public at MTH. The extension of the runway at both ends
400 feet to the southwest and 400 feet to the northe~ respectiveiy are proposed to provide a take-off
runway iengths needed to 'Will- eliminate most, if nofpayload restrictions currently imposed upon Delta
Airlines and its affiliates when operating at MTH.
To provide the required 1,000 feet of Runway Safety Area beyond the departure end of the runway, the
use of FAA Declared Distance Criteria wili be required. Accordingly, the last 120 feet of the extended
runway length at runway's northeast end of the runway must be used for the Departure Runway Safety
Area that restricts the Accelerated Stop Distance Available and Landing Distance Available to 5,688 feet.
The proposed airfield development and operational alternatives proposed by Monroe County that will be
needed to accommodate air carrier operations at MTH wili be depicted on the ALP and described within
the ALP Narrative Report. Where require for informational or FAA review and approval purposes, the
Narrative Report wili explain applicable changes to airfield geometry, FAR. Part 77 Imaginary Airspace
Surfaces and TERPS. Where applicable FAA airfield design criteria can not be fuliy satisfied, the
Narrative Report will describe event-specific operational controls proposed by the Airport Sponsor to
preclude the movement of aircraft at MTH the during landing take-off or taxiing operations by air carrier
aircraft.
As currently approved and on file at the FAA's Orlando Airports District Office, the ALP does not reflect
the following:
. Operations by air carriers operating under FAR 121,
. Proposed event-specific operational controls by Airport Sponsor during air carrier operations,
. Modification to FAA design standards for 200-foot runway-to-taxiway centerline separation,
. Proposed use of paved areas beyond each end of Runway 7-25 for takeoffs and landings,
. Application of 400-foor wide ARIt';:~-II" Runway Safety Area,
. Potential closure of the airfield'sU"paraliel taxilane, and
. Potential construction of an extension of Taxiway Alpha as an end-around taxiway to access the
existing shade hangers located within the northwet* quadrant of the airport.
B4-sr
C:\DOCUME-1\M1L_RE-1.RD2\LOCALS-1\Temp\notesC7A6DC\MTH SOS ALP Up~te and Alrflled Alternative Evalautlon 081307.docFlorida Keys Marathon Airport
ALP Update and Narrative Report
Task 1
UPDATE AIRPORT GEOMETRIC
ASSOCIATED WITH EXTENSION OF
AND THRESHOLD
RUNWY 7-25
SITING
REQUIREMENTS
1.1 Geometric and Design Requirements
The proposed extension of Runway 7-25 will be assessed using the FAA's Standard airport design
geometric requirement.
1.2 Conduct Runway Threshold Siting Assessment and FAR Part 77 / TERPS Assessment
The proposed extension of Runway 7-25 will be assessed using FAA's Threshold Siting Criteria Standard
and airspace protection criteria. Where appropriate, TERPS, 40:1 Departure Surface, FAR Part 77
Imaginary Surfaces and 62.5:1 One-engine Out Identification Surfaces will be analyzed for compatibility
or potential impacts.
Task 2
CONDUCT NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND LETTER REPORT
To assess the potential adverse noise impacts directly associated with the proposed extension of Runway
7-25 to the northeast and southwest, a noise impact assessment study and Letter Report will be
conducted.
The Noise Assessment conducted will be limited to the assessment of noise exposure levels that would
be directly associated with the proposed extension of the runway. The Noise Impact Assessment will
compare a maximum of two future proposed runway extension alternatives each having the proposed
take-off location beginning at the (extended) physical end of the runway, one alternative having different
landing locations based on the possibility that airspace or TERPS protection issue required keeping the
existing landing threshold unchanged.
Using the FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM) Version 7.0 and following FAA Order 1050.1E, Appendix
A, Section 14.3, Day/Night Noise Exposure Levels (DNL) will be modeled to assess whether the
proposed extension of Runway 7-25 (Proposed Action) wouid generate increased DNL noise exposure
levels that exceed the Threshold of Significance for noise impacts. The Threshold of Significance is 1.5
dBA or greater increase in noise at any noise-sensitive area within the 65 dBA DNL contour when
compared to the "No-Action" development alternative. Following FAA's guidance provided in 1050.1 E
and the recommendations of the 1992 Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON), noise sensitive
areas between 60 and 65 dBA DNL will be evaluated with the INM for increases of 3.0 dBA or greater
relative to the future No-Action Alternative if an increase of 1.5 dBA occurs at any noise-sensitive area
within the 65 dBA DNL.
2.1 Develop Existing Conditions Aircraft DNL Contours and Noise Exposure Estimates
DNL contours will be developed in increments of 60, 65, 70, and 75 DNL for the average annual day. The
noise contour compatibility analysis in terms of land use types, housing, and population will be performed
based on the 65 DNL and higher noise exposure contours. If required, the same assessment will be
developed for land areas located within the 60 DNL contour. The 60, 65, 70 and 75 dBA DNL contours
will be incorporated into the GIS mapping. Utilizing the data in the GIS, the noise exposure in terms of
housing units, population per household and area by land use type will be estimated within the 60, 65, 70
and 75 dBA DNL contour ranges as part of this task. Tables will be prepared summarizing the noise
exposure in terms of area by land use type, housing units and population. Graphics will be prepared
showing the noise contours superimposed over the GIS base mapping.
C:\OOCUME-1\MIL_RE-1.RD2\LOCALS-1\Temp\nolesC7A6DC\MTH 50S ALP Up@lleandAlrflledAlternatlve Evalautlon 081307.docFlorida Keys Marathon Airport
ALP Update and Narrative Report
2.2 Assessment of Noise Impacts for Proposed Action Using DNL Difference Contours
Using INM-generated DNL difference contours denoting increases of 1.5 DNL dBA within land areas
previously exposed to DNL levels of 65 or higher. or 3 DNL dBA Data points 3.0 dBA or greater relative to
the future No-Action Alternative if an increase of 1.5 dBA occurs at any noise-sensitive area within the 65
dBA DNL, the DNL Difference Contours will assess noise sensitive land uses that include residential use,
schools, churches, historic properties/districts, and other noise sensitive areas defined by FAA Order
5050.4B Section 1.9.n. A table summarizing any finding of increased DNL noise exposure levels between
the existing condition (No Action) and the proposed extension of the runway (Proposed Action) will be
prepared. A graphic will be prepared illustrating the location of the noise-sensitive sites included in the
DNL Noise Impact Assessment.
2.3 Development of LeUer Report
Upon completion of the Noise Impact Assessment a Letter Report will be developed that contains text,
tables and graphical mapping that conveys the technical findings of the Noise Impact Assessment. The
Letter report will contain all necessary information typically used by the FAA in determining the potential
for adverse noise impacts to surround land areas that would be directly associated with the proposed
extension of Runway 7-25.
Task 3
UPDATE ENTIRE ALP DRAWING SET TO REFELECT PROPOSED CHANGES TO
RUNWAY 7-25
Based on Monroe County's proposed use of the paved areas located beyond each end of the runway to
accommodate air carrier operations at MTH, the ALP Drawing Set would be updated to reflect the
following:
. Use of 1 DO-foot wide by 400-foot long paved asphalt areas located beyond the departure end of
Runway 25 for takeoff and landing operations,
. Use of 1 DO-foot wide by 280-foot long paved asphalt area located beyond the departure end of
Runway 7 for takeoff and landing operations,
. Use of Airport Reference Code (ARC) "C-II" Runway Safety Area design criteria having a 400-foot
width and extending 1,000 feet beyond the (newly established) runway ends,
. Relocation of Precision Approach Path Indicators (PAPls),
. Removal of all painted chevron markings beyond the departure end of Runway 25 and 280 feet of
same beyond the departure end of Runway 7,
. Remarking and re-Iighting of Runway 7-25 as appropriate,
. Relocation of Runway Protection Zones,
. Update of Runway end elevations and geodetic data, and
. Update of Airport Reference Point (ARP).
.
Other updates to the ALP drawing set will include, but would not be limited to the following:
. Potential closure of the airfield's west parallel taxi lane,
. Potential construction of an extension of Taxiway Alpha as an end-around taxiway to access the
existing shade hangers located within the northwest quadrant of the airport,
. Update of airport facilities, building layouts and airfield / apron pavements.
. Notation that No Threshold Siting Surface issues exist, and
. Notation that No adverse TERPS, 40:1 Departure Surface or 62.5:1 DEI Identification Surface
issues exist.
C:\DOCUME-l\MIL_RE-l.RD2\LOCALS-l\Temp\notesC7A6DC\MTH 50S ALP Up~te and Alrflled Alternative Evalautlon OS1307.dOcFlorida Keys Marathon Airport
ALP Update and Narrative Report
Specifically, the following drawings would be updated and revised as needed:
. ALP Drawing Set Cover
. Airport Layout Plan
. Inner Approach and Profile - Runway 7
. Inner Approach and Profile - Runway 25
. Building Area Plan 1
. Building Area Plan 2
. Buiiding Area Plan 3
. On-Airport Property Land Use Map
. Airport Property Map
In addition, four additional drawings will be developed:
. Departure Surface Plan and Proflie - Runway 7
. Departure Surface Plan and Profile - Runway 25
. OEI Surface Plan and Profile - Runway 7
. OEI Surface Plan and Profile - Runway 25
Task 4
DEVELEOP DRAFT ALP DRAWING UPDATE AND NARRATIVE REPORT FOR
REVIEW/COMMENT
In support of the ALP Update and alternative runway length considerations, an ALP Update Narrative
Report will be developed for the purpose of explaining the purpose and need for the proposed utilization
of the paved areas beyond each runway end to expedite the FAA's review of the proposed Modifications
to Airport Design Standards. A limited number of technical and color graphic depictions of the proposed
relocation of the runway ends and its direct affects and/or impacts will be developed for inclusion within
the ALP Update Narrative Report.
URS will present the draft update of the Airport Layout Plan drawing and supporting ALP Update
Narrative Report to Monroe County for review and comment. The updated ALP drawing and an ALP
Update Narrative Report will be modified, clarified or amended as directed for finalization and Monroe
County's subsequent submittal to the FAA ADO.
Task 5
PREPARE APPROPRIATE FAA FORMS FOR AIRPORT SPONSOR SUBMITTAL
URS will develop FAA Forms 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alternation and 7480-1, Notice
of Landing Area Proposal as appropriate to provide details regarding the proposed relocation of runway
ends. New geodetic coordinates wiil be developed for each relocated runway end using the NAD83 and
NA VD88 for the horizontal and vertical datums respectively. The FAA Form(s) will be assembled for
Monroe County's submittal to the FAA ADO.
Task 6
PREPARE DRAFT ALP DRAWING SET / NARRATIVE REPORT FOR FAA FOR
REVIEW/COMMENT
URS will prepare the final update of the Airport Layout Plan Drawing Set and supporting Narrative Report
and transmit a packaged set of deliverables to Monroe County for their submittal to FAA ADO.
C:\DOCUME-l\MIL_RE-l.RD2\LOCALS-l\Temp\notesC7A6DC\MTH SOS ALP up4te and Airflled Alternative Evalautlon 081307.c10cFlorida Keys Marathon Airport
ALP Update and Narrative Report
Task 7
PREPARE FINAL ALP DRAWING SET UPDATE / NARRATIVE REPORT
Upon review and acceptance of the proposed Airport Layout Plan Drawing Set and supporting Narrative
Report. URS will make any final changes as directed by Monroe County in response to FAA comments.
A total of eight (8) copies of the final Airport Layout Plan drawing and supporting ALP Update Narrative
Report will be transmitted to Monroe County. It is anticipated that the FAA will require six (6) copies of
the ALP and Narrative Report.
Task 8
FAA / CLIENT COORDINATION
This Task involves URS's assistance to THE Airport Owner (Monroe County) when presenting or
discussing technical issues relating to the proposed update of MTH ALP Drawing Set. At the request
and/or direction of the County, URS will attend one (1) meeting at the Federal Aviation Administration's
Orlando Airports District Office in Orlando, Florida. One (1) site visit and meeting at the airport will also be
scheduled to collect update information and to document recent airport developments not previously
shown in the ALP drawing.
Task 9
ENGINEERING COORDINATION
This Task involves the required coordination between the Airport Owner (Monroe County), the Consultant
(URS) and the Sub Consultant performing geotechnical testing services. URS will review the
Geotechnical Tests and Sub Consultant's recommendations
Task 10
GEOTECHNICAL TESTS
This Task involves the use of a Sub Consultant to perform geotechnical testing services to evaluate the
conditions of the existing pavement strengths and capacities. The testing will measure the resistance
(Capacity) of the existing overrun pavements beyond each end of Runway 7-25.
C:\DOCUME-l\M1L_RE-l.RD2\LOCALS-1\Temp\notesC7A6DC\MTH SOS ALP upfi.te and Alrflled Alternative EvalautJon OS1307.docFlorida Keys Marathon Airport
ALP Update and Narrative Report
"
~
.
il
..
o
"
"
~
."
"
o
~
m
o
-<
}>
."
."
r
B
}>
-<
o
z
"
~
o
-<
.;,
"
o
~
m
o
-<
}>
"
."
r
B
~
o
z
"
m
<
~
w
6
-<
if
.
o
}>
r
."
c:
."
o
~
m
!
w
6
:;;
;:
r
-<
if
;;
~I\) 0) ~
~88
is88
"'"
~."
~~
-<
c:Jz
~_G>
...g>
'ii
."
Z
"
......
""""
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . . , . ~ . . "
" " " " 0 " " " " "
m ~ , , , 0 ."
m Z ~" ~ m , ~
~ 0 mm m ~ 0 0 0
" ~ , ~ ~ 0 ~ "
m ~ ~ 0 c m .
z m m m m m , ~ ~ > 0
~
Z " Z , 0 ~ ~ z ~ ~
" , " ~ ,
0 0 > , , 0 Q ~ 0"
~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 0 " ~ ~ ,
, . 0 " ~ m "-
m " 0 , ~ . 0
~ i 0 " ~ " , m
~ ~ ~ z -<
z 0 > 0 .
~ , 0 ~ 0 < ~
" 0 c Z , ~ , ~ ^
0 m 0 , 0 ~ ~ ~ >
. z 0 ~ c: ~
~ "
-" ~ ~ ~ m
. > " ~ ~
~ z ~ " 0 m ~
" < z , < 0
~ > ~ ~ > ~ m ,
" " z z
z " " ~ " m , "
9 ~ m " ~ ~ ~ m
" " > , ~
m " 0 Z
m , ~ m " ~ Q
" 0 ~ ~ 0
m " , 0
, , " m 0 ~
on 0 , , , ~ m
" 0 m " "
c: 0 ~ " z
'" , " , , 0 "
-< ~ ~ ~ 0 m 0
Z , "
0 ~ " ~ 0 m
-< 0 " 0
}> , " " 0 , c
r 0 ~ m m ~
on " < ~
" c m , m
m . ~ 0 <
< < m
m ~ " z
0 c ,
. ~ < z ~
i> < .
2 m ~
z
< , ,
m ~
z
,
I""
~oo;ntiimo;~~f:;~g~a.
iil .. !l
..it
}> ;:
~~t;~~~~~~5_CI>
g:~~~~~~8g:5~""
888888888-8
-0
en!;.
~Q.
m."
H
~~
.
"
,
.
.
.
tf')YlM~i'fl(fl(fl{fl{flft){tJ
w
w
'"
'"
U>
8
QO~(DCCOlQ)(D""'''''N
lj Ol 0 0
Y!t>'l(fl{fl(fli'fl(oll(t)6't{fl(fl
",. ,..........1\) ~
:... CXllDlDCOWf,OCOOlWO
t;, 5:~[g~~~t:;885
8 888888888-
""en
g at g
iil ~ ~'
~oof:;;;;~~I\)"'''''N~~~
..... oooo~!i1':'i"
"
"
.."
}> 1:
.....!'-.....I\).f\)~!>- _J>,.!.J 3 g.
COlDOQOO~Qo""::,
ggg8C;ggoo38lJ>
888gg88gg-g!4
NONNN.........",.0>.....N5~C'>
~ OOON""OOOlO~!i!~
o
..~
~ g
~ :g ~:
-8:1
I"
;;;;O..................OOO.f>.",.~;.
(fl.- ()
..
.."
}>
3
(IIOlO""
OOe'"
gg:ag
i'flEf'ti'fl(;I'J<o'li'flfl'lYlYJffl
~
~
'"
o
o
'"
o
{fli'f!{fl{fl{fl&tYlYlYl(;I'Jffl
~
'"
'"
o
'"
o
........(.)01........
(>>CDmbt..:.Cn)..~'O:l
8g8~g:88f:;g
gggggg888
Eflffl{fl{flYli'flYli'fl{.<j(fl{fl
U>
~
o
'"
o
.1>.:-':>''::'
UlOt01Ul
8888
t:50,f>.OOCOUllJ1<O;::;::(;;~~
...,. CO(11W-...jQjNOO.$>.~~
tf'){fl(fit>'l6"lB'l6"li'fl1ll{fl{fl
-< ~ - ~ 00
'" '" '" 8 o ..
0 0 0 !!!.g;:
0 0 0 0
0 '" 0 '"
0 0 0 0
YI{fl{fli'flil'tYl{flYl(>'ti'fltl'l
~....tnO<OOlOl<O""-..ll.n
108bt;~~~~~~~
g08010l.nOOOOO
88888888888
}>
3 d
g g
~
M!l'
5"
-"
-"
'" "
'"
o
w
;.
c
c
~
c:
"
en
~
z
:i:
o
c:
"
m
en
-<
"
~
m
"
r
o
"
o
}>
"
m
-<
en
;:
}>
"
~
I
o
Z
}>
jj
."
o
"
-<
}>
r
."
en
m
-<
c:
."
o
~
m
-
z
o
en
m
}>
en
en
m
en
en
;:
m
z
-<
z
}>
"
"
~
"
m
"
m
."
o
"
-<
MONTGOMERY
CONSULTING GROUP
PLANNING . CONSULTING
Transportation . Aviation . Infrastructure
November 9, 2007
07-3001
Ms. Bevette Moore
County of Monroe, Florida
Key West International Airport
3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd.
Key West, Florida 33040
Sent via e-mail
Reference:
Independent Fee Estimate - Florida Keys Marathon Airport
Alternative Airfield Planning Analysis, Noise Impact Assessment,
Update of Airport Layout Plan, and Development of ALP Narrative Report
Dear Ms. Moore:
We have performed an independent fee estimate for professional services associated with the above
referenced project at the Florida Keys Marathon Airport. The independent estimate is based on the
scope of work narrative and pro-forma fee proposal format provided by your consultant (URS Corp.).
We have submitted a breakdown of the labor-hour estimates, and other costs (including travel,
production and out-of-pocket expenses) for your review. Based on the estimates prepared, our
independent estimate of the professional services fees and out-of-pocket expenses for Tasks I - 10 in the
scope of services is $101,000.00.
Our analysis provides one approach to completing the scope of work for the project. Your consultant's
hourly rates may vary based on level of expertise and associated salaries for each labor category. We
would recommend that you not compare fees for each subtask but compare the overall fee calculated for
the project. Should our independent estimate be substantially different from your consultants
(greater/lesser than 10%), we will need to ascertain additional details of the project.
Please feel free to contact me at (407) 539-7030, extension 15 at your convenience to discuss this
independent estimate. We have enjoyed this opportunity to provide services to Momoe County.
Yours very truly,
J.{(J-nt1j gett1js
Monty Gettys
President
Enclosures: Independent Estimate (I page)
341 N.Maitland Avenue, Suite 340
Maitland, Florida 32751
1
Tel 407.539.7030
Fax 407.539.7035
www.mcgi-us.com
s S U.Ul..lU~.i~ ~~~:~:~i;!
E ~ C'):~'~~ N ~ (CO r-- .... .... 0 i i S
r-<( ..... 'g'g'"
~~
~t04'~'t04;tA,t04...,.....,....,....,....,. .-.-....
:3 g g 8 g g 8,8 :5
.... ...."," 'I' .
O~ ~ ~ ~.~g!~:~I~I~~-
.... ....N.....'<tN
tl4:""':""'&<tt04to<t...,.l;R-MtIt ;.
_" i Q
~ 5 C'i [iiil ~ ~~;ctlgl~!~ro ~
; : ~:.~:.;:~'8.~'..8:8;8: , I:
~ 5 ~ g an;:: :;: :~U5ig!~jr 12
~ (0)....1'-........,.... ~
~ ; j ::::: :;::;:: G
ffi ~ 1: ~:~~r~~~ ~ ~ , , '~.
'0 ~ :=J 0:0 8 >! 0 0 0 0
"2 ~~~(DfZi~~,~: I le
~ .it N-~-,t'f NiN; ~
1-"'" tl4lc.o't,_!&<t:"'"e,<t...,.to<t...,....,...,.
~! ~ a:o'~'~'~ .... ~ ~ O~OIO ~
1t:I:'" I EJ
-g 8 " 8 818'8 8 8 8 8 10
-= g ::I g 818 !i!: Q 0 Q g g
'5.... ~....qqO:.<<I8.:a:_'<t q
<: <( ................N 0
llto<t~ ...,....,....,....,....,....,.,...,.,...,.I...,....,.~
Il~~ j ~ ~;~~~~;\ ~ 0 o~
8" 8 88.8 88818181,~.
..... It) ::) o,gQ'Q'O:O,oo,o 0
~ :: ,\!O ~.:co.i~Ii'\l'~~'~ 1e.1e. ~
.- ....,....;0)10> N.... N N LO
c: I (")
UJ"" """&'I-.&<tCl)""'/fl_""'c.Il-._t04
.~.si ~lD 0....:<0;'<1"'....: ~
Ql \'Il 0 .... ~ g co co N'....'N NO....
II) a:::I: " M
, ", .
~.... ~i~:~ ~ ~ E! ~ ~~ '~o
~ 03 Si g g 51 12 12 12,giSZ, 2
.... l() 0 0 0 N N;N;....:~ N
~ .a: ....-...:...: ,N""":
~V') to4t.'tit04:","'t04to<t...,....,....,....,....,.
~~ju~ ~ N N N ~~OG
. . '....' , , -
Z
~If-; ~
~ z .
i ! ~ s
~ ~~~;~
~ 12!!:!'~Ia:
0: r::r[j:(I) tt::
~ ~"a:'~ 2
~g~2g~
~ ~ g Ii: g,;2:lr:
(i) W W :t I- :t
o ~ ~ li!i~!lr:w
5 ~'~'w~'9 "
J: CI li:::>I- ttI w
(/);~~~:~ ~ ll:: ~
~ f-O ~ 2 ~ :5
I- Z W c( I- ~
o!!i!~z~~~
~ :z " ~ ~ ~.~
~ ~ g I- ,E::"" z' 0:
I- ~ I- W'~,~!~ Q w B
w W,(I)!~'z'~ I- U
~ lJ,(I);~,W - ~ c( Z N
@,c(~i~'~ ~ ~ z ~ ~
o;~:~!~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~.~.~ ~ t ~ 8~"
~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~:I-:~!~
_ ~ c( c( 0 ~IZ-,Z
~ lJ ~ ~ li! ~1~:!!:!'ffi!G
I- 5 I- g c( c(!c(ld ~ w
~-~ ~~I~ ~i~i ~ @
~,(:)::) ;0.:10.. c..'c..u.. w (!:l
Ii'
0
Q.
W
0:
~
~ f-
0:
0
W ~ Q.
"' 0:
Z ..
" -
t= f- Z
"' Z 0
W W :I:
W " i ~
w "' 9
u. "' ~
f- W
"' " z
z ~ .;,
w "'
" w >
Z W
W "' '"
Q. 0 <i
W Z "
0 - ii:
;;:: w 0
"' ~
" U.
Q.
"
f-
W
"'
Q.
~
<i
~
.
.
f-
o
o
o
'E.
.~
.
"
<:> <:> 0,0 <:> 0 q <:>
N .., .. l() <0 .... cO
~~~~~~l~
: .:: L 1-"'::'1-'
o
:;; g
. ~
~' <II
~
z
~
.
"'
~
<i
f-
o
f-
a>
"
"'
l!!
:il
~
13
~
...
'"
~
il!
~
,S
. .,
W"iij
i>
~~
'5 ~
,0
0_
~
M
i2
.;,
M
~
"-
~
l1gS!
'dI -.<>>
E ~;$
.g e ~
. '" .
~~~ x
~Elil ~
E :l > .....
-.:~<(~~
~8~Pl~
c ~=...J Cll
11l11l"iijU.f?
-g5~-gt;
!!.S'z,j!~
Q) r:::....._ ..
~~<')~;!
~
o
....
:e~
~e
c:fi
q
NO