07/28/1995 Special
95/231
MINUTES
OF THE MONROE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Special Meeting
Board of County Commissioners
Friday, July 28, 1995
Marathon, Florida
A Special Meeting of the Monroe County Board of County
Commissioners convened at 10 a.m., on the above date, at the
Marathon Government Center. Present and answering to roll call
were Commissioners Keith Douglass, Wilhelmina Harvey, Jack
London, Mary Kay Reich and Mayor Shirley Freeman. Also present
were Ruth Ann Jantzen, Deputy Clerk; James Hendrick, County
Attorney; James Roberts, County Administrator; County Staff,
members of the Press and Radio; and the general public.
All stood for the Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance.
ADDITIONS, CORRECTIONS, DELETIONS
Motion was made by Commissioner Harvey and seconded by
Commissioner London to delete Agenda Item D3 as it pertained to
Agenda Item E1, certification of the Tentative Millage Rate for
Fire and Ambulance District 1. Motion carried unanimously.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Robert C. Apgar, Special Litigation Counsel, of the law
firm Apgar, Pelham, Pfeiffer & Theriaque, presented the Board
with a Preliminary Executive Summary of the Hearing Officer's
Recommended and Final Orders regarding Monroe County's Year 2010
Comprehensive Plan. Motion was made by Commissioner Douglass
and seconded by Commissioner London authorizing former County
Planning Director, Lorenzo Aghemo, be hired as an outside
consultant to assist in the negotiations of the Monroe County
Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan at the hourly rate of $75.00, for
approximately fifty hours. Roll call vote was taken with the
following results:
commissioner Douglass Yes
Commissioner Harvey Yes
Commissioner London Yes
Commissioner Reich No
Mayor Freeman Yes
Motion carried.
95/232
Motion was made by Commissioner London and seconded by
Commissioner Douglass authorizing Special Litigation Counsel,
Robert Apgar, to file a Notice of Appeal of the Final Orders
regarding the County's Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Motion
carried unanimously.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Motion was made by Commissioner London and seconded by
Commissioner Harvey to adopt the following two Resolutions:
A Resolution adopting the Tentative Residential Solid
Waste COllection, Disposal and Recycling Rates for Fiscal Year
1995-1996.
RESOLUTION NO. 269-1995
See Res. Book No. 127, which is incorporated herein by reference.
A Resolution establishing the Tentative Per Month Solid
Waste Collection, Disposal, and Recycling Service Rates for
Commercial Property in the various Solid Waste Collection
Franchise Areas.
RESOLUTION NO. 270-1995
See Res. Book No. 127, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Motion carried unanimously.
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
James Roberts, County Administrator, addressed the
Board and presented a Budget Update of the Proposed FY 1996
Budget. Motion was made by Commissioner Harvey and seconded by
Commissioner Douglass to remove $79,500.00 from the proposed
budget as outlined on page 5 of his Budqet Update. This amount
includes $56,000.00 from the Sheriff's Budget by eliminating the
1% parity increase for Corrections Officers; and $23,500.00 from
the Veteran's Affairs Budget as transportation expenses may be
allocated to the gas tax rather than ad valorem, based on an
Attorney General's Opinion as well as a County Attorney's
Opinion. Motion carried unanimously. Said report is attached
hereto and made a part hereof. (Attachment 1.)
Mr. Roberts discussed the Safety Department. Motion
was made by commissioner Harvey and seconded by Commissioner
London directing the Safety Manager's position be put back into
the budget, with the second position to remain out of the budget
and support staff be reallocated from existing staff. Roll call
vote was taken with the following results:
95/233
Commissioner Douglass Yes
Commissioner Harvey Yes
Commissioner London No
Commissioner Reich Yes
Mayor Freeman Yes
Motion carried.
commissioner London discussed the use of cellular
telephones by County employees. Motion was made by Commissioner
London and seconded by Commissioner Reich directing the County
Administrator to reduce the number of cellular telephones in use
throughout the County by 75 per cent or more. Roll call vote was
unanimous.
Mr. Roberts discussed Extension Services. Motion was
made by Commissioner London and seconded by Commissioner Douglass
to accept the County Administrator's recommendation to put back
$45,000.00 into Extension Services Budget for support staff of 1
1/2 persons. Douglas Gregory, Extension Services Director,
addressed the Board. Richard MacKinnon, commercial fisherman,
addressed the Board. Motion was amended by the maker to include
two support personnel instead of 1 1/2 for Extension Services.
Motion carried unanimously.
The following individuals addressed the Board regarding
the tentative budget: Dr. David P. Rice, representing the
Marathon Guidance Clinic; Marshall Wolfe, President/CEO of Care
Center for Mental Health; Mel Gossard, representing C&M
Electronics, discussed the Translator System; Kelly Everman,
representing the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
and Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, discussed Channel 16;
Dalia Travis, representing the State of Florida Division of Jobs
and Benefits, discussed Channel 16; catriona Birnie, representing
the Upper Keys Youth Association.
Motion was made by Commissioner Douglass and seconded
by Commissioner Harvey to task the Human Services Advisory Board
to give the Board their direction on several levels of cuts from
25%, 20%, 15% and 10%. Roll call vote was unanimous.
Commissioner Douglass addressed the Board and asked for
reconsideration of the Summer Recreation Program. Commissioner
Douglass requested that when the Commissioners meet in joint
session with the School Board, the Summer Recreation Program be
put on the Agenda.
Motion was made by Commissioner Douglass and seconded
by Commissioner London to remove any new vehicle purchases from
the budget and to cut those funding figures out of the budget by
the presentation in September. Roll call vote was taken with the
following results:
95/234
commissioner Douglass Yes
Commissioner Harvey No
Commissioner London Yes
Commissioner Reich Yes
Mayor Freeman Yes
Motion carried.
commissioner Douglass requested the Sheriff to review
his vehicle purchases in his budget. Commissioner Douglass
requested the County Administrator consider the following for
presentation to Board in September: 3% COLA reduction for all
employees; consider early retirement program; reduce Public
Safety capital expenses.
Commissioner Harvey addressed the Board. Motion was
made by Commissioner Harvey and seconded by Commissioner Reich
requesting the Board put the Translator System back into the
budget. Roll call vote was taken with the following results:
commissioner Douglass No
Commissioner Harvey Yes
Commissioner London No
Commissioner Reich Yes
Mayor Freeman No
Motion failed.
commissioner London addressed the Board and recommended
that the Employee Benefits Department be eliminated and all
claims sent directly to Gallagher Bassett; eliminating the
Purchasing Department and make each Division responsible for its
own purchases; possible assistance in the Safety Department from
Gallagher and Basset; Eliminate all Fire and Rescue vehicle
purchases this year.
commissioner Reich addressed the Board and recommended
the elimination of the Marine Resources Division.
County Attorney James Hendrick informed the Board he
will be reviewing insurance coverage the county currently pays in
some areas where it may not be needed and suggested that Hugh
Morgan look into these matters. The County Attorney was directed
to make these investigations with recommendations by the
September Board Meeting.
Mayor Freeman discussed the proposed increase in the
Planning Commission salaries. Motion was made by Mayor Freeman
and seconded by Commissioner Douglass that the $15,000.00
increase proposed for the Planning Commission be rescinded. Roll
call vote was unanimous.
95/235
Motion was made by Commissioner London and seconded by
Commissioner Reich directing the County Administrator bring back
to the Board a list of proposed cuts that would bring the budget
to roll back. Roll call vote was unanimous.
*
*
*
*
*
DISTRICT #1
LOWER AND MIDDLE KEYS FIRE AND AMBULANCE DISTRICT
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
The Board of Governors of District #1 Lower and Middle
Keys Fire and Ambulance District convened. Present were
Commissioner Freeman, Commissioner Hal Ha1enza, Commissioner
London and Chairman Douglass. Mayor Samuel J. Feiner was absent.
Public Safety Director, Reggie Paros, addressed the
Board. Motion was made by Commissioner London and seconded by
Chairman Douglass to certify the Tentative Millage Rate for Fire
and Ambulance District #1 at 1.0768. Roll call vote was taken
with the following results:
commissioner Feiner
Commissioner Freeman
Commissioner Halenza
Commissioner London
Chairman Douglass
Motion carried.
Absent
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
There being no further business, the meeting of the
Board of Governors of District #1 Lower and Middle Keys Fire and
Ambulance District adjourned.
*
*
*
*
*
Motion was made by Commissioner London and seconded by
Commissioner Reich to Certify the Aggregate Tentative Millage
Rate at 7.2882, per the attached millage breakdown, (Attachment
2), and directed the County Administrator to notify the Property
Appraiser of same. Roll call vote was unanimous.
Motion was made by Commissioner Douglass and seconded
by Commissioner London setting the three Public Hearing dates,
time and place to consider and adopt the Final Budget and Final
Millage Rate. The date, time and place are as follows:
Tentative Hearing september 11, 1995, 5:05 p.m., Key Largo
LibrarYi Special Meeting September 14, 1995, 5:05 p.m., Holiday
Inn Beachsidei and the Final Hearing on September 21, 1995, 5:05
p.m., Marathon Government Center. Roll call vote was unanimous.
95/236
There being no further business to come before the
Board, the meeting was adjourned.
Clerk to the Board of County
commissioners of Monroe County
~~)
Depu y C1 rk
ATTACHMENT 1
BUDGET UPDATE
PROPOSED FY 1996 BUDGET
8A< 'KGROl JND
On .July II, 1995, the Administrator presented to the County Commissioncrs
copies of thc proposed fiscal yca.' 1996 budgct and- proposcd tcntativc millagc ratc.
Discussions thcn occu.Tcd in public mcctings on .July 13 and .July 14 and the 80ard
took action to adjust thc figurcs.
In summa..y, the budgct consistcd of a $10,000,000 tax impact, or 19lYcl ovcr
thc rollcd hack tax ratc. The $10,000,000 consisted of approximately $4,000,000 in
."cduction of non tax revcnucs and reduction of fund balance forward. The balance
was madc up of proposed appnJpriation increascs of $3.4 million under the Board
of County Commissioners and $2.3 million undcr thc Sheriff (including $1,000,000
+ in the group benefits fund which was included in the budget under the County
Commission). Approximately $400,000 additional was attributable to othcr
Constitutional Officers.
Thc Board and Administration agrccd that this was a totally unacceptable
situation. The."cfore, on .July 13, the Board reviewed issues presented by the
Administrator and cut a total of $3.8 million, including 19 County positions. On
.July 14, the Board went further and cut another $836,000 from the BOCC budget,
including 4 County positions and six (6) proposed positions. (The Board later put
two (2) positions back into the budget). In addition, there were adjustments to the
Sherifrs budget in the amount of $1.3 million, including 7 positions among which
were three (3) labo."atory positions funded by the State (it should be noted that in
the reduction of the I 'X, merit program for County employees, there was also a
reduction in the Constitutional Officers budget of a pro-rated amount).
Also, the Tax Collector identified an additional $4()(},OOO in fees that could be
utilized in the coming year. Therefore, the Board of County Commissioners has
already cut from the budget $5.9 million, more than the p.-oposed appropriation
increase. The bottom line is still an increase of approximately $4.6 million and a
7.9'X. inc..ease over the rolled back tax rate (it should be noted that the original
estimate for the tax rate was lower; however, the adjustments the Commissioners
made had to be allocated across the different cost centers and taxing jurisdictions
and, as was stated at the meeting, would need to be calculated before a final
inc..ease ove." rolled back figure was available).
This, of course, is not the end of the budget process. It will continue on .July
28 and then through the public hearings and the final adoption in September. The
.
Boa .-d of County Commissioners is reminded that the cuts that have all"eady been
made have been difficult and there will a definite impact on services.
2
RELATED ISSUES
During the two (2) days of meetings, the Board requested some additional
information and analysis. The following are the subjects requested.
1. The Boa.'d asked for an analysis of the possibility of combining the Extension
Services, the Marine Resources Department and the Derelict Vessel
Program. A review was undertaken by the Administrator with the
cooperation of the Divisions and Departments involved with the following
."esults.
It is natural to assume that since all three (3) agenc.es deal with marme
."elated issues they would be more efficiently operated as one (I) unit. Th~t appears
to have been the theory held by some up to this time. The reality is that the
missions they unde.'take arc different in nature and OUl' point in history with the
Marine Sanctua.'y coming on line suggests that it would be prudent to address this
question in the future. It is not known at this time, although the County has c.'eated
a Committee to do this analysis, what impact the Marine Sanctuary will have on
. County government marine issues.
For example, Marine Resources is involved primarily with planning and
grants work. Its focus is to identify marine related planning issues and to see that
they a.'e inculcated into the overall planning process in the County. After
identifying the issues and the problems, the department is then responsible for
assisting with the obtaining of grants to help solve those problems. Of recent note is
___ the hiring of a firm to undertake major wastewater planning in the County.
3
The Extension Service fulfills a different role. It primarily provides
education and information to sectors of the marine and horticultural communities
and does not become directly involved in the kinds of policy making and program
administration that is handled by the Marine Resources Department. In addition,
the mission defined by the University of Florida suggests that such involvement
would not be apllrOpriate for the Extension Service.
The De.'elict Vessel P.'ogram is clearly a Ilrogram of one (1) pnmary
purpose: the removal of derelict vessels in the waters of the Keys. There has been
some additional work involved with channel marking. In this regard, there is some
ove.-lap with the othe.' two (2) cntitics; however, at this stage it secms that
combining this function with onc or both of the othcrs would produce nothing mOl"C
than a paper change without achieving any substantial results.
In fact, even combining the three (3) entities would probably not produce any
di."ect economic benefit. Also, it would behoove the County to analyze the issues
pertaining to the impact on County government of the Sanctuary's Proposed
Management Plan before making any decisions concerning reorganization of this
nature. It is suggested that this issuc be revisited later.
ADDITIONAL REDlJCTIONS
The.oe were some questions left open in reference to possible further cuts.
They are as identified below.
4
I. The Sheriff was encouraged to provide additional
reductions in his budget that would affect ad valorem tax
rates. In a teleflhone conversation he indicated to the
Administratolo that he would eliminate the 1 %, parity
increase for corrections officers. He has stated that the
Administrator could present this to the Commissioners on
.July 28.
$56,000
2. A question was left open as to whether there was a way for
Veterans Affairs to continue to provide transportation for
veterans, especially to the mainland medical facilities, and
still reduce ad valorem impact. The Administration has
determined that there is a way to accomplish this by
allocating the costs to the gas tax I"ather than ad valorem.
There is an Attorney General's opinion that this is
appropriate as well as a County Attorney's opinion from
some yeat's back; therefore, the service can be continued
and removcd from ad valorcm taxation.
$23,500
Subtotal
$79,500
ITEMS FOR RECONSIDERATION
The Board of County Commissioners, after making major reductions,
n'considered putting the two (2) Codc Enforcement Officcrs back into the budget.
Thcloc are two (2) other issues which should be addressed because they have major
impacts upon the operation of the County.
1. On .July 13, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners
eliminated aU positions in the Safety Department. These two
(2) positions plus related costs amounted to approximately
$104,000. This was done over the objection of the County
Administrator.
5
It is unfortunate that sometimes essential functions are caught
up in the need to make drastic cuts. In this case, there has
been a function which impacts upon the safety of all County
employees and also has shown major success in the reduction
of accidents, medical costs and, the.'efore, workers'
compensation costs. Recognition of our success in our safety
p.'ogram was recently made by an achievement award from
the National Association of Counties at their annual
conference.
It is, of course, every County employee's obligation to utilize
safe practices; however, we all Imow it is necessary to provide
the guidance and framewOl'k in which safety can be taught
and monitored. Because of the overall impact upon the
County employees, the liability insurance program, the
worl"er's compensation program and medical payments, the
Administrator strongly recommends that the Safety
Manager's position be put back into the budget. The second
position will remain out of the budget and support staff will
be reallocated from existing staff.
2. The.'e have been many questions raised concerning the
elimination of the support staff for the Extension Service. Not
only is there great concern that the Extension Service could
continue to fulfill its mission without support staff, but there is
also some concern as to whether the reduced commitment from
1\1onroe County could result in the University of Florida not
continuing to provide this service to the County. In any case, it is
recommended that one (1) full position be placed back in the
budget for this purpose. Also, there will be an attempt to utilize
this position to support the Derelict Vessel Program which to
date has not had any clerical suppo..t.
Subtotal of items for reconsideration
6
$44,000
$30,000
$74,000
It is possible that the Board of County Commissioners will wish to see even
deepe." cuts by the time the budget is adopted. If that is the case, it is the
Administrator's suggestion that the Board review those items that were presented
to it on .July 13 and .July 14 and which were not identified for elimination. The
Boa."d of County Commissioners left on the table approximately $1.5 million in
options that we.-e not approved.
.James L. Roberts
County Administrator
7
N
H
Z
r:LI
~
U
<:
H
H
<:
(f)
w
X
<{
f-
>-
f-
0:: f-
W W
(L l')
00
0:: :;)
(L ro
ow
z >
<{ >=
(f) <{
W f-
f- Z
<{ W
0:: f-
W (f)
l') W
<{ f-
::::: <{
~ ~
U- l')
o <{
W -J
-J -J
::::> 2
o ill
W m
I m
U
(f)
~ 2
00 (L
N '"
r:::. N
a N
(ij rn
OJ c
>- OJ
rn f-
u
'"
u:
'"
m
m
~ ~
OJ i5.
>- 0
(ij ~
:;l
u:
"
m
m
u
Iii ~
OJ 0
>- U
rn <{
u
<!1
u-
""
c ~ ~
Q.l ro Q; ..0
u Q.l > -0
V U 0 ~
0... c 0.
0::
ill
m
m
C
:>
o
E
<{
OJ
'" OJ
Jg m
~ 0::
""
U
." OJ
ro 10
~ Q:
o
0::
C
:>
o
E
<{
OJ
'" OJ
~ ca
~ 0::
""
U
." OJ
ro 10
~ cr
o
0::
C
:>
o
E
<{
OJ
'" OJ
~ ro
~ 0::
""
U
." OJ
ro 10
~ n:
o
0::
c
o
.~
t;
'"
OJ
o
'"
OJ
u
25
'"
(j)
OJ
U
~
z;.
c
:>
o
U
u
c
:>
u-
rn i:' ~
Q:i ro <u
c .0 ..s
~:.:iO
Q) <D
U) <-
a
"":6
N N
'<I: l"l
M
l"l
<- a>
a> l"l
o ~
m Q)
a Q)
<D <-
a ~
<D <-
U) N
l"l a>
a:icti
~ N
m
ill l"l
U) <D
<D
l"l
a
" l"l
" a>
<- "
a
U) ....
U) a
l"l m
N~
m U)
Q)
,..:
Q)
" N
Q) ~
6 "'!
am
:;; ~
ci CO:
;f-
U)
"
;;:
....
l"l
N
,..:
"
<-
..:
"
<D
l"l
a
N
CD
a>
l"l
"
l"l
Q)
N
,..:
<-
N
o
Q)
Q)
"
<-
l"l
N
l"l
m
U)
N
,..:
"
a
m
m
CD
a>
l"l
a>
<-
a>
m
u
c
:>
u.
rn
Q;
c
OJ
l')
rn
-0
f-
;f-
a>
"
N
"
o
l"l
m
m
N
a
l"l
l"l
'"
....
N
<-
a
'"
N
CD
....
N
<-
o
m
N
Q)
m
"
N
N
l"l
m
l"l
ill
<-
ro
<-
Q)
ill
N
a
a
U)
'"
l"l
U)
N
<-
M
u
c
:>
u.
'"
.3
-ijj
't:
o
u.
D/l
OJ
c
u:
;f-
Q)
l"l
";"
a
a
~
Q)
N
Q)
Q)
l"l
a
c:i
l"l
a>
l"l
a
c:i
m
Q)
Q)
o
Q)
N
U)
a
"
a
c:i
"
a
c:i
<-
Q)
~
Q)
N
"
l"l
"
a
c:i
U)
U)
l"l
a
c:i
~
;:,
Q)
;:
U)
U)
<D
ro
U)
a>
..:
....
N
Q)
a
N
<ri
"
U)
U)
ui
....
l"l
ill
o
l"l
CD
m
l"l
N
....
;::
ui
a
<-
a>
N
ui
N
N
U)
<D
a
N
<ri
l"l
l"l
a
a>
U)
ui
<-
Q)
U)
r-
ui
<-
;::
a>
a>
N
a
U)
r-
U)
c:i
CD
N
a
"
c:i
m
r-
CD
N
CD
a
N
IX>
N
;;:
o
Q)
a
Q)
l"l
c:i
Q)
....
l"l
on
r-
Q)-
;;;
a
"
c:i
Q)
U)
U)
"
c:i
N
N
m
,..:
'"
N
r-
U)
c:i
m
;:
c:i
m
a
~
o
CD
;:;j
N
c:i
Q)
"
<D
a
c:i
U)
a>
ro
;;;
....
a>
<D
a
c:i
"
l"l
N
c:i
;f-
U)
l"l
c:i
"
a>
l"l
<D
m
a
Q)
M
N
N
l"l
<-
c:i
r-
N
U)
c:i
'"
'"
<-
N
r-
CD
N
m
"
l"l
U)
o
CD
U)
"
"
c:i
l"l
<D
N
..:
m
N
U)
r-
r-
"
a
N
a>
r-
U)
c:i
;f-
."
C
."
C
;f-
U)
"
ui
<:'
l"l
a
<D
<D
m
M
Q)
CD
<-
a
....
....
....
"
Q)
m
a
on
N
N
'"
"
a>
r-
"
<D
a
r-
'"
CD
m
N
a
l"l
M
l"l
l"l
N
Q)
....
r-
"
o
;f-
U)
...,
,?
a>
"
~
ill
"
"
N
a
<D
c:i
r-
<D
"
CD
c:i
"
l"l
....
ui
Q)
....
m
<D
<-
<D
o
r-
l"l
N
U)
a
c;
N
,..:
CD
l"l
a
'"
U)
U)
a
CD
<D
"
"
c:i
~
~
N
N
'?
l"l
a
r-
,..:
N
l"l
a
Q)
l"l
l"l
c:i
N
U)
a>
Q)
a
Q)
r-
a
N
U)
Q)
m
r-
m
c:i
Q)
Q)
CD
a
<D
Q)
CD
m
U)
U)
l"l
N
ill
CD
a
a
a
a
a
a
~
o
Q)
U)
U)
l"l
ui
Q)
m
M
;f-
a
ro
m
'f
'"
U)
"!
ill
N
a
a
<-
a
a>
m
<-
r-
N
U)
<{
z
N
Q)
'"
N
-,..:
l"l
U)
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
c:i
a
a
a
a
c:i
<{
z
,.,
N
"
r-
<ri
"
'"
"
a
a
o
a
a
a
c:i
a
a
a
a
c:i
a
ill
N
CD
U)
ui
~
o
Q)
"
l"l
l"l
N
r-
l"l
N
a
a
U)
ill
N
M
a
ro
"
~
Z
Q)
U)
l"l
a>
<ri
U)
a>
....
a
o
a
a
a
a
c:i
a
a
a
o
c:i
<{
z
N
Q)
U;
<ri
CD
CD
ill
a
c:i
N
<D
N
N
c:i
ill
m
ill
c:i
U)
U)
Q)
m
N
N
"
;f-
a
Q)
c:i
"
N
"
N
N
,..:
U;
'"
N
<D
m
r-
CD
<D
CD
"
N
ui
"
<(
z
l"l
U)
Q)
a>
CD
"
l"l
l"l
;::
a
c:i
a
a
U)
N
c:i
a
U)
Q)
<D
a
<(
z
r-
m
N
a>
<D
l"l
l"l
<D
a
a
U)
Q)
N
U)
c:i
l"l
"
N
r-
a
W
f-
<{
(ij ~ (l)
ti~ 1;) v; 0~
~-8~ 0 u ,g ~ ~ TI
~~~ ~ a M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~E~ ~ ~ u i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
* ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ .~ i ~ ~ ~ I
&. .~ Q) ~ ::J 0 ~ ~ <( LO to u: g ~ 'E
OC5 ~ ~ co ro Q) ~ .g U t3 <U <( :}: Q.l
~~~ ~ f- ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~
---~-------~-~-~-~-----------~-~
E
:;)
-S
rn
OJ
I
rn
u
o
-.J
'"
OJ
u
25
'"
(j)
OJ
U
~
>-
C
:>
o
u
rn
-0
f-
'"
."
OJ
~
OJ
u
25
OJ
(j)
Q;
.<:
o