Loading...
04/16/2008 Agreement DANNY L. KOLHAGE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DATE: April 21, 2008 TO: Peter Harton, Director Airports pameWG.Hanc~ Deputy Clerk FROM: At the April 16, 2008, Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted approval and authorized execution of an Agreement between Monroe County and the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration, for installation of two (2) Reveal Imaging Technologies CT-80 Explosive Detection Systems (EDS), in the new Terminal Building at the Key West International Airport. Enclosed are three duplicate originals of the above-mentioned, executed on behalf of Monroe County, for your handling. Please be sure to return the fully executed "Monroe County Clerk's Office Original" and the "Monroe County Finance Department's Original" as soan as possible. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact this office. cc: County Attorney Finance w/o document File ./ l\~:!c:7.:';:;:) 'L'~,'::.r:~.t;;,~ ;rX??b:n 1jr:~~,g~~~~ AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RELATING TO KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (EYW) Negotiated by the TSA pursuant to 49 V.S.C. 9114(m)(1) and 106(1)(6), 114(m), and Homeland Security Act of 2002 HSTS04-08-A-ST3069 ,..., .;:... = ." D CJ = ):>- "'" ~ :=0- ~''11 :;;;J C~) " -0 ".:J .-. ;;u [--, ;:'{~ -- ~-'~1 c; r- W LJ ':..:) .~-) 0 ;) . - :=0- " :;:: ....'... -''', <? ; --:1 :--:) r .s::- ..) C) HSTS04-08-A-ST3069 ARTICLE I - PARTIES This Memorandum of Agreement (Agreement) is entered into by the United States Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the Monroe County Board of Commissioners (COUNTY) relating to airport checked baggage screening improvements. This Agreement is authorized pursuant to the Aviation and Transportation Security Act (ATSA) Public Law 107-71 and the Homeland Security Act of 2002. TSA and the COUNTY agree to cooperate in good faith to perform their respective obligations in executing the purpose of this Agreement. ARTICLE II - PURPOSE AND SCOPE The subject of this Agreement is the installation of two (2) Reveal Imaging Technologies CT-80 Explosives Detection Systems (EDS) units for installation in the terminal of the Key West International Airport (EYW). ARTICLE III - RESPONSIBILITIES In furtherance of this Agreement, the parties shall have the following respective duties, responsibilities and obligations: A. TSA will: 1. Review and approve the Project design and deployment plan. 2. Make available and deliver the two CT -80 units to the Airport. 3. Provide services for rigging, uncrating and placement of the CT-80 units into their operational location and configuration. 4. Provide and pay for the support services to commission and support Site Acceptance Testing (SAT) from the CT-80 Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), Reveal Imaging Technologies (Reveal). 5. Identify the TSA approved testing entity and arrange for testing support through its contractual arrangement with Battelle Memorial Institute. 6. Establish, conduct, and pay for the testing criteria for the SAT test for EDS machine screening capabilities. Readiness for SAT can only be declared by Reveal. TSA's testing entity, Battelle, requires seven (7) days notice of machine readiness for testing. 7. Upon completion of the SAT testing, TSA will continue to maintain, repair, and operated the EDS units throughout their life cycle at no cost to the Airport. B. The COUNTY shall: 1. Ensure the Project site will be ready to accommodate the installation of the EDS units. 2. Should the site not be ready for installation of the EDS units upon their arrival, the County shall safeguard the CT -80 EDS units at the Airport until the units have been installed for operational use by TSA. Responsibilities to safeguard the units include protection from weather or damage. 3. Prior to the commencement of any work to be performed under this Agreement, the COUNTY shall have in place, and shall require of its contractors participating 2 HSTS04-08-A-ST3069 in the work under this Agreement, to have in place, no less than the minimum amounts of worker's compensation insurance required under applicable law. 4. Bear all site preparation costs associated with Airport facility modifications required for the installation of the EDS equipment in accordance with the Appendix A design layout. The design layout is to be provided by the COUNTY. Site preparation costs may include, but are not limited to environmental controls, electrical, or mechanical modifications required to place the EDS units into operation. The EDS units should not be placed at risk in proximity to ducts, drains, sprinklers, or utility/water pipes or other sources of leakage. S. Provide terminations to the EDS units for electrical power and all infrastructure power requirements. If applicable, the Airport will provide cabling from terminations to the EDS location. The Airport shall attest to the availability of power supply to adequately support the EDS and associated equipment in accordance with OEM specifications and be liable for damage to the EDS equipment resulting from intentional deviations to accepted power supply conditions. 6. Confirm the necessary power and site modifications are completed at least two weeks prior to the agreed upon delivery date of the CT-80 units. The Airport Project Point of Contact will provide in written communication to the TSA Site Lead and the TSA Deployment Lead, confirmation that the necessary power and site modifications are completed. The delivery date will be delayed two weeks should no confirmation be provided in order to reschedule TSA resources. 7. Facilitate installation of the EDS units by providing a clear path during rigging and installation, and provide sufficient space to allow for initial deployment activities such as uncrating the unit. If required, the Airport shall remove and replace any walls, windows, doors, or other physical barriers related to the rigging movement of the EDS units. 8. Adhere in good faith to all reasonable to OSHA standards and OEM installation guide requirements for the operational environment of the CT -80 EDS units. 9. Provide reasonable measures to protect the EDS equipment from harm once installed in the screening area. 10. In the event of damage caused by the Airport, its contractors and/or Airport personnel or business, the Airport shall reimburse TSA for the cost of shipping, repairing or replacing the unit. The Airport will be responsible for supplying the rigging required to load the EDS units onto the TSA transport vehicle and the rigging required to place the repaired/replacement unit into its operational location. C. It is understood and recognized that the CT-80 EDS Security Screening Equipment is and will at all times remain, the property of the U.S. Government. TSA will maintain, repair and refurbish the Security Screening Equipment at no cost to the COUNTY or Airport. It will remain the responsibility of the COUNTY or the Airport, as appropriate, to maintain, repair and or replace airport facility mechanical and electrical infrastructure such as heating, air conditioning, power and lighting needed to maintain the operational capabilities of the EDS Security Screening Equipment. 3 HSTS04-08-A-ST3069 ARTICLE IV - EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM The effective date of this Agreement is the date on which both parties have signed the Agreement. This Agreement shall continue in effect for as long as the EDS equipment remains in place at the Airport. The projected installation effort is scheduled for one week from EDS delivery. Delivery is expected the month of May, 2008. ARTICLE V - POINTS OF CONTACT Points of Contact for this action are: Title Name CotltaetIitformation TSA Office of Security Greg Cypher Greg.cypher@dhs.gov Technology Deplovment Lead 571-227-2320 TSA Office of Security Amy Becke Amy.becke@dhs.gov Technologv Testing Lead 571-227-1261 TSA Contracting Officer Connie Thornton Connie.thornton@dhs.gov 605-393-8191 Local TSA Point of Contact Tim Lewis Tim.lewis@dhs.goy 954-308-5525 Local TSA Point of Contact Christine Huczko Christine.huczko@dhs.gov 305-296-1092 TSA Contractor Site Lead Nate Brown Nate.brown@jacobs.com 817-735-6145 (0) 817-980-8276 (~) Airport Point of Contact Bruce Harkness bharkness@morganti.com 305-292-5969 8\3-927-2676 Airport Director Peter Horton Horton-peter@monroecounty- fl.com 305-292-3518 ARTICLE VI - EXAMINATION OF RECORDS The Comptroller General of the United States, or authorized representative, shall, upon reasonable notice and during regular business hours, be allowed by the COUNTY and/or the Airport access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent records involving transactions related to this Agreement. ARTICLE VI - LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY Each party expressly agrees, without exception or reservation, that it shall be solely and exclusively liable for the negligence of its own agents and/or employees in connection with its performance hereunder. 4 HSTS04-08-A-ST3069 ARTICLE VII - CHANGES AND/OR MODIFICATIONS No change or modification to this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the parties' authorized representatives. No oral statement by any person shall be interpreted as modifying or otherwise affecting the terms of this Agreement. The properly signed modification shall be attached to this Agreement and thereby become a part of this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII - CONSTRUCTION OF THE AGREEMENT 1.0 This Agreement is an "other transaction" issued under 49 U.S.C. S 114(m)(1) and 106(1)(6) and is not a procurement contract, grant or cooperative agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as incorporating by reference or implication any provision of Federal acquisition law or regulation. 2.0 Each party represents that it participated equally in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement and any amendments thereto, and agrees that this Agreement shall not be construed more stringently against one party than against the other. Each party represents that it makes no exceptions and holds no reservations, and agrees to construe this Agreement without recourse to any contemporaneous writing, correspondence or conversation. 3.0 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or written, of the parties. 4.0 This Agreement is not intended to be, nor shall it be construed as creation of a partnership, corporation, or other business entity between the parties. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create, enhance, or diminish any substantive right, duty or obligation owed to each party by the other, or by either party to any third party. ARTICLE IX - FUNDING ANY PAYMENT No funds are required to be obligated under the terms of this Agreement. Each party shall bear the cost of its own performance under the Agreement. ARTICLE X - PROTECTION OF INFORMATION The parties agree that they shall take appropriate measures to protect proprietary, privileged, confidential, or otherwise Security Sensitive Information (SSI) that may come into its possession as a result of this Agreement. A. RELEASE OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION No Sensitive Security Information, oral or written, concerning the scope of this Agreement, shall be published or released to the public, without prior written approval of the TSA Contracting Officer. 5 HSTS04-08-A-ST3069 B. RECORDS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION All Sensitive Security Information (SSI), as defined in 49 CFR Part 1520, shall be handled in accordance with TSA policies and regulations. All members assigned to work under this Agreement are subject to the provisions of 49 CFR Part 1520, Protection of Sensitive Security Information, because they act for, or carry out duties for, or on behalf of the TSA. SSI may not be disclosed except in accordance with the provisions of that rule or where TSA otherwise approves. C. MEDIA All publicity or public affairs activities related to the subject matter of this Agreement must be coordinated with the TSA Office of Strategic Communication and Public Affairs. ARTICLE XI - SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS The following provisions of this Agreement shall survive termination of this Agreement: Articles III paragraphs B.ll and C, VI, XI, and XI. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties ave entered into this Agreement by their duly authorized officers this ~ (}4v\day of ru l , 2008. Department of Homeland Security Transportation Security Administration ~ Connie Thornton TSA Contracting Officer t{ { cJljlt.oo f( Date Monroe County Board of Commissioners ~ Name Charles "Sonny" McCoy Title Mayor / Chairman April 16, 2008 Date Copy to: _ Federal Security Qirector, EYW TSA Office ofStlcflrity Technology ~\.m - ..~ " . .t. A....,~ " ---;;r'IJ' . ca- I (j y- 6 HSTS04-08-A-ST3069 APPENDIX A Key West International Airport CT-80 Design Layout (to be provided) 7 £"a=.,ANA—m°dv.c`^„' �f';,`?;`F,'^"" V .rtS.g. n. zrr'a.`iw ?,,rs yn,'xs 3p a. .kpY' "`^ M v CT-SO MEDIUM AND LARGE AIRPORTS The Reveal integration team will work with you to plan and determine configurations that work best with your airport and that minimize infrastructure changes and costs. ' � t ,511 lid" »...—._..., — ,..,.......... — SIMPLE INLINE INTEGRATED INLINE • Install 1-3 CT-80 units into each airline's outbound • Simplest in-line configuration for larger airports baggage conveyor belt • Removes screening process from passenger lobby area • Eliminates the complexities associated with a • Distributed architecture handles any level of throughput common inline system • Allows airlines to retain a dedicated baggage line • Minimal infrastructure cost • Level 3 screening is conducted in the bag room • Fully multiplexed, allowing threat resolution with passenger or in baggage makeup area • Alarmed bags may be pulled manually by TSA or • Minimal space required in baggage makeup area automatically diverted based on airport size • Expanded infeed queue serves as new takeaway belt • Minimal infrastructure cost for agents • Eliminates high operational and maintenance costs associated with a common in-line system REVEAL To see how these solutions can benefit your airport and screening process, 100% Check-In Protection call 781-276-8400, press option 1. CT-80 PHYSICAL SPECIFICATIONS 0 Han Bans until BIM Decision dp 6:13 PIA 4129l200.5 t 040008 Dimensions: Length: 244cm (95.5in) Width: 140cm (55.3in) 7 —� Height: 148cm (58.3in) 0 . 0 / , Weight: 1678kg (37001bs) _ 1769kg (39001bs)w/crate — Tunnel Size: 800mm (31.5in)tunnel diameter O Ready O Jog Forward �0 Faun Reset 635mm (24.5in)conveyor belt width i Conveyor Height: 460mm (18in) n -Conveyor Load: 50kgs (1101bs) 0O snutDown \ i Max. Bag Dimensions: Length: 1200mm (47.2in) D O Jog Backward OnIOffDuty) Width: 800mm (31.5in) Height: 630mm (25in) OPERATIONS SCREEN changescreer.' Throughput: 127 bags per hour(initial) Power: Single phase, 200-240VAC IMAGING PERFORMANCE 50/60Hz, 15Amps max X-ray resolution: 38 AWG tinned copper wire Unit is mounted on heavy-duty wheels and leveling feet X-ray penetration: 30mm steel for ease of installation CT pixel resolution: 0.80mm 21" high resolution flat panel display monitor 2 1600 x 1200 video resolution io / (� \ _ IMAGING FUNCTIONS '� Ir Gray scale, color(organic/inorganic/metallic),U reverse video, multi-level contrast, edge enhancement, ff( 3i "�' interpolated zoom, contrast adjustment, others I1E1 ,� ,. 0 II 18 1 17i I1A01 -- iiii ti ----r23� 55 82 a j 0 0 s HEALTH AND SAFETY COMPLIANCE dCy te r; FAA 14 CFR 108.17 Use of X-ray systems 4�S 0 - y J FAA 14 CFR 108.20 Use of explosives detection systems o' � FAA 14 CFR 129.26 Use of X-ray systems , CDRH 21 CFR 1020.40 Cabinet X-ray systems CE, UL, CSA approved ,.�w. Maximum X-ray leakage less than 0.1mR/Hr(1NS/Hr) MACHINE CONTROL INTERFACE ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS LCD touch screen Machine Control Interface (MCI) Operating AVAILABLE ACCESSORIES Temperature: 5°C to 32°C (41°F to 90°F) without optional A/C unit Full multiplexing utilizing Gigabit Ethernet 5°C to 40°C (41°F to 104°F) Threat image projection (TIP) with optional A/C unit Field data reporting system (FDRS) Relative Humidity: 5% to 85% non-condensing On-the-job training (OJT) Operator qualification test function (OQT) Fully-integrated check-in stations 1m infeed and outfeed conveyors 1.3m infeed and outfeed conveyors with optional tunnel shrouds Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. 1 m and 1.3m roller tables 201 Burlington Road Bedford, MA 01730 1m and 1.3m friction slides Tel: 781-276-8400 Fax:781-276-8410 External air conditioning unit Email: sales@revealima In com Large transport wheel set for ease of movement g g' Operator mat www.revealimaging.com All specifications subject to change without notice.