Loading...
Item I2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY MEETING DATE: 5/17/00 5/18/00 DIVISION: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BULK ITEM: No - Discussion item DEPARTMENT: AIRPORTS AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Discussion of purchase of a Radar System for the Control Tower at the Key West International Airport. ITEM BACKGROUND: We have been trying to obtain radar for the Key West Airport Control Tower for the last three years. We believe we finally have a viable system ready for purchase and installation. However, there are some purchasing considerations which need to be discussed and resolved prior to proceeding with this project. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: Progress report given to Commission, January 19, 2000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommendations will be presented and discussed at the Commission meeting. TOTAL COST: $82,207.00 BUDGETED: Yes COST TO AIRPORT: Topic of Discussion COST TO COUNTY: None REVENUE PRODUCING: No AMOUNT PER MONTH/YEAR: APPROVED BY: County Attorney N/A OMB/Purchasing X Risk Management N/A AIRPORT DIRECTOR APPROVAL ~stt Peter J. Horton DOCUMENTATION: Included V To Follow Not Required -- a AGENDA ITEM # DISPOSITION: /bev APB SUMMARY OF TOWER RADAR PROJECT AT KWIA · April 29, 1999 - I sent a letter to the FAA Southern Region stating our problem in obtaining tower radar and asked for their assistance. · June 18, 1999 - Received a response from FAA stating that "The needfor a control tower radar display is well documented, and wefind that KWIA does indeed meet the established minimum requirements for the installation of a DBRlTE, which is the display system utilized at FAA facilities. However, there are no DBRlTE systems available, and there is currently a prioritized waiting list of about 40 A TCTs to receive this equipment...... '" .... If you wish to obtain information regarding the establishment of a non-federal radar at EYW, please contact Mr. Lennox Goodridge. " · April 30, 1999 - In a related event, the KWIA Tower Chief sent a memorandum to NAS Key West requesting that KWIA be provided with a radar feed from the Navy's ASR-8 radar. · July 12, 1999 - NAS Key West responded to the KWIA Tower Chief stating that "The Commanding Officer has agreed to allow KWIA to receive radarfeedfrom the ASR-8 radar site to your airport. The Staff Judge Advocate will begin drqfting a Memorandum of Understanding outlining costs, installation, and any other specifics deemed necessary. · July 16, 1999 - I sent a letter to Mr. Goodridge outlining the contents of the letters exchanged with FAA Southern Region and requested that he "provide information regarding the procedure to establish and procure a non-federal radar in the airport A TCT. " · September 13, 1999 - An e-mail was sent from ASO-500CC (Bill Wagner) to ASO-400CC (Goodridge) stating that "The most economical method to fulfill the EYW request for radar in the EYW A TCT would be to utilize the Key West Long Range Radar (ARSR-4) signal..... The Airport Authority would probably need to enter into an agreement with the Joint Radar Planning Group (JRPG) FOR THE USE OF THIS DATA. If they are successful in obtaining the data. a TRACS could be utilized to display the data in the tower..... This is all we can do for EYW until the Navy upgrades to an ASR-ll at NAS Key West (est 2004). Even though the Navy has offered their ASR-8 data, it can't be used without a digitizer which could cost up to ten times the estimated up from cost of the TRACS. " · October 7, 1999 - I sent a letter to Mr. Dennis Koehler to follow up the recommendation contained in the above e-mail concerning the JRPG. We requested that he take the necessary action to obtain our access to the ARSR-4 data via approval from the JRPG. · October 22, 1999 - Mr. Koehler responded to my letter stating that "ASO-472 has placed the matter on the Joint Radar Planning Group's November meeting agenda". · TECHNICAL DISCUSSION: The reason for the various discussions between the radar sources and the radar display is caused by type of radar data to be used. All present radar displays are digital models, except for the very old equipment used by the Navy. The two sources of radar data are also different: the ASR-8 from the Navy is an analog system and the ARSR-4 is a digital system. You must mate a digital display with a digital radar system or else you have to use a digitizer system to convert an analog signal to a digital display. The biggest problem is that a digitizer system is quite expensive. · Early December - I received a call from Bill Wagner advising that the JRPG had deferred action on our request for access to the ARSR-4 signal. The JRPG decided that since there was a new FAA Order coming out in early 2000 revising the methodology for applying for access, that they would wait until this Order became effective. At that time, they thought that this new Order would simplifY the process and would be effective in the January or February time frame. · December 13, 1999 - I received a call from Bill Wagner. He advised that the publication of the new FAA Order discussed above would probably slip to Mayor June. He also advised that the JRPG expected that they would be swamped with new applications for use of radar systems and that the approval process would probably become very slow. He further advised (non-attributable, please) that he had heard that the JRPG would probably not act favorably to our request (reasons not stated). · December 22, 1999 - Received a FAX from Bill Wagner reflecting that EYW had been placed on the "Candidate Facilities of Tower Displays" list. This is the list of airports designated as being candidates for FAA purchased, installed and maintained radar systems. While we were added to the FAA list, we were not assigned a priority number or sequence. o U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region P. O. Box 20636 Atlanta, Georgia 30320 JUN 1 8 1999 o E@IEDV JUN 2 8 m9 Mr. Edward R. Sands Acting Director of Airports County of Monroe Key West, Florida 33040 Dear Mr. Sands: This is in response to your letter dated April 29, 1999, concerning a request for a control tower radar display for the Key West International Airport Traffic Control Tower (EYW). The need for a control tower radar display is well documented, and we find that Key West International does indeed meet the established minimum requirements for the installation of a Digital Bright Radar Indicator Tower Equipment (DB RITE), which is the display system utilized at FAA facilities. However, there are no DB RITE systems available, and there is currently a prioritized waiting list of about 40 airport traffic control towers to receive this equipment. Additionally, to ensure that the DBRITE will operate properly, radar information supplied by an Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR) is mandatory. Presently, the agency does not have an ASR in close proximity to the Key West International Airport, and we would have no means available to obtain such information. If you wish to obtain information regarding the establishment of a non-federal radar display at EYW, please contact Me Lennox Goodridge, Airway Facilities Branch, Technical Evaluation Section, Non-Federal Facilities Coordinator, at (404) 305-6343. Sincerely, t2 . S-c,. t1 ~Lt1- f Carolyn Blum Regional Administrator ~ U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration ORLANDO AIRPORTS DISTRICT OFFICE 5950 Hazeltine National Dr., Suite 400 Orlando, Florida 32822-5024 Phone: (407) 812-6331 Fax: (407) 812-6978 Mr. Peter Horton Director of Airports Key West International Airport 3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, Florida 33040 ~~M~~8D:~ ~ ::;:) Dear Mr. Horton: Re: Design, Acquire, and Install Radar A TCT - EYW The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is in receipt of Mr. Mil Reisert's memorandum of April 29, 2000 regarding the above referenced project. The memo indicated that Key West International Airport would like to include this project in its next Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) application, and was requesting an eligibility determination. Upon conferring with the Airports Regional Office in Atlanta, I spoke with Mr. Reisert and informed him that because it is an Air Traffic item, it would not be eligible for AlP or PFC funding. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please call me at (407) 812-6331, ext. 25. Sincerely, ' /'1 '~J 'I. .' '" - ;:'OJ.~ I 'J ""-t\ ( (,{. L. (I , \ I \ Jennifer A. Ganley, P. E. Program Manager cc: Mr. Mil Reisert, URS Greiner Mr. Edward R. Sands, Key West Int'I Airport PARTNERS IN CREATING TOMORROW'S AIRPORTS ,} COUNTY of MONROE Peter J. Horton Director of Airports Key West International Airport 3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, FL 33040 December 27, 1999 Honorable Congressman Peter Deutsch 204 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Deutsch, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAYOR, Shirley Freeman, District 3 Mayor Pro Tem, George Neugent, District 2 Wilhelmina Harvey, District 1 Nora Williams, District 4 Mary Kay Reich, District 5 In 1974 the Air Traffic Control Tower at Key West International Airport was commissioned. In that year, approximately 52,000 air operations were recorded and 97,000 passengers were processed through the airport. At that time, aircraft arriving and departing the airport were controlled by using a radio and binoculars. In 1998, the airport conducted approximately 120,000 air operations with 528,574 passengers passing through the airport. While we have experienced extraordinary growth in both aircraft operations and passengers passing through the tenninal, our aircraft control equipment remains a radio and binoculars! Our Control Tower is in desperate need of a radar display in order to safely and efficiently control and monitor the growing traffic at Key West International Airport. We have documented our problem with the Regional Administrator, FAA Southern Region in April of this year and her response acknowledged that the need for a control tower radar display was well documented. However, the Administrator continue that an acceptable radar system was not available and there was already a prioritized waiting list of about 40 airport traffic control towers waiting to receive such equipment. Subsequent to our contact with the Regional Administrator, we have been informed that the FAA has identified a new and acceptable radar system and plans are being formulated to provide this equipment to the needy airports. We have also been informed that Key West International has been added to the FAA's list of "Candidate Facilities for Tower Displays". I t would now appear that the equipment has been identified, our need has been documented, and we have been added to the priority list. Unfortunately, none of the foregoing assures the timely implementation of the program nor does it prioritize our position on the "waiting list". Key West International desperately needs this tower radar display to assure the continued safe control of aircraft at the airport. We are requesting your assistance in convincing the Federal Aviation Administration that this installation should be a priority issue and that the equipment should be made available to this airport at the earliest possible time. Peter 1. Horton COK~~.ITY of ~L2'~A~o9,E ,--- Edward R. Sands Manager, Key West International 3491 South Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, Fla. 33040 Mr. Lennox Goodridge Ainvays Facilities Branch Technical Evaluation Section Federal Aviation Administration Southern Regional Office P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, Ga. 30320 July 16, 1999 Dear l\1r. Goodridge, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAYOR, Wilhelmina Harvey, District 1 Mayor Pro Tem, Shirley Freeman, District 3 George Neugent, District 2 Nora Williams, District 4 Mary Kay Reich, District 5 In a lettcr to the Regional Administrator, Southern Region, dated Apd129, 1999, we outlined our present critical need for some form of radar display in the Control Towcr. The Administrator responded with a letter dated Junc 18, 199;)1. This response acknowledged that the need for a control tower radar display was well documented and stated that Key 'Vest Internationalmcets the established requirements for an installation. 'Vhilc thc Administrator supports a radar installation, she also states ilIa ( obtaining the equipmcnt may be a problcm. The DBRITE appears to be thc system of choice but therc are nonc available at this time and there is a prioritized list of about 40 towers prescntly waiting for this equipment. In closing, Ms. Blum sugpcsts that we explore the establishment of a non-federal radar display and offered ur namc as a point of contact. 'Ve havc bccn in contact with our counterparts at NAS Key 'Vest and {Ley have agl"ecd to allow us to receive a feed from their ASR-8 radar site to Ou!' <: i port. \Ve now need to locatc and pl"ocm"e a display system fOI" the tower. It is requested that you Pl"ovide information regal"ding the pl"ocedurc to establish and procurc a non-federal radar in the airport A TCT. This is an ill1pol"tant safety item requir-ing installation at the earliest possible date. Your prompt reply will be appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (305) 296-7223. Sincerely, ~~~ Edward R. Sands Memorandum 12 July 1999 From: Air Traffic Control Facility Officer, NAS Key West To: Air Traffic Manager, Key West Federal Contract Tower Subj: COMMAND ENDORSEMENT FOR ASR-8 RADAR FEED The Commanding Officer has agreed to allow Key West International Airport to receive radar feed from the ASR-8 radar site to your airport. The Staff Judge Advocate will begin drafting a Memorandum of Understanding outlining costs, installation, and any other specifics deemed necessary. Sincerely, fJvL 5-JJru14- M.L. S~h;~ftner LT USN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN NAVAL AIR STATION KEY WEST AND KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1. Purposp-. The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is to formalize the responsibilities and agreements between Naval Air Station Key West (NAS Key West) and the Key West International Airport (KWIA), in accordance with DoD Instruction 4000.19, dated 13 November 1996 (DRIS Regulation) . 2. Administratjvp- Tp-yms. This agreement authorizes KWIA access to the ASR-8 radar signal in order to provide a radar display at the KWIA Control Tower. 3. Rp-sponsjbilitip-s a. NAS Key West shall: (1) Provide access to the ASR-8 radar signal. (2) Allow installation of one BDX digitizer and one modem in one of the electronics racks. (3) Allow installation of one telephone line between NAS Key West and the KWIA Control Tower to carry the radar signal. b. KWIA shall: (1) Maintain and install required equipment. 4. Fllnrljng. Services will be provided on a non-reimbursable basis. There shall be no commitment, specified or implied, that NAS Key West personnel shall in any way be liable for any equipment or maintenance. 5. Tp.rms. a. Effective date. This MOU shall become effective on the date of the last signature. b. Review. This MOU shall be reviewed annually by both parties to determine the need for continuation, modification, or termination. c. Termination. This MOU may be unilaterally terminated at by either party without notice. 6. Points of Contact. Naval Air Station Key West Yolanda M. Mingo Command ISSA Coordinator (305) 293-2789 Key West International Airport Edward R. Sands Manager (305) 296-7223 l<.J ~(\ rv ~ 2(,11""2 <=<> . Ed~r:i Date Manager 2 · COMMENT: It would now appear that our efforts to gain access to the ARSR-4 signal have met a stone wall. We are left with two courses of action: (I) wait for a FAA system to be installed or (2) press on with the concept of using the ASR-8 system and pay for the digitizer and all the associated systems. · December 27, 1999 - To pursue the option ofa FAA system, we sent a letter to Congressman Deutsch requesting his assistance in "convincing the FAA that this installation should be a priority issue and that the equipment should be made available to this airport at the earliest possible time. " · In the interim, we plan to continue to explore the possibility of an off-the-shelf-system that can work with the ASR-8 system. One possible candidate producer has been identified by Bill Wagner. A company called Sensis produces this system. We will also discuss this concept with Greiner. · December 29,1999 - FAXed a copy of this sheet to Mil Reisert along with the data concerning the Sensis system. We discussed the best way to proceed at this time and we agreed that the first action would be for him to contact Sensis and gain some more information from them concerning the system cost and whether or not their system was an approved FAA system. After that, Mil would coordinate with Mr. Goodridge to see where we should go next. · January 6, 2000 - Discussed the Sensis system with Mr. Dave Mall from Sensis. He gave a breakdown of what the system was like and what it took. He stated that for the system to work, we would have to make arrangements to install the digitizer in the Navy facility in order to transmit the radar data over to our tower. We talked about the installation and he advised that he had a "ball-park" figure of about $60,000 for the entire hardware/software package. I asked him ifhe could provide me with a shopping list and include all of the costing figures for a turnkey operation. My feeling is that the whole thing will probably run about $80,000. · January 7, 2000 - Discussed the above with Mil Reisert. He advised that Dave Mall was planning on a trip down here the week of Jan 17 to show us his equipment. I asked Mil to contact Lennox and check with him to make sure that the Sensis system was a FAA approved non-federal system. lfit is, then we can continue to explore this option. However, ifit turns out that the Sensis system is not approved, then we'd better just abandon this approach and look elsewhere. We also discussed the fimding situation. He said that he didn't think that the FAA would allow us to use AlP even though Southern Region had already validated our need. We agreed that if this were the case, we'd again have to look for legislative support and pressure to get the FAA to provide fimding. · January 7, 2000 - Discussed the subject again with Mil. He had called FAA to see if the Sensis system was an approved system. He Called Lennox, but was passed on to Mr. Bill Cauldwell (sp). Mr. Cauldwell advised him that he thought that the Sensis system was approved by the FAA since it was being installed in other tower facilities. Mil was going to retouch base with Dave Mall and ask him if they had any hard copy proof that their system was approved by FAA. As presently planned, Dave Mall is planning to visit down here in the 26, 27, 28 Jan time frame. I will have to have J.D. make arrangements with the Navy for him to get access to the ASR-8 signal to give us a demonstration of his equipment. · January 7, 2000 - Discussed the above with J.D. at 1445. He says that part of the agreement he has with the Navy for access to the ASR-8 includes the installation of the digitizer at NAS. They know this and they have no problem with the concept. He will also make the necessary arrangements to get us access to NAS to conduct the demonstration of the Sensis system the end of January. · February 10,2000 - Visit from Mr. David A. Moll (Sensis Corp) and Mil Reisert from Greiner. Purpose of the visit was for Sensis to display their radar system. System, including the digitizer and display system, was set up at Boca Chica using their ASR-8 radar and beacon data. The system only displays beacon information, but J.D. viewed the display and pronounced it highly desirable. At the same visit to NAS, we discovered that they already have a digitizer installed as part of their system. As a result of this revelation, we have decided on a course of action. First, J.D. will accomplish liaison with the Navy to determine if there's a possibility for us to use info from NAS by directly plugging into their digitizer. If they say yes, then we will have Mr. Moll get in touch with the NAS Ground Electronics people to determine if we can plug into their digitizer and to determine if the output from the digitizer is compatible with the Sensis display system. Ifwe can get access to the Navy digitizer and if the signal is compatible, then we will proceed with efforts to simply buy a display system. However, if the signal is not available or if the systems are not compatible, then we will proceed with measures to buy the complete system from Sensis. In any event, the follow-on process will involve a ..., letter to FAA describing the system and either telling them or asking them if it is an approved system and determining whether or not it is authorized for installation in the tower. Then we will have to explore all of the possibilities concerning how we will go about funding the purchase. As an added part of the total radar package, we will offer the Navy a free installation of a system testing and analysis system for them to use at their end of the connection. This is something we can offer to them, at a rather reasonable cost, as an incentive to continue the negotiations and arrangements to use their signal and install our equipment in their facility. More to come. · February 11,2000 - During the General Airport Meeting, the decision was made that we will not pursue the option of using the Navy's digitizer. Instead we will press on with the plan to buy and install the total system offered by Sensis. · February 15, 2000 - Spoke with Dave Moll this morning. Informed him of our decision and asked that he provide us with the system descriptions and diagrams needed to proceed with the project. He will provide us with the necessary information to develop a Memorandum of Agreement with the Navy so we can proceed with getting access to their signal and installing the equipment in their spaces necessary to make the system operate. Now we await the technical information from Mr. Moll. Then we will proceed with the negotiations with the Navy and forward a copy to Mil Reisert so he can start his discussions with the FAA for approval of the system. · February 15,2000 - Spoke with J.D. about the coordination with the Navy. They are telling him that COMNA V AIRLANT has already approved our access to the signal, but they need a MOA between the airport and the Navy to describe the equipment that we propose to install and how much space it will take. J.D. has already spoken to the head at Ground Electronics as NAS and wants me to talk to him about how to proceed with the MOA. · February 15, 2000 - 1500, spoke with Master Chief Jim Crowley of Ground Electronics at NAS. He says there's another person at NAS that handles the preparation of all MOAs at NAS. He doesn't have a name or phone number for that person yet but will call me back and let me know whom to contact. · NEVER HEARD AGAIN FROM MASTER CIllEF CROWLEY!! · March 15, 2000 - 0900, spoke with Yolanda Mingo at NAS. She seems to be the one that does the drafting of any needed MODs. Have prepared a letter to her outlining exactly what we are looking for. Delivered same to her afternoon this date. · March 20, 2000 - Received an e-mail from Henry Dorsey, SENSIS, he sent me another copy of the picture of the display system. Already had this. He also said that he was sending the technical info that we needed to go to FAA. E-mailed him back and told him I only received the picture and nothing else. · March 22, 2000 - Received another e-mail from Henry Dorsey, SENSIS, he included a document providing a "thumb-nail" description of the system. Don't know if this is enough to go to the FAA with but I FAXed it to Mil Reisert and asked him to take a look and see if this was all he needed and if he needed more, to contact SENSIS and let them know what else he needs. · April 7, 2000 - Spoke with Yolanda Mingo at NAS concerning the MOD. She stated that the draft was working its way through all the appropriate departments. She expects that the Commanding Officer will sign the MOD early next week. · April 7, 2000 - Spoke with Dave Moll from SENSIS. He stated that they were ready to FAX us a copy of the price quote for the radar system. He thinks the price will come in at around $80,000. · April 12, 2000 - Received e-mail from Henry Dorsey at SENSIS. He provided us with a price quote for the total system. Price comes in at $79,835.00. FAXed same to Mil Reisert and we will discuss. · April 18, 2000 - Received a FAX from Greiner dated April 11, 2000 indicating that the FAA would impose no objection to the installation of the SENSIS equipment in the tower. · April 19, 2000 - Attempted to contact Yolanda Mingo at NAS by phone on April 18 and bye-mail this date to see ifshe could provide us with an update on the status of the Navy MOD concerning access to the ASR-8 radar signal. Have still received no reply. · April 19, 2000 - Sent an e-mail to Henry Dorsey at SENSIS advising him that we accepted his proposal (with a few modifications) and asked him to provide us with a clean contract document that we could take to the BOCC on May 17, 2000. · April 24, 2000 - Received an e-mail from Yolanda Mingo stating that she had made a few minor modifications to the MOD and had resubmitted it this morning for review and signature. She says she will call when it's ready for pickup. '2 · April 26, 2000 - Picked up executed copy of the MOl] between Naval Air Station, Key West and Key West International Airport. The MOU was signed by Capt. Johnson on 25 April 2000 and by the airport on 26 April 2000. A STATEMENT OF WORK FOR THE BEACON DATA EXTRACTOR SYSTEM INSTALLATION AT KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Equipment, Material and Service The following items of equipment, material and services as itemized in Table I are requirements of this Statement of Work. The work, render of services, including facilities, personnel, materials and supplies necessary to manufacture, inspect, test, package, and deliver the equipment complete to specification, together with other documentation as set forth in this Statement of Work and in accordance with the delivery schedule listed in Table I. ' Table 1. Item Equipment and Services Quantity Delivery No. Days ARO 1 Single channel, rack mountable, Beacon Data Extractor 1 90 (BDX-2000) 2 BDX Operations and Maintenance Manual 1 90 3 Rack Mounted Chassis Computer 1 90 4 Mini- Tower Comouter 1 90 5 Synchronous! Asynchronous Modems 2 90 6 Multi-sync Monitor 1 90 7 MX -6A Interface Board 2 90 8 Cabling set 1 90 9 BDX Installation and Performance Optimization 1 90 10 Engineer, Coordinate and Detail the Installation of 1 90 Leased Circuits at Surveillance and A TCT Locations 11 Install software as follows: Radar and Recording 1 90 Analysis Program (RRAP), Real Time Analysis Display System (RTADS), Radar Beacon Analysis Tool (RBA T), PlotASR, and WRITEASR. Equipment Design Commercial off the shelf (COTS) equipment as described in the technical description document. Material and Services Sensis Corporation will provide the equipment and services described in Table 1 configured to conform to the interface requirements ofNAS Key West and Key West International Airport. Sensis Corporation will provide 6 days support for the installation and optimization for the equipment and radar system as installed at Key West NAS, Florida. Additional days are available at $1 ,200/man day plus T &L expenses. Site spare parts and the extended maintenance contract will not be provided, at this time. All Sensis Corporation equipment is warranted for a term of one year from the date Of installation. All other equipment will follow the COTS manufacturer's warranty. The airport manager or their representative will be provided with warranty information upon completion of installation and ac~eptance. Inspection and Acceptance Hardware inspection and acceptance will take place when the equipment specified for delivery herein, has successfully passed all inspections and test. Delivery of equipment furnished under Table I shall be FOB Key West International Airport. Notice of Delay Sensis Corporation shall notify the airport manager, or designee, any time a problem arises that could endanger the schedule. Such notices will be telephoned to the airport manger and shall be confirmed byemail of fax within twenty-four (24) hours after occurrence. The report shall contain at least the following information or dates when each will become available: 1. Reason for the delay 2. Action being taken to correct or make up for the delay 3. Clearly indicate impact on schedule Schedules The delivery/schedule requirements shall be as specified in Table 1. Warranty The Sensis equipment delivered will be covered by a factory warranty against material or workmanship for a period of one year from the date of delivery. Shipping of equipment or travel and living cost associated with sending a technician to the site are not included. SENSIS CORPORA TION 5793 WIDEWATERS PARKWAY DEWITT, NY 13214 (315) 445-0550 (315) 445-9401 (FAX) PRICE QUOTATION PAGE 1 oF3 ISSUED TO: Key West International Airport 3491 South Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, Florida 33040 A TIN: Edward Sands, Airport Manager TELEPHONE: (306) 296-7223 FAX: (306)-292-3678 REFERENCE: David Moll, Sensis Field Engineer QUOTE NUMBER: TDX-00-0406-3 DATE: April 12, 2000 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE ESro DELIVERY 1 1 lot Beacon Data Extractor (BDX.2000) Consisting of a single $ 50,000 $50,000. 90 days ARO channel BOX configuration. Includes Beacon Data Extractor (BOX), Correlation Track Processor (CTP) and Communications Processor (CP) in a standard, rack mountable, slide in chassis. Dimensions are 5" H x 17" W x 22" D. 2 2 ea. System analysis and display computer system Two One @ $1,500 $ 4,000 90 days ARO Celeron-based processors, one in a mini- tower and one in a One @ $2,500. rack mounted chassis. The computer houses the unique boards required for processing the beacon data. 3 2 ea. Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS.2000INET & UPS $ 1,475. $ 2,950. 90 days ARO PRO.1000) External emergency power supply. provides backup power for graceful shutdown of systems. One larger UPS installed at the surveillance site and the smaller at the control tower. 4 1 lot TDX Site Installation Support for one (1) engineer for up to $8,860. $8,860. 90 days ARO 6 days, to provide BOX site installation and optimization. (Additional site support is available at $1,2oo1MD + per- diem.) 5 2 ea. Multiplexing modems Multiplexing synchronous modems $ 700. $ 1,400. 90 days ARO to transmit data from the surveillance site to the processing and display site. 6 1 ea. Flat Panel Monitor (FPM.1) Active matrix LCD flat panel, $ 8625. $ 8625. 90 days ARO capable of 30:1 contrast ratio, daylight or sunlight readable, sixteen inch, very-high resolution monitor. The multi-sync monitor has 0.249 mm x 0.249 mm pixel size for use in air traffic management applications. 7 1 lot Beacon Data Extractor Cable Set One set of each unique $ 1,000. $ 1,000. 90 days ARO cable required for setup and operation of the BOX and display system. 8 2 ea. MX-6A Board Unique, full height circuit card designed to $ 1,500. $ 3,000. 90 days ARO interface upto six radar digital outputs to a PC. - 9 Subtotal $79,835. SENSIS CORPORA TION 5793 WIDEWATERS PARKWAY DEWITT, NY 13214 (315) 445-0550 (315) 445-9401 (FAX) PRICE QUOTATION PAGE20F3 ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED PRICE ESrD DELIVERY ITEMS (Continued): 10 1 ea. Leased Circuit Service Consisting of coordination, $2372. $2372. 90 days ARO installation and setup of leased phone circuits betweeen the surveillance site and the Key West International Airport air traffic control tower. 11 2 ea. Radar Analysis Software Suite Included with the NSP NSP 90 days ARO installation are the five radar analysis products; Radar and Recording Analysis Program (RRAP), Real Time Analysis Display System (RT ADS), Radar Beacon Analysis Tool (RBA T), PlotASR, and WRITEASR. 12 1 lot BDX.2000 Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Manual NSP NSP 90 days ARO Documentation covering theory of operation, maintenance and users' guide of the BOX system. ...---- Subtotal page 2 $2372. ~_. . -...-..-- Subtotal page 1 $79,835. .........-..- Total $82,207. Ttrms of Pavm~nt: Net 30 days from date of invoice unless specified otherwise; prices are valid for 30 days from quote date T~nns and Conditions of Sale: (See next page.) Not~s: 1) Delivery is to destination; shipping is included in total price. 2) Quotation reflects published catalog list prices and docs not include GSA basic or quantity discounts. 3) BOX unit is a demonstration unit. The unit was used in capabilities demonstations of the beacon data extractor. BY: SENSIS CORPORA nON Page 3 of 3 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. Ownership, title to, and risk of loss of goods sold hereunder shall pass at the point of delivery specified in the price quotation. 2. Buyer assumes all risk and liability for the results obtained by the use of the equipment described by this price quotation. 3. Sensis equipment is warranted against defects in material or workmanship for one year from the date of delivery. This warranty does not include transportation costs involved in the return of components to the point-{)f-repair or the travel and living (T&L) costs associated with sending a technician to the site where the equipment is located. All such warranties are contingent upon proper use of the equipment. These warranties will not apply: (1) if adjustment, repair, or parts replacement is required due to accident, unusual physical or electrical power, air conditioning, humidity control, or causes other than intended ordinary use, or; (2) if the equipment has been modified by the customer, or where Sensis equipment serial numbers have been removed or altered without prior written approval of Sensis. 4. The terms of payment are those specifically quoted to the Buyer in writing. Unless otherwise specified, payment must be made for all partial deliveries according to the terms of the individual billings. The payment term begins with the date of the invoice. In the event the Buyer fails to fulfill the terms of payment, or in case Sensis shall have any doubt at any time as to the Buyer's financial responsibility, Sensis may decline to make further deliveries. 5. Buyer is responsible for the ultimate payment of all taxes including stamp charges, licenses, duties, and governmental exactions by whatever name, which may be assessed or levied on or on account of the products sold hereunder. 6. Any alteration requested by the Buyer in the normal operating characteristics of the eCjuipment ordered is subject to a price adjustment to be specified by Sensis. 7. Packing of the goods to be provided by Sensis to the Buyer will be according to Sensis standard commercial practice. 8. Operation and Maintenance Manuals or general product descriptions will be provided in accordance with Sensis standard commercial practice. In cases where no bona-fide manual exists a technical specification sheet or product description will be supplied to the Buyer. 9. Inspection reports and test results will not be provided by Sensis for items ordered, unless specifically agreed to by Sensis, or unless such reports are normally issued by Sensis for the equipment in question as standard commercial practice. 10. Upon request, Sensis will endeavor to furnish such technical advice or assistance as it has available in reference to the use of its product by the Buyer; it is expressly understood, however, that all such general advice or assistance is given gratis and Sensis assumes no obligation or liability for the advice given or the results obtained; all such advice or assistance being given and accepted at the Buyer's risk. Separate provision can be made for the purchase of installation and technical support services apart from the general advice implied above. 11. In no case will Sensis be subject to monetary or other penalties for failure to deliver within the period specified on the price quotation, purchase order or acknowledgment, independent of what terms and conditions may be specified on the Buyer's purchase order or its attachments. In the event of inability for any reason to supply the total demands for the material specified in this order, Sensis may allocate its available supply among any or all purchases on such basis as it may deem fair and practical without liability for failure of performance which may result therefrom. It is expressly understood that payment by the Buyer is required for the portion of the order that was provided by Sensis. 12. In the event the Buyer attempts to cancel an order for any reason other than flagrant default on the part of Sensis, it is to be expected that a cancellation charge will be imposed on the Buyer by Sensis of a value to be ultimately established after negotiation with the Buyer. 13. This instrument contains all the Terms and Conditions with respect to the sale and purchase of the material named herein. No modification of these Terms and Conditions shall be of any force, unless such modification is reduced to writing and signed by the party claimed to be bound thereby, this instrument shall not be affected by the acknowledgment or acceptance of purchase order forms containing different conditions. Any dispute between the Buyer and Sensis will be arbitrated in the laws of th~ State of New York, U.S.A. 14. In the event that any provision in these Terms and Conditions shall be deemed in contravention of law, it shall be excised from this document, and, insofar as possible, the balance of this document shall remain in full force and effect. From: Henry Dorsey <henryd@worldnet.att.net> To: Edward Sands <eywap@mail.state.f1.us> Date: Tuesday, May 02,20005:58 PM Subject: Revised Key West Quote Sandy, Attached are the revised quote and a SOW you might find helpful in getting this through the process. You asked a question earlier about the 90 days. It won't take that long to get the product, but we pack it to be sure. What time frame are you looking for? Here is a short list of contracts we have in place. MY contracts people let me down by not including the Marine Corps jobs so I will forward them to you tomorrow. FAA Logistics Contract Contract Number DTF AO 1-99-C-00073 Value: $687,772 Award date: 08/09/99 Term: Two years with options Furnish Lay-In Inventory for repairs or replacement of LRUs Furnish Logistics Support to 9 sites Medium Power Radar Contractor Logistics Support Contract (Netherlands) Contract Number: MKLu/MSEP/00/9701 Value: $315,538 Award Date: 06/09/98 3 years with options of 3 yrs each for a total of 15 years. Logistics Support GSA Schedule Sensis Products and Engineering Services Contract Number: GS-03F-5111C Current Period: April 1, 1999 - March 31, 2004 hd .J/ .)/ L.VVV From: Henry Dorsey <henryd@worldnet.att.net> To: Edward Sands <eywap@mail.state.f1.us> Date: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 9:26 AM Subject: More info on Government contracts - -----...--.-.-.. ...,..---.-- -'. - '. ...-. -- - -- .--.--- . .-- - - ----, ----.-- ~------ ..~ Morning Sandy, Below are more contracts info: United States Marine Corps, Engineering Services and some Sensis Products Contract Number: M67854-95-C-3108 Award Date 20 Jul 95 Value: $8,669,664 POC for USMC: MSgt Lance Newcomb, (703) 784 0787 Lockheed Martin (in support of USMC Tasks) Engineering Services Purchase Order: FFM160522 Award Date:01/98 Value: $899,000 POC for Lockheed Martin: Margo Huard, 315456 - 3546 FAA Logistics Contract Contract Number DTF AO 1-99-C-00073 Value: $687,772 Award date: 08/09/99 Term: Two years with options Furnish Lay-In Inventory for repairs or replacement of LRUs Furnish Logistics Support to 9 sites POC for FAA: Bill Mosko, (202) 267-5460 (THIS LINE WAS NOT ON THE FIRST EMAIL) I will continue to gather more info for. your defense of the planned project with the commissioners. Let me 'know if you have any specific needs. hd JI ~I L.VVV :'''.L.",Ji'W1L ',-UI t-'I.Jj ,11 1,,-'.1 "~/V"UU '.\.1 v..~. aM ~.' ___I ':._-- - . ----- ,'. ~ Federel Aviation Admln,stratlon (FAA) Juttlficatlon for Other Than full and open competition procurement of 8 RADAR/Beacon Dig"iler PRtOOOO596 ,. IOENTIFICAT10N OF THE AGE~ Fed.... Aviation Admln_tration SOUttrHIl _ion 2801 MeaCham BOuleVard Fort WImh. Texas 18137-0456 2. NA TUR! OF THE Ae"ON. Purcl'l." . TOX.2000 radarlbtRCfl digittler for ttle 8eaumonll1rport surveillance radar model.7 (ASR-7}1alr traffic beaCOn control \nterrogator mod~ (ATCBI"') from sentil Corporation. 5783 Wtd~rI ParkwIY. OtVVltt, NY 13214. The radar/beacon digltller \1 required to tr8n.mit rldar video from V'le BIlaumont ASR.1 site to the George 8ulh lntlmltional (IAH) terminll radar approach control (TAACON). 3. DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES AND eSTIMATED COST Senail Mode' TOX-2000dl. Radarlbeacon digitIZer. consistl of. Radar Oata ExtrlCtor. Beacon Data EJCtraCtor, Corrala1lon TIWCk ProctPOr and Communication, Processor in thr.. riCk mountetJlt chaslis. The .ystem wm 11'10 inc;ludt Nldundant Weathlr Data Extractor kit. , TOX Signal Oistrll)l,ition Ur'lit Spare Kit, and 19. equipment Clbln~. 'n,tallltion and letting of tfl. 'TDX-200Odi require, intetf.eing the ~u~"t to the ,.SR-7/ATC81-S equipment. On site training, Includln~ training materials. for techniCians .INwlldon site will be required. operation ,nd maintenance manuals mula j"dude system 1heory. edjUitmentl and _-up, period~ maintenance. troubleshooting procedures. and ~plilir procedures TOX.2000 digita.r system with training $3~9.937 4. STATUTORY AlJ'TMORITY. Tt\. Itltutory authority for tt'lll COf'\tra~U81 actIOn is 41 U.S.C. 253 (e) (1), as Implemented by paragral'h e.30:Z-1 of ttw federal Acquisition Regulaton (FAR). o,.,1y one reapon.ible lOurce. 5. AATIONAU! SUPPORTING USE OF CITED AU'THORITY. MarIW 8UrieY5 condu~d In 1996. inellClted that thef8." two vendorS (TelephoniCt and Sen.'. Cotp8.) Chit a... <al)lble of rTMIeting the requlremel"l'8 of. COTS digitizer Sln;1e source approval far the Sensls .y..ms It being &OUght fOf thl followin~ N;sona 1) ~.tlOl" within m. HAS Approxlmltely (I Senlit TOX-2000 digltllent .", now in oplration in the NAS ( tw'ling bien purchas.d 1M I",tallecl by ether r8;IQ"8). Four Idditlo"al system hive been installed. AOS ha. aev.loped and iHued Interim CertiftcatiOM S~nd.rd. for tht $en..' TOX systems and are ~urrent1y in the prg~'. of developing NatiOnal Certification Standards ConVerwty, tltare art currently no relephonles digitizer .y.c.mt In operutlon within the NAS. and no Iy.tem testing of that Iystem IsenVI,lOned or suggested. 2) Product Maturlty ~ __,.......:~:...:'_'L.-:-'_.; -'I. Tht . $entia dlgit~era within the NAS hive pro.....n \Cl be reliable; exhibiting no failure. in over two years at OQtr&tlOnll Vie The Sfnsi. TOX system IIta affers t more robust ~roduct line, us.llly In tht area of wtether utradara. To date, $en'lI hes lOIa Ind inltlllleO Ipproxirn8tlly 5 integl'lted weather extra~. wtlieh .re in Clperatlonal uM In the NAS tadlY-. Weather extractiOn is 8 key operational parameter for the 'Ytrttm 3) Product Support In tddilio'" to the one-yea' manuflctur8(1 warranty. . 10gisticI support contract for the TDX-2000 is alrndy in plaoe. GiVen the I...ble itlvettrMnt .Iready expended, demontntud 1Y,.m pel'fornWlce, .nd OVOfIU government NtIafaction with 8ensl,"lbl1ity to rntet cost and Ichedull, we bellt'il the prudent course is to continue bulldi"O the aovemmentllndultrY partnll'll'llp alreldy G.tabli'l'lod with St"til. FDf theM r88lOM ,ingle IOI.WC8 authority il ctl.lred 6 See ITEM 15. RATIONAL SUPPORTING USE OF CITEO AUTHORITY. 7. DETERMlNAT\ON OF FAI~ ANO REASONABLE COST/PRICE. 8 MARKeT suRVEY RESUL "~.: S.. ITeM ~, RATIONAL SUPPORTING USE OF CITED AUTHORITY 9 OTf04ER FACTS SUpp~'TING THE USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPET1TIQ!i The Oepartmtl'\t oi Otten.. (000), Air I='orct, II in the p:'CC8JS of proeuring rox tyltem& from Sensltl. A Q)mplete Fim Artiele Test (FAT) program w.. conducted IS part of ~ M' Force', procurement of TOX-ZOt)O tYWtwml. This telttng was r.....ieW8d. witntand and ilPProved by government peflO""el. Sine. u'e TOX-2000's beinl prOaJred by the FAA are In a limlllr c:onfiguratlon to thOse being proal* by the ~r Force, it has betn determined tho FAA nHCI !'lot replICate that FAT. 10. LIST OF OTHER SOURCE, If ANY. WHICH EXPRESSEO. IN WRITING. ~N INTERESi IN n4E ~QU'SIT'ON. Non- 11. ACTIONS, IF ANY, WHICH THE FAA MAY TAKE TO REMOVE ANY BARRIERS TO fUTuRE COMPETITION. - .-..-~~ ._._., 1-'-'1 '-~ .. _, -r 12. T~CHNICAl AND REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION (REQUIRED BV FAR 6.303-2 I) , certify tI'llt tht fecW and ",preantatiof1S under my eognitence which .re InchJCJeG in. or whlC;:h form a bill, tor, ttl\$ iustifi~" ere compl.te end .-ceurate .. T!CHN1CAL COGNIZANce 817 222 4500 Telephone - ~ftm.l? Date b. REQUIREMENT COGNIZANCE ....<Y // /~.; . ,. #.~: -..- 8172225510 Telephone ~I " / z,.. g i) cele 13, I.EGAL SUFFICIENCV REVIEW "'15 JU$\ification and Approval II cseterrnlned legally sufficient Lynette Word, ASW-1 817 222~oe4 Telephone Date 14. CONTRACTING OfFICER CERTIPICATION I certify th.t this jultlfleatlon and Approval Is accurate and complllte to the belt d my knowledge and belief flh:t Ol'lld Kltt, ASW.558 Contraeting Officer 817 222433' T .Iephone ~1~dcJ r....1 ., _..._" _' -,_."-_."._'.1.. ':'.i\J~~r:~ ....Ul ~UI 01. l Ui I _~ ._M'__ Search Detail <J rage t of2 ~*' 58 ( _ PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT "(Note: Effective -.; 7/1199. diu iI . .... &"""ul... .."ult of Sohodulel 5& IU B " S8 IX "'"""'= i.to the DI" 58 1) GSA Co.tlct: Monica Gormley Phone: (215) 656.3839 !-maU: IllQfl1tI.,.g.orml.~ fjiI]lT Paae 1 of6 -_~L J.'" ,If.. - II 1 Recorcling & Reprod"cing VICIGO & AUCllo EQuipment. Including spare , R.pai~ Pat1l & MeeHan.. '"c:I,,~ acl lM*C:t\OIt. ea.... Dr Cl1IlGge; SWIlc:MIS ar.d Gen.~.cor'. ~~nChro"lIIIlG. ~O. Of CII.'eot.r: Mill SWdiG S~ & Compatllllla. MonOChralM or Color: ~I Uc.cn, ~ Of MvnaChrome. ~",.!;Hl re,.. c.w.a. or C1111Ti1li'; Il1Clu,~1 or BroeClCUlI VId.o OIIc. lItMI1I'IdeO. PfOIetlOft. ... A...... I" GIA Mol..,.... CoIYWlg 10011 Cocr*lIIOCIll ColnIn8 - COINllV loon !sa ~ Ul ~ MOll CornnlI aoon la Comlnt aoon cOftllna ,,,Ill'l !U coming '0'" Yti rU :!1- m yq CocMtt lOCI" Vn e......, ""'"' ~~ ~~~ ~~~l.!l.TANT.5 ~ ~~ASCelATli:B INC Wt".t'l INC. ~u.J.A, INC ~~rtATION ~pMARf DI<il!&.l.Y.fiIUaLll& ~~cORPOMIKm "HI t"nUPANY W~T1ONgys..lN~ ~OHO""E U~1fOJ~ f:LEeTROS~G. ~ BA.OI,DCAST p,,~ ~~. L.e:1TC"'. ~ ~ UCMNOL.OOIU INk.. ~ mlIRMF.R ~ (file;. ~~ ~8EARCH' t~'~ ..ANASONI~ 8AnADCAST . UI.&.I:L~ esBCE.PH!l.P1..J!& "~!A SW11Qo1ING SYCTEh'S~ eJ:iXS~OMTlON ~I~l~ ~k ~~ ~ BY.B~"'J4 RO"N IHQlJ~J~ B~o SY!TE~~ GliY.WC!80NlC8 INC., $QUtQf~ ~~.. ;w1JM~.K. Rl-EWl"E I~ ~~~ Y!W-~ COntd~' . QI-03F-OtlCSJ GS-o:I'-I03?O ~F~1dJ ~~~H8 O~ GC-03F-<407li8 0I-03t=.A10ll8 ~o4OM Q&.oW.ea21H Gs.o3f..otQB 06-03F~8 QS.O!'-51 Z3C QS.03f~51B as.Q3f.OQO,J G$.Q3,.eoaIH oS-03f: -40118 GtaF.4lMtl c;s.oS'~08 G8.03F.1CJl1t'4 ~p..iOlfB ~ G5-01'~B ~~8 Gs.03F-8020toI OS-03F.40111 G&-01,.aoaO 08-03F -4' 058 Q"O~F~e3e fi8-O"''''OH GI-03f~7B ~~8 G&.W-4t,4B OI.()3F~ Gs-osJ.s065D QI.03f~O OS..o3F.ID2' C (j'~3t: .OOOtJ GSo03F-4004B '110"' l6tJ0)3:Z6-)l1 , (6'6)2....,. (113)171-1111 ~4001 (101)nN101 (nG)218-J200 (708)101.S400 (.'o)UOoO'l30 (1OO)21$-1l1tO t<lQ1P11.71.. (1S7J"O-Ol'" "'lfil11W1Ie (1Ot}ta3-301tl (112)t31o'7100 (117)&t:s.!l!15 (If'l3' 5-501' (1OO)Z3HI73 (lICO)2~ (100)143-1514 (118)4314111 (101)TSf-3I4O ~ (304)m-mo (toO)Z1..a222 (S01)e51-Z141 ~03leH-~1 00 (41 "157 ~480 (701)I?T-3000 (510)11401000 (309)H'~ (t1.)l7SoN11 (301)177-4857 1"4)414-"'. (T03P51...,1 (104l81Q.11'1C (IOO~-Rea (mI3n.e4. (21')J27-ZZI2 YJl Yn ~ I1~ m ;rll v.. III :w ~- Y.tI COtftIng 100II YIl ::r.. Y!t COIJIiIl9 1001\ YJII..l ...lpiS~bSumnwy .i\tefl:ontIKtorSeheGule_ on W ebEvwt(hrefContractorSehedule)?brefCo 2/11/2000 :;.l\JI~HL l-or por at 1011 ___r_o_^_o ,.,.~'U--<-'..J' t., 1~-' 'v.."".' ~~,y.,..,v ...~. ........__ .,,_ _.. -' - v.'.... . 1.10.::; ...'..." J.J...... rage 2 of 2 Search Oetail 'l.'/A5MINMON pROf:U!lIONAI. ',,(6~ 'tQ.FV)~.~ pqe 1 of6 Gt4II' -4OIA a$oC~'.oooeJ {3D' )M2.eeoo taO~3M.1lI43 CcIn...... .00I'I i;erl'>11Ig too1'l - .. JpS5earohSumnwy .luefContractofSchedule _on webEvent(hrefContractorSchcdule )?hrefCo 2/1112000 5/15/00 Peter Horton, Director of Airpo~ Recommendation for Item 1-2 (BOCC 5/17/00) OUNTYOf MONROE Memorandum To: Mayor and Commissioners Date: From: Subject: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MAYOR, Shirley Freeman, District 3 Mayor Pro Tem, George Neugent, District 2 Wilhelmina Harvey, District 1 Nora Williams, District 4 Mary Kay Reich, District 5 1. Declare the Sensis Corp. to be the sole source for the radar installation in the Air Traffic Control Tower at Key West International Airport, as per the declaration of same by the Federal Aviation Administration (documentation attached). 2. Immediately purchase the Sensis Corp. radar equipment and installation package using a combination of Florida Dept. of Transportation funds and Monroe County airport funds. 3.Authorize the Mayor to execute a contract with the Sensis Corp. for the above upon legal review and approval. 1 ),.r -' ". ~ f ederat Aviation Admtnmratlon (F AA) Justffication for Other Than full and open competition procurement of 8 AADARlBeacon Digitizer PRfOOOOS96 ,. IOENTlFICATlON OF 'mE AGENCY fed" ~y'-lion Admtn.tration 80uttNfelt Region 2e01 ~ BOv\e'tard FortWotth. Texas 18137-0466 2. NA TUR! OF THE ACT10N. Pun:tl... . TOX-2000 radarfDtlCC" digitizer for ttte Beaumont aIrport IUN.i".n~ rld.r model-7 (ASR-7}1.1r ~ beaCOn control \ntallOg'tor mod~ (A TCBI-4) from sentil Corporation. S7g~ Wtdewattl'l ParkWIY. DeWitt, NY 13214. The radar/baaccn Gig~er il requited to \nIntmit radar video tram the Bteumont ASR. T s. to the George auah International (IAH) terminll rwdar approach control (TAACON). 3. DESCRIPTiON OF SUPPLIeS ANO eSTIMATED COST SeMit Model TOX-2000dl. RBdarlbe.oon digitIZer. eonsista of. Radar Data Extrtetor, Be,CO" DatA EJc\r3CtOr, Correlation TrKk Proct"or and Communicadon, processor iI1 thAle ra~ mountable challis. ' . The IY-'" wl1l .tO inc;ludt redundant Weath~r caUl Extractor kit. . TOX Signal Distrlbl,jtion UI'llt Spare KJt. and 1V" equipment Clblnet. installltion and letting or the TDX-200Odi *,uires interfteing the equ~rtt to the ~SR.TIATC81-5 ~uipment. On site traininQ, Inc:ludlng training materlall. for technlcl.n$ .'Mtalldon aite will be MqUlred. operation Ind maintenanee manual. ShOuld .,dude system theory. adjUltmentl and Ht..up, periodic "".Imenanew, troubleshooting procedura. and repair proeedur.... TOX.2000 dlQrtlz.r syttem with tralnmg $3~9.937 4. STATVTORY AUTHORITY. The Itltutory authority for tn'l COl'Itractual actIOn is 41 U.S.C. 253 (c) {1}. as implemented by paraQraDh 6.302-1 of h federal Acquisition RegulatiOn (FAR). 0,,1y one rnptm1ibtesource 5. AATiONAU! SUPPORTING US!; or CITED AUTHORITY. Mar\Ult lurleY5 conOueted in 1996, IndlClted that thef'8 8re two vendOfS (TelephOrtieland SenitI Cotp1l.) tnet .AI capable of meeting the requirlmel'lts of. COTS d~ltiZer Sin;l. courc. approval far the Son,l, Iy.tem, la being aought for the following Nasons 1) O~ltlOf\ within tI'\. NAS Approxlmltely 1\ s.nsit TOX-ZOOO digltlZel1i 81'8 now in operation in the NAS ( M'/ing been purchased IMlln,talled by gther reglan,). Four Idditlonill system have been installed. AOS h.. cs.~elop.d and iHued Interim certif\cetions Standarelt far tht Sensi! TOX systems and arc ,unentty in the PrQ~'1 of developing NatiOnal Certification S~ndards Converw'y. U\are art curre"tly no Telephonlcl digitizer IYI\emt In operutlon within the NAS. and "0 Iystem lesting of that IYltem Is enVisIOned or lu998ited. 2) Product M.wrlty "'" Tha . Senlll dl9itlZera within the NAS have pro"a" tQ be reliable; exhlbitin~ nO failures in over twO ynrs at ooerBtkm.I UH The Stnsi. TOX Iystem Ilia ~rs 8 more robutt ~roduct line, espec;itlly 'n the area of weether ~.. To date, Sentla has 1OIC2 Ind installed Ipprgximlt81y ~ integr'lled weether ex1ractoR. which are in apeman.1 Ud ~ the NAS tad't. Weather extractiOn is · leey OJ)eratio,,a' parameter for the ..,..em 3) Product Support In _itiol'\ to the gna-ye., manuflctu",'1 w~rranty. . logistiCS IUpport contract for the TDX.2000 is _lldeSy in plaoe. GiVen the liZ.able inY"t~nt .Iready expended. demo"'tnmd sy.l8m perfornWlce. 1M OVefll govcmrM'" Hti,faction with 8ensl", ability' to meet cost and Ichedult. we belie'4c the prudent course is to continue bulldint the GOV9mmentllndultrY pBrtne..."lp alreaay ostablil"od with S8"'it. For theM realOnllingle IOI.rC8 authOrity i. dellred 6 oeSCRIPTION Of EFFORTS MADE TO I!NSURE TMA T or:FERS ARE SOLlCITEO FROM AS MANY POTENTIAL SOIJRCES AS IS PRACTICABLE. See ITEM .s. RATIONAl SUPPORTING USE OF erreo AUTHORITY. 7. OEl'ERM1NATION OF FAIR ANO REASONABLE COST/PRICE. e. MAft~T SURVEY RESUlTS. S8. ITeM ", RATIONAl SUPPORTING USE OF CITED AUTHORITY 9. OTt4ER FACTS SUPPORTING THE USE OF OTHER THAN FULl. AND OPEN COMPETITION. The Oepartment of Oaten.. (000), Air Foret, II in the p:'CCeSs of procuring TOX systems from $ens's. A c;omptate Fim Miele Test (FAT) progrtim w.. conducted as part OHhe M Force', procurement of TOX-20~ ')'1ItwmI. Tttl5 teltlng was r."ieWed. witneued and ~roved by government perlo"nel. Sin~ the TOX-2000'a being pl'OaJred by the FAA are In a limllar configuration to thOSe being procured by th8 ~r Foca, it hes been determined tho f M nHd t"lot replicate U\at FAT. 10. LIST OF OTHER SOURCE, IF ANY. WHICH EXPRESSEO. IN WRIT1NG. ~N INTERESi IN ntE ~UIS1TION. None 11. ACTIONS, IF ~v, 'MilCH THE FAA MAY TAKE TO REMOVe ANY BARRIERS TO FuTuRE COMPETITION -. 12. TeCHNICAL AND REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION (REQUIRED BY FAR 6.303-2(D} , certify U\1l the fecW and ",preantltiof'lS under my c;ognqanee which are InclUde<! in. or whIch form a 1:>1111 tor. this justifi~" ere complete end ~rate .. T!CHNlCAl COGNIZANCE 817 222 4500 T elept10ne - o/IflmD Date b. REQUIREMENT COGNIZANCE 817222 !5S10 Telephone '2./ " / t.,. g i) Olle 13. LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW ThIS JU$\ification and Approval,. determined ~lIy sufficient Lynette Word I ASW-1 811222~oe4 Telephone Dale 14. CONTRACTING OfFICER CERTIFIC"TION I certify th'l this ;ustmea1l0n and Approval Is accurate and complll\e to tht beslt c.f my knowledge and bellef. f:bJ . Ila-.1d 1<Io~ ~ Con~etlng Offietr 817222433' T elephant ~i~~o