7th Amendment 01/28/2009
DANNY L. KOLHAGE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DATE:
February 4, 2009
TO:
Suzanne A. Hutton
County Attorney
FROM:
Kathy M Peters
Executive Assistant
Pamela G. Hanc~.
ATTN:
At the January 28, 2009, Board of County Commissioner's meeting, the Board granted
approval and authorized execution ofthe following:
/Seventh Amended Settlement Agreement in Richard M Osborne & Conch Contrada LC
v. Monroe County & Joe Paskalik, CA K 01-108. Enclosed is the original for your handling.
Settlement Agreement in Monroe County v. Bender and Associates, P.A., et ai, CA K
03-915. Enclosed is the original and a photo copy for your handling.
Should you have any questions please feel free to contact our office.
cc: Finance
File ,/
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee,
And CONCH CONTRADA, L.c., a Florida
Limited Liability Company,
PlaintifflPetitioners
Case No.: CA-K-OI-I08
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the State of Florida and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in
his official capacity as Building Official,
Defendant/Respondents
I
SEVENTH AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO CONCH CONTRADA.
L.C.. a FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Plaintiff, CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., A Florida Limited Liability Company ("Conch
Contrada"), and Defendants, MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
("Monroe County"), and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official capacity as Building Official
("Paskalik"), (collectively, the "Parties"), previously resolved their differences which gave rise
to the above-styled action, wherein the parties agreed to settle the matter between them upon the
terms and conditions recited in:
a. The Settlement Agreement dated July 17, 2002, hereinafter "original Settlement
Agreement," attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
b. The Amended Settlement Agreement dated March 19, 2003, attached hereto as
Exhibit "B".
c. The Second Amended Settlement Agreement (Osborne) dated May 16,2006 attached
as Exhibit "C".
d. The Third Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrada, L.C. dated May
16,2006 attached as Exhibit "D".
e. The Fourth Amended Settlement Agreement as to Keys Federal Credit Union dated
February 21, 2007, as Successor in Interest to Richard M. Osborne attached as
Exhibit "E".
f. The Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrada, L.C. dated
February 21, 2007 attached hereto as Exhibit "F".
g. The Sixth Amended Settlement Agreement as to Keys Federal Credit Union dated
August 11, 2008, as Successor in Interest to Richard M. Osborne attached as Exhibit
"G".
1. The parties agree to amend the Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch
Contrada, L.C. as follows:
a. Paragraph l.a. (Paragraph 5 of the original Settlement Agreement) is hereby
amended to read:
l.a. Conch Contrada agrees to submit an application for Amended Conditional
Use Order that reflects the intended change in use, should Conch Contrada decide
to develop the subject property with an alternative use(s). Upon approval of the
Amended Conditional Use Order by the Planning Director, and in accordance
with the development orders referred to in Paragraph 2 of the Original Settlement
Agreement, Monroe County agrees to process promptly upon submittal the
application for building permit by Conch Contrada or its assigns for construction
of one 7,500 square foot restaurant, or as an alternative, a 7,500 square foot
medium-intensity, mixed use, retail and/or office/professional use facility by
December 1, 2009.
b. Paragraph 3 is hereby amended to read:
3. Plaintiff Conch Contrada, in cooperation with Monroe County, will prepare
and submit to the Court pleadings or notice required to address the Seventh Amended Settlement
Agreement. Conch Contrada shall pay any costs incurred as a result of filing the Seventh
Amended Settlement Agreement and any associated pleadings or notices with the exception that
each party shall bear its own attorney's fees.
c. Paragraph 5 is hereby amended to read:
5. All other terms of the original Settlement Agreement dated July 17,2002 and
the (first) Amended Settlement Agreement, the Second Amended Settlement Agreement, the
Third Amended Settlement Agreement (Conch Contrada), and the Fifth Amended Settlement
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
d. Paragraph 6 is hereby amended to read:
6. This Seventh Amended Agreement shall not be valid and binding upon the
parties until approved by the Court and incorporated into a Seventh Amended Final Judgment
entered by the Court in these proceedings.
e. Paragraph 7 is hereby amended to read:
7. Until this Seventh Amended Settlement Agreement has been approved by
the Court pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the original Settlement Agreement and Judgment
previously entered, and any subsequent approved amendments or modifications shall remain in
full force and effect.
ATTEST
BY:Cl~
Deputy derk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
::.~6:0::F[;t
/ Mayor/Chkfrperson
.'
DANNY L. KOLHAGE
CLERK OF THE COURT
~' -
~s /
/~v r::');;h~/
Prin d Name /
MONROE COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL
BY:~~
JOS PH P ASKALIK
Ii
wJZess ~
()V~ os"f;z- ~k:
Printed e
MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY
APPROI/ED AS TO FORM:
~ c!. 0 .0
" ~;.:~~ ~(~(S'LE',:' Pc ~:/
ASSI~TANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
Date :.. v'~' ,...,,"'-< ";~x.,-'~'
'" / ,.-;t' '
"
a )!\J - ;\h,] (n'\.~<').....coNCH CONTRADA, L.C.
\yjtnes~ r .' I . \ ~C c:.: ~_. . c..~ A Florida limited liability Company
~ c; ) I C1 I.I.J. : to >~yU f Z
Printed Name 0"
1,U
j).~J~
Witness Ic/( +le-,
])c\..\/)^-- j"-, <
Printed Name
t~;Jts &P~ /j
By: i~/ v _
Douglas Trevor, Manager
.. ,
,.'
I!XII.IBIT "A"
IN THE aaevlT COURT OFTlIE SJXTEENTIf JVDlaAL
CIRCUIT II! APm trOR MONROE COUJIlTY, ll'LORIDA
RICHARI)M, OSBORNE, as TNatee;
IIIld CONCH CONTRADA, L.C.. a
F1orid1 Limited Liability Company,
Pl8lntifl'sll'cdtionen,
Case No. CAK...oI.I08
Y.
::-0::
~: i.
.", ~"1
Iv
~' ,"j
I ".:J
'" ''1
~ 'J
.,""
"'CI ~3
-.
- ,.,
f:' (")
~,
to) "',
c.o '.i:.J
MONRoe COUN'lY. a poJitical
IIlbdivision of the Slate of Florida;
IIIId JOSBPH PASKAUK. in his omelial
CIpIICily as BuDding 0fBdaI.
Der-tanII Respond....
". ".
;..;;.;~ ".'
l~
?> 1"11
I
SrrTI.2MRNT ~
1'1ei1lliOil RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as T... ("Osboroe"), IIIld CONCH
CONTRADA, I..C., a P10rlda Limited Liability CoIIlpllly ("Conch Coalnlda"). and
Dofcndams, MONROE COUNTY, a polidoal IIIbdivi&foq of the Stale of Florida
("Monroe Countyj, lI1ld JOSEPH PASKAUK, ill bis official C8l*ity as BuDding
Oftlcial ("Pukaliltj, havius IIIIicably nlIlIlwd their dIfJ'<<e.... whid1 gave rise to this
lICtioll, hmeby aarec 10 RUle dill matter ~ Ihem upon tho tbllowiDg terms 8Dd
conditions:
1. Aa to OlIhoMo. Moaaoc County aan-: &) that a M'li<< Coaditioo81 Use to
COI\SlNI:t a 35.200 Ill. ft. mhti-BtOrlllle W8Illhouse has beeu appmwcI, with conditions, by
. "MiiitroeCiii.iiiiYPT8iiiiliii~;;;dBiiiiiDoni8iiiillY-27;i997;UDdcr RQC;b;dcmN;:'pj:9'7. ." '..
nlllOl'Cled 81 O. R. Book 1446, JlIICII nos . 2207; b) that a wrI_ with Rprd to off.
street paddng. reduclll8 tho number of""lUired .-u,.. ..- from 3.0 to 2.5 per 1,000
EXHIIIT
A
I'd
~ SBl!: 9Ii!F. !'In.1Iu'''' !'It"1lOln.l ~..
ltIIW""'IlI~-"'I-IIt
;\\~
"
, ....
! ,
"
. ..
_"I-_
sq. n. of tloor Ill'" for the pmposod mini-storago warehouse was llIutc1d by lho Monroe
C.ounty P1anniDs CommilS1on on JIIlUlllY 17, 1997, UDder lletoJudll8 No. P2-97: and. 1:)
that both developmllnt Oldcr8an ~ valid lII1d in full f_ aDd cffa:t.
2. As to Conch Contmda, .L.C.. Monroe County lI&fOOS: a) that a Minor
Conditional u. Developl~ Order No. 5-99 to ClOJIBtruct 0IIll 7.500 aquare foot
~t, to lllIocato an lllrislIna ICWlI,ge IrOItIllellt fiioUIty. and to Iocato a IhaEed
driWMy, - approwcl, with COlIdlli.-. by the PIImnilIa Dlreotar oCMonmc County on
AUI.lD!Il 4, 2000, recorded in OR Book 1654, peps 1591-1595: and, b) that this
devolopmenl order is p_dy valid and in IUD fbu:e and eftiK:<<.
3. NotwllhJbo!llt;na anythiq In IllY of the ~t ~ rer.rad 10 In
plb'8gIlIphs I or 2, abow (11III, speoltlcaUy CnndItI!!'1 No. I in CoIIdllioad U.
Development 0'" No. S;.l)9). or any other provision: of the eo...pa~...1Ifve Plan or
0tdInam:ea of ~ County, 1IO buildlq JIllI'IlIit Ih8II be dollied to elk Osbomo or
Coach Contrada, L.C.. on the buR of Momoe Covnty', I'lllP'latioDs reI8ting to 1\0\\-
residential t8tol of gI'CIWth or the adop\ion (or 1sck of sdopt!oo) of. JIOIIftlIidenti permit
a1'''''atI'''I systam or ill equivalent, iDc.IlIlIIDa. but not JImiJed to, the IlIl/PIIatIous lilt fbrth
in Monroe County CoInprehonsjve Plan Polinies 101.3.1 tIuvu&h 101.3.5, and MCJIIl'oe
Collllty QpI'~ No. 032-2001.
,
,
~
,
4. In ~ with the devolcJpmw CIIdcrs l8lilmd to In ~ I.
above. Mo_ County ..... to ~ JI.lUIIIptIy IIplIII aubmlUal 0Ib0me'. appliclatlon
... ..._..........lOrbiilldinipeliiiit-rw ~Ofilis;200~ ft..~~i~-RciOO._...'._...
V... 12 (July 14.2003, .Ihrouab July J3, 2004)..
2
e'd
~ ~ .... 1IW'Don........ :'"t,........ .......~
WWQ, I .. """'-"11__
.. .
S. In aocordance with the cIewJopmeat oMOI' rolbI.t.d to li1 paraamph 2,
ahove. Monme County eiirees 10 pmeea .-.11 1IJlllI\.IubmiUal Conch C4mtrllda'a
applill8li.on for buildiDg permit for COIIItruCtiOR of ORe 7,500 Iquaro foot Ie.m.".:a..t, to
relocate BIl exllltllll sewage treatment facility.1IId 10 locale a shared drivaway. in ROOO
YCIlf II (lull' 14,2002, 'tuwp lull' 13.2003).
6. Bxcept .. l>>CpI1:IIIy provided hcleln. OIllorM and Conc:b CcmIrad.. L.e.,
Monroe CouIIty 8Dd Publit, waive Illy daim tbat oaeh aie.1ed or _ Glpable of
-.tlna in this - and IllICh shall boar its own lIUtIrMy's files 8lIIf COlIs of this
proc:ocdlna. In p8IticuIar, and without UmIIldion, Osllonao IIl1d Conch CCodr.... r..c., OR
behalf of tbellllelves. dlefr lnCIIIIbc:n, bellofic:JarIes IIId lIIlJ' 0lher8 c1limiaa by or llmIuah
thelIa. waive aU cI81m. for damapa IIIld ctou.)lIlIIIali~, for denial of due plOCUll and
Im'Olllc c:ondeamaIlon (alsb rere..6d 10 88 IelJlIIIIIoJy or _}lCDQ' IllkiIllJ) IIriIlDl &om
the County's BCtiOIl$ and resuJatioas prior 10 Ibe date ofthia 8ettIement ~
7. The Plalatlfli Osborue IIIIlI COIIIlb CoatrIdl. I.,C. wiD Preptlftl and submit
to the Court a "Notice of Voluatary Diamilll1 W'rth l'nljudiClO" of their prolll!llt lllsims
agaimlt the DefendaIlts.
8. All patties 8llkaowIedp tbat Ibis IplImlI/It Is .........d Into tbr die JIlII'II\IIIl
. of IICttI10s pcndtaa UtIptlcm .ad does not COlIIlftute .... Bdmillllon or cvidanoe tbat IIIl)I
acliMa of Monroe c:oumy or Ita employees tbat PIsinIIfIk CClIIIpleIn of _ unlawfW,
UIlCORllitutioual or deprived Plalnlftl's or any ot1ua of any ricbts
~ ."
d.k~ilY./. \~:;1,~1.:~
(Print Name otWkneaa)
'I . '. /1 ,
k4.:/./;'c.... f./~,..,
Willln8
3
E;'d
2ZlIiIlt _ _ IICH. AM """W'lo-l _..
NWC:, III;, ;I"INIIp....."""'"
.. .
.'
~; .~
/, C/-
FItP~1J/;J!'-<'LL
.ifdness . ."- .' .'
[1.::;.1 aj)frAL /)A-)G re...
(PrInt. Nr ofW'lIDe8s)
~,. ;1-
. . t::ij~.1 -
_ \t _
T 1/ .,"'''$ ..:. ..'....., t"lr
(PrInt Name ofWiIDms)
.
f\uc~\.i(lu.t..
'l~d\<U~ bi\c.t\~~
(Print N_ ofWitneu)
:"J:~ --~f.8my
8. ,_.
~., ~ to JIcD...... 0luntF
~..
~~~
.....,..,,". lIS Build;'" Official
FOr Moame County.
Dated 1'- //, . #.
Datal S:Jl }.1JM.!J.
.~~~~.
V'd
4
~ 912 _ flCH\"AoI !'\,...... ........
WWCl4 .. ~___, ".
,
j
~
.
..
'i
~ ,. . ~ .
IN 1HE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIIB SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
-
RICHARD M. 'OSBORNE, .. Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a
Florida LimiIed Liability ~,
P1aiDtIffJPetilicmen,
Case No. CA-K..(JI-I08
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdiviaion of the S18lie of Florida;
and JOSBPH PASICALIK, in bis ofIjr.I,I1
C8pIIlrity .. Buildl'll 0fII.ciaI,
J)<+.nd'"1flR~lIp"Ddmta
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
AMRNnRn SRTTl'.RMRNT AORRRU1lNT
PlIIintlflll RICHARD M. OSBORNE. .. TruslR rOsbomeft), aad CONCH
CON1RADA, L.c., . PJorida I.Jmillld LIAIbiIilJ C-'1~DY ("cClIlIlh Co.4t"").1lI1l1 n..&..d....
MONROB COUNTY. a poIttical8Ubdivilion of the 8tato ofFJorida ("MoJuoo CouDty"), IIDd
JOSBPH PASKALIK, la bis t>fI'Ir.W CIplICity.. Buildlni otIicia1 (.........HIt.), previously
JeIOlved their di&encea wJJich save rise to the abovHtyled acci.cm, wbInin the partifla 8pIIId
to settle the __ bat\JUIl them 1IJIOIl tIIc \IDrmS _ CCIIIIIitloIII recited la the BatIk...aIt .
Asseemeat dated July 17. 2002, herelnefter "OrigInal Settl~ ~.. ......\ed hereto..
I
,
,
I
I
f
Bxblbit "A".
1.
Tho ~or ccm4itkmalllllD arIIIted to o.bome to CIOIIStrUCt. 35,200 lIljUlIRl tOot
IIIiIIHtanae WIIl'Ihouao with 84 pnId"lSJIIICII pl1ll4 ""nollOIp.... cIuriIIa
. ...a~.!!!_~~~the~_~~.~~~!~~"(l!___.
allow lIII aIMaudo lIIID COG IiIdDs ofCXlllllluclion of25.120 BqIIln 1bot credit
unJon. """lri"l or .......,mallastltutlon otIlco filcllity requiring 74 pllklng 1pIlles,
plus 4 ......., peddog 8p8CeI duMa llOOO Y_ 14.
EXfIBf
/?...
, '.
. .
2. Notwithstandina an)'thinr in any of the development orden re1Imed to in the
0rlainaI ~ ~ or uy othcr~lillO of the Compre/lenslve
Plan or Ordi....'1CU ofMomoe County, DO buiIdlDg JlIlI'IDit shall be ckmIed to
Osborne on the b8sis ofMomoe County"l'OJl1tatiou mlding to --ruldential
rate of lPVWth or the 8dopdon (or I8ck of adoption) of i nomesidential /lOI1l1it
all""",", syBbIm or i1s equivaloDt, inllIwIiD&. but not limited to, the JeSDIatlons
IIOt forth in Monroe County CompIebeaIive Plan Policies 101.3.1 througb
101.3.5, and Monroe County 0IdhIInce No. 032.2001.
3. In lIeClCI1'dauo:e with the development orders .<<&'.ed to in Pl\1'IIInIPh 1 of the
oriaina1 SettIammt ~ Monroe County ... to procu, JIlOauplly upon
IIlbndttaI the appIfcation for bulJdlna pemdt by 0Ib0me or his ....p for
..
conat>....tion of~WlIIehouse perfJ1e 0rIaiDaI ~ Aareemeut
dur1na ROOO Yar 12 or the 8Itemative 25,120 sq. ft. cndit union, .....lrillg or
tbumnlld InstliutIon o8ico J8ciItty in ROOO YIIIIl' 14 (July 14, 2005, tIuvuah July
13,2(06).
4. Except.. '*ya-I!;y provided hereID, Osborne IDd Momoe County 8lId ........1;11:.
waive ~ oIIim tha ~ ..Ifb.4 or _ ClIJIIIbIe oflMltlna in tbls__
each shall bear ita own attorney', fees_ COlItIl oftbls PI""-",. In )llIItIculsr,
8lId witbout 1im11Idiaa. 0IbII'1"l, CII1 bebaIf otltHlt their lJeln, IIUOll r 1Ian,
b_A. WIes IIIId any others e1111..., by or dnv..... them, Wldve all claims fbr
..... ...."...w ..."... '.. ...d....-..lIIIdOlllllJl""Mtionhclenlal-otdultJIIVu....IlIltilmne"........ ......lkiD"
(also '..vIi to II ,...J.tory or 1enlJlCll'lll'Y *D&lllrilfna 1iom the County',
-OUI 8lId JIllP'1ML.as prior to tbe cilia oftbls J\nwaded ......... ~
. I"
S. Plaintiff Osborno, in cooperation with Monroe County, wiD preparl/l and 8I1bmit to
1be Court p1e..fi'l8" or notice required to ~ the Amended Settlement
AgreeJnent.
6. All partillB acknow1eclae that the 0ristnaJ Settlement APemIlll.t was entc.llcllDto
for the purpose of ...,IUIg PendiDa Iidptlon IIlCI that this /4.mmyllllf Settlement
AaJreement does not llODetitute an ,dmUelon or evlcIeaoe that any lIIlIIons of .
Momoe County ori1ll ~ thatPllllntlftlo ~II of'Mnlllllkwlhl.
lIDl:OIISdtutlonal or cleprived P/,IntIftlo or any others of any rig)l1I or ~.
7. All ou- tenu oftbe Oriainal Sotdement Apemeat d8Iwd July 17. 2002. sIuJll
remain in 1b11 force IIlCI effect.
"
.'
8. A County Code BIItb.t..emeat1lel1 CIIIIIlII.tI) ""'CInnben 1hepr~. 'lbls 1ica
will be 8ddreSICd in a IIllplIrat.. agr=ment between Osborne and tho County.
9. 'lbls /4.moonc\ood -'Fa" l..nt sIuJll not be VIlid ancI bJDdIaa UJlCIIl the JIlIdIes
1IIICi111pJ1l'Cmd by the Court ancIlIIcorpmlllied into an AmencIed l'iDld .J>"'~
........cI by the Court in thI8e prooeecIInp;
10. umn this /4.m...d'N! s.&tllllllent Aareemem his boao IIppI'CMd by the Court
"'-'-10 JIlIIIII'8Ph 51 above. the 0r1ginal SaIt~ Aameu-,t IIlCI JlIIl8'-.t
.. .......-~iiijniilMailliirsiilni.,..m-iii~iii4OB1lii:._.... ..~.
I
I
. "
,
"
A1TEST: 1. /".>',,'
. l'1'
DANNYL.KO~~,'f /f:"" .,
CLERK: ' " ~{? .:: \
,..
. . " .
By: . 0;.." .",
Dep.ty CIe..k
o.ted i)~-19-6.s
~'
SJp......ot ~~
Prfated N_ otWlCDtiiii
BOARD OJ' COUNTY COMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY
By:-1~;' >;~J.~)
DIDe . Mayor
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
,
I
i
I
I
f
i
I
!
I
i
I
I
\
~~
By'~p ,w_lIk .
_M.,_
By: ..' . ..3
~.v~i<.J
.'
.. a " ',' . ~
IN THB CJRCV11' COUllT OF THB SIX1'BEN1H JUDICIAL
CIRCIlIT IN ANDJIOIlMONllOEi COVNTY.llL01UDA
lU~tot~ unu.tee;
lIiId'.~~AsL,C,.a
~t~.t4lt'l)~.
~ijt:l~
~NO, CA-K-61-108
v.
~9~~._
"~()~..:.l"~'~,. .<... '. . .
IIIlitJOiWiH ,aU.fllr lnlilJ o8I(IIat
.....'..~_.r-l.
~..........'.,.
~,..MItIR._~IL...I.
I
~...~~~,,~~
. . ".
I'LIh4i6lUCHARD M. ~ .. TruItee ("QIIiQme"). 8Dd ClONQ{ CON'ntADA,
L.e., aFloliclalJni1tool LiI1lIIf&y ~iy('Coadl ~'?1lIll DlI6...... MON1tOB
COUNTY, a pilJiIiaallllbdMlioa oftbe illite ofl'1odlla ("Mbam6 Coaat.y"). 8Dd JOlISpJI
PASKALlIt, In IilJ oIIic:iaI CI(IId1.y. RuOIIi'll 0ftldaI ("PaIQ/lk"). pmiouaIy redval tbeir
dIIIl.!_ wblQb. pve rile to theabovHtyled .... wherelIl thoplllties f&\'CIOd to ... the
I\lIIIlIlt bern.... thIm \IPOII tbe _ 8Dd COIIdItillna NllIted iD tho ~ ~ datal
July 17, 2002, lIereiIId... -oriaiDI1 S4l'~~""1 AanenIlltII." ~~ hftto.l>1dIibit "A", On
M8I'llh 19. 2003,IbeBoenl afCaunlyCominl~ otMoameClll1llly 1JIpI'Oved1be~"""""lI
Setd.-t Aa-~ IleniDIfttr .~~ ~.0i0-4" -nd benIto.ExhIbII
"8",
TIle panieI......to -- -(-'elf) IIld ...~ ~. ftlI1owa:
I, The lCeya Federal CredIt UDklII, .lluOmlor iD __ to Olborae, hu I1lCIlhecI
tIIroutlh the A-.cIlld --..... ~. Mtjor C<llo.dllh.ldl UleAppnmtlIO
!.
EXHIBrr
I(L.
:.
.'oJ.,\' --"
c:onstruct a 25,120 square filot c:redit IlIIion, baDkins or flntm~llutitution oftIoe
fiIciIlty requiring 74 parltiDa ~ plus 4 handU,ap puking 8)IIees durioa llOGO
Y_IJ.
2. Notwlt""'-'ins lIIlyIbiua In lIII}' of the ~ orchn relilll'ed to in the
QrisinaI or Amended Settlement Aareement. or lIII}' other proyisIon otthe
eom.,........w Pl8Il or ~ ofMonroe County. 110 lIuiIdiaa penuit ebaIJ be .
denied to 0Ib0me 011 tho bells otMonroe County's reauJatiOllS 1'DIatiDs to DOn.
reeI~ nile 9flJR)WdJ or die lIlIopdoa (or !lilt of8llapliOll) ofa -......tiai
pormIt .u0Clli0n system or ita equivalent, iDcIwIlu& but not Iimitod to, the
....IMlonI.. tbrth In Moaro..CGunlyCOlnp....... PlanPolldos 101.3.1
throup 101.3.5, IIId Monroe County 0rdinazuJ0 No. 032-2001.
3. In _.........wiIh tho dewIopm..A orden ..,ad to In JIII'I8I'Ipb 1 of the
Orisiul SectIemonl Aareemena. Monroe Coumy.... to ptOCeSs pron",1i)' upon
.Adilla! the W~ ........... JIllI1IIIt by 0Il10me or his..... fbr
COIIIbUOIioa ofllllni-ltarsp WlII'Obouse per the 0risinaI SIa:I_ Aareament
cIuriDs ROGO Yew 12 ortho ....Dodi>re 25, 120 sq. ft. oredIt IIIiclII, baJlIdl. or
f1n..-lellnstitution oftIoe fIIoiIlty In llOGO 1'_15 (July 14, 2006, throup 1uly
13, 2007).
IlIlXlOpI u OlIJlIWy providod herein, 0Ib0me IIIId Monroe County IIId Pulralik,
4.
wm...,dIIm 1IIIt. ~.llll.~~.~~.D!.""~_inf!lis_~~L...
.-..'..---__.._.~...'~.."m~'__,_,,___,.__,_ _ _,,'., '.
lllICh ebaIJ boIr ita own attorney's feellIId costs ottbls pro CII~'''8 In particular,
ad 1Vithout IiIrildon, 0lIbcJrne, 011 beI1IIt otitael( tblIlr IIein, _II an,
boooIiaiarios lIIId lIII}' others daiming by or tJrouah tbem, Mive aD claims for
-'!"j' .-
daJDaIaes and COIIIIH"IIU911 fur deaial of due proceII8 and inwne condemuation
(aIIO refe-,od to 8llresuJatory or temponuytakillg).arising fi'om the County's
IIlllions and IllfJUllOtit>llA prior to the date oftbis AIl*IlIed Settlemtllll Aareemem.
s, PIaiDIilI'OIbome, in COO)IfInlion with Monroe County, will prepare and submit to
the Court I'~ orllDlice RlqUirecI to ~ the Iomfol(led Settlemeat
~
6, AD pIIIiIla IIdmowIedge 1hIt!he 0riaiaaI Sel:1IeI_ Asnlemeol_llIIIiIJ'ed Into
fur the puIJIOIll,of sectlina p""rJi"8 Jbi&aIion 8IId that tbia AuumcJed ~
AsJ- does not ~ 8lI.......;,.;n.. or cwidclIIcetbat any adloa& of
Monroe County or ita emp~ 1hIt PIaintiftS CompJaln of_ ~ .'
_.tI...".....1 or .....i.od l'IainIiIfs or any 0IIIen of any Iigtds or" !
.... r- ..,
AU otherta1lll oftbeOrWull SeuIement ~"'1uJy 17, ~ !i
," ~C"):x
RlItI8in in 1bII tbrc:e and eIfeot. . ~:-I't 'R
r- ..... 0
Tbia Secoad An--1olI ..........lIhIII DDt be wIiI1 and blDditI8; IIpOIl til' puIies ..,
7.
8.
uaIilllpplVWc1 by the Court and incoJponlted iDto 811 Amended FinlII ~
enllnll by the Court in t'-prolJe' ,1;.
9. UlIIiI tIU Second AIIIllIlded SettL,....t Aea...... haI ~ appl'lMd by the Court
...."'_ punulllltto P.._. 8 --. theOria\Da1 hUI--t AsJ~ IIIId ;r...,.
"'~c~". -
..:l:;.~..;;) ~6.iot1lly euta'ed and .,........nLocI8haII__ in IUD. ftmle 8IId del.
...:..$..'',J' ..... ~ ..~.
.(..:If_'~ i'.
:;~~f ' . :. ,': OHH.--------BOMIHW.GGUNrY
-~ OPMONltOE
B~~I'~
By:
...,
S
"Y\
o
::0
~
g
f5
--"" :1 ,.~. ~ .
.~~~
~..s/7,,~
Printed NlIIIIll of~
MONROE COUNTYBtJlLDING OFFICIAL
By:(k~ ~~JJ
. Joseph PIIbIik
KEYS I'lWBkAL CREDIT UNION as
8uoeUIN IIIIIlIDtenllt to RICIfARD OSBORNE
BY:~.
.'
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
L
I
".J, /i~, ~.
IN THE CJRCtJ1T COUllT OP THE SIXTBENTH lUDICIAL
CIR.CUIT IN AND FOR MONROB COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. oSBORNE; .. TruItee;
aud CONCH CONTRADA, LC., a
Florida I AIIIited Li8llIIlty Compeny,
PlainIift7.PedIOIleI'I,
CIIIll No. CA-J(.OI-l08
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a poIltiCld
IIIbdIviIion of the S.. ofPlorida;
aud JOSBPR PASKALIIC, in his oIIIcial
CIp8CIty .. Ron~ 0IIIciaI,
~,
I
THIRD AMRNnRn RR'ITI.'RURIIIT AnRllRMIlNT AS TO CONCH CONTRADA. L C
PIaintIlfCONCH CONTRADA, LC., a Florida I~ LiIIIIIIlyCompay ("COIIllh
CoaInIda"), IIIIcI DIll: ........, MONROE COUNTY" politlc.hubdMllon of the State ofPlorida
("Monroe CouDty"). 1IIIcI10$BPH PASICAIJK. in Ide oft1cIal ClIpICity .. BuIIdIaa'08lcl8l
("PasbIik"), (ool1ecIiwIY, the "PIrtiea"), previouIIy nIIOMd tIIIir ..._ which IlIMl rile to
the alJove.<<yIad IIlIion, wbereiD the J*Iies II8fIIllCIIO MItIa the IIIlItt-.' W\f>...1bem upon the
tennllIIIcI """\llti0lll1llCited in~. 2, 3,IIIIcI5 in the SettI_ Aar-IlIIll.......1uIy 17,
2002, hereinafter "OrfaIna1 Self!..... Aareemem. . -~ hereIo as BxbIbit "A". 11Ie
SettIcmaIt Asnemtm WIt pRlViauIIy lIIIIllIIlIed 10 provide fbr a abaDge in the llOIIditloaaI Ulellllcl
to IIllIIlIIll the time period fbr bui/dloIa JIII1Iat IlpJIllcatiou IIIIcI CODIlIUClicm oftbe IpJlnlVed
COIIdltIonII _
I. Tbel*liu....to...., the (-.I) ~ lied ~ ~..
.........__._-,.,.__.._--_......._._,,----_._"'.....~._.._~-.~,._...~'-~-"~._~"..._".~--,,.."---'"._-,,--""'--"_._.._---.~,,--...~.".-
lbIIows:
a. JIarIanpb 5 II ~ to !lOW l'IlId:
EXH.S"
J t)
""'0 \ 'l.'~', ..":..>
Concb Contrada lIgRle8 to IIUbmit an applic:ation Ibr J\meoded Conditional
Use Order tb8t reflects the iIJter1ded c:haDp In use, IIhouJd Concb Contrada
decide to develop the lUbjeet property with III IIItemItive use(1). Upon
approval oftbe Amended CMdltlolIaJ Use Order by tbe P1BDniDg Director,
and in accordance with tbe dewlIopment orden ..&recI to in Parasraph 2
of the Original Seldlllllllllt ~ Mouroo CouDty.... to proceee
prm..,lIy upoa IIIbmi1ta1 the IppIICIItion Ibr buDcIIns permit by Conch
ContrIda or ltI uaI8ftJ Ibr COIISlIUCdOl1 of one 7,500 Iep/IIrll tbot
I'Il8t8unInt, or II III Iltem8Iive, a 7,500 IIQIIIIll fbot mediuJn..lntenIlty,
mixed use, retaillDdlor o.lIiariproftwi UIll ftIciIity In llOGO 1'_1$
(July 14, 2006 - July 13, 200'1).
2. Tho pIII1ieI ftIrther ...- that DO proviIion inithil ~ IIhaII exempt PIIIntIlF
Coach ev.....4LC ttam any~impoaed by IItaIute lIIIlIIor ~to
',,)1\1IIlCt to alllllU'll sewaae lIYItem when 0IIe beoomeI "avaiIab1e" II that term ill
-- .,'-...--' .'---"" - ~-- --- +------ -----~~- ------ ~---
deIInecI by atatute andIor onIinance.
3. PlaiatiffConch ConIrada, In coopeqdon with Maaroe Coumy, wiD prepare and
IlIbmit to the Court ~".. or IIlIIIce reqUIred to lIddNu the Ameolch.d
Selt~ ~ Conch Contrada IbaII pay any llllIII inc:urred II a nlIlIIt of
IIIIns tbillIecond Am.ded S"'tlement ~ and any UIOCliated p-". or
IIOlicea with the IlICllpIiuu that IICb pany shall bear ita own attotney'l fila
_._-------~-~------~. -- ---~ ----~ ---
4. AD JlIII'I* acImowledptbat the orisinal ~ WII entend ilIto tbr the
JlUI1ICl88 of.... pIIIlllas IiIiptloa IDd Ihat tbiI Second Amended SeItlemmtt
Aareement doeI not _~ne an admilllOll or ~ tIJat any lIlllioaI of
,-,'\ .:",
- --~'---'--------_.,""~----<,,,"
Monroe County or ita emp10yeu tIIIt PIalnti8i Complain ofwero unlawlW,
UlICllIIIlitu1i -or deprived PIaintiftIl or any othen of Illy rishta or property.
5. AU other terms of the Sett1ementAgreement datedlu1y 17, 2002, IIId the(flnt)
Am8Ided Settlement aar-t which W881pJ11O\1lld by the Board on or about
May 21, 2003, IIIlI the SeI:Ond Ameaded SeItlement Asreemeot wbicb was
approved bytbeBolrd on orlboutJanuary 19, 2005, especieUy88lt pertainJto
CODCh CoatrIda, L.C., IhaJI remaiD in tW1 force end efteet.
6. Thia Amended Asr-ent BIIIII not be ~ end bindlns upon the JIII'li- unbl
appro"8d by the Court end inoorporated IIIlO e ThIn! Ameaded Final Judamem
7.
entered by 1he Court in these Proc:eedinss. i
~ "='
lJD1iI tbia ThIrd Amended ~ Asr-t bill been lIJlIXOVlICl...a....n
' ur~z
....r--<
punuan1 to the pr-li11e Jl8I'88l'8Ph. the 0riainaI Settlemeot Aar-ne@Ma- ~
~;ij~
Ji,T-t previously entered, and any IIlIbsaqI.efttllppAMld _~~ ~
-'I'J J>'" 'II
,... ~~
.,. Q
\0
mocIiflcatiODl ahIII retIIIln in fidl force and eIftw;t.
I' a...,
BOARD OF
SSlONBRS
".-" '---"" ---..~.,-"--- , ,"",. -'~-......._.__..._._."'".,-,.._"'",.".,-
.~...
..,
;=
"'
o
..,
<:)
:;0
;0
.....
"
o
;u
I:>
;'.
,
I
I
..,":;
"
('~~u.~.s.
Signature orw.-. - Q "-
CindY SlnvF -
Printed Name ofWItDeI8
~~~~~
Tnwor '-
-,-_.,-~~-_.~~~~.-
.~ .1
....
()
(~
',",,39
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.c., a
Florida Limited Liability Company,
Plaintifflpetitioners,
Case No. CA-K-OI-I08
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida;
and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official
capacity as Building Official,
Defendant/Respondents
/
...> .......
~-- .....-;.
<;.:;:. 1''''
<;...a ("["\
~ '-
~..:,-? "':/
'SO .-:"'.
o
~;;:)
"1'ey", -;:r'j
Cd, ..,--:: ':>. .~ (l'l
t>";;";o .~~ ('")
~. r'" '.",... Cl
"."';:r. ..... :1,
,....':-Iv .' '2> .,.
.(\ Gl" '>?, 'II'
.- r
y
FOURTH AMENDRn SETTI .RMJ:1l\IT AGRRFMJ:1l\IT ~
KEYS FEDERAL CRRnTT UNION. AS SUCCESSOR IN ST
TO RICHARD M. OSBORNE
Plaintiff KEYS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ("Credit Union"), as successor in interest to
Richard M. Osborne, Trustee, and Defendants, MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Florida ("Monroe County"), and JOSEPH PASKALIK, in his official capacity as
Building Official ("Paskalik"), (COllectively, the "Parties"), having previously amended a
settlement agreement in the above-styled action, and agreed to Credit succeeding Osborne
according to the rights and duties contained in:
a. The Settlement Agreement dated July 17, 2002, hereinafter "Original Settlement
Agreement," attached hereto as Exhibit" A".
b. The Amended Settlement Agreement dated March 19, 2003, attached hereto as
Exhibit "B".
c. The Second Amended Settlement Agreement dated May 16, 2006 attached as
Exhibit "C".
I
EXHIBIT
I
E
\c.&
/,
( ,
.'
d, The Third Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrada, L. C. dated May 16,
2006 attached as Exhibit "0",
I, The parties hereby agree to amend the Second Amended Settlement Agreement as
follows:
a, Paragraph I is hereby amended to read:
I, The Keys Federal Credit Union, as SUccessor in interest to
Obsome, has received through the Amended Settlement
Agreement Major Conditional Use Approval to construct a
25,120 square foot credit union, banking or financial
institution office facility requiring 74 parking spaces plus 4
handicap parking spaces during ROGO Year 16 (ending
July 13, 2008).
b. Paragraph 3 is hereby amended to read:
3, In accordance with the development orders referred to in paragraph
1 of the Original Settlement Agreement, Monroe County agrees to
process promptly upon ~bmitta1 the application for building permit
by Osborne or his assigns for construction of mini-storage
warehouse per the Original Settlement Agreement during ROGO
Year 12 or the alternative 25, 120 sq, ft. credit union, banking or
financial institution office facility in ROGO Year 16 (July 14, 2007
through July 13, 2008).
2
,
(1
"
c. Paragraph 7 is hereby amended to read:
7. All other terms of the original Settlement Agreement dated
July 17, 2002, and subsequent Amended Settlement
Agreement, and Second Amended Settlement Agreement
and Third Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch
Contrada, L.c. shall remain in full force and effect.
d. Paragraph 8 is hereby amended to read:
8. This Fourth Amended Settlement Agreement shall not be
valid and binding upon the parties until approved by the Court and
incorporated into an Amended Final Judgment entered by the Court
in these proceedings.
e. Paragraph 9 is hereby amended to read:
9. Until this Fourth Amended Settlement Agreement has been
approved by the Court pursuant to Paragraph 8 above, the
preceding paragraph, the Original Settlement Agreement and
Judgment previously entered and unmodified, and any subsequent
approved amendments or modifications shall remain in full force
and effect.
3
",- -~:="",,'~ (1
;: -, >~,',,~
{, \\/,'~;~)
ATT~~T: ',," i);<c~
.,..'...." '<."','7' ~<
'\'". ~",;.:....,......".. '&,
DANN\'c~;~LRA . , '
CLERK d~;.nm' , T
BYe;:.. ~
eputy Clerk
Signature of Witness
'...:];;:~itD 411;t~474 O'i
Printed Name of Witness
~v~
Signature of Witness
~ !/,Sfr,J1P ~
Printed Name of Witness
()
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONR.. OE COUNTY, FL Ot,/
~77 Q /I,
By: "/ /' /~t/ZA, A":! /, ,'~
Mayor/Chairperson
~~
Joseph Pa ik
KEYS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION as Successor
:y~~ORNE
resid CEO
4
\'r- ~' "
i>"~
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a
Florida Limited Liability Company,
Plaintifi7petitioners,
Case No. CA-K-OI-108
v.
MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida;
and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official
capacity as Building Official,
DefendantJRespondents
/
I
i
I
i
I
I
i;
I
i
FIFTH AMENDED SETTT .RMRNT AGRF.RMP.NT AS TO CONCH CONTRADA L C.
Plaintiff CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company ("Conch
Contrada"), and Defendants, MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
("Monroe County"), and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official capacity as Building Official
("PaskaIik"), (collectively, the "Parties"), previously reaolved their differences which gave rise to
the above-styled action, wherein the parties agreed to settle the matter between them upon the
terms and conditions recited in:
a. The Settlement Agreement dated July 17, 2002, hereinafter "Original Settlement
Agreement," attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
b. 'I'I1~1:11Il!"4!:t!~!!I~"!.~,,!.~e!!,!~"!..da~~}J4~!,!h_!~..~Q.~~d!~1ttlll.hC!~p~..... .
Exhibit "B".
c. The Second Amended Settlement Agreement (Osborne) dated May 16, 2006
attached as Exhibit "C".
....of#'
,I
'tr I,
c .1
d. The Third Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrada. L. C. dated May
16,2006 attached as Exhibit "D".
I. The parties hereby agree to amend the Third Amended Settlement Agreement as
follows:
a. Paragraph I.a. (paragraph 5 of original Settlement Agreement) is hereby
amended to read:
I. a. Conch Contrada agrees to submit an application for
Amended Conditional Use Order that reflects the i!l.tended change in use,
should Conch Contrada decide to develop the subject property with an
alternative use(s). Upon approval of the Amended Conditional Use Order
by the Planning Director, and in accordance with the development orders
referred to in Paragraph 2 of the Original Setflement Agreement, Monroe
County agrees to process promptly upon submittal the application for
building permit by Conch Contrada or its assigns for construction of one
7,500 square foot restaurant, or as an alternative, a 7,500 square foot
medium-intensity, mixed use, retail and/or office/professional use facility in
!.
I.
ROGO Year 16 (July 14, 2007 - July 13, 2008).
b. Paragraph 3. is hereby amended to read:
3. Plaintiff Conch COntrada, in cooperation with Monroe County, will
prepare and submit to the Court pleadings or notice required to address the Fifth
Amended Settlement Agreement. Conch Contrada shall pay any costs incurred as a
result of filing this Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement and any associated
pleadings or notices with the exception that each party shall bear its own attorney's
fees.
2
;,.. I, ..
c. Paragraph 4 is hereby amended to read:
4. All parties acknowledge that the original Settlement Agreement was
entered into for the purpose of settling pending litigation and that this Fifth
Amended Settlement Agreement does not constitute an admission or evidence that
any actions of Monroe County or its employees that Plaintiffs complain of were
unIawfu~ unconstitutional or deprived Plaintiffs or any others of any rights or
property.
d. Paragraph 5 is hereby amended to read:
5. All other terms of the original Settlement Agreement dated July 17,
2002 and the (first) Amended Settlement Agreement, the Second Amended
Settlement Agreement and the Third ~d Settlement Agreement (Conch
Contrada) sha11 remain in full force and effect.
e. Paragraph 6 is hereby amended to read:
6. This FIfth Amended Agreement sha11 not be valid and binding upon
the parties unti1 approved by the Court and incorporated into a FIfth Amended
...-.------'----"--'...-'~-,-"'---.~--,.,..,---"---,-,--'~-~-,--"_,,__._'",..'''.~.''m__
... .........liY-iiieCourtpursuiiltt tothe preceding paragraph, the original Settlement
Agreement and Judgment previously entered, and any subsequent approved
Final Judgment entered by the Court in these proceedings.
f. Paragraph 7. is hereby amended to read:
7. Until this Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement has been approved
,
i
amendments or modifications sha11 remain in full force and effect.
3
> . .
. .
D
CLERK 0 COURT
G ~-~~
Deputy Clerk
:gnature of Witness
l t~ ;e /ld~~~c
Printed Name of Witness
ii~~
Si re ofWttness
J<C~ S. \J\kNSIf.J<=J
. Name of Witness
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:~~ J!2fl--
Mayor/Chairperson
MONROE COUNTY ATTO NEY
OVED AS T' .
MONROE COUNTY BUILDING OFFICIAL
BY:~~d
, Joseph PaSkalik
CONCH CONTRADA, L.C.
BY:-d' J.I.N~ ~.RAl-117 _
LibbyCfrevor
I
I
!.
4
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.e., a
Florida Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff/Petitioners,
Do~N 1692951 04/30/2008 1: 14P"
Filed & Recorded in Official Records of
"ONROE COUNTY DANNY L. KOLHAGE
Case No. CA-K-OI-I 08
v.
Do~N 1692951
BkN 2358 PIN 1207
MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida;
and JOSEPH PASKALIK, in his official
capacity as Building Official,
Defendant/Respondents
.-, -
.' ,
'.-.J
/
('"
.,~)
NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER APPROVING FIFTH AMENDED SEITLEMENTAGREEMENT
AS TO CONCH CONTRADA, L.C.
THIS MA ITER was considered, and the Court having reviewed the Fifth Amended
Settlement Agreement entered into by the parties and filed with this Court on March 9, 2007, and
finding same to be acceptable, it is
ADJUDGED that the Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement is approved. The Court shall
retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the terms of the Agreement contained therein.
. DONE AND ORDERED at Key West, Monroe County, Florida this
#1 J ' 2008.
It
day of
. ,
cm~
c: County Attorney
Adele V. Stones
"ONROE COUNTY
OFFICIAL RECORDS
\~
II" : i!1: CIF.,:UrrC')'JRT OFTHE SlY":ENTH JUDICIAL
e !ZCUIT iN AND roll. MONROE COU ITY, FLORlD.\
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee;
and CONCH CONTRADA, L.c., a
Florida Limited Liability Company,
PlaintiIDPetitioners,
Case No. CA-K-OI-108
v
MONROE COUNTY, a political
subdivision of the State of Florida;
and JOSEPH P ASKALIK, in his official
capacity as Building Official,
DefendantlRespondents
/
SIXTH AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO
KEYS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AS SUCCESSOR rN rNTEREST
TO RICHARD M OSBORNE
Plaintiff KEYS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ("Credit Union"), as successor in interest to
Richard M. Osborne, Trustee, and, and Defendants, MONROE COUNTY, a political subdivision
of the St.te of Florida ("Monroe County"), and JOSEPH PASKALIK, in his official capacity as
Building Official ("Paskalik"), (collectively, the "Parties"), having previously amended a
settlement agreement in the above-styled action, and agreed to Credit Union succeeding Osborne
according to the rights and duties contained in:
a. The Settlement Agreement dated July 17, 2002, hereafter "Original Settlement
Agreement," attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
b. The Amended Settlement Agreement dated March 19, 2003, attached hereto as
Exhibit llB".
c. The Second Amended Settlement Agreement dated May 16, 2006 attached as Exhibit
/fell.
EXHIBIT
I G-
, ,
'.-)
'110/
d. 'p.( Third Alnended Scttlemel'lt Agreemenl ',S to C'~~;~';h Cont.r&da, l.C (I~.ted )\;t8,j J6,
2006 attrtchcd as Exhibil' "0".
e_ The Fourth Amended Settlement Agreement as to K0YS Federal Credit Union dated
Februa.rv 21, 2007, as Successor in Interest to Richard M. Osborne attached as Exhibit "E".
f The Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrad., L.C. d.ted February
21,2007, attached hereto as Exhibit "F".
The parties hereby agree to amend the Fourth Amended Settlement Agreement as to
Keys Federal Credit Union as Successor in Interest to Richard M. Osborne as follows:
a Paragraph 1 is hereby amended to read:
The Keys Federal Credit Union, as successor in interest to Osborne,
bas received through the Fourth Amended Settlement Agreement Major
Conditional Use Approval to construct a 25,120 square foot credit union,
banking or financial institution office facility requiring 74 parking spaces
plus 4 handicap parking spaces during ROGO Year 17 (ending July 13,
2009).
b. Paragraph 3 is hereby amended to read:
3. In accordance with the development orders referred to in paragraph
1 of the Original Settlement Agreement, Monroe County agrees to process
promptly upon submittal the application for building permit by Osborne or
his assigns for construction of mini-storage warehouse per the Original
Settlement Agreement during ROGO Year 12 or the alternative 25, 120 sq.
ft. credit union, banking or linancial institution office fllcility in ROGO
Year 17 (July 14, 2008 through July 13,2009).
C p(1r,ifr~ph 7 is hc;.eby RiTli~.nd-ed h) rt':ad
7. All OtlKT tcrrn~ Or!:).; original Sett!enh?i1t Agreement dakd July 17,
2~J2, 3.nd subsequent Amended. Setdement AJ (ceme.nt, and Second
Arncnrlcd Settlement Af.t.t(~f':lllent, Third Amended Settlement Agreement as
to Conch Contrada, LC., Fourth Amended Settlement Agreement as to
Keys Federal Credit Union as Successor in Interest to Richard M. Osborne,
and Fifth Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrada, L,G,
shaU remain in full force and effect
d, Paragraph 8 is hereby amended to read:
8, This Sixth Amended Settlement Agreement shall not be valid and
binding upon the parties until approved by the Court and incorporated into
an Amended Final Judgment entered by the Court in these proceedings.
e, Paragraph 9 is hereby amended to read:
9, Until this Sixth Amended Settlement Agreement has been approved
by the Court pursuant to Paragraph 8 above, the preceding paragraph, the
Original Settlement Agreement and Judgment previously entered and
unmodified. and any subsequent approved amendments or modification
shan remain in full force and effect
\ ,
ATTE~TI
DANNY L. KOUIAGE
CLERK: '
Br.-~~
- ./,
Deputy Clerk
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY ~)
~ I
'/" _J"-
(
C~,u~~lA
~<?f ltness
St:c>TT'l>v5.:c;1/J,sk.J
Printed Name of Witness
~:ro~/~~::
1?)Q:fll~t\/\~ WUc-!t:>
Printed ame of witness
MONROE COUrHY BUILDfNG
OFFICIAL
l3y \J~J,bi",- ;/1 ____
J~eph l'askalik
KEYS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION a$
Successor in Interest to R [CHARD M.
OSBORNE
By~&w"LJe
, President/CEO
EY
OBERT B. SHOLLl R. JR.
D~~;~~;~T_:~T~~~
MONROE COUNTY
OFFICIAL RECORDS
RCD Jun 14 2004 09.58AM
DANNY L KOLHAGE, CLERK
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY
CASE NO: 2001-CA-108-K
FILE II 14. 509 19
BKII2015 PGII2137
RICHARD M. OSBORNE, as Trustee
And CONCH CONTRADA, L.C., a
Florida limited liability company,
Plaintiff/Petitioners
" 0"'"
Q ~ ~
c_ :)I' .
~~.;-- .:l ~ ~
r::.~-'l- c:P ~
" (">'
~-,:. ~ -;:0
:z:?"c ::It {"I'\
....("'l.- ,::::; C"l
...c.-,~ "':: 0
':.n' ~ <!!. ~
.- ,,,, ~
'P
Vs.
MONROE COUNTY, a political
Subdivision of the State of Florida;
And JOSEPH PASKALlK, In his official
Capacity as Building OffIcial,
Defendant/Respondents
/
ORDER ADOP.:rINq I~TTLEMENT AGREEMENT ~D
AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS TO C9NCH CONTRADA. L.C.
THIS CAUSE having come before the court pursuant to a Settlement
Agreement entered into by the parties and filed with this court on July 24, 2002,
as well as the Amended Settlement Agreement as to Conch Contrada, L.C., filed
with this court on July 17, 2003. The court does hereby,
ORDER and ADJUDGE that this court does hereby accept the terms and
conditions of the said Settlement and Amended Settlement Agreements, and this
court hereby retains jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter for purposes
of enforcement of said Settlement Agreements.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Key West, Monroe County, Florida,
this 7ttl day of June, 2004.
~R~
CIRCUIT JUDG~
co: Mark S. Ulmer, Esq.
David P. Horan, Esq.
MONROE COUNTY
OFFICIAL RECORDS
\~