Loading...
FY2009 11/18/2009 AgreementDANNYL. KOLHAGE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DATE: December 4, 2009 TO: Tina Boan, Sr. Budget Director ATTN. Penny Kipp, Sr. Bud et Analyst FROM: Pamela G. Han ck, .C. At the November 18, 2009, Board of County Commissioners meeting the Board granted approval and authorized execution of a Contract between Monroe County and KPMG to update the Fiscal Year 2009 Full Cost Allocation Plan and the OMB A-87 Cost Allocation Plan. Enclosed is a duplicate original of the above -mentioned for your handling. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. cc: County Attorney Finance File ✓ L/I (_PM L 11 October :Z9, 2009 Ms. Tina Boan Monroe County Government Budget Director 1100 S imonton Street Suite 2-213 Key West, FL 33040 Dear Ms„ Boan: KPMG LLP Suite 1600 111 North Orange Avenue PO Box 3031 Orlando, FL 32802 Telephone 407 423 3426 Fax 407 648 8557 Internet www.us.kpmg.com OCT 3 0 2009 KPMG LLP (KPMG) is pleased to submit this engagement letter to Monroe County, Florida (County) to provide professional advisory services. This letter confirms our understanding of the services desired by the County. KPMG is proposing to assist the County utilizing the State of Florida Management Consulting Services Contract # 973-001-06-1. The contract terms and conditions used in this document are managed by the Florida Department of Management Services and are located in the State Contracts, Agreements and Price Lists. The Management Consulting Service Contract # 973-001-06-1 is incorporated herein by reference and maintained in the contract manager's file. The County is requesting assistance with the preparation of a Full Cost Allocation Plan and a 2 CFR Part 225 (formerly OMB Circular A-87) Plan based on actual expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. KPMG will assist the County with the following: • The first plan will be a "full -cost" plan for use in allocating indirect costs to enterprise fiends, internal service funds, and certain special revenue funds. • The second plan will be prepared in accordance with the Federal Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments (relocated to Title 2 in the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Chapter II, part 225) and may be used in allocating indirect costs to the County's federal grant programs. The County is responsible for submitting its cost allocation plan for negotiation and approval if requested by its federal cognizant agency. Please note, current OMB Circular A-87 regulations do not require the County to submit its cost allocation plan for negotiation and approval unless specifically requested by its federal cognizant agency. By accepting this engagement letter, County management accepts responsibility for the substantive outcomes of this engagement and, therefore, has a responsibility to be in a position in fact and appearance to make an informed judgment on the results of this engagement and that the County will comply with the following: KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. Letter to Monroe County, Florida October 29, 2009 Page 2 • Designate a qualified management -level individual to be responsible and accountable for overseeing the engagement. • Establish and monitor the performance of the engagement to ensure that it meets management's objectives. • Make any decisions that involve management functions related to the engagement and accept full responsibility for such decisions. • Evaluate the adequacy of the services performed and any findings that result. KPMG Project Team Mr. David Dennis, a partner in KPMG's Orlando, Florida office, will serve as the engagement partner. Mr. David Jahosky, a senior manager in KPMG's Orlando office, will serve as the engagement manager and will serve as the KPMG primary point of contact for this engagement. Ms. Heidi Powell, a senior associate with KPMG's Government practice, will serve as the lead staff and will supervise other project staff during the course of the engagement. Engagement Objectives The objective of this engagement is to assist the County in developing the indirect cost allocation plan (CAP). To meet this objective, KPMG proposes to assist the County with the preparation of the CAPS based on County -provided data. The plans will be prepared based on statistical data and expenditures incurred for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Work Plan Approach KPMG its prepared to initiate the project within two weeks from the receipt of the signed engagement letter or executed contract. We estimate that an elapsed calendar time of 90 calendar days from the date of commencement would be required to assist you in the development of the final reports. This time frame is dependent upon the timeliness of requested information furnished by the County. The County will be responsible for the collection of all statistical information used as allocation bases, as well as all decisions regarding allocation statistics, cost pools, and receiving departments used in the cost allocation plan. KPMG's role will be to advise the County and complete the indirect cost plans after the County has made key decisions. CPM _ Letter to Monroe County, Florida October 29, 2009 Page 3 To achieve the objective outlined above, the project team will undertake a four -phased process as summarized in the table below. Phase Key Tasks Work Products 1. Project Initiation Meet with County personnel to confirm the project objectives and timeline. List of information needs Project Charter Communications Plan Develop a list of information needs. Conduct a kick-off meeting with all relevant stakeholders. Risk Register Develop an understanding of the County's current indirect cost recovery 2. Analysis of the County's strategy. Identify indirect cost centers and Current Indirect Cost Approach classify services performed. Interview County staff to understand the impact of the planned changes. Monthly Status Reports to the County Work with County to identify expenditures by cost pool and services 3. Data Collection and Analysis performed. Identify allowable and unallowable costs. Work with County staff to identify allocation bases that are representative of the costs being allocated. Where applicable, prepare adjustments to distribute direct and indirect costs. Full Cost Allocation Plan 4. Issue the County's Cost Issue the draft report to the County. Allocation Plans OMB Circular A-87 Cost After the County's review and written feedback on draft report, KPMG will Allocation Plan issue the final reports. Letter to Monroe County, Florida October 29, 2009 Page 4 KPMG has developed a project timeline that identifies our phased sequence of tasks that coincide with the County's time frame. The following chart depicts a view of project timing by phase. PROJECT TIMELINE BY PHASE Phase Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 1. Project Initiation* 2. Analysis of County's Current Indirect Cost Approach 3. Data Collection and Analysis 4. Issue County's Cost Allocation Plans *As part Of Phase I, KPMG will work with the County's staff to finalize the timeline. Project :Budget Our fees, for professional services include professional staffing, administrative support, report production, and travel costs. Total fees will not exceed $29,500. We will invoice the County monthly and invoices are due upon receipt. If unforeseen circumstances cause us to believe that our professional fees will exceed the estimate provided above, we will discuss this situation with you and agree upon an appropriate course of action. Other Considerations Our analysis will be prepared under the Consulting Standards issued by the American Institute of Certified. Public Accountants (AICPA) and does not constitute an examination, compilation or agreed upon procedures in accordance with the standards established by the AICPA. This analysis will be prepared based on information received from the County. No independent verification of this information will be made by KPMG and we assume no responsibility for the accuracy or reliability of the information provided to us. The analysis will be intended solely for the use of the County and may not be provided to any third party without the written consent of KPMG and should not be relied upon for any other purposes. It has been our experience that the County's participation is necessary for this type of engagement to be successful. It is imperative that we receive timely cooperation regarding requested data for effective use of KPMG and County resources. KPMG requests that information provided by the County to be summarized and subtotaled by Department/Division (or equivalent) for the General Fund and by Fund for non General Fund activities. Information requested by KPMG should be provided in both electronic and hard copy formats. Letter to Monroe County, Florida October 29, 2009 Page 5 Our assumptions for the engagement are as follows: • The County will provide data for central service departments at division / department / fund level (or their equivalent) summaries that provide a reasonable basis for allocating each function's activity to the benefiting department/division. • KPMG will issue a draft report to the County by February 28, 2010. Should KPMG not receive the requested information from the County by February 15, 2010, we will issue the draft reports within 30 days of receipt of financial, statistical and allocation data. • The County is requested to review the draft reports and provide comments to KPMG within 30 days of receiving the draft report. KPMG will issue the final reports within 15 days of receiving the County's comments. Should the County not provide written comments or request an extension for the review of the draft reports, KPMG will consider the draft reports as finalized and issue the reports in final form. • The County will provide relevant operational, technical, and background information as required by the engagement team. • The County will provide assistance to help KPMG achieve the successful completion of the engagement. Such assistance will include: ■ Assistance in gaining timely access to documentation, systems, and key personnel ■ Timely feedback at key decision points ■ Active participation to facilitate the timely resolution of project -related issues. • The County will provide a common office space adequate for up to 2 KPMG personnel. • The County will provide meeting space as needed to conduct interviews and work sessions throughout the project. Letter to Monroe County, Florida October 29, 2009 Page 6 We look forward to working with you and your staff in the performance of these services, and would be pleased to discuss this letter with you at any time. For your convenience in confirming these arrangements, we enclosed a copy of this letter. Please sign it and return it to me. Very truly yours, KPMG L.LP A 70< 4 David L. Dennis Partner State and Local Government Advisory Sector Leader tOONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY AC PTED BY T COUNTY: KVEDA R Authorized Signature, O , tx y m4yss' C �a rw�Q.•'1 Title NOV 1 8 2009 Date a� �tf h ECLEAK DEF" CL E K >. +Tr. ;Z rq t CA C) Amendments - Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) /Amendments /Management Consulting Ser... Page 1 of 6 Rate this Contract View Survey Results Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) June 2, 2009 MEMORANDUM NO.: (973-001-06-01) -9 TO: Department Addressed /User Agency FROM: Director,, State Purchasing SUBJECT: Contract No. 973-001-06-01 Amendment; 9 TITLE: Management Consulting Services The above mentioned Contract is renewed for three (3) years effective May 31, 2009 until May 31, 2012 with the following contractors: 21st Century Research & Evaluations, Inc. Accenture, LLP Achieveglobal ADG Business and Governmental Consultants (A) Advanced Systems Design, Inc. (ASD) Advent Group Inc. American Government Services Corporation Ariel Business Group, Inc. Avineon, Inc:. BCP International, Ltd. Brandt Information Services, Inc. Brown and Caldwell Burger, Carroll, & Associates, Inc. CedarCrestone, Inc. CMA Enterprise Inc. Crawford Marketing & Consulting Inc dba CMC & Associates Communication Applications, Inc. Community Synergy Group, Inc. Community Trust Corporation Dauntless Consulting Group Deloitte Consulting Disasters, Strategies and Ideas Group, LLC Donald J. Craig, CPA http://dms.myflorida.comlbusiness_operationslstate_purchasinglvendor_informationlstate... 10/26/2009 Amendments - Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) /Amendments /Management Consulting Ser... Page 2 of 6 DWB & Associates Dye Management Group, Inc. Electronic Training Solutions, Inc. Enterprise Technology Partners EMA, Inc. EquaTerra Public Sector LLC Evergreen Solutions, LLC EW Bryant Associates LLC(M) Faircloth Information Technology Systems, Inc. First Data Government Solutions, Inc. Fiscal Management Solutions, Inc. FL IT Centers of Excellence Focused Energy, LLC Foley & Lardner LLP Forefont Consulting LLC FOX Systems, Inc. General Physics Corporation Harvey, Covington & Thomas, LLC HDR Engineering, Inc Heron Bay Group, Inc. Horn by Zeller Associates IBM Corporation ICATT Consulting, Inc. (N ) Identity Theft Solutions Corporation I. S. Consulting (B) Information Engineering Services, Inc. Information Systems of Florida, Inc. (I) Integrated Computer Solutions Jacobs Technology Inc James Moore & Co PI J RD & Associates Inc Justice Research Center, Inc KM R Consultants LLC KLC u lti ng, Inc. 4MG LLP erbert Consultants, Inc. Law, Redd, Crona & Munroe, P.A. (A) Levings & Associates, Inc.(I) Lytmos Group, LLC Mary Key & Associates, Inc. (M) MAXIMUS, Inc. Mercer Health & Benefits, LLC MGT of America, Inc. (A) Milliman, Inc; Moten Tate, Inc. http://dms.myfloi-ida.comlbusiness_operations/state_purchasinglvendor_informationlstate... 10/26/2009 Amendments -Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) /Amendments /Management Consulting Ser... Page 3 of 6 Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc Critical Incident Solutions, LLC dba OGARA Paul Consulting, Inc. PKV Management Consulting, Inc. (A) PMA Consultants, LLC Program Planning Professionals (Pcubed) Progressive Engineering &Construction, Inc. Public Consulting Group Inc Quality Management International Rothenbach Research and Consulting, LLC Science Applications International Corporation Sharpton, Brunson & Company, P.A(H) The IPL Group The Management Edge, Inc The North Highland Company (A) Thomas Howell Ferguson P.A. Village Architects Incorporated Any questions or problems in delivery or service that may arise regarding this contract should be directed to the Contract Administrator Holly Merrick at holly.merrick@dms.myflorida.com or PH 850-488-7804. Management Consulting Amendment 9-06.04.09.doc (35-50 kB) 10/26/2009 Management Consulting Services • Price Sheets - Category 1 • Price Sheets - Category 2 • Price Sheets - Category 3 • Price Sheets - Category 4 & 5 • Price Sheets - Complete Pricing Spreadsheet • Contras:tors - 21st Century Research & Evaluations, Inc • Contras:tors - Accentu re LLP • Contractors - Achieveglobal, Inc. • Contractors - ADG Business And Governmental Consultants • Contractors - Advanced Systems Design, Inc. • Contractors - Advent Group Inc • Contractors - American Government Services Corporation • Contractors - Ariel Business Group, Inc. • Contractors - Avineon, Inc. • Contractors - BCP International Limited Corp • Contractors - Brandt Information Services, Inc. • Contractors - Brown and Caldwell http://dms.myflclrida.comlbusiness_operationslstate_purchasinglvendor_informationIstate... 10/26/2009 Amendments - Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) /Amendments /Management Consulting Ser... Page 4 of 6 • Contractors - Burger, Carroll, & Associates, Inc. • Contractors - Ceda rCrestone, Inc. • Contractors - CMA Enterprise Inc. • Contractors - CMC & Associates • Contractors - Communication Applications, Inc. • Contractors - Community Synergy Group, Inc • Contractors - Community Trust Corporation • Contractors - Dauntless Consulting Group • Contractors - Deloitte ConsultingLLP • Contractors - Disasters, Strategies, and Ideas Group, LLC • Contractors - Donald James Craig, CPA • Contractors - DWB & Associates • Contractors - Dye Management Group, Inc. • Contractors - Electronic Training Solutions, Inc. • Contractors - EMA, Inc. • Contractors - Enterprise Technology Partners • Contractors - Ea aTerra Public Sector LLC • Contractors - Evergreen Solutions, LLC • Contractors - EW Bryant Associates • Contractors - Faircloth Information Technology Systems, Inc. • Contractors - First Data Government Solutions, Inc. (formerly GovConnect) • Contractors - Fiscal Management Solutions, Inc. • Contractors - FL IT Centers of Excellence • Contractors - Focused Energy, LLC • Contractors - Foley & La rd ner LLP • Contractors - Forefront, LLC • Contractors - FOX Systems, Inc. • Contractors - General Physics Corporation • Contractors - Harvey, Covington & Thomas, LLC • Contractors - H DR Eng i neeri ngl Inc • Contractors - Heron Bay Group, Inc. • Contractors - Horn by Zeller Associates • Contractors - IBM Corporation • Contractors - ICATT Consulting, Inc • Contractors - Identity Theft Solutions Corporation • Contractors - I S Consulting (B) • Contractors - Information Engineering Services, Inc. • Contractors - Information Systems Of Florida • Contractors - Integrated Computer Solutions • Contractors - Jacobs Technology Inc • Contractors - James Moore & Co PI • Contractors - J RD & Associates Inc • Contractors - Justice Research Center, Inc • Contractors - KM R Consultants LLC • Contractors - KLC Consulting,Inc. hap:Hdms.myflorida.com/business_operations/state—Purchasing/vendor_information/state... 10/26/2009 Amendments -Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) /Amendments /Management Consulting Ser... Page 5 of 6 • Contractors - KPMG LLP • Contractors - Lampl Herbert Consultants Inc. • Contractors - Law, Redd Crona & Munroe, Pa • Contractors - Levings & Associates, Inc. • Contractors - Lytmos Group, LLC • Contractors - Mary Key & Associates • Contractors - Maximus, Inc. • Contractors - Mercer Health & Benefits, LLC (Aj • Contractors - MGT of America Inc • Contractors - MillimanI Inc • Contractors - Moten Tate. Inc. • Contractors, - Northrop Grumman Information Technology, Inc • Contractors - O'Gara Training & Services LLC • Contractors - Paul Consulting,Inc. • Contractors - PKV Management Consulting, Inc. (A • Contractors - PMA Consultant LLC (A� • Contractors - Program Planning Professionals • Contractors - Progressive Engineering & Construction, Inc. • Contractors - Proiect Management Solutions Inc • Contractors - Public Consulting Group Inc • Contractors - Quality Management International • Contractors - Rothen bach Research and Consulting, LLC • Contractors - Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) • Contractors - Sha rpton, Brunson & Company, P.A. • Contractors - The IPL Group • Contractors - The Management Edge, Inc • Contractors - The North Highland Company, Inc. • Contractors - Thomas Howell Ferguson P.A. • Contractors - Village Architects Incorporated • Amendments o Amendments -Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) o Amendments -Amendment 8 (30 January 2009.E o Amendments -Amendment 7 (02 December 081 o Amendments -Amendment 6 (6 October 2008� o Amendments -Amendment 5 (29 July 07) o Amendments -Amendment 4 (29 August 061 o Amendments -Amendment 3 (29 August 061 o Amendments -Amendment 1 (15 June 06) o Amendments -Amendment 2 (15 June 06) Complete Contract -Microsoft Word Complete Contract - PDF M FloridaMarketPlace Users Return to State Contracts, Agreements and Price Lists http://dms.myfloi-ida.comlbusiness_operations/state—Purchasinglvendor_informationIstate... 10/26/2009 Arriendments -Amendment 9 (2 June 2009) /Amendments /Management Consulting Ser... Page 6 of 6 Terms and Conditions I Privacy Statement I Accessibility I Copyright p2009 Department of Management Services -State of Florida http://dms.myflorida.comlbusiness_operations/state—Purchasinglvendor_informationlstate... 10/26/2009