01/09/1991 AgreementAVIATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF MONROE, FLORIDA
AND
DAMES & MOORE
P rl 3 7
This agreement (the Agreement) for Aviation Consulting Services is made and entered into this
9th day Wan, 1991 by and between the County of Monroe, Key West, Florida, a public body
corporate under the laws of the State of Florida, hereinafter designated as the "SPONSOR," and
DAMES & MOORE, One North Dale Mabry, Suite 700, Tampa, Florida, hereinafter designated
as the "CONSULTANT." Whereas the SPONSOR is in need of professional assistance relative
to development of Key West International and Marathon Airports, and whereas, the
CONSULTANT represents that it is in compliance with the Florida Statues relating to the
practice of airport planning and design and signifies its willingness to provide the desired
services. The parties hereto agree to services and conditions as hereinafter stated.
ARTICLE I THE PROJECT:
The PROJECT is known as professional aviation consulting and engineering services :elative
to Key West International and Marathon Airports. Services will include, but not be limited to,
preparation of an Environmental Assessment/Development of Regional Impact, Master
Drainage Studies, and Permitting for improvements at Key West International and Marathon
Airports, and other aviation consulting and engineering services, each individually negotiated
and defined, as authorized, and made part of this Agreement through a Task Order, in
accordance with Article II of this Agreement. A detailed description of all work elements will
be contained in each Task Order which will be executed prior to initiation of work and which
upon execution by both parties will become an integral part of the Agreement.
ARTICLE II SERVICES BY THE CONSULTANT:
The Scope of Services that the CONSULTANT will provide the SPONSOR, under this
Agreement, shall be rendered as follows:
ITEM 1. PROJECT MANAGER
Throughout all phases of the PROJECT, the CONSULTANT shall assign to the PROJECT a
Project Manager, approved by the SPONSOR, together with such technical and clerical staff
as he may from time to time require, who shall be responsible for the performance of the
administrative functions of a technical nature involved in properly coordinating, expediting,
and controlling all technical aspects of the PROJECT to assure its complete integrity including
the maintenance of complete PROJECT files with copies of all appropriate correspondence and
other documentation to be furnished the SPONSOR as accumulated.
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 1
ITEM 2. BASIC SERVICES
Upon approval from the Federal Aviation Administration and the Florida Department of
Transportation (if required) and notice to proceed from the SPONSOR, the CONSULTANT
will perform Basic Services defined by Task Order attached to this Agreement.
ITEM 3. SPECIAL SERVICES
Assist the SPONSOR with special services, as approved and authorized by Task Order attached
to this Agreement. Special services shall include professional services required for airport
engineering and planning not classified as Basic Services, and will include preparation of grant
applications, geotechnical investigations, survey and other services necessary to meet FAA
requirements and advance the improvement of Key West International and Marathon Airports.
ITEM 4. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Provide additional services, as required, to fully complete the program. The scope and cost of
such services will be agreed upon in advance and will be authorized by Task Order attached
to this Agreement. Any copies of documents, reports, drawings, files or specifications
requested by CLIENT and obtained from CONSULTANT after six months from the date of
the last invoice on this project shall be provided at actual cost.
ARTICLE III RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SPONSOR:
The SPONSOR shall:
A. Provide full information as to the SPONSOR's requirement for the work.
B. Assist the CONSULTANT by placing at his disposal all available information pertinent
to the site of the work including previous reports and any other data relative to the
work. CONSULTANT shall rely upon CLIENT furnished information as accurate and
shall not have an obligation to confirm its accuracy unless otherwise stated in the
Agreements. Any additional work or revisions to completed work performed by
CONSULTANT as a result of inaccurate information supplied by the CLIENT shall be
paid for as an additional service.
C. Guarantee access to and make all provisions for the CONSULTANT to enter upon
public lands as required for the CONSULTANT to perform his work under this
Agreement.
D. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, estimates, drawings, specifications, proposals, and
other documents presented by the CONSULTANT and render in writing, decisions
pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the
CONSULTANT.
E. Advertise for proposals from bidders, open the proposals at the appointed time and
place, and pay for all costs incident thereto.
F. Provide such legal, accounting, and insurance counseling services as may be required
for the work.
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 2
G. Designate in writing a person to act as SPONSOR's representative with respect to the
work to be performed under this Agreement; such person shall have complete authority
to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define SPONSOR's policies
and decisions with respect to materials, equipment elements, and systems pertinent to
the work covered by this Agreement.
H. Give prompt written notice to the CONSULTANT whenever the SPONSOR observes or
otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the work.
Obtain approval of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the work and
such approvals and consents from such other individuals or bodies, as may be necessary
for completion of the work.
J. If the CONSULTANT's most recent cost estimate for the work or the lowest bona fide
CONTRACTOR'S proposal is in excess of available funds or any limit states, the
SPONSOR shall give written approval of an increase in the limit, or he shall cooperate
in revising the work's scope or quality, or both, to reduce the costs as required.
K. Furnish, or direct the CONSULTANT to provide at the SPONSOR's expense, necessary
additional services required for the work and which are not provided by the
CONSULTANT.
L. Assist, as necessary, the CONSULTANT with the collection of required data from Key
West International and Marathon Airport Tenants.
ARTICLE IV COMPENSATION:
Payment to the CONSULTANT for all services provided in accordance with this Agreement
shall be described in each Supplemental Task Order.
The CONSULTANT will be paid by the SPONSOR for the complete work or services rendered
under this Agreement on the basis and at the price set forth in the Supplemental Task Orders.
Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all
labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
ITEM 1. ARTICLE II, ITEM 1
Invoices will be issued at least every four weeks, payable within thirty (30) days from receipt
of FAA reimbursement. Invoicing format will be agreed to and established prior to initial
billing.
ARTICLE V CONSTRUCTION COST:
Cost estimates prepared by the CONSULTANT represent his best judgment as a professional
familiar with the aviation industry. It is recognized, however, that neither the CONSULTANT
nor the SPONSOR have any control over the cost of labor, materials or equipment, over the
CONTRACTOR's method of determining bid prices, or over competitive bidding or market
conditions. Accordingly, the CONSULTANT cannot and does not guarantee that construction
bids will not vary from cost estimates prepared by him.
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 3
ARTICLE VI INSURANCE
The Consultant shall at all times carry, on all operations hereunder, worker's compensation
insurance, public liability and property damage insurance, and automotive public liability and
property damage insurance, in an amount not less than $1 million per person per occurrence.
The Sponsor shall be named additional insured and furnished with certificates evidencing such
coverage. The Consultant shall also carry at all times, on all operations hereunder, professional
liability insurance in an amount not less than $1 million. The Consultant shall save harmless
the Sponsor from claims and liabilities due to its negligent acts, errors or omissions.
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT:
This agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. The
CONSULTANT shall be paid compensation for services performed and direct costs to
termination date, said compensation and expenses to be established pursuant to negotiation
between the parties. Breach of Agreement terms by either party shall provide grounds for
termination, or administrative, contractual, or legal remedies, as appropriate.
ARTICLE VIII OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS:
One set of reproducible drawings, plans, specifications, maps, charts and Agreement documents
are to become the property of the SPONSOR, whether the PROJECT for which they are made
be executed or not. Original documents, such as tracings, plans, specifications, maps, basic
survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data prepared or obtained under the
terms of this Agreement, are instruments of service and will remain the property of the
CONSULTANT unless otherwise agreed. The Federal Aviation Administration, the
Comptroller General of the United States, or duly authorized representatives, shall have access
to any books, documents, papers, and records of the CONSULTANT which are directly
pertinent to the project, for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and
transcriptions. The CONSULTANT will maintain all required records for not less than three
years after the SPONSOR makes final payment and all other pending matters are closed.
ARTICLE IX SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:
The SPONSOR and the CONSULTANT each binds himself, his partners, successors, assigns,
and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and the partners, successors,
assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of this
Agreement. Neither the SPONSOR nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer his
interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. The CONSULTANT shall
not have the right to subcontract this agreement, or any part or portion thereof, without having
in advance of such subcontracting the written consent of the County.
CMRNMST October 10, 1990 Page 4
ARTICLE X TRUTH IN NEGOTIATIONS:
The CONSULTANT certifies that the wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the
fixed price compensation are accurate, complete and current at the time of contracting and that
the original Agreement price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any
significant sums where the SPONSOR determines the Agreement price was increased to
inaccurate, incomplete or noncurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such
Agreement adjustments shall be made within one (1) year following the end of the Agreement.
Certification by the CONSULTANT as to the Truth in Negotiations will be provided in
Appendix 1.
ARTICLE XI EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY:
The CONSULTANT will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11246, entitled, "Equal
Employment Opportunity," as supplemented in the Department of Labor Relations (41 CFR,
Part 60) applicable to this project. The CONSULTANT declares that it does not discriminate
on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, or age. The CONSULTANT will
assure that the provisions of Appendix 2 are incorporated in the Agreement documents.
ARTICLE XII PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES:
The CONSULTANT warrants, by the attached Certification, that he has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the
CONSULTANT, or subcontractor to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that the
CONSULTANT has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual or
firm, other than a bona fide employees working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee,
commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the
award or making of this Agreement.
ARTICLE XIII FAA AND FDOT:
Throughout this Agreement reference is made to the Federal Aviation Administration as FAA
and the Florida Department of Transportation as FDOT.
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 5
ARTICLE XIV DEFINITIONS:
Whenever used in this professional services Agreement the following terms or pronouns used
in place of them shall be defined as follows:
Additional Services - Services which the County may request or authorize the
Consultant to perform which are not included as part of the basic services.
Agreement - This professional services Agreement entered into by and between the
County of Monroe, Florida and DAMES & MOORE on which Supplemental Task Orders
may be attached or appended.
Basic. Special. and Additional Services - Services which are stated in Article II herein
which the Consultant shall perform in accordance with the terms of this Professional
Services Agreement and subsequent Supplemental Task Orders.
Direct Salary Costs - The salaries of professional, technical and clerical employees
engaged on the project by the Consultant and the cost of their mandatory and customary
benefits such as statutory employee benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacations,
pensions and similar benefits.
Estimated Maximum Fee - The sum of the Estimated Allowable Job Cost and the Fixed
Fee for a Design Project.
SuIRnlemental Task Order - An agreement which supplements, modifies or amends the
scope of work of the Agreement or a pre-existing supplemental agreement thereto and
which sets forth the basis for any addition or reduction or deletion of the applicable
corresponding fee and/or schedule contained in said agreement or supplemental
agreement thereto.
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and corporate seals by their
proper officers, duly authorized to do so:
By CONSULTANT this day of 5(r�tR�Z- , 1990.
DAMES & MOORE
By:
By the County this 9th day of January , 1991.
COUNTY OF MONROE
By:
Wilhelmina G. Harvey, Mayor/Chairman
Signed, sealed, and delivered in the presence of:
(SEAL)
ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
By: 10 !1a
Witness to the County - Deputy Cler
�;PPROVED AS TO FOX"
AND LEGA CVVCy
f3Y rteyaoice
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 7
APPENDIX 1
CERTIFICATE OF PROJECT CONSULTANT
I hereby certify that I am an officer and duly authorized representative of the firm of DAMES
& MOORE, whose address is One North Dale Mabry, Suite 700, Tampa, Florida 33609, and that
neither I nor the above firm I represent has:
a. Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee,
or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee
working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) to solicit or secure this
Agreement;
b. Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this Agreement, to
employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying
out the Agreement, or;
C. Paid or agreed to pay any firm, organization, or person (other than a bona fide
employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee,
contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with,
procuring or carrying out the Agreement; except as here expressly stated (if any).
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the Federal Aviation Administration
of the United States Department of Transportation, in connection with this Agreement
involving participation of Airport Improvement Program funds and is subject to applicable
state and federal laws, both criminal and civil.
DAMES & MOORE
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 1
Truth in Negotiation Certificate
I hereby certify that the wage rates and other factual unit costs used to compute the
compensations for the various services listed in this Agreement are accurate, complete and
current at the time of contracting and that the original Agreement price and any additions
thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums where the SPONSOR determines the
Agreement price was increased to inaccurate, incomplete or noncurrent wage rates and other
factual unit costs.
DAMES & MOORE
r
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 1
APPENDIX 2
CONTRACTOR CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS
TITLE VI ASSURANCES
During the performance of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assigns and
successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR") agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations. The CONTRACTOR shall comply with Regulations
relative to nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of
Transportation (hereinafter, "DOT") Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as
they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations),
which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement.
2. Non-discrimination, The CONTRACTOR, with regard to the work performed by it
during the Agreement, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national
origin in the selection and retention of subcontractor, including procurement of
materials and leases of equipment, The CONTRACTOR shall not participate either
directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by section 21.5 of the
Regulations, including employment practices when the Agreement covers a program set
forth in Appendix B of the Regulations.
3. Solicitations for Subcontracts. Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment. In
all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the
CONTRACTOR for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements
of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be
notified by the CONTRACTOR of the CONTRACTOR's obligations under this
Agreement and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race,
color, or national origin.
4. Information and Reports. The CONTRACTOR shall provide all information and
reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto and shall
permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its
facilities as may be determined by, the SPONSOR or the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such regulations,
orders, and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the
CONTRACTOR shall so certify to the SPONSOR or the FAA, as appropriate, and shall
set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of the CONTRACTOR's noncompliance
with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement, the SPONSOR shall impose
such Agreement sanctions as it or the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including,
but not limited to:
a. withholding of payments to the CONTRACTOR under the Agreement until the
CONTRACTOR complies, and/or;
b. cancellation, termination or suspension of the Agreement, in whole or in part.
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 1
6. Incorporation of Provisions. The CONTRACTOR shall include the provisions of
paragraphs 1 through S in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and
leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant
thereto. The CONTRACTOR shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or
procurement as the SPONSOR or the FAA may direct as a means of enforcing such
provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event
a CONTRACTOR becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a
subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the CONTRACTOR may request
the SPONSOR to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the SPONSOR and,
in addition, the CONTRACTOR may request the United States to enter into such
litigation to protect the interests of the United States.
MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (MBE) ASSURANCES
1. Policy, It is the policy of the Department of Transportation (DOT) that minority
business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity
to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal
funds under this Agreement. Consequently, the MBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23
apply to this Agreement.
2. MBE Obligation, The CONTRACTOR agrees to ensue that minority business enterprises
as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts and subcontracts financed in whole or in part with Federal
funds provided under this Agreement. In this regard, all contractors shall take all
necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure that
minority business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and
perform contracts. CONTRACTORS shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color,
national origin, or sex the award and performance of DOT assisted contracts.
CMRNMST August 31, 1990 Page 2
TASK ORDER 1
AVIATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MONROE
AND DAMES & MOORE
In accordance with Articles I and II of the Aviation Services Agreement dated the 9 th day
of January ,1991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, this Task
Order provides the Authorization for preparation of an Environmental Assessment for
improvements at Key West International Airport, as set forth in Attachment 1.
NOW THEREFORE, that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
herein, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
A. SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work for this Task Order shall be as indicated on ATTACHMENT 1
hereto, entitled Scope of Work, Environmental Assessment, Key West International
Airport.
B. PERIOD OF SERVICE TIME
Consultant will begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of the Task
Order under this Agreement and shall complete the work within the time frame
indicated in Attachment 1; such receipt shall constitute written notice to proceed.
If Consultant's services called for under this Agreement are delayed or suspended in
whole or in part by Sponsor for reasons beyond Consultant's control, the time for
performance shall be adjusted appropriately. If such delay or suspension extends for
more than one year for reasons beyond the Consultant's control, various fees and.or
rates of compensation provided for elsewhere in this Agreement shall be subject to
renegotiation. Any change in such fees shall apply only to the unfurnished services as
of the effective date of such change.
C. COMPENSATION
Compensation for the work to be performed under this Task Order shall be in
accordance with Article IV of the approved AGREEMENT dated
January 9, 1991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore as set
forth in Attachment 1. Compensation for basic services shall be a lump sum of two
hundred fifty seven thousand three hundred twenty eight dollars ($257,328.00).
Compensation for additional services, if required, shall not exceed a maximum of eight
thousand nine hundred thirty two dollars and no cents (8,932.00). Invoicing shall be
monthly, based on percent completed.
D. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, hereto have made
and executed this Task Order 1 the day and year written.
County of Monroe
-.W- �.np. r�w
By:
Wilhelmina G. Harvey
Mayor/Chairman
Date: January 9, 1991
(SEAL)
ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
.�� VA,
CKWIT01 August 31, 1990 Page 2
Dames & Moore
Date: S �`
APPROVED A; TO `-Vh
AND LEGALaU,Fl�JEr
�Y
Anton y's Offir-A
00� pp QQQppp
M .Mp Mp
�y
y� �ppp f� W MM ti T r•
M N M
t�
C� �f
N
00 M r• 0�0 O
LN
M1 �t
N N um
N
8 8 8
o8
O O �n pp
L 8 LA N O
v.
Q v. In u, Ln Un O �+ Q
g
1�1 d�
h
N
N
rn
LA pdpp ppp
0Mp N pry. Mp
M
yp�. r• N N MM r
ti �O vM,
a� N
CMD
M1 00 00 O
O
O N 4
10
r• r' N N M
N
r' r• �
r•
r
NN ��}}
N
a
N N N M
pp
`O
AN�
N O� �O OO N
00
�t
�
r•
r•
r•
N 00 It
N It N N It 10
Q
�n
N a- M r• r• r• r• SO
N
r
%0
.t 00
so
.t -0 d M N r
N
10 %t
r•
car
It
00
M
M
ao OD It co a 10
r•
ateO 00 N %0 It 00 00 � 00 �t 00 00 M N N N d �
N CO R
r•
O� %0 N f- 00 CO It It 10 a0 0� M N to M N e- r• r• %0 N
,0 r 00 kn r S 10 N N
N
Y
41
C
a 01 C 41
CK
41
(� U.a a x Cop dip
q V Z 4 > F Y J Y LL= Y q Q
C p� •'p- �I N C/ y < Cam/ Y- O
na LV O t v 10 O O 10 U. a L a J
a 8 C Y tQ�1 C< S a C C ` a� d< u WO p
•p-, O > Y v L. r q O vYi ��r n n u
r' t M+ OL N Y a% C > M q i0 a C C L.
Y 9L N IL O < W w tJ ry
Y
w r• N M N c- N M 't H a- N M1 t v% I- 00 01
f r• a- a- F<•- N N N N N N H M M M M M M M M M
$ •Nt CD co �t
c N N N M
V ai
N O
M N
Ln
00
00
L a
r
W
O
p�
L.
p�
�pp. .p
1 4
�j
O�
pp� ��yt
N e� ^ P
��.
..7 V
nj
r: �- r•
�}
�O
O �t N N N M
J
L
1� It M
00 �O f� �O Q
I�
N
o
O N N P S S 00 Q IN O�
1A vv
4,
V�
r �
N
J
i•.
M
�t M 00
N
10 c- •O N O O 00
c- V1
h
L
r
L
V
J
u v
SN
^
N N NO
CY
M O so Go
�T
r M
L
y
Y
H v
V
N U% N
Ol
10
pp p
10M 00
•r
J r,
O M
•r4 L
C
C
N 0, �t An
10 O0 %O It �t
N
N
O 00 IA N �j S
4.
J QI
7 L
4
u .+
C
N N
N M N
O,
O
h
CCy L
u
Fn
L
Al N
00
00
N``
O
L.
_C
•
pc
C S
•
••
IL
y
W v
r
L ..
C N N in
N M r- .t
�
�
� � � � � � �' � 00 M 4 e-
y
1•
Jo
N
N
N
ge
r a
c
a
W
v a
•
�
J
g
s
cc
<
1 40
v
>MA
a� u■ O�
>
J
^
-
L. 4,
iq+ 4
Cp
L
o O O u o O
at
y
ewe
•u
v
4` '�,,
•�
E
v m u <C t q
y
y
J
`Z
q
>
•r
u V Y �p CC
J V C O
W
C O M Y O u C C
11 J u G •r L 7 dl
<
O
OC
\
14.
V<< O a
1
88 U 8 u r J q<
y
r
►.
z
u o v
V
J 41 M
r ++ < CY
u
o
` M -p
L u U as G C
qq77 0o
•C .O
W
Q
z
M
$
J
J i+ .r
v"
u L J 8
V Y O O L y
7
J 55
<
O
W M �Q7 Y C V M J V J
41
~ ` r 4 L •r O U.s U.
<<
N
G V W
H .. < s r x m
Y
t7i
~
I
N
e- N M
V)
e' N M �t W%
N
yZy�
HJ Npp fpps M 8 O pM�pp �A rN• IL 00 M inkA spy .ppp yp� 00 M r• pM �O �pAp r'
t~If f� N UA 4 coo N N �t O �t eN-
12 u N N r• M1 00 kn P N P 00 P 1�
8 8 8 888fSV8 8 88 pQr'
YN N U" V% V; O
•r X r N N Fn N M r 1
IM W �yyp pp pp pMp N pN ppp yp� N Qp p pr N
L O M1 O O 00
V� 1 .t coo M � N EO �A OD .t M O
u N LA e- e- N •O M 100� LA
IA
N r• r• 00 •O in CM
M O N M CD M C-M N 00 00
N e- It ffn �O U1 e- 00 O P It 10 ti P M N
M N
r L
•Y
J SS
u ..
3 s r. -t It co co 10 pp co co o a,%o u+
•C
r y
L
6.0
t
4
1- v pp,.
CO CO 00 N � O N
•r �
4 y
•4r L
a
y v
4 .t N N O co N
O LA M
r•
� y
� L
u .. pp pp
!' r• N 00 M d �t co
M �
_O C7 L
O
L Go 00
CO C
yui
u t-1 e�0 e- N %t 00 %O .t 10 N 00 p P L^ �t O
Y L r` r• M �f inM N r•
d
N 10 N N .t 00 fN r• M s v c0
8
r y
•u L
dv
y
g u
4JC1 7pL 4Cp+ C
►'� ! y �1 J Cy ■ O O
W w tJ ���111 > K u8 O N �J!! pya N •O
W Z � t CIC q COy � i q M �pl > Oya L � pl 4 epL�i
ma
h h •� •Cpy OL •g- •Id N `p 2 d L= Y Y
000 W Z 7 1.1 Y J Cl C 3 M y S pL¢ O' w
y y ■ L y Y Y Y Ct L '� m
az ++ O
wu -+ fo C
3
40
u 8 3 W J H cps O 00 fv O P< �7 w e U.
%O f- co P O a- ]C •• Y •• •• ]C e- N
_ >. r• r• r• a- r• fV N N N e- N M �t Y! O M WZ X N f� f� 1� I� !� N f• N H 00 00 F P P P O• p• .11C O
W �y
LA
Ln N �o d W% f- Lf%
M r
Y
0 a 8 8 O O OLr% kA
�x
C W
41
F i3 Y1 M f- •O N 00 M pn N
N
N
pppp 00 Go ol M1 10pp N
N
^ 00 co pn 00 00 Q
r t
,L 7
Y 20
J
u ..
C^ OD 4 eN- M M M
r a
C L
iY
a ran M
•r �
J /Y
A a
r4 L
•a
N v pp pp
C 00 N M �1 �t N
4 In
J a
C� L
O
U v po
p c M P M co
�O
P O
M �
L J a
0 M L
In L
U
d 4r t r, N co so d CO 10 00 4 10 r
y �1 a to
8 OP
F-+ OD N N r• M1 4 M co V�
u 1D fV
W a r,
� •r a
c L
� c
•• o a yu
aM Y
41
r L
+, >
40
\ W w J a a O Y O U
41
M Y =
I O Y M Y •r C a u W
� G= �••� � N C Jeaa C S IO � u 0 A
W U N 01 C 4 0 N L v M d<
W r Y d W d U r d C
][ •r 3 �L N M �t �A O f� Y e- N M N -C K
< H r> < a- r• r• t N N N < u
F- IY = Y I--r* a- T- a- � V- s- !- c- V- T
S3
<
J
2
Y
Oc
OC
C
<
10
W
K
u
W
o>
2
O
O
H
d
r
M
•r
L
8
u
u
>
<
44
�4}
J
u
S
°
"ram,
o
i <
A_
v
u
ds
J
O
q
Jai
•C
9L¢
ei
W
M
1�1pp
�U�pp
4
M
N F
C
q
E
V
O.
O
W
C
11
•>
!.
AL
C
•r
CI
�e
C
•E
W ,
< 1-0p~pp�
M
`
V
`
L
�
�
U OC
2 ._•�
O
L
■
M
w
>
16
d!
cc
0
N W
W
gm H
L.
d
d
00
G
<
4-C
<
W
�+
V)
u
d'
d
u O
uuii
N
MeM-
n Y
N>'
►+ s
Y
cob
Y
Y
N
Y
(A
Y
to
Y
(AN
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
V)
Ac
YI
Y Y
N N
F
H
H
CL F
W Y
F<-
F
H
H
F<-
F
~
1<-
H
►<-
F<-
ATTACHMENT 1
TASK ORDER 1
SCOPE OF WORK
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
J UNE, 1990
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS
STUDY DESIGN
J UNE, 1990
RODUCTI
This study design represents the work program for the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment (EA) needed to identify the impacts of proposed improvements for the Key West
International Airport in Monroe County, Florida. The proposed improvements include the
development of:
1. 600' extension of runway 27 with associated clear zone and extended safety area,
taxiway and lighting.
2. Construction of a CFR road (from end of R/W 27 to Roosevelt Blvd.)
3. Expansion of terminal apron to the east for development of FBO G/A facilities.
4. Construction of aircraft hangar facilities on the southwest side of airport.
The Environmental Assessment shall discuss the potential for environmental impacts of
applicable improvements as specified in FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook
(October 1985). Provisions contained in the 1976 Environmental Assessment for Key West
International Airport will be addressed and implementation measures for land use and water
management practices will be discussed. These provisions will be discussed in a level of detail
consistent with that of other areas in an FAA Environmental Assessment (EA). For example,
each category of impacts will be assessed to determine if thresholds of significance are
exceeded. At such time as thresholds are surpassed, the results will be presented to and
discussed with Airport Management and decision made as to whether or not additional time and
expenditures are necessary to further resolve the issues. This will be accomplished by
discussing the commitments made in the original 1976 Environmental Assessment, determining
the present status of implementing those commitments and making general recommendations
as to the future courses of action that should be pursued in order that the installation of the
runway extension and other planned improvements be consistent with the original intent and
current status of environmental commitments made in the past.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 2
A breakdown of the contents of the EA covered by this study design is provided in the
following. Items listed represent those included in FAA Order 5050.4A. Where applicable
certain sections have been expanded to relate to items contained in either the 1976 EA, Master
Plan Update or the FAR Part 150 Study for the Key West International Airport.
TASK 1.0 PROJECT INITIATION
Task 1.1 Proiect Coordination
Task 1 will continue throughout the project and will initially involve establishment of
project coordination and clear definition of project objectives. Coordination meetings are
anticipated to follow completion of each major work element. Coordination will be established
with all appropriate agencies including the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT),
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the City of Key West, Monroe County, the Regional
Planning Council, and others as appropriate.
Task 1.2 Study Design
In accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circulars and FAA Order
5050.4A and other applicable federal guidelines, a study design and work program will be
developed. The study design and associated costing will be suitable for incorporation into a
planning grant application for federal funds.
In conjunction with FAA, County, and State representatives, the work program will be designed
for applicability to Key West International Airport. Maximum use will be made of the 1976
Environmental Assessment; however, it is anticipated that extensive efforts will be required
to update previous work.
Task 1.3 Project Initiation
This will follow the review of the 1976 EA, DRI/DO, Policy Plan, Master Plan Update, recent
correspondence, and the development of the scope of work for the Environmental Assessment.
An informal project initiation meeting will be arranged with concerned agencies. A
description of the project suitable for agency dissemination will be provided, with a request
to identify issues of concern.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 3
TASK 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE ACTION
Task 2.1 Review Documentation
A full review of all relevant previous documentation including the 1986 Master Plan will be
performed to identify factors supporting the need for the proposed action.
Task 2.2 User/Tenant Sury-a
Interviews and a survey will be performed to determine present user, tenant, and concessionaire
needs at Key West International Airport. These surveys will provide valuable information
relative to future critical aircraft, corresponding airside requirements, and airport role.
Task 2.3 Critical Aircraft Analysis
On the basis of the results of the user/tenant survey, and the aviation demand forecasts
prepared in Task 6.21, a critical aircraft analysis will be performed to determine the existing
and future critical aircraft expected to significantly utilize Key West International Airport.
This will include analysis of fleet mix, non-stop stage length, changes in aircraft design, and
other factors as appropriate.
Task 2.4 Airside/Landside Requirements URdate
Task 3 will result in the identification of at least one future critical aircraft and/or aircraft
category. This aircraft and category will be used to update runway length requirements and
other airside requirements, as they specifically relate to the EA.
Task 2.5 Interviews
Task 5 will involve interviews with related tenants to obtain additional data regarding needs
and potential mitigation (abatement) measures.
Task 2.6 Evaluation and Documentation
The findings of Tasks 1 through 5 will be evaluated and corresponding recommendations
formulated with respect to runway length, apron requirements, CFR access, and other items as
appropriate.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 4
TASK 3.0 UPDATE AVIATION DEMAND FORECASTS
Based on data collected in previous tasks, and other federal, regional, and state forecasts,
aviation demand forecasts for Key West International Airport will be prepared. Task 6.21 will
include forecasts of operations, based aircraft, fleet mix, instrument operations, military
operations, enplaned passengers and cargo, ground access demand, and airport role.
Task 3.1 Market Characteristics
Market characteristics may change significantly in the next few years, as they have since
deregulation. The impact of Cuba and other market characteristics will be fully evaluated in
Task 1. Based on data collected, future market characteristics which may affect the Airport
will be identified and evaluated. This overview will provide the basis on which the forecasts
will be developed.
Task 3.2 Based Aircraft Forecast
Using the data obtained in surveys conducted in previous tasks, the 1986 Master Plan, and other
applicable information, forecasts of based aircraft by type aircraft will be updated.
Task 3.3 Operations Forecast
Based on previous tasks, survey data, FAA records, and other applicable information, forecasts
of aircraft fleet mix will be updated. The operations forecast will include operations by type
(air taxi, general aviation, military, etc.), total volume, number of itinerant aircraft operations,
and annual instrument approaches.
Task 3.4 Aircraft Fleet Mix Forecast
Based on previous tasks, survey data, FAA records, and other applicable information, forecasts
of aircraft fleet mix will be prepared.
Task 3.5 Enplaned Passengers
Based on previous tasks, the total number of passengers departing from Key West International
Airport will be computed.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 5
Task 3.6 Enplaned Air Cargo
Based on data obtained during previous tasks, the total tonnage of priority, non priority,
foreign mail, express, and freight departing on aircraft, including originations, stopovers, and
transfer cargos, will be computed.
Task 3.7 Ground Access Demand
Based on data obtained during previous tasks, the total demand on ground transportation
facilities will be identified.
Task 3.8 Airport Role
Based on forecasts developed, the future airport classification and critical aircraft will be
determined. This data will be essential in determining airport facility requirements.
Task 3.9 Documentation
Following completion of Element 3, a technical report will be prepared and submitted detailing
the aviation demand forecasts. FAA approval will be required prior to initiation of other work
elements.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 6
TASK 4.0 DEMAND/CAPACITY ANALYSI
The objective of Task 6.22 is to evaluate the ability of facilities to satisfy current and future
demand. The analysis will require evaluation of demand versus capacity for airspace, airside,
and landside facilities. FAA Advisory Circulars 150/5050-3A, 15015060-5, and 150/5070-6 will
be utilized as guidance in performing this element.
Task 4.1 Airspace Capacity
Airspace capacity will be evaluated for projected aircraft operations. This will include an
evaluation of airspace interaction and the impact of the proposed runway extension on other
airports and Regional Air Traffic Control facilities.
Task 4.2 Airside Capacity
Task 2 will involve a comparison of the forecasts prepared in previous elements with airside
capacity. Airside capacity will include analysis of current and future airfield layout, area
meteorology, instrumentation, and aircraft operational demand by type of aircraft, both on an
annual and peak -hour basis. The most current FAA methodology will be used to perform this
task.
Task 4.3 Landside Capacity
Landside capacity will be evaluated for its ability to meet terminal, automobile access and
parking, cargo, access, support, administrative, water, sewer, electrical, maintenance, and other
landside facility needs.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 7
TASK 5.0 IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
The purpose of Element 6 is to identify and evaluate alternative development options for Key
West Airport International, relative to the EA. Element 6 will require the following major
tasks.
Task 5.1 Development Constr
Prior to the identification of alternatives, constraints to development will be identified,
allowing early elimination of unfeasible development options. Evaluation criteria and existing
constraints relative to physical, environmental, operational, and economic factors will be
developed during this task. Based on data collected during previous tasks, major environmental
characteristics will be evaluated to identify major constraints to airport development.
Additionally, potential strategies that will enhance environmental compatibility will be
developed for each alternative for use in the alternative assessment process.
Task 5.2 Identify Alternative Development Options
Several development options will be prepared during this task, including a "do nothing" option.
Preparation of alternative development options will involve an analysis of runway/taxiway
changes, instrumentation, aircraft demand levels, fleet mix variations, terminal expansion, and
landside facilities.
Task 5.3 Evaluate Alternative Development Options
This task will involve a detailed evaluation of the impacts associated with the alternative
development options previously prepared. This will include consideration of:
o Accommodation of Aviation Demand;
o Airspace Impacts;
o Environmental Impacts; and
o Development Costs.
Task 5.4 Final Alternativ
Following completion of Task 3, four alternatives for development will be selected for detailed
evaluation. Maximum coordination will be maintained with the State, FAA, and County during
this process. Prior to the start of Task 5.4, FAA and County approval of the four alternatives
selected for detailed evaluation will be required.
Task 5.5 Documentation
Following completion of Element 6, a technical report detailing the alternative identification
and evaluation process will be prepared.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 8
TASK 6.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
This portion of the study will identify the background conditions from which environmental
impacts of the project will be compared. Both on -site and of f-site conditions will be identified.
Project location and vicinity maps and an airport layout plan exhibit will be prepared.
After publication of the Notice to Proceed, Dames & Moore will begin the required data
collection for the following environmental and land use information. Existing data will be
used where available; the necessity to acquire new information in some areas will exist.
Background information will be gathered as required in Paragraph 47d of Chapter 5 of FAA
Order 5050.4A, and will include:
- Noise
- Off -site existing and planned land use and zoning
- Residential areas
- Public parks and recreation areas
- Air quality
- Water quality, quantity and aquifer recharge
- Wildlife and water fowl refuges
- Wetlands and floodplains
- Biotic communities, threatened and endangered species
- Public facilities (e.g., hospitals, schools)
- Population, industrial and commercial growth
- Other planned and developed activities
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 9
TASK 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES - SPECIFIC IMPACT CATEGORIES
Potential environmental impacts of the airport improvements will be analyzed for each aspect
of the affected environment discussed below. Potential impacts will be analyzed in terms of
the thresholds provided in Paragraph 47e of Chapter 5 of FAA Order 5050.4A and will include
both direct and indirect effects of the proposed project, as well as any project alternatives.
This section will include any mitigative measures to reduce or offset possible adverse effects.
Mitigation strategies may be particularly important as related to potential impacts to the
mangrove and salt pond habitats, and the potential future noise impact.
Task 7.1 Noise
The effect of the proposed runway extension upon noise exposure shall be evaluated. In order
to accomplish this, the on -going FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study shall be utilized to
reduce duplication of effort and to maintain consistency. If necessary, and using the FAR Part
150 as a basis, up to three additional noise analyses shall be conducted to examine alternatives.
Population impacts within 65, 70 and 75 Ldn contours shall be compared for all scenarios. The
determinations of the significance of impacts shall be conducted as specified in FAA Order
5050.4A.
Task 7.2 Compatible Land Use
Land uses outside of the airport property boundaries shall be identified within the 65, 70, and
75 Ldn noise contours for all alternatives in which a noise analysis is undertaken. The noise
impacts, if any, identified in the FAR Part 150 Study shall be reviewed in the context of land
use compatibility. Reference shall be made to the Monroe County Zoning Code's Airport
District to provide assurance under Section 511(a)(5) of the 1982 Airport Act that reasonable
actions have been taken to assure compatibility of adjacent land uses with airport section.
Task 7.3 Social Impacts
The proposed improvements are contained within the present boundaries of the Airport
property. As a result, no relocation or other community description is anticipated. In addition,
the proposed improvements should not alter surface transportation patterns. A summary
statement with supporting documentation shall be included in this section.
Task 7.4 Induced Socioeconomic Impacts
The potential for induced or secondary impacts of the proposed improvements on communities
in the project area shall be discussed.
Task 7.5 Air Ouality
Recent directives from the FAA have modified the requirements for air quality analysis under
FAA Order 5050A.A. The air quality section will utilize the flow chart contained in FAA
Report No. FAA-EE-82-21 entitled "Air Quality Procedures for Civilian Airports and Air Force
Bases". Contact will be made with appropriate air quality officials to identify the airport's
consistency with Federal and State Air Quality Requirements and State and local
implementation plans.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 10
A total load analysis will be conducted for Carbon Monoxide (CO), Hydrocarbons (HQ, and
Nitrogen Oxides (NO'), but no dispersion modeling or monitoring is anticipated to be required.
Task 7.6 Water Quality and Hydrologic Conditions.
(a) Water quality: The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the Clean Water
Act of 1977, provides authority to establish water quality standards, control discharges to
surface and subsurface waters, and to issue permits for discharges (Section 402) and dredge and
fill materials (Section 404). Additionally, Chapter 403 (Florida Statutes), the Florida Air and
Water Pollution Control Act, and Chapters 17-3 and 17-4 (Florida Administrative Code)
established the applicable water quality standards for waters of the State, including Monroe
County. Most coastal waters bordering the Florida Keys are designated as Class III waters -
"Recreation, Propagation and Maintenance of a Healthy, Well-balanced Population of Fish and
Wildlife;" exceptions exist along the mainland coastline and within the Everglades National
Park, where Class II waters occur.
In addition to the Class designations above, waters of the Florida Keys are designated as
Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW). All waters within the Keys are OFW, except artificial
waterbodies, the site of the Key West sewage outfall, and the Stock Island Power Plant effluent
mixing zone. The OFW designation requires that no lowering of ambient water quality occur.
To establish ambient, background conditions, Dames & Moore will obtain the available water
quality information from the state, federal and local resource agencies (e.g., EPA and DER's
STORET, USGS's WATSTORE, SFWMD, Monroe County). If limited or no information is
available for the immediate vicinity, site -specific data will be collected. New data will be
especially important in the adjacent mangrove and seagrass habitats as well as the salt ponds.
(b) Water quantity: The quantities of water generated (i.e., wastewater) or collected (i.e.,
stormwater runof f) on -site will be determined. Wastewater generated will be dealt with under
the section on Public Facilities. Stormwater assessment and management will be provided in
a separate, concurrent study by Dames & Moore.
(c) Aquifer recharge: The project area is not located within the boundaries of a federal or
state designated Sole Source Aquifer or a principal drinking water resource for the area.
Shallow groundwater tables and freshwater lenses do occur throughout the Keys; however, due
to the proximity to the ocean, it is not thought that any significant lens occurs in the immediate
vicinity of the airport. Most rainfall in the project area is believed to be lost through
evapotranspira-tion, runoff, and rapid infiltration and seepage to the ocean through the highly
permeable limestone subsurface soils.
Task 7.7 Department of Transportation Act. Section 4 (f)
As documented in the 1976 Environmental Assessment, there are no Section 4(f) properties
involved. This section shall reiterate the findings and documentation of the earlier
Environmental Assessment.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 11
Task 7.8 Historic Architectural Archaeological and Cultural Resources
Based on the documentation contained in the 1976 Environmental Assessment, no historic or
archaeological properties are anticipated to be involved. An updated response from the State
Historic Preservation Offices (SHPO) shall be sought. If historic or archaeological resources
are identified by SHPO, subsequent actions required to complete the Environmental Assessment
will be outside this Scope of Services.
Task 7.9 Biotic Communities (including both flora and faun
(a) Floral communities: Vegetative assemblages within and adjacent to the project will be
identified and mapped. Habitat types will be delineated according to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service classification (see reference in wetlands section above). Qualitative
assessments of the commonness or rarity of species present will be provided.
(1) Terrestrial - Limited amounts of upland vegetation are found within the boundaries of
the airport. These areas will be examined and an inventory of species present will be made.
(2) Aquatic and Wetland - Considerable efforts are being made to protect submerged and
wetland vegetation in waters throughout the State. These communities are among the most
productive natural areas in the world and provide habitat, nursery and feeding grounds for
numerous species of organisms.
Recent aerial photographs of the area indicate emergent wetland areas almost completely
surround the airport facility. These areas are composed predominantly of mangroves (red,
Rhizophora mangle; black,Avicennia germinans; white, Laguncularia racemosa; and buttonwood,
Conocarpus erectus), with numerous shoots and aerial root tips observed between the fringing
mangroves and the runways. Emergent wetland vegetation will be surveyed and mapped on
blue -line aerial photographs. Species composition and qualitative plant density will be
determined.
Aerial photographs also indicate the presence of seagrass beds along the southeastern end of
the island, particularly in the shallow portions of the channel between Key West and Cow Key.
Some scattered beds also occur along the southern shoreline of Key West adjacent to the airport.
These beds are composed primarily of turtlegrass (Thalassia testudinum) with varying amounts
of manatee grass (Syringodium filiforme), shoal grass (Halodule wrightii) and numerous species
of macroalgae. Although located on the ocean side of Roosevelt Boulevard, these beds will be
characterized. In addition, seagrasses and macroalgae may be found within the shallow salt
ponds bordering the airport runway. All grassbeds in the immediate project area will be
surveyed and mapped on blue -line aerial photographs. As with emergent vegetation, species
composition will be determined as well as qualitative assessments of plant density.
(b) Faunal communities: Wildlife resources within and adjacent to the project area will be
examined through a review of existing information from the area, consultations with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, the Florida Department of
Natural Resources and the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, and field
observations by Dames & Moore. Species lists will be developed for each of the major habitat
types, as identified in 6.4.3 (a) above.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 12
(1) Terrestrial - Relatively little undisturbed upland habitat is available within airport
property; much of the surface is impervious and unvegetated. Some terrestrial organisms,
however, may use adjacent vegetated areas.
(2) Aquatic and Wetland - Information concerning faunal communities associated with the
adjacent salt ponds, mangrove and seagrass habitats will be examined through literature
review, agency consultations and field observations. Additional marine habitats (e.g., inshore
hard and soft coral patches, sand and mud flats) adjacent to the project will also be evaluated.
With the close proximity of mangroves and salt ponds, the potential for feeding and/or roosting
areas for water fowl and wading birds near the project exists and will be evaluated.
Task 7.10 Threatened and endangered species
Several threatened and endangered species of plants and animals, as well as species of special
concern, are potential inhabitants or transients in the the general project area. Several species
of amphibians and reptiles, including five species of seaturtles, and numerous bird species are
possible on or adjacent to the project. Populations of two species (the Florida Key Mole Skink,
Eumeces egregius egregius, and the Key Mud Turtle, Kinosternum baurii baurii) have been
observed just north of the western end of the runway and specimens of the Key silverside
(Menidia conchorum) have been collected in several of the surrounding salt ponds.
Information concerning all potential threatened and endangered species and their occurrence
in the area will be obtained from the Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Florida Game and
Freshwater Fish Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildli fe Service, National Marine Fisheries Service
and local conservation groups. This information will be coupled with any field observations
made by Dames & Moore to assess the potential for occurrence in the project area.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 13
Task 7.11 Wetland Characteristics.
(a) Wetland delineations: Wetlands exist at both ends of the existing Key West airport
runway. These wetlands include mangroves and other emergent wetland and coastal species,
as well as seagrasses and other submerged marine species.
Existing wetlands in the vicinity of the airport will be identified and surveyed for general
flora, fauna, and the degree of disturbance. Wetlands will be mapped and classified according
to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services "Classifica-tion of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of
the United States" (1979).
State and federal wetland permitting jurisdiction lines will be staked and surveyed in the
immediate project vicinity, if necessary, to determine acreages of potential impact. Close
coordination with the Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) and U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (COE) will be necessary during this task to identify jurisdictional lines acceptable
to all parties. Dames & Moore will also conduct a joint field inspection with the DER and the
COE.
(b) Salt ponds: Several large "salt ponds" (i.e., old ponds used for the evaporation of
seawater to produce salt) or inland, seawater lakes are located within the project area. These
ponds may be directly or indirectly (via subsurface connections) linked to the ocean and may
contain submerged vegetation, in addition to fringing mangroves. These ponds have become
a very controversial issue in the airport improvement project because of their potentially
unique biological associations.
Dames & Moore will obtain information, if available, on the flora, fauna and water quality of
these ponds. If information is limited, or nonexistent, collections and observations will be
made by Dames & Moore to assess the communities involved. Benthic macroin vertebrates,
fishes and avifauna inhabitating or using these ponds are of particular interest. Any biota
observed will be counted and recorded.
Task 7.12 FloodDlains and floodwaya.
Flood zones within and adjacent to the airport will be determined using the latest and most
accurate resource material available. The extent of the 100-year flood area, as well as the
special flood hazard zones A and V, will be located. This information will be obtained from
several sources at the federal, state and local levels, including: Federal Emergency Management
Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Hazard Boundary Maps; U.S. Geological Survey;
and Monroe County engineering offices.
Any beneficial values, either natural or man-made, of these floodplain areas will be determined
from discussions with agency staff, as well as representatives from civic and environmental
organizations.
Proposed changes in drainage patterns, as well as increased runoff from impervious surfaces
and construction activities will be evaluated and coordinated with the Master Stormwater
Management under development. The Federal Aviation Administration, the Florida Department
of Transportation and Monroe County will be consulted for an historical accounting of
drainage or flooding associated with the existing airport facility.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 14
Task 7.13 Coastal Zone Management Program.
Through the state and local review process it shall be determined if the proposed actions are
consistent with the Coastal Zone Management Program. A discussion and documentation shall
be contained in this section.
Task 7.14 Coastal Barriers.
A review of the Coastal Barriers Resources Act of 1982 shall be undertaken to determine its
applicability to the proposed actions.
Task 7.15 Wild and Scenic Rivers
No impacts to wild and scenic rivers will occur as a result of the proposed actions. This fact
will be included in the Environmental Assessment.
Task 7.16 Farmland
The proposed actions will not require the acquisition of additional property, therefore, this
section is not applicable. This fact will be included in the Environmental Assessment.
Task 7.17 Energy SuRnly and Natural Resources
The additional energy requirements related to the proposed actions shall be determined for
stationary facilities, energy suppliers shall be contacted to document their ability to provide
service. For ground vehicles, an investigation shall be undertaken to determine if access times
are changed appreciably or if a substantial change in movement patterns is likely to occur. For
aircraft, an investigation shall be conducted to determine if there will be changes in flight
patterns or if ground movements or runup times are anticipated to be increased substantially.
Additionally, it shall be noted if any need is identified for natural resources other than fuel
that are in short supply.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 15
Task 7.18 Licht Emission
The potential for the increased annoyance to area residents from new and relocated lighting
shall be evaluated. Measures to reduce or eliminate such annoyance by shielding or other
methods shall be developed.
Task 7.19 Solid Waste Impact
Consultation shall be undertaken with the provider(s) of solid waste collections and disposed
services to determine if: 1) collection services are available; 2) disposal capability is available,
and 3) solid waste disposal facilities exist or are planned within 3000 meters of the runway.
The solid waste provider(s) shall be provided with pertinent solid waste generation data.
Task 7.20 Construction Impacts
The nature of the impacts that will be generated during construction of the project will be
investigated. Impact sources on this project will include noise, fugitive dust generation from
construction equipment and contribution by disturbed land areas to sedimentation of
surrounding bodies of water during heavy rainfall. Temporary measures which will need to
be taken to mitigate construction impacts will be identified. These could include such items
as erosion control, temporary detention basins, runway use (or downtime) during construction
and construction material haul routes. Federal and State Erosion Control requirements will be
made a condition of document approval.
Task 7.21 Other Considerations
To the extent not covered in the Specific Impact Categories enumerated above, the following
additional considerations shall be discussed as they relate to environmental consequences.
1) possible conflicts between the proposed action and the objectives of Federal, Regional,
State (including the Area of Critical State Concern designation for the area), and local
land use plans, policies, and controls for the area concerned;
2) considtency with the adoption applicable Comprehensive Plan;
3) means to mitigate adverse environmental impacts; and
4) degree of controversy on environmental grounds;
5) external loading upon geologic formations.
TASK 8.0 REVIEW PROCESS
For early coordination, a written description of the proposed improvements will be made and
sent to the State clearinghouse for comment. Comments received will be incorporated into the
Environmental Assessment Report.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 16
TASK 9.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
Public participation and agency coordination will play an important role in the successful
completion of the airport improvement project. The Florida Keys and the City of Key West
are two of the most intensely regulated areas in the nation because of their unique natural and
historical resources. Several local environmental and civic organizations actively monitor
every project proposed in the county or city. Public attention already has been raised at this
early stage in the development of the project and is anticipated to increase as the project
proceeds. Controversy focuses primarily around the potential impacts to the surrounding
mangrove and salt pond habitats and disturbances to neighboring residential areas.
Because of this potential controversy, Dames & Moore suggests a very active public
participation program. This program includes the development of a public involvement
strategy, a series of public workshops and meetings, and numerous additional discussions with
agency staff and environmental/conservation organizations.
A Kick-off meeting will be held very shortly after the Notice to Proceed is received. This
meeting will introduce the project, its objectives and the studies that will compose the
Environmental Assessment. The primary function of this kick -of f meeting is to establish the
concerns of the represented agencies and organizations. Attendants at this meeting should
include staff from the following agencies:
• Federal Aviation Administration
• Florida Department of Transportation
• Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
• City of Key West
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• Environmental Protection Agency
• Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission
• Florida Department of Environmental Regulation
• Florida Department of Community Affairs
• Florida Department of Natural Resources
• South Florida Regional Planning Council
• South Florida Water Management District
• Monroe County Planning Organization
• Local environmental organizations
(a) Sierra Club
(b) Izack Walton League
(c) Audubon Society
During the EA process two public workshops will be held to inform the public of the progress
of the ongoing studies and to receive informal input concerning the project. Dames & Moore
will prepare the necessary graphic material and conduct the workshop sessions. Dames & Moore
will ensure that knowledgeable project -level personnel will attend the meetings to address any
issues that might be raised. Issues that cannot be settled at the meetings will be evaluated later
with the appropriate technical staff; all responses will be approved by the Sponsor before
public circulation. Dames & Moore will coordinate post -meeting of forts to ensure that all issues
have been responded to properly. Depending upon the circumstances, follow-up news releases
might be required.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 17
A Public Hearing might be held after the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) has been
completed and made available for public review. The need for a formal public hearing will
be made in coordination with the Sponsor and the FAA. If a formal hearing is required, it will
consist of a brief description of the EA process, findings of the EA studies and an opportunity
for public testimony. All handout material and exhibits for the hearing will be prepared by
Dames & Moore. Additionally, Dames & Moore will draft the newspaper advertisements for
the workshop and hearing for use by the Sponsor in advertising these meetings.
A second Public Hearing may be necessary after completion of the EA. The purpose of this
meeting is to provide the public with the final project results and decisions.
In addition to the four public meetings described above, Dames & Moore will conduct two
workshops with representatives of the reviewing agencies and local environmental
organizations. These meetings will be used to inform the various representatives of progress
on the project, to discuss issues of particular concern to the specific agency or organization as
they arise, and to solicit input during project development.
Frequent informal meetings with the environmental and civic organizations will be essential
to explain the project and allay fears regarding perceived impacts. We believe such meetings
will build trust and minimize the possibility of third party challenges. The meetings with the
agencies will act as preapplication meetings for the subsequent permitting phase.
TASK 10.0 REPORT PREPARATION
The project will result in the preparation of a draft and final EA Report. A preliminary draft
report will be submitted to the Sponsor and FAA, and FDOT for review prior to making it
available to the public. The final EA will also be submitted in preliminary form to the Sponsor
and FDOT prior to submittal of the final report to the FAA. The final EA will include
responses to all substantive comments received from agencies, groups and individuals
throughout the EA process. Responses to all substantive comments received as a result of the
public hearing will also be included in the final EA.
Copies of each of these submittals are as follows:
Preliminary Draft EA - 6 copies
Draft EA - 50 copies
Preliminary Final EA - 6 copies
Final EA - 50 copies
Schedule
Upon Notice to Proceed, we anticipate the preliminary draft EA study would be completed
within five (5) months and a draft EA within six (6) months. The preliminary final EA would
be completed approximately eight (8) months after the Notice to Proceed and final EA
submitted within a nine (9) month time frame.
Completion of Assignment
The project would be considered complete after the Sponsor and FAA have reviewed and
accepted the final EA.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 18
TASK 11.0 AGENCY COORDINATION/PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
Information collected during the development of the Environmental Assessment (EA) will be
used, along with additional related data, to obtain the necessary authorizations and permits for
the airport improvements.
The following discussion outlines the tasks necessary under the permitting of fort; some of these
tasks are integrated into the Public Participation Program discussed in Section 6.7 of the EA
Scope of Services.
e-
TASK 11.1 KICK-OFF MEETING
Kick-off meeting with agency staff; agencies to be included are listed in Section 6.7 of the EA
Scope of Services. This meeting will be used to establish the agency concerns about the project
and any information requirements needed for permitting.
TASK 11.2 PERIODIC MEETIN
Periodic meetings with agency representatives during the collection and evaluation of EA
information. These meetings will ensure that all necessary information for permitting is
obtained during the development of the EA. This concentrated involvement should minimize
time and effort during the agency Completeness Reviews. Meetings with potential third parties
will also play an important role in facilitating the permitting process.
TASK 11.3 AGENCY CONTACTS
Completion of necessary background studies to supplement the various permit applications.
These studies will be completed during the development of the EA.
TASK 11.4 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
Permit applications will require detailed engineering drawings of the project structures as well
as impact and mitigation areas. Such detailed drawings are not required for the EA.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 19
TASK 11.5 PERMIT APPLICATIONS
Completion and submission of the permit applications and authorizations and application fees
to the various agencies. These agencies include:
(a) Florida Department of Environmental Regulation - dredge and fill; mangrove trimming;
Coastal Consistency approval
(b) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Section 404, wetlands fill; Section 10, navigable
waterways dredge and fill
(c) South Florida Water Management District - Management and Storage of Surface Waters
(MSSW), stormwater management
(d) Florida Department of Natural Resources - submerged lands easement
(e) Monroe County - local environmental permits (including the Area of Critical State
Concern approval)
TASK 11.6 COMPLETENESS SURVEY
Response to agency questions during the Completeness Summary Review period. The
application completeness review process is typically lengthy and repetitive with complex or
controversial projects. Dames & Moore will attempt to minimize this portion of the process by
prior meetings with agency permitting staff to establish information requirements.
TASK 11.7 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
Administrative Hearing preparation. Because of the controversial nature of this project, Dames
& Moore believes that a State administrative hearing should be anticipated at the conclusion
of the permitting process.
TASK 12.0 LANDUSE REGULATORY APPROVAL
The Monroe County Zoning Code, in accordance with Section 9.5.252(c)(1), requires a minor
conditional review for airport uses of less than 5,000 square feet of enclosed area. The
proposed terminal expansion will be less than 5,000 square feet and it is assumed that any other
proposed actions will not affect this threshold such that a major conditional review will be
required. Shall a major conditional review be required, the services required to complete a
major conditional review will be outside this Scope of Services.
TASK 12.1 PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE
At the time that the proposed actions are precisely known, Dames & Moore will meet with the
Monroe County planning department in a pre -application conference to determine specific
concerns of the department to determine the local, regional, state and federal agencies that will
be included in the development review.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 20
TASK 12.2 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Dames & Moore shall prepare the apRlication for development approval form provided by
Monroe County for the minor conditional review. In addition, Dames & Moore will prepare or
obtain the following required supporting documents:
• photographs of the site;
• a survey (from existing sources)
• a vegetation survey or habitat analysis (from the Environmental Assessment);
• a landscape plan at a scale of 1" = 40 feet;
• drainage plan (from the stormwater master plan to be prepared under separate
contract by Dames & Moore)
• elevation drawings (from existing sources and architectural drawings to be
parpared by others);
• traffic study, if applicable;
• phasing schedule;
• site plan at a scale of 1" = 40 feet which shall include the following:
1. all areas dimensions of all existing structure (from existing sources) and
proposed structure (from the architectural drawings to be proposed by
others);
2. setbacks;
3. parking and local zone locations and dimensions;
4. landscape plan and any open space preservation areas;
5. improvements for the handicapped, if any;
6. calculations for open space ratio, floor area ratios and parking;
7. outdoor lighting location and type;
8. mean highwater line nad shoreline where applicable;
9. extent and area of wetlands;
10. conceptual flood plans (to be provided by others), and;
11. provision for solid waste separation, storage and removal.
• An 8 1/2" x 11 complete site plan and location map.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 21
TASK 12.3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
After the submittal of the application and the supporting documentation, Dames & Moore will
represent the proposed actions before the Development Review Committee. It is anticipated
that requests for additional information to provide for a complete application can be
accommodated through the information derived from the work effort associated with the
Environmental Assessment or through the separate stormwater management and/or archectural
Scope of Services. Any request for significant additional analysis(es) not outlined above or not
included in other associated work efforts will be considered additional services and will
require a separate Scope of Services.
TASK 13.0 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
In accordance with Chapter 27F02.015, Florida Administrative Code, the following proposed
airport construction projects shall be presumed to be a development of regional impact:
a. a new airport with paved runways;
b. a new paved runway;
C. a new passenger terminal facility;
d. the proposed expansion of an existing runway or terminal facility by 25 percent
or more.
The proposed actions indicate a runway expansion of 600 feet and a terminal expansion of less
than 5,000 square feet. These proposed expansions would not require development of regional
impact review.
Dames & Moore will prepare a letter for review by the Department of Community Affairs
which will fully explain the proposed actions in the content of the applicable development of
regional impact thresholds. The letter will request a clearance letter from the Department
stating that the proposed actions do not require development of regional impact review.
In the event that the proposed actions are recommended to change such that the runway or
terminal expansion exceed the 25 percent threshold and a development of regional impact
review is required, an additional Scope of Services will be prepared. At this time, the
preparation of an Application for Development Approval and the services required to obtain
a Development Order are outside the Scope of Services.
CKWITOISD August 31, 1990 Page 22
TASK ORDER 2
AVIATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MONROE
AND DAMES & MOORE
In accordance with Articles I and II of the Aviation Services Agreement dated the 9 th day
of January 91991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, this Task
Order provides the Authorization for preparation of a Stormwater Management Plan for Key
West International Airport, as set forth in Attachment 1.
NOW THEREFORE, that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
herein, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
A. SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work for this Task Order shall be as indicated on ATTACHMENT 1
hereto, entitled Scope of Work, Stormwater Management Plan, Key West International
Airport.
B. PERIOD OF SERVICE TIME
Consultant will begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of the Task
Order under this Agreement and shall complete the work within the time frame
indicated in Attachment 1; such receipt shall constitute written notice to proceed.
If Consultant's services called for under this Agreement are delayed or suspended in
whole or in part by Sponsor for reasons beyond Consultant's control, the time for
performance shall be adjusted appropriately. If such delay or suspension extends for
more than one year for reasons beyond the Consultant's control, various fees and or
rates of compensation provided for elsewhere in this Agreement shall be subject to
renegotiation. Any change in such fees shall apply only to the unfurnished services as
of the effective date of such change.
C. COMPENSATION
Compensation for the work to be performed under this Task Order shall be in
accordance with Article IV of the approved AGREEMENT dated
January 9, 1991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore as set
forth in Attachment 1. Compensation for basic services shall be a lump sum of fifty
two thousand nine hundred eighty eight dollars ($52,988.00). Compensation For
additional services, shall not exceed a maximum of eighty seven thousand dollars and
no cents ($87,000.00). Invoicing shall be monthly, based on percent completed.
D. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, hereto have made
and executed this Task Order 2 the day and year written.
Con onr�ue_- -/ (SEAL)
By:
ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
Wilhelmina G. Harvey
Title: Mayor/Chairman Deputy •Clerk
Date: January 9, 1991
Title: �Z
Date: .�,7(7
,ppROVED AS TO i0k[
AND LEGAL U lCIENC`�
Y Attorn®t"s Off"
CMRNT02 September 5, 1990
ATTACHMENT 1
TASK ORDER 2
SCOPE OF WORK
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
BEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
COUNTY OF MONROE .
August 2, 1990
TASK ORDER 2
AVIATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
PROPOSED MASTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SCOPE OF WORK
INI1tODUCTION
The following proposed scope of work outlines the tasks necessary to undertake and
complete within a six month time frame a master stormwater management plan for the
Key West International Airport. This management plan will adequately address overall
drainage for the existing, as well as future, development at the airport. Basic services are
presented first, followed by Special Services.
BASIC SERVICES
1.1 Project Coordination
Task 1 will continue throughout the project and will initially involve establishment of
project coordination and clear definition of project objectives. Coordination meetings
are anticipated to follow completion of each major work element. Coordination will be
established with all appropriate agencies including the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the City of Key West,
Monroe County, the Regional Planning Council, and others as appropriate.
1.2 Study Design
In accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circulars and other
applicable federal guidelines, a study design and work program will be developed. The
study design and associated costing will be suitable for incorporation into a planning
grant application for federal funds. As appropriate, attendance will be provided at State
and FAA meetings necessary to obtain State and Federal funding.
In conjunction with FAA, County, and State representatives, the work program will be
designed for applicability to Key West International Airport. Maximum use will be made
of previous studies.
rep0rc3:cto23d.wpf/g9d 1 8/2/90
1.3 Project Initiation
This will follow the review of previous documents, recent correspondence, and the
development of the Scope of Work. An informal project initiation meeting will be
arranged with concerned agencies. A description of the project suitable for agency
dissemination will be provided, with a request to identify issues of concern.
TAM 2 - Data Collectlo% Preliminary Site Aoalwis.and HcgW=ry Criteria Review
Dames & Moore shall:
2.1 Become familiar with project issues including physical site characteristics,
both on -site and off -site, present status of plans, and regulatory criteria.
2.2 Assemble, correlate and evaluate all relevant data including topography,
soils, vegetation, and survey information as well as plats and construction
plans for the study area.
2.3 Review and familiarize itself with previous Stormwater Management studies
in the vicinity, if any.
2.4 Review the regulatory requirements of the Federal, State, Regional and
Local Agencies having jurisdiction over development of Stormwater
Management Facilities in the area. These Agencies include at a minimum
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER)
and Monroe County.
2.5 Determine the type and extent of specific additional information required
in order to design the Master Stormwater Management Plan to assess its
impact on the existing condition.
2.6 Review constraints and criteria of existing permitted and non -permitted
facilities and drainage systems to determine compatibilitywith incorporating
these systems into those new systems proposed by the Stormwater
Management Plan.
To facilitate the successful and timely completion of this task, the County/PBS&J shall
assist to the greatest extent possible in providing useful and historical aerial photographs,
maps and surveys; any local water quantity and quality data and reports; existing and
future land use maps and records; drainage plans and any other information useful to the
project.
rCPOrts:cto2sd.wpf/g9d 2 8/2/90
Dames & Moore shall:
Review all regulatory criteria of agencies with jurisdiction over the
development to establish:
3.1 Other general water management system design criteria.
3.2 Design storm frequency and duration.
3.3 Functional and operational requirements of the completed system (i.e.,
flood protection, peak rate of runoff, etc.)
3.4 Construction constraints related to site (i.e., wetlands, water levels, etc.)
TASK 4 - Evaluate R dsdng Drainage Condidons for the Site
Dames & Moore shall:
Perform specific sub -tasks to evaluate existing drainage conditions:
4.1 Approximation of headwater and tailwater conditions;
4.2 Segmentation of site into sub -basins and compilation of hydrologic
characteristics for each basin including soil characteristics, surface area,
land use characteristics, vegetative cover, slope, flow directions, times of
concentration, existing storage areas, swales and ditches and existing
drainage structures.
4.3 SImulation of existing hydraulics within the site. Input compiled data into
hydrologic and hydraulic models for computer simulations of existing site
conditions.
The results will be used to determine the existing design discharges.
rep0rf,:CW23&wpf/pd 3 8am
. TASK 5 - Prepare Master Stomwater tiignagement Plan
Dames & Moore shall:
5.1 Work with the Airport Authority/PBS&J as needed on the project in locating
proposed stormwater facilities to maximize development of the project
while minimizing environmental impacts and construction costs.
5.2 Utilizing the computer model(s) used in Task 4.3, determine post -
development condition runoff hydrographs and peaks.
5.3 Analyze alternative stormwater management plans developed in Task 5.1,
using the computer model, such that it meets all regulatory requirements
for stormwater discharge.
5.4 Prepare a Master Stormwater Management Plan with documentation and
information as may be required by the FAA, Monroe County and/or SFWMD.
The report will include data collected or generated in Tasks I through V.
Five (5) copies of a draft Final report will be provided to Monroe County.
Comments from Monroe County, FAA and PBS&J will be incorporated into
the Final report and twenty copies of that document will be provided.
5.5 The final Stormwater Management Plan will be in proper form and format
for submittal as a conceptional permit to SFWMD. If SFWMD issues a
Request for Additional Information, (RAI), Dames & Moore will respond to
clarification of the submitted application. Information requested by
SFWMD which is beyond the scope of this contract will be considered
additional services.
Dames & Moore will track the permit through the approval process.
Note:
Items regarding wetland impact issues associated with the SMP will be addressed as part
of the Key West Environmental Assessment.
Discussions with Florida Department of Environmental Regulations (FDER) regarding the
water quality issues of the SW including drainage wells will be addressed as part of the
Key West Environmental Assessment.
After notification to proceed is received, Dames & Moore shall initiate the project. Due
to the Airport Authority's desire to begin construction on or about July 1, 1991, Dames
and Moore will complete the investigations, Stormwater Management Plan report and
repora:cW2sd.wpf/Vd 4 8/2/90
SFWMD conceptual permit submittal within six months. Time frame for approval of the
SFWMD conceptual permit will be dependent upon agency promptness and responses.
A task project schedule is attached.
reports:cW2sd.wpf/Vd 5 8/l/90
TASK 1.1-
Dames & Moore shall subcontract with a qualified aerial photography
company to obtain the following:
1.1.A Black & White aerial photographs and mylars at 200- and 300-foot scales for
the airport and immediate surrounding area.
1.1.B Topographic contours on the 200-foot scale photography at one (1) foot
contour intervals.
1.1.0 Scribing/plotting of major impervious surface outlines on the 200-foot scale
photography.
LLD Correlate topographic and impervious surface data into digital form
(AUTOC.ADD). Monroe County (PBS&J) will be provided with up to four
(4) copies of this information on computer disk.
Note
Services described above are for the preparation of a specific purpose map to be used
for delineating the existing topographic features only and does not purport to provide
a certified boundary survey. The existing boundary survey will be utilized in support
of our work.
1.1.E Color infrared photograph at 200-foot scale of the airport and immediately
surrounding area to be utilized in the Key West Environmental Assessment.
TASK 1.2 - Iznd Survey
1.2.A Provide the ground control survey for the aforementioned topographic map
with reference ties to existing boundary control survey points to NGVD
datum.
1.23 Upon completion of the aerial topographic map, provide detailed surveys
of existing drainage facilities, including swales and ditches, culvert pipes,
etc. Information will include invert elevations, lengths, diameters, etc.
repocu:=2sd.wpf/Vd 6 8/2/90
Dames & Moore shall:
Complete a baseline surface water quality monitoring program to determine
existing characteristics of the site. This monitoring program will consist of
two general parts: stormwater runoff sampling and ambient water quality
sampling.
Stormwater sampling will be completed to determine the quality and
volume of runoff currently being generated at the site by a given rainfall
event. Sampling will occur during one (1) representative storm event at
two (2) locations (to be determined) on or adjacent to the site. Water
quality samples will be collected for laboratory analysis. These samples will
be analyzed for typical surface runoff parameters such as nutrients, oil and
grease, pesticides and metals, as necessary for the project. Rainfall data for
the runoff sampling event will be obtained from the nearest existing source.
Ambient water quality monitoring will include one (1) sampling event at six
(6) locations (to be determined), three (3) within the wetlands adjacent to
the airport facilities, and three (3) in the surrounding receiving waters.
These sites will be analyzed for typical runoff constituents, as well as
salinity, chlorophyll 'W', and any other parameter deemed relevant to the
study.
The samples will be transported to and analyzed by a Florida -certified
analytical laboratory. The results will be used for the background database
and as input to the numerical analysis of the potential. impacts from the
discharge wells, addressed in Special Services Task 2. It is anticipated that
the surface water data collected at the Key West site will be applicable for
the Marathon Airport study, and for other areas with similar physical and
developmental characteristics. These data will also be used to supplement
and support stormwater management permitting efforts for the Key West
and Marathon airports. This water quality information will be analyzed to
determine dominant characteristics and trends. Because the physical
characteristics and urbanization patterns are very similar for both the Key
West and Marathon sites, the water quality data and analysis will be
representative for both project locations.
report3:cW2sd.wpf/Vd 7 8/2/'90
Dames & Moore shall:
2.1 Install up to two deep monitor wells (100' deep maximum) to determine the
geologic stratigraphy near proposed stormwater facilities at the site. These
wells will be used to assess local hydraulic capabilities and provide geologic
information necessary to determine the most efficient design and placement
of drainage disposal wells.
Install up to five shallow monitor wells to assess the shallow subsurface
environment near proposed stormwater facilities at the site. These wells will
be used to provide water table fluctuation and quality data to assess existing
conditions, and to aid in the design and placement of stormwater control
facilities.
2.2 Perform testing necessary to assess groundwater characteristics at the site.
The deep wells will provide information as to the hydraulic capabilities, flow
direction and rate of groundwater transmission with regards to stormwater
discharge. Additionally, any quality testing deemed necessary to evaluate
groundwater flows will be completed. The shallow wells will be used to
record water table elevations and will be tested to the extent necessary to
determine any water quality characteristics vital to the project.
The water level and flow data will be used to design an efficient, permittable
and environmentally sound stormwater control system. The water quality
data will provide existing condition characterizations and will further ensure
the design and construction of a safe, useable and useful stormwater
management system.
2.3.A Provide an adequate numerical demonstration of the extent and
minimization of potential impacts to the surrounding environment that may
be caused by the placement and operation of the wells. The water quantity
and quality data collected under Tasks 2.1 and 2.2 will be used, with other
relevant existing information, to investigate the extent of impacts that may
occur to receiving waters (surface or groundwater) and the local ecology as
a result of the underground discharge of stormwater runoff. A simple
computer model or analytical method will be used as appropriate. Specific
issues to be addressed as necessary will include determining the hydraulic
capacity of the proposed wells to discharge runoff and any subsequent
groundwater mounding that may result, determining the general flow
direction and ultimate receiving area for discharged stormwater, and the
resultant quality of discharged stormwater when it leaves the subsurface
environment.
2.3.B Develop a groundwater monitoring program to be implemented upon
construction of the stormwater management system. This monitoring
repom:cw2sd.wpf/gsd 8 8/2/90
network will document background conditions, and will record any changes
evident in shallow or deep groundwater strata that occur after the
underground discharge of stormwater begins.
The shallow and deep wells constructed under Task 2.1 will form the base
of this network, and will be supplemented if necessary for compliance with
any permitting conditions. Periodic water level measurements and water
quality testing will be performed to develop a database on the performance
of these systems, and will be available to assess future proposed
groundwater well -based stormwater discharge facilities in the Florida Keys.
repores:cW2sd.wpf/Vd 9 8r2/90
Z W
Z 0 U
Z---•--------------- ---------------------......
CL
F- F-
z ,
c Q o
O-•----------------- ................ .......CL . .
W D .
~ 0 _
Q 0-z-
Qv own)•-•----------- --••---•--------•----- --•--- -- Q
v) z W
W W CL --- •-- --- ---------- U
F- N •----•--- -------------- W
� oLLJ F-
. ...... ..-•-••----------•- - - - .............
O
F" o
W
Q m r- N M •- N M
r N M it in In • . . . . .
I- -r N N N
Y Y Y Y Y Y
aaaQaa.
H-F-HE-t-PVfVfNvi6Vi
0 woP,o o�QQ Q Q
N Of CC#i) ^W M
N
aci C " NNE
"'
N CO I. a � ui N N
pp N
N N Go CM co
t7 N O O O O �(f O O O O gf P
N CO m cc N eD N
t �
� 00 N C7 ch O N a
C ch N V Go CD
°' v 4 m
,.� (D N N N Go CY
W)
^ t0 I* .N- a. co N �
CAD <O t0 N N N
ON
a $gym ma aCA ic
c y
Lb
cv dui �� a 3 15 C7 cg
Z 3 chi 4 i4 ; iri i0 i�i
TASK ORDER 3
AVIATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MONROE
AND DAMES & MOORE
In accordance with Articles I and II of the Aviation Services Agreement dated the 9 th day
of January , 1991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, this Task
Order provides the Authorization for preparation of a Stormwater Management Plan for
Marathon Airport as set forth in Attachment 1.
NOW THEREFORE, that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
herein, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
A. SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work for this Task Order shall be as indicated on ATTACHMENT 1
hereto, entitled Scope of Work, Stormwater Management Plan, Marathon Airport.
B. PERIOD OF SERVICE TIME
Consultant will begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of the Task
Order under this Agreement and shall complete the work within the time frame
indicated in Attachment 1; such receipt shall constitute written notice to proceed.
If Consultant's services called for under this Agreement are delayed or suspended in
whole or in part by Sponsor for reasons beyond Consultant's control, the time for
performance shall be adjusted appropriately. If such delay or suspension extends for
more than one year for reasons beyond the Consultant's control, various fees and or
rates of compensation provided for elsewhere in this Agreement shall be subject to
renegotiation. Any change in such fees shall apply only to the unfurnished services as
of the effective date of such change.
C. COMPENSATION
Compensation for the work to be performed under this Task Order shall be in
accordance with Article IV of the approved AGREEMENT dated
January 9, 1991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore as set
forth in Attachment 1. Compensation for basic services shall be a lump sum of fifty
thousand five hundred eighty dollars ($50,580.00). Compensation for special services
shall not exceed a maximum of sixty thousand five hundred thirty dollars and no cents
($60,530.00). Invoicing shall be monthly, based on percent completed.
D. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, hereto have made
and executed this Task Order 3 the day and year written.
County of Monroe (SEAL)
ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
By:
Wilhelmina G. Harvey
,2c'
Title: Mayor/Chairman'
Deputy er
Date: January 9, 1991
W3
CMRNT03 September 5, 1990
APPROVED Av;` 70 ."Chf,.
AND L£GA� SUrr1C1ff-C'
ATTACHMENT 1
TASK ORDER 3
SCOPE OF WORK
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
MARATHON AIRPORT
COUNTY OF MONROE
August 2, 1990
TASK ORDER 3
AVIATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
MARATHON AIRPORT
PROPOSED MASTER STORMWATER MANAGEMENT pJAN
SCOPE OF WORK
INTRODUCTYON
The following proposed scope of work outlines the tasks necessary to undertake and
complete within a six month time frame a master stormwater management plan for the
Marathon Airport. This management plan will adequately address overall drainage for the
existing, as well as future, development at the airport. Basic services are presented first,
followed by Special Services.
• 77 .
1.1 Proiect Coordinatio
Task 1 will continue throughout the project and will Initially involve establishment of
project coordination and clear definition of project objectives. Coordination meetings
are anticipated to follow completion of each major work element. Coordination will be
established with all appropriate agencies including the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the City of Marathon,
Monroe County, the Regional Planning Council, and others as appropriate.
1.2 Study Design
In accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circulars and other
applicable federal guidelines, a study design and work program will be developed. The
study design and associated costing will be suitable for incorporation into a planning
grant application for federal funds. As appropriate, attendance will be provided at State
and FAA meetings necessary to obtain State and Federal funding.
In conjunction with FAA, County, and State representatives, the work program will be
designed for applicability to Marathon Airport. Maximum use will be made of previous
studies.
rep0rts:ccosd3new.wpf/Vd 1 8%2/90
1.3 Proiect Initiation
This will follow the review of previous documents, recent correspondence, and the
development of the Scope of Work. An informal project initiation meeting will be
arranged with concerned agencies. A description of the project suitable for agency
dissemination will be provided, with a request to identify issues of concern.
TASK 2 - Data Collection. P tfl= Site Anaivsis, aW &md Qrr Criteria Review
Dames & Moore shall:
2.1 Become familiar with the project issues including physical site
characteristics, both on -site and off -site, present status of plans, and
regulatory criteria.
2.2 . Assemble, correlate and evaluate all relevant data including topography,
soils, vegetation, and survey information as well as plats and construction
plans for the study area.
2.3 Review and familiarize itself with previous Stormwater Management studies
in the vicinity, if any.
2.4 Review the regulatory requirements of the Federal, State, Regional and
Local Agencies having jurisdiction over development of Stormwater
Management Facilities in the area. These Agencies include at a minimum
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER)
and Monroe County.
2.5 Determine the type and extent of specific additional information required
in order to design the Master Stormwater Management Plan to assess its
impact on the existing condition.
2.6 Review constraints and criteria of existing permitted and non -permitted
facilities and drainage systems to determine compatibilitywith incorporating
these systems into those new systems proposed by the Stormwater
Management Plan.
Note:
To facilitate the successful and timely completion of this task, the County/PBS&J shall
assist to the greatest extent possible in providing useful and historical aerial photographs,
maps and surveys; any local water quantity and quality data and reports; existing and
future land use maps and records; drainage plans and any other information useful to the
project.
reports:ctOK8new.wpf/gsd 2 8/2/90
Dames & Moore shall:
Review all regulatory criteria of agencies with jurisdiction over the
development to establish:
3.1 Other general water management system design criteria.
3.2 Design storm frequency and duration.
3.3 Functional and operational requirements of the completed system (i.e.,
flood protection, peak rate of runoff, etc.)
3.4 Construction constraints related to site (i.e., wetlands, water levels, etc.)
Dames & Moore shall:
Perform specific sub -tasks to evaluate existing drainage conditions:
4.1 Approximation of headwater and tailwater conditions;
4.2 Segmentation of site into sub -basins and compilation of hydrologic
characteristics for each basin including soil characteristics, surface area,
land use characteristics, vegetative cover, slope, flow directions, times of
concentration, existing storage areas, swales and ditches and existing
drainage structures.
4.3 Simulation of existing hydraulics within the site. Input compiled data into
hydrologic and hydraulic models for computer simulations.of existing site
conditions.
The results will be used to determine the existing design discharges.
reports:ccoKBnew.wpf/gsd 3 8/2/90
Dames & Moore shall:
5.1 Work with the Airport Authority/PBS&J as needed on the project in locating
proposed stormwater facilities to maximize development of the project
while minimizing environmental impacts and construction costs.
5.2 Utilizing the computer model(s) used in Task 4.3, determine post -
development condition runoff hydrographs and peaks.
5.3 Analyze alternative stormwater management plans developed in Task 5.1,
using the computer model, such that it meets all regulatory requirements
for stormwater discharge.
5.4 Prepare a Master Stormwater Management Plan with documentation and
information as may be required by the FAA, Monroe County and/or SFWMD.
The report will include data collected or generated in Tasks I through V.
Five (5) copies of a draft Final report will be provided to Monroe County.
Comments from Monroe County, FAA and PBS&J will be incorporated into
the Final report and twenty copies of that document will be provided.
5.5 The final Stormwater Management Plan will be in proper form and format
for submittal as a conceptional permit to SFWMD. If SFWMD issues a
Request for Additional Information, (RAI), Dames & Moore will respond to
clarification of the submitted application. Information requested by
SFWMD which is beyond the scope of this contract will be considered
additional services.
Dames & Moore will track the permit through the approval process.
Note:
Items regarding wetland impact issues associated with the SMP will be addressed as part
of the Marathon Environmental Assessment.
Discussions with Florida Department of Environmental Regulations (FDER) regarding the
water quality issues of the SMP including drainage wells will be addressed as part of the
Marathon Environmental Assessment.
After notification to proceed is received, Dames & Moore shall initiate the project. Due
to the Airport Authority's desire to begin construction on or about July 1, 1991, Dames
and Moore will complete the investigations, Stormwater Management Plan report and
reportt:ctosd3new.wpf/Vd 4 8/2/90
SFWMD conceptual permit submittal within six months. Time frame for approval of the
SFWMD conceptual permit will be dependent upon agency promptness and responses.
A task project schedule is attached.
repocts:ctoed;new.wpf/gad 5 8/2/90
Dames & Moore shall subcontract with a qualified aerial photography
company to obtain the following:
1.1.A Black & White aerial photographs and mylars at 200- and 300-foot scales for
the airport and immediate surrounding area.
1.1.B Topographic contours on the 200-foot scale photography at one (1) foot
contour intervals.
1.1.0 Scribing/plotting of major impervious surface outlines on the 200-foot scale
photography.
1.1.D Correlate topographic and impervious surface data into digital form
(AUTOCADD). Monroe County (PBS&J) will be provided with up to four
(4) copies of this information on computer disk.
Note:
Services described above are for the preparation of a specific purpose map to be used
for delineating the existing topographic features only and does not purport to provide
a certified boundary survey. The eldsting boundary survey will be utilized in support
of our work.
1.1.E Color infrared photograph at 200-foot scale of the airport and immediately
surrounding area to be utilized in the Marathon Environmental Assessment.
- Iznd Surve►
1.2.A Provide the ground control survey for the aforementioned topographic map
with reference ties to existing boundary control survey points to NGVD
datum.
1.2.B Upon completion of the aerial topographic map, provide detailed surveys
of existing drainage facilities, including swales and ditches, culvert pipes,
etc. Information will include invert elevations, lengths, diameters, etc.
repoct8:ctoed3new.wpf/gsd 6 8/2/90
Dames & Moore shall:
2.1 Install up to two deep monitor wells (100' deep maximum) to determine the
geologic stratigraphy near proposed stormwater facilities at the site. These
wells will be used to assess local hydraulic capabilities and provide geologic
information necessary to determine the most efficient design and placement
of drainage disposal wells.
Install up to five shallow monitor wells to assess the shallow subsurface
environment near proposed stormwater facilities at the site. These wells will
be used to provide water table fluctuation and quality data to assess existing
conditions, and to aid in the design and placement of stormwater control
facilities.
2.2 Perform testing necessary to assess groundwater characteristics at the site.
The deep wells will provide information as to the hydraulic capabilities, flow
direction and rate of groundwater transmission with regards to stormwater
discharge. Additionally, any quality testing deemed necessary to evaluate
groundwater flows will be completed. The shallow wells will be used to
record water table elevations and will be tested to the extent necessary to
determine any water quality characteristics vital to the project.
The water level and flow data will be used to design an efficient, permittable
and environmentally sound stormwater control system. The water quality
data will provide existing condition characterizations and will further ensure
the design and construction of a safe, useable and useful stormwater
management system.
2.3.A Provide an adequate numerical demonstration of the extent and
minimization of potential impacts to the surrounding environment that may
be caused by the placement and operation of the wells. The water quantity
and quality data collected under Tasks 2.1 and 2.2 will be used, with other
relevant existing information, to investigate the extent of impacts that may
occur to receiving waters (surface or groundwater) and the local ecology as
a result of the underground discharge of stormwater runoff. A simple
computer model or analytical method will be used as appropriate. Specific
issues to be addressed as necessary will include determining the hydraulic
capacity of the proposed wells to discharge runoff and any subsequent
groundwater mounding that may result, determining the general flow
direction and ultimate receiving area for discharged stormwater, and the
resultant quality of discharged stormwater when it leaves the subsurface
environment.
2.3.B Develop a groundwater monitoring program to be implemented upon
construction of the stormwater management system. This monitoring
reports:ctoK6new.wp1Vgsd 7 8%Z/90
network will document background conditions, and will record any changes
evident in shallow or deep groundwater strata that occur after the
underground discharge of stormwater begins.
The shallow and deep wells constructed under Task 2.1 will form the base
of this network, and will be supplemented if necessary for compliance with
any permitting conditions. Periodic water level measurements and water
quality testing will be performed to develop a database on the performance
of these systems, and will be available to assess future proposed
groundwater well -based stormwater discharge facilities in the Florida Keys.
reports:cUmd3new.wpf/S9d 8 8/2/90
Z
O _Z
Q
w
Z o U
Z..................... -- ..........................
F-. a- p
x o '
Q
O--------------------- - ------
CL W 0
OC '
V
Q Q ~ ..Z.
W---------------............................... Q
z o
c r1 z
w
QQ " - -- w
z
...- -- ........... ..............
O
� o
w
�- N M qq
�- .- N N (v
Y Y Y Y Y Y
V� VI V) V1 to M N V) VI V1 U-
H H H H H H V) V) 0
CO)Wk
N
to
O
NLO
O
00)
tO
S
tgr
Qq
LO V
g
O
g
IA
g g
N
g
a
O;
(d
g C
g
N C
Cf
O- O^ O
Cff tt��
1 O§
0 0
O
�
N O1
0
�
LO O
N O
O O O
co
co
co
cm
cm
Z
tD
t0
<D
10
h
�
N
(D N
CO
N
m
�p
O Ch
N
M
l9
V N
N
N
N
N
tD CID
Of
O
N
r-
Cf
Of
O
<0
I a
C g
E
E
U
aA
W �� aO1cmE
ca
ul
F aU m U. m
a c w
a� �aa y
ci �cv m mCM�f ui tv
�0 �N
Y ��L5�� 0
TASK ORDER 4
AVIATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF MONROE
AND DAMES & MOORE
In accordance with Articles I and II of the Aviation Services Agreement dated the 9 th day
of January ,1991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, this Task
Order provides the Authorization for preparation of a Development of Regional Impact Study
for Marathon Airport as set forth in Attachment 1.
NOW THEREFORE, that in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
herein, the parties do mutually agree as follows:
A. SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work for this Task Order shall be as indicated on ATTACHMENT 1
hereto, entitled Scope of Work, Development'of Regional Impact Study, Marathon
Airport.
B. PERIOD OF SERVICE TIME
Consultant will begin work promptly after receipt of a fully executed copy of the Task
Order under this Agreement and shall complete the work within the time frame
indicated in Attachment 1; such receipt shall constitute written notice to proceed.
If Consultant's services called for under this Agreement are delayed or suspended in
whole or in part by Sponsor for reasons beyond Consultant's control, the time for
performance shall be adjusted appropriately. If such delay or suspension extends for
more than one year for reasons beyond the Consultant's control, various fees and or
rates of compensation provided for elsewhere in this Agreement shall be subject to
renegotiation. Any change in such fees shall apply only to the unfurnished services as
of the effective date of such change.
C. COMPENSATION
Compensation for the work to be performed under this Task Order shall be in
accordance with Article IV of the approved AGREEMENT dated
January 9, 1991 between the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore as set
forth in Attachment 1. Compensation for basic services shall be based on a not to
exceed lump sum fee of one hundred sixty thousand nine hundred ninety four and zero
cents ($160,994.00), subject to reduction in fee and scope following completion of TASK
II.B. Upon completion of Task II.B., any revisions to scope and fee shall be in
accordance with Attachment 1, Summary of Costs, and shall be subject to review and
approval by the State, County, and Consultant. Invoicing shall be monthly, based on
percent complete.
D. SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County of Monroe and Dames & Moore, hereto have made
and executed this Task Order 4 the day and year written.
County of Monroe
By:
Date : January 9, 1991
( SEAL )
ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK
By
Depu Clerk
D—[PatB]cmrnto4.wpf:pse
Dames & Moore
Date: O
TASK ORDER 4
SCOPE OF WORK
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW
_�ji1;,1001 l
JULY, 1990
MARATHON AIRPORT
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
AND MAJOR CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW
STUDY DESIGN
DULY, 1990
I
�►M y; • i► M M���
This study design incorporates the proposed improvements at the Marathon Airport
which include the expansion of the existing terminal building. The proposed
expansion exceeds the 120 percent threshold for determining whether a development
is required to undergo the Development of Regional Impact ( DRI ) review process.
By statute (Ch. 380.06, Florida Statutes), the proposed expansion is a DRI. Monroe
County, in accordance with Section 9.5.252(c)(1) of the Monroe County Zoning Code,
requires a major conditional use review for airport uses of 5,000 square feet or more
of enclosed space. Therefore, in accordance with Ch. 380.06, Florida Statutes and the
Monroe County Zoning Code, DAMES & MOORE will provide the consultant services,
as described in the task outline to follow, necessary to complete the DRI process and
the major conditional use review process.
TASK IA. PROJECT COORDINATION
Dames & Moore will be responsible for the coordination and management
of the DRI review process and the major conditional use review process.
Under separate contract, Reynolds, Smith & Hill will be responsible for
design of the terminal expansion. Together with the CLIENT and the
General Consultant, it will be critical that intercoordination efforts be
maintained throughout the approval process. Coordination meetings and
progress reports are expected to occur throughout the project and
particularly following completion of major tasks. Coordination will also
be required with the reviewing agencies particularly Monroe County, the
South Florida Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of
Community Affairs and the Florida Department of Transportation. This
task assumes a reasonable number of meetings either in Key West,
Marathon or Tampa. This task assumes no more than ten (10) person.
trips to Key West and/or Marathon. Additional person -trips for the
purpose of project coordination shall constitute additional services.
( CP045D.PR0/PAT.B pse ) - 1 - ! 7)n'%Mn ,%
TASK 1.B. STUDY DESIGN
In accordance with applicable federal, state and local guidelines a study
design and work program will be developed. The study design and
associated cost schedule will be suitable for incorporation into a planning
grant application for applicable funds. As appropriate, attendance will
be provided at necessary meetings to obtain funding. The work program
will be designed for applicability with the Marathon Airport, in accordance
with the 1986 Master Plan and reviews by DAMES & MOORE and others
of the Master Plan.
TASK II. COMPLETE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
(ADA) FOR THE DRI
DAMES & MOORE will provide the full range of necessary services to
complete an ADA for submittal to the Department of Community Affairs,
the South Florida Regional Planning Council and Monroe County. The
tasks involved in completing the ADA include:
A. PREPARATION OF PRE -APPLICATION AND TRANSPORTATION
MEMHODOLOGY DOCUMMN'IS
DAMES & MOORE will prepare a project narrative that gives an
overview of the main points of the proposed project based on the
1986 Marathon Airport Master Plan. The project narrative will also
address removal of those DRI questions which are deemed to be
unnecessary and irrelevant to the proposed project. Twenty copies
of the pre -application ( project ) narrative will be forwarded to the
South Florida Regional Planning. Council for their review and
distribution. It is anticipated that prior to submittal to the regional
planning council that a review and comment period will have taken
place with the CLIENT and other consultants, as necessary.
DAMES & MOORE will conduct preliminary transportation analyses
of the proposed terminal expansion and related improvements
concentrating on trip generation. The information will be incor-
porated into a Transportation Methodology document which will
stipulate the procedures to be utilized in performing the DRI
transportation analysis. The document will be forwarded to the
regional planning council after a .review and comment period with
the CLIENT and other consultants ( as necessary ). The basis for
trip generation information will be a review of the 1986 Marathon
Airport Master Plan. : Following the methodology/pre-application
( CT04SD.PRO/PAT.$/pw ) .2 - (7/05/90 )
conference, the Transportation Methodology document will be revised
( if necessary ) and resubmitted as a final methodology statement to
the reviewing agencies.
B. PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE(A)
DAMES & MOORE will present the pre -application narrative to the
South Florida Regional Planning Council in accordance with their
procedures for such pre -application conferences. It may be necessary` or advantageous to meet with the staff of the regional planning
council prior to a full council meeting ( if one is required ).
Additional conferences may be required with Monroe County and the
Department of Community Affairs to specifically address their concerns
and to work with the staffs to remove all unnecessary and irrelevant
DRI questions.
It is anticipated that presentation graphics may be appropriate for
the pre -application conference before the regional planning council.
The graphics associated with the 1986 Marathon Airport Master Plan
will serve as the base maps at this stage in the DRI process. For this
task up to four (a maximum of six person -trips) pre -application
meetings/conferences will be included. Attendance at additional pre.
application meetings/conferences shall constitute additional services.
C. COMPLETED APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL f ADA)
DAMES & MOORE will prepare responses to all DRI questions
remaining after the pre -application conference(s) as described in
Chapter 27-F-2 of the Florida Administrative Code and the rules of
the South Florida Regional Planning Council. The ADA's preparation
assumes a standard phased approach to development and does not
include the analyses required if multiple options for development are
proposed. The DRI process at this stage involves the submittal of
the application ( ADA ), a mandatory thirty -day review period by the
reviewing agencies at the end of which there are generated requests
for additional information. The project team ( the CLIENT, the
General Consultant, RS&H, and DAMES & MOORE ) will review the
requests and provide that information deemed to be important in
preparing the Development Order. Upon submittal of the new
information, a new thirty -day maximum review period is initiated. A
completed ADA occurs when either the project team or the review
agencies declare the ADA sufficient. For purposes of this task order,
responses to a maximum of two rounds of sufficiency questions from
the reviewing agencies will be prepared. Each ADA question is
! CP04MYROMAT.B/Pse) - 3 i 7neann
described in the following text, with a brief explanation of the
approach taken by'DAMES & MOORE In responding to the questions.
1. Questions 1 - 10 - General Appllcallon Information
DAMES & MOORE will provide general data related to the DRI
project. The CLIENT will provide the proper application
signature, ownership information, legal description ( and
boundary survey ) to DAMES & MOORE in response to DRI
Questions f, 4, and 5.
2. Question 11 - Maps
DAMES & MOORE will work closely with the members of the
project team to develop base maps of project location,
topography, existing land use, soils and vegetation, flood zones,
master drainage plan, master development plan, public facility
service areas, projected noise impact areas and transportation
impact areas. An aerial photograph of the project site will also
be adapted into a DRI base map.
3. Question 12 - Proiect Description
DAMES & MOORE will utilize information contained in the 1986
Marathon Airport Master Plan an information provided by
RS&H as the basis for presenting an answer to Question 12.
Such data will include a presentation of existing and proposed
land uses, building area, and parking space provisions, a general
description of the components, purposes, and benefits of the
findings contained in the Master Plan, and a discussion of the site
planning considerations that have been incorporated in the
proposed project design. The information provided in the initial
ADA can be updated as information becomes available through
the terminal design work effort.
4. Question 13 - Air Quality
Air quality impacts are anticipated to be primarily associated
with fugitive dust caused by construction activity and the impact
from ground transportation. Because of the limited air quality
impact anticipated to be generated by the increase in automobile
and truck traffic, no modeling or monitoring is anticipated to be
required. Should the regional planning council or other
reviewing agencies require a modeling and/or monitoring analysis,
DAMES & MOORE will provide a scope of services for the
• _ _ _ required analysis. In accordance with the standard Question 13
( CP04SD.PR0/PAT.B/J- ) -4
requirements, DAMES & MOORE will conduct a total load analysis
for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides. It is
assumed that any potential air quality impacts from aircraft or
from aircraft or automobile parking areas will not be included
in the air quality analysis. If such information is required by the
reviewing agencies, the required analyses will constitute additional
services.
5. Question 14 - Land
DAMES & MOORE will utilize data from the applicable U.S. Soil
Conservation Service. Soil Survey and the results of any available
on -site subsurface investigations to describe all existing soils and
the degree of their limitations for the proposed land uses. The
analysis will also include the identification of any known mineral
deposits or unique geologic formations, and a description of
measures to be taken to control soil erosion.
6. Question 15 - Water Qualia
DAMES & MOORE is conducting a surface water and limited
groundwater analysis under separate contract. It is assumed that
information from this separate Scope of Work will be available
for incorporation into the ADA. If separate or additional
information is required by the reviewing agencies, then the
required analyses and/or information will constitute additional
services.
7. Questions 16 and 18 - Wetlands Vegetadon and Wildlife
DRI Question 16 addresses wetland issues which are anticipated
to require a minimal response. It is the understanding of DAMES
& MOORE that the proposed airport improvements will occur in
upland habitats. DRI Question 18 addresses vegetation and
wildlife. Due to the nature of the existing vegetative communities
on site, only a limited field review will be required to characterize
the existing vegetation and to address the impacts of the
proposed development.
For the wildlife portion of Question 18, DAMES & MOORE will
conduct a literature survey and field review to identify potential
and actual wildlife/endangered species habitat on the project site.
Because of the previously altered nature of the site, it is assumed
that extensive surveys, as outlined in the Florida Game and Fresh
Water Fish Commission's ( FGFWFC ) "Wildlife Methodology
Guidelines For Computing Question 18 of the Application For
Development Approval", will not be required.
( GT 4SD.PRO/PAT.$/pee ) - 5 - f lfInc ,on X
Preliminary investigations have indicated that Florida burrowing
owls ( Athena cunicularia floridana ) may presently inhabit airport
property in the vicinity of the proposed project: The FGFWFC
has designated the burrowing owl as a Species of - Special
Concern. Activities which would negatively Impact a burrowing
owl or its burrow are regulated by Rules 39-9.002 and 39-27.002
of the Wildlife Code of the State of Florida ( Title 39, F.A.C. )
and 16 U.S.C. 703-712, the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
If necessary, DAMES & MOORE will locate the burrowing owl
burrows on the airport site and will coordinate with the Florida
Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service regarding a conceptual management/mitigation
plan. If required, DAMES & MOORE will conduct one guided
field review (a maximum of two person -trips to the project site).
This scope does not include acquisition of the permits to
impact/relocate owls or their burrows or to locate an off -site
relocation site.
DAMES & MOORE will fully communicate the results of the above
described tasks to the CLIENT to provide anticipated environ-
mental concerns and to select the best alternatives to properly
address these concerns.
8. Question 17 - Floodplains
Information from Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood
Information Rate Maps, existing studies, and the drainage analysis
to be conducted under separate contract will be used to deter-
mine floodplain elevations. Methods used to compensate for
flood hazards identified by this analysis will also be discussed.
In addition, DAMES & MOORE will provide a letter of verification
concerning the City's participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program.
9. Question 19 - Historical and Archaeological Sites
DAMES & MOORE will obtain a response from the State Historic
Preservation Officer concerning the likelihood of historical and
archaeological sites occurring within the project area. It is not
anticipated that such sites exist on the property. If an historical
or archaeological survey is required; a separate scope of services
will be provided.
( C 04SD.PRO/PAT.Hdpse ) - 6
( 7ros/go )
10. Question 20 - Employment and Economic Characteristics
DAMES & MOORE will provide estimates of construction and non -
construction ( permanent ) employment, by income group, that
will be generated from the project. The basis for this information
shall be the 1986 Marathon Airport Master Plan and updated
Information as it becomes available from RS&H. Using this
information, DAMES & MOORE will provide a projection of the
estimated construction and non -construction expenditures
generated by the project. Estimates of construction expenditures
will be broken down by type (i.e., labor, materials, professional
services, administration, overhead, etc. ), with an estimate
provided of the percent of expenditures that will be spent within
the region. The discussion of non -construction employment
generated by the project will include an estimate of the
percentage of employees which will be found within the region.
The discussion of construction expenditures generated by the
project will include an estimate of the percentage of these monies
which will be spent within the region, and consider the extent
to which non -construction employment will require specialized
skills or training not available within the region. .
In addition, the direct monetary costs and benefits of the project
to the local government will also be assessed. This analysis will
include an estimate of the average annual ad valorem tax yield
from the proposed development ( using available information on
assessed value, millage rate, exemptions, etc. ) and an estimate
of capital improvement costs that will be borne by the local
government for the installation of public facilities and transporta-
tion improvements necessitated by project development.
Finally, DAMES & MOORE will provide a general discussion of
the market conditions which create the current and expected
future demand for the project.
11. Question 21 - Wastewater Management
DAMES & MOORE will project average daily flows of wastewater
generated by the development, assess the volume and characteris-
tics of its effluent, address the methods and quality of wastewater
treatment and disposal, and address issues related to potential
surface and groundwater contamination .( a portion of this
information will be provided by RS&H ). In addition, DAMES &
MOORS will coordinate with the local government to obtain the
• _ _ _ _ most current information available for plant capacity, potential
( CP04SD.PR0/PAT.S/pse ) - 7 - (7/05/90 )
reuse systems, proximity of transmission facilities, etc., and to
verify the ability to provide service to the project.
12. Question 22 - Draldaee
DAMES & MOORE, under separate contract, will perform a
preliminary drainage analysis in sufficient detail to address pre -
and post -development hydrology and hydraulics of the project's
watershed area and its effect on regional systems. Analyses
performed pursuant to this question will include estimation of
the total acreage and storage capacity of proposed retention
areas, as well as the total acres of proposed impervious surfaces.
The volume and quality of pre -and post -development runoff will
also be assessed, with consideration given to design provisions
which will be utilized to minimize any increase in water runoff
from the site and any consequent degradation of water quality
in the ultimate receiving body. It is assumed that information
from the separate Scope of Work will be available for incorpora-
tion into the ADA and any additional requests for Information.
Any analyses required specifically to answer Question 22 of the
DRI or requests from the reviewing agencies will constitute
additional services.
13. Question 2.3 - Water Su12�ly
DAMES & MOORE will provide a projection of average daily
potable and non -potable water demands, indicate sources of
potable and non -potable water, and provide an inventory of any
wells which may exist on the project site. DAMES & MOORE will
also coordinate with Monroe County to obtain the most current
information regarding plant capacity, proximity of transmission
facilities, etc., and to verify the County's ability to service the
project.
14. Quesdon 24 - Solid Waste
DAMES & MOORE will provide a projection of the average daily
volumes of solid waste to be generated and _disposed of. A
general discussion of the potential for hazardous materials use
or hazardous waste generation and its disposal will also be
presented. In addition, DAMES & MOORE will coordinate with
Monroe County to obtain written verification of the County's
ability to accommodate the project.
ft
( CT+04SWRO/PAT.Row ) c - 8 = (7/05/90 )
15. Question 25 - Ene,•
DAMES & . MOORE will provide a projection of the average daily
and peak hour energy demands for ground vehicles and indicate
source(s) of the energy supply. For aircraft, an investigation shall
be conducted to determine if there will be changes in flight
patterns or if ground movements or runup times are anticipated
to be increased substantially. A general discussion of energy
conservation measures that will be incorporated into site
planning, building design, and equipment selection for the
project will also be provided. In addition, DAMES & MOORE will
obtain written verification of the ability of the applicable local
utility to service the project.
16. Question 26 - Education
DAMES & MOORE will request an exemption from this question.
17. Question 27 - Recreation and Open Space
DAMES & MOORE will request an exemption from this question.
18. Questions 28, 29. 30 - Health Care Police Fire
In coordination with the appropriate local agencies/departments,
DAMES & MOORE will assess the project's impact on health care
facilities, and police and fire services. DAMES & MOORE will also
obtain written verification of the availability and adequacy of
these facilities to serve the project site.
19. Quesdon 31 - Transportation Considerations
a. Inventory
DAMES & MOORE will perform an inventory of the existing
roadway system as necessary for Question 31-A ( Inventory
and Analysis of Existing Conditions ) of the DRI. This
inventory will include compiling available dam from the
appropriate governmental agencies such as: traffic volume
counts; seasonal adjustment factors, traffic signal operations
and roadway improvement programs. If necessary, DAMES &
MOORE will conduct peak hour intersection turning
movements counts within the identified impact area. This task
assumes a maximum of five person -trips to Key West and/or
= Marathon. If additional person -trips are required to complete
the analyses required for Question 31 of .the DRI and
subsequent sufficiency requests from the reviewing agencies,
then such person -trips shall constitute additional services.
( Cr04SD.PR0/*AT.$/pe ) - 9 -
7/ASAA \
DAMES & MOORE will conduct analyses involving the
generation, distribution and assignment of traffic for up to
four phases of development. The traffic forecasting and
project traffic distribution procedures will be performed based
upon available socioeconomic data provided by local
governments. These forecasting and distribution procedures
will involve utilizing transportation planning manual modeling
procedures. The analysis will be based upon the agreed upon
project land uses and demographic data for each phase of the
terminal expansion. The analyses will be accomplished to
provide input to Question 31 of the DRI.
Based upon the findings of the generation, distribution and
assignment of traffic, DAMES & MOORE will conduct an
analysis of project traffic impacts. Detailed p.m. peak hour
capacity analyses for the roadway links and intersections will
be prepared within the project's primary impact area as
defined at the traffic methodology meeting.
20. Question 32 - HousinP
DAMES & MOORE will request an exemption from this question.
21. Question 33 - Specific DRI Information - Airports
Utilizing data obtained from the 1986 Marathon Airport Master
Plan and/or by RS&H, DAMES & MOORE will provide narrative
and tabular information on the existing and projected airport
classification, on the ' number of runways and their lengths, and
on aircraft operations characteristics at the airport ( e.g.,-
enplaned passenger and cargo volumes, aircraft mix, operation
volumes, and flight patterns ).
In addition, DAMES & MOORE will utilize available information
( the results of the Part 150 Study ) to prepare a Noise Exposure
Forecast Map for the existing, and proposed, facility. An analysis
of land use within the airport's existing and proposed flight
patterns will also be presented. If necessary, up to three
additional noise analyses shall be conducted to examine
alternatives. Population impacts within the 65, 70 and 75 Ldn
contours shall be examined.
( Cr04SWRORAT.R/pse ) - lO -
DAMES & MOORE will coordinate with the project team- to
provide projections of the amount and type of subsidiary
development likely to occur on and adjacent to the site ( i.e.,
cargo handling facilities, warehouses, aircraft maintenance
facilities, industrial parks, etc. ). Finally, DAMES & MOORE will
provide a general discussion of existing and proposed transporm-
tion linkages utilized to serve the facility.
DAMES & MOORE will request an exemption from these
questions.
D. REVIEW AND MODIFICATIONS OF ADA DRAFT
DAMES & MOORE will carefully review the draft documents with the
CLIENT and CLIENT's attorney, and make appropriate modifications
prior to submittal. This service does not assume extraordinary changes
to project plans or extensive meeting times. A total of up to six
( 6 ) meetings with the CLIENT and/or public agencies is anticipated.
This task assumes a maximum of six (6) person -trips to Key West
and/or Marathon. Additional meetings and/or person -trips shall
constitute additional services.
E. DRI DOCUMENT PRINTING AND DISTRIBUTTON
DAMES & MOORE will prepare a camera ready (black and white, only)
document of the ADA and any sufficiency response documents for
reproduction and presentation in accordance with DRI guidelines.
This task assumes that up to 60 copies of the ADA and sufficiency
responses shall be provided to the reviewing agencies and to members
of the project team. This task also assumes a maximum of two
sufficiency response. documents. Additional copies and/or additional
rounds of sufficiency responses shall constitute additional services.
TASK M. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DEVELOPMENT ORDER
NEGOTIATIONS
After the ADA application is submitted and found sufficient, DAMES &
MOORE will assist the staff of Monroe County and the County attorney
in preparing a Development Order by reviewing potential conditions,
resolving issues, negotiating with agency staffs, and making presentations
( CT04SD.PR0/PAT.R/pw ) - 11
( 7ros/90 )
to local, regional, and State agencies at the direction of the CLIENT and
the project team. Due to the complexity and uncertainty of the DRI
process, the Development Order preparation and negotiation process can
become protracted with an uncertain level of involvement. To address this
uncertainty and to maintain the project schedule a basic level of effort has
been assumed. This assumption is based on the level of coordination
maintained throughout the project with the project team and the reviewing
agencies; and the willingness of the CLIENT to accept Development Order
Conditions which are not overly onerous or burdensome. The acceptance
of these conditions will facilitate the ability of the project -team to maintain
the project schedule. Accordingly, the basic level of effort will include up
to six ( 6 ) meetings with the CLIENT and project team and the reviewing
agencies. Also included will be minor additional technical analyses, if
necessary. The maximum number of person -trips is assumed to be twelve
(12). Additional meetings, person -trips and/or major analyses shall
constitute additional services.
TASK IV. hWOR CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW
The Monroe County Zoning Code, in accordance with Section
9.5-252(c)(1), requires a major conditional use review for airport uses of
more than 5,000 square feet of enclosed area. The proposed terminal
expansion will be more than 5,000 square feet. To the maximum extent
possible the information generated for the complete ADA will be utilized
to meet the requirements of the major conditional use review.
A. At the time that the proposed actions are precisely known, DAMES
& MOORE will meet with the Monroe County planning department
in a pre -application conference to determine specific concerns of the
department and to determine the local, regional, state and federal
agencies that will be included in the development review. It will be
the intent of Dames & Moore to pursue an agreement whereby the
information provided in the DRI-ADA and subsequent sufficiency
responses will be sufficient to meet or exceed the specific require-
ments of the major use review.
B. DAMES & MOORE shall prepare the application for development
approval form provided by Monroe County for the major conditional
use review. The following list of information is specifically required
by the Monroe County Zoning Code. Following each requirement is
the DRI-ADA equivalent that Dames & Moore assumes will suffice to
meet the requirements of the Zoning Code. If additional information,
maps, analyses or graphics are required for the Major Use Review, they
- - - will constitute additional services.
( G'TCAMPRO/PAT.A/pse ) - 12 - (7/05/90 )
1. An environmental designation survey consisting of
A plan drawn to an appropriate scale ( to be determined at the
pre -application conference and anticipated to coincide with the
DRI scale maps ) showing the following:
location of property;
date, appr :dmane north point and graphic scale;
- acreage within the property;
- boundary lines of the property and their bearings
and distances ( from existing sources );
topography and typical ground cover,
general surface characteristics, water areas and
drainage patterns;
contours of an applicable interval ( to be
determined at the pre -application conference and
anticipated to coincide with the DRI scale map );
one hundred year flood -prone areas by flood
zone;
presently-&w1oped and/or already altered areas
( from the 1986 Marathon Airport Master Plan );
and
location of mean high wager line.
It is anticipated that all of the information required for the
environmental designation survey will be available from the work
effort expended to date for the DRI ( the application of the
major conditional use review documents will lag behind the DRI
process by up to four months ). The environmental designation
survey should correspond to the maps prepared for the DRI-
ADA.
2. A natural vegetation map and/or a map of unique environmental
features. It is anticipated that this map will coincide with Map
D/F of the DRI-ADA and that a separate graphics or map will not
be required.
3. Aerial phonographs of the property and surrounding area ( from
the DRI ).
( CTOISD.PRORAT.$/Ow - 13
4. A review of historical and archaeological sites by the Florida
Division of Archives, History and Records Management It is
anticipated that the letter to be obtained from the State Historic
Preservation Officer will indicate that no such sites are expected
on the property.
S. A review of unique environmental features. It is anticipated that
this section will focus on the burrowing owi ( if any ) and/or to
the habitat available for burrowing owis ( if any ).
6. Actual acreage of specific vegetation species or other environ-
mental considerations ( from the DRI ).
7. General information relating to the property in regard to the
potential impact which development of the site could have on
the area's natural environment an ecology. It is anticipated that
this section will be adequately addressed in responses to
Questions 12, 16 and 18 of the DRI.
8. Environmental Resources: Describe plans for vegetation and
landscaping of cleared sites including a completion schedule for
such work. This requirement will require the input of RS&H
from the terminal expansion design. It is anticipated that
information from RS&H will be available to fulfill this require.
ment.
9. Environmental Resources - Wildlife: Describe the wildlife species
which rest, feed or reside on or adjacent to the proposed site.
Specifically, identify those species considered to be threatened or
endangered. Indicate measures which will be taken to protect
wildlife and their habitats. The DRI generally addresses only on.
site issues. As a result, this requirement will require review of
adjacent properties for wildlife usage.
10. Environmental Resources - Water Quality: Identify any waste-
water disposal areas including stormwater runoA septic tank
drainfields, impervious surfaces, and construction related runoff;
describe anticipated volume and characteristics. Indicate
measures taken to minimise the adverse impacts of these poten-
tial pollution sources upon the quality of the receiving waters
prior to, during and after construction; identify the nearshore
water quality and identify how this development will not
adversely impact the nearshore water quality. Indicate the
-- - - degree to which
any natural drainage patterns have been
( CT04SD.PR0/PAT.B/Pw ) - ]4 • i -yncroh
incorporated into the drainage system of the project This
informatfon will be available from the DRI and from the separate
DAMES & MOORE contact for the surface water analyses.
11. General description of the proposed development - provide a
general written description of the proposed development;
include in this description the proposed phases of development
or operation and facility utilization, target dates for each of
these, and date of completion; in addition, indictee the site size,
development staging and appropriate descriptin measures.
Identify aspects of the project design, such as a clustering which
were incorporated to reduce public facilities oasts and improve
the scenic quality of the development; describe building and
siting specifications which were utilized to reduce hurricane and
fire damage potential to comply with federal flood insurance
regulations and the comprehensive land use plan. It is antici-
pated that the response to Question 12 of the DRI and input
from RS&H will be utilized to meet this requirement.
12. Impact assessment on public facilities and water supply -identify
projected daily potable water demands at the end of each
development phase and specify any consumption rates which
have been assumed for the project; provide proof of coordina-
tion with the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, assess the present
and proposed capacity of the water supply system and the ability
of such system to provide adequate water for the proposed
development; describe measures to ensure that water pressure
and flow will be adequate for fire protection for the type of
construction proposed. It is anticipated that the responses to
.DRI Question 23 will meet this requirement.
13. Public Facilities - Wastewater Management: Provide proof of
coordination with the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services; provide projection of the average flow
of wastewater generated by the development at the end of each
development phase; describe proposed treatment system method
and degree of treatment, quality of effluent; and location of
effluent and sludge disposal areas; identify method and respon-
sibilities for operation and maintenance of fadlities; if public
facilities are to be utilized, provide proof of coordination with
the Monroe County Waste Collection and Disposal District; assess
the present and projected capacity of the treatment and transmis-
slon facilities to provide adequate service to the proposed
( CP04SD.PR0/PAT.B/PW ) - I5 - `•
7/b5M 1
development It is anticipated that the responses to DRI
Question 21 and coordination with RS&H will meet this ' require-
ment
14. Public Facilities - Solid Waste: Identify projected average daily
volume. of solid waste generated by the development at the end
of each phase; indicate proposed methods of treatment and
disposal; provide proof of coordination with Monroe County
Municipal Services District, assess the present and projected
capacity of the solid waste treatment and disposal system and the
ability of such facilities to provide adequate services to the
proposed development; comply with the requirements of Section
9.5-426 of the Zoning Code concerning any applicable traffic
study. It is anticipated that the responses to DRI Question 24
will meet this requirement.
15. Public Facilities - Transportation: Provide a projection of the
expected vehicle trip generation at the completion of each
development phase; describe in terms of external trip genem
tion and average daily and peak hour traffic; if the project is
adjacent to U.S. 1, describe the measures, such as setbaclo and
access limitations, which have been incorporated into the project
design to reduce impacts upon U.S. 1. It is anticipated that the
responses to DRI Question 31 will meet this requirement.
Coordination with RS&H will be necessary to describe the
measures taken .to reduce the impact on U.S. 1. It is anticipated
that responses to agency concerns during the DRI process will
adequately address this requirement.
16. Housing: Although the project does not contain a residential
component, it is anticipated that a discussion will be required
which addresses the proximity of existing housing stock by type,
tenure and cost to accommodate employees of the proposed
development. It is anticipated that a portion of the information
generated during the analysis required for Question 20 of the
ADA will be adequate to respond to this requirement :
17. Special Considerations: Describe the relationship of the
proposed development to the comprehensive land use plan
objectives and policies; also indicate relationships to existing or
proposed public facilities plans and identify any conflicts;
indicate any relationships of the project:to special land use and
development district such as - airport noise and hazard zones,
• _ _ solid or liquid waste treatment or disposal areas; if applicable,
( CP04SD.PRO/PAT.$/pse) -16-
- assess the impact of the proposed development upon other
adjacent or nearby municipalities or counties. It is anticipated
that an expanded discussion will be required to meet this
requirement. To the maximum extent possible, DAMES &
MOORE will utilize applicable DRI responses. DAMES & MOORE
will meet with the Monroe Country planning staff.to determine
additional information which may be required to comply with
this requirement.
C. PUBLIC MEETINGS AND PUB IC HEARINGS
DAMES & MOORE will meet with the planning staff of Monroe
County at the time of submittal of the major conditional review
application. DAMES & MOORE will attend the mandatory meeting
with the Development Review Committee to discuss their comments
and potential conditions to be attached to the development approval.
It is anticipated that a follow-up meeting with the planning staff of
Monroe County will occur approximately one week after the Develop-
ment Review Committee meeting to discuss the need for any changes
to the proposed development or to development conditions. There
are two required public hearings; one before the Planning
Commission and one before the Board of County Commissioners.
DAMES & MOORE will attend these hearings with other members of
the project team. It is anticipated that presentation graphics will be
prepared by both DAMES & MOORE and RS&H and that up to
several .persons within DAMES & MOORE will participate in the
presentation of materials or be available to answer questions.
It is anticipated that the public hearings for the major conditional
use review and the DRI will be coincident. The staff meetings
mentioned above and the Development Review Committee meeting
will be in addition to any DRI meetings. In addition, due to the
sensitivity of the entire Keys area, our scope includes attendance at
a third public hearing which could be the result of a continuance or
as a result of a request for an appeal before the Board of County
Commissioners. This task assumes a maximum of six person -trips to
Key West or Marathon. If additional meetings and/or person -trips are
required specifically to address issues concerned with the Major Use
Review then such meetings and/or person -trips shall constitute
additional services.
( CT04SD.PR0/PAT_B/PW ) - 1-� - i 'Y/A't %n ,
TASK V. ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND MEETINGS
All of the prior tasks assume a conventionaf approach to addressing
regional issues, based upon DAMES & MOORE's recent experience.
Should the agencies require responses to DRI questions that are not
addressed in this Scope of Services, or are not addressed in the project
narrative summary, or should the agencies require any additional studies
not generally required by State of Florida rules or guidelines, DAMES &
MOORE will provide the CLIENT with an addendum to this Agreement
seeking authorization for additional services.
The CLIENT may recommend courses of action or request assessments of
other courses of action in addition to or in replacement of the DRI
process. The most likely addition to the DRI is a Preliminary Develop-
ment Agreement ( PDA ) and the most likely replacement is a Florida
Quality Development ( FQD ) application. With the information to date,
DAMES & MOORE has prepared the Scope of Work for a DRI instead of
an FQD and without a PDA, because it is our opinion that the DRI can
accomplish the objectives of the proposed improvements at the Marathon
Airport. A PDA is of only limited value and an FQD can prove to be as
complex and as lengthy as a DRI provided that the proposed development
.qualities as an FQD. If the course of action changes to include a PDA,
then an additional task will be added to the present Scope of Work. If an
FQD becomes the recommended course of action, then a revised Scope of
Work shall be prepared.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
DAMES & MOORE will provide the services as expeditiously as possible to meet the
schedule developed by the CLIENT and the project team. Please see the attached
project schedule which assumes two dates for the Notice to Proceed: August 15, 1990
or October 1, 1990.
op
i !'Tr%dCn DUn/DA r Ana ♦ _ IQ
HEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICE
It is DAMES & MOORE's responsibility to assist the CLIENT by performing clearly
outlined tasks described in the Scope of Services in order to complete an acceptable
DRI Application for Development Approval and an acceptable. Minor Conditional Use
Application. DAMES & MOORE's services do not Include:
Application fees;
■ Legal fees or services;
■ Survey tasks (if any);
■ Legal description preparation;
• Public notification advertisements; or
. Other items not specifically described in this
proposal.
( CliKSD.PRO/PAT.B/ose 1 ' - 14
O
N q
b 0
1f) N •- •= �0 w N N O• �C
8M 8
8 8
.'
8 8 p 1pp p�
�
W 1D
10 1D
O f N 1� f O O 1►
N
8
O
O O
pf �ep8 p 8
N 1D 1D b A O
N �
10 A
N O O 1D O
O+ O
�� N � � � f O � � lV ��• A � O
071
•
!7 1O
�9 q f .N ^ O
5�8edVC
N !!
� N
CIO tmIt
� � � • f � O
•• N
O^ o
O O• N N N O 8 A {9 ♦ O N O• b a O O O f
l77 N • N O f A N N
• • • N N • • • N • • - - • - f .- - .- .- Q • • O
•
p ^ • •
f •
•
O
O
N
O •
O O
f
•
N
O N• • • g f O f f f••• O
O
O g •• 0 0••' N N N f f f N A O O Q
• • f f
O
N O f 0 N • N O f O
• •- N N
O- A • N N el
d
2
4
Q• : • QQQ C
W J 9 < C C' v
s.e < p
U. Z Q 9 C 7 f <^ .A N N N N N N N A
=CL
c< �U$o:tctc�c�cazctcV��tctcr�scsc�•;~
W Z ° s•• e •• e e• o e• e e o•• o
z o a..: g g s ~o o H 3 > > > N > U> 0> > E
os0>00000000>88>0
m NNVNNNUF1V0 to NNN N NFWtV N
~
N
O
C.
d
g o o g o o 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 l��ii Q^ 3 o I
o CA
o R • V.: *
M
N
1.00000 O N� 0 0 0 0 0 0" O
O ADD � • h ' � r
h' N -0
♦ N
S44O O O O O O� NO O O O N N O
� `'J o
40
M
O O O O O O O S O O O O O O Este
N � $ e
O 0 0 0 0 0 O w O o 0 0 0 0 0 p N^ o
CIA11�9 wD
N • co ♦ O
U �y
!9 f O A
N
z
c�
w N • N N
N ~ N O N
S r,
9 O _
•
•
IL o
= 02 U$ i$ E O s Y e
.-C 3T_ 01 5 $ o f
ozAi>>u5u`i3v 3c��x $ N
Q rip f �tV!7f 1po►•aa =V V
C Y 1 m m m m m m m m in m m m m adO m m m U~ N _ fA • f f f f f f f• f• f f f f• f f f i (O� - •
d
v
�
g
o
>
c
_
X
•c