01/08/1992 AgreementMONROE COUNTY
LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (YEAR 2010)
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this f th day of 11im- 1992,
by and between the MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO RS,
Monroe County, Florida referred to as the "CLIENT", and Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.,
also identified as "BA", with offices located at 5310 N.W. 33rd Avenue, Fort Lauderdale,
Florida 33309, hereinafter referred to as the "CONSULTANT".
WHEREAS, the CLIENT has determined that it is necessary, expedient, and to the best
interest of the CLIENT to retain a CONSULTANT to render and perform consulting and
other professional services in connection with the preparation of long-range travel demand
forecasts for Monroe County using the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model
Structure (FSUTMS).
WHEREAS, the CLIENT desires to engage the CONSULTANT on a contract basis, for
work assignments, as per the authorization procedures hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
SECTION 1. EMPLOYMENT OF THE CONSULTANT
The CLIENT hereby engages the CONSULTANT and the CONSULTANT agrees to
perform services hereinafter described.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The CONSULTANT shall do, perform and carry out in a professional and proper manner
certain duties related to the preparation of a Long -Range Travel Demand Forecast and
related studies. The Basic Scope of Services - Exhibit "A" - is attached hereto and made a
part of this agreement. Such work shall be carried out in the following phases of effort:
Task 1
Data Review
Task 2
Data Gathering
Task 3
Socio- Economic Data
Task 4
Build Network & Zones
Task 5
Model Calbration/Validation
Additional tasks (Tasks 6 and 7 as defined in Section 6 and Exhibit "A") will be carried out
after completion of this Scope of Services in accordance with schedules of performance and
scopes of work which shall be mutually agreed to by CLIENT and CONSULTANT.
SECTION 3. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES
The CLIENT shall complete the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services
of the CONSULTANT:
3.1 Provide all best available data and base maps as to the CLIENT's
requirements for Work Assignments including the employment and population
data from the City of Key West referred to in Task 3 of Exhibit "A".
Designate in writing a person with authority to act on the CLIENT's behalf
on all matters concerning the Work Assignment.
3.2 Furnish to the CONSULTANT all existing plans, studies, reports, and other
available data pertinent to the work described in Exhibit "A", and obtain or
provide additional reports and data as required by the CONSULTANT. The
CONSULTANT shall be entitled to use and rely upon such information and
services provided by the CLIENT or others in performing the
CONSULTANT's services.
3.3 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for the CONSULTANT to
enter upon public and private property as is reasonably required, and legally
allowed, for the CONSULTANT to perform services hereunder. Any
obstruction to such access by private property owners shall not constitute a
basis for waiver of any other required entries on to public and private
property, nor shall it provide a basis for termination of the contract. In the
event that such access is so obstructed, CONSULTANT and CLIENT shall
work together to resolve the difficulty in a timely manner.
3.4 Perform such other functions as are indicated in Exhibit "A" including but not
limited to scheduling all meetings, work sessions, and hearings associated with
the performance of the CONSULTANT's work, including preparation of
minutes and records.
3.5 Designate the members of the Technical Committee (as referenced in Tasks
6 and 7 of Exhibit "A") and schedule all Technical Committee meetings.
F
SECTION 4. TIME OF COMPLETION
The services to be rendered by the Consultant shall be commenced upon written notice from
the CLIENT and the work shall be completed in accordance with the following schedule,
unless it shall be modified in a signed document, by the mutual consent of the CLIENT and
CONSULTANT.
Submit deliverables for Tasks 1-5 as specified in Section 6 and Exhibit "A' within 8
months of the date specified on page 1 of the agreement.
SUBSEQUENT SERVICES shall be performed in accordance with schedules of
performance which shall be mutually agreed to by CLIENT and CONSULTANT.
SECTION 5. COMPENSATION
The CLIENT agrees to pay the CONSULTANT on the lump sum basis of EIGHTY-FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($85,000) for Phase 1 (Tasks 1-5) as identified in Exhibit "A",
including all direct expenses (as per Section 112.061 Florida Statutes) associated herewith.
Additional services, including but not limited to Phase 2 (Tasks 6-7) and meetings beyond
those specified in Exhibit "A", shall be reimbursed based on CONSULTANT's hourly rates
with direct expense reimbursement per Section 112.061 Florida Statutes, or as additional
lump sum payments as may be mutually agreed by CLIENT and CONSULTANT. Any
disagreement regarding which items are reimbursable shall be submitted to the County Clerk
for determination and whose decision shall be final.
SECTION 6. PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT
6.1 CONSULTANT shall submit periodic invoices for services rendered by the
CONSULTANT and Subconsultants based on the following schedule of deliverables
consistent with the BASIC SCOPE OF SERVICES, EXHIBIT "A".
3
Task
Descd9tion
Fee
Deliverables
1
Data Review
$ 5,000
Technical Memorandum
2
Data Gathering
$35,000
Origin-DestinationSuuveySummaries
3
Socio-Economic Data
$15,000
Z Data Input Forms
4
Budd Network & Zones
$ 5,000
Digitized Maps
5
Model Calibration/Validation
$25,000
Validated Assignment Model
6
Long -Range Transportation Plan
$25,000
Draft Technical Report
7
Public Involvement
$ 5,000
Final Report
The CLIENT shall make payments in response to CONSULTANTS's interim
statements within forty-five (45) days of the statement date. However, the CLIENT
shall make payments within sixty (60) days of the final statement date.
6.2 If the CLIENT fails to make any payment due to the CONSULTANT for services
and expenses within sixty (60) days after the interim statement dates, or within
seventy-five (75) days after the final statement date, the CONSULTANT may, after
giving seven (7) days written notice to the CLIENT, suspend services until the
CONSULTANT has been paid in full all amounts due for services.
SECTION 7. AUTHORIZATION OF WORK ASSIGNMENTS
7.1 All work assignments beyond or in addition to EXHIBIT "A' shall be authorized in
a signed document in accordance with the CLIENT's policy prior to any work being
conducted by the CONSULTANT.
7.2 Additional authorizations may contain additional instructions or provisions specific to
the authorized work for the purpose of clarifying certain aspects of this Agreement
pertinent to the work to be undertaken. Such supplemental instruction or provisions
shall not be construed as a modification of this Agreement. Authorizations shall be
dated and serially numbered.
SECTION 8. COST CONTROL
8.1 The CLIENT's budgetary requirements and considerations in respect of the Work
Assignments shall be set forth in said Work Assignment.
4
&2 Opinions of probable construction cost, financial evaluations, and feasibility studies
prepared by the CONSULTANT under the Work Assignment will be made on the
basis of the CONSULTANT's best judgement as an experienced and qualified
professional. It is recognized, however, that the CONSULTANT does not have
control over the cost of labor, material, equipment, or services furnished by others or
over market conditions or contractor's methods of determining their prices, and that
any utilitarian evaluation of any facility to be constructed or work to be performed
on the basis of the Work Assignment must be of necessity speculative. Accordingly,
the CONSULTANT does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual costs will not
vary from opinions, evaluations, or studies submitted by the CONSULTANT to the
CLIENT thereunder.
SECTION 9. NOTICES
All notices, requests and authorizations provided for herein shall be in a signed document
and shall be delivered or mailed to the addresses as follows:
To the CLIENT: Monroe County Division of Growth Management
5100 College Road West, Wing 3
Key West, Florida 33040-4399
Attention: Mark Rosch
Capital Improvements Coordinator
To the CONSULTANT: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
5310 N.W. 33rd Avenue, Suite 206
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
Attention: John D. Zegeer, P.E.
Principal Associate
or addressed to either party at such other address as such party shall hereinafter furnish to
the other party in writing. Each such notice, request, or authorization shall be deemed to
have been duly given when so delivered, or, if mailed, when deposited in the mails,
registered, postage paid.
5
SECTION 10. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
10.1 All documents created or prepared by CONSULTANT and which are necessary for
the fulfillment of this agreement, including reproducible copies of original drawings,
estimates, specifications, field notes, and data are and remain in the property of the
CLIENT. In the event the CLIENT uses said documents on any projects not covered
in this contract, it shall indemnify and save harmless CONSULTANT from all
damages, including legal fees and costs, resulting from the reuse of said documents.
10.2 This Agreement may be terminated by either party with or without cause by thirty
(30) days's written notice to the other party. In the event of any termination,
CONSULTANT will be paid for all services rendered and reimbursable expenses
incurred to date of termination. CLIENT will receive all work product performed,
in whatever manner, as of the date of termination.
10.3 The CLIENT and CONSULTANT each is hereby bound and the partners, successors,
executors, administrators, and legal representatives of the CLIENT and
CONSULTANT (and to the extent permitted by paragraph 10.4 the assigns of the
CLIENT and CONSULTANT) are hereby bound to the other party of this
Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators, and legal
representative (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants,
agreements, and obligations of this Agreement.
10.4 The CONSULTANT shall not assign, sublet, or transfer any rights under or interest
in (including, but without limitations, moneys that may become due or moneys that
are due) this Agreement or subsequent Work Assignment without the written consent
of the other, except to the extent that any assignment, subletting, or transfer is
mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless
specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to any assignment, no
assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under
this Agreement. The CLIENT hereby acknowledges and approves the following
subconsultants:
Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc.
This subconsultant list shall be amended only upon signed written consent which may
be mutually agreed to by CLIENT and CONSULTANT. The use of the listed
subconsultants by CONSULTANT shall not be considered an assignation, subletting,
or transferral of rights otherwise precluded by this paragraph.
10.5 Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this
Agreement to anyone other than the CLIENT and CONSULTANT, and all duties
and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and
exclusive benefit of the CLIENT and CONSULTANT and not for the benefit of any
other party.
10.6 This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between CLIENT and
CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior written or oral understandings. This
Agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified, or canceled by a written
instrument duly executed by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners and
the CONSULTANT, provided that the scope of services may be modified by a written
agreement executed by the Director of Growth Management and CONSULTANT,
consistent with Section 7 of this Agreement.
10.7 CONSULTANT warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT to
solicit or secure this Agreement and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee
working solely for the CONSULTANT any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement.
10.8 In the carrying out of this Agreement, CONSULTANT will not discriminate against
any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, creed, color or
national origin. In carrying out this Agreement, CONSULTANT will take affirmative
action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
employment without regard to their sex, race, creed, color, or national origin. Such
action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Upgrading, demotion or
transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or
other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and
applicants for employment, such notices as may be provided by the CLIENT setting
forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.
10.9 This Agreement shall be governed by the Laws of the State of Florida.
7
SECTION 11. INDEMNMCATION
The CONSULTANT does hereby consent and agree to indemnify and hold harmless the
County, its Mayor, the Board of County Commissioners, appointed Boards and Commissions,
Officers, and the Employees, and any other agents, individually and collectively, from all
fines, suits, claims, demands, actions, costs, obligations, attorneys fees, or liability of any kind
arising out of the sole negligent actions of the CONSULTANT or substantial and
unnecessary delay caused by the willful nonperformance of the CONSULTANT and shall
be solely responsible and answerable for any and all accidents or injuries to persons or
property arising out of its performance of this contract. The amount and type of insurance
coverage requirements set forth hereunder shall in no way be construed as limiting the scope
of indemnity set forth in this paragraph. The CLIENT does hereby covenant and agree to
indemnify and save harmless the CONSULTANT from any fines, suits, claims, demands,
actions, costs obligations, attorney fees, or liability of any kind resulting from a negligent act
or omission by the County, its Mayor, the Board of County Commissioners, appointed
Boards and Commissions, Officers, and Employees, individually and collectively under the
provisions and up to the limits of liability as stated in section 768.28 F.S. Further the
CONSULTANT agrees to defend and pay all legal costs attendant to acts attributable to the
sole negligent act of the CONSULTANT.
At all times and for all purposes hereunder, the CONSULTANT is an independent
contractor and not an employee of the Board of County Commissioners. No statement
contained in this Agreement shall be construed so as to find the CONSULTANT or any of
his/her employees, contractors, servants or agents to be employees of the Board of County
Commissioners for Monroe County. As an independent contractor the CONSULTANT shall
provide independent, professional judgment and comply with all federal, state, and local
statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations applicable to the services to be provided.
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of its work,
plan, supporting data, and other documents prepared or compiled under its obligation for
this project, and shall correct at its expense all significant errors or omissions therein which
may be disclosed. The cost of the work necessary to correct those errors attributable to the
CONSULTANT any damage incurred by the CLIENT as a result of additional costs caused
by such errors shall be chargeable to the CONSULTANT. This provision shall not apply
to any maps, official records, contracts, or other data that may be provided by the County
or other public or semi-public agencies.
The CONSULTANT agrees that no charges or claims for damages shall be made by it for
any delays or hindrances attributable to the CLIENT during the progress of any portion of
the services specified in this contract. Such delays or hindrances, if any, shall be
1.1
compensated for by the County by an extension of time for a reasonable period for the
CONSULTANT to complete the work schedule. Such an agreement shall be made between
the parties.
SECTION 12. INSURANCE POLICIES
The CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain a standard General Liability Insurance
Policy and a Professional Liability Insurance Policy in a minimum limit of $1,000,000 in
coverage on each policy. The County shall be named on the General Liability Insurance
Policy as an additionally named insured and shown on the insurance certificate provided to
the County by the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall provide the County a
certificate of Professional Liability Insurance coverage. The CONSULTANT shall also
procure and maintain workman's compensation policy and hold the County harmless from
all claims arising thereunder. Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the scope of
indemnity set forth above. The certificates shall provide that if the policies are canceled by
the insurance company or CONSULTANT during the term of the Contract, thirty (30) days
written notice prior to the effective date of such cancellation will be given to the Director
of Management Services.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed
on the --- day of J& K ka rd► , 1992.
Signed sealed and delivered in the
presence of: By:
DANNY, I YO iAC , Cle£k ,I
Attest: e&
�C •
f 70`
Approved as to legal sufficiency:
U�� I By:
Witness
Wilhelmina Harvey, Mayor
Date: /- fl' 9 dg
WILLIAM J. MCDO iALD?D?
TREASURER FOR:
Barry D. Lundberg
Executive Vice President
9 V,
EXHIBIT "A"
Basic Scope of Services
The project consists of developing long range travel demand forecasts for Monroe County
using the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS). Several
unique features of Monroe County will require special consideration during model
development. Those features include: tourist travel, resulting in a high proportion of
external trips; linear configuration of the highway network; and the linear configuration of
the zonal structure for the model. The project will be divided into seven tasks, with the
products and responsibilities for completion outlined as follows.
TASK 1: DATA COMPILATION AND REVIEW
Because of the initial data collection activities which have been completed for the Traffic
Element of the Comprehensive Plan Update, the plans, studies, maps, traffic data, and
reports in the CONSULTANT'S files will be evaluated as to their quality and completeness.
Deliverable: The results of this evaluation will be documented in a technical memorandum
(that documents the data compilation and review) and presented to Monroe County and
FDOT representatives (Meeting 1).
TASK 2: DATA GATHERING/DATA DEVELOPMENT
Trip generation rate and traffic count data have already been collected and summarized.
Travel time surveys have been conducted for 24 segments on US-1 in March 1991- the peak
month for traffic activity in the Keys. Origin -Destination surveys will be conducted on U.S.
1 and Card Sound Road by the CONSULTANT for this project to supplement the 1985
surveys already conducted on U.S. 1. Two-day surveys at seven locations will be conducted
to identify trip length and trip purpose characteristics during winter season activity for both
seasonal and permanent residents. Deliverable: The results of these new surveys as well as
summaries of the previous sets of surveys and counts will be summarized in tabular form
suitable for input into the statistical data files for the analysis.
TASK 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA DEVELOPMENT
Monroe County staff will review 1990 census data (population and households).
CONSULTANT will categorize population by resident and seasonal/tourist population and
will summarize resident population residing in Monroe County during peak and off-peak
seasons if available from previous studies. This existing data will be subdivided for analysis
purposes into Planning Area/Enumeration District (PAED) or Block Numbering Area, or
group of Keys. Monroe County staff will obtain employment and population data for the
County and from the City of Key West in a form and level of detail compatible with data
obtained for the remainder of the County and provide this data to the CONSULTANT
(Meeting 2).
10
The CONSULTANT will perform a field verification of countywide employment data
(provided by Monroe County staff) to verify the locations of employment centers and
isolated employment areas throughout the County. The CONSULTANT will distinguish
between public sector and private sector employment, estimate seasonal fluctuations in
employment, and estimate the relationship of employees per square foot for office,
commercial and industrial space as it varies from nationally accepted standards as
determined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
The CONSULTANT and Monroe County staff will then together develop Years 1990, 2000
and 2010 socio-economic data in close cooperation with the Land -Use Plan scenarios
developed by the Wallace, Roberts & Todd Comprehensive Planning effort. Deliverable:
The results of this task will be documented in tabular form on ZDATA Input Forms. This
data and the growth implications which are projected will be presented to the public in a
workshop format (Meeting 3).
TASK 4: NETWORK AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE DEVELOPMENT
Utilizing the same 1" to 2000' scale base mylar for Monroe County that is the basis for the
Comprehensive Plan map series, the CONSULTANT will digitize the Monroe County map
data in a coordinate format consistent with that utilized by the Florida Standard Urban
Transportation Modeling Structure (FSUTMS). The data that will be digitized will include
the Monroe County boundaries, the transportation analysis zones, the centroids relating to
the socio-economic data, the nodes and centroid connectors to the regional roadway
network, the Year 1990 roadway network, the Year 2000 roadway and the Year 2010
roadway network. Deliverable: The digitized maps will be presented to FDOT and Monroe
County for their review (Meeting 4).
TASK 5: MODEL CALIBRATIONNALIDATION
Socio-economic data from the County will be reviewed for each zone to ensure proper
coding. LUCHECK will be run to review the S.E. Data Base. Preliminary runs will review
the zone structure for consistency to find problem areas before running the Trip Generation
Model (ex. school enrollment/dwelling unit). Any information on ratios or zonal structure
that have potential problems will be reviewed with the County to assure adequate ZDATA
and zone structure. Additional zones may be required in the study area and will be
coordinated with the County. Trip Generation will be checked with preliminary runs of the
general model (GEN). Special generators (ZDATA3) will be added as needed in the study
area.
The 1990 base year highway network (LINKS, XY Data Input) will be reviewed and errors
will be found by the use of NEDS and plotting for number of lanes, area type, facility type
and distance (location of XY coordinates). XY errors will be determined by comparing plots
to actual street maps. On screen and physical plots will be analyzed to confirm paths
(HPATH) throughout the network. TCARDS will be added to the links and XY data sets
11
as needed for restrictive movements in the network. Traffic counts will also be reviewed for
accuracy in annual, seasonal and daily variations. The 1990 Network will be examined
closely to assure proper representation of links and nodes to the network system.
Validation
The FSUTMS model chain will be used to validate the Monroe County Model on the micro-
computer. The chain of programs to run for the validation is EXTERNAL, GEN, HPATH,
DISTRIB, MODE, HASSIGN, HEVAL and HPLOT. The main product to be achieved
from this analysis is a validated model ready to forecast and evaluate future travel on varying
highway networks. External Origin -Destination Trips will be obtained from the Monroe
County surveys. The remainder of the difference of the total trips, at the stations, will be
coded in the ZDATA 4 files as external -internal trips. Future external trips at the stations
will be coordinated with the County to insure adequate and accurate growth rates to apply
to each station. The unique characteristics in Monroe County, including the linear roadway
network, tourist travel and the E-I (daytripper) activity will be carefully considered.
Spreadsheets on Lotus will be developed to account for determining future screenline
projections. There will be no external -external (E-E) trips.
THR Generation Model (GEN)
The Seven Purpose FSUTMS Trip Generation Model will be used for preliminary runs to
help determine initial impacts in the TAZ's. The analysis to validate the Trip Generation
Model will be accomplished at two different levels. The first level of analysis will consider
and analyze the Trip Generation Model impacts alone. The performance of the Trip
Generation Model will be determined by comparing ratios against the standardized tables
such as persons/household, vehicles/household, trips/household, trips/person, and
trips/employee. The trip rate matrix (GRATES) and the dwelling unit weights
(DUWEIGHT) will be reviewed for their adaptability to the Monroe County area. Model
adjustment will be made at this level of analysis until the complete set is run.
The second level of analysis will review the Trip Generation results after the completed
model chain has been run. The traffic assignment will be reviewed with actual traffic counts
to help determine the need for special generators. Special Generators will not be utilized
unless there is no alternate except to put them in. If Special Generators are included in the
ZDATA 3 format, their characteristics will be identifiable for future modeling efforts.
Adjustments to the Trip Generation Model will not be made until the entire model chain
has been run, analyzed, and reviewed by the County (Meeting 5).
Trip Distribution Model (DISTRIB)
The average trip length, trip length frequency and the percentage of intrazonal trips by
purpose will be reviewed during runs of the Gravity Model with comparison of available data
from other areas. Ground count comparisons, screenline comparisons and cutline
12
comparisons will be made. Trip Length and Friction Factors will be used to validate the
Trip Distribution Model. To validate the Trip Distribution Model, three methods of
comparison will be made. The first check will compare the Monroe County Trip
Distribution Model output with other urban areas. The second check will include reviewing
the ground counts and assigned volumes at screenlines, cut lines and cordon lines. The third
check will review the travel time characteristics of Monroe County for travel time and
distance per traveler. Trip distribution paths will be reviewed using plots and the HPATH
program. As needed, the LINKS and XY files will be updated.
Auto Occupancy Model (MODE)
The standard mode split model developed in the "Urban Transportation Planning Model
Update ... Phase III" will be used to derive triptables for assignment to the highway network.
Modal shares estimated by the model and sensitivity of traffic assignment to transportation
system variables will be documented. The modes for the model are:
Drive alone auto
Two occupant auto
Three or more occupant auto
Triptables by purpose will be the output of this model. These triptables can be used to
model various trip interchanges for evaluating the impact of priority treatment for high
occupancy vehicles and parking policies.
Traffic Assignment Model (HASSIGN)
Validation of the Traffic Assignment Model (HASSIGN) will include a statistical check on
the relation of assignment volumes to actual ground counts. The incremental summaries
report includes a Percent Root Mean Square Error (%RMSE) by volume groups, by total
area, and on a link by link basis. This report will be used to check the assignment and
determine the overall performance of the model. Equilibrium loading up to 10 iterations
of capacity restraint will be used. HEVAL will be used to also help determine Vehicle Miles
of Travel (VMT) and Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) output to determine comparisons to
be made. Comparisons will be made at screenlines, cut lines, cordons, along specific
corridors, within the facility type, area type and number of lanes matrix and the study area
level.
Deliverable: Traffic assignment comparisons will be evaluated by providing color coded plots
of the network with counts and loads being compared. These plots will be reviewed for
inconsistent patterns of travel due to errors in the network or traffic counts. Corrections will
be made when errors are found in traffic counts and network coding.
13
Reiterations
As changes are made for the validation of the Traffic Assignment Model the network speed
can affect traffic distribution. Therefore, the distribution model will be checked for needed
changes and the process will continue through the model chain. If Trip Distribution tests
indicate changes are to be made in the Trip Distribution Model, then the model chain will
be followed until no changes are needed in the other model.
TASK 6: LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT
The overall objective of Task 6 is to develop Year 2000 and Year 2010 Cost Feasible Long
Range Transportation Plans that can be considered for adoption and implementation by the
state and county. By simulating future travel desires and traffic volumes, the
CONSULTANT will list the future problem areas and recommend improvements to the
roadway network. An Existing Plus Committed (E+C) Network will be created with Year
2000 and Year 2010 socio-economic data assigned to the network. This future travel
demand will be used to develop a Year 2010 Needs Plan. Once a 2010 Needs Plan is
developed, then the Year 2000 and Year 2010 Cost Feasible Plans can be planned for
Monroe County. In the development of each plan, the decision making process will involve
trade-offs from Goals and Objectives (provided by Monroe County), neighborhood impact,
economic impact, environmental impact, and financial resources in the County. The
priorities used for these trade-offs will be identified by Monroe County and FDOT based
on a matrix of issues provided by the CONSULTANT.
Preparation of alternative future networks will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT
in this task. This will include coding and debugging the following networks, plus all
alternatives from those networks:
- 2010 E+C Network
- 2010 Needs Plan
- 2010 Cost Feasible Plan
- 2000 Interim Cost Feasible Plan
The 2010 Needs Plan will be developed by assigning the 2010 triptable to the E+C Network
and adding facilities (new, additional lanes) or recommending TSM measures (ridesharing
or one way pairs using parallel portions of Old U.S. 1) to satisfy travel demand. Committed
projects from the Monroe County Roadway Plan will be added to the 1990 Base Year
Network to develop the E+C Network. The Monroe County and FDOT staff will provide
assistance in developing detailed transportation alternatives (Meeting 6). Recommendations
from the Technical Committee will be considered in the development of alternatives
(Meeting 7).
Cost estimates will be obtained from FDOT for the alternatives for new roadway
construction and Right -of -Way acquisition. This will allow for a comparison of the relative
14
cost between alternatives and for use in the development of the Year 2010 Cost Feasible
Plan. Deliverable: Draft Technical Report - The CONSULTANT will present in tabular
form, a comparison of alternatives and comparisons to ascertain the degree to which each
of the alternatives accomplishes the various goals and objectives for Monroe County
(Meeting 8).
TASK 7: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
The CONSULTANT will meet with Monroe County and FDOT staff to review their input
into the process and to plan for the presentation graphics and tabular formats for the
Technical Committee and County Commission (Meeting 9). After input has been received
from the County and FDOT staff, the CONSULTANT will make the appropriate
adjustments and the Needs Plan Alternatives will be reanalyzed, if necessary.
The Monroe County Commission will review all alternatives presented and select the 2010
Needs Plan before the 2010 Cost Feasible Plan is developed (Meeting 10). A similar
meeting will be held with the City of Key West Commission (Meeting 11). Once the 2010
Needs Plan has been developed, the 2010 Cost Feasible Plan will be developed as a subset
from the Needs Plan. The development of the 2010 Cost Feasible Plan will require input
as to the financial resources anticipated to be utilized so that a Cost Feasible Plan can be
implemented by the County and State agencies. Projected revenues by year will be provided
by County staff. Goals, Objectives, and Policies approved by the County Commission will
be used to help develop the 2010 Cost Feasible Plan.
Various cost feasible plans will be run on the FSUTMS model chain to review the
advantages and disadvantages of each. The various alternatives will be listed in order of
preference for review by the County. In this task the financial resources available in the
County will be reviewed with the 2010 Needs Plan to determine the ability of the County to
pay for its travel demand. The consequences of not being able to pay for the Needs Plan
will be identified by illustrating the reduced levels of service and restricted urban growth.
The County staff will approve the Year 2010 Cost Feasible Plan for presentation at the
Public Hearing (Meeting 12).
The 2010 Cost Feasible Plan will be presented at one Public Hearing with all of the logic
and alternatives used in the background to arrive with its development. The County staff
will schedule and advertise for the public hearing and provide Visual Aids for the
presentation. The CONSULTANT will present the 2010 Cost Feasible Plan and respond
to questions. If necessary, the County will provide the personnel needed to provide a public
record of the hearing. After the public hearing, responses will be reviewed with the County
and FDOT staff (Meeting 13). After the County, FDOT, and CONSULTANT have
reviewed the comments from the Public Hearing, changes to the 2010 Cost Feasible Plan
will be made, if necessary. The FSUTMS model chain will be used to analyze any necessary
changes. A final tested 2010 Cost Feasible Plan will then be provided.
15
Transfer of Data to Monroe County Microcomputer
During the preparation of the Model, the CONSULTANT will provide to Monroe County
and FDOT data input and output as needed on both MS-DOS based 5 1/4" diskettes and
printed hard copy. Deliverable: CONSULTANT will provide a one day training course for
five staff members from Monroe County and the City of Key West. (Meeting 14). Final data
sets will be delivered for the following alternatives:
1.
1990 Validated Plan
2.
2010 Needs Plan
3.
2010 Cost Feasible Plan
4.
2000 Interim Plan
All activities in Task 6 and 7 will be documented in a Technical Report, including alternative
plans and recommendations. The County will approve the contents of the summaries,
appendix, and information to be included in the report. Tabular and Plan illustrations will
be included for the 1990 Validated Plan, 2010 Needs Plan, and 2010 Cost Feasible Plan in
the Technical Report. Five draft copies of this report will be submitted to Monroe County
and FDOT for their review (Meeting 15). Deliverable: After the County and FDOT review,
the preliminary report will be finalized into one camera-ready copy of the final report and
will be submitted to the Monroe County staff for printing.
16
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEL:1-305-292-4538 Dec 23,91
17:18 No.013 P.03
SWORN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 287.133(3)(a),
FLORIDA VAn= ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES
REOCEIVE
..
JAPE 0 3 1992
PLANNING DEPT.
LAND USE DIVISION
THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND SWORN TO IN THE PRESENCE OF A NOTA &-p -
OTHER OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO ADMINISTER OATHS.
1. This sworn statement is submitted to N10NROE COUNTY
[println" of the ubiic entltyj
by John David Zegeer, Principal Associat
[print individual's name and title] •e "+,*�
for BARTON-ASCMIAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
[print name of entity submitting sworn statement]
whose business address is 5310 N.W. 33rd Avenue, Suite 206,
Fort LaWerdal e Florida 33309
and (if applicable) its Federal Employer Identification Number (FAIN) is. 36-2388053
(If the entity has no FEIN, include the Social Security Number of the individual signing this sworn
statement: )
2. I understand that a 'public entity crime as defined in Paragraph 287.133(i)(g), P4Qrida statutes.
• means a violation of aay state or federal law by a person with' respect to and directly related to
the transaction of business with any public entity or with an agency or political subdivision of any
other state or of the United States, including, but not limited to, any bid or contract for goods or
services to bo provided to any public entity or an agency or political subdivision of any other state
or of the United States and involving antitrust, fraud, chart, bribery, collusion, racketeering,
conspiracy, or material misrepresentation.
3. I understand that 'convicted! or `conviction' as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(b), Florida statutes,
means a finding of guilt or a conviction of a public entity crime, with or without an adjudication of
Fullit, in any federal or state trial court of record relating to charges brought by indictment or
u mation after July 1,1989, as a result of a Jury verdict, nonjury trial, or entry of a plea of guilty
or nolo contendere.
4. 1 understand that an "affiliate" as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(a), Florida Statutes, means:
1. A predecessor or successor of a person convicted of a public entity crime; or
2. An entity under the control of any natural person who is active in the management of the entity
and who has been convicted of a public entity crime. The term 'affiliate" includes those oMcers,
directors, executives, partners, shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active In the
management of an affiliate. The ownership by one person of sham constituting a controlling
interest in another person, or a pooling of equipment or income among persons when not for fair
market value under an arm's length agreement, shall be a prima facie case that one person controls
another person. A person who knowingly enters into a joint venture with a person who has been
convicted of a public entity crime in Florida during the preceding 36 months shall be considered
an affiliate.
5. I understand that a "person' as defined in Paragraph 287.133(1)(e), IoQrldg sit tute8, means any
L natural person or entity organized under the laws of any state or of the United States with the legal
power to enter into a binding contract and which bids or applies to bid on contracts for the provision
of goods or services let by a public entity, or which otherwise transacts or applies to transact business
with a public entity. The term "person" includes those officers, directors,, executives, partners,
shareholders, employees, members, and agents who are active in management of an entity.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEL:1-305-292-4538 Dec 23,91 17:19 No.013 P.04
6. Based on information and belief, the statement which I have marked below is true in relation to _
the entity submitting this sworn statement. [indicate which statement applies.]
X Neither the entity submitting this sworn statement, nor any of its officers, directors, executives,
partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the
entity, nor any affiliate of the entity has boon charged with and convicted of a public entity crime
subsequent to July 1, 1989.
,,,_,,,_The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of its officers, directors, executives,
partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the
entity, or an affiliate of the entity bas been charged with and convicted of a public entity crime
subsequent to July 1, 1989.
The entity submitting this sworn statement, or one or more of its officers, directors, executives,
partners, shareholders, employees, members, or agents who are active in the management of the
entity, or an MUste of the entity'has boon charged with and convicted of a public entity crime
subsequent to July 1, 1989. However, there has been a subsequent proceeding before a Hearing
Officer of the State of Florida, Division of Administrative Hearings and the Final Order entered by
the Hearing Officer determined that it was not in the public interest to place the entity submitting
this sworn statement on the convicted vendor list. [attach a copy of the Anal order]
I UNDERSTAND THAT THE SUBMISSION OF THIS FORM TO THE CONTRACTING, OFFICER FOR
THE PUBLIC TNTITY IDENTIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 1 (ONE) ABOVE IS FOR THAT PUBLIC ENTrff
ONLY AND, THAT THIS FORM IS VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31 OF THE CALENDAR YEAR IN
WHICII IT IS FILED. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT I AM REQUIRED TO INFORM TIM PUBLIC
ENTITY PRIOR TO ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT IN EXCESS OF THE THRESHOLD AMOUNT
PROVIDED IN SECTION 287.017, FLORIDA STATtITFS FOR CATEGORY TWO OF ANY CHANGE IN
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM.
STATE OF rzO)ei D "t�- -
COUNTY OF fi-�jb
[si a
December 30, 1991
[date]
Ts ONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,
2 who, after first being sworn by me, affixed his/her signature
[name of individual signingj
In the space provided above on this ✓ 0 day of 192-1.
Wly C3rnmission expires:
trDTA.CY ?"flt.'!'
MY COt'It!.,SSty":� EXP!^ES ' ' 15,, 1992
BONDED TH; U H',CKLE8 ,,Ry & A bOCI"TES
Form PUR 7068 (Rev. 04/10/91)
SWORN STATEMENT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 10-3.990
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
MICS CLAUSE
BARTON-ASCH4AN ASSOCIATES, INC.
warrants that lie/it has not employed,
retained or otherwise had act on his/its behalf any former County officer
or employee in voliation of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 10-I990 or any
County officer or employee in violation of Section 3 of ordinance No.
10-1990. For breach or violation of this provision the County may, in
its discretion, terminate this contract without liability and may also,
in its discretion, deduct from the contract or purchase price, or
otherwise recover, the fulX amount of any fee, commission, percentage,
gift, or consideration paid to the former County officer or employee.
L(sign r
ember 30, 9
Date _..__.._...W __
STATE OF
FZ0101 /)R-
COUNTY OF bAax)_. --
PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,
._........... who, after first being sworn by me,
affixed his/her signature (name of individual signing) in the space .
provided above on this ,___" 2--_- _day of
TARY PUBLIC
Y.y cvmMigaion. expires:
+CTP.RY P1'8 , , ��T,_
MY Y a5 a'v
130NDED T J H E, t
r
NSURANCE
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE 1S ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER OF CA NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
3550 WILSHIRE BLVD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
LOS ANGELES, CA
90010 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
PHONE213-385-5211
----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
INSURED COMPANY LETTER A NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPANY LETTER B
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
820 DAVIS STREET COMPANY LETTER C
EVANSTON, IL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
60204 COMPANY LETTER D
------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPANY LETTER E
> COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY
PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO
WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO
ALL TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LTRI TYPE OF INSURANCE I POLICY NUMBER I POLDICY ATEEFF--IPOLDATEEXP- IALLLIMITSINTHOUSANDS
--- I -------------------------------- I -- - - --- --- - --- -- - I!
-.------ - -- ----
A
A
A
GENERAL LIABILITY
K] COMMERCIAL GEN LIABILITY
[ ] K1 CLAIMS MADE [ ] OCC.
D11 OWNER'S & CONTRACTORS
PROTECTIVE
KI PROFESSIONAL LIAB
I
------------------------------
AUTOMOBILE LIAB
K] ANY AUTO
IN] ALL OWNED AUTOS
K] SCHEDULED AUTOS
N] HIRED AUTOS
KI NON -OWNED AUTOS
[ ] GARAGE LIABILITY
------------------------------
EXCESS LIABILITY
[ ] UMBRELLA FORM
[ I OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
--------------------------------
WORKERS' COMP
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIAB
-
OTHER
GL3252595BA
BA1427628 TX)
BA1427629 AOS)
WC1232079(CA)
WC1232081(AOS)
---------------------------
06/19/91
106/19/92
----------------------------
06/19/91 06/19/92
06/19/91 06/19/92
GENERAL AGGREGATE
2000
---------------------
PRODS-COMP/OPS AGG.
-----------
---------------------
PERS. & ADVG. INJURY
-----------
---------------------
EACH OCCURRENCE
-----------
1000
---------------------
FIRE DAMAGE
-----------
(ANY ONE FIRE)
---------------------
-----------
MEDICAL EXPENSE
(ANY ONE PERSON)
---------------------
CSL
---------------------
-----------
1000
BODILY INJURY
-----------
(PER PERSON)
---------------------
-----------
BODILY INJURY
(PER ACCIDENT)
PROPERTY
---------------------------------
EACH OCC
I
AGGREGATE
---------------------------------
STATUTORY
1000 EACH ACC
1000 DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT
1 0 0 ODISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE
----
SPECIAL PER ATTACHMENT.
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
BE: FSUTMS Contract
> CERTIFICATE HOLDER <_______________________________> CANCELLATION <___________________--------__--------------____-------------
-----------------------------------
= SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX-
MONROE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. = PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30
MARK RO S CH = DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT
5100 COLLEGE ROAD WEST = FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF
KEY WEST, FL = ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS S OR REPRESENTATIVES.
33040 ---------------- ----- -----------J ----- -- ----------------
ACORD 25-S (3/88)
= AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /
= L
t
Special Clauses attaching to Certificate of Insurance
Issued to: Monroe County Planning Dept.
Dated: 1 /3/92
Insured: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Cancellation Notice
It is agreed that, in the event of cancellation or material change in the
aforementioned policy(ies), the Certificate Holder shall be given thirty (30) days
prior written notice.
Additional Insured
Except as respects Workers' Compensation and solely as respects work
performed by the named insured, the Certificate Holder is included as an
additional insured but only to the extent of the named insured's negligence.
Attachment to Acord Form 25-S
'@'w � :F".�-�$.�j6�vYa. •,r' µi "f>fr i $ � �� _ .. v ���_ iLe'�i I� - _—
ui�r�s^�''�C.��ze��5r.ti�s�;'�»��