Miscellaneous--- —POST,-BUCKLEY,-SCHUH--8.-fERNIGAN,-IN£------------- '--
_ - 8600 N.W. 36TH STREET _
_ MIAMI. FLORIDA 33166
305/592-7275
--- 800/"3-7275 FL ----- ----- - --- - ---- -
September 21, 1989 e"", I
el
General Asphalt Co., Inc.
P. 0. Box 522306
Miami, FL 33152
Attn.: Mr. Royal S. Webster Jr., Vice President
RE: Marathon Airport - "Sealcoat Existing G/A Aircraft Parking Apron - Eastside;
Construct and Sealcoat New G/A Aircraft Parking Apron - Westside; Construct
200 "Blast Pads and Stage I of Stabilized Safety Areas".
FAA AIP Project No. 3-12-0044-0788
FDOT WPI Project No's. 6826639, 6826691, 6826650
Gentlemen:
This is to confirm our telephone conversation of this morning wherein we advised
you of the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners direction to us at their
meeting of September 20, 1989, to notify you in accordance with Paragraph 80-06
of the General Conditions of the Contract Documents to temporarilly suspend,
until further notice, all work in connection only with Schedule B of the
referenced Contract Documents, i.e. "Construct and Sealcoat New G/A Aircraft
Parking Apron-Westside"
The effective date of this order to temporarilly suspend in part the work is
therefore September 21, 1989.
Patrick J. Rebull� P.E.
Director, Airports Division
Received by:
Date:
PJR/mv
cc: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
Danny Kolhage, Clerk, Monroe County 7
Randy Ludacer, Monroe County Attorney
Capt. Brown, County Administrator
Peter Horton, Assistant County Administrator
Art Skelly, Director, Monroe County Airports
Charles Knighton, Manager, Marathon Airport
Gordon Shepardson, FAA -ADO
Len Bivens, FDOT - District 6
01-476.10
PJR/mv003
ENGINEERING PLANNING --ARC- HiTECTURE—__
BRANCH OFFICE
3117 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY
MARATHON, FLORIDA 33050
TEL. 1305) 743-9036
��ouNr�
4 yJJM CU���� �G9
3. •�'. ;gip
.......... .
1!E COVMTY,t �`y
;Dannp 1. R10109e
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
MONROE COUNTY
500 WHITEHEAD STREET
KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040
TEL. (305) 294-4641
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Those Listed Below
From: Rosalie L. Connolly, Deputy Clerk
Date: October 19, 1989
BRANCH OFFICE
P.O. BOX 379
PLANTATION KEY, FLORIDA 33070
TEL. (305) 852-9253
Attached hereto is a copy of a self-explanatory letter from
the Florida Department of Transportation regarding the Marathon
Airport apron problem. This correspondence was sent to the
Clerk's Office for distribution to you.
Rosalie L. Cnolly
Deputy Clerk
Attachment
Copies To: Mayor Michael Puto
Commissioner Wilhelmina Harvey
Commissioner Douglas Jones
Commissioner Eugene Lytton
Commissioner John Stormont
File
A
FLORIDA - = DEPARTMENT
BOB MARTMEZ .�
aovERnoR -■�
District Six
1000 N.W. lllth Avenue
Miami, Florida 33172
(305) 470-5197
October 11, 1989
Mr. William L. Todd, P.E.
Vice President
Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc.
8600 N.W. 36th Street
Miami, Florida 33166
OF TRANSPORTATIOI
RE: General Aviation Aircraft Apron Construction
West Side - Marathon Airport
FDOT WPI: 6826691
Dear Mr. Todd:
KATZ N. MZMrM
SECRETARY
The following is offered as further clarification of the Department's
position in response to your October 4, 1989 letter.
The Department has determined that the original apron design is
inadequate and does not provide a useful and useable product for the
future of Marathon Airport. The primary reason for this statement is
the fact the base material was not adequately protected from ground
water intrusion. Having construction experience in Monroe County,
your engineers should have been aware of the high water table, the
nature of the area surrounding this site, and the Department's minimum
standard criteria for pavements regarding the base clearance above the
design high water elevation.
The FAA Airport Drainage Advisory Circular 150/5320-5B, provides
guidance in the design and maintenance of airport drainage systems.
Not only does the Advisory Circular address applying sound engineering
principles, but it also states: "When a high water table does exist,
provision should be made for controlling or lowering it - or
alternatively raising the pavement grades."(Chapter 1, paragraph le.)
It would appear evident that due to the high water table along with
the elevation characteristics of this project site, raising the
pavement grades would be the alternative. In paragraph 2c the
statement is made: " The most dangerous consequence of inadequate
drainage systems are saturation of the subgrade and subbase, damage to
slopes by erosion, loss of load -bearing capacity of paved surfaces,
and excessive ponding of water." Then in paragraph 22 it states:
"Poor construction leads to progressive deterioration and endless
maintenance and reconstruction problems."
Mr. William L. Todd, P.E.
October 11, 1989
Page Two
If in fact your original design protected the base materials from
ground water intrusion, we invite and would appreciate the design
criteria and the calculations that show this to be the case.
As to the Department's suggestions contained in our September 18, 1989
letter to Captain Tom Brown, they were provided as recommended
solutions to Monroe County and should be viewed as such. We feel the
design needs to satisfy the future apron expansion to the west and the
future connector to the taxiway. The FAA Airport Apron Advisory
Circular 150/5335-2, indicates that "apron slopes or grades should be
kept to the minimum consistent with local drainage requirements." A
0.2% up to a maximum of 0.5% slope on the apron would be acceptable as
long as the concern of water intrusion into the base material is
addressed. The location, elevation, and capacity of the French drain
system is a decision you will be required to make -once you ultimately
decide on a final apron design. The above is a position agreed on by
my local staff as well as the engineering staff of the Aviation Office
in Tallahassee.
Monroe County can rest assured that the Department desires to fund and
participate in an amount equal to one-half of the non-federal share of
this project providing the final design has both FAA and Department
approval. It is suggested that Monroe County should verify the FAA's
current position regarding the project design and funding
participation.
In addition, you are advised that the Joint Participation Agreement
between Monroe County and the Department contains at least three (3)
provisions that apply in this situation. First is paragraph 2.4,
which requires the submission and approval of documents as listed in
Exhibit "C", i.e. Plans and Specifications. Second is paragraph
11.00, which addresses the authorization of project Audit and
Inspections. Lastly, is paragraph 15.00, which deals directly with
the approval of Plans and Specifications.
It is felt that in view of the field inspection made by the FAA and
Department personnel on June 30, 1989, and the immediate concerns
expressed in subsequent correspondence by Mr. Shepardson (FAA)
(attached) and Mr. Bivins (FDOT) (attached) the problem with the
existing project grades, as being constructed, was cause to go back
and review this project design. At that time, it was obvious that
sufficient information was not provided to staff to enable them to
foresee the possibility of a drainage problem. Had elevations west
and north of the project construction area and ground water table data
been provided, staff may have identified this potential problem.
Mr. William L. Todd, P.E.
October 11, 1989
Page Three
It is further pointed out that your own Resident Project
Representative, Ms. D. L. Moscone, in a June 30, 1989 letter
(attached) to Mr. Webster of General Asphalt, identified the
elevation problems being encountered on site and stated: "Post Buckley
drainage engineers were reviewing the plans and would establish
contours that would accommodate the existing field conditions."
Undoubtedly, your September 6, 1989 design revision of the apron was
accomplished to satisfy this situation. If in fact the original
design was adequate, why was the September 6, 1989 design revision
made?
We feel our actions, in this situation, have only been taken in the
best interest of Monroe County, the FAA, the FDOT, and the aviation
future of Marathon Airport.
Sinc 7rely,
C/rrDistrict Secrery
Attachments
cc: Monroe County Commission
Danny Kohlage, County Clerk
Randy Ludacer, County Attorney
Capt. Tom Brown, County Administrator
Peter Horton, Assistant County Administrator
Art Skelly, Airports Director
Charles Knighton, Marathon Airport Manager
Gordon Shepardson, Project Manager, FAA -Orlando ADO
Jack Johnson, Aviation Office Manager, FDOT Tallahassee
Len Bivins, Aviation Programs Administrator, FDOT Miami
. ARON I L
1W 4
.4 Ott. !P-7
Z7
Olt
M,
V4
_ ;: ..'{3~; Ft...,t:.::''.)%•.:'";;.'y't:�.in.'y�,�i��Vr•:i+`;' Ov
es
. .16
4i
1p
1�6
t
tlik*ctar Ajvp4ojrt
For lf*ot* Ii tit" tiesi
Po
21101 94ftt% 'Ravlovard
1C
I aq 4. Imc tie
Uva t less of her
appe-Gra.,th eadof
-agree
t%& Sk t�412t:', -**Ot*. west carike'
V, so *be* t two fe&t 1"t - r 410
drop Islet movt%Wvst*. kbe. &pros Is. abo, of 'at .2
0, + tk4it ft - .
VIVO* 4)VA44 Qr it t
Appealro t"t-Abe%vestorky portion of the SOm'. 7*111
water rat'istice or** sales the .9rad** is Vale'''
by
it
round 'oe
f'o near
of the
ex t#iaa
mr P It
a&VASO U0
W.%st4ctione
will b*.
Pv0b2*u tee 1roury
twiit' the aprva vill: teat fle4d 'i'lld'
normal
A100P
It the apron
grade is *x-a'Joed .0goaq
, . -to allem
se3entxc'c of water
in the area
Oct 1x"d1mt*2y'c&rr1
aWAT by
thw otorm drainsqo'
4FY*t*m vw*t
of tvU* *glow JIAW*d "L"
plea-beerplea-beeri6divate
%ov *tars
water retontiou will be provid*d f
I f f.. he
J!vroa is vxp4nd*4 farther
to thv
west.
Project tarAver
cc Pat. Xivbul 1
• Lon Sliftne
I.1 ORID
BOB MARTlrmz
GOVrRPtOR
r
A DEPARTMENT OF
Multi -Modal Programs Office
602 South Miami Avenue
Miami, Florida 33130
July.5, 1989
Mr. A. R. Skelly
Director of Airports
Key West International Airport
3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd.
Key West, Florida 33040
TMNSPORTATIG
ISAYL tC HL'm[I
SLCRLTAin
RE: WPI# 6826654 Expand, Sealcoat and Stripe Commercial "
Aircraft Apron Key West Int'1 Airport - Monroe County
WPIn 6826691'• Gen. Avn. Aircraft Apron
Marathon Airport - Monroe County
Dear Mr. Skelly,
This letter references the final inspection meeting Phil
Sellers and I attended at Key West Airport on June 291989.
Those in attendance were: ,
Len Bivins - FDOT
Phil Sellers - FDOT
Gordon Shepardson - FAA
Pat Rebull - PBS&J
Donna Mosconne - PBS&J
Art Skelly - EYW Airport
Charles Knighton - MTH Airport
In the future, it is requested that written notification be
provided regarding: important inspection/meeting times,
dates, location and meeting agenda. This, ''I thought the
meeting was ... at such 'n' such a time...", I feel is
inconsiderate, unprofessional, inconvenient,'and costly for`'
the condensed business schedules of today. Time ismoney!
It was obvious and evident that Gordon, Phil, and I were not
satisfied with the condition of -the Key West project. The
following discrepancies were noted.
The premature sealcoat cracking and separation is
unacceptable.
Taxiway lights (blue) behind marked parking area should be
removed or replaced with red lenses.
French drain area ponding adjacent to pavement. Pavement
in this area does not appear to meet P-401 standards.
Page Two
July 5, 1989
Mr. Skelly
Multiple "Bird Baths" on ramp and in front of Delta
Connection.
Sodding replacement for dead sod adjacent to taxiway.
Later that afternoon, Gordon and I visited the Marathon
Airport to inspect the progress of on -going projects. It
was suggested by Charles Knighton that there was a low '
elevation problem involving the G/A ramp project area that
could cause water runoff ponding. Gordon and I agreed that
there appeared to be a design problem and Pat Rebull should
be notified as soon as possible for design verification. I
understand that a 2 foot elevation discrepancy in the plans
must be corrected.
The above project items at Key West and Marathon Airports
shall not be eligible for Florida Department of
Transportation funding participation until such time the
condition/discrepancy is properly corrected, reinspected,
and approved jointly by the FAA and the Department.
Additionally, I must stress the need for SAFETY on and around
the Marathon airport active runway, taxiways and aircraft
parking areas. I am not satisfied with the aircraft taxi
routes in and around the construction area. Aircraft are
forced to taxi off paved taxiways, around barriers and
across unimproved areas to reach the runway. I feel that
appropriate signage, reconfigured routes, and temporary
improvements can provide safe aircraft and construction
routes during the Marathon project.
While on site, I witnessed a construction truck driving
closely (est. 5-10 feet) around a small Cessna, doing a
preflight run-up, and then down an active taxiway faster
than necessary. Incursions to the active aircraft
operations area shall not be expected or tolerated. Please
educate the construction personnel regarding liability,
operation safety, and provide for violation enforcement.
Please advise when corrective action is completed and the
projects are ready for reinspection.
Page Three
July 5, 1989
Mr. Skelly
Sincerely,
Lenwell J. Bivins, Jr.
District Aviation Specialist
cc: Phil Sellers, Aviation Office, Tallahassee
Gordon Shepardson, FAA, Orlando ADO
Peter Horton, Assistant Monroe County Manager
Charles Knighton, Manager, Marathon Airport
Pat Rebull, PBS&J
Donna Mosconne, PBS&J
y
POST, BUCKLEY; SCHUH 8, JERNIGAN, INC.
PB $13 WHITEHEAD STREET
KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040
305/294-6376
¢ S
MEMORAMDUM JUL
71;
TO Royal Webster, General Asphalt
FROM: D.L. Moscone, Resident Project Representative WOW
DATE: June 30, 1989
SUBJECT: MARATHON AIRPORT
"Sealcoat Existing G/A Aircraft Parking Apron -
Eastside; Construct New G/A Aircraft Parking Apron -
Westside; Construct 200' Blast Pads and Stabilized Safety
FAA Aip Proj. No. 3-12-0044-0788
FDOT WPI Proj. No. 6826639, 91, & 50
Engineer's Proj. No. 01.476.51
It was brought to my attention by Charles Knighton that your sub-
contractor was having a problem with the grades. An on -site
inspection by Mr. Knighton and myself, accompanied by Gordon
Shepardson of the FAA and Len Bivins of the FDOT, revealed that in
the extreem S.W. corner of the new G/A apron under construction, the
finish grade appeared to be approximately lz Ft. lower than the
surrounding existing area. This was contrary to that shown on the
plans as existing and proposed.
Upon investigation, Friday, June 30, 1989, it was discovered that
in setting grades for that area, Upper Keys Marine surveyors assumed
that a 5.0 Ft. contour was a drafting error and set the grade at
3.0 Ft. This indeed put the finish grade below the existing ground
and would have allowed water to flow onto the apron.
Post Buckley drainage engineers are currently reviewing the plans
and will establish countours that will accomodate the existing
field conditions.
We would like to remind you that the proper proceedure when you or
your subcontractor encounter a problem or discrepancy in the plans
or specifications, according to Section 50-01, you are required to
notify the Resident Project Representative, representing the
Engineer on -site. Changes in field conditions from those that are
shown on the plans are not unusual in construction. However, the
RPR must assess the nature of the problem and determine the proper
course of action. Under no circumstances are assumptions to be
made where engineering specifications are established.
cc: Ron Gilman, Upper Keys Marine
Gordon Shepardson, FAA
-Len. Bi vi ns, FDOT__7
Art Skelly, Airport Director
Charles, Knighton, Airport Manager
Pat Rebull, PBS&J
Joe Jerusalem, PBS&J