Loading...
Item P1BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: February 16, 2011 Division: Growth Management Bulk Item: Yes _ No X Department: Planning & Environmental Resources Staff Contact Person/Phone #: Christine Hurley — 289 -2500 Joseph Haberman - 289 -2532 AGENDA ITEM WORDING: A public hearing to consider an Ordinance by the BOCC amending Monroe County Code Section 101 -1, Definitions, and Section 130 -187, Maximum Height, to provide consistency between regulations regarding height in the land development code and policies regarding height in the comprehensive plan and to provide consistency between the definitions of height and grade in the land development code. ITEM BACKGROUND: The BOCC directed staff to amend the Monroe County Code to remove the language allowing hotel and affordable housing structures to be constructed at heights greater than 35 feet in order to be consistent with the 2010 Comprehensive Plan and to eliminate an inconsistency in the Monroe County Code of where the height measurement is taken. Language regulating maximum height exists in both the Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan and the Monroe County Code. Policy 101.4.24 of the comprehensive plan and §130 -187 of the code are in conflict, as §130 -187 allows hotel or affordable housing structures to be constructed at heights greater than 35 feet. As policies within the 2010 Comprehensive Plan supersede the regulations of the Monroe County Code, staff is proposing to amend the text of § 130- 187 in order to be consistent with the superseding Policy 101.4.24. Of relevance on how to measure maximum height, there are the definitions of height and grade as defined in Section 101- 1 of the Monroe County Code. The definition of grade is in conflict with the definition of height, as height is measured from vertical distance between average grade of the site, yet the definition of grade states that measurements should be undertaken from the highest natural elevation of the ground surface, prior to construction, next to the proposed walls of a structure, or the crown or curb of the nearest road, whichever is higher. Removal of the term "average" from the definition of height resolves this conflict. Policy 101.4.24 provides language concerning exceptions to the maximum height standard. The definition of height with Section 101 -1 also provides language concerning exceptions; however, the exceptions are not addressed or provided in Section 130 -187. Duplicating the exception language into Section 130 -87 from the definition of height would resolve this issue and conflict. At the December 15, 2010 a public hearing was held to consider this ordinance. There was discussion concerning the method for confirming the existing grade and staff was directed to address this issued. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: December 15, 2010 - BOCC public hearing continued to January 19, 2011 meeting. January 19, 2011 - BOCC public hearing continued to February 16, 2011 meeting. CONTRACT /AGREEMENT CHANGES: n/a STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval. TOTAL COST: INDIRECT COST: _ DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE: COST TO COUNTY: SOURCE OF FUNDS: REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes _ No AMOUNT PER MONTH Year APPROVED BY: County Atty X OMB/Purchasing Risk Management DOCUMENTATION: Included X Not Required BUDGETED: Yes No DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM # �� �� ��� ��' l ��i'�l� Al i '• MONROE COUNTY PLANNING & E NVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT We strive to be caring, professional and fair To: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Through: Christine Hurley, AICP, Director of Growth Management Townsley Schwab, Senior Director of Planning & Environmental Resources From: Joseph Haberman, AICP, Planning & Development Review Manager Date: February 1, 2011 Subject: AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING MONROE COUNTY CODE SECTION 101 -1, DEFINITIONS, AND SECTION 130 -187, MAXIMUM HEIGHT, PROVIDING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN REGULATIONS REGARDING HEIGHT IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND POLICIES REGARDING HEIGHT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, PROVIDING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE DEFINITIONS OF HEIGHT AND GRADE IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Meeting: February 16, 2011 (continued from December 15, 2010) 2 I REQUEST 3 4 The Planning & Environmental Resources Department is proposing amendments to the text 5 of §101 -1 and §130 -187 of the Monroe County Code, which concerns the County's 6 maximum height regulations. 7 8 NOTE: At the December 2010 BOCC meeting, there was discussion concerning whether or 9 not the existing language adequately addresses how county staff should confirm existing 10 grade. The item was continued to provide time to make such revisions. Staff has proposed 11 additional language within the proposed text amendment to address this issue. 12 13 II RELEVANT PRIOR COUNTY ACTIONS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 14 15 Language regulating maximum height exists in both the Monroe County 2010 16 Comprehensive Plan and the Monroe County Land Development Code. 17 18 19 Page 1 of 4 1 III REVIEW 2 3 Policy 10 1.4.24 of the Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan and currently reads: 4 5 In order to preserve the existing community character and natural environment, Monroe 6 County shall limit the height of structures including landfills to 35 feet. Exceptions will 7 be allowed for appurtenances to buildings, transmission towers and other similar 8 structures. 9 10 §130 -187 of the Monroe County Code currently reads: 11 12 No structure or building shall be developed that exceeds a maximum height of 35 feet. 13 Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, any hotel or affordable housing unit may 14 be developed to a height of three stories over parking or a maximum of 44 feet, 15 whichever is lower, measured from grade level, if constructed to meet wind load 16 resistances of 150 miles per hour and a binding commitment is signed that such facilities 17 will be used as official hurricane shelters in accordance with specifications of the county 18 department of civil defense. Affordable housing structures exceeding 35 feet in height 19 must be allocated proportionately to low- and moderate - income households according to 20 identified demand. 21 22 Policy 101.4.24 and §130 -187 are in conflict, as §130 -187 allows hotel or affordable housing 23 structures to be constructed at heights greater than 35 feet. As policies within the Monroe 24 County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan supersede the regulations of the Monroe County 25 Code, staff is proposing to amend the text of §130 -187 in order to be consistent with the 26 superseding Policy 101.4.24. 27 28 Of relevance on how to measure maximum height, there are the definitions of height and 29 grade as set forth in §101 -1 of the Monroe County Code: 30 31 Height is defined as "the vertical distance between average grade and the highest part of 32 any structure, including mechanical equipment, but excluding chimneys, spires and 33 steeples on structures used for institutional and public uses only, radio or television 34 antenna, flagpoles, solar apparatus, and utility poles. However, in no event shall any of 35 the exclusions enumerated in this section be construed to permit any habitable or usable 36 space to exceed the applicable height limitations. In the case of airport districts, the 37 height limitations therein shall be absolute and the exclusions enumerated in this section 38 shall not apply." 39 40 Grade is defined as "the highest natural elevation of the ground surface, prior to 41 construction, next to the proposed walls of a structure, or the crown or curb of the nearest 42 road, whichever is higher." 43 44 The definition of grade is in conflict with the definition of height, as height is measured from 45 vertical distance between average grade, yet the definition of grade states that measurements 46 should be undertaken from the highest natural elevation of the ground surface, prior to Page 2 of 4 1 construction, next to the proposed walls of a structure, or the crown or curb of the nearest 2 road, whichever is higher. Removal of the term "average" from the definition of height 3 would resolve this conflict. 4 5 In, addition as Policy 101.4.24 provides the following language concerning exceptions to the 6 maximum height standard: "Exceptions will be allowed for appurtenances to buildings, 7 transmission towers and other similar structures." The definition of height with §101-1 also 8 provides language concerning exceptions: "...excluding chimneys, spires and steeples on 9 structures used for institutional and public uses only, radio or television antenna, flagpoles, 10 solar apparatus, and utility poles." However, the exceptions are not addressed or provided in 11 §130 -187. 12 13 This creates some confusion as it is not obvious to a person to refer to the definition of height 14 in another section of the Land Development Code to find what exceptions would be allowed. 15 Further, there is a conflict between regulations as §130 -187 does not provide any written 16 exceptions. It could be interpreted that most restrictive section of code applies and therefore 17 there are no exceptions, which was not intended by the superseding Policy 101.4.24. 18 Duplicating or moving the exception language from the definition of height would resolve 19 this issue and conflict. Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 4 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING MONROE COUNTY CODE SECTION 101 -1, DEFINITIONS, AND SECTION 130 -187, MAXIMUM HEIGHT; PROVIDING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN REGULATIONS REGARDING HEIGHT IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND POLICIES REGARDING HEIGHT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE DEFINITIONS OF HEIGHT AND GRADE IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, language regulating maximum height exists in both the Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan and the Monroe County Code, as set forth in Policy 101.4.24 of the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan and Sections 130 -187 and 101 -1 of the Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, Policy 101.4.24 and Section 130 -187 are in conflict, as Section 130 -187 allows hotel or affordable housing structures to be constructed at heights greater than 35 feet. As policies within the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan supersede the regulations of the Monroe County Code, staff proposed to amend the text of Section 130 -187 in order to be consistent with the superseding Policy 101.4.24; and WHEREAS, of relevance on how to measure maximum height, there are the definitions of height and grade as defined in Section 101 -1 of the Monroe County Code; and WHEREAS, the definition of grade is in conflict with the definition of height, as height is measured from vertical distance between average grade, yet the definition of grade states that measurements should be undertaken from the highest natural elevation of the ground surface, prior to construction, next to the proposed walls of a structure, or the crown or curb of the nearest road, whichever is higher. Removal of the term "average" from the definition of height resolves this conflict; and WHEREAS, Policy 101.4.24 provides language concerning exceptions to the maximum height standard. The definition of height with Section 101 -1 also provides language concerning exceptions; however, the exceptions are not addressed or provided in Section 130 -187. Duplicating the exception language into Section 130 -87 from the definition of height would resolve this issue and conflict; and WHEREAS, the existing language within the definition of grade does not adequately addresses how county staff should confirm existing grade; and WHEREAS, this ordinance shall apply to any permit, development order or other development approval application submitted after effective date. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Section 1. Section 130 -187 shall be amended as follows (deletions area and additions are underlined) Sec. 130 -187. - Maximum height. No structure or building shall be developed that exceeds a maximum height of 35 feet. Exceptions will be allowed for chimneys; spires and/or steeples on structures used for institutional and/or public uses only, radio . and/or television antenna; flagpoles; solar apparatus; utility poles and/or transmission towers; and certain antenna supporting structures with attached antenna and/or collocations as permitted in chapter 146. However, in no event shall any of the exclusions enumerated in this section be construed to permit any habitable or usable space to exceed the maximum height limitation. In the case of airport districts, the height limitations therein shall be absolute and the exclusions enumerated in this section shall not apply. t_, ,.f 44 feet, ,4 a ri J,, a e d s , cvarcv- inwc ii a:az l ead z ° vs.s...,.,......., ... ..... .......: 1,eF vecvwding 35 V t in height mt t be e4leeatedpr-epeitionatelyto low Section 2. Section 101 -1 shall be amended as follows (deletions are s#iekea Offe and additions are underlined changes from December 15, 2010 BOCC meeting are double underlined) Sec. 101 -1. — Definitions. Grade means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface, prior to construction, next to the proposed walls of a structure, or the crown or curb of the nearest road directly adiacent to the structure whichever is higher. To confirm the natural elevation of the around surface the County hall utilize the Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) dataset for Monroe County prepared in 2007 In the event 2007 LiDAR data is not available for a given parcel the County shall use the best available data. including, but not limited to, pre - construction boundary surveys with elevations. pre - construction topographic surveys. elevation certificates and/or other optical remote sees Height is defined as "the vertical distance between a*er -age grade and the highest part of any structure, including mechanical equipment, but excluding chimneys,;I spires and/or steeples on structures used for institutional and/or public uses only,; radio and/ television antenna, flagpoles-,I solar apparatus,;I e d utility poles and/or transmission towers; and certain antenna supporting structures with attached antenna and/or collocations as permitted in chapter 146 However, in no event shall any of the exclusions enumerated in this section be construed to permit any habitable or usable space to exceed the applicable height limitations. In the case of airport districts, the height limitations therein shall be absolute and the exclusions enumerated in this section shall not apply. Section 3. Severability. If any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, sentence or provision of this ordinance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, invalidate, or nullify the remainder of this ordinance, but the effect thereof shall be confined to the section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, sentence, or provision immediately involved in the controversy in which such judgment or decree shall be rendered. Section 4. Conflicting Provisions. In the case of direct conflict between any provision of this ordinance and a portion or provision of any appropriate federal, state, or County law, rule code or regulation, the more restrictive shall apply. Section 5. Transmittal. This ordinance shall be transmitted by the Planning and Environmental Resources Department to the Florida Department of Community Affairs as required by F.S. 380.05 (11) and F.S. 380.0552(9). Section 6. Filing. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary of the State of Florida but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission approving the ordinance. Section 7. Inclusion in the Monroe County Code. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be included and incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of the County of Monroe, Florida, as an addition to amendment thereto, and shall be appropriately renumbered to conform to the uniform marking system of the Code. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective as provided by law and stated above. This ordinance applies to any permit, and or other development approval application submitted after the effective date. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida at a regular meeting held on the day of . 2011. Mayor Heather Carruthers Mayor pro tem David Rice Commissioner Kim Wigington Commissioner George Neugent Commissioner Sylvia Murphy MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMIVIISSIONERS Attest: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK By By Deputy Clerk Mayor Heather Carruthers MONROE COUNTY A RNEY APPROV ° AS TO FOAM: SUSAN M. G I . SLEY ASSISTANT COUNT? ATTORNEY Dale ---a2=2 - AO