Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item H6
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: July 20, 2011 Division: Growth Management Bulk Item: Yes x No _ Department: Planning and Environmental Resources Staff Contact Person/Phone #: Trish Smith, ph. 304-0412 AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of the ranking of the 2015 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Enhancement Applications. ITEM BACKGROUND: In April 2011, the FDOT opened the Transportation Enhancement Program application cycle. There is approximately $4,000,000 available in FY 2015 for the provision of alternative transportation (bicycle//pedestrian) facilities. The funding will be allocated for projects in both Miami -Dade and Monroe Counties. The cycle closed on June 3, 2011, and a selection committee comprised of the county and each municipality met on June 8, 2011 to rank each local application according to criteria provided by the FDOT. Upon BOCC approval, the local applications and the ranking will be submitted to FDOT for their evaluation (evaluation criteria is attached). Project awards are anticipated to be announced in Fall 2011. PREVIOUS , RELEVANT . BOCC ACTION: No r " CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: s STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval TOTAL COST: 00 INDIRECT COST: BUDGETED: Yes X No _ COST TO COUNTY: $0 SOURCE OF FUNDS: REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes _ No X AMOUNT PER MONTH Year APPROVED BY: County Atty _ OMB/Purchasing Risk Management DOCUMENTATION: Included X Not Required DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM # Revised 1 /09 2015 FDOT ENHANCEMENT FUNDING CYCLE FINAL RANKING SHEET I vl I I I m v v l I bo a •` I v o0 ;a I a. I �� � ; u l M� m ; m` I I al o� ®; ml �I (U Y PROJECT; _ Monroe County Total Score I D �S ___________________________________ ____ _________ _r_yyRank City of Key West TotalScore ---------------------------------/- I Rank I I I I TotalScore I1 CIt_y of 4-3 __________________________________ _______ Rank City of Layton Total Score _______________________________________________ �.______ _ F_____/--:RankYY; City of Key Colony Beach Total Score _______________________________-.______ __� ______ ___t_____ ____t____ _ Rank I Village of Islamorada Total Score _ ___________________________________________ y__ _ _ ,.___ -----------_ Rank ' TOTAL POINTS RANKING Z 4b, Signature of Selection Committee Member - Monroe County Date Cl ,� ' b �- op-t44 Signature of Selection Committee Member - City of Key West Date Signature of Selection Committee Member - City of Marathon Date L (Ji( n e-1 a4 f,. Signature of Selection Committee Member - City of Layton I ld nD Signature of Selection Committee Member - City of Key Colony Beach Date Date d (d- r a. - A 0( Signature of Selection Committee Member - Village of Islamorada Date 2015 ENHANCEMENT FUNDING CYCLE MONROE COUNTY PROJECTS FINAL TABU ATlQN fOIE SHEE3S SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBER a (//,ti' 1 1 I 1 I 1 ool 1 1 1 1 1 I m I 1 1 1 to; no •4, 1 � 1 a l E i t m; •4. 4,; m i a i co i L Y i RESPONDENT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i------ C i U Of V Oo; °p i -° U 0 ------- ------- ;------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------' __________, - 1 1 FDOT SCORING CRITERIA 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 Demonstrating how the project will improve safety for bicycle riders and/or I I 1 pedestrians (15 pts) ; $ 4 ; 11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'----------4----------L----------,---------- I I I 1 1 1 1 1 2) Improving intermodal transportation linkages, including those that will I f ¢ provide access to transit stations and/or facilities (15 pts). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------y----------L----------L----------;---------- I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 3) Contribution to mobility enhancement or community development for 1 1 1 1 1 1 disadvantaged groups (ie: children, the elderly, the poor, those with limited I I 1 1 transportation options, the disabled) (15 pts). 1 1 1 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------; 4) Local funding contribution or the completion of previous phases of project ----------;---------- - '®} development (10 pts). ( -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1---- ------- f---------- 4 ---------- 5) Improving the neighborhood or community quality of life (10 pts). 1 1 1 1 6) Improving environmental air, noise, water quality, and/or erducing the need: 1 for single occupancy vehicle trips (10 pts). I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 7) Evidence of community support, including minutes of public meetings, I 1 1 I newspaper clippings, petitions, letters of support from local business owners, 1 1 I� 1 _ 1 property owners, nonprofit organizations, political leaders, and other groups 1 I (10 pts).- I 1 ------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------'----------'--------------------'---------- 1 1 8) Top priorities identified by the Senior Director of Monroe County's `{ I I j Department of Planning and Environmental Resources Department (15 pts). i; TOTAL POINTS ; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----------4--------L--- C-- RANKING I i]����-, --;--- 2. L Signature of Selection Committee Member Date ' Score sheets for individual selection committee members available in file. 2015 ENHANCEMENT FUNDING CYCLE MONROE COUNTY PROJECTS FINAL TABULATION SCORE SHE S SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBER U M I T--H RESPONDENT •--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FDOT SCORING CRITERIA p ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- 1) Demonstrating how the project will improve safety for bicycle riders and/or --pedestrians (15 pts). 2) Improving intermodal transportation linkages, including those that will provide access to transit stations and/or facilities (15 pts). 3) Contribution to mobility enhancement or community development for disadvantaged groups (ie: children, the elderly, the poor, those with limited transportation options, the disabled) (15 pts). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4) Local funding contribution or the completion of previous phases of project development (10 pts). 5) Improving the neighborhood or community quality of life (10 pts). 6) Improving environmental air, noise, water quality, and/or erducing the need for single occupancy vehicle trips (10 pts). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7) Evidence of community support, including minutes of public meetings, newspaper clippings, petitions, letters of support from local business owners, property owners, nonprofit organizations, political leaders, and other groups (10 pts). 8) Top priorities identified by the Senior Director of Monroe County's Department of Planning and Environmental Resources Department (15 pts). )TAL POINTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4NKING 1 Signature of Selection Committee Member �A / rt Date *Score sheets for individual selection committee members available in file. m I o0'o • a I sl m EI MI �I d i vl ca I _a u 04 n U' _' O _ -------I----- -----+---------- -7 W 0o v m A BJ Y u -/------- ----------r----------•---------- I Meeting Minutes 2015 Enhancement Funding Cycle for Monroe County Projects Ranking Meeting 6/8/11 The Selection Committee (Committee) for the 2015 FDOT Enhancement Cycle met on Wednesday, June 8, 2011. The meeting began at 9 am at the Marathon Government Center located at 2798 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL. The selection committee was comprised of one representative from the county and one representative from each municipality. Each municipality was notified of the meeting via email one month prior to the meeting. Follow up telephone call reminders were made to each municipality the Friday before the meeting. The meeting was also publicly noticed one week prior to the meeting. Trish Smith, Monroe County Transportation Planner and Patty Childress, City of Marathon Biologist attended the meeting. There were no members of the public in attendance. The Committee reviewed and discussed each eligible project. Each committee member was provided a score sheet that included the ranking criteria provided by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The FDOT criteria are attached. A total of four potential projects were evaluated and ranked. 1) Coco Plum Pedestrian Bridge — A bike trail is currently being constructed by the City of Marathon on Coco Plum Drive. The City is requesting funds for a wooden pedestrian bridge across a canal to allow continuous access through the Coco Plum area. This project connects an existing bike trail (under construction) to the beaches, restaurants, and local residences in the Coco Plum area. It provides a direct link to US 1 and the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. The City will maintain the project upon completion. 2) Higgs Beach — This application included a request for funds to implement the Higgs Beach Master Plan. Funds were requested to shift the existing road and add bike lanes. The project is located at the end of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. It provides a destination for visitors and residents to park, play at the beach, and utilize county park facilities. The county will continue to maintain the project upon completion. 3) Old 7 Mile Bridge — Monroe County requested funds to begin making repairs to the Old 7 Mile Bridge. The application includes structural repairs and bike/ped improvements. This project provides a connection to historic Pigeon Key. A long term management and maintenance commitment has not yet been obtained for this project. 4) Duck Key Bridge —This project includes structural repairs to the existing bridge located between Hawks Cay Resort and the Duck Key community. The bridge will be widened to include bike lanes. There is currently no existing shared use path on either side of the bridge. Monroe County will continue to maintain the project upon completion. After thorough discussion, each committee member, working independently, scored each of the applications. Committee member scores were individually summed and ranked. The final ranking was determined by averaging the individual rankings. (Score sheets are attached.) The final ranking was as follows: Proiect Applicant Rankine Higgs Beach Monroe County 1 Coco Plum Pedestrian Bridge City of Marathon 2 Old 7 Mile Bridge Monroe County 3 Duck Key Bridge Monroe County 4 This ranking will be submitted to the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners in July 2011. Upon approval of the local ranking by the BOCC, the projects will be forwarded to FDOT for their consideration. These projects will compete with projects submitted by Miami -Dade County for a total of approximately $4,000,000 in enhancement funding to be allocated in Fiscal Year 2015. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 am. Minutes prepared by: _.-I 4'X4'4z7� Trish Smith, AICP, Transportation Planner County of Monroe Growth Management Division Plannine & Environmental Resources Department 2798 Overseas Highway, Suite 410 Marathon, FL 33050 Voice: (305) 289-2500 FAX: (305) 289-2536 We strive to be caring, professional and fair TO: City of Key West Jim Scholl, City Manager jscholl@keywestcity.com City of Marathon Roger Hernstadt, City Manager hemstadtr@ci.marathon.fl.us Village of Islamorada Edward Koconis, Village Manager Edward.koconis@islamorada.fl.us City of Key Colony Beach Ron Sutton, Mayor/Administrator cityclerk@keycolonybeach.net City of Layton Skip Harring, Administrative Assistant to the Mayor cityhall@cityoflayton.com FROM: Trish Smith, AICP Transportation Planner Monroe County Planning Department DATE: April 29, 2011 Board of County Commissioners Mayor Heather Carruthers, Dist. 3 Mayor Pro Tern David Rice. Dist. 4 Kim Wigington, Dist. 1 George Neugent, Dist. 2 Sylvia I Murphy. Dist. 5 You (or your designee) are invited to attend the local ranking meeting for FDOT's Transportation Enhancement Funding Cycle on June 8, 2011 from 9:00am until 5:00pm. The meeting will be held in the first floor Media Room at the Marathon Government Center located at 2798 Overseas Highway, Marathon, Florida, 33050. Monroe County and its municipalities will utilize FDOT criteria to rank local priorities for new enhancement applications prior to submittal to FDOT. The ranking committee will review and discuss the application packages during the meeting. Each committee member (one designee from each local government), working independently, will score each of the applications. Committee member scores will be individually summed and ranked. The final priority ranking will be determined by averaging the individual rankings. The ranking committee results will be submitted to the Monroe County Board of County Commission (BOCC) for approval at their regular July 2011 meeting. Upon approval by the BOCC, the results and applications will be forwarded to FDOT for review and selection of eligible FY 2015 projects. If you have any questions regarding the local ranking process, please contact Trish Smith, Monroe County Transportation Planner at 305 304-0412. If you have questions regarding FDOT's enhancement program, please contact Phil Steinmiller, FDOT District 6 Planning Manager at 305 470-5825. c; Christine Hurley, AICP, Monroe County Growth Management Director Townsley Schwab, Monroe County Sr, Administrator of Planning and Environmental Resources Harold Desdunes, PE, FDOT District 6 Director of Transportation Development Aileen Boucle, AICP, FDOT District 6 Planning and Environmental Resources Administrator N Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 1000 NW 111 Avenue OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Miami, Florida 33172-5800 SECRETARY April 6, 2011 Subject: Transportation Enhancement Program Application Cycle To Our Transportation Enhancement Partners: This letter announces the Transportation Enhancement Program application cycle for this year. The District will have approximately $4 million available for programming in FY 2015. Currently, enhancement funds are committed to projects through FY 2014. The enhancement program is part of the Federal Highway Administration's Surface Transportation Program. The attached document describes the transportation enhancement eligibility requirements and the selection and prioritization process for District Six. Thank you in advance for your partnership with the Department in implementing these important projects. Please contact Kenneth Jeffries, at 305- 470-5840, if you have any questions. g,S,"rel , ld Desdunes, P.E. District Director of Transportation Development Attachments Cc: Gus Pego, P.E. District Secretary Debora Rivera, P.E., Director of Transportation Operations Gary Donn, P.E., Director of Transportation Support Aileen Boucle, Planning and Environmental Management Office Roman Gastesi Jr., Monroe County Administrator Christine Hurley, Growth Management Division Judy Clarke, Engineering Services Townsley Schwab, Planning Department Trish Smith, Planning Department www.dot.state.fl.us TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT SELECTION AND PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA FOR FDOT DISTRICT SIX Applications for the next Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) funding cycle are due at county agencies by 5:00 pm on June 3, 2011. An original application package and ten copies should be sent to the Miami -Dade MPO (Miami -Dade County applications) for Miami -Dade County or Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department (Monroe County applications): David Henderson Enhancements Program Coordinator Miami -Dade MPO I I I NW First Street, Suite 920 Miami, FL 33128-1999 Email: davidh@miamidade.gov Phone: 305-375-1647 Patricia Smith Transportation Planner Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department 2798 Overseas Highway, Suite 400 Marathon, FL 33050 Email: smith-patricia@monroecounty-fl.gov Phone: 305-304-0412 There are twelve eligible categories of Transportation Enhancement Program projects: * Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles; * Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists; * Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; * Scenic or historic highway programs, (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities); * Landscaping and other scenic beautification; * Historic preservation; * Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals); * Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails); * Control and removal of outdoor advertising; * Archaeological planning and research; * Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle -caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; * Establishment of transportation museums More information on the types of eligible projects can be found on the FDOT website: http:/Iwww.dot.state.fl.us/emo/enhance/enhance.shtm. TEP Guidelines March 25 2011 1 Last Modified O3/2011 Applications for transportation enhancement projects must be submitted by a sponsor that is a recognized government body or agency with the ability to enter into a binding contract with the State of Florida. Sponsors must fall into one of the following categories: a municipal government, a county government, a state agency, a federal agency, or an Indian Tribal Council. The sponsor must be willing to: provide any funding match that may be required; enter into any required maintenance agreements with the Department; and/or support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. The application package must include a resolution of support for the project from the sponsoring agency. Applications for funding may be prepared by incorporated non-profit groups (such as an historic preservation society), however, all applications must have a sponsor as previously described. The application package (application form, drawings, photos, etc) may not exceed 10 pages. Letters of support can be included in a separate appendix and will not be counted against this page limit. The application must include reporting of all previous funding awards to the sponsor, the status of the each project, and the amount of funds utilized toward project completion. Additionally, the report shall identify all cases where enhancement funds were deferred, the number of fiscal years the funding was deferred, and a brief summary of the reason for each deferral. This status report will not count against the I 0-page limit. General Criteria for Selection 1) No more than $1 million in TIE funds will be awarded to any single project in any single application cycle, and no more than $3 million dollars in enhancement funds will be awarded toward the completion of any single project. Therefore, applicants whose project costs will exceed $1 million must demonstrate that they have the additional resources to complete the project. No local match is required but evaluation points are awarded to applications that include a local funding commitment. 2) This is not a grant program. Applicants should expect to pay for the work and be reimbursed from their award. Items eligible for reimbursement include, project planning and feasibility studies, environmental analysis or preliminary design, preliminary engineering, land acquisition, and construction costs. County Agency Project Evaluation The county agency will evaluate each application according to the following criteria (100 possible total points): TEP Guidelines March 25 2011 2 Last Modified 03/201 1 1) Up to 15 points for demonstrating how the project will improve safety for bicycle riders and/or pedestrians 2) Up to 15 points for improving intermodal transportation linkages, including those that will provide access to transit stations and/or facilities 3) Up to 15 points for contribution to mobility enhancement or community development for disadvantaged groups (i.e. children, the elderly, the poor, those with limited transportation options, the disabled) 4) Up to 10 points for a local funding contribution or the completion of previous phases of project development. 5) Up to 10 points for improving neighborhood or community quality of life 6) Up to 10 points for improving environmental air, noise, water quality, and/or reducing the need for single occupancy vehicle trips 7) Up to 10 points for evidence of community support, including minutes of public meetings, newspaper clippings, petitions, letters of support from local business owners, property owners, nonprofit organizations, political leaders and other groups 8) Prioritization a) Miami -Dade County Projects - Up to 5 points for top priorities identified by the MPO's Citizen's Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC), Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), and Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC). Each committee will score 5 points (a maximum total of 15 points). b) Monroe County Projects — Up to IS points for top priorities identified by the Senior Director of Monroe County's Department of Planning and Environmental Resources Department. County agency scoring/ranking shall be approved by either a) the Miami -Dade MPO or b) the Monroe County Commission prior to transmittal to FDOT District Six. FDOT District Six Project Evaluation The District will evaluate each project in two phases as follows: • Phase I Technical Evaluation, and • Phase II Project Presentation (if applicable). The projects with the highest ranking Technical Evaluation scores in Phase I will be selected for the Phase II Project Presentation evaluation. The number of projects selected to present at the District Six Scoping Committee will be based on sum of the County Agency and Technical Evaluation scores and overall available funding. TEP Guidelines March 25 2011 Last Modified 03/2011 Phase 1 Technical Evaluation (see attached Technical Evaluation Matrix) The Technical Evaluation will be conducted as described below. The District Six Scoping Committee will evaluate each application according to the following criteria (100 possible total points): 1) Up to 25 points for ability to implement project. Scoring will account for the status of the associated project development regarding project design/implementation plan completion and production scheduling. If applicable, scoring will account for status of all required non- FDOT permits. 2) Up to 25 points for project cost estimating based upon the level of detail provided ranging from order of magnitude estimates to an opinion of probable costs using unit prices including estimates for required professional services. 3) Up to 25 points for previous performance on administering previously awarded TEP funds and current funding levels for active projects. Score will also account for a history (if any) of deferrals of previous awards for the subject sponsor. 4) Up to 25 points for county agency prioritization. The top ranked project from each county agency will received 25 points, the second ranked project from each county will receive 24 points, the third ranked projects from each county will receive 23 points, etc. The overall top ranking projects will be required to present to the FDOT District Six Scoping Committee. Phase 11 Project Presentation (see attached Presentation Evaluation Matrix) The District Six Scoping Committee will score each project up to 100 points for each presentation and the scores will be added to the Technical Evaluation score to a maximum total of 200 points. The Districtwide ranking will be submitted to FDOT District Six Oversight Committee for review and approval. Once approved, the District Secretary or Designee will issue letters of award to each successful application. Project Implementation Projects prioritized in this funding cycle will be programmed into the FDOT 5-Year Work Program. Project sponsors will be responsible for working with FDOT to execute project funding agreements in a timely manner. Federal law requires that each project be administered under the rules and procedures governing federally funded transportation projects including right- of-way certification, environmental review and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance. The FDOT Local Agency Program (LAP) will control the project funding process. Project sponsors must enter into a LAP agreement with FDOT prior to the start of any work for which they wish to be reimbursed. Funds spent by the sponsor before execution of a LAP agreement cannot be reimbursed by FDOT. More information on the FDOT Local Agency Program can be found at: www.dot.state.fl.us/projectmanagementoffice/lap/. TEP Guidelines March 25 2011 4 Last Modified 03/2011 Additional information on the Transportation Enhancement Program is available from FDOT: www.dot.state.fl.us/emo/enhance/enhance.shtm and the Federal Highway Administration: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/te/-zuidance.htm If you have any questions, contact the listed county agency representatives. TEP Guidelines March 25 2011 5 Last Modified 03/201 1 FDOT District 6 TEP Application Cycle Process Begin TEP application Cycle Districwide TEP Project Composite Ranking / TEP — Applicallon Top o Application Not Ranked? Awarded Funding FDOT Scoping Committee Presentation (Ph. II) Scoring Districtwide TEP Project Overall Ranking / TEP Application Top No— Application Not Yes Districtwide TEP Project Overall Ranking Submittal to District Oversight Committee for Approval District Secretary Issues TEP Letters of Award End of TEP Application Cycle Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) Funding Application Scoring Matrix APPLICATION NAME: SUBMITTING AGENCY: ❑ MIAMI-DADE MPO O MONROE COUNTY Miami -Dade MPO/Monroe County Scoring Criteria Points Points Possible Awarded a. Safety —Project improves safety for bicycled and/or pedestrians. 15 b. Linkages — Project improves intermodal transportation linkages, include that will provide access to transit facilities 15 stations and/or c. Disadvantaged Groups —Project contributes to mobility enhancement or community development for disadvantaged 1 5 groups d. Local Funding — Project has local funding contribution or has completed previous phases of development. 10 project e. Quality of Life —Project improves neighborhood or community quality of life 10 f. Environment —Project improves environmental air, noise, water quality, and/or reducing the for 10 need single occupancy vehicle trips. g. Community Support —Project has documented community support including minutes of public meetings, newspaper clippings, petitions, letters of support from local business 10 owners, property owners, non-profit organizations, political leaders, and other groups. h. Prioritization 1. Monroe County Priority — Prioritization scores from Monroe County's Planning and Environmental Resources —Senior Director 2. Miami -Dade County Priority — Prioritization scores from Miami -Dade MPO's Citizen's 15 Transportation Advisory Committee (CfAC), Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), and Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TERC). Maximum of 5 points per Committee. Scoring Criteria —Total Points 1:100 0 � IL \ to §LL �k IL M z/ wW o� @ w/ 0 Lli / � 0 ) 9 � ! ■ � � ! kk~��C �k ■ § { � � $ $ a §2 - \ 7 / �k li�=f - m y� } �.)k) /kEL CL {\)� a _° ! ; @®ƒ$# .k§2 f 7 �2| a( `� a ) ƒ) ) a �2F \ \) 0-EL)3 J )D / k �«»IL CL )I - - a 2 6 ' �7 O ;` oa f [ |§;£ jCL / \ 3 ) -� A 75 f } )a(L „ .0. .IL , E2'z z 0 Q V J a °d IL to LL WO O~ 0:d a� z z w 2z w0_ zf d 2 H z W N OIL �a a oc 0 n DII L rity of Marathon rEP Grant Application 'E OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI c APPLICATION FORTRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS R17JUN 3 Wnpge Project Title: Coco Plum Recreational Trail Pedestrian Bridge I MONROE CO. PLANNING DEPT. Project Sponsor (municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council): Citv of Marathon Contact Susie Thomas Title Director of Community Services Address 9805 Overseas Highway Phone 305-743-0033 FAX 305-289-4123 Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor). Name of Applicant (If other than Project Sponsor): 1. Qualifying Enhancement Activities: Check the enhancement activity that the proposed project will address. (NOTE: Checking all activities possible does not ensure or increase eligibility. Each activity checked must meet all criteria listed for that activity in Appendix A of FDOT Procedure 525-030-300, Transportation Enhancement Projects). X Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles The provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrian and bicyclists Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites Scenic or historic highway programs, (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities) Landscaping and other scenic beautification Historic preservation Rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals) Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails) Control and removal of outdoor advertising Archaeological planning and research Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle - caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity Establishment of transportation museums District 6: 2011 Cycle 02/2006 Page 2 of 3 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed? (Check all that apply) Planning Activities Project Development and Environmental Studies X Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work Right of Way Acquisition X Construction X Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project is related to the intermodal transportation system by either function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). (c) Where is the project located (and what is the project length and termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. (d) Summarize any special characteristics of project. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. This description shall identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, including expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. 3. Project Implementation Information: Attach documentation as exhibits to this application. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house) and administering (i.e. local or state) each work phase of the project. If it is proposed that the project be administered by a governmental entity other than the Department of Transportation, the agency must be certified to administer Federal Aid projects in accordance with the department's Local Agency Program Manual (topic no. 525-010-300). (b) Describe any public (and private, if applicable) support of the proposed project. (Examples include: written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution, financial donations or other appropriate means). (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability. (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. Appendix B 2/2006 Page 3 of 3 4. Project Cost: What is the total estimated cost of the work requested to be funded as an enhancement project through this application? Planning Activities. Project Development and Environmental Studies. Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. Right of Way Acquisition. Construction. Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. Other. (Describe) TOTAL: How will the project be funded? $ 8,000 $ 98, 500 $ 6,000 $ 112,500 FDOT Enhancement Funds $100,000 + Local $ 12,500 = Total $112,500 FDOT Enhancement Funds 88.9% + Local 11.1 % = 100% CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by City of Marathon, (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council) and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (2) enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4) support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. This project will be administered using the department's Local Agency Program (check one) yes X no FOR FDOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program Date Signature S us/.e Name (please type or print) Title t19-z-ii CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA 9805 Overseas Highway, Marathon, Florida 33050 Phone: (305) 743-0033 Fax: (305) 743-3667 Grant Application Questions and Answers 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (b) Describe how the proposed project is related to the intermodal transportation system by either function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). Coco Plum has a unique character. Located on Fat Deer Key, a large publicly owned, pristine area is an in -situ Nature Center surrounded by Curry Hammock State Park and mangrove forests on the North and the Atlantic Ocean on the South and East. Native species of flora and fauna there -in, have been inventoried by the City as part of the Comprehensive Plan process. Phase 1 of The Coco Plum Multi - Use trail is currently under reconstruction from US 1 to Avenue G and Coco Plum Drive with the existing trail continuing past Coco Plum Beach. Phase 2, which completes the trail to the end of Coco Plum Drive, is designed and ready for construction upon availability of funding. The trail is connected, via pedestrian crosswalk, to the existing Heritage trail along US-1, which is heavily used by cyclists, walkers and other non -motorized users. This trail will provide an additional transportation mode for non -motorized users to access the pristine natural Coco Plum Beach through the scenic Coco Plum Corridor. The proposed pedestrian bridge provides a safe alternative to the existing conflict and often dangerous condition between the motorized traffic and non motorized users at the canal crossing. The existing condition presents a safety hazard for the non -motorized users. The trail that is currently under construction ranges from 8 to 12 feet in width, and provides a minimum separation of 5 feet from the travel lane. However, as you approach the existing bridge, the trail is reduced to 6 feet, and is immediately adjacent to the travel lanes, which are only 10 feet wide. Various users of the trail have voiced their concerns of this dangerous situation, and have often opted not to use the trail for this reason. In turn, the proposed separate pedestrian bridge will provide the needed safe alternative, for the non - motorized users. (c) Where is the project located (and what is the project length and termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. The proposed project is located on Coco Plum Drive within the City of Marathon. The proposed bridge project is Phase III of the overall Coco Plum Recreational Trail. The proposed pedestrian bridge is located approximately 1500 feet south of US 1 over Bonefish Bay. The City of Marathon is in the process of installing major capital improvements to the Coco Plum Multi -Use Nature Trail,(CPMUNT) that extends from the Overseas Heritage Trail, (OHT) at Coco Plum Drive to the pristine nature center on Fat Deer Key. The nature trail directly and primarily provides tourists a continuum of the Overseas Heritage Trail experience. This portion of the nature center, Coco Plum Beach Park and the bird sanctuary on Fat Deer Key are increasingly popular to cyclists, pedestrian visitors and eco-tourists. Many enjoy the beach or stop to use the facilities at the Coco Plum Beach Park. See Location Map Attachment - A (d) Summarize any special characteristics of project. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Imminent trail improvements include widening the CPMUNT to facilitate the increased intensity of use and enhance user safety and enjoyment of this nature trail. At present, a portion of the CPMUNT is used by pedestrians, skaters, cyclists, special needs users and vehicular traffic as it transits the narrow bridge. The community has serious safety concerns about the increased simultaneous pedestrian, cyclist, wheelchair, and vehicular use of the existing bridge. The installment of a dedicated pedestrian.../cyclist bridge on the Nature Trail, adjacent to the existing vehicular bridge, would mitigate safety issues. The proposed timber bridge will keep with the natural setting of the area, while making it economically feasible. See Draft Site Plan(s) Attachment — B (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. This description shall identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys) The City of Marathon owns the Right of Way. The City acquired ownership of all public right of ways from Monroe County during the incorporation of the City of Marathon in 1999. (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, including expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. The City already owns the right of way, which is of sufficient width to accommodate the proposed pedestrian bridge. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. Phase I of the Coco Plum Recreation Trail consists of paving, grading, and striping of approximately 5,500 linear feet of asphalt path along Coco Plum Drive from US 1 Highway to Avenue G in the City of Marathon. The project is expected to be completed in July of this year. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. The dedicated span would allow straight, safe, uninterrupted pedestrian, cyclist and special needs transit over the waterway. Coco Plum houses an Abuse Shelter and a Home for the Mentally Impaired needing assistance. Residents in both these facilities use the trail as a means of pedestrian access to US 1. All of these trail users would no longer have to abruptly swerve onto the narrow portion of the vehicular bridge and then back onto the nature trail. Unhampered transit and observation of Bonefish Bay would add to visitor enjoyment. The primary focus on constructing the separate pedestrian bridge is for public safety. This trail is heavily used both by locals and visitors, and the existing conditions pose a serious safety concern for the non -motorized public. 3. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION INFORMATION (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house) and administering (i.e. local or state) each work phase of the project. If it is proposed that the project be administered by the governmental entity other than the Department of Transportation, the agency must be certified to administer Federal Aid projects in accordance with the department's Local Agency Program Manual (topic 525-010-300). The City of Marathon is Certified to administer Federal Aid projects in accordance with the departments Local Agency Program. The concept for the crossing and existing topographic information will be provided by the City or its surveying consultant. The proposed bridge will be a turn key installation by a vendor providing such product that includes the structural design to meet the specific site conditions. The qualified contractor to be awarded the project shall be responsible for the design and erection of the 2 (b) (c) (d) bridge. Permitting of the limited impact to mangroves by the USACOE and FDEP as well as the minor adjustment to the trail to align with the new bridge will be performed by in-house engineering. Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. Upon completion of the the bridge, the City of Marathon will assume the maintenance responsibility of the bridge. The life expectancy of this bridge is 40 to 50 years. The City will provide yearly maintenance in treating the timber components to insure this longevity is achieved. Describe any public (and private, if applicable) support of the proposed project. (Examples include: written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution, financial donations or other appropriate means.). The City Council approved Resolution #2011-37 supporting this application and setting aside funds for the project. Attachment - E The City also received two letters of support from the Great Marathon Chamber of Commerce and the Coco Plum Beach Property Owners Association, Inc. Attachment — F Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability. The Marathon City Council approved Resolution #2011-37 setting aside $12,500.00 in matching funds. The City is currently constructing Phase I of the Coco Plum Recreational Trail with a total project cost of $415,000.00 of which the City is providing 50% match or $207,500.00. (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. The turn key installation of this bridge will provide minimal disruption to the area, and most important will provide minimal impact to the waterway and adjacent wetland along the banks of the channel. The minor modification to the trail as it approaches the bridge will be done by in-house engineering. The City will obtain all required Federal and State permits including but not limited to United States Army Corp of Engineer and the Florida Department of Environmental Protections. However, the proposed bridge will span the canal width, and no impacts to Sovereign Waters are proposed. The required permits for the bridge construction and mangrove trimming will be prepared and processed by the City's Engineering staff. Prior to the request for proposals for the turnkey bridge, City staff will solicit surveying and Geotechnical Services from consultants currently on the City's Continuous Service contracts. The estimated budget numbers for the proposed bridge were obtained from bridge suppliers. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE • Grant Awarded • City will proceed in preparing plans to the trail modifying the approach to new bridge and applying for all require Federal and State permits. 150 Days • Publish Bid and conduct Pre Bid Meeting 30 Days • Selection of Contractor 30 Days • Award of Contract and Pre Construction Meeting 30 Days • Notice to proceed, construction, and final exception of project 90 Days TOTAL PROJECT TIME - After Executed Grant Contract 330 DAYS M-1- P L,,'M u Ts 3k ,cpyright , 2,110 `sty of Marathon PEDESMIAN MiDGE ;:'LAN I I IWLHIVIt I C 174 A l l 1. 1 I I CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA 9805 Overseas Highway, Marathon, Florida 33050 Phone: (305) 743-0033 Fax: (305) 743-3667 • The City of Marathon hasn't received any Transportation Enhancement funding to date. • The City of Marathon hasn't deferred any Transportation Enhancement Funding to date. i t L it t t t n Sponsored by: Hernstadt CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA RESOLUTION 2011-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING AN ENHANCEMENT GRANT APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000.00 FOR A BYPASS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ON COCO PLUM DRIVE, COMMITTING $12,500.00 IN MATCHING CITY FUNDS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE APPLICATION AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") has opened its Transportation Enhancement Program Application Cycle for FY 2015. One of the grant categories is Provision of .facilities for pedestrians and bicycles; and WHEREAS, at its May 10, 2011 meeting the City Council authorized City staff to submit an application to FDOT for a bypass pedestrian bridge on Coco Plum Drive to enhance the Coco Plurn Multi Use Trail project, and committing $12,500.00 in City capital infrastructure funds to the project; and WHEREAS, a requirement of the grant application is a Resolution of support from the local governing body. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein. Section 2. The City Council hereby approves this Resolution in support of the submission of an enhancement grant application to FDOT for a bypass pedestrian bridge, and committing 12,500.00 in matching City funds for the project. The necessary funds are hereby appropriated from the City's capital infrastructure fund and the City Manager is authorized to execute and submit the grant application on behalf of the City. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. A I I ALHIVIL:NT E PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA, THIS 24" DAY OF MAY, 2011. 61a1l Ail F419 AYES: Cinque, Keating, Ramsay, Worthington, Snead NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None �� ca, Diane Clavier, City Clerk (City Seal) I RON 0 0 0 p p w i r -.;. d N 2 0 0 160 r�M LA z rim T- I I I I M" 11VIL-Am 1 I City of Marathon Overseas Highway Marathon, FL, 33050 May 22, 2011 Re: FDOT Transportation Enhancement Grant for the new Coco Plum Bridge Dear Sirs: The Coco Plum Multi -Use Nature Trail, (CPMUNT) extends from the Overseas Heritage Trail, (OHT) at Coco Plum Drive to the residences and nature center on Fat Deer Key. The nature trail directly and primarily provides a continuum of the Overseas Heritage Trail experience. This trail is used by our residents and is increasingly popular to cyclists, pedestrian visitors and eco-tourists. At present, an existing narrow bridge is part of the trail. The bridge is simultaneously used by fishermen, pedestrians, cyclists, special needs users, cars, trucks, boat trailers and other vehicular traffic. Our community has serious safety concerns about the increased simultaneous use of the existing narrow span. The installment of a dedicated pedestrian.../cyclist bridge on the Nature Trail, adjacent to the existing vehicular bridge, would mitigate serious safety concerns. The dedicated span would allow straight, safe, uninterrupted transit over the waterway. Cyclists, pedestrians and special needs users would no longer have to transit the narrow shoulder of the vehicular bridge. Vehicles would use the existing span without maneuvering around pedestrians, special needs and fisher folk. The Coco Plum Beach Property Owners Association supports the construction of the pedestrian bridge. We strongly urge the FDOT to approve the City of Marathon application for the FDOT Transportation Enhancement Grant for the new Coco Plum Bridge. Kindly include this letter in the grant application. Lives depend upon it. Thank you, Lynda Berrigan President Coco Plum Beach Property Owners Association, Inc. P.O. Box 3393 Marathon Shores, FL. 33052 P 0 Box 3393, Marathon Shores, FL 33052 1 E-Mail savecocoplum(a)aol.com I I AS-NIVILNT May 18, 2011 Daniel Samess CEO Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce 12222 Overseas Hwy Marathon, FL 33050 Re: City of Marathon Grant Proposal: FDOT Transportation Enhancement Grant To whom it may concern: The Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce, Board of Directors, and Marathon Economic Development Council strongly support the City of Marathon's grant proposal for the FDOT Transportation Enhancement Grant for the new Coco Plum Bridge project in Marathon, FL. This improvement will provide a safe and attractive addition not only to this specific bridge but Marathon as a whole. Once again we are in full support of this initiative and project and feel it will be a welcomed addition and improvement to our City's infrastructure; and well worth this grant's approval. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact me personally if I may be of any assistance. Respectfully (on behalf of the Marathon Chamber Board of Directors & Economic Development Council), Daniel Samess, M.S. Chief Executive Officer Greater Marathon Chamber of Commerce (305)743-5417 ceo,�i' floridakevsmarathon.cotn www.floridakevsmarathon.com «-%v-%v.relocatetothetloridakevs.cotn 12222 OVFRSFAS HIGHWAY - MARATHON, FLORIDA KEYS 33050 - (305) 743-5417 - FAx (305) 280 0183 - (800) 262-7284 E-mail: visitus@FloridaKeysMarathon.com • www.FloridaKPysMarathon com E rF STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORYA APPLICATION FOR TRANSPORTATION € MI AY 2 4 2 11 ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS�� E ` "Of,,,IR''E CO [ ' n!= :C ,EST Project Title: Hi_g_gs Beach Park., Multi -Modal Transportation Safety and Archeological Preservation Project Sponsor (municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council): Monroe County Board of Countv Commissioners Contact Trish Smith, AICP Title Transportation Planner Address Monroe County Planning Department, 2798 Overseas Highway Marathon FL 33050 Phone (305)304-0412 FAX (305)289-2854 Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor). See local scoring matrix Name of Applicant (If other than Project Sponsor): n/a 1. Qualifying Enhancement Activities: Check the enhancement activity that the proposed project will address. (NOTE: Checking all activities possible does not ensure or increase eligibility. Each activity checked must meet all criteria listed for that activity in Appendix A of FDOT Procedure #525-030-300, Transportation Enhancement Projects). X Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles X The provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrian and bicyclists Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites X Scenic or historic highway programs, (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities) Landscaping and other scenic beautification X Historic preservation Rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals) Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails) Control and removal of outdoor advertising Archaeological planning and research Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle - caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity Establishment of transportation museums 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed? (Check all that apply) Planning Activities Project Development and Environmental Studies X Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work Right of Way Acquisition X Construction X Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project is related to the intermodal transportation system by either function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). Higgs Beach Park is in the Florida Keys Scenic Highway corridor along the Atlantic Ocean on the south side of Key West and is transected by Atlantic Boulevard. The existing recreational area, owned and managed by Monroe County, contains a sandy beach, tennis courts, West Martello (a civil war era fort) which is home to the Key West Garden Club, Salute Restaurant, Astro City playground, one bathroom building, concrete benches and cabanas, large and small dog parks, the Whistling Duck Pond, volleyball and handball courts, Reynolds Street Pier, the African Memorial, and the swimming and snorkeling area adjacent to the beach. The park is at the southern terminus of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail bicycle/pedestrian path and is a major tourist attraction. The trail counter on the path at the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and White Street (by the east edge of the park) has had an average of 38,150 bicyclists and pedestrians cross it per month in 2011. Atlantic Boulevard in Higgs Beach Park is a County road that provides critical local and tourist connections on the island of Key West. Relative to the State Road System, the eastern end of Atlantic Boulevard starts approximately 1000 feet from the western end of SR A1A (South Roosevelt Boulevard), connected by Bertha Street. Atlantic Boulevard continues on to White Street then through Higgs Beach Park to its terminus at Reynolds Street. The proposed project area will effect several areas of the park including bike paths, sidewalks and crosswalks, intersections at the entrances to the park, the African Memorial and Graveyard, and the West Martello Fort (Civil War era fort). As part of the Master Plan for Higgs Beach Park, relocating Atlantic Boulevard and parking is proposed to: 1) resolve safety issues with the proximity of the road to the West Martello Fort, pedestrian and bicycle activity, the relationship of the current parking areas and loading zones to the travel lanes of the road, and traffic flow in the intersections of the Atlantic Boulevard with Reynolds Street and White Street, 2) provide designated bicycle lanes, sidewalks and crosswalks, 3) protect and enhance historic, cultural, and archeological integrity of the Scenic Highway and adjacent area while enhancing visitor appreciation; and 4) remove all development from the recently located African gravesites in one of the only known cemeteries of African refugees in the United States. (please see photographs in the Attachments illustrating need). (c) Where is the project located (and what is the project length and termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. The project is in Higgs Beach Park on the south side of Key West (see map of Key West to the right). The legal description is: KW PT TR 27 RR-3421343 W-4581459 G33-2761280 Atlantic Boulevard from Reynolds Street and White Street will be affected by the project (see proposed site plan, next page). (d) Summarize any special characteristics of project. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Since the early days of Key West, the site known as Higgs Beach Park has a past rich with historically significant events. Within the boundaries of the park, there are numerous cultural and recreational activities used by both residents and tourists. The sandy shoreline has withstood all that human nature and Mother Nature can deliver — from hurricanes to the notorious wreckers. Prior to the Civil War the beach was one of the early cemeteries on the island, not only for residents but also for African refugees rescued in the 1860's from slave ships bound for Cuban sugar plantations. Although storms removed many of the early gravesites, the location of the African refugee graves have been located and memorialized. This section of coastline has protected the island community during wars that threatened not only Key West but also the entire Country. From the West Martello Fort, constructed in 1863 as the War Between the States loomed, to the barracks, gun turrets and radio tower built in the 1900's in response to the threat of World Wars. Henry Flagler's Railroad terminated near here and it is reported the rails from that infamous train track were used in the construction of the Reynolds Street pier in the 1940's. At the close of World War ll, the military barracks were no longer needed and negotiations began with Monroe County to surplus this land. In 1948 Monroe County accepted the beach and began to enhance the park. Monroe County is endeavoring to protect and enhance this heritage, and has approved the preliminary site design as part of the Master Planning process for Higgs Beach Park. This Master Plan includes the following enhancement elements: Atlantic Boulevard Atlantic Boulevard is the lifeblood of the park and provides the primary access for many residents and visitors. During the design process, the safety concerns expressed included the proximity of the road to the West Martello Gardens, pedestrian and bicycle conflicts, loading zones for the restaurant and Gardens, the relationship of the current parking areas to the travel lanes of the road, intersections of the road with Reynolds Street and White Street. The proposed design, keeps the road alignment in the same location adjacent to the tennis courts. However, beyond the tennis courts, the road has been shifted to north and a gentle curve to facilitate traffic calming has been designed. Relocating the road has also provided the additional area needed to preserve the recently discovered additional graves of African refugees. The parking areas have been redesigned to include crosswalks and reduce conflict points with pedestrians. The proposed design of the road has also been widened to accommodate bicycle lanes on both sides. M Q z a W CL W U z W z Q u EXISTING ROAD-----' OAD" `-. ALIGNMENT Atlantic Boulevard and White Street Intersection The intersection with White Street has been changed as a result of the northern shift of Atlantic Blvd. Early in the design process, preliminary research indicated there was a need to review this location. There is no doubt that White Street and Atlantic Blvd is a very busy intersection. The potential for accidents exists due to the sheer number of automobiles, scooters, trolleys, pedestrians and bicyclists that traverse this area on a daily basis. The proposed design creates a sense of place for the end of White Street as well as an entrance to the park. Furthermore, it enlarges and provides an opportunity to enhance the entrance to White Street Pier and the AIDS Memorial. Atlantic Boulevard and Reynolds Street Intersection The Reynolds Street entrance to the park has been modified to improve circulation and enhance this access point to the park. The parking adjacent to the tennis courts has been removed, and two Pickleball Counts are proposed. Parking for these activities has been relocated to the east end of the tennis courts. The ' widened roadway allows for the radius of the curve �_..r J to be increased, a landscape median added, room A� 5,, `� • ®� j �y for the bicycle lanes and a canoe/kayak drop off % area. '� African Memorial and Graveyard Several years ago, a ground penetrating radar survey was conducted and identified nine gravesites located to the east of the West Martello Fort. The current African Cemetery Memorial stands at that site today. Then, in conjunction with Master Plan development, a ground penetrating radar survey was conducted in November 2010. This survey revealed a significant number of graves located (as shown by the dots at right). Upon completion of the survey, the Master Plan was revised to relocate the Small and Large Dog Parks, shift the road and relocate proposed parking in order to remove all development from the grave 5 area. It is expected that additional graves are located beneath the existing road. Once the road has been removed, these too shall be preserved. The history of the African refugees and the West Martello Fort are linked together. The opportunity to preserve and enhance these two parts of island history adds another gem to the features of Higgs Beach Park. An additional benefit is the further protection of the West Martello Fort due to the relocation of the road away from the Fort. The location of these graves is a significant archaeological discovery, one of the only known cemeteries of African refugees in the United States, and presents an opportunity for preservation of this historic discovery. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. This description shall identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). Monroe County owns the Atlantic Boulevard right of way in Higgs Beach Park, between Reynolds Street and White Street. In 1948 Monroe County accepted the Navy surplussed land that is the park today, including the road. Ownership documents are on file at the Monroe County Appraiser's Office. (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, including expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. No right of way acquisition is required for this project. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. Monroe County and the City of Key West have been collaborating in the development of the Higgs Beach Park Master Plan, which includes this proposed enhancement project. Although the Higgs Beach Park property belongs to Monroe County, the site is located within the City of Key West jurisdictional boundaries and redevelopment of the site is therefore subject to the municipal Land Development Regulations. The public design and approval process has included over ten public meetings, a preliminary hearing at the City of Key West's Development Review Committee Meeting, and preliminary design approval of phase one of the Master Plan at the Board of County Commissioners. As part of phase two, the Master Plan will be submitted to the City of Key West's Planning Department in the summer of 2011 and will enter into a development plan review and approval process that will include additional intergovernmental coordination, a DRC meeting, Planning Board meeting, and finally a City Commission hearing. An interlocal Development Agreement between the City of Key West and Monroe County is currently in development. Upon receipt of the development approval outlined above, the permitting process begins. Development of construction drawings, meeting City, County, State and Federal mitigation requirements, and obtaining multijurisdictional approvals and required licenses will be a collaborative effort between the County and City of Key West. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. Please see photographs illustrating need in the Attachments. 3. Project Implementation Information: Attach documentation as exhibits to this application. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house) and administering (i.e. local or state) each work phase of the project. If it is proposed that the project be administered by a governmental entity other than the Department of Transportation, the agency must be certified to administer Federal Aid projects in accordance with the department's Local Agency Program Manual (topic no. 525-010-300). Monroe County would act as the LAP Agency for the design and construction of this project. • Administration: All administration for each phase Higgs Beach Park project will be completed by Monroe County, which became LAP certified in 2009. • Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. Engineering design plans will be completed by a consulting engineering firm utilizing the Higgs Beach Park Master Plan and under the direction of Monroe County's Engineering Services Director. The project will be designed to meet the most recently approved planning and design requirements of the following: (1) American Association of State Transportation Officials (AASHTO): Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, (2) FDOT.- Florida Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Handbook, (3) FDOT.- Pedestrian Facilities Planning and Design Handbook, (4) the Americans with Disabilities Act Architectural Guidelines and (5) FDOT. • Plans Preparation Manual, Volumes I and Il (Nos. 625-000-005 and 625-000-006). • Right of Way Acquisition: The right of way is owned by Monroe County. No right of way acquisition is required for this project. • Construction: At this time, it is unknown who will contract with Monroe County to fulfill the construction work tasks. • Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities: All CEI activities will coincide with construction activities. At this time, it is unknown who will contract with Monroe County to fulfill the CEI work tasks. (b) Describe any public (and private, if applicable) support of the proposed project. (Examples include: written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution, financial donations or other appropriate means). The public design and approval process has included over ten public meetings, a preliminary hearing at the City's Development Review Committee Meeting, and preliminary design approval of phase one of the Master Plan at the Board of County Commissioners. Attached are the following regarding evidence of support. • Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Resolution Supporting Cohesive Planning with the City of Key West for Redevelopment of Indigenous Park and Higgs Beach Park. • Letter from City of Key West Planning describing its participation and collaboration in the Higgs Beach Master Plan Planning process. • Letter from the City Manager of Key West supporting this enhancement project. • FDEP Letter of Support (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. While the site is located within the City of Key West jurisdictional boundaries, Higgs Beach Park is the property of and maintained by Monroe County. Monroe County will continue to own and maintain Higgs Beach Park and the section of Atlantic Boulevard therein when the project is completed. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability. Monroe County has committed $132, 000 for the development of a Master Plan for Higgs Beach Park, and $4,400 for the Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of the middle and eastern sections of the park for the location of archeological resources associated with the African Memorial. (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. Statement of Previous Funding Awards: Monroe County in a unique position because of our previous commitment to the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail projects. In past years, FDOT, FDEP, and Monroe County agreed as a team to allow FDEP to utilize Monroe County's enhancement allocations for the design and construction of the trail. However, FDEP was responsible for working directly with FDOT to implement the LAP agreements and to complete the projects. Monroe County was not notified when LAP agreements were signed, and we were not kept informed by FDOT of past due LAP projects. Unfortunately, there is a significant backlog in enhancement funding in the current Monroe County FDOT 5 year work program due to circumstances beyond our control. FKOHT projects have rolled over in the work program for almost a decade. Please consider that we should not be penalized for incomplete projects that have been managed by FDEP. Monroe County is prepared to be the LAP administrator on the Higgs Beach Park project and commits to spending work program funds in a timely manner. Our track record on implementing ARRA projects over the past few years is a testament to our dedication towards working cooperatively with FDOT to complete LAP projects in a timely manner. 4. Project Cost: What is the total estimated cost of the work requested to be funded as an enhancement project through this application? Planning Activities. $ COMPLETED Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ 136,400 Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ 150,000 Right of Way Acquisition. $ N/A Construction. $ 800,000 Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ 50,000 Other. (Describe) $ TOTAL: $ 1,136,400 How will the project be funded? FDOT Enhancement Funds $1,000,000 + Local $136,400 = Total $1,136,400 FDOT Enhancement Funds 88 % + Local 12 % = 100% CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by Monroe County BOCC , (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council) and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (2) enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4) support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. This project will be administered using the department's Local Agency Prograrry(check one) yes X no FOR FDOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program gnature Townslev Schwab Name (please type or print) Sr. Director of Planning and Environmental Resources Title Date � �{ • Photographs • • • • Letters of Support • National Scenic Byways Designation Press Release • Higgs Beach Park Master Plan Report Photo 1 Aerial photo of Higgs Beach Park project site. The numbers are referencing following photos. 10 Photo 2 Taken from intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and Reynolds Street looking East. Photo 3 Taken at West Martello fort looking East. Note the bicycling related signs on far right and unmarked crossing. 11 Photo 4 Taken at African Cemetery Memorial, looking East. Photo 5 Taken at intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and White Street looking West. Note scooter behind sign post. M 13 Mayor Heather Carruthers RESOLUTION NO. 1-2-2011 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING COHESIVE PLANNING WITH CITY OF KEY WEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF INDIGENOUS PARK AND HIGGS BEACH. WHEREAS, the County Commission for Monroe County recognizes that the City of Key West may from time to time desire to redevelop all or parts of Indigenous Park; and WHEREAS, Indigenous Park is on the east side of White Street and a portion of Higgs Beach Park, owned and operated by the County, is on the adjacent south side of White Street; and WHEREAS, it is recognized that both parks would probably be best served if redevelopment on either park is designed to complement the other park to benefit the local residents and tourists who utilize either or both parks; and WHEREAS, the County currently has contracted with an architect for design of a master plan for redevelopment of Higgs Beach Park consistent with the expressed desires of residents to improve safety, enhance recreational use and beautify Higgs Beach Park for City and County taxpayers, residents and tourists; and WHEREAS, under the continuing contract with William P. Horn, Architect, the County could revise the Higgs Beach project contract to allow design efforts for Indigenous Park up to a maximum of $67,999 if an interlocal agreement is entered whereby the City provides commensurate consideration for the design services of the architect; and WHEREAS, it is possible that in the course of seeking grants for redevelopment of Higgs Beach Park, the County could partner with the City in seeking grants that would also fund redevelopment of Indigenous Park; and WHEREAS, the County recognizes that any reconfiguration of the road intersecting Higgs Beach Park should be coordinated with the City to ensure that no muniepal problems are created; and WHEREAS, the County wishes to extend to the City of Key West the opportunity to work together to benefit the residents and tourists who visit both the city and county parks adjacent to White Street; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY AS FOLLOWS; 1. That the City of Key West is invited to participate in any of the public meetings concerning redevelopment of Higgs Beach and to seek that such meetings enhance the complimentary redevelopment of both parks. 1 2. The County would like to open discussions with the City of Key West regarding the possibility of an interlocal agreement whereby: a) the County may agree to revise the architect's Higgs Beach project contract to increase the dollar amount to cover up to $67,999 in additional design services for Indigenous Park, provided the City agrees to provide reimbursement of the amounts spent on design specific to Indigenous Park; and b) the City and County may agree to explore operational issues regarding the parks; and c) the City and County may agree to partner in applying for grants for redevelopment of Higgs Beach Park and Indigenous Park; and d) the City and County may agree to terms regarding any reconfiguration of the road intersecting Higgs Beach; and e) the interlocal agreement may include any other considerations upon which the parties may agree. 3. "The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this resolution to the City Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners=af Morift County, Florida at a regular meeting of said board held on April 20 , 2011..; ; Mayor Carruthers Yes ry Mayor Pro Tem Rice Yes cn Commissioner Murphy des Commissioner Neugent Yes ner Wigington Yes r:, en rn BYNNJtj L. OL CLL",�GF�gCLRK Deputy Clerk� Higgs Beach Park Res re City 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROEC FLORIDA By. 41 M •-� :-, _. Ti 5 F1 [E( 11-Y OF KFY MIST April 5, 2011 Ms. Jane Tallman Scenic Highway Coordinator Planning and Environmental Resources Monroe County Government Offices 2798 Overseas Highway, Stlitc 400 Marathon, FI 33050 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a document from the City of Key West Planning De ment regardin our i2ardiii willin lic Mij or Key West jurisdictional boundaries and redevelopment of the site is therefore subject to the municipal Land Development Regulations. To date, the public design arid approval process has included over ten public meetings. a preliminary hearing at the City's Development Review Committee Meeting, and preliminary design approval of phase one of the Master Plan at the Board of County Commissioners. Over the past year the Planning Department's designated representative. Nicole Maio, has been involved in the public charrette process which has included collaboration with the design and project mariagenicat team, Monroe County Commissioners and staff, the Friends of Higgs Beach and the interested public. At the August 26, 2010 City's Development Review Committee (DRC) Meeting, the design and project management team presented for pre -application discussion the draft design for city staff. As part of phase two. the Master Plan is expected to be submitted to the Planning Department sometime this summer and will enter into a development plan review and approval process that will include additional intergoxertimental coordination. another DRC 'Mecting, Planning Board meeting, and finally City Commission hearing DiSLU',%101is, between city and county legal and planning staff have begun regarding, the leasihifity of a Development Agreement or other long term agreetTICT11 lvtween the two go%emmental entities ,All City. County, State, and Federal mitigation requirements, multi lurtvdictjonal appro,.als, and required licenses will be corroIN)rated on as well. Please feel free to contact myself or Nicole Malo for further information 16 13,r�pec�liy, Donald L. Craig, AleP, Interim Planning Director Xc: NCark Finigan, Assistant City Manager Larry Erskine, Assistant City Attorney Townsley Schwab, Senior Planning Director Barbra Mitchell. Project Planner Carol Schreck, Exccutivc Assistant Nicole Malo, Planner GEO Files K '°E;`cr f'r::;cctti'•4ft:4;, ff :sc°h\"()I l 04,11� f_rrier t`, c=>untN ,.f+oc Piro ova 7 n( 7 17 Florida Department of Gover Scott Governor Environmental Protection Jennifer Carroll Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building Lt. Governor 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Herschel T Vinyard ►r Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 y Secretary February 15, 2011 Ms. Trish Smith, AICP Monroe County Planning Department 2798 Overseas Highway, Suite 410 Marathon, FL 33050 RE: Higgs Beach Master Plan Dear Ms. Smith: The Office of Greenways and Trails is pleased that the Higgs Beach Master Plan was approved by the Monroe Board of County Commissioners last month at their regular January meeting. We believe that the upgraded facility will provide a great benefit for visitors and locals alike. Higgs Beach is listed in the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail (FKOHT) Master Plan as a rest area and a trailhead. Its location adjacent to the beach, as well as its restroom and park amenities, provides a draw for trail users at the southern end of the FKOHT. We applaud the community on forming a 501(c)3 organization to oversee the long term maintenance and management of Higgs Beach, and we support Monroe County on its efforts to seek grant funding for the capital improvements associated with the Higgs Beach Master Plan. M. Wood, Assistant Director of Greenways and Trails JMW/sf ivV%u.dep state fr.us America's Byways* Press Room October ! 2009 Transportation Secretary1 1d Announces Ame Byways 0 Designations for009 FHWA 31-09 Friday, October 16. '1009 Contact: Doug Hecox Phone: 202-366-0660 WASHINGTON — U. S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced 42 new designations to the America's Byways® collection. including five All -American Roads and 37 National Scenic Byways in 26 states. This increases the number of America's Bywayst to 151. `By enriching the National Scenic Byways program with their own unique historical or aesthetic quality, these new additions help our national road system tell our country's story," said Secretary LaHood_ "These routes continue to offer Americans .exciting new opportunities to explore the nation — whether they travel close to home or across the country." With Massachusetts and New Jersey included in the 2009 designations, 46 states have America's Byways® in them. Created in 1991. the National Scenic Byways program is a collaborative effort to help recognize, preserve and enhance selected roads throughout the United States. It has funded 2,672 projects for state and nationally designated byway routes in 50 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia_ The U.S. Department of Transportation recognizes certain roads as All -American Roads or National Scenic Byways based on one or more archeological. cultural, historic. natural, recreational and scenic qualities_ The following are the 2009 All -American Road (AAR) and National Scenic Byways (NSB) designations: Byway State Designation Alabama's Coastal Connection Alabama NSB The George Parks Highway Scenic Byway Alaska NSB Haines Highway -`'alley of the Eagles Alaska NSB Historic Route 66 - Arizona Arizona AAR Top of the Rockies Colorado NSB Lariat Loop Scenic and Historic Byway Colorado NSB Florida Black Bear Scenic Byway Florida NSB Florida Keys Scenic Highway Florida AAR Byway State Designation Big Bend Scenic Byway Flonda NSB Ormond Scenic Loop & Trail Florida NSB Indiana's Historic Pathways Indiana NSB Lincoln Heritage Scenic Highway Kentucky NSB Woodlands Trace Kentucky NSB Kentucky Great River Road Kentucky NSB Louisiana Great River Road Louisiana NSB; Acadia All American Road - Trenton Extension Maine AAR Journey Through Hallowed Ground Byway Maryland NSB Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad BYW2V Maryland AAR Baltimore's Historic Charles Street Maryland NSB Religious Freedom Byway Maryland NSB Connecticut River Byway Massachusetts NSB Woodward Avenue (M-1) - Automotive Heritage Trail Michigan AAR Gunflint Trail Scenic Byway Minnesota NSB Mississippi Great River Road Mississippi NSB City of Las Vegas, Las Vegas Boulevard State Scenic Byway Nevada NSB Millstone Valley Scenic Byway New Jersey NSB Delaware River Scenic Byway New Jersey NSB; Dry Cimarron Scenic Byway New Mexico NSB Forest Heritage National Scenic Byway North Carolina NSB Outer Banks Scenic Byway North Carolina NSB Historic Route 66 Oklahoma NSB Dry- Cimarron Scenic Byway Oklahoma NSB Cherokee Hills Byway Oklahoma NSB Wichita 'Mountains Byway Oklahoma NSB Journey Through Hallowed Ground Byway Pennsylvaria NSB Edisto Island National Scenic Byway South Carolina NSB East Tennessee Crossing Tennessee NSB Great River Road - Tennessee Tennessee NSB Scenic Byway 143 - Utah's Patchwork Parkway Utah NSB Journey Through Hallowed Ground Byway Virginia NSB N'%-hite Pass Scenic Byway Washington NSB Coal Heritage Trail West Virginia NSB 21 LAISE rip D E S I G N LOJ Prepared for: Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida 1100 Simonton Street Key West, FL 33040 January 19", 2011 Prepared by: WILLIAM P. HORN ARCHITECT, P.A. 915 EATON STREET. KEY wFST. FLORIDA 33040 In Association with: Q M. - N I., 1 111111. F1 W'-1 ju 0 9 HIGGS BEACH PARK — MASTER PLAN 4900T PF-. ?F- z.. ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT. INC STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA,,I APPLICATION FORTRANSPORTATION'AY 2 6 2011 ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS Project Title: Old 7 Mile Bridge (East End) Shared Use Path M. Project Sponsor (municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council): Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Contact Trish Smith AlCP Title Transportation Planner Address 2798 Overseas Highway Suite 400 Marathon FL 33050 Phone 305 304-0412 FAX 305 289-2854 Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor). See local scoring matrix Name of Applicant (If other than Project Sponsor): n/a 1. Qualifying Enhancement Activities: Check the enhancement activity that the proposed project will address. (NOTE: Checking all activities possible does not ensure or increase eligibility. Each activity checked must meet all criteria listed for that activity in Appendix A of FDOT Procedure 525-030-300, Transportation Enhancement Projects). x Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles x The provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrian and bicyclists Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites x Scenic or historic highway programs, (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities) Landscaping and other scenic beautification x Historic preservation x Rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals) x Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails) Control and removal of outdoor advertising Archaeological planning and research Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle - caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity Establishment of transportation museums m 0=006 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed? (Check all that apply) Planning Activities Project Development and Environmental Studies x Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work Right of Way Acquisition x Construction x Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project is related to the intermodal transportation system by either function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). The Old 7 Mile Bridge (East) is currently managed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) as a bicycle/pedestrian facility. The FDOT conducts regular inspections on the bridge as part of its routine maintenance program. The old bridge is situated adjacent to the newer 7 Mile Bridge which provides a vehicular connection from the mainland to the lower keys. (b) Where is the project located (and what is the project length and termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. The Old 7 Mile Bridge (East) is located approximately between Mile Markers 44.8 and MM 47 in Monroe County, Florida. The bridge traverses in an east to west direction for approximately 2.2 miles from Knights Key to historic Pigeon Key (see attached location map). This project provides the potential for low income neighborhoods to access the old bridge via recently upgraded segments of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. (c) Summarize any special characteristics of project. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. The facility accommodates over 100, 000 visitors per year including local residents and tourists who are in search of recreational pursuits, routine exercise, and unsurpassed sunset viewing. Recent structural inspections have determined that this extensively utilized facility needs significant repairs to remain open for public use. The bridge is listed on the Historic Register due to the fact that it was built in the early 1900s by railroad baron Henry Flagler to move goods and passengers via railroad between Key West and mainland Florida. The bridge subsequently became a part of the state highway system with the construction of the Overseas Highway and remained operational as a vehicular bridge until the 1980s when the new vehicular bridge was constructed. In an effort to preserve a part of history and celebrate the cultural significance of the old bridge, the Old 7 Mile Bridge (east) was then closed and retrofitted for use as a fishing pier and a bicycle/pedestrian facility by the FDOT. The ownership of the remaining portions of the Old 7 Mile Bridge, west of Pigeon Key, was transferred to Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). FDOT developed design concepts to upgrade the facility in the mid to late 2000s. These concepts are on file at FDOT District 6 and are currently being re-evaluated by the Department. The project provides the opportunity for reduced vehicular trips to local tourist destinations through increased use of the federally funded Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. The project is located centrally in an area of compact development. Hence, visitors can access the bridge and the trail by foot instead of getting into vehicles and driving to other scenic locations in the upper and lower keys. The intrinsic value of the old bridge segment provides for enhanced neighborhood/community quality of life. For years, locals and residents have gathered at the old bridge to celebrate the beauty of the Florida Keys and the treasures it offers. The bridge has become a fixture in the community and has become a prominent feature in national advertisements and movie sets. Tourists make their pilgrimages regularly to bask in the awesome presence of this historical structure. To eliminate public access and let the bridge crumble into the ocean would be a travesty. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. This description shall identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). The Old 7 Mile Bridge (East) is managed by the FDOT. The bridge segment connects to FDOT right of way on the west end of Knights Key. The parking area on Knights Key and adjacent right of way are managed by the FDEP as part of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. Ownership documents for the old bridge and the adjacent right of way parcels are on file at the FDOT Property Management Office. (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, including expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. No right of way acquisition is required for this project. We recognize that the old bridge and the adjacent Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail are projects of statewide significance and should include management by a statewide entity to provide consistency with the Statewide Greenways Plan and the Statewide Transportation Plan. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. FDOT converted the bridge segment for recreational use in the 1980s. FDOT developed design alternatives for upgrading the existing bicycle/pedestrian facility late in the last decade. In 2008 and 2009, FDEP planted landscaping on Knights Key near the entrance to the bridge and added benches and picnic tables as part of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail project. In 2009, FDEP was awarded $1,150,000 in FDOT Enhancement funding (FM 4280611) to construct an ADA accessible underpass between the north and south sides of the bridges on FDOT right of way. This project is currently programmed for FY 2013. Pigeon Key Foundation planted landscaping on the old bridge embankment in 2010. In May 2011, Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) approved a resolution requesting the FDOT to revisit potential design alternatives for the old bridge in light of the current economic conditions. The BOCC also requested that FDOT participate in a multi jurisdictional task force to investigate alternatives for keeping the bridge open for public use. FDOT completed a routine bridge inspection in May 2011. The results of the inspection have not yet been released. The City of Marathon recently sent a written request to FDEP and FDOT for additional lighting and a restroom facility at the east end of the old bridge. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. The Old 7 Mile Bridge is a cultural icon in the middle keys that represents the history of transportation in Florida. Its presence spans a century of technological advances and a way of life that should be memorialized for future generations. It sparks intense feelings along the spectrum of stakeholders who include the general public, history buffs, recreational users, fitness enthusiasts, international tourists, marine life observers, and even fishermen who still flock to the old bridge piers to catch their dinners. The Old 7 Mile Bridge is one of many old Flagler Bridges, but it is the only one that stands as a testament to the grit of early transportation engineers and their families who survived harsh conditions to open the "Keys Wilderness" to a civilized world. Its connection to Historic Pigeon Key and its cultural treasures provides the opportunity to relive the early days of transportation development and to understand the people, the equipment, and the technology that brought us to where we are today. 3. Project Implementation Information: Attach documentation as exhibits to this application. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house) and administering (i.e. local or state) each work phase of the project. If it is proposed that the project be administered by a governmental entity other than the Department of Transportation, the agency must be certified to administer Federal Aid projects in accordance with the department's Local Agency Program Manual (topic no. 525-010-300). District & 2011 Q l We recognize that the scope and location of this project will require a multi jurisdictional approach. One option is for Monroe County to act as the LAP Agency for the design and construction of this project. All activities would be performed in close collaboration with FDOT, the project owner. Another option would be for FDOT, as the project owner, to implement the project with a goal to keep the bridge open and operational for public use. Our BOCC is prepared to assemble and facilitate a multi -disciplinary task force that includes state, local, and federal partners who will be key in helping us to implement a project of this size and complexity. (b) Describe any public (and private, if applicable) support of the proposed project. (Examples include: written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution, financial donations or other appropriate means). The BOCC, the residents of Monroe County, the City of Marathon, and our state and national partners have all expressed their interest in seeing this project become a reality. Some of the world's greatest projects were the most difficult to implement. It would be shortsighted to undervalue the importance of preserving this historic icon based on the immediate ability to implement the project with available FY 2015 funding. Vision, perseverance, cooperation, and contributions by a multitude of stakeholder groups will be required to bring this project through the implementation phase. (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. This project exceeds the threshold of a local project. It lies on state owned right of way between two local jurisdictions. The old bridge is owned by the FDOT, and it is connected to a state trail that is managed by the FDEP. We humbly request our state partners to recognize the importance of the Historic 7 Mile Bridge as a transportation legacy that should be preserved for future generations. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability. Monroe County is committed to this project and is willing to meet with FDOT to discuss the potential restructuring of existing transportation enhancement dollars within the FDOT 5 year work program to help keep the old bridge open for public use. (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. Statement of Previous Funding Awards: Monroe County in a unique position because of our previous commitment to the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail projects. In past years, FDOT, FDEP, and Monroe County agreed as a team to allow FDEP to utilize Monroe County's enhancement allocations for the design and construction of the trail. However, FDEP was responsible for working directly with FDOT to implement the LAP agreements and to complete the projects. Monroe County was not noted when LAP agreements were signed, and we were not kept informed by FDOT of past due LAP projects. Unfortunately, there is a significant backlog in enhancement funding in the current Monroe County FDOT 5 year work program due to circumstances beyond our control. FKOHT projects have rolled over in the work program for almost a decade. Please consider that we should not be penalized for incomplete projects that have been managed by FDEP. Monroe County is prepared to be the LAP administrator on the Old 7 Mile Bridge (East) project and commits to spending work program funds in a timely manner. Our track record on implementing ARRA projects over the past few years is a testament to our dedication towards working cooperatively with FDOT to complete LAP projects in a timely manner. Appendix B anoos 4. Project Cost: What is the total estimated cost of the work requested to be funded as an enhancement project through this application? Please note that a project of this size and complexity exceeds the available enhancement dollar allocations for Fiscal Year 2015. Recent estimates provided by FDOT suggest that repairs and upgrades to the old bridge will cost between $8 million and $18 million. It is likely that a project of this magnitude will span several years and be completed in several stages that will allow safe access to the facility. Final cost estimates will be developed in close conjunction with FDOT engineers familiar with the maintenance requirements of the old bridge. The following cost estimate is provided to meet the criteria developed by FDOT for award of transportation enhancement funds for Fiscal Year 2015. Planning Activities. Project Development and Environmental Studies. Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. Right of Way Acquisition. Construction. Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. Other. (Describe) TOTAL: How will the project be funded? $ 200,000 $ 700,000 $ 100,000 H $ 1,000,000 FDOT Enhancement Funds $1,000,000 + Local $ tbd = Total $ tbd FDOT Enhancement Funds tbd % + Local tbd % = 100% CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by Monroe County BOCC (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council) and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4) support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. Appendix B This project will be administered using the departments Local Agency Program (check one) yes x no - 2-4A - J D—ate F FOR FDOT USX ONLY YNS NO Application Complete Project eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program RESOLUTION NO. 129 -2011 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, REQUESTING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WORK WITH STAFF TO DEVELOP A COST EFFECTIVE DESIGN ALTERNATIVE FOR BRIDGE UPGRADES THAT WILL ALLOW THE OLD SEVEN MILE BRIDGE TO REMAIN OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE AND PARTICIPATE IN A MULTI -AGENCY PARTNERSHIP EFFORT FACILITATED BY MONROE COUNTY TO SAVE THE OLD SEVEN MILE BRIDGE. WHEREAS, the Pigeon Key Historic District and the Old Seven Mile Bridge (the Bridge) in Monroe County, Florida, are each listed in the National Register of Historic Places; and WHEREAS The Old Seven Mile Bridge is considered significant in the areas of Transportation and Engineering based on associations with the Florida East Coast Railway and the Overseas Highway and as a structure of innovative engineering and the Pigeon Key Historic District is considered significant in the areas of Architecture and Transportation based on associations with the Florida East Coast Railway and the Overseas Highway as a worker's camp. It is also the only collection of vernacular architecture of its type remaining intact in the state; and WHEREAS, the island of Pigeon Key and the Bridge are also designated as historically significant by Monroe County, Florida; and WHEREAS, 2012 is the 100 year anniversary of the completion of the Florida East Coast Railway in the Florida Keys; and WHEREAS, the Bridge provides the only land access between Knights Key and Pigeon Key, in Monroe County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Bridge is considered a "linear park" and walkers, joggers, skaters, and cyclists made 101,480 trips to the bridge in 2010; and WHERAS, the Old Seven Mile Bridge is a key component of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Master plan which was done in partnership by the FDOT, Monroe County, National Park Service, and Rails to Trails Conservancy; and WHEREAS, Florida Department of Transportation is considering closing the Bridge to all users due to its severely deteriorated and unsafe condition; and WHEREAS, Monroe County, in partnership with other state federal and local agencies and nonprofit groups, desires to repair the Bridge to restore safe access from Knights Key to Pigeon Key, and to preserve the Bridge and Pigeon Key as historic, recreational, and cultural resources; and 0 0-1 1i O Li Cn L`1 L_ WHEREAS, FDOT has dedicated time, personnel and financial resources to evaluate the potential to upgrade the existing old Seven Mile Bridge; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, that The Board of County Commissioners requests that: 1) FDOT work with staff to develop a cost effective design alternative and cost estimate for bridge upgrades that will allow the Old Seven Mile Bridge to remain open for public use; and 2) FDOT allocate resources to participate in a multi -agency partnership effort facilitated by Monroe County to save the Old Seven Mile Bridge for use as an alternative transportation facility to Pigeon Key and establishment of a world class bicyclelpedestrian facility. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida at a regular meeting of said board on the 20th day of April, A.D., 2011. Mayor Heather Carruthers Mayor Pro Tem David Rice Commissioner Kim Wigington rnmmissioner George Neugent Syliva Murphy )LHAGE, Clerk By ,C0-1' e. Deputy Clerk Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes BOARD OF CO Y COMMISSIONERS OF MOI OE C FLORIDA By M or1C rson OR 1i: g C RIS i I! r K t,gRO�'!S 4 CC Assjsrz'al")PINEY tz: CITY OF MARATHON, FLORIDA 9805 Overseas Highway, Marathon, Florida 33050 Phone: (305) 743-0033 Fax: (305) 289-4123 February 18, 2001 Rudy Garcia, P.E. District Director of Maintenance Florida Department of Transportation 1000 N. W. I I I Avenue Miami, Florida 33172-5800 Todd McGee Construction Projects Manager Florida Department of Environmental Protection Office of Greenways and Trails 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., MS795 Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 RE: State property at Mile Marker 47, Knights Key, Bay side - locally called "Sunset Park" Dear Mssrs. Garcia and McGee: On February 8, 2011, the Marathon City Council gave staff direction to extend a request for a restroom with water fountain at the above referenced park area. In addition the Council requested we investigate the possibility of safety lighting. This park area enjoys a great deal of use by both local residents and tourists. There have been numerous requests for these amenities. The City of Marathon hopes the State of Florida will give favorable consideration to this important issue. A prompt reply will be most appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely, Roger T. Hernstadt City Manager Cc: Patty Ivey, Marathon FDOT Gus Rios, Marathon FDEP Susie Thomas, City of Marathon RECEIVED DISTRICT MAINTENANCE OFFICE FEB 2 4 2011 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MIAM1, FLORIDA � fi o rid grain l r,corn Old Seven Mile Bridge: History, scenery and a great bike ride Biking & Hiking, Florida Keys, Historic Florida —By Bonnie Gross on 09/24/2010 9:27 am Rusting railroad tracks serve as guard rails. Pigeon Key is in the distance. This gap in the Old Seven Mile Bridge, just south of Pigeon Key, prevents folks from reaching the other 5.8 mile section. How many shades of blue? MARATHON — This is a bike trail with a story to tell. The Old Seven Mile Bridge is not only spectacularly scenic, it also brings you as close as you can to experiencing Henry Flagler's historic "railroad that went to sea." The bridge, an engineering marvel of its day, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Today, it makes a memorable bike ride or walk when you're visiting the Florida Keys. Peering over the rusting guardrails — the actual rails that carried trains during its run from 1912 to 1935 — you gaze into the translucent waters and may spot sharks or other marine life. Magnificent frigatebirds and pelicans soar overhead. You'll travel far before you find another bike trip with this combination of history and postcard moments. It is 2.2 miles to Pigeon Key (a great visit and subject of another post here.) If you want more biking after your roundtrip on the bridge, the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail extends north for 11 miles to Mile Marker 58. The bridge's history is closely tied with Florida's history — Henry Flagler's railroad down the east coast of Florida is what opened the state to the world. For better or worse, Florida is what it is because of Henry Flagler. His overseas railroad, the first land route ever from Miami to Key West, never was a financial success and then it became a downright disaster. A devastating 1935 hurricane brought 200 mph winds and a 17-foot storm surge, washing away miles of railroad. Flagler's bankrupt Florida East Coast railway sold the whole right-of-way to the state for one -seventh what it cost Flagler to build the railroad. The Seven Mile Bridge was easily converted by the state of Florida to an automotive bridge — that's the surface you bike or walk today. Until 1982, when the adjoining new bridge opened, it was the only road cars could take to Key West. (I vividly remember it as awhite-knuckle ride, and when you experience how narrow it is first-hand, you will know what I mean.) Folks in the Keys treasure the bridge and use it daily. In season, it fills up each night with people savoring the famous Florida Keys sunset. If you're interested in the old bridge, you better come ride or walk it while you can. It is deteriorating and Monroe County and the State of Florida can't find the money to maintain it. Maintenance was in the budget for 2015 and has been pushed back to 2025, according to Kelly McKinnon, the executive director of the Pigeon Key Foundation. To help preserve the bridge, no vehicles are now allowed on it except the Pigeon Key golf cart. Pigeon Key used to run a tram out to the island, but now visitors come by boat. Recently, fishing, once a most popular pastime, was banned on the bridge to reduce stress. The main issue with the bridge, McKinnon says, is that the unsupported sections that were added in 1935 to widen the structure for vehicle traffic are starting to sag. The other 5.8 mile section of the Old Seven Mile Bridge south of Pigeon Key cannot be accessed— a section was removed south of the island to prevent that — and today the remaining expanse rusts in the sun and solitude, with an occasional tree finding enough dirt in a crack to sprout from it. With no maintenance, will the old bridge just blow down in the next big hurricane? McKinnon laughs at the thought. "The new bridge will go down before the old one does. It's been there for 100 years; it was made to last. The new one was just built by the lowest bidder." When you visit the Old Seven Mile Bridge, it may look familiar. It has appeared in several films, most famously the 1994 True Lies with Arnold Schwarzenegger, when the old bridge is shown being destroyed by missile strikes. (The explosion was done on an 80-foot model.) If you plan to bike or walk the Old Seven Mile Bridge: • There is parking just north of the bridge gulfside at Mile Marker 47 in Marathon. To visit Pigeon Key by boat, go to the visitor center on the ocean side. Even if you ride your bike to the island, you still need to pay the $11 admission, so you might as well enjoy the bike ride as a separate activity and then take the boat over for a guided tour. • Pigeon Key Foundation site, with good historic information and tour information • Jerry Wilkinson's detailed history of the overseas railroad Other nearby things to do in the Florida Keys and Marathon: Start of Old Seven Mile Bridge in Marathon Map Data V Close Map data ©2011 Google, INEGI This is a bike trail with a story to tell. The Old Seven Mile Bridge is not only spectacularly scenic, it also brings you as close as you can to experiencing Henry Flagler's historic "railroad that went to sea." The bridge, an engineering marvel of its day, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Today, it makes a memorable bike ride or walk when you're visiting the Florida Keys. Peering over the rusting guardrails — the actual rail tracks that carried trains during its brief run from 1912 to 1935 — you gaze into the translucent waters and may spot sharks or other marine life. Magnificent frigatebirds and pelicans soar overhead. It is 2.2 miles to Pigeon Key (a great visit and subject of another post here.) If you want more biking after your roundtrip on the bridge, the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail extends north for 11 miles to MM 58. The bridge's history is closely tied with Florida's history — Henry Flagler's railroad down the east coast of Florida is what opened the state to the world. For better or worse, Florida is what it is because of Henry Flagler. His Overseas Highway, the first land route ever from Miamit to Key west, was a more complicated story. It never was a a financial success and then it became a downright disaster — a devastating 1935 hurricane brought 200 mph Winds and a 17-foot tidal wave, washing away miles of railroad. Flagler's bankrupt F.E.C. Railway sold the whole right-of-way to the state for one -seventh what it cost Flagler to build the railroad. The Seven Mile Bridge was easily converted by the state of Florida to an automotive bridge — that's the surface you bike or walk today. Until 1982, when the sleek new bridge opened, it was the only road cars could take to Key West. (I vividly remember it as a white -knuckle ride, and when you experience how narrow it is first-hand, you will know what I mean.) Folks in the Keys treasure the bridge and use it daily. In season, it fills up each night with people lined up to watch the famous Florida Keys sunset. If you're interested in the old bridge, you better come see it while you can. It is deteriorating and Monroe County and the State of Florida can't find the money to maintain it. Maintenance was in the budget for 2015 and has been pushed back to 2025, according to Kelly McKinnon, the executive director of the Pigeon Key Foundation. To help preserve the bridge, no vehicles are now allowed on it except the Pigeon Key golf cart. Pigeon Key used to run a tram out to the island, but now visitors come by boat. Recently, fishing, once a most popular pastime, was banned on the bridge to reduce stress. The main issue with the bridge, McKinnon says, is that the unsupported sections that were added in 1935 to widen the structure for vehicle traffic are starting to sag. E2 Marathon Key Colony Bead The other 5.8 mile section of the Old Seven Mile Bridge south of Pigeon Key isn't reachable — a section was removed south of the island to prevent access— and today that section rusts in solitude, with an occasional tree finding enough dirt in a crack to sprout from it. With no maintenance, will the odl bridge just blow down in the next hurricane? McKinnon laughs at the thought. "The new bridge will go down before the old one does. It's been there for 100 years; it was made to last. The new one was just builty by the lowest bidder." ff you plan to bike or walk the Old Seven Mile Bridge: — There is parking just north of the bridge gulfside at Mile Marker 47. To visit Pigeon Key by boat, go to the visitor center on the oceanside. — Pigeon Key Foundation site, with good historic information. http://vmw.pigeonkey.net — Jerry Wilkinson's detailed history of the Overseas Railroad. http://wwN.keyshistory.org/osh.htmi Tags: Florida Keys, historic. Marathon • Tweet This •QShare _on F cebook • dDiaa This • Bookmark • MS tumble •MESS Feed ,Horne Page 1 of 1 "A global, grassroots campaign to preserve the 2.2 " bridge section ofthe world famous Overseas Railroad between Knightsa• Pigeon Key, Marathon, Florida" Website design and maintenance courtesy of Grants Pro htt„•//cavPnidceven.nmY/ 5/6/2011 ,Uld Seven Mile Bridge might get partial rehab Page 1 of 2 C7 .��NY f,' M News Photos Fishing Diving Keys Life Keys Guide Weather Opini Home ..... . 1, Search site Go'! Search classifieds 00; Search Archives GO! 11111ir "I • • • • • • •} By RYAN MCCARTHY rmccarthy@keynoter. com Posted - Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1O22 AM EDT The Old Seven Mile Bridge might not be destined for complete closure, after all: After removing the Middle Keys icon from its five- year work plan, the state Department of Transportation has apparently agreed to prepare estimates for a minimal refurbishment. The 2.2-mile span leads to historic Pigeon Key off the west end of Marathon. The "estimate is being prepared," DOT spokesman Brian Rick said in an e-mail to the Keynoter. "The ultimate project to replace the superstructure was deferred outside the five-year work program due to the inability of Monroe County to fund half of the capital cost and FDOT [being] unable to fund its half due to revenue reductions." Rick is referring to $34 million to repair the bridge agreed to several years ago by the county and DOT. He was clear DOT is working only on a potential price to rehab the bridge, not a rehab plan itself. "The department is developing repair alternatives. There are no plans being developed at this time," Rick said. DOT closed the bridge to auto and tour -train traffic in December 2007 due to structural deterioration. A year later, DOT banned fishing on the span, citing weight concerns. Rick said it's unclear whether either would be allowed if a minimal rehab is done. Now the main users are walkers, joggers, bicyclists and skaters. It's also a favorite photo stop for tourists. Since it closed the bridge to auto traffic, DOT has funded ferry service to historic Pigeon Key at $250,000 per year. It won't subsidize the service past June 2012. At its April 20 meeting, the Monroe County Commission approved a resolution asking DOT to develop a cost-effective design to keep the bridge open. "We also asked them to commit staff to creating a multi -agency task force," County Engineer Judy Clarke said. She said the county, DOT, city of Marathon and other groups would be involved. The old span is now u! and bicyclists. httn-llwww.kevsnet.coml20l l lO5lO4l3358971old-seven-mile-bridge-might-get.htmI 5/6/2011 , ,Old Seven Mile Bridge might get partial rehab Page 1 of 1 Marathon City Manager Roger Hernstadt said he's agreed to meet with county staff to discuss the city's involvement. "I think [the DOT] should put it into shape and the county could come up with a plan that Marathon can support. We want to see what we can do to help," he said. Beach Essi f'kei Vfi` It,94f hrrn•//www.kevsnet.com/201 l /05/04/335897/old-seven-mile-bridge-might-get.html 5/6/2011 4 t� All, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA !� APPLICATION FOR TRANSPORTATIONP 1Y 2 6 2114 ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS pass 10t Project Title: Duck Key gULdqe BikelPed Improvements Project Sponsor (municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council); Monroe County Board of Counter Commissioners Contact Trish Smith, AICP Title Transportation Planner Address 2798 Overseas tkhway, Suite 400 Marathon FL 33050 Phone 305 304 0412 FAX 305 289-2954 Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor). See attached ranking list Name of Applicant (If other than Project Sponsor): same 1. Qualifying Enhancement Activities: Check the enhancement activity that the proposed project will address. (NOTE: Checking all activities possible does not ensure or increase eligibility. Each activity checked must meet all criteria listed for that activity in Appendix A of FDOT Procedure 525-030-300, Transportation Enhancement Projects). x Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles The provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrian and bicyclists Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites Scenic or historic highway programs, (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities) Landscaping and other scenic beautification Historic preservation Rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals) Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails) Control and removal of outdoor advertising Archaeological planning and research Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle - caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity Establishment of transportation museums 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: 1. What type of work is being proposed? (Check all that apply) Planning Activities Project Development and Environmental Studies x Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work Right of Way Acquisition x Construction x Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities District to 2011i 02/2006 Page 2 of 3 (b) Describe how the proposed project is related to the intermodal transportation system by either function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). The Duck Key Bridge(#904603) is a vehicular bridge located 1 mile east of SR 5 (US 1) at Mile Marker 61.1. It provides the only means of vehicular access to portions of the Duck key community and is used by residents as well as visitors to the Hawks Cay Resort. (c) Where is the project located (and what is the project length and termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. The project is located on Bimini Drive on Duck Key. The bridge spans Sams Canal and links the residential Duck Key community to US 1 in Monroe County, FL. This community, along with visitors to the Hawks Cay Resort, is directly adjacent to US 1 and the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail, a 106 mile long, state owned bike/ped facility that traverses US 1. The segment of the Overseas Heritage Trail that passes Duck Key is currently under construction and is being funded with FDOT Transportation Enhancement Funding. (d) Summarize any special characteristics of project. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. The Duck Key bridge is a prestressed concrete bridge that was built in 1955 and was reconstructed in 1982. The bridge itself is approximately 42 feet long. The square footage of the deck is 1, 040 sf. It has two vehicular lanes and a total width of 25 feet (see attached). The narrow deck and arch geometry of the bridge present a safety issue for pedestrians and cyclists. The project includes widening the bridge and the bridge approaches to accommodate bicycle/pedestrian access. No pedestrian access is currently available to provide altemative transportation options from island to island. Increased pedestrian access will provide a low cost transportation facility for disadvantaged groups who may live in or visit the area. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. This description shall identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). Built by FDOT, the bridge is currently maintained by Monroe County, (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, including expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. The acquisition of additional right of way is not anticipated for this project. The existing county right of way will be used to widen the approaches. Additional width will be added to the bridge to create bike/ped access. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. An FDOT bridge inspection report was completed on the Duck Key Bridge in March 2010. The sufficiency rating was 71.7. The health index was 77.75. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. Alternative transportation options by way of bike/ped facilities offer a valid way to reduce our carbon footprint, improve human health, and reduce vehicular/pedestrian incidents. In addition to the 375 homes on Duck Key, the island is the location of Hawks Cay Resort. This internationally known resort hosts 230, 000 visitors a year. The residents and visitors walk and ride bicycles throughout the community. In the case of the Duck Key Bridge, the request to widen the bridge to safely accommodate a bike/ped facility was made by the Duck Key Security District Board of Directors and directly by the general public who reside within the Duck Key community. There is a strong desire to access commercial districts and shopping via alternative modes of transportation. The Hawks Cay Resort, that welcomes tourists from around the worid, also creates a significant demand for transportation and recreational pursuits. 3. Project Implementation Information: Attach documentation as exhibits to this application. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house) and administering (i.e. local or state) each work phase of the project. If it is proposed that the project be administered by a governmental entity other than the Department of Transportation, the agency must be certified to administer Federal Aid projects in accordance with the department's Local Agency Program Manual (topic no. 525-010-300). The project will be managed locally through FDOT's Local Agency Program (LAP) by the Monroe County Engineering Department. A contract will be awarded for each phase of the project utilizing the requirements outlined in the LAP agreement. 2. Describe any public (and private, if applicable) support of the proposed project. (Examples include: written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution, financial donations or other appropriate means). This project has been requested by the residents of Monroe County through phone calls to the Director of Engineering Services as well as through verbal requests to the County Administrator and members of the Board of County Commissioners. 3. Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. The project will continue to be owned and maintained by Monroe County. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability. It is anticipated that due to the age, condition, and construction materials used on the existing bridge, that additional funds above those currently available through the Transportation Enhancement Funding Program will be required to make the appropriate improvements. Monroe County plans to utilize local transportation impact fees to cover the costs over and above the enhancement allocation. 4. Other specific implementation information that should be considered. Statement of Previous Funding Awards Monroe County in a unique position because of our previous commitment to the Flonda Keys Overseas Heritage Trail projects. In past years, FDOT, FDEP, and Monroe County signed an MOA to allow FDEP to utilize Monroe County's enhancement allocations for the design and construction of the trail. However, FDEP was responsible for working directly with FDOT to implement the LAP agreements and to complete the projects. Monroe County was not noted when LAP agreements were signed, and we were not kept informed by FDOT of past due LAP projects. Unfortunately, there is a significant backlog in enhancement funding in the current Monroe County FDOT 5 year work program due to circumstances beyond our control. FKOHT projects have rolled over in the work program for almost a decade. Please consider that we should not be penalized for incomplete projects that have been managed by FDEP. Monroe County is prepared to be the LAP administrator on the Duck Key project and commits to spending work program funds in a timely manner. Our track record on implementing ARRA projects over the past few years is a testament to our dedication towards working cooperatively with FDOT to complete LAP projects in a timely manner. P.. ' • 1! g: 3 of What is the total estimated cost of the work requested to be funded as an enhancement project through this .. • Planning Activities. Project Development and Environmental Studies. Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. Right of Way Acquisition. Construction. Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. Other. (Describe) projectHow will the - funded? TOTAL: $ 150,000 $ 800, 000 $ 50,000 $— 1 000.000 • Local00, • • - • . • 0 _ This project will be administered using the department's Local Agency Program ( k one) yes x no FOR FDOT USX ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program 51 l ' - • IX BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM InspectlonICID/BrId.: Profile Report PAGE: I OF 33 NAME:Marlin Engineering, Inc. STRUCTURE Not Recorde,� • 2 County Hwy Agency YEAR BUILT: 1955 2 County Hwy Agency SECTION NO.: 90508001 5 Prestressed Concrete 1 mile E of SR5 at MM 61. 1 ROUTE:D,0i'i Highway FACILITY CARRIED: Blmlnl Drive ! Waterway FEATUREINTERSECTED: Same Canal FUNCTIONALLY Ej OBSOLETE 0 STRUCTURALLY TYPE OF INSPECTION: This report contains Informallon misting to dw physical sm of a structure and depictions of the structure. This Inkmation is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sec&= 119.071(3Xa) and 119 071(3)(b). Florida Staluiles, Only the cover pw of this report may be Inspected and copied. '•' ■- S0115 (condensed]) ' I t. . r .'.. 1: FLORIDADEPARTMENT OF • • BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM InsPection/CID/Bridge ProfileReport BY Marlin Engineering. Inc OWNER 2 County Hwy Agency MAINTAINED BY 2 County Hwy Agency STRUCTURE TYPE 5 Prestressed Concrete - 22 Channel Beam LOCATION lmlls E of SR5 at MM 61 1 SERVICE TYPE ON 1 Highway SERV TYPE LIND 5 Waterway PAGE: 2 OF 33 INSPECTION DATE: 3/2412010 IMHH STRUCTURE NAME Not Recorded YEAR BUILT. 1955 SECTION NO.. 90 508 001 MP. 0.973 ROUTE: 00000 FACILITY CARRIED. Blminl Drive FEATURE INTERSECTED. Sam Canal BRIDGEE] THIS • CRITICAL• .• SCOURNENTS C1 THIS BRIDGE IS REPORTE] THIS ► DEFICIENCIES FUNCTIONALLYOBSOLETE ■ STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT TYPE OF • VIM • • • • OVERALL NBI RA DECK 6 Satisfactory SUPERSTRUCTURE 6 Satisfactory SUBSTRUCTURE 7 Good PERF RATING Good FIELD PERSONNEL / TITLE / NUMBER Porres, Omar - Sens Diver Bridge Inspector (CBI#0 ) (lead) Guzman, Armando - Bridge Inspector (C9IB407) Alvarez. Jose - Assistant Bridge Inspector REVIEWING BRIDGE INSPECTION SUPERVISOR: Vazquez, Eduardo- Bridge Inspector (Cl3W369) CONFIRMING REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Soria, Miguel - Proffessiondfriginser IP E 1I49359) Marlin Engineering ine 2191 NW 97th Avenue Miami, FL 33172 to SIGNATURE DATE UNDERWATER 03/24/2010 CHANNEL. 5 Bank Prot Eroded CULVERT N N/A (NBI) SUFF RATING; 717 HEALTH INDEX 77 75 This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sedans 119.071(3)(8) and 119.071(3)(b), Florida Statutes Only the cover page of this report may be Inspected and copied REPORT 10 INSPO05 (condensed) PRINTED: 05105/2010 • tf tr • • • BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM InspectionICID/BrIdge Profile Report PAGE: 9 OF 33 Location Mao (Photo 021 This report contains Information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions Of the structure. This information Is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections 119 071(3)(a) and 119.071(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. REPORT ID INS (condensed) PRINTED: 06/05/2010 � 7! FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM InspectlonICID/BrIdge Profile Report West Agoroach View (Photo 04) PAGE: 10 OF 33 Ituc®errenu nwTr. ,........ — •--11H This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections I I9.071(3)(a) and 119 071(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied PRINTED. 05/05/2010 PRINTED:FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE MANAGF-ME14T SYSTEM REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 27 of 33 Structure ID: 904003 DATE , EL-1-lie,r.; Structure Unit Identification B ' nit Key: 904603 0 Structure Name: Description: MAIN SPAN 1 Type: M Main 0 Iflcati N81 Structure No (8) 904603 PositionlPrefuc (5) Route On Structure Kind Hwy (Rte Prefix) 4 County Hwy Design Level of Service 0 None of the below Route Number/Suffix / 0 MIA (NBI) Feature Intersect (6) Sams Canal Critical Faalily Not Defense-crit Facility Carried (7) Bimini Drive Mile Pant (I 1) 0.975 Latitude (16) 024d4&08' Long (17) 080d5&101 Roe a1/ Gass ftei n NaL Hwy Sys (104) 0 Not on NHS National base Net (12) Not on Base Network LRS Inventory Rte (13a► 90 508 001 Functional Class (2% 08 Rural min Collector On Federal Aid System N Defense Hwy (100) 0 Not a STRAHNET hwy Direction of Traffic (102) 2 2-way traffic Emergency® wav !Oft and Accidents Lanese (28) 2 Medians 1 Speed 25 mph ADT Class ADT Class 2 Recent ADT (29) 539 Year (30) 11999 FutureADT (114) 876 Year (115) 2030 Truck % ADT (109) 2 Delour Length (19) 99 mr Ddour Spew 0 mph Accident Count -1 bate -1 Roa_ n Clearances vertical (10) 99.99 ft Appr Road (32) 20 4 Hodr. (47) 23.1 q Roadway (51) 23.1 it Sub Rte (13b) 00 Truck Network (110) 0 Not part of nail netwo Toll Facility (20) 3 On free road Fed Lands Hwy (105) 0 WA (N61) School But Route Transit Route This report contains information relating to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure This Information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections 119.071(3)(a) and 119.071(3)(b). Florida Statutes Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 19RIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Inspection/CID/Bridge Profile Report REPORT ID: INVT001A COMPREHENSIVE Page 28 of 33 Structure ID:904603 DATE PRINTED: 05/06/2010 Structure Identification m bics Admin Area Miami -Dade County Spans in Main Unit (45) 1 District (2) D6 -Miami Approach Spans (46) 0 County (3) (90)Monme Length of Max Span (48) 414 It Place Code (4) Key Colony Beach Structure Length (49) 414 It Location (9) 1mile E of SR5 at MM 61.1 Total Length 42 It Border Br St/Reg (98) Not Applicable (P) Share 0 % Deck Area 1040 sgft Border Struct No (99) Structure Flared (35) 0 No flare FIPS State/Region (1) 12 Florida Region 4-Atlenta NBIS Bridge Len (112) Meets NBI Length MIAnd Service Parallel Structure (101) No II bridge exists Year Built (27) 1955 Temp. Structure (103) Not Applicable (P) Year Reconstructed (108) 1982 Maint Rasp. (21) 2 County Hwy Agency Type of Service On (42s) 1 Highway Owner (22) 2 County Hwy Agency Under (42b) 5 Waterway Historic Signif. (37) 5 Not eligible for NRHP Fracture Critical Detals Not Applicable Structure In and Material Curb/Sldewalk (50): Lett Oft Right Bridge Median (33): 2 Closed Mod w/o Barrier Main Span Material (43A): 5 Prestressed Concrete Appr Span Material (44A): Not Applicable Main Span Design (438): 22 Channel Beam Appr Span Design (448): Not Applicable Structure Arut+ralsal Open/P (41) A Open no restriction Deck Geometry (68) 4 Tolerable Undercearences (69) N Not applicable (NBQ Approach Alignment (72) 6-Touch BirakerDowrishlft Bridge Rafts (36a) 0 Substandard Transitions (36b) 0 Substandard Approach Guardrail (36c) 0 Substandard Approach Guardrail ends (36d) 0 Substandard Scour Critical (113) U Unknown Foundation Minimum Vertical Clearance Over Structure (53) 99.99 ft Under (reference) (540) N Feature not hwy or RR Under(54b) 0 ft Load Ratina Design Load (31) 5 MS 18 (HS 20) Rating Date 3/23/1995 Initials SHK Posting (70) 5 AVAba" Legal Loads Deck Tvpe and Material — Oft Deck Wkth (52): 25.1 Skew (34): 0 Deck Type (107): 2 Concrete Precast Panel Surface (108): 8 Bituminous Membrane. 0 None Deck Protection: Nora laatlon Data Navigation Control (36) Permit Required Nav Vertical Clr (39) 118 If Nav Horizontal Ck (40) 3.6 If Min Vert Lilt Ck (I IS) oft Pier P (111) 1 Not Required NBI Condition Rating Sufficiency Rating 717 Health Index 77 75 Structural Eval (67) 6 Equal Min Crawls Deficiency Not Deficient Minimum Lateral Underclearance Reference (559) N Feature not hwy or RR Right Side (55b) 0 ft Left Side(56) O It Operating Type (63) 1 LF Load Factor Operating rating (64) 58 tons Alternate -1 Inventory Type (85) 1 LF Load Factor Inventory Rating (66) 34.7 tons Altemale -1 All Meth -1 Current Inspection Next Inspection Date Scheduled Inspection Date: 03/24/2010 N81 3/2412012 Inspector: KNMEIOP-P - Omar Porras Element 03/24/2012 Bridge Group: NIA Fracture Critical. Primary Type: Regu°sr NBI Underwater: 03/24/2012 Review Required: rr Othedspedal: This report contains Information relalrng to the physical security of a structure and depictions of the structure. This information is confidential and exempt from public inspection pursuant to sections 119.071(3)(a) and 119.071(3)(b), Florida Statutes. Only the cover page of this report may be inspected and copied.