10/19/2011 PSODANNY L. KOLHAGE
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DATE: October 31, 2011
TO: Peter Horton, Director
of Airports
Attn: April Pearson
FROM: Pamela G. Hanc. C.
At the October 19, 2011 Board of County Commissioners meeting, the Board granted
approval and authorized execution of the following:
v l Item C 14 Purchase Service Order #I 1- 12-02 with URS for "Title 14 CFR Part 150 Study
Update" at the Key West International Airport. Enclosed is a copy for your handling.
Item C18 Financial Consulting Services Agreement with Newton & Associates, Inc. for
professional services at Key West International Airport and The Florida Keys Marathon Airport.
Enclosed is a duplicate original your handling.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office.
cc: County Attorney, w/o documents
Finance
File
PURCHASE / SERVICE ORDER
M!,
MONROE COUNTY
To: URS Corporation Southern
Re: PSA Agreement, Dated: 4 -1 -07
Purchase Service Order No
Resolution
F
n 9) �'
11/12 -2
Project Name: Key West International — Part 150 Study Update
Description of Services:
Multiple of Direct Salaries_
Lump Sum X
Days to Complete 1095
Reimbursable Expense
Fee this Service Order $431,178.00
c7
Payment for Services shall be in their entirety as per PSO. w
0
Prepared by:
Milford A. Reisert
Date:
�
Date: I O — 21 S -- <
Accepted by:
aa'e--R 0
Carlos Garcia
Date:
UL - 1 - 2011
(See attached Scope of Services)
Approved by:
l�' b
Mayor Heat 4r C uthers
NAADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTIAAA- RECEPTIONIST 1PS0111- 121PSO- 11- 12 -2.DOC
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
KEY WEST, FLORIDA
TITLE 14 CFR PART 150 STUDY UPDATE
URS CORPORATION
SCOPE OF SERVICES
30- May -2011
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
TITLE 14 CFR PART 150 STUDY UPDATE
SCOPE OF SERVICES
INTRODUCTION
The last title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) for Key West International
Airport (EYW) was approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 7- May -1999.
Updated Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) were accepted by the FAA on 27- August -2008. Several
changes in the aircraft operations at EYW have occurred since the NEMs were accepted in 2008,
including the introduction of passenger jet service by several air carriers. The updated NEMs
prepared under this Scope of Services will reflect the currently existing condition, as well as a
future forecast condition. After the NEMs have been completed and submitted to FAA for review
and acceptance, a decision will be made regarding the necessity to update the NCP.
This Scope of Services outlines the tasks to be completed by URS Corporation and its
subcontractors, hereafter referred to as "Consultant" to assist Monroe County in the preparation
of updated NEMs, and potentially an updated NCP, for EYW.
The updated NEMs and, if necessary, the NCP will be prepared in accordance with the
requirements and guidance outlined in title 14 CFR part 150.
PHASE 1 - NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS
TASK 1 MOBILIZATION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Task 1.1 Mobilization
This task involves the mobilization, coordination, and management of the non - technical aspects
of Phase 1 of the project. This would include a Kick -Off meeting in Key West to discuss the study
goals, objectives, and protocols. This task includes one two- day /one -night trip to Key West by up
to three Consultant staff (Project Manager, Deputy PM, Sr. Noise Consultant).
Task 1.2 Project Management
Throughout the duration of the project, the Consultants' Project Manager will be coordinating as
necessary with EYW staff and others to ensure that the project and schedule are progressing as
planned. This on -going coordination will provide EYW staff with a consistent, single
point -of- contact throughout the duration of the project. Progress Reports will be prepared
monthly and provided to EYW staff, with copies to the FAA. This task will include any
coordination meetings required outside the scope of the meetings associated with the Ad -Hoc
UM Page 1 of 26
Committee on Noise, which are described in Task 7.2, not to exceed two two -day / one -night
trips to Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager.
TASK 2 LAND USE MAPPING
The Consultant has been working at EYW since completing the Part 150 Study in 1999. As part
of the requirements of the 1999 Part 150 Study, the Consultant has performed a Noise Contour
Update annually. A detailed Geographical Information System (GIS) database of land use,
population and housing data was developed during the previous Part 150 Study. To maintain
consistency between the impacts associated with the 1999 Part 150 Study and the annual Noise
Contour Update, the GIS database has not been revised to reflect current conditions. Therefore, it
is appropriate to update the GIS database for this study, to ensure that compatible and
noncompatible land uses in the study area are accurately identified. Any future Noise Contour
Updates will utilize the updated GIS database prepared in this task.
Task 2.1 Update Land Use, Zoning, Population, and Housing Data
Updates to local comprehensive plans; existing and future land use maps; zoning maps and
regulations; land development regulations; and other existing land use plans, transportation
plans, approved subdivision plats, and other approved development plans will be obtained from
the City of Key West and Monroe County. These documents, as well as the Airport Layout Plan
(ALP), and Airport Master Plan, will be reviewed to determine any existing and potential future
conflicts between the airport and the surrounding communities. If needed, meetings will be
scheduled with appropriate local agencies to collect, review, and /or discuss the aforementioned
documents.
Current digital information (e.g., graphic and statistical databases, land use and land cover data,
Digital Line Graphs, U.S. Census TIGER /line files, and U.S. Census P.L. 94 -171 population data)
will be assembled to update the existing GIS. Updated parcel data will be obtained from the
Monroe County Property Appraiser's office to determine tax assessed property values and
ownership. EYW will facilitate obtaining the necessary information from the City of Key West and
Monroe County. Field review will be accomplished in order to verify changes, if any, to
noise - sensitive areas, specific noise sensitive sites, and verify and obtain additional detail
regarding current land uses in and around the airport property. The field review will be
accomplished during trips to Key West that are scheduled for the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings in
Task 7.2.
Task 2.2 Update GIS Databases and Mapping
The extensive existing digital GIS developed for the 1999 Part 150 Study will be updated and
utilized for base mapping and to delineate current land use, jurisdictions, zoning, population,
housing, noise sensitive sites, airport related easements, and airport facilities /property. The GIS
will be used to estimate noise exposure within the noise contours developed for this study.
TIR Page 2 of 26
Copies of the GIS databases will also be provided to EYW and the FAA in digital format upon
completion of the project.
Task 2.3 Web -Based GIS Mapping
The Consultant will make the Part 150 Study mapping electronically accessible to EYW and the
public via a web -based application. A link to the mapping will be available on the Ad -Hoc
Committee web site. The Consultant will utilize ESRI ArcServer software to develop the
web -based mapping. The Consultant will host the web site on a commercially available external
server. This Scope of Services includes the cost of hosting the web site for a period of three years
from the date of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) for these services.
The mapping portion of the web site will provide a variety of layers that can be turned on and off by
the user, including, but not limited to: DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours, Noise Insulation
Program (NIP) boundaries, RPZs for all runways, existing land use, and property over which
Monroe County holds an Avigation Easement as a result of the NIP. Search functions will be
provided that allow the user to search by specific address, street name, and parcels within
specified noise contours. Standard web -based functions will be provided including, but not limited
to: zoom in, zoom out, previous extent, select, pan, and print.
Task 2.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Detail Checking is a verifying procedure whereby all information of a deliverable is verified for
correctness, completeness and technical accuracy by a Senior Professional who is part of the
project team as assigned by the Project Manager.
Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 2.5 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on land use, jurisdictions, zoning, population, and housing
will be prepared in the form of Section 2, Jurisdictions and Land Use in the Noise Exposure
Maps and Supporting Documentation. (Note: Section 1 will be the Introduction to the Noise
Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation.) Section 1 and 2 will be provided to the
FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with
three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD version on each.
TASK 3 INVENTORY OF AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
This task consists of collecting data, issuing and collecting questionnaires, and analyzing all
information ultimately obtained.
.........
U119 Page 3 of 26
Task 3.1 Update Aircraft Operations Data
The Consultant has produced multiple annual Noise Contour Updates at EYW, therefore this task
will commence with a review and validation of the data used for the most recent Noise Contour
Update. This review will allow the Consultant to determine what existing data may no longer be
valid, and will assist the Consultant in determining which sources would provide the most
accurate and verifiable data. Historical air traffic activity records will be collected, reviewed,
verified, and updated with the latest available statistics. Commercial aviation data collection will
include origin /destination information leading to determination of city pairs, route distances,
estimated takeoff weights, actual and probable flight tracks, and any other information that will
contribute to the Part 150 Study. This task includes one three - day /two -night trip to Key West by
two Consultant staff (Deputy PM and Sr. Noise Consultant) to collect and update data. Data will
include:
Commercial aircraft operations for the following:
• Passenger Air Carriers
• Cargo Carriers
• Air Taxi
• Charters
• Aircraft Fleet Mix
General aviation activity including the following:
• Itinerant vs. Local Operations
• Number and Type of Based Aircraft
• Aircraft Fleet Mix
Military activity including the following:
• Itinerant vs. Local Operations
• Aircraft Fleet Mix
Current data will be collected to aid in the determination of existing and future aircraft operational
characteristics. The operational data will form the basis for development of the noise contours.
Data to be collected and analyzed will include the following:
• Fleet Mix
• Number and Type of Operations
• Origin /Destination
• Radar Flight Tracks
• Ground Run -up and Maintenance Activities
• Airspace and Air Traffic
• Day /Night Usage
• Runway Usage
VFR and IFR Operations
Page 4 of 26
Aviation related data will be obtained from various sources including:
• Airport Traffic Control Tower
• NAS Key West
• EYW Passenger and Cargo Landing Fee Reports
• EYW Passenger and Cargo Airline Schedules
• FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System (ATADS)
• FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF)
• Florida Aviation System Plans (FASP) Forecast
Task 3.2 Review Existing Aviation Plans and Studies
Specifically, collection and review of the following information will occur:
• National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS)
• FAA Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF)
• Current Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
• Current Airport Master Plan
• Studies accomplished specifically for, or relevant to, the airport
Task 3.3 Analyze Radar Data and Develop INM Flight Tracks
In order to obtain accurate flight track and performance profile data for aircraft currently using
EYW, radar data will be collected for periods of time which are representative of various
operational configurations (east flow /west flow) of the airport. This radar data must be obtained
from NAS Key West, and must be coordinated through appropriate chains of command. Flight
track data will be obtained to extract appropriate information on time, velocities, flight tracks,
altitude profiles, aircraft type and airline. NAS Key West has a Standard Terminal Automation
Replacement System (STARS). STARS receives radar data and flight plan information and
presents the information to air traffic controllers allowing the controller to monitor, control, and
accept hand -off of air traffic. The STARS system should be capable of providing 45 days of
archived data. However, the Consultant will attempt to obtain additional data to capture both east
and west flow at maximum activity levels. The length of available data will determine the effort
required to process this data. The Radar Data Processing Software Developer and Radar Data
Processing Specialist will review and evaluate the data in its native format. The Radar Data
Processing Software Developer, with input from the Radar Data Processing Specialist, will then
write a computer program to translate the radar data from its native format into a format that can
be imported to the GIS. The Radar Data Processing Specialist will review the data to determine
parameters by which the data can be screened to remove data that is not relevant to EYW. The
Radar Data Processing Software Developer will then write additional computer code to remove
the data that is not relevant to EYW. Analysis will include comparison of radar tracks to INM flight
tracks developed previously for the 2008 NEM Update. Costs associated with this activity are
based on obtaining 45 days of radar data.
TIRS Page 5 of 26
This information will be used to update flight track utilization records for the INM noise modeling
analysis. Furthermore, nominal and dispersed flight tracks along with representative flight profiles
will be updated for input into INM using actual radar data. This provides for a highly accurate
representation of the existing conditions at EYW during the noise modeling process.
Task 3.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 3.5 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on existing and future airport and aircraft operations will be
prepared in the form of Section 3, Airport and Aircraft Activity in the Noise Exposure Maps
and Supporting Documentation. Section 3 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to
inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and
three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD version on each.
TASK 4 EXISTING NOISE CONTOURS
Task 4.1 Develop Existing Noise Contours
Airport and aircraft operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. This information will be
formatted for input into the most current version of FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM) available
at the start of modeling, currently INM 7.0b. INM default database aircraft and departure and
approach profiles will be used to model existing aircraft operations at EYW. If FAA releases a
new version of INM during the development of the NEMs, they may require that the study be
updated to use the latest version of INM. If this occurs, required revisions to the study will be
addressed in a supplemental agreement.
If the radar data analysis determines that EYW regularly uses non - standard approach and /or
departure procedures, the FAA, the Airport, and the Consultant will decide if the INM profiles will
need to be modified to accurately portray these profiles. If the FAA deems it necessary for the
Consultant to customize INM flight profiles to represent actual conditions at EYW, the FAA's
Airports District Office (ADO) Project Manager will initiate coordination with the FAA Regional
Noise Program Manager and the FAA Office of Environment and Energy (AEE) Noise Division.
This modification and FAA AEEs' approval for the use of modified flight profiles will be considered
an Additional Service and is not covered under this Scope of Services or Fee Estimate.
Aircraft engine run -up operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. This information will be
formatted for input into the INM. INM default database engine run -up identifiers will be used to
UM Page 6 of 26
model existing engine run -up operations at EYW.
Noise contours representing the combination of flight and engine run -up operations will be
generated at DNL 60, 65, 70, and 75 dB. The DNL 60 dB may be used to define preventive land
use measures boundaries, but will not be used to quantify noise impacts. The INM standard grid
analysis feature will be used to calculate DNL values at up to 20 noise - sensitive sites.
Task 4.2 Evaluate Impacts of the Existing Condition Noise Contours
The DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours which were developed in Task 4.1 will be incorporated
into the GIS database in order to more accurately quantify noise exposure in terms of population,
households, and land use. The DNL 60 dB contour may be used to define preventative land use
measures and may be provided for informational purposes, but will not be used to quantify noise
impacts, nor will it be used for remedial land use measures. Tables will be developed from the
GIS to describe the noise exposure estimates for the Existing Condition. Graphics will be
provided to illustrate the noise contours superimposed over the base mapping and land use.
Noise compatibility will be determined by comparing the modeled DNL noise levels with existing
land use and the FAA Land Use Compatibility Guidelines provided in Table 1 of Appendix A in title
14 CFR part 150.
Task 4.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 4.4 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on existing condition noise contours will be prepared in the
form of Section 4, Existing Conditions Noise Exposure in the Noise Exposure Maps and
Supporting Documentation. Section 4 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion
into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3)
CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD version on each.
TASK 5 MEASUREMENT OF EXISTING NOISE LEVELS
There are several residential areas that historically have been located just outside the DNL 65 dB
noise contour. As a result, the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) recommendations from the
1999 Part 150 Study excluded these areas from the Noise Insulation Program (NIP) for EYW.
The purpose of this task is to conduct monitoring in areas just outside the current NIP boundary
where there have been a lot of inquiries regarding eligibility for the NIP. The results of the noise
monitoring will assist in presenting the validity of the noise contours to any interested parties and
Page 7 of 26
assist in determining if there are other factors affecting the propagation of aircraft noise not
accounted for within the modeling parameters.
Monroe County's Ad -Hoc Committee on Airport Noise specifically recommended that this task be
included in the Part 150 Update. In the absence of empirical noise measurements, the general
public tends to distrust the validity of noise contours developed using computer modeling. The
general public is more likely to accept the validity of the noise contours if it can be demonstrated
that they are accurate using noise measurements. The likelihood of acceptance increases with
the length of time measurements are taken.
Task 5.1 Noise Monitoring
The Consultant will prepare for, and coordinate with, airport staff and property owners for setting
up four noise monitors in the vicinity of the airport.
A total of three (3) days will be required for the Consultant to set -up and confirm the working
condition of the monitoring equipment. The first day will primarily be spent setting up one noise
monitor at each of the four sites to measure the exterior noise conditions for a period of four
weeks. Also on the first day, coordination will occur with each property owner representative
concerning the procedures for overseeing the noise monitor.
Two additional days will be spent in Key West recording details of aircraft and other human
produced noise events. These details will include, when identifiable, noise source, type of activity,
time of day, and measured noise levels. During the second and third day, noise events will be
recorded at each site including aircraft operations and other background noises. Typical aircraft
operations that are expected to create each unique noise event would include the following:
• Arrivals to Runway 09 and /or Runway 27;
• Departures from Runway 27 and /or Runway 09;
• Reverse thrust from Runway 27 arrivals and /or Runway 09 arrivals;
• Start of takeoff roll noise for Runway 09 departures and /or Runway 27 departures; and
• Engine runups prior to Runway 09 and /or Runway 27 departures.
This recorded information will aid in the identification of measured aircraft events during the
month of unattended operation.
Using a cell modem and datalogger, noise data will be remotely downloaded on a daily basis to
monitor any system issues and to backup all measured data. The noise monitors will transfer
data continuously to a datalogger computer. This data includes all measured noise data as well
as system parameters such as battery voltage and system settings. At least once a day, the
monitoring data will be downloaded from the datalogger to the servers, where the data can be
accessed and downloaded through the internet. Data will be monitored every few days by the
Manager of Noise Monitoring to ensure the system is collecting data.
TI S Page 8 of 26
At the end of the four -week measurement period, the Consultant will shut down the noise
monitors, takedown and pack the monitors, and arrange for return shipment.
This task includes one four - day /four -night trip to Key West by three staff from Tampa (Deputy PM,
Sr. Noise Consultant, Jr. Noise Consultant) and one five- day /five -night trip to Key West by the
Manager of Noise Monitoring from Boston for initiation of the monitoring. At the end of the
monitoring period the Consultant will make another trip to Key West from Tampa for removal of
the monitoring system. They will ship the equipment back to Boston. The removal of the
monitoring system will be accomplished during a trip to Key West that is scheduled for the Ad -Hoc
Committee meetings in Task 7.2.
Task 5.2 Measured Noise Impact Analysis
At the end of the four -week measurement period, all measured DNL data will be evaluated by the
Manager of Noise Monitoring and the Director of Noise Monitoring. Using the data collected and
the event logging performed in Task 5.1, the Manager of Noise Monitoring will analyze total
measured DNL levels and aircraft -only DNL noise levels.
With the measured total and aircraft -only DNL noise data, the exterior acoustical conditions and
measured DNL noise levels will be quantified at each site. The measured DNL will be compared
to the modeled DNL contour levels to determine if there may be noise propagation characteristics
not accounted for in the INM inputs and if the INM input data and INM default data accurately
represent the characteristics of the acoustical conditions at EYW.
Task 5.3 Modeled Noise Impact Analysis
Noise measurement data collected over an extended period (e.g., one month) may be used to
confirm INM modeling results or justify a reevaluation of the INM noise contours. There are
multiple issues that warrant a review of the modeling results. Some of these issues are significant
and some are minor, but even the minor ones may be important for an area located just outside
the DNL 65 dB noise contour produced by INM. Several issues that may directly impact the
residential areas where monitoring was conducted could result in producing measured results
higher than the INM predicts. These include the following
• Overwater sound propagation;
• Behind takeoff roll directivity;
• Business jet noise power distance curves; and
• Business jet departure profiles.
INM is based on over land sound propagation where the reflection of sound off the intervening
terrain results in significant sound attenuation. That "lateral attenuation" is greatly reduced when
sound propagates overwater as is partially the case with these areas. In addition, the directivity
1W Page 9 of 26
behind the start of takeoff roll used in INM is based on the directivity patterns of air carric;.
INM does not have specific directivity patterns of smaller business jets. Also, the noise pow -
distance curves and procedural and point profiles in INM, while generally reasonable, may
reflect procedures used at EYW. All of these factors may cause INM to under predict the actu,.
noise and will be used to support the validity of the measured noise data.
If the noise monitoring comparison indicates one or all of these factors may not be represented
properly in the INM modeling, any modification to the INM default modeling characteristics will
require the Airport Sponsor and the Consultant to request that the FAA ADO initiate the review
and approval process with FAA AEE. If the analysis determines that default modeling
characteristics do not accurately represent the characteristics at EYW, the FAA, the Airport, and
the Consultant will decide if, and which, INM data will need to be modified to accurately portray
these characteristics. If the FAA deems it necessary for the Consultant to customize INM input
data to represent actual conditions at EYW, the FAA's Airports District Office (ADO) Project
Manager will initiate coordination with the FAA Regional Noise Program Manager and the FAA
Office of Environment and Energy (AEE) Noise Division. This modification and FAA AEEs'
approval for the use of modified flight profiles will be considered an Additional Service and is not
covered under this Scope of Services or Fee Estimate.
Task 5.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 5.5 Documentation
A draft technical memorandum will be prepared by the Director of Noise Monitoring and the
Manager of Noise Monitoring detailing the measurement procedures, data analysis, data results
and INM issues related to the selected sites. Also, if measured results differ from the modeled
DNL levels, the Consultant will report the likely cause(s) for these differences.
A final technical memorandum will be produced incorporating any comments received on the draft
document. The technical memorandum will become an appendix in the Noise Exposure Maps
and Supporting Documentation. The monitoring locations and a summary of the results will
be included in Section 4, Existing Conditions Noise Exposure in the Noise Exposure Maps
and Supporting Documentation. This memorandum will be provided to the FAA with Section 4
for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3)
hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD version on each.
TASK 6 FUTURE NOISE CONTOURS
Task 6.1 Develop Future Condition Noise Contours
UM Page 10 of 26
The future aircraft and airport operations, developed in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day for the established forecast
period (five years or more beyond the Existing Condition). This information will be formatted for
input into the most current INM version, currently 7.0b. INM default database aircraft and
departure and approach profiles will be used to model future aircraft operations at EYW. If FAA
releases a new version of INM during the development of the NEMs, they may require that the
study be updated to use the latest version of INM. If this occurs, required revisions to the study will
be addressed in a supplemental agreement. If, in Task 4, it was determined that non - standard
flight profiles are regularly used at EYW and should be included in this Part 150 Study, the
development and approval process will be considered an Additional Service. If custom profiles
are developed for Task 4, these profiles will be used in place of the default profiles for the Future
Conditions.
Aircraft engine run -up operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to
determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. INM standard database
engine run -up identifiers will be used to model future engine run -up operations at EYW.
Noise contours representing both flight operations and engine run -up operations will be
generated at DNL 60, 65, 70, and 75 dB. (The DNL 60 dB may be used to define boundaries for
preventive land use measures.) The INM standard grid analysis feature will be used to calculate
DNL values at up to 20 noise- sensitive sites.
Task 6.2 Evaluate Impacts of the Future Condition Noise Contours
The DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours for the future conditions which were developed in Task
6.1 will be incorporated into the GIS database in order to more accurately quantify noise exposure
in terms of population, households, and land use. The DNL 60 dB contour may be used to define
preventative land use measures and may be provided for informational purposes, but will not be
used to quantify noise impacts, nor will it be used for remedial land use measures. Tables will be
developed from the GIS to describe the noise exposure estimates for each of the future
conditions. Graphics will be provided to illustrate the noise contours superimposed over the base
mapping and land use. Noise compatibility will be determined by comparing the anticipated DNL
noise levels with existing land use and the FAA land use compatibility guidelines provided in
Table 1 of Appendix A in Part 150.
Task 6.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 6.4 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on future condition noise contours and supplemental
Page 11 of 26
evaluation metrics will be prepared in the form of Section 5, Future Condition Noise Exposure
in the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation.. Section 5 will be provided to
the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with
three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pde version and a MS WORD ° version on each.
UM Page 12 of 26
TASK 7 NEM CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
The project will include consultation and public involvement necessary to meet the requirements
of the Part 150 process. The airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity
to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft
Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations.
Task 7.1 Notify § 150.21 (b) "Consulted Parties"
Title 14 CFR part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, § 150.21 (b) requires that each Noise
Exposure Map and related documentation must be developed and prepared in consultation with
states, and public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of
jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the map, FAA ADO, ATO and Regional
officials, and other Federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map.
This consultation must include regular aeronautical users of the airport.
The Consultant, in coordination with EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee, will identify these
parties. A letter and /or e-mail will be sent to the identified parties informing them that Monroe
County has initiated a title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Exposure Map Update. The letter will provide
information regarding opportunities for agency involvement in the process.
Task 7.2 Attend Ad -Hoc Committee Meetings
The Consultant will attend the regular Ad -Hoc Committee meetings in order to present the
progress of the study. The appropriate information will be approved by the FAA prior to being
distributed to the Ad -Hoc Committee in advance of each meeting. The information will also be
provided to Monroe County for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee website in advance of each
meeting. This task includes six two- day /two -night trips to Key West by up to two Consultant staff
(Project Manager, Deputy PM). These meetings are open to the public and will be advertised as
such for the purpose of providing public information sessions throughout the Part 150 Process.
In addition, each of the parties identified in Task 7.1 will be notified of these meetings and their
attendance requested to provide input and comment on the Part 150 and the Part 150 process.
The Consultant will coordinate with EYW staff to prepare the public notice for publication in The Key
West Citizen to announce the time and location of the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings. EYW will be
responsible for the cost of publishing the notices. The public notice will be published once during the
week preceding the meeting. EYW staff will obtain proof of publication from The Key West Citizen for
each publication of the public notice.
EYW will be responsible for arranging /providing for the necessary facilities for the Ad -Hoc
Committee meetings. The Consultant will be responsible for providing or arranging for easels and
presentation boards, and A/V equipment at each Ad -Hoc meeting, if needed. If needed, the
initial Ad -Hoc meeting will consist of up to twenty (20) presentation boards, with no more than five
Page 13 of 26
(5) new boards for each subsequent meeting.
Task 7.3 Provide Information for Posting on Ad -Hoc Committee Website
Prior to each Ad -Hoc meeting, the Consultant will provide information regarding the study for
posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site. The Web site will be used as a dynamic means of
informing and educating the public on the Part 150 process and status, and the role of the FAA in
the Part 150 process. The Web site includes the Consultant Project Manager's email address to
which members of the public can submit comments /questions about the Part 150 process. This
scope and accompanying cost estimate anticipate that all materials to be posted on the Ad -Hoc
Committee web site will be developed by the Consultant in a format that is ready to be uploaded
directly to the web -site (Adobe and /or HTML formatted language) by Monroe County staff.
Task 7.4 Present Information to the Monroe County BOCC
The Consultant will attend one BOCC meeting in order to present the findings of the study and
obtain BOCC approval to submit the NEMs to FAA. The Consultant will prepare the information
for distribution to the BOCC and provide one electronic (PDF format) to EYW staff for inclusion in
the BOCC agenda package. A copy of Version 3 of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting
Documentation will be provided on CDs for distribution to the BOCC in advance of the meeting.
This task includes one two- day /two -night trip to Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager.
Task 7.5 Compile and Analyze Public Comments
All comments received on the Part 150 Study, including letters, e- mails, and comment forms, will
be compiled and analyzed. Responses will be drafted as appropriate. Additionally, calls to the
airport's noise hotline will be documented and summarized. A summary of the comments will be
included in Section 6, Consultation and Public Participation, and copies of all comments will
be included in an appendix to the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation.
Postcards will be mailed to all parties who submitted comments (and legibly provided their name
and address), to let them know their comments were received and included in the study.
TASK 8 NEM REPORT PREPARATION
Sections 1 through 7 will be compiled and formatted to create the Noise Exposure Maps and
Supporting Documentation, which will be submitted to FAA for their consideration under title 14
CFR part 150. Five versions of the NEM document will be prepared over the course of the study.
A separate Executive Summary will be prepared. The CD will include both the NEM document
and the Executive Summary. Quantities of each version are estimates of the needs of both the
FAA and Monroe County. Exhibits will be provided in color. The cost estimate is based on the
quantities indicated below. If additional copies are determined to be necessary, they will be
printed and charged to the County on a per copy basis. A web - friendly version of the final NEM
document will be made available for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee Website.
iIRS Page 14 of 26
Task 8.1 Quality Review (NEM Version 1)
Prior to the submittal of the document to Monroe County, an independent technical review (ITR) of
the NEM Document and Executive Summary will be performed by qualified Consultant staff not
directly involved in writing the document. The purpose of the quality review is to ensure that all
study deliverables are high quality, technically sound documents. Version 1 will incorporate the
FAA's comments on preliminary NEM document Sections 1 through 5.
V1 Document , Distribution
Monroe County
FAA
Consultant,.'
NEM Document (Hard Copy)
0
0
1
Executive Summary
0
0
1
NEM Document & Executive
Summary (CD)
0
0
1
Task 8.2 Monroe County Staff and Ad -Hoc Committee Review Document (NEM
Version 2)
Version 2 of the NEM will be prepared and submitted to the Monroe County staff and Ad -Hoc
Committee for their review and comment. The FAA will be provided three (3) CD copies of Version
2 to review the incorporation of the FAA's comments provided during the initial review by the FAA.
The NEM Executive Summary will be provided in hard copy and the NEM document will be
provided on a CD for distribution to the Ad -Hoc Committee members. One hard copy of the NEM
documentation will be provided to Monroe County. Monroe County staff will be responsible for
distribution of the documents to the Ad -Hoc Committee members.
V2 Document Distribution"
'Monroe County
FAA
Consultant
NEM Document (Hard Copy)
1
0
1
Executive Summary
25
0
1
NEM Document and Executive
Summary (CD)
25
3
1
Task 8.3 Board of County Commissioners and Public Review (NEM Version 3)
Version 3 of the NEM will incorporate the comments from the FAA, the Monroe County staff, and
the Ad -Hoc Committee and will be made available to the public and provided to the BOCC for their
formal acceptance. Copies of the NEM will be placed in the public libraries, at the County
Commissioners' Office and the Airport Administration Office for the public to review. Copies will
be provided to the BOCC in advance of the BOCC meeting during which BOCC acceptance of the
document will be requested. The NEM Executive Summary will be provided in hard copy and the
- -- - ...- - -- - - - - --
..........
UM Page 15 of 26
NEM document will be provided on a CD for distribution to the BOCC. Hard copies of the NEM
document will be provided to Monroe County staff and /or placed in the public libraries. Monroe
County staff will be responsible for distribution of the documents to the BOCC. The Consultant will
send copies to the public libraries. Three CDs containing the NEM Executive Summary and the
NEM Document in electronic format (MS Word and .PDF) will be provided to the FAA for review.
V3 Document Distribution °
Monroe County
FAA
Consultant
NEM Document (Hard Copy)
6
1
1
Executive Summary
20
1
1
NEM Document and Executive
Summary (CD)
20
3
1
Task 8.4 FAA Formal Review (NEM Version 4)
Version 4 of the NEM will document the public involvement process, and be provided to the FAA
for their formal review and acceptance. Five (5) hard copies and five (5) CDs of the Executive
Summary and NEM Document will be provided for the FAA's review and comment The
Consultant will distribute the documents to various FAA Lines of Business as directed by the FAA
Program Manager.
V4 Document' Distribution
Monroe County '
FAA'
Consultant
NEM Document (Hard Copy)
0
5
1
Executive Summary
0
5
1
NEM Document and Executive
Summary (CD)
0
5
1
Task 8.5 Final NEM Document (NEM Version 5)
Version 5 of the NEM document will include the FAA's notice of acceptance and documentation of
compliance with Section 107 of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979, and will
represent the final NEM document for the project. The Executive Summary will be updated to
reflect the public involvement process, FAA's acceptance of the NEMs, and documentation of
compliance with Section 107 of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. Copies will
be provided to the FAA ADO, Region, and Headquarters. Monroe County staff will be
responsible for distribution of documents within Monroe County.
V5 Document Distribution
Monroe County
FAA
Consultant
NEM Document (Hard Copy)
5
3
1
Executive Summary
25
3
1
NEM Document and Executive
Summary (CD)
25
3
1
URS - - - Page 16 of 26
TASK 9 PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO LIMIT RECOVERY OF DAMAGES
After FAA acceptance of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation, the
Consultant will follow all procedural requirements outlined in Section 107 of the Aviation Safety
and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (PL 96 -193, 49 USC 2101) which provides a process whereby
a person acquiring property in an area surrounding an airport for which a Noise Exposure Map
has been submitted shall be limited in the recovery of damages with respect to noise attributable
to the airport. The Act outlines the requirements and exceptions to this limitation. The
Consultant will ensure that these requirements are met so as to further protect the airport.
The Consultant will prepare a camera -ready public notice for publication in The Key West
Citizen. EYW will arrange for publication of the public notice at a size of approximately 3 columns
by 6 inches. The public notice will be published once a week for three consecutive weeks. EYW
will obtain proof of publication from The Key West Citizen for each publication of the public notice
and provide this documentation to the Consultant for inclusion in the Final NEM (Version 5).
UM Page 17 of 26
PHASE 2 - NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM
This is a preliminary Scope of Services to develop the NCP for this Part 150 Update. This Phase
2 Scope of Services may be revised as needed based on findings of the NEM.
TASK 10 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This task involves the mobilization, coordination, and management of the non - technical aspects
of Phase 2 of the project. Progress Reports will be prepared monthly and provided to EYW staff,
with copies to the FAA. Project management meetings will be held in Key West as needed to
coordinate with EYW staff regarding Phase 2 of the project. This task includes up to two
two- day /one -night trips to Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager.
TASK 11 REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF PAST PART 150 MITIGATION MEASURES
On May 7, 1999, the FAA approved the following six land use measures as the Noise
Compatibility Program (NCP) for EYW:
1. Provide Noise Insulation in Exchange for Avigation Easements,
2. Purchase Homes, Provide Noise Insulation, then Resell with Easements,
3. Update Noise Contours Annually,
4. Rezone Vacant Parcels,
5. Acquire Vacant Parcel, and
6. Establish Compatible Land Use Zoning
In addition to the noise mitigation measures approved in the NCP, EYW has several
long- standing noise abatement measures in place. These include:
1. Voluntary Curfew,
2. Use of NBAA Close -In Departure Procedure,
3. Restriction on Engine Warm -Ups,
4. Use of Flight Tracks to Reduce Noise Exposure, and
5. Noise Complaint Hotline.
A summary and status of these measures was provided in Section 1.3 of the Noise Exposure
Maps and Supporting Documentation which was accepted by the FAA on August 27, 2008. The
information provided therein will be updated to reflect the current status of each measure. This
discussion of these measures will be documented in Section 7, Introduction to the Noise
Compatibility Program.
Furthermore, each of the measures listed above will be reviewed and evaluated to determine if
they should be included as measures recommended for FAA approval in this Part 150 Update or
whether they should remain as voluntary noise abatement measures for which the airport sponsor
has adequate implementation authority. Measures that will be recommended for FAA approval
LTRS Page 18 of 26
will be discussed in the appropriate sections of the NCP document that are described below in
Tasks 12, 13, and 14.
TASK 12 REVIEW AND UPDATE OPERATIONAL NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES
Operational measures which are required by the FAA to be considered as part of the Part 150
process will be evaluated for their applicability and effectiveness at EYW. Title 14 CFR part 150
§131 50.7(b) indicates that the following operational measures should be analyzed:
• The construction of barriers and acoustical shielding, including the soundproofing of public
buildings.
• The implementation of a preferential runway system.
• The use of flight procedures (including the modifications of flight tracks) to control the
operation of aircraft to reduce exposure to individuals (or specific noise- sensitive areas) to
noise in the area around the airport.
• The implementation of any restriction on the use of the airport by any type or class of
aircraft based on the noise characteristics of those aircraft.
• Other actions or combinations of actions, which would have a beneficial noise control or
abatement impact on the public.
Part 150 mandates a range of general noise compatibility actions, which must be considered
during a Part 150 Study. These actions, supplemented with the actions suggested by the Ad -Hoc
Committee, general public, airport users, and past efforts will be considered. This task constitutes
an identification of various types of aircraft noise abatement techniques, which could be applied
realistically to EYW.
Task 12.1 Alternative Airport Use Modifications
Alternative use modifications at EYW will be investigated for their potential to reduce noise levels
associated with aircraft operations. Included within this task will be assessments of runway use
programs, time -of -day incentives, and user category incentives.
Procedural alternatives will be addressed which reduce noise impacts on residences and other
noise sensitive land uses situated near the airport and beneath major flight tracks. This process
may result in "working groups" of the Ad -Hoc Committee evaluating specific noise abatement
measures. The FAA will figure importantly in the examination of the feasibility of any of these
measures.
Airport use modifications at EYW could be effective in reducing noise exposure within the airport
environs but must not be prohibitive with regard to airfield capacity, safety, or economic feasibility.
Page 19 of 26
Task 12.2 Alternative Aircraft Operational Changes
This task will involve the evaluation of various aircraft operational changes, which may be
effective noise abatement procedures at EYW.
Task 12.3 Airport Facility Modifications
Facility modifications will be evaluated for noise abatement. Noise abatement measures involving
physical changes to the airport itself will be reviewed. These could include construction of
acoustical barriers, such as noise walls or berms; isolating aircraft maintenance activity; and
others as appropriate. It is understood that runway extensions are not feasible alternatives at
EYW.
Facility modifications at EYW could be effective in reducing noise exposure but must not be
prohibitive with regard to airfield capacity, safety, or economic feasibility.
Task 12.4 Development of Noise Abatement Measures
Using those procedures found to be potentially effective in reducing aircraft noise levels under the
previous tasks, airport noise abatement measures for EYW will be developed. A variety of
measures will be included in this task, such as operational measures, facility measures and
administrative measures. Measures can be identified and prioritized for immediate
implementation, measures for future consideration and measures that are unlikely to be feasible
or productive.
Task 12.5 Evaluation of Measures
Refined noise abatement measures will be developed based on discussions held with Airport
staff, committee members, the FAA and the general public. These will consist of a combination of
operational, procedural and facilities alternatives, as found feasible under earlier tasks. This effort
will focus on the formulation of the optimum achievable measures.
Task 12.6 Model Alternative Scenarios
Up to three (3) operational noise abatement alternatives will be modeled using the INM for the
future conditions, in order to estimate the possible benefits of operational noise abatement
measures.
Task 12.7 Evaluate Noise Impacts of Alternative Scenarios
Noise exposure for up to three (3) alternative scenarios will be determined with the GIS and
quantified in terms of population, households, and land use. A summary of the measures
examined and their advantages and disadvantages will be developed and coordinated with the
UM Page 20 of 26
FAA, EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee in order to identify the preferred alternatives for
implementation.
Each scenario will be modeled in INM to establish noise patterns for the forecast operations.
Maps of each run will be prepared indicating 5 DNL incremental contours ranging from 55 to 75
DNL.
Task 12.8 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 12.9 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on operational noise abatement measures will be prepared
in the form of Section 8, Operational Noise Abatement Measures in the Noise Compatibility
Program. (Note: Section 7 will be the Introduction to the Noise Compatibility Program.) .
Sections 7 and 8 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM
Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a
pdf version and a MS WORD ° version on each.
TASK 13 LAND USE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES
Land use noise mitigation measures which are required by the FAA to be considered as part of
the Part 150 process will be evaluated for their applicability and effectiveness at EYW.
Task 13.1 Evaluate Remedial Land Use Mitigation Measures
Remedial actions seek to alleviate existing conflicts between land use and airport noise.
Changes in the use of noise - impacted land or changes in occupancy, to uses or occupations less
sensitive to noise, are practical strategies for resolving conflicts. Noise insulation and acquisition
of full or partial interest in the land are also examples of possible actions that can be used to
mitigate noise impacts. Existing non - compatible land uses will be identified in detail and
potential corrective land use measures will be evaluated. A summary of the measures
examined, and their advantages and disadvantages, will be developed and coordinated with the
FAA, EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee in order to identify the preferred alternatives for
implementation.
Task 13.2 Evaluate Preventive Land Use Measures
Land use and development controls that seek to prevent the introduction of additional
non - compatible and noise - sensitive land uses within existing and future noise contours are
referred to as preventive measures. The controls which are generally most useful are: zoning,
UM __ Page 21 of 26
easements, transfer of development rights, establishing minimum acoustical insulation standards
for building codes, and land acquisition. The land use controls and regulations identified in
Task 2.1 will be analyzed to determine their capability in order to ensure and maintain
compatibility with airport operations. Additional land use controls and regulatory mechanisms
will be examined, if necessary. These controls and mechanisms will be coordinated with EYW
staff and any other appropriate jurisdictions and /or planning agencies. A summary of the
measures examined and their advantages and disadvantages will be developed and coordinated
with the FAA, EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee to identify the preferred alternatives for
implementation.
Task 13.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and
assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results.
Task 13.4 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on land use measures will be prepared in the form of
Section 9, Land Use Measures in the Noise Compatibility Program. Section 9 will be
provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be
provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD
version on each.
TASK 14 CONTINUING NOISE PROGRAM MEASURES
The success of the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) requires a continuing effort to monitor
compliance and identify new or unanticipated problems and changing conditions. The
Consultant will identify measures that could become components of such a program. Examples
of such measures include:
• Ongoing voluntary noise abatement procedures,
• Permanent noise compatibility program management staff,
• Ongoing public involvement programs,
• Annual update of noise contours, and
• Acquisition of noise and /or flight track monitoring system /equipment.
Task 14.1 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on continuing noise program measures will be prepared in
the form of Section 90, Continuing Noise Program Measures in the Noise Compatibility
Program. Section 10 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM
Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a
pdf version and a MS WORD ° version on each.
- - -. _
UM Page 22 of 26
TASK 15 NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of Tasks 11 through 13 will be compiled, and the measures which collectively appear
to represent the best set of actions for EYW will be identified as the recommended Part 150 Noise
Compatibility Program. EYW will be responsible for selecting those actions which are desired for
inclusion in the Part 150 NCP. For each individual action, the Consultant will provide additional
information regarding the schedule and responsibilities for implementation of the action and its
affect upon improving noise compatibility.
Task 15.1 Documentation
Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on the recommended measures and implementation plan
will be prepared in the form of Section 11, Recommended Noise Compatibility Program in the
Noise Compatibility Program. Section 11 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to
inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and
three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD version on each.
TASK 16 NCP CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Phase 2 will include coordination and public involvement necessary to meet the requirements of
the Part 150 process. Prior to and during the development of a program, and prior to submission
of the resulting draft program to the FAA, the airport operator must afford adequate opportunity for
the active and direct participation of the public, to submit their views, data, and comments on the
formulation and adequacy of that program.
Task 16.1 Notify § 150.23 (c) "Consulted Parties"
Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, § 150.23 (c) requires that each noise compatibility
program must be developed and prepared in consultation with FAA regional officials, the officials
of the state and of any public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of
whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the noise exposure map,
and other Federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map.
Consultation with the FAA's Airports (ARP) and Air Traffic (ATO) Lines of Business shall include,
to the extent practicable, informal agreement from FAA on proposed new or modified flight
procedures. For air carrier airports, consultation must include any air carriers and, to the extent
practicable, other aircraft operators using the airport.
The Consultant will send a letter and /or e-mail to the parties identified in Task 7.1 informing them
that Monroe County has initiated a title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Update.
The letter will provide information regarding opportunities for agency involvement in the process.
UM Page 23 of 26
Task 16.2 Attend Ad -Hoc Committee Meetings
The Consultant will attend the regular Ad -Hoc Committee meetings in order to present the
progress of the study. The appropriate information will be distributed to the Ad -Hoc Committee
in advance of the each meeting. The information will also be provided to Monroe County for
posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee website in advance of each meeting. This task includes six
two- day /two -night trips to Key West by up to two Consultant staff. These meetings are open to
the public and will be advertised as such for the purpose of providing public information sessions
throughout the Part 150 Process. In addition, each of the parties identified in Task 7.1 will be
notified of these meeting and their attendance requested to provide input and comment on the
Part 150 and the Part 150 process.
The Consultant will coordinate with EYW staff to prepare the public notice for publication in The
Key West Citizen to announce the time and location of the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings. EYW
will be responsible for the cost of publishing the notices. The public notice will be published once
during the week preceding the meeting. EYW staff will obtain proof of publication from The Key
West Citizen for each publication of the public notice.
EYW will be responsible for arranging /providing for the necessary facilities for the Ad -Hoc
Committee meetings. The Consultant will be responsible for providing or arranging for easels and
presentation boards, and A/V equipment at each Ad -Hoc Committee meeting, if needed. If
needed, the initial Ad -Hoc meeting will consist of up to twenty (20) presentation boards, with no
more than five (5) new boards for each subsequent meeting.
Task 16.3 Provide Information for Posting on Ad -Hoc Committee Website
Prior to each Ad -Hoc meeting, the Consultant will provide information regarding the study for
posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site. The Web site will be used as a dynamic means of
informing and educating the public on the Part 150 process and status. The Web site includes the
Consultant Project Manager's email address to which members of the public can submit
comments /questions about the Part 150 process and status, and the role of the FAA in the Part
150 process. This scope and accompanying cost estimate anticipate that all materials to be
posted on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site will be developed by the Consultant in a format that is
ready to be uploaded directly to the web -site by Monroe County staff (Adobe and /or HTML
formatted language).
Task 16.4 Present Information to the Monroe County BOCC and Hold Public Hearing
Following the completion of Task 14, a Public Hearing will be held during a regularly - scheduled
BOCC meeting. The Consultant will present the final recommendations for the Noise
Compatibility Program, solicit public comments, and obtain BOCC approval to submit the NCP to
FAA. The Consultant will provide comment forms at the meeting for individuals who wish to
submit written comments. The Consultant will prepare information for distribution to the BOCC
UM Page 24 of 26
and provide one electronic (PDF format) to EYW staff for inclusion in the BOCC agenda package.
A copy of Version 3 of the Noise Compatibility Program will be provided on CDs for distribution
to the BOCC in advance of the meeting. Information to be included in the agenda package must
be submitted a month in advance of the meeting. This task includes one two - day /two -night trip to
Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager.
Copies of the NEM and NCP documents will be placed in the Monroe County Public Library and
the EYW Administrative office prior to the Public Hearing, for the public to review.
In addition the public notice normally provided by Monroe County regarding BOCC meetings and
public hearings, the Consultant will prepare a camera -ready public notice for publication in The
Key West Citizen to announce the time and location of the Public Hearing for the Part 150 Study.
EYW will arrange for publication of the public notice. The public notice ad will be published once
during the week preceding the meeting and once on the Sunday preceding the Public Hearing.
EYW will obtain proof of publication from The Key West Citizen for each publication of the public
notice and provide this documentation to the Consultant.
Task 16.5 Compile and Analyze Public Comments
All comments received on the Part 150 Study, including letters, e- mails, comment forms, and oral
transcripts will be compiled and analyzed. Responses will be drafted as appropriate. Additionally,
calls to the airport's noise hotline will be documented and summarized. A summary of the
comments will be included in Section 12, Consultation and Public Participation, and copies of
all comments will be included in an appendix to the Noise Compatibility Program. Postcards will
be mailed to all parties who submitted comments (and legibly provided their name and address),
to let them know their comments were received and included in the study.
TASK 17 NCP REPORT PREPARATION
Sections 7 through 12 will be compiled and formatted to create the Noise Compatibility
Program, which will be submitted to FAA for their consideration under title 14 CFR part 150.
Five versions of the NCP document will be prepared over the course of the study. A separate
Executive Summary will be prepared. The CD will include both the NCP document and the
Executive Summary. Quantities of each version are estimates of the Monroe County's needs.
Exhibits will be provided in color. The cost estimate is based on the quantities indicated below. If
additional copies are determined to be necessary, they will be printed and charged to the County
on a per copy basis. A web - friendly version of the final NCP document will be made available for
posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee Website.
Task 17.1 Quality Review (NCP Version 1)
Prior to the submittal of the document to Monroe County, an independent technical review (ITR) of
the NCP Document and Executive Summary will be performed by qualified Consultant staff not
UM Page 25 of 26
V3 Document Distribution
Monroe County
FAA
Consultant
NCP Document (Hard Copy)
6
1
1
Executive Summary
20
1
1
NCP Document and Executive
Summary (CD)
20
3
1
Task 16.4 FAA Formal Review (NCP Version 4)
Version 4 of the NCP will document the public involvement process, and be provided to the FAA
for their formal review and acceptance. The Consultant will send 10 copies of the documents to
the FAA Program Manager. The FAA's 10 copies will be distributed by the Consultant as
directed by the FAA Program Manager.
V4 Document Distribcrtron ;,:..
Monroe County
FAA
Consultant
NCP Document (Hard Copy)
0
10
1
Executive Summary
0
10
1
NCP Document and Executive
Summary (CD)
0
10
1
Task 16.5 Final NCP Document (NCP Version 5)
Version 5 of the NCP document will include the FAA's Record of Approval (ROA) and will
represent the final NCP document for the project. The Executive Summary will be updated to
reflect the public involvement process and FAA's approval of the NCP. Copies will be provided to
the FAA ADO, Region, and Headquarters. Monroe County staff will be responsible for distribution
of documents within Monroe County.
0 '1 ^
Monroe County
FAA
Consultant
Document Distribution
NCP Document (Hard Copy)
5
3
1
Executive Summary
25
3
1
NCP Document and Executive
25
3
1
Summary (CD)
0 '1 ^
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
30-May-11
FEE PROPOSAL
P.O., D.I.
D ... 1
P'.'d M ... ...
G.P. 1 P'.J. t
. v ,
M PON,
RAKM' P .... IN
3�NN,,N. D..I
A
ps'pZ*."�
DiY -I., .1 Noise
M anager ' N "'
I'. N.- C-INII-t
CUIM.,
NAi .
GIs SO .... H't
P--ir
x ".
A-1 .11.1m
A-A..
T.Ml S.I.,y C
E.
T-1 C-1
RIMIHI
$170
RIt./Hl
I SIDS
R-ft
$156
$132
Role /H1. 5225
R.I.- S175
RM./N
$III
RH,
$95
A.W.,
$ED
R.I.I.,
MO
R.I./.,
555
Ra1e1Hi
355
TASK DESCRIPTION
H...
t
H..M
c.'t
ra
F.
Coal
Ceal
Loal
Hour,
Coal
Heub
Coal
U0B"ON AND PROJECT MANAOT
MObllUalbn
12
$ 2.040
12
S 1,260
121
$ 1 200
0
11
0
11
0
3
4 $
2 1
8
$ 440
$ M
3 6.160
6 2.315
3 7.535
48
3 .,Is.
Is
s I."o
Ws
.
I
s
.
II
a
$
1
3 .
32
$ 1,760
$ BE
$ 11.600
S i
s 12.250
S.A1.1•1
60
S 10.200
18
6 2.141
12
1 1,20D
I
$
I
s
0
s
4
S 220
40
$ 2X0
6 1"
$ 16,760
s 4,015
$ 10,785
AND use NMPPIN
11 U0., I— U Z teDVlNlen, N ... P,g D
2
A 340
a
s 8Q
1
3 S.
I
$
16
$ M
20
$ ISM
I
S -
I
$
6 5.
s 4.540
$
s 4.540
I. UN, 013 d MNppl.q
2
$
2
3 210
1
3
1
$
8
$ ASO
20
3 1,600
o
$
C
$
5 32
S 2.930
1
s 2,610
013 DWA-11 NNPPl.q
a
$
1
3
1
3
SO
4
3 BUD
o
3
1
5
s so
s 4,600
S 1
$ 6.600
...... ....
2
$ 3.0
4
$ 420
l i
413
41
0
1
D
1
0
1
o
$
1
3
3 lo
5 11110
s
s ,'I
"
is Decummalbn
2
3 340
8
s SAO
.
I
.
.
, mo
.
3
6
s 330
4
11 I20
3 26
$ 2,210
s 130
$ 2,3.0
suhl
8
$ 1.360
22
$ 2,310
1 1
s 1,200
0
s
32
$ 1,220
100
s 8.000
A
I ISO
4
t 330
t 1114
6 15,340
S 1.130
s ,,IT.
3
ENTOR Y OF AIR PORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERA TIONS
.
3.-N op.,... -
, A K
1
1 341
1:
1.65
11
2.1.
1 10
S 114D
16
1 11.
1
1
1,120
o
3 -
I
I
:
I
1
1 1*2
1 11, 11
1 2,11.
$ 11.121
_1-w 'AF11. A-i- P 5 1
1
340
' 1
"o
o
s .
s
3 .
I
I
"0"
1 .
I
,
I
$
, 18
,
.
: 1,980
R"" D 4 D-lAp INM FROM T-k.
2
340
42
80
S 12.480
S 14
$
I
1
o
1
.
1
I
I
$
s 1
:::
s 210
A ... I - 1 1 R
2
S 34D
S $
420
0
3 .
1
:Aw
4
1 AGO
A
0
I
*
;1
1
].G OxumeMMlon
2
$ 34
4
$ 420
12
3 102
5 I
3 0
16
3 1s00
I
$
o
$
0
4
1
$ 330
4
1 220
1
1 1
3
su
ID
s VIM
36
5 3,710
loa
3 16.61,
.4
1
s 5,260
1
$
31
1 I.—
III
$ I.A..
6
$ 130
4
S 230
s 3110
s 41262
t 2,380
s 45,141
4
IMISTONG NO ME CONTOURS
4.1
'2
l 3 AD
1 421
1
2.:l
0
1
$ �Al
1
3 -
0
$
' w '
4
1
1
1 I :Z
� 3 .
4
. Q.
�l
0
S
5
$ 4A
25
3 2,240
0
$
4:** 2..
1:
2..
1, A ... R-N.
2
3 340
1 AID
4
1
$
o
3
1
,
:
*
I
0
S
II 10
' : '
s
4
S Ima,
$ 840
A.
1
1
2
1.21
D
,
.
$ AID
4
1 Il.
I AS
I 11: .
I.b.t.
I
S 1.700
2Q
S 2.100
4.
$ COOS
0
' 1
4,660
28
3 2.240
1
$ 1
4
$ 120
$ ISO
$ 16,210
s I
1
I
UA NVENT OF EXISTING NOME LEVELS
N-1 1— 19
2
$ W
32
S 3.360
6 3 1310
9111
17.150
11
$ 3 IOCI
I
li
32
$ 1.920
0
3 -
0
$
3 202
$ 27
1),8)5
I
I
s
0
3
''
'
':
D4
0
s
.
$ .
�
0
$
I
1
$
o
I
$ 2
SAID
s
1.4 lu'll,
2
S 3AO
4
S 42
1
Oi
$
4
1 40
o
S
0
$
0
1
0
0
S
6 w
6 '.0
"
1.,
2
$ 340
0
S .
ID 1 4.SDD
IS
1 $ 4.
0
-
0
S
0
S
0
4
4
S 2"
4
1 221
1 1
"1
10,310
S.-t.
1
$ IO20
36
6 3,710
IS s 11.050
178111
31 ,iSD
'
1. 600
1
s
32
I.
N
0
s
4
$ III
I 220
. s
64 960
18,005
I "s
I
FUTURE N013E CONTOURS
61 1.- d
2
1 311
2
S 2.4
0
$
36
2 160
0
S
$
SO
6.320
�ft W F.lul. d NP C-to-
2
"0
:2'
2.
3
S .00
0
11
1
2
$ 1.
0
A
1 . 640
A 41 .,• ..MO A—
2
1 340
411
4
3 AGO
0
I
0
1
$
I -
s
1.4
1
.20
$ A
0
w
.
1 3"
A
1 4.
4
S 220
$ 34
S 1:62:
Subr
1
16
40
S 4.DA
0
5!
3,12d
24
S 1,92Q
I
s "0
4
$ 220
$ 152
$ 12.70
12,870
7
NEM CONMULTA AND PURLK INVOLVEMENT N (b) 'CP.d P-1.
2
3 l
1
1 420
0
3
0
3
4
S 2
4
$ 320
4
S 22
4
$ I
$ 21
:
1.1 A I C.-
I
3 " N
SIR)
1
3
:
.
: 1.4:
1;:;:.
M"",:
I., A-C ...
$ 1.3
0 0
' 2
1 . 2
0
1
11
1 w
14
I .20
1 41
1
7.M.
$
$ 1,160
1 .4
1
2.72
12
5 12
.
2
W
0 4
'$
12
NO
A
4 0
1 11
1 1
"171
,.I C. Z:
4
I
$ ED
24
sW
3 2.5 0
24
1 1.-
m
S
I I.'
III
:
a
: :2 0 :
subtotal
ID2
S 17.349
120
s 12.600
41
$ 4.801
4
$ IIM
6�
ma
'0
1 s.I.I
I.
1100
20
1.100
$ I
$ 406
S 43.141
S 10.028
$ "IS..
I
NE REPOATFREPARA-N
N 11, INIMI 1*111" 11
1
3 1110
$ 800
I
1 11
2
1 1.11
1
1 1.1
1
1 140
1
111
: GO
A4
;:
'1:
A R. WESA .K. I)
4
S SED
=20
3 400
4
, m
. 4
$ 400
. 4
'
,
, I '0
' 1
20
836
s 4
1.]1wW Of I ..d k R INSM V Cl
2
$
:
4
S
1
3
4
1 11
4
1 22.
S
I I.
�:.2:
4 1
FAA F. =.C.
2
S 3.
2
1 1 1
2
4
SO
s
4
1 1
1
1
4
S 220
0
4
11 22 0
$
W
S .,4:.
'�: I
As -.1 (NE. 11
1
3
1
1 210
3 2-
4
S "
4
$ 24
8
S 6-
4
$ 220
4
$ 220
$ 1
1*
41
: I.5.362 l
4
lubl-
11
$
18
.
13
s ..DO
..
s 1.2110
"
A 1,61
IS
$
24
$ 1,120
21
$ 100
, 220
'. : .
' 2: I
I
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO LIUST RECRYOF DANAGES
I
$ SAO
0
s
0
4
$ 380
o
s -
I
s
0
1 .
I
A .
6 .
s 720
$ .
I 720
_�
122
$ 37.740
2116
$ 11A10
100
$ 16.1148
52
$ 6.1164
I. s 11050
1791
"
2531
. 36
32
6 3,01
320
6 19,200
328
1 26,240
SO
$ 4.400
100
s 5SDO
2032
3 220.912
1 $ 61,868
1 $ 272,800
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
30- May -11
FEE PROPOSAL
Project Manager
DRPwy Proj ect
M_, M_,
Radar Prac.ninp
SSH-M, D-ISp
R.mr D.M
Procnfinq
Sp:Ml.1
Director of Nei+e
Nonitorinp
Manager of Noiae
Menr oring
Sr. NOi+e Len.ullanl
CenaWlant
Jr. Noi+e
Conauhanl
OI8 3D<cMliel
ooRNmem
Production
Specl41i.1
Ad mini+trallve
pa+iatant
-.1 salary Coal
E.penae+
TOlal Ca+1
RatelHr:
3170
RMMNr:
3105
RalelHr:
$156
RaMIHI:
$132
RalelHr:
1225
RalelHr:
$175
RAMIH,..
$100
Ra.,H,
SES
RalelHr:
380
RatelHr:
X80
RAW.,:
$55
RA.IHr:
$55
TASK DESCRIPTION
How+
Cofl
HOUr+
Coat
Hours
Coal
Howf
Cofl
Iowa
Gast
C..t
How.
Co.l
How.
C..l
H.".
I Coat
PHASE 2 - NOISE CONIPA. TH]ILI'7Y PROGRAN
I
�
10
P RO-7 MANAGEMENT
40
1 6,800
0
3 -
0
3 -
0
$
O
$
0
3 -
0
3
16
$ 050
3 5.
f 7,660
f 2.476
3 10,166
11
RMEVy AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING PART ISO MITIGATION
16
$ 2720
12
3 1,260
i
12
3 1.200
0
3 -
8
f 480
S
3 -
0
3 -
4
3 220
3 52
1 6,880
1 -
f 6,BBD
12
AND UP DATE OPERATIONAL NOME ABATEMENT MISASUREB
E I. Iva A.11 -U.. Medhkatbna
3!
040
4
8 420
!
i
6
3 600
0
$ -
0
3 460
0
$ -
0
3 -
0
3 -
f 20
f 1,840
f -
f 1,.40
11.)Allewallw AircraR OperMbnY CMrrge+
1 AHp. 11-., Med111ca1iem
2
2
t 040
3 340
4
4
3 420
3 426
6
813
5 600
800
0
3 -
0
3 4.0
0
3 -
0
3
0
3
20
f 22
1 1,840
f 3.040
.
! -
f 1,/40
S 2,040
13.4 0awbprmw of NeMa AOMemenl Nnurea
123 Evalu GFF 0l AMasures
2
2
3 340
3 ]40
.
B
3 840
3 840
121
6
3 1.200
3 600
0
0
3 -
3
0
0
3 480
3 480
0
20
3 -
3 1,800
0
0
3 -
1 -
0
0
3
3 -
f JO
S AS
f 2,. 60
f 4,060
3 -
i
3 2.860
f 4,010
2.i MOeelAhernaiva 6canarba
t3.TE.Mrrate..... .1. al A.-MM....H..
Mlry Aaaur.nw OatallCMCYbpaM R.-
2.9 DOCwrwnMllon
suet
2
2
2
2
1.
! 040
3 JAS
$ 340
3 ]40
! 3.060
4
4
4
.
44
3 420
3 420
3 420
f 120
3 4,620
i
121
4
4
4
64
S 1,200
S AGO
3 400
3 A00
3 8.400
0
O
O
0
0
3 -
S -
S -
3 -
3 -
2.
.
O
.
.O
S 1,440
3 460
S -
i 480
S 4..00
20
20
O
0
SO
$ 1.600
f 1600
S -
3 -
3 4.800
D
0
O
6
6
3 -
3 -
S -
3 ]]0
S J]0
0
0
O
4
4
$ -
3 -
S -
3 220
! 220
3 62
f H
3 10
3 x.
3 278
f 5.000
3 s,xAS
f 1,180
S 3,190.
f 24,2]0
f -
3 -
110
I 110
f I.-
f 1,240
f 2,330
f 24,).0
12
LAND USE N013E MITIGATION MEABU...
ntl V+e NhlpMan AMUUrea
].i Ereluele PN rnNre� and U+e eMMwn
Dudley A.auranca O +IallcMCkinq and Review
14 OecumenwiRn
su-1.1
4
4
2
6
16
3 8.0
3 6.0
3 140
t 1,020
$ 2.720
0
6
4
0
2.
3 840
3 .40
3 410
3 840
3 2.940
1
12
12
d
tfi
44
3 1.200
3 1.300
3 400
3 1.600
3 4.400
O
0
0
S -
S -
S
16
f6
40
3 e.D
3 Bfi0
S 2.400
)O
IO
0
O
50
3 2.400
3 1.800
S -
3 4.000
O
0
6
6
S
S -
3 -
3 ]]0
3 3.
0
0
4
4
!
1 -
3 220
S 220
TO
f 60
S 40
3 1..
f 6,280
f 4490
f 17,01D
f -
4 110
$ tan
1 6.180
1,180
f A,930
3 11,140
14
ONTINUING NOISE PROGRAM MEASURES
_1 0.....-
2
3 140
a
3 640
B
3 800
G
S -
0
3 -
O
S -
6
3 110
4
3 220
3 26
3 1,610
f 110
f 2,660
15
NCP RECOMMENDATIONS
16.1
6
3 1,020
16
3 1.680
16
3 1.6.
0
$
16
3 960
16
$ 1 260
6
$ 130
4
3 220
$ 90
f 7,D90
$ 130
f T,220
16
- CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Newry St.aDO ^consultor P"I"
1..2 Anend Aa4loc cemmnlee AMMbpf
e.3 PrwIee lMOrmeuen lw P-1, on A- -1- wea+lte
aunty BOCCrPU61IC Nesenq
19.6 Comp^N and AnwyM PuEIIC COmnrnM
suMOtel
72
2
6
1 4
96
f ]40
3 12.240
! 140
$ 2720
S 6.0
3 16.]20
4
]2
4
13
.
100
S 410
3 1.560
3 420
f 1,2.0
3 .40
3 10,50D
0
4
0
.
12
S -
3 400
3 -
S .00
7 1.100
0
O
0
0
0
3 -
3 -
3 -
S
3 -
a
0
4
HS
40
64
S 240
! -
S 240
S 2.400
3 3.840
40
0
1fi
9
0
20
3 020
3 -
f 1280
1 640
3 -
$ 2.240
4
0
.
0
0
20
3 2
3 -
3 440
3 440
S -
3 1100
A
0
5
5
12
31
$ u0
S -
3 440
3 440
$ fi60
$ 11fi0
S 22
3 14A
f 40
S 40
3 72
S 351
s 1,7.0
$ 11.800
7 1,660
f t,40O
3 6,1.0
f 36,160
f Aix
3 18,]]5
f
t 1,175
f W
f 20,016
S 1,111
f ]6.115
f 3,660
f 76]6
6
f ,414
f 56,986
17
NCP REPORTPREPARATION
IOUaOty Ravlaw INCP Veralon ll
"sOry CemMhn R4vlew OecumeM INCP Ver.lon ll
11.]1..40 OI to myC -1,0 ner.+M P.Mm- H-INCP Versbn 3l
.A F AA FOrm+I Revew INCP Vwwon 4l
6 F NCP Decumen INLP verabn 61
su6101a1
.
4
4
4
4
21
$ 1,)60
3 q.0
3 690
3 660
S 6.0
3 4D.D
16
.
8
S
AS
3 1.690
3 .40
S 940
3 840
3 5.040
1
i
16
S
B
4
4
40
3 1.600
S 800
3 400
3 4pD
f 4000
16
.
4
4
4
3S
3 1.520
3 780
$ ].0
3 110
3 ].0
3 3.420
]2
24
0
0
m
1 1920
S 1440
3 480
f 480
S 4.00
20
8
4
4
4
d0
f 1,800
3 fiA0
S 320
$ ]20
3 320
3 )200
6
6
6
6
fi
]0
3 110
3 ]]0
3 130
3 310
3 ]JO
3 1,650
fi
6
fi
fi
6
10
3 ]30
3 310
3 ]JO
f J]0
3 310
5 1.650
3 120
S )2
S 40
S 44
f M
$ 323
f 10,]40
f 6,810
1 A,1L0
1 ],7fo
f 1,760
f 27,840
3 1T6
f 81L
3 1,]96
3 1,900
f 1,810
{ 6,111
f 10,515
f 6,666
f 5,556
i 5,660
f 5,590
f 11,&17
auR- A1.- •Ha.SF.'
216
f 37,060
266
3 21..0
0
4
D
.
0
f -
O
f -
11.
. 19..00
1.
3 1,420
2.8
1 17380
164
1 16,620
74
f 4,070
98
f 6,]f0
1f.0
S 119230
f 29198
f 158,)1/
GRAND TOTAL - PHASE &1.2
440
1 14,800
661
1 67110
108
. 16,848
S2
6,864
58
1 13.60
178
1 11150
U 464
. 46400
LB
3 6,460
10/
. 36.400
621
. 41,760
164
f 8 ,470
198
6 10,190
1111
f ]60,1]3
. 61,046
1 4021.118
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
URS Tampa
Document
Protect Manager
Deputy Protect
Sr. Noise
C....1-1
Jr. Noise
C.
GIs specialist
Production
Atlminlslrallfe
Assistant
Totsl Salary COft
Manager
ConfWta
tent
Specialist
ESPense.
Toth COST
TASK DESCRIPTION
Rats /Hr:
$170
Rate/HI:
$105
Rata /W'.
$100
Rele /Hr:
$95
Rale /Hr:
$60
Raie /Hr:
$80
Ra1e/HC.
$55
Rate /Ht:
$55
oat
oat
Cost
Hours
Coal
Hours
asl
C-I
Coal
Cost
S':'%::: c. I,.•;t�E' =F I' %!�C'ii1Rf: '.: :lr;i
1
MOBILIZATION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Mobdixation
12
$2,040
121
31,260
12
$1.200
SO
f0
SO
4
$220
8
5440
4:
$5,160
92,376
37,535
1.2 Protect Management
AS
$8,160
16
$1.680
f0
30
SO
30
30
J2
51 760
98
511,800
51.650
513,360
Subtotal
60
$10,300
21
33,840
12
$1,300
0
30
p
SD
0
SO
4
5220
/0
52,200
164
316,760
51.036
330 736
2
LAND USE MAPPING
.1 10 Is la d I— Z liq P p 1 - on, 1- 1-
2
S340
8
s840
8
$800
SO
16
5960
20
$1.600
so
$0
64
64,540
$4,540
2.3 Update 015 DaMba+e+ and Mapping
2
5340
2
$210
30
SO
6
$480
20
$1.500
$0
$0
32
$2,630
$2.630
2.3 Web -0ase GIS Databases and M4pPing
s0
$0
$0
$0
30
60
$4,800
$0
SO
90
$4,200
$1,800
$6,60D
2.4 Cuality Assurance Detail Cbeceing and Review
2
$340
4
5420
4
5400
$0
$0
30
f0
SO
10
$1,160
$1,160
2.5 Documenkyen
2
$340
a
"40
30
30
8
3480
$0
6
$330
4
$220
22
$2,210
$130
32.340
Subtotal
8
51360
33
.21]10
12I
(1,300
0
10
32
31,920
100
$1,000
6
$330
4
S320
114
$16,3 40
$1,830
$17.270
3
INVENTORY OF AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
3.1 UPdale Airc r.R Opelatlen Data
2
"'do
18
51,880
16I
31.800
$0
32
$1,920
$0
s0
$0
66
36,640
$2,260
$7,790
].2 Revew EVkllip AMelbn Plans and 6ludle+
2
3340
8
1840
8
1500
$0
SO
10
s0
s0
1t
31,9/0
31,!20
3.1 Analyse Radar Dala and Develop INM Flight Tracts+
2
$340
4
$420
0
Sam
30
SO
80
$6,400
$0
s0
S{
37,110
37.860
l.4Oualily AS,:urance Detail CbecLing arts Review
2
$340
4
1420
4I
5400
SO
$0
30
SO
SO
70
31,160
71,IGO
3.50e - t
2
$340
4
$420
16
31.600
$0
$ 0
30
6
5330
4
3220
]3
32.910
3130
$3,D4D
Subtotal
10
$1,700
36
33
521
$5,200
0
f0
]2
51,920
/0
S6,tOD
6
f]]0
4
5230
320
319,660
5 3,360
331.9]0
4
EXISTING NOISE CONTOURS
4.1 De 1 p E 1 g N C 1
A .3 Evaluate lmDacls of E +laliilp CandilMn Noise COnMYr+
2
2
$340
6340
4
4
$420
420
2
8�
$2.400
38130
$0
$0
A8
8
$2,880
$48D
28
$0
52.240
s0
$0
SO
30
7t
50
38,0 {0
f {,310
36,0 {0
Sd.210
d.]Gualiry Assurance Derail Cbe<Ylnp and Review
2
$340
4
$420
4
$400
SO
$o
$0
f0
SO
10
31,160
$1,190
d.d DOCUmenmtion
4
5880
B
Sa40
d
3400
SD
20
(1.200
f0
B
$440
4
5220
N
3],710
:130
S],9 t0
Subtoal
10
$1700
20
52.100
{0
$4,000
0
S
76
64,560
28
:2.210
8
$4 {0
ft
$320
1$6
$16,260
51]0
f16 ,J80
5
MEASUREMENT OF EXISTING NOISE LEVELS
6.1 Noi.e MPnimrinq
2
$340
321
53,360
32
$3.200
1 So
32
51 920
$0
$D
SO
:t
$9,830
56.fi36
711pd6
5.3 Meaauretl Noise lmOact Analy+i+
30
30
f0
1 fD
SD
30
SO
SO
0
$0
$ 0
5.3 Modeke Noise ImpxrAnary+ls
So
f0
SO
$0
SO
$O
$1
30
0
SO
$ O
S.d GUaDry Assurance Detail Cnecbing and Review
2
$340
4
S420
4
5400
SD
SO
$o
SO
30
10
51,160
$1,160
55DO non M.-
2
3]40
f0
SO
SO
SO
SO
4
3220
4
$ 220
10
3] :0
51]0
5910
SubloMl
6
51,020
36
S],790
]61
33,600
0
$0
32
$1920
0
$0
d
5220
4
3320
111
510,760
35,755
516,515
6
FUTURE NOISE CONTOURS
s.t Develop Future Condition N-1 Contours
2
SJ40
4I
$420
24
$2.400
$0
36
32.160
SO
SO
30
66
56,720
55,]20
6.2E -1- Impacts t,l Future C-beh Noise C-h-rs
2
3340
4�
$420
a
$800
SO
8
$480
20
$1,600
SO
30
{Z
B.]OUaIiry Assurance 1-s CnecYlnq antl Re-
2
1340
41
$420
4
$400
SO
SO
$O
SO
SO
10
51160
31,160
S.d DocumenMlon
2
3340
4
5420
5400
50
B
5480
d
5]20
8
3440
4
$220
34
73,130
3110
$2.760
SVblotal
B
31,]80
16
31,610
/0
$4.000
01
30
52
$3,120
24
51,820
9
1440
4
$220
162
$12,110
$130
$12,870
7
NEM CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
).t NonN $ 150.21 (b) 11 CPn+uhad P.10 i
2.,
$740
4
1420
O
SO
$0
4
3240
4
$320
4
3220
4
$220
22
51,]30
$4]3
33,193
].2 Ailend Ad414c COmminee Meeting+
72
$12,240
]2
5]560
f0
30
$0
SO
s0
$0
164
519,+00
$18,315
5]8,1]6
1.3 PrayWe lnlermenon Mr P-Ing on Ad4doc COmmiff- Web+Ire
8
$1,360
51
$Sao
13
+1.200
I $0
16
$960
24
31.920
8
5440
8
5440
t1
57,110
$]1160
1.4 present Inlormarkn M the Mpnrae C-ly BOCC
16
$2,720
121
$1260
12
57200
30
f 0
12
$960
8
$440
8
'440
61
57,030
57.116
$8,195
7.6 Compile and Analyze Publk COmmenb
0
f6a0
24
52.52(1
24
$2.400
4
$380
32
$1.920
SO
$0
$0
t8
544
57,941
Subtotal
102
3171 $40
120
$12,600
41
$4.100
4
$780
62
$5.130
4D
$3.200
20
$1.100
20
$1.100
406
143 640
$20,026
$63,666
B
NEM REPORT PREPARATRON
:.1-I ly Revew INEMV I n11
6
$1920
8
$640
81
1800
8
5760
24
$1,440
24
$1.920
8
$440
4
6220
90
$7
1176
57,816
1.2 Stall and Adv 1,C 1 e Review DOCUmenr INEM Vernon It
4
5650
4
5420
41
3400
4
5380
8
$ASS
a
$640
4
6220
4
5220
10
53,410
5136
31,276
0.3 Beard el Ceunly LO brwr+and Public Review (NEM Version 43
2
5340
Z
3210
2
5200
4
3380
4
$240
8
3640
4
5220
4
$220
30
$3,450
51,]96
S], $46
f.d FAA Form al Review (NEM 1-1d. Al
2
3J40
2
5210
3
5200
d
5380
4
$240
8
5640
4
3220
d
3220
70
32,/60
$1,035
:],176
6.6 Finel NEM Document(NEN V111 -5)
2
1340
2
5210
2
$200
4
$380
4
$240
8
$840
4
$220
4
3220
30
$3,460
51,6]0
$4,280
fubtenl
16
33,720
11
51,1:0
tt
31,100
21
$2,3:0
44
$2.$40
66
$4,410
21
$1,]20
20
$1,100
220
312,2]0
36.262
32],482
9
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO LIMIT RECOVERY OF DAMAGES
2
5]10
10
30
4
5] 10
30
SD
.0
f0
6
.720
3720
,. ..... >..
222
3]7,] {0
398
$J1.0:0
36 :
� 326,100
]2
53.010
]20
518,200
]2B
538.3/0
t0
3{,100
100
$6.600
1636
316].000
$39,6]8
5192,6]8
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
URS Tampa
PHASE 2 -NOISE f,OkIPATIRILITV CROIiRAfrl
I
'
10
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
40
36,100
$0
$0
30
s0
30
$0
16
$11110
a$
$7,660
$2,475
MASS
11
REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING PART 160 MITIGATION
16
$2.720
121
31,260
121
31,200
30
1
3480
30
f0
4
$220
52
$5.880
SS.:."
12
REVIEWAND UPDATE OPERATIONAL NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES
I
12.1 Alternative Airport Uae MPdtlic,t -e
2
S340
41
$420
611
$600
SO
8
$48G
SO
SO
30
20
$1,840
$1,940
12.2 Alternative Aircra110p <ralional C1,.....
2
S340
41
5420
6i
$600
SO
8
3480
f0
SO
$O
ZO
$1.840
$1,840
12.2 Airport Facility M -F-ti-
2
5340
4
$420
8
3800
$0
8
5480
SO
$0
$O
32
$2,040
$2,040
12A Develo0menl el Nois<Abatem<nl Measures
2
:340
8
am
12
31,200
SO
8
3480
30
30
$0
30
$2,966
$2.960
f a.6E.1 . "...'M .......
2
SJ40
5
:840
B
5800
30
8
5480
20
$1.600
30
$0
46
$4,060
$4.060
12.6Model ARernatle Scenarlaa
2
3340
4
3420
12
$120
f0
24
11.440
20
$1.600
SO
SO
62
36,000
$5,000
12.T Evaluate Neiae ImDaCLL el A9ernative Scenarios
2
$340
4
5420
4
3400
$0
8
3480
20
$1,600
$0
$O
38
$3.240
$3.240
13.1 OUaliry ASS .11- DeMll Cbec3ing and Rev,,
2
5340
4
3420
4
3400
30
$0
SO
SO
SO
10
$1,160
$1,160
12.3 Documenbbon
2
$340
1
5420
4
5400
S0
B
3480
SO
6
3330
4
52211
211
31,180
3130
(2.720
Subtotal
1:
$],060
.1
34,{30
64
!6,100
0
30
a0
34,800
60
30,1100
6
'330
4
3330
379
3'4,2]0
31]0
534,360
1]
LANDUSENOISE MITIGATION MEASURES
11.11EvaluaM Remedial L USe la4igation Measures
4
SM
B
SB40
121
$1.200
$0
1 6
$IN
30
$2.400
f0
$0
70
S[,DIO
!6.080
1].3 Evaluate P reventive L"' Use Maasures
4
3680
B
SB40
121
$1.200
30
16
$960
20
$1.600
SO
10
60
35,310
f5,L0
Danetad
ualiry Assurance il CNe<aing arW Review
t].] I
2
S3
4
5420
4
3400
SO
SO
SO
10
SD
10
31,1{0
31.160
1,)A o<umenlalion
6
31,030
Bi
3840
16
$1.800
$0
8
5480
SO
6
$330
4
5221]
49
84,840
St]0
3 /,630
Sublatal
16
32,120
281
$2.040
1I
44
34,400
01
$0
OD
32,400
50
$4.000
8
f]]0
4
3220
118
317,010
31]0
f/7, 140
14
CONTINUING NOISE PROGRAM MEASURES
14.1 D.--ti.
2
$340
81
$840
I
1
$100
30
SO
10
6
1730
1
3220
31
32,630
3170
52.660
16
NCP RECOMMENDATIONS
I
I
15.1 Docv,ne. on
6
$1,020
It
31,1110
16
$1,600
$0
16
$960
16
$1,280
6
$330
4
$220
t0
'7,090
$130
$7.220
16
NCPCON3ULTATIONANDPUBLICINVOLVEMENT
I
1
16. Nadly S 110.111 "1*11"I"d P-11
2
3740
4I
3420
30
$0
4
5240
4
$320
4
$220
4
$220
22
$1,780
3412
$3,192
16.2 Aff -Gomm Nee Meeings
12
312.240
72
3].560
30
30
$0
$0
$0
SO
1M
$1$,100
3/0,]75
t18,175
16.3 Pro Mde Iniormelbn 1b, PosS,p on Ad41oc Committee Website
2
$340
4
5420
4
$400
SO
1
3240
16
!1,280
8
$440
8
$440
48
$1,610
$7,560
16A Pn-I ln1.: .On to Monroe County 5000 I Public Nearing
16
$2,720
12I
f1.2e0
50
30
16
3860
8
$640
8
$440
B
5440
Bt
15,4:0
31,175
3],8]5
16.5 C-pik and Analyse Public Comments
4
5 880
B
3840
B
3800
f0
40
$2.400
SO
f0
12
] 660
$ 760
72
36,110
3 44
56,42 4
Sublelal
96
$16,120
1001
$10,500
1T
61,200
0
30
64
$3,840
20
12,200
20
31.1:0
]2
S
353
$36,9fi0
$20,026
356,986
17
NCPREPORTPREPARATION
1
17.11 Quality R<view INCP Version ll
8
"'O
161
SI.880
16
$1,600
16
$1.520
32
$1.920
20
$1.600
6
5330
6
$330
120
f10,]IO
3176
:10,516
17.2 51x11 antl Advlaory Committee Review Decumml lNDP Version 21
4
3880
0
3800
840
B
3
8
$760
24
SI A40
8
5640
6
$310
fi
$370
721
$5,130
3916
56,656
1T.S Saard 0l COUnryC- iaai. -, and Public R. -INCP Venian l)
4
S6B0
B
5810
6
5800
4
5390
8
$480
1
$320
6
$330
6
$330
41
34.160
31,]86
$6,656
17.0 FAA Formal Revew INCP Version ll
4
3680
0
f8b
/
$400
0
$780
8
3480
4
f320
6
SJJO
6
fJJO
M
{],760
$1,600
55,680
17.6 Final NCP Document INCP Version 61
4
3650
a
Selo
4
3400
4
SJ80
8
$480
4
5320
6
$110
6
3330
"1
1),160
51,8]0
55,590
SubmLLl
4
34.080
411
36.040
40
$4.00.
36
.1,420
BO
34,800
/0
f3.2D0
70
11,660
30
31,660
]311
$37,1,40
36,177
377,877
SuF!1OTAI. PIInbE2
216
5]7,060
25[
$28,180
136
319.100
76
$7AT0
281
31T,2BD
184
316,630
71
f /.070
11
36.310
13:0
"'.,220
539,158
3168,378
GRANOTOTAL -SES 162
WO
$74,900
551
$57.!60
451
$45,400
63
.6,460
608
138,480
522
341,760
161
SIA70
191
L10,1l0
2851
329',330
361,798
3]51,016
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
URS Santa Ana
Radar Processing
Radar Data Processing
Total
Expenses
Total
Software Developer
Specialist
Salary
Cost
Rate /Hr:
$156
Rate /Hr: $132
TASK DESCRIPTION
Cost
Hours
Cost
Hours Cost
Hours
Cost
3
INVENTORY OF AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
3.1 Update Aircraft Operation Data
161
$2,496
20 $2,640
36
$5,136
$5,136
3.2 Review Existing Aviation Plans and Studies
0�
$0
0 $0
0
$0
$0
3.3 Analyze Radar Data and Develop INM Flight Tracks
80,
$12,480
24 $3,168
104
$15,648
$15,648
3.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
3.5 Documentation
12
$1,872
81 $1,056
20
$2,928
$2,928
Subtotal
108
$16,848
521 $6,864
160
$23,712
$0
$23,712
GRAND TOTAL - PHASES 1 & 2
108
j $16,848
52I
$6,864
160
$23,712
0
$23,712
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
Landrum and Brown
Director of Noise
Manager of Noise
Total
Expenses
Total
Monitoring
Monitoring
Salary
Cost
TASK DESCRIPTION
Cost
Rate /Hr:
$225
Rate /Hr:l
$175
Hours
Cost
— ffo — u — rs7
Cost
Hours
Cost
5
MEASUREMENT OF EXISTING NOISE LEVELS
5.1 Noise Monitoring
6
$1,350
98
$17,150
104
$18,500
$12,250
$30,750
5.2 Measured Noise Impact Analysis
6
$1,350
52'.
$9,100
58
$10,450
$10,450
5.3 Modeled Noise Impact Analysis
26
$5,850
$0
26
$5,850
$5,850
5.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
5.5 Documentation
20
$4,500
28
$4,900
48
$9,400
$9,400
Subtotal
58
$13,050
178
$31,150
236
$44,200
$12,250
$56,450
GRAND TOTAL- PHASES 1 8 2
58
$13,050
1781
$31,150
236
$44,200
$12,250
$56,450
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
30- May -11
Expenses
TASK
1.1
TASK
1.2
TASK
3.1
TASK
5.1
TASK
T.3
TASK 7.4
TASK
to
TASK 18.2
TASK 16.4
Travel Per Person
unit c-
0uanliry
Total
Ouamiry
Tplal
Ownllry
ToW
Ownllry
1oW
OuanOry
Total
Ouantiry ToYI
OumOry
ToW
Own6ry TeW
Ownliry ToW
Anta�a 11: TPA£YNA
$475
J
fIA25
2
5950
2
3950
3
SI425
12
15.700
I 1415
]
$1,425
12 $5.)00
1 S'IT5
Antala (RntlmP BOS -EYNA
$700
1
1700
motel (nqM.)
3200
]
5600
3
5400
4
3600
t]
11 .400
24
14,500
2 14 00
3
$600
24 14.500
2 3400
Meak(Days)
$BO
3
3150
2
3120
4
3240
1)
31.020
2a
31'4
2 3120
3
1 150
24 31.440
2 3120
Car Bantal(Daysl
350
550
2
3100
2
5100
9
5450
t2
5600
3 lt00
3
3150
12 fSM
2 3100
Pa l9irp(pay.)
acMknaou.
320
320
3
3
360
360
2
2
S40
140
4
550
$80
17
11
$140
1w0
24
24
3450
3450
2 340
3 340
S
3
$60
$.
24 5450
24 3450
2 140
2 140
TOTAL
$1.52S
$2,375
110.
112.2%
$7.675
311
1,1)6
2,475
$11600
IT.176
TIID. (TPA -EYVO
1
2
1
1
6
1
]
6
1
Tips (SOS -EYMn
P T- Tampa)
3
1
2
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
People (rrom Boston)
NyM. (peopk Irom Tampa)
1
1
2
1
4
2
2
1
2
2
nts ( o k Irom Boston)
I
I
1
1
5
Expenses
TASK
6.1
Noise Monitorin E ent
unit CaM
0uamiry I Total
Sound Level Melar LM24 K4lper nn.-I
St 500
4 15.000
Shgpng(BOS- EYW -SOSI
$400
4
31600
Calubr -Pius (pal moron)
Miscelkneaus
1500
1200
1
$2.000
3200
TOTAL
59,600
Expenses
TASK
2.3
TASK
2.5
TASK
3.5
TASK
4.4
TgSK5.5
TASK 6.4
TASK
7.1
TASK T.2
TASK 7.5
MiSC 11 -...0 IOr NEMS
unit Co.,
Ouanliry I
Total
Ouanliry I
Total
O.-In
Total
Ouantiry 1.11
Ouanliry
TOtal
Owmiry Total
Ouanhry
Total
Ouanury Toul
Ownliry ToW
Wab S.!. roasting (perm Nh)
150
J6
31,000
BdW PIint., (0.5'rlt'andr.111'vt 71
30.10
300
$30.00
300
1.
300
SXI.00
300
S".
300 SXM
Cobs Pl oni, (1141r an.., 1.5 - .11 - )
51.50
50
$75:0
50
ST$:0
So
175:0
50
175.00
50 375.00
Prawmalkn Me,.
$95
45 $4.275
LelYmaa4..In Ernakpes
31:0
300
$300
oiled Stela. Po.UI Service (Per ko.0
$044
300
$112
100 S.
FetlEr (tlocumaMa)
525
1
125.00
1
$25:0
1
$25.00
1
S25M
I 525.00
FadEr( al meet for rooaMalion..,.1
$100
6 1600
TOTAL
11,600
$130.00
1]0:0
130:0
$1X1:0
1130.00
S.2M
$4,575.
44.00
Expenses
TASK9.1
TASK
8.2
TASK
e.3
TASKSA
TASK
6.6
TASK 9.6
TASK
8.7
Document Production - NEM
Unit -t
Oua I, I Total
Ouantry I Total
Ownllry Toul
.-fin Told
Ouanllry Total
Ouanllry ToYI
Ouanliry Total
Compkk Set (WM Document. CD. E.- Summary)
3150
1150
2
I,
]
3450
T
51,050
2
5300
6 3900
9
31.350
CD
35
0
$0
0
30
24
3120
14
SID
0
$0
0 So
20
5100
E...... Summary
$5
0
$0
0
$0
24
$in
14
$70
0
$0
0 SO
2D
SIM
Shipping
ca fete Gal IMain Document CD. E.eC. summary)
325
325
525
2
550
6
1150
t
325
5 3125
6
3200
Eacn Ad.honal CD
32
0
30
0
f0
14
346
14
32B
0
30
0 30
20
340
Eacn APohoral E-fiv. Summary
S2
0
SO
0
SO
24
346
14
$2B
0
to
0 So
20
540
TOTAL
1176
3325
51116
f1.3Be
5126
31025
51,530
Expenses
TASK
12.9
TASK
13A
TASK
14.1
TASK
16.1
TASKI..l
TASK 16.2
TASK
16.5
Mltcellan u6 for NCP
unitc-
Ouantiry Toter
Ouanlity Total
0uan1it, Total
Quantity I Total
Ouamiry Total
0,7nun Total
0-111, 1 Toll
BLW P...., 16.5 Y11'arW0111'.17')
50.10
300
$3000
300
S...
300
5]0.00
300
130.00
-, Plinlinp ltt'rtr aM/er a.5'.It�
$1.50
50
$75:0
50
175.00
50
375.00
50
375.00
Plasarelion Board.
nth E -Wb
395
31:0
300
3300
45 $4.275
UMatl Stale. Po.tal Service(per ykw)
10.44
300
$132
100
$44
FetlEr (tlowmams)
$25
1
$25.00
1
525.00
1
$25.00
1
125.00
FetlEr (par meeli kl �aaaMatgn baarm)
$100
6 1600
TOTAL
$130
130.00
1]0.00
130.00
3432.00
54,B76.D0
544.00
Expenses
TASK
16.1
TASK16.2
TASK
ti.]
I TA3K
1 i.4
TASK
16.5
TASK 16.6
TASK
16.7
Document Production - NCP
Unitcpat
C. Total
Quantity I T..1
Ouantit, Toul
I Ouanliry I Total
O I Total
Ouanu Total
Ouantiry Telal
NEM
C..Pwla Set ( D.-m ma
i. CO. E-C. Sumry)
$150
1
$150
2
5300
3
1450
7
31.050
2
53W
1 t 11.650
9
$1, 50
CD
f5
0
30
D
$0
24
3120
14
370
0
30
0 $0
30
1100
E-- Summery
SS
0
SO
0
f0
24
5120
14
170
0
10
0 10
20
3100
Shipping
Cp 6t. Sat (..in DC-nt. CD. E.- Summary)
525
1
121
1
125
2
150
6
3150
t
125
10 3250
0
3200
Eacn Atltliponal GO
32
0
30
0
30
24
346
14
325
0
30
0 30
20
340
Eacn AEtlitianal Erecuow Summery
$2
0
f0
D
3o
24
$ae
14
$20
0
So
0 $0
i0
!40
TOTAL
fIT6
326
3636
$1,396
$3251
11 ,900
$1,030
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
2011 PART 150 STUDY
PERSONNEL RATES
Project Manager
URS Tama
$170
Deputy Project Manager
URS Tampa
$105
Sr. Noise Consultant
URS Tama
$100
Consultant
URS Tama
$95
GIS Specialist
URS Tama
$
Jr. Noise Consultant
URS Tampa
$60
Document Production Specialist
URS Tama
$55
Administrative Assistant
URS Tampa
$55
Radar Processing Software Developer
URS Santa Ana
$156
Radar Data Processing Specialist
URS Santa Ana
$132
Director of Noise Monitoring
Landrum & Brown
$225
Manager of Noise Monitoring
Landrum & Brown
$175