Loading...
3rd Amendment 02/23/1998 GOUNTy 44, goF • OouNr• Q ;Danny IL. 1.o[ijage BRANCH OFFICE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT BRANCH OFFICE 3117 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY MONROE COUNTY 88820 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY MARATHON, FLORIDA 33050 500 WHITEHEAD STREET PLANTATION KEY, FLORIDA 33070 TEL. (305) 289 -6027 KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040 TEL. (305) 852 -7145 FAX (305) 289 -1745 TEL. (305) 292 -3550 FAX (305) 852 -7146 FAX (305) 295 -3660 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Herman Director of Growth Management Attention: Isabel T. Reid, Senior Staff Assistant FROM: Ruth Ann Jantzen Deputy Clerk DATE: March 11, 1998 At the February 23, 1998 Special Board of County Commissioners Meeting, the Board granted approval and authorized execution of the Marathon Wastewater Facilities Plan Contract Amendment 3 between Monroe County and CH2MHILL, Inc., directing CH2MHILL to make specified revisions to the Facilities Plan to secure the $4.3 million in de- obligated Title II construction fund dollars and to assist in securing the $52 million requested in the Congressional Funding Proposal AND adopted Resolution No. 087 -1998 concerning the Transfer of Funds to cover the costs associated with this Contract. Enclosed please find a fully executed duplicate original of the above Amendment for return to CH2MHILL, and a certified copy of the Resolution for your handling. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact this office. cc: County Attorney Finance County Administrator, w/o document File • AMENDMENT 3 CONTRACT FOR A WASTEWATER FACILITIES PLAN THIS CONTRACT AMENDMENT is entered into between Monroe County, whose address is Department of Marine Resources, Marathon Government Center, 2798 Overseas Highway, Suite 420, Marathon, Florida, 33050, and CH2MHill, Inc., whose address is 6410 5 Street, Suite 2a, Stock Island, Key West, Florida, 33040. Section 2. A. of the Contract dated the 20th day of September, 1995 between the parties, hereafter, the original agreement, is hereby amended as follows: Section 2. A. The Engineer must commence work on the plan by 20 September 1995 and satisfactorily complete and deliver the plan by 31 December 1998. The purpose of this contract amendment is to make unforeseen and necessary revisions to the Marathon Facilities Plan to reflect a change in treatment plant siting and to amend the plag -to eflect-a two-. phased approach to constructing Wastewater Facilities in the Primary Ser`yrce. Area. } II. Section 3. A. of the original agreement is amended to read: Section 3. A. The planning area covered by this contract is from the Seven Mile Bridge up to and including Conch Key. As approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the Primary Service Area extends from the Seven Mile Bridge to Coco Plum Road, including the area serviced by that road. The Secondary Service Area extends from Coco Plum Road up to and including Conch Key. Further development of the plan for the primary service area will include a phased approach, to include a first phase of approximately 400 residential units (or EDUs), while the remaining portion of the Primary Service Area will be considered as part of Phase II. FacM500.doc 02/06/98 8:35 AM III. The original agreement is hereby amended by the addition of the following tasks: Section 3. B. 9. Task IX. The Consultant shall revise the overall Marathon Wastewater Facilities Plan to reflect changes in treatment plant siting options in accordance with the following task requirements: a) The Consultant shall reevaluate wastewater treatment plant siting options to reflect the current availability of sites. The Consultant will provide an in depth environmental site assessment and an Environmental Inventory Document for Crawl Key. The Consultant will revise Chapter 6, Wastewater Treatment Plant Siting Alternatives, of the Marathon Facilities Plan to reflect changed siting options. b) The Consultant shall revise Chapter 7, Collection System Alternatives, of the Marathon Facilities Plan to reflect the Crawl Key site as the recommended Wastewater Treatment Plant site. This will include revising the size and locations of the main force mains to the treatment plant. The consultant will revise quantities and cost estimates for the four collection system scenarios. c) The Consultant shall prepare revised cost estimates and reevaluate all alternatives involving the regional Wastewater Treatment Plant site for both the Primary Service Area and Secondary Service Area and for all reuse options. The new plant site will also require the costing and evaluation of two additional alternatives. The Consultant will be required to revise approximately 13 tables and create 4 new tables relative to Chapter 11, Wastewater Treatment Alternatives, of the Marathon Wastewater Facilities Plan. 2 d) The Consultant shall prepare a new Wastewater Treatment Plant Conceptual Site Plan for the Crawl Key site and revise and update the design data summary to reflect suggested revisions to treatment plant components. These revisions reflect required changes to Chapter 12, Recommended Wastewater Treatment Facilities, of the Marathon Wastewater Facilities Plan. e) The Consultant shall revise and update Chapter 13, Environmental Assessment of the Recommended Alternatives, of the Marathon Wastewater Facilities Plan for consistency with the new recommended treatment plant site on Crawl Key. 10. Task X. The Consultant shall amend the existing draft Marathon Wastewater Facilities Plan to reflect a Phased implementation approach within the Primary Service Area in accordance with the following task requirements: a) The Consultant shall define the physical boundaries of the Phase I implementation area based upon a project cost, including financing and Operation and Maintenance considerations, that does not exceed $5.8 million. Considerations in defining the Phase I implementation area should also include, the number of potential cesspits located in the area and the extent to which the area is considered a "water quality hot spot." b) The Consultant shall assess flow projections for the Phase I implementation area. c) The Consultant shall address specific options in Phase I for using existing wastewater facilities in or near the implementation area. Consideration should be given to the most cost effective means of providing treatment in the Phase I implementation area. d) If options for using existing wastewater treatment facilities do not prove to be cost effective or otherwise feasible, the Consultant shall select a site 3 for the wastewater treatment plant in the Phase I implementation area. The Consultant shall provide a site specific Environmental Inventory Document and assess the cost of site acquisition. e) The Consultant shall assess options for wastewater collection in the Phase I implementation area. Considerations shall include any specific change in the configuration of the collection system necessary to implement Phase I construction as well as how the collection system will integrate with the Phase II construction effort at a later date f) The Consultant shall evaluate wastewater treatment, effluent disposal, and solids management for Phase I construction. Considerations shall include a comparison of different effluent standards as well as the possibility of utilizing the project as an AWT demonstration project. g) The Consultant shall complete a site specific Environmental Inventory Document, including threatened and endangered species. h) The Consultant shall consider and recommend wastewater management options for the Phase I implementation area. i) The Consultant shall provide a specific Capital Finance Plan for the Phase I implementation area. j) The Consultant will provide an implementation schedule for Phase I construction. k) The Consultant shall prepare and transmit the EPA application for federal assistance required for securing the $4.3 million grant. 11. Task XI - Public Outreach Effort. a) The Consultant shall hold two neighborhood meetings, limited to the Little Venice area. After the meetings, the Consultant will prepare a brief summary of the meetings 4 b) The Consultant shall coordinate with the media as is necessary to promote informational articles, provide press releases, and to notify the media of relevant workshops and public hearings. IV. Section 3. B., 9. of the original agreement is hereby amended to read: Section 3. B. 12. Task XII - Meetings with Board of County Commissioners and Technical Advisory Committee. a) Meetings must be held with the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners and the Technical Advisory Committee to report project status and receive comments. Meetings included in this task are limited to the following: (1) Board of County Commissioners: Including meetings already attended, not to exceed twelve meetings at BOCC meeting locations. (2) Technical Advisory Committee: Including meetings already attended, not to exceed six meetings in Marathon. V. Section 3. C. 5. of the original agreement is hereby amended to read: Section 3. C. 5. Deliverables will be provided to the County in the following form: (1) Subtask drafts of technical memoranda: one reproducible copy must be provided. (2) Draft Wastewater Facilities Plan: In addition to the Draft Marathon Facilities Plan documents previously provided (50 documents) under this Contract, the Consultant will provide 50 additional Revised Draft Marathon Facilities Plan documents 5 (3) Final Wastewater Facilities Plan: 50 bound copies must be provided. (4) The Preliminary Design Re is part of both the draft and the final Wastewater Facilities Plan. port VI. Section 4 of the original agreement is hereby amended to read: Section 4. A. The total compensation due the Engineer for satisfactorily completing the plan is $404,880, hereafter the contract price. The amount already expended in the Contract is $254,000. The amount remaining in the Contract, due the Consultant upon adequate completion of remaining tasks, is $150,880. The Engineer may not receive compensation for any work performed that is not described in Section 3 of this contract unless the work is approved in writing by the Board of County Commissioners. B. The p artial payment schedule, and Task or Subtask completion dates (non highlighted portions of the table remain to be completed and compensated for), are as follows: Task No. Task or Subtask Deliverable Completion Date Amount Payable A i, ` f y airs ! h� size h J « o v3 i s / �/�;�!„� `i"' # # s s # n } � C q � # - ; , i , # f3 y „., £ o ions f men • ble y r a of y i ,, ..... J� 3 f ,,,3 R . �, �."' ... � � s x " � ' v, , 5; ?9+� , 0 _ o #! �e # a o i t„' wa e : to , ..; : 1 , G „ , ' A� p )`T1 vze n g , ! 3 . [ P N # aa w� p� yp�2y ga p M� Ohara i 3H '� N` * ..s -,, tob r 4 0 R. i ' � 3', '''74114:4'f'''"'"V ,410:14/44SIESe::,--it'.7,74 - i,Pn's 5,911:4=telL ast : t $ en tine � % ' � # '4f' . ( °' i 1� .-0404,, . . ,,, , ,. 1 x ,, E :s, i - , f A re Po # , tI i ° 1 # T a t g' E 6 177 ft ate m _ # Y' , . # # �,. ,. � , "" ,..::. ` • Z ® : • - ,ice „ # ®, # ## ' i r. J' � nI� {r - � e_ ,i?r�rY�� n " z s.er, ,'� ..�... . P' M,a� .�s"aa ` .vrva:a&<�:�1`r'"uc �' ,, '. ': W; f g _ ,, m , # YY # # � ' , Lf s.r ?,: .pr'r' >h;,r ,..:tx. t rE ® w • m: v t . 11 -1 11. A Final Facilities Plan. September 30, 1998 $20,000 III 14. A Final Capital Financing Plan. July 1, 1998 $4,000 Task No. Task or Subtask Deliverable Completion Date Amount Payable IV 15. Documentation of Public Participation July 1, 1998 $30,000 t/ 3 i f: � � p5 q V 17. A Final User Charge Ordinance July 1, 1998 $4,000 'TIN,raftfSv .f . .,, . F, a.;f .. ® , Y'Y rf,' r #'# VI 19. A Final Sewer Use Ordinance July1, 1998 $2,000 o'CITOTEllitY AkiiiTT:utigrirS:trin y a _ ,s9. # ;, .,. » <rE IX 22. Draft Plan Revisions for Changes in VVWTP Siting April 30, 1998 $26,780 X 23. Draft Plan Amendment for two (2) Project Phases April 30, 1998 $55,500 XI 24. Public Outreach Effort July 1, 1998 $8,600 VII. Section 11 of the original agreement is hereby amended to read: Section 11 A. The Engineer may not assign or subcontract its obligations under this contract without the written consent of the County except for subcontracts with the following firms: a) Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari and Hellstrom, Inc.; b) Continental Shelf Associates, Inc.; 7 • c) Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Marks, Bryant & Yon, P.A., and d) Donald Roecker. 2. The County's consent to the four subcontractors listed does not in any way relieve or excuse the Engineer from the complete performance of all his duties and obligations under this contract. VIII. Amendments 1 and 2 to this Contract dated 18 December 1996 and 16 July 1997 respectively are null and void. IX. In all other respects, the Contract between the parties dated 20 September, 1995, and all its attachments remain in full force and effect. ,r SS THEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed this d4'6! ,February , 1998. ' MEAL) Attest: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK BOAR, s GQ NTY COMMISSIONERS OF if OE CC/ITY, FLO A By By i Deputy rk Mayor /Chairman (SEAL) CH2MHiII, Inc. Attest: By By •_-i ��.� / //, • Title Title , A :, , � ,,, cad Ae , ,p/ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY B . ATTiR 1— Y'S OF"' 8