Loading...
Miscellaneous `pOUNT� ..._ R.9 q � E CWNTT. t. Jatnnp IL. 3otIjage BRANCH OFFICE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT BRANCH OFFICE 3117 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY MONROE COUNTY P.O. BOX 379 MARATHON, FLORIDA 33050 500 WHITEHEAD STREET PLANTATION KEY, FLORIDA 33070 TEL. (305) 743 -9036 KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040 TEL. (305) 852 -9253 TEL. (305) 294 -4641 M E M O R A N D U M To: Rob Wolfe, Chief Assistant County Attorney From: Danny L. Kolhage, Clerk Date: October 17, 1991 Subject: Abolition of Escrow Account with State Board of Administration (Landfill Closure) This memorandum is in response to your memorandum of October 16, 1991 concerning the abolition of an escrow account in the Municipal Service District. It is not the accounting treatment which is of concern to me. Rather, it was the intention of the management of the District to remove the conditions that were placed upon the expenditure of the funds by the original adoption of the Escrow Agreement. Therefore, the question which needs to be resolved at this point is what type of document, if any, is required in order to properly reflect the Board's action in abolishing the Escrow Agreement and thereby removing the conditions that were placed upon the expenditure of the funds in that account. If you have any additional questions, please contact me. D.•'. Kol a age, Clerk DLK :RLC cc: File M E M O R A N D U M To: Danny Kolhage Clerk of the Courts From: Rob Wolfe Asst. County Attorne� Re: Abolition of escrow account with state board of administration (landfill closure) Date: October 16, 1991 Will the County receive any funds back from this account? If yes, would they be treated as an MSD budget amendment under Sec.129.06(2)(a), Fla. Stat., a receipt from a source not anticipated under Sec.129.06(2)(d), Fla. Stat., an appropriation to a reserve for future improvements under Sec.129.06(2)(c), Fla. Stat., or none of the above? Rosalie has raised a question as to whether an additional action is needed vis a vis the BCC's action in abolishing the escrow account on 9- 18 -91. It seems to me the question would be answered by whatever the proper accounting treatment is for the funds, if any, in the former account. RW /la • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADD ON - AGENDA ITEM SUS Meeting Date: Sept. 18, 1991 Division: Municipal Service Dist. Bulk Item: Yes No XXX Department: Municipal Service Dist. AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Rescind DER Escrow Agreement for Monroe County Landfills. ITEM BACKGROUND: According to Rule 17- 701.076 existing government -owned landfills which are scheduled to close on or before October 1, 1995 may establish or escrow account or other approved alternate mechanism. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: An escrow account agreement was approved by BOCC on 5 -15 -91 to provide for landfill closure and long term care of Key Largo Landfill, Long Key Landfill and Cudjoe Key Landfill. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The attached financial plan satisfies the requirement for landfill closure costs. Therefore recommend Board rescind escrow agreement and recognize the attached financial plan as proof of M.S.D.'s obligation to comply with DER's provisions of Rule 17- 701.076. TOTAL COST: $ BUDGETED: Yes No Cost to County: $ APPROVED BY: County Atty N/A OMB /Purchasing N/A Risk Management N/A DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL: A (Signature) DOCUMENTATION: Included: XXX To Follow: Not Required: Agenda CZ g da Item � DISPOSITION: