Item B2BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date: March 19, 2012
Bulk Item: Yes No Y
Division: Growth Mana ement
Staff Contact Person: Christine Hurley
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Presentation of the second portion of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR)
of the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan.
ITEM ACKGROUND: Keith and Schnars, P.A. (K&S) is finalizing Phase 2 (EAR) of the four -phased
Comprehensive Plan update process. The EAR is a document that serves as a "report card" of the existing
Comprehensive Plan by evaluating the existing goals, objectives and policies (GOPs) to determine their
effectiveness in balancing growth, preserving natural resources; achieving water quality improvements; complying
with State regulations; etc. The EAR contains the following: Introduction, Chapter 1-Public Involvement Process,
Chapter 2-Community-Wide Assessment, Chapter 3-Assessment of Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4-Major Issues
Analysis, Chapter 5-Special Topics, and Chapter 6-Assessment of Changes to Florida Statutes. Due to the large
amount of information, the EAR will be presented in two parts.
Part 1 was presented on November 16, 2011, and consisted of an overview of the following: Introduction, Chapter
1, Chapter 2, Chapter 3, and Chapter 4 Major Issues: Land Use/Mobility; Natural Resource Protection (excluding
wetland topics which will be included in the Part Two presentation); Climate Change/Hazard Mitigation; and
Public Facilities Funding.
Part 2 will consist of the following: Chapter 2 (data updates), Chapter 3, a portion of Chapter 4, Chapter 5 (coastal
high hazard area); and Chapter 6. The portion of Chapter 4 that will be presented will include brief discussions of
six of the nine Major Issues: Economic Sustainability; County -wide Visioning & Planning; Natural Resource
Protection (wetlands); Affordable Housing; Public Involvement; and Intergovernmental Coordination. The Major
Issue discussions will include implementation strategies which may require amendments to the current GOPs,
amendments to comply with changes to State Statute and Rule or require other County action as they relate to the
locally defined Major Issues.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
December 16, 2009 — BOCC approved a contract to update the Monroe County Year 2010 Technical Document (Phase
1), Evaluation and Appraisal Report (Phase 2), Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Phase 3), and Land Development
Code (Phase 4).
September 15, 2010 — BOCC approved Amendment No. 1 which amended the work program and deliverable schedule
October 20, 2010 — BOCC approved Amendment No. 2 amending Master Schedule "B" referencing the work program
timeline and deliverable schedule.
May 18, 2011 — BOCC approved Amendment No. 3 amending Exhibit "A" Scope of Services for Phase 2 to include
services relating to the Environmental Impact Statement
August 17, 2011 — BOCC approved Amendment No. 4 amending Exhibit "A" Scope of Services for Phase 3 relating to
changes to state statutory requirements.
November 16, 2011 — Presentation of the first portion of the draft Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: None
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None
TOTAL COST: INDIRECT COST: BUDGETED: Yes _ No —
DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE:
COST TO COUNTY:
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes No
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
AMOUNT PER MONTH Year
APPROVED BY: County Atty _ OMB/Purchasing _ Risk Management
DOCUMENTATION: Included x Not Required '
DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM #
3/5/2012
Michael L. Davis, Vice President and Principal-
in -Charge
■ Mr. Davis' experience encompasses all phases
of Environmental Sciences: Land and Watershed
Planning, Transportation Planning, Permitting
and NEPA reviews;
■ Mr. Davis directs the following K&S divisions:
PD&E Services;
Environmental Sciences;
Transportation Planning;
Land Use Planning;
Landscape Architecture; and
Public Involvement.
■ Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
■ Director of Natural Resources, White House CEQ
■ Director of Everglades Restoration
■ Extensive NEPA and study experience (e.g.
CERP, PSL EIS, SMDWSP)
Outline for Today
Part 2 Presentation
Introduction
Chapter 1: Public Involvement Process
Chapter 2: Community -Wide Assessment
Updated Vacant Land Analysis by Tier
Potential Land Use Conflicts Analysis
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Updated recommendations
"Date Certain" policy review
Reviewing update in Part 2
Others were reviewed in Part 1 ("11-15-11)
3
Outline for Today (cont'd)
Part 2 Presentation
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Identified
(Overall "Big Impacts"
will be introduced first)
Land Use/Mobility
s. County -wide Visioning &
z. Natural Resource
Planning (2)
Protection - wetlands (3) 6. Economic Sustainability (1)
Climate Change/Hazard
7 Affordable Mousing (4)
Mitigation
8. Public Involvement/
Public Facilities Funding
Information (5)
s. Intergovernmental
Coordination (6)
Reviewing these issues in Part 2I eviewed in Part 1 (11-15-11)/Review Ord-,
a
3/5/2012
2
3/5/2012
Outline for Today (cont'd)
Part 2 Presentation
Chapter 5: Special Topics (5 topics)
1. School Concurrency
2. Water Supply Planning
3, Coastal High Hazard Area
4. Compatibility with Military Installations
5. Transportation Concurrency
Reviewing this topic in Part 2
Others were reviewed in Para 1 (11-15-11)
Outline for Today (cont'd)
Part 2 Presentation
Chapter 6: Assessment Of Changes To Florida
Statutes [163.3191(2)(f)j
. Consistency with Florida Statutes;
■ Changes in GM Act since 2004; and
. Identifies needed amendments.
s
6
3
Order of Presentation
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts
■ Chapter 4: Major Issues —
`�:t Economic Sustainability
.t County -wide Visioning and Planning
u Natural Resource Protection — Wetlands
• Affordable Housing
Lj Public Involvement/Information
U Intergovernmental Coordination
Order of Presentation
■ Chapter 3 — Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
■ Chapter 2: Community —Wide Assessment
i Updated Vacant Land Analysis by Tier
:.j Existing Land Use to Future Land Use Potential
Land Use Conflicts Analysis
■ Chapter 5: Special Topics
■ Chapter 6: Assessment Of Changes To
Florida Statutes [163.3191(2)(f)]
8
3/5/2012
M
3/5/2012
In
Order of Presentation
■ Special Notes:
EAR page numbers included for ease of
reference; and
PC recommendations from 2/6/12 review
meeting regarding proposed strategies
are shown in I onn
9
Debbie Love, AICP, Project Manager
Certified Planner 20 years regulatory
planning experience (10 years in ACSC):
• Comprehensive Plan Amendments and
Land Development Regulations;
• Evaluation and Appraisal Reports;
• City-wide and Neighborhood Master Plans;
• Visioning and design workshop facilitation;
• Environmental permitting;
• Floodplain management and hazard
mitigation; and
• Grant writing and administration of CDBG,
EDA and other federal and state funding
opportunities.
10
5
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts
Initially introduced during one-on-one meetings
with BOCC members in June, 2011.
Compiled from public workshops and meetings with
PC, BOCC, and staff; the EAR and Technical
Document analyses.
Today's presentation ties together seemingly
disparate issues.
no
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts (cont'd)
Recurring themes throughout the EAR
■ Environmental protection; and
■ Sustainable, "green" development with a focus on
redevelopment.
Sustainable development
"...meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet theirs."
--- World Commission on Environment and Development
12
0
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts
(cont'd)
Considerations presented here today are based upon
the premise that the success of our common future
requires a clear understanding that a sustainable
economy is dependent upon a healthy environment.
"Sustainable Monroe: The Environment is the Economy"
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts
(cont'd)
Economic Development Strategy Categories:
■ Planning and Land Use
. Hotel and Tourism
■ Redevelopment
■ Marine and Waterfront
■ Finance and Investment
13
14
7
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts (cont'd)
Interconnection with Community Planning and
Visioning Topic Discussion
. Cross -cutting implementation strategies linking
environmental health with economic strength.
. Additional alignment activities between community
vision and effective implementation.
,s
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts (cont'd)
Strategies to consider:
Lj Hotel/Motel development/redevelopment options;
u Discontinuing the existing NROGO Allocation
Determination Formula;
Li Developing an exclusive Commercial Land Use
Category;
16
3/5/2012
■ r,
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts (cont'd)
Strategies to consider:
Evaluating KEYWEP and UMAM procedures,
Actions related to water dependent/water related uses
and recreational and working waterfront protections:
■ Public/Private partnerships;
■ Environmentally -based technology/research; and
■ Eco-tourism;
Economic health considerations.
17
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts (cont'd)
Take Away
■ Tourism
Economically, the "Main Game" in town.
Biggest opportunity.
Policies which constrain, limit, or otherwise hinder tourism
impacts the overall Keys economy. .7
■ Allocation System -
■ Transient Moratorium 2
. Redevelopment/rehab limits •--
■ Waterfront Impacts
Think about what policies are needed to support and build
the industry.
1e
W
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts (cont'd)
Take Awav (cont'd)
■ Working Waterfronts
:::: Similar changes as ALL island communities in Florida.
L, Productivity is down.
lj Jobs are down.
u: "Highest and best" use has changed.
E, Commercial fishing will never become the economic
mainstay of the Keys economy again.
u There is a desire to preserve what's left of the cultural and
historic industry, support recreational fishing guides and
"fresh catch", and focus upon enviro/eco tourism.
,9
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts
Take Away (cont'd)
■ Working Waterfronts
Use the primary engine of tourism for funding.
. Require commercial tourism uses to provide public access to
water;
. Maintain a component of water related uses, or;
. Contribute to a special fund;
Seasonal housing development
■ Utilize a portion of tourist tax or non-resident user fees to
support the industry.
so
T(,f 5
Zyvy a }T} U4
e �7�
10
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts
Take Away (cont'd)
■ Target New Industry
Think about the big picture and what long range
opportunity presents itself.
Lots of ideas out there; these are but a few:
. Marine research;
. Environmental tourism and research; and
. Partnering with the U.S. Navy research.
Directly engage the business community.
With input from multiple stakeholders, establish a plan
to build that future opportunity.
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Potential "Big Picture" Policy Impacts
Take Away (cont'd)
■ Aging Structures
Much of the hotel, retail and office building inventory is
quite old and possibly obsolete.
Long range policies must be put in place to
encourage rehab or replacement.
■ Hotels/Motels
. Non -conforming structures and uses that are part of the
community character
2,
22
3/5/2012
11
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Economic Sustainability
. (Page 4-22 through 4-48), including Appendix 4
23
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Issue Statement: Promote economic
_ sustainability, in a manner consistent with
•.e' environmental stewardship, with a special
focus upon existing businesses. (Page 4-22)
The Keys represent considerable natural and
economic resources, including two national
parks; world -renown tourism and destination
resorts; long established commercial and
recreational fishing industry; and coral reefs
which support snorkeling and diving industry.
24
3/5/2012
12
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Issue Statement: Promote economic
sustainability, in a manner consistent
• with environmental stewardship, with a
special focus upon existing businesses.
t : (Page 4-22)
The County faces a variety of economic
constraints.
Create implementation strategies that
link a healthy environment with economic
sustainability.
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Background and Introduction
• Strength or Weakness — what we WANT to
be or what we DON'T want to be?
Current Conditions compare Island
Communities, national trends, local
information;
■ Touchstone Issues (Targeted Industries) —
Tourism, Marine Industry;
■ Findings and Facts — both obvious and
surprising;
■ Recommendations — Choices to be made.
25
26
3/5/2012
13
'■
n
Chapter 4: Major Issues
13 Constraints
.��} �- ■ National Trends in Employment Structure;
■ State Restrictions — ACSC & Carrying Capacity;
■ Local Conditions:
J ROGO/NROGO;
u Environmental Regulation;
u Infrastructure Capacity Restraints;
® Evacuation Plans.
27
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Constraints
■ Local Conditions (cont'd):
Li Location in relation to Mainland;
Lack of Raw Materials;
j Water Pressure (fire insurance ratings);
:i Physical Layout (130 mile lineal archipelago);
Flood prone;
Hurricanes;
Development Costs; and
Limited amount of Tier III vacant land.
28
3/5/2012
14
Yet, these constraints are what assures
the County remains special and unique!
�(:st�mt GOhSIt M(bilc\1i'�\ an A�\ F\„IMsIRE S C vorl
0 Fernandina Beach w Marco ra Longboat Key ■ Cedar Key ■ Monroo
29
30
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
3-1Targeted Industries - % Change 1980-2010
s%
w_ 4%
2% ...............................
0 :....................�.......,....._�............ .......Y....,
a� �Jycy
___......__......... __..�� ' zv
o`
31
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Opportunities
..
Hotel/Eat-Drink/Entertainment (Tourism):
Includes eating/drinking establishments,
hotel/motels, seasonal rentals, entertainment
venues (museums, parks and beaches);
Dominate industry; focal point of the County
economy.
2nd fastest growing segment;
Up almost 5%; now it is over 30% of the
employment share;
❑ 10,506 jobs (2010).
32
3/5/2012
16
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Opportunities
■ Government (excluding military):
1- 2nd largest employer; and
Down 5%; however, still almost 20% of
employment share
❑ 5,808 jobs (2010).
33
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Opportunities
�F. ■ Business Services/Finance/Real Estate:
Includes legal, accounting, architectural,
computer and mgmt. consulting, research,
advertising and other professional services and
business support.
3rd largest share of employment;
L Up approx. 6%; currently almost 15% of the
share of employment; and
r�, Since 1980, employment share has doubled
& number of employees has tripled.
❑ 4,392 jobs (2010)
34
3/5/2012
17
Chapter 4: Major Issues
y1 Opportunities
�r ■ Medical/Health Services:
Employment had tripled (since 1980);
Small share, but among fastest growing;
rj Average age 43 years (older than FL average);
By 2030 44% will be 55 and up; and
Older population will require more medical
services.
LMM
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Opportunities
■ Other Services
Includes auto service, personal care,
laundry, civic and religious orgs and
household and commercial equipment
repair.
u 3rd fastest growing segment; and
Li Consistent growth since 1980.
35
36
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
10 County's Existing Economic Development Vision
■ Livable CommuniKeys Plans
Upper Keys and Key Largo:
❑ Redevelopment only within existing footprint,
no increase in square footage;
❑ New higher intensity commercial in very
limited areas;
❑ New commercial development limited to
2,500 sq. ft. per site
■ Every 6 months; 10,000 sq. ft total
■ 50,000 in Community Centers
37
■
r.V
Chapter 4: Major Issues
c, County's Existing Economic Development Vision
■ Livable CommuniKeys Plans (cont'd)
No Name and Bip Pine Keys:
❑ Limited land availability;
o Concurrency constraints;
❑ Square footage limitations;
o No regional users or facilities; and
❑ HCP/Environmental Impact Mitigation.
38
3/5/2012
19
Chapter 4: Major Issues
r•_
County's Existing Economic Development Vision
�_" • ■ Livable CommuniKeys Plans (cont'd)
Stock Island/Key Haven:
❑ Maintain marine dependent services;
facilities and marine support activities; and
❑ Strong opportunities for marine related
science and technology research due to
proximity to Navy's Marine Corrosion Test
Facility and Key West airport.
38
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
County's Existing Economic Development Vision
■ Working Waterfront:
To maintain and preserve the culture, history and
o} economy the County prepared a Working
Waterfronts Preservation Master Plan.
Components include: (none adopted)
❑ Marine facility survey;
❑ Draft comp plan amendments; and,
❑ Marina Siting Plan
County currently working with SFRPC to update
Marina Siting Plan and develop marina siting criteria
for Comp Plan.
40
3/5/2012
20
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Sub Regional Economic Characteristics Analysis
_1 pP
■ Upper r Keys
Y
Focus as a marine sanctuary;
Li Recreational diving and boating;
Eco-Tourism; and
L Marine Research.
41
:.: a ->.....
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Sub Regional Economic Characteristics Analysis
I
■ Middle Keys
Li Primarily residential;
U High value vacation and second homes; and
Tax base growth. ------ I ,
42
3/5/2012
21
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Sub Regional Economic Characteristics Analysis
■ Lower Keys
Bedroom community to Key West tourist
workers;
More industrial, includes much of the
County's marine industry; and
NAS-Key West (Naval Research Lab).
43
■
1
Chapter 4: Major Issues
p
�
_ g Touchstone Industries
I _ ' ■ Tourism
3.3 million visitors (2009) — 2.2 million
visited KW;
39% were cruise ship visitors;
Low wages (76% of avg. wage
countywide), 1 in 3 tourism industry
workers hold more than one job;
60% of total sales;
50% of all employment countywide;
i
3/5/2012
22
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
■ Tourism (cont'd)
8,796 hotel rooms, countywide (Dec 2010);
R u Loss of 452 rooms (5%) since Dec 2003;
u 4,800 seasonal resort units* (up 19%) since
2003;
u Total inventory of visitor accommodations,
13,500 combined rooms and resort units;
* Designed for longer stays, including kitchen facilities and/or
multiple sleeping quarters.
as
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
■ Tourism (cont'd)
Mix and type of accommodations changed
from short term hotel rooms to longer stay
resort units;
2,199 licensed (DBPR) hotel rooms/units in
unincorporated areas;
233 units: "Vacation Rental" licenses (county-
wide)
i Per Monroe County Tax Collector
Li Some licenses cover multiple units; and
❑ Unincorporated Area: 30 licensed in Lower Keys; 3
licensed in Middle Keys; 0 in Upper Keys
3/5/2012
23
Chapter 4: Major Issues
�:;..
Touchstone Industries
■Tourism (cont'd)
" } In 2010, 54% in structures older than 40
years; by 2030, 84% will be older than 40
years.
Important to Note: The need for hotel property investment
coupled with a prohibition on hotel expansion due to
seasonal occupancy constraints and other development
restrictions means new hotel tourists are likely to be
accommodated in newly built seasonal residential housing
units. Hotels which are in need of renovation will be unable
to justify needed capital investments.
47
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
■ Tourism (cont d)
a
• Effects of Transient Unit Moratorium:
65% occupancy is financial "break even" point;
In unrestricted markets, above 65% occupancy,
new rooms are added;
In hotel industry, between 63-73% average
occupancy annually;
Effective occupancies in Monroe County are
near 100% during peak season;
48
3/5/2012
24
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
■ Tourism (cont'd)
Effects of Transient Unit Moratorium (cont'd):
Off peak season unsustainably low; pDly
time occupancy can be raised among
existing facilities;
Tourism is event driven and highly
seasonal; and
There is a need to expand the season to off
peak times to utilize existing capacity and
expand revenue potential.
49
.. v
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
I
■ Tourism (contd)
Effects of Transient Unit Moratorium (contd):
�® Market has reacted b in y adding g new residential
units designed for seasonal occupancy:
• More rooms
• Increase in non -homesteaded status
so
3/5/2012
25
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
1
■ Marine Resources
Fishing and marine related industry:
2% of employment — small and declining;
Recreational boating registrations have more
than doubled since 1980; and
Commercial fishing (since 1980)
❑ Licenses, 25% decline
Li Volume of catch, 70% decline (all charter
fishing catch included)
51
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries — Commercial
Fishing
30.0
5,000
4,500
25.0 _......__................................................... .... __._.......... -...---...................................
-...... t 4,000
20.0 ......_......__.... _.. _.._... ............ ... .
3,500
a
3,000
'^
= 15.0
2,500 $
_0
2,000
10.0........._............... ................. ......... ............ ............ ................................................................------------
.--- ................ - ........... I 1,500
5.0 _ -_.. _-------- —.--
__j 1,000
S00
0.0...._........_................_............................ ................... ................................. .... _..............__.....r_................................-.
....... ...J.. 0
1980 1989 1998
2008
—+►—Catch Volume (Ibs) #Commercial
Boat licenses
52
3/5/2012
26
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
r,
■ Marine Resources (cont'd)
► ��" Fishing Industry:
Not a growth industry, but important part of
history and character of the County.
Fishing ("fresh catch") provides support to
local restaurants and can become a cultural
focal point:
o Support for surrounding uses, and
o Building the restaurant industry.
53
X
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Touchstone Industries
■ Marine Resources (cont'd)
Strategies to support culture and character more
so than jobs and wages - unless marine related
activity can be diversified.
Marine Related Industry:
Opportunity for growth in marine related
industries outside of fishing:
Marine research;
o Coral Reef Preservation; and
u Marine Related Eco-Tourism.
Target for expansion and relocation to the
Keys.
54
3/5/2012
27
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
•. in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
1: businesses. (Page 4-22)
J
Strategies: (Page 4-46)
Planning and Land Use
■ Designate economic business locations
(Community Centers) on FLUM and define how
to encourage; OK
■ Consider adding an Economic gJ1Sustainability�
Element, Vilh an eo1hasis, on retie e/opn?£a .
to the Plan. If no separate element, include
policies on redevelopment; and
55
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
businesses.
Strategies:
Planning and Land Use (cont'd)
■ Consider better alignment/consistency between
LCPs and existing policies or new Economic
Sustainability Element.
®k; however. any changes to the LCPs must be
approved by the stakeholders
se
3/5/2012
28
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
businesses.
n1 1 �•
Strategies:
Hotel and Tourism
■ Encourage and incentivize green building in
redevelopment and green lodging certification
NIP for hotel/motel facilities (pg 4-46); Okay:
consider extending green building incentives
into ROGO and NROGO: consider focusing on
redevelopment
57
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
businesses.
Strategies:
- 9
Hotel and Tourism (cont'd)
_r
■ Support TDC Office of Eco-Tourism (pg 4-47).
Okay; however would like to hear fmrr, T-L�e
EJ Facilitate communication and organization;
u Interface with environmental groups, and
Li Marketing efforts to focus on eco-tourism, reef
preservation and promotion of national wildlife
parks and reserves.
58
3/5/2012
29
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
businesses.
Strategies:
Hotel and Tourism (cont'd) (pg 4-47)
■ Consider Hotel/Motel Unit Development Options:
Remove from residential ROGO system;
❑ Completely, or
Li If no competition for allocations within Tier III parcels,
remaining allocations in a sub -area to be pooled and
used for hotel development; Explore with extensive
public input 1-1
59
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
F�
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
businesses.
Strategies:
Hotel and Tourism (cont'd) (pg 4-47)
■ Consider Hotel/Motel Unit Development Option
(eont'd): Ok; wait until the build -out threshold i
determined before specifics y a ocat►ng transient units
a ow►ng suites and then get public input.
j Set aside a flat % of allocations for transient units;
❑ Set aside a % of allocations based upon hotel/motel
occupancy; or
❑ Allow existing hotels to add suites with more rooms
per "unit'. OK (with one dissent);
60
tell
Te �( A
wa/" r
30
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
- in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
" businesses.
Strategies:
Redevelopment
■ Consider developing a "redevelopment capacity
bank" (pg 4-48); O k."
■ For legal, non -conformities, consider re some DC regulations, e. . setbacks, o en
space, 50% rule, where ap Hate, to reduc
ost of upgrade compliance (pgs 4-17,4-18 &
4-48); Okay
61
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
t►. in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
� businesses.
Strategies:
Redevelopment (cont'd)
■ Disengage NROGO allocation ratio of 239 sq. ft. IA from ROGO allocations (pg 4-17);
Not all commercial is driven by residential growth
Not necessarily increasing the available sq. ft.
j Develop a cap
62
31
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
businesses.
Strategies:
Marine and Waterfront (aas 4-47 thru 4-48
■ Consider creating a local marine quality/marine
Qi research and technology task force; Okay
■ Enhance the waterfront with more viable uses,
while maintaining and providing support for
fishing and marine industries; Okay; consider
allowing research facilities in commercial fishing
ss
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
' businesses.
Strategies:
Marine and Waterfront (cont'd)
■ Redevelopment in concert with waterfront
enhancement through the redevelopment
capacity bank (pg 4-48); Okay and
■ Create a definition for marinas in Comp Plan (pg
4-88); Ok'- y
64
32
3/5/2012
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement: Promote economic sustainability,
in a manner consistent with environmental
stewardship, with a special focus upon existing
a, '1 businesses.
Strategies:
Finance and Investment (Pg. 4-48) Okay to all
■ Consider exploring financing mechanisms such
as a Community Development District or
Community Redevelopment Area;
■ Consider a 3 — 5 year ad valorem tax break; and
■ Invest in infrastructure. _
65
Chapter 4: Major Issues
County -wide Visioning and
Planning
(Pages 4-2 Through 4-20)
66
33
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1:
Capitalize upon and protect the uniqueness (sense of place)
of the various communities within the planning areas;
implement the recommendations with the existing visioning
plans. (Page 4-2)
■ Livable CommuniKeys Plans (LCPs)
Directs type, magnitude and locational aspects of
desired development.
67
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: (cont'd)
Capitalize upon and protect the uniqueness (sense of
place) of the various communities within the planning
areas; implement the recommendations with the
existing visioning plans.
■ Nonconforming Uses and Structures
Some are part of the "character" of the community
Potential for loss of appropriate and desired
development
68
3/5/2012
34
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: (cont'd)
Capitalize upon and protect the uniqueness (sense of
place) of the various communities within the planning
areas; implement the recommendations with the
existing visioning plans.
Strategies: (Page 4-3)
■ Consider adding policy to Comp Plan that requires
future development to meet the action items of the
LCPs. Okay
69
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #2:
A. Promote Attractive, Well -Planned Development Adjacent to
Services, and Existing Commercial "Hubs", with an
Emphasis on Redevelopment. (Page 4-4)
■ Issue Category 2(a): Floor Area Ratios (Page 4-4)
Data collected for Technical Document indicates FAR
standards are higher than the overall development character
of the Keys
Need for flexibility to incentivize desired type and location of
development.
o For example: Big Pine LCP allows a max. of .40 FAR to
encourage, "... a coherent and dense streetscape."
70
3/5/2012
AA-
f-09
�0
35
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #2:
tL -� ;a Promote Attractive, Well -Planned Development Adjacent to
`�' Services, and Existing Commercial "Hubs", with an
Emphasis on Redevelopment. (Page 4-4)
■ Issue Category 2(a): Floor Area Ratios (Page 4-4)
Strategies: (Page 4-14)
■ Revise table within Policy 101.4.21 to add minimum
open space ratios. Ok,_,X).,
7,
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Issue Category 2(b): Redevelopment
Incentives — (Page 4-15)
—
Discussed within the Economic Sustainability Major
Issue.
LCPs focus upon redevelopment; however, existing
recommendations may conflict with economic
sustainability and may not encourage the desired
development type and locational aspects.
Strategies: (Page 4-17)
■ Consider discontinuing current NROGO Allocation
determination system (239 sq, ft per diu);
■ Consider a policy for a flat annual limit of commercial
floor area to be allocated through NROGO by permit;
72
3/5/2012
36
3/5/2012
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Issue Category 2(b): Redevelopment
Incentives — (Page 4-15) (cont'd)
' u Strategies: (Page 4-17 & 4-18) - cont'd
■ Relaxation of policies regarding non -conforming
structures:
J Upgrade requirements.
J Shoreline and property line setbacks (Tier
III).
73
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Issue Category 2(c): Discouragement of Density
Increases (Page 4-19)
Adequate land (vacant and developed) to
accommodate future population.
Approximately 62 acres of vacant Tier I land with
Mixed designation:
_ a_ � act as Sender Sites for floor area bonus
❑ Policy 101.13.4 requires tracking the movement of
TDRs through mapping.
a DV 4N`
09 ;�- I U
74
37
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■ Issue Category 2(c): Discouragement of Density
� Increases —
(Page 4-19)
Strategies: (Page 4-19) Okay with All \
■ Consider creating a policy to allow transfer of ROGO
allocations or exemptions from Tier I, II and III -A to Tier III. \
No increase in density unless transferred from Tier I to Tier III.
■ Encourage the use of vaca�nd with Mixed sII eW69i a ion
to serve as TDR sender sites for floor area bonus.
■ Review the requirements of Policy 101.13.4 to determine
appropriate method for tracking TDRs, e.g., GIS mapping,
building permits.
75
■ !""'
Chapter 4: Major Issues
0 is ■ Issue Category 2(e): Development of a
Commercial Land Use District (pg 4-21)
-j Potential for encroachment and impacts from litter and
pets from residential uses to Tier I land adjacent to
Mixed Use parcels which allow residential uses.
Strategies : (pg 4-21)
iW■ Consider creating a policy to create a Commercial
Future Land Use Designation that does not allow
residential uses. Okay
76
3/5/2012
m
3/5/2012
I•-
77
Dawn C. Sonneborn, AICP, Director of Planning
Certified Planner with 20 years of management
and regulatory planning experience:
■ Long -Range and Comprehensive Planning;
■ Visioning and workshop facilitation;
■ Downtown Redevelopment Plans;
■ Development of Regional Impacts;
■ Planned Unit Developments;
■ Transit Oriented Design; and
■ Due Diligence Studies
78
39
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
■
Natural Resource Protection
(Pages 4-114 through 4-252)
o., .
79
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
Issue Category 1(b): Habitat and Species Protection
(pg 4-122)
Strategies (pg 4-149): (Introduced in Part 1 with
instructions to discuss further in Part 2)
■ The County Biologist should cooperate with the State
and federal resource agencies having jurisdiction in
their efforts to implement an animal control plan for
feral animals. Okay
■ CBRS (Next slide) Recommend deletion of following
strategy and keep current Comp Plan policies
eo
3/5/2012
40
3/5/2012
■
PAGE 4.151: STRATEGY:
Future development in the County should be directed to the maximum extent possible away
from Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) units. This should be accomplished through
land use policies of the Plan and its implementing LDRs. Other actions which the County
should take to not encourage further development in CBRS units include (1) no new bridges,
causeways, paved roads or commercial marinas should be permitted for construction within
CBRS units; (2) shoreline hardening structures not permitted along shorelines of CBRS units;
(3) public expenditures on CBRS units limited to property acquisition, restoration, passive
recreation facilities and maintenance and repair of bridges existing prior to 2010; (4) consider for
acquisition privately -owned undeveloped land located within the CBRS units; and (5) coordinate
with the FKAA and private providers of electricity and telephone service to assess measures
that could be taken to discourage extension of facilities and services to CBRS units. Since the
federal government intent and effect of the CBRS has been to discourage development the
County's designated coastal barriers units by prohibiting federal flood insurance and other
federal programs funds that subsidize development. the County should consider whether it is
necessary to maintain -existing comprehensive plan policies that provide for local -level
discouragement of development in the CBRS, and whether the County should instead refrain
from actions that encourage development in the CBRS and focus on the development impacts
on endangered species and habitat should unsubsidized development still occur.
81
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: (cont'd)
Preserve and protect natural resources, including
water, habitat and species.
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (pg 4-153)
■ Regulated by federal and State authority
ca U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
o SFWMD
u FDEP
82
41
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
■ Regulated by the County in Comp Plan (e.g.
100% Open Space Requirement for certain
wetlands) and LDC as "environmentally sensitive
lands"; however, this term is not defined.
■ State requires the use of UMAM to evaluate
impacts and mitigation measures.
83
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
■ LDCs require the use of KEYWEP only for
lands classified as "Disturbed with salt marsh
and buttonwood association".
■ Only developable wetland habitat
■ Also protected by setbacks and buffers.
84
3/5/2012
42
■
Wr
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
■ ADID Program
Mapped and assessed 65,000 acres of
marine and freshwater wetlands
Limited use of the maps due to scale
85
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
Strategies: Okay to All
■ Provide definition of wetlands consistent with
State (pg 4-167).
Qi ■ Define wetland boundaries consistent with State
jurisdictional determinations (pg 4-167).
■ Specify setbacks from wetlands that are based on
the jurisdictional wetland boundary line and the
functional value of the wetland (pg 4-167).
88
3/5/2012
43
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
Strategies: Okay to All
■ Review and evaluate the KEYWEP for consistency
with State law (pg 4-167).
■ Consider establishing a process to allow for the
updating of KEYWEP scores (pg 4-168).
■ Consider using UMAM to determine mitigation
requirements for impacts to wetlands (pg 4-167).
3/5/2012
97
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
Strategies: Okay to All
■ Due to mapping limitations related to ADID,
consider revising the Comp Plan to require the use
of "best available data" in determining habitat and
plan communities (pg 4-167).
■ Require report at time of development.
■ Provide definition for environmentally sensitive land
(pg 4-167).
se
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
Strategies: Okay to All
■ Consider revising definition of saltmarsh wetlands &
buttonwood wetlands (pg 4-168).
Does the County wish to allow limited impacts to other
disturbed wetland types?
■ Amend Section 118-4 of the LDC to add salt ponds to
the list of habitat types where development is
prohibited (pg 4-168).
e9
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement #1: Preserve and protect natural
resources, including water, habitat and species.
(cont'd)
Issue Category 1(c): Wetlands (cont'd)
Strategies:
■ Continue land acquisition efforts related to
freshwater wetlands (pg 4-168). Okay
■ Consider developing ROGO scoring criteria for
wetlands (already proposed and under review —
Feb 13, 2012 transmittal).
90
3/5/2012
45
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Affordable Housing
(Pages 4-288 through 4-327)
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Promote the development of affordable,
attainable and senior living housing that is
well -planned, attractive and energy efficient.
(Page 4-288)
■ 2009 average value (Shimberg): $491,476.
■ HUD median income (2010): $68,400.
■ $68,400 x 3 = $205,200 (affordable house)
■ $572,607 - $205,200 = $286,276
(affordability gap)
91
92
3/5/2012
46
3/5/2012
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Promote the development of affordable, attainable
and senior living housing that is well -planned,
attractive and energy efficient. (cont'd)
■ Maximum affordable rental rate (median
income) for a 3 bedroom unit: $1,766 (2010).
■ In 2010, HUD Fair Market Rent was $1,986 for a
three -bedroom unit.
93
■ 'I ° f lei'
J
Chapter 4: Major Issues
p
Issue Statement:
Promote the development of affordable, attainable
and senior living housing that is well -planned,
attractive and energy efficient.
Strategies: (Page 4-327): Okay to All
■ Consider mapping the locations of all existing deed
restricted affordable housing units, including mobile
home and RV parks (while allow long-term rentals).
■ Target mapped areas for retention and expansion
programs.
■ Continue implementation of the Affordable Housing
Ordinance.
94
47
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
In
Issue Statement:
Promote the development of affordable,
attainable and senior living housing that is well -
planned, attractive and energy efficient.
Strategies (cont'd):
■ Consider incentives:
u Increase affordable ROGO allocation %?
Additional affordable unit allocations for
energy efficient/green building standards.
Consider transferring the qualifying of the
affordable housing applicants to the MC
Housing Authority.
95
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Public Involvement/Information
(Page 4-328 through 4-331)
9�
3/5/2012
IM
3/5/2012
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
4 Promote robust public involvement and information
sharing regarding land use issues throughout the
planning and development process. (Page 4-328)
■ Extensive formalized public involvement
process:
Florida Statutes: s. 125.66(4)(b)2, s. 163.3181
Comprehensive Plan:
❑ Section 5.0 Monitoring and Evaluation
Procedures (5.5 "Citizen Participation in the
Planning Process") ; and
❑ GOPs pertaining to public input and
involvement.
97
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
I Promote robust public involvement and
information sharing regarding land use issues
throughout the planning and development
process. (cont'd)
■ Extensive formalized public involvement
process (cont'd):
LDCs (Chapter 110: Development review
process, including meeting and noticing
requirements);
98
49
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Promote robust public involvement and information
sharing regarding land use issues throughout the
planning and development process. (cont'd)
■ Extensive formalized public involvement
process (cont'd):
Other outreach methods.
❑ County website
❑ Interested parties data base
• Comprehensive Plan Update Process
99
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Promote robust public involvement and information
sharing regarding land use issues throughout the
planning and development process. (cont'd)
■ Extensive formalized public involvement
process (cont'd):
Other outreach methods:
❑ TV 76
❑ Libraries and other government
buildings
❑ Speakers Bureau
too
3/5/2012
50
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Promote robust public involvement and information
sharing regarding land use issues throughout the
planning and development process. (cont'd)
■ Extensive formalized public involvement process
(cont'd):
Other outreach methods:
❑ Media interviews
❑ Editorials
101
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Promote robust public involvement and information
sharing regarding land use issues throughout the
planning and development process. (cont'd)
Strategies (Page 4-331):
■ Consider requiring that an applicant hold a
community meeting prior to the public hearings
to obtain direct public input into the project.
Okay, a member of the MC planning staff should
guide the process, and meeting should be held
near site.
102
3/5/2012
51
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Intergovernmental Coordination
(Pages 4-332 through 4-358)
103
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
Issue Category (a): Intergovernmental
Coordination (Page 4-332)
■Variety of existing coordination mechanisms:
Interloca1/Intergovernmental agreements;
J Development Review Committee;
J GOPs requiring specific coordination
activities; and
u Direct Staff interaction, e.g., Public Works
with FKAA.
104
3/5/2012
52
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
■ Recommendations from May, 2010 Scoping
Meeting (Page 4-347):
SFWMD: Coordinate during update of
Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan.
ACOE:
o Coordinate to develop a review system to
monitor permit compliance.
o Coordinate to improve the photic zones
over dredged basins.
105
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
■
Recommendations from May 2010 Scoping
Meeting:
ACOE (cont'd):
Coordinate with the FKNMS and Park Service to
promote in -kind mitigation for resource loss.
Coordinate with appropriate external agencies to
develop a response plan for manmade and
natural disasters which allow pre -authorizations
to restore beaches and clean natural areas.
106
3/5/2012
53
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
■ Recommendations from May 2010
Scoping Meeting:
Park Service:
❑ Participate and coordinate with National
Parks General Management Plans.
Miami Dade County:
❑ Coordinate on transit service.
❑ Coordinate with Hurricane Evacuation and
Modeling efforts .
107
■ iO
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
■ Recommendations from May 2010 Scoping
Meeting:
FKAA: FKAA to speak to PC regarding future
v,,eater demands and efficacy of interlocal
a reements
Review for necessity the Interlocal Agreement
related to fire hydrants and wastewater facility
development and operation in the Lower Keys.
Engage with agencies and other jurisdictions to
address wellfield protection issues.
108
3/5/2012
54
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
■ Recommendations from May 2010 Scoping
Meeting:
FKAA: FKAA to speak to PC regarding future
water demands and efficacy of interlocal
agreements
Participate in monthly Utility Coordination
meetings; GIS data sharing.
109
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
■ Recommendations from Scoping Meeting:
NAS-Key West. -
Li Greater coordination during permit review
process for development adjacent or proximate
to military installations. (County transmitted
amendments Dec 2012 to address coordination)
General Recommendations:
o Coordinate with FP&L on the expansion of the
Turkey Point nuclear facility.
110
3/5/2012
55
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
Strategies (Page 4-350): Okay to All
■ Encourage more frequent participation by FDOT
on DRC and elsewhere to better coordinate FDOT
activities with County's plans and projects.
■ Consider creating a user-friendly consolidated
list of all interlocal & intergovernmental
agreements. (See Tech Doc inventory)
■ Review Interlocal Agreement wlltrliami-Dade
re: water supply; is it adequate? Does it protect
our interests?
111
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
Strategies (cont'd):
■ Update "date certain" GOPs regarding interlocal
agreements and coordination activities.
■ The County, TDC and Chamber of Commerce
should jointly promote the County's parks as
family - friendly attractions. (Change to
"`community" attractions)
112
3/5/2012
56
■
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
Issue Category (b): Interdepartmental Data Sharing
and Development Review (Page 4-351)
■ Development Review Committee.
County Staff: GM, Engineering/Public Works, Fire
Marshall, others as necessary.
Local, Regional, State or federal agencies.
u Meets monthly to review development
applications and LDC and Comp Plan
amendments.
■ Coordination appears to be adequate; no strategy
recommendations at this time.
113
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
Issue Category (c): FKAA Supply of Adequate Water
Pressure for Fire Service (Page 4-353)
■ Obj. 701.8 addresses fire flow protection
Strategies (Page 4-355):
■ Continue to implement the GOPs related to adequate
water pressure for the distribution system and "onsite"
fire abatement requirements. Okay
114
3/5/2012
57
N
Chapter 4: Major Issues
Issue Statement:
Provide effective and efficient intergovernmental,
interdepartmental and interagency coordination.
Issue Category (d): Florida Keys Carrying
Capacity Study and Model (Page 4-356)
■ Required by Rule 28.20-100 F.A.C.
■ Implementation through amendments to the LDC,
FLUM series and the maximum permitted densities.
■ County has implemented the requirements of the Work
Program related to the FKCCS, no strategy
recommendations at this time.
115
Debbie Love, AICP, Project Manager
Certified Planner 20 years regulatory
planning experience (10 years in ACSC):
• Comprehensive Plan Amendments and
Land Development Regulations;
■ Evaluation and Appraisal Reports;
• City-wide and Neighborhood Master Plans;
• Visioning and design workshop facilitation;
■ Environmental permitting;
■ Floodplain management and hazard
mitigation; and
■ Grant writing and administration of CDBG,
EDA and other federal and state funding
opportunities.
116
3/5/2012
4-1
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
■ Updated Vacant Land Analysis by Tier (pg 2-7)
Approximately 9,424 acres of vacant land;
Majority located within Tier 1 (85.5%) with little
development potential ; and
Only 11.9% is located in Tier II, III, and III -A.
„7
■
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
Vacant Land Within Unincorporated Monroe
Vacant Net Parcels
I II III III -A 0 acres in and Acres
Tier
Lower Keys
Vacant Parcels
1 3,288
1 411
1,724
31
17
N/A
5,471
Acres
6,338.7
1 78.1
573.7
1 11.5
1 52.2
7,002.0
7,054.2
Percent Vacant Acres
I 89.9%
1 1.1%
8.19/.
1 0.2%
1 0.7%
N/A
N/A
Middle Keys
Vacant Parcels
20
1 0
284
0
N/A
N/A
304
Acres
147.E
1 0.0
63.6
0.0
N/A
211.2
211.2
Percent Vacant Acres
69.9 %
0.09.1.
30.1%
0.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Upper Keys
Vacant Parcels
835
0
1,658
265
225
N/A
2,983
Acres
1,501.1
0.0
316.3
79.9
261.3
1,897.3
2,158.6
Percent Vacant Acres
69.5%
0.0%
14.7%
3.7%
12.1%
N/A
N/A
Total Parcels
4,143
411
3,666
296
242
N/A
8,7Se
Total Acres
1 7,987.4
78.1
953.6
91.4
313.5
9,110.5
9,424.0
Percentage of Tier
84.8%
0.8%
10.1%
1.0%
3.3%
N/A
J 100%
178
3/5/2012
59
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
Years of Growth
119
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
■ Existing Land Use to Future Land Use
Potential Conflict Analysis (pg 2-9)
Li GIS, parcel -level review.
Li Future Land Use Map category allowable uses vs.
Property Appraiser PC assignments.
Lj Created conversion table, assigning PC to each
FLUM based upon the allowable uses in the FLUM
category.
120
3/5/2012
0
3/5/2012
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
■ Existing Land Use to Future Land Use
Potential Conflict Analysis (cont'd)
Mapped potential conflicts by FLU and Planning
Area.
Review of FLUM purpose & permitted uses vs.
existing land uses
The resulting analysis provides the County with an
inventory of POTENTIAL land use conflicts.
Additional review and determination by the
County will be needed to determine actual
status.
121
61
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
■ Existing Land Use to Future Land Use
Potential Conflict Analysis (cont'd)
Lower Keys
j Largest number of parcels with potential conflicts
county -wide. Total of 3,868 parcels (4,745 acres).
Residential Medium: Largest number of potential
conflicts, 2,766 parcels (513 acres).
Military: 371 parcels (2,644 acres).
o Residential Conservation: 321 parcels (1,181 acres).
123
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
■ Existing Land Use to Future Land Use
Potential Conflict Analysis (cont'd)
Middle Keys
• Fewest conflicts in this Planning Area.
• MLI-Commercial Fishing District: Largest number of
potential conflicts, 7 parcels (1.79 acres).
Total number of potential conflicts: 66 parcels (15.87
acres).
124
3/5/2012
62
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
■ Existing Land Use to Future Land Use
Potential Conflict Analysis (cont'd)
Upper Keys
a Second highest number of potential conflicts county-
wide, 3,692 parcels (7,905 acres).
Residential Medium: Largest number of parcels with
potential conflicts, 1,376 parcels (292 acres).
o Residential Low: 669 parcels (2,659 acres).
• Residential Conservation: 592 parcels (2,935 acres).
• Recreation: 409 parcels (295 acres)
125
Chapter 2: Community -wide Assessment
■ Existing Land Use to Future Land Use
Potential Conflict Analysis (cont'd)
Future Land Use Map amendments may be needed
to address potential conflicts
o BOCC directed staff to work on updating maps at the
October 19, 2011 BOCC meeting
o Task Planned for 2013
126
3/5/2012
63
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
■ Previously reviewed as the "Element by Element
Assessment".
PC: 5/25/11 BOCC: 6/20/11
■ What are we doing today?
Discuss and receive direction on new & updated
recommendations since the 5/25 and 6/20 meetings.
Receive official direction on previously reviewed
recommendations from 6/20/11.
Complete "Date Certain" policy review.
127
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
New/Updated Recommendations
■ Future Land Use Element: (Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
Issue: While addressed in the LDC, the Comp Plan does not
establish open space ratios; additionally, there is a need to clarify
permitted uses for Conservation lands and allow certain districts to
accommodate light industrial uses.
Review Obj. 101.4 and associated policies to determine if
4) open space ratios should be adopted into the
Comprehensive Plan (Page 3-4),
Consider the creation of a Preservation FLUM category for
publicly owned lands (Page 3-4).
128
3/5/2012
M
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
New/Updated Recommendations (cont'd)
■ Future Land Use Element (cont'd) Okay to A//
.j Evaluate transient residential moratorium;
Update Policy 101.2.13 to reflect implementation and
completion of tasks in Work Program & Rule revision (28-
20.400 F.A.C) (pg 3-3);
Consider creating a light industrial zoning district under the
Industrial and Mixed/Use/Commercial FLUM designations
(pg 3-4).
Establish scoring criteria for wetlands under the Tier
System (pg 3-8); 'already proposed and tinder review —
Feb 13, 2012 transmittal).
129
■
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
New/Updated Recommendations (cont'd)
■ Future Land Use Element (cont'd)
Upon completion of the 2011 NAS-Key West EIS, adopt
changes, if necessary & as appropriate.
130
3/5/2012
65
3/5/2012
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use
Consider whether or not to address the % of allocation
assigned for affordable housing (pg 3-2);
Consider lifting the transient moratorium,
Revise Policy 101.4.7 to limit the types of residential uses
allowed within the Industrial Land Use District (pg 3-5);
Consider establishing a Conservation district that does not
allow recreational uses (pg 3-5);
131
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd)
Revise Policy 101.4.16 to reflect that the County has
permitting review of all permit applications for the Key
West and Marathon airports (pg 3-5);
Li Add minimum open space ratios to Policy 101.4,21
(pg. 3-6)
Amend Policy 101.4.24 (height of structures) to be
consistent with recent LDC amendment; (pg. 3-6)
Amend Policy 101.5.4 to provide points for solar/other
green standards (pg. 3-6);
132
• •
■
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
■
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd) (pg 3-6)
Consider whether to cap the number of perseverance
points available;
Consider eliminating NROGO or make it an administrative
function.
J If NROGO is maintained, should the County continue to
limit the application to 2,500 square feet?
133
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd)
Consider adding a definition of Fair Market Value (pg 3-6);
Should the valuation limits of Policy 101.6.1 be revised for
using 1992 values? (pg 3-7)
Is Objective 101.7 (potential redevelopment areas) and its
associated policies necessary? (pg 3-7)
Li Review Objective 101.8 and its associated policies
regarding non -conforming structures: Should the flexibility
allowed in the Key Largo LCP regarding waterfront
setbacks be extended county -wide? (pg 3-7)
134
3/5/2012
M.
e
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use
While the LCPs are adopted into the Comp Plan and
used for regulatory purposes, there are no policies
identified for implementation;
Consider eliminating maximum net density;
:i Consider developing a Commercial FLUM category;
135
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd)
Adopt discouragement policy for increases in
density/intensity (already proposed and under review
— Feb 13, 2012 transmittal);
j Review NROGO and current equivalency ratio of 239
sf/unit;
Consider revisions to NROGO and limits to
maximum FAR,
136
3/5/2012
�7
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd) Okay to All
Review land use designation for Mixed Use parcels
located in Tier 1 lands (pg 3-4);
Evaluate Objective 101.4 and associated policies:
Review density and intensity standards and open
space criteria (pg 3-4);
137
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd) Okay to All
Li Review Policies 101.3.1 and 101.5.5 vis-a-vis existing
business growth and expansion (pg 3-5);
Li Revise policy 101.5.8: Establishing criteria for ROGO
exemptions and LDC guidelines (County has
completed LDC revision) (pg 3-6);
138
3/5/2012
M
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd) Okay to All
Develop a policy to allow the transfer of ROGO
allocations or exemptions from Tier I, II and III -A to Tier
III (pg 3-6);
c Review Policy 101.13.5 to determine best way to track
TDRs (pg 3-6);
Add a Tier category for military lands and right -of ways
(pg 3-8);
139
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd) :)kay to All
Consider deleting Objective 101.15 regarding signage
and defer to LDC (pg 3-9);
Delete Objective 101.17 since GIS system is
administrative (pg 3-10)
140
3/5/2012
VIN
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd) Okay to All
Evaluate for Policy 101.18.2 for either deletion or
revision of time period (pg 3-10);
Evaluate the limits of platting within Objective 101.19,
due to lot splits, etc. that are creating surface water
issues (pg 3-10);
Should the Land Acquisition Master Plan be updated?
(pg 3-10)
Since County does not have regulatory authority over
FKAA, should Policy 103. 2.5 be deleted? (pg 3-11)
141
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-11)
■ Future Land Use (cont'd)
:i Should the historic district protections established in
Goal 104 for the Tavernier Historic District be extended
to all areas of the County?
o Add policies regarding water dependent and water
related uses.
142
3/5/2012
71
3/5/2012
r
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-12 through 3-17)
■ Conservation and Coastal Management
Review/revise the stormwater regulations as
necessary;
Revise and update the Marina Siting Plan (pg 3-13);
Consider policy revisions for the siting of new
marinas; (develop marina siting criteria for adoption
into the Comp Plan)
143
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-12 through 3-17)
■ Conservation and Coastal Management (cont'd)
J Review and Compare both the KEYVVEP and UMAM
procedures to determine compliance with Chapter
373 F.S.:
.County currently requires 100% protection;
agencies allow with mitigation; follow agency
permitting?
L3 Develop scoring criteria for wetlands under the Tie,
System (already proposed and under review — Feb
13, 2012 transmittal);
72
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-12 through 3-17)
■ Conservation and Coastal Management (cont'd)
Revise Policy 205.1.1 to r ur'riove i iei" designauuns foI
Inds and right of ways (pg 3-14); Okay
Add a definition of "major development" (pg 3-15);
"3 ut uuCi i is g rt ice: €t PILA IS / J- 1 �)),
Complete an inventory of abandoned mining sites;
and establish standards for their reclamation; Okay
J (.ons r er policy revisions Lu er)uuui age W01 KirIg
waterfront preservation; Okay
11"
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-12 through 3-17)
■ Conservation and Coastal Management (cont'd) (pg 3-
16)
Review and consider the Comp Plan amendment
recommendations within the Working Waterfronts
Preservation Master Plan;
Evaluate and revise existing policies for protecting
and preserving water dependent uses;
Evaluate the shoreline setbacks for existing principle
and accessory structures for consistency with
community character; Okay and
146
3/5/2012
73
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-12 through 3-17)
■ Conservation and Coastal Management (cont'd)
Based upon the updated Technical Document
inventory of public access points to the water and
establish policies to protect access.
147
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-17 through 3-18)
■ Traffic Circulation
The County should consider developing a
Transportation Strategy Master Plan (pg 3-18).
148
3/5/2012
74
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-19 through 3-20)
■ Mass Transit (pg 3-20)
Continue to develop strategies to reduce trips on
US-1.1 and
Coordination activities with municipalities to better
facilitate mass transit.
149
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-20 through 3-22)
■ Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities
Review "Date Certain" policies for revision or deletion;
Okay
150
3/5/2012
75
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-23 through 3-24)
■ Housing Okay to All
Evaluate affordable housing income classifications
and consider if revisions are necessary to be
consistent with State and Federal standards; and
Continue to coordinate with the municipalities and the
DCA regarding the provision of affordable housing (pg
3-23)
151
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-24 through 3-26)
■ Potable Water Okay to All
i Evaluate the Agreement with FKAA relating to fire
hydrants; and
o Continue to evaluate capacity issues related to fire
flows of hydrants.
152
3/5/2012
76
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-26 through 3-29)
■ Solid Waste
Revise or delete outdated policies.
153
I=i"111111,111 m'- -.
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-29 through 3-31)
■ Sanitary Sewer Okay to All
ri Update the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the
changes to Rule 28-20.400 F.A.C.; and
Revise the LOS standards in Policy 901.1,1 to ensur(
adequate facility capacity for future development.
154
3/5/2012
77
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-32 through 3-33)
■ Drainage (pg 3-31) Okay to All
Complete a facility -specific land use inventory to
ascertain overall system need;
Complete the inventory and evaluation of existing
drainage structures and facilities and identify flood
issues; and
Consider revisions to stormwater management
regulations.
155
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-34 through 3-35)
■ Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
Consider revising stormwater ordinance to require
retaining natural drainage features and reduce
impervious surfaces, to the best extent practical (pg
3-32). Oka v
156
3/5/2012
W]
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-35 through 3-37)
■ Recreation and Open Space Jkay to Ah
Decide if Rec.& Open Space concurrency is
necessary Pg 3-33); No, it is not necessary
Evaluate draft 2005 Parks and Recreation Master
Plan, update as necessary and adopt (pg 3-33);
Review ADA standards to ensure compliance with
accessible design and ensure policies are consistent;
(pg 3-34)
157
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6120/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-35 through 3-37)
■ Recreation and Open Space (cont'd)
If County decides to maintain concurrency
requirements for Parks & Rec, evaluate LOS
standards recommended in 2005 Parks and Rec.
Master Plan vs. 2010 Technical Document update
LOS standard recommendations, provide direction on
what LOS to utilize (pg 3-34); and
158
3/5/2012
79
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-35 through 3-37)
■ Recreation and Open Space (cont'd)
Consider deleting Objective 1201.9 requiring creation
and staffing of a Parks and Recreation Department
due to lack of funding and previous BOCC direction
(Pg 3-24).
159
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Page 3-37)
■ Intergovernmental Coordination (pg 3-35)
Evaluate and determine if the inter -local agreements
are required and necessary. Okay
c Create a comprehensive list of all interlocal
agreements;
o The TDC & Chamber should promote the County's
parks and beaches as community -friendly attractic
160
3/5/2012
M
3/5/2012
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-38 through 3-39)
■ Capital Improvements (pg 3-36) Okay to All
Revise the Parks and Recreation LOS standards
(Policy 1201.1); and
Adopt sanitary sewer LOS standards into CIP to
ensure that adequate facility capacity will be provided
for future development (901.1.1).
161
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-39 through 3-40)
■ Cultural Resources (pg 3-37) Okay to All
Review ADA standards and ensure that the County' s
policies are consistent; and
Evaluate and determine if the Element is necessary.
Incorporate into Economic Element
162
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Previously Reviewed (6/20/11) Recommendations
(Pages 3-2 through 3-40)
- Any changes, comments or questions?
163
Chapter 3: Assessment of Comprehensive
Plan Elements
Review matrix of "Date Certain" GOPs (Appendix 3):
■ Majority have been implemented thru LDC.
■ Appropriate time for "clean up".
■ Question for PC: Delete, revise, or keep as currently
written? No changes w staff
!iil SS'C is0_t? R le 1'nttiin DNir ina
iruary a. Wi't Men?I C"Wlio00
tPtt<uv Mzh vatic aCagY!nq'�WPt^M=GYK +':$N CifAll
FoiX +i, �.
mp-n,ensfGry Vct l3tTN eaa++gw,+oM+et 5Y1�+s^i
tW roptrt!o6db.vuCbew GTWcpnYtrWut lNl:at
:arable'. `+N �CSK
+t42
�b.my,y,..
»: hokan n.ewa c.cool �. aa.bv'-* i tr seaete iav
ae a�snae m,a:-tw:» e�o++t mmt�,w..,e
w.wanw.c
',t`'�-�"��
wveY wtwa,-n,l.aw a+,cuar a.:noY
rttr�we�trn.vyocnloawa
WaI PfOY'1Krt. A,fl!
bit!rpw!lefY Ytt".CYi
(Apxy^.e. wtAl:
��C
..wYM N=YYTe bYtiete-n
:4/H1pfpW0i ip�DMC+Ma am 4e 6MY wYk
iuPq 3C?1.
asnnWuc BY L'>rt� IDD'7. tit COMry 1`+1i nOq at
:crraWld
• r
�ww! M:Mamlwalw M ex�wa.' Y�fwww fk
164
3/5/2012
82
Chapter 5: Special Topics
Coastal High Hazard Area
165
Chapter 5: Special Topics
■ Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) —
(Page 5-4 through 5-7)
In 2006, s. 163.3178(2)(h) redefined the CHHA as,
"... the area below the elevation of the category 1
storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and
Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH)
computerized storm surge model", and
S. 163.3178(9)(c) requires that, "No later than July 1,
2008, local governments shall amend their future land
use map and coastal management element to include
the new definition of coastal high -hazard area and to
depict the coastal high -hazard area on the future land
use map."
166
3/5/2012
m
Chapter 5: Special Topics
■ Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) — (Cont'd)
(Page 5-4 through 5-7)
SFRPC completed the SLOSH modeling for Monroe
County delineating the storm tide limits.
K&S mapped the storm tide limits (in relation to the
Future Land Use designation) using the GIS data
created by the SFRPC.
Chapter 5: Special Topics
e � t
�. `ter • �"`
f;
Upper Ken Planing Arsa !Enlarged)
167
168
3/5/2012
0
Chapter 5: Special Topics
• Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA)
1
f�
' Key Largo
3/5/2012
169
Chapter 5: Special Topics
■ Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) — (Cont'd)
(Page 5-4 through 5-7)
Based upon the revised definition for the CHHA:
Majority of land in the County appears to fall within
the CHHA;
Areas outside of CHHA largely confined to a linear
zone along much of US-1.
Strategies:
■ Ensure adopted definition is consistent with Statute and
adopt CHHA boundary on FLUM. (pg 5-7)
170
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
■ Section 163.3191(1) F.S. requires that the EAR
contain an evaluation assessment of relevant
changes to Chapter 163, F.S. since adoption of the
last EAR -based Plan amendments on May 1, 2007;
■ Inconsistencies are identified; and
■ Amendments are proposed.
171
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Proposed Amendments: PC Approved All recommended
rnendments be moved forward to BOCC
■ Add new policies to the FLUE, and ICE related to military
compatibility Strategies;
■ Add new Glossary Section to 2010 Comp Plan
incorporating numerous definitions;
■ Add policies related to preservation of working
waterfronts;
■ Revise Rec and Open Space Policy 1201.3.6 to include
"Waterways";
172
3/5/2012
uml
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Proposed Amendments (cont'd):
■ Amend the CCME to include criteria to encourage
preservation of recreational and commercial working
waterfronts;
■ Revise Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) definition
within Policy 217.1.1-1
■ Review, and potentially update, Draft Map Series 3-7
"Coastal High Hazard Boundaries" as produced in EAR
for adoption;
ANIMISM■
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Proposed Amendments (cont'd):
■ Potential new legislative requirements (2012 session)
may require amendments to Objective 901.1 and its
associated policies regarding onsite sewage disposal;
■ Add definition of "electric distribution substations",
amend various policies and the LDC to include exact
terminology;
■ The conservation element must include factors that
affect energy conservation;
173
174
3/5/2012
■
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Proposed Amendments (cont'd):
■ Amend ICE Policy 1301.3.1 & CCME Policy 216.1.2 to include
a mandatory (rather than voluntary) dispute resolution
process;
■ Revise all references of "Local Government Comprehensive
Planning and Land Development Regulation Act' to
"Community Planning Act.";
■ Update Policy 5.1.2, Objective 5.5 and Policy 5.5.1. to reflect
that Plan Amendments must be submitted and processed
under State Coordinated Review Process;
175
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Proposed Amendments (cont'd):
■ Amend CIE Policy 1401.1.2 to reflect if components in
the schedule are funded or not and, if desired, no longer
transmit updated CIE to state land planning agency;
■ Revise FLUE Goals 101, 102, 103, & 104 to reflect
requirements for analyzing future land use map
amendments and urban sprawl criteria;
176
3/5/2012
d
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Proposed Amendments (cont'd):
■ Add a policy requiring that housing data be based upon
most recent decennial census or more recent
information;
■ Revise GOAL 214 to include new provision relative to
preserving historic and archaeological resources;
■ Delete 9-J Rules citations throughout;
■ Revise ICE Goals if desired related to procedural
coordination requirements;
177
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Proposed Amendments (cont'd):
■ Decide if County wishes to maintain LOS for parks and
recreation, and transportation;
■ If County wishes to maintain traffic concurrency, must
amend Traffic Circulation Element to address new
requirements;
■ Review County transmittal and adoption processes for
consistency with "State Coordinated Review Process".
■ Revise FLUE to reflect change in EAR process; and
■ Review County Development Agreement processes for
consistency with State Law.
178
3/5/2012
Chapter 6: Chapter 163 Assessment
(Page 6-1)
Chapter 163. FS. N.A Addressed Amendment
Citaxians Chan es to Cha ter 163. F.S< wherer how Needed
004: ICL•.04.5. 5. 11: d... 04.37, s, t; th. U•1-230. sz 1-i::13.0i-37?. ;;. ^.•S: ch.0+-381.
ss,1-2: rh. 04-384, s, 2, Laws of F£orida.
Sect-163,31b7: FS,
(101: Amended tc conform to the repeal
'1;A
of the florda High-speed Rail
TramportatianAct and Ex tM&tian afihe
Honda High -Spud Rail Aathon y AC.,
(13), Creaud to regnre 1c 1 governx 'm
to identify adequate stater rnpplg
PaiabkW ter
wunm to melt fatrre demand for the
701.5.7-701.i.g
esub?xhed plaoa:ng period. (Chpt?011-
139 remamhred to (9))
(14) C e ud,: Witt', efecto£j.d1a.t
N,A
determination: issued subsequeu ro
attain deveioprn mt orders pmunt to
Wooed land devela^went ters,Atlow,
aw ecnan
_
1): rtntides legiolatire findings or. the
Prcce;larai
153.317a: F.S.
mmpad�ii:ity ofdeariapmeat xrth
military iostaDaaams
flJ. P: orides far the a haugr of
D—I pmitiuty
tmfa matiomrliating to proposed lend
campatiblty
use decisiams:§eta:een counties and lass•;
seaegies: FLUE,
gorentmentsand mCita.� utL41!ai:om•
mmu moat ICE
`Chpt 201:-139 naumbtrel to (4)I
(}J.?.Adr. t, respansire comment,
by a commasdiag offs—, h.!.h.r
de3lgntl.
179
Michael L. Davis, Vice President and Principal -
in -Charge
■ Mr. Davis' experience encompasses all phases
of Environmental Sciences: Land and Watershed
Planning, Transportation Planning, Permitting
and NEPA reviews;
■ Mr. Davis directs the following K&S divisions:
PD&E Services;
Environmental Sciences;
Transportation Planning;
Land Use Planning;
Landscape Architecture; and
Public Involvement.
■ Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
■ Director of Natural Resources, White House CEQ
■ Director of Everglades Restoration
■ Extensive NEPA and study experience (e.g.
CERP, PSL EIS, SMDWSP)
180
3/5/2012
W
e
Phase 2 - Next Steps
■ Incorporate PC and BOCC comments and finalize the
EAR;
■ April, 2012: K&S submits final EAR for BOCC
Adoption;
■ May, 2012: BOCC Adoption
How can you get involved?...
■ Dawn Sonneborn, AICP, Director of Planning
■ Email: dsonneborn@keithandschnars.com
■ Project Website: www.keyscompplan.com
■ Toll Free Telephone: (800) 488-1255
181
182
3/5/2012
91
3/5/2012
ON