Loading...
05/15/2013 ContractCLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE: June 7, 2013 TO: Roman Gastesi, County Administrator ATTN: Rhonda Haag FROM. • Pamela G. Hanc k; . C. At the May 15, 2013, Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted approval and authorized execution of Item Q5 a Contract with AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. in the amount of $37,725; to perform an extensive analysis of the existing canal documentation, conduct field visits to the estimated 502 canals in the County, recommend the top 15 proposed demonstration sites, and in coordination with the County and the Canal Restoration Subcommittee recommend the final estimated five (5) demonstration projects to be designed and constructed. Enclosed is a duplicate original of the above - mentioned for your handling. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact my office. cc: County Attorney Fin yce File J 500 Whitehead Street Suite 101, PO Box 1980, Key West FL 33040 Phone: 305 - 295 -3130 Fax: 305 - 295 -3663 3117 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: 305 - 289 -6027 Fax. 305 -289 -6025 88820 Overseas Highway, Plantation Key, FL 33070 Phone: 852 -7145 Fax: 305 - 852 -7146 s CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE SELECTION OF CANAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS THIS Contract made and entered into this 15 th day of May, 2013 by and between Monroe County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is 1100 Simonton Street, Key West Florida, 33040 its successors and assigns hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY," through the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), the Owner, and AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, Inc. whose address is 5845 NW 158 Street, Miami, Florida 33014, its successors and assigns, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the COUNTY benefits economically and environmentally by having non - impaired water quality in its canals and near shore waters; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has completed Phase I of the Canal Management Master Plan and is currently underway with Phase II to better understand the condition of the water quality in its 502 canals; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has agreed to proceed with several demonstration projects to test various methods for canal restoration techniques to verify the applicability, feasibility, effectiveness and costs in real time of the techniques on the canals; and WHERAS, the COUNTY issued a Request For Quotes for a firm to perform an extensive analysis of the documentation and conduct field visits to the canals and to then select the sites for the demonstration projects; and WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR provided the lowest responsive Quote; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises, covenants and agreements stated herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree as follows: ARTICLE I REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES By executing this Agreement, the CONSULTANT makes the following express representations and warranties to the COUNTY: 1.1.1 The CONSULTANT shall maintain all necessary licenses, permits or other authorizations necessary to act as CONSULTANT for the Project until the CONSULTANT'S duties hereunder have been satisfied; Page 1 of Contract 1.1.2 The CONSULTANT has become familiar with the Project site(s) and the local conditions under which the Projects are to be selected for further design, engineering, construction, and implementation; 1.1.3 The CONSULTANT shall prepare all documents required by this Agreement in such a manner that they shall be in conformity and comply with all applicable law, codes and regulations. The CONSULTANT warrants that the documents prepared as a part of this Contract will be adequate and sufficient to accomplish the purposes of the Project, therefore, eliminating any additional costs due to missing or incorrect design elements in the deliverables; 1.1.4 The CONSULTANT assumes full responsibility to the extent allowed by law with regards to his performance and those directly under his employ. 1.1.5 The CONSULTANT'S services shall be performed as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Project. In providing all services pursuant to this agreement, the CONSULTANT shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to, or regulating such services, including those now in effect and hereinafter adopted. Any violation of said statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations shall constitute a material breach of this agreement and shall entitle the COUNTY to terminate this agreement immediately upon delivery of written notice of termination to the CONSULTANT. 1.1.6 At all times and for purposes under this agreement the CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of the Board of County Commissioners for Monroe County. No statement contained in this agreement shall be construed so as to find the CONSULTANT or any other of his/her employees, contractors, servants, or agents to be employees of the Board of County Commissioners for Monroe County. 1.1.7 The CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any person based on race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age or any other characteristic or aspect which is not related, in its recruiting, hiring, promoting, terminating, or other area affecting employment under this agreement or with the provision of services or goods under this agreement. ARTICLE II SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES 2.1.1 The CONSULTANT will perform for the COUNTY services as described in Attachment A , Scope of Basic Services and Attachment B — Quote Response from AMEC. Page 2 of Contract 2.1.2 The CONSULTANT will complete all services for the COUNTY no later than ninety (90) days from execution of the CONTRACT. This CONTRACT shall expire September 30, 2013. 2.2 CORRECTIONS OF ERRORS, OMMISSIONS, DEFICIENCIES 2.2.1 The CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, promptly correct errors, omissions, deficiencies, or conflicts in the work product of the CONSULTANT or its subconsultants, or both. 2.3 NOTICE REQUIREMENTS 2.3.1 All written correspondence to the COUNTY shall be dated and signed by an authorized representative of the CONSULTANT. Any notice required or permitted under this agreement shall be in writing and hand delivered or mailed, postage prepaid, to the COUNTY by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following: Ms. Rhonda Haag Monroe County Sustainability Office 102050 Overseas Highway, Ste. 212 Key Largo, FL 33037 And: Mr. Roman Gastesi, Jr. County Administrator 1100 Simonton Street Key West, FL 33040 For the Consultant: AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, Inc. Jose R. Perez, Miami Lakes Office manager 5845 NW 158 Street Miami, FL 33014 ARTICLE III ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.1 The services described in this Article III are not included in Basic Services. They shall be paid for by the COUNTY as provided in this agreement as an addition to the compensation paid for the Basic Services but only if approved by the COUNTY before commencement, and as follows: A. Providing services of CONSULTANT for other than the previously listed consulting scope of Project provided as a part of Basic Services. Page 3 of Contract B. Providing any other services not otherwise included in this Agreement or not customarily furnished in accordance with generally accepted consulting practice. C. Providing representation before public bodies in connection with the Project, upon approval by the COUNTY. 3.2 If Additional Services are required, such as those listed above, the COUNTY shall issue a letter requesting and describing the requested services to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall respond with fee proposal to perform the requested services. Only after receiving an amendment to the Agreement and a notice to proceed from the COUNTY, shall the CONSULTANT proceed with the Additional Services. ARTICLE IV COUNT Y'S RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 The COUNTY shall provide full information regarding requirements for the project including physical location of work, county maintained roads and maps. 4.2 The COUNTY shall designate Monroe County's Sustainability Office to act on the COUNTY'S behalf with respects to the Project. The COUNTY or Monroe County's Sustainability Office shall render decisions in a timely manner pertaining to documents submitted by the CONSULTANT in order to avoid unreasonable delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the CONSULTANTS services. 4.3 Prompt written notice shall be given by the COUNTY and its representative to the CONSULTANT if they become aware of any fault or defect in the Project or nonconformance with the Agreement Documents. Written notice shall be deemed to have been duly served if sent pursuant to paragraph 2.3. 4.4 The COUNTY shall furnish the required information and services and shall render approvals and decisions as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Consultants services and work of the contractors. 4.5 The COUNTY'S review of any documents prepared by the CONSULTANT or its subconsultants shall be solely for the purpose of determining whether such documents are generally consistent with the COUNTY'S criteria, as, and if, modified. No review of such documents shall relieve the CONSULTANT of responsibility for the accuracy, adequacy, fitness, suitability or coordination of its work product. 4.6 The COUNTY shall provide copies of necessary documents required to complete the work. 4.7 Any information that may be of assistance to the CONSULTANT that the COUNTY has immediate access to will be provided as requested. Page 4 of Contract ARTICLE V INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 5.1.1 The CONSULTANT covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY /Monroe County and Monroe County Board of County Commissioners from any and all claims for bodily injury, including death, personal injury, and property damage, including property owned by Monroe County, and any other losses, damages, and expenses, including attorney's fees, court costs and expenses, which arise out of, in connection with, or by reason of services provided by the CONSULTANT or Subcontractor(s) in any tier, occasioned by the negligence, errors, or other wrongful act or omission of the CONSULTANT in any tier, their employees, or agents. 5.1.2 The first ten dollars ($10.00) of remuneration paid to the CONSULTANT is for the indemnification provided for above. The extent of liability is in no way limited to, reduced, or lessened by the insurance requirements contained elsewhere within this agreement. Should any claims be asserted against the COUNTY by virtue of any deficiency or ambiguity in the plans and specifications provided by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that he shall hold the COUNTY harmless and shall indemnify him from all losses occurring thereby and shall further defend any claim or action on the COUNTY'S behalf. 5.1.3 In the event the completion of the project (to include the work of others) is delayed or suspended as a result of the CONSULTANT'S failure to purchase or maintain the required insurance, the CONSULTANT shall indemnify COUNTY from any and all increased expenses resulting from such delays. Should any claims be asserted against COUNTY by virtue of any deficiencies or ambiguity in the plans and specifications provide by the CONSULTANT the CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that CONSULTANT hold the COUNTY harmless and shall indemnify it from all losses occurring thereby and shall further defend any claims or action on the COUNTY'S behalf 5.1.4 The extent of liability is in no way limited to, reduced or lessened by the insurance requirements contained elsewhere within the Agreement. 5.1.5 This indemnification shall survive the expiration or early termination of the Agreement. ARTICLE VI PERSONNEL 6.1 PERSONNEL The CONSULTANT shall assign only qualified personnel to perform any service concerning the project. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the parties anticipate that the following named individuals will perform those functions as indicated: Page 5 of Contract NAME Wendy Blondin, P.G. Mr. Michael Nardone, P.G. Mr. Lance Lumbard, CLP Ms. Charlene Stroehlen, PE Mr. Stephen Hanks, PE FUNCTION Ms. Project Manager Principal in Charge Water Quality Engineering GIS Database Management So long as the individuals named above remain actively employed or retained by the CONSULTANT, they shall perform the functions indicated next to their names. If they are replaced the CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY of the change immediately. ARTICLE VII PAYMENTS 7.1 PAYMENT SUM 7.1.1 The COUNTY shall pay the CONSULTANT in current funds for the CONSULTANT'S performance of this Agreement the Total Lump Sum Amount of Thirty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($37,725.00). 7.2 PAYMENTS 7.2.1 For its assumption and performances of the duties, obligations and responsibilities set forth herein, the CONSULTANT shall be paid monthly, based on a percentage of completion. (A) If the CONSULTANT'S duties, obligations and responsibilities are materially changed by amendment to this agreement after execution of this Agreement, compensation due to the CONSULTANT shall be equitably adjusted, either upward or downward; (B) As a condition precedent for any payment due under this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall submit monthly, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the COUNTY, an invoice to the COUNTY requesting payment for services properly rendered and reimbursable expenses due hereunder. The CONSULTANT'S invoice shall describe with reasonable particularity the service rendered. The CONSULTANT'S invoice shall be accompanied by such documentation or data in support of expenses for which payment is sought that the COUNTY may require. (C) For the performance of the optional additional services and contingent additional services described in Article III of this contract, provided same are first authorized in writing by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT shall be paid hourly at the rates to be negotiated. Page 6 of Contract 7.3 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 7.3.1 Reimbursable expenses are not authorized under this CONTRACT. 7.4 BUDGET 7.4.1 The CONSULANT may not be entitled to receive, and the COUNTY is not obligated to pay, any fees or expenses in excess of the amount budgeted for this Agreement in each fiscal year (October 1 - September 30) by COUNTY'S Board of County Commissioners. The budgeted amount may only be modified by an affirmative act of the COUNTY'S Board of County Commissioners. ARTICLE VIII INSURANCE 8.1.1 The CONSULTANT shall obtain insurance as specified and maintain the required insurance at all times that this Agreement is in effect. In the event the completion of the project (to include the work of others) is delayed or suspended as a result of the CONSULTANT'S failure to purchase or maintain the required insurance, the CONSULTANT shall indemnify the COUNTY from any and all increased expenses resulting from such delay. 8.1.2 The coverage provided herein shall be provided by an insurer with an A.M. Best Rating of VI or better, that is licensed to do business in the State of Florida and that has an agent for service of process within the State of Florida. The insurance certificate shall contain an endorsement providing sixty (60) days notice to the COUNTY prior to any cancellation of said coverage. Said coverage shall be written by an insurer acceptable to the COUNTY and shall be in a form acceptable to the COUNTY. 8.1.3 CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain the following policies: A. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of Florida, sufficient to respond to Chapter 440 Florida Statutes. B. Employers Liability Insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per Accident, $1,000,000 Disease, policy limits, $1,000,000 Disease each employee. C. Comprehensive business automobile and vehicle liability insurance covering claims for injuries to members of the public and/or damages to property of others arising from use of motor vehicles, including onsite and offsite operations, and owned, hired or non -owned vehicles, with One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) annual aggregate. Page 7 of Contract D. Commercial general liability, including Personal Injury Liability insurance covering claims for injuries to members of the public or damage to property of others arising out of any covered act or omission of the CONSULTANT or any of its employees, agents or subcontractors or subconsultants, including Premises and /or Operations, Products and Completed Operations, Independent Contractors; Broad Form Property Damage and a Contractual Liability Endorsement with One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and annual aggregate. An Occurrence Form policy is preferred. If coverage is changed to or provided on a Claims Made policy, its provisions should include coverage for claims filed on or after the effective date of this Agreement. In addition, the period for which they may be reported must extend for a minimum of 48 months following the termination or expiration of this Agreement. E. Professional liability insurance of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) annual aggregate. If the policy is a "claims made" policy, CONSULTANT shall maintain coverage or purchase a "tail" to cover claims made after completion of the project to cover the statutory time limits in Chapter 95 of the Florida Statutes. F. COUNTY shall be named as an additional insured with respect to CONSULTANTS liabilities hereunder in insurance coverage identified in Paragraphs C and D. G. CONSULTANT shall require its subconsultants to be adequately insured at least to the limits prescribed above, and to any increased limits of CONSULTANT if so required by COUNTY during the term of this Agreement. COUNTY will not pay for increased limits of insurance for subconsultants. H. CONSULTANT shall provide to the COUNTY certificates of insurance or will make copies of policies available for County to review including those naming the COUNTY as an additional insured by including any subsection hereunder. I. If the CONSULTANT participates in a self - insurance fund, a Certificate of Insurance will be required. In addition, the CONSULTANT may be required to submit updated financial statements from the fund upon request from the COUNTY. 8.2 APPLICABLE LAW This contract is governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any litigation arising under this contract must be in Monroe County, Florida. Page 8 of Contract ARTICLE IX MISCELLANEOUS 9.1 SECTION HEADINGS Section headings have been inserted in this Agreement as a matter of convenience of reference only, and that it is agreed that such section headings are not a part of this Agreement and will not be use in the interpretation of any provisions of this Agreement. 9.2 OWNERSHIP OF THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS The documents prepared by the CONSULTANT for this Project belong to the COUNTY and may be reproduced and copied without acknowledgement or permission of the CONSULTANT. 9.3 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The CONSULTANT shall not assign or subcontract its obligations under this Agreement except in writing and with the prior written approval of the Board of County Commissioners for Monroe County and the CONSULTANT, which approval shall be subject to such conditions and provisions as the Board may deem necessary. This paragraph shall be incorporated by reference into any assignment or subcontract and any assignee or subcontractor shall comply with all of the provisions of this Agreement. Subject to the provisions of the immediately proceeding sentence, each party hereto binds itself, its successors, assignees and legal representatives to the other and to the successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other party. The CONSULTANT shall not assign its right hereunder, excepting its right to payment, nor shall it delegate any of its duties hereunder without the written consent of the COUNTY. 9.4 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES Nothing contained herein shall create any relationship, contractual or otherwise, with or any rights in favor of, any third party. 9.5 TERMINATION A. In the event the CONSULTANT shall be found to be negligent in any aspect of service, the COUNTY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement after five (5) days written notification to the CONSULTANT. B. The COUNTY may terminate this Agreement without cause by giving the other party sixty (60) days written notice of its intention to do so. 9.6 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The contract documents consist of the Request for Quotes (RFQ), any addenda, the Form of Agreement (Articles I -XV), the CONSULTANT'S response to the RFQ, the Page 9 of Contract documents referred to in the Form of Agreement as a part of this Agreement, and the attachments and modifications made after execution by written amendment. In the event any conflict between any of those Agreement documents, the one imposing the greater burden on the CONSULTANT will control. 9.7 PUBLIC ENTITIES CRIMES A person or affiliate who has been place on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crime may not submit a bid on contracts to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017 of the Florida Statutes, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. By signing this Agreement, CONSULTANT represents that the execution of this Agreement will not violate the Public Entity Crimes Act (Section 287.133, Florida Statutes), Violation of this section shall result in termination of this Agreement and recovery of all moneys paid hereto, and may result in debarment from COUNTY'S competitive procurement activities. In addition to the foregoing, CONSULTANT further represents that there has been no determination, based on an audit that it or any subconsultant has committed an act defined by Section 287.133, as "public entity crime ", and that it has not been formally charged with committing an act defined as a "public entity crime" regardless of the amount of money involved or whether CONSULTANT has been placed on the convicted vendor list. CONSULTANT will promptly notify the COUNTY if it or any subcontractor or subconsultant is formally charged with an act defined as a "public entity crime" or has been placed on the convicted vendor list. 9.8 MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS CONSULTANT shall maintain all books, records, and documents directly pertinent to performance under this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. Records shall be retained for a period of five years from the termination of this Agreement. Each party to this Agreement or their authorized representatives shall have reasonable and timely access to such records of each other party to this Agreement for public records purposes during the term of the Agreement and for four years following the termination of this Agreement. If an auditor employed by the County or Clerk determines that monies paid to CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement were spent for purposes not authorized by this Agreement, the Page 10 of Contract CONSULTANT shall repay the monies together with interest calculated pursuant to Sec. 55.03, FS, running from the date the monies were paid to County. 9.9 GOVERNING LAW, VENUE, INTERPERTATION, COST AND FEES This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely in the State. In the event that any cause of action or administrative proceeding is instituted for the enforcement or interpretation of this Agreement, COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree that venue will lie in the 16 Judicial Circuit, Monroe County, Florida, in the appropriate court or before the appropriate administrative body in Monroe County, Florida. This Agreement shall not be subject to arbitration. The County and CONSULTANT agree that, in the event of conflicting interpretations of the terms or a term of this Agreement by or between any of them the issue shall be submitted to mediation prior to the institution of any other administrative or legal proceeding. 9.10 SEVERABILITY If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement (or the application thereof to any circumstance or person) shall be declared invalid or unenforceable to any extent by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement, shall not be affected thereby, and each remaining term, covenant, condition and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and shall be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law unless the enforcement of the remaining terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement would prevent the accomplishment of the original intent of this Agreement. The County and CONSULTANT agree to reform the Agreement to replace any stricken provision with a valid provision that comes as close as possible to the intent of the stricken provision. 9.11 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS The COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree that in the event any cause of action or administrative proceeding is initiated or defended by any party relative to the enforcement or interpretation of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and court costs expenses, as an award against the non- prevailing party, and shall include attorney's fees and courts costs expenses in appellate proceedings, as an award against the non - prevailing party. Mediation proceedings initiated and conducted pursuant to this Agreement shall be in accordance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and usual and customary procedures required by the circuit court of Monroe County. 9.12 BINDING EFFECT The terms, covenants, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the COUNTY and CONSULTANT and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Page 11 of Contract 9.13 AUTHORITY Each party represents and warrants to the other that the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary COUNTY and corporate action, as required by law. 9.14 CLAIMS FOR FEDERAL OR STATE AID CONSULTANT and COUNTY agree that each shall be, and is, empowered to apply for, seek, and obtain federal and state funds to further the purpose of this Agreement; provided that all applications, requests, grant proposals, and funding solicitations shall be approved by each party prior to submission. 9.15 ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES OR DISAGREEMENTS COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree that all disputes and disagreements shall be attempted to be resolved by meet and confer sessions between representatives of each of the parties. If no resolution can be agreed upon within 30 days after the first meet and confer session, the issue or issues shall be discussed at a public meeting of the Board of County Commissioners. If the issue or issues are still not resolved to the satisfaction of the parties, then any party shall have the right to seek such relief or remedy as may be provided by this Agreement or by Florida law. This provision does not negate or waive the provisions of paragraph 9.5 concerning termination or cancellation. 9.16 COOPERATION In the event any administrative or legal proceeding is instituted against either party relating to the formation, execution, performance, or breach of this Agreement, COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree to participate, to the extent required by the other party, in all proceedings, hearings, processes, meetings, and other activities related to the substance of this Agreement or provision of the services under this Agreement. COUNTY and CONSULTANT specifically agree that no party to this Agreement shall be required to enter into any arbitration proceedings related to this Agreement. 9.17 NON DISCRIMINATION CONSULTANT and COUNTY agree that there will be no discrimination against any person, and it is expressly understood that upon a determination by a court of competent jurisdiction that discrimination has occurred, this Agreement automatically terminates without any further action on the part of any party, effective the date of the court order. CONSULTANT and COUNTY agree to comply with all Federal and Florida statutes, and all local ordinances, as applicable, relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: 1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88 -352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; 2) Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972, as amended (20 USC ss. 1681 -1683, and 1685- 1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; 3) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Page 12 of Contract Act of 1973, as amended (20 USC s. 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; 4) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 USC ss. 6101 -6107) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; 5) The Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (PL 92 -255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; 6) The Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (PL 91 -616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; 7) The Public Health Service Act of 1912, ss. 523 and 527 (42 USC ss. 690dd -3 and 290ee -3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patent records; 8) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 USC s. et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; 9) The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC s. 1201 Note), as maybe amended from time to time, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of disability, 10) Any other nondiscrimination provisions in any Federal or state statutes which may apply to the parties to, or the subject matter of, this Agreement. 9.18 COVENANT OF NO INTEREST CONSULTANT and COUNTY covenant that neither presently has any interest, and shall not acquire any interest, which would conflict in any manner or degree with its performance under this Agreement, and that only interest of each is to perform and receive benefits as recited in this Agreement. 9.19 CODE OF ETHICS COUNTY agrees that officers and employees of the COUNTY recognize and will be required to comply with the standards of conduct for public officers and employees as delineated in Section 112.313, Florida Statutes, regarding, but not limited to, solicitation or acceptance of gifts; doing business with one's agency; unauthorized compensation; misuse of public position, conflicting employment or contractual relationship; and disclosure or use of certain information. 9.20 NO SOLICITATION /PAYMENT The CONSULTANT and COUNTY warrant that, in respect to itself, it has neither employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for it, to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for it, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of the provision, the CONSULTANT agrees that the COUNTY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability and, at its discretion, to offset from monies owed, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration. Page 13 of Contract 9.21 PUBLIC ACCESS The CONSULTANT and COUNTY shall allow and permit reasonable access to, and inspection of, all documents, papers, letters or other materials in its possession or under its control subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the CONSULTANT and COUNTY in conjunction with this Agreement; and the COUNTY shall have the right to unilaterally cancel this Agreement upon violation of this provision by CONSULTANT. 9.22 NON - WAIVER OF IMMUNITY Notwithstanding the provisions of Sec. 768.28, Florida Statutes, the participation of the CONSULTANT and the COUNTY in this Agreement and the acquisition of any commercial liability insurance coverage, self - insurance coverage, or local government liability insurance pool coverage shall not be deemed a waiver of immunity to the extent of liability coverage, nor shall any contract entered into by the COUNTY be required to contain any provision for waiver. 9.23 PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITY All of the privileges and immunities from liability, exemptions from laws, ordinances, and rules and pensions and relief, disability, workers' compensation, and other benefits which apply to the activity of officers, agents, or employees of any public agents or employees of the COUNTY, when performing their respective functions under this Agreement within the territorial limits of the COUNTY shall apply to the same degree and extent to the performance of such functions and duties of such officers, agents, volunteers, or employees outside the territorial limits of the COUNTY. 9.24 LEGAL OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Non - Delegation of Constitutional or Statutory Duties. This Agreement is not intended to, nor shall it be construed as, relieving any participating entity from any obligation or responsibility imposed upon the entity by law except to the extent of actual and timely performance thereof by any participating entity, in which case the performance may be offered in satisfaction of the obligation or responsibility. Further, this Agreement is not intended to, nor shall it be construed as, authorizing the delegation of the constitutional or statutory duties of the COUNTY, except to the extent permitted by the Florida constitution, state statute, and case law. 9.25 NON - RELIANCE BY NON - PARTIES No person or entity shall be entitled to rely upon the terms, or any of them, of this Agreement to enforce or attempt to enforce any third -party claim or entitlement to or benefit of any service or program contemplated hereunder, and the CONSULTANT and the COUNTY agree that neither the CONSULTANT nor the COUNTY or any agent, officer, or employee of either shall have the authority to inform, counsel, or otherwise Page 14 of Contract indicate that any particular individual or group of individuals, entity or entities, have entitlements or benefits under this Agreement separate and apart, inferior to, or superior to the community in general or for the purposes contemplated in this Agreement. 9.26 ATTESTATIONS AND TRUTH IN NEGOTATION CONSULTANT agrees to execute such documents as the COUNTY may reasonably require including a Public Entity Crime Statement, an Ethics Statement, and a Drug -Free Workplace Statement. Signature of this Agreement by CONSULTANT shall act as the execution of a truth in negotiation certificate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation pursuant to the Agreement are accurate, complete, and current at the time of contracting. The original contract price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude significant sums by which the agency determines the contract price was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or concurrent wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such adjustments must be made within one year following the end of the Agreement. 9.27 NO PERSONAL LIABILITY No covenant or agreement contained herein shall be deemed to be a covenant or agreement of any member, officer, agent or employee of Monroe County in his or her individual capacity, and no member, officer, agent or employee of Monroe County shall be liable personally on this Agreement or be subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the execution of this Agreement. 9.28 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be regarded as an original, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument and any of the parties hereto may execute this Agreement by signing any such counterpart. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Page 15 of Contract IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized representative on the day and year first above written. (SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest: CLERK OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA By. Deputy Clerk Date: !:� �; / 2a 1 3 (Seal) AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTU�, NC. Attest: / /l _Z100- i i_ By : � Mayor /Chairman MONROE COUNTY ATTORN AP OVED AS TO FOR ATILEENE W. CASSEL SSISTANT COUNTY FOR Date By. W ES C c, By: / W ESS o cn N . W r— r*i 0 r-t C7 CD t:3 Page 16 of Contract ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Background The County has initiated the last of its wastewater projects that will eliminate sewage releases into canal and near shore waters. The completion of the wastewater projects will help clean up degraded near shore waters of the Florida Keys and prevent against further degradation. However, the wastewater projects won't eliminate the pollution already in the canal waters and the organics and pollutants that have settled up to several feet deep on the bottoms of many of the canals. Pollutants become trapped at the canal bottoms due to poor canal flushing. The County is now moving forward with canal restoration demonstration projects that will remove the pollutants and organics from the affected canals. Canal restorations will enhance flushing, which will remove some trapped pollutants in the water column. Construction of residential canals in the Florida Keys was initiated in the mid -20th century, before resource managers fully understood their impacts on local water quality and broader coastal ecosystems. Many of the 502 canal systems currently present in the Keys were excavated to depths of 20 to 25 feet in order to maximize production of fill material. Many canal systems were designed as long, multi - segmented, dead -end networks which maximize waterfront property but provide little or no tidal flushing and accumulate nutrients and decomposing organic material. B. Regulatory The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has determined that the water quality is impaired in multiple water bodies (WBIDS) throughout the Florida Keys. The Florida Keys Reasonable Assurance Documentation Update of 2011 (FKRAD Update) http:/ /www dgp state fl us/ water / watersheds /docs/bmgp/keys -rad- update- 2011.pdf outlined extensive waste water and storm water restoration activities to address the nutrient impairments from these sources. However, DEP recognizes that even after the restoration and management activities detailed in the RAD are completed, water quality in many canals will likely not achieve Class III marine standards, as required by State water quality regulations. Canal restoration, including hydrological improvements, to improve tidal flow and reducing input of floating sea weed will be required. The poor water circulation, weed wrack, organic sediments, and /or deep water depth, were the cited reasons. Since the canals discharge directly to nearshore Outstanding Florida Waters in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS), where DEP adopted a "zero- degradation" policy for marine waters, addressing on -going canal water quality impairment is of utmost importance. Water quality conditions within various canal size classifications were evaluated as part of the 2003 Monroe County Residential Canal Inventory and Assessment. During the evaluation period, canal water quality was significantly poorer than the baseline reference for total nitrogen and total phosphorus for all canal types except Jumbo which was not Page 17 of Contract significantly different for total phosphorus and likely a result of small sample size (refer to table below). Dissolved oxygen concentration within these canals is often less than 1.0 mg/l. Summary of Water Quality for all Canals in The Florida Keys (from Monroe County Canal Inventory and Assessment 2003 Report) JUMBO POOR Temperature ( ° C) 29.6 35.3 16 (> 10 hectares) Salinity (ppt) 36.65 37.2 26 Very limited Total Nitrogen 26.8 263.3 8.8 sampling, especially in Total Phosphorus 0.36 2.7 0.1 winter Chlorophyll a 0.54 15.22 0 M LARGE POOR Temperature (C) 29.9 41.5 15.0 (between 2 -10 Salinity (ppt) 35.2 50.3 8.8 hectares) Total Nitrogen 31.6 184.65 8.33 Better representation Total Phosphorus 0.39 10.09 0 of POOR water quality Chlorophyll a 0.49 23.09 0 MEDIUM FAIR Temperature ( ° C) 26.5 38.5 14 (between 0.6 to Salinity (ppt) 36.7 59.1 12.2 2 hectares 2) Total Nitrogen 29.39 145.78 0.33 Total Phosphorus 0.32 44.39 0 Chlorophyll a 0.38 19 0 M SMALL FAIR TO GOOD Temperature ( ° C) 26.8 41.5 15 (less than 0.6 Salinity (ppt) 37.3 46.4 0.3 hectares) Total Nitrogen 32.39 149.32 7.72 Total Phosphorus 0.34 4.75 0.06 Chlorophyll a 0.43 4.79 0 M Cluster `B" BASELINE Temperature ( ° C) 27.5 39.6 15.1 Keys Nearshore Salinity (ppt) 36.3 40 29.5 Waters 2001- Total Nitrogen 13.25 85.88 1.78 Page 18 of Contract Monroe County will now implement canal restoration techniques that will improve the water quality in the Florida Keys canals and thus in the near shore waters affected by canal outflow. A Monroe County CMMP is underway and is evaluating the conditions of the Keys canals, prioritizing the need for water quality improvement, and identifying appropriate restoration options for each canal. A Phase I CMMP completed in June 2012 initiated the canal restoration process. The complete CMMP will be completed in June 2013. C . SCOPE The County plans to construct and implement Federal and State - mandated canal restoration projects in the Florida Keys, as specified in the Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan (CMMP) htlp://www.monroecounty-fl.gov/DocumentCenterNiew/5301 When completed, the projects will result in significantly reduced nutrient loading to the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, improved water quality in the Sanctuary, and compliance with mandatory state water quality standards and relevant federal and state regulatory standards. The scope of services for the Canal Demonstration Project Selection includes a professional engineering evaluation process used to determine the top 15 potential demonstration canal restoration sites to be selected (to include 3 of each of the specified technologies), based upon a technical selection screening process to be developed for approval by the County, that includes environmental, water quality and other factors as outlined in the Canal Management Master Plan that is currently under development. The project includes canals with impaired water quality projects located throughout the entire Florida Keys, in Monroe County. The cities of Key West, Marathon, Layton, and Key Colony Beach; Village of Islamorada, and unincorporated Monroe County are included. The map areas included can be found at http: / /www.monroecounty- fl.gov /DocumentCenterNiew /5306 A list of the Keys' canals can be viewed at http://www.monroecounty-fl.gov/DocumentCenterNiew/5312 Page 19 of Contract Coordination of approvals from homeowners shall be provided. In addition, complete documentation for the recommendations for the top 15 projects, including anticipated costs, and a list of the permits shall be required. The Consultant shall use a selection and ranking process approved by the County and the Canal Restoration Subcommittee to determine the final 5 demonstration sites and projects. Each shall implement a different type of restoration technology — and be most applicable for each site. D. TECHNOLOGIES: To address the specific Class III water quality exceedances (DO, nutrients) within the canals and surrounding near shore waters, several technologies are being evaluated in the CMMP and are proposed to be implemented as part of this grant including: (1) removal of organic accumulation (e.g. dredging), (2) minimization of further organic accumulation via weed gates, (3) circulation of water within canals via pumping systems, (4) culvert connections to facilitate water movement using natural tidal flow; (5) backfilling of too -deep canals and /or 6) any other technology the consultant may recommend. These technologies will address the "legacy" load and will enhance the wastewater treatment improvements already made or underway within the watersheds as part of the RAD. The proposed technologies will target water quality improvements using several strategies necessary for ecosystem recovery. 1. Removal of accumulated organic matter within the canals will prevent future release and cycling of nutrients resulting from bacterial decomposition during oxic conditions as well as release of iron- complexed phosphorus during anoxic conditions (e.g., Hupfer and Lewandowski, 2008). 2. Weed gates will provide a physical barrier to minimize additional accumulation of organics once the legacy organics have been removed. 3.& 4. Pumping systems and culvert connections will facilitate oxygenation of otherwise stagnant water which is expected to provide desirable fish habitat within the canals. The third strategy will be enhanced by achievement of reduced biological oxygen demand as a result of the first two strategies. 5. Backfilling of too -deep canals will remove the stagnant water column that occurs below canal depths of 8 feet. Estimated Costs: The likely cost to implement the canal restorations is thought to range from $191 -$298 million, based upon a preliminary assessment of canal conditions and assumptions regarding design and construction costs. The estimated number of canals that may require restoration is only preliminary and will be revised as additional data is collected and evaluated. It is assumed that some canals may achieve adequate water quality improvement through the installation of waste water collection and treatment systems alone and will not require additional canal restoration. The tables below have been provided to illustrate the range in total restoration costs as well as variation between technologies. Page 20 of Contract Nrnmhor o Panal Ppetn ratinnc hV qt- 1prted Technnlnov ✓y- Scenario Weed Wrack Organics Pumping Culverts Backfilling Total Removal Gate Low Range 62 31 20 20 40 173 High Range 72 54 34 34 60 254 Technical Feasibility: The canal restoration technologies being proposed have been identified in the CMMP and address two major water quality issues: seaweed loading (both prevention of future impacts and removal of existing accumulated organics) and improvement in canal flushing to restore the natural tidal flow and circulation via culverts or pumps that was destroyed during the canal construction. These technologies include: 1. Installation of weed wrack gates /air bubble curtains 2. Removal of accumulated organics from canal bottoms 3. Culvert installation to enhance tidal flow 4. Pumping to enhance circulation. 5. Backfilling Each of these technologies has been implemented at one or more canal sites in the Keys. Weed Wrack Gates /Air Bubble Curtains: Severe water quality problems in the Keys canals has resulted from excessive amounts of weed wrack (floating seaweed) entering the canals, fouling the water, and becoming trapped in the dead end sections of the canals. The orientation and prevailing winds at many canals do not allow the weed wrack to float back out of the canals, so it becomes trapped, decays and drops to the canal bottom, where it uses up dissolved oxygen and emits hydrogen sulfide and methane gases. Photographs are attached http://www.monroecogpty- fl.gov /DocumentCenter /View /5311 that show examples of this problem. Weed wrack gates in combination with air bubble curtains have been shown to be the most effective method for preventing weed wrack from entering the canals. The Phase I CMMP includes conceptual designs of this system. Removal of Accumulated Organics: Even when seaweed is prevented from entering a canal, the existing accumulated organics are still an on -going source of water quality impairment. The removal of organics from the canal bottoms through hydraulic dredging or other technique will remove this on -going source. Under a current FDEP Grant # S0640, surveyors are collecting canal bathymetry data to determine the natural depth of the canals and the amount of accumulated organics. The FDEP grant scope also includes sampling the organic material to determine the physical and chemical properties to assist in final design for removal, dewatering and disposal options. Although each organic sediment removal project varies depending on specific objectives, local conditions, and disposal options, similar projects have recently been completed in Florida with positive water quality response. Page 21 of Contract Culverts to Enhance Tidal Flow and Improve Circulation: The construction of homes in many parts of the Keys created long, multi - segmented, dead -end canal networks which maximize waterfront property but provide little or no tidal flushing and thus accumulate nutrients and decomposing organic material. Now that nutrient loading from septic tanks has been significantly reduced there are many canal systems that still have water quality impairment due to lack of natural flushing. The Keys have a natural tidal flow that can be utilized to improve water quality. Culverts, typically concrete box type, can be installed between canals or between canals and thin land strips to improve flushing. Pumping to Improve Circulation: For canal systems that do not have an accessible area to install a culvert, a pump can be installed to promote water circulation within a canal. Water can be pumped from a `dead end' canal to an enhanced mangrove water treatment area or water from a nearby near shore area can be pumped into the canal to increase dissolved oxygen levels and assist with flushing. Pump installations will be designed to prevent adverse secondary effects such as resuspension of sediments, bottom scouring, or negative impacts to the near shore waters. The Phase I CMMP contains a conceptual design for a pumping system in Marathon which was designed to pump in Florida Bay water to the dead end of the canal. The County is also interested in other restoration methods that may exist but are not discussed here. The respondent may provide any additional information for other technologies. E. PROJECT SELECTION The Consultant will develop the list of 15 potential demonstration sites, and then work closely with the County to determine the final 5 demonstration projects. A detailed description of each proposed restoration technology for each site shall be provided, and include a list of the components, permits, and other issues as applicable. F. DOCUMENTS The Consultant shall prepare, for approval by the County, a detailed list of the 15 proposed demonstration projects, and shall include a ranking sheet, permit criteria, access potential, and preliminary design and construction cost estimates. This list shall be narrowed to an estimated five (5) sites by working closely with the COUNTY and the Canal Restoration Subcommittee. Each site shall employ a different restoration technology. The Consultant shall use due care in determining permit requirements and shall meet with regulatory agencies as necessary to determine specific permit requirements. NOTE: The projects are not located on COUNTY property, but rather on property owned by private homeowners. The CONSULTANT must coordinate awareness and acceptance Page 22 of Contract with the homeowners in each demonstration project area. The CONSULTANT shall also identify easements and access to the separate sites, and provide preliminary recommendations for disposal of any spoil material, and identification of any issues related to the design or construction which could affect project cost. The Consultant shall document all meetings and conversations with residents, regulatory agencies, and others related to the performance of the Work. Work required by the Consultant to conform documents to federal, state, city, county, or agency specifications to allow them to be approved shall be completed at no charge or cost to the County, unless said requirements are changed during the course of the project. G. ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COST Contemporaneously with the submission of the final 5 projects, the Consultant shall submit to the County in writing its final estimate of the estimated engineering design, construction administration and also contractor's anticipated bid price for each of the Demonstration Projects. The Engineering and Construction Cost shall be the total estimated engineering and construction bid cost to the County of all elements of EACH of the Projects designed or specified by the Consultant. The Engineering and Construction Cost shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and materials and Equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the Consultant, plus a reasonable allowance for Contractor's overhead and profit. The Engineering and Construction cost does not include the compensation of the Consultant and the Consultant's consultants, the costs of land, rights -of -way, financing or other costs which are the responsibility of the homeowners or County. Page 23 of Contract ATTACHMENT B CONSULTANT'S QUOTE Page 24 of Contract ame9 Monroe County Board of County Commissioners Statement of Quotes for Engineering Services for Selection of Canal. Demonstration Projects \ , i 1 _ o _R, .. :ter .• , II, l• .iw V. ,itj1 '' � , ; • 1 �.._�' to 1 1 . ' f • �•. 4 .1 ' aor� _ft �.,, •.. . • ' a • r S.y• i�wi ....CS • �v; K; O e Date: May 1,2013 Original. ame 5845 NW 158th Street, Miami, Florida 33014 • 305.826.5588 • amec.com April 30, 2013 Ms. Rhonda Haag Sustainability Manager Monroe County Sustainability Office 102050 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 Key Largo, Florida 33037 Re: Engineering Services for Selection of Canal Demonstration Projects Dear Ms. Haag: AMEC Environment& Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) is very pleased to submit our Statement of Quotes to Monroe County for Engineering Services for Selection of Canal Demonstration Projects.AMEC pledges to optimize our services and keep things as simple as possible, provide outstanding value for the County's dollars spent, provide exceptional client service, deliver products on time and within budget, and be proactive in preventing and avoiding risk to the County. Why choose AMEC? AMEC's team offers the County a broad and comprehensive group of experts with a variety of technical backgrounds.AMEC can provide full support with the capacity to handle the tasks required under this contract. AMEC is a global multidisciplinary architectural and engineering firm located in Miami Lakes with offices throughout Florida. Our geologists, water resource engineers, civil engineers, planners, environmental scientists, and GIS/CADD specialists have years of experience completing projects similar in nature to the services requested in this RFQ. AMEC (formerly MACTEC Engineering & Consulting, Inc.) in 2003 completed the initial Monroe County effort to inventory and assess all the residential canals in the Keys. In 2012, AMEC in association with Monroe County was awarded a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) grant to initiate a Canal Management Master Plan (CMMP) — Phase 1. AMEC, in association with Monroe County, was also awarded an EPA grant to complete the CMMP (Phase 2). While Phase I addressed only 23 canal systems, Phase 2 addresses all of the approximately 502 residential canals in the Florida Keys. AMEC Florida Regional Manager Mr.Michael Nardone,PG,will be assigned as the Principal-in-Charge of this engagement and to assure all of AMEC's resources are fully available to assist in the successful implementation of any task. Mr. Jose R. Perez, AIA, LEED AP, CGC, our Miami Lakes Office Manager, is authorized to negotiate with the County. Ms. Wendy Blondin, PG,will be the Project Manager for this opportunity and will be the local point of contact for the County. Ms. Blondin is a distinguished professional with extensive experience, familiar with the County's vision and projects, and will remain fully accessible to the needs of the County throughout this engagement. AMEC has a strong desire to continue our work with Monroe County. We are completely committed to working with County staff and are excited about the possibility of continuing our work with the County. Sincerely, Jose R. Perez,AIA, LEED AP,C C Wendy Blondin, PG Miami Lakes Office Manager Project Manager y305.826.5588 ext 203( ff 305.298.9431 (cell) jose.r.perez@amec.com wendy.blondin@amec.com Monroe County Cover Letter Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1. 2013 Canal Demo Projects amecP Monroe County NW Board of CountyCommissioners cr Environmental Engineering Services for Selection of Canal Demonstration Projects Related to the Monroe County Canal Master Plan CD 0 A. Cover Page 3 —f1 B.1 Executive Summary and Lump Sum Price n Executive Summary and Lump Sum Price 4 B.2 Relevant Experience 5 = B.3 Familiarity with the Canal Master Plan 7 rm.` B.4 Understanding the Scope of Work/Ability to Select Demonstration Projects/ '� Coordination with Homeowners rf Scope of Work 8 Ability to Select Demonstration Projects 9 Coordination with Homeowners 10 B.5 Schedule and Availability 11 B.6 References and Past Performance on Similar Projects Project Profiles 13 Letters of References 21 B.7 Staffing for this Project and Quote of Key Personnel Description of Firm's Structure 23 Office Information 23 Organizational Chart 23 Resumes 24 B.8 Current and Project Workload 48 B.9 Office Location 49 B.10 Financial Information and Litigation 50 B.11 County Forms Response Form 51 Lobbying and Conflict of Interest Clause 52 Non-Collusion Affidavit 53 Drug Free Workplace Form 54 Respondent's Insurance and Indemnification Statement 55 Insurance Agent's Statement 56 Professional Licenses 57 Monroe County Table of Contents Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 2 Canal Demo Projects n ame0 , 0 0 el AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. '.1 5845 NW 158th Street Miami Lakes, Florida 33014 2) Contact Person: CD Wendy Blondin, PG wendy.blondin@amec.com 305.826 5588 (p) 305.298,9431 (c) 305.826, 1799 (f) Date: Wednesday, May 1 , 2013 Subject: Statement of Quotes for Engineering Services for Selection of Canal Demonstration Projects tak, ..,, , : ,r. . ,b,. ..i ' `` .J t {lip YS, `r 'i t-�• -., % '.- is a' ersa - V '. — #41.1 -- . - - , Monroe County Cover Page Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 3 Canal Demo Projects ameiP B.1 Executive Summmary and Lump Sum Price AMEC is pleased to present our response to efficiently, and in a way that satisfies our Monroe County Board of County Commissioner's ultimate clients-the citizens you serve. X Request for Quotes for Environmental Engineering Services for Selection of Canal Our project team for the Monroe County CD Demonstration Projects Related to the Monroe opportunity is comprised of highly skilled 0 County Canal Master Plan. professionals who have experience with Monroe County's Canal Management Master Plan. In Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, AMEC 2012, AMEC in association with Monroe Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) County was awarded a FDEP grant to initiate is an international environmental consulting, a CMMP — Phase 1. This grant was awarded engineering and design, and construction with only a three-month completion schedule corporation operating with more than 4,600 due to expiration of fiscal year end funds. professionals in 115 locations across the UnitedCn States. Serving the clean energy, federal, AMEC, in association with Monroe County, industrial/commercial, mining, oil and gas, was also awarded an EPA grant to complete transportation, and water sectors, we provide the CMMP (Phase 2). While Phase I addressed services to both public and private clients only 23 canal systems, Phase 2 addresses all worldwide. This entity is part of a larger division of of the approximately 502 residential canals AMEC plc, a publically traded company based in in the Florida Keys. AMEC's Project Manager London. for this opportunity, Ms. Wendy Blondin, PG, thoroughly understands and is familiar with In Florida, AMEC has 500 full-time employees — the Monroe County CMMP, working on both more than 100 in the South Florida region. Our previously mentioned phases of the Master Plan skills and experience around the world are key as the overall project planner. elements in choosing AMEC. Our clients know we can rise to the challenge. AMEC has extensive experience in Florida outside of Monroe County related to canal During the past 60 years, AMEC has offered and water quality improvement projects. Two multidisciplined solutions through civil projects of specific relevance are the Lake engineering, architectural services, surveying, Griffin Canal Dredging project and Lake environmental services, geotechnical engineering, Beauclair Aquatic Enhancement project. program management, materials testing and AMEC performed evaluation, design and engineering, and water resource services to construction support services related to public and private clients. Our employees live removal of sediment from Lake Griffin, a 9,300- and work in our local communities, making us acre lake in Lake County, Florida. The Lake especially dedicated to improving our surrounding Beauclair project involved AMEC's evaluation environments. We say "world skills on your of sediment removal to improve water quality, doorstep" because our customers recognize habitat and navigation in the 1,100-acre lake the value of our local presence. in Lake County. AMEC's knowledge gained completing these projects will be utilized in We understand the challenges facing government evaluating, designing, costing, and determining agencies today with an ever increasing demand effectiveness of organic removal from the Keys for services while operating under budget canals. constraints and shortfalls. We have firsthand experience with your project needs and our In summary, AMEC's project team fully meets wealth of knowledge and expertise delivered the needs for this contract and hopes to have by our skilled professionals provides you with the opportunity to provide the services required the assurance that tasks will be completed under this Request for Quotes. competently, professionally, on time, and within budget. Our professionals strive to become AMEC will complete the scope specified transparent extensions of your staff so that in this RFQ for a Lump Sum Total price of together we can tackle any challenge effectively, 37,725.00 Monroe County Executive Summary Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 4 ame B.2 Relevant Experience AMEC is a multidisciplinary firm with geologists, ;CI water resource engineers, civil engineers, planners, environmental scientists, and GIS/ CD CADD specialists that have years of experience completing projects similar in nature to theCD .� services requested in this RFQ. AMEC (formerly MACTEC) in 2003 completed the initial Monroe �, < County effort to inventory and assess all the residential canals in the Keys. This inventory developed a GIS canal layer that mapped the canals and populated an attribute table with the rf physical characteristics that could influence t �' the water quality of the canals. The work 4\ rn included compilation of existing water quality Agrik data collected in the canals and near shore ® waters, performing a quality review of the data, ~ , performing statistical analyses, and developing . /A 11 a predictive model to assess the water quality � / in the canals without sampling data. This effort increase circulation, and backfilling to eliminated Mill• saved the County hundreds of thousands deep stagnation zones. AMEC identified several of dollars in sampling costs. The inventory potential canal restoration funding sources also developed the first list of potential canal including Restore ACT 2012 and EPA and DEP restorations and identified the different types of special project funds. canals where each restoration would be most effective. The WQPP Canal Subcommittee supported CD completing the CMMP for the entire Keys and AMEC staff, Ms. Wendy Blondin, PG, a Keys identified an EPA grant as a funding source. resident, has worked with the Florida Keys AMEC in association with Monroe County was National Marine Sanctuary Water Quality awarded the EPA grant to complete the CMPP Protection Program (WQPP) Committee since (Phase 2). While Phase 1 addressed only 23 2003 to obtain additional funding to continue with canal systems, Phase 2 addresses all of the efforts in canal water quality improvements. In approximately 502 residential canals in the 2012, AMEC in association with Monroe County Florida Keys. AMEC is evaluating all the Keys was awarded a FDEP grant to initiate a Canal canals through field visits to determine water Management Master Plan (CMMP) — Phase quality impacts and to identify appropriate 1. This grant was awarded with only a three- cleanup options. month completion schedule due to expiration of fiscal year-end funds. This project involved Extensive homeowner interviews and meetings creating a CMMP throughout the Florida Keys have been performed and will continue for prioritizing canals that need water quality throughout the process. AMEC has obtained improvement and selecting appropriate cleanup extensive knowledge about the conditions of the options. AMEC, working closely with a newly canals, the existing restorations, and what will formed WQPP Canal Subcommittee, identified and won't work in the Keys. AMEC has refined a plan objectives, goals, priority issues, screening prioritization process to rank the canals for need criteria, and ranking formulas. AMEC utilized for water quality improvement. An updated GIS the GIS database developed in 2003, along with database is being prepared incorporating the field assessments, to apply the newly created new information obtained on the canals related master plan ranking process on a subset of the to water quality, restoration options, and potential Keys canals. Restoration conceptual designs and homeowner participation. cost estimates were prepared for the top three priority canals. The restorations included 'weed During the completion of the CMMP Phase 1 and wrack' barrier and air bubble curtains, organic 2 scopes of work, AMEC has identified several removal from the bottoms of canals, pumping to major data gaps in the information required to Monroe County Relevant Experience Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 5 correctly select and design canal restorations. The data -ti: . :gaps included lack of depth data of the canal bottoms, .. lack of information on the thickness of accumulated - , organics particularly related to seaweed, and lack of '- - __ information on the physical and chemical characteristics •;+. ~�. «» - t of the accumulated organics. AMEC prepared a scope of e� .� ' i work to obtain bathymetric data and sediment samples i . to assist in fulfilling these data gaps. A DEP grant was ' / awarded to AMEC in association with Monroe County to -/- - complete bathymetric surveys to determine the average // depths of the residential canals and collect sediment r- �` I samples to characterize the materials. 1,1 y The surveys are being performed using automated ---- --'� 1_-' hydrographic survey equipment consisting of a dual i ` I frequency echo sounder used in conjunction with a GPS positioning system to survey a profile of each canal centerline with bottom surface elevations of the canal. 1F-. * ' - As part of this effort, AMEC is obtaining sufficient data to provide approximate unconsolidated material thickness - €,- - within the canals. The collected bathymetric survey data is being processed to develop attribute data to be added to the existing GIS. The scope of the grant also includes collection �` of 10 sediment samples from 10 different canals to be , — 1 4)6 submitted for physical and chemical laboratory testing to -== assist in refining the design for removal and disposal of -_--'f r. the material from the canal bottoms. Through completion ---'' ;w'. -,- ,,, . -- of this grant, AMEC is obtaining extensive knowledge ... of the characteristics of the canals that will allow for -,4.1 an accurate and efficient selection of the appropriate • restoration technologies for each canal and will allow for N identification of the best demonstration sites. __.--- AMEC has extensive experience in Florida outside of Monroe County related to canal and water quality I improvement projects. Two projects of specific relevance =,/i''' are the Lake Griffin Canal Dredging project and Lake Beauclair Aquatic Enhancement project. AMEC performed evaluation, design and construction support County Environmental Protection Division to develop a services related to removal of sediment from Lake water quality and watershed assessment of Bay Lake. Griffin, a 9,300-acre lake in Lake County, Florida. The The evaluation included an assessment of the biological Lake Beauclair project involved AMEC's evaluation of and overall habitat conditions within the lake and an sediment removal to improve water quality, habitat and analysis of the available water quality parameters. navigation in the 1,100-acre lake in Lake County. AMEC's Recommendations were provided for the management knowledge gained completing these projects will be and potential restoration of the lake. utilized in evaluating, designing, costing, and determining effectiveness of organic removal from the Keys canals. The AMEC project team members proposed to perform the Engineering Services for Selection of Canal AMEC's project experience relevant to this RFQ Demonstration Projects have experience working on scope also includes developing nutrient budgets and the above referenced projects. AMEC is proposing an management plans for lakes in Florida. The Bay Lake extremely qualified team of professionals very familiar Hydrologic/Nutrient Budget and Management Plan is with the Keys canals to complete the selection of one such project. AMEC was contracted by the Orange Demonstration Projects. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 6 x,,z amecP ....1-.,.. B.3 Familiarity with Canal Masterplan AMEC is very familiar with the Canal WQPP Canal Subcommittee to ensure that the Management Master Plan (CMMP) since we process correctly reflected the County's interests 1111111 are the company that was involved in every and met scientific scrutiny. Our firm prepared theCD phase of the process to develop the objectives, Phase I CMMP Report included with this RFQ. goals, management process, screening criteria, 3 and ranking sheet. AMEC understands that the AMEC developed a Phase 2 scope of work to • objective of the CMMP is to prioritize canals complete the CMMP and was funded through that need water quality improvement and select an EPA grant.As part of the Phase 2 scope, our �• appropriate cleanup options, AMEC developed team is performing field water quality verification the field assessment form and determined what for all of the 502 Keys canals. AMEC will have mis field parameters would provide the most useful completed the field visits of the canals by the end nttt••• data for ranking water quality in canals. AMEC of May 2013 and is very familiar with the water developed the initial list of canal restoration quality issues and conditions that are needed to technologies. AMEC also worked closely with the select demonstration sites. m■ !••F` amec49 z . ..4. , Ims Monroe County CD Canal Management Master Plan(CHIMP) Phase l Summary Report .. y 4,, .4- sclo . ._ „..„„ ,,:. .1t ay. 11 •• • ..11; ,5;., _ _..... „--c.-, - . -.4..., . , ' -- 1 .- -..--_—.-: , lir COs t .. d �rc t r 4 -}4': EMI - d CD 13 SD Prepared by: AMEC Environment&Infrastructure Prepared for: Monroe County and the WQPP Steering Committee and Canal Subcommittee June 21,2012 Monroe County Familiarity with the Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for Canal Masterplan May 1, 2013 7 Canal Demo Projects amec B.4 Understanding of the Scope of Work/ Ability to Select the Demonstration Projects/Coordination with Homeowners AMEC has a very clear understanding of the scope of work required to select demonstration r 9 v ' ..._ projects for canal restorations and the need MI * to coordinate with and engage homeowners. Having worked for the past year on the Canalt Management Master Plan,AMEC is very familiar _ ,.a with the conditions of the canals, the appropriate (I) restorations techniques, and what will and - won't work in the Keys. AMEC has visited almost every canal and has created a database of canal conditions that will be required to successfully select demonstration projects. AMEC has met with many homeowners to listen sm., to their opinions concerning canal water quality issues and hear what types of restoration they would like to see on their canals. AMEC understands and appreciates how Objective(s) 0 important homeowner buy-in is to the success The objective of the selection of residential y7 of the demonstration projects. AMEC will canals for water quality improvement schedule site visits with homeowners for the demonstration projects is to complete the first canals selected to be part of the demo project step toward implementing demonstration projects field screening process to determine their of various restoration techniques. In order to interest, both in being a demonstration canal prepare detailed scopes of services for the final CD and financial commitment. The meeting with be design/permitting and construction of the canal scheduled with the president or vice president restoration demonstrations, specific canals with Cn of the homeowners association, if possible. appropriate physical characteristics for pilot AMEC will ensure that the homeowners are testing of the selected technologies need to be engaged in the technology selection, any identified. 0 equipment location(s), and required operation and maintenance of the system(s). AMEC will The objective of the canal restoration document all meetings and conversations for the demonstrations is to verify the applicability, project file and will provide these to the County. feasibility, effectiveness. and costs in real time on Keys canals. The demonstration canal restoration O The project descriptions provided in Section results will assist in modifying, if required, the msh B.6 and discussed in Section B.2 provide the restoration designs, and will provide costs that documentation of AMEC's level of knowledge can be utilized for future restoration planning. The to complete the required scope of work. demonstration testing will allow for future 'shovel Additionally, AMEC has a good working relation ready' proposals to be prepared to obtain grant 0 with the WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory funding, particularly from Restore Action 2012 Subcommittee members which will lead to sources, where 'shovel ready' is a high priority for a productive canal demonstration selection funding approval. process. Applications, Benefits, and Importance An outline of AMEC's understanding of the The canal restoration demonstration testing project objectives. benefits, and a proposed will help to reduce discharges of pollutants methodology for completing the selection from onshore canal systems to near shore and of canal restoration demonstration projects offshore waters. Initiating canal restoration that as requested in the RFQ is presented in the address dissolved oxygen will also provide following paragraphs reasonable assurance to the FDEP that these Monroe County Understanding the Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for Scope of Work May 1, 2013 8 Canal Demo Projects impairments are being corrected and that water body The desk top screening process will allow the grouping specific Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) will not be of canals by appropriate restoration technologies and required. allow the prioritization for demonstration testing. Factors such as water quality condition, existence of an existing Proposed Methodolgy for Assessment and Selection restoration, known homeowner interest and financial of Canals for Restoration commitment are examples of items that will be utilized in AMEC proposes to utilize both GIS canal database the desk top screening process. This task will generate a information and on-site field assessments and to assist list of the most suitable canals for each technology. in the selection of the canals for the demonstration of various restoration technologies. Canal selection will Task 2: Engineering Evaluation of Canals for consider the most critical and deteriorated canals that Demonstration of Technologies require restoration based upon the information available AMEC will prepare a site selection criteria check list for from Phase I and Phase II of the CMMP as well as site each of the above five (possibly six) technologies.AMEC conditions that will be suitable for installing demonstration will review this check list with Monroe County and the testing technologies. A detail of the tasks proposed to WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee prior complete this selection are outlined below. to use. Upon approval, AMEC will perform a site visit in order to obtain information necessary to complete the Task 1: Review of GIS Canal Database for Technology site selection criteria check list for each canal that is Selection evaluated. It is anticipated that approximately 20 canals AMEC has developed a technology selection will be visited. The site visit will confirm site conditions, methodology which utilizes the GIS database and aerial determine critical design conditions for canals, and photographs to determine appropriate technologies for investigate general site operations. AMEC will meet with each canal. The following restoration technologies will be homeowners at each canal to ascertain homeowner evaluated: potential participation in restoration activities, including approval of the recommended technology and financial 1. Installation of weed wrack gates/bubble curtains involvement. 2. Removal of accumulated organics from canal bottoms 3. Backfilling canals A determination of the required permits for each 4. Pumping (for water equalization) restoration site along with any anticipated cost or 5. Culvert installation schedule impact to the project will be included in 6. Other, if applicable the selection process. The permits that have been identified to date for the canal restorations include: DEP i "�'�� l � Jay al"�`°•n ;#h:S.:,. C y": ,.)e" -. eJ J ..ashi, , •• , 74.7 s. .s'b; at=�+z` �R-�.�'.'sR_3.. 5.. A.,.. <:t i2?',u.. �"?'f � :.t . :. --- :_r u S Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 9 Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), USACE Dredge - and Fill permit, and FKNMS permit. The technology T.r_ selected and site conditions will determine which of these " `a permits are required at each site. ' A registered professional engineer who has experience in -.,; water resources will direct and supervise the engineering evaluation and canal selection process.A ranking process ' will be developed and the top 15 canals evaluated for ;)11-113-, willin _�i water quality improvements (3 for each technology) will ',,._,,,,r s ,,,,�,.— be generated. For each of the 15 canals proposed for a , demonstration project a ranking sheet, permit criteria, f - -00 access potential, and preliminary design and construction _A� �,rw�!Y cost estimates will be provided to Monroe County. 4, Task 3: Final List of Canals for Demonstration of Restoration Technologies AMEC will work closely with the County to determine the final five demonstration projects. AMEC will meet with the WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee to discuss the list of selected demonstration canals. Based upon County feedback AMEC will perform a final evaluation of the list of proposed demonstration canals +ti which will include applicable comments/recommendations received from the WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory 1g: Subcommittee and any additional information obtained on the canals. , + A• A report will be prepared summarizing the selection process and recommended list of demonstration canals. This report will include the following: - / ' • •Description of the selection process methodology I, •Description of the canal conditions encountered during the field exploration - - . ... ■Review of the surface features and site conditions that l: .,,. could affect the function of the canals - •General evaluation of the site considering the `� proposed restoration method, i.e., need for restoration -- r and potential benefit, access, presence of easements, - / proximity to power source, homeowner involvement, _ potential disposal of materials, etc. -"�_.,. •Permit requirements ��,.�._.. «.�: SIP •Preliminary restoration design "y,.. 9 � ■Estimated engineering design, construction administration, and contractor's bid price for each - demonstration project . • . trial Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 10 ,,,,„„ ,,,. NI , ame B.5 Schedule and Availability AMEC is committed to providing the necessary resources, both technical and managerial, to =� Y/ assure that the County's schedule requirements are met and exceeded. AMEC will complete 0 the specified RFQ scope within 90 days from {''. j,` �' ' • contract award. Our confidence in our team's - lt CD ability to exceed the County's requirements \' I. stems from AMEC's project management `> •' approach, which consists of rigorous training ' requirements for all project managers, stringent i j ;i- project management protocols and controls, and ` -- internal audits throughout the project to ensure _ _ . „ '11 i' a) successful project delivery to our clients. Equally 1 /�� important for this project, we are proposing a _ iY project team with extensive relevant experience =-. ' M that will help improve the County's currently ,k _ - projected schedule and project costs. Our _ CI project management approach for the Canals .. _; Demonstration Projects Related to the Monroe r' ?I. County Canal Master Plant is outlined below. •Before the project kick-off meeting,AMEC CO will prepare a Project Execution Plan (PEP) ■ mom that will describe in detail all management and scope activities, including deliverables Project Controls and completion dates. The PEP will also Project monitoring and control are essential includear parts of AMEC's project management strategy. a communications plan. The PEP will _■ be submitted for review by all members of The basis of our cost and schedule controlmom the project team including the County. Once process is accountability and communication, �, approved, it will define the technical and which requires strong leadership in the form of a qualified and experienced project manager. ‘111117 administrative project procedures. Ms. Blondin's extensive experience with projects •The role of Ms. Wendy Blondin, PG, as the almost identical in scope to those subject to this PM will be to assign tasks to the appropriate solicitation in conjunction with her recognized technical staff and to provide management technical capabilities and commitment to clients and technical direction for the entire project. make her the ideal project manager for the On a weekly basis, she will review project County for this assignment. Under the leadership progress and make adjustments as needed to of Ms. Blondin's, AMEC's approach will be to meet each task's budget and schedule.The work closely with the County, and all stakeholders task managers will be responsible for the day- from project initiation to completion to identify in to-day project progress. advance critical issues that may affect schedules. ■A detailed schedule will be developed and maintained throughout the project using Microsoft Project. The schedule will identify tasks in the critical path and will account for operational and regulatory constraints such as time for public input. Tasks that are part of the critical path will be aggressively managed and monitored to ensure that project milestones are met. Monroe County Schedule and Availability Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 11 ame B.6 References and Past Performance on Similar Projects A list of projects that AMEC has performed which included similar services is presented below. Project 713 Descriptions of each of these projects start on the following page. CD •Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan —Phase 2 •Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan—Phase 1 •Monroe County Canal Bathymetry and Sediment Characterization CD •Monroe County Residential Canal Inventory and Water Quality Assessment GIS Services •Lake Griffin Canal Dredging and Eustis Muck Farm Wetland Restoration /I) •Lake Beauclair Aquatic Enhancement CD •Bay Lake Hydrologic/Nutrient Budget and Management Plan •Canal Conveyance Capacity Program 100-mile evaluation References related to several of these projects are presented below. Written references are included starting on page 21. •Steven Blackburn. EPA- Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan —Phase 2 •Ron Hart—Lake County Water Authority- Lake Griffin Canal Dredging and Eustis Muck Farm Wetland Restoration !mil` CD 0 3 0 CD Monroe County References and Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for Past Performance May 1, 2013 12 Canal Demo Projects amec' Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan Phase II Scope Construction of residential canals in the Florida ,ski `f�, Keys was initiated in the mid-20th century, '` ' ''; • Monroe County before resource managers fully understood their impacts on local water quality and broader ,t Rhonda Haag coastal ecosystems. Many of the 500+ canal "' ,,; Sustainability Program systems currently present in the Keys were Manager excavated to depths of greater than 15 feet in - 102050 Overseas Highway order to maximize production of fill material. Most ,e;� Suite 212 were designed as long, multi-segmented, dead- _ - - Key Largo, Florida end canal networks which maximize waterfront USA 33037 property but provide little or no tidal flushing and 305.453.8774(p) accumulate oxygen-demanding and potentially toxic sediments as well as decomposing organic material. Monroe County has initiated action to • Monroe County,Florida address the canal water quality impacts through the creation of a Phase I Canal Management Master Plan (CMMP) completed by AMEC in M7•IG PINE KEY " • Wendy Blondin. PG June 2012. vaya,.,i vF: ; • Lance Lumbard CLP FIG t:t REEWITIA M]ISO FIKENEY • Stephen Hanks. PE.CFM, This project is the completion of the CMMP wos,,: ,UT «'� LEEDAP mEA_K2 1'.195 t61348 and was funded by an EPA grant. While Phase S irasoa • Jeremy Paris x COCAO 4,8)01 47 1 addressed only 23 canal systems, Phase T_COORO '„ 2 addresses all of the approximately 502 '2°, K;" residential canals in the Florida Keys. • ",Jaudemat •dA•dm • $100,000 81 Fttl 2RECO Fa The objective of the CMMP is to provide an •ASSES 1„05„ •• - ' � 4l_PATIO 35I ecologically sound and economically feasible �, I' +• t! • 2012 funding and implementation strategy for '';Ilk ':.'; E11ERCr- - improving and managing the environmental t•s.uu ...._ tE.Et_• a ��.��-r �, .�' Cxiu CE.r 1e quality of canal systems in the Florida Keys. .k- ,.'y GEC OF_ A'' +DOCENT r • Ongoing The plan will provide flexible and cost-effective +.1�Y ofRMET Dna+rTOi g g solutions that improve canal management ,� '� f0 f«h•3 :a4F:�>. LETIGTAOT E:2 MS practices throughout the Keys and satisfy the '•� �' CM, i t � r. �r • 5 existing and future needs of the community. It �S., - S„�.X oXIVEK E„P� must address affordability and equity issues, reflect key stakeholder concerns, and satisfy new information obtained on the Keys canals environmental and regulatory criteria and related to water quality and restoration options. guidelines. The primary environmental impact of the project The canals are being evaluated through field will be to help improve and protect water, visits to determine water quality impacts and to sediment and habitat quality within manmade identify appropriate cleanup options. Extensive canal systems. By reducing the export of homeowner interviews and meetings have been pollutants such as nutrients and BOD from performed. The canals will be ranked for need canals, the project will also help to protect and for water quality improvement. An updated GIS maintain water quality in the 'halo,' nearshore database is being prepared incorporating the and offshore zones of the Florida Keys. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 13 amec' Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan Phase I Scope This project was a Florida Department of Environmental Protection Grant which involved • Monroe County creating a Canal Management Master Plan — (CMMP) for the Florida Keys. The CMMP /6",►r Rhonda Haag provided a methodology to prioritize canals that / Sustainability Program need water quality improvement and select Manager appropriate cleanup options. A prioritization 102050 Overseas Highway process was developed which included > Suite 212 identifying plan objectives, goals, priority issues, L. Key Largo. Florida screening criteria, and ranking formulas. USA 33037 F 305.453.8774(p) The Water Quality Protection Committee " Ai% 'I. 1 Canal Subcommittee provided guidance on � the development of the plan. A multidisciplinary �j�j • Monroe County.Florida team was involved with the prioritization ranking process, canal field surveys including water quality evaluations, and remedial alternative - •:; ; . i .• a4 • Ricardo Fraxedas, PE selections for each canal. - i • Wendy Blondin. PG • Gerold Morrison, PhD Utilizing various methods, including GIS and r -w • Lance Lumbard.CLP aerial image interpretation, AMEC identified �„ IRO' -d • Stephen Hanks. PE CFM, the canals with the potential to have the most LEED AP serious water quality problems, due to design =�,, • Jeremy Paris flaws that limit circulation and flushing. For Phase I, a small subset of the 500 canals were 1111 ranked and further assessed through site visits • $100,000 to confirm that the most problematic canals had been identified. e " The Phase 1 identification resulted in a list of 23 J • 2012 • canals with noted water quality problems. These a; '" — canals were then closely evaluated and scored ion Date on a variety of factors, including the following: •Availability of data to prepare project designs • 2012 and grant proposals y• ■ Severity of problem • Project implementability • Potential to provide improvement in water, --• sediment, and habitat quality within the canal From the original list of 23 canals, conceptual • Potential to provide improvement in water, designs and cost estimates were developed for sediment, and habitat quality within the halo or the top three priority canals. These conceptual nearshore zone designs included 'weed wrack' barrier and air • Public benefit—number of users affected bubble curtains,organics removal from the bottom ■ Public funding support—removed from Phase of the canals, pumping to increase circulation, I-assumed public funding potential was likely and backfilling. Additional funding sources were equal for all canals identified by AMEC, including EPA and FDEP • Likelihood of receiving external funding special project funds and RESTORE ACT 2012 support(e.g.,grant-based) funds. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 14 amec Monroe County Canal Bathymetry and Sediment Characterization Scope AMEC is performing bathymetric surveys to determine the average depths of the residential Wit. , • Monroe County canals identified in the 2003 Monroe County - .. Residential Canal Inventory &Assessment GIS , Rhonda Haag Database. The surveys are being performed r Sustainability Program using automated hydrographic survey •.� i Manager equipment consisting of a dual frequency 102050 Overseas Highway echo sounder used in conjunction with a GPS Suite 212 positioning system to survey a profile of each Key Largo, Florida canal centerline with bottom surface elevations USA 33037 of the canal, relative to the North American jJj ', 305.453.8774(p) Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), determined '' ? IA , at approximate 50' intervals and at the end , and mouths of the canals. An elevation is '+ ■ Monroe County, Florida f s t being collected of the natural sea bottom at f the canal mouth. The collected survey data is being referenced to the North American Datum • Wendy Blondin, PG of 1983 (NAD83) to allow for inclusion into the 6 • Stephen Hanks, PE. LEED existing GIS. r + AP,CFM • Mark Follis, PLS As part of this effort AMEC is obtaining, • Max Ramos PLS through the use of the automated hydrographic survey equipment and traditional probing methodologies, sufficient data to provide $100,000 approximate information regarding unconsolidated material thickness within the determine disposal options is being performed - canals. The collected bathymetric survey data by Test America Analytical Laboratories, a - ' to • is being processed to develop attribute data State National Environmental Laboratory • 2013 to be added to the existing GIS. All surveying Accreditation Conference (NELAC) certified and mapping services associated with this laboratory. The parameters being tested `ion Date assignment conform with applicable sections include: Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs; • Ongoing of Florida Administrative Rule Chapter 5J-17, Chlorinated Herbicides; 8 RCRA Metals; .-_-- Minimum Technical Standards, pursuant to Copper; Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons; Chapter 472, Florida Statutes. Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons; and TCLP metals. Ten sediment samples from ten different canals are being collected and submitted for The bathymetry and sediment characterization physical and chemical characterization to data will be utilized in evaluating the need assist in refining the design for removal and for canal restoration and in the selection and disposal of the material from the canal bottoms. final design of restoration technologies for the The physical testing is being performed at residential canals. AMEC's Geotechnical Lab and will consist of the following: Moisture/Solids Content; 200 The survey covers the entire Keys and is Mesh Sieve Distribution; Organic Content; estimated to include 111 miles of canals. The Specific Gravity; Grain size distribution; and project is funded through a grant from the Settling rate. The chemical characterization to Department of Environmental Protection(DEP). Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 15 amer9 Monroe County Residential Canals Inventory and Water Quality Assessment GIS Services Scope The Keys stretch 110 miles from Key Largo r-*^ to Key West and are home to about 80,000 _ 1:ha __" ■ Monroe County Office of people. Because residents desire homes Marine Resources adjacent to the water with dock space for _ boats, finger canals have become an essential `7- __ Richard Jones characteristic of Keys life. Today there are 500+ r. ,, Senior Administrator .y r f'i =''"•i 2798 Overseas Highway. canals, totaling 111 miles, in Monroe County. - r .y s's. , . .a " = °` _ Suite 420 Monroe County officials were concerned i ✓f -• riles Marathon. Florida about water quality degradation in the canals l ; 'r` ' 1,' :\ ,•,',.g.arl*eit‘ ", 1 USA 33050 and residents have long reported a problem 305.289.2805(p) with flotsam entering open canals, with the a:lD+ 305.289.2536(f) accumulating seaweed decaying and fouling the waterway. AMEC collected sufficient information, through GIS analysis of physical attributes, to evaluate . Monroe County,Florida There had been no systematic monitoring of potential impacts to water quality without the canal water quality in the Florida Keys and as cost of a large-scale field sampling effort. a first step to evaluate what type of remedial A classification model for the canals was actions may be necessary for the canals, created, with canals queried and grouped • Ricardo Fraxedas, PE AMEC was awarded a contract to undertake a by common physical characteristics. An • Wendy Blondin. PG survey of canal conditions throughout the Keys. estimated water quality for each canal was ' Stephen Hanks, PE,CFM, The goal of this project was to bring as much based on its classification, and the soundness i., LEED AP information as possible into a single Graphical of the developed methodology was verified by .. . .. , Information Systems (GIS) database on the comparing the estimated water quality with the -- ..t physical characteristics, potential pollution actual water quality where data were available. • $210,000 sources and existing water quality of each of the canals. AMEC then developed a strategy for selecting _ the canal-specific treatment approaches and - H-2001- AMEC spatially located the residential canals technologies that would improve water quality. _ through a process that began with digitizing ArcView was used to query the physical all water bodies from aerial photographs. After attributes, which were the major factor in ion Date determiningthe most applicable and cost- • 2003 digitizing the water bodies, quality control was pp performed through select field verifications, effective restoration options. The process interviews with local homeowner associations, also presented a methodology for prioritizing and distribution of the water body layer to local canals based on available funding or immediate agencies for comments. interest of local residents to improve canal 4 water quality. ._., After the polygon layer representing the residential canals was created and verified, AMEC populated the attribute table with physical characteristics that could potentially impact water quality in the canals. These attributes included canal area, width, length, number of mouths, degree of convolution, and latitude and longitude of the centroids of the canals. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 16 amec' Lake Griffin Canal Dredging and Eustis Muck Farm Wetland Restoration Scope Lake Griffin is a 9,300-acre lake at the headwaters f , , * } h.* of the Ocklawaha River in Lake County, 1 t{ " �. ii ,' ■ Lake County Water Authority Florida. AM EC provided evaluation, design, ,, � � and construction support services of a project . j= ' .T„� , �' `' Ron Hart to remove sediment and maintain low water Water Resources Manager navigation within more than 30 canals surrounding 107 North Lake Avenue the lake. The project involved hydraulic dredging Tavares. Florida and pumping of sediments up to 12 miles away USA 32778 where they were utilized beneficially to restore 352.343.3777(p) sections of a historic muck farm managed by the 352.343.4259(f) St.Johns River Water Management District. This project required AMEC's expertise in: • Leesburg. Florida •Water resource engineering(disposal site impoundment water budget) • Walter Reigner. PE. CPESC •Hydraulic system design(floating pipeline with • John Kiefer. PhD. PE. PWS booster pumps) " • Lance Lumbard,CLP •Water quality treatment(alum and polymer feeds Wit ... • Carl Chnstmann. PE for turbidity control) -`-` -- __ .g • Terry Dykehouse. PE •Geotechnical engineering(slope stability, _ • Jacqueline Levine embankment design,settling and consolidation _ . of mixed media slurry) s , _ • Mark Jones •Construction support services(bid specifications may` and plans,contractor screening and selections "- ` - - ~r'' engineering inspections,progress payment r"; "';, .. • Engineering: $400,000 review,permit compliance review,and landowner - . , ti .. 4.; •q , I • Construction:$7.2 million coordination) • - ' VOA - r� ` . A •Wetland science "..� y — • 2003 ' Unique components of the project included: .. oil •Long transport distances(5 to 12 miles)from the ‘ •"�=; I ■ Design:2004 canals to the disposal site _; "a' -�{ �- Construction:2008 • Highly variable composition of the dredged . _ .-' ' : sediment(unconsolidated sands,flocculent d =nt ' „ muck,consolidated muck,and cohesive day) w'�. 0; z ■A requirement for precise sediment deposition V " =' ..1..:_ . at a subsided muck farm to cap pesticide ,A, 1,_- contamination hotspots while simultaneously maintaining several feet of water over the disposal site •The project was completed by the lowest bidder without change orders under AMEC's inspection and coordination program Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 17 Canal Demo Projects amec' Lake Beauclair Aquatic Enhancement Scope Lake Beauclair is situated as the first lake ,a-- 7 j,> .A downstream from Lake Apopka in the Hams Chain ,;_- ,-- ■ Lake County Water Authority of Lakes, and receives controlled discharges z` A 4: from Lake Apopka through the Apopka-Beauclair (AB) Canal. Long-term sediment and nutrient - Ron Hart inputs to Lake Beauclair have degraded the F_- Water Resources Program aquatic plant community and fish and wildlife Manager assemblage, largely due to high levels of .-�• - - 107 North Lake Avenue .--. - phosphorus and low dissolved oxygen.The Lake Y t' " Tavares.Florida County Water Authority (LCWA) in partnership � "- ''' USA 32778 with SJRMD and FWC contracted with AMEC - 352.343.3777(p) W to evaluate a sediment removal enhancement 352.343.4259(f) initiative to improve water quality, habitat, and -:f ',- navigation within the western-most portion of - • Lake Beauclair where anthropogenic sediment • Lake County, Florida deposits are most pronounced. j • t This project enhances the water quality and ,ta - • Walt Reigner, PE,CPESC navigability of the 1,100-acre Lake Beauclair :-.¢-rle Locaapas �, by removing more than 1.3 million cubic yards ' • Carl Christmann. PE of organic sediment. A partial lake pump-down • Scott Wuitschick, PE and installation of aquatic vegetation were 44, vi } • John Kiefer, PhD, PE, PWS also considered. AMEC has worked closely with • Lance Lumbard,CLP the LCWA and a variety of stakeholders and • j„e,�,�,ium ■ Leon Seale. PE funding partners to prepare the project feasibility . " _ . Pavan Kolukula. El assessment and alternatives assessment for 4)ir' "` - -T deposition of sediments proposed for removal. 41/A..•. �sommumA 'a • Mark Jones During this process, AMEC has performed • Aziza Baan.GISP water quality and sampling analyses to assess coagulants, flocculants and nutrient removal aids nutrients, metals, and geotechnical/agronomic to design the treatment train necessary to meet TMDL and other water quality requirements of " ' F characteristics and determine potential beneficial $420,000 uses of sediments proposed for removal. Multiple the project. AMEC recommended use of the • spoil disposal alternatives were considered. dredged material to cap pesticide-contaminated We developed a water balance model of the soils in a subsided muck farm near Lake Lake and designed a hydraulic system for a Apopka at sufficient elevation to support wetland • 2007" proposed pumpdown alternative to facilitate restoration (emergent marsh)as a beneficial use j shoreline planting during project implementation. of the sediments. AMEC completed the design ""'' In addition, bathymetric surveys were performed of the disposal area embankments, chemical "°t tion Date • to define the thickness of accumulated sediments treatment system for the supernatant, and the 2010 atop the natural mineral lake bottom. pipeline and pumping system for sediment management at the recipient location. Our staff AMEC provided recommendations for reducing prepared permit applications in consultation ' navigational hazards, enhancing aquatic habitat, with the LCWA, FDEP, FWC, and USACE to improving water quality, and minimizing impacts obtain regulatory project approvals necessary to a variety of listed species known to utilize the for project implementation, and provided area. Pre-application meetings were organized representation to the LCWA to successfully with our clients (LCWA and FWC), FDEP, defend against administrative challenge to the SJRWMD, and USACE to determine permitting project. AMEC has also prepared bid documents requirements and potential issues for design. and provided support to LCWA during the Extensive jar tests were made of various contractor selection process. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 18 amec! Bay Lake Hydrologic/Nutrient Budget and Management Plan Scope As a Continuing Professional Lakes Management . Services Consultant for Orange County, FL, I 1 • Orange County AMEC was contracted by the Environmental Protection Division (EPD) to develop a water Brian Catanzaro quality and watershed assessment for Bay Lake. Senior Environmental The 36-acre lake is a 303(d)-listed impaired water t Specialist and has existing Total Maximum Daily Loads Environmental Protection (TMDLs) for total phosphorus and total nitrogen. Division The evaluation included an assessment of the . , Lake Management Section biological and overall habitat conditions within i ='s, � , 800 Mercy Drive,Suite 4 the lake and a review of the FDEP STORET Orlando. Florida database for statistical trend analysis of all -r USA 32808 available water quality parameters. Hydrologic - 407.836.1428(p) inputs from the 133-acre lake basin were r, - . , modeled, and recommendations were provided p�3 _ . Orange County, Florida for the management and potential restoration of ■, si this lake in support of the necessary reductions indicated by the TMDL. AMEC also provided . * an assessment of the Bay Lake TMDL which =-me • Lance Lumbard, CLP indicated that the necessary loading reductions &neeM1ove)somiveurrott` algid!!!= • R.Michael Jones, PLS, mwere likely overestimated due to an overstated ' "" � ' '� + CFedS watershed boundary. •. - - - • Charles Gardiner, PLS. CFedS In order to perform the basin evaluation and provide management recommendations, AMEC measured using seepage meters and compared developed ground-truthed sub-basin delineations to literature values for validity prior to use in the • $70.000 and provided details of structures and model. conveyance mechanisms within each basin using :to GIS. Field observations were compared with The nutrient and hydrologic budgets were • 2011 desktop GIS evaluation to develop accurate basin used to develop nutrient limitation water quality size and delineations, percentage of impervious models for each lake using BATHTUB software. ,letfon Date areas, soil characteristics and conveyance Hydrologic loadings of phosphorus, nitrogen and • 201 system types. Based on the results of the TSS were estimated using BATHTUB software sub-basin characterization, AMEC developed and calibrated using available water quality and spreadsheet models estimating nutrient and quantity data. Based on the model results, sub- hydrologic budgets for the lake and obtained basins were ranked according to their nutrient - - annual runoff inputs of phosphorus, nitrogen and contributions and various combinations of Best TSS from each of the contributing watershed Management Practice (BMP) alternatives were areas and geopolitical boundaries. Hydrologic recommended for each sub-basin. Effects of budgets were developed and calibrated using the BMPs were modeled in BATHTUB. BMP historic rainfall and lake elevation data provided alternatives were evaluated based on cost and by the EPD. Nutrient budgets were developed effectiveness, and included stormwater ponds, and compared using both literature-based Event modular media filters, inlet baskets, and alum Mean Concentrations and empirically derived site- injection systems. AMEC provided details of this specific stormwater monitoring data. Seepage report in various presentations to members of the inputs or groundwater recharge outputs were public. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 19 Canal Demo Projects ame Canal Conveyance Capacity Program 100-mile Evaluation Scope AMEC was tasked with evaluating 100 miles of -- canals as part of SFWMD's CCCP in the East ; • South Florida Water Central Region of the District These canals were X , Management District originally designed, permitted and constructed by '• the USACE. AMEC conducted bathometric and ' 4 Greg Coffelt upland surveys were which were plotted against —. --�._.r_ Project Manager the USACE original criteria. The engineering tip. 3301 Gun Club Road teams then conducted field reconnaissance West Palm Beach, Florida 444 USA 33406 to observe canal bank conditions, right of way ," (RNV), structures and other potential impedances 561.682.2863(p) to the canal's original design function of drainage and flood control. • Martin. St. Lucie,and Palm Beach Counties. As one component of the strategic plan for Florida the SFWMD Operation and Maintenance ■ Preparing a digital terrain model(DTM)with Program, the CCCP identifies areas of canals, one-foot contours for the full length and width levees, and structures where conveyance may of the canal, and cross sections of the canals • Brian Hathaway, PE be compromised due to scouring, siltation, based on results of the survey data and • Stephen Hanks, PE, various structural constrictions, or from adjacent visual inspections. LEED AP,CFM development impacting the conveyance system, ■ Characterizing the conditions at each project • Coleman Bender and recommend the remedial measures needed culvert, bridge, dock, ramp, or other instream • Mark Follis. PLS to restore the system to its designed capacity. structure or obstruction. • Jason Hudson AMEC's scope of services included: • Evaluating the reduction of hydraulic capacity of the canals due to impedances by •Conducting a review of design using HEC-RAS. documentation reports, available aerial • Preparing a comprehensive report • $525,000 photographs, GIS and other previous presenting the findings, recommendations, surveys. Collecting existing data from and detailed costs for canal, structure and to the District, from USACE and from other levee repairs. • 2008 reputable sources prior to initiating field activities. •Performing canal and levee reconnaissance ion Date including: locating areas of shoaling or • 2008 bank instability and making an assessment to the causes for each; characterizing the conditions at each project culvert, bridge, dock, ramp, or other in-stream structure or obstruction; documenting any apparent right of way(RAN)encroachments; and visually identifying slope stability, bank line encroach •Conducting bathometric survey of the canal bottoms for evidence of sediment buildup and scouring. •Conduction and upland survey of the right of ways for identification of erosion of material, scouring and shoaling. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 20 Canal Demo Projects Project Reference Project Name: EPA Grant 00D03712 for Monroe County Water Quality Protection —Canal Management Master Plan Phase 2 Location: Monroe County, Florida Keys, Florida Contract Owner: EPA, Region 4 Steven Blackburn EPA, Region 4 Water Protection Division 61 Forsyth St., SW Atlanta, GA 30303-3014 404-562-9397 Blackburn.Steven(a.epa.00v AMEC Consulting Start Date(month/year): September 2012 AMEC Consulting Completion Date(month/year): on-going, with a completion date of September 2013 Project Fees: $100,000 AMEC is completing the Canal Management Master Plan (CMMP)for the Monroe County residential canals. The objective of the CMMP is to provide an ecologically sound and economically feasible funding and implementation strategy for improving and managing the environmental quality of canal systems in the Florida Keys. AMEC is evaluating all the Keys canals through field visits to determine water quality impacts and to identify appropriate cleanup options. Extensive homeowner interviews and meetings are being performed. AMEC will rank the canals for need for water quality improvement. AMEC is also updating the GIS database incorporating the new information obtained on the Keys canals related to water quality and restoration options. AMEC has worked closely with the Water Quality Protection Program Canal Advisory Subcommittee, of which I am a member. As Project Officer for the EPA, Region 4 Canal Management Master Plan grant, AMEC has provided required reports in a timely fashion, project deliverables on schedule, and regular updates to the Water Quality Protection Program as requested by the Steering Committee. AMEC has completed all work to date successfully and this project will provide the necessary prior experience for the proposed work related to the Monroe County Canal Demonstration Projects. Project Contract Reference Verification Steven Blackburn Program Manager, FKNM Water Quality Protection Program, EPA Region 4 Date: /Z��3 Project Reference Project Name: Lake Griffin Canal Dredging Design, Muck Farm Restoration, and Construction Management Location: Lake Griffin, Lake County, FL Owner: Lake County Water Authority (LCWA) Ron Hart 107 North Lake Ave., Tavares, FL, 32778 352.343.3777(office)/352.516.4823 (cell)/352.343.4259 (fax) rhart@Icwa.org AMEC Consulting Start Date (month/year): March 2003 AMEC Consulting Completion Date (month/year): August 2008 Project Design Fees: $400,000 Project Construction Cost: $7,200,000 AMEC provided evaluation, design, and construction support services for this project to remove sediments from 43 canals surrounding Lake Griffin. This project required extensive coordination with regulatory agencies and careful consideration and monitoring of water quality throughout the course of the project. AMEC provided an innovative beneficial use alternative for these sediments and designed the disposal site. Relocated dredge material provided restoration benefits to an adjacent historic muck farm which required pumping of up to 12 miles. AMEC's innovative use of hydraulic dredging, consideration residential complexities, incorporation of a beneficial use, and successful completion of the project will provide the necessary prior experience for the proposed work related to the Monroe County Canal Demonstration Projects. Project Owner Refer nce Verification Ron Hart Date: 4- 2 G0— 1 3 Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 22 Canal Demo Projects amec { B.7 Staffing for this Project and Quotes of Key Personnel Established in 1946,AMEC was incorporated on June 1, 1994, in the state of Nevada.As a corporation, �/� AMEC is 100 percent owned by National Ventures, Inc, who has no involvement in the day-to-day �/� management of the activities of AMEC. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (AMEC) is an international environmental consulting, engineering and design, and construction corporation operating with more than 4,600 professionals in 115 locations across the United States. The Monroe County opportunity will be managed from our Miami Lakes office,with support from our Key West,Orlando,and Gainesville offices. Principal-in-Charge Michael Nardon,PG Project Manager Wendy Blondin,PG Water Quality Engineering GIS Database Management Lance Lumbard.CLP Charlene Stroehlen,PE Stephen Hanks.PE,LEED AP CFM Jeremy Pans Gregory Coming,EIT Jose Milian Key Personnel for the Monroe County Environmental Engineering Services for Selection of Canal Demonstration Projects Related to the Monroe County Canal Master Plan Monroe County Staffing Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 23 Canal Demo Projects amec0 Michael J. Nardone, PG Principal-in-Charge Mr. Michael Nardone has 28 years of experience in the Florida engineering consulting industry. He has served in the capacity of office manager, regional manager and national director during the course of his career. His broad areas of expertise include contract management, program management, construction management hazardous waste management, ecological permitting, homeland security, disaster response, and NE management. Mr. Nardone has also performed as Principal-in-Charge for numerous multi-million dollar contracts with local governments, as well as state and federal agencies and with the private sector. As Principal-in-Charge, his primary responsibilities have been to provide contract management, serve as client liaison, and provide senior technical support. Mr. Nardone has also been responsible for developing multiple new business sectors. Further, he has lead strategic marketing plan development initiatives in Florida, along the East Coast of the U.S. and nationally. .s Key Projects •B.S.Geology,Florida State ■MIAMI DADE PARK AND RECREATION certifications, rate studies, and financial University, 1983 DEPARTMENT,PARK TRAILS forecasts as required by the Seaport Miami-Dade County, Florida Master Bond Ordinance, review of design Principal-in-Charge: A $1.8 million general and construction documents for code Registrations & engineering contract for various MDPR compliance and adherence to funding improvements. Recent and current projects requirements, property values for insurance •Professional Geologist. include three pedestrian bridges over 100- coverage, facilities reserve for maintenance, Florida No. PG1171 feet canals and two multi-purpose park trails and annual inspections of Miami-Dade totaling 5.5 miles. County Seaport facilities to report on their state and condition. •ROADWAY/CANAL RESTORATION •AMEC:2011 PROJECT •BELEN CONVEYANCE SYSTEM •Industry: 1983 Miami, Florida (PHASE 4B),CONSTRUCTION Principal-in-Charge:A$400 million stormwater MANAGEMENT improvement program targeted at 3,300 City of Miami, Florida Professional individual street segments within Miami-Dade Principal-in-Charge: Conducted program .a_ County where the existing drainage facilities management and construction administration •Miami Beach Chamber of were damaged. Responsible for managing for a "water tight" stormwater conveyance Commerce the design and construction of about 45 system for the Belen area. Responsible for MM of roadway and drainage infrastructure the construction administration, inspection, repairs throughout Miami-Dade County. and management of 2 miles of 72-inch The project was completed at the end stormwater pipe through the urban Belen of 2005. The project was awarded with area. superior performance by DERM for services performed during this four-year assignment. ■SSES/PEAK FLOW STUDY City of Hialeah Gardens, Florida •BOND ENGINEERING SERVICES(E09- Principal-in-Charge: Managed a four-week SEA-02)AND(E04-SEA-02) flow monitoring study for 16 sanitary sewer Miami-Dade County Seaport Department, pump stations to determine the collection Florida system's infiltration and inflow (I/I) and Principal-in-Charge: Served as Principal- Rainfall Dependent I/I. During the dry season in-Charge for the Miami-Dade County this four-week monitoring will be repeated. Seaport Department to perform bond Used MS-Access and ArcView software to engineering services at the Port of Miami. manage the data. Recommendations were Services include inspection of financial made for the rehabilitation of the system. and budgetary records; preparation of the annual bond engineering report which includes recommendations, approvals and Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 24 Canal Demo Projects Michael J. Nardone, PG (Continued) •ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES the $5.2 billion Panama Canal Expansion Florida Department of Environmental project that will provide ship access from the Resources Management-Miami-Dade existing canal to the Pacific Ocean through County, Florida a new set of Post-Panamax size locks. The Principal-in-Charge: A six-year, $60 million dam structure must be 30 meters high and hazardous waste, turnkey environmental 3.8 kilometers long to retain the waters of services contract involving the cleanup the new approach channel at the level of the of soil, groundwater, and surface water existing canal waterway. contamination at facilities owned and operated by Metro Dade County. Met with ■WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN the client regularly to discuss upcoming Panama Canal Authority, Panama projects and ensure adequate pricing and Principal-in-Charge: This study included delivery for work varying from remediation physical inspection and flow monitoring of of more than 800.000 tons of contaminated 80 sewer outfalls into the Panama Canal. soil to the design-build of several large scale Population projection, GIS maps. and remediation systems. databases will be developed to offer a preliminary design a transmission system •ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES network to provide wastewater pumping and Florida Department of Transportation treatment for the Canal Authority. District 4, Florida Principal-in-Charge: Responsible for •EVERGLADES CITY/MARINA two consecutive three-year, $5 million DREDGING contracts. Directed activities associated Everglades National Park, Florida with site preparation, construction, relocated or replacement of underground utilities; Principal-in-Charge: Responsible for the installation and operation of dewatering maintenance dredging services provided systems: preparation of contamination at the Everglades City Marina located in assessment plans and reports; and remedial Everglades National Park. The project action plans and implementation when either consisted of obtaining all required permits contaminated soil or groundwater was and performing maintenance dredging of identified. approximately 1,125 cubic yards of mud from the marina boat basin. Worked with •SSES STUDY PHASE 2 the FDEP to allow the dredged sediment to City of Hallandale Beach, Florida remain onsite and avoid the significant cost Principal-in-Charge: Phase I included of off-site disposal for the client. 11. the pre-rehabilitation flow monitoring of five pump station basins. Phase II includes ■FORT JEFFERSON DRY TORTUGAS/ the post rehabilitation flow monitoring DREDGING and evaluation of the effectiveness of National Park Service, South Florida the rehabilitation. The Phase One Report Principal-in-Charge: The dredging of concluded that these basins were tidally storm-driven sand from two locations within influenced(finger developments into the bay). the moat surrounding Fort Jefferson at the Dry Tortugas National Park. Dry Tortugas ▪GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING National Park is located 70 miles west SERVICES of Key West and includes seven remote Panama Canal Authority, Panama islands composed of coral reefs and sand. Principal-in-Charge: The most significant The dredging was undertaken to restore the work order forming part of this contract was historic setting and improve water quality the conceptual, preliminary, and final design within the moat. Following mechanical of the Borinquen Dam in Panama (Task dredging, dredged material was placed in an Order No. 4). Also developed construction upland disposal area on the northern side plans and specifications, and the engineer's of the fort and used to replenish an eroded estimate of construction cost and schedule beach on the southern side of the fort. for the dam. The dam will retain the Pacific Approach Channel, a major component of Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 25 Canal Demo Projects ameP Wendy C. Blondin, PG Project Manager Ms. Wendy Blondin is a Principal Geologist with 28 years of experience in environmental consulting with expertise in contamination assessments and remediation, drinking water quality evaluations, and all types of environment permitting. Ms. Blondin has experience in both management and technical areas. As a senior project manager, she is responsible for work scope development and costing, implementation of work scopes, budget tracking, customer communication, and regulatory r negotiations. As a professional geologist she has experience in surface water and groundwater hydrology, water quality sampling and characterization, and wetland and stormwater management system permitting. She has expertise in identifying potential source areas and areas of environmental concern; designing sampling plans; delineating contaminant plumes; determining pathways of migration; and designing and installing surface water, groundwater, and soil remediation systems. Ms. Blondin has extensive experience in technology selection and cost/ benefit analysis of remedial options. •M.S.Geology/ Key Projects Hydrogeology,University of ■MONROE COUNTY CANAL were prepared for several of the highest Massachusetts at Amherst, MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN— priority canals and funding sources identified 1984 PHASE 2 to obtain funding for implementation of the •B.S.Soil Science, Monroe County Engineering Services, remedial plans. University of Maine at Florida Orono. 1979 Project Manager/Project Hydrogeologist: MONROE COUNTY CANAL The project was funded by an EPA grant and BATHYMETRY AND SEDIMENT involves completing the Canal Management CHARACTERIZATION RegistratioI. ..& Master Plan created during Phase 1 for the Monroe County Engineering Services, Certificate y entire Florida Keys. All of the approximately Florida, USA •Professional Geologist. 502 residential canals are being evaluated Project Manager: This project consists of Florida No.PG1888 through field visits to determine water quality performing bathymetric surveys to determine •FDEP Qualified Stormwater impacts and to identify appropriate cleanup the average depths of all residential canals in Management Inspector options. Extensive homeowner interviews the Keys. The surveys are being performed •HAZWOPER 40 Hour and meetings have been performed. The using automated hydrographic survey •HAZWOPER 8 Hour canals will be ranked for need for water equipment consisting of a dual frequency Refresher quality improvement. An updated GIS echo sounder used in conjunction with a GPS database is being prepared incorporating the positioning system located on a survey boat. new information obtained on the Keys canals This survey will provide information on the related to water quality and restoration total depth of the canals and the accumulated •AMEC:2002 options. sediment in the canals. Additionally, ten samples of the unconsolidated materials •Industry:1984 •MONROE COUNTY CANAL are being collected utilizing a piston tube MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN— sampler and submitted for physical and `p eSslonal PHASE 1 chemical characterization to assist in refining Monroe County Engineering Services, the design for removal and disposal of the 'ffiliaf Florida material from the canal bottoms. - - mencan Water Resources Association Project Manager/Project Hydrogeologist: •RESIDENTIAL CANAL INVENTORY •Florida Association The project was funded by a DEP grant and involved creating a Canal Management AND WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT of Environmental Master Plan for Florida Keys by prioritizing Monroe County Marine Resources Professionals canals that need water quality improvement Department, Florida and selecting appropriate cleanup options. Project Manager/Project Hydrogeologist: Phase I developed the prioritization process The project involved compilation of all existing and applied the process to a select group surface water quality data from multiple of previously identified canals with water agencies and sources, evaluation of the quality problems. Conceptual remedial plans Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 26 Canal Demo Projects Wendy C. Blondin, PG (Continued) usefulness of the data in regards to quality a contamination screening evaluation and format, and setup of a GIS of the entire and prepared the final report. Attended canal system (480 canals) and metadata file meetings with the MDX team and assisted of the available information. The physical with the State environmental impact report attributes of the canals were correlated to preparation. the influence on water quality. The objective of the project was to determine current ■ENVIRONMENTAL SITE water quality conditions in the canals and to ASSESSMENTS IN THE BISCAYNE evaluate treatment options for the different BAY COASTAL WETLANDS AND EAST canal types. COAST BUFFER ZONE AREAS ■KISSIMMEE RIVER AQUIFER South Florida Water Management District STORAGE AND RECOVERY WELL Land Acquisition Program, Miami-Dade PILOT TEST SITE County, Florida Project Manager/Project Hydrogeologist: U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Multiple site project involving ESAs of Project Manager/Project Hydrogeologist: thousands of acres in southeast Florida that The scope of services includes development are part of the Comprehensive Everglades of all sampling and analysis plans (field Restoration Project land acquisition program. sampling plan, QA project plan, and ADaPT The Phase I ESAs entailed evaluation of site library); weekly sample collection from the conditions including geology, hydrogeology, ASR well, surface water, and groundwater historic research, and documentation of monitoring well network; laboratory analysis former and current land-use. Helicopter of a broad range of geochemical parameters fly-overs along with site reconnaissance and ecotoxicity testing; and ADaPT data were performed. Phase II ESAs entailed review and reporting. The data will be surface and subsurface soil sampling, evaluated to determine the geochemical and sediment sampling, and surface water microbiological changes during the different and groundwater sampling, along with cycles of recharge, storage, and recovery analytical analyses of the collected samples. and will be utilized to determine the feasibility Assessments have been performed on of ASR as part of the Comprehensive more than 45 sites where recognized Everglades Restoration Project. environmental concerns were noted. Ecological risk assessments were performed •HILLSBORO CANAL AQUIFER on several parcels formerly used for STORAGE AND RECOVERY PILOT agricultural purposes in order to determine TEST SITE potential impacts of pesticides and metals to U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Florida aquatic organisms and birds after the lands Project Manager/Project Hydrogeologist: are flooded. These assessments require The scope of services included weekly approval from the FWC as well as SFWMD. sample collection from the ASR well, surface Remedial recommendations and remedial water, and groundwater monitoring well costs were provided to the SFWMD to assist network; laboratory analysis of a broad in the acquisition negotiations and planning. range of geochemical parameters; and Environmental Site Assessments and ADaPT data review and reporting. This is the second active ASR pilot test site to ■REMEDIATION AT VARIOUS SITES IN determine the feasibility of ASR as part of MIAMI-DADE COUNTY the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Project. Florida Project Manager/Project Hydrogeologist: •PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND Multiple site contract involving environmental ENVIRONMENT REPORTS FOR SR services to determine environmental 836 WIDENING concerns at properties being considered Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, for construction of schools and Florida implementation of required remedial actions. Project Manager/Project Geologist: Environmental services including ESAs, soil Managed a team of scientists who prepared characterization, risk assessments, remedial the wetland evaluation report, endangered planning and oversight, and regulatory/ species biological assessment, and environmental compliance for existing and sociocultural effects evaluation. Completed proposed school sites throughout the county. Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 27 Wendy C. Blondin, PG (Continued) Services provided under master services ■STATE SCHOOL SS-1 NATURAL agreement from 2004 to 2012 and included FOREST COMMUNITY PERMITTING sites in the cities of Miami and North Miami, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and unincorporated areas. Environmental Florida concerns were identified including former Project Hydrogeologist: Part of the landfills, industrial discharges, and environmental permitting services provided agricultural chemical residues. Remedial to Miami-Dade County Public Schools. alternative evaluation/costing and site Provided permitting services related to cleanup was performed at numerous sites to construction of new school in a designated allow schools to be built on schedule. Natural Forest ■STATE SCHOOL TT-1 ON-SITE WETLANDS DESIGN Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Florida Project Hydrogeologist: Part of the environmental permitting services provided to Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Managed the design and construction of an on-site wetland mitigation area to meet the requirements of a USACE dredge and fill permit.An existing canal and poor functional value wetlands were replaced with an engineered mitigation area. The services included preparing cut and fill drawings, proposed topography detail, technical specifications, planting plans, construction oversight, and long-term monitoring and maintenance. Additionally, designed an educational overlook with signage to be utilized in the school curriculum. •STATE SCHOOL QQQ-1 WETLAND AND STORMWATER PERMITTING, OLETA RIVER RECREATION AREA Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Florida Project Hydrogeologist: Part of the environmental permitting services provided to Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Provided permitting and ecological services required to obtain the permits to construct a school on a property that contains coastal wetlands that are part of the Oleta River Recreation Area. The scope of services included wetland delineation, off-site mitigation for indirect impacts of construction, preparation of a wetland maintenance and monitoring plan, protection of the wetlands during construction, development of a conservation easement for long-term preservation of the wetlands and associated buffer, documentation of permit compliance, and long term monitoring and maintenance of the wetlands. Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 28 amec Charlene Stroehlen, PE Engineering Ms. Charlene Stroehlen is a Senior Associate Engineer with professional experience in stormwater treatment design, pumping system design, wetland restoration design, environmental resource permitting, Hillsborough County, SWFWMD, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permitting, surface water modeling, wetland water budget modeling, construction bid package plans and specification preparation and construction management. She has managed many stormwater and wetland projects from the design and permitting stage through construction and final certification. Ms. Stroehlen has designed, modeled, and prepared permit applications and bid • specifications as well as supervised construction for many pumping systems and thousands of acres of wetlands. ' ,f;%-.1 r Key Projects I, ■DREDGING AND BANK to the stability of various portions of Beville STABILIZATION SERVICES FOR Creek, where the creek banks are not stable •MBA.Florida Southern EAST CENTRAL REGION CANAL and are in turn causing the foundation of the College, 1986 CONVEYANCE CAPACITY PROGRAM house to be undermined. The restoration •BS,Mining Engineering South Florida Water Management District, will include bank stabilization, slope grading, Mining Engineering. Various East Region Locations, Florida natural creek bed elevation restoration, University of Pittsburgh. Principal: Responsible for field investigation and debris and blockage removal. Services 1980 of 100 miles of canals in South Florida. included survey, geotechnical engineering, preliminary basin review, basin assessment Reported canal conditions, bathymetric survey, Registrations & developed hydraulic models to determine of the 113 ac basin, creek restoration design, flow reduction and designed and costed slope stability design, hydraulic analysis using %canal re airs to return canals h draulic ICPR modeling to review proposed design •Professional Engineer/ p y versus existing conditions, and technical Civil, Florida No.58774, flow capacity and repair erosional features. 2002 Engineering evaluation services in conjunction specification preparation. A basin assessment with dredging and bank stabilization projects was performed for the 113 ac basin, creek •e-RAILSAFE Contractor. for the East Central Region (Okeechobee restoration design was performed for the 700 2012 and West Palm field stations) of the District's feet portion of the creek to be restored, and •FEC-Florida East Coast- Canal Conveyance Capacity Program, a an existing conditions model and proposed Contractor Safety,2012 multi-phase program to identify and schedule model was prepared to analyze the restoration /prioritize dredging and restoration services to and slope stabilization. Responsible for canal system to restore capacity in locations development of stream modeling, design and affected by siltation, encroachments and other construction plans for creek bank stabilization. •AMEC:2006 forms of blockage. Services include review FINNIGAN ROAD •Industry:1980 of historic data and documentation research, IN topographic and hydrographic surveys, field Putnam County, Florida -- - . •. reconnaissance, and report of findings of Senior Engineer: This project's objective Professional - - recommendations. was to assist the County with upgrading the ' t' 'ens . stormwater system along Finnigan Road •American Society of Civil •SLOPE STABILIZATION AND which discharges into a canal connected Engineers to the St Johns River. The project reduced RESTORATION OF BEVILLE CREEK turbidity coming from the ditches and unpaved •American Water Resources AT COFRIN NATURE PARK Association shell roads in the subdivision, upgrading the City of Gainesville, Florida outfall structure and assessing the amount •National Society of Project Manager: Stabilizing the creek bank of sediment already deposited in the canal. Professional Engineers of Beville Creek to a more historic condition, Project tasks included collection of survey data, •Society for Mining, specifically in the vicinity of the historic on-site creation of a hydrologic model, development Metallurgy and Exploration house at Coffin Nature Park, and restoring of water quality BMP alternatives, and grant •Florida Stormwater a portion of Beville Creek to its historical preparation. Recommendations included ADS Association condition. The foundation of the onsite house Bay Separators, vegetated infiltration swales, at Coffin Nature Park was in jeopardy due and paving alternatives to reduce turbidity. •Florida Engineering Society Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 29 Charlene Stroehlen, PE (Continued) ■CHASSAHOWITZKA HEADSPRING 2d stormwater model and three proposed RESTORATION PROJECT alternatives to reduce flooding and add water •Florida Institute of Southwest Florida Water Management quality aspect to the tidally influenced urban Consulting Engineers District, Homosassa, Florida stormwater system Project Manager: This project consists of design and permitting for the dredging of the ■SOUTH LAKE CONINE WATERSHED Chassahowitzka Headspring, an OFW in RESTORATION AND STORMWATER Citrus County. Responsible for development TREATMENT SERVICES •HAZWOPER 40 Hour.2009 and construction plan to remove sediment City of Winter Haven, Florida •HAZWOPER 8 Hour from the spring head Also permitted the Project Manager: Design and permitting Refresher,2012 dredging activities and oversaw construction. services for development/restoration of - •MSHA Safety Trainer, 1990 watershed facilities on 34-acre, city-owned ■MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT lakefront parcel. Lake impaired with nutrient FOR LAKES AND WATERSHED TMDL. Design includes regional stormwater MANAGEMENT pond and treatment train, finishing with •ICPR City of Lakeland, Florida polishing wetland before discharge into •XPSWMM Principal Engineer: Environmental and lake; design intended to improve lake •HEC suite engineering services under a master water quality via nutrient load reductions. services agreement, providing support Design effort included wetlands delineation •SPAW for lakes and watershed management for / assessments, geotechnical investigations, •ARC View the Lakes and Stormwater Division of the boundary and topographic survey. watershed •ACAD county public works, involving various lake, modeling, stormwater pollutant load modeling, stream and watershed areas. Services stormwater treatment train design, and park have included water quality statistical trends design. Services also included bidding and analysis, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, construction services and post-construction nutrient load estimates. Best Management water quality monitoring. As project manager Practices (BMP) nutrient reduction estimates, and engineer-of-record oversaw all services prioritization of BMPs, conceptual designs, including bidding and construction services land acquisition cost estimates and and post-construction water quality monitoring. construction cost estimates. After BMPs were selected, Responsible for grant writing, ■ALL ABOARD FLORIDA HIGHSPEED developing construction bid documents and RAIL ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING oversite and permitting. Responsible for AND CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES work performed for Southwest Basin of Lake Florida East Coast Industries, Inc., Florida Parker BMP Analysis, an impaired waterbody Permitting Coordinator: All Aboard Florida covering more than 600 acres and involving (AAF), a subsidiary of Florida East Coast 2 lakes and 17 subbasins, the water quality Industries, Inc. (FECI), is developing a analysis was executed in just over two months. privately owned, operated, and maintained passenger rail that will connect South Florida •RIVERSIDE FILTER MARSH to Orlando. AMEC was selected to provide City of Naples, Florida environmental permitting and civil engineering Project Manager: Provide engineering water services. The project is composed of two quality services to prepare designs, permits distinct segments: a 200-mile north-south and provide construction services for a filter segment of the existing Florida East Coast marsh to treat stormwater discharge from the Railroad right-of-way (ROW). from Cocoa Goodlett Road Pump Station. Responsible to Miami, and a 40-mile east-west segment for oversight of design, permitting, and along State Road 528 that connects the construction of a stormwater treatment filter Orlando Airport to the rail mainline. Permitting marsh for the City coordinator for 240 miles of high speed passenger rail. Developed and reviewed III SPRING LAKE OUTFALL BASIN federal (including NEPA EIS). state and local MASTER PLAN STORMWATER permit applications for the project to include MODELING collection of biological, wildlife, stormwater, City of Tampa, Florida geotechnical, noise and vibration, traffic, Project Manager: Preparation of two- floodplain, environmental justice. survey and dimensional stormwater model as part of other data for development of permits to master plan for 420-acre Spring Lake Ouffall build the rail. FDEP started a Tiger Team to Basin. Provided principal review XP SWMM assure all regulatory agencies were receiving Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 30 Charlene Stroehlen, PE (Continued) information and processing it in a timely construction to restore wetlands hydro periods fashion. Permitting and reviewing agencies that were altered through historic ditching. included FRA, USACOE. FDEP, USFWS, NMFS, FDEP, SHPO, FFWCC, SFWMD, •ROCKY CREEK LAKE ENHANCEMENT SJRWMD and Orange. Broward, and Miami DESIGN -Dade Counties. Southwest Florida Water Management • District,Tampa Florida COLT CREEK STATE PARK HYDROLOGIC RESTORATION Project Manager: Preparation of designs and permit, and preparation of construction Southwest Florida Water Management bid packages for pipeline corridor to transport •- District, Lakeland, Florida water from Lake Pretty to three adjacent Project Manager: This project consists of county lakes during "high water" periods. the assessment, design, and environmental Project consists of design and related permitting in an effort to restore hydrologic services for three corridors. approximately and natural systems within the Colt Creek 5 acres, totaling 4,000 linear feet by 50 feet State Park area to a more historic condition. wide. Two buildings house diesel pumps and The District hired AMEC to conduct these approximately 3.500 feet of pipeline, including services, including a hydrologic model two jack and bores. Responsible for system analysis to determine baseline hydrologic civil, electrical, mechanical and architectural • conditions as well as both on-site and off-site design, preparation of construction bid effects of proposed restoration alternatives. documents and technical specifications, and The primary objective of this project is obtaining permits from DEP, DOT Hillsborough recover the hydrologic functions of storage County,and USACE. and conveyance and the ecological value of wildlife habitat diversity in wetland systems I SECTION 316(B)COMPREHENSIVE that have been lost or degraded due to DEMONSTRATION STUDIES disturbance by onsite ditching and farming Gulf Power Company, Pensacola, practices. Restoration for Colt Creek State Sneads, Lynn Haven, Florida Park, an approximate 5.118 acre tract, located in Polk County, Florida,just north of Lakeland. Senior Engineer: Environmental consulting Responsible for QA of the hydrologic to provide permitting and comprehensive modeling, design, and environmental demonstration studies at three power permitting effort to restore hydrologic and generating plants on the Florida panhandle natural systems within the Colt Creek State (Escambia and Apalachicola Rivers and St. Park area. The hydrologic model compared Andrews Bay). for compliance with Clean the existing conditions, historic conditions, and Water Act 316(b), including: preliminary proposed altematives to determine the level of facility engineering assessments, preparation restoration. Models from adjacent upstream of proposal for information collection (PIC) parcels were incorporated into the models for including a sampling plan for entrainment and the baseflow coming into the property. impingement assessment). characterization of source water, and other services. Also •FLYING EAGLE SHINN DITCH developed hydraulic and water quality models HYDROLOGIC AND WETLANDS at Plant Crist to determine effects of proposed 1,560-foot barge mooring facility in adjacent RESTORATION Escambia River. Responsible for oversight Southwest Florida Water Management of the HZI studies which modeled the zone District, Inverness, Florida of influence of the cooling intake structures: Principal Engineer: Design, construction model included bathymetric cross sections and environmental permitting services as and vertical temperature profiles; parameters part of hydraulic and wetlands restoration analyzed by the models included changes plan for Shinn Ditch wetlands system in river flow velocities and water surface within 3,500-acre rural Flying Eagle tract in elevations under different river flow conditions. Citrus County. Environmental and ecologic conditions degraded over decades due to ■MARJORIE HARRIS CARR CROSS unfavorable historic land use. Services to FLORIDA WITHLACOOCHEE BAY restore natural hydrologic functions of storage TRAIL and conveyance and ecologic value of wildlife O'Steen Brothers, Inc., Inglis, Florida habitat diversity within system Responsible Project Manager. The project involved for oversite of investigation, designs and surveying, ecological evaluation, engineering Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes - Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 31 Canal Demo Projects Charlene Stroehlen, PE (Continued) design, permitting, and construction services of development of hydrologic restoration of for the installation of the Marjorie Harris Carr a 34,000 acre tract of farmland for wetland Cross Florida Greenway Withlacoochee Bay restoration. Hydrologic models were Trail along the Cross Florida Barge Canal.The developed to determine existing conditions project area, approximately 25-acres, included and three wetland restoration alternatives. 3.2 miles of a 12-foot-wide paved trail. An adjustable drop structure with headwall and •NUTRIENT LOADING REDUCTION 70 linear feet of 24-inch reinforced concrete STUDY AND WATERSHED pipe with a TF-1 TdeFlex at the outlet to MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR TWO prevent backflow. a concrete outfall structure CREEKS and stormwater treatment swales. Developed Orange County Board of Commissioners designs and permitted 4.5 mile trail adjacent -Environmental Protection Division, to the Florida Barge Canal. Also conducted Orlando, Florida construction oversite and testing for pavement Principal Engineer: Development of of trail. nutrient loading and reduction evaluation for •KISSIMMEE WETLAND RESTORATION management and protection of waters of the U.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA)/ Upper Shingle Creek and Western Boggy Creek Basins. Upper Shingle Creek Basin Natural Resources Conservation Service includes four water bodies: Lake Mann, (NRCS), Okeechobee, Florida Lake Cane, Lake Catherine and Clear Lake. Project Manager: This project consists of Evaluation is to identify specific areas within design and permitting for the hydrologic both basins where nutrient load reductions and natural systems restoration of impacted can be achieved, and to provide watershed wetlands on the USDA-NRCS Kissimmee management and plans to achieve water easement. Developed wetland restoration quality improvements. Responsible for a plans for 560 acre Cattle management area nutrient loading and reduction evaluation in South Florida. Responsible for a plan to involving watershed subbasin delineations and restore wetland hydrology without offsite hydrologic and nutrient budget development: impacts. hydrologic modeling and water identified significant pollution sources: budget modeling was conducted for each provided ranking of sub-basin areas with historic wetland onsite. Three alternatives respect to annual mass and areal loadings were developed using practices such as ditch and a sampling plan which verifies pollutant blocks, structure removal. sheet pile weir and source and loads: estimated inputs from dikes for water retention. Construction plans precipitation, groundwater seepage, and were prepared for the chosen alternative. stomiwater runoff in developing hydrologic Permits were obtained from SFWMD and the budgets. nutrient budgets considered inputs USACE. from bulk precipitation, groundwater seepage, stormwater runoff, and internal recycling. •NRCS WETLANDS RESERVE PROGRAM Fisheating Creek Site, Florida Project Manager: The Fisheating Creek Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) project is the largest contiguous private lands project (33,000 acres) in the country involving four four landowners and seven seven individual tracts of land and approximately 8 miles of channelized Fisheating Creek located in Highlands County, Florida. AMEC has conducted assessment of the ecological health and hydrologic regime of the project area. AMEC is developing solutions for restoration of the area to a more historic condition. To meet success criteria, AMEC has conducted surveying, modeling and a biological assessment of the site. Modeling includes development of an existing model and three alternatives. Responsible for the oversite Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 32 Canal Demo Projects amec' Gregory Corning, EIT Engineering As a Staff Engineer, Mr. Gregory Corning provides technical input and engineering analysis to projects involving stormwater, hydrologic, and environmental investigations. Mr. Corning has participated in the analysis of surface water quality and stormwater pollutant loadings, treatment of agricultural runoff by wetland systems, design of wastewater and water supply systems, and analysis of stormwater structures and facilities. He has conducted field exploration and research on several environmental projects, such as surface water assessment and monitoring and wetland evaluations. Mr. Corning also has experience in the development of construction documents such t< • as drawings,technical specifications, and cost estimates. Key Projects ■ALL ABOARD FLORIDA HIGHSPEED use of GIS. Assisted with creating a cost RAIL ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING estimate for bid process. Environmental AND CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES and engineering services under a master Florida East Coast Industries, Florida services agreement, providing support Staff Engineer. Assisted in preparing for lakes and watershed management for 'B.S.Civil Engineering, 9 P P g Florida Atlantic University, federal permits for a high speed railway. the Lakes and Stormwater Division of the 2009 All Aboard Florida (AAF), a subsidiary of county public works, involving various lake, Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. (FECI), stream and watershed areas. Services have is developing a privately owned, operated, included water quality statistical trends Registrations & analysis, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, and maintained passenger rail that will Certifications connect south Florida to Orlando. AMEC nutrient load estimates, Best Management Practices (BMP) nutrient reduction •Engineer-in-Training: was selected to provide environmental Florida No. 1100014080 permitting and civil engineering services. estimates, prioritization of BMPs, conceptual The project is composed of two distinct designs, land acquisition cost estimates and segments; a 200-mile north-south segment construction cost estimates. of the existing Florida East Coast Railroad •AMEC:2010 right-of-way (ROW), from Cocoa to Miami, •SOUTH LAKE CONINE WATERSHED and a 40-mile east-west segment along RESTORATION AND STORMWATER •Industry:2010 State Road 528 that connects Orlando to TREATMENT SERVICES the FECI mainline. City of Winter Haven, Florida CADD Designer. Assisted with the •CHASSAHOWITZKA HEADSPRING design of the land use areas within the RESTORATION PROJECT aforementioned project. Also assisted with Southwest Florida Water Management creating cross-sections of the proposed turn District, Homosassa, Florida lane for the aforementioned project. Design Staff Engineer. Assisted with the design and permitting services for development/ of the dredging system and construction restoration of watershed facilities on 34- drawings. Prepared the permit applications, acre, city-owned lakefront parcel. Lake technical specifications, and bid impaired with nutrient TMDL. Design specifications. This project consists of includes regional stormwater pond and design and permitting for the dredging of treatment train, finishing with polishing the Chassahowitzka Headspring in Citrus wetland before discharge into lake; design County. intended to improve lake water quality via nutrient load reductions. Design effort ■MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT included wetlands delineation/assessments, FOR LAKES AND WATERSHED geotechnical investigations, boundary and MANAGEMENT topographic survey, watershed modeling, Cityof Lakeland, Florida stormwater pollutant load modeling, stormwater treatment train design, and park Civil Engineer. Used AutoCAD 2009 to design. Services also included bidding and design construction plans for permitting/ construction services and post-construction construction. Pulled together ERP permit water quality monitoring. application information which required the Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 33 Canal Demo Projects Gregory Corning, EIT (Continued) ■COLT CREEK STATE PARK was not a design criterion, although water HYDROLOGIC RESTORATION quality was part of the design for proposed Southwest Florida Water Management new pavement surfaces.To account for the f water quality treatment of the proposed District, Lakeland, Florida impervious areas, earthen swales along Staff Engineer. Prepared the quality with drop structures and reinforced assurance plan, and bid specifications, concrete pipes were designed throughout g' permit applications, technical specifications, the proposed areas to direct the runoff to operation and maintenance plan. Assisted the proposed stormwater ponds, which with the design of the restoration system will utilize percolation to treat the designed and construction drawings. This project 1-inch of runoff. For the existing paved consists of the assessment, design, and roads the stormwater runoff will sheetflow environmental permitting in an effort to through existing vegetation in a drainage restore hydrologic and natural systems pattern similar to the existing site conditions within the Colt Creek State Park area and will discharge into the existing onsite to a more historic condition. The District lakes, as they do in the existing conditions. hired AMEC to conduct these services, including a hydrologic model analysis to •JACK CREEK HYDROLOGIC AND determine baseline hydrologic conditions WETLAND RESTORATION as well as both on-site and off-site effects of proposed restoration alternatives. The Southwest Florida Water Management primary objective of this project is recover District, Sebring, Florida the hydrologic functions of storage and Staff Engineer. Prepared the permit conveyance and the ecological value of applications, technical specifications, and wildlife habitat diversity in wetland systems bid specifications. Assisted with the design that have been lost or degraded due to of the restoration system and construction disturbance by onsite ditching and farming drawings. This project consists of design practices. and permitting for the hydrologic and natural systems restoration of impacted wetlands •ICHETUCKNEE TRACE MINING on the Jack Creek Tract in Highlands RECLAMATION AND STATE PARK County. DESIGN •KISSIMMEE WETLAND RESTORATION Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Lake City, Florida US Department of Agriculture/Natural Staff Engineer. Responsible for the Resources Conservation Service, civil design of the infrastructure of the Okeechobee, Florida recreational park which included the Staff Engineer. Assisted with the design stormwater system, on-site septic system, of the restoration system and construction and potable water system. The purpose drawings. Prepared the permit applications, of this project is to design and permit the technical specifications, operation and Ichetucknee Recreational Facility, which maintenance plan, quality assurance plan, includes a swim beach, fishing platforms, and bid specifications. This project consists boat ramp, trails, restroom facilities, of design and permitting for the hydrologic maintenance building, entrance roadway and natural systems restoration of impacted with gatehouse, and a dive platform with wetlands on the USDA-NRCS Kissimmee loading area. The facilities are located on Oaks/Oxbow easement boundary. land owned by FDEP. The project area, which is approximately 660-acres, proposed •WETLAND RESERVE PLAN OF for the facility is located within Columbia OPERATION 1,160 ACRES County, Florida in Sections 16,17,20, and US Department of Agriculture National 21, Township 5 South, and Range 16 Resource Conservation Services, East.. The project area extends from the Highland County,Sebring, Florida existing access road off of Carpenter Road Staff Engineer. Assisted with construction and continues through the existing mine drawings and the design of the restoration quarry pits to the intersection of the existing system. Prepared the permit applications, paved Kirby Pit Road. Stormwater runoff operation and maintenance plan, quality from the proposed improvements will be assurance plan, technical specifications contained onsite. Due to all stormwater and bid specifications. This project consists being contained on site, water quantity of design and permitting for the hydrologic Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 34 Canal Demo Projects Gregory Corning, EIT (Continued) and natural systems restoration of impacted •ROCKY CREEK LAKE ENHANCEMENT wetlands on the USDA-NRCS Lott DESIGN easement boundary. Southwest Florida Water Management District,Tampa. Florida ■MARJORIE HARRIS CARR CROSS Staff Engineer. Responsible for system FLORIDA WITHLACOOCHEE BAY civil, electrical, mechanical and architectural TRAIL design, preparation of construction bid O'Steen Brothers, Inc.. Inglis, Florida documents and technical specifications, Staff Engineer. Assisted with the and obtaining permits from DEP, DOT, engineering and design of the stormwater Hillsborough County, and USACE. system and construction drawings. Preparation of designs and permit, and Prepared the permit applications, technical preparation of construction bid packages specifications, and bid specifications. for pipeline corridor to transport water The project involved engineering design, from Lake Pretty to three adjacent county permitting. and construction services for lakes during "high water" periods. Project the installation of the Marjorie Harris Carr consists of design and related services - Cross Florida Greenway Withlacoochee for three corridors, approximately 5 acres, Bay Trail. The project area, approximately totaling 4,000 linear feet by 50 feet wide. 25-acres. included 3.2 miles of a 12 foot Two buildings house diesel pumps and wide paved trail. An adjustable drop approximately 3,500 feet of pipeline, structure with headwall and 70 linear feet of including two jack and bores. 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe with a TF-1 TideFlex at the outlet to prevent backflow , ■WETLAND RESERVE PLAN- 60 linear feet of 14-inch x 23-inch elliptical KISSIMMEE OAKS&OXBOW concrete pipe with mitered end sections, US Department of Agriculture/National and 20 linear feet of 18-inch reinforced Resource Conservation Services, concrete pipe with mitered end sections. Okeechobee, Florida Staff Engineer. Assisted with the design •EARLY SITE PERMIT(ESP) of the restoration system and construction PSEG Power/Sargent& Lundy, LLC drawings. Prepared the permit applications. LowerAlloway Creek Township, New technical specifications, operation and Jersey maintenance plan, quality assurance plan, Staff Engineer. Performed quality and bid specifications. The Kissimmee Oaks assurance/control on modeling input data. and Oxbow easement is approximately Performed data collection, analysis and 536 acres located in western Okeechobee report to support the preparation of Sections County, Florida. AMEC was contracted by 2.4 and 2.5 of Ch 2 for an early site permit the USDA-NRCS to prepare a Wetland application. Reserve Plan of Operation (WRPO) for the Easement Restoration Agreement between •SCARBOROUGH AND SONS USDA-NRCS and the landowners of the WETLAND RESTORATION Kissimmee Oaks and Oxbow Ranch. The US Department of Agriculture(USDA)/ project was broken down into three phases National Resource Conservation to achieve historic ecological communities Services, Sebring, Florida of the aforementioned site. Staff Engineer. Prepared the permit •WETLAND RESERVE PLAN OF applications, technical specifications, bid OPERATION 1,160 ACRES HIGHLAND specifications, operation and maintenance plan and quality assurance plan. Assisted COUNTY with the design of the restoration system US Department of Agriculture/National and construction drawings. This project Resource Conservation Services Lake consists of design and permitting for the Placid, Florida hydrologic and natural systems restoration Staff Engineer. Prepared the technical of impacted wetlands on the USDA-NRCS specifications, operation and maintenance Scarborough and Sons easement boundary. plan, permit applications, quality assurance plan, and bid specifications. Assisted with the design of the restoration system and construction drawings. This WRPO Monroe County Resumes Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 35 Gregory Corning, EIT (Continued) easement property covers approximately 1,160 acres in Highlands County. FL. AMEC was contracted by the USDA-NRCS to prepare a WRPO for the Easement Restoration Agreement between USDA- NRCS and the landowners. The project was broken down into three phases to achieve historic ecological communities of the aforementioned site. ■PHASE I AND II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS US Department of Agriculture National Resource Conservation Services, 16 Sites throughout South Florida Civil Engineer. Analyzed field notes, GPS points, and aerials to create a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report. AMEC completed 16 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments according to the standards and specifications set forth by CERCLA. the USEPA, AAI Final Rule ASTM Standards. The total acreage assessed in this project was 40,000 acres (approximately 62 square miles). At three of the 16 sites, Phase II assessments were recommended and performed under a follow on contract. Two of the three Phase II sites were in Highlands County and part of a 26,000 acre Wetland Reserve Program easement acquisition known as the Fisheating Creek WRP. Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 36 amec' Lance Lumbard, CLP Water Quality Mr. Lance Lumbard has 17 years of applied aquatic science and business management experience with design, permitting, construction, and operation of lake dredging and restoration projects, stormwater retrofit projects,water treatment and filtration systems, fisheries management programs, aquatic animal laboratory facilities, and other water resources projects. Prior to joining AMEC in 2011, Mr. Lumbard was the Water Resources Project Manager for the LCWA for nine years where he managed more than 60 water resources projects. Mr. Lumbard has also served as an expert witness in fisheries science and lake restoration in support of large construction projects. Mr. Lumbard is the project manager for some of AMEC's commercial clients and has a successful record of providing task facilitation services for major permitting efforts with the USACE. Mr. Lumbard is the project manager for multiple watershed studies for government clients within Central Florida aimed at identifying the causes of water quality impairments and providing appropriate solutions. Mr. Lumbard's construction projects at the LCWA required successfully obtaining multiple permits for dredge and fill operations from the USACE and other ERPs from agencies including the FDEP. Mr. Lumbard's experience working for local government and •M.B.A. Business with various permitting agencies makes him ideally suited to assume key roles with AMEC's Administration. University of commercial clients requiring permitting assistance. Central Florida,2008 •M.S. Fisheries Science, Key Projects Louisiana State University, ■MONROE COUNTY CANAL required nearly 10 years of planning and 1997 MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN— permitting to initiate construction. Challenges •B.S. Biological Science, PHASE I to the project included location of a suitable Florida State University. Monroe County, Florida disposal site, consolidation of dredge material, 1994 Project Scientist: The project involved and potential heavy metal contaminants in Phase I of creatinga canal management the dredge material. Coordinated several site g Registrations, • master plan throughout the Florida Keys for alternatives with the SJRWMD and ultimately prioritizing canals that need water quality selected one that would provide a beneficial improvement and selecting appropriate use of the dredge material by capping •Certified Lake Professional cleanup options. Phase I developed the contaminated sediments within a restored prioritization process and applied the agricultural property. Provided expert witness _ _ 100— process to a select group of previously testimony and successfully defended LCWA ` identified canals with water quality problems. against a challenge to the ERP alleging that -AMEC:2011 Conceptual remedial plans are being the Lake Beauclair sediments contained •Industry: 1995 prepared for several of the highest priority excessive arsenic levels. Managed the Dredge canals and funding sources identified to and Fill permit for the USACE and the ERP obtain funding for implementation of the for the FDEP. Successfully negotiated a no- .i,iji . (:lily remedial plans. cost mitigation strategy with FDEP for any disturbance to lake vegetation at the time of •American Fisheries Society •LAKE BEAUCLAIR AQUATIC dredging. Worked with FWC to secure $1 million in cooperative funding. •North American Lake ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Management Society Lake County Water Authority, Florida ■LAKE BUMBY/TYNER SEDIMENT •Florida Lake Management LCWA Project Manager: Developed and SAMPLING AND BATHYMETRY Society managed this project as part of a TMDL Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) Orange County, Florida to restore approximately 50,000 acres of Project Manager: AMEC was contracted by surface waters downstream of Lake Apopka. Orange County to obtain bathymetric data and This project targeted in-lake nutrient loading physico-chemical sediment characterization and navigational issues, induding residential data for Lakes Bumby and Tyner. This project canals, and involved the strategic removal involved lake bottom characterization using of approximately 1.4 million cubic yards of bathymetric techniques and collection of anthropogenic sediments deposited in Lake undisturbed sediment core samples using Beaudair. This $10 million project was the specially design equipment Sediment largest project undertaken by LCWA and core samples were evaluated to determine phosphorus speciation and internal sources Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 37 Canal Demo Projects Lance Lumbard, CLP (Continued) of available phosphorus. Depth to lake bottom stormwater sampling, and archival rainfall and and muck thickness was also determined in discharge data. Hydrologic data was then used each lake. Statistical analysis was provided to develop loading models for an evaluation and evaluated for the data produced from of BMP alternatives which were proposed for sediment cores in each lake. The data is ' the watershed. Linear regression analysis proposed to be used for determination of was performed for all available water quality application rates for chemical sediment- parameters using STORET water quality data phosphorus inactivation at a future date. archives and County-supplied data. Trophic State Indexes (TSI) were computed annually •LAKE CANE SEDIMENT SAMPLING and analyzed based on FDEP protocol. AND BATHYMETRY Spreadsheet models were utilized to develop Orange County, Florida hydrologic and nutrient load estimates and Project Manager: AMEC was contracted Bathtub was employed to verify that the loading by Orange County to obtain bathymetric model matched the predicted water quality for data and physico-chemical sediment data the lake. Bathtub was also used to provide the for Lake Cane which is listed as an impaired expected water quality response for a given water by the FDEP. This project involved lake project alternative. Seven project alternatives bottom characterization using bathymetric were developed including dry retention, wet techniques and collection of twenty undisturbed retention,media filtration,and alum treatment. sediment core samples using specially design equipment. Sediment core samples were ■LAKE CONDEL HYDROLOGIC/ evaluated to determine phosphorus speciation NUTRIENT BUDGET AND LAKE and internal sources of available phosphorus. MANAGEMENT PLAN Depth to lake bottom and muck thickness was Orange County, Florida also determined in each lake. AMEC provided Project Manager: Prepared hydrologic Orange County with GIS data detailing location budgets for this impaired 3.3-acre lake using of sediment and sounding locations as well as literature values, topographic data. ArcGIS, the physico-chemical data for each sediment field verification of stormwater structures. core. The data is proposed to be used for seepage analysis, stormwater sampling, determination of application rates for chemical and archival rainfall and discharge data. sediment-phosphorus inactivation at a future Sediment cores were obtained and analyzed date. to estimate potential internal loading. Hydrologic data is being used to develop II PINE LAKE SEDIMENT NUTRIENT loading models for an evaluation of BMP INACTIVATION PROJECT alternatives which are being developed for Pinellas County, Florida the watershed. Linear regression analysis Project Scientist: Prepared the sediment was performed for all available water quality sampling plan and performed sampling parameters using STORET water quality for Pine Lake to include phosphorus data archives and County-supplied data. TSI speciation and an assessment of bio- were computed annually and analyzed based available phosphorus within the lake. on FDEP protocol. Spreadsheet models were Responsible for review and interpretation utilized to develop hydrologic and nutrient of the sediment data and development and load estimates and Bathtub was employed review of the nutrient inactivation project to verify that the loading model matched the involving PhoslockTM. This project is aimed predicted water quality for the lake. Bathtub at reducing internal nutrient loading and will also be used to provide the expected achievement of the TMDL for this south water quality response for a given project Florida lake. alternative. •BAY LAKE HYDROLOGIC/NUTRIENT •LAKE CHRISTIE HYDROLOGIC/ BUDGET AND LAKE MANAGEMENT NUTRIENT BUDGET AND LAKE PLAN MANAGEMENT PLAN Orange County, Florida Orange County, Florida Project Manager: Evaluated the existing Project Manager: Prepared hydrologic TMDL and prepared hydrologic budgets budgets for this impaired 11-acre lake using for this 36-acre lake using literature values, literature values, topographic data. ArcGIS, topographic data. ArcGIS, field verification field verification of stormwater structures, of stormwater structures. seepage analysis, seepage analysis, stormwater sampling, Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 38 Canal Demo Projects Lance Lumbard, CLP (Continued) and archival rainfall and discharge data. basin. Ground and surface water will Sediment cores were obtained and analyzed also be monitored to determined actual to estimate potential internal loading. groundwater loading and establish baseline Hydrologic data was then used to develop information. Estimated loading reductions loading models for an evaluation of BMP from incorporation of media will be calculated alternatives which are being developed for using literature based values from similar the watershed. Linear regression analysis projects. was performed for all available water quality parameters using STORET water quality ■APOPKA-BEAUCLAIR CANAL data archives and County-supplied data. TSI NUTRIENT REDUCTION FACILITY were computed annually and analyzed based Lake County WaterAuthority, Florida on FDEP protocol. Spreadsheet models were LCWA Project Manager: Developed utilized to develop hydrologic and nutrient and managed this project as part of a load estimates and Bathtub was employed comprehensive plan for restoration of nearly to verify that the loading model matched the 50,000 acres of impaired lakes downstream predicted water quality for the lake. Bathtub of Lake Apopka. Developed the RFP for will also be used to provide the expected project design and recommended design water quality response for a given project award. The design was based on a novel alternative. application of proven technology involving injection of aluminum sulfate to remove ■LAKE GANDY HYDROLOGIC/ excessive nutrients from water discharging NUTRIENT BUDGET AND LAKE from Lake Apopka. Managed the project MANAGEMENT PLAN design process and prepared the project Orange County, Florida construction bid package. Managed the Project Manager: Prepared hydrologic Dredge and Fill permit application process budgets for this impaired 27-acre lake using with the USACE as well as the ERP literature values, topographic data. ArcGIS, application process with FDEP. Successfully field verification of stormwater structures, defended LCWAs ERP application and estimated seepage analysis, and archival wetland delineation after a permit challenge rainfall and discharge data. Hydrologic data from a local activist group. Proposed and was then used to develop loading models for implemented a no-cost mitigation strategy an evaluation of BMP alternatives which are involving granting of an easement to Florida being developed for the watershed. Linear Communities Trust over land already owned regression analysis was performed for all by LCWA in exchange for wetland impacts available water quality parameters using from the project. Evaluated project proposals STORET water quality data archives and and recommended construction of the County-supplied data. TSI was computed $7.2-million project. Negotiated a no-cost annually and analyzed based on FDEP lease agreement for the project site with the protocol. Spreadsheet models were utilized SJRWMD. Submitted a grant application and to develop hydrologic and nutrient load obtained $3.6 million in construction funds estimates and Bathtub was employed to from FDEP to support the project. Secured verify that the loading model matched the the building permits for the project and predicted water quality for the lake. Bathtub oversaw and managed project construction. was also used to provide the expected Developed a beneficial use disposal plan for water quality response for a given project residual material that would be produced by alternative. the facility. Prepared facility operation plans and developed annual operating budgets in •STORMWATER POND NUTRIENT excess of $1 million. Hired and trained an REDUCTION ENHANCEMENT STUDY operation staff to run the facility. Implemented Seminole County, Florida a QA project plan and a routine performance Project Manager: Developed a ranking monitoring plan for the facility. Provided the system to determine the most suitable executive director and board of trustees stormwater pond sites for implementation of with monthly performance reports detailing soil amendments using Bold and GoldTM successful improvements to water quality. media. 20 County ponds were evaluated using GIS and geotechnical information to determine greatest potential for loading reduction to the Wekiwa Springs recharge Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 39 Canal Demo Projects amecf1 Jeremy Paris Water Quality As a Staff Scientist with AMEC, Mr. Jeremy Paris is a valuable resource in a range of environmental services, biological assessments, and wetland delineations. Mr. Paris has a portfolio of wetland biology and environmental sciences for the South Florida and Southwest Florida Water Management Districts, United States Department of Defense, and the National Parks Service. As a wetland biologist, Mr. Paris' responsibilities include technical writing, research, and review of regulatory statutes, vegetative restoration, wetland determinations, species identification, and mangrove protection. Serving as an environmental scientist, Mr. Paris participates in stormwater, groundwater,effluent, and soil sampling. - Key Projects ■MONROE COUNTY CANAL MASTER South Florida. Prime author of the permits PLAN(PHASE I&II)2012-2013— sections dedicated to the ecological surveys. WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION ■MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE •M.S.Wetland Ecology. Monroe County, Florida Tampa, Florida University of Florida:2005 Field Scientist: Conducted water Field Scientist: Performed protected •B.S. Plant Science, quality monitoring and limited biological species surveys for the Florida mouse and University of Tennessee. assessments on several hundred canals bald eagle. The ecological services included 2001 throughout Monroe County, Florida. During migratory bird surveys within beach and Phase I, utilized data sets developed coastal ecosystems. Additional services _ during his canal visits as well as, existing included nesting surveys for bald eagle �9lstrations & information to rank a subset of canals for fledglings, delineation of mangrove forests, potential restoration. and identification of migratory birds. •USACE-approved Indigo Snake Monitor •9R-27L RUNWAY EXPANSION ■NORTH DADE MIDDLE SCHOOL •USACE-approved Bird Broward County Aviation Department, Ft. DEVELOPMENT Monitor Lauderdale, Florida Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Field Scientist: Providing ecological Florida services and permit compliance monitoring Field Scientist: Performed nesting for the expansion of the 9R-27L runway surveys for burrowing owls as part of the •AMEC:2009 at Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International construction of a Miami-Dade County public •Industry:2007 Airport (FLL). Ecological services include school. Monitored active burrowing owl implementation and review of daily nests for burrowing juvenile development. inspection reports for compliance as well as Subsequent to observing the maturation oversight of the Manatee and Indigo Snake process and completion of the fledgling Protection education plan and migratory stage, Coordinated with Florida Fish and bird nest removal activities. Protected Wildlife Commission officers to obtain a species include the burrowing owl, wood permit for the collapsing of the burrow. stork, and crested caracara. Developed an environmental permit matrix for the purpose •WETLANDS RESTORATION PLAN of tracking environmental regulatory NRCS Wetlands Reserve Program requirements for the project. Fisheating Creek Site, Florida Wetlands Scientist: The Fisheating Creek •ECOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS AND Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) project is PERMITTING SERVICES the largest contiguous private lands project All Aboard Florida, South Florida (26,225 acres) in the country involving four Field Scientist: Conducted wetland and landowners and five individual tracts of land benthic surveys in support of the All Aboard and approximately 8 miles of channelized Florida High Speed Rail project, as well Fisheating Creek located in Highlands as completed the associated coastal and County, Florida. AMEC has conducted aquatic ecosystem permitting requirements assessment of the ecological health and for Miami-Dade and Broward Counties in hydrologic regime of the project area.AMEC Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 40 Canal Demo Projects Jeremy Paris (Continued) is developing solutions for restoration of the District's (SFWMD) Environmental area to a more historic condition. To meet Resource Permit (ERP). Acting on behalf success criteria, AMEC has conducted of MDX and their representatives, attended surveying, modeling and a biological public scoping meeting that detailed the assessment of the site. Modeling includes projects benefits and impacts. development of an existing model and three alternatives. Evaluated the ecological ■WETLAND DETERMINATION AND benefits of the proposed hydrologic ASSESSMENT REPORT restoration of wetlands within the Fish SBA Communications, Doral, Florida Eating Creek floodplain. He also completed Field Scientist: Completed a wetland a UMAM style wetland evaluation and determination and evaluation report ecological assessment. The aforementioned in response to a Miami Dade County assessment included a survey of threatened Department of Environmental Resources and endangered species in addition to (DERM) citation prohibiting the installation identifying all invasive and exotic species of a cellular communications tower. During within the project limits for the development the evaluation process, performed a Unified of a maintenance and monitoring plan. Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) and Wetland Assessment Technique for ■HERBERT HOOVER DIKE Environmental Review (W.A.TE.R) as REHABILITATION ECOLOGICAL part of the reporting requirements. Duties SERVICES also included delineating the jurisdictional US Army Corps of Engineers,Jacksonville wetlands and coordinating mitigation District/Hayward Baker, Inc,St. Lucia requirements with the Florida Power and Waterway, Florida Light Wetlands Mitigation Bank. Field Scientist: Ecological services in conjunction with installation of subsurface •WETLAND RESERVE PLAN barrier system during rehabilitation of Department ofAgriculture/National Herbert Hoover Dike, surrounding Lake Resource Conservation Services, Okeechobee, in South Florida. Ecological Kissimmee Oaks and Oxbow, services included development and Okeechobee, Florida presentation of Environmental Protection Wetlands Specialist: The Kissimmee Oaks Plan and Indigo Snake Protection/ and Oxbow easement is approximately Education Plan and ecological monitoring 536 acres located in western Okeechobee and initial site surveys for threatened and County, Florida. AMEC was contracted endangered species, and for migratory by the USDA-NRCS to prepare a WRPO bird nests during construction activities. for the Easement Restoration Agreement Responsible for identification of migratory between USDA-NRCS and the landowners birds and endangered plant and animal of the Kissimmee Oaks and Oxbow Ranch. species. The project was broken down into three phases to achieve historic ecological •MIAMI-DADE EXPRESSWAY communities of the aforementioned site. EXPANSION Responsible for the ecological surveys Miami-Dade County, Florida at the site. This included extensive data Field Sceintist: In accordance with the with collection on quality of habitats, vegetation the Florida Department of Transportation classification, identifying protected (FDOT) Project Development and species habitats, and identifying presence Environment Manual (PD&E), Delineated of invasive species. He was the prime and ecologically assessed through the author of the report sections dedicated Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method to ecological surveys and conservation (UMAM) the ecological benefits of the practices. wetlands located within the transportation corridor. Performed an Endangered ■FLORIDA KEYS OVERSEAS Species and Biological Assessment of the HERITAGE TRAIL numerous habitat features (i.e. canals, Florida Department of Environmental lakes, vegetated swales) which exist within Protection, Monroe County, Florida the proposed area for development. Project Wetlands Scientist: Developed pre- activities also included reviewing the construction plans for the restoration existing South Florida Water Management of three disturbed sites located within Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 41 Canal Demo Projects Jeremy Paris (Continued) the Crocodile Lake National Wildlife •STATE SCHOOL T-1 ENVIRONMENTAL Refuge. The plans were a U.S. Fish and PERMITTING Wildlife requirement for the loss of wood Miami-Dade County Public Schools, rat habitat as part of the trails project. Doral, Florida Designed the planting plan and invasive Field Scientist: The project required the species management plan. Will be review of the existing SFWMD ERP and providing biological monitoring during the Dredge and Fill Permits for completeness. construction. •STATE SCHOOL TT-1 ON-SITE •GULF COAST DEEPWATER HORIZON WETLANDS DESIGN SPILL NRDA, HUMAN RESOURCE Miami-Dade County Public Schools, SURVEY Florida Gulf Coast of Florida Wetlands Scientist: Performed oversight Field Scientist: In response to the of the construction of an on-site wetland Deepwater Horizon spill, performed a mitigation area to meet the requirements human resource survey that assessed the of a USACE Dredge and Fill Permit for the disasters impact on beach utilization in the mitigation of filling jurisdictional wetlands. Florida Panhandle. The survey focused Performed routine daily inspections of the on the public response to the spill and effectiveness and proper construction of silt willingness to use the water for recreational fencing and sediment control. Designed and purposes. supervised the installation of the mitigation planting plan in addition to, performing post- •STATE SCHOOL QQQ-1 WETLAND mitigation semi-annual monitoring of the MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING site. Confirmed that the installation of trees Oleta River Recreation Area,North Miami, and shrubs met the FDOT requirements for Florida planting. In accordance with the mandatory Field Scientist: Provided permitting and conditions detailed in the USACE Dredge ecological services required to obtain the and Fill Permit, completed a Wetland permits to construct a school on a property Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP) that contains coastal wetlands that are for the post-restoration mitigation area part of the Oleta River Recreation Area. documenting the change in ecological Regularly met with regulators on-site to conditions. ensure that permit compliance was being achieved. During the construction of the school, performed routine inspections of the silt fencing and construction fencing to verify that the sediment control devices were being properly maintained. As part of the South Florida Water Management District ERP, Provided oversight of the installation of rip rap for the purpose of slope stabilization within the conservation easement. During the re-vegetation of the mitigation area, supervised the installation of the planting plan and verified that the plants meet State of Florida criteria. Furthermore, activities included the supervision of the the invasive species removal program. As part of the monitoring and management plan, performs semi-annual monitoring that includes flora and fauna surveys. i Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 42 amec' Stephen J. Hanks, PE, CFM, LEED AP GIS Database Management Mr. Stephen Hanks serves as a Senior Engineer with AMEC. As Senior Engineer, Mr. Hanks is a valuable resource in a range of engineering services, including surface water modeling, water quality assessment, and wetland and stormwater permitting. Mr. Hanks has a portfolio of water resources engineering services for Water Management Districts, county municipalities, and parks departments.As a Senior Engineer, Mr. Hanks'responsibilities include design and analysis, project accounting,technical writing, and field sampling. air' Additionally, Mr. Hanks is a valuable resource in a range of environmental services, including remediation, human health risk assessment, and fate and transport modeling. His petroleum site remediation services emphasizes free product recovery, bio-enhancement applications, and natural attenuation modeling. Mr. Hanks' environmental services experience includes petroleum companies, insurance providers, and retail facilities. iimpApoim Key Projects •B.S. Land and Water •MONROE COUNTY CANAL meetings have been performed. The canals Engineering. University of BATHYMETRIC SURVEY will be ranked for need for water quality Florida,2005 Monroe County Engineering Services, improvement. An updated GIS database Florida is being prepared incorporating the new 'M.S. Hydrologic Flo Florida,Sciences,011 information obtained on the Keys canals University of ida,2011 Senior Engineer: The project involved Y utilizing automated hydrographic survey related to water quality and restoration equipment consisting of a dual frequency options. Responsible for providing GIS ty1r.� . echo sounder used in conjunction with a support and evaluation and verification of the .... ,"""" _ GPS positioning system to survey a profile of field data. provided •Professional Engineer, each canal centerline. The survey p ■MONROE COUNTY CANAL Florida No.72253 depths of the canal and sediment to facilitate further prioritization of restoration projects, MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN— •Certified Floodplain as well selecting the most effective remedial PHASE I Manager measures. Responsible for post processing Monroe County Engineering Services, •LEED Accredited the survey data including incorporation of the Florida Professional point data into GIS, assigning canal attributes Senior Engineer: The project involved •Certified Professional in to the point data, performing a statistical Phase I of creating a canal management Erosion&Sediment Control evaluation of the bathymetry data, and master plan throughout the Florida Keys for •Certified SCUBA Diver summarizing the depth profile for each canal. prioritizing canals that need water quality improvement and selecting appropriate •HAZWOPER 40 Hour •MONROE COUNTY CANAL cleanup options. Phase I developed the MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN— prioritization process and applied the PHASE II process to a select group of previously .AMEC:2006 Monroe County Engineering Services, identified canals with water quality problems. Florida Conceptual remedial plans are being •Industry:2006 Senior Engineer: The project involved prepared for several of the highest priority Phase II of creating a canal management canals and funding sources identified to master plan throughout the Florida Keys for obtain funding for implementation of the prioritizing canals that need water quality remedial plans. Responsible for providing GIS improvement and selecting appropriate support and developing various queries of the cleanup options. The project was funded by canal attributes to prioritize locations for the an EPA grant and involves completing the implementation of treatment technologies. Canal Management Master Plan created MONROE COUNTY CANAL GIS during Phase 1 for the entire Florida Keys. • All of the approximately 502 residential UPDATE canals are being evaluated through field Monroe County Engineering Services, visits to determine water quality impacts Florida and to identify appropriate cleanup options. Senior Engineer: The project involved Extensive homeowner interviews and updating the GIS database to current Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 43 Stephen J. Hanks, PE, CFM, LEED AP (Continued) standards to facilitate the development of a for nine coal power plant ash ponds. The Canal Management Master Plan. Activities hydraulic models were used to develop completed included re-digitizing the canal emergency response plans based on the features utilizing high resolution aerial projected inundation of the evacuation imagery, incorporating water quality data, routes, as well as the temporal progression and impaired water body designations; as of the flood wave. Additional analysis was well as determining weed rack loading, completed for select generating stations, implemented treatment technologies, where two-dimensional hydraulic analysis and wastewater coverage for high priority was completed using CCHE2D software canals. Also, a general cost estimate for the to determine the potential impacts if multi- implementation of treatment technologies directional flow paths were analyzed. The throughout the county was developed. additional analysis also included the cost- benefit determination for hazard mitigating ■STATE SCHOOLS JA FERGUSON& structural modifications. WR THOMAS POLLUTION CONTROL STRUCTURES ■JACK CREEK HYDROLOGICAL Miami Dade County Public Schools, WETLAND RESTORATION Florida Southwest Florida Water Management Senior Engineer: Responsible for District, Florida the hydraulic evaluation, design, and Senior Engineer: Responsible for construction oversight of a pollution control hydrologic modeling using Visual MODFLOW structure to prevent the release of fuel and SPAW to evaluate the potential benefits oil to surrounding surface water in the from various rehydration alternatives for an event of a breach of integrity of a stand- impacted wetland community in southwest by diesel generator. Design components Florida. The model results were used to consisted of specifying the capacity of the select the desired alternative, design the oil water separator, designing the collection alternative to meet site constraints, and components, and retrofitting the existing prepare construction documents. stormwater system to provide retention of a potential release. ■DAM BREACH INUNDATION MAPPING Confidential Client, North Carolina •HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC Senior Engineer: Responsible for hydraulic MODELING FOR AN EARLY SITE modeling using HEC-GeoRAS and HEC- PERMIT RAS software to evaluate the potential PSE&G, New Jersey inundation of the surrounding community Senior Engineer: Responsible for resulting from an embankment breach for hydrologic modeling using HEC-HMS and seven coal power plants, with the failure of hydraulic modeling using HEC-GeoRAS multiple ash ponds completed for each plant. software. Determined the Probable Maximum The PMF was modeled using HEC-HMS for Precipitation (PMP) storm event for a the two plants that contained cooling water 13,000-square-mile watershed and evaluated reservoirs to evaluate a worst case failure the corresponding Probable Maximum Flood scenario. (PMF) elevation. Additionally, inundation mapping for more than 500 river miles was performed for the seismically induced failure •CANAL CONVEYANCE CAPACITY of the major reservoirs within the watershed, PROGRAM as well as the inundation resulting from South Florida Water Management District, the propagation of the hydraulic surge Florida associated with the Probable Maximum Project Engineer: Responsible for hydraulic Hurricane(PMH). modeling using HEC-GeoRAS and HEC- RAS software for more than 90 miles of •DAM BREACH INUNDATION MAPPING conveyance canals. The hydraulic models Confidential Client, Kentucky were used to compare existing versus Senior Engineer: Responsible for hydraulic as-built canal geometries and identify modeling using HEC-GeoRAS and HEC- conveyance reductions associated with RAS software to evaluate the potential alterations in canal geometry. The scope of inundation of the surrounding community services also included field reconnaissance, resulting from an embankment breach surveying, digital terrain modeling, and Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 44 Canal Demo Projects Stephen J. Hanks, PE, CFM, LEED AP (Continued) professional recommendations for dredging •QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR BRIDGE and bank repair. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS REPORTS ■BAYFRONT PARK WATER QUALITY PI Florida AND HYDRAULIC EVALUATION Project Engineer: Responsible for evaluating the hydraulic analysis performed Miami-Dade Parks Department, Florida by a third party for proposed modifications Project Engineer: Responsible for water to the 836/826 interchange to ensure quality assessment, hydraulic modeling appropriate model setup and execution were pursuant to the SFWMD recommended implemented. method of culvert evaluation, and preparation of the water quality assessment and •STATE SCHOOL TT-1 WETLAND hydraulic evaluation reports. The scope of DESIGN services included hydraulic modeling of a Miami Dade County Public Schools, three-acre tidal pool and tributary bay in Florida three different operating situations, water Project Engineer: Responsible for the quality assessment of the area of study, and design of a three acre preservation area, professional recommendations for design creation of a digital terrain model through based on the results of the hydraulic model. Autodesk Land Desktop, completion of cut •NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE and fill calculations, and the development of ELIMINATION SYSTEM INDUSTRIAL construction documents. ACTIVITY STORMWATER PROGRAM •STATE SCHOOL U-1 WETLAND Broward County Aviation Department, PERMITTING Florida Miami Dade County Public Schools, Project Engineer: Responsible for the Florida evaluation of stormwater system BMPs, Project Engineer: Responsible for assistance to airport tenants with FDEP utilizing GIS information to complete spatial NPDES regulations, and surface water analysis, assistance with the completion quality assessment to ensure integrity of the Environmental Resources Permit of receiving bodies. Performed trend (ERP), radius of influence calculations for evaluations and suggestions for program dewatering activities, and the preparation of modifications. Further activities include bid drawings.The scope of services included the investigation into available stormwater obtaining an ERP, wetlands mitigation, system technologies, evaluation of oversight of de-mucking and backfilling stormwater master planning methodologies, activities,and site closure negotiations. and general client services. •ORANGE COUNTY NUTRIENT REDUCTION STUDY Orange County, Florida Project Engineer: Responsible for the development of nutrient loading and reduction evaluation for management and protection of waters of the Upper Shingle Creek and Western Boggy Creek Basins. Upper Shingle Creek Basin includes four waterbodies: Lake Mann, Lake Cane, Lake Catherine, and Clear Lake. Evaluation is to identify specific areas within both basins where nutrient load reductions can be achieved. Evaluation will also provide watershed management and plans to achieve water quality improvements. Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 45 Canal Demo Projects amec Jose A. Milian GIS Database Management Mr. Jose Milian has performed more than 180 visual assessments including the use of specialized photo simulation software. He has also served as the CAD design lead for several multi-million dollar jobs for the FDOT as well as several out of state architectural and structural airport projects. His specific areas of expertise include the utilization of 3D animations, renderings, walk-throughs, and telecommunications, as well as environmental, architectural, structural, transportation, and111111 geotechnical CAD design. TM He has created numerous photo simulations for AMEC's Architecture& Engineering Infrastructure Design Department. These simulations were used for tower collocations, rooftop installations, and new build view shed analysis sites. In addition to new build visual assessments, Mr. Milian has created rooftop visual assessments depicting future antennas and telecommunication equipment. He also develops designs that require matching of ambient colors to satisfy building codes and municipal requirements. Additional examples are concealment flagpoles, clock towers, mono- Registrations& palms, mono-pines, monopoles, stealth crosses, bell towers, light poles, and water towers. Certifications Key Projects •More than 220 hours of online training for ■MONROE COUNTY CANAL •JUPITER WEST FACILITY Microstation and FDOT MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN— CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc./Florida •Revit Architecture 40-hour PHASE 2 Power&Light, Florida course Monroe County Engineering Services, CAD Specialist: Provided engineering Florida services for Florida Power & Light at Jupiter GIS Data Administrator: The project was West Facility. Performed design services for funded by an EPA grant and involves site layout, as well as created Photo-Sim and •AMEC.2009 completing the Canal Management Master Renderings. •Industry: 1994 Plan created during Phase 1 for the entire Florida Keys. All of the approximately 502 •HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL residential canals are being evaluated AIRPORT PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR through field visits to determine water TERMINAL-4 APRON REPLACEMENT quality impacts and to identify appropriate Broward County/HDR, Inc., Florida cleanup options. Extensive homeowner CAD Specialist: Provided pavement interviews and meetings have been evaluation and design services in support performed. The canals will be ranked for of the civil works associated with the need for water quality improvement. An reconfiguration of Terminal-4 at Fort updated GIS database is being prepared Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport. incorporating the new information obtained The apron pavements and surrounding taxi on the Keys canals related to water quality lanes, totaling approximately 1.8 million and restoration options. square feet, will service a reconfigured terminal and gate layout. Pavement structural •STORMWATER SERVICES AT FORT designs, details, and considerations for LAUDERDALE INTERNATIONAL AND phased construction are included in the NORTH PERRY AIRPORTS evaluation and design process. Assisted in Broward County Aviation Department, preparation of report for proposal, as well as Florida created Photo-Sims as requested by client. CAD/Environmental Professional: Provided stormwater compliance services for tenant •I-595 DESIGN BUILD facilities at Fort Lauderdale International Dragados USA/Florida Department of and North Perry airports. Services included Transportation, Florida sampling, permitting, and facility inspections. CAD Specialist: Provided geotechnical Created environmental data plans and GIS exploration, QC, CMT, and inspection location plans. services for a five-year FDOT project involving construction of three miles of HOT Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 46 Jose A. Milian (Continued) lanes on a three-lane highway. Current services for various sites throughout South microstation CAD manager for the 1-595 Florida. Created and updated designs for the expansion project. project. •ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING •TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER SERVICES DESIGN SITE ASSESSMENTS AND Comcast,Various Locations OTHER SERVICES CAD Designer: Provided A&E services T Mobile USA, Inc., Georgia for various Comcast sites. Responsible for CAD Designer: Provided environmental, creating and updating designs for the client. geotechnical, and other services for telecommunication tower design projects •STATE ROUTE 5A KEY WEST at 28 sites in 15 counties throughout north RECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION Georgia, ranging from 60 to 250 feet in ENGINEERING INSPECTION AND height. Created and updated designs for the t PROJECT MANAGEMENT project. Florida Department of Transportation, Florida CAD Specialist: Provided CEI and project management for the reconstruction of 8 miles of major state highway (SR-5A) in Key West, along with bridge approach slab reconstruction, embankment and drainage repair, and landscaping. Prepared Photo- Sims and renderings used for proposal purposes. •DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUILDING 66 SITE ASSESSMENT Miami-Dade County, Florida CAD/Environmental Professional: Provided • soil and groundwater assessment and created environmental data and GIS location plans. •DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT RED TOP SEDAN SOURCE REMOVAL Miami-Dade County, Florida CAD/Environmental Professional: Provided source removal services and created environmental data and GIS location plans. •POLK COUNTY ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES Motorola, Inc., Florida CAD Specialist: Provided A&E design for six telecommunication sites. Prepared CAD designs for lease exhibits, zoning drawings, and construction drawings. •VERIZON SOUTH FLORIDA SBA Communications Corporation, Florida CAD Designer: Provided A&E services for installation of new Verizon LTE Technology including structural analysis, structural = design, electrical design, and surveying Monroe County Resume Statement of Quotes 1 Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 47 31vie B.8 Current and Projected Workload The AMEC project team understands and Regarding our ability to handle the scope of appreciates the needs outlined by the County services. AMEC's proposed Project Manager, Ms. in the Request for Quotes. We are completely Wendy Blondin, PG, will continuously coordinate committed to providing the staff, equipment, and with task managers to ensure that all assignments resources required to fulfill all project needs and receive the proper allocation of staff resources. swig task assignments. and to meet or exceed all Additionally. the team, allocated to any specific anticipated project objectives. Our firm tracks assignment. including AMEC's and County CD client satisfaction on a quarterly basis and we staff, will be kept informed of work progress on are pleased to consistently achieve 95±% overall that assignment through a project work plan. P4" satisfaction. We are well known and respected in The project manager and task manager for the our industry for performing multiple projects and task assignment will also review the progress of the assignments within the constraints and limitations of technical work and compare it against the planned schedules, budgets, and project boundaries. schedule and allocated budget for each task. Ms. Blondin will serve as the point of contact between The AMEC project team has ample capacity, at County staff to assure that the right combination of any given time, to perform the important projects service, schedule, budget, and solutions is targeted anticipated for this contract. Staff availability for each task. 113 information in the graphic below depicts our current mpg workload commitments for key team members over The staff members proposed for each specific the next four months. identifies excess capacity and task will be available daily to provide services O� demonstrates our availability to Monroe County indicated in its scope, and individual staff members' during this engagement. Should the need arise committments can and will be adjusted as dictated CD for specialty qualifications, we have included team by project needs and in accordance with the project CI) members who offer those skills in some of those work plan and schedule. We understand that the areas. Another staffing resource, though we do not nature of this contract may not be one of uniform CD anticipate the need to use this resource, is through workload. but rather of varying labor requirements, our corporation, AMEC, which (through its 29,000 and the AMEC team commits to Monroe County employees) offers additional flexibility to provide that it will provide sufficient staff resources to backup staffing with numerous similarly skilled and handle even peak workload demands. Our team qualified staff. as well as numerous other specialty has the resources available to expedite schedule at disciplines, any time as needed. 0 UT Key Staff Availability for Monroe County Currently Committed Time Committed to Monroe County II Remaining Time Available 0 100 80 60 40 20 0 M.Nardone W.Blondin C.Stroehlen G.Corning L.Lombard J.Paris J Milian S Hanks Monroe County Current and Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for Projected Workload May 1, 2013 48 Canal Demo Projects amec9 0 aa� 0 Pensacola Tallahassee Jacksonville CD • Gainesville 0 Tavares Orlando 0 Lakeland- Cocoa Beach • Tampa Avon Park 0 West Palm Beach Fort Lauderdale Naples •Miami • AMEC offices assisting with the Monroe County opportunity Additional AMEC offices in Florida • Key West B.9 Office Location AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc., is an environmental consulting, engineering and design, and construction company operating with more than 4,600 professionals in 115 locations across the United States. In Florida,AMEC has 500 employees in 14 offices, including more than 100 in the South Florida region. The Monroe County contract will be managed from our Miami Lakes office with support from our Key West, Orlando, and Gainesville offices. With offices located strategically in Monroe County, Miami-Dade County, and South Florida, the AMEC team will be able to conveniently service projects in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Project Manager Wendy Blondin is also a resident of the Keys and will be able to respond to the County's needs in a very time-efficient manner. World skills on your doorstep We are more than 29,000 people in more than 40 countries globally-but focused on you. Our skills and experience around the world are key elements in choosing AMEC. Our clients know we can rise to the challenge. We say"on your doorstep"because our customers recognize the value of our local presence. Monroe County Office Location Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 49 Canal Demo Projects :,. .„.,,:• amec0 . 3 B.10 Financial Information and Litigation The Respondent will provide the following information: IIIZ 1. The number of years the Respondent has been operating and, if different, the number of I _. years it has been providing the services, goods, or construction services called for in the CD RFQ; During the past 60 years,AMEC has offered multidisciplined solutions through civil engineering, surveying, architectural services. environmental services, geotechnical engineering. program management, materials testing and engineering, and water resource services to public and mom■ private clients. Our employees live and work in our local communities, making us especially dedicated to improving our surrounding environments. We say "world skills on your doorstep" because our customers recognize the value of our local presence. 2. The number of years the Respondent has operated under its present name and any prior names; 1.141 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Nevada on June 1, O 1994 under the name of AGRA Earth & Environmental. Inc. On September 6, 2000. the above name was changed to AMEC Earth & Environmental, Inc. On November 1, 2011, the AMEC Earth & Environmental. Inc. name was changed to AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 2 Recent acquisitions in Florida include MACTEC, Inc., and BCI Engineers and Scientists, Inc. AMEC's acquisition of of these two compainies in the past several years has significantly expanded the firm's geographic reach and capacity in the United States. The acquisitions bring rat' additional engineering, design, and construction expertise and capabilities in support of AMEC's mom. growth strategy. 0 3 The following, including answers to the questions regarding claims and suits: a. Are there any judgments, claims, arbitration proceeding or suits pending or outstanding against the Respondent, or its officers or general partners? If yes, provide details; AMEC is a large international service company and as such, there are inevitably minor disputes arising from time to time. While details of these disputes are confidential, we can CI confirm that there are no disputes or litigation of any kind that individually or collectively will have a material effect upon the quality of AMEC's performance and its ability to provide services for this contract. rm b. Has the Respondent, within the last five years, been a party to any lawsuit or arbitration ! • with regard to a contract for services, goods or construction services similar to those 1. —■to requested in the specifications? If yes, provide details Please see above for litigation information.Also, AMEC has never failed to complete a project for which it was paid by the client. From time to time. AMEC's clients have suspended or ra terminated projects for their convenience. mom• c. Has the Respondent ever initiated litigation against the county or been sued by the O county in connection with a contract to provide services, goods or construction services? If yes, provide details No. Monroe County Financial Information Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for and Litigation May 1, 2013 50 Canal Demo Projects amec0 RFQ for Engineering Design of Canal Demonstration Projects SECTION THREE: RESPONSE FORMS RESPONSE FORM TO: MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS rF clo Sustainability Manager MURRAY E. NELSON BUILDING, ROOM 212 102050 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY "n KEY LARGO, FLORIDA 33070 0 I acknowledge receipt of Addenda No. (s) My lump sum price for the work is$ 37,725.00 - I have included: o The Submission Response Form x o Lobbying and Conflict of Interest Clause x o Non-Collusion Affidavit x o Drug Free Workplace Form x o Respondent's Insurance and Indemnification Statement x o Insurance Agent's Statement x o Local Preference Form N/A not claiming a local preference In addition, I have included a current copy of the following professional and occupational licenses: (Check mark items above,as a reminder that they are included.) Mailing Address: 5845 NW 158 Street Miami Lakes. Fl 33014 Telephone: 305-826-5588 Fax:305-826-1799 +o`,,ar°°'"f. LORENA * MYCCMMISSION E853831 Date: 4/25/2013 EXPIRES:Decent r tots Brnded rlw Budge.N • 5 • Sig Witness: ---- (Seal) Jos . Perez (Name) Office Manager (Title) Monroe County County Forms Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1 2013 51 Canal Demo Projects RFQ for Engineering Design of Canal Demonstration Projects LOBBYING AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE SWORN STATEMENT UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 010-1990 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA ETHICS CLAUSE " AMEC Environment& Infrastructure. Inc (Company) '...warrants that he/it has not employed, retained or otherwise had act on his/its behalf any former County officer or employee in violation of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 010-1990 or any County officer or employee in violation of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 010-1990. For breach or violation of this provision the County may, in its discretion, terminate this Agreement without liability and may also, in its discretion, deduct from the Agreement or purchase price, or otherwise recover, the full amount of any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or consideration paid to the former County officer or employee". (Si ature) ate: 4/25/2013 STATE OF: -c-A Y \GI CA- COUNTY OF: Iv' TtA 1 ' 4 e_ /n� Subscribed and sworn to(or affirmed)before me on 1r\-D 113 )C\3 (date)by )tne • RC(( 2- (name of affiant). He/Sh is persona y known to or has produced . u EnA as ip�'.•: F MY COMMISSION:EE I identification. (type of identification) * **. EXPIRES:December20, tE 4'1,or,,s1* Bmiled llw Butyet N tary �h NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: I Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 52 RFQ for Engineering Design of Canal Demonstration Projects NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT I, Jose R. Perez of the city of Miami-Dade County according to law on my oath, and under penalty of perjury, depose and say that: 1. I am of the firm of AMEC Environment& Infrastructure, Inc the bidder making the Proposal for the project described in the Request for Quotes for: Environmental Engineering Services for Selection of Canal Demonstration Projects. and that I executed the said proposal with full authority to do so: 2. the prices in this bid have been arrived at independently without collusion, consultation, communication or agreement for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other bidder or with any competitor; 3. unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the bidder and will not knowingly be disclosed by the bidder prior to bid opening, directly or indirectly, to any other bidder or to any competitor; and 4. no attempt has been made or will be made b the bidder to induce any other person, partnership or corporation to submit, or not to submit, a bid for the purpose of restricting competition; 5. the statements contained in this affidavit are true and correct, and made with full knowledge that Monroe County relies upon the truth of the statements contained in this affidavit i awardin contr or said project. 4/25/2013 (Si ature of Respo ent) (Date) STATE-OF: 61,-1 ( 6 COUNTY OF: \A1 CA 1 _ bGt_Cke PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, who, after first being sworn by me, (name of individual signing) affixed his/her signature in the space provided above on this 2 ) day of 20 t3 . ~ ) c y '' NOT Y PUBLIC My Commission Expires: ,�",,:.°" toRENA00NZM.EZ • * MY COMMISSION 1 EE 859831 '+ EXPIRES:December 20,2016 3 5 ^'*4.c;ne''' 8mded Thv Budget Mom Services Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 53 Canal Demo Projects RFQ for Engineering Design of Canal Demonstration Projects DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE FORM The undersigned vendor in accordance with Florida Statute 287.087 hereby certifies that: AMEC Environment& Infrastructure, Inc (Name of Business) 1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. 2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. 3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are under bid a copy of the statement specified in subsection (1). 4. In the statement specified in subsection (1), notify the employees that, as a condition of working on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, any violation of Chapter 893 (Florida Statutes) or of any controlled substance law of the United States or any state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5)days after such conviction. 5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community, or any employee who is so convicted. 6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of this section. As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify that this firm complies fully with the above requirements. 4Res dent's Signature 4/ /2013 __ ate „, , _ ,_._iN C'WCY TAR PUBLIC L My Commission Expires:� :0.Y P LOAM GANIZALEZ 36 *4e MY COMMISSION 1EE85933I EXPIRES:December 20,206 �'�no* !e I:ri TtN Cu".get Nagy Swims Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 54 Canal Demo Projects RPQ for Engineering Design of Canal Demonstration Projects Respondent's Insurance and Indemnification Statement Insurance Requirement Required Limits Worker's Compensation Statutory Limits Employer's Liability $1,000,000/$1,000,000/$1,000,000 GeneralLiability $1,000,000 Combined Singlelimit Vehicle Liability $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit per Occurrence. Professional Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate IDEMNIFICATION AND BOLD HARMLESS FOR CONSULTANTS AND SUBCQNSULTANTS- The.CONSULTANT covenants and agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Monroe County,its commissioners,officers, employees, agents and servants from any and all claims for bodily injury,including death,personal injury,and property damage;including:property owned by Monroe County, and any other losses, damages, and expenses of any kind, including attorneys fees,court costs and.expenses,Which arise out of,in connection with,or by reason of services provided by the CONSULTANT or any.of its Subcontractor(s)in any tier,occasioned by the negligence, errors,or other wrongful act or omission of the CONSULTANT,including its Subcontractors)in any tier,their officers,employees,servants or.agents. In the event that the completion of the project (to include the work of others) is delayed-or suspended as .a result of the CONSULTAN 's failure to purchase or maintain the required insurance,the CONSULTANT shall indemnify the.County from any and all increased expenses. resulting from such delay, Should any claims be:asserted.against the COUNTY by virtue of any deficiency or ambiguity in the plans and specifications provided by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that CONSULTANT shall hold the County harmless and shall indemnify it from all losses occurring thereby and shall further defend any claim or action on the County's behnlf. The first ten dollars($10,00)of remuneration;paid to the CONSULTANT is consideration for the indemnification provided for above. The extent of liability is in.no way limited to,reduced,or lessened by the insurance requirements contained elsewhere within this agreement. This indemnification shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of the Agreement. Monroe County Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 55 Canal Demo Projects 9S sloefoJd owao ieueo E lOZ 'L AeW iol saoimaS 6uliaaui6u3 salon°)o luawalelS Aluno3 awuoyu Japuelas naglleW :2=1\1}tn.rd a•maeugis A nnaSV aouginsui ':seayyoN saonias N{st.a uod (Ieultsseloid) (Om'ohd'10) apgi.sune10 X oouauttoo0 X nig sa1Dttod nlrtggr'i 000'OSS Al4!Qetl leuo!ssegud 000'IS uogesuadwoo s; IJOM 000'IS cry 000'0ls:a5ewea Apado.id/1IN lUnful AIP08 411I!gell lwauaw STIMIDOUHa A3Il0d •1Cottod Eutpnodsai oo aql of�jdd13 saigtponpap 2trtmotio3 atn •moiaq pauieu sapplq alp 111i/A sluamaitnbal anogg atp paiaatnai aim;I Dawaivis s iov aDtsIVIMSKI a w3 2luapuodsag •sluotua.rmbaa oqa re pia tir 'al f tdtuoo Elm pug latrinoa alp pap:uk t:3t,Cso;cpunm aq ttiM iggl oougmsnt alp pugls.iaptm i I1�I3I131 V1S S.diR2aNi0dS3'I spacoxd uoprllsaotuaQ irtivp 3o a2!saG 8utiaaat$u3 Jo;an'3 ameê rate '0`fxrt-rib. r ilaarb of Tngineers CD AMEC ENVIRO � . '', STRUCTURE INC. Air Is authorized under the provisions of a Statutes,to offer engineering services to the public through a Professional Engin ' ed under Chapter 471,Florida Statutes. CD EXPIRATIoN:2/28/2013 CA.Lic.No: CI) Certificate of Authorization Auorr No: 2282013050671 5392 AC# 6182125 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS SEQ#L12070202311 LICENSE NBR Ala, 0'7/02/2012 120002583 1GB514 The GEOLOGY BUSINESS Named below IS CERTIFIED Under the provisions of Chapter -.4., • !� Expiration date: JUL 31, 2014 1.y, -- t AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE;T 1105 LAKEWOOD PKWY STE 300 ALPHARETTA GA 30009 �µ� RICK SCOTT KEN LAWSON GOVERNOR DISPLAY AS REQUIRED BY LAW01 SECRETARY off : o to it X ., ibd a lt tiS Kit 9F ?I lepattmtat of blatr 4..e. ai UN spz 1 ready from theme records_.of NS'oVco Mai AMlC`eNVIRONMENT S --�tf t. INFRASTRUCTURE, INC%8.i Nevida.eorporafun.eulhorRed to traneaci #'IQ li o sncss m 11. S1310 of ploria3,cualdred ne Augl.3.2000. :.:- 4A at The docurneol number al fisoorporason is F0000b*0089. 31G I forth!,cents Mel Said decorated has paid all leesp due s oniCe th,v-gh %Tc December 31,2013,tlral ils renal decent annual i afE 44 } was filed MJanuary 21.2013 and+ls statusacli ne re. to -s, regal y�p)4.. St( f 111,n1Wr cents that said corporation ha:rot tiled a Ccrldlcala of Wdhdrawai„ f uf Given under my hand and the ?Z>i • Goal Seat 0 the SWIG of no.iaa ': el Tallahassee the Capdal.;his the P t r February,ft. Twenueih day o1 2013 4 In-_„, 'y Os .otil.A.' ''',,._:,,2:744'i-' •:i V9M- 0.1t-e't F- Monroe County Licenses Statement of Quotes Engineering Services for May 1, 2013 Canal Demo Projects 57 • ACORO® DAT (M /MDDIY YY) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the t�-' certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). c CONTACT fv PRODUCER 'O NAME: Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc. PHONE FAX Morristown NJ office (NC.No.Cot): (866) 283-7122 (A/c.No.): 800-363-0105 D 44 Whippany Road, Suite 220 E-MAIL p Morristown NJ 07960 USA ADDRESS: _ INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL# INSURED INSURER A: Zurich American Ins CO 16535 AMEC Environment & infrastructure, Inc. INSURER B: American Zurich Ins CO 40142 f/k/a AMEC E&I, Inc., f/k/a MACTEC 5845 NW 158 St. INSURER C: ACE American Insurance Company 22667 Miami Lakes, FL 33014 USA INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:570050163181 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. Limits shown are as requested INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF I POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE _INSR-WVD POLICY NUMBER ((MMIDDIYYYY11 ))MMIDDIYYYY)) LIMITS C GENERAL LIABILITY G24553401 05/01/2013l05/01/2014 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED $100,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES(Ea occurrence) CLAIMS-MADE ri OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $10,000 I PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1,000,000 c GENERAL AGGREGATE $1,000,000 iTol GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $1,000,000 E, 7 POLICY n JECOT- n LOC r A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BAP 9483148-02 05/O1/2013 05/01/2014 COMBINED SINGLE LIMn (Ea accident) $1,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) 0 ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) d X AUTOS AUTOS "'' X HIRED AUTOS X NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE V AUTOS (Per accident) F X Comp.Ded.31000 X Coll.Ded.31000 t: d UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE U EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE DED RETENTION B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC350486612 05/01/2013 05/01/2014 WC STATU- H- EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY YIN All Other states X TORY LIMITS OT ER ANY PROPRIETOR I PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 B OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED? N NIA WC386713306 05/01/2013 05/01/2014 (Mandatory in NH) MA & WI E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1,000,000 A ' Archit&Eng Prof 'EOC938357805 05/01/2013.05/01/2014'Each Claim $1,000,000 Professional Liability Aggregate $2,000,000= SIR applies per policy terms & conditions eil- iy 1 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) RE: On Call Engineering Services Contract. Where required by written contract Monroe County,is included as Additional Insured with respect to General Liability and Automobile Liability policies. App V N�GE (IT BY •I '�' AM �_t DWAN N � CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE --` POLICY PROVISIONS. an Monroe County AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �yy� 1100 Simonton St., Room 216 �+ Key West FL 33040 USA ele e.Q. ee—gae ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 10650550 LOC#: '4 a® ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page _ of _ AGENCY NAMED INSURED Aon Risk Services Northeast, Inc. AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. POLICY NUMBER See Certificate Number: 570050163181 CARRIER NAIC CODE See Certificate Number: 570050163181 EFFECTIVE DATE: ADDITIONAL REMARKS THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL# INSURER INSURER INSURER INSURER ADDITIONAL POLICIES If a policy below does not include limit information,refer to the corresponding policy on the ACORD certificate form for policy limits. INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY POLICY LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSR WVD POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION LIMITS DATE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) WORKERS COMPENSATION A N/A wc672425403 05/01/2013 05/01/2014 Idaho ACORD 101(2008/01) C.2008 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD