Sugarloaf Blvd. Bridge Replacement 10/21/2015AMY HEAVILIN, CPA
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT &COMPTROLLER
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
DATE: November 16, 2015
TO: Breanne Erickson
Engineering
FROM. Cheryl Robertson Executive Aide to the Clerk of Court & ComptrollerMW1160hexlso
At the October 21, 2015 Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted approval and
authorized execution of Item D32 Task order with Kisinger=Campo-&:-Assoc ates;-f-Pprofessional
design and permitting services for the Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project. This task order
is being awarded under the On Call contract for Professional Engineering Services in the lump sum fee
of $398,496.69 with $8,625.50 in estimated expenses.
Enclosed is a duplicate original executed on behalf of Monroe County, for your handling. Should you
have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
CC: County Attorney
Finance
File
500 Whitehead Street Suite 101, PO Box 1980, Key West FL 33040 Phone: 305-295-3130 Fax: 305-295-3563
3117 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: 305-289-6027 Fax. 305-289-6025
88820 Overseas Highway, Plantation Key, FL 33070 Phone: 852-7145 Fax: 305-852-7145
g
TASK ORDER FOR ON CALL PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND PERMITTING
SERVICES BETWEEN MONROE COUNTY AND KISINGER CAMPO &
ASSOCIATES
FOR
SUGARLOAF BOULEVARD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
In accordance with the Continuing Contract for On Call Professional Engineering
Services made and entered on the 16th day of January, 2014 between Monroe County
hereinafter referred to as the "County" and Kisinger Campo & Associates, hereinafter
referred to as "Consultant" where design services are allowed if construction costs do
not exceed $2,000,000.
All terms and conditions of the referenced Contract for on Call Professional Engineering
Services apply to the Task Order, unless the Task Order modifies an Article of the
Agreement of which will be specifically referenced in this Task Order and the
modification shall be precisely described.
This Task Order is effective on the 21st Day of October, 2015 and shall expire 60 days
after construction is complete.
Article II Scope of Basic Services, Paragraph 2.1.1 is amended as follows:
The scope of. services for the Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge (#904153) Replacement
Project will include production of construction plans, specifications, permitting services
and support during the bidding of the project required for the replacement of the
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge and associated roadway reconstruction.
The Design for Construction shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, plans
and specifications which describe all systems, elements, details, components, materials,
equipment, and other information necessary for construction. The Design for
Construction shall be accurate, coordinated and in all respects adequate for construction
and shall be in conformity, and comply, with all applicable law, codes, permits, and
regulations. Products, equipment and materials specified for use shall be readily
available unless written authorization to the contrary is given by the County.
Details of the scope of services are outlined below and included in the Consultant's
proposal that is attached to this task order as Exhibit A.
1.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
1.1 The Engineer shall prepare a Design Development Letter Report for the County's -
approval. The Design Development Report shall consist of a written document that
establishes and describes the size and character of the proposed bridge replacement,
materials and such other elements as may be appropriate. The report will contain a
conceptual cost estimate.
2.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE
2.1 Based on the approved Design Development Documents and any further
adjustments authorized by the County in the scope or quality of the Project, the
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 1 of 6
Consultant shall prepare, for approval by the County, Construction Documents
consisting of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for the
construction of the project. Construction documents shall conform to the standards
contained in the most current version of the following:
1. Florida Department of Transportation Roadway Plans Preparation Manuals
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesig,n/PPMManual/PPM.shtm
2. Florida Department of Transportation Design Standards
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesi n/DesignStandards/Standards shtm
3. Florida Department of Transportation Surveying Procedure
http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/proceduraldocuments/procedures/bin/550030101 pdf
4. Florida Department of Transportation Drainage Manual
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesivn/dr/files/2008DrainageManual pdf
5. Florida Department of Transportation Soils and Foundations Handbook
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/structures/Manuals/SFH.pd
6. Florida Department of Transportation Structures Manual (625-020-018)
including Temporary Design Bulletins
7. MUTCD
http://mutcd.fhwa.dot. ov/
8. American Disabilities Act
http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/proceduraldocuments/procedures/bin/625020015 pdf
9. Florida Department of Transportation Pavement Coring and Evaluation
Procedure
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/statematerialsoffice/administration/resources/library/pU
blications/materialsmanual/documents/vl-section32-clean pdf
10. Florida Department of Transportation Flexible Pavement Design Manual
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/pavementmanagement/PUBLICATIONS.shtm
11. Florida Department of Transportation Rigid Pavement Design Manual
12. Federal Highway Administration Checklist and Guidelines for Review of
Geotechnical Reports and Preliminary Plans and Specifications
http://www.fhwa.dot. ov/en ineering/ eotech/pubs/reviewguide/checklist cfm
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 2 of 6
13. Florida Department of Transportation Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards
for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesi mVF] oridaGreenbook/2007/2007FIoridaGreenbo
ok.pdf
14. Florida Statutes
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?Mode=View%20Statutes&Submen
u=1 &Tab=statutes&CFID=14677574&CFTOKEN=80981948
15. Florida's Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Handbook.
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/safety/ped bike/ped bike standards.htm#Florida%20B
ike%20Handbook
16. AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities
http://www.sccrtc.orWbikes/AASHTO 1999 BikeBook.pdf
17. Florida's Quality/Level of Service Handbook for Planning
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planniny/systems/sm/los/los sw2.htm
18. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American Association
of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO Green Book) (GDHS-
5 AASHTO Bookstore).
19. The Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board)
http://Rulliver.trb.or z/bookstore/
(TRB Bookstore `HCM2KE).
20. FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (with
supplemental specifications).
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/Specificationsoffice/2007BK/TOC.htm
21. Facilities Design Manual (Topic No. 625-020-016-a)
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/structures/Manuals/2002fdotfacilitiesmanual pdf
22. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Mandatory beginning 2007)
(AASHTO Bookstore `4-LRFDUS-4')
23. Right of Way Mapping Procedure (Topic No. 550-030-015-e)
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/surveyingand mappin RWMapplingHandbook pdf
24. Project Development and Environmental Manual Par 1 and 2 (Topic No. 650-
000-001).
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/emo/pbs/pdeman.htm
Where FDOT design standards cannot be met the Consultant will request a design
variance or exception.
2.2. The Consultant shall provide Drawings and applicable Technical Special
Provisions to the County for the County's review (the Florida Department of
Transportation Standard Specifications will be incorporated by reference) at the 30%
and 100% stages of the project. The Consultant shall respond to questions resulting
from County review and incorporate any required revisions to the construction drawings
and specifications. Design calculations package will be submitted with the 100% phase
construction drawings.
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 3 of 6
2.3 The Consultant will provide a construction cost estimate and a project schedule
at each phase submittal.
2.4 Upon completion of the Construction Documents Phase, the Consultant shall
provide Construction Documents for the County's approval. Upon approval by the
County the Consultant shall provide the County up to 5 sets of Construction Documents
that have been signed and sealed by the Consultant. The Consultant shall also provide
an electronic version of the construction documents.
2.5 The Consultant shall assist the County in the preparation of the necessary
bidding information for the production of bidding forms, the Conditions of the Contracts,
and the forms of Agreements between the County and the Contractors by providing
supporting information as to the projects scope, bid items, estimated quantities and
construction duration. The County shall prepare all Bidding Forms, Conditions of the
Contract, and Forms of Agreement.
2.6 The Consultant's construction documents (plans, specifications, etc) will conform
to all codes and regulations of the federal government, county, state, municipalities,
agencies and state departments, in effect at the date of this Agreement, and shall be of
such completion as to be acceptable for review and ruling by said agencies when
permits are applied for. The Consultant shall use due care in determining permit
requirements and shall meet with regulatory agencies as necessary to coordinate
specific permit requirements. The Consultant shall document all meetings and
conversations with said regulatory agencies. If permits are denied for incompleteness or
for lack of following said codes or regulations, or permit requirements, then the Engineer
will conform the construction documents in such manner to receive permits upon such
plans. Work required by the Consultant to conform documents to federal, state, city,
county, or agency specifications to allow them to be approved shall be completed at no
charge or cost to the County, unless said requirements are changed during the course of
the project.
2.7 The Consultant shall file (through the County) all documents required for the
approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project. The Consultant
shall file (through the County) the necessary documents to obtain Environmental
Resource Permits and all other permits required for construction. The County shall be
responsible for the timely submittal of all permit application fees.
2.8 As needed by the County, the Consultant will provide clarification and answers to
questions from prospective bidders during the construction bid process. Answers will be
provided in a timely manner in order to facilitate bidding.
3.0 CONSTRUCTION COST
Contemporaneously with the submission of the Design, the Consultant shall submit to
the County in writing its final estimate of the contractor's anticipated bid price for
constructing the Project. Once submitted, the final anticipated price estimate shall be
adjusted by the Engineer to reflect any increase or decrease in anticipated price
resulting from a change in Design.
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 4of6
3.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total estimated bid cost to the County of all
elements of the Project designed or specified by the Engineer.
3.2 The Construction Cost shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and
materials and Equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the
Engineer, plus a reasonable allowance for Contractor's overhead and profit.
3.3 Construction cost does not include the compensation of the Consultant and the
Consultant's consultants, the costs of land, rights -of -way, financing or other costs which
are the responsibility of the County.
Article VII, Paragraph 7.1 is amended to include the following:
The Consultant shall be paid monthly based on the following Lump Sum amounts
(except where noted):
KCA Fee
Roadway/Utility Coordination/Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)/Signage
And Pavement Markings (SAPM) $ 77,284.00
Drainage $ 7,736.00
Structures $ 214,242.00
Environmental Permitting $ 35,154.00
Total $ 334,416.00
Subconsultant Fee
Coastal Engineering - Intera $ 23,140.00
SUE — Keith and Associates $ 2,750.00
Survey - Keith and Associates $ 18,980.00
Geotech — Tierra South Florida $ 19,210.69
Total $ 64,080.69
Total Design Fee
Total Design Fee
Estimated Expenses
$ 398,496.69
Estimated Expenses $ 8,625.50
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 5 of 6
Article IX Miscellaneous, Paragraph 9.21 is amended to add the following:
Pursuant to F.S. 119.0701, Contractor and its subcontractors shall comply with all public
records laws of the State of Florida, including but not limited to:
(a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required
by Monroe County in order to perform the service.
(b) Provide the public with access to public records on the terms and conditions that
Monroe County would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cost
provided in Florida Statutes, Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law.
(c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public
records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law.
(d) Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer, at no cost, to
Monroe County all public records in possession of the contractor upon termination of the
contract and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and
exempt from public records disclosure requirements. All records stored electronically
must be provided to Monroe County in a format that is compatible with the information
technology systems of Monroe County.
Paragraph 9.30 Federal Highway Administration Requirements do not apply to this
project.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party caused the Task Order to be executed by its duly
authorized representative.
Consultant
Kisinger Campo & Associates
9/30/2015
Ig rejstep n H. McGuc en, P.E.�ate 1
Chief-E 'ecutive Officer
-Title '
Mi.O.'IrROE COUNTY A7 TO
APPR0VE4) A,3 70 FOf;i'.
Gh!f=i! �i !";E h✓1. lJi����R�l-Br'�?i= Cr`P`S
ASS!STANT COUN Y iTO{ 1,1E.Y
o
Witness:
c: C3
00
Signature :•date
- G7
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
Mayor/Chairma
Date: / Q b / l / -5
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 6 of 6
-r,
EXHIBIT A
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Proposal
August 18, 2015
Judith S. Clarke, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
1100 Simonton Street
Key West, Florida 33040
Project Description: Monroe County on Call Professional Engineering Services
Re: Task Work Order #2 — Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Dear Ms. Clarke:
Kisinger Campo & Associates (KCA) is pleased to submit this Scope of Services and Fee Estimate
for the above referenced project. This project will consist of the production of construction plans,
specifications and permitting required for the replacement of the Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge and
associated roadway reconstruction. Tasks will include roadway design, structures design, drainage
design, environmental/permitting, utility coordination, maintenance of traffic, coastal engineering,
survey, subsurface utility engineering and geotechnical engineering. For additional scope detail,
see the attached Scope of Services and Staff Hour Estimation Forms.
We have estimated the level of effort required for all engineering services described above. Our
total estimated lump sum fee amounts to $398,496.69. This fee includes all KCA efforts and sub -
consultant efforts, coordination, QA/QC and supervision. The fee estimate is based on hourly rates
which include our overhead.
Our expenses were estimated separately and are not included in the lump sum fee estimate. Our
total estimated expenses amount to $8,625.50. Expenses will be itemized and submitted
separately with each invoice. For a detailed description of the lump sum fee and estimated
expenses see the fee proposals in the attached Appendix.
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to continue our working relationship with you on this
project. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Best Regards,
Jason L. LaBarbera, P.E.
Project Manager
File: 12013.16 (KCA)
201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400 I Tampa, Florlda 33602 1 F I+UNE 813 871-5331 FA'i 813 871-5135 1 ce-,
KisinAer Campo & Associates, Corp.
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Scope of Services
Task Work Order # 2
Monroe County On -Call Engineering Services
Date: August 17, 2015
1. PROJECTTITLE:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153).
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES:
The Consultant will complete construction plans, specifications and permit applications for the
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153). The existing bridge is a three span AASHTO
Type II Beam bridge supported by intermediate pile bents in the canal and slope embankment above the
vertical face canal walls. The proposed replacement will be a phase constructed, single span Florida -I
36" Beam Bridge with end bent retaining walls and side slopes. The bridge typical section will
accommodate two 11' travel lanes with 2.5' outside shoulders and a 5' sidewalk on the west side to
accommodate pedestrian traffic. The approximate span length with be 95'. The original channel width
of 75' will be restored and a vertical sand cement bulkhead wall will be constructed along the north side
of the channel, similar to the existing sand cement wall on the south side of the channel. The approach
roadway alignment and profile will be adjusted as necessary for the new bridge typical section.
3. SPECIFIC SERVICES
• Environmental & Permitting: The Consultant will perform a field investigation within the project
right-of-way (ROW) to identify wetlands and protected species. The Consultant will prepare a
report summarizing the results of the field investigation. This report will be used to coordinate
with environmental regulatory and resource agencies during the permitting phase of the project.
The Consultant will prepare permit applications (or applicable exemption notices) for the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and
the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). It is anticipated that construction of the proposed structures will
meet the requirements of a SFWMD General Permit or exception and that a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will not be required. The proposed replacement structure
is also anticipated to meet the criteria of a Nationwide Permit (most likely a NWP 3, Maintenance,
or NWP 15, U.S. Coast Guard Approved Bridges) for the USACE, or be exempt from USACE
201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400 • Tampa, Florida 33602.• Phone: (813) 871-5331 • Fax (813) 871-5135
Visit our website at www.kisingercampo.com
Kisinaer Campo & Associates, Corp.
permitting. The Consultant will prepare a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Bridge Permit application and
submit it to the USCG for processing. The Consultant will coordinate with the Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) to obtain any required environmental clearance for the
project from this agency. This Scope of Services is exclusive of any environmental mitigation for
wetlands, mangroves, seagrasses, corals or protected species. Formal consultation with Federal
resource agencies (USFWS and NMFS) and preparation of Endangered Species Biological
Assessments (BAs) or evaluation of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) are also not included.
• Drainage: The Consultant will analyze the existing drainage systems at the bridge location and
will design proposed systems for the new bridge replacement. It is anticipated that bridge
drainage will be provided with scuppers, similar to what is currently in place.
• Bridge Hydraulics: The Consultant will provide a Bridge Hydraulic Memorandum showing the
result of the existing and proposed hydraulic analysis at the bridge location. A scour analysis
and Bridge Hydraulic Recommendation Sheet (BHRS) will be provided.
• Roadway: The roadway design may require a new longitudinal grade due to the increased
structural depth required to span the canal. This will result in revised roadway profiles and cross
sections. It is assumed the horizontal alignment will be shifted slightly to the west as a result of
the phased construction. The Consultant shall provide roadway plan/profile, cross section,
maintenance of traffic plan and any necessary detail sheets. For a detailed list of roadway plan
sheets, see the attached Staff Hour Estimation Forms.
The Consultant shall also prepare detailed quantities and construction cost estimate.
Remaining effort includes time for meetings, coordination and quality control reviews.
• Structural: The Consultant will prepare a Bridge Development Report (Memo) to determine the
most cost effective bridge replacement solution. After county approval of the recommended
bridge concept the consultant will begin production of final construction plans, quantities, cost
estimates, and specifications for the bridge replacement and associated walls. It is anticipated
that the structure will be comprised of reinforced/prestressed concrete components and be
similar in overall geometry in an effort to minimize roadway reconstruction and environmental
impacts. For a detailed list of structural design efforts and anticipated plan contents, see the
attached Staff Hour Estimation Forms.
• Utility Relocation: The Consultant will perform a utility search in the vicinity and complete
plans for utility relocation efforts.
• Survey: The Consultant, through our sub -consultant, will provide a topographic survey of the
areas surrounding the referenced bridge as detailed in the attached survey staff hour sheets of
services.
• Geotechnical: The Consultant, through our sub -consultant, will perform geotechnical studies
201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400 • Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 871-5331 9 Fax (813) 871-5135
Visit our website at www.kisingercampo.com
Kisinger Campo & Associates, Corp.
in accordance with the attached sub -consultant scope of services.
• Coastal Engineering: The Consultant, through our sub -consultant, will perform coastal
engineering services in accordance with the attached sub -consultant scope of services.
4. FEE:
The total estimated lump sum design fee amounts to $398,496.69. This fee includes all KCA and sub -
consultants efforts, coordination, QA/QC and supervision. The fee estimate is based on hourly rates which
include our overhead.
Our expenses were estimated separately and are not included in the lump sum fee estimate. Our total
estimated expenses amount to $8,625.50. Expenses will be itemized and submitted separately with each
invoice. For a breakdown of the lump sum fee, sub -consultants fees and estimated expenses see the
following sheets.
Any post design services involving shop drawing review, materials review, site visits, and meetings are not
included in this proposal. Post design services will be included under a separate post design task work
order.
The County will pay any required permit application fees. KCA will request that the county issue checks
for the fees when required.
S. SCHEDULE:
A detailed schedule will be produced and submitted to the County after issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Below is a preliminary schedule:
• Preliminary Submittal —30% Roadway Plans, Bridge Development Report (Memo), Bridge
Hydraulics Memo, Preliminary Geotech Report, Survey, Preliminary Cost Estimate -16 weeks
from notice to proceed
• County Review- 4 weeks
• Final Submittal - 100% Construction Plans, Quantities, Cost Estimates and Permitting- 20 weeks
• County Review- 4 weeks
• Signed and Sealed Plans — Signed and sealed plans and specs — 2 weeks
Total - 46 weeks
201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400 • Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 871-5331 • Fax (813) 871-5135
Visit our website at www.kisingercampo.com
FEE SUMMARY SHEET
TWO #2 - Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
KCA FEE
Roadway/Utility Coordination/MOT/SAPM $77,284.00
Drainage $7,736.00
Structures $214,242.00
Environmental Permitting $35,154.00
TOTAL $334,416.00
SUBCONSULTANT FEE
Coastal Engineering - Intera $23,140.00
SUE - Kieth and Associates $2,750.00
Survey - Kieth and Associates $18,980.00
Geotech - Tierra South Florida $19,210.69
TOTAL DESIGN FEE
TOTAL $64,080.69
TOTAL DESIGN FEE $398,496.69
ESTIMATED EXPENSES
Project Manager (County Meetings, Coordination, Etc.) $2,400.00
Roadway $800.00
Structures $800.00
Environmental $1,244.00
Coastal Engineering - Intera $731.50
SUE, Survey - Kieth and Associates $2,225.00
Geotech - Tierra South Florida $425.00
TOTAL EXPENSES $8,625.50
ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT AND COST - PRIME CONSULTANT
Name of Project: Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
County: Monroe
FPN:
FAP No.:
Consultant Name: KCA
Consultant No.: N/A
Date: 9/16/2014
Estimator. JLL
Hours From
Project
Senior
Senior
Secretary/Cl ri
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi.
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi-
SH
Salary
Average
Staff Classificatio
•SH
Manager
Chief Enginee
Engineer
Engineer
Designer
CADD
cal
fication 8
fication 9
fication 10
fication 11
fication 12
Summary -
By
Cost By
Rate Per
$177.00
$228.00
$178.00
$139.00
$136.00
$87.00
• $63.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Finn'
Activity
Activity
Task
. Project General and Project Common Tasks
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
. Roadway Analysis
200
0
20
60
40
50
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
$30,210
$151.05
. Roadway Plans
150
0
8
45
30
30
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
151
$21.390
$141.66
. Drainage Analysis
45
0
5
23
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
46
$7,736
$168.17
. Utilities
93
0
5
28
19
14
23
5
0
0
0
0
0
94
$12,985
$138.14
S. Environmental Perils, Compliance & Clearances
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Nan -Tech.
300
120
30
60
60
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
$49,710
$165.70
10. Structures - Bridge Development Report
222
89
22
44
44
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
221
$36,631
$165.75
11. Structures -Temporary Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge
650
195
65
130
195
0
65
0
0
0
0
0
0
650
$105,235
$161.90
14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIVI01
15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
16. Structures - Movable Span
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
17. Structures - Retaining Walls
140
42
14
28
42
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
140
$22,666
$161.90
18. Structures - Miscellaneous
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis
59
0
6
18
12
15
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
$9,063
$151.05
0. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans
26
0
1
8
5
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
$3,636
$139.85
1. Signalization Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
2. Signalizalion Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIVI01
3. Lighting Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
4. Lighting Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
5. Landscape Architecture Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
8. Landscape Architecture Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIVI01
7. Survey (Field & Office Support)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
8. Photogrammetry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
9. Mapping
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
0. Terrestrial Mobile UDAR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIVI01
1. Architecture Development
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
2. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
3.Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
4. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
5. Geotechnical
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
Total Staff Hours
1,885
446
176
444
465
114
238
5
0
0
0
0
0
1,888
Total Staff Cost
$78,942.00
$40,128.00
$79,032.00
$64,635.00
$15.504.00
$20,706.00
$315.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$299,262.00
$158.61
Survey Field Days by Subconsultanl
SALARY RELATED COSTS:
4 - Person Crew:
OVERHEAD:
OPERATING MARGIN:
Notes:
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
1. This sheet to be used by Prime Consultant to calculate the Grand Total fee.
EXPENSES:
2. Manually enter fee from each subconsultant. Unused subconsultant rows may be hidden.
Survey (Field - if by Prime)
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
Subconsuhant: Enter Name Sub 1
Subconsuhant: Sub 2
Subconsuhant: Sub 3
Subconsuhanl: Sub
Subwnsuhant: Sub 5
Subconsullant: Sub6
Subconsuhant: Sub 7
Subwnsultanl: Sub 8
Subconsuhant: Sub 9
Subconsuhanl: Sub 10
SubconsuhanL Sub 11
Check= $299,262.00
$299,262.00
0 %
$0.00
0 %
$0.00
0.00 %
$0.00
0.00%
$0.00
4-man crew
days@
$ - lday $0.00
$299,262.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Stafiho urtls6mationForms_9_l 2_14.xis
Fee Sheet- Pnme 1 of 26 9/162014 2:01 PM
Subconsultant: Sub 12
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$299,262.00
Geotechnical Field and Lab Testing
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$299,262.00
Optional Services
$0.00
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$299.262.00
StaOhourEsOmationFormS_9_12_14.xis
Fee Sheet - Prime 2 of 26 9/162014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
4.1
Typical Section Package
LS
1
0
0
na
4.2
Pavement Type Selection Report
LS
1
0
0
na
4.3
Pavement Design Package
LS
1
0
0
na
4.4
Cross -Slope Correction
LS
1
0
0
na
4.5.1
Horizontal /Vertical Master Design Files
LS
1
53
53
225 hours x 0.25 miles = 56 hours
4.5.2
Horizontal /Vertical Master Design Files
skeletalplans)
LS
1
0
0
na
4.6
Access Management
LS
1
0
0
na
4.7
Cross Section Design Files
LS
1
20
20
10 cross sections @ 2 hrs each
4.8
Traffic Control Analysis
LS
1
30
30
single lane phased const. (signal)
4.9
Master TCP Design Files
LS
1
15
15
40 scale @ 60 hrs x 0.25 mi = 15 hours
4.10
Design Variations and Exceptions
LS
1
0
0
na
4.11
Design Report
LS
1
12
12
12 hrs
4.12
Quantities
LS
1
8
8
2 hrs with 4 updates = 8 hrs
4.13
Cost Estimate
LS
1
8
8
2 hrs with 4 updates = 8 hrs
4.14
Technical Special Provisions
LS
1
1 0
0
Ina
4.15
Other Roadway Analysis
LS
1
0
0
na
Roadway Analysis Technical Subtotal
146
4.16
Field Reviews
LS
1
16
16
1 field review @ 2 days = 16 hrs
4.17
Technical Meetings
LS
1
20
20
Meetings are listed below
4.18
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
7
4.19
Independent Peer Review
LS
%
0%
0
na
4.20
Supervision
LS
%
5%
7
Roadway Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal
50
4.21
Coordination
LS
I %
1 2%
4
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
4. Roadway Analysis 3 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No of
Hours/
Total
Task
Units
Comments
No,
Units
Unit
Hours
4. Roadway Analysis Total
200
Technical Meetings
Typical Section
EA
1
8
8 4 hrs with 2 people
Pavement
EA
0
0
0
Access Management
EA
0
0
0
15% Line and Grade
EA
0
0
0
Driveways
EA
0
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties,
MPO)
EA
0
0
0
Work Zone Traffic Control
EA
0
0
0
30/60/90/100% Comment Review Meeting
EA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
8
Progress Meetings (if required by FDOT)
EA
0
0
0
Phase Review Meetings
EA
3
4
12 3 mtgs @ 4 hrs
Total Meetings 20
Carries to 4.17
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
StaffhourEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
4. Roadway Analysis 4 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
August 18, 20151 Page 3 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
been located from the surface, vacuum excavation services should be used to visually verify and to provide the
accurate horizontal location and vertical measurements (a test hole). Vacuum excavation techniques are used to
provide a cost-effective service that causes minimal disturbance to the site, the utility, vehicle traffic, and is
acceptable to the permitting agencies. The reporting of a negative result (no facility found) should not be used as a
positive determination that the subject area is clear of all facilities or that the facility does not exist. CLIENT shall hold
harmless and indemnify Keith and Associates, Inc. (K&A) against any losses as a result of limitations within the
equipment, but not against negligence on the part of K&A. Use of this service does not relieve interested parties from
their responsibility to make required notification prior to excavation, nor does it relieve utility owners of their
responsibility to mark the location of their facilities. K&A will not be responsible for damage caused by others. K&A
will not be responsible for utilities that cannot be located with the equipment and techniques provided, or those
located underneath other utilities. If records research is not part of the scope of services, the utility owner's marks will
be used to identify the utility. K&A will not be responsible for correcting mistakes made by other locators. Where
vacuum excavation services are used and no utility is found at the mark provided by the utility at a depth of 5 feet, the
excavation will be backfilled, referenced and invoiced as one test hole.
Subsurface Utility Enaineerinci Conditions and Understandings
The utility markings are for design purposes only. The Florida One Call must be notified forty-
eight (48) hours in advance of any excavation.
CONSULTANT will not access confined spaces. If confined spaces need to be accessed for
locating purposes then the client will be notified and further arrangements will be made for said
access. Additional fees may be applicable.
If Due to traffic conditions additional MOT is required and is beyond the capability of
CONSULTANTS standard MOT operations, CONSULTANT will notify client and provided and
additional fee for the MOT operation.
Additional requests outside the scope of services, when requested by client and/or client's
representative, will be invoiced on an hourly basis.
This proposal assumes site access is available and work can be performed between the hours
of 7:30 AM and 5:00 PM Monday through Friday.
CONSULTANT'S TOTAL LUMP SUM FEE.........................................................$2,750.00
Section 6 - Additional Services
The undertaking by CONSULTANT to perform professional services defined within this Agreement
extends only to those services specifically described herein. No other services, whether they may
be interpreted as related, incidental or implied, shall be considered to be included in the scope of
work of this proposal. If upon request of CLIENT, CONSULTANT agrees to perform additional
services hereunder, CLIENT shall be obligated to pay CONSULTANT for the performance of such
additional services an amount (in addition to all other amounts payable under this Agreement)
based on an hourly fee in accordance with CONSULTANT'S current professional fee schedule,
plus reimbursable expenses as incurred by CONSULTANT, unless a lump sum addendum to
Agreement is executed by the parties to this Agreement which addresses the additional services.
t�"E_ ITH
conbu.11ing bnp7neorb
August 18, 2015 / Page 4 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
Additional services shall include revisions to work previously performed that are required due to a
change in the data or criteria furnished to CONSULTANT, a change in the scope or concept of the
project initiated by CLIENT, or services that are required by changes in the requirements of public
agencies after work under this Agreement has commenced.
If the preceding scope of services includes public agency permitting, our quoted fees/hours include
services to respond to the agency's first RAI (Request for Additional Information). Additional
agency requests or requirements shall be considered an increase to our scope of services.
Ill. COMPENSATION
A). Payments and Invoicing:
Invoices will be submitted by CONSULTANT to CLIENT monthly for services performed and
expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement during the prior month. Payment of such invoice
will be due upon presentation. CONSULTANT'S standard invoice format shall apply and such
format shall be acceptable to CLIENT for payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing
hereunder. Invoices shall be submitted monthly based on a percentage completed for lump
sum contracts. On a Time and Material contract, invoices shall be submitted in accordance
with our current professional service fee schedule as seen on "Exhibit A" attached.
In the event of any dispute concerning the accuracy of content of any invoice, CLIENT shall
within seven (7) days from the date of said invoice, notify CONSULTANT in writing stating the
exact nature and amount of the dispute. Any invoice that is not questioned within seven (7)
days shall be deemed due and payable. In the event an invoice or portion of an invoice is
disputed within seven (7) days, CLIENT shall be obligated to pay the undisputed portion of the
invoice as set forth in below.
If CLIENT fails to make any payment due to CONSULTANT for services and expenses within
thirty (30) days from the date of invoice, CONSULTANT may, after giving seven (7) days
written notice to CLIENT, apply the retainer to the unpaid balance of the account and/or
suspend services under this Agreement until the account has been paid in full. There will be a
fee charged for suspended work, which will be negotiated when work is resumed.
In the event any invoice or any portion thereof remains unpaid for more than forty five (45)
days following the invoice date, CONSULTANT may, following seven (7) days prior written
notice to CLIENT, initiate legal proceedings to collect the same and recover, in addition to all
amounts due and payable, including accrued interest, its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
The invoices referenced above, will be sent in accordance to the information as reflected on
the "Billing Information Form" attached hereto.
PAYMENT DELAY: If the CONTRACTOR has received payment from the OWNER and if for
any reason not the fault of Keith and Associates, Inc.(the SUBCONTRACTOR) does not
receive a progress payment from the CONTRACTOR within seven (7) days after the date such
payment is due; the SUBCONTRACTOR, upon giving an additional seven (7) days written
notice to the CONTRACTOR, and without prejudice to and in addition to any other legal
remedies, may stop work until payment of the full amount owing to the SUBCONTRACTOR
�.rEITH
t on 5 u.l l Ong Ong In 0 0 1e
August 18, 2015 / Page 5 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
has been received. The Subconsultant Amount and Time shall be adjusted by the amount of
the SUBCONTRACTOR'S reasonable and verified cost of shutdown, delay and startup, which
shall be effected by an appropriate Subcontractor Change Order.
B). Reimbursable Expenses:
CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed for direct charges as itemized in "Exhibit B". For those
out-of-pocket expenses directly chargeable to the project but not itemized in "Exhibit B",
CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed at actual cost incurred, plus a 10% carrying charge.
IV. PROVISIONS RELATIVE TO THE SERVICES RENDERED
A). Re -use of Documents:
All original documents, including, but not limited to, drawings, sketches, specifications, maps,
as -built drawings, reports, test reports, etc., that result from CONSULTANT'S services
pursuant or under this Agreement remain the sole property of CONSULTANT and are not
intended or represented to be suitable for re -use by CLIENT or others.
CLIENT may, at their expense, obtain a set of reproducible copies of any maps and/or
drawings prepared for them by CONSULTANT, in consideration of which CLIENT agrees that
no additions, deletions, changes or revisions shall be made to same without the express
written consent of CONSULTANT. Any re -use without written verification of adaptation by
CONSULTANT mandates that CLIENT indemnify and hold CONSULTANT harmless from all
claims, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees, arising out
of or resulting there from.
Photographs of any completed project embodying the services of CONSULTANT provided
hereunder may be made by CONSULTANT and shall be considered as its property, and may
be used for publication.
B). Performance:
CONSULTANT shall not be considered in default in performance of its obligations hereunder if
performance of such obligations is prevented or delayed by acts of God or government, labor
disputes, failure or delay of transportation or by subcontractors, or any other similar cause or
causes beyond the reasonable control of CONSULTANT. Time of performance of
CONSULTANT'S obligations hereunder shall be extended by time period reasonably
necessary to overcome the effects of such force majeure occurrences.
C). Professional Standards:
All work performed by CONSULTANT will be in accordance with its professional standards and
in accordance with all applicable government regulations. CONSULTANT will exercise its best
efforts to obtain all governmental approvals contemplated under this Agreement. However,
CONSULTANT does not warrant or represent that any government approval will be obtained.
Unless the Scope of Services of this Agreement includes an investigation into the applicable
_ ITFI
i
o 0 as u it in g on g f n o o r s-
August 18, 2015 / Page 6 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
land use, zoning and platting requirements for the Project, CONSULTANT shall proceed on the
assumption that the Project as presented by CLIENT, is in accordance with all applicable
governmental regulations.
D). Opinions of Cost:
Since CONSULTANT does not have control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or
services furnished by others, or over methods of determining prices, or over competitive
bidding, or market conditions, any and all opinions as to costs rendered hereunder, including,
but not limited to, opinions as to the costs of construction and materials, shall be made on the
basis of its experience and qualifications and represent its best judgment as an experienced
and qualified CONSULTANT, familiar with the construction industry. CONSULTANT cannot
and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual costs will not vary from opinions of
probable cost. If, at any time, CLIENT wishes greater assurance as to the amount of any cost,
CLIENT shall employ an independent cost estimator to make such determination. Engineering
services required to bring costs within any limitation established by CLIENT will be paid for as
additional services hereunder by CLIENT.
If the services under this Agreement continue for a period of more than one (1) year from the
notice to proceed, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to renegotiate the terms of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall not be bound under this Agreement if modifications to the terms
contained herein are made without the written consent of CONSULTANT (such consent to be
signified by CONSULTANT'S initials next to each modification, and if a fully executed copy
hereof is not received from CLIENT by CONSULTANT on or before sixty (60) calendar days
from the date of execution by CONSULTANT.
E). Termination:
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice in event
of the substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement through no fault of the terminating party. For the purpose of this Agreement, the
failure to pay any invoice submitted by CONSULTANT within sixty (60) days of the date of said
invoice, shall be considered a substantial failure on behalf of CLIENT. In the event of any
termination, CONSULTANT shall be paid for all services rendered to the date of termination
including all reimbursable expenses.
F). Liability:
CONSULTANT is protected by Workmen's Compensation Insurance, Professional Liability
Insurance and by Public Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage and will
furnish certificates of insurance upon request. CONSULTANT agrees to hold CLIENT
harmless from loss, damage, injury or liability arising solely from the negligent acts or omission
of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, subcontractors and their employees and agents, but
only to the extent that the same is actually covered and paid under the foregoing policies of
insurance. If CLIENT requires increased insurance coverage, CONSULTANT will, if
specifically directed by CLIENT, secure additional insurance obtained at CLIENT'S expense.
CLIENT agrees that CONSULTANT'S aggregate liability to CLIENT and all construction and
professional contractors and subcontractors employed directly or indirectly by CLIENT on the
. eons o i f i n g o n g i n oars-
August 18, 2015 / Page 7 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
Project, due to or arising from CONSULTANT'S services under this Agreement or because of
the relation hereby of CONSULTANT, its agents, employees or subcontractors, or otherwise, is
and shall be limited to CONSULTANT'S total fees under this Agreement or $50,000.00
whichever is greater. In no event shall CONSULTANT be liable for any indirect, special or
consequential loss or damage arising out of the services hereunder including, but not limited
to, loss of use, loss of profit, or business interruption whether caused by the negligence of
CONSULTANT or otherwise.
CLIENT agrees that CONSULTANT shall have no liability to CLIENT, or to any person or entity
employed directly or indirectly by CLIENT in the project for damages of any kind from services
rendered by CONSULTANT relating to the testing for, monitoring, cleaning up, removing,
containing, treating, detoxifying or neutralizing of pollutants, whether or not, caused by the
negligence of CONSULTANT.
G). Litigation:
In the event litigation in any way related to the services performed hereunder is initiated
between CONSULTANT and CLIENT, the non -prevailing party shall reimburse the prevailing
party for all of its reasonable attorney's fees and costs related to said litigation.
V. CLIENT'S OBLIGATIONS:
CLIENT shall provide CONSULTANT with all data, studies, surveys, plats and all other pertinent
information concerning the Project. CLIENT shall designate a person to act with authority on
CLIENT'S behalf with respect to all aspects of the Project. CLIENT shall be responsible for all
processing fees or assessments required for the completion of the Project. CLIENT shall provide
CONSULTANT access to the Project site at reasonable times upon reasonable notice.
VI. GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A). Persons Bound by Agreement:
The persons bound by this Agreement are CONSULTANT and CLIENT and their respective
partners, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and other legal representatives.
This Agreement and any interest associated with this Agreement may not be assigned, sublet
or transferred by either party without the prior written consent of the other party, such consent
not to be unreasonably withheld. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent
CONSULTANT from employing such independent consultants, associates and sub -
consultants as CONSULTANT may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of the
services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any rights or benefits arising
from this Agreement to anyone other than CONSULTANT and CLIENT.
B). No Waiver or Modifications:
No waiver by CONSULTANT of any default shall operate as a waiver for any other default or
be construed to be a waiver of the same default on a future occasion. No delay, course of
dealing or omission on the part of CONSULTANT in exercising any right or remedy shall
T.rEITH
cons u l r i n g_ o n g l n o e r s
August 18, 2015 / Page 8 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
operate as a waiver thereof, and no single or partial exercise by CONSULTANT of any right or
remedy shall preclude any other or further exercise of any right or remedy.
This Agreement, including all requests for additional services placed hereunder, express the
entire understanding and agreement of the parties with reference to the subject matter hereof,
and is a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of this Agreement, and no
representations or agreements modifying or supplementing the terms of this Agreement shall
be valid unless in writing, signed by persons authorized to sign agreements on behalf of both
parties.
C). Governing Laws or Venue:
This Agreement shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the
State of Florida. Venue for any litigation shall be Broward County, Florida.
VII. CLOSURE
If you concur with the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the aforementioned work,
please execute the agreement in the space provided and return same to the undersigned with the
required retainer and completed billing information form.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal. Dan Checchia has been selected to serve
as project manager. Please contact Mr. Checchia or myself if you have any questions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CONSULTANT and CLIENT have executed this agreement the day and
year indicated below.
As to CONSULTANT
Keith & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Dodie Keith-Lazowick
President
DATED:
As to CLIENT
Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp.
Client:
Title:
DATED:
Ire JH ITH
cons i fling 0 n g i n 0 o r 5
August 18, 2015 / Page 9 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
EXHIBIT A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEE SCHEDULE
Hourly Rate
01 Administrative Assistant................................................................................................$50.00
11 CADD Technician..........................................................................................................$80.00
15 Senior Technician..........................................................................................................$90.00
30 Associate Planner..........................................................................................................$90.00
32 Senior Planner (AICP).................................................................................................$115.00
33 Landscape Designer......................................................................................................$80.00
34 Senior Landscape Designer.........................................................................................$100.00
35 Landscape Architect (RLA).........................................................................................$110.00
36 ISA Certified Arborist...................................................................................................$110.00
50 Project Engineer..........................................................................................................$100.00
51 Senior Project Engineer..............................................................................:................$115.00
52 Professional Engineer(PE)..........................................................................................$120.00
53 Junior Field Inspector..................................................................................................$75.00
54 Field Inspector / Representative
....................................................................................$90.00
60 Project Manager...........................................................................................................$125.00
61 Senior Project Manager...............................................................................................$150.00
70 Principal.......................................................................................................................$200.00
72 Expert Witness Testimony...........................................................................................$250.00
76 BIM Modeler.................................................................................................................$125.00
77 GIS Specialist..............................................................................................................$100.00
78 Project Surveyor...........................................................................................................$95.00
79 Senior Project Surveyor............................................................................................... $110.00
80 Professional Surveyor & Mapper(PSM)...................................................................... $120.00
81 Survey Party (2) Person...............................................................................................$100.00
82 Survey Party (3) Person...............................................................................................$125.00
83 Survey Laser Scanning................................................................................................$125.00
85 Survey Party w/Watercraft ...........................................................................................$160.00
90 Utility Crew Supervisor...................................................................................................$70.00
91 Utility Locating Technician.............................................................................................$60.00
92 Utility Project Manager.................................................................................................$100.00
93 Utility Project Engineer.................................................................................................$125.00
94 Utility CADD Technician.................................................................................................$80.00
95 Utility Field Technician...................................................................................................$40.00
96 Utility Designating/GPR (2) Person..............................................................................$200.00
97 Utility Locating (3) Person............................................................................................$250.00
103 Vacuum Excavation Test Hole (Pervious Surface) .......................................... $350.00/Each
104 Vacuum Excavation Test Hole (Impervious Surface) ...................................... $400.00/Each
Effective 08/01 /07
T.rE_ ITH
o 0 as a•I10ng 0ag In a 0re
August 18, 2015 / Page 10 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
EXHIBIT B
Direct Expenses Cost per Unit
Photographic Copies
Color Copies
a) 8.5" x 11 " $ 1.00
b) 8.5" x 14 or 11 "x 17" $ 2.00
c) 24"x 36" $18.00
Black & White Copies
a) Any Size up to 11 "xl 7" $ 0.15
b) 24"x 36" Blackline $ 2.00
c) 30" x 42" Blackline $ 2.00
d) 24"x 36" Mylar $15.00
Laminating/Transparency Film Covers $ 2.00
Display Boards
Mounted (Foam) 30"x 40" $42.00
Mounted (Foam) 40"x 60" and larger $70.00
3 Ring Binders 1" $ 1.00
Dividers (Tabs) Set of 10 $ 0.80
Acco/GBC Binding $ 1.50
Facsimiles $ 2.00
Overnight Packages per service
Courier & Delivery Services per service
Postage: 1st Class Current US Postal rate
Mileage: $ 0.50 / mile
Any other expenses will be billed at cost plus 10% carrying charge.
**NOTE: Typical other reimbursable expenses include travel, lodging, and meals when traveling on
CLIENT'S behalf, identifiable communication expenses, all reproduction costs, and special
accounting expenses not applicable to general overhead.
Effective 08/01 /07
�.rE_ ITH
consulting o n g i n o o i s _
August 18, 2015 / Page 11 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
BILLING INFORMATION FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND OWNER:
OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER PHONE NO.: ( )
OWNER CELL PHONE NO.: ( )
E-MAIL:
JOB SITE SUPERINTENDENT:
JOB SITE PHONE:
PURCHASE ORDER #:
INVOICE:
Company Name
ATTN:
Name Title
COMPANY ADDRESS:
Street Address/Post Office Box
City/State/Zip Code
PHONE: ( )
Area Code/Number
FAX: ( )
Area Code/Number
SPECIAL BILLING INSTRUCTIONS:
c o n s u r r i n g o np l n o o r e
PROPOSAL FEES
Our Project/Proposal Number
10860I.M0.01
Personnel and Hourly Rates
Proposal Date
1811812015
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Tasks
Utility Crew
Supervisor
MII
Locating
Technician
��
Project
Manager
��
Project
Engineer
Utility CADD
Technician
IT'utility
Field
Techician
Designating/GPR
(2) Person
Locating
(3) Person
Task
Subtotals
Description
$70.00
$60.00
$100.00
$125.00
$80.00
$40.00
$200.00
$260.00
Designation
I
I
I
I
1
112
1
J$ 2,400.0(
mel Hours
0
0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 12
1 0
$ 2,400.0(
mel Cost
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
is -
Is 2,400.00
$ -
mel Subtotal $ 2,400.00
Dies - Pervious $350.00/each
Dies Subtotal Is
-
Test Holes - Impervious $400.00/each
Test Holes Subtotal 1 $ -
Miscellaneous Expenses Is 350.00
Direct Exoenses Is -
T.lEITH
00Y 9Y /1fO 9--8 O Af 0001 B-
ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT AND COST - SUBCONSULTANT
Name of Project: Sugarloaf Key Bridge Rehab #904153
County: Monroe
FPN: 0 Contract No.:
FAP No.: n/a WO: ##
Consultant Name: Keith and Associates, Inc.
Consultant No.: 08601.00
Date: 8/18/2015
Fcfi-t- PnV11FRC
Staff Classification
TotalStaff
Senior
Surveyor 8
Surveyor &
Field Crew
Survey
Secretary/
Senior Utility
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi-
Staff Classi-
SH
Salary
Average
Hours From
Mapper
Mapper
Supervisor
Technician
Clerical
Coordinator
£cation 7
fication 8
£cation 9
rication 10
fication 11
fication 12
"SH Summa ry
By
Cost By
Rate Per
$120.00
$110.00
$95.00
$80.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
so.90
$0.00
Firm"
Activi
Activity
Task
27. Survey (Field 8 Office Support)
74
4
26
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
$6,860
$92.70
8. Photogrammetry
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
9. Mapping
12
1
4
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
$1,120
$93.33
30. Terrestrial Mobile LIDAR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
35. Geotechnical
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV/01
Total Staff Hours
86
5
30
o
s1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
e6
Total Staff Cost
$600.00
$3.300.00
$0.00
$4.080.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$7.980400
$82.79
Notes:
1. This sheet to be used by Subconsultant to calculate its fee.
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE (Field Crew Supervisor)
$0.00
OVERHEAD:
117.17 %
$0.00
OPERATING MARGIN:
21.0 %
$0.00
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
0.314%
$0.00
EXPENSES:
0.53 %
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
_ _ _ _ _ ._
. $0.00
cn�x= 57.9e0oo
SALARY RELATED COSTS:
$7,980.00
Survey (Field)
0 4-person crew $
- / day
$0.00
Survey (Field)
11 3-person crew $
1.000.00 / day
$11,000.00
Survey (Field)
0 2-person crew $
- / day
$0.00
SUE (Field)
0 3-person crew $
- ! day
$0.00
SUE (Field)
0 2-person crew $
- / day
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
OVERHEAD:
0.00 %
$0.00
OPERATING MARGIN:
0.0 %
$0.00
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
0.000%
$0.00
EXPENSES:
0.00%
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
Hotel/Perdiem
$0.00
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08-1 e-15 rev-1.xis
Fee Sheet -Sub Page 1 of 1 a/182015 5:16 PM
Prolect Activity 27: Survey
Estimator.
Sugarloaf Key Bridge Rehab #904153
Task No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Field Crew
DaysNnit
Crew
Days
Field Support
Hours /Crew Days
Field
Support
Hours
Office Support
Hours! Crew Days
ice Support
Hours
Comments
27.1
Horizontal Project Control (HPC)
ESTABLISH 2 PRIMARY CONTROL POINTS. ESTABLISH SECONDAR
CONTROL POINTS.
2-Lane Roadway
Mile
0.25
4.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
3.00
Multi -lane Roadway
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.2
Vertical PC / Bench Line
ESTABLISH 2 PRIMARY CONTROL POINTS. ESTABLISH SECONDAR
CONTROL POINTS.
2-Lane Roadway
Mile
2.00
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
3.00
Multi -lane Roadway
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.3
Alignment and Existing RN/ Lines
CALULATE EXISTING ALIGNMENT AND RN/ LINES
Mile
0.25
0.01
0.00 0.00 0.00 8000.00 20.00
27.4 Aerial Targets
Units/Day
2-Lane Roadway
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -lane Roadway
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.5 Reference Points
"A"
Units/Day
REFERENCE CONTROL POINTS
2-Lane Roadway
EA
8.00
16.00
0.50
0.50
0.25
3.00
1.50
Multi -lane Roadway
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reference Points
"B"
Units/Day
Non Alignment Points/Approximate
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.6
Topography/DTM (3D)
TOPO/DTM
Mile
0.25 8.00 1 2.00 0.50 1.00 3.00 6.00
27.7
Planimelric (2D)
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.8
Roadway Cross-SectionslProfiles
OBSERVE CHECK CROSS -SECTIONS TO VERIFY DTM
Mile
0.25 4.00 1 1.00 1 0.50 0.50 2.00 2.00
27.9
Side Street Surveys
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08-1 B-15 rev-1.xls
27. Survey Page 1 of 3 8/18/2015
Protect Activity 27: Survey
Task No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Field Crew
Days/Unit
Crew
Days
Field Support
Hours I Crew Days
F
Suppield ort
Hours
Office Support
Hours1 Crew Days
Office Support
Hours
Comments
27.10
Underground Utilities
LOCATE PAINT MARKS AND FLAGS FROM SUE INVESTIGATIONS
Designates
Mile/Site
0.00
0.00
0.00
Locates
Point
0.00
0.00
0.00
Survey
0%
0.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
3.00
27.11
OuHall Survey
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.12
Drainage Survey
Units/Day
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.13
Bridge Survey
LOCATE BRIDGE DETAILS INCLUDING APPROACH SLABS, BENTS,
DECK, SEAWALL, RIPRAP, ETC.
Minor/ Major
EA
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.500.50 3.00 3.00
27.14
Channel Survey
OBSERVE CROSS SECTIONS THAT EXTEND 100' IN EACH
DIRECTION. THREE CROSS SECTIONS PER SIDE. ONE AT BRIDGE,
ONE AT 50' AND ONE AT 100'.
EA
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 3.00 3.00
27.15
Pond Site Survey
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.16
Mitigation Survey
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.17
Jurisdiction Line Survey
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.18
Gectechnical Support
Units/Day
LOCATE TWO GEOTECH BORINGS
EA
2
8
0.25 0.50 0.13 3.00 0.75
27.19
Sectional / Grant Survey
Comer
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.20
Subdivision Location
LOCATE PROPERTY CORNERS TO AID IN RECOVERY OF
ALIGNMENT AND R/W
Block
2 0.5 1.00 1 0.50 0.50 3.00 3.00
27.21
Maintained RIW
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.22
Boundary Survey
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.23
Water Boundary Survey
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.24
R/W Staking / R/W Line
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.25
R/W Monumentalion
Point
0.00 0. 00 0.00
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08-18-15 rev-1.xls
27. Survey Page 2 of 3 8/18/2015
Protect Activity 27: Survey
Task No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Field Crew
Days/Unit
Crew
Days
Field Support
Hours /Crew Days
Field Support
Hours
Office Support
Hours / Crew Days
Office Support
Hours
Comments
27.26
Line Cutting
Mile
0,00
27.27
Work Zone Safety
PROVIDE MOTTO COUNTY STANDARDS
10 0.125 1.25
27.28
Miscellaneous Surveys
0.00
0.00
0.00
Survey Subtotal
Crew Days
11
Field Support
Hours
5
Office Support
Hours
48
27.29
Supplemental Surveys
THE % FOR SUPPLEMENTAL WILL BE DETERMINED AT
NEGOTIATIONS. THIS ITEM CAN ONLY BE USED IF AUTHORIZED IN
WRITING BY THE DISTRICT SURVEYOR
11 0 0 0
27.30
Document Research
Units
0
27.31
Field Reviews
Units
ONE FIELD REVIEW
8.00 8
27.32
lTechnical Meetings
LS
TECHNICAL MEETINGS
6.00 6
27.33
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
LS
5% 2
27.34
Supervision
LS
.. 5% 3
27.35
Coordination
LS
3%
1
27. Survey Total
Crew Days
11
Field Support
Hours
5
Office Support
Hours
69
Technical Meetings
Kickoff Meeting with FDOT
FA
1
2
2
Baseline Approval Review
FA
1
2
2
Network Control Review
FA
1
2
2
Vertical Control Review
IA
0
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EA
0
0
0
Final Submittal Review
FA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
FA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
6
Progress Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Phase Review Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Total Meetings
- 6
Carries to 27.32
SPLS =
PLS =
Office Support =
Total Hours =
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08-18-15 rev-1.xis
27. Survey Page 3 of 3 8/18/2015
TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA, INC.
SUGARLOAF BRIDGE
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Unit
# of Units
Unit Price
Total
Truck Mounted Equipment
Unit
1
$
350.00
$
350.00
Mob Between Holes
Each
1
$
150.00
$
150.00
SPT Borings (truck)
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
100
$
14.50
$
1,450.00
50-100 ft depth
Foot
70
$
17.75
$
1,242.50
Grout (truck)
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
100
$
6.50
$
650.00
50-100 ft depth
Foot
70
$
8.00
$
660.00
Casing (truck)
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
100
$
8.00
$
800.00
50-100 ft depth
Foot
70
$
9.75
$
682.50
Extra Split Spoon Samples
0 - 50 ft depth
Each
16
$
42.00
$
672.00
50-100 ft depth
Each
14
$
48.00
$
672.00
Rock Coring
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
10
$
68.50
$
685.00
Flagmen & Barricades (2 man crew)
Day
1
$
900.00
$
900.00
Arrow Rental Sign
Day
1
$
106.69
$
106.69
Natural Moisture Content Tests
Each
4
$
10.00
$
40.00
Grain -Size - Full
Each
4
$
65.00
$
260.00
Organic Content Tests
Each
2
$
50.00
$
100.00
Environmental (Corrosion) Tests
Each
2
$
120.00
$
240.00
Rock Compression Test
Each
2
$
110.00
$
220.00
Principal Engineer
Hour
4
$
150.00
$
600.00
Senior Engineer
Hour
13
$
125.00
$
1,625.00
Project Engineer
Hour
45
$
100.00
$
4,500.00
Senior Technician
Hour
30
$
75.00
$
2,250.00
CADD
Hour
7
$
65.00
$
455.00
TOTAL = $ 19,210.69
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Estimator: KV
Sugarloaf Bridge
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
Roadway
35.1
Document Collection and Review
LS
0
0
0
35.2
Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan
LS
0
0
0
35.3
Stake Borings/Utility Clearance
Boring
0
0
0
35.4
Coordinate and Develop MOT Plans for Field Investigation
EA
0
0
0
35.5
Drilling Access Permits
Location
0
0
0
35.6
Property Clearances
EA
0
0
0
35.7
Groundwater Monitoring
EA
0
0
0
35.8
LBR/Resilient- Modulus Sampling
EA
0
0
0
35.9
Coordination of Field Work
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.10
Soil and Rock Classification -Roadway
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.11
Design LBR
LS
0
0
0
35.12
Laboratory Data
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.13
Seasonal High Water Table
Boring
0
0
0
35.14
Parameters for Water Retention Areas
EA
0
0
0
35.15
Delineate Limits of Unsuitable Material
Cross-section
0
0
0
35.16
Electronic Files for Cross -Sections
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.17
Embankment Settlement and Stability
Embankment
Boring
0
0
0
35.18
Stormwater Volume Recovery and/or Background Seepage
Analysis
EA
0
0
0
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 1 of 4 8/18/2015
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
35.19
Geotechnical Recommendations
LS
0
0
0
35.20
Pavement Condition Survey and Pavement Evaluation
Report
LS
0
0
0
35.21
Preliminary Roadway Report
LS
0
0
0
35.22
Final Report
EA
0
0
0
35.23
Auger Boring Drafting
100 If boring
0
0
0
35.24
SPT Boring Drafting
100 If boring
0
0
0
Roadway Geotechnical Subtotal
0
Structures
35.25
Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan
LS
1
2
2
2 SPT borings
35.26
Stake Borings/Utility Clearance
Boring
2
1
2
2 spt@85 ft = 170 ft
35.27
Coordinate and Develop MOT Plans for Field Investigation
EA
1
6
6
35.28
Drilling Access Permits
Location
0
0
0
35.29
Property Clearances
EA
0
0
0
35.30
Collection of Corrosion Samples
EA
1
1
1
35.31
Coordination of Field Work
100 If of boring
1.7
2
3
35.32 lSoil
and Rock Classification - Structures
100 If of boring
1.7
2
3
35.33
Tabulation of Laboratory Data
100 If of boring
1.7
1
2
35.34
Estimate Design Groundwater Level for Structures
EA
0
0
0
35.35
Selection of Foundation Alternatives (BDR)
Bridge boring
2
3
6
35.36 1
Detailed Analysis of Selected Foundation Alternate(s)
Bridge boring
2
7
14
35.37
Bridge Construction and Testing Recommendations
Bridge boring
2
2
4
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 2 of 4 8/18/2015
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments -
35.38
Lateral Load Analysis (Optional)
Bridge boring
0
0
0
35.39
Walls
Wall Boring
0
0
0
35.40
Sheet Pile Wall Analysis (Optional)
Wall Boring
0
0
0
35.41
Design Soil Parameters for Signs, Signals, High Mast
Lights, and Strain Poles and Geotechnical
Recommendations
Boring
0
0
0
35.42
Box Culvert Analysis
EA
0
0
0
35.43
Preliminary Report - BDR
EA
1
15
15
35.44
Final Report - Bridge and Associated Walls
EA
1
20
20
35.45
Final Reports - Signs, Signals, Box Culvert, Walls and High
Mast Lights
EA
0
0
0
35.46
SPT Boring Drafting
100 If of boring
1.7
4
7
35.47
Other Geotechnical
LS
0
0
0
Structural Geotechnical Subtotal
85
Geotechnical Technical Subtotal
85
35.48
Technical Special Provisions
EA
0
0
0
35.49
Field Reviews
LS
1
2
2
35.50
Technical Meetings
LS
1
2
2
35.51
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
3%
3
35.52
Supervision
LS
%
3%
3
Geotechnical Nontechnical Subtotal
10
35.53
Coordination
LS
%
4%
4
35.54
Optional Preliminary Contamination Assessment
LS
1
0
0
35. Geotechnical Total
99
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 3 of 4 8/18/2015
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Task
Task
Units
No of
Hours/
Total
Comments
No.
Units
Unit
Hours
.Technical Meetings
Kickoff Meeting with FDOT
EA
0
0
0
Boring Layout Approval
EA
0
0
0
Attend in BDR Review Meeting
EA
0
0
0
30/60/90% Submittal Review
EA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
0
Progress Meetings
Phase Review Meetings
EA 0
EA 0
Total Meetings 0
Carries to 35.50
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 4 of 4 8/18/2015
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Scale
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
5.1
Key Sheet
Sheet
1
5
1
5
5.2
Summary of Pay Items Including Quantity
Input
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.3
Drainage Map (Including Interchanges)
Sheet
0
0
1 0
1 0
na
5.4
Typical Section Sheets
5.4.1
Typical Sections
EA
1
5
5
5.4.2
Typical Section Details
EA
0
0
0
na
5.5
General Notes/Pay Item Notes
Sheet
0
0
1
6
5.6
Summary of Quantities
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.7
Box Culvert Data Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.8
113ridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheets
Sheet
1
24
1
24
5.9
Summary of Drainage Structures
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.10
Optional Pipe/Culvert Material
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.11
Project Layout
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.12
Plan/Profile Sheet
Sheet
2
4
2
8
5.13
Profile Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.14
Plan Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.15
Special Profile
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.16
Back -of -Sidewalk Profile Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.17
Interchange Layout Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.18
Ramp Terminal Details (Plan View)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.19
Intersection Layout Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
5. Roadway Plans 5 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Scale
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
5.20
Special Details
EA
1
4
4
5.21
Drainage Structure Sheet (Per Structure)
EA
4
2
8
5.22
Miscellaneous Drainage Detail Sheets
Sheet
1 0
0
0
0
5.23
Lateral Ditch Plan/Profile
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.24
Lateral Ditch Cross Sections
EA
0
0
0
5.25
Retention/Detention Ponds Detail Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.26
Retention Pond Cross Sections
EA
0
0
0
5.27
Cross -Section Pattern Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.28
Roadway Soil Survey Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.29
Cross Sections
EA
10
0.25
3
5.30
Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets
Sheet
12
4
12
48
3 phases with 4 sheets each
5.31
Temporary Traffic Control Cross Section
Sheets
EA
0
0
0
na
5.32
Temporary Traffic Control Detail Sheets
Sheet
3
3.5
3
11
3 sheets for typicals, notes, AWS and signal
5.33
Utility Adjustment Sheets
Sheet
2
4
2
8
5.34
Selective Clearing and Grubbing
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.35
Erosion Control Plan
Sheet
2
3
2
6
5.36
SWPPP
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.37
Project Network Control Sheet
Sheet.
0
0
0
0
na
5.38
Environmental Detail Sheets
LS
0
0
0
na
5.39
Utility Verification Sheet (SUE Data)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
on utility adjustment sheets
StaffhourEstimationForms_9_12_14.xis
5. Roadway Plans 6 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Scale
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
Roadway Plans Technical Subtotal
24
136
40
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
7
L5.41
Supervision
LS
%
5%
7
5. Roadway Plans Total
24
150
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
5. Roadway Plans 7 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: Ali
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
6.1
Determine Base Clearance Water Elevation
Per Basin
0
0
0
6.2
Pond Siting Analysis and Report
Per Basin
0
0
0
6.3
Design of Cross Drains
EA
0
0
0
6.4
Design of Ditches
Per Ditch Mile
0
0
0
6.5
Design of Stormwater Management Facility
(Offsite or Infield Pond)
EA
0
0
0
6.6
Design of Stormwater Management Facility
(Roadside Ditch as Linear Pond)
Per Cell
0
0
0
6.7
Design of Flood Plain Compensation
Per Flood -plain
Basin
0
0
0
6.8
Design of Storm Drains
EA
4
3
12
6.9
Optional Culvert Material
LS
0
0
0
6.10
French Drain Systems
Per Cell
0
0
0
6.11
Drainage Wells
EA
0
0
0
6.12
Drainage Design Documentation Report
LS
1
16
16
6.13
Bridge Hydraulic Report
EA
0
0
0
6.14
Temporary Drainage Analysis
LS
1
0
0
6.15
Cost Estimate
LS
1
0
0
6.16
Technical Special Provisions
LS
1
0
0
6.17
Other Drainage Analysis
LS
1
0
0
StaffhourEstimationForms_9_12_14.xls
6. Drainage Analysis 8 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
Drainage Analysis Technical Subtotal
28
6.18
Field Reviews
LS
1
16
16
6.19
Technical Meetings
LS
1
0
0
Meetings are listed below
6.20
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
1
6.21
Independent Peer Review
LS
%
0%
0
6.22
Supervision
LS
%
0%
0
Drainage Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal
17
6.23
Coordination
LS
I %
1 0%
0
6. Drainage Analysis Total
45
Technical Meetings
Base Clearance Water Elevation
EA
0
0
0
Pond Siting
EA
0
0
0
Agency
EA
0
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EA
0
0
0
FDOT Drainage
EA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
0
Progress Meetings (if required by FDOT)
Phase Review Meetings
Total Meetings
EA 0 0 0
EA 0 0 0
0
Carries to 6.19
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
6. Drainage Analysis 9 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total Hours
Comments
7.1
Kickoff Meeting
LS
1
0
0
7.2
Identify Existing UAO(s)
LS
1
4
4
4 utility owners (5 utilities)
7.3
Make Utility Contacts
LS
1
8
8
4 utils x 2 contact x 1 hr each
7.4
Exception Processing
LS
1
0
0
7.5
Preliminary Utility Meeting
LS
1
0
0
7.6
Individual/Field Meetings
LS
1
10
10
2 hrs each for 5 utilities
7.7
Collect and Review Plans and Data from UAO(s)
LS
1
4
4
1 hr for each utility owner
7.8
Subordination of Easements Coordination
LS
1
0
0
7.9
Utility Design Meeting
LS
1
0
0
7.10
Review Utility Markups & Work Schedules, and
Processing of Schedules & Agreements
LS
1
10
10
2 hours x 5 documents
7.11
Utility Coordination/Followup
LS
1
15
15
1 hrs x 5 utilities x 3 (complexity)
7.12
Utility Constructability Review
LS
1
10
10
2 hrs x 5 utilities
7.13
Additional Utility Services
LS
1
32
32
relocation plans for water and sewer
7.14
Processing Utility Work by Highway Contractor
(UWHC)
LS
1
0
0
7.15
Contract Plans to UAO(s)
LS
1
0
0
7.16
Certification/Close-Out
LS
1
0
0
7.17
1 Other Utilities
LS
1
0
0
r- 7. Utilities Total
93
StaffhourEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
7. Utilities 10 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Technical Meetings
Kickoff
EA 0
Preliminary Meeting
EA 0
Individual UAO Meetings
EA 0
Field Meetings
EA 0
Design Meeting
EA 0
Other Meetings
EA 0
Total Technical Meetings 0
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
7. Utilities 11 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: JLL
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Task
No.
Task
Units
Design and Production Staffhours
Comments
No. of
Units
Hours
per Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
General Drawings
9.1
Key Sheet and Index of Drawings
Sheet
1
6
1
6
9.2
Project Layout
Sheet
0
0
0
0
9.3
General Notes and Bid Item Notes
Sheet
2
20
2
40
9.4
Miscellaneous Common Details
Sheet
1
20
1
20
9.5
Incorporate Report of Core Borings
Sheet
2
1
2
2
9.6
Existing Bridge Plans
LS
1
6
6
9.7
Assemble Plan Summary Boxes and
Quantities
LS
1
12
12
9.8
Cost Estimate
LS
1
8
8
9.9
Technical Special Provisions
LS
0
0
0
Structures - Summary and Miscellaneous Tasks
and Drawings Subtotal
6
94
Task
No.
Task
Total
Task 10
Task 11
Task 12
Task 13
Task 14
Task 16
Task 16
Task 17
Task 18
10-16
Bridge 1
872
222
0
0
650
0
0
0
10-16
Bridge 2
0
10-16
Bridge 3
0
17
Retaining Walls
140
140
18
Miscellaneous Structures
0
0
Structures Technical Subtotals
1012
222
0
0
650
0
0
0
140
0
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours
per Unit
Total
Comments
9.10
Field Reviews
LS
2
16
32
9.11
Technical Meetings
LS
1 1
1 24
1 24
Meetings are listed below
StaffhourEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
9. Structure Summary 12 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
9.12
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
55
9.13
Independent Peer Review
LS
1
0
0
9.14
Supervision
LS
%
5%
55
Structures Nontechnical Subtotal
166
9.15
Coordination
LS
1
40
40
9. Structures - Summary and Miscellaneous
Tasks and Drawings Nontechnical and
Coordination Total
300
Technical Meetings
BDR Coordination/Review
EA
0
0
0
90/100% Comment Review
EA
0
0
0
Aesthetics Coordination
EA
0
0
0
Regulatory Agency
EA
2
4
8
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EA
0
0
0
Utility Companies
EA
2
4
8
Other Meetings
EA
2
4
8
Subtotal Technical Meetings
24
Progress Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Phase Review Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Total Meetings
24
Carries to 9.11
Structures Hours Total = 1312
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3.
StaffhourEstimationForms_9_12_14.xls
9. Structure Summary 13 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Bridge Identifier (Number or Name):
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
General Requirement
10.1
Bridge Geometry
LS
1
24
24
Phased Construction
10.2
Ship Impact Data Collection
LS
1
0
0
10.3
Ship Impact Criteria
EA
0
0
0
Superstructure Alternatives
10.4
Short Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
10.5
Medium Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
1
24
24
10.6
Long Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
10.7
Structural Steel Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
Foundation & Substructure Alternatives
10.8
Pier/Bent
EA Type
2
8
16
24" piles and drilled shafts
10.9
Shallow Foundations / GRS Abutments
EA Type
0
0
0
10.10
Deep Foundations
EA
Foundation
Evaluated
2
8
16
24" piles and drilled shafts
Movable Span
10.11
Data Collection and Design Criteria
LS
1
0
0
10.12
Movable Span Geometrics and Clearances
LS
1
0
0
10.13
Deck System Evaluation
LS
1
0
0
10.14
Framing Plan Development
LS
1
0
0
10.15
Main Girder Preliminary Design
LS
1
0
0
10.16
Conceptual Span Balance/Counterweight
LS
1
0
0
10.17
Support System Development
LS
1
0
0
10.18
Drive Power Calculations
LS
1
0
0
Drive System Development
LS
1
0
0
R10.19
10.20
Power and Control Development
LS
1
0
0
5tattnourtstimationr-orms a 12_14.xis
10. Structures-BDR 14 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No of
Hours/
No. of
Total
Task
Units
I
Comments
No.
Units
Unit
Sheets
Hours
10.21
Conceptual Pier Design
LS
1
0
0
StaffhourEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
10. Structures-BDR 15 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
10.22
Foundation Analysis (FL PIER)
LS
1
0
0
10.23
Tender Visibility Study
LS
1
0
0
Other BDR Issues
10.24
Aesthetics
LS
1
0
0
10.25
TCP/Staged Construction Requirements
LS
1
24
24
Phased construction
10.26
Constructibility Requirements
LS
1
10
10
10.27
Load Rating for damaged/widened structures
EA Unit
1
0
0
10.28
Quantity and Cost Estimates
EA ALT
0
0
0
10.29
Quantity and Cost Estimates - Movable Span
LS
1
16
16
10.30
Wall Type Justification
LS
1
12
12
Retaining Walls at End Bents
Report Preparation
10.31
Exhibits
EA SHT
3
20
60
Plan and Elevation, Typical Section, Construction
Sequence.
10.32
Exhibits - Movable Span
EA SHT
0
0
0
10.33
Report Preparation
LS
1
16
16
BDR Memo Only
10.34
Report Preparation - Movable Span
LS
1
0
0
10.35
BDR Submittal Package
LS
1
4
4
10. Structures - Bridge Development Report Total
222
When ONLY 30% plans are final deliverable, use Task Nos. as shown for applicable bridge types for project Activities 12 thru 16. Staffhours
to be negotiated and scaled appropriately.
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
10. Structures-BDR 16 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: JLL
Bridqe # 904153
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
General Layout Design and Plans
13.1
Overall Bridge Final Geometry
LS
1
20
20
13.2
Expansion/Contraction Analysis
EA Unit
1
4
4
13.3
General Plan and Elevation
Sheet
1
32
1
32
13.4
Construction Staging
Sheet
2
20
2
40
13.5
Approach Slab Plan and Details
Sheet
2
12
2
24
Pas e Constructed
13.6
Miscellaneous Details
Sheet
3
20
3
60
Slope protection (2), Load Rating.
End Bent Design and Plans
13.7
End Bent Geometry
EA End Bent
2
8
16
Phase constructed end bent.
13.8
Wingwall Design and Geometry
EA End
Bent
4
4
16
13.9
End Bent Structural Design
EA Design
1
30
30
13.10
End Bent Plan and Elevation
Sheet
2
20
2
40
13.11
End Bent Details
Sheet
2
20
2
40
Intermediate Bent Design and Plans
13.12
Bent Geometry
EA Bent
0
0
0
13.13
Bent Stability Analysis
EA Design
0
0
0
13.14
Bent Structural Design
EA Design
0
0
0
Bent Plan and Elevation
Sheet
0
0
0
0
L113.15
3.16 1
Bent Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
13. Medium Span Concrete 17 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
Pier Design and Plans
13.17
Pier Geometry
EA Pier
0
0
0
13.18
Pier Stability Analysis
EA Design
0
0
0
13.19
Pier Structural Design
EA Design
0
0
0
13.20
Pier Plan and Elevation
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.21
Pier Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Miscellaneous Substructure Design and Plans
13.22
Foundation Layout
Sheet
2
16
2
32
Foundation Layout and Pile Data Table.
Superstructure Deck Design and Plans
13.23
Finish Grade Elevation (FGE)
Calculation
LS
1
24
24
13.24
Finish Grade Elevations
Sheet
2
16
2
32
13.25
Bridge Deck Design
EA Section
3
8
24
13.26
Bridge Deck Reinforcing and
Concrete Quantities
EA Unit
1
12
12
13.27
Diaphragm Design
EA Section
0
0
0
13.28
Superstructure Plan
Sheet
1
20
1
20
13.29
Superstructure Section
Sheet
1
20
1
20
13.30
Miscellaneous Superstructure Details
Sheet
4
16
4
64
Edge Beam Detail (1), SIP Forms/Camber (1), Temporary
Bracing (1)
Reinforcing Bar Lists
13.31
Preparation of Reinforcing Bar List
Sheet
2
10
2
20
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
13. Medium Span Concrete 18 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
Continuous Concrete Girder Design
13.32
Section Properties
LS
1
0
0
13.33
Material Properties
LS
1
0
0
13.34
Construction Sequence
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.35
Tendon Layouts
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.36
1 Live Load Analysis
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.37
Temperature Gradient
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.38
Time Dependent Analysis
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.39
Stress Summary
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.40
Ultimate Moments
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.41
Ultimate Shear
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.42
Construction Loading
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.43
Framing Plan
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.44
Girder Elevation, including Grouting
Plan and Vent Locations
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.45
Girder Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.46
Erection Sequence
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.47
Splice Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.48
Girder Deflections and Camber
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
13. Medium Span Concrete 19 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
Simple Span Concrete Design
13.49
Prestressed Beam
EA Design
2
8
16
Interior and Exterior
13.50
Prestressed Beam Schedules
Sheet
1
20
1
20
13.51
Framing Plan
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Beam Stability
13.52
Beam/girder stability
EA Unit
1
12
12
Bearing
13.53
Bearing pad and bearing plate design
TypSan/
1
12
12
13.54
Bearing pad and bearing plate details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Load Rating
13.55
Load Ratings
Per Beam
2
10
20
13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge Total
25
660
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xis
13. Medium Span Concrete 20 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: JLL
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Unit
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
General Requirements
17.1
Key Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.2
Horizontal Wall Geometry
Per Wall
2
8
16
Permanent Proprietary Walls
17.3
Vertical Wall Geometry
Per Wall
0
0
0
17.4
Semi -Standard Drawings
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.5
Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.6
Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Temporary Proprietary Walls
17.7
Vertical Wall Geometry
Per Wall
0
0
0
17.8
Semi -Standard Drawings
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.9
Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.10
Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Cast -in -Place Retaining Walls
17.11
Design
EA Design
1
12
12
17.12
Vertical Wall Geometry
EA Wall
2
10
20
17.13
General Notes
Sheet
1
20
1
20
17.14
Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings)
Sheet
2
20
2
40
17.15
Sections and Details
Sheet
1
20
1
20
17.16 1
Reinforcing Bar List ISheet
1
1
12
1
12
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
17. Structures -Retaining Walls 21 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Unit
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
Other Retaining Walls and Bulkheads
17.17
Design
EA Design
0
0
0
17.18
Vertical Wall Geometry
EA Wall
0
0
0
17.19
General Notes, Tables and Misc. Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.20
Wall Plan and Elevations
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.21
Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17. Structures - Retaining Walls Total
5
140
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
17. Structures -Retaining Walls ' 22 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Units
Total
Hours
Comments
19.1
Traffic Data Analysis
LS
1
0
0
na
19.2
No Passing Zone Study
LS
1
0
0
na
19.3
Reference and Master Design File
LS
1
40
40
30 hrs + (40 hrs x 0.25 mi) = 40 hrs
19.4
Multi -Post Sign Support Calculations
EA
1
0
0
na
19.5
Sign Panel Design Analysis
EA
1
0
0
Ina
19.6
Sign Lighting/Electrical Calculations
EA
1
0
0
na
19.7
Quantities
LS
1
2
2
2 shts x 1 hr
19.8
Cost Estimate
LS
1
8
8
2 hrs each x 4 submittals
19.9
Technical Special Provisions
LS
1
0
0
na
19.10
Other Signing and Pavement
Marking
LS
1
0
0
na
Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis Technical Subtotal
50
19.11
Field Reviews
LS
1
0
0
19.12
Technical Meetings
LS
1
0
0
Meetings are listed below
19.13
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
3
19.14
Independent Peer Review
LS
%
3%
2
19.15
Supervision
LS
% 1
5%
3
Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal
8
19.16
Coordination
LS I
% 1
2%
1
19. Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis Total
59
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.x1s
19. Signing & Marking Analysis 23 of 26
9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
-1
No. of
Hours
Total
Task
Units
Comments
No.
Units
Units]Hours
Technical Meetings
Sign Panel Design EA 0 0 0
Queue Length Analysis EA 0 0 0
Local Governments (cities, counties) EA 0 0 0
Other Meetings EA 0 0 0
,Subtotal Technical Meetings 0
Progress Meetings EA 0 0
Phase Review Meetings EA 0 0
Total Meetings 0
Carries to 19.12
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
StaffhourEstimation Forms _9_12_14.xis
19. Signing & Marking Analysis 24 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Scale
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
20.1
Key Sheet
Sheet
1
4
1
4
20.2
Summary of Pay Items Including TRNS•Port
Input
LS
1
0
0
na
20.3
Tabulation of Quantities
Sheet
5
2
5
10
7 hrs (1st sht) + 3 hrs (2nd sht)
20.4
General Notes/Pay Item Notes
Sheet
1
4
1
4
20.5
Project Layout
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
20.6
Plan Sheet
Sheet
2
3
2
6
2 shts x 3 hrs each
20.7
Typical Details
EA
0
0
0
na
20.8
Guide Sign Worksheet(s)
EA
0
0
0
na
20.9
Traffic Monitoring Site
EA
0
0
0
na
20.10
Cross Sections
EA
1 0
0
0
na
20.11
Special Service Point Details
EA
0
0
0
na
20.12
Special Details
LS
1
0
0
na
20.13
Interim Standards
LS
1 10
0 Ina
Signing and Pavement Marking Plans Technical Subtotal
9
24
StaffhourEstimationForms_9_12_14.xls
20. Signing & Marking Plans 25 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
20.14
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
LS
%
5%
1
20.15
Supervision
LS
%
5%
1
20. Signing and Pavement Marking Plans Total
9
26
Staffhou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
20. Signing & Marking Plans 26 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
SUGARLOAF BOULEVARD(CR939) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE SUGARLOAF BW 12SEP2014
DESCRIPTION
HOURS
FEE
COMMENTS
Chief
Scientist
Senior
Scientist
GIS
Specialist
TOTALChief
hours
Scientist
Senior
Scientist
GIs
Specialist
SUBTOTAL
$159.00
$122,00
$90.00
SIS9.00
$122.00
$9000
Hourly rates per Monroe Co. General Services Contract (December 2013)
Acquire and Review Existing Environmental Data
2
4
4
30
$313.00
$498.00
$360.00
$1,166.00
2
4
4
30
Perform Environmental Assessment
48
0
0
48
$7,632.00
$0.00
$0.00
$7,632.00
Seagrasses, Corals and Mangroves Site Assessment
16
16
Two scientists for one day in the field = 8 x 2 = 16 hours
Travel
32
31
1
Travel time is two days RT (Ind. mobil./demobil.) for 2 scientists - 16 x 2 = 32 hours
Prepare Environmental Assessment Report
16
16
B
40
$2,544.00
$2,952.00
$720.00
$5,216.00
Data Assimilation and Letter Report
16
16
8
40
Agency Coordination
36
0
0
36
$5,724.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5,724.00
SFWMD
4
4
Should be an ERP General Permit or Exemption
USACE
4
4
Likely to be a NWP 3 or NWP15; possible LOP or General Permit if fill or rip rap placed in wetlands.
USCG
30
10
A USCG Bridge Permit Application will be required for this project (per USCG, BSEP2014)
FKNMS
8
8
Coord. regarding corals, seagrass and mangroves, as required... no ENV mitigation or relocation included.
FFWCC
2
2
Limited coordination only
USFWS
4
4
No formal consultation or BA preparation, limited coordination only
NMFS
4
4
No formal consultation or BA preparation, limited coordination only
Prepare Permit Applications
36
44
12
92
$5,724.00
$5,368.00
$1,080.00
$12,172.00
SFWMD ERP GP or Exemption Letter
8
16
2
26
USACE NWP or NPR Letter
4
4
2
10
USCG Bridge Permit Application
24
24
8
56
Prepare USCG Bridge Permit Application only. (No preparation of NEPA support documents, if applicable)
Submit Permit Applications &Respond to RAN
4
8
4
I6
$636.00
$976.00
$360.00
$1,972.00
County Pays Permit FEES, as appl—ble
SFWMD RAIs(only)
4
8
4
16
Coordination
e
0
0
B
$1,272.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,272.00
Project Team Coordination
4
4
Monroe County Coordination
4
4
FDOT D6 Coordination
0
0
No FDOT Coordination
TOTAL
ISO
72
28
$23,850.00
$8,784.00
$2,520.00
LABOR SUMMARY
HOURS
LABOR FEE
SR ENV
ENV
GIS
TOTAL
I SR ENV
I ENV
GISi
Environmental Assessment & Reporting
66
20
12
99
$10,494.00
$2,440.00
$1,080.00!n
Coordination & Permittin
84
52
16
152
$13,356.00
$6,344.00
$1,440.00
Labor Total
150
72
28
$23,850.00
58,79400
$2,520.00
Estimated Expenses
Total
Estimated Esp.—
Lodging
2 persons for 2 nights
4
nights $250.00 per night
$60000
Meals
Monroe County Rate (@$36.00/day) 3 days 13 days x 2 people = 6 days)
6
days $36.00 per day
$216.00
Boat Rental
NOT INCLUDED
0
days $450.O0 per day
$0.00
Mileage
950
miles $0.45 per mile
$427.50
Total Expenses
$1,243.50
Mileage
One-way trip mileage lone way to Key West- may have to stay In KW)
425
Round trip mileage
850
Local travel for the project
200
Total mileage
950
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Design
INTERA Incorporated
August 2015
Introduction
The Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge spans the canal bisecting Lower Sugarloaf Key, which connects Upper
Sugarloaf Sound with Lower Sugarloaf Sound. Although these water bodies are only connected to the
Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico through a series of small channels, island overtopping during
hurricanes provides an additional connection to the ocean during hurricane events. As a result,
determining design water surface elevations and wave heights is complex and requires a sophisticated
approach that accounts for all of the processes.
Scope of Services
To determine design water surface elevations and wave heights, INTERA will update an existing
ADCIRC model previously developed for the FDOT to estimate the design hydraulic and wave
parameters for all the US-1 bridges in the Keys. For that study, INTERA (operating as OEA Inc. at the
time) developed and calibrated an ADCIRC Model to hindcast all the hurricanes and tropical storms that
have affected the Florida Keys between 1850 and 2004. For this study, INTERA will modify the existing
model mesh to increase the resolution at the bridge. Model boundary conditions will consist of hurricane
wind and pressure fields obtained from the historical hurricanes (1850 to 2004). To do this, INTERA will
identify which of the historical hurricanes produced winds closest to the 100-year conditions at the bridge,
and scale the wind speeds to produce the 50-, 100-, and 500-year events. Those three sets of hurricanes
wind fields will provide the boundary conditions to determine the design water surface elevations and
waves at the bridge. Model results will provide the inputs to determine wave crest elevations and to
calculate wave forces if necessary.
A Bridge Hydraulics Report (BHR) suitable for submittal to the FDOT will document all procedures,
methodologies, calculations, and results performed in support of this work. Additionally, INTERA will
provide the hydraulic and scour information for the Bridge Hydraulic Recommendation Sheet (BHRS).
Task 1. Data Collection
INTERA will collect recent publicly available bathymetry, design flood elevations, and design wind
speeds near the bridge to assist in model modification and development of boundary conditions. This task
includes determination of the 100-year wind velocity magnitude from ASCE 07, identifying the
appropriate Hurricane for scaling, and developing the scaled 50-, 100-, and 500-year wind and pressure
fields for the model boundary conditions.
Task 2. Hvdraulic and Wave Modeling
INTERA will adapt an existing calibrated Keys SWAN+ADCIRC model to include increased resolution
at the project location. The model will incorporate any recent survey identified in the data collection task.
The updated model will simulate the three scaled hurricanes to produce the 50-, 100-, and 500-year events
at the bridge location. Model output provides the hydraulic parameter associated with the 50-, 100-, and
500-year events and the wave climate associated with the 100-year event.
Task 3. Engineering Analysis
INTERA will employ results from the modeling and techniques outlined in the FDOT Scour Manual as
well as FHWA's HEC-18 to calculate scour at the bridge. Additionally, INTERA will employ the
methodologies outlined in AASHTO's Guide Specifications for Bridge Vulnerable to Coastal Storms to
compute the maximum wave heights along the bridge centerline and — if the superstructure low chord is
within the wave crest — calculate wave forces on the superstructure.
Task 4. Report
INTERA will prepare a Bridge Hydraulics Report (BHR) suitable for submittal to the FDOT
documenting all procedures, methodologies, calculations, and results performed in support of this work.
Additionally, INTERA will provide the hydraulic and scour information for the Bridge Hydraulic
Recommendation Sheet (BHRS).
Task 5. Meetings. Coordination and QAQC
This task includes meetings with the Prime Consultant and coordination efforts during INTERA's
involvement with the project. This task also includes Quality Assurance/Quality Control activities.
Budizet
Labor
ODC's
Task
Staff Hour Estimate by Classification
Total
Hours
Total Cost
Principal
Engineer/
Scientist
II
Sr.
Engineer/
Scientist
1
Sr.
Engineer/
Scientist
IV
Engineer/
Scientist
I
$ 205.00
$ 175.00
$ 130.00
115.00
Task 1
0
0
4
24
28
$3,280.00
Task 2
1 1
4
0
52
57
$6,885.00
Task 3
0
8
0
22
30
$3,930.00
Task 4
1
8
2
36
47
$6,005.00
Task 5
8
8
0
0
16
$3,040.00
Totals
178
$ 23,140.00
negotiated rates for 2014.
Item
Quantity
Unit
Cost
Cost
Mileage
3.0
$105.00
$315.00
Fuel
2.0
$50.00
$100.00
Hotel
1.0
$210.00
$210.00
Meals
2.0 1
$53.25
1 $106.50
Total $731.50
Total Project Cost = $23,871.50
c o n s u I I I n g e n g i n e e r s
August 18, 2015
Jason LaBarbera, PE
Project Engineer
Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp.
One Tampa City Center
201 N. Franklin Street, Suite 400
Tampa, FL 33602
Phone 813-871-5331, Ext. 4117
Email Jason. LaBarbera(cDkisingercampo.com
301 East Atlantic Boulevard, Pompano Beach, Florida 33060-6643
Tel. 954-788-3400 Fax: 954-788-3500
RE: Agreement for Professional Services
Project Name: Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Location: Summerland Key
Our Project/Proposal Number: 08601.M0 (0.01)
Dear Mr. LaBarbera:
In accordance with your request and subsequent discussions between members of our association
and yourself, this agreement between Keith & Associates, Inc. ("CONSULTANT"), and Kisinger
Campo & Associates Corp. ("CLIENT") for professional services is submitted for your consideration
and approval. Such receipt shall constitute written notice to proceed.
I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The purpose of this Agreement is to outline the scope of services recommended by CONSULTANT
and accepted by CLIENT, and to establish the contractual conditions between CONSULTANT and
CLIENT with respect to the proposed services.
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Section 1 - Engineering Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
Section 2 - Planning Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
Section 3 - Surveying Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
August 18, 20151 Page 2 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
Section 4 — Landscape Architecture Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
Section 5 — Subsurface Utilitv Engineering (SUE) Services
Keith and Associates (CONSULTANT) appreciate the opportunity to provide SUE/Survey
services on this very important project. CONSULTANT will follow ASCE Standard 38-02 —
"Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data" during
the field and office operations for this project. The quality levels discussed below are defined
within the standard. CONSULTANT is to provide professional services associated with
designation of existing subsurface utilities .CONSULTANT shall designate all known tone able and
non -tone able utilities 400' north and south of the bridge within the apparent right of way (+/-50' from
the centerline)
Task 001 Horizontal Designation Services - (Quality Level `B')
CONSULTANT will horizontally mark any known tone able and non toneable underground
utilities that are represented on as -built plans, above ground appurtenances, and other
miscellaneous utility records (to be provided by CLIENT). Conductive utilities will be marked on
the surface utilizing active geophysical prospecting techniques in conjunction with
electromagnetic equipment utilizing passive radio and audio frequencies. Known non-
conductive utilities and/or structures will be marked on the surface utilizing 2-d radar, above
ground features, professional judgment, utility plats and/or as-builts. This proposal does not
include identifying gravity systems, service laterals, irrigation or overhead facilities.
The Lump Sum Fee for this Task shall be ...................................................... $2,750.00
Technical Limitations
Services will be provided with due diligence and in a manner consistent with standards of the subsurface utility
locating industry. Every reasonable effort will be made to locate all utility systems of interest whether indicated on
record plans available to us or not. However, no guarantee can be made that all existing utility systems can be
detected, located or exposed. It may not be possible to detect utilities without prior knowledge, such as systems that
are not depicted on record prints available to us. Typically the horizontal location effort will include electromagnetic
induction, power source detection, and ground penetrating radar (GPR). Electromagnetic induction is a method in
which a transmitted signal is applied to a metallic target. As long as the target is metallic and unbroken, the target can
be traced and a receiver at the surface is used to detect the transmitted signal. If the signal cannot be applied directly
to the target, induction may be produced from the surface. In this scenario bleed -off of the transmitted signal to an
adjacent facility is possible, sometimes resulting in erroneous information. PVC, HDPE, concrete pipe and other non-
metallic facilities cannot be located by electromagnetic methods. Power source detection is a technique used to
locate naturally occurring magnetic fields that exist around cables while generating a signal (electric, telephone,
CATV for example). Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is available to assist in locating non-metallic utilities and other
facilities that are unidentifiable using traditional electromagnetic techniques. The accuracy of these techniques is
subject to the limitation of the available technology and certain factors and field conditions beyond our control, such
as the size, depth and conductivity of the target, the site conditions and access, soil conditions, depth to water table
and the existence of adjacent buried materials and debris. The targeting of subsurface utilities, although highly
reliable, is expressly understood to represent an approximate location of the facility marked on the ground surface.
Facilities located from the surface are usually found within two feet of the surface mark. Once a possible facility has
e on s u'I 11 ng on 0 lno ors