12/14-48 Miscellaneous Planning StudyR
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
ROE COU ORNEY
'P OVE FORM
PEU .O J.
I' `7
c { _Z
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By
WafQPT Faan
CONSULTANT:
J ACOBS PR MANAGEMENT CO
B Nom- ��
Title tot'G�� t�
Effective Date
Client Project No.
Task Order No. 12/1448
Engineer Project No. E9Y16748
This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master
Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ( "Client ") and JACOBS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ( "Consultant"), dated November 16, 2011 ( "Agreement ") as
ammended by Amendment #1, dated October 17, 2012 ( "Addendum "). The Agreement is
incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
Services Authorized: MTH Miscellaneous Planning Study
Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and
consists of 24 page(s).
Pricing
N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement.
X Firm Fixed Price of $ 258247.00
N/A Other (Describe):
Schedule
Services may commence on Execution
Services will cease by 365 days
Other
File: MSTR APS - Monroe County
Page 1 of 1
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Exhibit A
MAY 6, 2015
Table of Contents
Overview.................................................................................................................................. ............................... 3
Scopeof Services .................................................................................................................... ............................... 3
KeyAssumptions ..................................................................................................................... ..............................3
1. Data Collection ........................................................................................................... ..............................5
2. Establish Applicable Design Criteria and Identify Airfield Deficiencies ............. ............................... 5
3. Establish Runway/Taxiway Alternatives and Associated Impacts ....................... ............................... 6
3.1 Establish Runway/Taxiway Alternatives .................................................... ..............................6
3.2 Identify Impacts Associated With Each Alternative ................................. ..............................7
3.3 Develop Mitigation Plans for Re- Establishing the Impacted Facilities .. ..............................8
4. Develop Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Cost Estimates ................................ ..............................9
S. Evaluate Alternatives and Define Preferred Development Option ..................... .............................10
5.1 Evaluate Alternatives ................................................................................... .............................10
5.2 Conduct Airport Stakeholder and Tenant Meeting ................................. .............................10
5.3 Conduct Public Meeting ............................................................................. .............................11
5.4 Conduct FAA/FDOT Review Meeting ........................................................ .............................11
5.5 Define Preferred Development Option ..................................................... .............................11
6. Develop Conceptual Construction Phasing Plan and Refine /Update Cost Estimate for Preferred
Option........................................................................................................................ .............................12
7. Update Airport Layout Plan ............................. ...............................
7.1 Wind Data ............................................. ...............................
7.2 Title Sheet ............................................. ...............................
7.3 Existing Airport Layout (NEW SHEET ) ..............................
7.4 DATA Sheet (NEW SHEET) .................. ...............................
....12
....12
....13
....13
....13
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses Ill
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
8.
P3
10.
MAY 6, 2015
7.5 Airport Layout Plan ..................................................................................... .............................13
7.6 Airport Airspace Drawing ........................................................................... .............................14
7.7 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings ................................... .............................14
7.8 Building /Hangar Area Drawing ................................................................. .............................15
7.9 Land Use Drawing ........................................................................................ .............................15
7.10 Airport Property Map ................................................................................. .............................15
7.11 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal ......................................... .............................15
7.12 Final Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal .................................................... .............................16
7.13 Final Airport Plans Set ................................................................................. .............................16
CoordinationMeetings ............................................................................................ .............................17
StudyDeliverables .................................................................................................... .............................17
Study Administration and Coordination
18
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [21
r
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
Overview
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends a standard separation distance of 240 feet between a
runway and associated parallel taxiway for airports with a B -II Airport Reference Code (ARC) designation.
However, the current separation at the Florida Keys Marathon International Airport (MTH) is 200 feet.
The Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) that was initiated in 2009 recommended the shifting of the runway
to the northwest as the proposed action to bring the runway and parallel taxiway into compliance with FAA
standards. Considering the EA was initiated more than five years ago and given that the FAA airport design
standards have recently been updated, the need to further investigate a range of reasonable alternatives to
solve the existing runway to taxiway separation distance deficiency has been identified.
This study will evaluate the practicability of shifting the runway to the northwest, relocating parallel Taxiway
"A" to the southeast, or a combination thereof, and provide a qualitative and, where possible, a quantitate
annotation of impacts and actions needed for implementation associated with each alternative. Once a
preferred airfield improvement option has been identified for the Airport, the existing Airport Layout Plan
(ALP) drawing set would be updated for review and approval by the FAA.
Scope of Services
The following sections provide a summary scope of work and approach for this study. This scope of work was
derived based on the discussions that took place on April 1, 2015 between the Airport staff, the FAA, and the
Planning Team. This scope of work assumes that the Project Team's effort will focus on 1) the identification of
existing non -FAA standard airfield geometric or separation deficiencies, 2) the development of
runway /taxiway alternatives in compliance with FAA design standards, 3) the evaluation and comparison of
the alternatives including the development of cost estimates and the identification of potential areas of
environmental concern, and 4) the update of the Airport Layout Plan (ALP) to reflect the preferred
development alternative.
Key Assumptions
For budgeting purposes, the following assumptions have been made regarding this study:
Monroe County will provide electronic copies of the Draft EA analyses that were completed by URS
Corporation including exhibits in AutoCAD format, the Integrated Noise Modeling (INM) input files
(airport layout, activity levels and fleet mix, flight tracks, runway use, etc.), and any Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) files that were used as part of the analyses.
The runway /taxiway alternatives will focus on the identification of options to provide proper separation
distance between the runway and parallel taxiway. This proposal assumes that the existing and
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [3]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
proposed lengths of the runway, as currently shown on the ALP, will remain unchanged (i.e. this
effort excludes the identification of future runway length requirements and the siting of displaced
thresholds).
This study also excludes the reevaluation of the Aircraft Approach Category (AAC) and Airplane
Design Group (ADG) for the Airport. It is assumed that the Airport B -II designation will remain
unchanged in the future.
This study will focus on the development of alternatives to provide adequate separation between the
existing runway and parallel taxiway. This proposal does not include the reevaluation of other airfield
projects that have been planned for the Airport and are currently depicted on the ALP.
The existing ALP and attendant drawings, comprising the ALP Set will be updated to reflect the preferred
development option. This proposal, however, does not include the development of a new ALP set.
Additional assumptions that were made regarding the update of the ALP Set are as follows:
- Aerial photogrammetry and mapping is excluded from this scope of work. The planning team will
rely on the digital base map from the current ALP.
- No surveys, including obstructions and property boundary surveys, would be conducted as part of
this effort.
- Monroe County will provide the electronic (AutoCAD format) copies of ALP Set and as -built
drawings of all completed projects since the preparation of the 2009 ALP.
- No new wind data will be collected. The Planning Team will rely on the data included in the
current ALP.
- The Planning Team will use the AutoCAD layering structure and naming conventions from the
existing ALP. Since the intent of this effort is not develop an electronic ALP for the Airport,
compliance with FAA AC 1S0 /S300 -18, Data Collection and Data Standards, is not required.
- The airport property map will not be updated as part of the ALP update.
- No change to the runways lengths, thresholds locations, and declared distances, as currently
depicted on the ALP set, is anticipated. As a result, the airspace and inner - portion of the
approach drawings would only be updated to reflect any potential change to the runway
alignment.
• For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that no field work will be required for the assessment of
environmental impacts. This analysis will address the environmental conditions at the Airport as
determined through a review of existing reports and through contacts with various state and federal
agencies. The Project Team, however, will verify the Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) that were completed
as part of the draft EA and update, if necessary, the Noise and Compatible Land Use sections.
It is assumed that the operation levels that were used to generate the EA baseline noise contours,
representing conditions in 2012 and the forecast 2016 and 2021 conditions are acceptable to the FAA (i.e.
no update to the NEMs will be required to reflect possible change in operational levels).
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [4]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MAY 6, 2015
1. Data Collection
To initiate this study, the Project Team will collect information on the Airport including previously completed
studies. THE PLANNING TEAM'S'S proposed budget to complete this study assumes that the following
information will be provided by others, or in lieu thereof, the ability to consult with Monroe County staff to
jointly define the assumptions to be used as the basis for this study:
All files, including data files and analysis input and output files for all environmental categories (e.g., all
INM input and output files for the noise analysis) associated with the Draft Environmental Assessment that
was completed by URS Corporation
Existing Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Drawing Set in AutoCAD format
If available, official records associated with the land parcel(s) that have been acquired or released since
the approval of the current ALP
2. Establish Applicable Design Criteria and
Identify Airfield Deficiencies
The existing airfield geometry will be reviewed to define substandard dimensions. In particular, the Planning
Team will review the runway /taxiway configuration including dimensions, safety areas, and vehicle movement
areas. This information will provide the foundation for the development of runway /taxiway alternatives.
Dimensional standards for the elements of the airfield geometry will be listed in tabular format and any
deficiencies noted. Dimensional standards will include but not be limited to runway and taxiway safety areas,
runway and taxiway widths, shoulders, blast pads, object free areas, holding position lines, taxiway to taxilanes
and /or parking limit lines separation distances, runway protection zones, etc. Additionally, graphic depictions
of the airfield layout will be provided in plan view with any existing deficiencies noted.
This task will include a review of the modification of standards (MOS) in place at the Airport, as well as the
identification of potential operational benefits associated with the construction of an Air Traffic Control Tower
(ATCT). This identification of potential benefits will be based on: (1) the Planning Team's familiarity with
airport operations; (2) the Planning Team's experience working on airfield geometry issues at similar airports
with and without ATC towers; and (3) a review of available documentation related to the planning for a new
ATC tower at the Airport.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [5)
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MAY 6, 2015
3. Establish Runway/Taxiway Alternatives
and Associated Impacts
This task includes the development of a range of reasonable alternatives to solve the existing runway to
taxiway separation distance deficiency and the identification of associated impacts.
3.1 Establish Runway/Taxiway Alternatives
The practicability of shifting the runway to the northwest, relocating parallel Taxiway "A" to the southeast, or a
combination thereof will be re- evaluated. Specifically, the Planning Team will evaluate the actions needed to
bring the separation distance between the existing runway and taxiway into compliance and provide a
qualitative and, where possible, a quantitate annotation of impacts. Graphical illustrations of each alternative
will be prepared. These layouts will serve as the basis for subsequent operational review, cost implications
and compliance comparisons.
This subtask will also include the identification of options for eliminating /mitigating RPZ encroachments from
existing and proposed facilities including, but not limited to, buildings, public roads /highways, and vehicular
parking facilities.
Airfield alternatives to mitigate encroachments into the RPZ will include the following:
• Threshold displacement /Apply the use of declared distances — An FAA- approved exception to its
standard runway requirements
• Relocate, shift, or realign the runway
• Increase approach visibility minimums
• Develop a combination of the above
This subtask will also include the identification of possible alternatives to relocate Aviation Boulevard For
budgeting purposes, however, it has been assumed the ultimate runway length, as shown on the FAA -
approved ALP, will remain unchanged (i.e. alternatives to reduce the runway length will not be evaluated as
part of this study).
Graphic depictions in plan view of these alternatives will be prepared illustrating the critical elements and
dimensions associated with each, and will show potential relocations of runway end and associated NAVAIDS.
These layouts will serve as the basis for assessing the feasibility of undertaking the proposed runway /taxiway
alternatives including an assessment of potential impacts (refer to Subtask 2.4.2).
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [6]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
As stipulated in the Interim Guidance on Land Uses Within a Runway Protection Zone, documentation of the
alternatives will include:
• A description of each alternative including a narrative discussion and exhibits depicting the alternative
• Analysis of the specific portion(s) and percentages of the RPZ affected, drawing a clear distinction
between the Central Portion of the RPZ versus the controlled activity area, and clearly delineating the
distance from the runway end and runway landing threshold.
• Analysis of (and issues affecting) sponsor control of the land within the RPZ
3.2 Identify Impacts Associated With Each Alternative
Impacts to be evaluated as part of this analysis will include the following.
• Airfield Safety Areas : Impacts to the runway safety area (RSA), runway and taxiway object free area
(OFA), and other airfield safety areas will be evaluated. To the extent the existing planimetric base
map provides sufficient information, this task will also include a review of grading requirements.
• Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) Assessment: This task will include the identification of existing and
proposed facilities that would encroach the proposed RPZ and a review of the specific portion(s) and
percentages of the RPZ that may fall outside the airport boundary, drawing a clear distinction
between the Central Portion of the RPZ versus the Controlled Activity Area.
• Existing Leasehold and Apron Area: The impacts of the alternatives on existing leaseholds will be
evaluated. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that all leasehold information would be
provided by the Monroe County As part of this analysis, the Planning Team will establish potential
financial impacts during and after construction (note: no detailed financial analysis would be
conducted as part of this task. This effort will be limited to documenting potential lost revenue during
and after construction based on financial data to be provided by the Monroe County)
• Airspace: The potential impacts of each alternative on the existing protected airspace will be assessed.
• Navigational Aids: Impacts to all NAVAIDs including instrument landing systems, approach lighting
systems, and runway and taxiway in- pavement and edge lighting systems will be evaluated.
• Existing Airport Facilities: Impacts to existing airport facilities including, but not limited to, fencing and
security perimeter, airside service roads, taxiways, aircraft hangars, tie -down, apron area, etc., will be
evaluated and documented and mitigation options (if available) will be identified and graphically
illustrated.
• Land Acquisition and Land Use Impacts: The potential impacts of each alternative on surrounding
land uses, including potential land acquisition requirements, will be assessed.
• Stormwater Management: The potential impacts of each alternative on existing stormwater
management practices will be assessed.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [7I
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
• Environmental Impacts: This effort will be limited to the quantification of the mangrove areas located
along the northern edge of the Airport property to be impacted by each of the proposed alternative.
• Operational Impacts: The implementation of each alternative with respect to on -going airfield
operations that will take place during and after the time of construction will be evaluated (qualitative
review only — no airfield simulation is included as part of this scope of work)
3.3 Develop Mitigation Plans for Re- Establishing the Impacted
Facilities
As part this effort, the Planning Team will also develop high -level concept plan alternatives indicating where the
impacted facilities, including apron area, could be relocated on- airport property. This will include a review of the
land parcel south /southeast of the Runway 7 departure end and the identification of alternatives to develop this
area. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that a maximum of three concept plans would be developed.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [8]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MAY 6, 2015
4. Develop Rough Order of Magnitude
(ROM) Cost Estimates
This task will include the development of ROM costs necessary to implement each of the alternatives based on
readily available and recent construction bids procured for MTH and /or Key West International Airport (EYW).
A contingency allowance, to be determined in collaboration with the Airport staff, would be applied to the
overall cost estimate in order to provide a project budget. These cost estimates will include, but not be
limited, taxiway /apron improvements, runway relocation and /or reconstruction, stormwater conveyance
system improvements, interior roadway /parking improvements, apron /taxilane airfield edge lighting and
improvements, and etc. The cost of replacing existing facilities to be impacted by the project will also be
included.
The cost estimates to be developed as part of this task will also include cost items for temporary construction
that include, but are not limited to, temporary runway and taxiway painting, temporary runway lighting, and
temporary tie - downs. Construction duration and timing requirements will also be considered as part of these
cost estimates.
Finally, to assist with the development of the ROM cost estimates, this scope of work includes the preparation
of preliminary runway pavement section designs for the future runway, parallel taxiway, and connecting
taxiways.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives - Planning and Technical Analyses 191
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MAY 6, 2015
5. Evaluate Alternatives and Define
Preferred Development Option
This task includes the evaluation of the runway /taxiway alternatives and the definition of a preferred
development option based on feedback received from airport staff, tenants and other stakeholders, as well as
the public, FAA, and FDOT.
5.1 Evaluate Alternatives
The runway /taxiway alternative layouts will be reviewed and evaluated with respect to the following criteria to
assess the general advantages and disadvantages of each in comparison with the others.
• Design Standards: An examination will be conducted for each alternative relative to compliance with
FAA airfield standards.
• Leasehold and other Airport Facilities Impacts: Each alternative will be evaluated based on its impacts
to existing facilities and leaseholds.
• Flexibility: Each concept will be evaluated based on its ability to respond to future aviation demand
levels, its potential to maximize functional land areas by type, and the degree of relocation
requirements.
• Operational Effectiveness: Each alternative will be evaluated based on its ability to work well with
existing and proposed airfield geometries.
• Implementation Difficulty: The implementation of each alternative will be considered with respect to
potential construction challenges and potentially intricate phasing requirements.
• Environmental Impacts: Each alternative will be evaluated with respect to the potential environmental
impacts.
Evaluation matrices will be developed and reviewed with Airport staff.
5.2 Conduct Airport Stakeholder and Tenant Meeting
One meeting will be conducted at the Airport to brief stakeholders and tenants about the study and the
outcome of the runway /taxiway alternatives analysis. The Planning Team will prepare briefing materials for
this meeting and arrange for any necessary audio - visual equipment.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [10]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
5.3 Conduct Public Meeting
One public meeting, in an open house format, will be conducted to brief residents and interested stakeholders
about the study and to receive public comments. The Planning Team will prepare briefing materials for the
public workshops and will have appropriate personnel in attendance to respond to questions and comments
from the public. The Planning Team will prepare the meeting notice for mailing to the public and the meeting
advertisement for publication. The Planning Team will prepare and collect comment forms, and will review
and summarize the comments. The Planning Team will also arrange for any necessary audio - visual
equipment.
For budgeting purposes, however, it has been assumed that the Monroe County and /or Airport staff will
secure the meeting location, mail meeting notices, and arrange for and pay for any public advertisements for
the meeting.
5.4 Conduct FA A /FDOT Review Meeting
One meeting will be conducted at the Orlando Airports District Office (ADO) to brief the FAA (and, possibly,
FDOT) about the study and the outcome of the runway /taxiway alternatives analysis. The Planning Team will
prepare briefing materials for this meeting and arrange for any necessary audio - visual equipment. For
budgeting purpose, it has been assumed
5.5 Define Preferred Development Option
Based on feedback from the Airport staff and stakeholders, FAA, and FDOT, the Planning Team will define a
preferred development option for incorporation into the ALP Set.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives - Planning and Technical Analyses [11]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
6. Develop Conceptual Construction
Phasing Plan and Refine /Update Cost
Estimate for Preferred Option
This task will include the development of a construction phasing plan for the preferred runway /taxiway
alternative. Phasing the various elements of the preferred runway /taxiway alternative will be complex and
challenging. Construction will need to be phased to accommodate a number of factors including funding
constraints and the sponsor's desire to maintain Airport operations with minimal closures. This task will
include a description of the steps required to construct the preferred development alternative including the
development of exhibits illustrating the potential phasing for the project.
This task also includes the update of the ROM cost estimates based on the construction phasing plan for the
preferred runway /taxiway alternative.
7. Update Airport Layout Plan
Using the FAA- approved ALP set, comprised of ten (10) drawing sheets, the Planning Team will prepare an
updated set to reflect the preferred development option for the Airport. The ALP Set will be prepared in
accordance with FAA standards as defined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5070 -7B, Airport Master Plans, and
FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300 -13A, Change 1, Airport Design. The ALP set will be prepared as a paper -copy
ALP and does not include preparation of an electronic ALP (eALP).
All components of the ALP drawing set described herein will be developed in accordance with the FAA ARP
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 2.00, Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (ALPS). To support the
submittal of this updated planning product, the Planning team will also review, complete, and submit the
checklist that is provided in the FAA SOP 2.00.
7.1 Wind Data
The wind roses that are included in the 2009 ALP set were developed based on wind data covering a period of
10 years, from 1991 to 2000. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that no new wind roses will be
developed as part of this effort.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [12]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
7.2 Title Sheet
MAY 6, 2015
The existing title sheet will be updated in accordance with the FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No. 2.00).
7.3 Existing Airport Layout (NEW SHEET)
Utilizing the base map from the current ALP, a new sheet will be created to identify facilities at the Airport as
they currently exist. This drawing will include existing structures, pavement, imaginary surfaces, NAVAIDs,
ground contours, runway protection zones, runway safety areas, property interests, and other pertinent
dimensional data recommended by the FAA.
This drawing will depict the configuration and general dimensioning of the existing airport facilities, including
surveyed building height of all buildings on airport property if available. The Airport Reference Point (ARP),
key elevations, runway end latitude /longitude coordinates, and runway approach surfaces will also be
identified. The draft FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No. 2.00) will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that
the existing airport layout contains the information required for submittal to the FAA.
The scale of the drawing will be defined at the time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to
provide a clearly legible drawing with all requisite data readily discernible. The scale of the drawing, however,
will fall in the range of 1" = 200' and 1" = 600', in accordance with the draft FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No.
2.00).
7.4 DATA Sheet (NEW SHEET)
A new Airport Data Sheet containing data specific to the Airport Layout Plan sheet, will be created. This data
sheet will include the wind roses for the Airport's runways, runway data, safety separation distances, declared
distance charts, elevations of specific Airport, runway and taxiway points, etc. Existing and proposed
modifications to FAA airport design standards will be identified and delineated in table format along with
either the waiver allowing the modification or the proposed method of addressing the modification. This data
The Approach and Departure Reference Codes (APRC and DPRC designations) and Taxiway Design Groups
(TDG) for each taxiway will be identified along with other information specified in FAA SOP 2.00 ALP Review
Checklist.
7.5 Airport Layout Plan
Utilizing available digital mapping, the Planning Team will update the ALP depicting future airport
development as it relates to existing facilities presented in the previous drawing. As part of this task, the
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives - Planning and Technical Analyses (13]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
Planning Team will integrate the preferred development option for the Airport's runway and associated
parallel taxiway.
The ALP will illustrate all airfield pavement, roadway & parking pavement /structures, trails /gravel roads,
runway markings, on and off - airport structures, appropriate levels of vegetation, key drainage features,
navigational and landing aids, and other miscellaneous natural and man -made items.
Ground contours (if available), runway protection zones, runway safety and object areas, future property
interests, and other pertinent dimensional data recommended by the FAA will also be depicted on the plan.
As part of this effort, the dimensions of the runway protection zones will be verified and, if required, updated.
Each of the components of the ALP will contain the information as required in FAA AC 150/5300 -13A, Change
1, Airport Design, and the FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No. 2.00).
7.6 Airport Airspace Drawing
As needed, this drawing will be updated to reflect the preferred runway /taxiway development option for the
Airport and any potential change to the runway alignment. This drawing will depict all relevant Federal
Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces as they relate to the Airport's immediate airspace.
The plan will illustrate the ultimate runway configuration of the airfield with key elevations of the surfaces and
stationing from the runway ends being referenced. Fifty (50) foot contour intervals will be shown for all FAR
Part 77 sloping imaginary surfaces. This sheet will depict objects violating FAR Part 77 surfaces that have not
been identified on the ALP or approach sheets. The top elevation of each obstruction will be identified on the
sheet as will the disposition of the obstruction. The dimensions of the approach surfaces and transitional
surfaces will be charted.
All obstruction data will be extracted from the current ALP set. No field obstruction surveys and /or additional
research to identify existing obstructions will be completed as part of this effort. The draft FAA checklist (per
ARP SOP No. 2.00) will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the airport airspace drawing contains the
information required by the FAA.
7.7 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings
As needed, the inner portion of the approach surface drawings will be updated to reflect the preferred
runway /taxiway development option for the Airport and any potential change to the runway alignment.
In accordance with the draft ARP SOP No. 2.00, these drawings will depict the obstacle identification surfaces
contained in 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, threshold siting surfaces, Glideslope
Qualification Surfaces (GQS) if applicable, and any applicable surfaces associated with the United States
Standards for Instrument Procedures (TERPS), Change 1 through 25.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [14]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6, 2015
The data already included in the existing FAA - approved ALP will be used as the basis for determining
obstruction information to the airport's existing runway approaches. No surveys will be completed as part of
this effort.
Obstructions will be listed numerically in an obstruction table for each approach with data describing the
obstruction type, the surfaces penetrated, top elevation, allowable elevation, amount of penetration, and
proposed dispositions. Elevations of roads, railroads, power poles, trees, buildings, etc., in the approaches will
also be shown.
7.8 Building /Hangar Area Drawing
The update of the building /hangar area drawing will be limited to incorporation of the preferred
runway /taxiway development option for the Airport, as well as the preferred option for re- establishing the
impacted facilities. The draft FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No. 2.00) will be reviewed (and completed) to
confirm that the building /hangar area drawing contains the information required by the FAA.
7.9
Land Use Drawing
The update of the land use drawing will be limited to incorporation of the preferred runway /taxiway
development option for the Airport. The draft FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No. 2.00) will be reviewed (and
completed) to confirm that the land use drawing contains the information required by the FAA.
7.10 Airport Property Map
The update of the airport property map will be limited to incorporation of the preferred runway /taxiway
development option for the Airport. The draft FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No. 2.00) will be reviewed (and
completed) to confirm that the airport property map contains the information required by the FAA. For
budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that no additional land parcel would need to incorporated in the
updated airport property map.
7.11 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal
Two draft copies of the drawings developed will be assembled and distributed to the MTH staff for review and
comments. Revisions will be made as appropriate based on these comments. The drawings to be included in
the preliminary ALP set are as follows:
Title Sheet
Data Sheet
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [15]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MAY 6, 2015
• Existing Airport Layout
• Airport Layout Plan
• Airport Airspace Drawing
• Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing — Runway 7
• Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing — Runway 25
• Building /Hangar Area Drawing
• Land Use Drawing
• Airport Property Map
7.12 Final Draft Airport Pla Set S ubmit tal
Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate) four copies of the final draft Airport Plans
set will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FAA (one copy), FDOT Aviation and Spaceports
Office (one copy), and airport staff (two copies). An electronic version of the drawings set will also be
provided. Drawings will be provided in both AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat (PDF) formats. As part of this
submittal, will also prepare a transmittal letter to the FAA that will list the key changes that have been made
to the Airport Layout Plan. The FAA checklist (per ARP SOP No. 2.00) will also be completed and included in
this transmittal.
7.13 Final Airport Plans Set
Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate) eleven copies of the final Airport Plans
Package and associated FAA checklist will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FDOT
Aviation and Spaceports Office and to the FAA. It is assumed that Monroe County will be responsible for
forwarding the Airport Plans set to the FAA local ADO for their review, coordination, approval, and signature.
An electronic version of the drawings set will also be provided. Drawings will be provided in both AutoCAD
and Adobe Acrobat (PDF formats).
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [16]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
MAY 6. 2015
8. Coordination Meetings
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. and Jacobs.
Throughout the study, the Planning Team anticipates participating in up to five (5) meetings at the Airport
These meetings will provide an opportunity to kick -off the study (1 meeting), discuss /review the alternatives
that were developed (2 meetings), evaluate the alternatives and review associated construction costs (1
meeting), review the ALP drawing sets (1 meeting). The Planning will be responsible for the preparation of the
meeting materials including summarizing the findings of the analyses in a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation
format.
9. Study Deliverables
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask.• Ricondo & Associates, Inc.
The Planning Team will summarize the findings of the analyses in a technical report. The content of the final
report will include, but not be limited to, the following elements:
• Study goals and objectives
• Design Parameters
• Runway/Taxiway Development Alternatives
• Mitigation Plans for Re- establishing the Impacted Facilities
• Alternatives Evaluation
• Preferred Alternative
• Executive Summary (in PowerPoint format)
A DRAFT report (6 copies) and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format detailing the input,
analysis, and results will be prepared and submitted to the Airport staff, FDOT and FAA for review and
comments. The FINAL version (10 copies) of the document will be distributed to the Airport staff for
acceptance. Digital files of the final report will be provided to the Monroe County and Airport Management in
a readable CD format. A total of five (5) PDF versions will be provided on CD's.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses (17]
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MAY 6, 2015
10. Study Administration and Coordination
This task covers additional day -to -day study administration and coordination required for the project for
purposes of scope and budget development, it is assumed that this project will be conducted over a 10-
month period (including the FAA's approval of the ALP Set) and project administration and coordination
would occur throughout that period.
The Planning Team will coordinate with Airport staff via conference calls on a bi- weekly basis throughout
the duration of the study. This coordination is assumed to require two (2) hours per meeting to prepare
for, conduct, and prepare meeting notes as needed. This task provides coordination and documentation
support for each meeting.
The Planning Team will prepare and submit monthly invoices and progress reports. This task is assumed
to require four (4) hours per month for subconsultant coordination, reconciliation of invoices and
budgets, and completion and preparation of invoices and status reports.
The project manager will maintain a current project schedule and provide updates on a monthly basis, as
part of the monthly progress reports.
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses [18]
0
F4
t0
E
E
3
N
0
U
v
m
'o
I1
H
0)
N
C
I
d
a+
t0
E
Y
Q
>A
3
'x
m
A
R
o .
c
N
Q
d
a
R
0000000000 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
on 40CD0t�t C2 v
t0 N N" h N r Olt 0' N
0 ^ N cn � IV M N- to
H N
iR a a N M w W {N W W 140
0
cm C O O O O O O O O O
7
m Q 00
t '
to 00 m 1 � M O N N
N N O LO h 0 OD Of
r <O t�: r- M I O In (d CI
O M N C N t0
H
69 6 69 fA 69 69 d9 64 EA EA W
O O O O O O O O O
m 0 ' N O C M ' C 0 G N
U M r '7 .- tt') -I O w! M
V) ulj to 'T O � IT f- co
to bH GH 6H 64 H9 6H V! fA fR w
H
Y
t0
F
C
0
C
O
n
o v
0
U _
0.
m
O m
�
CD a
0
E O
N
O N
N O
m
H
N E
0
p =
V
y w
IV
0) O
0
(D
to
f0
N L y
0)
f6
N G Q
j
t0 N
c
C
CL p
U )
m
3
-0 - t0 47
0 E w
c'
N N C O
r
0)
Q W C
UO y m
0)
0 0
c Q
o
IL
-O c O
Y
cu C
0
O
C
O
O M N d
L
C 0 c O to CO
.� .. N
O
w C
0 U O) U
O o
t0 (� N
U
O w 3 0 o
N .
c
Y p x U
0 m
Y -0 0 a
c G
c
c
3O 0
O O G O U
min
U < 0;Fc o a
U
o> E
— L L y Q
CL
m Q Q
c
U .n 7 — 4) 6�
> > - 0
T T
O 7 0
. .� tU
C, W W O W O Z)
U (.0 (A
0 0 0 o O O O
O o 0
N M r to O n
00 O O
T,
O
N
T
(0
L
V
C
y
a�
f9
�U
0
Q
06
0
c
8
X
T
a
t`o
a
0)
EL
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Table B
Jacobs(Prime Consultant)-Labor/Fee Estimate Summary
B08ng Rate: $ 220 8 196 $ 140 $ 00 8 90 $ 86 $ 68
Labor Estimate(Hours) Fee Estimate IS)
Sub-
Sr.Project consultants
Task Description Project Director Manager Senior Engineer Engineer Designer Sr.CADS Tech Clerical Total Labor Expenses Expenses Total
Task No A Description Responsibility
1.0 Data Collection 8 Kkk-0R MaeHrtl Total 0 0 14 0 0 0 4 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 8 4,170 8 1,200 $ - 8 6,370
Conduct Rick-Off Meeting B Initial Site Visit JCB.R8A 12 12 $ 2,340 5 1.200 $ - $ 3,640
Embry
Collect and Renew Available Data JCB,RBA 2 4 12 .i. - - S 1,830
0 S - $
2.0 Establish Applicable Design Criteria and Identify Airfield Deficiencies Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - 8 8 -
3.0 Establish Rmway/Tadway AOerretives and Msocialed Impacts Total 0 16 24 48 a 0 0 0 0 136 $ 15,120 $ . S - $ 16,120
Identity Impacts Associated With Each Alternative 0 $ $ a 5 -
Slormwater management JCB 8 24 24 56 8 5,880 $ - S 5,880
Renew 8 Define Stormwater Management Requirements 8 Alternatives JCB 8 24 24 24 80 $ 9.240 $ - $ 9.240
4.0 Dewelep Rough Order o/Magnitude(ROM)Oast Estimates Total 0 18 28 48 86 0 0 0 148 $ 16,400 $ . $ - $ 16,400
Develop Cost Spreadsheets JCB 8 16 24 24 72 S B 120 $ - S - S 8,120
Define Quantities and Identify Unit Costs JCS 4 8 16 16 44 S 4,780 $ - S • S 4,780
Define Typical Sections JCB 4 4 8 16 32 $ 3,500 $ - S - S 3,500
5.0 Evaluate Alternatives(Im3udirg Stakeholder Meetings)&Define Preferred Development Option Total 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 8 9,380 $ 4,800 8 . $ 14,180
Conduct/Attend Airport Stakeholder and Tenant Meeting RBA,JCB 12 12 $ 2,340 $ 1,200 $ - $ 3,540
$ 1200
Moderate Public Meeting JCB 12 - t 344
Attend Public Meeting R&A,JCB 12 12 $ 2,340 $ 1,200 $ - S 3.540
Conduct/Attend FAA/FDOT Renew Meeting RM.JCB 12 12 $ 2.340 5 1,20 $ - S 3,540
8.0 Develop Conceptuel Combustion Ptrsekg Plan and Refine/Update Cost Estimate for Preferred Option Total 0 2 16 40 48 0 0 0 0 104 $ 10,650 $ - $ - 3 10,650
Develop Conceptual Construction Phasing Plan JCB 8 16 24 48 S 4.720 $ - S - S 4,720
Refine/Update Cost Estimate for Preferred Option JCB 2 4 lb 16 38 $ 3.830 $ - $ - 5 3,830
Prepare Phasing Plan/Refired Cost Estimate Package JCB 4 8 8 20 $ 2,000 $ - S - 5 2,000
1.0 update ALP Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 - 8 - S - $ -
Moon Layout Plan ter 11-.r RB,-,
Airpml Airspace OrrWing itch o $ - 5 - $ - S -
Inner Portion of the App,oacn Surface DtarAgs R8�' 0 5 - S - $ - S -
buJdinglHargm Area Drawing R6r, 0
Land Use Urarrerg Re,<
Airpnrl Properly Man R6'. 0
Preliminary Drat A:rpn,i Plans Set Submittal Re,1 C
$.00 Coordination Meetings()' r. -,.:I-1,-.:.' . 1 .,i,"-JIoClo,y Total 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 $ 9,360 $ 4,800 $ - S 14,160
QB
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives-Planning and Technical Analyse. ZQ
TILE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT -
Tale 8
Jacobs IPrltne Consultant)-Labor/Fee Estimate Summary
eNBng Rate: S 220 S 196 8 110 8 90 3 90 $ 85 S 58
Labor Estimate(Hours) PM EslbrW L.
Sr.Protect CatlslNatMs
Task Description Project Director Manager Senior Engineer Engineer Designer Sr.CADD Tech Clerical total Laboe Ea1rl,M Eawnw Total
Conduct/Attend Meeting at(Diacuee/Remew Alternatnes) RSA.JCB 12 12 3 2,340 6 1.200 3 - $ 3.640
Conduct/Attend Meeting N2(DscucclRemew Alternatives) RSA.JCB 12 12 6 2.340 3 1.200 3 - 3 3,540
Conduct/Attend Meeting N3(Evaluate AlIs./Rewew Construction Costs) RSA,JCR 12 12 3 2.340 $ 1.200 $ - 6 3,540
Conduct/Attend Meeting N4(Renew ALP Dravngs Set) REA,JCR 12 12 1 2,340 $ 1.200 S - 3 3,640
6.0o Study 04loerablea Total 12 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $ 4,518 $ - $ 1 4r/80
Renew Draft Report JCB 4 4 e 3 1.660 S - S - 6 1,660
Renew Executive Summary PPT JCB 4 4 8 S 1.660 3 - S - S 1,660
Review Final Report JCB 4 4 e 3 1 660 S - S - $ 1,660
10.00 Study Administration snit Coordination Total 0 20 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 52 6 7,680 $ $ - $ 7,680
Project Administration,Monthly Billing S Reports 8 8 S 1.560 S - S - 3 1,560
Develop Project Schedule JCB 4 4 S 7B0 3 - S - 6 780
0 S
Prepare Invoices JCB 8 8 S 1560 3 - S - S 1,560
Coordination Conference Calls Ibi-weekly over 10 months) JCB RSA 16 16 32 S 3680 1 - 3 - S 3,680
Grand Total 12 176 84 164 164 0 0 0 112 3 77,520 8 10,800 $ • $ 00,320
Ink "amass
1 Raid ems(I visit of 2 Jays per viol ys SIM day) S 160
I liar(Car Rcntal(In-Sirs l 0 VI.la 2 days pa vim rri S30puday l S MO
I Islam/ Paa I I m m.I malt)per no(a t S2411per minim) 6 240
I Airf ry(I Pain a S7004115 l 700
S 1,200
5 RoastCartlos,l lit w 1days pa etoa Saludsy) S 160
S Om for Car Ronal On-Sit:12 days pv m0 s, $50 pr devil S RIO
S 104gmg(I pare pr I night per man gyp,$240pm eight( S 240
5 Airfare(I person l S701umaba S 70u
5 1.200
a Runlet Coll sad y 2 days pmvise ps SSO/dsyt S 160
S Om for Car Remit On-Soy t l viol(n:2 days psr mot re SSO par day) 5 100
II I.xlnng(I wen p.I night put vim p 6240pa eight) S 240
II Airfare(I p1110 p STm flrghii S Thor
5 1,001
May 7,illAti
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives—Planing and Technical Analyses 21
•
•
•
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT -
Table C
Ricondo 8 Associates(Subconsultant)-Labor/Fee Estimate Summary
Billing Rate: $ 328 $ 252 $ 234 8 191 $ 154 $ 124 8 124
Labor Estimate(Hours) Fee Estimate(5)
Managing Senior Technical
Task Description Officer Director Consultant Consultant Consultant Specialist Admin. Total Labor Expenses Total
Task No 8 Description Responsibility
1.0 Data Collection 8 Klok-Off Meeting Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 $ 6,021 $ 1,200 $ 8,281
Prepare Meeting Materials for Kick-Off Meeting R84 1 4 5 $ 1 046 $ - $ 1,046
Conduct Kick-Off Meeting 8 Initial Site Visit JCB,RMA 8 8 16 $ 3./84 $ 1,200 $ 5,044
Collect and Review Existing Available Data JCB,R&A 1 t $ 151 $ - $ 191
2.0 Establish Applicable Design Criteria and Identify Airfield Deficiencies Total 0 4 0 18 20 0 0 0 0 40 8 7,204 $ S 7,284
Review Existing Airfield Geometry RSA 2 4 8 14 $ 2.560 $ - $ 2,680
Review Existing MOS R54 4 4 $ 764 $ - $ 754
Identify ATCT Operational Benefits R57-i 2 5 11 22 $ 3,940 $ - $ 3,040
3.0 Establish Runway/Taxlway Alternatives end Aeeoclated Impacts Total 0 20 0 84 100 0 0 0 0 204 $ 37,004 8 - $ 37,004
Establish Runway/Taxiway Alternatives R8A 8 32 40 80 $ 14.526 $ - $ 14,528
Identify Impacts Associated With Each Alternative 0 $ - $ - $ -
Airfield Safety Areas R&A 4 4 0 $ 1,002 $ - $ 1,002
Runway Protection Zones(RPZ)Assessment R&A 3 13 $ 2,278 E - 5 2,278
Existing Leasehold and Apron Area R&A 2 4 7 $ 1.280 $ - $ 1,250
Airspace R&A 4 8 13 $ 2,278 $ - $ 2,278
Navigational Aida R&A .. a 11 $ 1,890 $ - $ 1,806
Existing Airport Facilities R&A 2 7 8 1,280 $ - $ 1,280
Land Acquisition and Land Use Impacts R&A 0 7 8 1,280 $ - $ 1,250
Slcimwater inanagem JCB 0 $ $ t.
Environmental Impacts MA in 10 $ 3,050 $ - S 3,058
Operational Impacts RSA 1 4 13 S 2,420 $ - $ 2,426
Develop Mitigation Plans for Re-Establishing the Impacted Facilities R&A 4 8 I c 28 $ 5,120 $ - $ 5,120
Review 8 Define Slormwater Management Requirements 8 Alternatives JCB 0 $ - $ $
4.0 Develop Rough Order of Magnitude(ROM)Coat Estimate. Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - 8 - $ -
Develop Cool Spreadsneets C., i
Define Quantities and Identity Unit Costs
Pi spare Runway/I axiway Cioss-Section, -i- -
6.0 Evaluate Alternatives(including Stakeholder Meetings)8 Define Preferred Development Option Total 0 18 0 42 44 0 0 0 0 104 $ 10,874 $ 3,720 $ 23,594
Evaluate Alternatives R&A 2 6 .. 16 $ 2,042 $ $ 2,942
Prepare Materials for Airport Stakeholder and Tenant Meeting R&A 2 12 c 30 5 5,320 $ - $ 5,320
Conduct/Attend Airport Stakeholder and Tenant Meeting R&A,JCB 4 4 8 $ 1,802 $ 1,635 $ 3,527
Prepare Presentation Materials for Public Meeting R8A 2 a n 18 $ 3,324 $ - $ 3,324
Moderate Public Meeting 10'. 0 $ - $ - $ -
Attend Public Meeting R&A,JCB 4 4 6 $ 1.802 $ 1,050 $ 3,842
Prepare Materials for FAA/FDOT Review Meeting R&A 2 - 4 8 $ 1,582 $ - 8 1,582
Conduct/Attend FAA/FOOT Review Meeting RBA,JCB 2 2 4 $ 040 $ 135 8 1,081
Define Preferred Development Option R&A 4 8 12 $ 1.990 $ • $ 1,996
0.0 Develop Conceptual Construction Phasing Plan and Refine/Update Cost Estimate for Preferred Option Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ -
Refine/Update Cost Luiimale IC:Preferred Option .. ' - -
Prepare Phasing Plan/Refined Cost Estimate Package - y -
7.0 Update ALP Told 0 10 0 102 05 2 0 0 0 218 8 38,334 $ 7,800 $ 47,134
Wind Data R&A 2 2 $ 382 $ - $ 382
Title Sheet RMA 2 2 4 $ 550 S $ 556
Existing Airport Layout(NEW SHEET) R&A 16 24 40 $ 0,752 $ - $ 6,752
DATA Sheet(NEW SHEET) RSA 6 8 14 $ 2,378 S - $ 2,378
Airport Layout Plan RSA 16 24 40 $ 8,752 $ $ 0,762
Airport Airspace Drawing R&A • 1 14 $ 2.856 8 5 2,856
inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings NSA L 28 $ 5.148 $ $ 5,148
Building/Hangar Area Drawing RSA 4 8 12 $ 1,090 $ - $ 1,000
Land Use Drawing 1284 4 4 8 $ 1,380 $ - $ 1,350
May 7.2015
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives-Planning and Technical Analyses 22
•
THE FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Table C
Ricondo&Associates(Subconaultent)-Labor/Fee Estimate Summary
Billing Rate: $ 328 $ 282 $ 234 $ 191 $ 154 $ 124 $ 124
Libor Estimate(Hours) Fee Estimate($)
Managing Senior Technical
Trak Description Officer Director Consultant Consultant Consultant Specialist Admin. Total Labor Expenses Total
Airport Property Map R&A 2 4 6 $ 998 $ - $ 998
Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal R&A 8 4 8 20 $ 4,252 $ 1,500 $ 5,752
Final Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal RSA 2 4 8 14 $ 2,560 $ 1,800 $ 4,380
Final Airport Plana Set RSA 2 8 8 18 $ 3.324 $ 4,500 $ 7,824
8.00 Coordination Meetings(4)NOTE:The 1Ackn0 Meeting was Included as Part of Task 1.Data Collection; Total 0 22 0 SO 14 0 0 0 0 98 $ 14,000 $ 2,040 $ 10,730
Prepare Materials for Meeting 41(Discuss/Review Alternatives) RSA 2 4 4 10 $ 1,944 $ - $ 1,944
Conducl/Attend Meeting#1(Discuss/Review Alternatives) RBA,JCS 4 4 8 $ 1.892 $ 80 $ 1,952
Prepare Materials for Meeting#2(Discuss/Review Alternatives) R8A 2 4 4 10 $ 1.940 $ - $ 1,944
Conduct/Attend Meeting#2(Discuss/Review Alternatives) RBA,JCB 4 4 8 $ 1,892 $ 60 $ 1,952
Prepare Materials for Meeting#3(Evaluate Ails/Review Construction Costs) R&A 2 4 4 10 $ 1 944 $ - $ 1,944
Conduct/Attend Meeting#3(Evaluate Alta./Review Construction Costs) RBA,JCB 4 4 8 $ 1,892 $ 1,200 $ 3,152
Prepare Materials for Meeting#4(Review ALP Drawings Set) R&A 2 2 4 $ 690 $ - $ 890
Conducl/Attend Meeting#4(Review ALP Drawings Set) RBA,JCB 4 4 8 $ 1,892 $ 1.260 $ 3,152
'9.00 Study Deliverables Total 0 19 0 40 64 0 0 0 0 120 $ 22,008 $ 3,010 $ 25,018
Prepare Draft Report RU 8 24 32 04 $ 11,768 $ 1,850 $ 13,518
Review Draft Report JCB $ $ • $
Prepare Executive Summary PPT RBA 4 8 '6 28 $ 5,120 $ 535 $ 5,855
Review Executive Summary PP I JCB 0 $ $ - $
Prepare Final Report RSA 4 8 le. 28 $ 5,120 $ 025 $ 5,745
Review Final Report JCB SO $ - $ • $
10.00 Study Administration and Coordination Total 0 12 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0,622 $ - $ 6,822
Project Administration,Monthly Billing S Reports - $
Jevebp rrolect JCnenulc ,t, -
Prepare Monthly Status Report RSA 2 8 10 $ 2.092 $ - $ 2,092
Prepare Invoices Joy $
Coordination Conference Calls(bi-weekly over 10 months) JCB,R&A 10 10 20 $ 4,730 $ - $ 4,730
Grand Total 0 117 0 346 340 2 0 0 804 $ 151,497 $ 18,430 $ 189,027
May 1,2015
Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives-Planning and Technical Analyses 2 j!
Table 0
Rieondo&Associates,Inc.-Reimbursable Expenses
Technical Editor Printing/Reproduction(Reports) Printing/Reproduction(24"a 38"-Drawings) Mileage Trawl to MTH
Unit Cost
0of Hof (Hotel+Flight 0 of Person
Task Description Hourly Rate Hours Total Unit Cost Pages Copies Total Unit Cost Sheets Copies Total Unit Cost Miles Total ♦Per them) Traveling Total Grand Total
1.00 Data Collection&Kick-Off Meeting
$ 100.00 0 $ - $ 030 20 10 $ 60.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ $ 0 575 0 $ - $ 600 000 2 $ 1.200 00 $ 1.260
Subtotal $ 1,260
2.00 Establish Applicable Design Critada and Identify Airfield Deficiencies
Subtotal $ -
3.00 Establish Runway/faxlway Alternatives and Associated Impacts
4.00 Develop Rough Order of Magnitude(ROM)Cost Estimates
Subtotal $
6.00 Evaluate Alternatives(including Stakeholder Meetings)&Define Preferred Development Option
$ 100.00 0 $ - $ 0.30 30 15 $ 135.00 $ 30.00 10 1 $ 300.00 $ 0.575 0 $ - $ 500000 2 $ 1.20000 $ 1,635
$ 10000 0 $ . $ 030 5 300 $ 450.00 $ 30.00 10 1 $ 300.00 $ 0 575 0 $ - $ 000000 2 $ 1.200.00 $ 1.850
$ 10000 0 $ - $ 030 30 15 $ 135.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ - $ 0575 0 $ - $ - $ 135
Subtotal $ 3,720
0.00 Develop Conceptual Construction Phasing Plan and Refine/Update Cost Estiml 0
Subtotal $ -
7.00 Update ALP
$ 100 00 0 $ $ 0.30 0 0 $ - $ 30.00 10 5 $ 1500.00 $ 0575 0 $ - $ - $ 1,500
$ 10000 0 $ - $ 0.30 0 0 $ - $ 30.00 10 6 $ 180000 $ 0.575 0 $ - $ - $ 1800
$ 10000 0 $ - $ 0.30 0 0 $ - $ 30.00 10 15 $ 4.500.00 $ 0575 0 $ - $ - $ 4.500
Subtotal $ 7,800
8.00 Coordination Meetings(4)NOTE:The Kickoff Meeting was Included as Part of Task 1,Data Collec5on)
$ 10000 0 $ - $ 0.30 20 10 $ 60.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ $ 0.575 0 $ - 2 $ - $ 60
$ 100 00 0 $ - $ 0.30 20 10 $ 00.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ - $ 0.575 0 $ - 2 $ - $ 80
$ 10000 0 $ - $ 0.30 20 10 $ 00.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ - $ 0.575 0 $ - $ 600 000 2 $ 1.200 00 $ 1.260
$ 100 00 0 $ - $ 0.30 20 10 $ 00.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ - $ 0 575 0 0 - $ 000 000 2 $ 1.200 00 $ 1.260
Subtotal $ 2,840
$.00 Study Deliverables
$ 100 00 17 $1.700.00 $ 0.30 50 10 $ 150.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ . $ 0.575 0 $ - $ - $ 1.850
$ 100 00 4 $ 400.00 $ 0.30 30 15 $ 135.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ - $ 0.575 0 $ - $ - $ 535
$ 100 00 4 $ 400.00 $ 0.30 50 15 $ 225.00 $ 30.00 0 0 $ - $ 0575 0 $ - $ - $ 625
Subtotal $ 3,010
10.00 Study Administration and Coordination
Subtotal $ -
Grand Total $ 18,430
Letter of Transmittal
Ryan Forney
Jacobs
3300 PGA Blvd., Suite #780
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
T: 561 - 799 -3855 • F: 561 - 799 -6579 • www.jacobs.com
DATE: September 16, 2015
PROJECT NO:
TO: Don DeGraw RE:
Key West International Airport
WE ARE SENDING YOU VIA ENTER FEDEX, UPS, USPS, ETC.
® Attached: ❑ Under Separate Cover the Following Items:
❑ Drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Other
❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Submittals ❑ Reports
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
3 9/16/15 PSO #48 -MTH Miscellaneous Planning Study
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For Approval
❑ For Your Use /Files
❑ As Requested
❑ For Review and Comment
® For Execution
❑ No Exception Taken
❑ Make Corrections Noted
❑ Amend and Resubmit
❑ Rejected -(See Remarks)
❑ Other
❑ Submit _ Copies for Distribution
❑ Return _ Corrected Copies
❑ Resubmit _ Copies for Approval
❑ Return _ Approved Copies
REMARKS: PLEASE RETURN ONE SIGNED COPY.
F RCEIVED
SEP 17 2015
BY: 6X-.
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. company