Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12/14-67 Marathon Master Plan Update
AMY REAVILIN, CPA CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT &COMPTROLLER MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA DATE: December 19, 2016 TO: Don DeGraw, Director ofAirports ATTN.• Beth Leto, Airport Business Manager FROM: Cheryl Robertson Executive Aide to the Clerk of Court & Comptroller At the November 22, 2016 Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted approval and authorized execution of Item FI I Approval of Jacobs Project Management Co.' s Task Order No.12/14- 67 for the Services Authorized: Marathon Master Plan Update PSO#67 in the amount of $709,205.00 to be funded by FAA Grant#044-35 (90%), FDOT Grant#GOE41 (5%), and Marathon Operating Fund 403 (5%). Enclosed is a duplicate originals executed on behalf of Monroe County, for your handling. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. cc: County Attorney Finance File 500 Whitehead Street Suite 101, PO Box 1980, Key West, FL 33040 Phone: 305-295-3130 Fax: 305-295-3663 3117 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: 305-289-6027 Fax: 305-289-6025 88820 Overseas Highway, Plantation Key, FL 33070 Phone: 852-7145 Fax: 305-852-7146 MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE! TASK ORDER FORM Effective Date Upon Execution Task Order No. 12/14-67 Client Project No. Engineer Project No. E9Y16767 This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ("Client") and JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated November 16, 2011 ("Agreement") as ammended by Amendment #1, dated October 17, 2012 ("Addendum"). The Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order. Services Authorized: MTH Master Plan Update Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and consists of 60 page(s). Pricing �_ N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement:' c-. X Firm Fixed Price of $ 709,205.00_ `_' CD N/A Other (Describe): Schedule Services may commence on Execution - Services will cease by 790 days Other (SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AT ®Y HEAVILIN, CLERK OANR;CO eLJI�TFL,ORIDA� 1 23 B • Mayor/Chairman VIUN. CLERK '0} 1 W ess --- File: MSTR APS — Monroe County CONSULTANT: JA ;BROJECT MANAGEMENT CO B� Title Page 1 of 1 Exhibit A - 12/ 14/-67 Florida Keys Marathon International Airport . . ..' . `.. . . .6 *:V:P: *:tons qV: ■ 3t.. ■ ■ vow■ ■ of*E*■ ■ #.■*■ Master Plan Update Study for the Florida Keys Marathon International Airport Draft Scope of Work PREPARED FOR: THE MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS April 22, 2016 Jacobs and Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (R&A) prepared this document for the stated purposes as expressly set forth herein and for the sole use of the Monroe County Department of Airports and its intended recipients. The techniques and methodologies used in preparing this document are consistent with industry practices at the time of preparation. FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Overview APRIL 2016 Table of Contents .......................................................................... 5 Scopeof Services...................................................................................................................................................7 1. Project Initiation & Administration.......................................................................................................9 1.1 Establish Technical Review Committee....................................................................................9 1.2 Project Administration, Monthly Billing & Reports...............................................................9 2. Aerial Surveying and Mapping.............................................................................................................10 2.1 Aerial Mapping & Surveying...................................................................................................10 2.2 Establish Geodetic Control......................................................................................................10 2.3 Pre -Survey Preparation Activities...........................................................................................11 2.4 Photographic mapping — remote sensing.............................................................................13 2.5 Airspace Surfaces & Obstacle Analysis..................................................................................15 3. Inventory of Existing Conditions.........................................................................................................17 3.1 Develop, Distribute, and Tabulate Tenant Survey................................................................18 3.2 Inventory of Airport Physical Facilities..................................................................................18 3.3 Off -Airport Land Use and Land Use Controls........................................................................20 3.4 Land Holdings and Existing Leaseholds.................................................................................21 3.5 Known Environmental Areas of Concern...............................................................................21 3.6 Review of Other Reports......................................................................................................... 21 3.7 Prepare Inventory Of Existing Conditions Report ................................................................22 4. Aviation Activity Forecasts...................................................................................................................23 4.1 Collect and Analyze Socioeconomic Data..............................................................................24 4.2 Develop Aviation Activity Forecasts.......................................................................................24 4.2.1 REVIEW GENERAL AVIATION INDUSTRY TRENDS.......................................................................................24 4.2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS OR OPPORTUNITIES AFFECTING ACTIVITY LEVELS ........................ 24 Master Plan Update [1] FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 4.2.3 COMMERCIAL AIR SERVICE ANALYSIS............................................................................................................. 24 4.2.4 PREPARE AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECASTS..................................................................................................... 25 4.2.5 DEVELOP MILITARY AIRCRAFT ACTIVITY FORECASTS................................................................................ 25 4.2.6 PREPARE COMMERCIAL AIR SERVICE FORECASTS...................................................................................... 26 4.3 Prepare Aviation Activity Forecasts Report ...........................................................................26 5. Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements.....................................................................................27 5.1 Airfield.......................................................................................................................................27 5.1.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT...................................................................................................................27 5.1.2 DESIGN AIRCRAFT AND RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS.................................................................28 5.1.3 AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS.....................................................................................................................................28 5.2 Passenger Terminal..................................................................................................................29 5.2.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT...................................................................................................................29 5.2.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS......................................................................................................................................29 5.3 On -Airport Roadways..............................................................................................................29 5.3.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT...................................................................................................................29 5.3.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS...................................................................................................................................... 30 5.4 Fixed Base Operator (FBO) and General Aviation Facilities.................................................30 5.4.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................... 30 5.4.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS...................................................................................................................................... 30 5.5 Support Facilities......................................................................................................................31 5.5.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT................................................................................................................... 31 5.5.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS...................................................................................................................................... 31 5.6 Prepare Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements Report ................................................31 6. Alternatives Analysis and Recommended Development Plan..........................................................32 6.1 Airfield Alternatives.................................................................................................................32 6.1.1 AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES.......................................................................................................32 6.1.2 REVIEW EXISTING INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES WITHIN THE RUNWAY 25 RPZ ............................... 33 6.2 Terminal/Vehicle Parking Alternatives..................................................................................34 6.3 Roadway Alternatives.............................................................................................................. 34 6.4 General Aviation Facility Alternatives....................................................................................34 6.5 Support Facility Alternatives...................................................................................................35 6.6 Evaluate Development Alternatives.......................................................................................35 Master Plan Update [21 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 6.7 Refine Recommended Airport Development Plan...............................................................35 6.8 Prepare Airport Development Alternatives Report ..............................................................36 7. Environmental Overview.......................................................................................................................37 7.1 Evaluation of Proposed Development................................................................................... 37 7.2 Airport Noise Evaluation.........................................................................................................38 7.2.1 DEFINE AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX.............................................................................................................................. 38 7.2.2 ESTABLISH AIR TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROFILE......................................................................................... 39 7.2.3 ESTABLISH BASELINE (EXISTING) NOISE CONTOURS.................................................................................39 7.2.4 ESTABLISH LONG TERM (10- YEAR) NOISE CONTOURS............................................................................ 39 7.3 Prepare Environmental Overview Report ..............................................................................39 8. Sustainability Initiatives........................................................................................................................40 8.1 Establish Baseline Conditions..................................................................................................40 8.2 Facilitate Sustainability Workshop.........................................................................................40 8.3 Formulate Sustainability Framework.....................................................................................41 8.4 Prepare Simplified Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction Plan......................................41 8.5 Draft Sustainability Chapter....................................................................................................42 9. Capital Improvement Program Implementation Plan.......................................................................43 9.1 Establish Preliminary CIP Project Priorities and Sequencing..............................................43 9.2 Develop Estimates of Rough Order of Magnitude Cost (ROM)..........................................44 9.3 Funding Source Strategies/Implementation Schedule........................................................44 9.4 Prepare Implementation Plan Report ....................................................................................44 10. Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis..........................................................................................46 10.1 Prepare Financial Plan..............................................................................................................47 10.2 Prepare Financial Analysis Report ..........................................................................................47 11. Update of the Airport Layout Plan Set................................................................................................48 11.1 Title Sheet..................................................................................................................................49 11.2 Existing Airport Layout............................................................................................................49 11.3 Airport Layout Plan.................................................................................................................. 50 11.4 Airport Airspace Drawing........................................................................................................50 Master Plan Update [31 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 11.5 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings................................................................51 11.6 Terminal Area Drawing(s)........................................................................................................51 11.7 Land Use Drawing.....................................................................................................................52 11.8 Airport Property Map..............................................................................................................52 11.9 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal......................................................................53 11.10 Final Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal.................................................................................53 21.11 Final Airport Plans Set..............................................................................................................53 11.12 Narrative Report .......................................................................................................................54 11.13 Obstacle Action Plan................................................................................................................ 54 11.14 Coordination Meetings............................................................................................................54 12. Documentation......................................................................................................................................56 12.1 Prepare Executive Summary ....................................................................................................56 12.2 Prepare Draft Master Plan Update Report ............................................................................56 12.3 Prepare Final Master Plan Update Report .............................................................................56 - 13. Outreach and Participation Program..................................................................................................58 13.1 Conduct Public Meeting.......................................................................................................... 58 13.2 Elected Officials Briefing Support ..........................................................................................59 13.3 Technical Review Committee Meetings and Stakeholder Briefings...................................59 Master Plan Update [41 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Overview This project is for the preparation of a Master Plan Update (MPU) for the Florida Keys Marathon International Airport (MTH) in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and the needs of the Monroe County. The services described in this scope of work will be conducted by American Infrastructure Development, Inc., Jacobs, Martinez Geospatial, Sanborn, and Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (the Planning Team). The MPU entail an analysis of current Airport facilities, determination of trends and activities affecting the Airport, the identification and analysis of potential sectors of the aviation industry having likelihood of continued operational activity at the Airport or new opportunities for expanded aviation, and the integration of the 2015/2016 planning study (Runway and Parallel Taxiway Alternatives — Planning and Technical Analyses) recommendations. This planning study evaluated the practicability of shifting the runway to the northwest, relocating parallel Taxiway "A" to the southeast, or a combination thereof to meet FAA Airport design requirements. Additionally, the MPU will result in the preparation of an analysis of airside and landside development alternatives, the preparation of a financial plan, and the development of an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) set to guide future development on the Airport. The MPU will be conducted in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans, and the FDOT Guidebook for Airport Master Planning and will use guidance from other relevant FAA Advisory Circulars and Orders, publications from the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP), and other aviation industry publications. As part of the MPU, an ALP drawing set that depicts the future (20-year) buildout of aviation- and non -aviation -related facilities in a manner that best serves the Airport's needs and objectives will be developed. This ALP drawing set will adhere to the FDOT and FAA's prescribed design guidelines and be developed within a GIS platform, conforming to ACs 150/5300-16A, 150/5300-17b, and 150/5300-18B. The ALP set will also include a property inventory map that will reflect the latest Airport property acquisitions. There are a number of key issues for MTH that have been identified by the Monroe County as requiring attention. Issues requiring consideration in the MPU are delineated below, and tasks have been incorporated into this scope of services to address, to varying levels of detail, these considerations. • Aviation related development at the Airport continues to show a strong demand trend. Because of land constraints, an important element of the MPU will be the definition of the best uses for Airport property or adjacent County -owned land parcels, the identification of potential developable parcels for aviation -related uses with existing or potential connection to the airfield, and the identification of County -owned Airport parcels or facilities that could be redeveloped to generate additional aeronautical revenues. • The proposed land use concepts for the Airport would need to account for the needs of the rental car companies that currently operate at the Airport since they provide a key source of revenue for the Airport. Master Plan Update [51 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 As future Airport development requirements and environmental factors are defined, it is anticipated that additional land acquisition recommendations may be necessary, especially on the east side of the Airport. The study will identify land acquisition needs to meet short, intermediate, and long-term needs. An evaluation of the long-term potential for regularly scheduled air service needs to be analyzed. Depending on the outcome of such an air service analysis, recommendations for the appropriate facilities to accommodate such activity will be addressed. The identification of alternatives to provide additional aircraft parking areas for business jet aircraft, including the evaluation of the existing fuel tanks location. Specifically, this study will evaluate the practicability of relocating the existing fuel storage facility away from the aircraft ramps and maneuvering areas. The identification of airfield alternatives to increase the takeoff runway length available while maintaining the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) in place. This would include the development of airfield alternatives that consider the application of declared distances. The identification and evaluation of potential sites for the construction of an air traffic control tower including line of sight analyses. As part of this task, the Planning team will also assess any potential change to the airspace classification following the opening of the tower. The identification and evaluation of potential sites for the construction of an emergency operations center within the Airport boundary. The proposed development plan for the Airport would seek to strategically locate land uses to enhance the Airport operations and community benefits. The plan would allocate land uses to ensure compatibility with existing and proposed off -Airport uses, including community recreation spaces, dog parks, and etc. The review of the proposed Remote Communications Air -Ground (RCAG) Antenna Tower site near the Runway 25 Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). Specifically, the Planning Team will review whether the proposed antennas may impact aircraft operations at the Airport, including departure climb gradients and takeoff distance available (TODA). The evaluation of airfield taxiway geometry: The FAA released AC 150/5300-13A, Airport Design, on September 28, 2012 (subsequently, Change 1 was issued on February 26, 2014), which modified the geometric layout requirements for airfield taxiways with the introduction of the new Taxiway Design Group (TDG) categories for fillet design. The Airport Master Plan will include an evaluation of the airfield taxiway geometry to identify other airfield modifications necessary to comply with the FAA's runway incursion mitigation and enhancement of situational awareness techniques set forth in FAA AC 150/5300-13A. Particular emphasis would be given to the prescribed TDG fillet requirements, mitigation of runway incursion risks, and enhancing pilot situational awareness. As part of the airfield alternatives, the Planning Team will review existing incompatible land uses within the Runway 25 RPZ and assess whether the severity of the risk to people and property would require the maintenance building and aircraft storage hangars to be relocated outside of the RPZ. Master Plan Update [61 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 • The incorporation of the ongoing planning study recommendations: As part of this study, the practicability of shifting the runway to the northwest, relocating parallel Taxiway "A" to the southeast, or a combination thereof, are being evaluated. The MPU would incorporate the preferred airfield improvement option. • The need to 1) establish possible goals to minimize the impact or consumption to reduce the Airport's overall environmental footprint and 2) identify and describe a range of generic sustainability initiatives to help the Airport achieve each set goal. • The preparation of a simplified recycling, reuse, and waste reduction plan: Based on Section 133 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Airports are required to prepare a Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction plan as part of their Master Plan. This plan will address the feasibility of solid waste recycling, minimizing the generation of solid waste, operation and maintenance requirements, the review of waste management contracts, and the potential cost savings or generation of revenue. • The preparation of an Obstacle Action Plan (OAP): On August 18, 2015, FAA Headquarters issued a memorandum entitled, "Reminder of Responsibilities for FAA Personnel and Airport Sponsors for Protecting Approach and Departure Surfaces" stating that Airport Sponsors that have unmitigated obstacles would need to develop an OAP that details how and when each of the surfaces will be cleared and maintained. The preceding list is not intended to be an exhaustive delineation of issues but it does present an overview of a number of the key considerations that would need to be considered in this MPU. The goal of the MPU is to define current and future aviation demand at MTH, the means and alternatives for addressing this demand, and the role of the Airport in the local, regional, and national aviation system. The master planning activities will also provide a Capital Improvement Plan for future development of the Airport, as well as an overview of land use compatibility issues in the Airport environs and possible recommendations and options to address land use compatibility. The approach to undertake the MPU study is outlined in the following elements of this proposal. Scope of Services The Airport/County staff have provided specific direction regarding the elements to be included in the MPU to address the current and future needs at the Airport. The following work program describes the effort required to successfully complete the MTH MPU within the FAA and FDOT framework. The work elements and tasks identified in this scope of services and the associated fee for completing that work is based on a set of assumptions. The major assumptions are identified as follows: • Aerial Surveying and Mapping: The basemap for MTH will be prepared in compliance with FAA's prescribed design guidelines within a GIS platform, conforming to applicable FAA AC and regulations. This scope of services, however, excludes the production of an AGIS eALP since the FAA's eALP module remains in development phase. Master Plan Update [71 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Environmental Overview: Existing environmental conditions will be documented as part of the environmental assessment to be initiated in the fall 2017. This scope of services is limited to the integration of the data to be collected as part of EA into the MPU (no any additional field surveys will be completed). • Sustainability: The MPU will include a chapter that addresses the Airport sustainability policy, establish possible goals to minimize the impact or consumption to reduce the Airport's overall environmental footprint, and identify and describe a range of generic sustainability initiatives to help the Airport achieve each set goal. This scope of services, however, does not include any field surveys and energy audits and does not provide for the development of an implementation plan to guide the implementation of sustainability initiatives. • Project Schedule: Although the estimated cost to complete the MPU is based on the level of effort anticipated for each task, schedule also has a significant influence. The fee estimate is based on an 18- month completion schedule for the work elements defined in the next section of this Scope of Services. If additional services are subsequently added, the schedule would likely need to be extended. • Utility: This project does not include an assessment of future utility system requirements to serve the Airport. Master Plan Update [81 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask.• Jacobs/Ricondo & Associates, Inc. A Technical Review Committee comprised of representatives of the Airport and potential other County staff, Fixed Base Operators, and key tenants will be established at the initiation of the project for the purpose of providing technical guidance, review and comment on each element of the MPU. Each member of the technical committee will be provided with a three ring project notebook binder for working papers. A total of 20 binders will be provided to members of the technical review committee. 1.2 Project Administration, Monthly Billing & Reports Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Jacobs/Ricondo & Associates, Inc. This task will involve the necessary project coordination between the Planning Team members over the course of the planning period and between the client and the team to ensure distribution of information and guidance on project related items. This task will also include the development of project status reports on a monthly basis and invoicing of the project. This task will include several specific coordination efforts including: Meet with the Airport/County staff to develop and review the project schedule; Prepare monthly status reports for inclusion with the invoice. Status reports will describe progress on a task -by -task basis; Miscellaneous meetings through web conferences (typically on a monthly basis) to facilitate coordination, provide updates and present draft reports. • FAA & FDOT coordination Master Plan Update 191 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 2. Aerial Surveying and Mapping Firm Responsible for Completing this Task: Jacobs 2.1 Aerial Mapping & Surveying The key objectives of this task are to: (1) obtain geodetic control and survey for the identified runway ends; (2) collect aerial photogrammetric imagery of the area necessary under current FAA guidance to collect planimetric mapping; (3) develop and analyze the appropriate airspace surfaces and identify object penetrations and potential mitigation measures to obtain the lowest possible approach minimums. The basemap for MTH will be prepared in compliance with FAA's prescribed design guidelines within a GIS platform, conforming to ACs 150/5300-16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys: Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; 150/5300-17C, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; 150/5300-18B, General Guidance and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards; 150/5300-13A, Change 1, Airport Design; and Orders 8260.36, The United States Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS), and 8260.54A, The United States Standard for Area Navigation. The project will result in the creation of an existing data project for upload to the FAA AGIS platform. The primary Airport planning services and related deliverables to be performed and completed in this task include: Geodetic Control & Surveying Aerial Photography and Planimetric Mapping FAR Part 77 Airspace Surfaces and Obstacles Analyses 2.2 Establish Geodetic Control The geodetic control and ground survey will be prepared in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300- 16A & 150/5300-18B for establishing imagery control and tie-in with the Airports Primary and Secondary Airport Control Stations (PACS and SACS). Prior to conducting the ground survey and control, an in -person interview will be conducted with appropriate Airport staff to complete the required forms. Survey subtasks for will include: Master Plan Update [101 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 2.3 Pre -Survey Preparation Activities The following tasks provide information that will be reviewed to prepare for the survey prior to going into the field. Generally, addressing each item listed below prepares the survey team to begin the survey: Review list of prepared questions to discuss with the Airport/County staff or proponent about the survey. Develop an FAA approved Safety Risk Management Plan for ground survey crew coordination with Airport Operations. Ensure a thorough understanding of the specifications and requirements for the type of survey required. Determine areas of private or government property and arrange for access. Review the descriptions for control stations identified for use in the project. • Acquire and review an accurate Airport diagram for use on the Airport. • Review FAA Form 5010, Airport Master Record, at http://www.gcrl.com/5010web/. Coordinate with Airport authorities. 2.3.1.1 Reconnaissance A review of station descriptions in the NGS database will be performed. The Primary and Secondary Airport Control Stations (PACS & SACS) need to be researched and their current data sheets obtained from the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) website. Mark recovery. The surveyor will use the following process for the "recovery' of a control station, with a physical visit to the station to determine its usability. Check each control station to determine proper identity. Check the mark type, disk type, and stamping against the NGS datasheet. Ascertain its apparent unmoved position. • Selection of PACS, SACS, and NSRS ties. The surveyor will utilize Trimble GPS mapping grade equipment for "station reconnaissance" (navigating to known PACS & SACS points) After the stations are recovered and observed to be in apparent un-disturbed condition, preparation of the required descriptions, sketches, photographs and other documentation will begin. The unmoved position and elevation of the recovered PAC and SACS points will be verified by the surveyor through the use of GPS measurements and/or EDM and Level measurements. Preparation of required descriptions, sketches, photographs and other documentation by the surveyor and the Planning Team: - An Airport Control plot (modeled on appendix 5 of AC 150/5300-16A) will be prepared. All stations will be labeled with the corresponding designation and description (PACS, SACS, etc...). - Photographs (JPEG format) of the recovered points will be taken and submitted (per AC 150/5300-18B section 1.6.2). Master Plan Update [11] FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 - A FAA Station Location Sketch and Visibility Diagram will be prepared and submitted for each recovered point. - A FAA Survey Station Description and Recovery Form will be prepared and submitted for each recovered point. - A pencil rubbing (if required) utilizing FAA Pencil Rubbing Form will be taken at each of the recovered points. - A FAA Station Table and Reconnaissance Checklist will be prepared. 2.3.1.2 Verification of Pre Survey The Planning Team, prior to submission, will verify that correct forms and processes have been followed using the appropriate FAA supplied forms for use in contact with the Airport Manager and Air Traffic Control Interview. Jacobs will also verify the surveyor uses the appropriate Field Survey Operations forms as supplied by the FAA on the aGIS web page. The Planning Team will perform the following verification tasks associated with the survey work: Review list of PACS and SACS. Review/confirm recovered existing Primary Airport Control Station (PACS) and the associated Secondary Airport Control Stations (SACS) at the Airport is done. Review verification that if either the PACS and/or SACS are not found, or are destroyed, or damaged, or are not usable for some other reason, contact has been made with the FAA Airport Surveying-GIS Program Manager. • Review the submittal of the recovery report for the PACS and SACS to the NGS 2.3.1.3 GPS Occupation (Ground Survey) The surveyor will take horizontal and vertical measurements of safety critical items to include: • Aerial Photo Control Points (as identified by the aerial mapping firm). Per AC 150/5300-17C, a FAA Station Location and Visibility Form will be prepared and submitted. Additionally, a photograph (JPEG format) of each control point will be taken and submitted. Existing features are anticipated to be used as Photo Control Points. Five check points (as described in AC 150/5300-17C Section 6) will be occupied with a GPS station and the measurements submitted to NGS OPUS. • Existing Runway End points. FAA Navigational Aid Facility/Runway End Sketches will be prepared for each point. • Runway centerline points every 10-feet and every 10-feet left and right of runway centerline. • Displaced thresholds. • On -Airport Navigational Aids. Master Plan Update [121 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Coordinate System/Datum: APRIL 2016 Generated Horizontal Coordinates will be State Plane Coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). Elevations will be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). 2.3.1.4 Deliverables— Geodetic Control / Ground Survey Final Coordinates, Elevations, and Runway Profile Data submitted in Autodesk DWG format; • Raw observational data including: Data Collector Files, GPS receiver files, OPUS solutions; • Final Processing/Adjustment/Reduction Files; • Scans/copies of field notes and sketches; • Checklists and Forms listed elsewhere within this scope; • Final project report *If PACS & SACS points are found to be destroyed or damaged, new control points may need to be established utilizing the guidelines set forth in AC 150/5300-16A. This work is not anticipated or included in this scope of services. 2.4 Photographic mapping — remote sensing The Planning Team will enlist the services of a qualified photogram metric/remote sensing mapping firm to acquire aerial imagery and perform the planimetric mapping tasks in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300-18B and -17C. Unless otherwise directed, the datum used for development of survey control will be NAVD 88 and NAD 83 (1996) and will be tied into NGS disks which have been previously set at the Airport per AC 150/5300- 17C. The aerial imagery and mapping will be captured to the extents of the Vertically Guided Instrument Approach Surfaces for MTH as outlined in FAA AC 150/5300-18B. 2.4.1.1 Airport Imagery Acquisition Planning The Planning Team will work with The Sanborn Mapping Co. to create an imagery flight plan and ground control diagram for submission to the Monroe County Department of Airports. 2.4.1.2 Aerial Photography Acquisition Sanborn will acquire the leaf -on aerial photography of the 64 square mile project area conforming to the General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey, Advisory Circular 150/5300-17C dated 9-29-08. The 24 cm resolution digital aerial photography will be acquired with a 60% forward overlap and 30% side overlap to provide for complete stereoscopic aerial photography coverage out to the Vertically Guided Conical Surface (VGCS) and include the Master Plan Update [131 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces that extend beyond the vertically guided conical surface as described in FAA AC 150/5300-18B Section 2.7.1.1. 2.4.1.3 Aerial Photography Ground Control The ground control surveying will be coordinated as required to accurately support the aerial photography and subsequent photogrammetric mapping deliverables. Sanborn will provide the ground control diagram with the general location of required control points. The ground control diagram will include the runway thresholds and runway physical ends, which is also a requirement under 16A. 2.4.1.4 Airport Obstruction Mapping The aerial photography obstruction mapping will include identifying and locating the top most visible part of natural objects and man-made elevated features utilizing the Runways with Vertical Guidance specifications and associated figures included in Chapter 2.7 of AC No: 150/5300 18B dated May 8, 2008. In large wooded areas within the Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces, Vertically Guided Connection Surfaces, Vertically Guided Transitional Surfaces, Vertically Guided Horizontal Surfaces and Vertically Guided Conical Surfaces the highest tree within a 200' by 200' area will be identified and collected at the top most visible part of that object utilizing leaf -on aerial photography. 2.4.1.5 DigitalOrthoimagery With the latest release of AC 150/5300-17C dated 9-30-11, the development and delivery to FAA of digital orthoimagery and FGDC compliant metadata has been added as a deliverable. Sanborn will develop natural color digital orthophotography imagery of the Vertically Guided Conical Surface and include the Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces that extend beyond the Vertically Guided Conical Surface. The color orthophotography will be developed at the resolution of the original aerial photography imagery, which is being planned at 24 cm or 0.75 feet. The color orthophotography imagery will be delivered in uncompressed TIFF format on DVD or USB hard drive. Accuracy and Datum: Sanborn's proposed Aerial Photography Acquisition and Ground Control Diagram will be designed to accurately support the obstruction mapping and digital orthophotography delivery conforming to ASPRS Class II Accuracy Standards for 1"=200' scale maps. The analytical aerial triangulation, obstruction mapping and color orthophotography will be referenced to the FL State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 83/2007 (NSRS) and NAVD 88. The unit of measurement will be the US Survey Foot. 2.4.1.6 Planimetric Mapping Within the VGRPS, VGPCS, VGATS and VGPS imaginary surfaces, the following Airport planimetric Features Groups that are visible and identifiable on the aerial imagery will be captured at a scale of 1" = 200': Airfield, Airspace, Man-made Structures, Surface Transportation and Utility. Master Plan Update [141 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 2.4.1.7 Deliverables - Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing The following items will be delivered as a result of the Photographic Mapping: Aerial Photography acquisition report Digital Orthoimagery on DVD or hard drive for review and acceptance Planimetric and Obstruction mapping in AutoCAD drawing file format (stereoscopically collected vector data will also be converted for compliance to 18B AutoCAD standards) for Airport obstruction analysis tasks. Three 36" x 36" color aerial prints on medium weight glossy photo paper. 2.5 Airspace Surfaces & Obstacle Analysis Once the photogrammetric data has been received, the obstacle elevation and location data will be analyzed to identify penetrations to applicable FAA FAR Part 77 airspace surfaces as detailed in the tasks below. FAR Part 77 airspace surfaces will be mapped and integrated into a composite airspace surface to give the Airport a means by which to screen future proposed vertical development projects in the vicinity of the Airport using a point and click query method. 2.5.1.1 Obstacle Analysis The airspace surfaces will be imported by the Planning Team into a Geographic Information System (GIS). 3- dimensional representations of the airspace surfaces will be created in ArcView for analysis against the planimetric data. Current penetrations (man-made and vegetative) as well as objects within 10-feet of each airspace surface (vegetative only) will be identified. Color coding and symbology will be used to clearly identify each object. Unique identification numbers will be given to each object. In certain instances, an object may penetrate multiple surfaces. In those cases, each surface that is penetrated by the object, or is within 10-feet above the object, will be noted and included in the master database. The database will contain the following information for each object: • Object ID • Data source • Obstruction type • Elevation • Longitude/Latitude • Airspace surface • Airspace surface height • Height difference from object to airspace surface Master Plan Update [151 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Property information (if cadastral information is available from MassGIS) Airport property line (if available from the Airport) Avigation easements (if available from the Airport) The mapping shall show the location of all objects (man-made and vegetative) that penetrate the airspace surfaces as well as those which may be within 10 feet below the respective surfaces (vegetative only). Objects shall be identified as numbered tags. Each tag number will be listed on a separate appendix table with information to include the top elevation, the amount of penetration relative to the imaginary surface, the object height relative to the ground, and a short descriptor as to the type of obstruction. The tag will be color -coded to show whether the object is above or below the imaginary surface. Edges of the surfaces will be shown, along with contours of these surfaces shown at a 10-foot interval. Planimetric mapping will include all visible ground features within the mapping limits, including edges of roadway and airfield pavements, airfield pavement markings, buildings, structures, poles, tree and brush drip lines, water bodies, etc. Obstruction mapping plans will utilize a digital orthographic photo (obtained as part of Task 2.3.2) as a backdrop to all obstruction information data as well as planimetric information obtained as part of Task 2.3.2. Deliverables for this task include one (1) set of hard copy color plots of the obstruction mapping areas plotted on 24" x 36" sheets. Master Plan Update [161 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 3. Inventory of Existing Conditions The purpose of this Inventory is to assemble and organize existing relevant information and data pertaining to the Airport. A series of inventory efforts are necessary to collect and organize a variety of specific technical and financial data. The Planning Team will perform inventories of existing physical facilities and land uses within the present boundaries of the Airport, and will inventory existing land uses outside the Airport boundaries but inside the Airport environs (within with one nautical mile of the Airport). All available plans, specifications, maps, photographs, drawings and other data, including FAA Form 5010-1 and NOAA Obstruction Charts, will be obtained. The inventory will identify and generally describe existing facilities as they relate to type and condition. Where applicable, Airport facility data and information previously developed and maintained by the Monroe County will be referenced and documented. Additional data shall be collected through the inspection, review and use of Airport Layout Plan's, aerial photographs, FAA and FDOT databases. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that two (2) one -day site visits by a mid -level planner and the Project Manager will be conducted. The first site visit will provide an opportunity to inventory and document existing facilities and conduct field observations of airfield operations to ensure a full understanding of baseline operation conditions. The second site visit will be needed to interview stakeholders and tenants, gather additional information, and/or validate facility information. The collection of environmental data is excluded from this effort. It is assumed that is information will be acquired as part of the environmental assessment (a separate study planned to commence in FY 2017). Data & Resources Required From the Monroe County/Airport The Planning Team's proposed budget to complete this study assumes that the following information will be provided by others, or in lieu thereof, the ability to consult with the Monroe County Airport staff to jointly define the assumptions to be used as the basis for the MPU. Deliverables • Previous Airport Master Plan • Current Airport Layout Plan Drawings (digital required) Area Land Use and Zoning Information Airfield Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Study (if available) or FDOT Pavement Management Report • Current Capital Improvement Program • Airport Property Map and Detailed Property Information • Area Transportation Plans and Existing Traffic Counts A narrative report summarizing the results of the inventory of existing conditions including supporting graphic exhibits and tables o Five (5) copies of a preliminary draft Inventory working paper for Airport review/comment o Five (5) copies of a final draft Inventory of working paper for the Airport review/comment Master Plan Update [171 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 o A final Inventory report in electronic format (PDF) • Comprehensive leasehold map integrated from current lease agreement documents and electronic files. Estimated Task Duration 60 Days 3.1 Develop, Distribute, and Tabulate Tenant Survey Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. A survey will be developed and distributed to key Airport tenants and operators of facilities at MTH. This survey is intended to obtain responsible input relative to facility needs and issues at the Airport. The Monroe County staff will be consulted relative to potential survey recipients. 3.2 Inventory of Airport Physical Facilities Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc., AID, Inc. The physical facilities inventory will consist of an on -site review of existing airfield and landside facilities relative to their size, condition, use, configuration, and adequacy. This information will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the individual facility, as well as the interrelationships between developed uses on the airfield. Following is an outline of key elements to be addressed: Airfield (AID) — Runway, taxiway and ramp configuration including pavement strength and condition, marking, signing, lighting, navigational aids, aircraft circulation, and access to the Airport operational areas will be reviewed. On -going or near -term improvements (physical or operational) being considered by the Monroe County and reflected in the Airport's CIP, but not necessarily depicted on the ALP will be incorporated, as appropriate, based on discussions with the Monroe County. • Historic and Current Air Traffic Activity (R&A) — Aviation activity statistics for the last 10 years of operations at the Airport will be assembled and organized. Information concerning general aviation and military operations by local and itinerant categories and fleet mix and based aircraft by aircraft type will be obtained. Information concerning peak hour, daily, monthly, and annual activity will be obtained and quantified if available. Data will be obtained from Airport records, Airport users including the fixed base operator, and various sources at the FAA. Master Plan Update [18] FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 • Air Traffic Control and Airspace (AID) — Air traffic control facilities responsible for handling traffic into and out of the Airport will be identified and their procedures, as they relate to the Airport, will be reviewed. An inventory of the area airspace will be undertaken, based on Air Traffic Control documents, with emphasis on the identification of airways, restricted areas, intersections, and obstructions. Terminal Area (AID) — Airside and landside components of the current terminal area will be inventoried. Attention will be paid to aircraft and passenger circulation, distribution of space by functional use within the terminal building (rental cars counters, holdrooms, concessions, Airport administrative offices, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) facilities, etc.) facility utilization, and condition of the terminal building. An inventory and utilization assessment of parking facilities in the terminal area will be addressed as well. Airport Access and Vehicle Parking (AID) — The inventory will also include review of the following areas: roadways and intersections, terminal curbfront, rental car facilities, commercial vehicle staging areas, public transportation and general ground access, public parking and interface with the local roadway network. Every effort will be made to utilize available recent traffic count information provided by the Monroe County or others, including data from recent FDOT traffic counts. It is anticipated that traffic count information for the primary arterial roadways surrounding MTH (U.S. 1, 107th Street Gulf, and Aviation Boulevard) would be obtained from FDOT traffic count data. No vehicle surveys will be conducted as part of this effort. • FBO/General Aviation Facilities and Other Tenant Facilities (AID) — Structures devoted for the use of general aviation, including fixed base and corporate operators will be identified and evaluated as to their size, use (maintenance hangar, storage hangar, office, etc.), age and/or condition, and tenant lease lot uses. Also included in the inventory will be a description of the services provided by the unique FBO. General aviation facilities including ramp areas, number of tiedowns, and hangars by type (conventional and T-hangar) will be identified and quantified by area or other appropriate measure. Age or condition of the facility will be identified, as will the utilization and location of the facility on the Airport. Additionally, a survey questionnaire will be created for distribution to Airport tenants. The survey will be developed in conjunction with the Airport and will solicit information such as services provided, satisfaction with current facilities, level of activity conducted from the Airport, based aircraft, itinerant aircraft serviced, future expansion plans, and perceived Airport needs. Responses will be tabulated and used in subsequent analyses. Results of the survey will be included in an appendix to the MPU. • Support Facilities (AID) — Airport support facilities to be inventoried will include, but not necessarily be limited to fueling facilities, Airport maintenance, FAA facilities, and Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF). Airport Utility Systems (AID) — To the extent this information is available, utilities supporting the Airport will be reviewed. The Planning Team will gather existing maps and record drawings of recent on -Airport utility improvements from the Monroe County/Airport, to prepare a map of the utility systems. The water system, sewer system, storm water system, gas distribution system, electrical distribution system, and telephone/communications systems will be included. A narrative Master Plan Update [19] FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 summarizing the existing conditions and findings for each utility will be prepared. In addition, a utility map will be prepared showing locations and sizes of the utilities inventoried. No field verification of information will be performed. • Airport Security (AID) — This subtask includes the collection and review of relevant information to be provided by the Monroe County regarding security systems and issues in the airfield, and Airport operations area, and MTH Airport perimeter. The purpose of gathering this information is to determine how MTH's security operations compared to other general aviation Airports and FAA requirements, so that improvements can be accounted for in the capital improvement plan resulting from this MPU. • Weather Data (AID) — The Planning Team will assemble and analyze 10-years of historical wind and weather data. Ceiling, visibility, wind speed and direction will be analyzed to develop a wind rose, assess existing wind coverage and determine the percentage of observations in visual and instrument meteorological conditions. Financial Data (R&A) — This subtask will consist in the assembly of Airport financial information including, but not limited to, Airport grant history, capital improvement program, operating budgets vs. actuals, and aviation fuel sale/delivery records. This information will be used as part of the financial analysis tasks (Task 10). The objective of this task is to gather documents which affect the financial management of Airport maintenance, operations, and capital development and to develop an understanding of the structure, constraints, requirements, and opportunities for financing Airport activities as related to the development of a capital improvement program. 3.3 Off -Airport Land Use and Land Use Controls Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. Existing land use mapping, aerial photography, comprehensive plans, and other documentation pertaining to current and future land use in the vicinity of the Airport (up to one mile from the Airport boundary) will be reviewed. Existing zoning districts will be reviewed to determine locations where potential incompatible land uses could develop. Further, local planning agencies will be interviewed to obtain future land use or zoning plans and to identify the potential for future residential, commercial, and industrial development in the vicinity of the Airport. Particular attention will be paid to identifying land uses and zoning that could affect both in a positive and negative fashion, the future development of the Airport. Master Plan Update [201 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3.4 Land Holdings and Existing Leaseholds Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. APRIL 2016 Land holdings interests and existing leaseholds will be identified. The land holdings interest information will be incorporated into the Airport Property Map Drawing of the Airport Plans Package and the inventory of existing leaseholds information will be obtained from the Monroe County to collect relevant information on the existing leases on -Airport, including lease agreements and leasehold drawings in electronic format. 3.5 Known Environmental Areas of Concern Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. It is anticipated that a detailed inventory of the environmental conditions at MTH will be conducted as part of the environmental assessment (EA) to be initiated in the winter 2016/2017. To avoid duplication of efforts, the Planning Team will work closely with the EA Consultant and Subconsultants to identify pertinent environmental information that will be collected during the EA and incorporate pertinent information into the Inventory of Existing Conditions for the MPU. Features that will be identified as part of the EA and documented in the Inventory of Existing Conditions for the MPU will include water resources (e.g., streams, wetlands, floodplains, and coastal zones), historic or cultural resources, natural communities and vegetative associations, threatened and endangered species, and other features or groups of features that may influence the development and operation of Airport improvement projects. This subtask will also include an inventory of noise abatement measures including existing zoning laws and local regulations, as well as any other local zoning and land use restrictions instituted by the City and County which may impact potential on or contiguous compatible development. 3.6 Review of Other Reports Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. In an effort to reduce duplication of work and develop a common base of information, other studies that have been recently completed would be reviewed and coordinated as applicable. This would include but not be limited to previous master planning efforts, transportation studies, and other reports as appropriate. Where possible, the Monroe County/Airport will provide copies of existing studies for the Planning Team's reference and use. Master Plan Update [211 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3.7 Prepare Inventory of Existing Conditions Report APRIL 2016 Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtosk. AID, Inc. The Inventory Chapter will discuss the issues and information obtained during the inventory phase of the project. This chapter will present, in narrative and graphic format, information relating to Airport facilities, the roadway access system serving the Airport, natural features affecting the current Airport property and tracts immediately adjacent to the Airport, and data related to land use compatibility. The findings of the inventory task will be summarized as a draft chapter to the final report. No additional draft reports will be provided prior to the draft Master Plan report. The number of hard copies to be provided is noted on Page 17 of this scope of services. Master Plan Update [221 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 4. Aviation Activity Forecasts Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask.• Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (unless otherwise noted) The Planning Team will prepare forecasts of aviation traffic activity suitable for guiding the update to the MTH master plan. Utilizing the inventory of aeronautical activity data collected in the inventory tasks and data gathered in the forecasting effort, activity projections for the 5-, 10- and 20-year time frames would be prepared. The updated projections of future aviation activity will provide the basis for evaluating the adequacy of the existing Airport facilities. These forecasts will also provide activity measurements or thresholds that will be used in conjunction with other portions of the master plan study to determine the need, timing, and extent of future Airport facility or infrastructure development. The forecasts, consisting of up to three alternate forecast projections, will be prepared using FAA -accepted methodologies (regressions, market share, and trend analyses) and will be compared against other recently prepared forecasts, such as the FAA Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF). The aviation activity forecasts will comprise projections of annual activity for aircraft operations. These projections will further be segregated by local versus itinerant operations and will be presented by Airport user categories, namely general aviation, air taxi, and military. Existing and forecast based aircraft activity and fleet mix composition will also be analyzed as part of this task. The forecasts will also define demand and/or activity volumes associated with the potential for commercial air service. The intent is to analyze the potential level of air passenger enplanements and aircraft operations that may occur at the Airport. Previous Airport and other transportation related forecasts will be reviewed including, but not limited to: Most recent FAA Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF) Most recent FDOT Florida Aviation System Plan (FASP) Forecasts Most recent forecasts used as part of the previous EA Data & Resources Required From The Monroe County Deliverables Annual Aircraft Operations from 1996 (if available) or for the last 10 years (from 2006) Detailed inventory (by aircraft type or tail number) of based aircraft at the Airport Peak month data for the most recent 12-month period that provides fleet type information for operations served during that month. This data will help determine the existing fleet mix at the Airport. • Excel spreadsheets and graphs summarizing the aviation activity forecasts • Five (5) copies of a preliminary draft chapter for Airport review and comment • Five (5) copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment Five (5) copies of a preliminary draft chapter for FAA and FDOT review and comment Five (5) copies of a final draft chapter for FAA review and comment • A final forecast report in electronic format (.PDF) as approved by the FAA Master Plan Update [231 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Estimated Task Duration 90 Days (excluding a 60-day review period by the FAA) 4.1 Collect and Analyze Socioeconomic Data This subtask will consist in the definition of the Airport's catchment area and the assembly of historical and forecast socioeconomic data (employment, population, personal income, gross regional product) for the region and the nation. This will include data from the U.S. Census Bureau, regional economic development organizations, regional and national socioeconomic data sourced through Woods & Poole Economics, Inc., and any other relevant sources. 4.2 Develop Aviation Activity Forecasts 4.2.1 REVIEW GENERAL AVIATION INDUSTRY TRENDS The Planning Team will review national general aviation trends based on the FAA Aerospace Forecasts FY 2016-2036, the General Aviation Statistical Databook & Industry Outlook from the General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA), and the existing traffic logs. The data collected under this subtask will help assess local and nationwide short- and long-term trends including projections of active general aviation aircraft by type. In turn, these projections will be evaluated to assess whether these trends are likely to influence future general aviation aircraft fleet mix projections at the Airport. 4.2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS OR OPPORTUNITIES AFFECTING ACTIVITY LEVELS A key element in the forecast process is the identification of potential for new or expanded activity by existing Airport users, as well as the potential for the Airport to secure new services and users. This task will analyze potential changes in business and tourism patterns, or in potential based operators at the Airport, to determine any potentially significant factors that could impact the level or type of activity at the Airport. The effort will identify potential niche markets that could be the basis for either expanding existing activity or initiating new activity at the Airport. Potential for the expansion of corporate/business activity, air charter operations will be analyzed. Changes in aircraft activity at the Airport since the opening of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) facility in the spring of 2016 will also be documented based on data/information to be provided by the Monroe County, CBP staff, and/or FBO tenants. 4.2.3 COMMERCIAL AIR SERVICE ANALYSIS The opportunities for attracting and securing commercial air service will be analyzed. This task will include an overview of the market potential now and in the future for regularly scheduled commercial air service. Such an analysis will look at the state of the airline industry; trends affecting decisions in this industry; the existing and future fleet of aircraft utilized for such service; and the market potential or capture area. This analysis will also include a review of the City of Marathon catchment area including review of the geographic area(s) for which commercial service may attract customers. Data to be reviewed will include population and Master Plan Update [241 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 demographics data, employment and earnings information, and drive -time analysis. An issue will be the immediate influence of the surrounding commercial service Airports including Key West International, and Miami International Airport. The existing and projected activity levels at such competing Airports will be identified along with other items such as costs associated with the use of these facilities, approximate travel times, and flight options. These considerations, as well as others which may be identified during the course of the analysis, will be investigated to determine if they provide a basis for securing this type of service. It is emphasized, however, that this task is not intended as an Airport marketing analysis. 4.2.4 PREPARE AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECASTS Updated aviation activity forecasts for MTH, taking into consideration forecasts from other sources, will be prepared. The methodology used in this analysis will involve a variety of techniques that will identify state, regional, and national aviation trends and their influence on activity at the Airport, as well as the influence local business and economic activity have on aviation activity. Historical activity data will be organized to identify peaking characteristics, local and itinerant mix, and the fleet mix of based aircraft. Based on the traffic projections and assumptions regarding the projected aircraft fleet mix, the Planning Team will provide a breakdown of projected aircraft operations by aircraft type. The based aircraft forecast will directly influence the type and number of aircraft storage facilities and apron tie down that will be needed. Projections of based aircraft will also provide an indication of anticipated growth in flight activity that is expected to occur at the Airport. Based on the projections for based aircraft, the FAA 5010 Airport Record, the review of the industry trends, and interviews with representatives of the FBO and Airport management, the Planning Team will provide a breakdown of projected aircraft operations by the following types: single -engine, multi -engine, turboprop, and turbojet. Forecasts of aviation activity will be prepared for the 5, 10, and 20-year planning periods and will provide individual projections of the following: Annual General Aviation Operations (Local vs. Itinerant) • Annual Military Operations (Local vs. Itinerant) • Annual Air Charter/Air Taxi Operations Annual Instrument Operations • Total Annual Aircraft Operations Annual Operational Fleet Mix Based Aircraft Totals • Based Aircraft Fleet Mix 4.2.5 DEVELOP MILITARY AIRCRAFT ACTIVITY FORECASTS Considering the limited number of military operations at the Airport (less than 500 annual operations'),it has been assumed that the Planning Team will not be responsible for developing any new projections of aviation activity and the FAA TAF will provide the sole basis for the military aircraft activity forecasts. ' FAA Terminal Area Forecast, Issued January 2016. Master Plan Update [251 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 4.2.6 PREPARE COMMERCIAL AIR SERVICE FORECASTS This task will forecast any demand and/or activity volumes associated with the potential for commercial air service, taking into consideration the information generated under Task 4.2.3. This task is intended to analyze the potential level of air passenger enplanements and aircraft operations that may occur at the Airport. Forecasts of commercial air service, if it is found that such activity is deemed to be reasonably viable, will be prepared for the 5, 10, and 20-year planning horizon. Note that the commercial air service forecasts may not be part of the baseline forecasts to be presented to the FAA for approval. 4.3 Prepare Aviation Activity Forecasts Report A Forecast of Aviation Demand report will be prepared to summarize the forecast of aviation demand for MTH. It is anticipated the baseline forecasts will only account for general aviation and military traffic at the Airport. The commercial air service forecasts will only be presented as an alternate demand scenario. A preliminary draft version of the Forecast of Aviation Demand report will be submitted to the Airport, FDOT, and FAA for review and comment. The Airport, FDOT, and FAA review and comment process for the Aviation Activity Forecasts Report will incorporate four revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, (2) final draft for the Airport review and comment, (3) preliminary draft for FAA review and comment, and (4) final draft for FAA review and comment. The fourth round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the MPU. As necessary, the Planning Team will prepare supplemental documentation comparing the FAA TAF and the MTH Master Plan forecasts and attend meetings with the FAA Orlando ADO and FAA APO to review forecast findings. The forecasts will be prepared in calendar year (CY) unless otherwise specified by the Airport staff. Master Plan Update [261 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 5. Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements The capacity and facility requirements analysis will address the Airport's ability to accommodate airside, terminal and landside facility demand based on the updated aviation activity forecasts and the selection of the current and future design aircraft. The updated facility requirements analysis will quantify demand and existing airside, terminal, and landside facilities will be analyzed to determine the type and magnitude of aviation improvements ultimately required for the Airport. The facilities requirements analysis will focus on the physical facilities and associated improvements needed to safely and efficiently accommodate projected aviation demand on those aviation facilities for the twenty year planning period (2016-2036). Deliverables Five (5) copies of the Facility Requirements chapter for Airport review and comment Five (5) copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment • A final Facility Requirements report in electronic format (.PDF) Estimated Task Duration 75 Days 5.1 Airfield Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. 5.1.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT Using the FAA's methodology for assessing airfield capacity and delay, as described in the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, an assessment of the current and future level of airfield capacity will be developed. This analysis will consider the airfield configuration, including runway orientation, parallel taxiways and exit taxiways, weather conditions, aircraft fleet mix, current and forecast operations at each 5-, 10- and 20-year time frame. The Airport capacity will then be calculated for both visual flight rules (VFR) and instrument flight rules (IFR) conditions. These values will then be utilized to express the overall capacity in terms of the hourly and annual service volume of the airfield. This information will assist in validating recommendations of previous planning analyses or to identify potential new considerations regarding the potential need and timing of taxiway enhancements over the 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 year planning horizon. An assessment will also be undertaken to identify potential improvements to the system of taxiways and exit taxiway connectors that could enhance the movement of aircraft to and from the airfield to use areas on the Airport and the impact that these improvements might have on the efficiency of movements on the airfield. Master Plan Update [271 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 5.1.2 DESIGN AIRCRAFT AND RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS Using information generated in the interviews conducted during the inventory portion of the study, the characteristics of the current aircraft fleet will be identified, paying particular attention to the level, type, and stage length of operations by jet aircraft. Additionally, any results from Task 4.2 will be factored into the analysis to identify future changes that may occur in the aircraft fleet using the Airport, and in the airfield facilities and/or dimensional criteria required to meet the demands that commercial activity would place on the facility. From this analysis, design aircraft will be identified for use in determining short, intermediate, and long-term runway length requirements. The design or critical aircraft(s) may consist of a single aircraft type or may need to be identified by approach category, wingspan and/or by weight for different Airport components. Evidence will be provided that the current and future design aircraft(s) conduct a minimum of 500 operations annually, as per FAA requirement. Analysis of runway length requirements at MTH will utilize the Aircraft Characteristics for Airport Planning manuals as provided for individual aircraft by the aircraft manufacturers. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that this analysis will be completed for no more than 10 critical aircraft. Required weather data that is necessary for runway lengths will be obtained for MTH from the National Climatic Data Center as mentioned previously in the inventory phase. The results of the various runway length calculations and requirements, as well as the required dimensional standards, will be incorporated into the facilities requirements portion of the MPU. This information, as well as the design/critical aircraft identified for Airport planning purposes, will be submitted for review and acceptance by the FAA. As part of this analysis, the Planning Team will also assess whether the proposed Remote Communications Air -Ground (RCAG) Antenna Towers near the Runway 25 Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) may impact aircraft operations at the Airport, including departure climb gradients and takeoff distance available (TODA). 5.1.3 AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS Using the results of the demand/capacity assessment, as well as relevant information from other tasks and airfield planning criteria, a preliminary listing of airfield facility requirements necessary to meet projected levels of demand for the five, ten, and 20-year time frames will be developed. These airfield requirements will be based upon both accepted Airport planning criteria and the forecast of aviation activity for the Airport, as well as the knowledge and expertise of the Consultant, Airport management, and TAC members. Airfield characteristics to be assessed include: Runway length, width and shoulders • Necessity for addition/removal of taxiways or taxiway connectors • Relocation of runway thresholds and associated runway extensions • Pavement strength Taxiway requirements Lighting and marking • Navigational aids Master Plan Update [281 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 FAR Part 77 surfaces Airfield facility needs will be identified in terms of linear feet, strength, separation, clearances, etc. and will be compared to existing facilities to identify excess or deficient facility capacity or capability. Where appropriate the airfield facilities will be linked to activity demand thresholds or triggers as a means of determining the point at which demand is sufficient to warrant the improvement. Additionally, existing airfield components will be evaluated to ensure that they comply with the changes of the recently updated Airport Design AC. 5.2 Passenger Terminal Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. 5.2.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT Based on input from the forecasts and the results of the commercial air service analysis, the need for additional passenger terminal facilities at the Airport will be defined. The facilities necessary to support the potential commercial air service activity (both fleet and passengers) will be identified. The Planning Team will identify demand for various functional areas of the passenger terminal using industry standards for the baseline forecast scenario. The demand for the various facilities will be compared to the current capacity to determine facility requirements throughout the planning horizon. The functional areas to be considered would include, but are not limited to aircraft gates and gate frontage, passenger holdrooms, baggage claim, airline lease space (ticket counters, operations areas, bag make-up area), security space, concession (food, gifts & news, business centers, etc.), U.S. Customs facilities, rental car facilities, vehicle parking. 5.2.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS Based on the demand/capacity assessment, terminal facility requirements to meet future demand expressed in the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios will be identified. Facility needs will be defined in terms of the various categories identified above. Based upon the inventory of ground transportation components performed in Task 3 and the Aviation Activity Forecasts developed in Task 4, the demand for the Airport access terminal road and other on -Airport roadways will be compared to current capacity to determine facility requirements. This assessment, however, excludes the analysis of off -Airport roadways. The Planning Team will develop a roadway demand/capacity spreadsheet model to estimate the roadway demands and capacity for the on -Airport roadway system on a link -by -link basis. Roadway capacity will vary based on the number of roadway lanes and characteristics of roadway segment using Airport -specific industry -standard capacity assumptions based on roadway speed. Master Plan Update [291 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 5.3.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS APRIL 2016 On -Airport roadways requirements will be based on future demand, and discussed in terms of number of traffic lanes, access points, intersection congestion, and level of service. Off -Airport roadways will not be assessed from demand -capacity standpoint however; existing traffic studies and existing planning studies will be reviewed to identify off -Airport roadway networks that support traffic to/from the Airport which will require improvements by FDOT or other local planning agencies in order to support the traffic volumes expected to be generates by MTH. 5.4 Fixed Base Operator (FBO) and General Aviation Facilities Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask. AID, Inc. 5.4.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT Using standard methodology for assessing general aviation demand and capacity, an evaluation of current and future demand and capacity for general aviation facilities will be completed. The analysis will consider facility requirements for: • Aircraft ramp and parking area • T-hangars • Conventional hangar facilities • FBO terminals • Flight training facilities • Aircraft maintenance and repair shops • Vehicle parking areas • Other general aviation facilities that reside at MTH 5.4.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS General aviation facility requirements will be identified as needed to meet projected levels of demand expressed in the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios based on the demand/capacity analysis for GA facilities. Facility requirements will be expressed in terms of gross area, linear feet, or other basic units to determine excess or deficient capacity. This assessment will quantify future development items needed to maintain an adequate level of service, function, and operation at the Airport. Master Plan Update [301 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 5.5 Support Facilities Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. 5.5.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT Using pertinent FAA regulations, advisory circulars, and information gained from discussions/surveys of Airport users, the Planning Team will determine the capacity of the existing Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Facilities (ARFF), fuel storage facility, airfield maintenance center facilities, Airport administration and management, and FAA facilities. 5.5.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS Future support facility requirements will be based on the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios, and discussed in terms of expansion of existing facilities or procurement of additional equipment including any required NAVAIDS. This task will also consider the need for the construction of an air traffic control tower at the Airport. 5.6 Prepare Capacity Analysis & Facility Requirements Report Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. A draft Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements report summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and provided to Airport staff and Technical Review Committee for their review. The Planning Team will prepare exhibits as necessary to clarify and summarize the various items addressed in the alternatives section. The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Capacity Analysis and Facility Requirements Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the MPU. The number of hard copies to be provided is noted on Page 26 of this scope of services. Master Plan Update (311 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 6. Alternatives Analysis and Recommended Development Plan The Planning Team will prepare sketches and evaluate alternative Airport development concepts to accommodate the range of requirements needed to satisfy forecast demands for the S-, 10- and 20-year time frames. The Airport will review the concepts and work with the Planning Team to determine suitability of the Airport to accommodate future Airport improvements. Based on Airport comments, the Planning Team will prepare the recommended alternative development plans. Because of land constraints, the definition of the highest and best uses for Airport property or adjacent County -owned land parcels, the identification of potential developable parcels for aviation -related uses with existing or potential connection to the airfield, and the identification of County -owned Airport parcels or facilities that could be redeveloped to generate additional aeronautical revenues will be key to the evaluation of the development alternatives. As part of the alternative analysis, the Planning Team will also define land acquisition needs to meet short, intermediate, and long-term needs. The proposed development plan for the Airport would seek to strategically locate land uses to enhance the Airport operations and community benefits. The plan would allocate land uses to ensure compatibility with existing and proposed off -Airport uses. Deliverables Five (5) copies of the Airport Development Alternatives chapter for Airport review and comment • Five (5) copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment A final Airport Development Alternatives report in electronic format (.PDF) Estimated Task Duration 60 Days 6.1 Airfield Alternatives Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. 6.1.1 AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES On the basis of the Airport facility requirements established previously, preliminary airfield development alternatives will be developed. Airfield alternatives will be based on schemes for development within existing or expanded Airport boundaries and will show necessary major runway and taxiway development for each of 5-, 10- and 20-year time frame. This task will be conducted simultaneously with the following tasks and will result in a series of overall development options for the Airport. Airfield alternatives will be developed based on the identified facility requirements, environmental considerations, engineering factors, costs, and overall Master Plan Update [321 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 feasibility for implementation. Airfield alternatives will also be analyzed to determine their potential for creating or being affected by line of sight considerations as well as FAR Part 77 and TERPS surfaces. This task would also include the development of airfield alternatives that consider the application of declared distances. Runway enhancements that may include possible extensions as well as improvements to approach capabilities (threshold siting) will include a general assessment of the requirements that would need to be met associated with these improvements. Up to three (3) airfield alternatives will be prepared for inclusion in the final MPU document. No airfield modeling or simulation will be provided as part of this task. 6.1.2 REVIEW EXISTING INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES WITHIN THE RUNWAY 25 RPZ As part of the airfield alternatives, the Planning Team will review existing incompatible land uses within the Runway 25 Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). Specifically, the Planning Team will assess the operational risks associated with the preservation of a maintenance building and two aircraft storage hangars located within the RPZ. This subtask will include the following efforts: • Review airfield safety areas and runway critical surfaces associated with Runway 25: This review will provide a means to assess whether the existing maintenance building and aircraft storage hangars encroach on the airfield safety areas and runway critical surfaces associated with Runway 25. Safety areas and critical surfaces to be reviewed will include RPZ, Runway Object Free Area (OFA), Runway Safety Area (RSA), Runway Obstacle Free Zone (OFZ), Precision Runway Obstacle Free Zone (POFZ), FAR Part 77 surfaces, TERPS - Straight out Instrument, Departure Surface, One Engine Inoperative (OEI) Departure Surface, Glide Slope Qualification Surface (GQS) for Screening Approach Procedure with Vertical Guidance (APV), Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) Obstacle Clearance Surface (OCS). • Collect data from the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB's) database on historical accidents at the Airport. Define building occupancy: since building occupancy would have a major effect on the likelihood of a groundling fatality, the Planning Team will meet with the Monroe County and aircraft hangar storage tenant to define the number of employees that occupy those buildings on a regular basis. Define the type aircraft anticipated at the Airport. The type of aircraft is a major factor in estimating the probable crash size and the crash consequence. As such, the Planning Team will define the largest and fastest aircraft anticipated at the Airport. Identify the likelihood of an aircraft accident in the Runway 25 RPZ ("the event"). • Estimate the severity of the event based on the building occupancy and type of aircraft. • Analyze and assess risk levels using the risk matrix included in Appendix C of FAA Order 5200.11 Change 3, FAA Airports (ARP) Safety Management System: Risk levels will be established based on the severity and likelihood of the event. Mitigate risks: if required, develop mitigation measures to reduce risk to the lowest possible level. • Using the RPZ risk assessment tool that is being developed' as part of the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Project #04-18, assess the risk of an aircraft accident in the Runway 25 ' According to htto://aaos.trb.org/crosfeedlrRBNetProiectDisolay asp?ProjectID=3711. the anticipated completion date for ACRP 04-18 is July 2016. Master Plan Update [331 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 RPZ and assess the risk to people and property. Should this tool not be available by the time the MPU is initiated, the Planning Team will engage directly with the research agency that is responsible for the development of this tool. 6.2 Terminal/Vehicle Parking Alternatives Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. On the basis of terminal facility requirements established in Task 5.2, up to five alternatives will be developed to provide for a plan that is "balanced" and meets or exceeds customer expectations for level of service. The terminal area plan will include analyses of how the terminal facility could be expanded to meet projected demand while minimizing the impact that the expansion would have on existing operations. The analyses of terminal expansion will also include consideration of the airline operations area, security facilities, curbfront and vehicle parking requirements, concessions, support facilities, and various other terminal -related functions that will have a direct impact on terminal expansion strategies. An evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the various alternatives. 6.3 Roadway Alternatives Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. Based upon information developed during the review and analysis of the existing ground access/roadway systems conducted in the demand -capacity task, the Planning Team will develop optional schemes for providing additional ground access capacity. Specifically, the Planning Team will prepare conceptual plans and illustrate these in scaled exhibits depicting alternative ground access roadways and circulation schemes that meet the facility requirements for the 20-year planning horizon. It is anticipated that up to three conceptual plans will be developed and will depict ground access options for the fully expanded/renovated terminal area. 6.4 General Aviation Facility Alternatives Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. Based on the general aviation area facility requirements determined previously, preliminary general aviation development within or beyond existing Airport boundaries will be formulated. General aviation alternatives will be evaluated on the basis of their efficiency in meeting identified facility requirements, ability to group tenants in the same general areas; engineering factors, ease of implementation, costs, and environmental considerations. This task will include the identification of alternatives to provide additional aircraft parking area for business jet aircraft. Specifically, this task will evaluate the practicability of relocating the existing fuel storage facility away from the aircraft ramps and maneuvering areas. This will lead to the selection of the Master Plan Update [341 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 options best satisfying the identified need. Up to three (3) general aviation facility alternatives will be prepared as part of this task. 6.5 Support Facility Alternatives Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask.• AID, Inc. Alternatives for the development of required support facility improvements shall be developed and evaluated to assess preferred layouts on the basis of the ability to serve the projected demand, expandability, and operational considerations. Up to three (3) support facility alternatives will be prepared as part of this task. This task also will also include the identification and evaluation of potential sites for the construction of an air traffic control tower including line of sight analyses, as well the evaluation of potential sites for the construction of an emergency operations center within the Airport boundary. 6.6 Evaluate Development Alternatives Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. The Planning Team will conduct an evaluation of the development alternatives based on criteria developed in conjunction with the goals and objectives of the Study and through dialogue between the Planning Team and the Airport staff. These will include: ability of the concept to provide required capacity and capability; potential environmental impacts; relative costs (using labor and materials price data from recent Airport construction projects); and constructability/ease of implementation. Criteria may be weighted to reflect importance in the evaluation process. An evaluation matrix will be prepared to compare the various alternatives in terms of the evaluation criteria. This task will result in the revision of options or the combination of individual alternatives into a single alternative for implementation. 6.7 Refine Recommended Airport Development Plan Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Asosciates, Inc. As needed, the Planning Team will refine the near -term recommended alternatives identified in the previous tasks, including airfield, terminal, and roadway access (on and off -Airport). Based on input from the Airport, refinements to the recommended development plan will be made. Master Plan Update [35] FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT .__.__ __.... 6.8 Prepare Airport Development Alternatives Report APRIL 2016 Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask AID, Inc. A draft Airport Development Alternatives report summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and provided to Airport staff and Technical Review Committee for their review. The Planning Team will prepare exhibits as necessary to clarify and summarize the various items addressed in the alternatives section. The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Airport Development Alternatives Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft Airport Development Alternatives of the MPU. The number of hard copies to be provided is noted on Page 32 of this scope of services. Master Plan Update [361 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 7. Environmental Overview Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (unless otherwise noted) The environmental overview to be completed as part of this MPU will assist in selecting a preferred development alternative that minimizes potential environmental impacts. It will identify potential areas of environmental concern, whether any components of the preferred development plan might affect significant environmental resources, and the level of environmental documentation required by FAA prior to implementation of the recommended Master Plan projects. The Planning Team will review each element of the proposed development plan so the Airport/County staff is made aware of: • Potential environmental concerns • The anticipated environmental documentation required prior to implementation • Whether the proposed improvements are likely to require Federal and/or State Permits. The environmental overview will identify environmental concerns based on the guidance provided in FAA's Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures and Order 5050AB, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions or the current versions of those documents. The first step will be to review existing environmental reports prepared for the Airport and gather information from existing databases, maps, and published information available from applicable resource agencies to establish existing conditions. Deliverables A detailed narrative report summarizing the results of the findings of the environmental overview including supporting graphic exhibits and tables o Five (5) copies of a preliminary draft working paper for Airport review/comment o Five (5) copies of a final draft working paper for Airport review/comment o A final Environmental Overview report in electronic format (.PDF) Estimated Task Duration Documentation of Existing Conditions - 30 Days Noise analysis & determination of probable environmental documentation and permitting requirements for the preferred alternative — 30 days 7.1 Evaluation of Proposed Development Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. By using data to be collected as part of the EA for the proposed improvements to Runway 7-25 and Taxiway A (to be initiated in the winter of 2016/2017), the preferred development alternative will be evaluated to identify Master Plan Update [371 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 potential environmental issues. This subtask will also include the identification of possible environmental documentation and permitting requirements for the preferred alternative. 7.2 Airport Noise Evaluation Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. and Deborah Murphy Lagos & Associates, LLC (analysis oversight). The Planning Team will conduct a noise analysis, resulting in noise contours that are representative of the existing base year (2016), and future ten-year (2035) aeronautical activity and existing/future (preferred alternative) airfield configuration consistent with the MPU. The noise contours will be prepared for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used for the purpose of 14 CFR FAR Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) or Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The methodology used to develop the contours, however, will comply with that recommended by the FAA; the FAA's Aviation Environmental Design Tool [AEDT] version 2b will be used for the noise modeling. The noise contours will be placed on a current aerial photograph base map or USGS quadrangle map, depending on the area of noise exposure that extends beyond the Airport. It is anticipated this effort will build on the model that will be developed as part of the EA for the proposed improvements to Runway 7-25 and Taxiway A. Fleet mix information and airfield conditions, however, will be updated to reflect the FAA -approved activity forecasts (Task 4) and the future airfield conditions (for example, runway extension, threshold changes, or safety areas) to be defined as part of the MPU (Task 6.1). The noise analysis will identify and depict noise exposure associated with the projected aeronautical activity at the Airport and will include an identification of noise sensitive land uses. The DNL 65 dB and higher noise contours will be generated for each modeled scenario. Federal noise standards recognize DNL 65 dB as the threshold for evaluating noise impacts, which will be noted on all figures or drawings depicting noise contours. The existing and 10-year noise contours will also be depicted on the Airport land use plan drawing. A narrative description of Airport noise exposure, compatibility with adjacent land uses, and a summary of federal noise compatibility guidelines will be prepared for inclusion in the environmental overview working paper. 7.2.1 DEFINE AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX The aircraft fleet mix representing the average annual day aircraft operations for the existing and future airfield conditions will be used for noise modeling. The following data sources will be collected, reviewed, and compiled into the 2016 aircraft fleet mix: • Fixed Base Operator (FBO) records/interviews, • FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System (ATADS), Master Plan Update [381 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 • FAA Traffic Flow Management Systems Count (TFMSC), and • FAA Form 5010 (Airport Master Records). The future year (2026) fleet mix and operations will be sourced from the Master Plan forecasts. The corresponding AEDT aircraft types will be determined for each category of aircraft included in the Master Plan forecasts. 7.2.2 ESTABLISH AIR TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROFILE The air traffic operational profile (i.e., aircraft flight tracks, runway utilization, and flight track utilization) will be established as part of the EA. As such, it is anticipated that this effort will be limited to the update of the INM model to reflect the future/proposed airfield configuration. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that the assumptions regarding flight track and runway use from the EA would remain valid and would not need to be updated. 7.2.3 ESTABLISH BASELINE (E)GSTING) NOISE CONTOURS The aircraft noise contours of DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB resulting from the average annual day operations for the existing baseline condition will be created using the FAA's AEDT 2b. The annual aircraft operations for the existing baseline conditions will be based on the FAA's ATCT annual counts for the Airport. 7.2.4 ESTABLISH LONG TERM (10- YEAR) NOISE CONTOURS The aircraft noise contours of DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB resulting from the average annual day operations for the future year condition (2025) will be created using the FAA's INM, version 7D or AEDT 2b. The annual aircraft operations and the fleet mix will be estimated based on data developed as part of Task 4. 7.3 Prepare Environmental Overview Report Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. A draft Environmental Overview summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and provided to Airport staff for their review. This report will address the environmental conditions at MTH as determined through a review of existing reports and through contacts with various state and federal agencies. The overview will identify potential effects on environmental resources as a result of projects proposed in the updated Airport Master Plan. The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Environmental Overview Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the MPU. The number of hard copies to be provided is noted on Page 36 of this scope of services. Master Plan Update [391 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 8. Sustainability Initiatives Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (unless otherwise noted) This task will address the Airport sustainability policy, establish possible goals to minimize the impact or consumption to reduce the Airport's overall environmental footprint, and identify and describe a range of generic sustainability initiatives to help the Airport achieve each set goal. Deliverables Five (5) copies of the Sustainability Initiatives chapter for Airport review and comment Five (5) copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment A final Sustainability Initiatives report in electronic format (.PDF) Estimated Task Duration 45 Days 8.1 Establish Baseline Conditions The Planning Team will conduct a baseline inventory or assessment of each defined sustainability category, such as environmental resource usage (e.g., water consumption per year or per passenger, etc.), emissions inventory, surface transportation management, land uses, and etc. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that this effort will require a site visit to the Airport that will include interviews of key Airport staff. 8.2 Facilitate Sustainability Workshop The Planning Team will attend and help facilitate a half -day workshop to define the Airport's sustainability goals, outline the sustainability categories at the Airport, such as socioeconomics, Airport facilities and procedures, environmental resources (e.g., noise, water, air quality, etc.), and identify and describe a range of specific sustainability initiatives to help the Airport achieve its goals. The Planning Team will be responsible for developing all support materials for facilitating the Sustainability workshop. These materials will include presentations, meeting agenda, questionnaires, and etc. Master Plan Update [401 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 8.3 Formulate Sustainability Framework Based on the outcomes of the sustainability workshop, the Planning Team will formulate a sustainability framework for the Airport that will identify the following: • Sustainability Policy • Sustainability Strategies (if applicable) • Long- and short- term objectives • Priorities List Timeline and Responsibilities Upon approval of the Airport's Sustainability framework, the Planning Team will develop a Sustainability Initiatives chapter for inclusion in the MPU. 8.4 Prepare Simplified Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction Plan Based on Section 133 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Airports are required to prepare a Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction plan as part of the master planning process. This plan will address the feasibility of solid waste recycling, minimizing the generation of solid waste, operation and maintenance requirements, the review of waste management contracts, and the potential cost savings or generation of revenue. This task will include, in collaboration with Airport staff, the identification of the types of solid waste generated at the Airport, as well as the factors likely to influence the scope and nature of the Airport recycling program (e.g. local markets for recyclable commodities; cost for transport and processing recyclables; local recycling infrastructure; willingness of an Airport and its tenants to implement recycling programs; Airport layout and logistics.) It is anticipated the recycling, reuse, and waste reduction plan will include a description of the scope of the existing recycling and waste management programs, the identification of the drivers for implementing/maintaining a recycling program, a description and inventory of infrastructure in place, both on and off- Airport, that supports Airport recycling, and a description of the Airport's current solid waste recycling, reuse, and waste reduction efforts, including instances when tenants recycle materials. Results of previously completed waste audits will be documented as part of the plan. However, no waste audits will be conducted as part of this MPU Technical and economic factors, as well as logical constraints, that currently affect the Airport's ability to recycle will be reviewed and Federal, state, or local guidelines or policies that aid or hinder recycling efforts will be identified. Master Plan Update [41 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 This task will also include a brief review of existing waste management contracts including a description of current contracting for waste management at the Airport, the identification of tenant leases and service contracts with corresponding expiration, extension, and/or renewal dates, and a description of how waste handling and recycling is funded. Potential for cost savings or revenue generation and recommendations to minimize solid waste will be identified. No detailed financial analysis and modeling however, will be completed as part of this effort. 8.5 Draft Sustainability Chapter A draft Sustainability Chapter summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and provided to Airport staff for their review. The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Sustainability Initiatives chapter will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the MPU. The number of hard copies to be provided is noted on Page 39 of this scope of services. Master Plan Update [42I FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 9. Capital Improvement Program Implementation Plan The implementation plan will consist of the Implementation Schedule and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The recommended development plan will be subdivided into distinct projects for which estimates of probable costs will be prepared and funding sources which will be phased over the development period. The CIP will be coordinated with Airport management and the existing CIP to include both currently programmed and master plan -related capital improvements for the Airport. The development schedule will be based on the improvements needed to satisfy demand at each of the 5-, 10- and 20-year time frames, which will be assumed to occur as determined under the Baseline Demand Scenario developed in the forecasting task. Individual development projects will be phased to allow improvements to be designed, constructed, and operational to meet demand. The phasing process will be an iterative process with the financial analysis to ensure that the CIP is both implementable and economically feasible. Deliverables A report including the project summaries and supporting graphic exhibits o Five (5) copies of a preliminary draft Implementation Plan working paper for Airport review/comment o Five (5) copies of a final draft Implementation Plan report for the Airport review/comment o A final Implementation Plan report in electronic format (PDF) Estimated Task Duration 45 Days 9.1 Establish Preliminary CIP Project Priorities and Sequencing Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs The Monroe County staff will provide a summary of the current CIP needs and priorities for MTH. In consultation with the Monroe County staff, each project in the preferred long range development concept will be assigned to a particular planning term (short term, intermediate term, or long term). Each project will be individually described in sufficient detail to describe the nature and purpose of the project, identify potential conflicts with other projects, and identify projects that must occur to enable completion. Master Plan Update [43I FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 ...__.._.__._... __..... . ...... ____. 9.2 Develop Estimates of Rough Order of Magnitude Cost (ROM) Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs Cost estimates will be prepared for each project in the recommended development plan for the 20-year planning horizon, with additional detail provided for the initial near -term 5-year capital improvement projects. The Cost estimates will be provided on an item of work basis. 9.3 Funding Source Strategies/Implementation Schedule Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Jacobs & AID, Inc. The purpose of this task is to identify the funding sources available to support the planned capital development at MTH, and to determine the financial feasibility of the Monroe County undertaking and implementing its planned capital development. Potential funding sources for the planned capital development may include, but not be limited to: federal grants, both entitlement and discretionary; state grants; passenger facility charges (PFC), both on a pay-as-you-go basis and leveraged basis; general Airport revenue bonds; Monroe County funds; and other, which may include third -party financing, special facility financing, etc. The determination of the preferred funding source strategy will be based, in part, on the availability of each funding source; market conditions and the ability of the Monroe County to access any particular source; and the Monroe County policies and preferences. It is anticipated that adjustments to the phasing plan may be necessary to accommodate cash flow and debt funding considerations. These refinements will be conducted in consultation with the Monroe County staff and result in the development of implementation schedule for the preferred long range development concept for MTH. 9.4 Prepare Implementation Plan Report Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc. The Implementation Plan report will include graphic exhibits depicting the capital improvement projects. In addition, summary sheets will be developed for each project that identifies typical CIP entry fields to facilitate future programming of each project in the JACIP for the Airport. It is anticipated the project summary sheets will include the following information: Name of and brief description of the project Project justification: brief explanation of why the project is needed. • Site information: Location map indicating the project location and clarifying limits of construction Projected timing (short-, mid-, or long- range) or demand trigger • Order of magnitude costs for the proposed projects Source of Funds: anticipated sources of funding for the projects (to be provided by the Monroe County) Master Plan Update [441 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Environmental documentation: identification of the type of environmental documentation (categorical exclusion, EA, or EIS) expected. The findings of the implementation plan task, including the project summaries and exhibits, will be summarized in a draft report and provided to Airport management and staff for review and comment. The Airport/County staff review and comment process for the Implementation Plan Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2) final draft for the Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the MPU. Master Plan Update [451 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 10. Financial Feasibility and APRIL 2016 Funding Analysis Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (unless otherwise noted) The results of the master planning analyses described in the prior tasks will be evaluated from a financial standpoint, taking into consideration existing debt and expected levels of available FDOT, FAA entitlement, and FAA discretionary funding, as well as the availability of local funds and any opportunities for third party funding. The analyses will help establish a phasing plan for the recommended improvements identified for the Airport that can be implemented in accordance with projected demand growth and emerging facility needs. The financial plan will be prepared to outline the actions and initiatives necessary to carry out the CIP in a financially sound manner. Included in the financial plan will be the identification of specific funding sources, projections of revenues and expenses, and development of a preferred strategy for undertaking the CIP. Data & Resources Required From the Monroe County/Airport Financial data will be collected to support the financial analyses of this study and will include: • Lease disclosure data Historical and upcoming capital projects Prior funding assistance Revenue sharing agreements Airport financial statements as well as applicable information pertaining to state/local financial support • Airport Leases Summary, if available; if not, copies of tenant leases Projected debt service schedule, if applicable • Projected capital projects and funding sources for upcoming five years Deliverables • A Financial Analysis report: o Five (5) copies of a preliminary draft Financial Analysis working paper for Airport review/comment o Five (5) copies of a final draft Financial Analysis report for the Airport review/comment o A final Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis report in electronic format (PDF) Estimated Task Duration 45 Days Master Plan Update [46) FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 10.1 Prepare Financial Plan APRIL 2016 The recommended airport financial plan will be prepared under this subtask. This effort will take into consideration typical participation levels from federal and state grant-in-aid programs to determine the net amount of capital funds required by the airport to accomplish each proposed stage of improvement for the Airport. Alternative financing strategies that may be available for implementing the proposed development program will also be analyzed. The sources of airport funds as to their financial implications, their use to finance proposed airport development projects and airport operations and maintenance needs will also be explored. The financial plan will be broken into a five-year initial phase (which will be delineated on an annual basis), an intermediate five year term, and a long-term of ten years, to complete the 20-year planning program. Available sources of airport revenue and expenditures will be obtained to provide an overview of the airport's operating income. This information will be used to provide an analysis of the revenue that can be expected over the course of the short term planning period only. Projections of future airport revenue and expenditures will be made for the first five -years and then utilized to evaluate the financial feasibility of the projects needed within that timeframe. The analysis will focus on the first five -years in attempt to keep the financial analysis as realistic as possible, while at the same time providing valuable data for the airport to use when updating the Joint Automated Capital Improvement Program (JACIP). Based on the findings, revisions will be made to the work program with the intent of producing a realistic approach to accomplishing future airport projects, while at the same time maintaining the current airfield facilities. During the development of a recommended financial plan, specific projects will be reviewed with airport management to confirm project costs and timing as well as to review the strategy for available funding sources, all in an effort to maximize the financial feasibility of the capital program. 10.2 Prepare Financial Analysis Report The findings of the financial plan task will be summarized in a draft report and provided to the Master Plan Technical Review Committee and Airport management and staff for review and comment. The Airport/County staff review and comment process for the Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2) final draft for the Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the MPU. Master Plan Update [471 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 11. Update of the Airport Layout Plan Set Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (unless otherwise noted) This effort is intended to produce the necessary documents (including the ALP drawing set and associated Narrative Report) required for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to review and conditionally approve the proposed development plan for the Airport. The Airport Layout Plan will be prepared in accordance with FAA standards as defined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5070-7, Airport Master Plans, and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A, Change 1, Airport Design. The ALP set will be prepared as a paper -copy ALP and does not include preparation of an electronic ALP (eALP). Data will be submitted in CAD format and is not intended to be provided in GIS format for use in an eALP submittal to the FAA. All components of the ALP drawing set described herein will be developed in accordance with the provisions of AC 150/5070-613, Airport Master Plans, and the FAA ARP Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 2.00, Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (ALPS). To support the submittal of this updated planning product, the Planning team will also review, complete, and submit the checklist that is provided in the FAA SOP 2.00. Deliverables • Five (5) copies of the preliminary draft ALP set for distribution to the Airport • 13 copies of the draft ALP set for distribution to the FAA (9 copies), FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office (2 copies), and Airport staff (2 copies). • 15 copies of the final ALP set for distribution to the FAA (9 copies), FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office (2 copies), and Airport staff (4 copies). A narrative report discussing the components of the ALP Plan Set and the proposed development plan reflected on the sheets of the ALP o Five (5) copies of a preliminary draft ALP Narrative Report working paper for Airport review/comment o Five (5) copies of a final draft working paper for the Airport review/comment o A final ALP Narrative Report in electronic format (PDF) Estimated Task Duration 120 Days (including a 60-day review period by the FAA) Master Plan Update [481 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 11.1 Title Sheet APRIL 2016 A title sheet will be prepared in accordance with the FAA checklist' to serve as the drawing set cover sheet. This title sheet will include pertinent information such as the Airport name, owner/operator, location, and plan set preparer. An index of drawings, graphic representations of the Airport location (including the identification of the county the Airport is located in) and Airport vicinity will also be presented on the title sheet. 11.2 Existing Airport Layout Utilizing new digital mapping for the Airport, a new drawing will be created to identify facilities and geographical features at the Airport as they currently exist. This drawing will include existing structures, pavements, imaginary surfaces, NAVAIDs (visual and instrument), ground contours, runway protection zones, runway safety areas, property interests, and other pertinent dimensional data recommended by the FAA. Based on the new digital mapping obtained for the Airport, this drawing will reflect projects and other Airport improvements that have materialized since the current ALP was developed (2003). This drawing will also depict the configuration and general dimensioning of the existing Airport facilities, including surveyed building heights of all buildings on Airport property. The Airport Reference Point (ARP), key elevations, runway end latitude/longitude coordinates, and runway approach surfaces will also be identified. The drawing will also include a legend and applicable notes section, wind roses and wind coverage tables to be developed under Task 3.2, as well as a runway data and building data tables. The runway data table will include information such as Approach and Departure Reference Code (APRC and DPRC), Runway Reference Code (RRC), runway length, runway width, runway end elevation, runway lighting, runway marking, pavement type, pavement strength and NAVAIDs (visual and instrument). The "true" and magnetic north will also be depicted, which will require the calculation of the magnetic declination at the Airport. Any deviations to FAA design standards will be identified and noted appropriately. The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the existing Airport layout contains the information required for submittal to the FAA. The scale of the drawing will be defined at the time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to provide a clearly legible drawing with all requisite data readily discernible. The scale of the drawing, however, will fall within the range of 1" = 200' and 1" = 600', in accordance with the FAA checklist. ' FAA ARP Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), Standard Procedure for FAA Review and Approval o(Airport Layout Plan, October 1, 2013. Master Plan Update [491 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 11.3 Airport Layout Plan APRIL 2016 Utilizing new digital mapping and other available resources, the Planning Team will create an ALP to reflect the recommended development plan to accommodate the future facility needs as identified in the updated Master Plan. Specifically, the ALP will illustrate existing and proposed airfield pavements, roadway & parking pavement/structures, trails/gravel roads, runway markings, on -Airport structures, appropriate levels of vegetation, key drainage features, NAVAIDs (visual and instrument), off -Airport structures that are located in the immediate vicinity of the Airport, and other miscellaneous natural and man-made items. Established survey monuments located on or in the immediate vicinity of the Airport will also be identified. Ground contours, runway protection zones, runway safety and object free areas, future property interests, and other pertinent dimensional data recommended by the FAA will also be depicted on the plan. The ARP (existing and proposed), the Approach and Departure Reference Code (APRC and DPRC), and Runway Reference Codes (RRCs) for each runway, key elevations, runway end latitude/longitude coordinates, and runway approach surfaces will also be identified. Any proposed improvements and/or changes to these items will be depicted graphically and identified. The ALP will be developed in accordance with the FAA checklist. Thus, each of the components of the ALP will contain the information necessary to obtain approval from the FAA. Like the Existing Airport Layout, any deviations to FAA design standards will be identified and noted on the ALP. The scale of the drawing will be defined at the time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to provide a clearly legible drawing with all requisite data readily discernible. The scale of the drawing, however, will fall within the range of 1" = 200' and 1" = 600', in accordance with the FAA checklist. 11.4 Airport Airspace Drawing Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs This drawing will depict all relevant Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces as they relate to the Airport's immediate airspace in a plan and profile view. The plan view will be prepared at an approximate scale of 1" = 2,000' and will be overlaid onto a USGS 7-minute quadrangle basemap (or orthophotography) of the surrounding area. The profile view will be prepared at a horizontal scale of 1" _ 1,000' and a vertical scale of 1" = 100'. The plan will illustrate the ultimate runway configuration of the airfield with key elevations of the surfaces and stationing from the runway ends being referenced. Fifty (50) foot contour intervals will be shown for all FAR Part 77 sloping imaginary surfaces. This sheet will depict objects violating FAR Part 77 surfaces that have not been identified on the ALP or inner approach drawings. The top elevation of each obstruction will be identified on the drawing as will the disposition of the obstruction in a tabular format. The dimensions of the approach surfaces and transitional surfaces will be charted. Obstruction heights will be obtained from the new Master Plan Update [501 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 digital mapping and other available resources. In addition, all known obstructions to navigable airspace off - Airport will be identified through the use of the latest USGS mapping, the NOAA Obstruction Chart, and the aeronautical sectional chart as applicable. No field obstruction surveys, however, will be completed as part of this effort. The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the Airport airspace drawing contains the information required by the FAA. 11.5 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs These drawings will depict plan and profile views of the inner portion of the approach to each ultimate runway end at the Airport. These drawings will utilize a 1" = 200' horizontal scale for the plan and profile views and a 1" = 20' vertical scale for the profile views. The plan/profile extents will cover from the referenced runway out to a point where the approach surface reaches a 100-foot height above the runway end. The new digital base mapping will be used to identify obstructions to navigable airspace, as well as those documented on the latest USGS 7-minute quadrangle mapping and the NOAA Obstruction Chart. In accordance with the FAA checklist, these drawings will depict the obstacle identification surfaces contained in 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, threshold siting surfaces and any other applicable surfaces associated with the United States Standards for Instrument Procedures (TERPS), Changes 1 through 26. Obstructions will be listed numerically in a tabular format for each approach with data describing the obstruction type, the surfaces penetrated, top elevation, allowable elevation, amount of penetration, and proposed dispositions. Elevations of roads, railroads, power poles, trees, buildings, and other objects that are located within the approaches will also be shown. The drawings will also depict the threshold siting surfaces associated with each runway end. These surfaces will be defined based on the type of instrument approaches anticipated and the critical aircraft for each runway end in accordance with the standards defined in Table 3-2, Approach/Departure Standards Table, of FAA AC 5300-13A, Change 1, Airport Design. Additionally, any local zoning ordinances or protection zones will also be reflected in the inner portion of the approach surface drawings, where applicable. 11.6 Terminal Area Drawing(s) Similar to the ALP, the terminal area drawing(s) will depict existing and proposed development at a larger scale (within a range of 1" = 50' and 1" = 100') of the terminal area and other adjacent facilities. Master Plan Update [511 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 At this scale, the terminal area drawing(s) will provide further detail in terms of dimensional criteria, annotations, aircraft parking positions, existing and proposed facilities. A building data table that list details specific to each facility will also be included. 11.7 Land Use Drawing This drawing will depict the existing and recommended use of all Airport property and all land in the immediate vicinity of the Airport (to the 65 DNL contour as specified in FAA RGL- 5070.1). The land uses will be depicted by general use categories such as aviation, commercial, residential, industrial, recreational, public use, etc. The specific designations to land uses within the Airport property limits will be discussed with Airport representatives and revised as directed to reflect the categories that are desired. The off -Airport land uses in the immediate vicinity of the Airport (to the 65 DNL contour) will be defined based on the Monroe County zoning and land use maps. The noise contours (65, 70, and 75 DNL) to be developed as part of the EA will be depicted on the land use drawing. The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the land use drawing contains the information required by the FAA. 11.8 Airport Property Map This drawing will be prepared at a scale equal to that of the ALP and will depict the existing Airport property boundary as well as proposed acquisition areas. Property boundary bearings and distances will be denoted on the drawing where appropriate and if available. The Planning Team will research the acquisition history of property for MTH to validate data from previous documents. Anticipated tasks include researching the Airport records, documents held at the City of Marathon and/or the Monroe County, FDOT records, and FAA records in Orlando. Specific attention to grant data will be researched. The Property Map and will also cross reference the individual parcels depicted on the Property Map drawing to tabular data summarizing the size of the parcel (in acres), the ORB Record Reference and the date of record (if available), and the sources of funds (FAA, local, other), if available, used to acquire the property. It is anticipated that a property line survey and the preparation of the Airport boundary legal description will be required for this subtask. The drawing will indicate in matrix form how, when, and from whom the various parcels were acquired. In accordance with the FAA checklist, the data table will include (if available): • Number or letter and area of each parcel or easement Date property was acquired or property status Federal Aid project number under which the property acquisition was reimbursed Master Plan Update [52I FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 • Type of Acquisition (i.e. AIP-noise, AIP entitlement, surplus property, local purchase, local donation, condemnation, other) • Grantor of property • Acreage 11.9 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal Five draft copies of the drawings developed will be assembled and distributed to the MTH staff for review and comments. Revisions will be made as appropriate based on comments received. The drawings to be included in the preliminary ALP set are as follows: • Title Sheet • Existing Airport Layout • Airport Layout Plan • Airport Airspace Drawing • Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing — Runway 7 • Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing — Runway 25 • Terminal Area Drawing(s) • Land Use Drawing Airport Property Map 11.10 Final Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate), 13 copies of the final draft Airport Plans set will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FAA (nine copies), FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office (two copies), and Airport staff (two copies). An electronic version of the drawings set will also be provided. Drawings will be provided in both AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat (PDF) formats. As part of this submittal, R&A will also prepare a transmittal letter to the FAA that will list the key changes that have been made to the Airport Layout Plan. The FAA checklist will also be completed and included in this transmittal. 11.11 Final Airport Plans Set Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate) fifteen copies of the final Airport Plans set and associated FAA checklist will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FDOT Aviation Master Plan Update [53I FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 and Spaceports Office and to the FAA. It is assumed that Monroe County will be responsible for forwarding the Airport Plans set to the FAA local ADO for their review, coordination, approval, and signature. An electronic version of the drawings set will also be provided. The final drawings will be provided in both AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat (PDF formats). 11.12 Narrative Report This task will include the preparation of an ALP Narrative Report that will document, in narrative form, the proposed development plan reflected on the sheets of the ALP set for formal review and comment by the Airport staff. This narrative will include discussions of any modifications to FAA standards, including the justification of any new modification requests. In addition, a half-size version of the ALP set (11"x17") will be printed and included in the report. The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the ALP Narrative Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2) final draft for the Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft ALP Narrative Report. 11.13 Obstacle Action Plan As part of this task, the Planning Team will prepare an Obstacle Action Plan (OAP) that outlines how and when Airport Sponsors will mitigate penetrations to airspace surfaces. On August 18, 2015, FAA Headquarters issued a memorandum that emphasizes the importance of establishing and maintaining clear approach and departure surfaces at Airports. This memorandum also states that the Airport Sponsor will integrate the OAP analysis and findings into their Master Plan, Airport Layout Plan and CIP. The final action plan must include at a minimum the following items for unmitigated penetrations: obstacle reference number, type, latitude, longitude, elevation (AMSL), height, surface penetrated, penetration amount, runway, if the obstacle is on or off the Airport, if the obstacle is under sponsor control, proposed maintenance action and when each of the obstacles will be cleared and triggering event if associated with a particular event. - 11.14 Coordination Meetings R&A anticipates participating in up to four (4) web conference sessions using GoToMeeting or similar software. These web conference sessions will provide an opportunity to review the base map layering, review the draft ALP set with Airport staff and discuss required modifications to the drawings. In addition to the web conference sessions, two meetings at the Airport are anticipated with MTH staff and management. These meetings will provide an opportunity to review the draft ALP sets prior to distributing copies to the FAA and FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office for review and comment. Master Plan Update [541 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Similarly, two meetings at the FAA Orlando ADO in Orlando are anticipated. These meetings will provide an opportunity to present the draft ALP sets to the ADO staff and to go over the proposed projects to be reflect on the future ALP. These meetings will be attended by R&A staff, currently located in Orlando. Master Plan Update [551 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 12. Documentation Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo & Associates, Inc. (unless otherwise noted) The final MPU deliverables will represent the formal documentations that will become a matter of public record approvals. These documents will include an Executive Summary, a Draft MPU Report, and a Final MPU Report. Deliverables • 50 copies of the Executive Summary and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format • 10 copies of the Draft MPU Report and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format • 25 copies of the Final MPU Report and ten (10) PDF versions to be provided on CD's. Estimated Task Duration 120 Days (including a 90-day review period by the FAA) 12.1 Prepare Executive Summary The Planning Team will prepare and submit a draft Executive Summary that summarizes the results of the aviation forecasts, the facility requirements, the recommended plan and Capital Improvement Program. The Executive Summary shall include approximately 15 to 25 pages with color exhibits. A total of 50 copies and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format of the Executive Summary will be provided. 12.2 Prepare Draft Master Plan Update Report To insure proper coordination of the planning effort and assure agreement between the Planning Team, City of Marathon, Monroe County, and FAA, a Draft Airport Master Plan Report will be submitted for formal review. The draft report will contain all working papers (revised based on comments provided on original drafts), ALP drawings and the financial evaluation. The draft documents and plans will also be submitted to the FAA and FDOT for review. A total of ten (10) copies and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format of the draft report will be provided. 12.3 Prepare Final Master Plan Update Report The final Airport MPU report consolidating all previous analyses will be prepared after all agency and participants have made their comments on the draft final report and Airport Management has directed the Planning Team to incorporate these comments into a final report. Twenty-five (25) coil bound final reports of the Florida Keys Marathon International Airport MPU will be prepared for distribution. Of these copies, two (2) Master Plan Update [561 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 will be forwarded directly to the FAA Orlando Airports District Office and one (1) will be forwarded directly to the FDOT Aviation and Spaceports office. The remaining twenty-two (22) will be sent to the Monroe County/Airport. Digital files of all final chapters and associated graphics will be provided to the Monroe County and Airport Management in a readable CD format. A total of ten (10) PDF versions will be provided on CD's. Master Plan Update [571 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 13. Outreach and Participation Program The update of the Master Plan has implications for a variety of parties within the community. These parties range from the tenants who operate from the Airport including corporate users, general aviation pilots, and fixed base operators, to businesses and governmental agencies who rely upon the Airport to provide connection to regional, national and international destinations and markets. Additionally, the MPU has implications for those persons who reside adjacent to or in proximity to the facility. To this end Airport management has established the need conduct three public meetings. Deliverables • Power Point Presentations for the public workshop • Presentation Boards • Technical Review Committee Binders • Briefing Materials, Graphics and Presentations for the Elected Officials Briefings 13.1 Conduct Public Meeting Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask. AID, Inc., Ricondo & Associates, Inc., Jacobs, and McFarland Johnson One public workshop, in an open house format, will be conducted to brief residents and interested stakeholders about the project and to receive public comments. It is intended for this workshop to occur at some time during the alternatives analysis to allow input before the recommended development options are made. At a minimum, R&A's Officer in Charge and/or Project Manager will attend the meeting and participate in the role desired and requested by Airport staff. In addition, the meetings will be moderated by McFarland Johnson. The meetings will be scheduled to coincide with Technical Review Committee meetings (same day or consecutive day), whenever possible. The Planning Team will prepare briefing materials for the public workshop and will have appropriate personnel in attendance to respond to questions and comments from the public. The Planning Team will prepare the meeting notice for mailing to the public and the meeting advertisement for publication. The Planning Team will prepare and collect comment forms, and will review and summarize the comments. The Planning Team will also arrange for meeting refreshments and any necessary audio-visual equipment. For budgeting purposes, however, it has been assumed that the Monroe County and/or Airport staff will secure the meeting location, mail meeting notices, and arrange for and pay for any public advertisements for the meeting. Master Plan Update [58] FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 13.2 Elected Officials Briefing Support Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask AID, Inc., Ricondo & Associates, Inc.,and Jacobs. Over the course of the MPU, it will be necessary to provide briefings for elected officials at the local level. It has been anticipated that representatives of the Planning Team will likely need to be in attendance to provide technical support during the briefings. Additionally the Planning Team will prepare briefing materials, graphics and presentations to support the Airport in these activities. For scoping purposes it has been assumed that a total of three (3) briefings of various elected officials will occur over the course of the planning process for which consultant participation and support would be needed. 13.3 Technical Review Committee Meetings and Stakeholder Briefings Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc., Ricondo & Associates, Inc.,and Jacobs. It is anticipated that up to three (3) presentations on the work status of the MPU study will be presented to the Technical Review Committee. These presentations will occur on the same days as the public meetings. These presentations are intended to present project status updates as well as to receive feedback and guidance from the Committee when necessary. R&A's Office -in -Charge and Project Manager will attend each of these meetings and participate in the role desired and requested by the Airport Manager. Master Plan Update [591 FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT APRIL 2016 Appendix A Master Plan Update [601 C) 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O Nor; O O N O O N O O 6f) O CO Is V' N M O CO M N 0 CO CO CO O CO O I` EC) CO Is 00 V' CO Is Is O M 0 N O To • tD O O co- M O a a 6W N p M in tO CO N N Cr O N EC) N I- r EA IA IA EA to EA EA EA 60 EA fA fA EA U1 i 1 1 , , , , , O O O -- C N 0 O N tn O N N O C LL to O 0 2 C fA EA EA 69 EA EA 69 EA E9 EA fA 69 fA EA EA 0) CD Id_ U O ' ' O O o CO > W O 0 O Is O m co O O O E ❑ w co • 0 Q � v v J J N •'D ❑ EA to 6969 EAA E EA fA EA EA 69 EA 69 EA 69 (1) 7 4t LD m U 3 N ' O ' CO O ' ' CO ' ' ' O O O o 0 M 'C co 'C CO O O O O to p m O N 0 0) I- Cl03 r IC) CO M tt) (0 coW COO CO N N N N 6 O to 0_ N N 0 CS)69 EA EA EA fA EA 69 CA fA fA EA 69 EA EA CA J # L O ' N 0) O O NCO N CO N to O 0 o EL N - N- N CO M CO 1- 0 0) •- tf) O 0 D CO CD O N CO I- r N N N U) CO , Q O) M ,- V N I� M O) N O N V L 06 '0' N M CO N CO V N N N 2CL 0O O M EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA fA EA EA EA EA to N # 0 O ,- O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o C 03 N CO CO CO CO CO CO N CO 0) N 0 O - co I` N I` to to N to .1- toI� �- CO • p C co M O M W to a) U ,- to CO 0.) E a a 0 N N EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA fA to EA EA EA > O 0 d EY C Tv' O (O tj CT- o- c c a a) co E co _i c a Q p c _ C T D 0 0 CO 0) N O co ❑ -� a) E ac) D o .� Q E E a) E En `) Q p Q) N 0 7 a) EQ � E c N N a E co a O N O O E ojf @ 0) Cl) Cl) U - o d c 0 u 1- io c o ao) a W 0 N N O. E. U O) LL O C co N 2 C CC o N 3 N o a CC 4 d Q a Env 3 � CO a) � a cJ n c Q p tT a) c w Z > o UC ots T 7 0 03 O. O .0 X Y T C c7) To O C > Q C a a) OU >, W > Lo < n >. O CO a) O 'a of Q. Co Q) C O C O (0 mac„ C �' O U Q a) N O. co C to a a r c .>_ E co E w, 15 a) cc as o m (n p O .0 C C 'U c0 > O a) a) m C CO E o m .0 c co o 2 co E s co d .CC O5 co. a > to O. C d o0 •7 N Q U) Q m a < m < O Q W C/) O LL ❑ ❑ O ❑ N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 D F N M V tO CO I� O O O - c to 0 I- E cp Egm \'!■■k \ . ■ ■ . \- -- - // . . .... ..�, ..... . . .. ■! ILI ■ § ~ . ■ . ■ . . , | � ■ � � ■ � � \- ! ■ . �• � � � , | , z ) � � . f ss . ■ ` {_�; ` ; ■ . . � ! ■ \7§� § 2 . .■. ! §§ -- ��| " ` § q »•§ ® » §K ! � � ■ | ' � a � § ! | ` . ! . ■ ° ■ t # ) ) ! ! ! I■ e2|q !& °qq§2 }|q| \ ■q I ff RL | � $ : I . - c!f ; { ■ . , !In! ) ki`! � |� ;. ,.. |� | � �, © / � . . • •m d c;• e��� \ �� ■■■ REES § . . .� . §. .■ . m.■ a � \ . . - ■ --- ---- - - J - ----- :-- ---- ----- . - �|■ |. . . . . , . . . . |�� --- ---- - - ------ - --- --- i � --- ---- - - ° ------- --�- ---® ---- � . ISE ■■■■ § . ! ■ ■ .I .i # . 4 a ■ . ■ k ' f , � � ■ ' � ■ , . | . . . B | - i 7 ! , § § � ! ■ ■ � ■ ; ■B■ P|§§Z§d\iql:>di§§ 1q:<<f ■q■q||§ :! . eg& »■.# \ # / ! � | | £ . , � !0 f I | ƒ | E ! | # 1; | | | § \ � ; �ME : �EE _ ` ■- - !y < \ ,!a!, Ss .N z|!|��! »»»ww.,»» » »»»»»» -o 2 8� »»»w»»»w w w»»www IS M�'l »w w w»ww»wwww HEMP i I e 9 i �' I I m+Nm+FIN [! .-�• $F3 I xffi s5 Is 61 fit ff RE E 0 0 m I a a 8a e$ ¢ 3E ° adrffi ga r m � w •^ " . Nww»»». .M ..., ..,aN mNNwaa a w ! n W NN aNN»N NN Rik n � u N»w w w »N wNNNNw wNN- N e» Na R r e � 'o m'o E u w p pfr 3g 0 e s a 0 U U U a o35ot 8 a L a u a E @ gl 5 t < u-m ru ae 'Es m eR m —ee a eee Re ��a W m g n � rca $LLLLaa aaa a rub rE _� � u� m m a wQ •- � mmmoDai _ Oi 4-ap � �.- �� F J F Nils $ Via N N ...... .......... »«« N «« N N N......... ...... .... » « »«»Na» »««N«N»N»» »»« «N »» «» »»«» N»»«» �G Y; ! Y aaaamm maw N o N '>}.m A V if w a 3 gs a e n N w wN Y m YN �,ry Y m a m w 1$ s` S e f f sm m mROP MM HMM i M. i H11ii � a r a E � �� mQg`�10 o E u aaLL H<�a�_�'Ea E E d 8 gp� W u `o a LL z LL0� a'. a » R wa C a f a NNNN a»Na» ..NNNNNN NNNNN N »Macaw N N aNNNM-NwwN NN NN NNNN N NN NAM » a � N NN»»»wwNwNNNNN N NNNNN V A m2Rm4-A oom�mmr u Y i a $ u m` s 6 O � a 8 m mm mYY Y p �. W a A� o o U � s .( a]U POOO�OOpp0000 00000 O m�.<tlm< pp p 6 c u ul ! o = m :x �Zb•=� � _ mw wwmww m m m ! �§§ § ` §§§§ § ƒ \ \ m �| § ! • ■ ° . . . . . . . � . . |, . . . . „■;© ■ , � !� ■,�< / � � 9 §_ ._: _ �;■. ; � � . ■ .. . �: ��. � �... � , ■ .. � � . a �• | «< � ��«� < ■ , \ M \ k £} \|| ! _ | zl■| | 4 / \k| : | !| Ilk \ \ \ | \ \ | 2! | } k!|| _ ; AS7 / | $ Mi J1 a 8 la �` a e� Ya - s � °p`o u � of fv 0 G S� a o000 M$ S 9 e - a v e IL a rq m I w ^ a i E' o G c! $c i s s i $ u, 8 � W� 0 S D i V O g g ci a i TL g s 8 c n E o 3 E $ sm s V �a �s � L FLORIDA KEYS MARATHON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT _ APRIL 2016 Appendix B Hasler Plan Update [611 o-owsASsae, ea h AVIROM & ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYING & MAPPING ,,,r^eusNco,pe" May 25, 2016 Via E-Mail: Thomas.Schillingna,Jacobs.com Mr. Thomas Schilling,P.E. JACOBS 245 Riverside Avenue, Suite 300 Jacksonville, FL 32202 Re. Task Order for Marathon Airport, Marathon, Monroe County- Our Job No. 8997 Establish Controls to Support Aerial Photogrammetry in Accord with AC 150/5300-17B Scope: Task 1 -Completion of FAA forms We shall attend one meeting with Jacobs and airport staff to coordinate survey efforts and complete the forms noted below. I. Airport Operations Manager interview(requires one meeting with Operations Manager). 2. Airport Operations Manager checklist. 3. Runway Data Sheet. 4. Air Traffic Control interview(requires one meeting with Tower Chief). 5. Field survey operations. 6. Project Survey plan. 7. Airport Field Survey checklist. Task 2 -Reconnaissance 1. A review of station descriptions in the NGS database will be performed. The Primary and Secondary Airport Control Stations (PACS & SACS) will be researched and their current data sheets obtained from the National Geodetic Survey(NGS)website. 2. Mark recovery. We will use the following process for the `recovery' of a control station, with a physical visit to the station to determine its usability. We will check each control station to determine proper identity. We will check the mark type, disk type, and stamping against the NGS datasheet. We will ascertain its apparent unmoved position. 402 APPELROUTH LANE, SUITE 2E, KEY WEST, FLORIDA 33040 (3051 294.7770 WWW.AVIROM5URVEY.COM Mr.Thomas Schilling,P.E. a _ ° 12 Task Order for Marathon Airport May 25,2016 3. Selection of PACS. SACS, and NSRS ties. We will utilize Trimble R 10, GPS survey grade equipment for"station reconnaissance" (navigating to known PACS & SACS points). After the stations are recovered and observed to be in apparent un-disturbed condition, preparation of the required descriptions, sketches, photographs and other documentation will begin. The unmoved position and elevation of the recovered PAC and SACS points will be verified by our firm through the use of GPS measurements and/or EDM and Level measurements. 4. Preparation of required descriptions, sketches, photographs and other documentation by the surveyor and Jacobs: • An Airport Control plot (modeled on appendix 5 of AC 150/5300-16A) will be prepared. All stations will be labeled with the corresponding designation and description (PACS, SACS,etc...). • Photographs (JPEG format) of the recovered points will be taken and submitted (per AC 150/5300-18B section 1.6.2). • A FAA Station Location Sketch and Visibility Diagram will be prepared and submitted for each recovered point. • A FAA Survey Station Description and Recovery Form will be prepared and submitted for each recovered point. • A pencil rubbing (if required) utilizing FAA Pencil Rubbing Form will be taken at each of the recovered points. • A FAA Station Table and Reconnaissance Checklist will be prepared. • Compilation of a Project Survey Plan. Task 3 -Prepare Survey and Quality Control Plan A Survey and Quality Control Plan will be generated by the surveyor subsequent to and based on the results of Reconnaissance activities in Task 2. The Project Survey Plan will contain the following items: a. Airport Summary Report b. Station Table c. Airport Control Plot d. Photographs e. Station location sketch and visibility diagrams f. Station Descriptions g. GPS Observing Scheme h. Project Vector Diagram i. Proposed Implementation List j. Data Processing Software k. Quality Control Plan AVIROM & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr.Thomas Schilling,P.E. �' o n 13 Task Order for Marathon Airport May 25,2016 Task 4-GPS Occupation (Ground Survey) The surveyor will take horizontal and vertical measurements of safety critical items to include: I. Aerial Photo Control Points(to include fourteen (14) targeted imagery control points, five (5) targeted imagery check points and two (2) painted 4'X4' black & white "bowtic" targets as identified by the aerial mapping firm and shown on Exhibit A, below). Per AC 150/5300- 17B, a FAA Station Location and Visibility Form will he prepared and submitted. Additionally, a photograph (PEG format) of each control point will be taken and submitted. Existing features are anticipated to be used as Photo Control Points, except for the painted targets, which we will construct prior to the flight. Both photo control points and check points will be in areas that are accessible without restrictions. There are no provisions within this scope to coordinate or obtain access within restricted areas. 2. The requirement for the five (5) check points (as described in AC 150/5300-17B Section 6) which is to be submitted to NGS OPUS for processing cannot be accomplished because OPUS fails to process data within this geographical region. The failure occurs because the geometry relative to the base processing stations is too acute and also possibly because OPUS only process GPS data and does not process GLONASS data. An alternative which we have utilized successfully in the past would be to process the data through Trimble CenterPoint RTX Post-Processing which will process both the GPS data and the GLONASS data. 3. Existing Runway End points for Runway 7/25. FAA Navigational Aid Facility/Runway End Sketches will be prepared for each runway end point. 4. Collect and document runway true azimuths 5. Runway centerline profile at 10-foot stations and 10-foot offsets. 6. Collect and document runway touchdown zone elevations 7. On-airport Navigational Aids, horizontal and vertical positions (orthometric and ellipsoid heights) 7.1. Airport beacon 7.2. Air traffic control tower cab height 73. NDB 7.4. Airport Surveillance Radar 7.5. VASI (Runways 7 &25) 7.6. REII. (Runways 7 & 25) AVIROM & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr.Thomas Schilling,P.E. P a '= c 4 Task Order for Marathon Airport May 25,2016 Coordinate System/Datum: Generated Horizontal Coordinates will be FL Slate Plane Coordinates, East Zone referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 NAD83 (2011), Epoch 2010.00. Elevations will be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Task 5-Deliverables—Geodetic Control/Ground Survey 1. Final Coordinates, Elevations, and Runway Profile Data submitted in Autodesk DWG format; 2. Raw observational data including: Data Collector Files, GPS receiver files, OPUS solutions; 3. Final Processing/Adjustment/Reduction Files; 4. Scans/copies of field notes and sketches; 5. Checklists and Forms listed elsewhere within this scope; *If PACS & SACS points are found to be destroyed or damaged. new control points may need to be established utilizing the guidelines set forth in AC 150 /5300-16A. This work is not anticipated or included in this Scope. Timeframe: We can mobilize to the meeting with Jacobs and airport staff within one (1)week after receipt of an executed contract. The milestones for deliverables will be determined and developed subsequent to the above meeting, because the work will be subject to the availability of the airport's staff for the escorting of our crews. Cost I. Task 1 - Completion of FAA forms, including one meeting $ 3,300.00 lump sum 2. Task 2—Reconnaissance I. Research $ 750.00 2. Mark Recovery $ 3.500.00* 3. Verification(GPS Observations& Bench Run) $ 7,000.00* 4. Prepare Documentation $ 2,250.00 Total-Task 2 $13,500.00 lump sum 3. Task 3 - Prepare Survey and Quality Control Plan $ 2,400.00 lump sum AVIROM & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr.Thomas Schilling,P.B. P 'a cc 15 Task Order for Marathon Airport May 25,2016 4. GPS Occupation(Ground Survey) 1. Set two(2)painted aerial targets(including materials) $ 1,000.00 2. Survey Aerial Photo Control Points $ 16,800.00* 3. Survey Check Points $ 3,520.00* 4. Survey Existing Runway End Points $ 1,760.00* 5. Determine Runway True Azimuths $ 750.00 6. Runway Centerline Profile $ 9,372.00 7. Runway Touchdown Zone Elevations $ 8,520.00* 8. On-airport Navigational Aids $ 4,200.00 Total-Task 2 $ 45,922.00 lump sum 5. Task 5-Deliverables- Geodetic Control/Ground Survey $ 4,024.00 lump sum *Fees include a factor for escort and safety delays. Excessive delays due to waiting on airport escort personnel may incur additional costs, and will be billed at our current hourly rates. Client will be notified if such conditions exist. General Conditions: All work shall be completed under the direction of a Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Florida. All work shall be conducted using equipment, personnel, and procedures that will insure compliance with the accuracy standards as defined by State of Florida Standards of Practice in Chapter 51-17, FAC. All documents submitted shall bear the Surveyor's seal, signature, and a certificate that all work was done under the Surveyor's supervision and that all information contained in the document is true and is accurately shown. The Surveyor is responsible for quality assurance for the survey work performed on this project. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Should you have any questions, please contact me accordingly. Respectfully, c4u 1: LLh_ Keith M. Chee-A-Tow, P.L.S. Project Surveyor ‘Documems ProporalsiKeysJacobs MTMAerlal Controls.MTH Aerial Controls.doca AVIROM & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mr.Thomas Schilling,P.E. 1' ;1 = 16 Task Order for Marathon Airport May 25,2016 EXHIBIT A MTH Cwoo.Pc. • 'o fle • J } ,�,.i a ' �`�.i or � ,.. -, 1 1'. ,o /mo o At. ).. 110* Id • 'nor gnor8'sti' 1. t 0 AVIROM & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1.171T ( INEZGEOSPATlAL A GEOSPATIIAL SERVICE PROV��ER Scope and Fee Proposal Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys The Florida Keys Marathon Airport (MTH) 2/3/2015 2915 Waters Road Suite 100 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Tel:651-686-8424 • www.mtzgeo.com Scope and Fee Proposal The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys 2/3/2015 PROJECT SUMMARY j CLIENT Jacobs CLIENT CONTACT Heath Marsden CLIENT ADDRESS Two Executive Park Drive Suite 205 Bedford, NH 03110 PROJECT LOCATION The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Martinez Geospatial, Inc. (MTZ)will provide Jacobs with remote-sensing and photogrammetry services in support of an Airport Layout Plan update. The main objective of this effort will be to fulfill the data-collection requirements for updating a paper ALP, adhering to the following guidance: AC-150/5070-6B National Airport Layout Plan Checklist(ARP SOP No. 2.00) This proposal also includes tasks required to comply with FAA Airports-GIS program standards. All survey and photogrammetry work will be accomplished in accordance with the following Advisory Circulars: AC-150/5300-16A(16A) AC-150/5300-17C(17C) AC-150/5300-18B(18B) MTZ will fulfill the data collection, formatting, and delivery requirements of the FAA Airports-GIS program (not including required field-survey tasks). In general, MTZ's approach to fulfilling the GIS requirements will be accomplishing those required tasks as outlined in Table 2-1 (Survey Requirements Matrix)of 18B, Column "Airport Layout Plan." r PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS STATE FLORIDA COUNTY MONROE PROJECT TYPE AVIATION (AIRPORTS-GIS INCLUDED) COORDINATE SYSTEM FLORIDA STATE PLANE—EAST ZONE HORIZONTAL DATUM NAD83 VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88—GEOID12A FIELD-SURVEY PROVIDED BY JACOBS SUB-CONSULTANT MAPPING SCALE 1"=100', 2' CONTOURS MAPPING FORMATS REQUIRED STANDARD CAD w/DTM and AIRPORTS-GIS ORTHO RES& PHOTO FORMAT 0.50' and 1.0' GSD,TIF&TFW FORMAT 1 d!N!EOSP!L Scope and Fee Proposal The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys 2/3/2015 LPROJECT AREA DEFINITION The total project area for each airport site consists of two major components: AREA A Airspace Analysis Limits(Airports-GIS and Part 77) - Horizontal Limits of the applicable Obstruction Identification Surfaces(OIS) used for Airports-GIS and Part 77 analysis. AREA B Planimetric &Topographic Mapping Limit-This area defines the limit for the compilation of planimetric&topographic data, necessary for the ALP update. [ PROJECT TASKS Project Planning/Project Management/FAA Airports-GIS Coordination MTZ will assist Jacobs in developing, submitting, and gaining approval of the"Statement of Work"for the project through the ADO and FAA Airports-GIS. MTZ will also assist Jacobs in developing, submitting, and gaining approval of the "Imagery/Remote Sensing Plan" and the"Survey&Quality Control Plan" required by the FAA Airports-GIS Program. Aerial Imagery Acquisition A Jacobs sub-consultant will provide imagery acquisition services. New color aerial imagery will be captured for all areas defined in the PROJECT AREA DEFINITION section of this proposal utilizing a digital photogrammetric camera. The aerial imagery acquisition flight mission will be executed in accordance with all guidelines and specifications within FAA AC 150/5300- 17C. The aerial imagery acquisition flight mission will consist of the following specifications: RESOLUTION PURPOSE/USE 10cm Plan/Topo Mapping, Ortho Photography,Airspace Analysis/Obstruction Surveys 15cm Ortho Photography, Airspace Analysis/Obstruction Surveys Upon completion of the flight mission, the imagery will be reviewed through in-house Quality Assurance procedures for photogrammetric acceptability and compliance with AC 150/5300-17C requirements. 2 ��aw�eeosvanai _ Scope and Fee Proposal The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys 2/3/2015 Aero Triangulation A Jacobs sub-consultant will provide aero triangulation services. The digital aerial imagery will be imported onto a digital photogrammetric workstation where it will be oriented with field-surveyed ground control. This procedure will establish both horizontal and vertical control for orienting individual photogrammetric models. This orientation will be accomplished using Soft Copy Aerial Triangulation methods. Survey Imagery Photo Control A Jacobs sub-consultant will provide field-survey services. A combination of photo-identifiable control points and artificial targets will be selected or set/surveyed for use as imagery ground control. Imagery Control will be set, surveyed (properly tied to NSRS), and documented in accordance with AC-150/5300-17C and FAA Airports-GIS requirements. Ground Control data and documentation will be submitted to FAA Airports-GIS along with the AP Acquisition Report. Create Digital Ortho Imagery Digital orthophotos will be produced to meet the needs of Jacobs and the Airport as well as to comply with the requirements of the FAA Airports-GIS program and AC 150/5300-17C. Two sets of ortho imagery will be produced, covering the following defined areas and meeting the following specifications: RESOLUTION COVERAGE LIMIT 0.50' GSD AREA B 1.0' GSD AREA A Runway Surveys A Jacobs sub-consultant will provide field-survey services. A Jacobs sub-consultant will accomplish field-survey of Runway 7/25 at MTH; survey tasks will include survey of runway-end-points and centerline profile. For each runway-end-point, a monument will be set, surveyed, and documented in accordance with AC-150/5300-18B. The runway-centerline-profile will be surveyed at 10-foot stations with like profiles accomplished offset 10-feet on both sides of the centerline. Runway survey data will be utilized for the Airport Airspace Analysis/Obstruction Surveys task. Runway survey data will be properly formatted by MTZ and reported in the FAA Airports-GIS deliverable. NAVAID Surveys A Jacobs sub-consultant will provide field-survey services. A Jacobs sub-consultant will accomplish survey of NAVAIDs associated with MTH. Each NAVAID will be surveyed and documented in accordance with AC-150/5300-18B. NAVAID survey data will be properly formatted by MTZ and reported in the FAA Airports-GIS deliverable. M 41Cm:4XTINEZ GEOSV4TI4l Scope and Fee Proposal The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys 2/3/2015 Airport Airspace Analysis/Obstruction Surveys An Airport Airspace Analysis will be performed in accordance with AC 150/5300-18B. This task will be performed in order to comply with the requirements of the FAA Airports-GIS Program for projects involving Airport Layout Plan updates and Instrument Approach Procedures. The Airport Airspace Analysis will meet the following specifications: RUNWAY ANALYSIS TYPE 7/25 Runways-With-Vertical-Guidance Formatting of final reported obstacles will adhere to the specifications of AC 150/5300-18B, Chapter 5 Airport Data Features. An FAR Part 77 Obstruction Survey will be performed in support of the Airport Layout Plan Update. Using the digital stereo imagery, the prescribed Part 77 Obstruction-Identification-Surfaces will be examined and analyzed to identify natural and manmade objects penetrating the surfaces. The Part 77 Obstruction Survey will meet the following specifications: RUNWAY ANALYSIS TYPE 7 NPI-C 25 NPI-C Part 77 obstruction data will be reported and delivered in two ways: DELIVERABLE NOTES CAD FILE ' Contains Part 77 OIS and Obstruction Points(including object type, _ number, and elevation) SPREADSHEET Contains X-Y coordinates& MSL elevation of each obstruction point. (EXCEL) The following calculations will also be included for each obstruction: • Object type • Object number(corresponding to CAD File) • Height-Above-Runway-End • Height-Above-Touchdown-Zone • Height-Above-Airport-Elevation • Distance-to-Runway-End • Distance-From-Runway-Centerline(and direction) • Penetration Value Planimetric&Topographic Mapping Compilation Utilizing the aerotriangulated digital imagery, photographic stereo pairs will be oriented and compiled on digital photogrammetric workstations within AREA B. Mapping data will be compiled meeting the following specifications: PLANIMETRIC DATA SCALE 1"=100' SCALE (ASPRS CLASS II STANDARDS) TOPOGRAPHIC DATA SCALE 2' CONTOUR INTERVAL(ASPRS CLASS II STANDARDS) 4 MAFTINEZ GEOSPATIAL Scope and Fee Proposal The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys 2/3/2015 MAPPING DELIVERABLE FORMAT PLANIMETRIC FILE AUTOCAD(Other formats available upon request) CONTOUR FILE AUTOCAD(Other formats available upon request) DIGITAL-TERRAIN-MODEL FILE AUTOCAD(Other formats available upon request) The CAD products above will be delivered directly to Jacobs for the updating of ALP drawings. Mapping Edit and GIS Formatting In addition to generating mapping data in CAD formats, all collected data will be edited and formatted in the appropriate GIS format. In terms of GIS-attributes, MTZ will be responsible for populating all spatial related attributes such as geographic locations, distances, elevations, AGL heights, etc. Final GIS data will meet the following specifications: DATA TO BE FORMATTED IN GIS Planimetric, Topographic, Runway, NAVAID, Airport Airspace Analysis Data GIS DATA-MODEL UTILIZED FAA Airports-GIS (AC 150/5300-18B, Chapter 5) GIS DELIVERY FORMAT ArcGIS Shapefile Airports-GIS Data Submission and Final Reporting All data will be formatted into compliant Airports-GIS format and prepared for submission. Prior to submission, the survey-files will be tested using the FAA's survey-file-test tool in order to ensure acceptability. A'`Final Report"will be generated in accordance with Advisory Circular 150/5300-18B and submitted with the final project file. Project close-out will also consist of ensuring receipt and acceptance of the obstruction survey and digital mapping data by Jacobs, the FAA and NGS. 5 �(/ ARTINEZ GEOSRATIAL Scope and Fee Proposal The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys 2/3/2015 DELIVERABLE OVERVIEW DELIVERABLE NOTES FAA AIRPORTS-GIS STATEMENT-OF-WORK ASSIST JACOBS WITH PREP AND REVIEW FAA AIRPORTS-GIS IMAGERY PLAN ASSIST JACOBS WITH PREP AND REVIEW FAA AIRPORTS-GIS SURVEY/QUALITY CONTROL PLAN ASSIST JACOBS WITH PREP AND REVIEW AP ACQUISITION REPORT(RAW AERIAL IMAGERY, FOR SUBMITTAL TO FAA/NGS CONTROL DATA,AND A.T. REPORT) AIRPORTS-GIS AIRPORT AIRSPACE ANALYSIS DATA ArcGIS SHAPEFILE PART 77 OBSTRUCTION DATA CAD FILE AND SPREADSHEET PLANIMETRIC MAPPING DATA CAD FILE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING DATA CAD FILE AIRPORTS-GIS FORMATTING FOR ALL DATA ArcGIS SHAPEFILE DIGITAL ORTHO IMAGERY OF AREA'A'(1.0' GSD) COPIES WILL BE MADE FOR JACOBS AND FAA DIGITAL ORTHO IMAGERY OF AREA'B'(0.50' GSD) COPIES WILL BE MADE FOR JACOBS AND FAA FAA AIRPORTS-GIS FINAL REPORT FOR FINAL SUBMISSION TO FAA AIRPORTS-GIS 6 (AARTINEZ GEOSPATIAL Scope and Fee Proposal The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH) Digital Orthophotography,Topographic/Planimetric Mapping,and Obstruction Surveys 2/3/2015 FEE SCHEDULE It is understood that compensation for this project will be on a LUMP SUM basis. MTZ will invoice Jacobs monthly based on percent-complete of each category below. The following is a proposed fee schedule based on major production processes/work category: TASK FEE Management/QA/Oversight 2,758.80 Imagery Acquisition (Flight Mission) N/A Control Selection N/A Aerotriangulation Set-Up 633.60 Orthophoto Production(0.50' GSD) 3,795.00 Orthophoto Production(1.0' GSD) 4,356.00 Planimetric/Topographic Mapping 4,135.30 Airspace Analysis/Obstruction Survey(Airports-GIS, Part 77) 4,950.00 Mapping Edit. GIS Formatting/ FAA Compliance(Mapping &Obstruction Survey) 1,776.65 TOTAL $22,405.35 7 rn (AARTINEZ GEOSVRTIAE Planimetric & Topographic Mapping Limit __ 4404 Y' A ti �1 % i /;;�y'B_� LP- +•• •• •e. r4. �/' — i- L► ''► `l i f� w .filli � a - �` ' � lik 1..f•I.. f ' r ,,r ti,..r...r $.... . s .„.• Legend Planimetric&Topographic Mapping Limit MTZ I Martinez Geospatial „ 2915 Waters Road Suite 100 MAATINEZ GEOSPATIAL Eagan.Minnesota 55121 Tel 651 686 8424 Fax:651.686.8389 Sanborn704 52 41114 701a l Roo Phone' e:1865426. s a n b o rn Char Carmel Rood282 Fox. 1666]26.26]6 Suite i0t Pow.]a9 Jorn.co SuiteChar 301 NC 2a226 sonborncom February 2,2015 Mr.heath Marsden Senior Airport Planner Jacobs Two Executive Park Drive Suite 205 Bedford,NII 03110 Re:The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH),Marathon,FL Dear Mr. Marsden: The Airport Aerial Surveying to be conducted will conform to FAA Advisory Circulars 150/5300-17C and 18B. Under the guidance and specification of these FAA Advisory Circulars,Sanborn will acquire leaf on color digital imagery and perform fully analytical aerial triangulation for use by Jacobs.Jacobs will nuke use of these products to develop obstruction and planimetric features collection typical of 18B collection;DEM and orthophotography ---- --mapping and complete their airport(18B)Airspace analysis and(FAR 77) surface analysis tasks. Area of interest to be flown The aerial photography coverage area will include the following Obstruction Identification Surfaces (01S) to support the Airport Airspace Analysis of Vertically Guided Instrument Approach Surfaces of Runway 7/25 of Florida Keys Marathon Airport,located in Marathon Florida. 2.7.1.1.1. Vertically Guided Runway Primary Surface(VGRPS). 2.7.1.1.2.Vertically Guided Primary Connection Surface(VGPCS). 2.7.1.1.3.Vertically Guided Approach Surface (VGAS), 2.7.1.1.4. Vertically Guided Protection Surface (VGPS). 2.7.1.1.5.Vertically Guided Approach Transitional Surface(VGATS). 2.7.1.1.6.Vertically Guided Horizontal Surface(VMS). 2.7.1.17. Vertically Guided Conical Surface (VGCS). These areas arc pictured on figure-1 on Attachment A,enclosed with this proposal letter Scope of Work Aerial Photography Upon FAA approval of the MTH Imagery Plan submittal,Sanborn will acquire 15 cm resolution leaf-on color aerial imagery of the 41 square mile OIS project area that includes out to the Conical Surface and Vertically Guided Approach Surface of runway 7/25. Sanborn will also acquire 10 cm resolution leaf on color aerial imagery of the Primary Surfaces associated with runway 7/25 in order to develop higher accuracy and greater detailed mapping of the VGRPS. Mr.Marsden Page 2 of 3 February 2,2015 Re:The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(Mq'H),Marathon,FL Ground Control Surveying Jacobs will provide Sanborn with all of the ground control surveying data including sixteen(16)targeted imagery control points,five (5) targeted imagery check points and runway 7/25 threshold positions referenced to the FL State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone,WAD 83/2011,and NAND 88 in the US Survey Foot.A preliminary plan for the control points,indicates that most of these photo control points can be photo-identifiable features on the ground,with exception of two locations that definitely will need a target in place prior to the aerial flights. Analytical Aerial Triangulation Upon FAA approval of the Imagery Plan submittal and after all planned images are flown,processed and accepted; and upon receipt of the photo-control surveying coordinate values and ground control and checkpoints descriptions;Sanborn will complete the analytical aerial triangulation constrained to the ground control surveyed points provided by Jacobs.The aerotriangulation will be computed at same coordinate system used for the ground survey points-FL State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone,NAI) 83/2011,and NAVD 88 in the US Survey Ft. AP Acquisition Report Upon completion of the Analytical Aerial Triangulation,Sanborn will submit the AP Acquisition Report to FAA/NGS. Project Schedule Sanborn will acquire the leaf-on aerial photography in the fall 2015, from September 20 to December 24's,weather permitting,following the FAA approval of the Imagery Plan and the placement of the targeted imagery control points and targeted imagery check points.Sanbom will submit the AP Acquisition Report within 30 days of the aerial imagery acquisition completion date and/or receipt of all required ground surveying information. Project Deliverables Sanborn will deliver the MI'I l Imagery Plan and MTH AP Acquisition Report on a USB hard drive to Jacobs. Price Sanborn's price to perform the above aerial acquisition services will be$43,500.00 and separated into the following two major tasks: 1. Imagery Plan and Aerial Photography Acquisition $35,800.00 2. Fully Analytical Aerial Triangulation Processing and results $ 7,700.00 Should you have any questions,please contact me. Sin_ rely, Luiz Cortes Certified Photogrammetrist#1546/Professional Surveyor General Manager 6701 Carmel Road, suite 301,Charlotte, NC 28226 P.(704)347-4552—M.(980)213-5357 lti Sanborn Mr.Marsden Page 3 of 3 February 2,2015 Re:The Florida Keys Marathon Airport(MTH),Marathon,FL ATTACHMENT - A Marathon Obstruction Identification Surfaces-MTH OIS -r. 1 it,r- y, , .4, ' .or . t a!„,::" Dery .. t �5 '. /I h on rAt • t` us •'�'t`w1R yl J e.. .of Key ' Alf,JR1 �. ��io K..- 1 I Figure-1 Yellow outline=OIS for Digital Orthophoto Light-blue(cyan)outline=Approach and transitional surface for Mapping Red triangles=preliminary locations for survey of 16 photo-control points Green triangles=preliminary locations for survey of 5 check points