12/14-69 Rehab Runway 9-27 AMY HEAVILIN3 C
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER
'?..1.--‘\\ MONROE MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
yet:- r!A
DATE: November 2, 2016
TO: Don DeGraw,
Director of Airports
ATTN: Beth Leto,
Airport Business Manager
FROM: Cheryl Robertson Executive Aide to the Clerk of Court & Comptroller
At the October 19, 2016 Board of County Commissioner's meeting the Board granted approval and
authorized execution of Item C17 Approval of Jacobs Project Management Co.' s Task Order No.12 /14-
69, PSO #69 for the Services Authorized: Rehabilitation Runway 9 -27 for design, permitting and
bidding support services in the amount of $675,310.00 to be funded by FAA Grant # 037 - 53(90 %),
FDOT #G0E40(5 %), and Airport Operating Fund 404(5 %).
Enclosed is a duplicate originals executed on behalf of Monroe County, for your handling. Should you
have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
cc: County Attorney
Finance
File v'
500 Whitehead Street Suite 101, PO Box 1980, Key West, FL 33040 Phone: 305- 295 -3130 Fax: 305- 295 -3663
3117 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: 305 -289 -6027 Fax: 305- 289 -6025
88820 Overseas Highway, Plantation Key, FL 33070 Phone: 852 -7145 Fax: 305 - 852 -7146
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
Effecti.e Date Upon Execution Task Order No. 1 _2. 14 -69_
Client Project \o. Engineer Project No. _E9Y 16769 ,
This Task Order is entered into on the eftecti.e date noted above pursuant to the "Master
Agreement for Professional Services between Monroe Count.. Florida ("Client and 1.ACOBS
PROJECT MA \.AGEME\T CO. ("Consultant "). dated No.ember 16. 2011 ("Agreement - ) as
ammended by Amendment u l . dated October 17. 2012 ('Addendum "). the Agreement is
incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
j
Services Authorized: Rehabilitation Runty ay 9 -2 PSO 469
Client authorizes Consultant to pertorrn the Ser. ices described in Exhibit .1 attached hereto and
incorporated herein...hich Exhibit ;A is marked ..it!' the aho.e noted Task Order No. and
consists of 3 page( s).
Pricing
.A rime and Expense per Agreement and appendix F3 to the Agreement. J
X Firm Fixed Price of S 675.310.()() - pr- _3
r1
S. A Other (Describe): -,• 1 -7
ry _:�
Schedule _ .
Serx ices ma. commence on Execution _ . - _
•
Ser. ices ..ill cease by 365 da. s '' c-
Other
F3(.):ARD OF CO T ' )\1\1ISSIONERS
st e � 4 � Ni1 FIEA� "ILIN. CLERK OF MONROE
�+ Ma.or Chai an
C1 NEAVI N. CLERK
g it ,�
1, �.. 1 � . ��j � CONSULTANT:
1. '4 , . CLERK
*o..;:, i / — Z_ (4 J %COBS PROJECT ITT% \- -CEME‘T CO
Ar - - -- Fi �/ t
• CU II I
Fle vs a ti me („unn / AP R A VE O D �"�
Pate 1 of' 1 PEDROJ. r RCADO
ASSISTANT • • NTY ATT • : • m f //
Exhibit A— (12/14-69)
Scope of Services
Monroe County Airports
Key West International Airport
Rehabilitation Runway 9 -27
SCOPE OF WORK
Jacobs will provide project management, coordination services, design, permitting, and bidding
support services for the rehabilitation of Runway 9 -27 at Key West International Airport (EYW).
EXISTING CONDITIONS
EYW is a commercial service airport regularly utilized by Boeing 737 -700W aircraft. The
existing Runway was not designed to accommodate larger aircraft such as the Boeing 737 -700W.
Runway 9 -27 at EYW is 4,801 foot long, 100' wide with 10' paved shoulders and is bound by
Runway Safety Areas (RSA) that contain Engineered Material Arresting Systems (EMAS). The
Runway 9 EMAS is set back 35' from the Runway 27 threshold. The Runway 27 EMAS is set
back approx. 306' from the Runway 9 threshold.
The Runway is exhibiting distresses and requires constant monitoring and maintenance to remain
safe for aircraft operations. According to an FDOT Pavement Condition Index (PCI) evaluation
in 2015, the PClFvalue for Runway 9 -27 was 58. A PCI value of 58 falls into the fair category.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
This project is made of two improvement elements.
1. Rehabilitate Runway 9 -27 will include addressing the existing pavement's condition
utilizing milling and hot mix asphalt overlay. The project will also strengthen the
pavement to accommodate the current aircraft fleet mix.
2. Included in the rehabilitation of Runway 9 -27 will be the conversion of the existing
Runway 27 overrun pavement to usable runway pavement. This will result in the
construction of a displaced threshold and the application of declared distances to increase
the take off distance available for Runway 9 departures.
This project will reconstruct a portion of this overrun pavement to PCC pavement. This
project element will also include the installation of runway edge and end lighting. This
project will reduce the setback of the Runway 27 EMAS from 306' to 35' from the end of
Runway 9.
General Scope
One construction package will be developed for this project. For this construction package,
Jacobs will provide the following services:
1. Management of the project from data collection, bid opening and award of the
construction contract.
Page 1 of 7
2. Coordination with the geotechnical subconsultant and survey subconsultant.
3. Coordination with JAA, FAA/FDOT as required.
4. Preparation of minutes of meetings and phone conversations.
5. Program verification and site investigations.
6. Preparation of the constructions documents and incorporation of Monroe County's front -
end contract documents.
7. Preparation of the engineering report, construction cost estimate, and construction
schedule.
8. Bidding and award assistance.
Assumptions/Design Parameters
1. This project is eligible for AIP funding.
2. Acquisition of topographic survey will be performed in accordance with the accuracies as
outlined in FAA AC 150/5300 -18B.
3. Jacobs will develop plans, an outline of specifications, an engineering report, and a
construction cost estimate at the 30% design level for review.
4. Jacobs will develop plans, technical specifications, an engineering report, and a construction
cost estimate at the 60% and 90% design level for review. Jacobs will develop the CSPP and
7460 to be submitted to the Airport and FAA for review.
5. It is assumed the existing airfield lighting vault has available capacity to support the
additional runway edge lighting for the addition of the Runway 9 displaced threshold. This
scope of work does not include any work associated with the airfield lighting vault.
6. Jacobs will produce a final contract set of plans, specifications, engineering report,
construction schedule, and construction cost estimate for bidding purposes.
7. DEP and ACOE permits are not required based on the current scope of the project.
8. A pavement design report is required and will be based on the airport's current fleet mix.
9. The runway design criteria will be based on Airplane Design Group C -III along with footnote
No. 12, on Page 93 of FAA Advisory Circular, 150/5300 -13A, "12. For airplanes with
maximum certificated takeoff weight of 150,000 lbs or less, the standard runway width is 100
feet, the shoulder width is 20 feet, and the runway blast pad width is 140 feet."
10. The design will be in accordance with the most current FAA -AIP Advisory Circulars dated
12/31/2015.
11. The airport recently replaced the existing runway edge lights, sign fixtures, and associated
circuitry. Jacobs will confirm that the existing runway edge lights and guidance signs
conforms to the latest FAA Advisory Circulars and will correct any identified issues.
12. The existing paved shoulders for Runway 9 -27 are 10'. This project will widen the shoulders
to 20'. The widening and re- paving of the existing shoulders will required the existing
runway edge light bases will need to be adjusted to the new proposed grades.
13. This scope of work does not include construction administration, resident project
representative nor quality assurance testing. This scope of work also does not include the
development of a construction management plan. These services along with a construction
management plan will be provided under a separate purchase order.
14. This scope of work includes the creation of a AGIS project to upload the design of the new
displaced threshold for Runway 9. It is assumed that the as-built data will be uploaded to the
Page 2
FAA's AGIS website and will be performed as part of a future task order to provide
construction support services.
15. This scope of work assumes that the Part 77 surfaces and departure surfaces are clear and that
the addition of the displaced threshold will not result in the addition of penetrations that will
require additional survey and clearing.
ARTICLE A — DATA COLLECTION AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Data Collection:
1. Prepare for and attend project design kick off meeting.
2. Coordinate with subconsultants including but not limited to survey and geotechnical as well
as other Project Team members.
3. Perform a detailed topographic survey of Runway 9 -27 as outlined in the attached survey
scope of work by Avirom and Associates, Inc.
4. Jacobs to provide full time badged escort for the survey crew. It is assumed that the survey
will take approximately 15 - 8 hour shifts to complete.
5. Perform a geotechnical investigation to assess the existing condition of the Runway 9 -27
pavement section along with assisting in determining methods to rehabilitate the runway
pavement (hot mix asphalt). Geotechnical investigation will also be used to perform both
pavement designs to strengthen the Runway 9 -27 hot mix asphalt pavement along with
constructing a new PCC pavement section for the new Runway 9 displaced threshold
pavement. The geotechnical investigation will be performed as outlined in the attached scope
of work by Tierra.
6. Review prior runway pavement testing and the geotechnical report as it's produced.
7. Perform a pavement inspection. Conduct a visual inspection of the existing runway
pavement to identify and quantify major pavement distresses requiring repair. All distresses
will be mapped with a GPS handheld data collector. A distress plan will be developed to
indicate repair locations and quantities during design.
8. Jacobs to provide full time badged escort for the pavement inspection crew. It is assumed
that the pavement inspection work will take approximately 3 - 8 hour shifts to complete.
9. Nondestructive tests (NDT) previously performed as part of FDOT's pavement management
survey report will be evaluated for potential areas where geotechnical testing would be
required. The previously reduced NDT data will provide in -situ pavement and subgrade
strength that can be tied to potential runway distresses.
10. Jacobs to provide full time badged escort for the geotechnical field crew. It is assumed that
the geotechnical field work will take approximately 5 - 8 hour shifts to complete.
11. Research record drawings for underground utilities. (i.e. sewer, water, electric, gas,
communication, etc.).
Page 3
12. Perform an inventory and inspections of the existing runway edge light bases. The inspection
will verify conditions of the cans, bolt circles and capability to accept a "riser" to adjust the
runway edge lights to the proposed grades.
13. Perform site walk through survey to locate and note any special site conditions that would
affect construction techniques or materials. Take photographs of the site and provide written
documentation, sketches, notes, or reports to confirm and record the general conditions of the
existing site. Field verify that all existing features in the field were picked up during the
topographic survey.
Preliminary Design:
14. Runway Safety Area Analysis. Several Runway Safety Area (RSA) alternatives were
evaluated as part of the "Environmental Assessment for Proposed Runway Safety Area
Improvements" that was completed in 2007. The preferred alternative recommended the
construction of a non - standard RSA width of 400 feet for the length of the runway; except for
approximately 2,000 feet at the center of the runway where the north boundary of the RSA
would be 150 feet north of west end of the runway. The FAA approved the proposed
improvements in August 2007 and issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI),
concluding that preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would not be
required. The construction of the EMAS and the RSA improvements based the runway
centerline. The RSA would extend approximately 375 feet beyond the east end of the runway
with installation of a minimum - length Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS). A
non - standard RSA, 600 feet long, would be constructed at the on the recommendations from
the EA were completed in 2012.
The following summarizes the tasks necessary to determine the practicability of further
improving the existing RSA, especially on the south side of the runway, to meet the airport
design criteria associated with Airport Reference Code (ARC) C -III. The documentation to
be prepared as part of this analysis would be used by the FAA to issue a RSA determination
for the Airport. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that a maximum of three (three)
additional RSA alternatives will be examined. This effort will include:
• Data Collection and Review of Prior RSA/EA Studies
• Documentation of Existing Runway 9 -27 RSA Conditions
• Development of RSA Improvements Alternatives for Runway 9 -27
• Rough Order of Magnitude Cost Estimates
• Qualitative Environmental Review (Limited to Water Resources, Wetlands, Biological,
Natural Resources, and Hazardous Materials)
• Evaluation of Runway 9 -27 RSA Alternatives and Selection of the Preferred Alternative
The preparation of this analysis will consider the most recent FAA criteria, guidelines and
documentation regarding improvements to RSAs, consistent with FAA Order 5200.8, Runway
Safety Area Program, and 5200.9, Financial Feasibility and Equivalency of Runway Safety Area
Improvements and Engineered Materials Arresting Systems in order to identify the preferred
feasible and practicable alternative for the Runway 9 -27 RSA.
Page 4
Deliverables
• Draft technical memorandum in PDF format will be prepared and submitted to the
Monroe County Department of Airports (three copies) and the FAA (two copies) and one
electronic copy for review and comment.
• The final version of the technical memorandum will address any comments received from
the draft technical memorandum. Six hardcopies and electronic files in PDF format will
be distributed to the Monroe County Department of Airports (three copies) and the FAA
(two copies) and one electronic copy.
DOCUMENTATION OF EXISTING RUNWAY 9 -27 RSA CONDITIONS
The effort will include a data collection and review of the studies that were previously conducted
for the Runway 9 -27 runway safety area. In coordination with the Monroe County and the FAA,
this task includes collecting the necessary information to document the previous RSA findings for
Runway 9 -27. The aerial topographic mapping survey that was completed in early 2016 as part
of the Master Plan Update for the Airport will be used to assist with the documentation of the
existing RSA condition for Runway 9 -27 and subsequent analyses.
Consensus on the dimensional requirements of the required safety area for Runway 9 -27 will be
established with the FAA during the documentation of the existing RSA conditions process,
based on the design aircraft expected to use the runway (based on the projection of aviation
activity to be developed as part of the Master Plan Update), runway categorization, utilization,
and aircraft activity on the runway.
RSA deficiencies, as identified during the data collection process, will be presented on the
exhibits developed for this RSA analysis. The existing RSA will be reviewed, constraining
factors identified, and substandard dimensions defined. This subtask will include the
identification of deficiencies necessary to support the development of RSA improvement
alternatives. As part of this effort, the grading associated with the RSA and Taxiway A safety
area will be reviewed.
The "Documentation of Existing Runway 9 -27 RSA Conditions and Previously Proposed
Improvements
DEVELOPMENT OF RSA ENHANCEMENT ALTERNATIVES
Activities to be completed as part of this subtask include the following:
• Evaluate the alternatives that were developed as part of the 2007 EA to identify RSA
enhancement alternatives that should be considered for further review.
• Prepare up to three (3) RSA refined enhancement alternatives in AutoCAD format using
the topographic mapping from the Master Plan Update. Runway protection zones,
runway object free area, runway obstacle free zone, NAVAID critical areas, impacted
NAVAIDs, and impacted runway and taxiway lighting systems, as well as the approach
lighting system, would be depicted on the RSA enhancement alternatives.
Page 5
• Assess RSA design feasibility:
- Evaluate and quantify RSA grading requirements
- Conduct a preliminary qualitative environmental review of each alternative based
upon information contained within existing studies and documentation. This
analysis will be limited to a review of water resources, wetlands, biological,
natural resources, coastal resources, and hazardous materials (the review of
climate, historical, architectural, archeological, cultural resources, noise, noise-
compatible land use, socioeconomics, environmental justice, environmental
health, and safety risks is excluded from this scope of services). The
environmental review will identify areas of potential environmental concern with
respect to proposed runway modifications. This will include determining whether
wetlands and/or bodies of water are present in the area of proposed construction,
which permits (if any) will likely to be required for the proposed implementation
of the RSA enhancement alternatives, and whether the likelihood exists for
hazardous materials to be located in or around the areas of potential construction.
No site visit will be neither made, nor independent agency coordination
undertaken as part of this task.
- Prepare preliminary design drawings at a schematic design level of detail to
ensure feasibility of the project. The RSA schematic drawings (no more than
three) will be used as the basis to develop cost estimates.
- Develop rough order of magnitude cost estimates for each alternative.
Representative items that will be addressed include: additional electric duct
banks for existing airfield lighting/NAVAIDS, alterations to any closed drainage
systems, alterations to the approach lighting system, changing to in- pavement
lighting, profile changes to address grade deficiencies, relocation of fences,
access roads, navigational aids, etc. due to regarding or reconfiguration of the
existing RSA, access to the EMAS beds, conceptual environmental mitigation
associated with wetlands, floodplains, etc., allowances to cover estimated costs of
permitting processes required for implementation of each alternative, design,
geotechnical, administrative and other costs associated with implementation
• Conduct airspace and obstruction analyses in plan and profile view for 14 CFR Part 77
surfaces and United States Standards for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS)
surfaces
EVALUATION OF RUNWAY 9 -27 RSA ALTERNATIVES AND SELECTION OF A PREFERRED
ALTERNATIVE
This subtask includes the following activities:
• A comparative evaluation of the proposed RSA improvement alternatives and ultimate
selection of a "Preferred Alternative ". Evaluation of the runway safety area enhancement
alternatives for Runway 9 -27 will consider the following factors:
Page 6
- Aircraft operational impacts
- Construction phasing/implementation complexity
- Implementation schedule
- Environmental considerations
- Effects on other facilities - airfield, landside, off - airport, etc.
- Land acquisition requirements
- Financial feasibility
• The Planning Team will incorporate the cost estimates and qualitative environmental
review for each alternative in identifying a "Preferred RSA Alternative" for Runway 9-
27. The preliminary recommendations for the preferred RSA enhancement alternative
will be reviewed with the Monroe County and FAA staff. Following this review, a
preferred alternative for RSA enhancement for Runway 9 -27 will be recommended.
PREPARATION OF TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
A technical memorandum documenting the study process and the Planning Team
recommendations will be submitted in draft form to the Monroe County and FAA staff and others
as directed, consistent with the identification of the preferred alternative. Six (6) copies of the
draft technical memorandum will be prepared for FAA/Monroe County review. Six hardcopies
and electronic files in PDF format of the final technical memorandum will be distributed to the
Monroe County Department of Airports (three copies) and the FAA (two copies) and one
electronic copy.
Page 7
15. Request for Modification of Standards. As documented on the Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
for the Airport, the separation distance between Runway 9 -27 and Taxiway A is 315 feet.
Aircraft Design Group (ADG) III requirements specify a runway -to- taxiway centerline
separation distance of 400 feet. In addition, the Runway Object Free Area (OFA) is 500 feet
wide. FAA design criteria for ADG III require an OFA width of 800 feet. As part of this
effort, the Planning Team will prepare the documentation required to request a modification
to the runway -to- taxiway and ROFA width design standards to allow simultaneous operations
of ADG III on Runway 9 -27 and Taxiway A. The runway -to- taxiway centerline separation
distance and ROFA width will be individually evaluated relative to existing configuration and
conformity. However, the organization of the documentation to be prepared for these two
requests of Modification of Standards (MOS) will adhere, to the extent feasible, to the outline
for analyzing potential adaptations to standards as presented in guidance from FAA. As a
result, the following subtasks will be completed for each MOS request:
- Document existing conditions: The aerial topographic mapping survey that was
completed in early 2016 as part of the Master Plan Update for the Airport will be used to
assist with the documentation of the existing conditions. This assessment will also
discuss whether the particular airfield component conforms to criteria associated with
ADG III and define the extent to which the facility does not comply.
- Document actions to conform to ADG III Criteria: The Planning Team will identify and
quantify the extent of improvement that is necessary to conform to the requirements of
ADG III design criteria. As part of this effort, the quantities of materials involved in full
conformity, the project (construction plus soft) cost of these actions, environmental
impacts, and potential operational restrictions or closures of adjacent airfield facilities
required to comply with the ADG III design standards will be documented. The definition
of environmental impacts will be qualitative and based upon information contained
within existing studies and documentation. No site visit will be undertaken as part of this
task.
- Define and Evaluate alternatives and/or potential MOS: Alternatives for full conformity
with ADG III criteria at EYW are limited by the available expansion area for enhancing
the lateral separation between the Runway 9 -27 and Taxiway A. Since one option at
constrained airports for meeting criteria is the application of MOS, consideration of
whether full conformity with ADG III criteria is truly warranted (given the physical
characteristics and frequency of operations of ADG III at the Airport) will be analyzed.
If full conformity cannot be attained and/or if the safety of operations can be maintained
while maintaining the existing separation distance between Runway 9 -27 and Taxiway A,
an analysis will be conducted and recommended MOS defined along with the rationale
for the recommendation. This analysis will include a review runway usage data by type
of aircraft, the evaluation of current operation of the airfield, and a review of the
percentage of time an ADG III aircraft would be on Runway 9 -27 at the same time a
similar aircraft would be on Taxiway A.
- Prepare MOS forms and supporting documentation: The Planning Team will fill out the
FAA MOS forms to request modifications to the runway -to- taxiway and ROFA width
design standards and document existing conditions, actions necessary to conform to ADG
III criteria, alternatives for full conformity with ADG III criteria (and why these
alternatives may not be viable), and the proposed MOS. Supporting documentation,
including graphics and detailed analyses, will be prepared and attached to the MOS
Page 8
forms. A total of four (4) copies and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF)
format of the draft MOS forms and supporting documentation will be provided to the
FAA and Monroe County for review. Once comments have been addressed, four (4)
copies and an electronic file version of the final MOS forms and supporting
documentation will be provided to the FAA and Monroe County.
As part of this task, it is anticipated that the design team will participate in up to four (4) web
conference sessions with the Airport using GoToMeeting or similar software. These web
conference sessions will provide an opportunity to review the proposed MOS and supporting
analyses. In addition to the web conference sessions, one meeting at the Airport is anticipated
with EYW staff and management. This meeting will provide an opportunity to review the
proposed MOS prior to distributing copies to the FAA for review and comment. Similarly,
one meeting at the FAA Orlando ADO in Orlando is anticipated. These meetings will
provide an opportunity to present the requested MOS to the ADO staff.
Services for Article A will be provided under a lump sum basis.
ARTICLE B — DESIGN
Based on the information collected under Article A, the 30 %, 60 %, 90 %, and final contract
documents for the construction package will be developed for all elements identified in this scope
of work.
1. Develop technical specifications utilizing FAA's standard specifications for construction.
(i.e. FAA Specifications: P-101, P -152, T -904, T -901, T -905, P-620, ,etc.). Submit an
outline of technical specifications at 30 %. Submit complete technical specifications at
60 %, 90% and Final.
2. Coordinate and incorporate Monroe County provided contract document/front -end
specifications into the final contract bid documents. (i.e. Notice to Bidders, Invitation to
Bidders, Instruction to Bidders, Bid Proposal, Contract, Contract Articles, General
Specifications).
3. Develop a construction schedule for use in determining phasing and duration.
4. Prepare for and attend three (3) design review meetings (30 %, 60 %, and 90 %) with the
Airport to discuss project progress and review the design submittals.
5. Prepare for and attend three (3) meetings at the Airport to discuss construction phasing
with Airport staff, ATCT and Tenants.
6. Pavement Evaluation and Design. FAA mechanistic design method will be used to
design the Runway 9 -27 rehabilitation and new extension pavement thickness
requirements. The FAA's FAARFIELD program is proposed as the primary mechanistic
design methods as described in FAA Advisory 150 - 5320 -6E. A sensitivity analysis will
also be performed to identify changes in pavement thickness with variations in aircraft
weight and subgrade strength.
Page 9
The functional condition and distress repairs as a result of the pavement inspection will
also be included with the analysis to complete the runway pavement evaluation and
design.
Upon the completion of the pavement design, Jacobs will evaluate the construction
requirements for the rehabilitation options as a function of reliability; constructability;
time for construction; operational need and disruptions; and other factors identified by the
client and design team.
7. Prepare pavement design report. All analytical methods, results, and recommendations
will be summarized in a detailed written draft and final report. The report will be
integrated with the design elements to identify the primary rehabilitation design
requirement for the runway.
8. Develop detailed construction quantities and cost estimate at the 30 %, 60 %, 90 %, and at
final contract document design levels.
9. Develop the following anticipated plans:
Title Sheet (1)
Index of Drawings and Notes (1)
Summary of Quantities (1)
General Plan (1)
Survey Control Plan (1)
Haul Route and Part 77 Surfaces (2)
Existing Conditions Plan (7)
GeotechBorings Plan (4)
General Phasing Plan (2)
Detailed Phasing/Safety Plan (4)
Safety Notes/Details (2)
Demolition Plan (2)
Geometry Plan (7)
Typical Sections (2)
Profiles (4)
Grading Plans (7)
PCC Joint Plan (1)
PCC Joint Details (2)
Cross Sections (20)
Pavement Marking Plan (7)
Pavement Marking Details (2)
Erosion Control Plan (7)
Erosion Control Details (2)
Electrical Plan/Circuitry (2)
Electrical Details (2)
Grooving Plan and Details (1)
Runway Edge Light Adjustment Plans/Schedule /Details (7)
Miscellaneous Details (2)
Total: 103 Sheets
Page 10
10. Evaluate potential bid alternates and alternatives for the construction based on available
funding sources.
11. The construction of the new Runway 9 displaced threshold will reduce the EMAS
setback from 306' to 35'. Jacobs will coordinate with ESCO, manufacturer of the
EMAS, to insure this setback is acceptable and review potential jetblast impacts.
12. With the widening of the existing runway shoulders from 10' to 20', Jacobs will perform
drainage design and the necessary South Florida Water Management District Permitting.
13. Develop Engineer's report.
14. Coordinate, distribute and print the following copies of the preliminary construction
documents for the construction package (plans, specifications, design report, and
construction cost estimate) for review by the Airport, FAA, and FDOT:
Preliminary Submission (30 %, 60 %, 90 %, Final Contract Documents for each construction
package)
FAA: 1 half size copies of plans, 1 hard copy of the specifications, engineer's
report and estimate, and a CD containing the drawings, specifications,
engineering report, and engineer's estimate for the 90% submission.
FDOT: 2 half size copies of plans; and a CD containing the drawings,
specifications, engineering report, and engineer's estimate for the 90%
submission only.
JAA: 2 copies of plans (1 full size; 1 half size); 2 copies of specifications; 2 copies of
engineering report; and 2 copies of engineer's estimate for each submission
15. Conduct an in -house QA/QC prior to each submission. The in -house QA/QC check will
involve an experienced independent individual, depending on each discipline, to conduct
a comprehensive check on all documents to be submitted (e.g. plans, specifications,
estimates, reports). Time will be required for engineers and CADD technicians /designers
to correct items listed under the in -house QA/QC checks.
16. Address comments from 30 %, 60 %, and 90% design submissions.
17. Prepare for and participate in a SRM for the project.
18. Prepare for and submit Modifications of Standard for the use of limerock.
19. Prepare and submit electronically FAA form 7460 -1 Notice of Proposed Construction or
Alteration.
20. Prepare and submit a Construction Safety Phasing Plan (CSPP) with the 30% design.
21. Create an AGIS project and upload the design for the construction of new Runway 9
displaced threshold.
Page 11
Services for Article B will be provided under a lump sum basis.
Article C — Bid Phase Services
Upon completion of the construction documents and at the request of the Airport, Jacobs will
prepare the project documents for bidding. Jacobs will perform bidding support services, the
following terms will apply:
A. The County appoints Jacobs as its Agent, and Jacobs accepts such
appointment to perform bid/procurement services on the County's behalf
in connection with the project.
B. Such services shall be performed under the County's direction and in
accordance to such forms, terms and conditions, or modifications or
revisions to same as the County may in its sole discretion at any time
instruct Jacobs to use. All services shall be carried out in accordance
with the procedures mutually agreed upon by the County and Jacobs.
C. Jacobs shall not have authority to accept or bind the County in any way
to changes, modifications, revisions, alterations, amendments, or
supplemental, additional, or different terms and conditions (hereinafter
referred to as "deviations ") which may be submitted or requested by a
vendor or contractor. Jacobs shall immediately submit any deviations
from the County's standard terms and conditions to the County for
review by the County's Purchasing Manager or their representative and
such deviations shall not be accepted by Jacobs unless Jacobs receives
express written approval thereof from the County's Project and/or
Purchasing Manager or their representative.
D. All documents issued by Jacobs hereunder shall be signed by Jacobs for
the County if so directed. The ownership and title of all items purchased
hereunder shall pass directly from the selling party to the County, and
Jacobs shall at no time be a party to such transaction other than as agent
of the County. The County shall have the unilateral right to have the
commitment authority of Jacobs, its employee or this limited agency
authorization in its entirety revoked and cancelled at any time, with or
without cause. The County shall be obligated directly to the selling party
for all payments for materials, equipment, supplies and services procured
hereunder.
E. The County shall hold Jacobs and its employees harmless from any
claims, suits or liabilities arising out of any breach or other failure of
performance by any contractor, vendor or supplier under any contract or
purchase order issued by Jacobs hereunder.
The following task will be performed as part of the bid phase services:
• Coordinate with the County Purchasing Department and the Airport to advertise for bids.
• Coordinate with the County to provide electronic copies of the bid documents to
prospective bidders
Page 12
• Prepare for and attend a project pre -bid conference
• Prepare responses to address requests for information from prospective bidders
• Prepare and coordinate the issuing one (1) addendum with the County purchasing
department.
• Revise bid documents as necessary for the addendum
• Review bids for responsiveness
• Prepare a bid tabulation
• Make a recommendation for award based on review of the bid information submitted.
Services for Article C will be provided under a lump sum basis.
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
The tentative project schedule from the Notice to Proceed date will be as follows:
Article A - 30% Design 60 days
Article B — 60% Design 60 days
Article C — 90% Design 45 days
Article D — Final Design 30 days
Article E — Bid Phase Services To be coordinated with County Purchasing Department
Page 13
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Key West International Airport
Project:
Rehabilitate Runway 9-27 (12/14 -69)
FEE SUMMARY
BASIC SERVICES
Hours Fee DBE AMOUNT
Article A: Data Collection and Preliminary Design 548 $ 64,299 $ 16,758.00
Article B: 30% Design 670 $ 77,070 $ -
Article B: 60% Design 1,496 $ 183,065 $ 19,478.00
Article B: 90% Design 1,130 $ 130,285 $ 7,157.00
Article B: Final Design 296 $ 30,730 $ -
Article C: Bid Phase 148 $ 19,785 $ -
Total Basic Services Lump Sum Fee 4,288 $ 505,234 $ 43,393
SPECIAL SERVICES Hours Fee DBE AMOUNT
Article A: Data Collection
Avirom and Associates - Survey (Lump Sum) $ 57,876 $ -
Tierra - Geotechnical (Lump Sum) $ 14,540 $ 14,540
RSA Analysis and MOS 288 $ 97,660 $ -
Total Special Services Lump Sum Fee 288 $ 170,076 $ 14,540
(TOTAL LUMP SUM PROJECT FEE 4,576 $ 675,310 $ 57,933
DBE Percentage 8.58%
a
•
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR ANC)FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Key Woat International Airport
Project:
Rehabilitate Runway 9-27(12114.69)
.\nick:\:testa Collection and PrII ec,sn Donn
Prof. Sr.Proj. Sr. Proj.et Se.CARD
WORK ITEM Died* Ma.mRe, ExyMeer Engleeer Engisere DedPeer Ted Orchid TOTAL
1Mt.Collection
1 Prepare for and atkad one IN pylon design kidroRmoeriag 8 8
2 Coordinate with SubmmulwOs 8 8
3. Perform'topographic Dusty µera co be Pefwwdb0.4N.e64•ed.ta44.644 Soo Bel.
4 Preside Badgod Esccn lit Smxay.Ase mlod 15 Shifts of fraud 120 120
week
5 Per6mn licochdral Inweli94Wn Bent 1 dby 7rrra See Behr
6 Roil Pnor Rummy Pammern'Imting,1)0loch Report Mirk re*Perforsd by FDIC See Bel.
7 Pasartenl Inspctton Rent cobe Pefreedby RAIL See Be/wr
8 Pnvs&Bodged Escort for Pasmtem bepuctiort Assumed 3 Shifts 24 24
of Field Week
9 Rork.NOT Test Results Rent es be Pale...RAIL See Rd.
10 Provide Bulged Pion fc Gmh:Usual In aigatioo.Assumed 5 411 40
Mulls of Field Work
11 *month Record 36dAy Ikawin mi 4 4
12 htsmto.y and Impaction Runway Edge Light Bases.Assumed 3 24 24
shifts of Field Work
13 IVlhrNI Site Walk-Survey Confirmation 8 8
Pre9e{nry D.e18e
Rummy Safety Aree A..yde
• 14 Drcmentatim ofbx1iog RSA Cmmlima µedaek Preformed by R/pMN See Bdew
IS Ilsvelopta.t of RSA Aliorum.- 8 24 24 56
16 EaluDe Ades.Imo Previous EA to Uentify AIN for Ned co be Pee dby Rk.444 See Bel.
ComMranon
b.Prepare Mine RSA Refined Ahmoalism Wert co be Pe./wrl by Rkwdw See&bry
e.Assess RSA li.ign Feasibility 8 IS 24
el.Eglwte and Quantify RSA Grading Raluimrnts 8 16 24
e2.Prelim.Ewirmmo al Rocimt µjet N be Perlman!by Bk..See Belem
e3.Prepare Pedlnmury IIo.I40Sebo atic Mamma 16 40 40 96
•
M.Ikselop Rnu811 Order ofMagnitude Cot/Fstienatat 8 32 40 80
6.Conduct Aimee,and Obst.Nayvu µerg..k&heed by R.664 See Bdwe
16 Evaluate RSA ABumlises Sciat Preferrol Wort w be Perfe.wdbyPleawlw See Bdor
•
17 Preeretimoffch.Menu µopt to be Performed Mc..See Belot.
It Request for Modification of Standards(RW-T7W Sepaetno and ROM) nabg µk Perfenn 14R.N.
6,R See Bel.
•Attend 4*chum MoaelB0 4 4
19 Coordinate with the FAA and Montt Coady for RSA Analysis 4 4
and MOS
20 Prepare for and Aecod Pro App Molina 5FWMD 4 8 12
21 Axiom QA,QC andlbamun Review 12 12
TOLU.110I.BS 12 12 0 240 140 80 64 0 548
RATE S 2?0.00 S 195.00 S 140.00 S 123.00 S 90.00 S 8500 S 9000 S S8.00 --
PAYROLL ESTIMATE S 4640 S 2,340 5 - S 29,520 S 12.600 S 6,800 S 5,760 S - S 59.660
SabeomeRaela TO'1'AI.PAYROLL S 59.660
Asirdu and Associates S 57.876
Remo&and Associates S 70.244 Subcaawlarm 5 159.418
ROM S 16,758 Espanol S 15.1197
It.,.South S 14,5/0 Lump Sum Ere Total S 214.375
S 159.418
'POT:U.FEE S 234375I
lads lame
1 Airfare 1S600 RT1 x 2 People S 1.200
I axgig9Mod*diem S30414ight r 2 Pospk x l 66 3U S 608
4 Airfare(5600R1)n 1 Persons 2 RI S 1,200
lodgi5B:Food Peedtern S304Night x IS bights S 4.560
8 Ainic(5600'RT)a 1 Person S 600
lodging:Fo d Portion S304Nght x 3 Nights S 912
10 Ainare(5600,RT)x 1 Pass. S 600
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Key Want Intamatlonal Airport
Proj.ct:
Rahabilltate Runway 9-27(12114-99)
Article B:30%Design
pv &&raj Sr. 30 *M 5r.C1DD
WORK ITEM Dbelrr 16aacer Emboli Salon°' ,iadaear• Dtieiper tack 'OMIa1 : TOTAL
I Develop Outline of Technical Specification: 2 2
2 Coordinate and Incorporate Manure County Contract Documents Nor bee akd br 30%Submission 0
into Project Manual(90%and Final)
3 Develop Construction Sch Jule 2 8 10
4 Prepare for and Ancd Design Review Marling(30%) 12 (2 24
5 Pr pas for and Anted Phasing Meting(30) 8 8 16
6 Pavement Evaluation and Design Not Included in 30%Submission
7 Pavememsat Design Report .Net Included in 30%Submission
8 Dovdop nomination enmities and cost intimate for 30% 4 8 24 36
documents
9 Prepare the following plan
a.Tide Shad(I) 8 9
b.Itdco of Drawings and Notes(1) 8 8 16
c Nola and Summary ofQuantitin 11) Not&Nadel IN 30%Submission 0
d Gensal Plan(I) 4 4 8
e.Survey Control Plan(1) Not Included in 30%Submission 0
L Haul Route and Pan 77 Surfaces(2) 4 4 8
g.Existing Conditions Plan(7) 8 32 40
b.Gan:di/Bonnp Plan(4) Not minded in 30%Submission 0
I.General Phasing Plan(2) 4 8 12 24
J.Detailed Phasing/Saki),Plan(4) Not Included In 30%Submission 0
k Safety Notes/Details(2) :Not Included In 30%Submission 9
I.Demolition Plan(2) 16 8 24
m Gmmdry Plan(7) 8 16 24 48
e.Typical Sections(2) .Not IncWkd in 30%Submission 0
a Pmlila(4) 4 8 24 16 52
p.Grading Plan(7) 4 8 24 28 61
r.PCC Joint Flan(I) 4 12 6 24
s.PCC Joint Details(2) Not Included in 30%Submission 0
t.Cross Sections(20) Not larbided/n 30%Submission 0
u.Pavrnnal Making Plan(7) 8 16 28 52
v.Pavansw Marking Wads(2) 4 16 8 28
w.Erosion Comml Plan(7) Not Included in 30%Submission
S.Erosion Control Details(2) .Not lnrladedIn 30%Submission
y.Electrical PlaniCuctitry(2) 8 16 12 3
z Elint ical Details(2) .Noe Included in 30%Submission
an.Grooving Plan and Details(I) Not Included in 30%Submisson
bb.RW Light Adjustment PlanlDdails/Schaluks(7) Not Included in 30%Submission -
no.Miscdlanentu Ddails(2) Not&eluded in 30%Submission 0
Article B:30%Design ,.
Prof. Sr.Proj. Sr. Project Sr.(ADD
WORK ITEM Director Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Designer Tech Clerical TOTAL I.
10 Eva1.Bid Altataa %i n Included in 0%Submission I)
11 Cooed.With ESCO for change in EMAS Setback ` 0
12 Drainage Design ad SFW MD Permitting 4 16 8 28
13 Enginoas Report 2 4 16 22
14 Distribute Plans for Row 4 2 6
15 QA/QC
16 16
16 Address(30%)Rcviem Cotmnals 8 8 16 8 8 48
17 Prepare foe and Participate in SRM .Nor Incher ed In 30%Submission 0
18 Prepare and Submit MOS for the use of Local Lintaock Nei fudadrd fit 30%Submkctbc 0
19 Prepare and Submit FAA Form 7460 Not Included In 30%Submission 0
20 Prgtac ad Submit CSPP 2 16 1 22
21 Create and Upload AGIS project Not!minded In 30%Submission 0
TOTAL HOURS 16 54 52 76 158 100 212 2 670
RATE S 220.00 S 195.00 S 140.00 S 123.1% S 90.00 S 85.00 S 90.00 S 58.00
_
PAYROLL ESTIMATE S 3,520 S 10,530 S 7,280 S 9,348 S 14,220 S 8,500 S 19,080 S 116 S 72,594
Sabcomuttants TOTAL PAYROLL S 72,594
S Subansullaots S
Expenses S 4,476
Lung Sum Fee Total S 77,070
Task Eanenena,
4 Airfare($600/RT)x 2 People S 1,200
Lodging/Feed Pathan S304/Nhghl x 2 People x 1 Nigh S 608 TOTAL FEE S 77,070
5 Airfare(5600/R7)x 2 People S 1,200
Lodging/Food Pathan S304/N.gh x 2 People x 1 Nigh S 608
Parking/Misc./Printing S 860
Taal Espana S 4,176
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County ,
Airport:
Key Weet International Airport
ProWet.
Rehabilitate Rummy 0.27(12/1400)
.%rticle B:60%Deign
PM. Sr.Pre). Sr. Mled Sr.CADD
WORK ITEM Director Merger Register Engineer Engear Deipar Tad Clerks' TOTAL
1 Ikdop falmal SpaL16:46 ns 4 41) 4 48
2 Coordinate and 4loorporalc Monroe Carly Contract .yaheeded G 60%Sadmimon 9
Documents into Project Manual(90%and Foul)
3 Devekip Construction Schedule 4 8 24 36
4 Prepare for and Attrnl resign Raiew Mooing(60%) 12 12 24
5 Prepare for and Mad Phasing Mating(60%) 8 8 16
6 Pavement Evaluation and Design Work as be Perform.,by RDM Sot Below
7 Pa.rammnau Design Report Wont M be Performed by RDM See Btlo.
0 Demlop eweetnacliall ananfia and rot estimate lb.60% 8 8 41) 56
documents
9 Prepare the following plan.
..title Sheel(I) _ 2
b.Ides of Drawings and Notes(1) A 4 12
e.Naa and Slmmary of Quunities(I) 4 8 4 16
d.General Plan(I) 4 4
e.Survey Control Plan(l) 4 12 16
L lad Route and Pan 77Sarwes(2) 4 A 4 16
E Basting Conditions Plan(7) 14 14
b.(lcotehBainp Plan(4) 4 24 20
L General Phasing Plan(2) 8 16 8 32
j.Wailed Phasing.Safety Plan(4) 4 4 24 24 56
k.Safety NaesDcails(2) 2 4 16 16 30
• I.DaaBition Plan(2) 8 8 16
m.(iier=mry Flan(7) 4 12 16 16 48
a.Typical Sections(2) _ 16 24 42
co.Profiles(4) _ 16 16 34
p Grading Plans(7) 16 40 28 84
r.P('C loin Plan(1) 4 16 16 36
s.PC('loin Ihails(2) 4 16 16 36
t.(Toss Scctiaa(32) 4 40 80 124
a.Parana=Making Plan(7) 16 24 40
v.Pavement Making Derails(') 8 16 24
re.Erosion Control Phn(7) 4 8 16 34 52
s.Erosion Control Details CO 8 16 24
y.Electrical Plancircuiuy(2) 24 24 a8
s.Electrical Details(2) 24 32 56
a..(irom•ing Plan and Ddaih l l) 4 16 20
bb.RW light Adjustment Plan Ikuds,Schodules(7) 8 8 40 40 96
to.Miscellaneous Details(2) 4 8 8 16 16 52
10 rival.Bid Mantes 4 4
II ('oord.With'NCO for change in EMAS Setback 4 4
12 Drainage Design and SEWMD Panelling 4 16 40 16 76
13 Engineers Report 4 24 4 n
IMMMENE...-
.article N.MOO Ilr.i l ._. = -.�
!! Pro.. Sr.Proj. Sr. Projart Sr.C.N)D
WORK ITE51 Director 'Manager Enigmas Engineer Engineer Designer Tech CkrkN TOTAL
l9 1)s,r1Uc PI.:,I..li,:c.. _ 2
IS QA.QC 16 0 24
16 Address(60.)Review Ca nments 4 24 8 36
17 Prepare foram Participate in SRN 12 12 4 28
18 Prepare and Submit MISS for the the aloes)Uncork 4 8 12
19 Prepare and Submit FAA Form 7460 4 4 8
20 Prepare and Submit CSPP No.lrIoJo in 30%&boobs!. 0
21 Create and Upload A(i1Spro)at 16 8 24
TOFAI.IIOL7tS 16 130 132 104 380 192 532 10 14%
RATE S 2220.00 S 19500 S 140.00 5 123.00 S 90.00 S 85.00 S 90.00 S 58.00 ---
_ PAYROLL ESTIMATE S 3.520 S 233 150 S 18.480 S 12.792 S 34.3/0 S 16,3 S 47.880 S 580 S 159.122
%k en%bents TOTAL PAYROLL S 159.122
RDM S 19.478
S 19.478 Subcorwdurs S 19.478
Expenses S 4.465
lamp Sum Fee Total S 183.065
Iglk 1111SIIISIL
4 Airfare(S600rRT)x 2 P00Pk S 1.330
Iudgingtcod Prdtem S304Mgb x 2 People x 1 Night S 608
5&17 Airfare(S6011RT)x 2Pcopk S I.3)0
Lodging/Food Pe diem S304Mghl x 2 People x 1 Nighi S 608
PerkingMisc.'Pnnung 5 849
foul Expenses S 4.465 I TOTAL FEE $ 183,065 I
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Kay West International Airport
Project:
Rehabilitate Runway 9-27(12/14-69)
Article B:90%Design
Irk} Sr. Tadao Sr GDP
WOSICITIMA Dina. Mar Leer RBOpar isomer Draper Ted C4elu1 TOTAL
I DcvdopTehmcal Specifications 16 8 40 4 68
2 CooNmarc and Incorporate Mane County Contract 2 16 10
Documents oat Project Manual(90%and Final)
3 Develop Construction Schedule 4 8 12
4 Prepare for and Anent Design Review Meeting(90%) 12 12 24
5 Prepare for and Anted Phasing Meeting(90%) 8 8 16
6 Pavan rl Evaluation and Design Mork to be Performed by RDM.See Below
7 Paveinon ent Design Report Work in be Performed by ROM..Set Below
8 Dcvdop construction quantities and cost estimate for 90% 40 4g
documents
9 Pnparc the followmg plans
a.Tide Shed(I) 2 2
b.Index of Drawings and Notes(1) 4 8 12
c.Notes and Summary of Dwindles II) 8 4 12
d.Gaiaal Plan(I) 2 2
e Survey Control Plan(I) 2 2
L Haul Route and Part 77 Surface(2) 8 2 10
g.E meting Conditions Plan(7) 8 8
b.Geolcdl/Borings Plan(4) 4 4
I.Genera)Phasing Plan(2) 8 8 16 32
j.Detailed Phasing/Safety Plan 14) 4 8 16 24 52
.Safey Nota/D laile(2) 4 16 20
L Demolition Elm(2) 4 8 12
ar.Geometry Plan(7) 4 8 24 36
a Typical Sections(2) 4 8 8 20
o.Profiles(4) 4 8 16 28
p.Grading Plans(7) 8 41) 60 108
r.PCC Joint Plan(1) 8 8 16
s.PCC Joint Details(2) 8 8 16
t.Cross Sections(20) 16 60 76
u.Pavement Marking Plan(7) 4 8 16 28
v.Pavcman Marking Details(2) 4 8 8 20
w.Erosion Control Plan(7) 4 8 24 36
s.Erosion Control Details(2) 4 8 8 20
y.Electrical Plan/Circuitry(2) 16 16 32
n.Electrical Details(2) 16 8 16 40
eta.Grooving Plan and Details(1) 2 2
bb.RW Light Adjustment PIan/Ddats/Sdtelulct(7) 4 24 40 40 108
ee.Mrscdlanr:ors Muds(2) 4 8 8 16 36
10 Eval.Bid Alb:mares 4 4
Article B:90%Design
Prof. Sr.Proj. Sr. Project Sr.CADD
WORK ITEM Director Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Designer Teeb Clerical TOTAL
I Cool.With ESCO for change m EMAS Sabo k Not In:udrd in 9r2%Sobno,ro n 0
12 Address SFWMD Permitting Comments 4 N N x 2N
13 Fngmen%Repot 4 24 4 32
14 Distribute Plan for Review 2 2
15 QA/QC 16 x 2
16 Address OM)Review Comntn o 4 S N S 2
17 Address Comments From SRM 4 4 N
18 Prepare and Submit MOS for the use of local Limemck Vol: Included In 90%Sa/ani...on 7
19 Prepare o n)Sabo FAA Form 7460 Not Included in 90%Sudwhsbn 0
20 Address Comments CSPP 4 4
21 Creole and Upload AGIS pmjoa 16 IS 32
TOTAL ROC RS 16 98 76 48 320 _ 120 _ 446 6 1130
RATE S 220.00 S 195.00 S 140.00 S 123A0 $ 90.00 S 8501 S 90.00 S 58.00 —•
PAYROLL.ESTIMATE S 3,520 S 19,110 S 10.640 S 5,904 S 28,800 S (0.21t0 S 40,140 S 348 S 118,662
TOTA,.PAYROLL S 118,662
Sukon,ullants
ROM S 7,157
S 7,157 Sub:onsullann S 7,157
Expenses S 4,466
Lump Sum Fee Total S I30,285
IgA Ememea.
4 Airfare(56001RT)x 2 People S 1,200
Lod®og/Food Perdicm S304/Night x 2 Poopk x I Night S 608 I TOTAL FEE S 134,285 I
5 Airfare(5600/RT)it 2 People S 1,200
Lodginp/Food Parhaa S301/Night x 2 People x I Night S 608
MisclPrintiog/Parking S 050
Total Expense: S 4,466
•
JACOBS ENGRIEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Key West International Airport
Project:
Rehabilitate Runway 9-27(12/14-89)
Article B:Final Design
j yc
eaY ai >ir knots
MORKIIAI Dinar Dleatter gleam Illabior '.iar9eee �ielaer
1 Develop TrLnial Specifications 4 16 4 24
2 Coortbaata and Incorporate Maroc County Contract 2 8 10
Documanls into Project Manual(91/N and Final)
3 Develop Construction Sdnadule Not lncbdal E7nelSrbnriWon
4 Prepare for and Attad Design Review Mating Net larbr*d Is Find Srbnavbn
5 Prepare for and Anad Phasing Messing Not iarbded in FinalSuboeisaion
6 Pav matt Evaluation and Design Nor included in Find Swbdssion
7 Pavmanao Design Report Nor included in Find Submission
Develop ennsiruction quamdie and cost amain for 24 24
Final documents
9 Prepare the following plea
a.Title Sheet(l) 2 2
b.Index of Drawings and Notes(I) 2 2
4.Note and Summary of Quantities(I) 4 4
a General Plan l I) 0
e.Survey Control Plan(I) 0
f.Had Rome and Pan 77 Surfaces(2) 2 2
g.Existing Conditions Plan 17) 0
h.Goaait/Borings Plan(4) 0
1.General Phasing Plan(2) 2 4 6
J.Detailed Plusmg/Safdy Plan 14) 4 8 8 20
k.Safety Notes/Wads(2) 4 4 9
I.Demolition Plan(2) 2 2
s.Camay Plan(7) 4 4
a Typical Sessions(2) 4 4 8
o.Pmfila(4) 2 4 6
p.Grading Plans(7) 4 8 16 28
r.PCC hint Plat 1 q
0
s.FCC Joint Details(2) 8 8
t.Cross Saxions(20) 16 16
a.Pavement Making Plan(7) 4 4
v.Pavcmrnt Marling[iamb(2) 0
w.Erosion Control Plan(7) 8
s.Erosion Control Dumb(2) 4 4
y.Electrical PIan1Cirwitry(2) 4 4 9
a.Elcotrwal Details(2) 4 4 8
as Grooving Plan and Details(1) 0
lob.RW Light Adjustment PIanfDdaak/Scbadula(71 8 8 4 20
CO.Mo cdlantma Details(2) 8 8 8 24
Anidr 8:Final Design
Proj. Sr.Proj. Sr. Project Sr.CADD
WORK ITEM Director Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Designer Tech Clerical TOTAL
IS Eval.Did AVlarnvo. Sot lit,ludrd in Final Sobmiasinn
I I Coord.With ESCO for change in EMAS Saba& Not Included in Final Submission
12 Drainage Dssign and SFWMD Permitting Not Included in Final Submission
13 Engineer's Rmon 2 4 g _ 16
14 Distribute Plans for Review 4 4 2 10
IS QeVQC
8 g 16
j16 Address Review Commits Not Included in Find Submimion
17 Prepare for and Participate in SRM Vol. !nandrd in Final Submission
18 Pnpatc and Sudoii MOS for dm use of Local Not!minded in Find Submission
Iamaock
19 Pre pan;and Submit FAA Form 7460 Vol. Included in Final Submission
20 Prepare and Submit CSPP Not lnrWdcd in Final Submission
21 Creaieond Upload AGlS project Aar Included he Find Submission
TOTAL HOURS S 18 14 6 74 68 100G _ .8 296
RATE _ _ S 220ge S 195.00 S 140.00 S 123.00 S 90.00 S 85.00 S 90.00 S 58.00 —
• PAVROLI.ESTIMATE S 1,760 S 3,510 S 1,960 S fl8 S 6,660 S 5.780 S 9,000 S 464 S 29,0!2
TOTAL PAYROLL S 29,872
Subconsuhants
Suboomdtaots S
S - Expenses S 858
5 - Lump Sum Fee Total S 30,730
I TOTAL FEE S 30,730 I
last .130smsz_
MisrfPnnung S 858
Taal Eapaws S 858
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Key West International Airport
Project:
Rehabilitate Runway 9-27(12/14-69)
,\rticle C:Rid Phase
Proj. Sr.Proj. Sr. Project Sr.CADD
WORK ITEM _Director Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Designer Tech Clerical TOTAL
Coordinate bid advertisement and posting of bid documents 4 4
with the County
2 Prepare for and attend the Pre-Bid Conference 10 10 20
3 Prepare responses to RFIs 4 4 8 8 24
•
4 Prepare and Issue Addenda(Assume 2) 4 16 16 20 56
5 Revisions to Bid Drawings 8 8 8 24 li
6 Review Bids for Responsiveness 2 8 10
7 Prepare a Bid Tabulation 8 8
8 Make Recommmendalion for Award 2 2
TOTAL HOURS 0 22 32 IO 32 16 36 0 148
RATE S 220.00 S 195.00 S 140.00 c S 123.00 S 90.00 S 85.00 S 90.00 S 58.00
PAYROLL ESTIMATE S • S 4,290 S 4,480 S 1,230 S 2,880 S 1,360 S 3,240 S - S 17,480
Subconsrdtants TOTAL PAYROLL S 17,480
Subconsultants S -
S - Expenses S 2.305
Lump Sum Fee Total S 19,785
lags Ranenseu TOTAL FEE S 19,785
2 Airfare(5600'R7)a 2 People S 1,200
Lodging/Food Pendiem S304/Night x 2 People x I Night S 608
MisclPrintingiParking S 497
Total Expenses S 2,305