Ordinance 007-20161
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
ORDINANCE NO. 007 -2016
AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE MONROE COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ADOPTING THE 10 -YEAR WATER SUPPLY
PLAN UPDATE TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA
WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT LOWER EAST COAST WATER
SUPPLY PLAN UPDATE OF 2013; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;
PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND PLANNING
AGENCY AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR
INCLUSION IN THE MONROE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN;
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 163.3180(2)(x). F.S. requires local governments to consult with
water suppliers to ensure that adequate water supplies will be in place and available to serve new
development no later than when the local government issues a certificate of occupancy. Local
Governments should update their comprehensive plans and land development regulations to
address this concurrency requirement; and
WHEREAS, the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code
already have adopted policies and regulations requiring concurrency; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 163.3177(6)(c), F.S., local governments that are subject
to a regional water supply plan must update their adopted 10 -year water supply facilities work
plan within 18- months of the adoption of the regional water supply plan update; and
WHEREAS, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) updated its
Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan on September 12, 2013, which identifies areas where water
supply, demand, and shortages are projected to occur within the next 20 years; and
WHEREAS, the service provider for potable water in Monroe County is the Florida
Keys Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) and the FKAA has coordinated with Monroe County staff to
ensure that the current potable water supply and projected demands are incorporated within the
Monroe County 10 -year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update; and
WHEREAS, the FKAA 20 -year Water System Capital Improvement Master Plan serves
as the Monroe County water supply plan; and
WHEREAS, the FKAA demand and supply data project adequate water supply; and
File: 2014 -100
Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting held on the 23` day of September, 2014, the
Monroe County Development Review Committee considered the proposed amendment; and
WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting held on the 28` day of January, 2015, the
Monroe County Planning Commission held a public hearing for the purpose of considering the
proposed amendment and recommended approval to the Board of County Commissioners,
contingent on revisions to sections 2.2 and 3.9 of the 10 -year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan
Update to reconcile conflicting information regarding potential saltwater intrusion into the FKAA
wellfield due to sea level rise, memorialized by Resolution No. P02 -15; and
WHEREAS, staff made revisions to sections 2.2 and 3.9 of the 10 -year Water Supply
Facilities Work Plan Update, as requested by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 15` day
of July, 2015, for the purpose of considering the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the
State Land Planning Agency for review and comment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners voted to transmit the amendment and
made the following Conclusions of Law: 1) the ordinance is consistent with the Principles for
Guiding Development in the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern; 2) the ordinance is
consistent with the provisions and intent of the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan; and 3) the
ordinance is consistent with the provisions and intent of the Monroe County Code; and
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2015, the State Land Planning Agency issued its Objections,
Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) report, which identified two objections and two
comments; and
WHEREAS, the County must address the two identified objections and determine
whether to adopt the amendment, adopt the amendment with changes or not adopt the
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the County is not required to make modifications relative to the two
comments; and
WHEREAS, the ORC report's first objection relates to Goals, Objectives, and Policies
(GOPs) proposed under the County's Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) that were not yet
adopted; and
WHEREAS, the ORC report's recommendation states: Remove the Goals, Objectives,
and Policies referenced in Section 5.0 of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. Alternatively,
include these policies within the Ordinance for explicit adoption and include them within their
respective elements within the Comprehensive Plan. However, if the Evaluation and Appraisal
Review -based amendments are adopted prior to this amendment's adoption, and includes these
policies verbatim, they may remain within the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan; and
File: 2014 -100 Page 2 of 4
I WHEREAS, the County's response to the first objection is that the GOPs referenced in
2 Section 5.0 of the Work Plan are included in the proposed EAR -based amendments to the
3 Comprehensive Plan, which are anticipated to be adopted at the April 13, 2016 special meeting
4 of the BOCC. Based on guidance received from the South Florida Water Management District
5 regarding preparation of the Work Plan, the relevant GOPs from the County's Comprehensive
6 Plan should be included in the Work Plan; and
7
8 WHEREAS, in response to DEO's first objection, staff is proposing to leave the GOPs
9 within the Work Plan, assuming they are adopted at the April 13, 2016 public hearing as part of
10 the EAR -based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and
11
12 WHEREAS, the referenced EAR -based amendments were adopted by the BOCC on
13 April 13, 2016; and
14
15 WHEREAS, the ORC report's second objection relates to Policies regarding a five year
16 timeframe for considering the vulnerability of public infrastructure to sea level rise; and
17
18 WHEREAS, the ORC report's recommendation states: Use the available data and
19 analysis to identify points along a sea level rise continuum that threaten public infrastructure. The
20 County can then identify approximate planning time frames for addressing those risks; and
21
22 WHEREAS, the County's response to the second objection is that the County does not
23 currently have data available regarding the elevations of water supply facilities; the data or
24 mapping capabilities to analyze the projected 3" to 7" rise; or a specific timeline of estimated
25 future sea level rise. Additional time is necessary to allow the county to obtain additional data on
26 both the water supply facilities and LIDAR or comparable elevation data. Further, the referenced
27 policies are proposed as part of the new Energy and Climate Element in the EAR -based
28 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. These policies have been transmitted to the State, and
29 the County received DEO's ORC report on April 28, 2015, which identified no objections or
30 comments regarding the policies. They are anticipated to be adopted at the April 13, 2016 special
31 meeting of the BOCC as part of the proposed EAR -based amendments to the Comprehensive
32 Plan; and
33
34 WHEREAS, in response to the second objection in the ORC report, the County is
35 proposing to leave reference to Policies 1502.1.5, 1502.1.6 and 1502.1.7 within the Work Plan,
36 assuming they are adopted at the April 13, 2016 public hearing as part of the EAR -based
37 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and
38
39 WHEREAS, Policies 1502.1.5, 1502.1.6 and 1502.1.7 were adopted by the BOCC on
40 April 13, 2016, as part of the EAR -based amendments to the Comprehensive Plan;
41
42 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
43 COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
44
45 Section 1. The Monroe County Comprehensive Plan is amended as follows (deletions are
46 striek thfough and additions are underlined
File: 2014 -100 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS : .f OF MONROE COIVNTY. FLORIDA
BY:
Mayor eat r arruthers
N
G?
4�
3
a
0
cr.
-
r
rrn
0
0
71
tK
MONROE COUNTY ATTORNEY
AFOPftOVED 14S�1�0 FORM:
STEVEN T. WILLIAMS
ASSISTANT C UN � ATTORNEY
Date - .�P�g�
Policy 701.1.86
Monroe County adopts the Monroe County 10 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan
update, dated March, 2016, by reference, into the Comprehensive Plan. Monroe County shall
update the 10 -year Water Supply Work Plan every 5 years or within 18 months after the
governing board of the South Florida Water Management District approves an updated
regional water supply plan.
Section 2. The Monroe County 10 -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan update,
adopted by reference into the Comprehensive Plan, is attached to this ordinance as Exhibit A.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, change, or
provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected
by such validity.
Section 4. Repeal of Inconsistent Provisions. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict.
Section 5. Transmittal. This ordinance shall be transmitted by the Planning and
Environmental Resources Department to the State Land Planning Agency pursuant to Chapter
163 and 380, Florida Statutes.
Section 6. Filing and Effective Date. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the
Secretary of State of Florida, but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the State
Land Planning Agency or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance,
and if challenged until such challenge is resolved pursuant to Chapter 120, F.S.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida,
at a special meeting held on the 13` day of April, 2016.
Mayor Heather Carruthers
Mayor pro tem George Neugent
Commissioner Danny Kolhage
Commissioner David Rice
Commissioner Sylvia Murphy
Yes
Yes c)
Yes
Yes
Yes oc�
Page 4 of 4
File: 2014 -100
Exhibit A to Ord 007 -2016
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
10 -YEAR WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES
WORK PLAN UPDATE
Prepared By:
Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department
March, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Statutory History
1.2 Statutory Requirements
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1 Overview
2.2 Relevant Regional Issues
3.0 DATA AND ANALYSIS
3.1 Population Information
3.2 Maps of Current and Future Areas Served
3.3 Potable Water Level of Service Standard
3.4 Population and Potable Water Demand Projections by Each Local Government Utility
3.5 Water Supply Provided by Local Government
3.6 Water Supply Provided by Other Entities
3.7 Conservation
3.7.1 Countywide Issues
3.7.2 Local Government Specific Actions, Programs, Regulations, or Opportunities
3.8 Reuse
3.8.1 Regional and Countywide Issues
3.8.2 Local Government Specific Actions, Programs, Regulations, or Opportunities
4.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
4.1 Work Plan Projects
4.2 Capital Improvements Element/Schedule
5.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
6.0 REGIONAL ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLANS
6.1 Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update, September 12, 2013
6.2 Integrating Climate Change & Water Supply Planning In Southeast Florida, Southeast
Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, June 10, 2014
7.0 REFERENCES
8.0 EXHIBITS
Exhibit A Section 7.2 of the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 20 -Year Water
System Capital Improvement Master Plan, December 2006
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Monroe County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Work Plan) is to
identify and plan for the water supply sources and facilities needed to serve existing and new
development within the local government's jurisdiction. Chapter 163, Part II, F.S., requires
local governments to prepare and adopt Work Plans into their comprehensive plans within 18
months after the water management district approves a regional water supply plan or its
update. The Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update was approved by the South Florida
Water Management District (SFWMD) on September 12, 2013.
Residents of Monroe County obtain their water directly from the Florida Keys Aqueduct
Authority (FKAA), which is responsible for ensuring that enough capacity is available for
existing and future customers.
The Monroe County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Work Plan) will reference the
initiatives already identified in FKAA's 20 -year Water System Capital Improvement Master
Plan. According to state guidelines, the Work Plan and associated comprehensive plan
amendments must address the development of traditional and alternative water supplies, bulk
sales agreements and conservation and reuse programs that are necessary to serve existing
and new development for at least a 10 -year planning period. The Monroe County Work Plan
will have the same planning time schedule consistent with the comprehensive plan and the
Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update,
The County's Work Plan is divided into five sections:
Section 1 — Introduction
Section 2 — Background Information
Section 3 — Data and Analysis
Section 4 — Work Plan Projects /Capital Improvement Element/Schedule
Section 5 — Goals, Objectives, Policies
1.1 Statutory History
The Florida Legislature has enacted bills in the 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2011 sessions to
address the state's water supply needs. These bills, particularly Senate Bills 360 and 444
(2005 legislative session), significantly changed Chapter 163 and 373 Florida Statutes (F.S.)
by strengthening the statutory links between the regional water supply plans prepared by the
water management districts and the comprehensive plans prepared by local governments. In
addition, these bills established the basis for improving coordination between local land use
planning and water supply planning.
1.2 Statutory Requirements
Monroe County has considered the following statutory provisions when updating the Water
Supply Facilities Work Plan (Work Plan):
1. Coordinate appropriate aspects of its comprehensive plan with the appropriate water
management district's regional water supply plan, [163.3177(4)(x), F.S.]
2. Ensure that its future land use plan is based upon availability of adequate water
supplies and public facilities and services [s.163.3177(6)(a), F.S. Data and analysis
demonstrating that adequate water supplies and associated public facilities will be
available to meet projected growth demands must accompany all proposed Future
Land Use Map amendments submitted to the Department for review.
3. Ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities area available to serve new
development no later than the date on which the local government anticipates issuing
a certificate of occupancy and consult with the applicable water supplier prior to
approving a building permit, to determine whether adequate water supplies will be
available to serve the development by the anticipated issuance date of the certificate
of occupancy [s. 163.3180(2)(a), F.S., effective July 1, 2005].
4. For local governments subject to a regional water supply plan, revise the General
Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater
Aquifer Recharge Element (the "Infrastructure Element "), within 18 months after the
water management district approves an updated regional water supply plan, to:
a. Identify and incorporate the alternative water supply project(s) selected by the
local government from projects identified in the updated Lower East Coast
Regional Water Supply Plan, or the alternative project(s) proposed by the
local government under s. 373.709(8)(b), F.S. [s. 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.];
b. Identify the traditional and alternative water supply projects and the
conservation and reuse programs necessary to meet current and future water
use demands within the Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan [s.
163.3177(6)(c), F.S.]; and
c. Update the Work Plan for at least a 10 -year planning period for constructing
the public, private, and regional water supply facilities identified in the
element as necessary to serve existing and new development. [s.
163.3177(6)(c), F.S.]
5. Revise the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to include any water supply,
reuse, and conservation projects and programs to be implemented during the five -year
period [s. 163.3177(3)(a)4, F.S.].
6. To the extent necessary to maintain internal consistency after making changes
described in Paragraph 1 through 5 above, revise the Conservation Element to assess
projected water needs and sources for at least a 10 -year planning period, considering
the Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan, as well as applicable consumptive
use permit(s). [s.163.3177 (6)(d), F.S.]
The plan must address the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the
existing and projected water use demand for established planning period, considering
the appropriate regional water supply plan. [s.163.3167 (9), F.S.]
2
7. To the extent necessary to maintain internal consistency after making changes
described in Paragraphs 1 through 5 above, revise the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element to ensure coordination of the comprehensive plan with the
Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. [s. 163.3177(6)(h) L, F.S.]
8. While an Evaluation and Appraisal Report is not required, local governments are
encouraged to comprehensively evaluate, and, as necessary, update comprehensive
plans to reflect changes in local conditions. The evaluation could address the extent to
which the local government has implemented the need to update their Work Plan,
including the development of alternative water supplies, and determine whether the
identified alternative water supply projects, traditional water supply projects, bulk
sales agreements, and conservation and reuse programs are meeting local water use
demands. [s. 163.3191 (3) F.S.]
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1 Overview
Monroe County was incorporated in 1824, making it one of the first counties established in
the State of Florida. Monroe County includes an approximately 112 -mile long string of
islands served by Highway US 1, an area of approximately 1,200,344 acres bounded by the
Atlantic Ocean to the east and south, the Gulf of Mexico and Florida Bay to the west, and
Miami -Dade County to the north. Incorporated municipalities within Monroe County
encompass 12,678 acres, which include Key West, Marathon, Key Colony Beach, Layton,
and Islamorada. A non - contiguous uninhabited mainland portion of Monroe County totaling
944,275 acres is located within Everglades National Park with another 126,437 acres located
within Big Cypress National Park. Fort Jefferson/Dry Tortugas National Parks total almost
64,379 acres. The remaining unincorporated area totals 51,747 acres or approximately 81
square miles.
Monroe County has limited or restricted growth potential. Future development potential and
population growth is limited by linear geography, the amount of land already in public
ownership, and the scarcity of vacant and developable land, together with growth restrictions
dictated by the County's Residential Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) and Non -
Residential Rate of Growth Ordinance (NROGO). These growth ordinances were developed
following designation of the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern and the completion
of the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study. The unincorporated County's total ROGO
annual allocation for new residential building permits is 197 dwelling units per year, and the
County allocates 47,083 square feet of new floor area for nonresidential uses. This provides
the FKAA with a firm basis for predicting future water supply allocation needs.
Existing land use data in the 2011 Technical Document of the Monroe County
Comprehensive Plan reveals that 4,988 acres or 6.8% of the total gross acreage in the
unincorporated County (outside the mainland portion) is dedicated to residential uses. The
remaining gross acreages are allocated to nonresidential uses such as commercial (1.2 %);
industrial (0.6 %); institutional (0.2 %); recreational (1.8 %); military (5.5 %); conservation
(75.9 %); and vacant or undeveloped (3.2 %). The County does not anticipate substantial
3
increases in land area in the near future, unless there is policy decision from the
municipalities for dissolution. In the meantime, the residential and nonresidential growth rate
is anticipated to be minimal for the next 10 to 20 years due to ROGO and NROGO.
2.2 Relevant Regional Issues
As the state agency responsible for water supply in the Lower East Coast planning area, the
SFWMD plays a pivotal role in resource protection, through criteria used for Consumptive
Use Permitting. As pressure increased on the Everglades ecosystem resource, the Governing
Board initiated rule- making to limit increased allocations dependent on the Everglades
system. As a result, the Regional Water Availability Rule was adopted by the Governing
Board on February 15, 2007 as part of the SFWMD's water use permit program. This reduced
reliance on the regional system for future water supply needs, and mandates the development
of alternative water supplies and an increase in the use of conservation and reuse techniques.
The regional issues identified for 2030 in the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update
(adopted September 12, 2013) include:
1. Increased withdrawals from both the Surficial Aquifer System (SAS) and surface
water from Lake Okeechobee are limited;
2. Conservation continues to be relied upon to reduce per capita use and as a means to
potentially delay or perhaps avoid adding capacity;
3. Use of reclaimed water continues to be an important alternative source in the region
and helps to meet requirements of the 2008 Leah G. Schad Ocean Outfall Program;
and
4. The FKAA wellfield in Florida City is indicated as a Utility at Risk from saltwater
intrusion.
The sole source provider of potable water to Monroe County is FKAA, whose wellfield is
located in Florida City. As stated above, the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update
indicates the FKAA wellfield as a Utility at Risk relative to saltwater intrusion based on
SFWMD's updated analysis of utilities facing saltwater intrusion in 2007 following an
extended period of dry weather and concerns for accelerated saltwater intrusion. SFWMD
anticipates reformulating its analysis of utilities at risk and utilities of concern prior to the
next update of the LEC plan. This, along with the limited availability of SAS withdrawals,
presents a potential risk to the water supply for all of Monroe County. FKAA is a permitted
Floridan Aquifer User, which should offset any anticipated drought- driven salt water
intrusion event. FKAA also operates reverse osmosis facilities in Marathon and Stock Island.
Other regional water issues have been identified by the Southeast Florida Regional Climate
Change Compact, which includes Palm Beach, Broward, Miami -Dade and Monroe Counties.
The Compact communities have agreed to use a sea level rise prediction of between 3 and 7
inches by 2030, and between 9 and 24 inches by the year 2060 for planning purposes in the
Southeast Florida region until more definitive information on future sea level rise is available
(the Compact's A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast Florida, April, 2011). The
potential landward movement of the salt water intrusion line resulting from the impact of sea
4
level rise may affect future decisions regarding the implementation of capital improvements,
requiring adaptation mitigation strategies to preserve the potable water supply. Monroe
County's climate change and sustainability consultants have recently summarized hydrologic
modeling by the United States Geological Survey that suggests relatively low risk to the
FKAA wellfields in Florida City under even the worst -case 2060 sea level rise scenarios.
However, FKAA continues to monitor the most current data and analysis regarding this
issue.
To address these issues, FKAA's strategic goals include encouragement of water
conservation and reuse through their grant and rebate incentive programs for customers and
continued development of their reclaimed water program. Additionally, as shown in Figure
30 of the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update, FKAA is a permitted Floridan
Aquifer User, which should offset any anticipated drought- driven salt water intrusion event.
Further, FKAA also operates RO facilities in Marathon and Stock Island, with a combined
supply capacity of 3 MGD, as an alternative water source for the county during emergencies
and extreme peaks in demand.
3.0 DATA AND ANALYSIS
3.1 Population Information
The County's existing and future population figures are derived from the projections
prepared by Fishkind and Associates for the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Update (March 15, 2011). The methodology for the preparation of these projections was
approved by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (formerly known as the
Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Table 9 of this report identifies unincorporated
functional population (permanent and seasonal) projections from 2000 — 2030. In 2000, the
unincorporated functional population was 69,277. This increased to 70,808 in 2010 and is
projected to be 71,763 in 2015; 72,494 in 2020; 73,225 in 2025; and 73,956 in 2030, The
projection reflects a total increase of 4,679 in population with a predicted decrease in
permanent population and increase in seasonal population.
The relatively minor increase in population growth is reflective of the fact that County
development is substantially constrained, with future development potential and population
growth limited by the amount of land in public ownership and the scarcity of vacant
developable land, together with growth restrictions dictated by the County's Residential Rate
of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) and Non - Residential Rate of Growth Ordinance (NROGO).
These growth ordinances were developed following designation of the Florida Keys Area of
State Critical Concern and the completion of the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study. The
County's total ROGO annual allocation for new residential building permits is 197 dwelling
units per year. This provides a firm basis for predicting future water supply allocation needs.
3.2 Maps of Current and Future Areas Served
A map depicting current and future County boundaries served by the FKAA is included as
Figure 1 on page 8 of this document.
5
3.3 Potable Water Level of Service (LOS) Standard
Pursuant to the 2010 Comprehensive Plan, Monroe County has an adopted Potable Water
LOS of 132 gallons /capita/day. The FKAA has recommended an overall LOS for Monroe
County of 100 gallons /capita/day, and this adjustment has been included in the Monroe
County 2030 Comprehensive Plan update (to be adopted in 2016). The unincorporated
Monroe County 2015 Functional population projection was 71,763, therefore 7.2 MGD or
more of water supply capacity is required to meet the adopted concurrency standard for
residential potable water. In 2014, the overall Monroe County water consumption was 94
gal/capita/day (see Figure 3). Therefore the County is meeting the FKAA LOS of 100
gal/capita/day.
3.4 Population and Potable Water Demand Projections
The population estimates and projections and the potable water demand projections for
unincorporated Monroe County are presented below in Table 1. The projections are through
the year 2030. The population projections are consistent with the other elements of the
comprehensive plan. The water demands are for finished water.
Table 1. Population & Potable Water Demand Projections
Year
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Functional Population
Projection*
70,080
71,763
72,494
73,225
73,956
Water Supply Demand
(MGD)
7.0
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.4
Trunctionat ropuiation means total population: permanent plus seasonal residents.
(Source: Table 9 - Monroe County 2010 -2030 Population Projections March 15, 2011, Keith and
Schnars, P.A.; Fishkind and Associates)
The FKAA Projected Finished Water Demand compares projected population and potable
water demand for the entire FKAA service area. In summary, FKAA's average daily water
demand for the entire service area is expected to increase from 16.22 MGD in 2010 to 17.76
MGD in 2015 and 21.48 MGD in 2030.
3.5 Water Supply Provided by Local Government
Monroe County does not supply potable water to Unincorporated Monroe County and its
municipalities.
3.6 Water Supply Provided by Other Entities
The Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) is the sole provider of potable water in the
Florida Keys, established by Special Legislation, Chapter 76 -441, L.O.F. (as amended).
FKAA's primary water supply is the Biscayne Aquifer, a shallow groundwater source. The
FKAA's wellfield is located within an environmentally protected pine rockland forest west of
Florida City. The location of the wellfield near Everglades National Park, along with
restrictions enforced by state and local regulatory agencies, contributes to the unusually high
water quality. These wells contain some of the highest quality groundwater in the state,
meeting all regulatory standards prior to treatment. Additionally, the FKAA is continually
monitoring, assessing, and working to eliminate potential hazards to our water source,
including inappropriate aquifer utilization, unsuitable land uses, and the potential for
saltwater intrusion.
The groundwater from the wellfield is treated at the FKAA's Water Treatment Facility in
Florida City, which currently has a maximum water treatment design capacity of 29.8 million
gallons per day (MGD). The primary water treatment process is a conventional lime
softening /filtration water treatment plant and is capable of treating up to 23.8 MGD from the
Biscayne Aquifer. The secondary water treatment process is the newly constructed reverse
osmosis (RO) water treatment plant which is capable of producing 6 MGD from the brackish
Floridan Aquifer. The product water from these treatment processes is then disinfected and
fluoridated. The FKAA treated water is pumped 130 miles from Florida City to Key West
supplying water to the entire Florida Keys.
The FKAA maintains storage tank facilities which provide an overall storage capacity of 45.2
million gallons system wide. The sizes of tanks vary from 0.2 to 5.0 million gallons. These
tanks are utilized during periods of peak water demand and serve as an emergency water
supply. Since the existing transmission line serves the entire Florida Keys (including Key
West), and storage capacity is an integral part of the system, the capacity of the entire system
must be considered together, rather than in separate service districts.
Additionally, two saltwater RO plants, located on Stock Island and Marathon, are available to
produce potable water under emergency conditions. The RO desalination plants have design
capacities of 2.0 and 1.0 MGD, respectively.
At present, Key West and Ocean Reef are the only areas of the County served by a flow of
potable water sufficient to fight fires. Outside of Key West, firefighters rely on a variety of
water sources, including tankers, swimming pools, and salt water either from drafting sites on
the open water or from specially constructed fire wells. Although sufficient flow to fight fires
is not guaranteed, new hydrants are being installed as water lines are replaced to make water
available for fire - fighting purposes, and pump station/tank facilities are being upgraded to
provide additional fire flow and pressure. A map of the key FKAA transmission and
distribution facilities is shown in Figure I on the following page.
The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.
7
Figure 1. FKAA Transmission & Distribution System Overview
FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY
TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
45.2 MG STORAGE CAPACITY
1 YC
1 YS
1. KEY WEST
2 230 NP PUMPS
ORIRIBIIiIdI 3110
STATION Stl.NMI
3 MD
2. STOCK ISLAND 1 {BS NP PUMP
2 30D w PUMPS s MO
RAMROD KEY ��TT
ATKRI 1 IOpp Np PUMP I 6. BIG PINE KEY
1 {00 NP PUMP I I 273 MP PUMPS
1 B
5. SUMMERUND KEY
2 30 M PUMPS N 1 . IIOD
�J R PW/T
r 4. BIG COPPITT KEY I MARATHON
v
BAY POINT 1- MS
WW TREATMENT PUNT
2,0 MW
R.O. PUNT
STOCK ISLAND
0 sTS mat
ztATKw 3. STOCK ISLAND (DESAL)
3 MD 1 A NP IR'T PUMP
: 1x3 w PUMPS
LITTLE VENICE M U � p TREATMENT PUNT a0 NDD
WW TREATMENT PUNT
-7. MARATHON -a. 69th ST MARATHON
3 x >D NP PUMPS
STATNRI 2 300 o NP PUMPS
1 {00 NP PUMPS
TRANMISSION BACKPUMPING CAPABILITIES
MARATHON (1) -5 MG TANK
STOCK ISLAND (3) -5 MG TANKS
STOCK ISLAND DESAL (1) -5 MG TANK
Demand for Potable Water
Figures 2 and 3 provide a historical overview of the water demands in the FKAA service area
including Water Use Permit (WUP) allocation limits, yearly percent changes, and remaining
water allocations. In March 2008, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
approved the FKAA's modification of WUP 13- 00005 -5 -W for a 20 -year allocation from the
Biscayne and Floridan Aquifers. This modified WUP provides an annual allocation of 8,751
Million Gallons (MG) or 23.98 MGD and a maximum monthly allocation of 809 MG with a
limited annual withdrawal from the Biscayne Aquifer of 6,492 MG or 17.79 MGD and an
average dry season (December 1 -April 30 of 17.0 MGD.
In order to meet the requirements of this limitation, the FKAA constructed a new Floridan
Aquifer Reverse Osmosis (RO) water treatment system. This RO water treatment system is
designed to withdraw brackish water from the Floridan Aquifer, an alternative water source
approximately 1,000 feet below the ground surface, and treat the water to drinking water
standards. The RO water treatment plant provides added capability to limit Biscayne aquifer
withdrawals and is designed to meet current and future water demands. The RO water
treatment system provides an additional 6.0 MGD of potable water.
8
KEY LARGO
s MD 15. FLORIDA CITY
6
3lATgN
1
Z 40 NP PUMPS
s 1
14. OCEAN REEF-
21A MW 1111E SOFTENMO TIEATWIENT RANT 2 73 H ' PUMPS
{ NOD R.0. TREATMENT PLANT
TAVERNIER J
x 300 NP PUMPS
7 BW NP PUMPS
PUM
13. ROCK
HARBOR
7 1000 M DIESCL PUMPS
E93KNENC7 BACKUP
1
LITTLE VENICE M U � p TREATMENT PUNT a0 NDD
WW TREATMENT PUNT
-7. MARATHON -a. 69th ST MARATHON
3 x >D NP PUMPS
STATNRI 2 300 o NP PUMPS
1 {00 NP PUMPS
TRANMISSION BACKPUMPING CAPABILITIES
MARATHON (1) -5 MG TANK
STOCK ISLAND (3) -5 MG TANKS
STOCK ISLAND DESAL (1) -5 MG TANK
Demand for Potable Water
Figures 2 and 3 provide a historical overview of the water demands in the FKAA service area
including Water Use Permit (WUP) allocation limits, yearly percent changes, and remaining
water allocations. In March 2008, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
approved the FKAA's modification of WUP 13- 00005 -5 -W for a 20 -year allocation from the
Biscayne and Floridan Aquifers. This modified WUP provides an annual allocation of 8,751
Million Gallons (MG) or 23.98 MGD and a maximum monthly allocation of 809 MG with a
limited annual withdrawal from the Biscayne Aquifer of 6,492 MG or 17.79 MGD and an
average dry season (December 1 -April 30 of 17.0 MGD.
In order to meet the requirements of this limitation, the FKAA constructed a new Floridan
Aquifer Reverse Osmosis (RO) water treatment system. This RO water treatment system is
designed to withdraw brackish water from the Floridan Aquifer, an alternative water source
approximately 1,000 feet below the ground surface, and treat the water to drinking water
standards. The RO water treatment plant provides added capability to limit Biscayne aquifer
withdrawals and is designed to meet current and future water demands. The RO water
treatment system provides an additional 6.0 MGD of potable water.
8
KEY LARGO
— MARATHON
6
3lATgN
1 130 NP PUMP
Z 40 NP PUMPS
L�L
3 700 NP PUMPS
I. VACA ® 12.
TAVERNIER J
r 273NP 230M
I PUMPS 5 5
PUM
13. ROCK
HARBOR
10. CRAWL KEYtN
1 30 MP PUMP
2 30 NP PUMPS
DUCK KEY 190 MD
11. ISLAMORADA Y
WW TREATMENT PUNT
2 73 HP PUMP 69
KEY . NUMP
I � LONG
j
l {00 MP PUIR
LITTLE VENICE M U � p TREATMENT PUNT a0 NDD
WW TREATMENT PUNT
-7. MARATHON -a. 69th ST MARATHON
3 x >D NP PUMPS
STATNRI 2 300 o NP PUMPS
1 {00 NP PUMPS
TRANMISSION BACKPUMPING CAPABILITIES
MARATHON (1) -5 MG TANK
STOCK ISLAND (3) -5 MG TANKS
STOCK ISLAND DESAL (1) -5 MG TANK
Demand for Potable Water
Figures 2 and 3 provide a historical overview of the water demands in the FKAA service area
including Water Use Permit (WUP) allocation limits, yearly percent changes, and remaining
water allocations. In March 2008, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)
approved the FKAA's modification of WUP 13- 00005 -5 -W for a 20 -year allocation from the
Biscayne and Floridan Aquifers. This modified WUP provides an annual allocation of 8,751
Million Gallons (MG) or 23.98 MGD and a maximum monthly allocation of 809 MG with a
limited annual withdrawal from the Biscayne Aquifer of 6,492 MG or 17.79 MGD and an
average dry season (December 1 -April 30 of 17.0 MGD.
In order to meet the requirements of this limitation, the FKAA constructed a new Floridan
Aquifer Reverse Osmosis (RO) water treatment system. This RO water treatment system is
designed to withdraw brackish water from the Floridan Aquifer, an alternative water source
approximately 1,000 feet below the ground surface, and treat the water to drinking water
standards. The RO water treatment plant provides added capability to limit Biscayne aquifer
withdrawals and is designed to meet current and future water demands. The RO water
treatment system provides an additional 6.0 MGD of potable water.
8
Along with the new reverse osmosis water treatment plant, compliance with withdrawal
limits can also be accomplished by using other alternative water sources (blending of the
Floridan Aquifer, reclaimed water and operation of the RO desalination plants), pressure
reduction, public outreach, and assistance from municipal agencies in enforcing water
conservation ordinances.
Figure 2 - Annual Water Withdrawals
Year annual Withdrawal % Change WUP Limit (MG)
(MG)
Ak
WUP +/- Annual
Allocation (MG)
2002
6,191
10.03%
7,274
1083
2003
6,288
1.57%
7,274
986
2004
6,383
2.74%
7,274
813
2005
6,477
0.16%
7,274
803
2006
6,283
- 2.49%
7,274
964
2007
5,850
- 7.35%
7,274
1428
2008
5,960
1.89%
8,751
2791
2009
5,966
0.09%
8,751
2785
2010
5,919
-0.79%
8,751
2832
2011
6,327
6.89%
8,751
2424
2012
6,042
- 4.50%
8,751
2709
2013
6105
1.04%
8,751
2646
2014
6377
4.46%
8,751
2374
Source: Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 2015
Figure 3. M Potable Water Demand Summary
FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORIT
Potable Water Demand Summary - New Water Deman Actual Water Demand, and Expected Water Demand
_Year - 2014 Year - 2014 Year 2015
New Water Actual Water
Metered Water Expected Water Demand -
Service - Gallons /Year Demand _ Gallons/Year
Municipality Gallons/Year I Gallons/Yeare
Unincorporated Monroe County 15,679,200 1,903,099,800 2,479,9 31,978 2,495,611,178
City of Key West — 3,631,200 1,766,546,300 2 ! 301.988,924 2,305,620,124
City of Marathon
8,314,800
495,760,700
95,524,800
646,028 453
124,478,4991
854,341,253
city of Key Colon
0
124,478,4
City of Layton
0
10,950,400
14,269,4811
14 269,481
7,273,200
622,144,200
4,894,026,200
8 107716 ,966
6,377,412,301
8,751,000,000
817,99 0,166
6,41 2,310,701
8,751,000,000
City of Islamorada
Entire Florida Keys
34,898,400
SFWMD WUP Annual Allocation
'metered + unmetered water demand (is. flushing, )eaks, ate.)
9
•
Figure 4 illustrates projected water supply availability vs projected water demand. Demand
for potable water is influenced by many factors, including the number of permanent
residents, seasonal populations and day visitors, the demand for commercial water use,
landscaping practices, conservation measures, and the weather.
Figure 4. FKAA Water Supply Available vs. Water Demand Projections
FLORIDA KEYS AQUEDUCT AUTHORITY
Water Supply Available vs. Water Demand Projections
30
25 —
20
Floridan Blend and Bypass(mgd)
min Proposed Reclaimed Water
15M=Reverse-Osmosis WTP(mgd)
c
NM Biscayne Aquifer(mgd)
c Adjusted 2014 Avg.Day Projections
i o
10 —
t 2005 Avg Day Projections thru 2026
5
0 • T r ` .
n 00 rn -o . N m v .n I n ao m o .-+ N m v .n 50 N CO rn 0
O O 0 O .--( .--1 .--1 N N N N N N N N (0
O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
As shown in Figure 5 on the following page,_the FKAA distributed an annual
average of—from the Biscayne Aquifer from Floridan RO
Production. This table also provides the water treatment capacities of the emergency RO
plants. Since the emergency RO plants utilize seawater, a WUP is not required for these
facilities.
r ons indicate a slight increase in annual average daily
demand rom . ' to 17.76 MG and an increase in maximum monthly demand from
D to 596.29 MG.
10
Figure 5 - Projected Water Demand in (in MG)
FKAA Permit 2014 Water
Thresholds Demand
2015 Water
Demand
Projected
Annual Allocation
Average Daily Demand
23.98
17.47
17.76
Maximum Monthly Demand
809.01
546.94
596.29
Annual Demand
8,751
6,377
6,481
Biscayne Aquifer Annual Allocation/Limitations
154,495
17,228,192
112
Average Daily Demand
17.79
16.83
17.11
Average Dry Season Demand*
17.00
16.67
16.85
Annual Demand
6,492
6,143
6,245
Floridan RO Production
155,440
16,017,315
103
Average Daily Demand
6.00
0.64
0.65
Emergency RO WTP Facilities
155,441
16,345,205
105
Kermit L. Lewin Design Capacity
2.00 (MGD)
0.00 (MGY)
0.00
Marathon RO Design Capacity
1.00 (MGD)
0.00 (MGY)
0.00
AlIfigures are in millions of allons
156,391
16,508,197
106
*Dry Season is defined as December thru April
156,727
16,836,164
107
Source: Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 2015
Figure 6 provides the amount of water used on a per capita basis. Based on Functional
Population and average dail demand, the average water consumption
a k allons (person), which reflects the entire FKAA service area,
including unincorporated Monroe County, Key West, Marathon, Islamorada, Key Colony
Beach, and Layton.
Figure 6. Per Capita Water Use (Entire FKAA Service Area)
Functional Daily Average Per Capita Water
Year _ Population' Demand (gallons) Consumption (gallons)
2000
153,080
17,016,393
111
2001
153,552
15,415,616
100
2002
154,023
16,962,082
110
2003
154,495
17,228,192
112
2004
154,924
17,652,596
114
2005
156,150
17,730,000
114
2006
155,738
17,287,671
111
2007
155,440
16,017,315
103
2008
154,728
16,285,383
105
2009
155,441
16,345,205
105
2010
155,288
16,210,959
104
2011
156,054
17,334,247
111
2012
156,391
16,508,197
106
2013
156,727
16,836,164
107
Source: 1. Monroe County Population Projections - Monroe County Planning Department, 2011
2. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 2015
11
Improvements to Potable Water Facilities
FKAA has a 20 -year Water System Capital Improvement Master Plan for water supply,
water treatment, transmission mains and booster pump stations, distribution mains, facilities
and structures, information technology, reclaimed water systems, and Navy water systems.
In 1989, FKAA embarked on the Distribution System Upgrade Program to replace
approximately 190 miles of galvanized lines throughout the Keys. FKAA continues to
replace and upgrade its distribution system throughout the Florida Keys and the schedule for
these upgrades is reflected in their long -range capital improvement plan. The FKAA's Water
Distribution System Upgrade Plan included the upgrade or replacement of approximately
58,000 feet of water main during fiscal year 2014.
The master plan was revised in 2013 to include the critical projects, as summarized in Figure
7. Figure 7 also provides the schedule and costs projected for the capital improvements to the
potable /alternative water systems planned by the FKAA. The total cost of the scheduled
improvements is approximately $34 million over the next 5 years. These projects are to be
funded by the water rate structure, long -term bank loans, and grants.
Figure 7 - FKAA Projected 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Total
Water Supply
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
$2
Water Treatment
$0
$0
$2,600,000
$2,600,000
$0
$5,200,000
Transmission Mains &
$200,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,250,000
$2,950,000
Booster Pump Stations
Distribution Mains
$4,300,000
$3,700,000
$2,250,000
$7,700,000
$3,600,000
$21,550,000
Facilities & Structures
$0
$0
$100,000
$500,000
$0
$600,000
Information
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Technolo
Reclaimed Water
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Systems
Navy Water Systems
$500,000
$400,000
$510,000
$585,000
$100,000
$2.095,000
Totals
$5,000,000
$4,600,000
$6,960,000
$12,885,000
$4,950,000
$34,395,000
Source: Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 2013
In summary, based on current conditions and projects, an adequate supply of water to meet
current and future demands is provided by the following: The Biscayne permitted water
supply of 17.79 MGD, the 6.0 MGD RO water treatment plant, the new reclaimed water
systems, and the ability to operate the 3.0 MGD RO desalination plants during emergency
situations. The FKAA continues to monitor and track conditions and events that could
negatively impact the existing water supply. Any such impacts will be evaluated to determine
future changes necessary to continue servicing Monroe County with adequate water supply.
3.7 Conservation
One method of reducing water use and increasing the availability potable water is the
implementation of Best Management Practices for water use. Mandatory outdoor water
12
restrictions, water rate pricing and xeriscape landscaping that utilizes native flora can all
assist in reducing potable water demand and the impacts of future growth.
3.7.1 County -Wide Issues
Water conservation is one method available to promote the reduction of use and increase of
availability of potable water. FKAA implements a high base water rate for water use, which
effectively deters wasteful water use. Implementation of mandatory year -round watering
restrictions also aid in conserving water.
3.7.2 Local Government Specific Actions, Programs, Regulations, or Opportunities
Monroe County will coordinate future water conservation efforts with the FKAA and the
SFWMD to ensure that proper techniques are applied. In addition, the County will continue
to support and existing goals, objectives and policies in the comprehensive plan that promote
water conservation in a cost - effective and environmentally sound manner. The County will
also continue to actively support the SFWMD and FKAA in the implementation of new
regulations or programs that are structured to conserve water during the dry season.
Monroe County has also adopted an Interlocal Agreement between FKAA and Monroe
County that will ensure the availability of potable water prior to the issuance of a building
permit. This agreement is to be referenced in the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the
Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update as Policy 1301.1.16, which states:
sh
establishes a mechanism whereby the FKAA and the County identify the availability
of water supply needed to serve existing and new development within the
Unincorporated Area, monitor the utilization of water supply, and implement such
alternative water su projects, traditional water supply projects, conservation
ary to meet Monroe County's water supply needs.
3.8 Reuse
Water reuse is a method for supplementing water availability. Desalination at the source
through reverse osmosis is presently incorporated within the design of new water treatment
facilities that tap into the Floridan Aquifer. Some local communities, such as Key Colony
Beach, use recycled water to irrigate its municipal golf course. However, the cost of
developing a centralized collection, treatment, and distribution system for recycled water in a
county such as Monroe that is less than 5 miles wide and 112 miles long creates significant
feasibility challenges.
Monroe County, together with FKAA and the Key Largo Sanitary Sewer District, has
implemented a public infrastructure program to construct and operate central sewer
collection and treatment systems. Sewage treatment facilities will have the capability to make
available gray water for non - potable water applications, such as irrigation for County parks
and landscaped rights -of -way. However, the lack of possible users has inhibited the
necessary investment to create and maintain a viable reuse water distribution system.
13
3.8.1 Regional and County -wide Issues
State law supports reuse efforts. For the past years, Florida's utilities, local governments, and
water management districts have led the nation in implementing water reuse programs that
increase the quantity of reclaimed water used and public acceptance of reuse programs.
Section 373.250(l) F.S. provides that "water reuse programs designed and operated in
compliance with Florida's rules governing reuse are deemed protective of public health and
environmental quality." In addition, Section 403.064(1), F.S., provides that, "reuse is a
critical component of meeting the State's existing and future water supply needs while
sustaining natural systems."
3.8.2 Local Government Specific Actions, Programs, Regulations, or Opportunities
The County will support the SFWMD and FKAA water reuse projects and implementation of
new regulations or programs designed to increase the volume of reclaimed water used and
public acceptance of reclaimed water.
The County has established regulations limiting the clearing of native habitat and requiring
landscaping consisting of native plants, which are more drought tolerant and demand less
irrigation than most non - native species. Incentives for the installation of cistern rain
collection systems are also encouraged, such as the granting of positive points in the Rate of
Growth Ordinance permit allocation system.
3.9 Climate Change and Sea Level Rise
Southeast Florida is widely considered one of the most vulnerable regions to the impacts of
climate change and sea level rise. This is especially true of the Florida Keys, a 110 mile
string of offshore islands connected by US 1 to Miami -Dade County. As discussed earlier,
potential landward movement of the salt water intrusion line resulting from the impact of sea
level rise may affect future decisions regarding the implementation of capital improvements,
requiring adaptation mitigation strategies to preserve the potable water supply. Monroe
County's climate change and sustainability consultants have recently summarized hydrologic
modeling by the United States Geological Survey that suggests relatively low risk to the
FKAA wellfields in Florida City under even the worst -case 2060 sea level rise scenarios.
However, FKAA continues to monitor the most current data and analysis regarding this
issue.
3.10 Local Government Specific Actions, Programs, Regulations, or Opportunities
FKAA presently operates two reverse osmosis (RO) plants within Monroe County, in
Marathon and Stock Island, which have a combined production capacity of 3 MGD. A
Floridan wellfield and RO water treatment facility were constructed by FKAA in Florida
City and have been operational since the fall of 2009. This RO water treatment plant treats
the brackish water of the Floridan Aquifer and has a production capacity of 6 MGD. Storage
facilities maintained by the FKAA have a total storage capacity of 45.2 MG; of this amount,
there is 12 MG of storage available in above ground storage reservoirs at Florida City. The
remaining capacity is obtained from tanks located throughout the transmission and
distribution system that provide an additional 33.2 MG of storage capacity. It is therefore
14
anticipated that FKAA will be well positioned to accommodate Monroe County's future
water demands as sea level rise impacts South Florida's regional water supply.
4.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
4.1 Work Plan Projects
The FKAA 20 -Year Water System Capital Improvement Master Plan identifies all proposed
work projects within Monroe County (See Exhibit A: Section 7.2 of the master plan).
4.2 Capital Improvements Element/Schedule
Monroe County presently has a proposed LOS of 100 gallons /capita/day (2030
Comprehensive Plan Update). The County will continue to work with FKAA to ensure that
the adopted LOS is maintained. Adoption by reference of Section 7.2 of the FKAA 20 -Year
Water System Capital Improvement Master Plan (see Exhibit A) will link water availability
and programmed improvements with the County's Concurrency Management System
through the establishment of a permit review and approval process that requires evidence of
water supply availability prior to the issuance of a building permit and certificate of
occupancy.
Exhibit 7 -2 of the FKAA 20 -Year Water System Capital Improvement Master Plan will serve
as Monroe County's 10 -year Water Supply Plan and CIE for potable water (see Exhibit A).
5.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The adopted and presently effective Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan
includes several Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs) that implement water supply
concurrency and conservation. These GOPs are located within the Potable Water Element,
Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element,
Future Land Use Element and Capital Improvements Element. The following proposed
amendments have been included in the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which the
BOCC approved for transmittal to the State of Florida Department of Economic Opportunity
(DEO) at their January 14, 2015 special meeting. On April 28, 2015, DEO issued its
Objections, Recommendations, and Comments Report (ORC) on the ro osed amendments.
The ORC contained no objections to the proposed changes below. 30
5.1 Potable Water Element
GOAL 701
Monroe County shall support FKAA in the fulfillment of their statutory obligation and
authority to provide for a safe, high quality and adequate supply, treatment, distribution, and
15
conservation of potable water to meet the needs of present and future residents. f9J-
5.011(
Obiective 701.1
Monroe County shall ensure that at the time a nit-certificate of
occupancy or its functional equivalent is issued, adequate potable water supply,
treatment, and distribution facilities are available to support the development at the
adopted level of service standards °nt • ,:t1, th e impaets o f s u """
rnr 5 [§ 163.3177(6)(c), F.S.,I
Policy 701.1.1
Monroe County hereby adopts the following level of service standards to
achieve Objective 701.1 and shall use these standards as the basis for
determining facility capacity and the demand generated by a development.
ror c n1 1(2)(
f § 163.3180(1)(b)., F.S., §163.3180(2)., F.S., §163.3177(3)(a)3., F.S.]
Level of Service Standards
1. Quantity:
100 gal. /capita/day*
*Note: Based on historical data through December 2011; provided by
FKAA, December 2012.
Residential LOS 66.50 gal./eapita/day
Nen Residential LOS 0.35 gal./sq. ft./day
Over-all L - - 132 (n..,1 021 2009)
„
q
B �,-«ent��identia T n t 149 gallons ns day
(2.24 aver-age per-sons pe-r-
2. Minimum Pressure:
20 PSI at customer service
3. Minimum Potable Water Quality:
Shall be as defined by
(Paft 143 National Seeendafy Drinking Standards, 40 GFR 143, 44F
4-21 8)Cha2ter 62 -550 F.A.C.
16
Polic 701.1.32
Monroe County shall adopt Land Developm
Regulatiens land development regulations which provide a
Concurrency Management System (See Capital Improvements Policy
1401.4.5). The Concurrency Management System shall ensure that no pefwAts
certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent will be issued for new
development unless adequate potable water supply, treatment, and distribution
facilities needed to support the development at the adopted level of service
standards are available
dent. [9i 5 > iwc-M L§ 163.3180(1)(b)., F.S., § 163.3180(2)., F.S.,
§ 163.3177(3)(a)3., F.S., § 163.3177(6)(c)., F.S.I
701.1
- shall specify procedures for updating facility demand and capacity
information, utilizing data provided by the FKAA as potable water facilities
are installed or upgraded. f91 c n„ (2)(0 f§ 163.3180(2)., F.S.I
Policy 701.1.64
Monroe County shall implement a concurrency management system that is
consistent with the South Florida Water Management District Lower East
Coast Regional Water Supply Plan and Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 20-
year Water System Capital Improvement Master Plan. (Ord. 022 -2009)
Policy 701.1.75
Monroe County shall prepare and maintain a 10 -year Water Supply Work
Plan that identifies alternative water supply projects, traditional water supply
projects, conservation, and reuse necessary to meet the Monroe County
Unincorporated Area water supply needs, consistent with the South Florida
Water Management District Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan
and the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 20 -year Water System Capital
Improvement Master Plan. (Ord. 022 -2009) [§ 163.3177(6)(c)3., F.S. l
Policy 701.1.86
Monroe County shall update the 10 -year Water Supply Work Plan every 5
years or within 18 months after the governing board of the South Florida
Water Management District approves an updated regional water supply plan.
(Ord. 022 -2009) [§ 163.3177(6)(c)3., F.S.I
17
� 1
identi€� responsible paAies and aseiisic nd
• •
IN
r F1SlLlITi iii M_
. .
eff:,.:o..,,., ,.f r
.............
*
of u
.. ides seFV.*--
L MY, I
"Ol
-
developed areaslaeking
•
.
identi€� responsible paAies and aseiisic nd
• •
IN
r F1SlLlITi iii M_
. .
eff:,.:o..,,., ,.f r
€a
*
of u
.. ides seFV.*--
events of:
"Ol
ienteasrs,
developed areaslaeking
full seFv
.
•. •
~11
'-
• • um
Level One Whether- the- pfe�eet is- eensijtent with thFKAA's -°no
Level Two Whether th o r : ee l t o t te r „1�1;,. he a s for d
Level -- — .. .- Whether ---- r~v.�- - -_ -� -. .._�...�... .., �1 VLVVL ru V11V 11V 0.1111 uilcs
,:.lo f.,,.;l;r;o� -m- -1 so r!. .. L,:o.,o full us e
Yiv ...... l..vlla uaau .,vi i'ivvu, vl o o u °
f., a;r;o
rcccrrrczcr.
Level ThFee- �Whet#ef
the
eff:,.:o..,,., ,.f r
€a
*
of u
.. ides seFV.*--
events of:
FeElueesfrto .
ienteasrs,
developed areaslaeking
full seFv
.
18
Obiective 701.22
Monroe County and FKAA shall work cooperatively with the FKAA, South
Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD), Miami - Dade County, and the Cities
of Layton, Key Colony Beach -ate, Marathon, Key West and the Village of
Islamorada to ensure the protection and availability of an adequate raw water supply
at the Florida City Wellfield to meet the needs of Monroe County through the year
204.30. f § 163.3177(6)(h)1., F.S.I
Policy 701.22.1
Monroe County -,4ke- shall work closely with FKAA
shall, as neeessay-y, in their renewal of the Florida City Wellfield
consumptive use permit issued by SFWMD. Alter-native
Policy 701.2.2
Monroe County shall encourage the use of alternative water sources such as
reverse osmosis, cisterns and water re -use and -shall devaluate the
feasibility of using such alternative sources d and the fnest feasible solution
dented -in the event that the necessary withdrawals from the Biscayne
Aquifer are limited. ;
Policy 701.22.23
QN Monroe County GFewth Management Division shall provide teehnieal
assistanee shall coordinate with the FKAA for the consumptive use
permitting process. This teeMieal assistaneecoordination shall include
providing information regarding future land use growth patterns, population
trends, growth management policies and demand projections to ensure
consistency between the FKAA permitting process and the Monroe County
Comprehensive Plan. ro �T( 2 )(e)' • 9i 5 . 01 3(2 )( e)41
Policy 701.32.34
The- Monroe County Growth Management Division shall annually supply
FKAA and SFWMD with the Geneaffeney Public Facilities
Capacity Report prepared in accordance with Capital Improvements Policy
1401.4.9. These annual reports shall include the latest information on land
use, population trends, and growth management policies as well as facility
capacity analyses using data supplied by service providers. [9i 5
;
9j c 0 3(2)(Oni
Policy 701.22.45
Monroe County shall oordinate and
eex wat provide comments on the SFWMD plans, such as water supply, cost,
needs and sources, and water conservation plans, as they are developed.
Policy 70132.56
Monroe County shall continue to coordinate with the Cities of Layton, Key
Colony Beach -ate Marathon, Key West the Village of Islamorada, and
19
FKAA as necessary to facilitate stem iide system -wide compatibility on
such potable water - related issues as potable water levels of service,
consumption projections, water conservation programs, and emergency
management.
Objective 701.43
Monroe County shall work cooperatively with Miami - Dade County to encourage land
use planning and development controls which shall protect the recharge area of the
Florida City Wellfield from potential sources of groundwater contamination,
saltwater intrusion and overextraction [9i c 0 , (2)(b)S 9i 5 . 01 3(2)
[§163.3177(6)(c)., F.S., §163.3177(6)(h)1.. F.S.I
Policy 701.43.1
Protection of the Florida City Wellfield shall be accomplished through
eentinued the Miami - Dade County Wellfield Protection
Ordinance and the SFWMD Water Supply Policy Document. 91
5. and 4 9i 5 13 (2)(e)91
Polic 701.43.2
Monroe County shall seek inaintain an interlocal
agreement with FKAA and Miami - Dade County. This agreement shall
provide Monroe County with an opportunity to comment on land use and
regulatory issues related to the Florida City Wellfield, aquifer and aquifer
recharge area. It shall set forth procedures for review of land use and
regulatory activities identified as having potentially significant impacts on the
aquifer recharge and water supply systems especially concerning hazardous
waste generation. Criteria for determination of significant impacts shall be
included in the interlocal agreement. [9i a A. 9i 5
• ••
20
Objective 701.84
FKAA shall impfove its eap _Monroe County shall continue to coordinate with
FKAA to ensure adequate capacity is available to provide for fire flows i the aF eas
o o utlined i n Pehe,, 701 to ensure for protection of the public health, welfare and
safety. r9T c n1 1(2)(bO4 63.3177(3)( a) 3., F.S.1
Policy 701.84.1
By the year , Monroe County shall coordinate with the FKAA, in
accordance with its Capital Improvements Program, shaR continue to
upgr- de r ading the distribution system toward the goal of providing fire
flow capabilities i n throughout Florida Keys as funds and
land are available:. Fire flows shall meet the provisions of the Florida Fire
Prevention Code.
Areas
2. Key W
3. Ever-ywhefe on US 1, exeept non developable areas
4 .Oeean -Kee€
5. Key Goleny Beae.h.
6. La�4efi
7. Mar-atlan
S— BuEk K&y
9. TavemieF
10. Pr F ire Flow Requir by Land Use •
12. Mo -uo me, Fc Vehicle 1,500 GPN
Urban -G9ii 2P`rEisrr .- 9ii—mPFEial,and Gef an crcm r
2, 000 GPN4
21
All commercial facilities not along L�S 1 shall provide "on site" fire
abatement, unless identified in the Agreement Between
Monroe County and the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority for Installation and
Maintenance of Fire Hydrants in Unincorporated Monroe County. In all
Policy 701.4.2
Monroe County shall require that at the time a construction permit is issued,
adequate fire flow is supplied to the site in accordance with the Florida Fire
Prevention Code.
Objective 701.15
Monroe County shall continue to assist the FKAA with water conservation efforts and
assist in implementing the FKAA's Water Conservation Plan consistent with
SFWMD's Water Shortage Plan and Comprehensive Water Conservation Program.
The County shall implement Policies 701.95.1 to further conserve potable water use.
5 .011 ( 2 )( b ) 4; of 5 . 013(2)(b)21
Policy 701.15.1
�e thc FKAA and cFWN4D, a nd other- a€feet ed organizations h
adopt Land Development Regulations, whieh implement a xeri
landseape > > and plumbing fi*tur-e
effleieney stan eansist w t he -r a n d ater —y elem ents • of the FKA i
W G ° atio Pl an th c�x�l, D Mod T ,1 ° C f S ,r1,
vi �,.ViiJVl 1(411 V11 1 1Y11 W111 111V Vl �I I.ZD fL�ji IIdI �(j
Florida. P Pr-- the— cadopt-i9n of the *efiseape landscape anew
these- iffl-difi-an d-standaMs will be 1. tte to t h e c�x�MD f
n c�v - crr cvicvr
r
in t f9i 5. 011(2)( e) 3; 9i 5.013
-- l�e— i`�ter Ee
-- i�se��iei�-- i�ear� � -
Within one (1) year of the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Monroe
22
s.
INVOMMMIN
Objective 701.15
Monroe County shall continue to assist the FKAA with water conservation efforts and
assist in implementing the FKAA's Water Conservation Plan consistent with
SFWMD's Water Shortage Plan and Comprehensive Water Conservation Program.
The County shall implement Policies 701.95.1 to further conserve potable water use.
5 .011 ( 2 )( b ) 4; of 5 . 013(2)(b)21
Policy 701.15.1
�e thc FKAA and cFWN4D, a nd other- a€feet ed organizations h
adopt Land Development Regulations, whieh implement a xeri
landseape > > and plumbing fi*tur-e
effleieney stan eansist w t he -r a n d ater —y elem ents • of the FKA i
W G ° atio Pl an th c�x�l, D Mod T ,1 ° C f S ,r1,
vi �,.ViiJVl 1(411 V11 1 1Y11 W111 111V Vl �I I.ZD fL�ji IIdI �(j
Florida. P Pr-- the— cadopt-i9n of the *efiseape landscape anew
these- iffl-difi-an d-standaMs will be 1. tte to t h e c�x�MD f
n c�v - crr cvicvr
r
in t f9i 5. 011(2)( e) 3; 9i 5.013
-- l�e— i`�ter Ee
-- i�se��iei�-- i�ear� � -
Within one (1) year of the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Monroe
22
County shall implement a landscape ordinance consisting of water
conservation measures which may include Florida Friendly provisions.
Policy 701.15.2
During the development of updated Land Developm Regulati °land
development regulations inaeeo eewith Pokey 70 .9 4 d+.--Monroe
County shall coordinate with the FKAA
skallto evaluate building codes, utility regulations, landscaping ordinances,
and public education programs for implementation of water conservation
measures. rnt c n, , �� �3 or c n, ����� ��,
r , [ §163.3177(6 ), F.S.I
Policy 701.15.3
I* Monroe County shall coordinate with the FKAA in accordance with i6 their
Water Conservation Plan the FKAA ^ sha l w ith input f ^ M-A- e G-A ^ *
, V >L >[ > JSS , • y ,
^tee to implement a leak detection program and a conservation rate
structure. Monroe County a*& shall coordinate with the FKAA, wi th input
4amthe SFWMD and other affected organizations, shallto formulate and
initiate implementation of a joint public education program for water
conservation. {9J 5.011(2)(e)3; °T 5 . 013(2 )( e)4]
Policy 701.15.4
Monroe County -and th RK ^ ^ shall continue to comply with SFWMD water
use restrictions including all Phase I and Phase I (modified) water use
restrictions when water shortages are declared by the SFWMD.
5.011(2)(e)3; or c ni 3(2)( e )4j
Policy 701.15.5
Monroe County shall coordinate with the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative ce,..,:ees (HRS (DOH ) to permit utilization of gfey reclaimed
water storage systems and utilization for all exterior irrigation and flushing
purposes. Upon receipt of authorization from HRo policies shall be
developed to implement the use of grey reclaimed water storage systems where
economically feasible. f°- �;T(2)(e)3; 9i 5.013(2(e)41
Policy 701.15.6
Monroe County shall permit and encourage rainwater
---- -- - -- - -- --_� -- -- ---- ---- a ». -.. - -, -- -, 1.. ---- 9 .,..,w. •...,,..... — w
in capture for all non - potable uses and for safe household potable uses
[9i 5.011(2)(e)3; 9r c 013(2)( )n, l§163.3177(6)(c)., F.S.1
Policy 701.15.7
By januafy 4, 1997, Monroe Geunty shall adopt Land Development
.wb......,.oaa.a .•aaavaa establish u > vaaauc z
Fesi lea l an d n r esidenti a l (See Future h U Obje
...�,a.. va.ua.ca axaau aavaa iVJauvaacaa l
101.2, 1 01 . 3 , and 1 and suppef ing pok eies). in developing the Point
System, Monr County sh Within one (1) year of adoption of the 2030
23
Comprehensive Plan. Monroe Countv shall evaluate the hermit allocation and
point system to consider assigning a positive point rating to developments
utilizing alternative water collection systems sueh as eisteffis,
which conserve potable
water supply. [°T�(2)(e)3; °T 5 . 013(2 )( e)41
Policy 701.95.8
As the water conservation measures set forth in Policies 701.15.1 through
701.95.7 are implemented, Monroe County shall re- evaluate the adopted
potable water levels of service through the evaluation and appraisal report
process .
Objective 701.4-06
In coordination with the FKAA, Monroe County shall continue to maximize the use
of existing facilities and discourage urban sprawl thfough implementation of Potable
. mT c ni , (2b)31[§ 163.3177(6)(c)2., F.S.1
Policy 701.6.1
Monroe County shall annually evaluate proposed FKAA capital
improvements for inclusion in the annual update of the County's CIE
Schedule.
Policy 701.6.2
Existing facilities shall be maximized by encouraging capital developments in
already developed areas and discouraging extension of facilities to
undeveloped areas.
r fras�ns�ris
• •••
•. • •
•.
• •
24
I IIMF i It
EfF WW
_
.. •.
. • •
IMMAII
I IIMF i It
EfF WW
_
.. •.
. • •
5.2 Natural Groundwater and Aquifer Recharge Element
GOAL 1101
Monroe County shall protect the quality and quantity of water in the potable water aquifer
and in the freshwater lens systems so as to ensure public health, conserve the public water
supply, and preserve ecosystems dependent upon freshwater. 10i 5
[ §163.3177(6)(c), F.S.I,
Objective 1101.1
Monroe County shall work cooperatively with Miami - Dade County to encourage land
use planning and development controls which shall protect the recharge area of the
Florida City Wellfield from potential sources of groundwater contamination
saltwater intrusion and over - extraction (See Potable Water Objective 701.4 and
related policies.) [9i5. (d), (J163.3177(6) F.S.I
Obiective 1101.2
�, .. ..____...... ., _iiv, _.�vaaa VV vvua aJ Jaawaa aaau aaav 1a vJaa .. uaVa aVIIJ J'Jaa/IIIJ u lf u
•e d F M. the Flefida Keys and shall ado w hich
nrnteet the le f of l ess o f ..e,.la p 1 n f om th o f g n r
ra Vavva aaav avaaJVJ as Viii aVJJ Va aVVIIC{I LV l.JVIVIIT
r9i c n1 1(2)(b)c. or 5
E6�t6a'. �v7�� r�
Monroe County shall provide for the protection of groundwater within the
unincorporated areas.
25
MA
LO'NEL-VA1104rap"TA 2211-7-mall
25
Policy 1101.2.21
Monroe County shall undertake activities which shall reduce pollutant entry
into groundwater, summarized as follows:
1. Monroe County shall develop and implement permitting, inspection
and enforcement procedures designed to reduce pollutant discharges
into groundwater from:
a) on -site disposal systems (See Sanitary Sewer Goal 901 and
related objectives and policies);
b) secondary sewage treatment plants and injection wells (See
Sanitary Sewer Goal 901 and related objectives and policies);
affd
C) stormwater runoff (See Drainage Element Objective 100131
and related policies);
d) pesticides used for mosquito control — Monroe County shall
immediately take oordinate with the Florida Keys
Mosquito Control District to promote mosquito control
techniques which will reduce the entry of pollutants from aerial
pesticide applications into groundwater (See Genser- ation an
Coast �►,r,,,,,,,.o Obje rn r elated po fi ie
\.V{AJ LCLl i�aua e , 1 i an
e) fuel storage tanks — Monroe County 14RS Unit shall coordinate
with the Department of Health (DOH) to continue to
undeitake undertakinc activities designed to reduce pollutant
discharges into ground and surface waters from aboveground
and underground fuel storage tanks (See Conservation and
Coastal Management Objective 202.12 and related policies);
and
f) hazardous wastes — Monroe County shall continue to undertake
activities which support existing state and federal laws
pertaining to the handling, transportation and disposal of
hazardous wastes (See Solid Waste Objective 801.5 and related
policies.) [9i 5 9- b)
�(3)(m 9i
c ni 3(2)(b) 9 and 10
I
N.
N. ■
`
■
n
1'a
26
1
System. [9J 5.011(2)(c)4; 9J 5.013(2)(b)1 and 9]
Policy 1101.2.42
Monroe County shall
continue to restrict the percentage of impervious surfaces on development
sites through application of the Open Space Requirements in the Land
Development RegulationsCode. These regulations shall be met or exceeded in
order to minimize impervious areas and to protect freshwater lens recharge
areas. [9J 5.011(2)(c)4; 9J 5.013(2)(b)1 and 9]11163.3177(6)(c),F.S.1
Policy 1101.2.53
evaluation theMonroe County shall consider altering the minimum required
open space ratios, and other development regulations, to protect the quantity
and quality of groundwater in the freshwater lens systems. —The-County-shall
9J 5.013(2)(b)1,2,9 and 10] f§163.3177(6)(c), F.S.1
1111My 1101.2.4
Monroe County shall maintain land illikmentiltulatidirthat prey
groundwater contamination during resource extraction operations. Such
regulations shall require onsite retentio int source ollution controls
inecting FDEP and AcOE requirement
Ob eetivc >>0 3
freshwater lens system. [9J 5.011(2)(b)5; 9J 5.013(2)(b)2]
Policy . .
water testing. [9J 5.011(2)(c)4; 9J 5.013(2)(b)1 and 9)
Policy . ,
5.011(2)(c)4; 9J 5.013(2)(b)1 and 91
27
1 1 0 9 .1-- ft—
XUR
5.4 Conservation and Coastal Management Element
,K17� i�►�i it
Monroe County shall conserve and protect potable water resources and cooperate with
regional efforts to ensure the continued availability of high quality potable water. [9i 5.011
R 163.3177(6)d. 9i c 0 3i.b., F.S.; § 163.3177(6)d. } .c., F.S.I
Objective 211.1
Monroe County shall encourage the use of water conservation strategies, including,
but not limited to cisterns, on -site stormwater collection systems used for irrigation
and bio- swales, and work cooperatively with FKAA and Miami - Dade County to
encourage water conservation efforts and assure that land use planning and
development controls are maintained which shall ffetec-t rop tects the recharge area of
the Florida City Wellfield from potential sources of groundwater contamination and
saltwater intrusion. (See Potable Water Objective 701.43 and related policies). {9j-
c.0 3(2)(b`'" f § 163.3177(6)d.2.b., F.S.; § 163.3177(6)d.2.c., F.S.]
Objeetive 2H.2
Policy 211.1.1
Monroe County shall continue to assist the FKAA with water conservation
efforts and assist in, including_ implementing the FKAA's Water
Conservation Plan, consistent with SFWMD's Water Shortage Plan and Water
Consumption Guidelines, and shall implement measures to further conserve
potable water. (See Potable Water Objective 701.9--5 and related policies).
[9i 5 R163.3177(6)d.2.b., F.S.; §163.3177(6)d.2.c., F.S.]
nNeetiye 211
Policy 211.1.2
By januar-y Monroe County shall idenfifyhas identified the freshwater
lens system and associated recharge areas of the Florida Keys and --sue
implement Pf:8gFaffiS as noted within Water Resources of Big Pine
Key, Florida, (Hanson, 1980). Within one (1) year after the adoption of the
2030 Comprehensive Plan, the County shall adopt land development
regulations that regulate the storage and use of hazardous materials in
recharge areas, prohibiting new water withdrawals, and phasing out existing
water withdrawals to protect freshwater lenses.
(one AT.,r,, G r-e ,,,,a,. atef Aquif R ee h ar - ge Obje b yes 1101 d 1101
and related pohei es)[9i 5.013( f § 163.3177(6)d. F.S.;
§ 163.3177(6)d. F.S.I
28
5.4 Future Land Use Element
GOAL 101
Monroe County shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life, ensure the safety
of County residents and visitors, and protect valuable natural resources. rot 5
j§163.3177(1), F.S.1
Objective 101.1
Monroe County shall ensure that all development and redevelopment taking place
within its boundaries does not result in a reduction of the level -of- service
requirements established and adopted by this comprehensive plan. " Co
shall ensure that at the fifne a developffient per is issued, adequate publie faeilifi
are available to sef�ve the development at the adopted - level -- orser s*,,ndai.as
coneuFfent with the impaets of sueh development. r9j 5 . 006 ( 3 )( b ) 1 Further, Monroe
County shall ensure that comprehensive plan amendments include an analysis of the
availability of facilities and services or demonstrate that the adopted levels of service
can be reasonably met. f § 163.3177 & 163.3180, F. S.l
Policy 101.1.1
Monroe County shall adept maintain level of service (LOS) standards for the
following public facility types required by Chapter 9-J--5163, F. A.C. r-aads,
sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, and potable water- Additionally the
County shall maintain LOS for roads, and parks and recreatio
pai-7atransit. The LOS standards are established in the following sections of
the Comprehensive Plan:
2. The LOS for potable water is established in Potable Water Policy
701.1.1;
Policy 101.1.3
Facilities for potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste and drainage shall be
in place and available to serve new development no later than the issuance of
the certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. If facility
improvements are needed to ensure that the adopted level -of- service standards
are achieved and maintained, prior to commencement of construction, a
developer is required to enter into a binding and legally enforceable
commitment to the County to assure construction or improvement of the
facility. f 163.3180, F. S.l
5.5 Capital Improvements Element
Objective 1401.4
Monroe County shall coordinate land use decisions and fiscal resources with a
schedule of capital improvements in order to maintain the adopted level of service
29
(LOS) standards for both previously issued development orders and future
development. f nT Trr - 5.04 3.3177 (3)(ba)3 -ate., F.S.1
Policy 1401.4.1
Monroe County shall adopt and maintain level of service (LOS) standards for
the following public facility types: roads, sanitary sewer, solid waste,
drainage, potable water, and parks and recreation. The LOS standards are
established in the following sections of the Comprehensive Plan:
2. The LOS for potable water is established in Potable Water Policy
701.1.1;
Policy 1401.4.4
Public facilities and services needed to support development shall be available
eeneufFent with the impaets of development, in accordance with the adopted
levels of service referenced in Policy 1401.4.1 and Chapter- 9i 5.0055, F.A.G_
Development approval may be phased to allow the provision of public
facilities and services necessary to maintain the adopted levels of service. {)J-
c n1 6(3)( e )64
Policy 1401.4.5
Monroe County hereby adopts a Concurrency Management System to ensure
that facilities and services needed to support development are available
concurrent with the impact of development. The Concurrency Management
System shall ensure that the County shall issue no development order or
permit which results in a reduction in the level of service (LOS) below the
adopted LOS standards referenced in Policy 1401.4.1 for those public
facilities that are subject to the system. The guidelines established in Policies
1401.4.6, 1401.4.7, 1401.4.8, 1401.4.9, and 1401.4.10 shall ensure that
concurrency is successfully implemented.
Policy 1401.4.6
The following guidelines identify the stages in the development review
process when the test for concurrency must be met.
1. Preliminary Development Order Stage - A preliminary development
order is a development order that precedes the issuance of a building
permit, such as a subdivision plat, development plan, certificate of
compliance, conditional use permit, or development of regional impact
development order. A proposed development must receive a
conditional concurrency determination prior to receiving a preliminary
development order.
30
2. Final Development Order Stage - A final development order is a
building permit or any other development permit authorizing the
construction or expansion of a structur an increase in
development intensity, or a change of use requiring a new certificate of
occupancy. A proposed development must receive a final concurrency
determination prior to receiving a final development order.
Policy 1401.4.8
The following guidelines identify the minimum criteria necessary to meet the
concurrency requirements of each public facility type.
1. The concurrency requirements for potable water, solid waste,
sanitary sewer, and drainage facilities and services shall be satisfied if
one or more of the following conditions are met:
a) the necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a
development permit is issued; or
b) the necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a
certificate of occupancy, or its functional equivalent is issued.
b) t he developmen permi -is issued subj'e t o the eendi ion that
is of the d ffie.,t oeeur- of
e) the neeessi aeili ies —afe under- eenstFue at the fifne -a
p o ; t i s i ssu e d; e
2. The concurrency requirements for recreational facilities shall be
satisfied if one or more of the following conditions are met:
a) conditions 1(a) or 1(b) or- 1(e) listed above or, in the case of
acreage for parks and recreational facilities, which shall be
dedicated to or acquired by the County prior to issuance of a
building permit, or funds in the amount of the developer's fair
share are committed no later than the approval to commence
construction or
31
b) a binding exeeuted t is - iirpraEe at the tline tl-1
development ent pe mit i r issued — hiehpf id es f er- the
eemmeneefnent of the actual eenstmetion of the fequired
f seFyie2s within one iai
e) enforceable development agreement guarantees that the
necessary facilities and services will be in place wi thin
yeaf a with the issuance of the applicable development permit.
An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not
limited to, development agreements pursuant to section
163.3220, F.S., or an agreement or development order issued
pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.
3. The concurrence requirements for roads shall be satisfied if one or
more of the following conditions are met:
) conditions 1(a) or 1(b) listed above; or
b) a binding executed contract is in place at the time the
development permit is issued which provides for the
commencement of the actual construction of the required
facilities or provision of services; or
c) an enforceable development agreement euarantees that the
necessary facilities and services will be in place with the
issuance of the applicable development permit. An enforceable
development agreement may include, but is not limited to,
development agreements pursuant to section 163.3220, F.S., or
an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter
380, F.S.
Policy 1401.4.10
Monroe County shall use the following guidelines for interpreting and
applying level of service standards to development order applications. For the
purposes of this policy, reserve capacity refers to the capacity of existing
public facilities plus the capacity of public facilities which do not exist but
which meet the applicable requirements of Policy 1401.4.7, less the existing
demand for those facilities and the demand expected to be created for those
facilities by approved but unbuilt development as determined by the databases
in Policy 1401.4.9.
1. Potable Water- The County shall not render a final concurrency
determination unless the quantity of water available under the FKAA
Consumptive Use Permit meets or exceeds the estimated water
32
demand of the proposed development together with the estimated
water demand of all existing and committed development.
5.6 Energy and Climate Element
Policy 1502.1.5
Within five (5) years after the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan,
Monroe County shall initiate an inventory of existing and planned
infrastructure up to the 2030 horizon, based upon the vulnerability mapping
identified in Policy 1502.1.4, for capacity to accommodate projected sea -level
rise over the life expectancy of that infrastructure. Monroe County shall
identify the infrastructure within those areas, its useful life and any retrofits or
capital projects necessary to address the impacts of sea level rise. These
strategies may include defense, accommodation, or and retreat projects, or not
building planned infrastructure in vulnerable locations, to address the impacts
of sea level rise. Monroe County will consider developing design criteria, in
conjunction with a broader asset management planning_ process.
Policy 1502.1.7
Monroe County shall ensure that new, renovated and replacement up blic
facilities and infrastructure, such as streets and bridges, water and wastewater
treatment plants, police stations and fire stations, and any other public
facilities that the County has authority over, are designed in a manner which
considers the useful life of public facilities and infrastructure. The County
shall also consider the potential impacts from climate change, including rising
sea levels and shoreline stabilization needs, on its infrastructure and public
facilities.
Policy 1503.1.5
Consistent with the Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan, Monroe
County shall encourage FKAA to continue expanding water auditing
programs to increase the scope of the audits and identify opportunities to
reduce system leaks and promote water conservation retrofitting_
33
Policy 1502.1.6
Within five (5) years after the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan,
Monroe County shall consider incorporating a planning, design and permitting
standard for infrastructure and public facilities that may include a sea level
rise assumption of Y -7" by 2030 as developed by the Southeast Regional
Policy 1503.1.6
Within one (1) year after the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Monroe County shall develop policies to increase water conservation which
may include the adoption of a recognized standard such as the South Florida
Water Management District's "Water Star" or EPA's "Water Sense"
programs.
Policy 1503.1.7
Within five (5) years after the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Monroe County shall determine the appropriate climate change considerations
(including but not limited to, emergency management, flood risk, storm surge
threats to potable water supply, the potential for changing habitat and
landscapes, the need for shoreline stabilization and the potential impacts to
infrastructure necessary to serve proposed uses) to evaluate when reviewing
land use amendments.
6.0 REGIONAL ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLANS
6.1 Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update, September 12, 2013
The sole source provider of potable water to Monroe County is FKAA, whose wellfield is
located in Florida City. The Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update indicates that the
FKAA wellfield as a Utility At Risk from saltwater intrusion, but also states that the FKAA
is a permitted Floridan Aquifer User, which should offset any anticipated drought- driven salt
water intrusion event. FKAA also operates RO facilities in Marathon and Stock Island.
6.2 Integrating Climate Change & Water Supply Planning In Southeast Florida,
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, June 10, 2014
The Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, which includes Palm Beach,
Broward, Miami -Dade and Monroe Counties, predicts that the sea level will rise between 9
and 24 inches by 2100 (the Compact's A Unified Sea Level Rise Projection for Southeast
Florida [April, 2011] predicts that the sea level will rise between 3 and 7 inches by 2030).
This may have implications regarding the ability of the local utility to provide fresh potable
water from the Biscayne Aquifer to Monroe County as the salt water intrusion line shifts
westward towards the FKAA wellfield. Monroe County's climate change and sustainability
consultants have recently summarized hydrologic modeling by the United States Geological
Survey that suggests relatively low risk to the FKAA wellfields in Florida City under even
the worst -case 2060 sea level rise scenarios. However, FKAA continues to monitor the most
current data and analysis regarding this issue.
34
7.0 REFERENCES
• Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 20 -Year Water System Capital Improvement Master
Plan, December 2006
• Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, Annual Water Demand Update Through 2030
• Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, Annual Water Demand Update by Municipal
Boundary
• Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority Projected 5 -Year Capital Improvement Plan
• Keith and Schnars, P.A.and Fishkind and Associates, Monroe County 2010 -2030
Population Projections, March 15, 2011
• Monroe County Growth Management, Monroe County 2010 Comprehensive Plan
• Monroe County Growth Management, Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update
• South Florida Water Management District, Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update,
September 12, 2013
• Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, A Unified Sea Level Rise
Projection for Southeast Florida, April, 2011
• Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, Integrating Climate Change &
Water Supply Planning In Southeast Florida, June 10, 2014
8.0 EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Section 7.2 of the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority 20 -Year Water System
Capital Improvement Master Plan, December 2006.
35
Exhibit A to Monroe County 10 -Year
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update
SECTION 7. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
7.2 Water Infrastructure System
7.2.1 Major System Upgrades
The CIP identifies many short- and long -term improvements to the water transmission,
distribution, water storage, raw water supply, and the water treatment plants. Upgrades to
the Water Infrastructure System will increase water treatment and storage capacities, and
improve flows and pressures to meet anticipated water demands. Significant upgrades and
proposed new facilities to the water treatment plants are planned to improve the reliability
and quality of FKAA's drinking water. A specific goal is to provide high quality water that
will meet future regulatory standards and will be able to meet projected water demands.
Major improvements to the water system include a new Floridan aquifer wellfield that will
serve a new LPRO treatment facility at the J Robert Dean WTP in Florida City, multiple
rehabilitation or upgrade projects at both the Kermit H. Lewin Desalination WTP and the
Marathon Desalination WTP facility to increase reliability and capacity to meet emergency
and peak day flows, and various transmission/ distribution line replacements, distribution
pump station upgrades, and improved water storage tanks to improve delivery capacity of
the system.
Exhibit 7 -2 shows all planned project improvements from 2006 through 2025 and associated
order of magnitude cost estimates. The total estimated cost (in 2006 dollars) of these
improvements is $208,606,402 during the next 20 years.
EXHIBIT 7.1
20 -Year Water Infrastructure Capital Improvement - Order of Magnitude Cost Summary
Including an Annual
Item Amount 3% Inflation
Water Supply Wells
$11,575,000
$12,695,000
Water Treatment Plants
$41,886,368
$45,224,000
Transmission Mains and Booster Pump Stations
$58,899,034
$72,725,000
Distribution Mains
$47,500,000
$64,676,000
Distribution Pump Stations and Ground Storage
$33,546,000
$43,949,000
Facilities and Structurel
$15,200,000
$16,223,000
20 Year Water Infrastructure Capital Improvement Program - GRAND TOTAL $208,606,402 $266,492,000
Note:
'Facilities and Structures are not included in the detailed discussions in previous sections of this Master Plan document. Only
order of magnitude costs included in Section 7 (per FKAA).
7.2.2 Basis of Project Cost Estimates
For master planning purposes, planning level cost estimates are order -of- magnitude esti-
mates. As defined by the American Association of Cost Engineers, order -of- magnitude cost
estimates are believed to be accurate within a range of 30 percent below, to 50 percent
above, actual costs.
WPB310127161224.DOC/061640010 7.3
WB122005005DFB
3
2010
4
2011
51 Immediate
TOTAL
1
2012
B
2013
7
2014
6
2015
9 10
2076
Mid -term
Subtotal
1
2017
2018
13 14
15 18
17
18
19
Lon •term
a
2018 2020
2021 2022
2023
2024
2025
Subtotal
Total
$
S
l
a 6,160,906
a
a
$ 8,160,IX
a
$ 2,415,000
$ 2,415,000
$
$ 2,415,6[
$
$
E !,000,000
$ _
$
$ 1,000,00
$ 9,180,000
$ -
$ 2,415,000
$ -
S -
S -
a 2,415,000
a -
a
S - E
$
-
- S
$ 11,575,00
$
$
E
5.18,3
$
--
- - - --
18,323,39
$ 6,900,000
$ 6,900,00
S
$ 1,836,400
S 1,636,400
$
$ 9,836,40
S 9,6!7,568
$
S
$ 3,817,56E
2,658,003
E -
a
$ 2,659,003
a 8,950 000
$
a
$ 8,350,000
a
$ -
$ 40,049,966
$
$ 1,836,400
$
S
E -
a 1,896,400
$ -
S
a
E
E
-
S -
$
$
S
$
$ 41,886,366
a
$
s
$ 200,666
a
$
$ 296,666
E 73,862,000
$ _
$
$ 13,662,000
$ 9,188,000
$
S
$ 3,188,060
E 1.500.000
$
a
$
1,500,000
ONV3101569546.x18/0 6 24 9 0 01 0
6f 3
Exhibit 7 -2 1
1 '
20 -Year Capital Improvement
Plan
1
2
3
4
5 Immediate
6
7
B
9 10
Mid -term
11
12 13
Project Name Project
2007
2006
2009
2010
2011
TOTAL
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Subtotal
14
15
16
17
18
19
Long -term
2017
2018 2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
_2024
2025
Subtotal
Total
Marathon 18-
inch
Transmission
i
Main
Replacements
18 -inch
$ -
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
; -
$ 300,000
Transmission
Main
- placement
-
N. Roosevelt
$ 1,572;OD0
$1,572
$ 3,144,DD0
E
Phase tI
$
$ 3,144,000
Cathodic
Protection
$ 2,118,334
$ 2,118,394
$
Upsize diesel
$
$ 2,118,334
J. Robert
driven pumps 1 and
Dean WfP
2
J. Robert Install new 5 MG
$ 302,000
S 302,000
$
$ -
$ 302,000
Dean V TP storage tank
$ -
$ 4,855,000
S 4,855,000
Key Largo Install 3rd electric
$
$ 4,855,000
Booster PS transmission purnp,
E
$ 251,850
$ 251,860
Plantation Key
$
6 251,850
Booster PS
$
S 4,209,000
$ 4,209,000
S 8418000
Marathon
, ,
E
$ 8,418,000
Pump Station Engine 8 Pumps -
In . 1075
$ 907,000
$ 907,000
$
Marathon Add a second 3 MG
$ -
S 907,ODD
Booster PS Istoragetank.
1
$1,430,500
$ 1,430,50D
$ 2,861,000
S
Marathon Install 3rd electric
$
$ 2,861,000
Booster PS pump
y _
$ 251.650
$ 267,850
Lower Keyes
$
$ 251,850
Booster Pump
Station #1
$
$ 4,2D9,OOD
$ 4,209,000
$ 8,418,000
Lower Keyes
$
$ 8,418 DOO
Booster Pump
Station #2
$
E
Ramrod
$4,209,000
$4,209,000
$ 8,418,000
$ 8,418,000
Booster PS
S -
$ 104,000
S iD4,000
$
Total project Costs
; - S 7,578,334
E10,058,000
S 5,510,0011
$3,304,500
$ 1,430,500
$ 27,882,334
E 9,364,000
E 4,209,000
$ -
$ 4,816,700
$ 4,209,000
$ 22,598,700
$
$ - $
$
$
-
$ 104,OD0
-
-
S -
S
54,209,006
$4,209,000
$ 8,418,000
$ 58,899,034
Distribution Mains
S
$
Replace Old
$ -
Galvanized
Mains
$ 341,000
S 341,000
$
Ups¢e Small-
E
$ 341,000
Diameter
Mains to 4
inch 8 other
upgrades
$ 1,607,000
3 1,558,500 1
5 1,558,500
$2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 9,724,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
E 12,500,000
$ 2,50QDOD
$2,500,000 $2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
Cudjoa Key
$2,500,0617
$22,500,000
$ 44,724,000
Additional
Distribution
Main Header
$ 552,000
$ 652,000
;
Islamorada
$
$ 552,000
Distribution Install distribution
I PS
main header
$ 941,500
$ 941,500
$ 1,883,000
$
Total Distribution Mains Project
S $ 2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 12,500,000
$ 2,500,000
S 2,500,000
$2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$ 12,500,000
$ 2,500,000
$2,500,000 $2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
;2,500,000
52,500,000
52,500,000
$ -
$22,500,000
$ 1,863,000
$ 47,580,000
DisMbutfon Pump Station and Storage
Immediate
Ocean Rest
Additional 1.0 MG
Storage
$
Long -term
New Pump Station
-
$ 860,000
3 660,000
$ 00
$
S 1,720,000
Lake Surprise
and 0.75 MG
T1,126.5-W$
-
Stora tank
$
$ 1,126,500
00
Repla
Repla ce and
S 2,253,0110
Rock Harbor
Upsize existing
Station
S
$ 536,000
S 536,000
00
Rock Harbor
Install 0.5 MG
$
$ 1,076,000
Storage Tank
;
$ 405,000
$ 405,000
$ 810,000
S
Rock Harbor
Install athird 0.5
MG Tank
E -
-
$ 810,000
New Larger Pump
$
$ 810,1700
$ 910
$ 610,000
Tavernier
Station and Ncw
Larger Storage tank
I.
(1.0 MG)
$1
$ 1,318,500
S 2,637,000
$
finch tap and 8" fill
$
$ 2,637,000
Tavernier
line
S 76,000
5 76,000
$ 152
E
$
$ 152,000
GNV3101589546.xIsfM490010 2 of 3
Exhibit 7 -2
20 -Year Capital
improvement
Plan
1 2
3
a
5 Immediate
8
7
a
9 10
Mld -term
11
12
13
1a
75
18
Project Name
Project
J 2007
2008 2008
2010
2011
TOTAL
2012
2015
2014
2015
2016
Subtotal
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
17
2023
18
2024
19
2025
Long -tern
Subtotal
Total
Install 8•inch
distribution main
Tavernier
header along both
sides of US-1
where required
$ 646,000
5 646,000
$ 1,292,000
$
New Pump Station
$
$ 1,292,000
Plantation Key
and 1.0 MG
Lower
Storage tank
New Pump Station
$ -
$
$ 1,325,500
$1,325,500
$ 2,651,000
$ 2,851,000
Matecumbe
and and 0.5 MG
key
Duck
Storage tank
New Pump Station
§ _
$
$ 974,500
$ 974 500
$ 1,949,000
$ 1,949,000
Key/Grassy
and 0.75 MG
Key
Storage tank
Install New and
$ _
§
$7.133,500
$1,133,500
§ 2,Z87,000
$ 2,267,000
Crawl Key
Upgraded Pump
Station
Install New 6-inch
$1,090,OOD
$ 1,090,DOD
$ _
$
$ 1,090,000
Crawl Key
tap and 8 -inch
(assumed) Fill Line
5 109
$ 109,000
$
Replace and
$
$ 109,000
Crawl Key
Upsize Storage
Tank(101
'�
$
$ 1,464,000
$ 1,464,000
§
$ 1,464,0110
Vary Cut
Install New 0.5
5 MG
Storage Tank
$ 811),000
$ 810
§
Demolish Existing
—
$
$ 810,000
0.5 MG Storage
Vary Cut
Tank and Install
New 0.5 MG
Storage Tank
§
$ 969,000
$ 869,000
$
$ 869,000
891h Street
$
$
33rd Street
Replace Existing
$
$
Pump Stall n
§ -
S 1,138,D00
§ 1,196,000
$
$ 1,138,000
Replace Existing
-
33th Street
1).5 MG Storage
Tank with New 0.5
MG storage tank
New Pump Station
$ 897,000
$ 897,000
$ 897,000
Ramrod
and 0.50 MG
Storage Tank
New Pump station
-
$ _
$
$ t ' g �'�
$ 1,900,000
$ 1,900,000
Cudjoe Key
and 1.OMG Storage
Tank
$ 1,750,D00
$ 1,750,000
_
Replace Pump
$ 7,750,000
Summerfand
Station and Storage
Key
tank, New 0.5 MG
tank
New Pump Station
$
$
$ 1,932,000
$ 1,932,000
$ 1,932,000
Lower
Sugarloaf
and Storage Tank,
Stock Island
New, 0.5 MG tank
Replace Existing
$
$
51,800,000
$ 1
$ 1,900,000
Dl' Mbutiar
Pum Station
— Pump
$ 2,850,500
$ -
$ 7,840,000
$ 2,070,000
$4,151,1100
_
§ 1,809,000
$ 860,000
§ 1,126,500
$ 9,459,500
$ 2,070,000
$
_
_
�
_
_
$ -
$ 2, 070,000
Total Olstrlbutlon
Station
§ - $ 1,750,000
$ - S -
$3,238,600
11,400,000
S 5,1fi7,500
$2,960,000
$2,108,000
$1,949,500
$2,797,000
$
§ -
§ -
E -
$14,308,000
$ 33,546,000
Ficilf0e , antl
Structure
Desal Sewall
$
Repairs
3073
$ 750,000
$ 3,250,000
$ 4,000,000
§
Rehab Admin
$ -
$ 4,()00,000
BldglGara a
3081
$ 400,000
$ 3,400,000 $ 3,400,000
$ 7,200,000
$
Marathon
$
$ 7,200,000
Central
Warehouse
3077
$ _
Customer
-
Servica Meter
.119
3091
$ 425,00
$ 4
$ 8 80,000
--
DESAL/Stock
--
$
_
_
,-
�
$ -
$ 850,000
Islandr -ower
_
Keys Garage
Wastewater 3083
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ -
Marathon
$
$ 200,DDO
Customer
Service
Center 3077
$ 300,000
$ 1,ODD,ODD $ 1,650,000
$ 2,950,000
$
Total Project Costs
$ $ 2,075,000
$ 8,076,000 $ 5,050,000
$ -
S -
$ 15,200,000
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$
§
§
$
$ 2,950,000
$ $18,263,117
44,082,986 §33,461,200
9,044,000
$ 6.781,551)
$112,632,302
18,015,000
$12,763,400
$3,360,000
$ 8,443,2D0
10,168,500
§ 50,750,100
§ 7,667,500
4,800,000
$4,80§,000
$4,449,b00
$b,297.000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$
$6,709,000
$
$8,70B
$
$46,224,000
S 75,200,000
208,606,402
GNV3101569546.xls]OS2490010 3 of 3
Exhibit 7.2
20 -Year Ca
iial Im "ment Plan
Costs in initiated
Dollars
1
2
3
4
5 Immediate
8
7
a
9 101
Mid-term
11
12
13
14
151
16
17
18
1B
Lon -term
Project Name
Proect
2008
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Subtotal
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Subtotal
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Subtotal Total
WamrS F
y - --
—
_.—
S
-
J. Robert
Fora 4.5 MGD
__ �
—
_
-
Dean WTP
WrP -Three2 mgd
-
Phase 1 RO
wells and orre
Facile
standby
8 -
$ 1,751,000
$ 3,819ADO
$ 3,125,000
S -
S -
S 8,696,000
$ -
S
$ -
S -
$ -
S -
$ -
$
$
$
$
S
J. Robert
-
-
-
-
3
$
$
$ 6 8,695,000
Dean WrP
For an additional
Phase 2 RO
1.5 MOD WfP -One
I FOCility
2 mild well
$ -
$. -
$ -
8 -
$
S -
S
S
$ 2,970,000
-5
1 $ -
S -
S 2,970,01ID
$ -
$ -
$
E
S -
$ -
$
$ $ 2,970,000
— Ocean Reef
-
Oceen Reef
supply welts are
Wrp 4.5 MOD
incluo'edin the
RO Facility
water frastnrem
Wotan.
5 -
S -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
f
$ -
5 -
S -
S -
$ -
S -
S -
$ -
S -
It -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
-
Aquifer
Storage and
Recovery
(ASR)
1073
$
S 1,030,000
$ -
$ -
$
E -
$ 1,030000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
S -
5
S
$
Torn] Project
-
_
g
$ _
$ -
S -
E E 1,030,000
costs
$
f 2,781,0011
1 $ 3,819,000
S 3.12-%000
S
f
$ 10,725 801
S
$ 2,970,000
$
$
f
S 2,970.000
$
S
$
S
S
E
$
E
S
$ f 12 695.000
weer rrebnenr
S
E
J. Robert
$
Dean WfP
Phase 1 RO
4.5 MOD RO
S -
$ 412,000
$ 9,507,000
S 9,793,000
$
$ -
$ 19,712,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
$
$
E
!
J. Robert
1 DIW for
-
E -
$ -
$ -
E -
S - S 19,712,000
Dean WTP
Concentrate
Phase 1 RO
Disposal
$ 31380
$ 3,770,000
$ 7,430,010.
J. Robert
$ 7,430,000
Dean WfP
An additional 1.5
Phase RO
MGD RO
$ -
$ -
S -
S -
$ -
8 -
$
$ -
$ 2.259,000
$ -
S -
$
E 2,259,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$ $. 2259,000
Komi fi.
t
.
-
Lawin RO
Desalinatlon
Wrp
Membrane
Stock island
Replacement
Construction 1082
$ -
5 1,988,000
$ 2,025,000
E -
$ -
$ -
f 3,981,000
5 -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
S
S
$
S
$
Marathon Ro
-
-
$ -
$
8
$
$ $ 3;981p00
Desalination
WTP
Membrane
replacemera
and Plara
Marathon
Upgrades
Construction Cost
$
S -
$ 1,410,000
$ 1,453,000
$
S -
$ 2,663,OD0
$ -
$
$ -
3
$ -
S -
S -
S
$
S
Ocean Reer
-
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
3 -
$ -
-
S $ 2,863,000
4.5 MOD RO
De"dinali0n
WTP
1.5 MOO(FKAA's
Membrane
cost share
Plant
component) "Npte-
Consbuc5on
coViotovldedby
Cost O tion
FKAA
$
$ 361,000
$ 4,456,000
$ 4,152,000
ll -
E -
$ 8.888000 Is
-
8
$ -
$ -
$ -
S
$
$
E
S -
E -
E -
E
$
E
S S 8,969,000
Total Project Coats
$ -
S 2,739,000
521,056,000
$19,168,000
$ -
E
$ 42,995,001)
$
$ 2,259,000 1
$
S
f -
f 2.258,900
S
IS
S -
$
$
$
S
E
$
$ S 45,224,000
T7anaftpa
Shins end800sfer
PemP Slat—
S
$ -
Replace 36
S
Inch
transmission
Other 16 -mile
Main
stretch se meets
$
S
$ 212,000
f -
$ -
$ -
$ 212,000
S
$
$
-
-
-
8
$ -
$
$
$
$
$ -
$ -
$ _
$ _
$ _
5 -
S S 212,000
Replace 36-
inch
tra nsmission
MM 9398
Main
Replacement
$
S 4,691,000
$ 9,663,000
$
$ -
$ -
$ 14,354,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
5
S -
S
$
$
$
$
12 -inch Ocean
$ -
$ -
S -
S -
5 -
E 5 14,354.000
reef
Transmission
Maim
Conoect1
S
$ -
$ -
$ 3,4&1,000
$ -
$ -
S 3A84.DOO
S -
S -
S
S
$ -
S
$ -
$ -
$
$
Replace 18-
-
S -
E
S
S E 3,464,000
inch Main,
Key Larg. 92-
$ -
$ -
$ 796,000
$ 620,000
S -
8 -
S 1,616,000
$ -
$
$
$
g
-
-
-
-
$
$
$ _
$
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
S _
$
S $ 1,616,000
MaralhOn 18-
inch
rensmission
Mein
Replacements
,
S -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
S -
It 358,000
E -
$ -
$ -
$ -
S 958000
$ -
$
S
S
$ -
S _
$ -
S
$
$ $ 358,000
GNV3101569546.MBr062490010
1 013
ExhlbH 7 -2
2D-Year Capital
Improvement Plan
Costs in Inflated
Dollars
1
2
3
4
5 Immediate
8
7
8
9
Mid -term
17
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Lon -term
Proect Name
Proect
2006
2007
2008
2008
2010
2011
Subtotal
2012
2013
2014
WAS
Subtotal
2017
2018
2019
2920
2021
2022
2023
2024
2026
Subtotal Total
18 -inch
t
Transmission
Main
m replaceent
N. RoOSevelt
Phase II
S -
S -
S -
S 1,718,000
S 1,769,000
S -
E 3,487,000
3
S -
$ -
$ -
It
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$
3 -
$
$
$ $ 3,487,000
Cathodic
Protection
$
$ 2,182,000
1 $ -
E -
It -
1 $ -
S 2,182,000
$ -
S
5
$
$
$
S -
$ -
S -
$ -
S -
S -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ $ Z182,000
J. Robert
Unsize diesel
Dean WfP
driven pumps 1 and
2
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 340,000
$ -
; 340
$
Is -
S
$
$
$
S
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
E -
; -
S ', S 340,000
J. Robert
ean
D WTP
Install near 5 MG
storage tank
$ -
E -
$ -
$ -
5 -
$ -
E -
$ 5,797,000
$ -
$ -
S -
S -
$ 6,797,000
5
$
3
$ -
$
$
S
S
It
S S 5,797,000
Key Largo
Install 3rd electric
Booster PS
transmission pump
S -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
f
$ -
3 -
$
$ 329000.
$
8 329,000
$ -
S -
$
S -
$ -
3 -
$ -
E -
$
$ '.S 329
Plantation Key
Booster PS
$ -
$ -
$
I S -
$ -
$ -
S -
S 5,026,000
$ 5,177,000
S
$
S
570,20.1,000
9
$ -
$ -
It -
$ -
$ -
$ -
; -
$
$ S 10,203000
Marathon
Pump Staaon
Engine
.
1075
$
S 934,000
$
$ 830.000
$ -
E -
$ -
S -
5 -
S -
S
is -
S -
$
$
$
$
Marathon
Add a second 3 MG
-
-
-
-
S -
$ -
S E 934.000
Booster
storage tank
E -
$ -
S -
$ -
S 1,610,000
$ 1,658,000
$ 3,266,000
5
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ _
$ _
$ _
; _
S _
$ -
$
$ -
5
$.
$ $ 3,268,000
Marathon
booster PS
Install 3rd electric
PUMP
$ -
8 -
S -
S -
$ -
S -
$
$ -
3
$ -
$ 329,000
$ -
E 328,000
$ -
E -
8
S -
$ -
S
$ -
3 -
$
S $ 329
Lower Keys
Booster pump
Station #1
It -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ -
8 -
S -
S -
$ -
5 -
it 5,492,000
3 5,657,000
$11,149,000
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
S
S -
S -
S -
$
E $ 11,149,000
Lower Keys
Booster pump
is
Station #2
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ _
$ _
; _
$ _
S _
S -
S -
$
S -
-
$ -
$ -
S _
$ _
S -
S 7,166,000
4 7,381,000
510.x47,000 $ 14.547]IDI 000
Ramrod
Booster PS
S
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$ _
$ _
$ 136,000
$ -
$ 136,000
E -
$ -
S -
S -
$ -
3
5
$
$
$ $ 196 Total
Proect
DOaM
5
$ 7,107000
$10,671,000
E 6,022,000
$ 719000
S 1,668,000
$ 29,977,000
$11,181,000
$ 6,177,000
$ -
S 6,2tI8,D011
S 6,667000
$28,301,000
E -
S
S
S
S
$
'$
$ 7,166,000
E 7]81,000
S 72,726 Dist79w9on
Mains
$
$
Replace Old
Galvanized
Mains
S -
$ 357,000
5 -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 361000
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
S -
$
$
3
$
$
$
$
Upsize Small -
-
$
$
Diameter
'
Maims to 4-
inch a other
upgrades
5
$ 1,655,000
$ 1,653,6,00
$ 1,703,000
$ 2,814,000
5 2,898,000
S 10,723000
$ 2,9&5,00)
5 3,D75,DD0
S3,167,DDD
S 3,202,000
S 3,360,000
$16,849,000
S 3,461,000
53,564,000
$3,671,000
$ 3,781,000
$3,895,000
$4,012,000
Cudjoe Key
54,132,000
$ 4,256,000
S 4,3111,000
S36,156,000 3 81,728,000
Additional
Disiridnion
Mein Header
8 -
$ 569,000
$ -
S -
$ -
S -
$ 569,DDO
$ -
It -
S -
S -
$
$
$ -
S
$ -
S -
S -
S -
$
569,000
Islamoretle
Distribution Install distribution
PS mein header
$
5 -
8 999,000 16
1,029,000
S -
3 -
$ 2,028,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
; -
5 -
$
5 _
$ _
g _
;
$
$
S
$ $ 2,028,000
Total DlstribWion Mains Pmect
S
S 2675,000
E 2,662,000
E 2,732,000
$2,876,000
$ 2,898,000
$ 73,677000
$ 2,98fi
$ 3.076,000
$3167,000
S 3,262,000
$ 3,31110,0110
576,849,000
S 9,461,000
53,600,000
$3,871,000
S 5,701,000
$3,895,000
$4,012,000
$41,1132,11100
$ 0.266,000
S 4,384,000
$36,756,000 $ 00,676,009
DisMbuOon PO Stan- and Stwaga
Immediate
Mid -term
I
Lon 4enrl
Ocean Rear Additional 1.0 MG
store e
$
3
$
$
$
$ -
E
E -
$ 7.058,000
$1,089,000
S -
S
S x,ta7,0o0
3 -
5
$
S -
$ -
5 -
$
$ -
$ -
E I S 2,147,000
New Pump Station
_
Lake Surprise and 0.75 MG
r
Storage tank
$
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$ 1,470,000
$ 1,514,000
$ 2994,000
S -
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$
$
E -
F S 2,984,000
Replace and
Rock Harbor Upsize existing
Pump Station
S -
$ -
S -
S -
$ -
$ -
3
$ 642,000
5 082,000
$ -
$
$
$ 1.304,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
E -
8 -
8 -
$
5
$ -
$ $ 1,304,000
Rock Harbor Install 0.5 MG
,
swre9e Tank
$
$
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
S -
$ 484,000
$ 498,000
$ -
S -
S -
$ 982,000
S
s
$
S -
It
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ - It 982,000
Rock Harbor InstaO a third 0.5
MG Tank
Mew Larger Pump
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
E
$ -
8 -
$
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$
$ 1,225,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
$
$ 1,226000 .5 1225,000
Station and New
Tavernier Larger Storage tank
1.0 MG)
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
8 1,484,000
3 1,529,000
$ 3.013,000
$ -
3 -
$
$ -
$ -
S
$ -
5 -
$
S -
$ -
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ 3013,000
&inch lap and 13'1111
$
Tavernier
line
S
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 86,000
$ 88,000
$ 170.000
8 -
S -
S
5 -
$
S
$
$
$
$ -
$
$ -
It
$ -
$ -
S $ 174,000
Install 84nch
distribution mein
Tavernier
header along both
_
sides or US -1
w
S
- -_.
-__-
-.
S 727000
$ 749
_-
S 7,476,000
_._
5 _ -
__.
S -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -__
_
$ -
$ '..
5 -
S -
$ -
S -
$ -
$
$
$ _ $ 7.4 78,008
Now Pump Station
Plantation Key
and 1.0 MG
Storage tank
S 1
$
$ -
5 -
It Is
- I
$
$ -
S -
$ -
$
3
f Is
1,835,000 1
$1,aw
$
$ -
$
$ -
;
$ -
S
S 3,725000 $ 3,725,000
GNV31015695s8.M.Da2490010
2 IN3
Exhibit 7.2
20 -Year Cap
itaI Improvement Plan
Costs in Inflated
Dollars
1
2
3
4
5
Irrrmadmta
6
7
8
91
10
Mid-tam
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
Lon -term
Pro act Name
Pro ect
2006
2007
2006
2009
2010
2011
Subtotal
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Subtotal
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2023
2024
2025
Subtotal Total
Lower
New Pump Station
Metecurllbe
antl and 0.5 MG
12"022
ke
re Sta etank
$
$ -
5
$
5
S -
$
5 -
$
$
5 -
5
$
$ _
$1,389,000
$1.431,000
$ -
$ -
3 -
$ -
$ -
E 2,620,000 6 2,820,00D
Duck
New Pump Station
Key/Ga say
antl 0.75 MG
Ke
Stora etank
S
S. -
$ -
S -
$
6 -
$
$
$
$
$
$
S
5
5
51,865,000
$ 1.715,000
5
$
$
5
It 3,380,000 S 3,38D,000
Install New and
Crawl Key
Upgraded Pump
Station
$
is -
$ -
$ -
$ 1
1 $ -
5 1,227.000
5 -
S
IS -
5 -
$
1 $
$
$ -
$
$ -
$
S -
$ -
S
$
$ - $ 1,227,000
Install New 84nch
Crawl Key
tap and 84nch
( assumed) Foil Line
S
It -
$ -
S -
E 123,000
E -
$ 123,000
$
$
S
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5
$ -
$
$
$
f $ 123,000
Replace and
Crawl Key
Upsize Storage
Tank (to 1 MG)
$
$
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
S
$
5
$
$
$ 1,967,000
$ 1,967,000
5
$
S
S
3
S
$
S
$
S $ 1,967,000
Vary Cut
Insist New 0.5 MG
Storage Tank
$
$
$ -
S. -
$
5 939,000
$ 939,000
$
$
E
5
$
$
S
3
$
$
E
$
$
E
$
$ $ 939,000
Demolish Existing
0.5 M 3 Storage
Vacs Cut
Tank antl Install
New 0.5 MG
Storage Tank
$
$
$
$ -
$
$ -
$
$
s
$
s
5 1,188,000
f 1,168,000
5
$
$
$
E
Is
$
s
$
$ $ 1,186,000
69m Street
1
$ -
$ -
$ -
s -
$
$ -
$
F
$
$
$
$
$
F -
$ -
$
$
E -
$ -
$ -
s
$
f F
33rd Street
Replace Existing
Pump Station
5 _
$ -
5 -
$ -
S _
S -
f _
$ 1359 ODD
$
$
S _
$ _
$ 1,359,000
6 _
6 _
$ _
$ _
$ _
a _
$ _
$ _
$ _
_
$ $ 1,359,000
Replace Existing
33th Street
0,5 MG Storage
Tank with New 0.5
MG storage tank
$
5
S
5
s
5
$
$
$
$
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$1.397,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,397,000 $ 1,397,000
New Pump Station
Ramrod
and 0.50 MG
Storage Tank
6 -
6 -
E -
6 -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
E -
5 -
s -
5 -
$
$ 2,630,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
S
5 2,8,000
S 2,630,000 30
New Pump station
Cuclae Key
and 1.OMG Storage
Tank
is -
$ 1,80,0001$
-
$ -
$ -
$ -
S 1,803,000
$ -
$
S -
$
E
$
$ -
It
$
E -
$ -
$
E -
$
$
S $ 1,803,000
Replace Pump
Summeriand
Station and Storage
Key
tank, New 0.5 MG
tank
$
6 -
5 -
$ -
$
$ -
$
$
$
$
S
$
$
$ 2,674,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 2,674,000 $ 2,674,0DO
New Pump Station
Lower
Storage Tank,
I.
Sugarloaf
New
New 0.5 MG tank
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
f
$ -
$
It -
F -
$
$
It
$
$ -
$2
$ -
$ -
s -
S
f 2,960,000 $ 2,960,000
Stock Island
Replace Existing
Distribution
Pump Station
S
$
$
$
E
$
$
$ 2,472,000
S
$
$
$
S 2,472.000
$
$
$
$
S
$
$
$
$
$ 6 2,472,000
Total Distibutim
Pump Station
$
$ 1,803,000
S
f
$ 3,647,000
$ 3,305,000
S 8,766,000
S 4,967,000
$ 2,218,000
$1,089,000
$ 1,470,000
$ 4,649,000
$14,383,000
$ 7,139,000
$3,279,000
$3,098,000
$ 2,940,000
$4,357,000
$
$
$
$
$20,811,000 $ 43,949,000
F6c➢9ie11; Wd
stuemro
$
Desal Sewall
Rapsin
3073
$
$ 773,000
$ 3,A48,ODD
$ -
$ -
s -
$ 4,221,000
E -
S
$ -
S
$
f
$
$ -
$
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
3 -
$
$ S 4
New Admin
Bld era a
3081
6 -
6 412,000 Is
3,007;000
S 3,715,000
$ -
s -
$ 7,734,000
$ -
E -
S -
E
S -
S -
$
S
6 -
6
$ -
$ -
$
$ _
$ -
-
$ S 7,734,1300
Marathon
Cenval
Warehouse
3077
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
5
$ -
$
$
$ -
E -
$ -
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
$ $
- -
DESAL
Customer
Service/REcor
ds Bldg
3091
$ _
$ 438000
,
$ 451000
,
$ -
$ _
$
BBB,
000 $ 889000
$
$ _
$
$ _
E
$
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
It _
$ _
$ $ 889,000
DESAUJStock
Island/Lower
Keys Garage
Wastewater
3083
$ _
$ 206,000
E _
$ -
$ _
$ _
$ 206000
,
$
$ _
$
$ _
$ _
$
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
S _
S _ S 205,0DO
Marathon
Customer
Senioe
Center
3077
E Is
309,000
$ 1,051,000
$ 1;803,000
$ 15
-
$ 3,173,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
S
$
$
$
$ $ 3,173,000
Total Pro ect Costs
$
$ 2,1311
E 6,1167,000
S 5,610,000
f
S
S 18,228000
S
E
$
$
$
$
$
$
E
$
It
E
S
S
S
$ $ 16,223,000
All Project Cos4Includes
FacllM
18,843,000
48,767,000
36,566,000
10,180,000
f 7,861,000
$121,216,000
119,123,000
515,699,000
54,2 000
$11,018,000
513,866,000
$63,762000
$10,600,000
$6.11143.660
$6,767,000
E 8,721,000
$8,252,000
4,012000
(4132,000
$11,422,000
$11,765,000
$70,514,000 $255,492,000
Note: Pm eded Caste assume annual
inflation
3.00%
GNV3101569548.xIs1082490010 3 m 3
Exhibit 7 -2 (continued)
vvaier zniu
Total Consulting,
Construction C Total Project Suggested
Project ' Construction Administrative Contingency
Cost Cost' , Legal Feesb Cost Timing
J. Robert Dean WTP Phase I and Phase II RO Facility, Floridan Wells Construction Cost
Floridan Water Supply Well - Phase 14.5MGD WTP - Three
2mgd wells and one standby $ 5,913,044 $ 5,913,044 $ 1,182,609 $ 1,064,348 $ 8,160,000 2007 -2009
Floridan Water Supply Well - Phase II adding 1.5MGD for a
total of 6MGD WTP - One additional 2mgd well $ 1,750,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 350,000 $ 315,000 $ 2,415,000 2013
ASR (Cost per FKAA for FY 2007 only) $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2007
Notes:
'These are order -of- magnitude cost opinions (in April 2006 dollars) made without detailed engineering design. It is normally expected that estimates of this type are
accurate within -30% to +50 %.
b Consulting, administrative, legal fees equal 20 percent of construction cost.
° Contingency (15 percent of subtotal costs for all items).
GNV3101569546.xls/062490010 1 of 1
Exhibit 7 -2 (cont.)
Water Treatment Plant
Project
Construction Total Total Project Suggested
Construction Remarks
Cost'
Cost'
Cost Timing
J. Robert Dean WTP Phase I and Phase II RO Facility Construction Cost Option
(Phase 1 based on 60% design cost estimate and Phase 2 based on 60% estimate line
Item cost)
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Piping and Electrical to supply wells and concentrate injection well
$ 1,829,721
$ 1,829,721
$ 1,829,721 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO membrane system
$ 5,439,072
$ 5,439,072
$ 5,439,072 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Degasifier /Scrubber system
$ 1,248,204
$ 1,248,204
$ 1,248,204 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Product transfer pump station
$ 3,123,766
$ 3,123,766
$ 3,123,766 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Chemical storage and feed system
$ 760,706
$ 760,706
$ 760,706 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Site work
$ 795,946
$ 795,946
$ 795,946 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Yard piping
$ 1,026,337
$ 1,026,337
$ 1,026,337 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Electrical and I &C
$ 1,863,390
$ 1,863,390
$ 1,863,390 2007 -2009
PHASE I- 4.5MGD RO Building
$ 2,236,257
$ 2,236,257
$ 2,236,257 2007 -2009
PHASE I - One Concentrate Disposal DIW 1
$ 6,900,000
$ 6,900,000
$ 6,900,000 2007 -2009
PHASE II - 1.5MGD ADDITION (TOTAL 6.OMGD RO) RO membrane system
$ 1,290,000
$ 1,290,000
$ 1,290,000 2013
PHASE II - 1.5MGD ADDITION (TOTAL 6.OMGD RO) Well pipinig, pump, electrical
$ 546,400
$ 546,400
$ 546,400 2013
PHASE II - 1.5MGD ADDITION (TOTAL 6.OMGD RO) Site work
$ -
$
$ - 2013
PHASE II - 1.5MGD ADDITION (TOTAL 6.OMGD RO) Yard piping
$
$
$ 2013
PHASE II - 1.5MGD ADDITION (TOTAL 6.OMGD RO) Yard electrical
$
$
$ 2013
PHASE II - 1.5MGD ADDITION (TOTAL 6.OMGD RO) Plant computer system and programm $
$
$ 2013
Project Total
$27,059,799
$27,059,799
27,059,799
Kermit H. Lewin RO Desalination WTP Membrane Replacement and Plant Upgrades,
Stock Island, Construction Cost Option (Based on 60% Design Cost Estimate)
CO2 pretreatment storage and feed system
$ 826,851
$ 826,851
$ 826,851 2007 -2009
Elevated walkway and platform
$ 143,403
$ 143,403
$ 143,403 2007 -2009
14" Auger cast piles
$ 88,532
$ 88,532
$ 88,532 2007 -2009
Clearwell rehabilitation
$ 37,898
$ 37,898
$ 37,898 2007 -2009
Relocate injection well piping
$ 16,788
$ 16,788
$ 16,788 2007 -2009
RO train piping upgrade
$ 1,379;755
$ 1,379,755
$ 1,379,755 2007 -2009
Electrical and I &C
$ 66,839
$ 66,839
$ 66,839 2007 -2009
Toyobo RO membrane /pressure vessels
$ 1,257,500
$ 1,257,500
$ 1,257,500 2007 -2009
Project Total
$ 3,817,566
$ 3,817,566
$ 3,817,566
Marathon RO Desalination WTP Membrane Replacement and Plant Upgrades,
Marathon, Construction Cost Option (Based on Stock Island 60% line item estimate)
CO2 pretreatment storage and feed system
$ 413,400
$ 413,400
$ 413,400 2007 -2009
14" Auger cast piles
$ 88,000
$ 88,000
$ 88,000 2007 -2009
RO train piping upgrade
$ 689,900
$ 689,900
$ 689,900 2007 -2009
Elevated walkway and platform
$ 143,403
$ 143,403
$ 143,403 2007 -2009
Electrical and I &C
$ 66,800
$ 66,800
$ 66,800 2007 -2009
Toyobo RO membrane /pressure vessels
$ 1,257,500
$ 1,257,500
$ 1,257,500 2007 -2009
Project Total
$ 2,659,003
$ 2,659,003
2,659,003
OCEAN REEF 1.5MGD NEW RO WT
$ 8,350,000
$ 8,350,000
$ 8,350,000 2007 -2009
Grand Total
$ 41,886,368
Notes:
'Standby DIW not required since FKAA has flexibility to perform the 5 year MIT during the wet season and can shut down the RO WTP during that time
Cost provided by FKAA
GNV3101569546.xis/062490010 1 of 1
Exhibit 7 -2 (cont.)
Construction and Total Proiect Cost Estimates for ProDosed Transmission Main Improvement Proiects
J. Robert Dean WTP
Pipeline
Upsize diesel driven pumps 1 and 2
218840.5
218840.5
$43,768
$39,391
$302,000 FY2010
Total
Consulting,
3518116
3518116
$703,623
$633,261
$4,855,000 At FKAA discretion
Construction
Construction
Administrative,
Total Project
$0
Project
Size (inches)
Size (inches)
Cost'
Cost'
Legal Fees
Contingency`
Cost Suggested Timing
Remarks
Replace 36 -inch Transmission Main
182500
182500
$36,500
$32,850
$251,850 At FKAA discretion
(maintenance)
Jewfish Creek
$0
$0
$0 At FKAA discretion
Implementation at the end of master plan
Paint exterior of 5MG concrete tank
FY2008
Contingency, only needed if construction
planning period. Depends on results of
(maintenance)
6100000
$6,100,000
$0
$0
costs exceed funds in JPA
C -111, Protect 36 -inch
Key Largo Booster PS
$0
With elimination of C -111 Canal Bridge
182500
$182,500
dictate
(maintenance)
FOOT owes money to FKAA
Other 18 -mile stretch segments, Protect
$32,850
$
144,928
$ 144,928
$28986
$26087
$200000 FY2008/2009
For protection of transmission main during
36 -inch
On line by 2011
Lower Keys Booster Pump Station #2
6100000
$6,100,000
,
,
,
highway construction
MM 93 -98"
36
21,120 $
13,662,000
$ 13,662,000
FY2007 and 2008
delayed, property acquisition and design
$13,662,000
Replace Other Transmission Mains
should begin immediately
GNV3101569546.xis/062490010
12 -inch Ocean Reef Transmission Main
12
22,000
$2,310,145
$2,310,145
$462,029
$415,826
$3,188,000 At FKAA discretion
Worst segments done first
Replace 18 -inch Main, Key Largo MM
$
1,086,957
$ 1,086,957
92 -93°
18
1,400
$217,391
$195,652
$1,500,000
Marathon 18- inch Main Replacements
18
1,000 $
217,391
$ 217,391
$43,478
$39,130
$300,000
18 -inch Main Replacement, N.
18
15,500 $
2,278,261
$ 2,278,261
$455,652
$410,087
$3,144,000
Roosevelt
Phase II Cathodic Protection
$
1,613,696
$ 1,613,696
$228,334
$276,304
$2,118,334 FY2006/2007
Based on bid price and contingency
allowance (includes engineering SDC)
J. Robert Dean WTP
Upsize diesel driven pumps 1 and 2
218840.5
218840.5
$43,768
$39,391
$302,000 FY2010
Ready to go out to bid
Install new 5MG storage tank
3518116
3518116
$703,623
$633,261
$4,855,000 At FKAA discretion
Paint interior of 1 MG steel tank
$0
$0
$0 FY2007
(maintenance)
2073188.5
2073188.5
$0
$0
$0 FY2007
Paint exterior of IMG concrete tank
182500
182500
$36,500
$32,850
$251,850 At FKAA discretion
(maintenance)
$0
$0
$0 At FKAA discretion
Implementation at the end of master plan
Paint exterior of 5MG concrete tank
planning period. Depends on results of
(maintenance)
6100000
$6,100,000
$0
$0
$0 At FKAA discretion
transmission system hydraulic evaluation
Key Largo Booster PS
and what increasing water demands
Install 3rd electric transmission pump
182500
$182,500
dictate
(maintenance)
$36,500
$32,850
$251,850 At FKAA discreticn
Implementation at the end of master plan
Plantation Key Booster PS
6100000
$6,100,000
$1,220,000
$1,098,000
$8,418,000 FY2010 and 2011
On line by 2011
Lower Keys Booster Pump Station #2
6100000
$6,100,000
$1,220,000
$1,098,000
$8,418,000 At FKAA discretion
If 36" at MM 93 -97 replacement is
FY2007 and 2008
delayed, property acquisition and design
should begin immediately
Marathon Booster PS
Engine & Pumps 1075
657246.5
657246.5
$131,449
$118,304
$907,000 FY2006 and 2007
Ready to go out to bid
Repairs to 3MG tank exterior
0
0
(maintenance)
$0
$0
$0 FY2007
Add a second 3MG storage tank
2073188.5
2073188.5
$414,638
$373,174
$2,861,000 At FKAA discretion
Install 3rd electric pump (maintenance)
182500
182500
$36,500
$32,850
$251,850 At FKAA discretion
Implementation at the end of master plan
planning period. Depends on results of
Lower Keys Booster Pump Station #1
6100000
$6,100,000
$1,220,000
$1,098,000
$8,418,000 At FKAA discretion
transmission system hydraulic evaluation
and what increasing water demands
dictate
Implementation at the end of master plan
planning period. Depends on results of
Lower Keys Booster Pump Station #2
6100000
$6,100,000
$1,220,000
$1,098,000
$8,418,000 At FKAA discretion
transmission system hydraulic evaluation
and what increasing water demands
dictate
GNV3101569546.xis/062490010
1 of 2
Exhibit 7 -2 (cont.)
Construction and Total Proiect Cost Estimates for Proposed Transmission Main Improvement Proiects
Pipeline
Construction
Project Size (inches) Size (inches) Cost'
Total
Construction
Cost'
Consulting,
Administrative,
Legal Fees
Contingency`
Total Project
Cost Suggested Timing
Remarks
75362
75362
Implementation at the end of master plan
planning period. Depends on results of
Ramrod Booster PS
$15,072
$13,565
$104,000 At FKAA discretion
transmission system hydraulic evaluation
and what increasing water demands
dictate
Transmission SCADA Upgrade 0
0
$0
$0
At FKAA discretion
Being implemented
Project Total
$58,899,034
Notes:
'These are order -of- magnitude cost opinions (in April 2006 dollars) made without detailed engineering design. It is normally expected that estimates of this type are accurate within -30% to +50%
'Consulting, administrative, legal fees equal 20 percent of construction cost.
`Contingency (15 percent of subtotal costs for all items).
° Construction Cost from Exhibit D -2, with 20 percent contingency removed from that estimate.
'Unit Price Construction Cost from Exhibit D -1, with 20 percent contingency removed from that estimate.
GNV3101569546.xis/062490010 2 of 2
Exhibit 7 -2 (cont.)
Construction and Total Proiect Cost Estimates for Proposed Distribution Pipeline Improvements
Pipeline
P Construction
Project
Construction
4
Administrative, Contingency
Total Project Suggested
Remarks
Size (inches) Length (foot) Cost
Cost �
Legal Feas
Timing
Replace Old Galvanized Mains 4 400 $23,102
$247,102
$49,420 $44,478
$341,000 FY 2006/2007 Part of $2.5 million annual allocation for
6 3,200 $224,000
distribution upgrades
Subtotal
$341,000
Upsize Small- Diameter Mains to 4-
4
369,900
$32,408,696
$32,408,696
$6,481,739
$5,833,565
$44,724,000
At FKAA
At $2.5 million per year, will take 11 years
inch
discretion
to replace all pipe
Subtotal
$44,724,000
Cudjoe Key Additional Distribution
8
6000
$400000
$400000
$80000
$72000
$552000
At FKAA
Part of $2.5 million annual allocation for
Main Header
,
,
,
,
,
discretion
distribution upgrades
Subtotal
$552,000
Tavernier Pump Station
New Dedicated 6 -inch tap and 8 -inch Fill
6 -inch Tap
--
--
FY 2007/2008
8 -Inch Fill Line
8
900
$0
$0
$0
Part of Tavernier pump station
improvements
Install 8 -inch distribution main header
At FKAA
along both sides of US 1, where
8
12,000
$0
$0
$0
discretion
Part of Tavernier Pump Station
required
Improvements
Subtotal
$o
Islamorada Distribution PS
Install distribution main header
8
17,500 $
1,364,493 $
1,364,493
$272,899
$245,609
$1,883,000
At FKAA
Part of $2.5 million annual allocation for
discretion
distribution upgrades
Subtotal
$1,883,000
Crawl Key
Install New 6 -inch tap and 8 -inch
(assumed) Fill Line
6 -inch Tap
8 -inch Fill Line B 500 $0 $0 $0 At FKAA discretior Installed when pump station installed
Subtotal $0
Project Total $47 ,500,001
Notes:
'Pipeline costs are estimated in Appendix E as follows: 4- inch= $58 /LF, 6- inch= $70 /LF, 8- inch= $78 /LF, 10- inch= $95 /LF, 12 -inch= $105 1LF
'These are order -of- magnitude cost opinions (in April 2006 dollars) made without detailed engineering design. It is normally expected that estimates of this type are accurate within -30% to +50
'Consulting, administrative, legal fees equal 20 percent of construction cost.
° Contingency (15 percent of subtotal costs for all items).
GNV3101569546.xis
I oil
Exhibit 7 -2 (cont.)
Construction a T otal Project Cost Estimates of Proposed Distribution Pump Station System Improvements and for Proposed New Distribution Pumo Station Systems
Distribution Pump
Pump Station
Ground Storage Tank
Total
Consulting,
Total Project
Station System
Construction Cost
Construction Cost '
Construction
Administrative,
Contingency 3
Suggested Timing and Remarks
Cost
$1,910,870
$382,174
$343,957
Cost'
Legal Fees'
110144.6
$110,145
Ocean Reef
$19,826
$152,000
Additional 1.0 MG Storage
Requires demolition of existing pump
$1,246,377
$1,246,377
$249,275
$224,348
$1,720,000 If space is available with RO WTP
Permanent Standby Power (included in RO WTP)
along both sides of US -1 where required
included in RO WTP
construction begins. As soon as possible;
Subtotal
$1,720,000
Lake Surprise
Subtotal
$4,081,000
Plantation Key
New Pump Station and 0.75 MG Storage
Tank
$1,632,609
$0
$1,632,609
$326,522
$293,870
$2,253,000 Implemented at FKAA's discretion
P
$1,921,015
$384,203
$345,783
$2,651,000 Implemented at FKAA's discretion
p
Subtotal
$2,253,000
Rock Harbor
Subtotal
$2,651,000
Lower Matecumbe Key
Replace and Upsize Existing Pump
New Pump Station and 0.5 MG Storage $1,412,319
Tank
$1,412,319
$282,464
Assumes maintenance functions will be
Station
$779,710
$779,710
$155,942
$140,348
$1,076,000 relocated and site will be dedicated to
Duck Key /Grassy Key
distribution pump station system
Install 0.5 MG Storage Tank
$ 586,957
$586,957
$117,391
$105,652
$810,000 Within next 5 years
Repaint Tank Exterior maintenance
p (maintenance)
-_
$295,696
$0
$0
$0
As corrosion of exterior dictates, probably
$0
Subtotal
$2,267,000
within 5-10 years
Install a Third 0.5 MG Tank
$ 586,957
$586,957
$117,391
$105,652
$810,000 Monitor need for a third 0.5 MG tank; likely
will be at and of planning period
Subtotal
$2,696,000
Tavernier
New Larger Pump Station and New
Larger Storage Tank (1.0 MG)
1910869.5
$1,910,870
$382,174
$343,957
$2,637,000
6 -inch tap and 8" fill line
110144.6
$110,145
$22,029
$19,826
$152,000
Requires demolition of existing pump
Install 8 -inch distribution main header
$936,232
$936,232
$187,246
$168,522
station and storage tank before
$1,292,000
along both sides of US -1 where required
construction begins. As soon as possible;
definitely within the next 5 years.
Subtotal
$4,081,000
Plantation Key
New Pump Station and 1.0 MG Storage
Tank $1,921,015
$1,921,015
$384,203
$345,783
$2,651,000 Implemented at FKAA's discretion
p
Subtotal
$2,651,000
Lower Matecumbe Key
New Pump Station and 0.5 MG Storage $1,412,319
Tank
$1,412,319
$282,464
$254,217
$1,949,000 Implemented at FKAA's discretion
Subtotal
$1,948,000
Duck Key /Grassy Key
New Pump Station and 0.75 MG Storage
Tank
$1,642,754
$1,642,754
$328,551
$295,696
$2,267,000 Implemented at FKAA's discretion
Subtotal
$2,267,000
GNV3101569546.xis/062490010 1 of 3
Exhibit 7 -2 (cont.)
Construction and Total Project Cost Estimates of Proposed Distribution Pump Station System Improvements and for PfoDosed New Distribution Pumo Station Systems
Distribution Pump Pump Station
Ground Storage Tank
Total
Consulting ,
Total Project
Station System
Construction Cost
Construction Cost '
Construction
Administrative,
Contingency a
Suggested Timing and Remarks
Cost
Cost'
Legal Fees'
Crawl Key
Assumes adjacent property could not be
Install New and Upgraded Pump Station
789855
$789,855
$157,971
$142,174
$1,090,000 purchased. As soon as possible, within
next 5 years.
Repaint Existing Exterior Storage Tank
$78,986
$78,986
$15,797
$14,217
$109,000 Probably within the next 5-7 years
(Maintenance)
Replace and Upsize Storage Tank (to
Assumes tank replacement will occur
1 MG) .
$1,060,870
$1,060,870
$212,174
$190,957
$1,464,000 when existing tank needs replaced.
(Estimate between 10-15 years.)
Subtotal
$2,663,000
Vaca Cut
Install New 0.5 MG Storage Tank
$586,957
$586,957
$117,391
$105,652
$810,000 Begin immediately
Demolish Existing 0.5 MG Storage Tank
Assumes existing tank will be used until
and Install New 0.5 MG Storage Tank
$629,710
$629,710
$125,942
$113,348
$869,000 about end of useful life, probably within the
next 7- 10 years
Subtotal
$1,679,000
No capital costs; assumes facility will be
69"' Street
$824,638
$824,638
$164,928
$148,435
$1,138,000 abandoned when existing tank needs
painting
33`" Street
$650,000
$650,000
$130,000
$117,000
$897,000
Replace when pump station cannot meet
demands (assumed to be within the next
Replace Existing Pump Station
--
$0
$0
$0
4-7 years). Proposed new 3 MG storage
tank proposed under transmission will
accommodate additional distribution
storage requirements.
Paint Existing 0.5 MG Storage Tank
$0
$0
$0
$0 When corrosion dictates, probably within 7-
Exterior (maintenance)
12 years
When tank has reached its useful life
Replace Existing 0.5 MG Storage Tank
$0
$0
$0
$0 (estimated to be within next 15 -20 years).
with New 0.5 MG Storage Tank
Requires demolition of existing storage
tank.
Subtotal
$3,714,000
Ramrod
New Pump Station and 0.5 MG Storage $ 1,376,812 $1,376,812 $275,362 $247,826 $1,900,000 Longer term improvement. Implemented at
Tank FKAA's discretion
Subtotal $1,900,000
GNV3101569546.xis/062490010 2 of 3
Exhibit 7 -2 (cont.)
Construction and Total Project Cost Estimates of Proposed Distribution Pu mp Station System Improvements and for Proposed New Distribution Pump Station Svstems
Distribution Pump
Pump Station Ground Storage Tank
Station System , '
Construction Cost Construction Cost
Total
Construction
Cost'
Consulting ,
Administrative,
Legal Fees
Contingency �
Total Protect
Suggested Timing and Remarks
Cost
Summerland Key
Assumes FKAA adjacent property has
Replace Pump Station and Storage
wetlands; must build on existing site.
Tank, New 0.5 MG Tank $1,400,000
$1,400,000
$280,000
$252,000
$1,932,000 Demolition of pump station and storage
tank required. Implemented at FKAA's
discretion
Subtotal
$1,932,000
Cudjoe Key (4)
New Pump Station and 1.0 MG Storage
$1,268,116
$1,268,116
$253,623
$228,261
Longer term improvement. Implemented at
$1,750,000
Tank (under design)
FKAA's discretion
Subtotal
$1,750,000
Lower Sugarloaf
New Pump Station and 0.5 MG Storage
$1,376,812
$1,376,812
$275,362
$247,826
Longer term improvement. Implemented at
$1,900,000
Tank
FKAA's discretion
Subtotal
$1,800,000
Stock Island Distribution
Replace Existing Pump Station
Replace when deteriorating conditions of
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$300,000
$270,000
$2,070,000 existing structure dictate, and Records
Storage Building is abandoned
Subtotal
$2,070,000
Project Total
$33,546,000
Notes:
'Land acquisition costs are not included in these are order -of- magnitude cost opinions (in April
2006 dollars), which were made without
detailed engineering design. It is normally expected that estimates of this type
Consulting, administrative, legal fees equal 20 percent of construction cost.
3 Contingency (15 percent of subtotal costs for all items).
4. From Bond Report.
GNV3101569546.xls1062490010 3 of 3
SECT 7. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Project cost estimates reflect April 2006 costs (Engineering News Record Construction Cost
Index of 7,695).
Actual costs for any given project would depend on multiple factors, including, but not
limited to, actual material and market costs, competitive market conditions, final project
scope, implementation schedule, and other variable factors. As FKAA is aware from recent
construction projects, prices are also highly subject to variation as a result of shortages
resulting from recent natural disasters. As a result, the final project costs will vary from the
estimates presented herein.
Because of such factors as limited labor force, high cost of housing, and high cost of goods
and services, Keys construction costs are greater than costs for comparable work on the
mainland of South Florida. Generally, a 20 percent "Keys Factor' is added to Keys
construction cost estimates to account for the Keys market conditions.
Wherever possible, actual construction prices recently received by FKAA for different types
of work (that is, distribution system pipelines, distribution pump stations, storage tank
painting) have been used to develop cost estimates for this Master Plan, adjusted to April
2006 costs, where noted. These costs already account for Keys market conditions and
generally provide the most accurate cost estimates at this planning stage when only a
conceptual design is available.
Where actual construction prices for similar types of recent work are not available, standard
estimating procedures are used to estimate construction costs.
Other costs, such as consulting and engineering inspection, administration, legal, and
financing, are part of any project and must be included with construction costs, so that all
capital improvement costs are accounted for. For this Master Plan, these other project costs
are estimated as follows:
An amount of 20 percent of the construction cost was used for consulting and
engineering inspection, administration, legal, and financing.
• A contingency of 15 percent of the subtotal of construction cost and the 20 percent cost
above was also included as part of the other project costs.
Total project costs are the total of the construction cost and the other project costs. All capital
improvement costs addressed in this Master Plan are total project costs, unless otherwise
indicated.
Estimated project costs for all proposed water system capital improvements are sum-
marized in Exhibit 7 -2. The basis for estimating detailed construction costs and total project
costs for specific projects is provided in the respective sections of this Master Plan.
WP8310127161224.DOC/061640010 7-18
WB122005005DFB
AMY NEAVILIN, CPA
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER
MOMM CNK" nffi A
May 21, 2016
Mr. Ernest L. Reddick, Program Administrator
Administrative Code & Weekly
R.A. Gray Building
500 S Bronough Street
Tallahassee FL 32399 -0250
Dear Mr. Reddick,
Enclosed please find a certified copy of Ordinance No. 007 -2016 A public hearing to consider
adoption of an ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending the Monroe
County Comprehensive Plan, adopting the 10 -Year Water Supply Plan Update to be consistent with the
South Florida Water Management District Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update of 2013.
(Legislative Proceeding).
This Ordinance was adopted by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners at a
Special Meeting, held in formal session, on April 13, 2016. Please file for the record. Should you have
any questions please feel free to contact me at (305) 295 -3130.
Respectfully ubmitt d,
I y 4avilin, � � CPA,
Clerk of the Circuit Court
and ex officio Clerk of the
Board of County Commissioners
by: Cheryl Robertson, D.C.
cc: County Attorney via e -mail
Growth Management via e-mail
County Administrator via e-mail
BOCC via e -mail
MuniCode via e-mail
File
500 Whitehead Street Suite 101, PO Box 1980, Key West FL 33040 Phone: 305 - 295 -3130 Fax. 305- 295 -3663
3117 Overseas Highway, Marathon, FL 33050 Phone: 305 - 289 -6027 Fax: 305 - 289 -6025
88820 Overseas Highway, Plantation Key, FL 33070 Phone: 852 -7145 Fax: 305 - 852 -7146
'Oa 1VE t�
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 0 STATE
RICK SCOTT
Governor
May 23, 2016
Honorable Amy Heavilin
Clerk of the Circuit Court
Monroe County
500 Whitehead Street, Suite 101
Key West, Florida 33040
Attention: Ms. Cheryl Robertson, Executive Aide
Dear Ms. Heavilin:
KEN DETZNER
Secretary of State
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes, this will acknowledge receipt of your
electronic copy of Monroe County Ordinance No. 007 -2016, which was filed in this office on May 23,
2016.
Sincerely,
Ernest L. Reddick
Program Administrator
ELR/lb
R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250
Telephone: (850) 245 -6270
www.dos.state.fl.us