Item C17M
C ounty of f Monroe
ELj » °o
�
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
/� r i � ��
Mayor George Neugent, District 2
The Florida. Ke Se
y
I
Mayor Pro Tern David Rice, District 4
Danny L. Kolhage, District I
Heather Carruthers, District 3
Sylvia J. Murphy, District 5
County Commission Meeting
May 17, 2017
Agenda Item Number: C.17
Agenda Item Summary #2908
BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Engineering / Roads
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Judith Clarke (305) 295 -4329
no
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of amendment 1 to the task order with Kisinger Campo
& Associates in the amount of $37,401 for Engineering design and permitting services for the
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement project to add supplemental design services to evaluate
raising the profile of the roadway and bridge to accommodate an additional 12 inches of navigational
clearance and to develop a detailed cost estimate for this alternative.
ITEM BACKGROUND: Staff presented the preliminary design of the Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge
replacement to Sugarloaf residents at a homeowners meeting. The current proposed design will
provide an additional 6 inches of navigational clearance to the current clearance. Residents requested
that the county evaluate an option to increase the clearance by an additional 12 inches to allow for
future sea level rise and determine the associated increase in construction cost for that alternative.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
CONTRACT /AGREEMENT CHANGES:
add task to evaluate increasing profile by 12 inches
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval as requested.
DOCUMENTATION:
Amend 14 24 2017
KCA - Task Order - EXEC - 10 -21 -15
KCA - On Call Contract - EXEC - 1 -16 -14
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
05/17/17 102 -22554 - SUGARLOAF BLVD BRIDGE $37,401.00
REVIEWED BY:
Judith Clarke
Completed
04/24/2017 8:53 AM
Christine Limbert
Completed
04/24/2017 2:12 PM
Budget and Finance
Completed
04/28/2017 10:09 AM
Maria Slavik
Completed
04/28/2017 10:36 AM
Kathy Peters
Completed
05/01/2017 10:50 AM
Board of County Commissioners
Pending
05/17/2017 9:00 AM
AMENDMENT 1 TO THE TASK ORDER FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN AND
PERMITTING SERVICES BETWEEN MONROE COUNTY AND KISINGER
CAMPO & ASSOCIATES FOR SUGARLOAF BOULEVARD BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT PROJECT
THIS AMENDMENT 1 to the Task Order IS ENTERED INTO BETWEEN Monroe
County, whose address is 1100 Simonton Street, Room 2 -216 Key West, Florida 33040,
hereafter the "County ", and Kisinger Campo & Associates, Corp. a Corporation of the
State of Florida, whose address is 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400, Tampa,
Florida 33602, its successors and assigns, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT ",
1. Paragraph 2.1.1 is added to ARTICLE II SCOPE OF BASIC SERVICES, and is
to state the following:
2.1.1 The CONSULTANT will perform for the COUNTY supplemental
Engineering Design Services to evaluate raising the profile of the roadway approaches
and bridge to accommodate an additional 12 inches of navigational clearance and develop
a detailed cost estimate for this alternative as described in Attachment A, Proposal To
Produce A Cost Estimate For Raising Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge an Additional 12
Inches. The service's as described are for a Lump Sum fee not to exceed $37,401.00
2. Article IX MISCELLANEOUS, Paragraph 9.21 shall be amended to add the
following:
Public Records Compliance. Contractor must comply with Florida public records
laws, including but not limited to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes and Section 24 of article I
of the Constitution of Florida. The County and Contractor shall allow and permit
reasonable access to, and inspection of, all documents, records, papers, letters or other
"public record" materials in its possession or under its control subject to the provisions of
Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the County and Contractor in
conjunction with this contract and related to contract performance. The County shall
have the right to unilaterally cancel this contract upon violation of this provision by the
Contractor. Failure of the Contractor to abide by the terms of this provision shall be
deemed a material breach of this contract and the County may enforce the terms of this
provision in the form of a court proceeding and shall, as a prevailing party, be entitled to
reimbursement of all attorney's fees and costs associated with that proceeding. This
provision shall survive any termination or expiration of the contract.
The Contractor is encouraged to consult with its advisors about Florida Public
Records Law in order to comply with this provision.
Pursuant to F.S. 119.0701 and the terms and conditions of this contract, the
Contractor is required to:
(1) Keep and maintain public records that would be required by the County to
perform the service.
(2) Upon receipt from the County's custodian of records, provide the County with a
copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a
reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as
otherwise provided by law.
(3) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from
public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for
the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the
contractor does not transfer the records to the County.
(4) Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public
records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records that would be
required by the County to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public
records to the County upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any
duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records
disclosure requirements. If the Contractor keeps and maintains public records upon
completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for
retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the County,
upon request from the County's custodian of records, in a format that is compatible with
the information technology systems of the County.
(5) A request to inspect or copy public records relating to a County contract must be
made directly to the County, but if the County does not possess the requested records, the
County shall immediately notify the Contractor of the request, and the Contractor must
provide the records to the County or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a
reasonable time.
If the Contractor does not comply with the County's request for records, the County
shall enforce the public records contract provisions in accordance with the contract,
notwithstanding the County's option and right to unilaterally cancel this contract upon
violation of this provision by the Contractor. A Contractor who fails to provide the public
records to the County or pursuant to a valid public records request within a reasonable
time may be subject to penalties under section 119.10, Florida Statutes.
The Contractor shall not transfer custody, release, alter, destroy or otherwise dispose
of any public records unless or otherwise provided in this provision or as otherwise
provided by law.
IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE
CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS
RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN
OF PUBLIC RECORDS, BRIAN BRADLEY AT PHONE# 305 -292-
3470 BRADLEY - BRIAN @MONROECOUNTY- FL.GOV, MONROE
COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 1111 12 Street, SUITE 408, KEY
WEST, FL 33040.
3. Force and Effect. In all other respects the Contract dated January 16, 2014 and
Task Order effective October 21, 2015 remain in full force and effect.
In WITNESS WHEREOF each party hereto has caused this contract to be executed by its
duly authorized representative.
(SEAL)
Attest: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK
WE
In
Mayor /Chairman
Date:
(SEAL)
K
Attest:
By: / " v✓v B
Title �° �/ T.
Deputy Clerk
Attachment A
Proposal To Produce A Cost Estimate For Raising Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge An
Additional 12 Inches.
March 27, 2017
Judith S. Clarke, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
1100 Simonton Street
Key West, Florida 33040
Project Description: Monroe County on Call Professional Engineering Services
Re: Task Work Order #2 — Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement — Supplemental Agreement #1 —
Detailed Cost Estimate for Raising the Profile of the Bridge
Dear Ms. Clarke:
Kisinger Campo & Associates (KCA) is pleased to submit this Scope of Services and Fee Estimate for the
supplemental work to raise the profile of the roadway approaches and bridge to accommodate an additional
12 inches of navigational clearance above what was proposed in the 60% plan set. This supplemental work
will be added to the Task Work Order #2.
The current bridge concept as submitted at the 60% Phase provides approximately 10 feet of navigational
clearance to the Mean High Water (MHW) Line. A detailed cost estimate was provided for this 60% Phase
Submittal. As part of this scope, KCA will provide a detailed cost estimate for raising the bridge and
associated roadway approaches an additional 12 inches to provide 11 feet of navigational clearance to the
Mean High Water (MHW) Line. Additional cost associated with the change in profile may include:
• expanded project limits
• additional roadway reconstruction quantities
• additional guardrail quantity
• possible side street /driveway /trail construction for harmonization
• possible temporary walls between construction phases due to profile increase
• increased substructure concrete quantity
• increased piling quantity
• increased riprap quantity
• reconstruction /strengthening of existing retaining wall
• additional retaining walls at the right -of -way line due to slope tie down point
In order to estimate the cost changes associated with the above items, KCA will create a new concept
profile, generate cross sections, determine project /roadway reconstruction limits, determine wall limits,
evaluate larger foundations, determine piling requirements and determine new riprap limits. The results of
this evaluation will be quantified and an updated cost estimate will be provided using current unit costs.
The final deliverable will be a Cost Comparison Report (Memo) that details the increase in cost of the raised
bridge concept.
Revised concept plans are not included as part of this scope. The cost comparison will be for construction
cost only and will not include the additional consultant /sub - consultant design and plans production effort
if the raised bridge alternate is preferable to the County.
We have estimated the level of effort required for all engineering services described above. Our total
estimated lump sum fee amounts to $37,401.00. This fee includes all KCA analysis efforts, coordination,
QA /QC and supervision. The fee estimate is based on the hourly rates which were previously approved for
this contract.
Our expenses were estimated separately and are not included in the lump sum fee estimate. It is not
anticipated that any additional site visits or additional expenses will be required for this detailed cost
analysis.
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to continue our working relationship with you on this project.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Best Regards,
Jason L. LaBarbera, P.E.
Project Manager
File: 12013.16 (KCA)
r
0
U N
Q C -
YZ tn=
E z m
z c F
m LL
c
w o
c U
U
N
m
m
L_
D)
C
O
N
E
w
0
U
d
O
N
Q
(h
V
O
O)
U)
a
m
C
N
E
U
N
m
U
m
2
0
0
m
`m
o m
o
° o
c'n �
U
0
CL
O y O
z
E 'o a
Z 3
w w
O a Y°
E
o 0 0 a 0 y o 6 0 0 a 0 o N o o Ei o - - - - - - - - - - 0 a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > `> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
v
w
N m
o 0 0 o 0 o p o ,N o 0 0 o N o 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I a
I
N �
i n C
V
m
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0
w V/
I w
YI
13.2 c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o
t n
N .2
N o
3 c
U.2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t 2
N «
N �
o
°o
U ) y
N .2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
() -°
o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o
L y
N �
N
`w
U
r A
d
N
°
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 o o 0 0
o
O
p
U
c�l o 0 0 o. v o o o 0 0 o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
co
a
`o
C .2
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
° o
N M
d N
N 0
`w
C
W
m
0 0 0 0° O O O O o o 0 0 0 o 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
° o
N N
N W
w r o o° o o 0 o o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o
O
d
C
�
W
W
L
U
O O O O O O O N O O O O o o o o o 0 o O O O O
O
N
N�
`a
O
o c
a O o
o 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
° o
. m
a`z
I
m
E
o Z
W = E
o 0 0 0� M o h o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
r N
2
U
n
E m v
N
m co
E �`a Z ` v m v ¢ a T N .� ¢ m v«
U o.
E 0
o m U g U m
N
e U m N m rn
N
rn g
a .E w p O o. u«
N E�` -�
N
o
° 2 °i a E o m '° E 22 65 E a"
Z
V
°
m '^ v m n
- T = m N m r to N i>l >¢ d '^ ¢¢ p w
`m m `o o `m E F
r
m r
¢ ^n °° a a ii E
N
c7 N N N N
> > > .. Ti ? E 2
L E'
.� 2 e 2 2 rn rn&& a m m 10 m
!n y fn N N N fn y y N N N N (n a r ¢ Z U'
K K
a O w In
O r O 6 co T O M
y
° 000�U
v v
o
w W E
N U
U E w z o
U z- a r M y m w rn
p n w n n
F Q U V F W fn N N N N N N N N N
W F li N
a o- r
U v
5 ° 8
W W w U u U u U
> d Z O d D
N O O I W N N N N N w w w N w N to N
N
t�
a 3
0
° U
m
W N
2 a
'n v
z
E
E
BtS
yy�gg
a.�
CN
LLJ
UJ n
T
o o
E
E BtS
BtS
w
04
v
CN
E
.a
0
cu
TASK ORDER FOR ON CALL PROFESSIONAL DESIGN AND PERMITTING
SERVICES BETWEEN MONROE COUNTY AND KISINGER CAMPO &
ASSOCIATES
FOR
SUGARLOAF BOULEVARD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
In accordance with the Continuing Contract for On Call Professional Engineering
Services made and entered on the 16th day of January, 2014 between Monroe County
hereinafter referred to as the "County" and Kisinger Campo & Associates, hereinafter
referred to as "Consultant" where design services are allowed if construction costs do
not exceed $2,000,000.
All terms and conditions of the referenced Contract for on Call Professional Engineering
Services apply to the Task Order, unless the Task Order modifies an Article of the
Agreement of which will be specifically referenced in this Task Order and the
modification shall be precisely described.
This Task Order is effective on the 21st Day of October, 2015 and shall expire 60 days
after construction is complete.
Article II Scope of Basic Services, Paragraph 2.1.1 is amended as follows:
The scope of services for the Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge ( #904153) Replacement
Project will include production of construction plans, specifications, permitting services
and support during the bidding of the project required for the replacement of the
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge and associated roadway reconstruction.
The Design for Construction shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, plans
and specifications which describe all systems, elements, details, components, materials,
equipment, and other information necessary for construction. The Design for
Construction shall be accurate, coordinated and in all respects adequate for construction
and shall be in conformity, and comply, with all applicable law, codes, permits, and
regulations. Products, equipment and materials specified for use shall be readily
available unless written authorization to the contrary is given by the County.
Details of the scope of services are outlined below and included in the Consultant's
proposal that is attached to this task order as Exhibit A.
1.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
1.1 The Engineer shall prepare a Design Development Letter Report for the County's
approval. The Design Development Report shall consist of a written document that
establishes and describes the size and character of the proposed bridge replacement,
materials and such other elements as may be appropriate. The report will contain a
conceptual cost estimate.
2.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE
2.1 Based on the approved Design Development Documents and any further
adjustments authorized by the County in the scope or quality of the Project, the
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 1 of 6
Consultant shall prepare, for approval by the County, Construction Documents
consisting of Drawings and Specifications setting forth in detail the requirements for the
construction of the project. Construction documents shall conform to the standards
contained in the most current version of the following:
Florida Department of Transportation Roadway Plans Preparation Manuals
http : / /www. dot. state . fl. us /rdde sign /PPMManual /PPM. shtm
2. Florida Department of Transportation Design Standards
http: / /www. dot. state.fl.us /rdde sign /DesinStandards /Standards. shtm
Florida Department of Transportation Surveying Procedure
htt : / /www2. dot. state. fl. us / proceduraldocuments /procedures/bin /550030101. df
4. Florida Department of Transportation Drainage Manual
/ /www. dot. state.fl.us /rdde sign /dr /files /2008Draina�eManual.pdf
Florida Department of Transportation Soils and Foundations Handbook
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/structures/Manuals/SFH.pdf
6. Florida Department of Transportation Structures Manual (625- 020 -018)
including Temporary Design Bulletins
http: / /www. dot. state. fl. us / structures /StructuresManual /C urrentRelease /S
Tn A iT- __-1 L-
7. MUTCD
htt / /mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/
American Disabilities Act
http: / /www2.dot. state.fl.us/ proceduraldocuments /procedures/bin /625020015.pdf
9. Florida Department of Transportation Pavement Coring and Evaluation
Procedure
http: / /www. dot. state. fl. us /statematerialsoffice/ administration /resources/library /pu
blications /materialsmanual /documents /vl- section32- clean. df
10. Florida Department of Transportation Flexible Pavement Design Manual
/ /www. dot. state . fl .us /pavementmanaement /PUBLICATIONS . shtm
11. Florida Department of Transportation Rigid Pavement Design Manual
:// www.dot.state.fl.us /pavementmana ement /pcs /RiidPavementManualJanu
ary 12009. df
12. Federal Highway Administration Checklist and Guidelines for Review of
Geotechnical Reports and Preliminary Plans and Specifications
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 2 of 6
13. Florida Department of Transportation Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards
for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways
http: / /www. dot. state.fl.us /rdde sign /FloridaGreenbook /2007 /2007F1oridaGreenbo
ok.pdf
14. Florida Statutes
htt : / /www.le.state.fl.us/ Statutes /index.cfm ?Mode = View %20Statutes &Submen
u =1 & Tab = statutes &CFID = 14677574 &CFTOKEN = 80981948
15. Florida's Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Handbook.
http: / /www. dot. state.fl.us /safetped_ bike /ped_bike_standards.htm #Florida %20B
ike %20Handbook
16. AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities
http:/ /www. sccrtc.org /bikes /AASHTO_1999_BikeBook.pdf
17. Florida's Quality /Level of Service Handbook for Planning
http: / /www. dot. state.fl.us /planning /systems /sm /los /los_sw2.htm
18. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American Association
of State Highway and Transportation Officials ( AASHTO Green Book) (GDHS-
5 AASHTO Bookstore).
19. The Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board)
http://Zulliver.trb.org/bookstore/
(TRB Bookstore `HCM2KE).
20. FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (with
supplemental specifications).
http:/ /www. dot. state. fl. us/ Specificationsoffice /2007BK/TOC.htm
21. Facilities Design Manual (Topic No. 625- 020 - 016 -a)
http: / /www. dot. state. fl. us / structures / Manuals /2002fdotfacilitiesmanual.�df
22. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Mandatory beginning 2007)
( AASHTO Bookstore `4- LRFDUS -4')
23. Right of Way Mapping Procedure (Topic No. 550- 030 - 015 -e)
: / /www.dot.state.fl.us /surveying and mapping /RWMapplin�Handbook.pdf
24. Project Development and Environmental Manual Par 1 and 2 (Topic No. 650-
000 -001).
h 2:// www. dot .state.fl.us /emo /pbs /pdeman.htm
Where FDOT design standards cannot be met the Consultant will request a design
variance or exception.
2.2. The Consultant shall provide Drawings and applicable Technical Special
Provisions to the County for the County's review (the Florida Department of
Transportation Standard Specifications will be incorporated by reference) at the 30%
and 100% stages of the project. The Consultant shall respond to questions resulting
from County review and incorporate any required revisions to the construction drawings
and specifications. Design calculations package will be submitted with the 100% phase
construction drawings.
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 3 of 6
2.3 The Consultant will provide a construction cost estimate and a project schedule
at each phase submittal.
2.4 Upon completion of the Construction Documents Phase, the Consultant shall
provide Construction Documents for the County's approval. Upon approval by the
County the Consultant shall provide the County up to 5 sets of Construction Documents
that have been signed and sealed by the Consultant. The Consultant shall also provide
an electronic version of the construction documents.
2.5 The Consultant shall assist the County in the preparation of the necessary
bidding information for the production of bidding forms, the Conditions of the Contracts,
and the forms of Agreements between the County and the Contractors by providing
supporting information as to the projects scope, bid items, estimated quantities and
construction duration. The County shall prepare all Bidding Forms, Conditions of the
Contract, and Forms of Agreement.
2.6 The Consultant's construction documents (plans, specifications, etc) will conform
to all codes and regulations of the federal government, county, state, municipalities,
agencies and state departments, in effect at the date of this Agreement, and shall be of
such completion as to be acceptable for review and ruling by said agencies when
permits are applied for. The Consultant shall use due care in determining permit
requirements and shall meet with regulatory agencies as necessary to coordinate
specific permit requirements. The Consultant shall document all meetings and
conversations with said regulatory agencies. If permits are denied for incompleteness or
for lack of following said codes or regulations, or permit requirements, then the Engineer
will conform the construction documents in such manner to receive permits upon such
plans. Work required by the Consultant to conform documents to federal, state, city,
county, or agency specifications to allow them to be approved shall be completed at no
charge or cost to the County, unless said requirements are changed during the course of
the project.
2.7 The Consultant shall file (through the County) all documents required for the
approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project. The Consultant
shall file (through the County) the necessary documents to obtain Environmental
Resource Permits and all other permits required for construction. The County shall be
responsible for the timely submittal of all permit application fees.
2.8 As needed by the County, the Consultant will provide clarification and answers to
questions from prospective bidders during the construction bid process. Answers will be
provided in a timely manner in order to facilitate bidding.
3.0 CONSTRUCTION COST
Contemporaneously with the submission of the Design, the Consultant shall submit to
the County in writing its final estimate of the contractor's anticipated bid price for
constructing the Project. Once submitted, the final anticipated price estimate shall be
adjusted by the Engineer to reflect any increase or decrease in anticipated price
resulting from a change in Design.
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 4 of 6
3.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total estimated bid cost to the County of all
elements of the Project designed or specified by the Engineer.
3.2 The Construction Cost shall include the cost at current market rates of labor and
materials and Equipment designed, specified, selected or specially provided for by the
Engineer, plus a reasonable allowance for Contractor's overhead and profit.
3.3 Construction cost does not include the compensation of the Consultant and the
Consultant's consultants, the costs of land, rights -of -way, financing or other costs which
are the responsibility of the County.
Article VII, Paragraph 7.1 is amended to include the following:
The Consultant shall be paid monthly based on the following Lump Sum amounts
(except where noted):
KCA Fee
Roadway /Utility Coordination /Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) /Signage
And Pavement Markings (SAPM) $ 77,284.00
Drainage $ 7,736.00
Structures $ 214,242.00
Environmental Permitting $ 35,154.00
Total
Subconsultant Fee
$ 334,416.00
Coastal Engineering - Intera $ 23,140.00
SUE — Keith and Associates $ 2,750.00
Survey - Keith and Associates $ 18,980.00
Geotech — Tierra South Florida $ 19,210.69
Total $ 64,080.69
Total Design Fee
Total Design Fee
$ 398,496.69
Estimated Expenses
Estimated Expenses $ 8,625.50
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 5 of 6
Pursuant • F.S. 119.0701, Contractor and its subcontractors shall comply with all publi*
records laws ♦ the State • Florida, including but not limited to:
(a) Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be require'•
by Monroe County in order to perform the service.
(b) Provide the public with access to public records on the terms and conditions that
Monroe County would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed the cosl
provided in Florida Statutes, Chapter 119 or as otherwise provided by law.
Paragraph 9.30 Federal Highway Administration Requirements do not apply to this
project.
: GIiibf Executive Officer
Title
C '.' -t-- il - [(cL'�
-) Co Lf
Lei Z & Lei Ig I wo me•ej k I X63 :4 1 by-'��
------- JL
or/Chairm
Date: 1 012- 1116
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement Project
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Oct 16, 2015
Page 6 of 6
Date: / 0 1. / 1-5
EXHIBIT A
Kisinger Campo & Associates
Proposal
E
E
IM
M
0
IM
CD
N
0
(f}
L)
E
KISINGER CAMPO
August 18, 2015
Judith S. Clarke, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
1100 Simonton Street
Key West, Florida 33040
Project Description: Monroe County on Call Professional Engineering Services
Re: Task Work Order #2 — Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Dear Ms. Clarke:
Kisinger Campo & Associates (KCA) is pleased to submit this Scope of Services and Fee Estimate
for the above referenced project. This project will consist of the production of construction plans,
specifications and permitting required for the replacement of the Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge and
associated roadway reconstruction. Tasks will include roadway design, structures design, drainage
design, environmental /permitting, utility coordination, maintenance of traffic, coastal engineering,
survey, subsurface utility engineering and geotechnical engineering. For additional scope detail,
see the attached Scope of Services and Staff Hour Estimation Forms.
We have estimated the level of effort required for all engineering services described above. Our
total estimated lump sum fee amounts to $398,496.69. This fee includes all KCA efforts and sub -
consultant efforts, coordination, QA/QC and supervision. The fee estimate is based on hourly rates
which include our overhead.
Our expenses were estimated separately and are not included in the lump sum fee estimate. Our
total estimated expenses amount to $8,625.50. Expenses will be itemized and submitted
separately with each invoice. For a detailed description of the lump sum fee and estimated
expenses see the fee proposals in the attached Appendix.
We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to continue our working relationship with you on this
project. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or need any additional
information.
Best Regards,
Jason L. LaBarbera, P.E.
Project Manager
File: 12013.16 (KCA)
Kisin Campo & Assoc
engineering • inspection • planning
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Scope of Services
Task Work Order # 2
Monroe County On -Call Engineering Services
Date: August 17, 2015
1. PROJECTTITLE:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153).
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES:
The Consultant will complete construction plans, specifications and permit applications for the
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153). The existing bridge is a three span AASHTO
Type II Beam bridge supported by intermediate pile bents in the canal and slope embankment above the
vertical face canal walls. The proposed replacement will be a phase constructed, single span Florida -I
36" Beam Bridge with end bent retaining walls and side slopes. The bridge typical section will
accommodate two 11' travel lanes with 2.5' outside shoulders and a 5' sidewalk on the west side to
accommodate pedestrian traffic. The approximate span length with be 95'. The original channel width
of 75' will be restored and a vertical sand cement bulkhead wall will be constructed along the north side
of the channel, similar to the existing sand cement wall on the south side of the channel. The approach
roadway alignment and profile will be adjusted as necessary for the new bridge typical section.
3. SPECIFIC SERVICES
• Environmental & Permitting: The Consultant will perform a field investigation within the project
right -of -way (ROW) to identify wetlands and protected species. The Consultant will prepare a
report summarizing the results of the field investigation. This report will be used to coordinate
with environmental regulatory and resource agencies during the permitting phase of the project.
The Consultant will prepare permit applications (or applicable exemption notices) for the South
Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE), and
the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). It is anticipated that construction of the proposed structures will
meet the requirements of a SFWMD General Permit or exception and that a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will not be required. The proposed replacement structure
is also anticipated to meet the criteria of a Nationwide Permit (most likely a NWP 3, Maintenance,
or NWP 15, U.S. Coast Guard Approved Bridges) for the USACE, or be exempt from USACE
201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400 ■ Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 871 -5331 • Fax (813) 871 -5135
Visit our website at www.kisingercampo.com
Kisin Campo & Assoc
engineering • inspection • planning
permitting. The Consultant will prepare a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) Bridge Permit application and
submit it to the USCG for processing. The Consultant will coordinate with the Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) to obtain any required environmental clearance for the
project from this agency. This Scope of Services is exclusive of any environmental mitigation for
wetlands, mangroves, seagrasses, corals or protected species. Formal consultation with Federal
resource agencies (USFWS and NMFS) and preparation of Endangered Species Biological
Assessments (BAs) or evaluation of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) are also not included.
• Drainage: The Consultant will analyze the existing drainage systems at the bridge location and
will design proposed systems for the new bridge replacement. It is anticipated that bridge
drainage will be provided with scuppers, similar to what is currently in place.
• Bridge Hydraulics: The Consultant will provide a Bridge Hydraulic Memorandum showing the
result of the existing and proposed hydraulic analysis at the bridge location. A scour analysis
and Bridge Hydraulic Recommendation Sheet (BHRS) will be provided.
• Roadway: The roadway design may require a new longitudinal grade due to the increased
structural depth required to span the canal. This will result in revised roadway profiles and cross
sections. It is assumed the horizontal alignment will be shifted slightly to the west as a result of
the phased construction. The Consultant shall provide roadway plan /profile, cross section,
maintenance of traffic plan and any necessary detail sheets. For a detailed list of roadway plan
sheets, see the attached Staff Hour Estimation Forms.
The Consultant shall also prepare detailed quantities and construction cost estimate
Remaining effort includes time for meetings, coordination and quality control reviews.
• Structural: The Consultant will prepare a Bridge Development Report (Memo) to determine the
most cost effective bridge replacement solution. After county approval of the recommended
bridge concept the consultant will begin production of final construction plans, quantities, cost
estimates, and specifications for the bridge replacement and associated walls. It is anticipated
that the structure will be comprised of reinforced /prestressed concrete components and be
similar in overall geometry in an effort to minimize roadway reconstruction and environmental
impacts. For a detailed list of structural design efforts and anticipated plan contents, see the
attached Staff Hour Estimation Forms.
• Utility Relocation: The Consultant will perform a utility search in the vicinity and complete
plans for utility relocation efforts.
• Survey: The Consultant, through our sub - consultant, will provide a topographic survey of the
areas surrounding the referenced bridge as detailed in the attached survey staff hour sheets of
services.
• Geotechnical: The Consultant, through our sub - consultant, will perform geotechnical studies
201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400 ■ Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 871 -5331 • Fax (813) 871 -5135
Visit our website at www.kisingercampo.com
Kisin Campo & Assoc
engineering • inspection • planning
in accordance with the attached sub - consultant scope of services.
• Coastal Engineering: The Consultant, through our sub - consultant, will perform coastal
engineering services in accordance with the attached sub - consultant scope of services.
4. FEE:
The total estimated lump sum design fee amounts to $398,496.69. This fee includes all KCA and sub -
consultants efforts, coordination, QA /QC and supervision. The fee estimate is based on hourly rates which
include our overhead.
Our expenses were estimated separately and are not included in the lump sum fee estimate. Our total
estimated expenses amount to $8,625.50. Expenses will be itemized and submitted separately with each
invoice. For a breakdown of the lump sum fee, sub - consultants fees and estimated expenses see the
following sheets.
Any post design services involving shop drawing review, materials review, site visits, and meetings are not
included in this proposal. Post design services will be included under a separate post design task work
order.
The County will pay any required permit application fees. KCA will request that the county issue checks
for the fees when required.
S. SCHEDULE:
A detailed schedule will be produced and submitted to the County after issuance of the Notice to Proceed
Below is a preliminary schedule:
• Preliminary Submittal —30% Roadway Plans, Bridge Development Report (Memo), Bridge
Hydraulics Memo, Preliminary Geotech Report, Survey, Preliminary Cost Estimate - 16 weeks
from notice to proceed
• County Review- 4 weeks
• Final Submittal - 100% Construction Plans, Quantities, Cost Estimates and Permitting- 20 weeks
• County Review- 4 weeks
• Signed and Sealed Plans — Signed and sealed plans and specs — 2 weeks
Total - 46 weeks
201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400 ■ Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 871 -5331 • Fax (813) 871 -5135
Visit our website at www.kisingercampo.com
FEE SUMMARY SHEET
TWO #2 - Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
KCA FEE
Roadway /Utility Coordination /MOT /SAPM $77,284.00
Drainage $7,736.00
Structures $214,242.00
Environmental Permitting $35,154.00
TOTAL $334,416.00
SUBCONSULTANT FEE
Coastal Engineering - Intera $23,140.00
SUE - Kieth and Associates $2,750.00
Survey - Kieth and Associates $18,980.00
Geotech -Tierra South Florida $19,210.69
TOTAL $64,080.69
TOTAL DESIGN FEE
TOTAL DESIGN FEE $398,496.69
ESTIMATED EXPENSES
Project Manager (County Meetings, Coordination, Etc.)
Roadway
Structures
Environmental
Coastal Engineering - Intera
SUE, Survey - Kieth and Associates
Geotech -Tierra South Florida
$2,400.00
$800.00
$800.00
$1,244.00
$731.50
$2,225.00
$425.00
TOTAL EXPENSES $8,625.50
ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT AND COST - PRIME CONSULTANT
Name of Project: Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
County: Monroe
FPN:
FAP No.:
Consultant Name: KCA
Consultant No.: N/A
Date: 9/16/2014
Estimator: JILL
Survey Field Days by Subconsultant
Hours From
project
OVERHEAD:
Senior
OPERATING MARGIN:
Senior
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
Secretary /Cleri
Staff Class I-
Staff Class I-
Staff Class!-
Staff Class!-
Staff Class!-
SH
Salary
Average
Staff Classificatio
^
Manager
Chief Enginee
Engineer
Engineer
Designer
CADD
cal
fication 8
fication 9
fication 10
fication 11
ficatlon 12
Subconsultant: Sub 9
Subconsultant: Sub 10
Sum mary- m
By
Cost By
Rate Per
$177.00
$228.00
$178.00
$139.00
$136.00
$87.00
$63.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Firm"
Activity
Activity
Task
3. Project General and Project Common Tasks
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
4. Roadway Analysis
200
0
20
60
40
50
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
$30,210
$151.05
5. Roadway Plans
150
0
8
45
30
30
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
151
$21,390
$141.66
6. Drainage Analysis
45
0
5
23
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
46
$7,736
$168.17
7. Utilities
93
0
5
28
19
14
23
5
0
0
0
0
0
94
$12,985
$138.14
8. Environmental Permits, Compliance & Clearances
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
9. Structures - Misc. Tasks, Dwgs, Non -Tech.
300
120
30
60
60
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
$49,710
$165.70
10. Structures - Bridge Development Report
222
89
22
44
44
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
221
$36,631
$165.75
11. Structures - Temporary Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
12. Structures - Short Span Concrete Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
13. Structures- Medium Span Concrete Bridge
650
195
65
130
195
0
65
0
0
0
0
0
0
650
$105,235
$161.90
14. Structures - Structural Steel Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
15. Structures - Segmental Concrete Bridge
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
16. Structures- Movable Span
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
17. Structures - Retaining Walls
140
42
14
28
42
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
140
$22,666
$161.90
18. Structures- Miscellaneous
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
19. Signing & Pavement Marking Analysis
59
0
6
18
12
15
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
$9,063
$151.05
20. Signing & Pavement Marking Plans
26
0
1
8
5
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
$3,636
$139.85
21. Signalization Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
22. Signalization Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
23. Lighting Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
24. Lighting Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
25. Landscape Architecture Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
26. Landscape Architecture Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
27. Survey (Field & Office Support)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
28. Photogrammetry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
29. Mapping
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
30. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
31. Architecture Development
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
32. Noise Barriers Impact Design Assessment
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
33. Intelligent Transportation Systems Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
34. Intelligent Transportation Systems Plans
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /01
35. Geotechnica1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DI.!
Total Staff Hours
1,885
446
176
444
465
114
238
5
0
0
0
0
0
1,888
Total Staff Cost
$78,942.00
$40,128.00
$79,032.00
$64,635.00
$15,504.00
$20,706.00
$315.00
$0.00
1 $0.00
1 $0.00
1 $0.00
1 $0.00
1
1 $299,262.00
$158.51
Survey Field Days by Subconsultant
SALARY RELATED COSTS:
4- Person Crew:
OVERHEAD:
0%
OPERATING MARGIN:
Notes:
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
1. This sheet to be used by Prime Consultant to calculate the Grand Total fee.
EXPENSES:
2. Manually enter fee from each subconsultant. Unused subconsultant rows may be hidden.
Survey (Field - if by Prime)
4 -man crew
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
days
Subconsultant: Enter Name Sub 1
Subconsultant: Sub 2
Subconsultant: Sub 3
Subconsultant: Sub 4
Subconsultant: Sub 5
Subconsultant: Sub 6
Subconsultant: Sub 7
Subconsultant: Sub 8
Subconsultant: Sub 9
Subconsultant: Sub 10
Subconsultant: Sub 11
Stafthou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.x1s
Fee Sheet - Prime 1 of 26 9/16/2014 2 :01 PM
Check = $299,262.00
$299,262.00
0%
$0.00
0%
$0.00
0.00%
$0.00
0.00%
$0.00
4 -man crew
days
$ - /day $0.00
$299,262.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Stafthou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.x1s
Fee Sheet - Prime 1 of 26 9/16/2014 2 :01 PM
Subconsultant: Sub 12
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$299,262.00
Geotechnical Field and Lab Testing
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$299,262.00
Optional Services
$0.00
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$299,262.00
Staffiou rEstimation Forms_9_12_14.xls
Fee Sheet- Prime 2 of 26 9/16/2014 2 :01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.'
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments'
4.1
Typical Section Package
LS
1
0
0
na
4.2
Pavement Type Selection Report
LS
1
0
0
na
4.3
Pavement Design Package
LS
1
0
0
na
4.4
Cross -Slope Correction
LS
1
0
0
na
4.5.1
Horizontal /Vertical Master Design Files
LS
1
53
53
225 hours x 0.25 miles = 56 hours
4.5.2
Horizontal /Vertical Master Design Files
skeletal plans
LS
1
0
0
na
4.6
Access Management
LS
1
0
0
na
4.7
Cross Section Design Files
LS
1
20
20
10 cross sections @ 2 hrs each
4.8
Traffic Control Analysis
LS
1
30
30
single lane phased const. (signal)
4.9
Master TCP Design Files
LS
1
15
15
40 scale @ 60 hrs x 0.25 mi = 15 hours
4.10
Design Variations and Exceptions
LS
1
0
0
na
4.11
Design Report
LS
1
12
12
12 hrs
4.12
Quantities
LS
1
8
8
2 hrs with 4 updates = 8 hrs
4.13
Cost Estimate
LS
1
8
8
2 hrs with 4 updates = 8 hrs
4.14
Technical Special Provisions
LS
1
0
0
na
4.15
Other Roadway Analysis
LS
1
0
0
na
Roadway Analysis Technical Subtotal
146
4.16
Field Reviews
LS
1
16
16
1 field review @ 2 days = 16 hrs
4.17
Technical Meetings
LS
1
20
20
Meetings are listed below
4.18
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
LS
%
5%
7
4.19
Independent Peer Review
LS
%
0%
0
na
4.20
Supervision
LS
%
5%
7
Roadway Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal
50
4.21
Coordination
LS
I %
1 2%
4
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
4. Roadway Analysis 3 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
EA
1
No of
Hours/
Total
EA
0
Task
Units
Access Management
I
0
Comments
No.
15% Line and Grade
EA
Units
Unit
Hours
Driveways
4. Roadway Analysis Total
200
0
Technical Meetings
Typical Section
EA
1
8
8 4 hrs with 2 people
Pavement
EA
0
0
0
Access Management
EA
0
0
0
15% Line and Grade
EA
0
0
0
Driveways
EA
0
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties,
MPO)
EA
0
0
0
Work Zone Traffic Control
EA
0
0
0
30/60/90/100% Comment Review Meeting
EA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
8>
Progress Meetings (if required by FDOT)
EA
0
0
0
Phase Review Meetings
EA
3
4
12 3 mtgs @ 4 hrs
Total Meetings 20
Carries to 4.17
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
4. Roadway Analysis 4 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No'.
Task
'Scale
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
'Comments
5.1
Key Sheet
Sheet
1
5
1
5
5.2
Summary of Pay Items Including Quantity
Input
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.3
Drainage Map (Including Interchanges)
Sheet
0
0
1 0
1 0
na
5.4
Typical Section Sheets
5.4.1
Typical Sections
EA
1
5
5
5.4.2
Typical Section Details
EA
0
0
0
na
5.5
General Notes /Pay Item Notes
Sheet
0
0
1
6
5.6
Summary of Quantities
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.7
Box Culvert Data Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.8
Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheets
Sheet
1
24
1
24
5.9
Summary of Drainage Structures
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.10
Optional Pipe /Culvert Material
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.11
Project Layout
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.12
Plan /Profile Sheet
Sheet
2
4
2
8
5.13
Profile Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.14
Plan Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.15
Special Profile
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.16
Back -of- Sidewalk Profile Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.17
Interchange Layout Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.18
Ramp Terminal Details (Plan View)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.19
Intersection Layout Details
Sheet
0
0
1 0
1 0
na
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
5. Roadway Plans 5 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Scale
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
5.20
Special Details
EA
1
4
4
5.21
Drainage Structure Sheet (Per Structure)
EA
4
2
8
5.22
Miscellaneous Drainage Detail Sheets
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.23
Lateral Ditch Plan /Profile
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.24
Lateral Ditch Cross Sections
EA
0
0
0
5.25
Retention /Detention Ponds Detail Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
5.26
Retention Pond Cross Sections
EA
0
0
0
5.27
Cross - Section Pattern Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.28
Roadway Soil Survey Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.29
Cross Sections
EA
10
0.25
3
5.30
Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets
Sheet
12
4
12
48
3 phases with 4 sheets each
5.31
Temporary Traffic Control Cross Section
Sheets
EA
0
0
0
na
5.32
Temporary Traffic Control Detail Sheets
Sheet
3
3.5
3
11
3 sheets for typicals, notes, AWS and signal
5.33
Utility Adjustment Sheets
Sheet
2
4
2
8
5.34
Selective Clearing and Grubbing
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.35
Erosion Control Plan
Sheet
2
3
2
6
5.36
SWPPP
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.37
Project Network Control Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
5.38
Environmental Detail Sheets
LS
0
0
0
na
5.39
Utility Verification Sheet (SUE Data)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
on utility adjustment sheets
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
5. Roadway Plans 6 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Scale
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
Roadway Plans Technical Subtotal
24
136>
5.40
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
LS
%
5%
7
5.41
Supervision
LS
%
5%
7
5`. Roadway Plans Total
>24
150 >'
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
5. Roadway Plans 7 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: Ali
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
6.1
Determine Base Clearance Water Elevation
Per Basin
0
0
0
6.2
Pond Siting Analysis and Report
Per Basin
0
0
0
6.3
Design of Cross Drains
EA
0
0
0
6.4
Design of Ditches
Per Ditch Mile
0
0
0
6.5
Design of Stormwater Management Facility
(Offsite or Infield Pond)
EA
0
0
0
6.6
Design of Stormwater Management Facility
(Roadside Ditch as Linear Pond)
Per Cell
0
0
0
6.7
Design of Flood Plain Compensation
Per Flood -plain
Basin
0
0
0
6.8
Design of Storm Drains
EA
4
3
12
6.9
Optional Culvert Material
LS
0
0
0
6.10
French Drain Systems
Per Cell
0
0
0
6.11
Drainage Wells
EA
0
0
0
6.12
Drainage Design Documentation Report
LS
1
16
16
6.13
Bridge Hydraulic Report
EA
0
0
0
6.14
Temporary Drainage Analysis
LS
1
0
0
6.15
Cost Estimate
LS
1
0
0
6.16
Technical Special Provisions
LS
1
0
0
6.17
Other Drainage Analysis
LS
1
0
0
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
6. Drainage Analysis 8 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
I Hours /
Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
Drainage Analysis Technical Subtotal
28
0
6.18
Field Reviews
LS
1
16
16
EA
6.19
Technical Meetings
LS
1
0
0
Meetings are listed below
6.20
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
LS
%
5%
1
Subtotal Technical Meetings',
6.21
Independent Peer Review
LS
%
0%
0
0
6.22
Supervision
LS
%
0%
0
0
Drainage Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal
17
6.23
Coordination
LS
I %
1 0%
0
6.' Drainage Analysis Total
45
Technical' Meetings
Base Clearance Water Elevation
EA
0
0
0
Pond Siting
EA
0
0
0
Agency
EA
0
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EA
0
0
0
FDOT Drainage
EA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings',
0
Progress Meetings (if required by FDOT)
EA
0
0
0
Phase Review Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Total Meetings ! 0
Carries to 6.19
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
6. Drainage Analysis 9 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
Total Hours
Comments'
7.1
Kickoff Meeting
LS
1
0
0
7.2
Identify Existing UAO(s)
LS
1
4
4
4 utility owners (5 utilities)
7.3
Make Utility Contacts
LS
1
8
8
4 utils x 2 contact x 1 hr each
7.4
Exception Processing
LS
1
0
0
7.5
Preliminary Utility Meeting
LS
1
0
0
7.6
Individual /Field Meetings
LS
1
10
10
2 hrs each for 5 utilities
7.7
Collect and Review Plans and Data from UAO(s)
LS
1
4
4
1 hr for each utility owner
7.8
Subordination of Easements Coordination
LS
1
0
0
7.9
Utility Design Meeting
LS
1
0
0
7.10
Review Utility Markups & Work Schedules, and
Processing of Schedules & Agreements
LS
1
10
10
2 hours x 5 documents
7.11
Utility Coordination /Followup
LS
1
15
15
1 hrs x 5 utilities x 3 (complexity)
7.12
Utility Constructability Review
LS
1
10
10
2 hrs x 5 utilities
7.13
Additional Utility Services
LS
1
32
32
relocation plans for water and sewer
7.14
Processing Utility Work by Highway Contractor
(UWHC)
LS
1
0
0
7.15
Contract Plans to UAO(s)
LS
1
0
0
7.16
Certification /Close -Out
LS
1
0
0
7.17
Other Utilities
LS
j 1
j 0
0
7. Utilities Total
93
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
7. Utilities 10 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Technical Meetings
Kickoff
EA 0
Preliminary Meeting
EA 0
Individual UAO Meetings
EA 0
Field Meetings
EA 0
Design Meeting
EA 0
Other Meetings
EA 0
Total Technical Meetings 0
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
7. Utilities 11 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: JLL
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement
Task
No.
Task
Units
Design and Production Staffhou'rs
Comments
No. of
Units
Hours
per Unit
No. of
Sheets'
Total
General Drawings
9.1
Key Sheet and Index of Drawings
Sheet
1
6
1
6
9.2
Project Layout
Sheet
0
0
0
0
9.3
General Notes and Bid Item Notes
Sheet
2
20
2
40
9.4
Miscellaneous Common Details
Sheet
1
20
1
20
9.5
Incorporate Report of Core Borings
Sheet
2
1
2
2
9.6
lExisting Bridge Plans
LS
1
6
6
9.7
Assemble Plan Summary Boxes and
Quantities
LS
1
12
12
9.8
Cost Estimate
LS
1
8
8
9.9
Technical Special Provisions
LS
0
0
0
Structures - Summary and Miscellaneous Tasks
and Drawings, Subtotal
6
94
Task
No.
Task
Total
Task 10
Task 11
Task 12
Task 13
Task 14
Task 15
Task 16
Task 17
Task 18
10 -16
Bridge 1
872
222
0
0
650
0
0
0
10 -16
Bridge 2
0
10 -16
Bridge 3
0
17
Retaining Walls
140
140
18
Miscellaneous Structures
0
0
Structures Technical Subtotals
1012
222
0
0
650
0
0
0>
140
0
Task
No.
Task'
Units
No. of
Units
Hours
per Unit
'Total '
Comments
9.10
Field Reviews
LS
2
16
32
9.11
Technical Meetings
LS
1
24
24
Meetings are listed below
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
9. Structure Summary 12 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
9.12
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
LS
%
5%
55
EA
9.13
Independent Peer Review
LS
1
0
0
0
9.14
Supervision
LS
%
5%
55
Local Governments (cities, counties)
Structures Nontechnical ' Subtotal
0
0
166
Utility Companies
9.15
Coordination
LS
1
40
40
2
9. Structures - Summary and Miscellaneous
Tasks and Drawings Nontechnical and
Coordination Total
8
Subtotal Technical Meetings
300
Technical Meetings
BDR Coordination /Review
EA
0
0
0
90/100% Comment Review
EA
0
0
0
Aesthetics Coordination
EA
0
0
0
Regulatory Agency
EA
2
4
8
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EA
0
0
0
Utility Companies
EA
2
4
8
Other Meetings
EA
2
4
8
Subtotal Technical Meetings
24
Progress Meetings
Phase Review Meetings
EA 0 0 0
EA 0 0 0
Total Meetings 24
Carries to 9.11
Structures Hours Total = 1312
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3.
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
9. Structure Summary 13 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Bridge Identifier (Number or Name):
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No`.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
>Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
General Requirement
10.1
Bridge Geometry
LS
1
24
24
Phased Construction
10.2
Ship Impact Data Collection
LS
1
0
0
10.3
Ship Impact Criteria
EA
0
0
0
Superstructure Alternatives
10.4
Short Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
10.5
Medium Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
1
24
24
10.6
Long Span Concrete Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
10.7
Structural Steel Bridge
EA ALT
0
0
0
Foundation & Substructure Alternatives
10.8
Pier /Bent
EA Type
2
8
16
24" piles and drilled shafts
10.9
Shallow Foundations / GRS Abutments
EA Type
0
0
0
10.10
Deep Foundations
EA
Foundation
Evaluated
2
8
16
24" piles and drilled shafts
Movable Span
10.11
Data Collection and Design Criteria
LS
1
0
0
10.12
Movable Span Geometrics and Clearances
LS
1
0
0
10.13
Deck System Evaluation
LS
1
0
0
10.14
Framing Plan Development
LS
1
0
0
10.15
Main Girder Preliminary Design
LS
1
0
0
10.16
Conceptual Span Balance /Counterweight
LS
1
0
0
10.17
Support System Development
LS
1
0
0
10.18
Drive Power Calculations
LS
1
0
0
10.19
Drive System Development
LS
1
0
0
10.20
Power and Control Development
LS
1
0
0
Stattn o u rtst I m atl o n t o rms_y_ 11 14. XIS
10. Structures -BDR 14 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No of
Hours/
No. of
Total
Task
Units
Comments
No'.
Units
Unit
Sheets
Hours
10.21
Conceptual Pier Design
LS
1
0
0
StaffhourEstimation Forms 9 12 14.xls
10. Structures -BDR 15 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No'.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
10.22
Foundation Analysis (FL PIER)
LS
1
0
0
10.23
Tender Visibility Study
LS
1
0
0
Other BDR Issues
10.24
Aesthetics
LS
1
0
0
10.25
TCP /Staged Construction Requirements
LS
1
24
24
Phased construction
10.26
Constructibility Requirements
LS
1
10
10
10.27
Load Rating for damaged /widened structures
EA Unit
1
0
0
10.28
Quantity and Cost Estimates
EA ALT
0
0
0
10.29
Quantity and Cost Estimates - Movable Span
LS
1
16
16
10.30
Wall Type Justification
LS
1
12
12
Retaining Walls at End Bents
Report Preparation
10.31
Exhibits
EA SHT
3
20
60
Plan and Elevation, Typical Section, Construction
Sequence.
10.32
Exhibits - Movable Span
EA SHT
0
0
0
10.33
Report Preparation
LS
1
16
16
BDR Memo Only
10.34
Report Preparation - Movable Span
LS
1
0
0
10.35
BDR Submittal Package
LS
1
4
4
>.10. Structures - Bridge Development Report Total
222
When ONLY 30% plans are final deliverable, use Task Nos. as shown for applicable bridge types for project Activities 12 thru 16. Staffhours
to be negotiated and scaled appropriately.
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
10. Structures -BDR 16 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: JLL
Bridge # 904153
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task '
Units
No. of
Units >
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
'Comments'.
General Layout Design and Plans
13.1
Overall Bridge Final Geometry
LS
1
20
20
13.2
Expansion /Contraction Analysis
EA Unit
1
4
4
13.3
General Plan and Elevation
Sheet
1
32
1
32
13.4
Construction Staging
Sheet
2
20
2
40
13.5
Approach Slab Plan and Details
Sheet
2
12
2
24
Pase Constructed
13.6
Miscellaneous Details
Sheet
3
20
3
60
Slope protection (2), Load Rating.
End Bent Design and Plans
13.7
End Bent Geometry
EA End
Bent
2
8
16
Phase constructed end bent.
13.8
Wingwall Design and Geometry
EA End
Bent
4
4
16
13.9
End Bent Structural Design
EA Design
1
30
30
13.10
End Bent Plan and Elevation
Sheet
2
20
2
40
13.11
End Bent Details
Sheet
2
20
2
40
Intermediate Bent Design and Plans
13.12
Bent Geometry
EA Bent
0
0
0
13.13
Bent Stability Analysis
EA Design
0
0
0
13.14
Bent Structural Design
EA Design
0
0
0
13.15
Bent Plan and Elevation
Sheet
0
0
0
0
F 1
Bent Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
13. Medium Span Concrete 17 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task '
Units
No. of
Units >
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
'Comments'
Pier Design and Plans
13.17
Pier Geometry
EA Pier
0
0
0
13.18
Pier Stability Analysis
EA Design
0
0
0
13.19
Pier Structural Design
EA Design
0
0
0
13.20
Pier Plan and Elevation
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.21
Pier Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Miscellaneous Substructure Design and Plans
13.22
Foundation Layout
Sheet
2
16
2
32
Foundation Layout and Pile Data Table.
Superstructure Deck Design and Plans
13.23
Finish Grade Elevation (FGE)
Calculation
LS
1
24
24
13.24
Finish Grade Elevations
Sheet
2
16
2
32
13.25
Bridge Deck Design
EA Section
3
8
24
13.26
Bridge Deck Reinforcing and
Concrete Quantities
EA Unit
1
12
12
13.27
Diaphragm Design
EA Section
0
0
0
13.28
Superstructure Plan
Sheet
1
20
1
20
13.29
Superstructure Section
Sheet
1
20
1
20
13.30
Miscellaneous Superstructure Details
Sheet
4
16
4
64
Edge Beam Detail (1), SIP Forms /Camber (1), Temporary
Bracing (1)
Reinforcing Bar Lists
13.31
Preparation of Reinforcing Bar List
Sheet
2
10
2
20
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
13. Medium Span Concrete 18 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task '
Units
No. of
Units >
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
'Comments'
Continuous Concrete Girder Design
13.32
Section Properties
LS
1
0
0
13.33
Material Properties
LS
1
0
0
13.34
Construction Sequence
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.35
Tendon Layouts
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.36
Live Load Analysis
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.37
Temperature Gradient
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.38
Time Dependent Analysis
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.39
Stress Summary
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.40
Ultimate Moments
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.41
Ultimate Shear
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.42
Construction Loading
EA Unit
0
0
0
13.43
Framing Plan
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.44
Girder Elevation, including Grouting
Plan and Vent Locations
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.45
Girder Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.46
Erection Sequence
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.47
Splice Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
13.48
Girder Deflections and Camber
Sheet
0
0
0
0
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
13. Medium Span Concrete 19 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No.
Task '
Units
No. of
Units >
Hours/
Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
! Hours
'Comments'
Simple Span Concrete Design
13.49
Prestressed Beam
EA Design
2
8
16
Interior and Exterior
13.50
Prestressed Beam Schedules
Sheet
1
20
1
20
13.51
Framing Plan
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Beam Stability
13.52
Beam /girder stability
EA Unit
1
12
12
Bearing
13.53
Bearing pad and bearing plate design
S an/
1
12
12
13.54
Bearing pad and bearing plate details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Load Rating
13.55
Load Ratings
Per Beam
2
10
20
13. Structures - Medium Span Concrete Bridge Total
25
650'
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
13. Medium Span Concrete 20 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator: JLL
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
>No.
Task
Unit
No'. of
Units
Hours /
Unit
'No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
General Requirements
17.1
Key Sheet
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.2
Horizontal Wall Geometry
Per Wall
2
8
16
Permanent Proprietary Walls
17.3
Vertical Wall Geometry
Per Wall
0
0
0
17.4
Semi - Standard Drawings
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.5
Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.6
Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Temporary Proprietary Walls
17.7
Vertical Wall Geometry
Per Wall
0
0
0
17.8
Semi - Standard Drawings
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.9
Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings)
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.10
Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
Cast -in'- Place Retaining Walls
17.11
Design
EA Design
1
12
12
17.12
Vertical Wall Geometry
EA Wall
2
10
20
17.13
General Notes
Sheet
1
20
1
20
17.14
Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings)
Sheet
2
20
2
40
17.15
Sections and Details
Sheet
1
20
1
20
17.16
Reinforcing Bar List
Sheet
1
12
1
12
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
17. Structures - Retaining Walls 21 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
>No.
Task
Unit
No. of
Units
Hours /
Unit
'No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments'
Other Retaining Walls and Bulkheads
17.17
Design
EA Design
0
0
0
17.18
Vertical Wall Geometry
EA Wall
0
0
0
17.19
General Notes, Tables and Misc. Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17.20
Wall Plan and Elevations
Sheet
1 0
0
0
0
17.21
1 Details
Sheet
0
0
0
0
17. Structures - Retaining
Walls
Total
' 5
140'
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
17. Structures - Retaining Walls 22 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No.
Task
Units
No. of
Units
Hours/
Units
Total
Hours
Comments'
19.1
Traffic Data Analysis
LS
1
0
0
na
19.2
INo Passing Zone Study
LS
1
0
0
na
19.3
Reference and Master Design File
LS
1
40
40
30 hrs + (40 hrs x 0.25 mi) = 40 hrs
19.4
Multi -Post Sign Support Calculations
EA
1
0
0
na
19.5
Sign Panel Design Analysis
EA
1
0
0
na
19.6
Sign Lighting /Electrical Calculations
EA
1
0
0
na
19.7
Quantities
LS
1
2
2
2 shts x 1 hr
19.8
Cost Estimate
LS
1
8
8
2 hrs each x 4 submittals
19.9
Technical Special Provisions
LS
1
0
0
na
19.10
Other Signing and Pavement
Marking
LS
1
0
0
na
Signing
and Pavement Marking Analysis Technical Subtotal
50'
19.11
Field Reviews
LS
1
0
0
19.12
Technical Meetings
LS
1
0
0
Meetings are listed below
19.13
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
LS
%
5%
3
19.14
Independent Peer Review
LS
%
3%
2
19.15
Supervision
LS
%
5%
3
Signing, and Pavement Marking Analysis Nontechnical Subtotal
8
19.16
Coordination
LS
I %
2%
1
19. Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis Total
59'
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.x1s
19. Signing & Marking Analysis 23 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Task
No. of
Hours/
I Total
Task
Units
Comments
No.
Units
Units
I Hours
Technical Meetings
Sign Panel Design EA 0 0 0
Queue Length Analysis EA 0 0 0
Local Governments (cities, counties) EA 0 0 0
Other Meetings EA 0 0 0
Subtotal Technical Meetings 0
Progress Meetings EA 0 0 0
Phase Review Meetings EA 0 0 0
Total Meetings 0
Carries to 19.12
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
19. Signing & Marking Analysis 24 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement (Bridge #904153)
Task
No
Task
Scale
Units
No of
Units
Hours/
>Unit
No. of
Sheets
Total
Hours
Comments
20.1
Key Sheet
Sheet
1
4
1
4
20.2
Summary of Pay Items Including TRNS•Port
Input
LS
1
0
0
na
20.3
Tabulation of Quantities
Sheet
5
2
5
10
7 hrs (1st sht) + 3 hrs (2nd sht)
20.4
General Notes /Pay Item Notes
Sheet
1
4
1
4
20.5
Project Layout
Sheet
0
0
0
0
na
20.6
Plan Sheet
Sheet
2
3
2
6
2 shts x 3 hrs each
20.7
Typical Details
EA
0
0
0
na
20.8
Guide Sign Worksheet(s)
EA
0
0
0
na
20.9
Traffic Monitoring Site
EA
0
0
0
na
20.10
Cross Sections
EA
0
0
0
na
20.11
Special Service Point Details
EA
0
0
0
na
20.12
Special Details
LS
1
0
0
na
20.13
Interim Standards
LS
1
0
0
na
Signing and Pavement Marking Plans Technical Subtotal
9 >'
24
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
20. Signing & Marking Plans 25 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
20.14
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
LS
%
5%
1
20.15
Supervision
LS
%
5%
1
20. Signing and Pavement Marking Plans Total
9 >'
26
StaffhourEstimationForms _9_12_14.xls
20. Signing & Marking Plans 26 of 26 9/16/2014 2:01 PM
SUGARLOAF BOULEVARD (CR939) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
ENV IRON ME NTALBUDGET ESTIMATE SUGARLOAF BW 12SEP2014
LABOR SUMMARY
HOURS
LABOR FEE
SR ENV
11
11
111
SR ENV
ENV
GIS
TOTAL
Environmental Assessment & Reporting
66
20
11
11
111
Hourly rates per o oe Co. General Services ontract (December 21
$1,080.00
$14,014.00
Agency Coordination & Permitting
84
52
16
152
$13,356.00
$6,344.00
$1,440.00
Acquire and ReAew Existing EmArommental Data
aoom
150
72
28
'.'.'.250'.'.'.
$23,850.00
$8,784.00
$2,520.00
$35,154.00
Estimated Expenses
''.$1,243.50I'.
Total
$36,397:50
-
-�
-
-
--
. . 1 ,
No formal consultation or BA preparation, limited coordination only
P r ep ar e PeA pp li ca ti ons
mmmm��
SFWMD ERP GP or Exemption Letter
USACE NWP or NPR Letter
USCG Bridge Permit Application
.. ,, M
oaom
LABOR SUMMARY
HOURS
LABOR FEE
SR ENV
ENV
GIS
TOTAL
SR ENV
ENV
GIS
TOTAL
Environmental Assessment & Reporting
66
20
12
98
$10,494.00
$2,440.00
$1,080.00
$14,014.00
Agency Coordination & Permitting
84
52
16
152
$13,356.00
$6,344.00
$1,440.00
$21,140.00
Labor Total
150
72
28
'.'.'.250'.'.'.
$23,850.00
$8,784.00
$2,520.00
$35,154.00
Estimated Expenses
''.$1,243.50I'.
Total
$36,397:50
Estimated Expenses
Lodging 2 persons fort nights
4 nights $150.00
per night
$600.00
Meals Monroe County Rate( @$36.00 /day) 3 days (3 daysx 2 people =6 days)
6 days $36.00
perday
$216.00
Boat Rental NOT INCLUDED
0 days $450.00
per day
$0.00
Mileage
950 miles $0.45
per mile
$427.50
Total Expenses
$1,243.50
Mileage One -way trip mileage (one way to Key West- may have to stay in KW) 425
Round trip mileage 850
Local travel forthe project 100
Total mileage 950
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Design
INTERA Incorporated
August 2015
Introduction
The Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge spans the canal bisecting Lower Sugarloaf Key, which connects Upper
Sugarloaf Sound with Lower Sugarloaf Sound. Although these water bodies are only connected to the
Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico through a series of small channels, island overtopping during
hurricanes provides an additional connection to the ocean during hurricane events. As a result,
determining design water surface elevations and wave heights is complex and requires a sophisticated
approach that accounts for all of the processes.
Scope of Services
To determine design water surface elevations and wave heights, INTERA will update an existing
ADCIRC model previously developed for the FDOT to estimate the design hydraulic and wave
parameters for all the US -1 bridges in the Keys. For that study, INTERA (operating as OEA Inc. at the
time) developed and calibrated an ADCIRC Model to hindcast all the hurricanes and tropical storms that
have affected the Florida Keys between 1850 and 2004. For this study, INTERA will modify the existing
model mesh to increase the resolution at the bridge. Model boundary conditions will consist of hurricane
wind and pressure fields obtained from the historical hurricanes (1850 to 2004). To do this, INTERA will
identify which of the historical hurricanes produced winds closest to the 100 -year conditions at the bridge,
and scale the wind speeds to produce the 50 -, 100 -, and 500 -year events. Those three sets of hurricanes
wind fields will provide the boundary conditions to determine the design water surface elevations and
waves at the bridge. Model results will provide the inputs to determine wave crest elevations and to
calculate wave forces if necessary.
A Bridge Hydraulics Report (BHR) suitable for submittal to the FDOT will document all procedures,
methodologies, calculations, and results performed in support of this work. Additionally, INTERA will
provide the hydraulic and scour information for the Bridge Hydraulic Recommendation Sheet (BHRS).
Task 1. Data Collection
INTERA will collect recent publicly available bathymetry, design flood elevations, and design wind
speeds near the bridge to assist in model modification and development of boundary conditions. This task
includes determination of the 100 -year wind velocity magnitude from ASCE 07, identifying the
appropriate Hurricane for scaling, and developing the scaled 50 -, 100 -, and 500 -year wind and pressure
fields for the model boundary conditions.
Task 2. Hvdraulic and Wave Modeliniz
INTERA will adapt an existing calibrated Keys SWAN +ADCIRC model to include increased resolution
at the project location. The model will incorporate any recent survey identified in the data collection task.
The updated model will simulate the three scaled hurricanes to produce the 50 -, 100 -, and 500 -year events
at the bridge location. Model output provides the hydraulic parameter associated with the 50 -, 100 -, and
500 -year events and the wave climate associated with the 100 -year event.
Task 3. Enizineeriniz Analvsis
INTERA will employ results from the modeling and techniques outlined in the FDOT Scour Manual as
well as FHWA's HEC -18 to calculate scour at the bridge. Additionally, INTERA will employ the
methodologies outlined in AASHTO's Guide Specifications for Bridge Vulnerable to Coastal Storms to
compute the maximum wave heights along the bridge centerline and — if the superstructure low chord is
within the wave crest — calculate wave forces on the superstructure.
Task 4. Report
INTERA will prepare a Bridge Hydraulics Report (BHR) suitable for submittal to the FDOT
documenting all procedures, methodologies, calculations, and results performed in support of this work
Additionally, INTERA will provide the hydraulic and scour information for the Bridge Hydraulic
Recommendation Sheet (BHRS).
Task 5. Meetings, Coordination and QAQC
This task includes meetings with the Prime Consultant and coordination efforts during INTERA's
involvement with the project. This task also includes Quality Assurance /Quality Control activities.
Budget
Labor
ODC's
Task
Staff Hour Estimate by Classification
Total
Hours
Total Cost
Principal
Engineer/
Scientist
II
Sr.
Engineer/
Scientist
I
Sr.
Engineer/
Scientist
IV
Engineer/
Scientist
I
$ 205.00
$ 175.00
$ 130.00
115.00
Task 1
0
0
4
24
28
$3,280.00
Task 2
1
4
0
52
57
$6,885.00
Task 3
0
8
0
22
30
$3,930.00
Task 4
1
8
2
36
47
$6,005.00
Task 5
8
8
0
0
16
$3,040.00
Totals
178
$ 23,140.00
negotiated rates for 2014.
Item
Quantity
Unit
Cost
Cost
Mileage
3.0
$105.00
$315.00
Fuel
2.0
$50.00
$100.00
Hotel
1.0
$210.00
$210.00
Meals
2.0
$53.25
$106.50
Total $731.50
Total Project Cost = $23,871.50
as
E
�a
03
M
0
03
N
�a
0
�a
d
L)
as
E
r�_ ITH
_ � 301 EastAtlan is Boulevard, Pompano Beach, Florida 33060.6643
c o n s u 1 1 e n g e n g i n e e r s
Tel: 954. 788 -3400 Fax: 954. 788 -3500
August 18, 2015
Jason LaBarbera, PE
Project Engineer
Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp.
One Tampa City Center
201 N. Franklin Street, Suite 400
Tampa, FL 33602
Phone 813 - 871 -5331, Ext. 4117
Email Jason. LaBarbera kisin ercam o.com
RE: Agreement for Professional Services
Project Name: Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Location: Summerland Key
Our Project/Proposal Number: 08601.M0 (0.01)
Dear Mr. LaBarbera:
In accordance with your request and subsequent discussions between members of our association
and yourself, this agreement between Keith & Associates, Inc. ( "CONSULTANT "), and Kisinger
Campo & Associates Corp. ( "CLIENT') for professional services is submitted for your consideration
and approval. Such receipt shall constitute written notice to proceed.
I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT /PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The purpose of this Agreement is to outline the scope of services recommended by CONSULTANT
and accepted by CLIENT, and to establish the contractual conditions between CONSULTANT and
CLIENT with respect to the proposed services.
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Section 1 - Engineering Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
Section 2 - Planning Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
Section 3 - Surveying Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
August 18, 2015 / Page 2 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
Section 4 — Landscape Architecture Services
Not a part of this Agreement.
Section 5 — Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Services
Keith and Associates (CONSULTANT) appreciate the opportunity to provide SUE /Survey
services on this very important project. CONSULTANT will follow ASCE Standard 38 -02 —
"Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data" during
the field and office operations for this project. The quality levels discussed below are defined
within the standard. CONSULTANT is to provide professional services associated with
designation of existing subsurface utilities .CONSULTANT shall designate all known tone able and
non -tone able utilities 400' north and south of the bridge within the apparent right of way ( +/ -50' from
the centerline)
Task 001 Horizontal Designation Services - (Quality Level `B')
CONSULTANT will horizontally mark any known tone able and non toneable underground
utilities that are represented on as -built plans, above ground appurtenances, and other
miscellaneous utility records (to be provided by CLIENT). Conductive utilities will be marked on
the surface utilizing active geophysical prospecting techniques in conjunction with
electromagnetic equipment utilizing passive radio and audio frequencies. Known non-
conductive utilities and /or structures will be marked on the surface utilizing 2 -d radar, above
ground features, professional judgment, utility plats and /or as- builts. This proposal does not
include identifying gravity systems, service laterals, irrigation or overhead facilities.
The Lump Sum Fee for this Task shall be ....................... ............................... $2,750.00
Technical Limitations
Services will be provided with due diligence and in a manner consistent with standards of the subsurface utility
locating industry. Every reasonable effort will be made to locate all utility systems of interest whether indicated on
record plans available to us or not. However, no guarantee can be made that all existing utility systems can be
detected, located or exposed. It may not be possible to detect utilities without prior knowledge, such as systems that
are not depicted on record prints available to us. Typically the horizontal location effort will include electromagnetic
induction, power source detection, and ground penetrating radar (GPR). Electromagnetic induction is a method in
which a transmitted signal is applied to a metallic target. As long as the target is metallic and unbroken, the target can
be traced and a receiver at the surface is used to detect the transmitted signal. If the signal cannot be applied directly
to the target, induction may be produced from the surface. In this scenario bleed -off of the transmitted signal to an
adjacent facility is possible, sometimes resulting in erroneous information. PVC, HDPE, concrete pipe and other non-
metallic facilities cannot be located by electromagnetic methods. Power source detection is a technique used to
locate naturally occurring magnetic fields that exist around cables while generating a signal (electric, telephone,
CA TV for example). Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is available to assist in locating non - metallic utilities and other
facilities that are unidentifiable using traditional electromagnetic techniques. The accuracy of these techniques is
subject to the limitation of the available technology and certain factors and field conditions beyond our control, such
as the size, depth and conductivity of the target, the site conditions and access, soil conditions, depth to water table
and the existence of adjacent buried materials and debris. The targeting of subsurface utilities, although highly
reliable, is expressly understood to represent an approximate location of the facility marked on the ground surface.
Facilities located from the surface are usually found within two feet of the surface mark. Once a possible facility has
c a n s r r n g e n p n e Paeket',.Pg. 3JV '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 3 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
been located from the surface, vacuum excavation services should be used to visually verify and to provide the
accurate horizontal location and vertical measurements (a test hole). Vacuum excavation techniques are used to
provide a cost - effective service that causes minimal disturbance to the site, the utility, vehicle traffic, and is
acceptable to the permitting agencies. The reporting of a negative result (no facility found) should not be used as a
positive determination that the subject area is clear of all facilities or that the facility does not exist. CLIENT shall hold
harmless and indemnify Keith and Associates, Inc. (K&A) against any losses as a result of limitations within the
equipment, but not against negligence on the part of K&A. Use of this service does not relieve interested parties from
their responsibility to make required notification prior to excavation, nor does it relieve utility owners of their
responsibility to mark the location of their facilities. K&A will not be responsible for damage caused by others. K&A
will not be responsible for utilities that cannot be located with the equipment and techniques provided, or those
located underneath other utilities. If records research is not part of the scope of services, the utility owner's marks will
be used to identify the utility. K&A will not be responsible for correcting mistakes made by other locators. Where
vacuum excavation services are used and no utility is found at the mark provided by the utility at a depth of 5 feet, the
excavation will be backfilled, referenced and invoiced as one test hole.
Subsurface Utility Engineering Conditions and Understandings
The utility markings are for design purposes only. The Florida One Call must be notified forty -
eight (48) hours in advance of any excavation.
CONSULTANT will not access confined spaces. If confined spaces need to be accessed for
locating purposes then the client will be notified and further arrangements will be made for said
access. Additional fees may be applicable.
If Due to traffic conditions additional MOT is required and is beyond the capability of
CONSULTANTS standard MOT operations, CONSULTANT will notify client and provided and
additional fee for the MOT operation.
Additional requests outside the scope of services, when requested by client and /or client's
representative, will be invoiced on an hourly basis.
This proposal assumes site access is available and work can be performed between the hours
of 7:30 AM and 5:00 PM Monday through Friday.
CONSULTANT'S TOTAL LUMP SUM FEE .... ............................... ......................$2,750.00
Section 6 - Additional Services
The undertaking by CONSULTANT to perform professional services defined within this Agreement
extends only to those services specifically described herein. No other services, whether they may
be interpreted as related, incidental or implied, shall be considered to be included in the scope of
work of this proposal. If upon request of CLIENT, CONSULTANT agrees to perform additional
services hereunder, CLIENT shall be obligated to pay CONSULTANT for the performance of such
additional services an amount (in addition to all other amounts payable under this Agreement)
based on an hourly fee in accordance with CONSULTANT'S current professional fee schedule,
plus reimbursable expenses as incurred by CONSULTANT, unless a lump sum addendum to
Agreement is executed by the parties to this Agreement which addresses the additional services.
E ITH p GA
c a n s r r n g� e n p n e Paeket',.Pg. 359 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 4 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
Additional services shall include revisions to work previously performed that are required due to a
change in the data or criteria furnished to CONSULTANT, a change in the scope or concept of the
project initiated by CLIENT, or services that are required by changes in the requirements of public
agencies after work under this Agreement has commenced.
If the preceding scope of services includes public agency permitting, our quoted fees /hours include
services to respond to the agency's first RAI (Request for Additional Information). Additional
agency requests or requirements shall be considered an increase to our scope of services.
III. COMPENSATION
A). Payments and Invoicing:
Invoices will be submitted by CONSULTANT to CLIENT monthly for services performed and
expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement during the prior month. Payment of such invoice
will be due upon presentation. CONSULTANT'S standard invoice format shall apply and such
format shall be acceptable to CLIENT for payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing
hereunder. Invoices shall be submitted monthly based on a percentage completed for lump
sum contracts. On a Time and Material contract, invoices shall be submitted in accordance
with our current professional service fee schedule as seen on "Exhibit A" attached.
In the event of any dispute concerning the accuracy of content of any invoice, CLIENT shall
within seven (7) days from the date of said invoice, notify CONSULTANT in writing stating the
exact nature and amount of the dispute. Any invoice that is not questioned within seven (7)
days shall be deemed due and payable. In the event an invoice or portion of an invoice is
disputed within seven (7) days, CLIENT shall be obligated to pay the undisputed portion of the
invoice as set forth in below.
If CLIENT fails to make any payment due to CONSULTANT for services and expenses within
thirty (30) days from the date of invoice, CONSULTANT may, after giving seven (7) days
written notice to CLIENT, apply the retainer to the unpaid balance of the account and /or
suspend services under this Agreement until the account has been paid in full. There will be a
fee charged for suspended work, which will be negotiated when work is resumed.
In the event any invoice or any portion thereof remains unpaid for more than forty five (45)
days following the invoice date, CONSULTANT may, following seven (7) days prior written
notice to CLIENT, initiate legal proceedings to collect the same and recover, in addition to all
amounts due and payable, including accrued interest, its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
The invoices referenced above, will be sent in accordance to the information as reflected on
the "Billing Information Form" attached hereto.
PAYMENT DELAY: If the CONTRACTOR has received payment from the OWNER and if for
any reason not the fault of Keith and Associates, Inc.(the SUBCONTRACTOR) does not
receive a progress payment from the CONTRACTOR within seven (7) days after the date such
payment is due; the SUBCONTRACTOR, upon giving an additional seven (7) days written
notice to the CONTRACTOR, and without prejudice to and in addition to any other legal
remedies, may stop work until payment of the full amount owing to the SUBCONTRACTOR
E ITH p C ff
cansrrn g�enpne Paeket',.Pg. 360 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 5 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
has been received. The Subconsultant Amount and Time shall be adjusted by the amount of
the SUBCONTRACTOR'S reasonable and verified cost of shutdown, delay and startup, which
shall be effected by an appropriate Subcontractor Change Order.
B). Reimbursable Expenses:
CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed for direct charges as itemized in "Exhibit B ". For those
out -of- pocket expenses directly chargeable to the project but not itemized in "Exhibit B ",
CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed at actual cost incurred, plus a 10% carrying charge.
IV. PROVISIONS RELATIVE TO THE SERVICES RENDERED
A). Re -use of Documents:
All original documents, including, but not limited to, drawings, sketches, specifications, maps,
as -built drawings, reports, test reports, etc., that result from CONSULTANT'S services
pursuant or under this Agreement remain the sole property of CONSULTANT and are not
intended or represented to be suitable for re -use by CLIENT or others.
CLIENT may, at their expense, obtain a set of reproducible copies of any maps and /or
drawings prepared for them by CONSULTANT, in consideration of which CLIENT agrees that
no additions, deletions, changes or revisions shall be made to same without the express
written consent of CONSULTANT. Any re -use without written verification of adaptation by
CONSULTANT mandates that CLIENT indemnify and hold CONSULTANT harmless from all
claims, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees, arising out
of or resulting there from.
Photographs of any completed project embodying the services of CONSULTANT provided
hereunder may be made by CONSULTANT and shall be considered as its property, and may
be used for publication.
B). Performance:
CONSULTANT shall not be considered in default in performance of its obligations hereunder if
performance of such obligations is prevented or delayed by acts of God or government, labor
disputes, failure or delay of transportation or by subcontractors, or any other similar cause or
causes beyond the reasonable control of CONSULTANT. Time of performance of
CONSULTANT'S obligations hereunder shall be extended by time period reasonably
necessary to overcome the effects of such force majeure occurrences.
C). Professional Standards:
All work performed by CONSULTANT will be in accordance with its professional standards and
in accordance with all applicable government regulations. CONSULTANT will exercise its best
efforts to obtain all governmental approvals contemplated under this Agreement. However,
CONSULTANT does not warrant or represent that any government approval will be obtained.
Unless the Scope of Services of this Agreement includes an investigation into the applicable
E ITH p C.1
cansrrn g- enpne Paeket',.Pg. 361 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 6 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
land use, zoning and platting requirements for the Project, CONSULTANT shall proceed on the
assumption that the Project as presented by CLIENT, is in accordance with all applicable
governmental regulations.
D). Opinions of Cost:
Since CONSULTANT does not have control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or
services furnished by others, or over methods of determining prices, or over competitive
bidding, or market conditions, any and all opinions as to costs rendered hereunder, including,
but not limited to, opinions as to the costs of construction and materials, shall be made on the
basis of its experience and qualifications and represent its best judgment as an experienced
and qualified CONSULTANT, familiar with the construction industry. CONSULTANT cannot
and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual costs will not vary from opinions of
probable cost. If, at any time, CLIENT wishes greater assurance as to the amount of any cost,
CLIENT shall employ an independent cost estimator to make such determination. Engineering
services required to bring costs within any limitation established by CLIENT will be paid for as
additional services hereunder by CLIENT.
If the services under this Agreement continue for a period of more than one (1) year from the
notice to proceed, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to renegotiate the terms of this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall not be bound under this Agreement if modifications to the terms
contained herein are made without the written consent of CONSULTANT (such consent to be
signified by CONSULTANT'S initials next to each modification, and if a fully executed copy
hereof is not received from CLIENT by CONSULTANT on or before sixty (60) calendar days
from the date of execution by CONSULTANT.
E). Termination:
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice in event
of the substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement through no fault of the terminating party. For the purpose of this Agreement, the
failure to pay any invoice submitted by CONSULTANT within sixty (60) days of the date of said
invoice, shall be considered a substantial failure on behalf of CLIENT. In the event of any
termination, CONSULTANT shall be paid for all services rendered to the date of termination
including all reimbursable expenses.
F). Liability:
CONSULTANT is protected by Workmen's Compensation Insurance, Professional Liability
Insurance and by Public Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage and will
furnish certificates of insurance upon request. CONSULTANT agrees to hold CLIENT
harmless from loss, damage, injury or liability arising solely from the negligent acts or omission
of CONSULTANT, its employees, agents, subcontractors and their employees and agents, but
only to the extent that the same is actually covered and paid under the foregoing policies of
insurance. If CLIENT requires increased insurance coverage, CONSULTANT will, if
specifically directed by CLIENT, secure additional insurance obtained at CLIENT'S expense.
CLIENT agrees that CONSULTANT'S aggregate liability to CLIENT and all construction and
professional contractors and subcontractors employed directly or indirectly by CLIENT on the
E ITH p C+f
cansrrn g�enpne Paeket',.Pg. 362 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 7 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
Project, due to or arising from CONSULTANT'S services under this Agreement or because of
the relation hereby of CONSULTANT, its agents, employees or subcontractors, or otherwise, is
and shall be limited to CONSULTANT'S total fees under this Agreement or $50,000.00
whichever is greater. In no event shall CONSULTANT be liable for any indirect, special or
consequential loss or damage arising out of the services hereunder including, but not limited
to, loss of use, loss of profit, or business interruption whether caused by the negligence of
CONSULTANT or otherwise.
CLIENT agrees that CONSULTANT shall have no liability to CLIENT, or to any person or entity
employed directly or indirectly by CLIENT in the project for damages of any kind from services
rendered by CONSULTANT relating to the testing for, monitoring, cleaning up, removing,
containing, treating, detoxifying or neutralizing of pollutants, whether or not, caused by the
negligence of CONSULTANT.
G). Litigation:
In the event litigation in any way related to the services performed hereunder is initiated
between CONSULTANT and CLIENT, the non - prevailing party shall reimburse the prevailing
party for all of its reasonable attorney's fees and costs related to said litigation.
V. CLIENT'S OBLIGATIONS:
CLIENT shall provide CONSULTANT with all data, studies, surveys, plats and all other pertinent
information concerning the Project. CLIENT shall designate a person to act with authority on
CLIENT'S behalf with respect to all aspects of the Project. CLIENT shall be responsible for all
processing fees or assessments required for the completion of the Project. CLIENT shall provide
CONSULTANT access to the Project site at reasonable times upon reasonable notice.
VI. GENERAL PROVISIONS:
A). Persons Bound by Agreement:
The persons bound by this Agreement are CONSULTANT and CLIENT and their respective
partners, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and other legal representatives.
This Agreement and any interest associated with this Agreement may not be assigned, sublet
or transferred by either party without the prior written consent of the other party, such consent
not to be unreasonably withheld. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent
CONSULTANT from employing such independent consultants, associates and sub -
consultants as CONSULTANT may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of the
services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any rights or benefits arising
from this Agreement to anyone other than CONSULTANT and CLIENT.
B). No Waiver or Modifications:
No waiver by CONSULTANT of any default shall operate as a waiver for any other default or
be construed to be a waiver of the same default on a future occasion. No delay, course of
dealing or omission on the part of CONSULTANT in exercising any right or remedy shall
E ITH p C p
c a n s r r n g� e n p n e Paeket',.Pg. 363 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 8 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
operate as a waiver thereof, and no single or partial exercise by CONSULTANT of any right or
remedy shall preclude any other or further exercise of any right or remedy.
This Agreement, including all requests for additional services placed hereunder, express the
entire understanding and agreement of the parties with reference to the subject matter hereof,
and is a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of this Agreement, and no
representations or agreements modifying or supplementing the terms of this Agreement shall
be valid unless in writing, signed by persons authorized to sign agreements on behalf of both
parties.
C). Governing Laws or Venue:
This Agreement shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the
State of Florida. Venue for any litigation shall be Broward County, Florida.
VII. CLOSURE
If you concur with the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the aforementioned work,
please execute the agreement in the space provided and return same to the undersigned with the
required retainer and completed billing information form.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal. Dan Checchia has been selected to serve
as project manager. Please contact Mr. Checchia or myself if you have any questions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CONSULTANT and CLIENT have executed this agreement the day and
year indicated below.
As to CONSULTANT
Keith & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Dodie Keith- Lazowick
President
DATED:
As to CLIENT
Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp.
Client:
Title:
DATED:
E ITH p C
c a n s r r n g� e n p n e Paeket',.Pg. 364 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 9 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
EXHIBIT A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEE SCHEDULE
Hourly Rate
01 Administrative Assistant ........................................ ............................... .........................$50.00
11 CADD Technician .................................................. ............................... .........................$80.00
15 Senior Technician .................................................. ............................... .........................$90.00
30 Associate Planner .................................................. ............................... .........................$90.00
32 Senior Planner (AICP) .......................................... ............................... ........................$115.00
33 Landscape Designer .............................................. ...............................
.........................$80.00
34 Senior Landscape Designer .................................. ...............................
........................$100.00
35 Landscape Architect (RLA) .................................. ...............................
........................$110.00
36 ISA Certified Arborist ............................................ ...............................
........................$110.00
50 Project Engineer ................................................... ...............................
........................$100.00
51 Senior Project Engineer ........................................ ...............................
........................$115.00
52 Professional Engineer ( PE) ................................... ...............................
........................$120.00
53 Junior Field Inspector .......................................... ...............................
.........................$75.00
54 Field Inspector/ Representative ............................ ...............................
.........................$90.00
60 Project Manager .................................................... ...............................
........................$125.00
61 Senior Project Manager ........................................ ...............................
........................$150.00
70 Principal ................................................................ ...............................
........................$200.00
72 Expert Witness Testimony .................................... ...............................
........................$250.00
76 BIM Modeler .......................................................... ...............................
........................$125.00
77 GIS Specialist ....................................................... ...............................
........................$100.00
78 Project Surveyor ................................................... ...............................
.........................$95.00
79 Senior Project Surveyor ........................................ ...............................
........................$110.00
80 Professional Surveyor & Mapper ( PSM) ............... ...............................
........................$120.00
81 Survey Party (2) Person ........................................ ...............................
........................$100.00
82 Survey Party (3) Person ........................................ ...............................
........................$125.00
83 Survey Laser Scanning ......................................... ...............................
........................$125.00
85 Survey Party w /Watercraft .................................... ...............................
........................$160.00
90 Utility Crew Supervisor ........................................... ...............................
.........................$70.00
91 Utility Locating Technician ..................................... ...............................
.........................$60.00
92 Utility Project Manager .......................................... ...............................
........................$100.00
93 Utility Project Engineer .......................................... ...............................
........................$125.00
94 Utility CADD Technician ......................................... ...............................
.........................$80.00
95 Utility Field Technician ........................................... ...............................
.........................$40.00
96 Utility Designating /GPR (2) Person ....................... ...............................
........................$200.00
97 Utility Locating (3) Person ..................................... ...............................
........................$250.00
103 Vacuum Excavation Test Hole (Pervious Surface) ........... ............................... $350.00 /Each
104 Vacuum Excavation Test Hole (Impervious Surface) ....... ............................... $400.00 /Each
Effective 08/01/07
a�
F
F
M
0
03
M
E ITH pp CG
cans��rr�n g�enp�ne Paeket,.f'y. 365 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 10 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
EXHIBIT B
Direct Expenses Cost per Unit
Photographic Copies
Color Copies
a) 8.5" x 11 " $ 1.00
b) 8.5" x 14 or 11 "x 17" $ 2.00
c) 24 "x 36" $18.00
Black & White Copies
a)
Any Size up to 11 "x17"
$ 0.15
b)
24 "x 36" Blackline
$ 2.00
c)
30" x 42" Blackline
$ 2.00
d)
24 "x 36" Mylar
$15.00
Laminating /Transparency Film Covers $ 2.00
Display Boards
Mounted (Foam) 30 "x 40" $42.00
Mounted (Foam) 40 "x 60" and larger $70.00
3 Ring Binders 1" $ 1.00
Dividers (Tabs) Set of 10 $ 0.80
Acco /GBC Binding $ 1.50
Facsimiles $ 2.00
Overnight Packages per service
Courier & Delivery Services per service
Postage: 1S Class Current US Postal rate
Mileage: $ 0.50 /mile
Any other expenses will be billed at cost plus 10% carrying charge.
* *NOTE: Typical other reimbursable expenses include travel, lodging, and meals when traveling on
CLIENT'S behalf, identifiable communication expenses, all reproduction costs, and special
accounting expenses not applicable to general overhead.
Effective 08/01/07
E ITH p CC
c a n s r r n g� e n p n e Paeket',.Pg. 366 '.
August 18, 2015 / Page 11 of 11
Sugarloaf Boulevard Bridge Replacement - Bridge Number 904153
Project Number 08601.M0
BILLING INFORMATION FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND OWNER:
OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER PHONE NO.: ( )
OWNER CELL PHONE NO.:
E -MAI L:
JOB SITE SUPERINTENDENT:
JOB SITE PHONE:
PURCHASE ORDER #:
INVOICE:
Company Name
ATTN:
Name
COMPANY ADDRESS:
Title
Street Address /Post Office Box
City /State /Zip Code
PHONE: ( )
Area Code /Number
FAX: ( )
Area Code /Number
SPECIAL BILLING INSTRUCTIONS:
a�
F
F
�a
M
0
03
M
E ITH p 44 pp C 7
PROPOSALFEES
Our Project /Proposal Number
108601.MO.01
Personnel and Hourly Rates
Proposal Date
8/18/2015
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
Tasks
Utility Crew
Supervisor
iiy
Locating
Technician
iiy
Project
Manager
iiy
Project
Engineer
Utility CADD
Technician
iiy
Field
Techician
Utility
Designating /GPR
(2) Person
iiy
Locating
(3) Person
Task
Subtotals
No. Description
$70.00
$60.00
$100.00
$125.00
$80.00
$40.00
$200.00
$250.00
0011 Designation
I
I
I
I
1
1 12
$ 2,400.00
Personnel Hours
0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 12
0
$ 2,400.00
Personnel Cost
$ -
$
$
$
Is
$
is 2,400.001$
Personnel Subtotal $ 2,400.00
Test Holes - Pervious $350.00 /each
Test Holes Subtotal
$ -
Test Holes - Impervious $400.00 /each
Test Holes Subtotal
$
Miscellaneous Expenses
Is 350.00
Direct Expenses
$
A AB4��
ESTIMATE OF WORK EFFORT AND COST - SUBCONSULTANT
Name of Project:
County:
FPN:
FAP No.:
Sugarloaf Key Bridge Rehab #904153
Monroe
0
n/a
Contract No.:
WO: ##
Consultant Name: Keith and Associates, Inc.
Consultant No.: 08601.00
Date: 8/18/2015
Estimator: POWERS
Notes:
1. This sheet to be used by Subconsultant to calculate its fee.
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE (Field Crew Supervisor)
$0.00
Senior
117.17 %
$0.00
OPERATING MARGIN:
21.0 %
$0.00
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
0.314%
$0.00
`> EXPENSES:
0.53 %
$0.00
SH
Salary
Average
Staff Classification
Total Staff
Su &
Surveyor &
Field Crew
Survey
Secretary/
Senior Utility
Staff Class!-
Staff Class!-
Staff Class!-
Staff Class!-
Staff Class!-
Staff Class!-
$18,980.00
OVERHEAD:
0.00 %
Hours From
rveyor
Mapper
Supervisor
Technician
Clerical
Coordinator
fication 7
fication 8
fication 9
fication 10
fication 11
fication 12
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
"SH Summary
Mapper
$0.00
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
By
Cost By
Rate Per
$120.00
$110.00
$95.00
$80.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Firm"
Activity
Task
27. Survey (Field & Office Support)
74
4
26
0
44
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
74
$6,860
$92.70
28. Photogrammetry
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /0I
29. Mapping
12
1
4
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
$1,120
$93.33
30. Terrestrial Mobile UDAR
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /0I
35. Geotechnical
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
#DIV /0I
Total Staff Hours
86
5
30
0
51
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
86
Total Staff Cost
$600.00
$3,300.00
$0.00
$4,080.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$7,980.00
$92.79
Notes:
1. This sheet to be used by Subconsultant to calculate its fee.
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE (Field Crew Supervisor)
$0.00
`OVERHEAD:
117.17 %
$0.00
OPERATING MARGIN:
21.0 %
$0.00
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
0.314%
$0.00
`> EXPENSES:
0.53 %
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$11,000.00
$0.00
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08 -18 -15 rev -1.xls
Fee Sheet- Sub Page 1 of 1 8/18/2015 5:16 PM
Check= $7,98000
SALARY RELATED COSTS:
$7,980.00
Survey (Field)
0 4- person crew $
- / day
$0.00
Survey (Field)
11 3- person crew $
1,000.00 / day
$11,000.00
Survey (Field)
0 2- person crew $
- / day
$0.00
SUE (Field)
0 3- person crew $
- / day
$0.00
SUE (Field)
0 2- person crew $
- / day
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
OVERHEAD:
0.00 %
$0.00
OPERATING MARGIN:
0.0%
$0.00
FCCM (Facilities Capital Cost Money):
0.000%
$0.00
EXPENSES:
0.00 %
$0.00
SUBTOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
Hotel /Perdiem
$0.00
GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE:
$18,980.00
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08 -18 -15 rev -1.xls
Fee Sheet- Sub Page 1 of 1 8/18/2015 5:16 PM
Project Activity 27: Survey
Estimator:
Sugarloaf Key Bridge Rehab #904153
0
Task No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Field Crew
Days /Unit
Crew
'. Days
'.Field Support
D
Hours / Crew'Aays
Field
Support
Hours
Office Support
a
Hours /Crew Days
Office Support
Hours
Comments
27.1
Horizontal Project Control (HPC)
ESTABLISH 2 PRIMARY CONTROL POINTS. ESTABLISH SECONDAR
CONTROL POINTS.
2 -Lane Roadway
Mile
0.25
4.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
3.00
Multi -lane Roadway
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.2
Vertical PC / Bench Line
ESTABLISH 2 PRIMARY CONTROL POINTS. ESTABLISH SECONDAR
CONTROL POINTS.
2 -Lane Roadway
Mile
2.00
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
3.00
Multi -lane Roadway
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.3
Alignment and Existing RAN Lines
CALULATE EXISTING ALIGNMENT AND RAN LINES
Mile
0.25
0.01
0.00 0.00 0.00 8000.00 20.00
27.4 Aerial Targets
Units /Day
2 -Lane Roadway
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -lane Roadway
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.5 Reference Points
"A"
Units /Day
REFERENCE CONTROL POINTS
2 -Lane Roadway
EA
8.00
16.00
0.50
0.50
0.25
3.00
1.50
Multi -lane Roadway
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Interstate
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reference Points
"B"
Units /Day
Non Alignment Points /Approximate
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.6
Topography /DTM (3D)
TOPO /DTM
Mile
0.25 8.00 2.00 0.50 1.00 3.00 6.00
27.7
Planimetric (2D)
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.8
1 Roadway Cross- Sections/Profiles
OBSERVE CHECK CROSS- SECTIONS TO VERIFY DTM
Mile
0.25 4.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 2.00
27.9
Side Street Surveys
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08 -18 -15 rev -1.xls
27. Survey Page 1 of 3 8/18/2015
Project Activity 27: Survey
Task No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Field Crew
Days /Unit
Crew
Days
»Field Support
<
Hours i Crew
Field
Support
Hours
Office Support
Hours /Crew Days
Office Support
Hours
Comments
27.10
Underground Utilities
LOCATE PAINT MARKS AND FLAGS FROM SUE INVESTIGATIONS
Designates
Mile /Site
0.00
0.00
0.00
Locates
Point
0.00
0.00
0.00
Survey
0%
0.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
3.00
27.11
Outfall Survey
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.12
Drainage Survey
Units/Day
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.13
Bridge Survey
LOCATE BRIDGE DETAILS INCLUDING APPROACH SLABS, BENTS,
DECK, SEAWALL, RIPRAP, ETC.
Minor/ Major
EA
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 3.00 3.00
27.14
Channel Survey
OBSERVE CROSS SECTIONS THAT EXTEND 100' IN EACH
DIRECTION. THREE CROSS SECTIONS PER SIDE. ONE AT BRIDGE,
ONE AT 50' AND ONE AT 100'.
EA
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 3.00 3.00
27.15
Pond Site Survey
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.16
Mitigation Survey
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.17
Jurisdiction Line Survey
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.18
Geotechnical Support
Units/Day
LOCATE TWO GEOTECH BORINGS
EA
2
8
0.25 0.50 0.13 3.00 0.75
27.19
Sectional / Grant Survey
Corner
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.20
Subdivision Location
LOCATE PROPERTY CORNERS TO AID IN RECOVERY OF
ALIGNMENT AND RAN
Block
2 0.5 1.00 0.50 0.50 3.00 3.00
27.21
IMaintained RAN
Mile
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.22
Boundary Survey
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.23
Water Boundary Survey
EA
0.00 0.00 0.00
27.24
IRAN Staking/ RAN Line
EA
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mile
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.25
RAN Monumentation
Point
0.00 0.00 0.00
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08 -18 -15 rev -1.xls
27. Survey Page 2 of 3 8/18/2015
Project Activity 27: Survey
Task No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Field Crew
Days /Unit
Crew
Days
»Field Support
<
Hours i Crew
Field
Support
Hours
Office Support
Hours /Crew Days
Office Support
Hours
Comments
27.26
Line Cutting
Office Support =
Mile
0.00
27.27
Work Zone Safety
2
Total Hours = 74
PROVIDE MOT TO COUNTY STANDARDS
EA
1
2
10 0.125 1.25
27.28
Miscellaneous Surveys
EA
1
2
2
Vertical Control Review
EA
0
0.00
0
0.00
Local Governments (cities, counties)
0.00
Survey Subtotal
Crew Days
11
'Field Support
Hours >s'.
5
Office Support
Hours
46
0
27.29
Supplemental Surveys
Other Meetings
EA
THE % FOR SUPPLEMENTAL WILL BE DETERMINED AT
NEGOTIATIONS. THIS ITEM CAN ONLY BE USED IF AUTHORIZED IN
WRITING BY THE DISTRICT SURVEYOR
0
0
11 0 0 0
27.30
Document Research
Units
6
Progress Meetings
EA
0
0
27.31
Field Reviews
Units
EA
ONE FIELD REVIEW
0
0
8.00 8
27.32
Technical Meetings
LS
6
Carries to 27.32
TECHNICAL MEETINGS
6.00 6
27.33
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
LS
5% 2
27.34
Supervision
LS
5% 3
27.35
Coordination
LS
3%
1
27. Survey Total
Crew Days
11
'Field Support
Hours >s'.
$
Office Support
Hours
69
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08 -18 -15 rev -1.xls
27. Survey Page 3 of 3 8/18/2015
SPLS =
Technical Meetings
PLS =
Office Support =
Kickoff Meeting with FDOT
EA
1
2
2
Total Hours = 74
Baseline Approval Review
EA
1
2
2
Network Control Review
EA
1
2
2
Vertical Control Review
EA
0
0
0
Local Governments (cities, counties)
EA
0
0
0
Final Submittal Review
EA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical Meetings
6
Progress Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Phase Review Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Total Meetings
6
Carries to 27.32
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
Survey STAFF HOUR FORM - 08 -18 -15 rev -1.xls
27. Survey Page 3 of 3 8/18/2015
TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA, INC.
SUGARLOAF BRIDGE
MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Unit
# of Units
Unit Price
Total
Truck Mounted Equipment
Unit
1
$
350.00
$ 350.00
Mob Between Holes
Each
1
$
150.00
$ 150.00
SPT Borings (truck)
QS
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
100
$
14.50
$ 1,450.00
E
50 -100 ft depth
Foot
70
$
17.75
$ 1,242.50
Grout (truck)
E
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
100
$
6.50
$ 650.00
4)
50 -100 ft depth
Foot
70
$
8.00
$ 560.00
03
Casing (truck)
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
100
$
8.00
$ 800.00
50 -100 ft depth
Foot
70
$
9.75
$ 682.50
M
O
Extra Split Spoon Samples
03
0 - 50 ft depth
Each
16
$
42.00
$ 672.00
50 -100 ft depth
Each
14
$
48.00
$ 672.00
CD
Rock Coring
M
co
0 - 50 ft depth
Foot
10
$
68.50
$ 685.00
Flagmen & Barricades (2 man crew)
Day
1
$
900.00
$ 900.00
cs�
Arrow Rental Sign
Day
1
$
106.69
$ 106.69
C4
Natural Moisture Content Tests
Each
4
$
10.00
$ 40.00
Grain -Size - Full
Each
4
$
65.00
$ 260.00
Organic Content Tests
Each
2
$
50.00
$ 100.00
W
Environmental (Corrosion) Tests
Each
2
$
120.00
$ 240.00
a
QJ
Rock Compression Test
Each
2
$
110.00
$ 220.00
0
Principal Engineer
Hour
4
$
150.00
$ 600.00
Senior Engineer
Hour
13
$
125.00
$ 1,625.00
Project Engineer
Hour
45
$
100.00
$ 4,500.00
Senior Technician
Hour
30
$
75.00
$ 2,250.00
CADD
Hour
7
$
65.00
$ 455.00
qd
O
TOTAL =
$ 19,210.69
t
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Estimator: KV
Sugarloaf Bridge
Task
No.
Task
Units
No of
Units
Hours /'
>.Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
Roadway
35.1
Document Collection and Review
LS
0
0
0
35.2
Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan
LS
0
0
0
35.3
Stake Borings /Utility Clearance
Boring
0
0
0
35.4
Coordinate and Develop MOT Plans for Field Investigation
EA
0
0
0
35.5
Drilling Access Permits
Location
0
0
0
35.6
Property Clearances
EA
0
0
0
35.7
Groundwater Monitoring
EA
0
0
0
35.8
LBR /Resilient Modulus Sampling
EA
0
0
0
35.9
Coordination of Field Work
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.10
Soil and Rock Classification - Roadway
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.11
Design LBR
LS
0
0
0
35.12
Laboratory Data
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.13
Seasonal High Water Table
Boring
0
0
0
35.14
Parameters for Water Retention Areas
EA
0
0
0
35.15
Delineate Limits of Unsuitable Material
Cross - section
0
0
0
35.16
Electronic Files for Cross - Sections
100 If of boring
0
0
0
35.17
Embankment Settlement and Stability
Embankment
Boring
0
0
0
35.18
Stormwater Volume Recovery and /or Background Seepage
Analysis
EA
0
0
0
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 1 of 4 8/18/2015
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Task
No.
Task '
Units
No of
Units
Hours /'
>Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
35.19
Geotechnical Recommendations
LS
0
0
0
35.20
Pavement Condition Survey and Pavement Evaluation
Report
LS
0
0
0
35.21
Preliminary Roadway Report
LS
0
0
0
35.22
Final Report
EA
0
0
0
35.23
Auger Boring Drafting
100 If boring
0
0
0
35.24
SPT Boring Drafting
100 If boring
0
0
0
Roadway Geotechnical Subtotal
0
Structures
35.25
Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan
LS
1
2
2
2 SPT borings
35.26
Stake Borings /Utility Clearance
Boring
2
1
2
2 spt @85 ft = 170 ft
35.27
Coordinate and Develop MOT Plans for Field Investigation
EA
1
6
6
35.28
Drilling Access Permits
Location
0
0
0
35.29
Property Clearances
EA
0
0
0
35.30
Collection of Corrosion Samples
EA
1
1
1
35.31
Coordination of Field Work
100 If of boring
1.7
2
3
35.32
Soil and Rock Classification - Structures
100 If of boring
1.7
2
3
35.33
Tabulation of Laboratory Data
100 If of boring
1.7
1
2
35.34
Estimate Design Groundwater Level for Structures
EA
0
0
0
35.35
Selection of Foundation Alternatives (BDR)
Bridge boring
2
3
6
35.36
Detailed Analysis of Selected Foundation Alternate(s)
Bridge boring
2
7
14
35.37
Bridge Construction and Testing Recommendations
Bridge boring
2
2
4
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 2 of 4 8/18/2015
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Task
No.
Task '
Units
No of
Units
Hours /'
>Unit
Total
Hours
Comments
35.38
Lateral Load Analysis (Optional)
Bridge boring
0
0
0
35.39
Walls
Wall Boring
0
0
0
35.40
Sheet Pile Wall Analysis (Optional)
Wall Boring
0
0
0
35.41
Design Soil Parameters for Signs, Signals, High Mast
Lights, and Strain Poles and Geotechnical
Recommendations
Boring
0
0
0
35.42
Box Culvert Analysis
EA
0
0
0
35.43
Preliminary Report - BDR
EA
1
15
15
35.44
Final Report - Bridge and Associated Walls
EA
1
20
20
35.45
Final Reports - Signs, Signals, Box Culvert, Walls and High
Mast Lights
EA
0
0
0
35.46
SPT Boring Drafting
100 If of boring
1.7
4
7
35.47
Other Geotechnical
LS
0
0
0
Structural Geotechnical Subtotal
85
Geotechnical Technical Subtotal
85'
35.48
Technical Special Provisions
EA
0
0
0
35.49
Field Reviews
LS
1
2
2
35.50
Technical Meetings
LS
1
2
2
35.51
Quality Assurance /Quality Control
LS
%
3%
3
35.52
Supervision
LS
%
3%
3
Geotechnical Nontechnical Subtotal'
10
35.53
Coordination
LS
%
4%
4
35.54
Optional Preliminary Contamination Assessment
LS
1
0
0
35.' Geotechnical Total'
99'
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 3 of 4 8/18/2015
Project Activity 35: Geotechnical
Task
EA
0
No of
Hours /'
Total
EA
0
Task '
Units
Attend in BDR Review Meeting
EA
0
Comments
No.
30/60/90% Submittal Review
EA
Units
>Unit
Hours
Other Meetings
Technical Meetings
Kickoff Meeting with FDOT
EA
0
0
0
Boring Layout Approval
EA
0
0
0
Attend in BDR Review Meeting
EA
0
0
0
30/60/90% Submittal Review
EA
0
0
0
Other Meetings
EA
0
0
0
Subtotal Technical > Meetings
0
Progress Meetings
Phase Review Meetings
EA 0 0 0
EA 0 0 0
Total Meetings 0
Carries to 35.50
Note: Project Manager attendance at progress, phase and field review meetings are manually entered on General Task 3
StaffhourEstimation_Sugarloaf Bridge.xls
35. Geotechnical Page 4 of 4 8/18/2015
��
L.
This Aonmmn�mn� ("Amnyannan�'\ made mdm and entered into this /� '~ my of
jarluarq
2»/(� byan betvveo ~ onn)m�� ' unty. m political subdivision of ------ ateof Florida, whdse
address is 1100 Simonton Street, Key VVmot, Florida, 33040. its successors and assigns,
hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," through the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
Xisinger Campo & Associates, a Corporation of the State of Florida, h lq*;
address is 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 400, Tampa, Florida 33602, its successors a
assigns, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT',
Execution of a Task Order by the COUNTY and the CONSULTANT constitutes the COUNTY's
written authorization to CONSULTANT to proceed with the services described in the Task Order
The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall a to each Task Order, except to the extent
expressly modified. When a Task Order is to modify a provision of this Agreement, the Article of
this Agreement to be modified will be specifically referenced in the Task Order and the modification
shall be precisely described.
NL)VV, |MENEFOR|E. in consideration ctthe noutue| pronn|eee, covenants onQ agreements
stated henain, and for other good and valuable ooneidaradion, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree oofollows:
1.1.6 At all times and for all purposes under this agreement the CONSULTANT is an independenl,
contractor and not an employee of the Board of County Commissioners for Monroe County.
No statement contained in this agreement shall be construed so as to find the
CONSULTANT or any of his/her employees, contractors, servants, or agents to b';
employees of the Board of County Commissioners for Monroe County.
1.1.7 The CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, cree
color, national origin, sex, age, or any other characteristic or aspect which is not job relate
in its recruiting, hiring, promoting, terminating, or any other area affecting employme
under this agreement or with the provision of services or goods under this agreement. I
utlitrQxw
PA 10 1 &1901 a 4 EOTA riyeT.-D,
Ms. Judith Clarke, P.E.
Director of Engineering Services
Monroe County
1100 Simonton Stre at_R-rTa0--9j-6
Key West, Florida 33040
And: Mr. Roman Gastesi, Jr.
Monroe County Administrator
1100 Simonton Street, Room 2-205
Key West, Florida 33040
For the Consultant:
Jason LaBarbera, P.E.
201 N Franklin Street, Ste. 400
Tampa, Florida 33602
3.1 Additional services are services not included in the Scope of Basic Services. Should the
COUNTY require additional services they shall be paid for by the COUNTY at rates or fees
negotiated at the time when services are required, but only if approved by the COUNTY
before commencement.
3.2 If Additional Services are required the COUNTY shall issue a letter requesting and
describing the requested services to the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall
respond with a fee proposal to perform the requested services. Only after receiving an
amendment to the Agreement and a notice to proceed from the COUNTY, shall the
CONSULTANT proceed with the Additional Services.
ARTICLE IV
cou
ARTICLE V
INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
5.2 The first ten dollars ($10.80 of remuneration paid to the CONSULTANT is for the
indemnification provided for above. The extent ofliability is in no vvey limited to, reduoed,
or lessened by the insurance requirements contained elsewhere within this agreement.
Should any claims be asserted against the COUNTY by virtue of any deficiency or
ambiguity in the plans and specifications provided by the CONSULTANT, the
CONSULTANT agrees and warrants that he shall hold the COUNTY harmless and shall
indemnify him from all losses occurring thereby and shall further defend any claim or
2ction on the COUNTY'S behalf.
1 '11111111111 1111 111�111�piip 1111111�r;i�p� 1111pill
DA �
The CONSULTANT shall assign only qualified personnel to perform any service concerning the
project. At the time of execution of this Agreement, the parties anticipate that the following nameit.
individuals will perform those functions as indicated:
I � F-11 �, I t
So long as the individuals named above remain actively employed or retained by the
CONSULTANT, they shall perform the functions indicated next to their names. If they are replaced
the CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY of the change immediately.
9 M 4 MyJ I
MIMMMRMNN��
[JK91 JTJ J :J =1 0 6'YA'l I L
7.1.1 The COUNTY shall pay the CONSULTANT in current funds for the CONSULTANTE
performance of this Agreement based on rates negotiated and agreed upon and shown
Attacti
I it A.
7.2 PAYMENTS
7.2.1 For its assumption and performances of the duties, obligations and responsibilities set forth
herein, the CONSULTANT shall be paid monthly. Payment will be made pursuant to tha.
Local Government Prompt Payment Act 218.70, Florida Statutes.
(A) If the CONSULTANTS duties, obligations and responsibilities are materially
changed by amendment to this Agreement after execution of this Agreement,
compensation due to the CONSULTANT shall be equitably adjusted, either upward
or downward;
7.3 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
7.3.1 Reimbursable expenses include expenses incurred by the CONSULTANT in the interest
the project: ` 1
a. Expenses of transportation submitted by CONSULTANT, in writing, and living expenses
in connection with travel authorized by the COUNTY, in writing, but only to the extent
and in the amounts authorized by Section 112.061, Florida Statutes;
b. Cost of reproducing maps or drawings or other materials used in performing the scope
of services;
ME - -I I
t.4.1 The CONSULTANT may not be entitled to receive, and the COUNTY is not obligated to
pay, any fees or expenses in excess of the amount budgeted for this contract in each fiscal
year (October 1 - September 30) by COUNTY's Board of County Commissioners. The
budgeted amount may only be modified by an affirmative act of the COUNTY's Board of
County Commissioners.
7.4.2 The COUNTY's performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon
an annual appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners and the approval of tha.
Board members at the time of contract initiation and its duration.
a I I" IR
I !!, 1111 111111 11111 ' 1 1 1 '111 11111 111111 !11 1 ;11 ;!!1:11111 11
M*��I � Em=
insurance at all times that this Agreement is in effect. In the event the completion of t
project (to include the work of others) is delayed or suspended as a result of t
CONSULTANT'S failure to purchase or maintain the required insurance, t
CONSULTANT shall indemnify the COUNTY from any and all increased expenses resulti
from such delay.
8.2 The coverage provided herein shall be provided by an insurer with an A.M. Best rating of VI
or better, that is licensed to business in the State of Florida and that has an agent for
service of process within the State of Florida. The coverage shall contain an endorsement
providing sixty (60) days notice to the COUNTY prior to any cancellation of said coverage.
Said coverage shall be written by an insurer acceptable to the COUNTY and shall be in a
form acceptable to the COUNTY.
A. 'ITorkers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of Florida, sufficient to
respond to Florida Statute 440.
B. Employers Liability Insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per Accident, $1,000,000
Disease, policy limits, $1,000,000 Disease each employee.
C. Comprehensive business automobile and vehicle liability insurance covering claims for
injuries to members of the public and/or damages to property of others arising from use
of motor vehicles, including onsite and offsite operations, and owned, hired or non-
owned vehicles, with One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit and One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) annual aggregate.
An Occurrence Form policy is preferred. If coverage is changed to or provided on a
Claims Made policy, its provisions should include coverage for claims filed on or after
the effective date of this contract. In addition, the period for which claims may be
reported must extend for a minimum of 48 months following the termination or
expiration of this contract.
E. Professional liability insurance of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence
and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) annual aggregate. If the policy is a "claims
made" policy, CONSULTANT shall maintain coverage or purchase a "tail" to cover
claims made after completion of the project to cover the statutory time limits in Chapter
95 of the Florida Statutes.
Mani
A a I I km*104*91 9 ler.10 W10191w-Arj At$ at-W. I fi�zl I Lei rzg&r-lem I I Ity-61 0 Ris I a R-1110 I ffi - a
�M �
COUNTY during the term of this Agreement. COUNTY will not pay for increased limits
if insurance for subconsultants.
MIMBIF
A N
1. If the CONSULTANT participates in a self-insurance fund, a Certificate of Insurance w
be required. In addition, the CONSULTANT may be required to submit updated financial
statements from the fund upon request from the COUNTY.
Mali
;M
PIRRIVIN Magi
The documents prepared by the CONSULTANT for this Project belong to the COUNTY and
may be reproduced and copied without acknowledgement or permission of the
rights in favor of, any third party.
A. In the event that the CONSULTANT shall be found to be negligent in any aspect of
sen/ims. the COUNTY shall have the right to terminate this agreement after five days
written notification to the CONSULTANT.
Either of the parties hereto may cancel this Agreement without cause by giving the
other party sixty (60) days written notice of its intention to do so.
This contract consists of the Request for Proposals, any addenda, the Form of Agreement
(Articles I-IX), the CONSULTANT'S response to the RFQ, the documents referred to in
the Form of Agreement as a part of this Agreement, and attachments A, B and C, and
modifications made after execution by written amendment. In the event of any conflict
between any of the Contract documents, the one imposing the greater burden on
the CONSULTANT will control.
9.7 PUBLIC ENTITIES CRIMES
interest -• pursuant to Sec. 55.03, of - Florida Statutes, • from the
thv-
monies were paid • - COUNTY.
•,, j,'
9.10 SEVERABILITY
S.12 BINDING EFFECT
The terms, covenants, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement shall bind and inure 11
the benefit of - COUNTY and CONSULTANT . • their respective •.' representative
successors, and assigns.
PTRI i.
Each party represents and warrants to the other that the execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary County and
corporate action, as required by law.
that all applications, requests, grant proposals, and funding solicitations shall be approve
by each party prior to submission. 11
WE VM 0 M i" 111 - kj - 0
CONSULTANT and COUNTY covenant that neither presently has any interest, and sh
not acquire any interest, which would conflict in any manner or degree with its performan
under this Agreement, and that only interest of each is to perform and receive benefits
recited in this Agreement. I
COUNTY agrees that officers and employees of the COUNTY recognize and will be
required to comply with the standards of conduct for public officers and employees as
delineated in Section 112.313, Florida Statutes, regarding, but not limited to, solicitation or
acceptance of gifts; doing business with one's agency; unauthorized compensation; misuse
of public position, conflicting employment or contractual relationship; and disclosure or use
of certain information.
9.21 PUBLIC ACCESS.
The CONSULTANT and COUNTY shall allow and permit reasonable access to, and
inspection of, all documents, papers, letters or other materials in its possession or under its
control subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by
the CONSULTANT and COUNTY in connection with this Agreement; and the COUNTY
shall have the right to unilaterally cancel this Agreement upon violation of this provision by
CONSULTANT.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Sec. 768.28, Florida Statutes, the participation of the
CONSULTANT and the COUNTY in this Agreement and the acquisition of any commercial
liability insurance coverage, self-insurance coverage, or local government liability insurance
pool coverage shall not be deemed a waiver of immunity to the extent of liability coverage,
nor shall any contract entered into by the COUNTY be required to contain any provision for
waiver.
PlIKIM
No covenant or agreement contained herein shall be deemed to be a covenant or
agreement of any member, officer, agent or employee of Monroe County in his or her
individual capacity, and no member, officer, agent or employee of Monroe County shall be
liable personally on this Agreement or be subject to any personal liability or accountability
by reason of the execution of this Agreement.
OKV-m
This Agreement may be executed in any number ofcounterparts, each of which shall he
regarded as an ohgina|, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same
instrument and any of the parties hereto may execute this Agreement by signing any such
counterpart.
a). Appendix I of the FDOT Standard Professional Services Agreement is included as Attachment
B.
b). The CONSULTANT and any sub-consultants shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color,
national origin or sex in the performance of this contract. The CONSULTANT shall carry out
applicable requirements of4SC.F.R. Part 20in the award and administration QfDOT-assisted
contracts. Failure by the CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is o material breach of
this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the
COUNTY deems appropriate.
d). Equal Employment Opportunity: In connection with the carrying out ofany project, the
CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment
because of race, age, religion, color, sex national origin, disability ormarital status. The
CONSULTANT will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that
employees are treated during employment without nagGnd to their naoe, age, religion cm|mr.
Qender, national origin, disability mrmarital status, Such action shall include, but not be limited to,
the following: employment upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment
advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for
tnaining, including apprenticeship.
e). The CONSULTANT and all sub-consultants agree to utilize the U.S Department of Homeland
Security's E-verify System to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the
CONSULTANT or sub-consultants during the term of the contract.
f). The CONSULTANT will complete and submit the FDOT Anticipated DBE Participation
Statement Form No. 275-030-11Ato identify []BE participation as outlined in Paragraph 9.29,
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Policy and Obligations, of the Contract for
Professional Services. FDOT has a race neutral program with an 8.6% goal.
g). Executed copies of the FDOT Certification for Disclosure of Lobbying Activities on
Federal Aid Contracts and the Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibili
and Voluntary Exclusion for Federal Aid Contracts are included as Attachment C.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly
authorized representative on the day and year first above written.
(SEAL),
Attest AMY HEAVILIN, Clerk
By:
Deputy Clerk
Date: 1 1 _7 X1
(Seal)
Attest:
BY:
Ri6ribild E. Gott
Title: genior Vice Pr&ident
OWN' 1,5
Z V
pridd irman
o L o ' OF
CONSULTANT
(Kisinger Campo & A�pf ociates, Corp.)
By:
PaUTG.Fol ,
Title: President
E
E
BtS
68
BtS
0
BtS
BtS
U)
co
CD
8
8
L)
LU
x
LU
0
L)
L)
I
KISINGER CAMPO& AssocIATES CORP.
2013
Average Hourly
- Job Classification Billing Rate*
Project Manager
$
177.00
Chief Engineer
$
228.00
Senior Engineer
$
178.00
Engineer
$
139.00
Senior Designer
$
136.00
Designer
$
96.00
CADD/Computer Technician
$
87.00
Chief Scientist
$
159.00
Senior Scientist
$
122.00
Environmental Specialist
$
100.00
Software Developer / GIS Manager
$
128.00
GIS Specialist
$
90.00
it Technician
$
77.00
Certified Bridge Inspector (CBI)
$
115.00
Bridge Inspector Assistant
$
84.00
EDIVIS Technician
$
79.00
Secretary/Clerical
$
63.00
*Please note:
1) Billing Rates include salary, overhead and fixed fee ... but do not include expenses.
2) Billing Rates effective for the 4-year contract term and 1-year renewal, if time extension option is exercised
E
E
BtS
as
0
M
4-
U)
co
CD
cr)
2!�
K#_ a
a ,
2013
Average Hourly
Job Classification Billing Rate*
Senior Project Engineer - CEI $ 157.00
Project Administrator - CEI $ 122.00
Senior Inspector - CEI $ 79.00
*Please note:
1) Billing Rates include salary, overhead and fixed fee...but do not include expenses.
2) Billing Rates effective for the 4-year contract term and 1 -year renewal, if time extension option is exercised.
E
QS
E
M
pfd
(D
0
pfd
U)
CO
CD
CF)
2i,
Principal Engineer/Scientist 1
$230
Principal Engineer/ Scientist 11
$205
Principal Engineer/ Scientist 111
$190
Sr. Engineer/Scientist 1
$175
Sr. Engineer/Scientist 11
$155
Sr. Engineer/Scientist 111
$135
Sr. Engineer/Scientist IV
$130
Engineer/Scientist 1
$115
Engineer/Scientist 11
$100
Engineer/Scientist 111
$90
Engineer/Scientist IV
$80
QA Engineer 1
$185
Sr. CAD/Graphics
$80
CAD/Graphics
$70
Sr. Technician
$95
Technician
$65
Sr. Project Analyst
$170
Project Associate
$70
Sr. Technical Editor
$95
Technical Editor
$70
Sr. Computer Programmer
$200
Computer Programmer 1
$135
Computer Programmer 11
$90
Engineering/Scientist Intern
$70
E
as
E
as
0
U)
CD
2i,
Page I of I
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEERING
HOURLY RATE
Effective
August SCHEDULE 21, 2013
Engineer IX
$
190.00
Principal Ecologist
$
170.00
Engineer Vill
$
170.00
Ecologist IV
$
150.00
Engineer VII
$
160.00
Ecologist III
$
130.00
Engineer VI
$
150.00
Ecologist 11
$
115.00
Engineer V
$
135.00
Ecologist 1
$
100.00
Engineer IV
$
125.00
Engineer Intern III
$
115.00
Expert Witness
$
250.00
Engineer Intern 11
$
105.00
Engineer Intern 1
$
95.00
Surveyor and Mapper VI
$
190.00
Surveyor and Mapper V
$
170.00
Development Project Coordinator
$
115.00
Surveyor and Mapper IV
$
150.00
Surveyor and Mapper III
$
125.00
Project Director
$
145.00
Surveyor and Mapper 11
$
115.00
Designer IV
$
135.00
Surveyor and Mapper 1
$
100.00
Designer III
$
115.00
Designer 11
$
90.00
StarVAC w/Water Truck Four-Man Party
$
330.00
Designer 1
$
80.00
StarVAC w/Water Truck Three-Man Party
$
280.00
StarVAC w/Four-Man Party
$
290.00
Technician IV
$
100.00
StarVAC w/Three-Man Party
$
265.00
Technician III
$
75.00
Technician 11
$
65.00
Two-Man Field Party
$
135.00
Technician 1
$
55.00
Three-Man Field Party
$
160.00
Four-Man Field Party
$
170.00
Hydrogeologist V
$
150.00
Hydrographic Field Party
$
225.00
Hydrogeologist IV
$
135.00
GPS Mapping Grade: One-Man Party
$
90.00
Hydrogeologist III
$
125.00
GPS Mapping Grade: Two-Man Party
$
130.00
Hydrogeologist 11
$
100.00
GPS Mapping Grade: Three-Man Party
$
170.00
Hydrogeologist 1
$
90.00
GPS Surveying Grade: One or Two-Man Party
$
170.00
GPS Surveying Grade: Three-Man Party
$
180.00
Environmental Scientist V
$
120.00
Environmental Scientist IV
$
100.00
Principal GIS Consultant
$
170.00
Environmental Scientist III
$
85.00
GIS Consultant IV
$
170.00
Environmental Scientist 11
$
65.00
GIS Consultant III
$
135.00
Environmental Scientist 1
$
55.00
GIS Consultant 11
$
110.00
GIS Consultant 1
$
90.00
Principal Planner 11
$
170.00
GIS Technician III
$
80.00
Principal Planner 1
$
150.00
GIS Technician 11
$
70.00
Senior Planner
$
115.00
GIS Technician 1
$
60.00
Planner IV
$
125.00
Planner III
$
110.00
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION SERVICES
Planner 11
$
95.00
Senior Project Engineer
$
170.00
Planner 1
$
85.00
Construction Observation Services Manager
$
150.00
Planning Technician III
$
80.00
Project Administrator
$
125.00
Planning Technician 11
$
70.00
Contract Support Specialist
$
110.00
Planning Technician 1
$
60.00
Senior Construction Observer 11
$
100.00
Senior Construction Observer 1
$
90.00
Grant Proposal Manager
$
95.00
Construction Observer III
$
75.00
Grant Administrator
$
90.00
Construction Observer 11
$
65.00
Grant Writer
$
75.00
Construction Observer 1
$
55.00
Resident Compliance Specialist (RCS)
$
65.00
Principal Landscape Architect
$
170.00
Managing Landscape Architect
$
140.00
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Senior Landscape Architect
$
130.00
Materials
Cost+ 10%
Landscape Architect
$
120.00
Sub-Consultant Services
Cost+ 10%
Senior Landscape Designer
$
105.00
Project Landscape Designer
$
85.00
Landscape Designer 11
$
78.00
Landscape Designer 1
$
72.00
Page I of I
consulting engineers-
301 East A tlantic Boulevard, ! � i: ; - Beach, Florida 33060-6643
Tel, 954-788-3400 Fax: 954-788-3500
Project Manager
$
130.00
Sr Utility Coordinator
$
120.00
Utility Coordinator
$
105.00
Utility Locator
$
65.00
Technician
$
55.00
CADD Technician
$
65.00
Administrative Assistant
$
50.00
Ground Penetrating Radar
$
200.00/ our
Subsurface Utility Designation/GP
$
1,600.00/ ay
Vacuum Excavations Pervious
$
290.00 /Each
Vacuum Excavations Impervious
$
400.00/Each
Maintenance of Traffic
$
150.00 /Day
neRnA SOUTH FLOR INC
UNIT FEE SCHEDULE (FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES)
L M
By
so
as
����
Unit
#ufUnits
Unit Price
Tom
| FIELD INVEST
Mobilization mf Men and Equipment
rmu+Mounteueqvipment
Each
o
$
350,00
$
o�oo
Spec|onzeuxTwmuuu"g
Each
o
$
/OO.Uo
$
o�oo
Support Vehicle
Each
D
$
150A0
$
0.00
Barge-Mounted Equipment
oor
o
$
7300�00
$
0.00
Crane Rental
Hour
O
$
1e0u0
$
OVo
Crash AttenuarTruck
Hour
D
$
115u0
$
ouo
Mob Between Holes
Each
D
$
150�00
$
o�oo
Support Boat
oov
o
$
uODVo
$
o�OD
Open/CmooGuord moU
Each
o
*
Guo�Ao
$
0,00
Standard Penetration Test Borings
(By Truck-Mounted Equipment)
Land:o - oUnoaptx
L�F
o
$
14.50
*
0�00
so 1no8depth
LF,
O
$
17�75
*
Ooo
100 1uO8depth
L�F
o
*
oauo
$
ooV
Standard Penetration Test Borings
(By*TV/Wudbug)
Lend: o - oOVdep/h
LT'
o
*
15�25
$
0�80
oo-1OOftdepth
1_1
o
$
18�50
$
0.00
1DD-1aoftdepth
L5
o
$
n1 ton
$
OAS
Standard Penetration Test Springs
(By CmEGsO(Trnck-muunted))
Land: o - aoftdepto
Ls
o
$
\r.ao
$
0.00
50 1o8Kdepth
Lp,
O
$
24o0
*
000
1no-1oOhdepth
L. F.
o
$
2&75
$
000
Standard Penetration Test Borings
(By Barge-Mounted Equipment)
Land: O-5Vxdepth
L.F�
U
$
20u0
$
0.00
mO 10o8depth
L F
o
$
27.00
$
Ooo
100 1uoftdepth
LF
V
*
oo�OO
$
000
Grout-Seal eureho|ms
(By Truck-Mounted Equipment)
Land: u oO0depth
o
$
0�50
N
000
50 1oOftdepth
LF
D
$
&OU
$
ouo
100 1ooftdepth
L�F
n
$
Vuo
$
n»u
Grou+8co|uorexo|mm
(ByArwMuuoug)
Land:u 5oftdepth
L�F
O
$
7.25
$
0,00
5n-1OOkdepth
ILT'
O
$
8.25
$
ouo
100 150 ft depth
LT'
o
$
%On
*
ouo
Grout-Seal aorehm|em
(By COso5o(TmcxMounted))
Land: O 5Oftdepth
L_F�
o
$
825
$
0�00
ou-1UO8depth
/_F�
o
$
*.eo
$
Oxu
100 1oondepth
Lp
O
$
1450
$
nVo
Smut-Seal moreho|es
(By Barge-Mounted Equipment)
Land: O-5Oftdepth
L F
o
$
muo
$
ouO
50 iooftdepth
L. F.
o
$
10-50
$
0u0
100 1oOftdepth
L.F.
o
*
1e-00
*
V»o
L M
By
so
as
����
TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA, INC
Casing Allowance
(By Truck-Mounted Equipment)
Land:o - uuftdepth
L.F.
o
$
&oo
$
o»o
50 1ooftdepth
L_F_
O
$
975
$
V»o
100 1ooftdepth
L. F.
0
$
11a0
$
O�Oo
Casing Allowance
(eyATVMwdbuV)
Land: V-5Dftdepth
L. F.
U
$
nJa
$
000
om 1ooftdepth
LF
o
$
1325
$
O�OO
1Om-1nQftdepth
L�F-
0
$
16-50
$
0.00
E
Casing Allowance
(By CmEmso(Trad+Mnumau)>
Land: o ooxdepth
o
$
12u0
*
0.00
50 1ooKdepth
L.
o
$
114�e0
*
0.00
1Vo-|uoftdepth
LF_
o
$
16�50
$
0o0
Casing Allowance
(By Barge-Mounted Equipment)
n
Land: o-m0kdepth
/p.
o
*
1150
$
0,00
og 1onxdepth
LF
o
$
1e�50
$
ouo
1DO-15o*depth
L. F,
O
$
1875
$
0.00
ul
Rock Coring (Sh"cmres)
�
(By Truck-Mounted squ|pmem
By
O-5VMdeep
LY
n
$
8&50
$
ouo
..
mO-1oVftdeep
Lp.
o
$
8230
$
Vuo
CD
Rock Coring (8tmomreo)
(By«TVMuduug)
~�
0 -50ft deep
LF.
0
$
75u0
$
o�OO
oD-1Voftdeep
LF.
o
*
e&OD
$
8.00
~�
�
Rock Coring (Structures
(By CMEo5O(rramk-Moume4)
um
n ooftdeep
L.
o
$
75�00
$
U�oo
x
uD 1OOftdeep
L.
O
*
oaoo
$
oVo
~�
Rock Coring (Guvcmrem)
ol
(By Barge-Mounted Equipment)
0-50 ft deep
o
$
75,00
$
o»o
0
50 1OO8deep
LF�
D
$
85u0
*
0�00
L)
1nO-1mDVdeep
LT'.
o
$
9&00
$
Ouo
�
L)
Field Permeability Tests (ooreHo|mPmnc)
Each
V
$
450�00
$
Dun
r_
0
Flagman & Barricades (2 man crew)
Day
o
$
900,00
$
0.00
'
Flagman & Barricades (o man crew)
Night
O
$
1200�00
$
o�uo
Florida Patrolmen (Traffic Control)
Hour
o
$
mouo
$
o�Oo
Sr. Eng Tech (Traffic Control)
Hour
n
$
mooD
$
ouo
Arrow Rental Sign
Day
o
$
106�69
*
o�oV
^�
Cones Barricades
Day
o
$
21218
$
ooO
Variable Message Board
Day
o
$
15914
$
o�oo
Auger Springs (noodwo*)
|.F�
o
$
110�50
*
ouO
����
TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA, INC
Extra Split Spoon Samples
Land: 0-60 ft depth
Each
0
$
42.00
$
0.00
50-100 ft depth
Each
0
$
48.00
$
0.00
Hand Muck Probes (2-man crew)
Day
0
$
900.00
$
0.00
2-Inch Piezometer Installation
L. F.
0
$
45.00
$
0,00
Sta no b y(D eco n to m i n ati a n
Hour
0
$
200.00
$
0.00
E
(Drill Rig A Crew)
as
Piezometer Permit
Each
0
$
70.00
$
0.00
E
Double Ring Infiltration Test
Each
0
$
500.00
$
0.00
Pavement Cores, Asphalt
Each
0
$
105,00
$
0.00
03
'D
Pavement Cores, Concrete
Each
0
$
105.00
$
0.00
E .
Qd
LABORATORY TESTING
Z
0
Natural Moisture Content Tests
Each
0
$
10.00
$
0.00
Grain-Size Analysis - Full Gradation
Each
0
$
65.00
$
0.00
.2
el
Grain-Size Analysis - Single Sieve
Each
0
$
30.00
$
0.00
Or
U)
Organic Content Tests
Each
0
$
%oo
$
0.00
as
Afterberg Limit Tests
Each
0
$
85.00
$
0.00
(7)
04
Environmental Tests (pH, sulfates,
Each
0
$
175.00
$
0.00
chlorides, resistivity)
Unit Weight Determination
Each
0
$
50.00
$
0.00
0
Rock Compression Test
Each
0
$
110.00
$
0.00
LU
X
Split Tension Test
Each
0
$
110.00
$
0.00
LU
LBR Test
Each
0
$
320.00
$
100
Permeability Test-Failing Head
Each
0
$
275.00
$
0.00
0
L)
Grain-Size with Hydrometer
Each
0
$
125.00
$
0.00
0%
L)
Sample Preparation
Hour
0
$
75.00
$
0,00
r_
0
Direct Shear Strength Test (1 Point)
Each
0
$
300.00
$
0.00
TIERRA SOUTH FLORIDA, INC
"I
Unit # of Units Unit Price
Total
Hour
0
$
150.00
$
0.00
Hour
0
$
125.00
$
Mo
Hour
0
$
10000
$
Mo
Hour
0
$
75.00
$
0.00
Hour
0
$
65.00
$
0.00
E
E
Qd
0
0
U)
co
Cc
or)
2i,
APPENDIX ATTACHMENT B
OF D• STANDARD PROFESSIONAL
T R49, qB_FEMAL4Ii ONIRAC 5 (AFTEMPA Liz
The following terms apply to all contracts in which it is indicated in Section 5.B of the Standard Professional Services
Agreement that the services involve the expenditure of federal funds
A. It is understood and agmad that all rights of the Department relating to inspection, review, approval, patents,
copyrights, and audit of the work. tracing, plans, specifications, maps, dals, and cost records relating to this
Agreement shall also be reserved and held by authorized repifesentatives of the United States of America.
B, It is understood and agreed that, in order to permit federal participation, no supplemental agreement of any nature may be
entered into by the parties hereto with regard to the work to be performed hereunder without the approval of the U.S.
Department of Transportation, anything to the contrary in this Agreement not withstanding.
C Compliance with Regulations: The Consultant shall comply with the Regulations of the U,S. Department of Transportation
Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the
Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement,
G. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the Consultant's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this
contract, the Florida Department of Transportation shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Highway
Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Aviation Administration, and/or Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to,
1, withholding of payments to thin Consultant under the contract until the Consultant complies and/or
2, cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part.
Interest of Members of Congress No mernber of or odor legato to the Congress of the United States will be admitted to any
chum or part of this contract or to any benefit arising therefrom,
j interest of Publlc Officials: No membor, officer, or employee of the public body or of a local public body during his tenure
or for one troar thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this contrast or the proceeds thereof. For purposes
of this provision, public hotly shall lincludo municipnlitlos and other political subdivisions of States; and public corporations,
boards, one commissions established under the laws of any State,
E
as
E
E.
E .
as
'S
0
0
V)
co
CD
an
04
0
LU
X
LU
0
0
0
I
I
i
Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises: The Consultant shall agree to abide by the following statement from
49 CFR 26. I 3(b), This statements shall be included in ail subsequent agreements between the Consultant and any
subconsultant or contractor.
The Consultant, sub recipient or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin,
or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall Garry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part
26 in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the Consultant to carry out these
requirements is a (112teriaf breach of this contract, which may result in termination of this contract or other such
remedy as the recipient deems appropriate.
It is mutually understood and -agreed that the willful falsification, distortion or misrepresentation with respect many facts
related to the projects) described in this Agreement is a violation of the Federal Law, Accordingly, United States Code,
Title 18, Section 1020, is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement.
M It is understood and agreed that if the Consultant at any time leams that the certification it provided the Department in
compliance with 49 CFR, Section 26. s1, was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed
circummances, the Consultant shall provide immediate written notice to the Department, It is further agreed that the clause
fified "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered
Transaction' as set forth in 49 CFR, Section 29,510, shall be included by the Consultant in all lower tier covered
transactions and in all aforementioned federal regulation.
The Department hereby certifies that neither the consultant nor the consultant's representative has been required by the
Department, directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this
contract, to
I employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or
2, pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind;
The Department further acknowledges that this agreement will be furnished to a federal agency, in connection with this
contract involving participation of Federal-Aid funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal Laws, both criminal and
civil,
c), The Consultant hereby certifies that it has not:
employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other consideration, any firm or
person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for the above contractor) to solicit or secure this contract;
agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services of any firm or
person in connection with carrying out this contract; or
paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for the
above contractor) any fee contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or
carrying out the contract.
The consultant further acknowledges that this agreement will be furnished to The State of Florida Department of
Transportation and a federal o9oncy in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal -Aid funds, and is
subject it) applicable State and Federal Laws, both criminal and civil.
qa
E
as
E
A
Qd
0
0
T:
or
U)
no
CD
ce
L)
did
X
LU
0
L)
L)
I
I
i
ATTACHMENT C
Certification for Disclosure of Lobbying Activities on Federal Aid Contracts
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion for
Federal Aid Contracts
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 375-030-33
CERTIFICATION FOR DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYI PROCUREMENT
NG ACTIVITIES 10/01
ON FEDERAL-AID CONTRACTS
(Compliance with 49CFR, Section 20.100 (b))
Name of Consultant: — Kisinaer Campo & Associates, Corp.
Date: - 12/17/2013
Title: PreSident
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 375-030-32
PROCUREMENT
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, 10/01
INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION FOR FEDERAL
AID CONTRACTS
(Compliance with 49CFR, Section 29.510)
(Appendix B Certification]
W - iillw 4
W _-_ 0
department or agency.
Name of Co tant'.
By Date: 12/17/2013
Z�
Authorized Sign Lure {Pau fia' P.E.)
UTURN -me