Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Item M7
M C ounty of f Monroe ELj » °o � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS /� r i � �� Mayor George Neugent, District 2 The Florida. Ke Se y I Mayor Pro Tern David Rice, District 4 Danny L. Kolhage, District I Heather Carruthers, District 3 Sylvia J. Murphy, District 5 County Commission Meeting July 19, 2017 Agenda Item Number: M.7 Agenda Item Summary #3174 BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Sustainability TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Rhonda Haag (305) 453 -8774 N/A AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of a $1.4 Million TMDL Stormwater Grant Application for a combined roads /canal restoration project in the Key Largo Twin Lakes Subdivision area, seeking $710,00,000 of grant funds towards a canal restoration project to install submerged culverts to improve dissolved oxygen impairments on canal #47 (Poor Ranked Canal) and the implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMP) infrastructure for the roads project, and offering $710,000 in budgeted roads funds as a match, retroactively ratifying the grant application submitted June 30, 2017; and authorization for the County Administrator to sign all necessary documents in connection with this grant. ITEM BACKGROUND: This is a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Grant Application combining an existing roads elevation project for Shaw Drive in Key Largo, with a new canal restoration project on canal 47 in the same neighborhood. The County has $200,000 in budgeted funds in FY18 for the design of the Twin Lakes Subdivision road elevation project in Key Largo, which includes a storm water management element. An additional $510,000+ is anticipated to be budgeted in FYI for the construction of the roads project. These $710,000 in funds will be used as a cash match to apply for $710,000 in additional funds for a new canal restoration project in Twin Lakes to improve the water quality in a poor rated canal and to partially fund some of the road storm water infrastructure work. The total grant amount is $1.4 Million. The grant requires a 50% match. To qualify for the TMDL grants, storm water management must be included. Therefore, a new canal restoration project was combined with the Twin Lakes road project to leverage the County's $710,000 budgeted project road funds to seek $710,000 in additional funds for a canal restoration project and stormwater infrastructure. The Canal on Twin Lakes is Poor and requires a restoration project to improve the water. This project is unique in nature as it combines two strategic programs (roads and canals) in protecting infrastructure and improving the impaired waters while incorporating conventional best management practices (BMP) for treating urban runoff prior to entering the canal and ultimately the Outstanding Florida Waters within the Florida Keys. The grant application was submitted June 30, 2017, with a deadline of July 6, 2017. The canal project includes strategic submerged culverts within the canal to provide additional treatment capabilities in improving the dissolved oxygen impairment within the waterbody. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: N/A CONTRACT /AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval DOCUMENTATION: Monroe County TMDL Grant Application - July 2017 (REV 7 7 17 RH) FINANCIAL IMPACT: Effective Date: TBD Expiration Date: TBD Total Dollar Value of Contract: TBD Total Cost to County: If awarded, $710,000 Current Year Portion: N/A Budgeted: Source of Funds: Grant ($710,000) and Local Option Gas Tax ($710,000) CPI: Indirect Costs: Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: Revenue Producing: Yes If yes, amount: $710,000 Grant: Yes County Match: $710,000 Insurance Required: Additional Details: . REVIEWED BY: Rhonda Haag Completed 07/09/2017 9:43 AM Cynthia Hall Skipped 07/10/2017 9:40 AM Pedro Mercado Completed 07/10/2017 10:06 AM Budget and Finance Completed 07/10/2017 12:12 PM Maria Slavik Completed 07/10/2017 12:26 PM Kathy Peters Pending 07/07/2017 1:09 PM Board of County Commissioners Pending 07/19/2017 9:00 AM County of Monroe c;. The Florida Keys�Y June 29, 2017 Mr. Roman Gastesi County Administrator Monroe County 1100 Simonton Street, Ste. 205 Key West, FL 33040 Ms. Katie Britt, FCCM Division of Water Restoration Assistance Nonpoint Source Management Program Grant Coordinator / Project Manager Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS #3570, Room 432AA Tallahassee, FL 32399 -3000 Office: 850- 245 -2938 E -mail: Katherine.Britt @den.state.fl.us Reference: TMDL Grant Application — July 2017 for Monroe County Twin Lakes Subdivision Road and Canal Restoration Project Dear Ms. Britt, Monroe County appreciates the opportunity to submit a TMDL Grant Application for the Twin Lakes Subdivision Road and Canal Restoration Project. This project is unique in nature as it combines various strategic programs in protecting infrastructure and improving the impaired waters while incorporating conventional BMP treatment practices for treating urban runoff prior to entering the canal and ultimately the Outstanding Florida Waters within the Florida Keys. The project also includes strategic submerged culverts within the canal to provide additional treatment capabilities in improving the dissolved oxygen impairment within the waterbody. Monroe County has been an integral partner in the Water Quality Protection Program Steering Committee since the inception in the early 90s who mission is to manage all waters as well as natural and cultural resources surrounding the Florida Keys. This committee along with the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners is committed to initiating water quality programs to preserve and protect the Outstanding Florida Waters within the Florida Keys. As an example, the County recently undertook a $1 billion septic to sewer program as well as another $7 million canal demonstration program to tackle the water quality impairment addressed within the Florida Keys Reasonable Assurance Plan. This is an important water quality restoration project that will enhance the nearshore waters of the Outstanding Florida Waterbody within the Florida Keys. This project is being partial funded by the local gas tax and will be used as an example tc obtain additional state and federal funds for water quality restoration projects throughout the Florida Keys. Monroe County will support this water quality restoration project using existing resources to the extent available. Rhonda Haag, Haag - Rhonda @monroecounty - fl.gov. telephone (305) 453 -8774 will be Monroe's main contact for this grant. We hope you consider this application favorable and support Monroe County's mission in continuing to improve the nearshore waters c the Outstanding Florida Waterbody within the Florida Keys. Please advise if there is any additional information needed to review this important time sensitive project. P Oman Ga stes . -DUnt? Adminisirat0- M.7.a BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Mayor George Neugent, District 2 Mayor Pro Tem David Rice, District 4 Commissioner Danny Kolhage, District 1 Commissioner Heather Carruthers, District 3 Commissioner Sylvia Murphy, District 5 CL CL r_ CU FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION TMDL WATER QUALITY RESTORATION GRANT PROPOSAL APPLICATION Is PROJECT NAME: Monroe County Twin Lakes Subdivision Road and Canal Restoration Acres Project 1210 FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS PROJECT FUNDING: TMDL Grant $710,000 50_% 58.7 Matching Funds $710,000 _50_% 30.3 Total Project Cost $1,420,000 5120 CHANNELIZED WATERWAYS - CANALS _100_% 12.2 LEAD ORGANIZATION: Monroe County End of Fiscal Year: September 30, 2017 FEID Number: 073876757 CONTACT PERSON: Rhonda Haag ADDRESS: 102050 Overseas Highway, Ste. 246, Key Largo, FL 33037 PHONE: 305- 395 -9928 FAX: 305- 292 -4415 EMAIL: Haag- Rhonda @monroecount�fl.g_ov COOPERATING ORGANIZATIONS AND CONTACT PERSON (THOSE PROVIDING FUNDING OR IN- KIND SERVICES): N/A PROJECT ABSTRACT: The project provides various BMPs which include gravity walls, vegetated swales, and flushing culverts to reduce the discharges and improve the water quality of the impaired WBID 6006A which includes an unnamed canal and ultimately the Outstanding Florida Waters of the Florida Keys Marine Sanctuary. The WBID is impaired for copper and mercury (in fish tissue) and is included in the adopted Florida Keys RAP. The project has a drainage area of approximately 137 acres in which the implementation of strategic gravity walls, vegetated swales, and flushing culverts will provide a load reduction of approximately 87 percent for TSS, 29 percent for TP and TN, 60 percent for BOD and copper. The load reduction values were determined using the Stormwater BMP Performance Analysis prepared for USEPA documented dated March 2010. PROJECT LOCATION AND WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS: Water Body Name: South Key Largo Hydrologic Unit Code(HUC): Florida Bay — Florida Keys Project Latitude: 25.133788' Project Longitude: - 80.412532° Land Uses within the Watershed (acres and percentages of total): >Land Use Acres % 1210 FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS 80.3 58.7 1320 MOBILE HOME UNITS 30.3 22.1 5120 CHANNELIZED WATERWAYS - CANALS 16.7 12.2 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION 5300 RESERVOIRS 1.5 1.1 5410 EMBAYMENTS OPENING DIRECTLY TO GULF OR OCEAN 3.2 2.3 6120 MANGROVE SWAMP 0.5 0.1 6170 MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS 0.6 0.5 8140 ROADS AND HIGHWAYS 3.9 2.8 Land Use Totals (Acreage and %) 137.0 100.0 TMDL STATUS OF WATER BODY AND PROJECT: Name of Impaired Water: 6006A Status of Impaired Water: Impaired Status of BMAP: The Florida Keys is under a Reasonable Assurance Document POLLUTION REDUCTION STRATEGY: The strategy for pollution reduction includes the implementation of gravity walls, vegetated swales, and flushing culverts to reduce loadings to the impaired WBID 6006A. PROJECT OBJECTIVE(S): The Objective of the project is to reduce stormwater pollutant loads to the WBID 6006A which includes an unnamed canal and ultimately the Outstanding Florida Waters of the Florida Keys Marine Sanctuary. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (PLEASE LIST ALL TASKS AND DELIVERABLES): TASK 1: DESIGN, PERMITTING, AND PROCUREMENT SUPPORT The project will consist of (1) collection and processing of environmental and engineering data; (2) completion of 30, 60 and 100 percent design plans; (3) preparation of permit packages for state, federal, and local permit applications; and (4) resident notification and staging area access coordination. DELIVERABLES: An electronic copy of the final design, including professional certification as applicable, and a list of all required permits identifying issue dates and issuing authorities submitted to the Department's Grant Manager. Upon request, the Grantee will provide copies of obtained permits or permit related correspondence or documentation and /or a paper copy of the final design. SCHEDULE: The task shall be begin on October 1, 2017 and shall be complete by June 30, 2018. TASK 2: BIDDING AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION The Grantee will subcontract the construction of the project with a qualified and licensed contractor, selected through the Grantee's procurement process. The Grantee shall prepare and solicit proposals utilizing a proposal package in accordance with state and federal laws and this Agreement. Included in this task are pre - proposal meeting(s) in response to proposal questions. 2 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION DELIVERABLES: Completed bidding and contractor selection as evidenced by: 1) Electronic copy of public notice of advertisement for the proposal; 2) electronic access to all inquiries, questions, and comments regarding the proposal documents; 3) electronic copy of proposal package; 4) written notice of selected contractor; 5) electronic copy of executed subcontract(s) provided prior to submitting any invoices for the subcontracted work. SCHEDULE: The task shall begin on December 1, 2017 and shall be complete by June 30, 2018. TASK 3: PROJECT MANAGEMENT / CEI SERVICES The Grantee's engineering consultant will perform project management, to include field engineering services, construction observation, site meetings with construction contractor and design professionals, and overall project coordination and supervision. If the Grantee contracts these services, the Grantee will procure such services in accordance with state law. DELIVERABLES: Completed project management activities to date as evidenced by: 1) An electronic copy of the Grantee's executed contract(s) and scope of services for project management submitted to the Department's Grant Manager provided prior to submitting any invoices for the subcontracted work; 2) interim progress status summaries including summary of inspection(s), representative photos, meeting minutes and field notes, as applicable. Upon request by the Department's Grant Manager, the Grantee will provide additional supporting documentation relating to project management. SCHEDULE: The task shall begin on October 1, 2017 and shall be complete by September 30, 2018. TASK 4: CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT The Grantee will construct the project in Key Largo in accordance with the final design(s) and required permits. Construction under this Agreement is the final phase of construction leading up to the completed project. DELIVERABLES: The project as described in this task, as evidenced by: 1) Dated color photographs of the construction site(s) prior to, during, and immediately following completion of the construction task; 2) written verification that the Grantee has received record drawings and any required final inspection report(s) for the project; 3) signed acceptance of the completed work by the Grantee; and, 4) signed statement from a Florida Licensed Professional Engineer indicating construction has been completed in accordance with the design. SCHEDULE: The task shall begin on October 1, 2018 and shall be complete by March 30, 2019. TASK 5: MONITORING 3 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION The Grantee will work with FDEP to prepare a monitoring program to determine the effectiveness of the implemented BMPs. DELIVERABLES: The monitoring deliverables will include a sampling location map, sampling instruments, and parameters to be sampled and results. SCHEDULE: The task shall begin on March 30, 2019 and shall be complete by September 30, 2019, depending on storm events. ESTIMATED POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTION: BMP's Activity Start Complete 1 Other Other Installed TSS kg /yr TP kg /yr TN kg /yr BOD kg /yr k / r kg/` r Vegetated September 30, 2019 4 Swales October 1, 2018 March 30, 2019 5 Monitoring Copper September 30, 2019 y Pre - Project 13,602.4 73.0 466.8 2,052.7 4.7 0 Post - Project 1,732.7 51.8 331.4 821.11 1.9 Load Reduction 11,869.7 21.2 135.4 1,231.6 2.8 0 a % Reduction 87 29 29 60 60 MODEL USED: Allowable models include Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant Load ( STEPL, 2007), Nonpoint Source Loading Management Model (NPSLMM, 2008) and Watershed Management Model (WMM, 2006). The STEPL model is available for download at http./ /it.tetratech - ffx.com /stepl/ while the other models are on the TMDL Grant web site. EMCS USED IN MODEL: Please use the Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs) listed in Attachment 1 in the model to estimate pre- and post - project pollutant loads and load reductions. PROJECT MILESTONES: Task Activity Start Complete 1 Design, Permitting, And Procurement Support October 1, 2017 June 30, 2018 2 Bidding And Contractor Selection December 1, 2017 June 30, 2018 3 Project Management / CEI Services October 1, 2017 September 30, 2019 4 Construction of Project October 1, 2018 March 30, 2019 5 Monitoring March 30, 2019 September 30, 2019 PROJECT BUDGET: CL Ci FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION Project Funding Activity Grant Amount Matching Contribution Match Source Design, Permitting, And - $350,000 Local Gas Tax Procurement Support Bidding And Contractor - $10,000 Local Gas Tax Selection Total: $690,000 Project Management / CEI - $40,000 Local Gas Tax Services Construction of Project $710,000 $290,000 Local Gas Tax Monitoring $20,000 Local Gas Tax Total: $710,000 $710,000 Total Project Cost: I Percentage Match: 50 1 50% *If a stormwater utility or other dedicated recurring fee is contributing, put that information in the following table. DEDICATED STORMWATER FUNDING INFORMATION: Match Source Name Description ERU /Fee Local Gas Tax $0.52 sales tax per gallon of gas spent in the County paid into a special infrastructure fund. $0.52 per gallon of gas OTHER FUNDING (Not Match): Agency Activity Amount State of Florida Hazard Mitigation Grant Program $690,000 Total: $690,000 REFERENCES CITED: NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT ALL APPENDICES IN A SEPARATE WORD DOCUMENT. THIS MAY INCLUDE MAPS, FIGURES OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE WITH YOUR APPLICATION CL 61 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION ATTACHMENT 1 - EMC VALUES FOR MODELING POLLUTANT LOADS LAND USE TYPICAL RUNOFF CONCENTRATION (mg /1) CATEGORY TOTAL N TOTAL P BOD TSS COPPER' LEAD ZINC Low- Density Residential' 1.61 0.191 4.7 23.0 0.008 0.002 0.031 Single - Family 2.07 0.327 7.9 37.5 0.016 0.004 0.062 Multi - Family 2.32 0.520 11.3 77.8 0.009 0.006 0.086 Low- Intensity Commercial 1.18 0.179 7.7 57.5 0.018 0.005 0.094 High- Intensity Commercial 2.40 0.345 11.3 69.7 0.015 0.160 Light Industrial 1.20 0.260 7.6 60.0 0.003 0.002 0.057 Highway 1.64 0.220 5.2 37.3 0.032 0.011 0.126 Agricultural Pasture Citrus Row Crops General A riculture 3.47 2.24 2.65 2.79 0.616 0.183 0.593 0.431 5.1 2.55 3.8 94.3 15.5 19.8 43.2 0.003 0.022 0.013 0.001 0.004 0.003 0.012 0.030 0.021 Undeveloped / Rangeland / Forest 1.15 0.055 1.4 8.4 -- -- -- Mining / Extractive 1.18 0.15 1 7.6 1 60.03 1 0.0033 1 0.002 0.057 1. Average of single - family and undeveloped loading rates 2. Mean of pasture, citrus, and row crop land uses 3. Runoff concentrations assumed equal to industrial values for these parameters 4. Value assumed to be equal to 50% of single - family concentration CL 1:1 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION APPENDIX 2. MONITORING TO DETERMINE TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS If this project is approved for funding, the applicant will be required to monitor CL the effectiveness of the stormwater BMP. BMP effectiveness data is required to demonstrate the environmental benefits of a project. The general monitoring requirements are set forth below. Please note that the final scope of work in the contract may include more specifics on particular monitoring requirements. Within six months before the completion of the project, the applicant will submit a detailed monitoring plan to the department for review and comment. The monitoring plan will specify the sampling locations, sampling instruments, and parameters to be sampled. The monitoring will include sampling of from seven to ten (10) storm events as described below. If possible, monitored events will be discrete rainfall events generally consisting of greater than 0.20 inches and less than 1.5 inches or rain. However, we want to monitor the real world to determine true efficiency. Therefore, remember this is a GENERAL guideline with respect to the storm event. Actual rainfall may vary depending on the type of BMP, the contributing drainage area, the amount of impervious area, and the time of concentration. Monitoring will be conducted at two locations: inflows and outflows. Monitoring will include the following parameters: • Daily rainfall (to nearest 0.01 inch) measured at the sampling location with verification from the local weather station. Rainfall data should be provided for at least the week proceeding monitoring and day(s) of monitoring. • Flow using approved flow activated flow meters • Parameters as specified below Parameter Detection Limit Method Total Cadmium 1 ug /I Composite* Total Chromium 5 ug /I Composite* Total Copper 5 ug /I Composite* Total Zinc 10 ug /I Composite* NO2 +NO3 0.1 mg /I Composite* TKN 0.3 mg /I Composite* Total Ammonia 0.05 mg /I Composite* Or Total N Composite* Total Phosphorus 0.05 mg /I Composite* Ortho Phosphate 0.05 mg /I Composite* TSS 1 mg /I Composite* Oil /Grease 1 mg /I Composite* Fecal coliform N/A Grab ** if possible 7 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION *Flow weighted composite samples will be taken over the storm hydrograph. Typically, the samples will be composited over the inflow hydrograph at the inflow and for up to a 36 hour period at outflow station, depending upon the time of concentration and flow into and out of the BMP. Each composite will include at least six evenly distributed sub - samples. * *Grab samples to be collected within the drainage area time of concentration at influent and effluent stations described above. The applicant should estimate the pollutant removal efficiency of the stormwater BMP by calculating the percent reduction in the event mean concentration (EMC) for the period of record [1- (Average Inflow EMC /Average Outflow EMC)]. For BMPs with multiple inflow (and /or outflow) points, the pollutant contributions for each inflow should be flow weighted. See the National Stormwater Best Management Practice database at http: / /www.bmpdatabase.orc/ and Development of Performance Measures, Determining Urban Stormwater Best Management Practice Removal Efficiencies, 1999 by URS Greiner Woodward Clyde, ASCE and EPA at http : / /www.bmpdatabase.org /task3 1.pdf From ASCE Data base 3.1 Efficiency Ratio Definition The efficiency ratio is defined in terms of the average event mean concentration (EMC) of pollutants over some time period: Average outlet EMC average inlet EMC — average outlet EMC ER= 1 - ----------------------- - - - - -- = ------------------------------------------------------- Average inlet EMC average inlet EMC EMCs can be either collected as flow weighted composite samples in the field or calculated from discrete measurements. The EMC for an individual event or set of field measurements, where discrete samples have been collected, is defined as: EMC= yViCilyVi where, V: volume of flow during period i C: average concentration associated with period i n: total number of measurements taken during event The arithmetic average EMC is defined as, averageEMC = EMCj l m where, m: number of events measured In addition, the log mean EMC can be calculated using the logarithmic transformation of each EMC. This transformation allows for normalization of the data for statistical purposes. CL E:3 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION Mean of the Log EMCs = Log(EMQ) / m 1 Estimates of the arithmetic summary statistics of the population (mean, median, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation) should be based on their theoretical relationships (Appendix A) with the mean and standard deviation of the transformed data. Computing the mean and standard deviation of log transforms of the sample EMC data and then converting them to an arithmetic estimate often obtains a better estimate of the mean of the population due to the more typical distributional characteristics of water quality data. This value will not match that produced by the simple arithmetic average of the data. Both provide an estimate of the population mean, but the approach utilizing the log- transformed data tends to provide a better estimator, as it has been shown in various investigations that pollutant, contaminant and constituent concentration levels have a log- normal distribution (NURP, 1983). As the sample size increases, the two values converge. eft Assumptions This method • Weights EMCs from all storms equally regardless of relative magnitude of storm. For example a high concentration /high volume event has equal weight in the average EMC as a low concentration /low volume event. The logarithmic approach tends to minimize the difference between the EMC and mass balance calculations. • Is most useful when loads are directly proportional to storm volume. For work conducted on nonpoint pollution (i.e., inflows), the EMC has been shown to not vary significantly with storm volume. This lends credence to using the average EMC value for the inflow but does not provide sufficient evidence that outflows are well represented by average EMC. Accuracy of this method will vary based on the BMP type. • Minimizes the impacts of smaller /cleaner storm events on actual performance calculations. For example, in a storm by storm efficiency approach, a low removal value for such an event is weighted equally to a larger value. • Allows for the use of data where portions of the inflow or outflow data are missing, based on the assumption that the inclusion of the missing data points would not significantly impact the calculated average EMC. Comments This method Is taken directly from nonpoint pollution studies and does a good job characterizing inflows to BMPs but fails to take into account some of the complexities of BMP design. For example, some BMPs may not have outflow EMCs that are normally distributed (e.g., a media filter that treats to a relatively constant level that is independent on inflow concentrations). Assumes that if all storms at the site had been monitored, the average inlet and outlet EMCs would be similar to those that were monitored. 10*] FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION ATTACHMENT 3 - GRANT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS The DEP Bureau of Watershed Restoration administers state funds allocated to the TMDL program for the reduction of urban nonpoint source pollutant loadings to impaired waters. These grant funds are used to implement projects (Best Management Practices or BMPs) to reduce urban stormwater pollutant loadings from existing drainage systems without treatment and from lands developed before the implementation of the state's stormwater treatment rules. Nonpoint source pollution is the biggest cause of water pollution in Florida today, and reducing stormwater pollutant loadings is critical to meeting Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) established for impaired waters. 1. Project Name: Provide the name of the project. For example, Lake Greenwood Urban Wetland Stormwater Retrofit 2. Project Funding: Provide the total project costs, the matching funds, and the amount of TMDL grant funding requested. Provide the % for matching funds and TMDL grant funds. 3. Lead Organization: This is the entity that is applying for the grant funds and with which DEP will enter into a contract for the project. Also, provide the date on which the Lead Organization's Fiscal Year ends (i.e., December 31, September 30, June 30) and the Lead Organization's Federal Employment Identification Number (FEID) 4. Contact Person: Provide the name and contact information for the person from the Lead Organization that will serve as the project /contract manager. 5. Cooperating Organizations: Provide the name and contact person for any entities that are providing matching funds or in -kind services on the project. 6. Project Abstract: Provide an abstract of the project that includes the name of the water body to which the stormwater BMP discharges, the status of the impaired water body (i.e., BMAP adopted, TMDL adopted, verified list), the number of acres in the drainage area to be treated, the BMPs to be implemented, and the anticipated load reductions. 7. Project Location and Watershed Characteristics: Provide the requested information for the drainage area that will contribute stormwater to the retrofit project. 8. TMDL Status of Water Body: Provide the requested information. Status of impaired water body means one of the following, as applicable: TMDL Adopted, on Adopted Verified List of Impaired Waters, on Planning List of Impaired Waters, on 1999 Consent Decree list. Status of Basin Management Action Plan (BMAP) means one of the following, as applicable: BMAP Adopted, BMAP in development, no BMAP 9. Pollution Reduction Strategy: Summarize the actions, both structural and nonstructural, that will be undertaken as part of the project to reduce stormwater 10 FORM #: 62- 305.900 RULE #: 62- 305.300(1) FORM TITLE: TMDL WATER QUALITY GRANT APPLICATION pollutant loadings to impaired waters. Please state if the project is specifically listed in a Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM Plan), National Estuary Program Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP), BMAP, or other watershed or stormwater master plan. 10. Project Objectives: Provide the objectives of the project. For example, the objective of this project is to reduce stormwater pollutant loads to Dirty Lake, an impaired water body with an adopted TMDL, and to educate the public about effective stormwater treatment. 11. Project Description: Provide a brief, but complete, description of each task to be undertaken as part of the project. For each task, include the specific deliverables that will result from the task, and the start date and end date for the task. Some tasks may actually occur before the grant application is submitted such as land acquisition, project design, permitting, etc. 12. Estimated Pollutant Load Reduction: Using the models listed and the Event Mean Concentrations listed in Attachment 1, provide stormwater pollutant load estimates for the existing condition, the condition after the BMP is installed, and the resulting load reductions. 13. Project Milestones: List your tasks from Number 11 and their start and end dates 14. Project Budget by Category: Provide your budget, for both grant funds and matching funds, by the categories listed. You may add additional categories, as needed. 15. Dedicated Stormwater Funding Information: If matching funds are being provided by a dedicated stormwater funding source, such as a stormwater utility fee, MSBU, MSTU, or infrastructure sales tax, please provide the requested information. 16. Budget by Task: Provide your budget, for both grant funds and matching funds, by task. Tasks should correspond to those listed in Items 11 and 13. 17. Other Funding: List other funding sources that do not serve as matching funds 18. References Cited: Please list any references cited in your project description 11 Additional Information for TMDL Watershed Restoration Grant Application Please check the appropriate responses and return this form with the application TMDL WATER QUALITY RESTORATION GRANT PROPOSAL APPLICATION Supplemental Information – Revised 01 -12 -2016 PROJECT NAME: Monroe County Twin Lakes Subdivision Road and Canal Restoration Project 1. a. Is the project fully permitted? Yes —X–No b. If the answer to 1 a is No, has the permit been scheduled for approval at the next meeting of the water management district governing board? Yes –X—No c. Are permits required for this project? – X — Yes No 2. Is the design phase at least 60% completed? Yes _X No, if No, explain • The design is scheduled to begin in October 2017 3. Is at least 25% of the match from a local source (not a state or federal entity. e.g. not a WMD, state agency or federal funding source). — X — Yes No If Yes, provide each amount /source. • Local Gas Tax - $710,000 4. Is the construction phase due to be completed by June 30th, 2020 (3 years from July 5, 2017). – X — Yes No CU 1 13 Nrie L • -Q -* Oral i I M.7.a I CL CL Q f i O O Imant Ln IWO Un � ff y Drainage Area - 137 WBID #6006A 0 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographic„ ONES/ Ibus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swi p "nd the GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Mapmylndia &, OpenStreetMap contributors, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Mapmylndia, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user community N 1 inch = 800 feet 0 800 1,600 Feet Monroe County Twin Lakes Subdivision Road and Canal Restoration Project WBID Location Ma FDEP TMDL 2017 Grant Application Figure Monroe County, FI Packet Pg. 2491 M.7.a a a . t7 J v r n. - JAIPP Q Q F D i Legend a+ f Drainage Area - 137 Acres i O U 1210 FIXED SINGLE FAMILY UNITS : 80.4 Acres C 1320 MOBILE HOME UNITS: 30.3Acres + 5120 CHANNELIZED WATERWAYS - CANALS: 16.6 Acres 'a O 5300 RESERVOIRS: 1.5 Acres 5410 EMBAYMENTS OPENING DIRECTLYTO GULF OR OCEAN: 3.2Acres 6120 MANGROVE SWAMP: 0.1 Acres S, SD ,.USES, EX, G- ppi g, r grid, IGN, IGP, i p d GIS U "r a uniy, E ri, HERE, D -L r -, M p yl di � v 6170 MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS: 0.6Acres p.- S r- M p con ribu 'r , Esri, HERE, D -L r -, M p yl di e r 8140 ROADS AND HIGHWAYS: 3.9 pmS ree M p c n ribu rr `nrd he GIS u er o muni y Q Monroe County Twin Lakes Subdivision N 1 inch = 800 feet Road and Canal Restoration Project 0 800 1,600 Feet a.•., Land Use Ma Moog FDEP TMDL 2017 Grant Application Figure Monroe County, . Packet Pg. 2492 558800 25° 8'23" N N Soil Map— Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida 559000 559200 5594W 559600 M.7.a En N 560000 25° 8'23" N N Q CL Q r_ / L v J D H r M 8 r N N 8 r N N N 8 N W 25° 728 .. N N 558800 559000 559200 559400 559600 En Map Scale: 1:8,280 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11 ") sheet. $ Meters N 0 100 200 400 600 A Fe 0 400 �0 1600 2400 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84 us Natural Resources Web Soil Survey r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 8 r N N 8 r N N N 8 N N 25° 7 28 N 560000 in v P Packet Pg. 2493 ca ti VM :) [� uolslnab] (HU L� L L n3U) LWZ AInr - uol ;eollddV ;ueaE) - lawl A ;unoa aoauow : ;uGwt43e ; ;V Z O C Q G O LL Z C a G 0 Z W W J CL N w Q Q N E N N O Q 7 O T w y Q E O U (6 t U) T w U) U) 0 $o V � N a) .0 LD 7 U O O � U O O O) E Q O N U O C E C U) E N y 32 y O O O O C U) (U (6 O- p C: y E y > t O O w C > Q O w _0 -p U) 6 > Q N U N y E O- 2) N N 0 N E N O C N w y u) a) N E rn N 'E 2 3 Q� 6 y w 0 m W A E = U ( v rn v N 6) a r m U m a IL T w 7 U O U 7 w (6 O N U) Q Q O U m 0 U) Z w U y > L V w 7 N O 0 y • O L L 7 N (0 O Z U ` p L O y 0 w U y U) w O N N (n w i a) - U) CL U 0 O 6 m 0 O ° O y 3 C O2 m O U R L N N C '0 U O N w U) a w N U L.L : E y-0 O w y t (6 00 Q (U w w - yo (O w C w U) w O Z Q tl) U E u ' N c d O U) -5 U) Q >, O O w L E > E W U 2 O N (U N w CO Y N L 3: w (U p o Q ul o a) m o w Q csi N a) i N N O C O U O w Q a) U (u Q O O O- -6 uj E U) E c p O 3 w w N . ' U a) O N 3 O y O = p_ E T O N L '� w N O U y 2 (n � Q -cm E a) N E N w a 7 U) U O N U) .o Q� w '6 a) O O 0 '0 N U) E a) U3 y > a) U 0 - p N O w w -0 7 . J N w U U) Q C Q N N U > w Q y t O N a) Z E U O W N O O w N N a) w O) 0 p -L! -p " >+ L N N (U O) (U - O N D N a) E O _O T 7 C y Q w j, w (6 (6 7 ,tl) C N Q U) (6 6 O ' N Q O w >' 7 U .J 2i C N N U .0 Q N C 0 L O N E E U ° o E N 3 U o 7 y o > LQ 7 �o N ` C O v'i �� n" = N m Q� C/) a) Eo No N �° o'Qw N N w w O p w p Q.� w U N O y �_ U) L — O 7 — O O N N w E N L E U> U p Q '6 Q N H O (n (n (n H U N v rn v N 6) a r m U m a IL T w 7 U O U 7 w (6 O N U) Q Q O U m 0 U) Z w U y > L V w 7 N O 0 y • O L L 7 N (0 O Z U y � y Q 4 LL O U R L r Q Q >. a) 2 y a - yo O L d Q 0 0 CL U) J m N E w m y . 0 O O a o Z ° cz w m ° R U m CL O U) (o N > L_ O (n y 2 (n � O S a Q R w LL R 0 C F m y C O O y 5 o o O Q U) w a a w Q E y Q a w a U C > C C > > w Q w w Q U) 3 3 y R `o O w > > O w o CL 0 CL ° LU Q _ o o a R R R R w — C) 3 3 O T a w > > = a F R w w cw) E O o w o Y o w (n a y Q 0 (n 0 0 (n (n o o m o R m U O U C7 c7 m J 'm R J y w a O m m U) R U) w U) in a U) o U) w a p J ll y Q U) v rn v N 6) a r m U m a IL T w 7 U O U 7 w (6 O N U) Q Q O U m 0 U) Z w U y > L V w 7 N O 0 y • O L L 7 N (0 O Z U Soil Map— Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Map Unit Legend Monroe County, Keys', Area, Florida (FL687) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 2 Pennekamp gravelly muck, 0 -2 percent slopes, extremely sto ny 39.2 28.7% 7 Udorthents -Urban land complex 94.4 69.1% 100 Waters of the Atlantic Ocean 3.1 2.2% Totals for Area of Interest 136.7 100.0% CL uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/27/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description: Pennekamp gravelly muck, 0 -2 percent slopes, extremely stony-- - Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida 2— Pennekamp gravelly muck, 0 -2 percent slopes, extremely stony Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: vey6 Mean annual precipitation: 43 to 51 inches Mean annual air temperature: 72 to 79 degrees F Frost -free period: 358 to 365 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Pennekamp and similar soils: 95 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Pennekamp Setting Landform: Islands, rises Landform position (three - dimensional): Rise Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy residuum over coral limestone Typical profile Oa - 0 to 3 inches: gravelly muck A - 3 to 8 inches: very gravelly loam Cr - 8 to 12 inches: weathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 4 to 16 inches to paralithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (2.00 to 6.00 in /hr) Depth to water table: About 42 to 60 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 30 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos /cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 4.0 Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 1.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: D CL uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/27/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Map Unit Description: Pennekamp gravelly muck, 0 -2 percent slopes, extremely stony-- - Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Islamorada, tidal Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Mangrove swamps on islands Landform position (three - dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Lignumvitae, tidal Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Mangrove swamps on islands Landform position (three - dimensional): Dip Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Keylargo, tidal Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Mangrove swamps on islands Landform position (three - dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Tavernier, tidal Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Mangrove swamps on islands Landform position (three - dimensional): Talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) Hydric soil rating: Yes Cudjoe, tidal Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Mangrove swamps on islands Landform position (three - dimensional): Dip Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) CL uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/27/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Description: Pennekamp gravelly muck, 0 -2 percent slopes, extremely stony-- - Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Hydric soil rating: Yes Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Survey Area Data: Version 8, Sep 16, 2016 CL uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/27/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description: Udorthents -Urban land complex - -- Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida 7- 1.11dorthents -Urban land complex Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: veyc Mean annual precipitation: 43 to 51 inches Mean annual air temperature: 72 to 79 degrees F Frost -free period: 358 to 365 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Udorthents and similar soils: 65 percent Urban land: 35 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Udorthents Setting Landform: Islands Landform position (three - dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Convex Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Altered marine deposits Typical profile C - 0 to 32 inches: extremely gravelly sand 2C - 32 to 60 inches: marly silt loam 3R - 60 to 64 inches: weathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 60 to 90 inches to paralithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 5.95 in /hr) Depth to water table: About 24 to 48 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Slightly saline to moderately saline (4.0 to 8.0 mmhos /cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum in profile: 4.0 Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) CL uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/27/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Udorthents -Urban land complex - -- Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Hydric soil rating: No Description of Urban Land Setting Landform: Islands Landform position (three - dimensional): Interfluve, talf Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: No parent material Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Frequency of flooding: Rare Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Other vegetative classification: Forage suitability group not assigned (G156AC999FL) Hydric soil rating: Unranked Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Monroe County, Keys Area, Florida Survey Area Data: Version 8, Sep 16, 2016 CL uSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/27/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 M.7.a r1 ( v /fi J B unkyP M 11C ael Or T C ' Brown `' SantaAnirtaL•n � ) e �,�� .�' - 7 V G * ,ra11c lr P _ .s ► iC Idsmar Ln ''. ,�., Adams Drive - Vegetated Swales * ,p, B"W �. .' �►(.� -- Crane Street - Ve etated Swales 9 r Trans j+lvartia e:, E , DD'o IGI b E E G. hic , CNES/ x p b -- Shaw Drive - Gravity Wall /Vegetated Swales DS, h1S© , USES, AM agmtvft, gr,i, IGN I,GyyP��, i p d t Cran St 1 r v � fit p �t Bel mant f. Drainage Area - 137 Acres ' � p nStree M p c n ribu r , nd e Gf5 user c munity +• � Q Monroe County Twin Lakes Subdivision ,ri • '� pimlico.L�n Road and Canal Restoration Project MOR 1,400 Feet �. Cab rerbs St Pro osed BMP Ma St O o+ do LFDEP TMDL 2017 Grant Application Plante , Collins S i t `� 1" Packet Pg. 2501 J !'1 a ,.fir Z s „ p'Sound L -a r g ��� Can� t L Of x e - _ - ,- ,•si Q ter: Y � '`�� � , • Y ( v J B unkyP T C ' Brown ) e P Legend 611 C C ,�., Adams Drive - Vegetated Swales * ,p, -- Crane Street - Ve etated Swales 9 e:, E , DD'o IGI b E E G. hic , CNES/ x p b -- Shaw Drive - Gravity Wall /Vegetated Swales DS, h1S© , USES, AM agmtvft, gr,i, IGN I,GyyP��, i p d t � GIS U -r uni y, E ri, HERE, DeLmrr'eM p h-, v Submerged Flushing Culverts p S Free M p c n ribu r , E ri, HERE; ®e rorme, M�rapmyl di � r f. Drainage Area - 137 Acres ' � p nStree M p c n ribu r , nd e Gf5 user c munity +• � Q Monroe County Twin Lakes Subdivision N 1 inch - 700 feet Road and Canal Restoration Project 0 700 1,400 Feet .... Pro osed BMP Ma LFDEP TMDL 2017 Grant Application Figure Monroe County, FI Packet Pg. 2501 M.7.a CL CL Q r c R (7 J D H m r M r C O N d 2 r LL r O N 7 7 C O V Q CL Q r C R i J D H T r C 7 O U a> O c O r c a> E t 0 R r r Q Packet Pg. 2505 M.7.a co (o .. U ca O ^ W m 0) co U) co C� E m z CL 2 m i C 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O I-- r O 00 N O r O CO O co O O co 67 O co O O co O O M m U i � 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T I— O r— r— O (O I— O (O O O r 00 O O 00 N O 00 N O 00 N O 00 N O 00 N 00 C7 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \° 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 N r O r LO O r N r r M M r LO N r N d d 00 N O 00 N O 00 N O 00 N 00 00 N 00 t J o p 0 � 0 .cm O O = 0) J C Op o 0 -00- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 ++ m O (O I-- q-t (O 1-- O I-- I-- r O I— r c0 I-- c0 d i 1-- r O I— r O I-- r O 00 I— r I-- H O O ca � � � � � � O o O 0 CO 0 r 0 O 0 CO 0 O 0 r 0 CO 0 00 0 0 M 0 LO 0 M 0 M 0 r 4- O t r � 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O r 0 (O r O O N O N LO 0 Oqqt 0 0 O co O co O co O O O (O N o O 0 O 0 O o O 0 o 0 o 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o o o O LO LO LO LO LO LO O O LO 00 00 In r r— (O (C � r o o 0 o 0 o 0 O o O 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 O 0 O o O 0 o O O N N O N O O N�q9t N Nq9t N I— N (O co LO co LO co co co N C fC 7 C W (n (n (n ( a U) CL := U) CL := U) IL := U) I := :_ H H N H H N H H N H H N N >1— >1 — N L ' C E+ cu E o C C C a� a� - a Fn U5 J U — _ J i M M Lo � O [ r r M 0 �Nc-i000o m U) CL co MOLO N y 'It r LCD 0 r r r 0 0 fC _O r C f4 N CO M 0 (/) NOO r CL ~ r r r N _ co ( o Co � � C d cu co N 0) y U N E : ; �' y J o p 0 � 0 .cm O O = 0) J N N M �i nY a nY N a s~ s~ i CL CL Q r c m (7 J D H r M Packet Pg. 2506