Item C3M
ounty of f Monroe
ELj » °o
�
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
/� � ��
Mayor George Neugent, District 2
leOI1d8 Ke Sou',
y
r i
Mayor Pro Tem David Rice, District 4
•. =�1
Danny L. Kolhage, District I
Heather Carruthers, District 3
w
Sylvia J. Murphy, District 5
County Commission Meeting
November 29, 2017
Agenda Item Number: C.3
Agenda Item Summary #3623
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Mayte Santamaria (305) 289 -2500
n/a
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Discussion and direction on potential comprehensive plan
amendments to incentivize and prioritize the provision of workforce housing after the significant
damage caused by Hurricane Irma.
ITEM BACKGROUND:
The Monroe County Mayor declared a State of Local Emergency on September 5, 2017 due to
Hurricane Irma, a "threat of danger to the populace inhabiting Monroe County" and that the County
"may require expedient action in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the community."
At 9:10 a.m. on September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall near Cudjoe Key as a Category 4
Hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 130 mph. Significant damage has occurred to the
housing stock which is largely the lower cost housing options to the members of the workforce.
Staff, in coordination with Commission Carruthers, has discussed the potential impediments to the
development of workforce housing as well as some potential solutions to the creation of this housing
and assist in the recovery of the Florida Keys.
Attached are potential comprehensive plan amendments to incentivize and prioritize the provision of
workforce housing after the significant damage caused by Hurricane Irma. The amendments have
been drafted to be effective for 2 years to incentivize workforce housing or until all County
affordable ROGO allocations are utilized.
Staff is seeking direction on the proposed amendments.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
N/A
CONTRACT /AGREEMENT CHANGES:
n/a
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Direction on the proposed amendments.
DOCUMENTATION:
Hurricane Recovery Element proposed amendment_ 11.20.17
County AFF Housing Developments and Incentives_vl9_l l.20.17xlsx
approved ILAs with the City of Marathon
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Total Dollar Value of Contract:
Total Cost to County:
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted:
Source of Funds:
CPI:
Indirect Costs:
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing:
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required:
Additional Details:
If yes, amount:
REVIEWED BY:
Mayte Santamaria
Completed
Assistant County Administrator Christine Hurley
11/20/2017 2:05 PM
Steve Williams
Completed
Jaclyn Carnago
Skipped
Budget and Finance
Skipped
Maria Slavik
Skipped
Kathy Peters
Completed
Board of County Commissioners
Pending
11/20/2017 2:09 PM
Skipped
11/20/2017 4:37 PM
11/20/2017 1:46 PM
11/20/2017 1:46 PM
11/20/2017 1:46 PM
11/21/2017 10:17 AM
11/29/2017 10:00 AM
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
3.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
3.1 FUTURE LAND USE
Direction/vote results
L
O
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
a
M
a
CL
E
0
U
Hurricane Irma Recovery
C
N
K
M
R
Goal 109
At 9:10 a.m. on September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall near Cudjoe Key as a Category 4
Hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 130 mph. Significant damage has occurred to the
housing stock within the County, primarily among lower cost housing options occupied by the
members of the workforce. In the recovery from the impacts of Hurricane Irma, Monroe County
shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life and safety of County residents, and
prioritize the provision of workforce housing that is safe, code - compliant and resilient.
Obiective 109.1
In order to advance the recovery from the impacts of Hurricane Irma, Monroe Count
incentivize the development and redevelopment of resilient, workforce housing to improve the
safety and welfare of County residents, preserve the quality of life and the economy of the
Florida Kevs, reduce the need for workforce housing, and better protect the Countv from future
damage.
For the Hurricane Irma Recovery Goal and the associated objectives and policies, the terms
`development' and `redevelopment' shall mean the following for a period of two (2) y ears
from the effective date <insert date> of the Goal 109:
Redevelopment means the substantial improvement and /or demolition and replacement of
existing development on a site.
Development means the carrying out the construction of new structures, the demolition of a
structure and reconstruction, the substantial improvement of a structure and /or a change in the
intensity of use of land, such as an increase in the number of dwelling units in a structure or
on land or a material increase in the number of businesses, manufacturing establishments,
offices or dwelling units in a structure or on land.
d
E
d
E
d
0
0
CL
0
CL
i
c
d
E
d
w
d
0
d
a
M
�L
x
Page 1 of 11
Packet Pg. 135
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
The following Land Use Districts allow dwelling
units, employee housing or commercial apartments:
CFA (130 -77)
CFSD (130 -79) [except CFSD 4, 6 and 7]
CFV (130 -80)
DR (130 -81)
1(130-82)
IS (130 -82)
Ml (130 -85)
MF (130 -86)
MN (130 -87)
MU (130 -88)
NA (130 -89)
OS (130 -90)
RV (130 -92)
SC (130 -93)
SR (130 -94)
SR -L (130 -95)
SS (130 -96)
UC (130 -97)
UR (130 -98)
URM (130 -99)
Example:
Sec. 130 -88. Mixed Use District (MU).
(a) The following uses are permitted as of right in the mixed use district:
(1) Detached dwellings; [workforce housing]
(2) Commercial retail, office, restaurant uses, or any combination thereof, of low and medium intensity, and of less than 2,500 square feet of floor area,
(3) Institutional residential uses, involving less than ten dwelling units or rooms;
(4) Commercial apartments [workforce housing] involving less than six dwelling units, but tourist housing use, including vacation rental use, of commercial
apartments is prohibited;
(5) Commercial recreational uses limited to
a. Bowling alleys;
b. Tennis and racquet ball courts;
C. Miniature golf and driving ranges,
d. Theaters,
e. Health clubs, and
f. Swimming pools;
(6) Commercial fishing,
(7) Institutional uses;
(8) Public buildings and uses,
(9) Home occupations Special use permit required,
(10) Parks,
(11) Accessory uses
(12) Vacation rental use of detached dwelling units is permitted if a special vacation rental permit is obtained under the regulations established in section 134 -1;
(13) Replacement of an existing antenna - supporting structure pursuant to section 146 -5(b);
(14) Collocations on existing antenna- supporting structures, pursuant to section 146 -5(c);
(15) Attached wireless communications facilities, as accessory uses, pursuant to section 146 -5(d);
(16) Stealth wireless communications facilities, as accessory uses, pursuant to section 146 -5(e);
(17) Satellite earth stations less than two meters in diameter, as accessory uses, pursuant to section 146 -5(f);
(18) Attached and detached dwellings involving less than six units, designated as employee housing [workforce housing] as provided for in section 139 -1; and
(19) Wastewater nutrient reduction cluster systems that serve less than ten residences.
0
w
fA
C
d
E
C
d
E
M
a
M
CL
M
E
0
U
d
E
c
d
E
M
Page 2 of 11
Packet Pg. 136
C
N
K
M
R
Policy 109.1.1
Notwithstanding the land uses provided in Chapter 130 [Land Use Districts] of the Monroe
County Land Development Code, for a period of two (2) years from the effective date <insert
date> of the Hurricane Irma Recovery Goal or until all County affordable ROGO allocations are
utilized, workforce housing shall be a permitted use in all land use districts where detached or
attached dwellings, employee housing or commercial apartments is included as a current
permitted use. The term "workforce housing" is interchangeable with the terms detached or
attached dwellings, employee housing or commercial apartments included in the land use
districts. The development of workforce housing is subject to the other requirements included
in the land use districts, including but not limited to, size requirements, bufferyards, access, etc.
The following Land Use Districts allow dwelling
units, employee housing or commercial apartments:
CFA (130 -77)
CFSD (130 -79) [except CFSD 4, 6 and 7]
CFV (130 -80)
DR (130 -81)
1(130-82)
IS (130 -82)
Ml (130 -85)
MF (130 -86)
MN (130 -87)
MU (130 -88)
NA (130 -89)
OS (130 -90)
RV (130 -92)
SC (130 -93)
SR (130 -94)
SR -L (130 -95)
SS (130 -96)
UC (130 -97)
UR (130 -98)
URM (130 -99)
Example:
Sec. 130 -88. Mixed Use District (MU).
(a) The following uses are permitted as of right in the mixed use district:
(1) Detached dwellings; [workforce housing]
(2) Commercial retail, office, restaurant uses, or any combination thereof, of low and medium intensity, and of less than 2,500 square feet of floor area,
(3) Institutional residential uses, involving less than ten dwelling units or rooms;
(4) Commercial apartments [workforce housing] involving less than six dwelling units, but tourist housing use, including vacation rental use, of commercial
apartments is prohibited;
(5) Commercial recreational uses limited to
a. Bowling alleys;
b. Tennis and racquet ball courts;
C. Miniature golf and driving ranges,
d. Theaters,
e. Health clubs, and
f. Swimming pools;
(6) Commercial fishing,
(7) Institutional uses;
(8) Public buildings and uses,
(9) Home occupations Special use permit required,
(10) Parks,
(11) Accessory uses
(12) Vacation rental use of detached dwelling units is permitted if a special vacation rental permit is obtained under the regulations established in section 134 -1;
(13) Replacement of an existing antenna - supporting structure pursuant to section 146 -5(b);
(14) Collocations on existing antenna- supporting structures, pursuant to section 146 -5(c);
(15) Attached wireless communications facilities, as accessory uses, pursuant to section 146 -5(d);
(16) Stealth wireless communications facilities, as accessory uses, pursuant to section 146 -5(e);
(17) Satellite earth stations less than two meters in diameter, as accessory uses, pursuant to section 146 -5(f);
(18) Attached and detached dwellings involving less than six units, designated as employee housing [workforce housing] as provided for in section 139 -1; and
(19) Wastewater nutrient reduction cluster systems that serve less than ten residences.
0
w
fA
C
d
E
C
d
E
M
a
M
CL
M
E
0
U
d
E
c
d
E
M
Page 2 of 11
Packet Pg. 136
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
0
w
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
a
M
CL
CL
E
0
U
d
E
d
E
d
0
0
CL
0
L
Q
d
E
d
w
d
0
d
a
M
�L
x
Page 3 of 11
Packet Pg. 137
N
K
M
R
Policy 109.1.2
The workforce housing to be prioritized by Monroe County shall mean dwelling units for those
who derive at least 70% of their income as members of the workforce in Monroe County and
who meet the affordable housing income categories of the Monroe County Code. Workforce
means individuals or families who are gainfully employed goods and/or services to
Monroe County residents or visitors.
Notwithstanding the density limitations in Policy 101.5.25 and Section 130 -157 of the Land
Development Code, for a period of two (2) years from the effective date <insert date> of the
Hurricane Irma Recovery Goal 109 ) or until all County affordable ROGO allocations are
utilized, workforce housing may be developed pursuant to a maximum net density of 25
du/buildable acre for the UR zoning district and 18 du/buildable acre for the MU and SC zoning
districts and will not require Transferable Development Rights (TDR).
The maximum net density standards in Policy 101.5.25 for affordable housing can be applied to
the development of workforce housing without the use of TDRs.
OPTION for Policy 109.1.2 — limit to lower income categories?
The workforce housing to be prioritized by Monroe County shall mean dwelling units for
those who derive at least 70% of their income as members of the workforce in Monroe
Countv and who meet the very low, mow and median affordable housing income categories
of the Monroe County Code.
OPTION for Policy 109.1.2 — increase density if rental units?
... workforce housing, limited to exclusively rental units, may be developed pursuant to a
maximum net densitv of 25 du/buildable acre (increase by 15% or 30% or 50%) for the UR
zoning district and 18 du/buildable acre (increase by 15% or 30% or 50 %) for the MU and
SC zoning districts and will not require Transferable Development Rights (TDR).
0
w
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
a
M
CL
CL
E
0
U
d
E
d
E
d
0
0
CL
0
L
Q
d
E
d
w
d
0
d
a
M
�L
x
Page 3 of 11
Packet Pg. 137
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
0
w
fA
C
d
E
C
d
E
M
a
M
CL
M
E
O
U
C
d
E
d
E
M
d
0
O
O.
O
L
Q
d
E
d
W
d
0
O
V
d
d
a
M
V
�L
L
Page 4 of 11
Packet Pg. 138
K
M
R
Policy 109.1.3
All workforce housing projects which receive development benefits from Monroe Countv
during the period of two (2) years from the effective date <insert date> of the Hurricane Irma
Goal or until all County affordable ROGO allocations are utilized, including but not limited to,
receiving affordable ROGO allocation award(s), reservations of affordable ROGO allocations,
maximum net density standards without the use of TDRs, rental workforce housing density
bonuses or the restructured development approval procedures included under Goal 109, shall be
required to maintain the project as workforce housing for a period of 99 years pursuant to deed
restrictions or other mechanisms specified in the Land Development Code.
All affordable housing projects greater than 20 dwelling units developed as workforce housing
during the period of two (2) years from the effective date <insert date> of the Hurricane Irma
Recovery Goal or until all County affordable ROGO allocations are utilized, shall not be subject
to Section 139- 1(a)(6)h. (Affordable housing protects shall be no greater than 20 units unless
approved by resolution of the County Planning Commission.)
0
w
fA
C
d
E
C
d
E
M
a
M
CL
M
E
O
U
C
d
E
d
E
M
d
0
O
O.
O
L
Q
d
E
d
W
d
0
O
V
d
d
a
M
V
�L
L
Page 4 of 11
Packet Pg. 138
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
Pink boxes below are options for the BOCC to consider:
C
N
K
M
R
Policy 109.1.4
Notwithstanding the development approval procedures included in Chapter 110 [Development
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Review] of the Land Development Code, for a period of two (2) years from the effective date
<insert date> of the Hurricane Irma Recovery Goal or until all County affordable ROGO
allocations are utilized, the development of workforce housing shall follow the procedures
below:
Pink boxes below are options for the BOCC to consider:
0
w
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
a
M
a
CL
E
0
U
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
0
CL
0
CL
c
d
E
d
w
O
Gf
c
M
�L
2
Page 5 of 11
Packet Pg. 139
Development Agreement
Major Conditional Use
Minor Conditional Use
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Eliminate Community Meeting
Eliminate Community Meeting
Development Review Committee
Community meeting
or
C
Community meeting
or
(DRC)
1
45 -120 days prior to public hearing,
45 -120 days prior to public hearing,
(last Tuesday ofthe month)
DRC
Change timeframe for
Change timeframe for
noticed and advertised at least 15 days
Community Meeting to 15 -30
noticed and advertised at least 15 days
Community Meeting to 15 -30
noticed and advertised at least 15
prior to the meeting
days prior to the meeting
prior to the meeting
days prior to the meeting
days prior to the meeting
Maintain DRC
Maintain DRC
Development Review Committee (DRC]
(hold additional special meetings)
Development Review Committee
(hold additional special meetings)
DEO
(last Tuesday ofthe month)
or
(DRC) (last Tuesday ofthe month)
or
2
noticed and advertised at least 15 days
noticed and advertised at least 15 days
Rendered to DEO for review and
DEO
Eliminate DRC and require a
Eliminate DRC and require a
prior to the meeting
meeting with staff to discuss
prior to the meeting
meeting with staff to discuss
approval — 45 day review
project (no notice /advertising)
project (no notice /advertising)
Planning Commission (PC)
Planning Commission (PC)
If Appealed, sent to PC.
(last Wednesday ofthe month)
(last Wednesday ofthe month)
3
noticed and advertised at least 15 days
PC
noticed and advertised at least 15 days
PC
If PC decision is appealed, sent
prior to the meeting
prior to the meeting
to DOAH
0
w
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
a
M
a
CL
E
0
U
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
0
CL
0
CL
c
d
E
d
w
O
Gf
c
M
�L
2
Page 5 of 11
Packet Pg. 139
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
`o
w
fA
C
d
E
C
d
E
M
c
m
CL
M
E
O
U
I
C
d
E
c
d
E
M
Page 6 of 11
Packet Pg. 140
BOCC
(third Wednesday of the month)
noticed and advertised at least 15 days
DEO
prior to the meeting
4
public hearings and adoptions shall take
BU,
Rendered to DEO for review and
place at the board's meeting which is
approval — 45 day review
closest to the subj ect property or at the
board's meeting site that is neat closest to
the subject property
DEO
5
Rendered to DEO for review and approval
DEO
If Appealed, sent to DOAH
DOAH
— 45 day review
6
If Appealed, sent to DOAH
DOAH
`o
w
fA
C
d
E
C
d
E
M
c
m
CL
M
E
O
U
I
C
d
E
c
d
E
M
Page 6 of 11
Packet Pg. 140
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
Pink boxes below are options for the BOCC to consider:
Comp Plan
N
K
M
R
Policy 109.1.5
Notwithstanding the amendment procedures included in Chapter 102 [Administration] of the
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Land Development Code, for a period of two (2) years from the effective date <insert date> of
the Hurricane Irma Recovery Goal or until all County affordable ROGO allocations are utilized,
amendments to facilitate workforce housing shall follow the procedures below:
Eliminate Community Meeting
Pink boxes below are options for the BOCC to consider:
0
w
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
a
M
a
M
E
0
U
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
0
M
0
a
c
d
E
d
w
0
d
c
M
�L
L
2
Page 7 of 11
Packet Pg. 141
Comp Plan
FLUM
Text Amendment
Map Amendment
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Concept Meeting
Eliminate Community Meeting
Community meeting
or
1
Discuss amendment with staff and identify whether or not
Eliminate Concept Meeting
45 -120 days prior to public hearing (PC), noticed and
the proposed text amendment will have a county -wide
advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
Change a timeframe for Community Meeting to
g y g
impact
P
15 -30 days prior to the PC hearing
BOCC impact meeting (if county -wide impact)
Maintain DRC
Private proposals to amend the text of Code and /or Comp
(hold additional special meetings)
Plan require a public meeting with the BOCC ( "Impact
Development Review Committee (DRC) (last Tuesday of
or
2
Meeting') prior to the application proceeding to the DRC
Eliminate BOCC impact meeting
the month)
for review All Impact Meetings shall be held in
Marathon.
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
Eliminate DRC and require a meeting with
staff to discuss project
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the
(no notice/advertising)
meetin
Community meeting (if county -wide impact)
Eliminate Community Meeting
Planning Commission (PC)
3
(last Wednesday of the month)
PC
At least 3 months prior to public hearing (PC), noticed
or
0
w
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
a
M
a
M
E
0
U
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
0
M
0
a
c
d
E
d
w
0
d
c
M
�L
L
2
Page 7 of 11
Packet Pg. 141
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
0
w
fA
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
c
M
a
CL
E
O
U
�I
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
O
M
O
a
I
C
d
E
d
w
O
d
c
M
�L
L
2
Page 8 of 11
Packet Pg. 142
and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
Change timeframe for Community Meeting
to at least 15? 30? days prior to the PC
hearing
Development Review Committee (DRC) (last Tuesday
Maintain DRC
ofthe month)
(hold additional special meetings) or
Protest procedure by affected property owners —the
4
amendment shall not become effective except by the
Eliminate protest procedure
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the
Eliminate DRC and require a meeting with
favorable vote of four members ofthe BOCC
meeting
staff to discuss project (no notice/advertising)
BOCC — If processed as a Small Scale
BOCC - transmittal hearing
Amendment, (163.3187, F.S.) can eliminate
(third Wednesday ofthe month)
transmittal hearing and BOCC can adopt.
Planting Commission (PC)
(last Wednesday ofthe month)
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
* *Limited to proposed amendment of 10 acres or
5
PC
fewer for the construction of affordable housing
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the
public hearings and adoptions shall take place at the board's
units **
meeting
meeting which is closest to the subj ect property or at the
another option: eliminate requirement
board's meeting site that is next closest to the subject
property
regarding location of BOCC hearing
BOCC - transmittal hearing
DEO
6
(third Wednesday ofthe month)
BOCC — Transmittal hearing
DEO — transmittal stage review - eliminated if
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the
Rendered to DEO for review and comment — 60 day review
processed as a small scale amendment
meeting
- ORC report
BOCC — adoption hearing
(third Wednesday ofthe month)
BOCC — this is only BOCC hearing if processed
as a small scale amendment
DEO
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
7
Rendered to DEO for review and comment — 60 day
DEO — ORC report
public hearings and adoptions shall take place at the board's
review - ORC report
meeting which is closest to the subj ect property or at the
another option: eliminate requirement
board's meeting site that is next closest to the subject
regarding location of BOCC hearing
property
BOCC — adoption hearing
(third Wednesday ofthe month)
DEO
8
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the
BOCC — Adoption hearing
Rendered to DEO for compliance review — 45 day review —
DEO - NOI
meeting
notice of intent (NOI)
0
w
fA
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
c
M
a
CL
E
O
U
�I
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
O
M
O
a
I
C
d
E
d
w
O
d
c
M
�L
L
2
Page 8 of 11
Packet Pg. 142
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
Pink boxes below are options for the BOCC to consider:
DEO
Zoning
Text Amendment
9
Rendered to DEO for compliance review — 45 day review
DEO - NOI
If Appealed, sent to DOAH
DOAH
Recovery Process
— notice of intent NOI
10
If Appealed, sent to DOAH
DOAH
Community meeting
Pink boxes below are options for the BOCC to consider:
L
fA
C
d
E
c
d
E
M
c
M
a
M
E
0
U
�I
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
O
CL
0
CL
I
C
d
E
N
w
d
0
d
c
M
.
L
2
Page 9 of 11
Packet Pg. 143
Land Development Code
Zoning
Text Amendment
Map Amendment
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Existing Process
Recovery Process
Elinw>ate Community Meeting
Concept Meeting
Community meeting
or
1
Discuss amendment. and identify whether or not the proposed
Eliminate Concept Meeting
45 -120 days prior to public hearing (PC), noticed and
Change timeframe for Community Meeting
text amendment will have a county -wide impact
advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
to 15 -30 days prior to the PC hearing
BOCC impact meeting (if county -wide impact)
Maintain DRC
Private proposals to amend the text of Code and/or Comp Plan
Development Review Committee (DRC) (last Tuesday of
hold additional special meetings) or
2
require a public meeting with the BOCC ( "Impact Meeting")
Eliminate BOCC impact meeting
the month)
prior to the application proceeding to the DRC for review All
Impact Meetings shall be held in Marathon.
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
Eliminate DRC and require a meeting with
staff to discuss project (no notice/advertising)
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
Eliminate Community Meeting
Community meeting (if county -wide impact)
or
Planning Commission (PC)
3
(last Wednesday of the month)
PC
at least 3 months prior to public hearing (PC), noticed and
Change timeframe for Community Meeting to
advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
at least 15? 30? days prior to the PC hearing
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
Development Review Committee (DRC) (last Tuesday ofthe
Maintain DRC
Protest procedure by affected property owners —the
4
month)
amendment shall not become effective except by the
Eliminate protest procedure
(nom additional special meetings) or
favorable vote of four members of the BOCC
L
fA
C
d
E
c
d
E
M
c
M
a
M
E
0
U
�I
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
O
CL
0
CL
I
C
d
E
N
w
d
0
d
c
M
.
L
2
Page 9 of 11
Packet Pg. 143
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
0
fA
C
d
E
c
d
M
c
M
a
M
E
O
U
�I
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
O
CL
O
L
CL
c
d
E
d
w
d
O
d
d
c
M
�L
L
Page 10 of 11
Packet Pg. 144
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
Eliminate DRC and require a meeting with
staffto discuss project
no notice/advertising)
BOCC — adoption hearing
(third Wednesday ofthe month)
BOCC — Adoption hearing
Planning Commission (PC)
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
5
(last Wednesday ofthe month)
PC,
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
public hearings and adoptions shall take place at the board's
Mother option: eliminate requirement
meeting which is closest to the subj ect property or at the
board's meeting site that is neat closest to the subject
regarding location of BOCC hearing"
property
BOCC — adoption hearing
BOCC — Adoption hearing
DEO
(third Wednesday ofthe month)
6
Rendered to DEO for compliance review — 45 day review —
DEO
noticed and advertised at least 15 days prior to the meeting
another option: eliminate requirement
appeal or waive appeal
regarding location of BOCC hearing
DEO
7
Rendered to DEO for compliance review — 60 day review —
DEO — final order
If Appealed, sent to DOAH
DOAH
final order
21 day challenge period
8
If Appealed, sent to DOAH
DOAH
0
fA
C
d
E
c
d
M
c
M
a
M
E
O
U
�I
c
d
E
c
d
E
M
d
0
O
CL
O
L
CL
c
d
E
d
w
d
O
d
d
c
M
�L
L
Page 10 of 11
Packet Pg. 144
C.3.a
DRAFT Amendments for Discussion
Policy 109.1.6
Notwithstanding Section 138 -24 [Administration] of the Land Development Code, for a period
of two (2) years from the effective date <insert date> of the Hurricane Irma Recovery Goal or
until all County affordable ROGO allocations are utilized, the following shall be the ROGO
d i ctrihnti nn
Number of available annual residential ROGO allocations. The number of market rate residential
ROGO allocations available in each subarea of the unincorporated county and the total number
of affordable residential ROGO allocations available countywide shall be as follows:
Subarea
Number of Dwelling Units
Upper Keys
61
Lower Keys
57
Big Pine and No Name Keys
8
Total market rate
126
Affordable dwelling units
Very Low, Low, and Median
Incomes
360*
Moderate Income
350*
*Includes one annually for Big Pine Key and No Name Key.
Change the
distribution between
the lower income
categories and
moderate income?
Increase the
allocations to the lower
income groups?
Based on the last PC approval of ROGO allocations on August 30, 2017 (Yr 25 Q4), there
were 15 applicants in the Lower Keys which did not receive a market rate allocation, 13
applicants in the Upper Keys which did not receive a market rate allocation and 21 applicants
in BPK which did not receive a market rate allocation. There were no requests /applicants for
affordable housing.
Note, new applicants enter the ROGO competition as they have ready building permits.
C I N I K I M
R o
w
fA
C
d
E
d
E
M
c
m
a
CL
E
0
U
c
d
E
r
M
M
a
Page 11 of 11
Packet Pg. 145
C.3.a
Total Allocation used /Reserved 445 59 45 540 1089
1260 -445= 915 -585= 1086
Remaining Allocations 815 330 1145
Remaining Allocations 815 59
Gorman reduced reservation. Allocations returned Year 24
4 allocations expired Year 24 (Fletcher). Returned
Two reservations to the City of Marathon rescinded. Returned 46 + 36 = 82
Roy's Trailer Park reserved allocations returned. Allocations unsed by Jan. 2017
BOCC Resolution 213 -2017, County received AFH from City of Key West (380 agreement)
8
4
82
54
104
252
Total Affordable Housing Balance
Allocations to be provided to municipalities based on 380 agreement
Islamorada 10.25
Layton 0.12
10.37
571.63 Total Affordable Housing Balance
Big Pine Key
7 - very low, low & median
11 - moderate
< - - ------------------------------------------
Upper & Lower Keys
212 - very low, low, median
350 - moderate
c
m
E
r
Q
Packet Pg. 146
Market Rate
Affordable Housing
Total
Year 21 (July 2013) ending Balances:
0
205
205
Hurricane MOU (added to balances):
1260
710
1970
Beginning Totals Year 21 balance +
1260
915
2175
Hurricane MOU:
Mkt Rate Allocated
Unused MKTAllocations
AFH allocated
AFH / Reservations
Total awarded (Mkt
& AFH)
Available for Adm. Relief
July 2013 -July 2014 (ROGO Year 22)
91
35
9
46
Reservation (Oceanside) 46
181
July 2014 -July 2015 (ROGO Year 23)
22
1
127
Reservation BPK (Caya Place) 16
July 2015 -July 2016 (ROGO Year 24)
124
2
29
98
253
2 reservations to City of Marathon: a) 36, b)46
July 2016 -July 2017 (ROGO Year 25)
126
6
135
3 Reservations to City of Marathon: a) 34; b) 46;
267
and c) 55
two Reservations for Quarry Partners LLC
July 2017 -July 2018 (ROGO Year 26)
(104 +104) 206
as of October 11, 2017
0
0
261
261
Reservation to City of Marathon
Total Allocation used /Reserved 445 59 45 540 1089
1260 -445= 915 -585= 1086
Remaining Allocations 815 330 1145
Remaining Allocations 815 59
Gorman reduced reservation. Allocations returned Year 24
4 allocations expired Year 24 (Fletcher). Returned
Two reservations to the City of Marathon rescinded. Returned 46 + 36 = 82
Roy's Trailer Park reserved allocations returned. Allocations unsed by Jan. 2017
BOCC Resolution 213 -2017, County received AFH from City of Key West (380 agreement)
8
4
82
54
104
252
Total Affordable Housing Balance
Allocations to be provided to municipalities based on 380 agreement
Islamorada 10.25
Layton 0.12
10.37
571.63 Total Affordable Housing Balance
Big Pine Key
7 - very low, low & median
11 - moderate
< - - ------------------------------------------
Upper & Lower Keys
212 - very low, low, median
350 - moderate
c
m
E
r
Q
Packet Pg. 146
C.3.a
Only 18
affordable
allocations
available on
BPK
Packet Pg. 147
Estimate of the
571
General name
)3E NUMBER
KEY NAME
VACANT DEVELOPED/
acreage
development potential of AFH
starting
COMMENTS
units on entire parcel
ROGOs
County purchased parcel for affordable
Habitat
00156320- 000000
Big Coppitt Key
Vacant
0.84
10 units
561
housing project
LEASED to Lower Keys Habitat
00178350- 000000
County purchased parcel for affordable
Habitat
00178360- 000000
Cudjoe Key
Vacant
1.12
16 units
545
housing project
00178370 - 000000
LEASED to Lower Keys Habitat
00178380 - 000000
Currently proposing map amendments
Shrimp Farm
00114840- 000000
Summerland Key
Vacant
—9
—163 units
382
and site specific policy to develop
property with affordable housing
Caribbean
00121050- 000000
Currently proposing text amendments to
Village
00121070 - 000000
Big Coppitt Key
Vacant
—1. 1
—31 units
351
move forward with affordable housing
00121060- 000000
00300090 - 000000
Text amendment to LCP and tier
00300180 - 000000
Developed and mostly
amendment approved to move forward
Seahorse
Big Pine Key
3.93
18 units
333
with affordable development
00300590- 000000
vacant
Property includes 32 platted lots with 5
00300670- 000000
existing permanent residential units
Henderson
Applied for a minor conditional use to
Building
00111560- 000000
Big Pine Key
Vacant
0.69
6 units
327
develop a 2,600 SF retail office space
and 6 affordable, employee units
Development agreement approved for
Roy's Trailer
00126090 - 000000
Stock Island
Developed mobile home
7.35
108 units
219
affordable development transfer off of
Park
park
market rate rights. Needs minor
conditional use approval.
571 affordable allocations available.
If these projects are completed, the
county will have a balance of 219
TOTAL
352
affordable allocations.
Note, not all BPK proposed units can
be awarded ROGOs with a current
balance of 18 allocations.
Only 18
affordable
allocations
available on
BPK
Packet Pg. 147
Monroe County Affordable Housing Developments and Incentives
DRAFT 11/70/2019
*fvcome CeWgory (201"])
.ownuoccupied incomelvni6( singleparone )- 4 person household size
u ied incomelimi6 (mersied) -4 aovhousehold size
V. LOW
LOW
—D
MOD
$459``0
$'13,500
X1900
$14'],040
X1
s,8,000
$122,533.
$196,053
ante mel— (— glep-- )- 4personh —ehold size
—.11-- 1— ,( —ed) -4 -- household size
$459`-0
$'13,500
$51900
$110,280
X1,26'1
X8000
$122,533
$1-0'1040
'.
.� ..
®
1
•.'
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®tea
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o�������
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®o
®���o���
®����
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o�������
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®tea
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®����
®moo
®o
®���a���
®
®
®����
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®tea
®o
®���o���
®����
®moo
®
®���o�������
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo-
®
®���o���
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®o
®���o���
®����
®
®moo
®o
®���o���
®
®
®����
®moo
®
®��o����
®
®
®����
®
®moo
®
®��o����
®
®
®����
®moo
®o
®��o����
®
®
®����
®
®tea
®a
®��a����
®����
Nofe 1. InWecLFee Weivers SfR, $1,534 pa nni� MFR'. $1,331 pa nvif; end MH. $1,229 pa nnit
C.3.c
ILA approved by
Income category
BOCC to
Proposing
Requiring 70%
provide
Applying
Proposing
to deed
income from
allocations to the
for
New Units
restrict
within Monroe
Very low
Low
Median
Moderate
TOTAL
City of
LIHTC
existing
County
(50 %)
(80 %)
(100 %)
(120 %)
units
Marathon
Schmitt
No
No
Yes
Yes
34
34
Crystal Cove
Yes
Yes
No
No
3
23
20
46
Keys Vaca
Yes
Yes
No
No
3
52
55
Seaward
No
Yes
No
No
8
8
33
4
53
TOTAL 188
a)
S
O
(D
L
W .
Y
O
3
L
O
a.+
(D
E
c
(D
E
R
C
R
a
a
E
O
U
c
O
cu
cu
L
C R
G
O
U
(>
t
t
3
U)
a
J_
G1
O
L
Q
Q
R
a
E
t
V
R
a.+
Q
Packet Pg. 151
Board of County Commission
Special meeting November 29, 2017
Marathon Government Center
Agenda Item C -3
policy 109.1.4
Mayor Rice and Commissioners, I am Deb Curlee Vice President of Last Stand
speaking today on behalf of Last Stand.
Public meetings were implemented for good reasons. A development perceived
as onerous by the neighboring community does not become less onerous by
eliminating a meeting. It only eliminates the public's ability to work with staff and
the developer to achieve a mutually satisfactory resolution. Last Stand
encourages you to continue to require this very important step in all development
proposals. Community meetings for residents of the proposed projects' areas,
held at convenient times and with adequate notice, definitely need to be
continued, whether or not developers may view such meetings as hindering the
progress of their proposals.
Thank you.
Deb Curlee
Vice President Last Stand