Loading...
Item C06' CM ounty of onroe BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  Mayor Heather Carruthers, District 3 Mayor Pro Tem George Neugent, District 2 TheFloridaKeys Danny L. Kolhage, District 1 David Rice, District 4 Sylvia J. Murphy, District 5 County Commission Meeting June 15, 2016 Agenda Item Number: C.6  Agenda Item Summary #1730 BULK ITEM: DEPARTMENT: Yes Extension Services TIME APPROXIMATE:STAFF CONTACT: Alicia Betancourt (305) 453-8747 N/A AGENDA ITEM WORDING: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners adopting a climate action target (goal) of reducing greenhouse gases in both county operations and community wide by 40% by 2030 as measured from a 2012 baseline inventory. ITEM BACKGROUND: The Climate Change Advisory Committee, Monroe County Sustainability Office, and UF/IFAS Monroe County Extension recommend that the Board of County Commissioners establish a climate action target (goal) of reducing greenhouse gases in both county operations and community wide by 40% by 2030 as measured from a 2012 baseline inventory.As the County is implementing the Sustainability Action Plan, greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets are identified as a Year One priority (I-29). It is recommended that the County establish a target for 2030, consistent with the timeframe of its latest Comprehensive Plan, for a 40% reduction by 2030 as compared to the 2012 baseline. This new target provides adequate time for significant changes, while remaining aggressive enough to maintain pressure for change and momentum for contributing to achieving the long-term goal of 80% global emissions reduction by 2050. The county has already reached and exceeded the first GHG reduction target of 20% by 2020 based on the 2005 baseline inventory. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: BOCCis signatory to the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, has developed a 2005 baseline greenhouse gas inventory, and approved variousresolutions including the Comprehensive Plan Energy and Climate Element. The BOCC established a target goal for the county to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and associated energy costs for county operations by 20% by the year 2020 relative to the 2005 baseline inventory as established by the Extension Service, Resolution #067-2010. CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. DOCUMENTATION: 4EGOIX4K ' Resolution GHG 2016 Sustainability Action Plan MC GHG Executive Summary Resolution 067-2010 FINANCIAL IMPACT: Effective Date: June 15, 2016 Expiration Date: June 15, 2030 Total Dollar Value of Contract: $0.00 Total Cost to County: $0.00 Current Year Portion: $0.00 Budgeted: No Source of Funds: N/A CPI: No Indirect Costs: No Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: None Revenue Producing: No If yes, amount: Grant: No County Match : N/A Insurance Required: No Additional Details: REVIEWED BY: Alicia Betancourt Completed 05/31/2016 11:15 AM Christine Limbert Completed 05/31/2016 12:05 PM Budget and Finance Completed 05/31/2016 12:07 PM Kathy Peters Completed 05/31/2016 5:12 PM Board of County Commissioners Pending 06/15/2016 9:00 AM 4EGOIX4K 'E RESOLUTION NO. - 2016 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPTING A CLIMATE ACTION TARGET (GOAL) OF REDUCING GREENHOUSE GASES IN BOTH COUNTY OPERATIONS AND COMMUNITY WIDE BY 40% BY 2030 AS MEASURED FROM A 2012 BASELINE INVENTORY. WHEREAS, Monroe County, Florida, encompasses the uniquely beautiful natural environment of the Florida Keys; and WHEREAS, the Monroe County Board of Commissioners (BOCC) is dedicated to preservation of the natural environment, conservation of energy and natural resources, encouraging residents and visitors to be good stewards of the environment; and WHEREAS, the BOCC met and exceeded the target goal for the county to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and associated energy costs for county operations by 20% by the year 2020 relative to the 2005 baseline inventory as established by the Extension Service; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Monroe County Climate Change Advisory Committee (Climate Committee) shall make recommendations to the BOCC regarding appropriate mitigation and adaptation policies needed to address climate change issues; and WHEREAS, the BOCC has made environmental stewardship a priority by embracing the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA: Section 1: It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to encourage energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Florida Keys. Section 2 : The Board of County Commissioners hereby establishes a target goal for the county to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and associated energy costs for county operations by 40% by the year 2030 relative to the 2012 baseline inventory as established by the Extension Service. Section 3 : This Resolution shall become effective on the date written below. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida, at a meeting th of said Board held on the 15 day of June, A.D., 2016. Mayor Heather Carruthers Mayor Pro Tem George Neugent Commissioner Danny Kolhage Commissioner David Rice Commissioner Sylvia Murphy (SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest: Amy Heavilin, Clerk OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA By By Deputy Clerk Mayor/Chairman 4EGOIX4K %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ %XXEGLQIRX7YWXEMREFMPMX]%GXMSR4PER 6IWSPYXMSR+,+ 'G 13263)'3928= +VIIRLSYWI+EW)QMWWMSRW-RZIRXSV] As part of its ongoing efforts to be a leader in energy efficiency and sustainability, Monroe County has updated its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory, comparing its 2012 results to an original 2005 baseline. This inventory measures total energy consumption and GHG emissions in two categories: government operations and the community at large. Measuring emissions is an important component of managing the contributions to climate change and identifying where the greatest opportunities exist to reduce those impacts. This 2012 GHG Emissions Inventory serves as a significant milestone in documenting the County progress toward sustainability and in determining next steps for targeting opportunities for continuous improvement.  463+6)777-2') Since 2005, Monroe has demonstrated significant progress in reducing GHG emissions and has reduced emissions in all sectors of County operations. For government buildings and operations, emissions dropped by 31 percent, from 11,854 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (COe) in 2005 to 8,224 2 metric tons in 2012. This reduction is equivalent to the emissions from the electricity use in 499 homes. This 31 percent reduction means the County has already exceeded the reduction targets established in its of 2011 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy 3 percent by 2020 as compared to the 2005 baseline. Figure 1: GHG Emissions from Monroe County Government Operations 1 The baseline GHG emissions numbers from 2005 have been revised for both municipal operations and community scale to reflect consistent methods and data sources and a fair comparison between 2005 and 2012 results. 2 US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy- resources/calculator.html 3 Monroe County, Florida, Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy. 2011. http://fl-monroecounty.civicplus.com/DocumentCenter/View/4041 1 4EGOIX4K 'G At the community scale, emissions decreased by 22 percent, from 1,572,770 metric tons of COe in 2005 2 to 1,224,278 in 2012. Community emissions decreased in all sectors, and have surpassed the 20 percent reduction target. However, this reduction includes a one-time transition from municipal solid waste being entirely landfilled, to the majority being incinerated in a waste-to-energy facility, which provides significant and ongoing GHG reductions. While this reduction should be celebrated and is a reflection of effective waste management and climate action planning, it will be important to remember when setting future targets that it will be challenging to identify additional climate actions that will be able to reduce emissions at a similar magnitude. Figure 2: GHG Emissions from Monroe County Community Activities  +3:)621)2834)6%8-327 municipal operations were responsible for the emission of 8,224 metric tons of COe in 2 2012, which is equivalent to the annual emissions created by providing energy to approximately 750 homes for one year. The breakdown of emissions by sector is listed in Table 1 below. Electricity used in buildings and facilities was responsible for the largest source of government GHG emissions (65%), followed by County fleet fuel use (20%). Given the contribution that these two sectors make to total GHG emissions, it is promising to see a reduction in both, with reductions in each category in excess of 25 percent. Also notable is a 60 percent reduction in energy usage from streetlights and traffic signals. 2 4EGOIX4K 'G Table 1: Monroe County Government Operations Energy Use Summary MONROE COUNTY OPERATIONS ENERGY USE SUMMARY 2005 (from EECS)2012 Scope 1gallonsCostMTCO2egallonsCostMTCO2e County Fleet and Equipment Mobile Emissions: Fuel Use (Gasoline)166,692$487,4621,499105,856$322,862936 Mobile Emissions: Fuel Use (Diesel)74,132$138,99075869,893$274,679718 Scope 1 total$626,4522,257$597,5411,654 Scope 2MWhCostMTCO2eMWhCostMTCO2e Buildings and Facilities Buildings and Facilities Total12,349$1,497,5837,4219,791$1,210,0315,337 Streetlights and Traffic Lights Streetlights and Traffic Lights Total1,369$189,721823604$136,499329 Airport Airport Total2,251$285,4991,3531,657$196,713903 Scope 2 total15,969$1,972,8039,59712,052$1,543,2436,570 County Operations Total $ 2,599,25511,854$ 2,140,7848,224 Percentage reduction, 2005 to 2012: ElectricityCostMTCO2e 25%18%31% Figure 3: Monroe County Government Operations Electricity Use  3 4EGOIX4K 'G ŶĞƌŐLJŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶDĞĂƐƵƌĞƐWĂLJKĨĨ A number of energy conservation measures implemented in early 2012 across several county buildings, including the Freeman Justice Center (pictured here), Lester Building, Historic Courthouse, Jefferson Browne Building, and Chiller Plant, have already provided significant savings. Together, the improvements have reduced energy usage at these facilities by 23 percent, leading to more than $70,000 in annual cost savings. Table 2: Monroe County Government Operations Energy Conservation Measures   4 4EGOIX4K 'G '31192-8= The community inventory includes emissions generated by all residences and businesses within Monroe County, including government operations. The sources of these emissions are from electricity used in buildings, fuel from the transportation sector, and decomposition and incineration of solid waste generated within Monroe County. The total community-wide emissions from Monroe County in 2012 were 1,224,278 metric tons of CO2e. This is equivalent to the carbon sequestered by 1,003,507 acres of U.S. 4 forests in one year. In contrast, Monroe County itself has a land mass of approximately 629,120 acres. The breakdown of emissions by sector is provided in Table 2, with all categories showing emission reductions from 2005 to 2012. Electricity use was the largest share of emissions (57%), which makes it a target for future continued reduction. Table 1: Monroe County Community Energy Use and GHG Emissions Summary MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY GHG EMISSIONS Scope 120052012 TransportationFuel used (gal)MTCO2eFuel used (gal)MTCO2e Mobile Emissions: Fuel Use (Diesel)63,121.03,706,177.638,071.7 Mobile Emissions: Fuel Use (Gasoline)581,014.047,803,594.0422,602.9 Scope 1 total644,135.0460,674.6 Scope 2Electricity used (kWh)MTCO2eElectricity used (kWh)MTCO2e Residential 707,992,535 425,442 692,025,831 377,239 Commercial 409,529,520 246,092 398,014,748 216,967 Industrial 206,342,975 123,994 200,036,902 109,045 Scope 2 total 1,323,865,030795,5281,290,077,481703,251 Scope 3Tons MSWMTCO2eTons MSWMTCO2e MSW Landfilled 212,470 133,107 49,597 36,470 MSW Incinerated (WTE facility) - - 57,307 23,881 Biogenic (not included in total) - 28,962 Scope 3 total 212,470 133,107 106,904 60,352 Community Total (MTCO2e) 1,572,770 1,224,278 % Change from Baseline22%    4 US EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy- resources/calculator.html 5 4EGOIX4K 'G 13:-2+*36;%6( %RI[FEWIPMRI -to- associated GHG emissions in order to best assess progress made by the County in achieving its reduction targets. However, it should be noted that, in recent years, the County has been able to work closely with its utilities, Keys Energy Services and Florida Keys Electric Cooperative, to maintain a more complete and accurate set of electricity data. Additionally, the County has begun utilizing the Facility Dude UtilityTrac system, which further supports maintenance of a comprehensive set of energy data. As of 2012, the County now has a more complete and comprehensive set of data from which to benchmark its energy reduction and climate action efforts. For this reason, it is recommended that this more complete baseline data be used moving forward for forecasting energy and emissions and for setting additional reduction targets. This new baseline energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions, ensuring consistency in data tracking and billing, and  identifying additional opportunities for further reductions. *YXYVIJSVIGEWXW Along with a new baseline in 2012, new forecasts have been created. The forecast accounts for projected population changes and the adoption of the so-called Pavley rules (more stringent control of motor vehicle emissions to California standards). The results show a 4.6 percent total emissions increase by 2030 for County operations, and a total community emissions increase of 8.4 percent by 2030, compared to the 2012 baseline. The relatively modest increases could be due to projections that population may not grow as quickly as in other counties in Florida or the state in general, or may not grow 5 at all. Figure 4: Total Monroe County Government Operations GHG Emissions Projections (BAU) Monroe County Government Operations GHG Emissions Forecast (BAU) 11,600 11,400 11,200 11,000 10,800 10,600 10,400 20122015202020252030 5 Florida Office of Economic & Medium Projections of Florida Population by County, 2015- 2040 http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/population-demographics/data/Medium_Projections.pdf 6 4EGOIX4K 'G Figure 5: Total Monroe County Community GHG Emissions Projects (BAU) Monroe County Community Activities GHG Emissions Forecast (BAU) 1,340,000 1,320,000 1,300,000 1,280,000 1,260,000 1,240,000 1,220,000 1,200,000 1,180,000 1,160,000 20122015202020252030   2I[8EVKIXW Lastly, a new baseline requires re-thinking the targets for future emission reductions, especially in light of Monroe County already exceeding its 20 percent reduction goals for both government operations and community-wide. In addition, these new targets allow the opportunity to update the assumptions used in the last set of targets and to adjust based on current information. Projected population growth, electricity grid fuel mixes, and the additional utility accounts should be reflected in new reduction targets. The assumptions and projections should also which forecasts to 2030. Many climate action plans across the country call for an 80 percent reduction by 2050, compared to a 1990 baseline. While such targets are admirable, such a long-term target and various external variables It also requires back- As a result, it is recommended that the County establish an interim target for 2030, consistent with the timeframe of its latest Comprehensive Plan, for a 40 percent reduction by 2030 as compared to the 2012 baseline. This new target provides adequate time for significant changes, while remaining aggressive enough to maintain pressure for change and momentum for contributing to achieving the long-term goal of 80 percent global emissions reductions by 2050.     2)<878)47 7 4EGOIX4K 'G The 2012 GHG emissions inventory demonstrates much progress toward the sustainability goals, with reductions in every category in both the municipal operations and community categories. Moving forward, Monroe County, like the rest of the state and country, will need to maintain and continue to improve efficiencies, even as the nation bounces back from the recent recession. In addition, some reduction strategies that have been effective in reducing emissions, such as the diversion of waste away from landfills to waste-to-energy plants, have already been implemented. This can make future large- scale reductions more challenging -. Continued reductions will require creative and aggressive strategies that produce both economic and environmental benefits to the Florida Keys. For municipal operations, the inventory update shows that buildings and facilities produce nearly 65 targeting government buildings for efficiency upgrades will be an important opportunity for improvement. Transportation, at 20 percent of emissions, provides the next greatest area of potential improvement. Monroe County can claim success in its energy efficiency efforts to date, and should target other facilities that use large amounts of energy, such as the Gate Building, Marathon Government Center and Annex, and the airport terminals, for future energy efficiency improvements. At the community scale, the largest contributor is also electricity usage, which shows that a significant opportunity for implementation of building energy efficiency programs and a shift to renewable sources of electricity. Of note is electricity usage of the commercial sector, which dropped significantly between 2008 and 2010, but has been climbing back toward pre-recession levels since 2010. Thus, energy efficiency efforts aimed toward the commercial sector may be especially effective in keeping emission levels down. Similarly, the large contribution of transportation sector to community emissions shows the potential for community-scale reductions if efforts are made to reduce vehicle miles traveled within Monroe County and to shift to alternative fuels. Strategies that reduce energy use and GHG emissions within the transportation and residential sectors have the co-benefits of improving air quality, improving mobility, and enhancing community well-being. In addition, because the County buildings and transportation mirror those of the larger community, the County should continue to lead by example by improving the energy efficiency of its buildings and facilities and improving the efficiency of its own municipal fleet to reduce its overall emissions while also playing a leadership role in shifting to clean, renewable sources of energy. 8 4EGOIX4K 'H 4EGOIX4K