Item B1o$ (9 �o
4! �G . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Monroe �a Mayor Sylvia Murphy, District 5
r _ Mayor Pro Tern Danny Kolhage, District 1
The Florida Keys _ Michelle Coldiron, District 2
we'' ,•c" Heather Carruthers, District 3
David Rice, District 5
County Commission Meeting
January 30, 2019
Agenda Item Number: B.1
Agenda Item Summary #5157
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Emily Schemper (305) 289-2506
No
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Discussion and direction on Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROGO)
allocation distribution through the year 2023 (current allocation period) vs. extending the ROGO
allocation period beyond the year 2023 as outlined in Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.3.2.
ITEM BACKGROUND:
The Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department is requesting direction from
the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) regarding Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.3.2 (see
below), which requires re-evaluation of the ROGO allocation distribution schedule, if substantial
financial support is provided by July 12, 2018 for land acquisition to retire development rights.
Below is a graph and list demonstrating the land acquisition by the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP), the Monroe County Land Authority, and the County. This
information should inform the BOCC on the progress made toward acquisition, as it relates to
consideration of extending ROGO allocation distribution by a comprehensive plan amendment.
Policy 101.3.2
"The number of permits issued for residential dwelling units under the Rate of Growth
Ordinance shall not exceed a total of 1,970 new allocations for the time period of July 13,
2013 through July 12, 2023, plus any available unused ROGO allocations from a
previous ROGO year. A ROGO year means the twelve-month period. beginning on July
13. Market rate allocations shall not to exceed 126 residential units per year. Unused
allocations for market rate shall be available for Administrative Relief.
In 2012, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., the Department of Economic Opportunity
completed the hurricane evacuation clearance time modeling task and found that with 10
years' worth of building permits, the Florida Keys would be at a 24-hour evacuation
clearance time. This creates challenges for State of Florida and Monroe County as there
were 8,168 privately owned vacant parcels [3,979 Tier I; 393 Tier lI, 260 Tier 111-A
(SPA); 3,301 Tier III, and 235 No tier (ORCA, etc.)] but only 1,970 ROGO allocations to
distribute between 2013 and 2023. This deficit of ROGO allocations could result in a
balance of approximately 6,198 privately held vacant parcels at risk of not obtaining
permits once the 1,970 ROGO allocations are exhausted. In recognition of the possibility
that the inventory of vacant parcels exceeds the total number of allocations which the
State will allow the County to award, the County will consider adopting an extended
timeframe for distribution of the ROGO allocations through 2033 with committed
financial support from its State and Federal partners. This timeframe can provide a safety
net to the County and provide additional time to implement land acquisition and other
strategies to reduce the demand for ROGO allocations and help transition land into public
ownership.
The County is actively engaged in acquisitions and is requesting its State and Federal
partners for assistance with implementing land acquisitions in Monroe County. The
County will allocate the 1,970 new dwelling unit allocations over a 10 year timeframe. If
substantial financial support is provided by July 12, 2018, the County will reevaluate the
ROGO distribution allocation schedule and consider an extended timeframe for the
distribution of market rate allocations (through a comprehensive plan amendment).
Further, the State and County shall develop a mutually agreeable position defending
inverse condemnation cases and Bert J. Harris, Jr. Private Property Rights Protection Act
cases, with the State having an active role both directly and financially in the defense of
such cases.
The County shall distribute ROGO allocations by ROGO year, as provided in the table
below.
ROGO Year
Annual Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable
Housing
July 13, 2013- July 12, 2014
126
71
July 13, 2014- July 12, 2015
126
71
July 13, 2015- July 12, 2016
126
568 total AFH
(total available
immediately)
July 13, 2016- July 12, 2017
126
July 13, 2017- July 12, 2018
126
July 13, 2018- July 12, 2019
126
July 13, 2019- July 12, 2020
126
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
126
July 13, 2021- July 12, 2022
126
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
126
TOTAL
1,260
710*
*(includes two annual affordable ROGO allocations for the Big Pine Key/No Name
Key subarea)
The State of Florida, pursuant to Administration Commission Rules, may modify the annual
allocation rate. Monroe County will request a Rule change from the Administration
Commission to authorize the above allocation timeframe and rate."
The Florida Legislature and the Administration Commission have mandated that local governments
(except the City of Key West) include measures to protect public safety and welfare in the event of a
hurricane by maintaining an evacuation clearance time for permanent residents of no more than 24
hours in their respective Comprehensive Plans. Florida Administrative Code Rule 28-36.003(2)(a)7
requires the City of Key West to prepare and adopt an evacuation plan that is consistent with the
regional and County plans.
The Florida Legislature mandated that the hurricane evacuation time for the Florida Keys Area of
Critical State Concern (ACSC) be determined by a state approved hurricane evacuation study. The
Division of Emergency Management ("the Division") produced an evacuation study titled
"Statewide Regional Evacuation Studies Program" dated November 2010, augmented with other
professional data and analysis, to determine input variables and assumptions to determine clearance
times. For the first time since the hurricane modeling began, after the growth limitations were added
to the comprehensive plan, the model demonstrated that the award of allocations through the year
2023 by DEO would place the County, including municipalities at the maximum 24 hour limit
evacuation. This indicated the county was at maximum buildout and additional allocations would
not be forthcoming, unless other changes are made such as transportation/evacuation improvements,
etc.
In 2012, the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Department of
Economic Opportunity (DEO), the Division, Marathon, Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach
and Layton. The MOU provided the distribution of allocations among the local governments based
upon a vacant land analysis. Based on the MOU, the County began receiving 197 ROGO allocations
annually. Following the MOU, the County updated its Comprehensive Plan and adopted Objectives
101.2 and 101.3, and the Policies therein (Attachment). The existing model indicates the current
ROGO allocations available to maintain evacuation at the 24-hour mark will be exhausted in 2023.
DEO will run an evacuation model after the completion of the 2020 Census, using updated data and
analysis. Staff anticipates this process may take two to three years, and will require a new MOU with
the previously included parties. This will be the earliest point in time that the County will be able to
evaluate the results based on any changes experienced in the inputs and assumptions utilized. In the
meantime, the County is required to reevaluate the ROGO distribution allocation schedule and to
consider an extended timeframe.
The following policy language is included that represents the 24 hour requirement for evacuation:
Objective 101.2
As mandated by the State of Florida, pursuant to Section 380.0552, F.S. and Rule 28-20.140,
F.A.C., and to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare, Monroe County shall maintain
a maximum hurricane evacuation clearance time of 24 hours and will coordinate with the
State Land Planning Agency relative to the 2012 Memorandum of Understanding that has
been adopted between the County and all the municipalities and the State agencies.
Policy 101.2.1
Monroe County shall maintain a memorandum of understanding with the State Land
Planning Agency, Division of Emergency Management, Marathon, Islamorada, Key
West, Key Colony Beach, and Layton to stipulate, based on professionally acceptable
data and analysis, the input variables and assumptions, including regional
considerations, for utilizing the Florida Division of Emergency Management's (DEM)
Transportation Interface for Modeling Evacuations ("TIME") Model to accurately
depict evacuation clearance times for the population of the Florida Keys.
Policy 101.2.2
Monroe County shall coordinate with all the municipalities, the State Land Planning
Agency and Division of Emergency Management to update the variables and
assumptions for the evacuation clearance time modeling and analyses of the build -out
capacity of the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern based upon the release of
the decennial Census data. Pursuant to the 2012 completed hurricane evacuation
clearance time modeling by the State Land Planning Agency, which incorporates the
2010 Census data, the County may allocate 10 years' worth of growth (197 x 10 = 1,970
allocations, 197 annual ROGO rate based on Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C.) through the year
2023, while maintaining an evacuation clearance time of 24 hours. The County will
adopt a slower rate of annual allocations for market rate development to extend the
allocation timeframe to 2033 without exceeding the total of 1,970 allocations (see
Policy 101.3.2). The County shall reevaluate the annual ROGO allocation rate based on:
1) statutory changes for hurricane evacuation clearance time requirement standards; 2)
new hurricane evacuation modeling by the State Land Planning Agency and Division of
Emergency Management; and 3) a new or revised memorandum of understanding with
the State Land Planning Agency, Division of Emergency Management, Marathon,
Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach and Layton (see Policy 101.2.1).
Policy 101.2.3
The County will consider capital improvements based upon the need for improved
hurricane evacuation clearance times. The County will coordinate with the FDOT, the
state agency which maintains U.S.1, to ensure transportation projects that improve
clearance times are prioritized.
Policy 101.2.4
In the event of a pending major hurricane (Category 3-5) Monroe County shall
implement the following staged/phased evacuation procedures to achieve and maintain
an overall 24-hour hurricane evacuation clearance time for the resident population.
I . Approximately 48 hours in advance of tropical storm winds, a mandatory
evacuation of non-residents, visitors, recreational vehicles (RVs), travel trailers,
live -aboard vessels (transient and non -transient), and military personnel from the
Florida Keys shall be initiated. State parks and campgrounds should be closed at
this time or sooner and entry into the Florida Keys by non-residents should be
strictly limited.
2. Approximately 36 hours in advance of tropical storm winds, a mandatory
evacuation of mobile home residents, special needs residents, and hospital and
nursing home patients from the Keys shall be initiated.
3. Approximately 30 hours in advance of tropical storm winds, a mandatory phased
evacuation of permanent residents by evacuation zone (described below) shall be
initiated. Existing evacuation zones are as follows:
a) Zone 1 - Key West, Stock Island and Key Haven to Boca Chica Bridge (MM
1-6)
b) Zone 2 - Boca Chica Bridge to West end of 7-mile Bridge (MM 6-40)
c) Zone 3 - West end of 7-Mile Bridge to West end of Long Key Bridge (MM
40-63)
d) Zone 4 - West end of Long Key Bridge to CR 905 and CR 905A intersection
(MM 63-106.5 and MM 1-9.5 of CR 905)
e) Zone 5 - 905A to, and including Ocean Reef (MM 106.5-126.5)
The actual sequence of the evacuation by zones will vary depending on the individual
storm. The concepts embodied in this staged evacuation procedures should be embodied
in the appropriate County operational Emergency Management Plans.
The evacuation plan shall be monitored and updated on an annual basis to reflect
increases, decreases and or shifts in population; particularly the resident and non-
resident populations.
For the purpose of implementing Policy 101.2.4, this Policy shall not increase the
number of allocations to more than 197 residential units a year, except for affordable
housing. Any increase in the number of allocations shall be for affordable housing.
For a number of years prior to 2016, County staff had frequent meetings with the State of Florida
requesting that DEP reinitiate land acquisition in Florida Keys Florida Forever project areas. In
addition to the staff outreach, Representative Holly Raschein and the legislature passed the Florida
Keys Environmental Stewardship Act in 2016 codifying the State's recognition of the importance of
land acquisition as a critical need and secured Florida Forever funds for state land acquisitions in the
Florida Keys. For the period between July 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, the state has purchased
133 parcels, at an approximate cost of $2,659,945 and retired 58.09 TDRs. The State of Florida
designated $5 Million toward land acquisition in Florida Forever in the 2018 legislative session.
The following table and graph shows the amount encumbered or spent on acquisitions and the TDRs
retired from July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018.
JUL 2018
AUG 2018
SEP 2018
OCT 2018
NOV 2018
DEC 2018
(This column
includes dollars
encumbered or
spent since July 1,
2016 Stewardship
Bill)
$
1 TDR
$
TDR
$
TDR
$
TDR
TDR
$
TDR
MC
$1,587,228
15.00
0
0
$46,144
0
0
0
$232,087
1.00
$448,610
4.00
304/316
Fund
MC Land
56,544,119
123.45
0
0
$122,043
1.00
$442,857
5.00
$541,351
0.00
$1,040,441
5.00
Authority
ACSC Fund
MCLA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ROGO
Reserve
DEP Florida
$864,721
38.89
$629,806
2.00
$31,500
0
$495,000
0
$18,153
2.40
$620,765
14.80
Keys
Stewardship
ure
TBD
BD
G-DR
FCDl3
ure
TBD
BD
MA/DEM
DECEMBER 2018
Land Acquisition Funding
_ Available and Potential Balances
From 7/1/16 • to 12/31/18
S2o,deD,dOd
SISAWAM
S16ANA"
S1AAM.000
S12,008,0as
Stoam,oes
$S, WA"
Ssdob,aa
saeeo,Me
Sr.eM,edb
r
Monroe County
NW516 fund
M—1 Caunty
land Authority FI
Keys ACS( Fuld
MCLA POGO
a.-- fund (Comp
Man 101.7.2)
total County
Fund.[
DCr Fidi Yy3
arl1D/0
Stewan6A*P ACC
M00 CObf
Ontastew ".0i y
rtMA/DCM- statard
Masan. Guam
rrgan
■AeadaW Daiwa*
$3,685,931
S1,Saa,534
$3,291,243
$8,546,013
S2aM,OSS
■C--bereda Spell
mood d. ,M
laralnde IKO
$11,00e,OM
�101trab0/ef1.M
Conservation \
aiedncu—
$1,159.692
SS,Oit'sol
in n9bed by
a '�
S2,659,945
LTF De ANurtlOn
SSM 790
Affa4W H--%
SSM f07
S2AM,010
■ Potential Funds(
SIO,OM 000
510,000 OGO
TOTAlS:
Si.DDD.M
S10.WMS
53"12Y-
SII.SSO,Hi
SS,000A00
TOTALTDeeET111111liewu2M
NOTE TM 0" Casa sbowe are subject to roelfrltlshoo by D[r Due Ci ftence COM ert00y iansned by 9= COW wd Idtbrlately be reenbursed by DCl are bated u DE► cost.
•• The MCLA AOGO Mseere rued (Camp Mora 101 7.2I IDW doll not re00ct wAsrand010 mautary mmperuaboo potty owed by On County and State for dw Ga1MOn's bay and Collm cam
These acquisitions help to further progress on Policy 101.3. 2 of the Comprehensive Plan adopted
April 13, 2016.
Based on the information above and progress made towards land acquisition, the County may
consider extending ROGO beyond 2023. Staff has drafted three options for consideration by the
BOCC which include consideration of whether or not to accept 300 early evacuation workforce
housing allocations. Please note that a separate agenda item is provided to discuss the State's
workforce housing initiative.
The annual Market Rate ROGO allocations is 126 and the annual Affordable ROGO allocations is
71, based on the total of 1970 ROGO allocations through the year 2023.
The three options are:
OPTION #1: Do not accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and extend
ROGO allocations through 2026;
OPTION #2: Accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and extend ROGO
allocations until 2026; and
OPTION #3: Accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and do not extend
ROGO beyond 2023.
The tables below show the details of how this would work in the Comprehensive Plan and Land
Development Code if the BOCC directs staff to change the annual allocations. It also gives a
breakdown for each subarea. For the purposes of discussion, staff is presenting the 3 Options for
both the Comprehensive Plan and LDC together. Staff is recommending no change in allocation
distribution through July 12, 2020.
Deletions are shown in stfikethFouo, Additions are show in purple underline.
Items in are already allocated or would be allocated prior to beging able to adopt a comprehensive
plan and code amendment to extend the ROGO allocations.
Current Tables for CP Policy 101.3.2 and Land Development Code Section 138-24:
The County shall distribute ROGO allocations by ROGO year. as provided in the table below.
C'nrrent Tahle fnr rP Pnlicv 1013.2!
Annual Allocation
ROGO Year
Market rate
Affordable
568 total AFH (total available
immediately)
126
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
126
July 13, 2021- July 12, 2022
126
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
126
Total
1,260
710*
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key subarea.
Sec. 138-24. Residential ROGO Allocations.
(a) Number of available annual residential ROGO allocations. The number of market rate
residential ROGO allocations available in each subarea of the unincorporated county and the
total number of affordable residential ROGO allocations available countywide shall be as
follows:
Subarea
Number of Dwelling Units
Upper Keys
61
Lower Keys
57
Pine and No Name Keys
8
-Big
Total market rate
126
Affordable Dwelling Units
Low, Low, and Median Incomes
360*
-Very
Moderate Incomes
350*
*Includes one annually for Big Pine Key and No Name Key
ROGO Year
Annual Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable Housing
71
71
71
497 total AFH
(total available immediately)
July 13, 2020- July 12,
2021
July 13, 2021- July 12,
2022
126
U: 61, L:57, BPK/NNK: 8
July 13, 2022- July 12,
2023
126
U: 61, L:57, BPK/NNK: 8
Total
1,260
710*
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key subarea
***
Option 1: Do not accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and extend ROGO allocations
through 2026.
CP Policy 101.3.2
Annual Allocation
ROGO Year
Market rate
Affordable
568 total AFH (total available
immediately)
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
4-6 64
July 13, 2021- July 12, 2022
+6 64
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
4126 64
July 13, 2023- July 12, 2024
62
July 13, 2024- July 12, 2025
62
July 13, 2025- July 12, 2026
62
Total
1,260
710 *
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key subarea
through the Incidental Take Permit ITP ending in 2023.
Sec. 138-24. Residential ROGO Allocations.
(a) Number of available annual residential ROGO allocations. The number of market rate
residential ROGO allocations available in each subarea of the unincorporated county and the total
number of affordable residential ROGO allocations available countywide shall be as follows:
Number of elling Units
Subarea
ROGO Years:
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
ROGO Years:
July 13, 2023- July 12, 2024
July 13, 2021- July 12, 2022
July 13, 2024- July 12, 2025
July 13 2022- July 12 2023
Jul 13 2025- July 12 2026
Upper Keys
6.31
30
Lower Keys
3-729
28
Big Pine and No Name Keys
94
4
Total market rate
4,1664
62
Affordable Dwelling Units
Very Low, Low, and Median
Incomes
360*
Moderate Incomes
3 5 0 *
*Includes one annually for Big Pine Key and No Name KeN
ROGO Year
Annual Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable Housing
497 total AFH
(total available immediately)
July 13, 2020- July 12,
2021
4-26 64
U: 64- 31, L:34 29, BPK/NNK: & 4
July 13, 2021- July 12,
2022
44664
U: 61- 31, L:3:� 29, BPK/NNK: 8 4
July 13, 2022- July 12,
2023
42664
U: 64- 31, L:67 29, BPK/NNK: 8 4
July 13, 2023- Jules
62
U: 30, L:28, BPK/NNK: 4
2024
July 13, 2024- July 12,
62
U: 30, L:28, BPK/NNK: 4
2025
July 13, 2025- July 12.
62
U: 30, L:28, BPK/NNK: 4
2026
Total
1,260
710 *
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key subarea
throujzh the Incidental Take Permit ITP endin in 2023.
Option 2: Accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and extend ROGO allocations
until 2026.
CP Policy 101.3.2
ROGO Year
Annual
Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable
Housing
Phase One Affordable
Housin
71
0
71
568 total AFH
(total available
immediately)
710*
u
300**
July 13, 2020- July
12, 2021
424 14
July 13, 2021- July
12, 2022
I
July 13, 2022- July
12, 2023
July 13, 2023- July
12, 2024-'
July 13, 2024- Ju1X
1'
12.2025
July 13, 2025- July
11
12, 2026
Total
4-,269 960
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key
subarea through the Incidental Take Permit ITP ending in 2023.
** POA allocations subject to restrictions specified in Comprehensive Plan Goal 109 and LDC
Section 138-24. POA allocations shall be reserved and utilized for any development with two
(2) or more affordable units and shall require a Development Agreement pursuant to Chapter
1 10. Article V Dei,elo pmentA eement Authorization.
Sec. 138-24. Residential ROGO Allocations.
(a) Number of available annual residential ROGO allocations. The number of market rate
residential ROGO allocations available in each subarea of the unincorporated county and the total
number of affordable residential ROGO allocations available countywide shall be as follows:
Number of Dwelling Units
Subarea
ROGO Years:
July 13 2020- July 12
ROGO Years:
July 13 2022- July 12 2023
ROGO Years:
July 13 2025- Jul
2021
July 13, 2021- July 12,
July 13, 2023- July 12, 2024
12, 2026
July 13, 2024- July 12, 2025
2022
Upper Keys
64-7
6
6
Lower Keys
Sq 6
6
5
Big Pine and No
Name Keys
91
—
1
—
0
Total market rate
4- 6 14
13
1 1
Affordable
Dwelling Units
Very Low, Low,
and Median
Incomes
360*
Moderate Incomes
350*
*Includes one annually for Big Pine Key and No Name Key through the Incidental Take Permit OTP)
ending in 2023.
Phase One
300**
Affordable
Dwellin Units
**Limited to restrictions
established in -Comprehensive
Plan Goal 109 and LDC Section 138-24.
ROGO Year
Annual Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable Housing
Phase One
Affordable
Housin
0
u
U
497 total AFH
(total available
immediately)
n
U
July 13, 2020- July 12,
2021
4-26 14
U: 64- 7, L:34 6, BPK/NNK: S
1
300 total POA
July 13, 2021- July 12,
2022
4-26 14
U: 64- 7, L:3-7 6, BPK/NNK: 8
1
July 13, 2022- July 12,
426 13
AFH (total
2023
U: 64- 6, L:--'4 6, BPK/NNK: S
1
available
immediately)
July 13, 2023- Jules
13
U: 6, L:6, BPK/NNK: 1
2024
July 13, 2024- July 12,
13
U: 6, L:6, BPK/NNK: 1
2025
July 13, 2025- July 12,
11
U: 6, L:5, BPK/NNK: 0
2026
Total
4-,269 960
710*
300*
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key subarea
through the Incidental Take Permit ITP ending in 2023.
** POA allocations subject to restrictions specified in Comprehensive Plan Goal 109 and herein. POA
allocations shall be reserved and utilized for any development with two (2) or more affordable units
and shall require a Development Agreement pursuant to Chapter 110, Article V Development
A-areement Authorization.
The POA workforce -affordable housing units built under this program shall:
1. be multifamily structures onsisting_9f att the willing _ ni s-;
2. be rental units;
3. require ,a.Development Agreem�nt�ur uant_tp chapter 1._1Q, Arr isle V_Deyelopment A-prement
Authorization �,
A ..dhefo....o ram, rt.v l-Arosr
the Fi0fid Budding f
edition of
FeqUiFe, a4 a minimum, ode
5. not be placed in the V-Zone or within the Coastal Barrier Resource Systems;
6. require on -site property mana ement;
u
8. incorporate sustainable and resilient design principles into the overall site design;
9. ensure accessibility to employment centers and amenities;
10. require deed -restrictions ensuring:
zL the property remains workforce -affordable housing in perpetuity
tenants evacuate during theperiod in which transient units are required to evacuate;
rental agreements contain a separate disclosure requiring renters to acknowledge that
failure to adhere to the evacuation requirement could result in severe penalties,
including eviction, to the resident; and
d. onsite property managers are formally trained in evacuation -procedures.
***
Option 3: Accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and do not extend ROGO
beyond 2023.
CP Policy 101.3.2
ROGO Year
Annual
Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable
Housing
Phase One Affordable
Housing
0
0
568 total AFH
(total available
immediately)
126
126
July 13, 2020- July
12, 2021
July 13, 2021- July
12, 2022
July 13, 2022- July
12, 2023
Total
4�A 960
710*
300**
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key
subarea
** POA allocations subject to restrictions specified in Comprehensive Plan Goal 109 and LDC
Section 138-24. POA allocations shall be reserved and utilized for any development with two
(2) or more affordable units and shall require a Development Agreement pursuant to Chapter
1 10 Article V Develo meat AgLeement Authorization.
Sec. 138-24. Residential ROGO Allocations.
(a) Number of available annual residential ROGO allocations. The number of market rate
residential ROGO allocations available in each subarea of the unincorporated county and the total
number of affordable residential ROGO allocations available countywide shall be as follows:
Number of Dwelling Units
ROGO Years:
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
ROGO Years:
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
J uly 13 2021- July 12 2022
Subarea
Upper Keys
64- 13
1
Lower Keys
37 12
1 1
Big Pine and No Name Keys
92
1
Total market rate
4-26 27
24
Affordable Dwelling Units
Very Low, Low, and Median
Incomes
360*
Moderate Incomes
350*
*Includes one annually for Big Pine Key and No Name Key.
Phase One Affordable
300**
Dwelling Units
**Limited to restrictions established in Comprehensive Plan Goal 109 and LDC Section 138-24.
ROGO Year
Annual Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable Housing
Phase One
Affordable
Housin
0
0
0
497 total AFH
(total available
immediately)
U
(I
U
0
July 13, 2020- July 12,
2021
426 27
U: 64- 13, UP 12,
BPK/NNK: 8 2
300 total POA
July 13, 2021- July 12,
2022
426 27
U: 64 13, L:37 12,
BPK/NNK: S 2
AFH (total
available
immediately)
July 13, 2022- July 12,
2023
426 24
U: 64• 12, L:37 11.
BPK/NNK: 8 1
Total
4-, 9 960
710*
300* *
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key subarea
throu h the Incidental Take Permit ITP ending in 2023.
** POA allocations subiect to restrictions specified in Comprehensive Plan Goal 109 and herein. POA
allocations shall be reserved and utilized for any development with two (2) or more affordable units
and shall require a Development Agreement pursuant to Chapter 110, Article V Development
AiL,reement Authorization.
The POA workforce -affordable housing units built under this program shall:
H. be multifamily structures consisting.of attached dwelling units;
12. be rental units:
13. rewire a Development Agreement pursuant to Chapter 1 10, Article V Development Agreement
Authorization;
15. not be placed in the V-Zone or within the Coastal Barrier Resource Systems;
16. require on -site property mana eg ment;
HR4s-..
18. incorporate sustainable and resilient design principles into the overall site design;
19. ensure accessibilityto o employment centers and amenities;
20. require deed -restrictions ensurin&
g,, the property remains workforce -affordable housing in perpetuity;
L tenants evacuate during the period in which transient units are required to evacuate;
i rental agreements contain a separate disclosure requiring renters to acknowledge that
failure to adhere to the evacuation requirement could result in severe penalties,
including eviction, to the resident; and
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
2012: The County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Department of
Economic Opportunity (DEO), the Division, Marathon, Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach
and Layton which provided the distribution of allocations among the local governments based upon
a vacant land analysis.
April 13, 2016: The County adopted Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.3.2
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Option 2 presented in this agenda item:
extend the Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) Allocation Distribution Schedule through 2026, and
continue to pursue accepting 300 Workforce Housing ROGOs offered by the State; staff also
recommends that the BOCC direct staff to not process the required Comprehensive Plan
amendments until any challenges to local municipalities' Comprehensive Plan amendments are
completed, so that the County can further study the issues raised.
DOCUMENTATION:
1.CP_Hurrican_Evac_Objectives&Policies
2.Land_Aqu_Funding_Dec2018
3.WHITE PAPER_build out_land_acquisition_strategies_7_11_13
Copy of Summary Table for ROGO options for Extension (.pdf)
Copy of Summary Table for ROGO options for Extension (LINKED)
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Total Dollar Value of Contract:
Total Cost to County:
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted:
Source of Funds:
CPI:
Indirect Costs:
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing:
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required:
Additional Details:
"I✓ UIWAlial1l.1116
If yes, amount:
Emily Schemper Completed
Assistant County Administrator Christine Hurley
01 / 16/2019 4:15 PM
Bob Shillinger Completed
Budget and Finance Completed
Maria Slavik Completed
Kathy Peters Completed
Board of County Commissioners Pending
O1/16/2019 3:01 PM
Completed
O1/16/2019 6:36 PM
01/] 7/2019 8:35 AM
O1/17/2019 9:16 AM
O1/17/2019 9:40 AM
O1/30/2019 10:00 AM
Option 4: Accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and extend ROGO allocations until 2026 - ONLY
MOVE 240 MARKET RATES TO ADMIN RELIEF
CP Policy 101.3.2
ROGO Year
Annual Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable
Housing
Phase One Affordable
Housing
71
0
71
0
568 total AFH
(total available
immediately)
710*
0
0
0
0
300
300
July 13, 2020- July
12, 2021
4-26 25
July 13, 2021- July
12, 2022
4-2g 25
July 13, 2022- July
12, 2023
42623
July 13, 2023- July
22
12, 2024
July 13, 2024- July
12, 2025
July 13, 2025- July
1
12, 2026
Total
4-2W 1,020
*Includes two annual affordable ROGO allocation for the Big Pine Key / No Name Key subarea
through the Incidental Take Permit (ITP) ending in 2023.
** POA allocations subject to restrictions specified in Comprehensive Plan Goal 109 and LDC*
Section 138-24. POA allocations shall be reserved and utilized for any development with two
(2) or more affordable units and shall require a Development Agreement pursuant to Chapter
110, Article V Development Agreement Authorization.
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
Obiective 101.2
As mandated by the State of Florida, pursuant to Section 380.0552, F.S. and Rule 28-
20.140, F.A.C., and to maintain the public health, safety, and welfare, Monroe County
shall maintain a maximum hurricane evacuation clearance time of 24 hours and will
coordinate with the State Land Planning Agency relative to the 2012 Memorandum of
Understanding that has been adopted between the County and all the municipalities and
the State agencies.
Policy 101.2.1
Monroe County shall maintain a memorandum of understanding with the State
Land Planning Agency, Division of Emergency Management, Marathon,
Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach, and Layton to stipulate, based on
professionally acceptable data and analysis, the input variables and assumptions,
including regional considerations, for utilizing the Florida Division of Emergency
Management's (DEM) Transportation Interface for Modeling Evacuations
("TIME") Model to accurately depict evacuation clearance times for the
population of the Florida Keys.
Policy 101.2.2
Monroe County shall coordinate with all the municipalities, the State Land
Planning Agency and Division of Emergency Management to update the variables
and assumptions for the evacuation clearance time modeling and analyses of the
build -out capacity of the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern based upon
the release of the decennial Census data. Pursuant to the 2012 completed
hurricane evacuation clearance time modeling by the State Land Planning
Agency, which incorporates the 2010 Census data, the County may allocate 10
years' worth of growth (197 x 10 = 1,970 allocations, 197 annual ROGO rate
based on Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C.) through the year 2023, while maintaining an
evacuation clearance time of 24 hours. The County will adopt a slower rate of
annual allocations for market rate development to extend the allocation timeframe
to 2033 without exceeding the total of 1,970 allocations (see Policy 101.3.2). The
County shall reevaluate the annual ROGO allocation rate based on: l) statutory
changes for hurricane evacuation clearance time requirement standards; 2) new
hurricane evacuation modeling by the State Land Planning Agency and Division
of Emergency Management; and 3) a new or revised memorandum of
understanding with the State Land Planning Agency, Division of Emergency
Management, Marathon, Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach and Layton
(see Policy 101.2.1).
Policy 101.2.3
The County will consider capital improvements based upon the need for improved
hurricane evacuation clearance times. The County will coordinate with the
FDOT, the state agency which maintains U.S.], to ensure transportation projects
that improve clearance times are prioritized.
Future Land Use Element 3 Keith and Selmars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
Policy 101.2.4
In the event of a pending major hurricane (Category 3-5) Monroe County shall
implement the following staged/phased evacuation procedures to achieve and
maintain an overall 24-hour hurricane evacuation clearance time for the resident
population.
Approximately 48 hours in advance of tropical storm winds, a mandatory
evacuation of non-residents, visitors, recreational vehicles (RVs), travel
trailers, live -aboard vessels (transient and non -transient), and military
personnel from the Florida Keys shall be initiated. State parks and
campgrounds should be closed at this time or sooner and entry into the
Florida Keys by non-residents should be strictly limited.
2. Approximately 36 hours in advance of tropical storm winds, a mandatory
evacuation of mobile home residents, special needs residents, and hospital
and nursing home patients from the Keys shall be initiated.
3. Approximately 30 hours in advance of tropical storm winds, a mandatory
phased evacuation of permanent residents by evacuation zone (described
below) shall be initiated. Existing evacuation zones are as follows:
a) Zone 1 — Key West, Stock Island and Key Haven to Boca Chica Bridge
(MM 1-6)
b) Zone 2 — Boca Chica Bridge to West end of 7-mile Bridge (MM 6-40)
c) Zone 3 — West end of 7-Mile Bridge to West end of Long Key Bridge
(MM 40-63)
d) Zone 4 — West end of Long Key Bridge to CR 905 and CR 905A
intersection (MM 63-106.5 and MM 1-9.5 of CR 905)
e) Zone 5 — 905A to, and including Ocean Reef (MM 106.5-126.5)
The actual sequence of the evacuation by zones will vary depending on the
individual storm. The concepts embodied in this staged evacuation procedures
should be embodied in the appropriate County operational Emergency
Management Plans.
The evacuation plan shall be monitored and updated on an annual basis to reflect
increases, decreases and or shifts in population; particularly the resident and non-
resident populations.
For the purpose of implementing Policy 101.2.4, this Policy shall not increase the
number of allocations to more than 197 residential units a year, except for
affordable housing. Any increase in the number of allocations shall be for
affordable housing.
Future Land Use Element 4 Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
Obiective 101.3
Monroe County shall regulate new residential development based upon the finite carrying
capacity of the natural and man-made systems and the growth capacity while maintaining
a maximum hurricane evacuation clearance time of 24 hours.
Policy 101.3.1
Monroe County shall maintain a Permit Allocation System for new residential
development known as the Residential Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROGO)
System. The Permit Allocation System shall limit the number of permits issued
for new residential dwelling units The ROGO allocation system shall apply within
the unincorporated area of the county, excluding areas within the county mainland
and within the Ocean Reef planned development (Future development in the
Ocean Reef planned development is based upon the December 2010 Ocean Reef
Club Vested Development Rights Letter recognized and issued by the Department
of Community Affairs). New residential dwelling units included in the ROGO
allocation system include the following: affordable housing units; market rate
dwelling units; mobile homes; and institutional residential units (except hospital
rooms).
Vessels are expressly excluded from the allocation system, as the vessels do not
occupy a distinct location, and therefore cannot be accounted for in the County's
hurricane evacuation model. Under no circumstances shall a vessel, including
live -aboard vessels, or associated wet slips be transferred upland or converted to a
dwelling unit of any other type. Vessels or associated wet slips are not considered
ROGO allocation awards, and may not be used as the basis for any type of ROGO
exemption or THE (Transfer of ROGO Exemption).
ROGO Allocations for rooms, hotel or motel; campground spaces; transient
residential units; and seasonal residential units are subject to Policy 101.3.5.
Policy 101.3.2
The number of permits issued for residential dwelling units under the Rate of
Growth Ordinance shall not exceed a total of 1,970 new allocations for the time
period of July 13, 2013 through July 12, 2023, plus any available unused ROGO
allocations from a previous ROGO year. A ROGO year means the twelve-month
period beginning on July 13. Market rate allocations shall not to exceed 126
residential units per year. Unused allocations for market rate shall be available for
Administrative Relief.
In 2012, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., the Department of Economic
Opportunity completed the hurricane evacuation clearance time modeling task
and found that with 10 years' worth of building permits, the Florida Keys would
be at a 24 hour evacuation clearance time. This creates challenges for State of
Florida and Monroe County as there are 8,168 privately owned vacant parcels
[3,979 Tier I; 393 Tier II, 260 Tier 111-A (SPA); 3,301 Tier 111, and 235 No tier
(ORCA, etc.)] and with 1,970 new allocations this may result in a balance of
6,198 privately held vacant parcels at risk of not obtaining permits in the future.
Future Land Use Element 5 Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
In recognition of the possibility that the inventory of vacant parcels exceeds the
total number of allocations which the State will allow the County to award, the
County will consider adopting an extended timeframe for distribution of the
ROGO allocations through 2033 with committed financial support from its State
and Federal partners. This timeframe can provide a safety net to the County and
provide additional time to implement land acquisition and other strategies to
reduce the demand for ROGO allocations and help transition land into public
ownership.
The County is actively engaged in acquisitions and is requesting its State and
Federal partners for assistance with implementing land acquisitions in Monroe
County. The County will allocate the 1,970 new dwelling unit allocations over a
10 year timeframe. If substantial financial support is provided by July 12, 2018,
the County will reevaluate the ROGO distribution allocation schedule and
consider an extended timeframe for the distribution of market rate allocations
(through a comprehensive plan amendment). Further, the State and County shall
develop a mutually agreeable position defending inverse condemnation cases and
Bert J. Harris, Jr. Private Property Rights Protection Act cases, with the State
having an active role both directly and financially in the defense of such cases.
The County shall distribute ROGO allocations by ROGO year, as provided in the
table below.
ROGO Year
Annual Allocation
Market Rate
Affordable Housing
July 13, 2013- July 12, 2014
126
71
July 13, 2014- July 12, 2015
126
71
July 13, 2015- July 12, 2016
126
total AFH
(total available
immediately)
July 13, 2016- July 12, 2017
126
July 13, 2017- July 12, 2018
126
July 13, 2018- July 12, 2019
126
July 13, 2019- July 12, 2020
126
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
126
July 13, 2021-July 12, 2022
126
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
126
TOTAL
1,260
710*
'(mcludes two annual attordable ROW allocations for the Big Pine Key/No Name Key subarea)
The State of Florida, pursuant to Administration Commission Rules, may modify
the annual allocation rate. Monroe County will request a Rule change from the
Administration Commission to authorize the above allocation timeframe and rate.
Future Land Use Element 6 Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
Policy 101.3.3
Monroe County shall allocate at least 20% of the annual allocation, or as may be
established by the State of Florida, pursuant to Administration Commission Rules,
to affordable housing units as part of ROGO. Any portion of the allocations not
used for affordable housing shall be retained and be made available for affordable
housing from ROGO year to ROGO year. Affordable housing eligible for this
separate allocation shall meet the criteria specified in Policy 601.1.4 and the Land
Development Code, but shall not be subject to the competitive Residential Permit
Allocation and Point System in Policy 101.6.4. Any parcel proposed for
affordable housing shall not be located within an area designated as Tier I as set
forth under Goal 105 or within a Tier III -A Special Protection Area as set forth in
Policy 205.1.1.
Policy 101.3.4
The Permit Allocation System (or Rate of Growth Ordinance) for new residential
development shall specify procedures for:
establishing the annual number of permits for new residential units to be
issued during the next ROGO year based upon, but not limited to the
following:
a. expired allocations and building permits in previous year;
b. allocations available, but not allocated in previous year;
c. number of allocations borrowed from future quarters;
d. vested allocations;
e. modifications required or provided by Administration Commission
Rules;
f. modifications required or provided by this plan or agreement pursuant to
Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; and
g. receipt or transfer of affordable housing allocations ' by
intergovernmental agreement; and
h. receipt or transfer of allocations pursuant to the 2012 Hurricane
Evacuation Clearance Time Memorandum of Understanding.
2. allocation of affordable and market rate housing units in accordance with
Policy 101.3.3 and
3. timing of the acceptance of applications, evaluation and scoring of
applications, and issuance of permits for new residential development
during the calendar year.
Policy 101.3.5
Due to the limited number of allocations and the State's requirement that the
County maintain a maximum hurricane evacuation clearance time of 24 hours,
Monroe County shall prohibit new transient residential allocations for hotel or
motel rooms, campground spaces, or spaces for parking a recreational vehicle or
travel trailer until May 2022. Lawfully established transient units shall be entitled
Future Land Use Element 7 Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
to one unit for each type of unit in existence before January 4, 1996 for use as a
ROGO exemption.
(Ordinance 024-2011)
Policy 101.3.6
All public and institutional uses (except hospital rooms) that predominately serve
the County's non -transient population and which house temporary residents shall
be subject to the Permit Allocation System for residential development, except
upon factual demonstration that such transient occupancy is of such a nature so as
not to adversely impact the hurricane evacuation clearance time of Monroe
County.
Policy 101.3.7
Monroe County may permit temporary emergency housing, not subject to the
Permit Allocation System, for temporary occupancy by residents displaced by
natural or manmade disaster damage; or for relief workers involved in
reconstruction activities.
Temporary emergency housing may be permitted subject to the following:
• Temporary emergency housing means recreational vehicles (or similar
approved sheltering units) used for temporary occupancy in response to
natural or manmade disasters, including, but not limited to, hurricanes and
tropical storms, where such units are provided to residents and relief workers
as part of emergency relief efforts.
• Building permits for temporary emergency housing for displaced residents on
single family parcels shall be limited to one recreational vehicle (or similar
approved sheltering unit) per lot, and occupancy shall not exceed 180 days,
unless an extension of up to an additional 180 days is granted by the building
official.
• Building permits for temporary emergency housing for displaced residents on
nonresidential or mixed use sites shall not exceed 180 days, unless an
extension of up to an additional 180 days is granted by the building official.
• Approval by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) of a resolution
authorizing the placement and duration of temporary emergency housing for
relief workers shall be required. Occupancy of temporary emergency housing
for relief workers shall not exceed the duration specified by the BOCC
resolution, but may only be extended at the discretion of the BOCC by an
additional resolution.
Policy 101.3.8
Monroe County may permit temporary non -emergency housing, not subject to the
Permit Allocation System, for temporary occupancy by workers undertaking a
long-term capital improvement project to provide site security for the capital
improvement project site; or to avoid delay in completing ongoing or future
airport safety and capacity improvements on county airport properties.
Future Land Use Element 8 Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
Temporary non -emergency housing may be permitted subject to the following:
• Temporary non -emergency housing means recreational vehicles (or similar
approved sheltering units) used for temporary occupancy by employees in
order to provide project site security for a long-term capital improvement
project or to avoid delay in completing ongoing or future airport safety and
capacity improvements.
• Approval by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) of a resolution
authorizing the placement of a temporary non -emergency housing unit to
provide site security for a capital improvement project shall be required. The
BOCC resolution shall specify the location (placement of the unit at the
project site) and the duration of the temporary housing unit, not to exceed 180
days. No more than one (1) temporary non -emergency housing unit shall be
approved per project site. Occupancy may only be extended at the discretion
of the BOCC by an additional resolution. When considering such placement,
the BOCC shall take into account the number of times a parcel has been used
for temporary non -emergency housing purposes for capital improvement
projects and shall consider compatibility, complications, public comment and
other circumstances that may require a site to be utilized for more than 365
consecutive days.
• Occupancy of temporary non -emergency housing .necessary to avoid delay in
completing ongoing or future airport safety and capacity improvements on
county airport properties shall not exceed 30 days after the completion of the
associated project, unless an extension is granted by the BOCC.
For all permitted temporary housing, upon expiration of relevant approvals and
timefrarnes expressly set forth in the relevant authorization, the temporary
housing shall be removed.
Policy 101.3.9
For those ROGO applications and properties which have not received a ROGO
award for four consecutive years and have applied for administrative relief, which
are designated Tier I, II, or IIIA, the County or the State shall offer to purchase
the property if funding for such is available. Refusal of the purchase offer shall
not be grounds for granting a ROGO award.
Policy 101.3.10
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, ROGO allocations utilized for
affordable housing projects may be pooled and transferred between ROGO sub-
areas, excluding the Big Pine/No Name Keys ROGO subarea, and between local
government jurisdictions within the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern
(ACSC). Any such transfer between local government jurisdictions must be
accomplished through an interlocal agreement between the sending and receiving
local governments.
Future Land Use Element 9 Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Update
Policy 101.3.11
Monroe County may receive additional building permit allocations pursuant to the
2012 completed hurricane evacuation clearance time modeling and allocation
recommendations by the State Land Planning Agency and the Administration
Commission's direction that the City of Key West would transfer annually (by
July 15th) any remaining unused allocations for that year to the other Florida
Keys' local governments based upon the local governments' ratio of vacant land.
Any transferred allocations from the City of Key West to Monroe County shall be
made available for Administrative Relief.
<The remainder of this page intentionally left blank>
Future Land Use Element 10 Keith and Schnars, P.A.
Comprehensive Plan
Final Adopted Version April 13, 2016
DECEMBER 2018
Land Acquisition Funding
Available and Potential Balances
From 7/1/16 * to 12/31/18
$20,000,000
$18,000,000
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
Ju
Monroe County
Monroe County
MCLA ROGO
Total County
DEP Florida Keys
HUD/DEO CDBG -
FEMA/DEM - Hazard
304/316 Fund
Land Authority FI
Reserve Fund (Comp
Funding
Stewardship Act *
Distaster Recovery
Mitigation Grant
Keys ACSC Fund
Plan 101.7.2)
Progam
■Available Balance
$3,685,931
$1,566,834
$3,293,248
$8,546,013
$2,340,055
■ Encumbered or Spent
TDR retired = 20.00
TDR retired = 134.45
$11,004,880
DEP TDR retired = 58.09
Conservation &
TDR retired by
Density Reduction
$1,159,692
$5,861,801
COUNTY = 154.45
$2,659,945
LTF Density Reduction
$584,390
Affordable Housing
$569,987
$2,829,010
■ Potential Funding
$10,000,000
$10,000,000
TOTALS:
$6,000,000
$10,257,645
$3,293,248 **
$19,550,893
$5,000,000
TOTAL TDR RETIRED = 212.54
NOTE: The DEP costs shown are subject to confirmation by DEP. Due Diligence costs initially incurred by BOCC that will ultimately be reimbursed by DEP are listed as DEP costs.
** The MCLA ROGO Reserve Fund (Comp Plan 101.7.2) total does not reflect outstanding monetary compensation jointly owed by the County and State for the Galleon's Bay and Collins cases.
Land Acquisition Expenditures b7 Monroe County Land Authorit,t Monroe Count, BOCC and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Closed Transactions for Conservation and Non -Conservation Densit, Reduction - 711,116 to 12l31t18
Dau Btrtr
Sekt
orrp=r. T F-
Bbc*
.tit
Subdrvnan
Parcels
TDR;;enrel
uCLA'sCm-
BOCC'sCow
DEPsior'
782016
MCIA
Rodriguez kanre+e
Conservation
15
5unorwoodShorts
1
100
S948741
50O0
5000
1, 112016
MCLA
Smrth Law, 8 Mana
Conse w*n
Par d Parcel 3
loward F Peri s Parce: 31PB 1-1151
1
024
$3 596 78
$1100
SON
7152016
MCLA
Finch
Conser.aton
23
EastEnd !unrecaoedplav
1
100
526.39841
$000
5700
1142016
MC LA
Rocca
Conserw*r
3
5
Ramrod Shores Manna Sec w
1
1.30
541.00178
$000
SO Oc
714'2016
NKLA
Peoca.
Conservator
3
6
Ramroo Shores Manna Season
1
1.00
mduded above
$000
goo
7272016
MCLA
0".LLC
Conservation
4
11
Centerlsiano
1
1.00
S197,55528
so Oc
$000
7272016
MCLA
Ck.n LLC
Conservation
6
30
Come Island
1
1.00
rcludee above
$000
SO Oc
272016
MCLA
Chita, LLC
Conservation
11
12
Center Isrand
1
100
r-iLded abo+e
SG 00
SO OG
727.2016
MCLA
06a LLC
Conservation
13
8
Center Island
1
1.00
mclr.ded above
$000
$0 00
7272016
MCLA
Olivia LLC
Conservation
16
8
Centerrynd
1
1.00
rckdea above
SO OD
SOOO
7272016
MCLA
YkWlo Dorm*,
Conservation
13
5
Center island
1
1.00
$39,94603
$0.00
$000
1.242016
MCLA
Souhrada Mrnael
Conservation
12
3
Center Island
1
1.00
539.946O3
$0.00
1000
7292016
MCLA
D'Argeb S+tip^en
Conservator
13
center Island
1
1.00
139,94603
$000
$0Oc
7;3,'2016
MCLA
Souhrada N Oiam
Conser.awn
13
6
Comer Island
1
1.00
$39.946 03
so Oc
goo
8111.2016
MCLA
D'Argelo:rerrerlaPoland
Conserawr,
12
4
Center Island
1
too
$3999633
so Oc
SO00
7.%2016
MCLA
YAP*'4arc_
Conservation
13
4
Comer Island
1
100
$39W633
$000
$000
65:016
MCLA
McNilard
Conservation
17
East End tumecordedplau
,
1.00
$26,35178
goo
$300
&5:016
MC_A
kT#w
Conservation
3
13
Eden PeresCobr;
1
1.00
$2591553
$000
so 00
&52016
MC LA
YkVob.aurer
Corserawn
12
2
Cenwwaind
1
1.0c
539.946.03
SOOC
$000
651016
MCLA
Ukvlo oaul
Conservaxr
12
5
Cenwlaland
1
100
$3994603
$000
$000
632016
MCLA
Souhrada Chns+opher
Conservation
12
1
Comer Island
1
1.00
$39,946.03
so Oc
50 00
V 2016
MCLA
Boca EavPeak. lrc
Consenrwn
4
11
Carter Wand
1
100
523667528
$000
$00c
8192016
k4CLA
Boca East Peak, roc
Conser.aticn
5
19
Cemer Isla l
1
1.00
ocbdod above
$000
$000
&192016
MCLA
Boca East Reek; . Inc
Conservation
8
17
Center Island
1
100
rAded above
so Oc
So Oc
8192016
MCLA
Boca Ear Peak me
Conser.awn
9
6
Center ISlann
1
1.00
r�kdee above
SOOC
$000
8142016
MCLA
Boca East Peak. Ire
CConseraton
12
6
Center Kano
1
1.00
mdudec above
$000
S300
611I9'2016
MCLA
Roca Eas+Peak,, krc
Conseraton
14
18
Cerra klaro
1
1.00
rcIL4te above
$000
so 00
6192016
MCLA
Dameck.tPeak Mvestmems.LLC Conser.awn
4
9
Comer Wand
1
1.30
515818528
$0O0
$000
S 152016
MCLA
Danvecl, Rea* Investments LLC Conseraton
12
',
Center Island
i
1.00
mcln ded above
f0.00
$000
&192016
MCLA
DamKcloPeak; knvesarrKms LLCConser+own
14
4
Comer Island
1
100
r; des above
XOQ
$000
&192016
MCLA
Damreck,Peak nvescments.LLC Conservation
14
19
CetterIslard
1
1,00
xtclWeaabove
$000
so Oc
6'192016
MCLA
Damecl,.Janes
Conservation
3
17
center Island
1
1.00
S399%03
s0OO
SDo0
8192016
MCLA
ConndAsset Trur L_C
Conseraton
II
11
Carter Island
1
1.00
5391%,03
soOC
$001)
9'b2016
MCLA
Keleher
Conservator
11
4
Comer Island
1
1.00
581.231.78
10.00
goo
922016
MCLA
Keienet
Conseration
11
5
Center Islam:
1
1,00
included above
$0 0c
SO OO
$92016
MCLA
Kozak David b Gar
Conservation
8
7
Coma Isano
1
100
581.23178
$000
so 00
992016
MCLA
Kozak David 6 Gar,
Ca seraxn
8
8
Cnreor Island
1
1.00
mcluded above
$O 00
WOO
9142016
MCLA
lanzt8o
Conwr.aton
11
$
Comor Island
1
100
S,13.10278
SO00
so 00
9'142016
►rKLA
Lanzk
Conservation
16
5
Center Island
1
1.00
:rAdedabove
$000
so 00
W2016
MCA
Larz9o,
Consorawn
16
6
Center Wand
1
1.Oc
rck:dod above
$O 00
SO GO
916,7016
MCLA
Bahus
Conservation
23
11
Palm VAN
1
1.00
$22 772 71
So 00
$000
916r2016
MCLA
East;
Conservation
14
5
Center Island
1
1.00
UO 903.78
goo
$000
921.2016
MICLA
Tsavdans .Arthor and Pana:iotnsConseraxn
13
1
Center Island
1
1.00
54110178
$000
so 00
Page 1 of 8
nto7.N*d
Does
Does
OS £St l9S
301
1 "A Mrd 0ei00
6
Z
UWAiOsw}
s6,nseH
t'1}Y'!
LLOZ1K
00 OS
Does
a"oge p"u'
00 l
l Sugee out saute p!4t}
it
S
ua"evasw}
nawaN MaH
tl1}jy
LtOZlfff
Does
Does
a"09e D" Y",
001
1 5"ec Due Sawa "D
Ot
S
w40%mua}
t1}W
Lieu
ODDS
OO OS
OO M 9ZtS
OO t
1 sagec Due sau.d "D
6
S
0"vos,,o}
z,awaN:. faN
V1A
Ltom
DO 0S
Does
00 L£110s
DO 1
1 Sm1ec Due Soule pwe}
S
9
uoneNa ,io-•
*d"A.4appeW
YIA
Ll0Zt9Z.2
DOGS
DOD$
SL ON 9Zs
001
l _WV s10a00
9t
1
U04vosw}
DY pUe-d1d
V1A
LIOZ»Z7
00C$
DOGS
0095tt5S
001
1 "OdDue sawdp"ie}
S
L
uoxNasuo}
0%,S "
VIA
LIOM
00 CS
D00S
0095i ISS
001
t sugeaPut sawa"D
v
L
uouen,OS o}
—S06p
ViA
LI0vat
DO DS
000$
05 09f tS
co
1 ved 004.n1
t
f
uauvasw}
ela5jp ,a ao4 fM
q1A
LtOZ�LVI
OODS
ODDS
0095tIS$
301
I S.:gecyjesaweLs4e}
tf
L
uouevasuo}
01ue9
V1A
-1tomi
DODS
ODDS
SzLZt'9K
001
t e►P,etawec
Of
9
ua,eNas,,o}
ugeH
11A
110mll
DO OS
000E
009SI'LSS
001
1 5ugecPuesawd104e}
L£
9
uooe.vasuD}
Pei9
q1A
L10V£tlt
ODDS
OO OS
0095t IS$
001
t swlec Pue saved Mtg
OZ
L
wutuasw}
a_uau a uaq;
VIA
L101;lLl1
DODS
0001
009Si IS$
001
1 swWc Due Saud rwD
tt
L
uNe"OSw}
614414
%qA
LlDTSI
DOGS
00as
OOOI t'£ti
001
l "Ire Due s" 04e)J
it
9
u(Nx".asw)
e°962 S SoNt} a" a
ylA
LIOUS't
ODDS
ODDS
DOW its
Oct
1 sugee Due sau,d Frye}
OZ
9
uoue"asw}
o6nl; g soue} and
VIA
11 1MS�1
OD0S
000E
9Z6S115S
001
l su*dout sawep4p)
9
9
OooeNasuO}
sawl
V",)h
MUNI
ODDS
ODDS
SZLZI9tS
Oct
1 NeduOfwm
9t
Z
uoneNaSuo}
wt4Pta>r
pl}ty
91011Z2l
ODD$
ODDS
is ON 9"
001
t sa,e:s3 ,evj ft e9
9
£
uooe'uas: a}
eu4osol Ma
41}ti
91OUNt
ODDS
DOD$
-Aoge Dapnpw
9£ 0
1 sw4S W 00 Me IOU 9 p"N PuZ
91 VI S
uaievas o}
seveg
V1A
9tCLillll
DODS
OO 0$
9L 96t ssis
►LO
1 s4,045 aa' 101e1d `ad 9 M PuZ
L
ucOeNasw}
sri,eg
t A
9tOZ7 V
DOGS
ODDS
OC 9Sl tSS
001
1 s"gec 0,10 S"d two
9Z
9
uactvas.,o}
c•,a,oh
yl}W
9t MIZl
OO 0$
DOGS
is Oft 9"
001
t lied uwswM
S
£
uouevasw}
MG
Y1A
910UZZIZ1
00 0S
ODD$
9Z 6SI IS$
001
1 SWIec Due Sawa "D
SZ
9
uoueNasuo}
vel •zr0
'Vl}P1
910MIZI
DOGS
0001
is O£t 9K
OO i
t Sale S_ ,evi 04N
Zt
6
uw.%p ,,Oo
eo.an6• j
Vl}W
91MV,,Zi
00 D$
0001
SZ661 IS$
001
1 SuJec Ole Sawa pye}
9Z
g
uooe"asw}
ab,ep —to
viA
9tOlazt
000$
DOM
a"0gtpWp-"
001
l u014pr:s,,,sa3e.s310"H-m*ft)
91
Si
uouelos c}
me4iel
tr A
9ims'ZI
ODDS
DOGS
a"04t"p, "
000
l JOIDPPt.S1;:t4les3,oquH:WVr
S
h
uouel,asuo,
we4lel
VA
910ZVLI
DO CS
ODDS
9LtZ6ZlS
001
t joioppV•so. Shcft53Wg1eH.eagn7
Z
►1
uoaeNasuo}
weµlel
p!A
Slow,I
ODD$
GODS
9LU9LS$
001
t u(xrppt:sa,swag JOWH:e +Ap
t
►t
uaoeNasw)
Pa
viA
9t 19vtl
`JOGS
ODDS
£5Oct WS
OCt
l 50IM::,eheulrg
£
£
u014fuasw}
ai%tpePO
VIA
9WIL'It
DO CS
00 CS
W0ge papnpw
001
1 uo+"Ppr u"a saie.sa ,oae j ,eagyn}
OZ 9 61
91
ua,e„asw}
pfgD ueuuagor
V1:AM
9tOZ 91 11
DODS
ODDS
fStic '9LS
DOD
t ua"Dor 4uisaa..sjINA-1:eapn}
9
5i
U00&.vw}
0P4)uew,ator•
y1A
9t0ZSI'tl
OD OS
ODDS
st9"9S
001
l uanDPt,s,.,x0i4 n}
11
St
uoueNasuo}
0J141
Y1A
910, l£:Cl
DODS
DO CS
9ZV66'ZS
000
l 0-4 "d6ra
►li-.•JOued
uoae,uasw}
awogsi,sue"souazej
V1A
9tozzei
Does
ODDS
is S9L 9zS
001
l esug tWnd
I -r'l to jec
ump. asw)
Sane. j
V1A
9LOZ's""Ol
ODDS
000$
9L A its
001
l Poetsl uua}
9
S
uoueNasw}
uOneJOd,o} SAV
V ,A
9t IN—Vl
ODD$
DOGS
9L toll ItS
00 t
t PurlSI igloo}
L
£
uooeAasuo}
PH
Y1A
MUM
ODD$
DQOS
9LLee ttS
OCl
t puelsl4WD)
tl
S
uoeetiasuo}
uouewa,0}lilt
r.A
9t0A£1101
0005
DOGS
SL LOO It&
Oct
l Duelsl Nlua}
Z
11
u04uuasw3
}11 nesseN
Ir,A
910zlvoi
0005
OOOS
a"ogrpapVw
OD 1
l ouelsl,a,uao
£
9.
aooeNasw}
WAS
11A
Mz;bCi
ODD$
ODD$
9L 1fZ t91
Oct
1 Puelsl Alua}
Z
91
uoueNasw}
ozue
t+ A
91OZ'L'Ct
DO Cs
DOOS
k!,00tr4
001
1 Duetsi,ar,a}
91
r
wne"ssuo-,
D(xltNw)SAS
Ir,A
9199rot
•:so} s d30
+so} s• }08
so} s•y13h
Panay Sol
spoxd uaS.voOn:,
,o-
lops
,a ng
ale
a 1 r c,a
9lll£!Zl of 9litlL - uoipnpad Llmueo uoge"jasuo}uoN pue uogenxi:uo} Jot :uogoe:uetl 04=013
ualDatad lelwwuaInu3 to luawpedad epuoi j pue }}09 dtuno} aotuoiN 1.puog4ny puel F,tuno) aauoW Lq sainlipuadx3 umplinb3V puel
Land Acquisition Expenditures by Monroe County Land Authority. Monroe County BOCC and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Closed Transactions for Conservation and Non Conservation Density Reduction - 711/16 to 12131118
.gar.
Buis
Seder
ProperT_pe
EX�
_c'
SuDd,vsrcn
Fare;
TDR;nenred
.'CLa;t.o;+
9OC'.;Cost
OEP;Co,'
361011
MC LA
Hastings
Conser,anon
6
8
-'alma.`io,a
1
1,30
mckdecabove
5000
$000
362017
MC LA
Hastings
Conservation
6
9
-�almaSaa
1
1.00
in&dedabove
5000
SO00
112017
MCLA
OamurIA'GaWnwre
Conser,aton
9
19
:)ameiaVdb
1
100
19138600
5000
$000
312017
MCLA
GamunaGa$we
Coeser;awn
9
20
PametaVita
1
130
rchdedabove
$000
5000
3.24,2017
MCLA
DMana
Corser,aoon
7
2
Ramroc Shoes Manra Ser.y
1
1.30
5N 73350
5000
$300
329t2017
MCLA
Perez Jorge
Co^ser,ation
1
13
JtrnstcrDark
1
1.00
546.11725
50.00
SO00
427,M7
MCLA
TsavdansGeorcearc Fa-a,wnsCorser:awn
13
9
Centeriswnc
1
1.00
541.09850
Sooll
so 0C
532017
MCLA
Corno4.
Conser.awn
6
18
RIM.= Shores
1
1,00
520.983 50
$000
S0 0C
06017
MCLA
ranks
Conseraeon
2
6
-Iams3ceanPa4=sores
1
100
538.95143
$000
NOD
60M7
MCLA
Miles
Corseman
tw
4
24
dams Ocean Parts = sates
1
100
S31 19115
5000
$000
V52017
BOCC
Maw Enterprres Inc
%<orservaton Dersr; Reducoen
1
3
Tropical 3a Second Addition
1
1,00
$0.00
$43.17815
$000
6r.22017
BOCC
Hoof
%<onservatonDery Reducoon
1
7
Trop,43a,Second Addition
1
1.00
$000
$43.11000
$0.00
&27-2017
MCLA
Habra! for i-umamt,ot-4JpperlCorser,atwn
3
40
4arrrsOcean ParkEstates
1
1:30
S41.09850
5000
so 0C
63N2011
MCLA
Jacoos
Corse yawn
2
28
Harris Ocean Park E,ates
1
130
$38,95143
5000
50O0
630''2017
3OCC
Johnson R-chars 3 Joanr
Non-Conser.aoon Dersr, Reduction
11
10
Tropwa' 3a ThKd Add roon
1
1,00
$000
588.368 75
so 0C
V02017
BOCC
Johnson Richard & Joan,
Von -Conservation Densm Reduction
12
1
Troprca, 3a, Thad Adcmon
1
1.00
50.00
m Wed above
SO 00
7:72017
3OCC
Parker Johr
Nor-Conser.anon DReduction
eism
9
2
Trap ca-Sat, 'hnc 4ddroon
1
1.00
5000
543110 00
SO t30
7.10017
BOCC
Arid'
son-Conservatwr Densrr Reductior
10
8
Trop.ca 3a ?hnrd Addmon
1
1,00
50.00
546.186 84
50.00
7111/2017
JOCC
Gleasor
4on-Conservation Densx} Reductior
1
2
Tropcai 5a SeWnC Adartor
t
1.00
$0.00
$46.186 50
$000
7:2811017
MCLA
Csasar
Corser:awn
3N
kYrcr!edArr
1
0.39
52099100
$OOC
50.00
&1&2017
MCLA
Es" ofOwens'Roberts DR
Conser:aoon
1
SumrnedandEswesRe-suodiv,wnNo
1
I00
$20.98350
SOOC
5000
S11I 17
MCLA
Melehn
Conser.awn
metes and bourds Acreage
1
1.36
561.213.50
$000
so 0C
&242017
MCLA
CasseknanGaardo
Cot-,eratpn
9
16
Center;anc
t
1.00
$49.89910
$Coo
$000
S'2Sy2017
MCLA
ElecwSunsrineardCompan
LConser,anon
1
24
_argoCt'
t
035
526.01225
5000
$000
&252017
MCLA
Adkins
Corservawn
3
11
SdvetShore;Erates
1
011
$2112965
5000
$000
96'2017
KlL
Grath
Conservation
4
1
Cer+erIsland
1
1.00
562.87595
$000
2000
14272017
MCLA
LotS. Bock 8. Duck Kt LX
Conservation
8
5
Center Island
1
100
549.89910
$000
$0.00
10,27'2017
50T
Roval Group lnvesrmerts *.
FL Forever • Pamership
5
3
Gulfstream Shores
1
1.00
$28.21530
5677.50
528.9T 13
1027.2017
SOT
Rio; al Group Invesonerr, Inc,
rL Forever - Panrership
5
4
Gul0stream Shores
1
100
mclude4 above
$000
naiuded above
IW7.2017
SOT
Sion,
^L Fo e.er - Parmerst,;
103
Ocean Reef Shores
1
1.00
$19.275 00
5677 50
519.1ir"15
10272017
SOT
Stor:
FL Forever . P amershit
104
Ocean Reef Shorts
1
1.00
included above
$000
included above
10W2017
MCLA
FraEwm
Corser.awn
8
18
Crime, Island
1
1.0c
$49,89910
S00o
s00G
111262017
MCLA
Tsavdais Jack
Corser.atwn
13
2
C!mlrlstard
1
100
550.58813
5000
s000
t0*31:017
MCLA
Howard
Corseryarwn
4
15
Certertsiand
1
100
$4918835
5000
$000
10f31:2017
MCLA
Sarchez Rustar
Constmanon
7
2
Centerisiand
1
1.00
$5436440
$000
SO.00
10312017
MCLA
MamnBrother.. 'nc
Conser,atwn
8
6
Center Island
1
1.00
$49,89910
$00C
so 0C
14312017
MCLA
Bums
Conser.ancn
4
9
:denPmescow,
1
1.00
$26,02925
$000
so 0C
1MV2017
MCLA
Masoud
Corser:awr
3
6
CrterIslam
i
100
571.271.00
so 0C
so 0C
111312017
MCLA
WoIlram
Consen.aoon
3
Center island
1
1.00
$70.230.25
5000
SOX
11.30'2017
MCLA
Herr.
Conservawn
3'
Dwors Ann
1
1.00
S25.969 37
$000
so 0C
1VA''2017
MCLA
Kamber
Conser:awn
30
DocrorsAn�
1
100
525969.37
$000
$000
IZ1r2017
JOT
Saunders
FL Forever • Parinerhir
metes and bounds Acreage
1
444
596,275.00
52.537.50
$99.526.62
V`2017
SOT
Spriggs
FL Forever - Partnership
metes and bands Acreage
1
056
$112-5,DO
54.057.50
$15,165-47
Page 3 of 8
9jot =&d
'%7[{E?apre-m
00 t'S
00'9$$
ale 3sprl>J
3AOAC)Gu=
R
-
d gsAUJee• AAalo_ lj
06e 1-ESJ*M13C,alla jDDi3
10E
ROZ.IEZ19
wageDaP"
00 CS
0004
',XP'°PIPA
aen4e4U6
-
dgsAu:lae•HAilo_11
06eI-ES,mm4-,w9.U"'i'Dj3
102
fit UZ9
a"m Daprgy
Oats
OO'Og
aUga DaprlsJ
L
aAGAr a%
g
c
d ys.auue`, - jaAalD_ 1]
o& -ES;1
lord
"n'IOZ.&A
a4oge2ePrP4
00 CS
CO'Og
'••a*o*rpJ
L
aA -0#UIC
g
_t
dysia%wk- jimuo_ld
0eea.eS,W*.IW-9.4+4+9
109
MEMO
a+-Ne Daprpi!
00 ES
(k.3
a%age r-prlDU
L
sea£*Ulm
p
dys:ewec -ia -ia_ 1.1
JCQ
91OM9
&ugeaTr#r
006S
LIVA
aSlJ'"I"
+Jo
dysaue- ianam_1.
c6a-EsIla"'t�^8xapa'z)
106
SICE 7J9
aaDge?eprf"
00 CS
'Slog
om)gEDapnlai
L
aeA,naub
c
dysrawte-JatizD_1,
C6LJ-ESlld"! &L'1y'3
10E
9iCZE-13
Z-IA'9rJ7g
00 CS
OC'Og
f19Z
aAAf auk
i
d4�'A'ac•�D-1U
o6°�-E'rll "I�E,g�a�»i�
1
SIOZI1,19
SVM aapefae
Dots
CO'O$
a•.oge Depri"
L
M815 e3
g
Og
d4-W-YaAalo_ ly
aZ:ue, 1I0A43g9
109
91OUZM
05'9SlV
00'CS
00'Oi
L. 0
L
xa 4 !O:
y
0S
d4SAuurr-Ja.'eJo,13
:69MS 119" 49
109
WWI
0C' N
00 CS
±Aoge pap,"!
oa .
L
:1:10: sal l d uaar_
RZ
Z
JgFAAK.O�
P' I'd f ^a
tl171%
51UPEZ-8
OC'9S
DOTS
I'MIRS
00.
L
:nlo;.sa�dua y
Lc'
Z
Jcrevesuo
€J}IaP^d
YUk
3IOZAWv9
X In
00 CS
;"e PaP'IAW
M
L
a5alPN kGd 4ea00
9
1
J092AASUay
87ldad
'dl3h
REZIM
OC-DC
00 CS
.SRZEAS
'30
L
"11,NI-edLF-0
L
l
JoreAasuo-
aaDod
V1J11
PkEt"`r5
073E
MCI
awge PaPlloa!
OO ;
1113 ; euuep MD ; PaUk
LZ
(
JQGIfJi:u4
J3y11eTi,4{eLbrvnn:J
VI.-h
PUZ.V;
aC OS
00 ii
5L'Sl{'iS!
ON.
Ua.a3, ew,en ais* PWWLpd
OZ
L
JuxrJasua�
-;Um n�e�banaun5
vrk
91ti.M
O'.TO'r"S
0S4CiS
fXA
v_0
lJul :•"ICD�u'`'MrksIt
I
dgSAUur ej-ralDcld
- ',e ue�
10c
3lGU5Zi
Wffis
OSLSIS
D001
0J.
U} EUUeAS6Aa4SpL1n1N
a
L
d4SAUUe_•JOWUD_U
Spou.ad
10C
9tGZl5Z'`7
OrDS
00CS
aeagepapnpm
a13ga3apnlaJ
""_IEDaeil
91
Z
JcaeA.Suo^.
Iso3
Iil"k
91GZhl:i
000E
00CS
a."ePaPIPu!
a•3q=3apnpJ
weilewacil
LI
E
JcceAb:uo�
4z"0
Yl'Jw
RCU16
00'Oj
WE
aAwQepapnpu
a.3ge3apnlDJ
we_lewc-I
91
E
JUWA,41 1
019
dl_d%
GICNI-10
LTH
000
arooe pWpu,
a.sge NVr,,IDJ
:lie_ 10=4
st
E
J p"No;
ysa3
Y1DIt
RCZ V?
OOQS
Oafs
arocepaPspu
aaaq DEpnIDJ
*e_1e31oa.1
Tl
E
Julw,azuo
01a
Y13W
"rICUL.IP
WK
DOES
W Dqe papipul
a•.3q= 3aprlDJ
VP-- Ie3oel
£I
E
pls,% soo"
450-3
Ylow
utu,1I4
OUDS
DOES
;"epaP'p"
a•.DgeDaprlDJ
We-leo"Jl
Zl
E
jU-4LkaSU02
4Sa3
tl111k
6IOMV?
00•DS
DOE'S
+`Age pgmpu!
a•.Dge oepnlDJ
wee Ir-owl
it
E
JEMAASuo-
4sn9
b'1Jk
RCM-17
OC•a4
00CS
A"ePaP7put
a,ugaoaprlsJ
We:leoml
01
E
JCrEA*fuo:
ysna
Y1Dk
21CULIV
Ix' 36
00 ,)
aaoye PaPSpul
aaDge aap"I>j
leDldcil
6
E
JCCRAAEUo:
41e9
tlluk
SIOZAIII
OC OS
00 CIS
aooge papSpu!
OkwF DapnpJ
9
E
XAW.ASUD:
I.Sn3
I it f,
3V
9lOZE17
0r0S
oats
^_S'RM"3
)Co
weNleode�l
JCCe%i<_Uo;
"03
V11-U
91cU14
O":0S
gets
"dsm,;3
OD':
MENbayuao
9
IL
JcreAasuo^
9?3
YUK
RlCl.firi
Xx
oOGS
mo" P P"Pu!
X -
qV Alled
91
91
-&C�e.%Asuo:
)1- eJ.eila'i
tllDk
RICZICI:
0C-DS
00 CS
CS2fiG':TS
OD.
e0!:ti.i0Ie_
Ol
91
JEGewe!uc
vl-.k
RIC'btuC
OG'OS
001.1S
Si Ll1'94S
OD .
: ON Mc Samd 9wais,4M
9Z
xJr�Azuo�
_Ul SaSWiar_ ctue3
4131%
T..'X
CZ Lt4 9SS
LC S
09 .
µ1E'N ffiI�
£C
uowr,D3� 7Kua1] uJI@Va5 A3•UG%
Al._ 1. Ifw-Iap;uu�
339e
t•��RtG�i
� M < 9ULl
ue N
60 LIc G
arog
aD .
FURF UDl.r.uaL-
r
uDg9nTa, 1<�a,] D.J,p"ac c' -UD`
- i
3300
uml± tl
OC-OS
aeagep wji
W-af
05'.
Pue{s uorrAIL-
it
MOMMa.'1lcuar]uoaevas.CS-uo�,
J4011
M09
'1C21±Z1Z1
0u 0S
OS M is Is
GO.03
00 .
µleg UD�e:nel_
G t
i
wpnpe_ 'i-ual] uJorJas,.L`,-uo�
IeFal
a A9
_tIS L'2l
OC'OL
S�11T9f5
I1f0g
43 •
WEI=lielua�
yE
i
uoADnaa� `ysua�luopevas_ca-uo`
s"eIN."ZOD
LIWLZ,Zt
OC'as
SL ZZE GE J
3c,al
OJ :
PUelsl iaua�
T£
E
uo wmme LsuOG uuoewSA.).) Uo\
b "N
XOG
iLM.�l
CURS
SZ t£C ZES
06M
OD".
WEI`I Ialua j
9E
E
uogDnoat alEuaQ 00geva56c3•U0,
1°'"^'Y
370E
UEZILMI
00"53
00 CS
arage PaPpu!
*-.up .1*013 J
aDfwt soJ Cc put Ma .0
44SAWIc-HAaID_ I=
log
i10V ZI
aC:OS
00'CS
aecale PaPipu!
a•.3ge oapnloU
are,D; :7.rc:
Put Sa1a.0
d4SAWle--JOMUO, 1-
Mo8
109
±IMMI
�Sa�se3C
iw-s97L'E
�a:'VT
Pa.za s�91
slaaed
Uu�.{D
a
.ce{_
a ,l,u
MiesJa
re
stet
9Ul£,Zo{ g„l,i- Jogonpoa fllsuap uogeuasuo�-ior4 p,� uol�trJasuo� inl :uogx�s�Jl Po�IJ
coyoa{oud le3JauuoJlAu3 t0 416m ache epuou Pin -jCB `luno3 Gaudy ,iwog{nV pJe- /1uoo3 acuuoyt dq wJn{Ipuadl3 uc4!vrb3V pueg
Land Acquisition Expenditures by Monroe Count; Land Authorit, Monroe County BOCC and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Closed Transactions for Conservation and Nor -Conservation Density Reduction - 711116 to 12/31118
Date Bww
Seger
Proper T.pe
9x�
.Or
ubansien
Parccs
TL"P;Penred
4tCLA'sCost BOCC'sCost
DEPsCosr'
629.201E
SOT
Crxiez5aClwel.Sarnago
FL Forever - Pannership
5
10
IneGrovf
1
rck,deoabave
SC30
$000
includedAm
629,2013
SOT
CrockeroBsc/well `antiago
FL Forever - Pa"rr.io
5
t t
Pne 3rove
1
r,.U-d stove
$000
WOO
mduded above
629r2018
SOT
Croi:W.I&aclwel.5aruagc
FL Forever . Panrershw
5
12
Dine Grove
1
rduded above
SC.00
50.00
included above
6242013
SOT
Crodem$acl well Santiago
cL Forever - Parmershp
5
13
Pm Grove
1
ndudee above
S0.00
;0 00
nckrded above
629i2013
SOT
Crocwev&ad well.Santrago
=L Forever, - Pwinershp
5
14
Poe Grove
1
included above
$000
SG 00
ndluded above
6292018
SOT
Crocus, **eLSarwago
=LForever- Pavws*
5
to
P"GM*
1
ndvdedabove
S0.00
SOOC
trckdedabove
6.292018
SOT
Crode-t'BlaclwellSarnago
`Forever - Pam ship
5
1'
PrxG^:a
1
nckdeoat-,e
SO.00
-'G.00
ndndedabove
6+292013
SOT
CweroBlaci well Santiago
=L Forever - Parmersbp
5
1B
Pure = :
1
nldrrdec above
$0 00
SO 00
educed above
62912018
SOT
Crocken'Btad well Swugo
-L Fore.et - Panrershp
5
19
Pine ; : =
1
rek+dec above
$0.00
$000
nduded above
61292018
SOT
Croedetvb*a wel'Sa,,W
cL Forever - Pamorshp
5
20
Pine ?•: -
1
ndudeo above
SC.00
$000
included above
6291013
SOT
Cro0e%5W&*ASarrrago
°L Forever - Partner -.hp
5
Prix 5-7 =
1
nokrded above
SO.00
$000
nduded above
629'2018
SOT
CrooietCBiat•IweN'Santogo
`LFwever-Partre,*,p
5
22
"Sro.
1
ttdudeaabove
SC.06
$000
ndueedabove
629'2018
SOT
Crodembiackwek'Sarrrago
cL Forager - PartrersFio
5
23
or* Grove
1
iaokrdld above
$0.00
$0.0C
rnduded above
6+232018
BOT
CroaenBlaclwel.'Santiago
:LFxever- Pamviirsoip
6
1
or*3mve
1
included above
$000
$0.00
molwed above
629'2018
SOT
CrodemB4awell,Santiago
cl. Forever - Panmrsnip
6
2
Pne Grove
1
ndudec above
S000
WOO
moitroed above
6242018
SOT
CnxvveaBlad wellSa aogo
FL Forever - Pam+ershp
6
3
Arne Grove
1
included above
SO.00
$0.00
ncirded above
6232018
SOT
CroovvBbc►weq'Sartrago
FL Fo*ever - PartnerslV
r
4
Pine Grove
1
#chided above
SC.00
$000
included above
6291018
SOT
Crockem%ci well Saraago
FL Forever - Parrer0w,
6
S
Prue G•mve
1
nrrkdec abo.e
$0.00
$000
nciuded above
6292018
BOT
Crvciem8iadwe4,31t ago
FL Forever - Pawn 4p
6
e
Pare Grove
1
ndudod above
SO.00
SO OO
nckrded above
629,2018
SOT
CrockemBiaawel Saruago
FL Forcer - Parnershp
6
7
Pine 3rove
1
tntiudad above
$000
$000
nduoed above
6292018
SOT
CroctenB4&*0 Santiago
FL Forcw - Parnershp
6
8
Om vrove
1
nekded above
$000
SO 00
nduoed above
629'2c 13
SOT
Croc►rvBtarlwerl Santiago
FL Fore.er - Par-emhp
6
G
Pine Grove
1
woUto above
S000
$000
included above
6'292018
30T
Cm0en'Btadwell`_antogo
FL Fore.er - Parershp
6
10
Piro Grove
1
rduded above
Woo
$000
rndrded above
629r2018
SOT
CroriemBladweil Sareago
FL Fore.r - Par-ershp
6
11
Prx Grove
1
rckded above
SO.00
$000
nduded above
629(2018
SOT
Crone-t8arAwel Santiago
`L forever - Parmershp
6
12
Pr* Grove
1
Hudeo ato'e
SC.00
SO.00
mckded above
6:32018
BOT
Cmovi%ciwekSarnago
-LForever- Patwshp
6
15
PneGmve
1
r*,detabove
S000
$0OG
mdtudedabove
6292013
SOT
Croceem-1146 wel;Sartiago
=L Forever - Parrer Nr
6
to
Pate Gros
1
rduded above
Woo
$0 OC
n eWed above
611,2018
SOT
Cro6vpn)blw well.Sarnaga
"L Forever - Panner.4
6
17
Poe Grove
1
Hudeo above
$000
$0.00
:nckx*d above
6292013
SOT
CrrrcketBlac. well Santiago
cL Foie.er - Parowrshp
6
18
Pr* Grow
1
rok.ded above
$0,00
$O.00
mck ded above
629'2018
SOT
Crod@-VB1acr wellSartrago
FL Forever - Partnership
6
19
Ppra Grove
1
rduded above
$000
$0,00
nduded above
6492018
SOT
CroderoBrao we4Sannago
=L Forever - Parmershp
6
2t
Pme Grove
1
rcludec above
$L100
$000
nckx*d above
629'2018
SOT
CroclemBiao well Santago
zL Fore.er - Partnenkp
6
22
Pine Grove
1
rAded above
$0.00
SO OC
included above
6292018
SOT
Croden'B+aciwe4'Sarrrago
FL Fore.er - Panrershp
6
23
Pine Grove
1
sdr.ded aba.e
Woo
$0 OC
nduded above
&29'2013
SOT
CroewtBuc: wro't'Sanrygo
FL Forcer - Parmorshp
6
:4
Pine Grove
1
r Oudeo above
SO o0
$0 OC
ncl ded above
6292018
SOT
CrodettBtaow@4 Santiago
FL Fore.er • Pw rwshp
8
e
Sea View
1
included above
$01)
$000
rnckaad above
62A2018
BOT
Crode vBaclwell Santiago
=L Fore.er - Partnership
9
1
Sea'oft
1
nck ded above
S000
$0.00
rAided above
6292018
30T
Crxkru8lac� well, 5arrraga
FL Forever - Parmershp
9
. -e.%
1
rdudeoabove
$000
$000
nduaedabove
6292018
SOT
Croot vbiad wel.S•artiago
"L Forever - Pamwshrp
10
1
Sea'.rew
1
ncludec above
$000
$0.00
nekded above
6,291018
SOT
CroewB46 met Sannago
FL Forever - Panrershp
10
Sea Vie*
1
ndtidecabove
SO.00
S000
ndudedabove
6.29r2018
SOT
Croo @04cv wel-Sarttago
FL Forever - Pa?-ershp
11
o
Sea View
1
included above
$0.00
$000
nduded above
6,32018
SOT
Cro6eniBlaa well Santiago
FL Forever - Parmersbp
14
3
Sea Vrew
1
ndudec above
$0,00
$0 00
taduded above
629.4018
SOT
CroclettBlad owl Santiago
'�L Forever - Parmershtp
14
♦
Sea View
1
ndtidec above
$0 00
$000
rrduded above
6N2018
SOT
CrocsenBlao iv@A 5artiago
pL Fore.er - Parmershp
14
5
Sea View
1
ncluded above
SO 00
$000
m kuded above
Page 5 of 8
Land Acquisition Expenditure: b; Monroe County Land Authority. Monroe County BOCC and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Closed Transactions for Conservation and Non -Conservation Density Reduction - 711116 to 1231,118
Date
Bg or
Seller
Proper T,pe
BW
_o+
Subotvrton
Parcels
TORzReared
WLA'sCos-
BOCC'sCost
DEP'sCos!'
6297018
SOT
CrwitetBaci woh5arnago
FL Forever • Pa"tst rp
14
0
Sea View
1
rck deo above
$O 00
SG OC
nduced above
6292019
DOT
Cm6et546 wet:Santiago
FL Forever - Parmerhrp
14
7
Sea View
1
rck:ded above
SC Oc
SC 0G
mctuded above
6'292418
SOT
CrocketBiad,wetSarvrago
dl Forever - Parawrsrw
14
8
Sea Vicar
1
rdudeo above
Zoo
SC OC
mckided above
6 �'i92018
SOT
Croc. et DtacFweBSannago
=L Forever • Parmers,,ir
7
1
Slas h nw-S
1
r-Ued above
$000
SOX
nchK*d above
6'.92018
SOT
CrocketSlad w•*15aruago
FL Forever - Parmershr
7
2
Sias I, nowes
1
rckAed above
SO 00
SO OG
ndwed above
6292015
SOT
CrociemBtao ve15arnago
°L Forever - ParrrershK
7
3
Seas Krowes
1
rckidea above
$C OG
$G OC
mduded above
6.292018
SOT
CrodenBiaci «el Sarnago
Fl Forever - Parnershir
7
4
Sias k "-?s
1
-r;U#c above
$O 00
$000
rKWed above
6292013
90T
Crociert Bari weit'Sartiago
FL Forever - Parmershop
7
5
Sass h.rowes
1
rAded above
SO OC
SO DO
ncwk above
6292018
SOT
Crodertkoweil Sar•nago
FL Forever - Parml,4T
7
6
Sias hnowbes
1
rcluded above
$0,00
$O OG
mduded above
6292015
BOT
CrocitryBtadwo Sarnago
FL Forever . Par�trh,r
7
$Sias 0 noes
1
rdudea above
SO OO
SO 00
rrehided above
6242018
SOT
CradienBadweil,Sanaago
FL Forever - Parnershtr
7
a
Sias K.nolw:s
1
rduded above
SO 00
SO 00
mduded above
6.292018
SOT
CrockettNowed Saraago
FL Faever - Par^erahtr
7
9
Sias h.naw*s
1
rduded above
SG 00
SO OC
ncluded above
6292015
30T
Crode+t8ad wet'Sx r ago
PL Forever - Panrers iv
7
18
Sias imowes
1
rdWed above
SG Oc
$0.00
nowed above
6292013
DOT
Croriet:Bactwe8'Swruaga
FLForevet-Parmershie
7
19
SiasKrdwes
1
rdudecabove
$000
S000
included above
632018
SOT
CrocketBlacr«etSantygo
FL Forever - Part^ersrir
7
20
Siashrowes
1
rc6dedabow
to Oc
:0 00
induced above
629'2018
90T
Cto6etB4ci we45irriago
FL Forever • Pa mersr,r
72
Sias h naa'es
1
rck.d*d above
SO OG
SO 00
mckded above
6492015
SOT
Crod.etBau wetSaniago
FL Forever - Pa"tsirK
7
22
Sias hrawes
1
rduded above
$000
50 OC
mi kKW above
Q92018
SOT
Crotke-tBtaciwet'Sartrago
FL Forever - Parrershir
7
23
Six►"owes
1
re edabove
SLOG
$000
mckided above
6292015
DOT
t"rodertBaa «edSar rage
Fl Forever - Pa ft-4ir
-
24
Sias hrnwes
1
r*dea above
SO 00
$O 00
included above
629:015
SOT
C od et Biad wel'Sar•twge
FL Forever - Pan ershQ
?
4
Sias Rnowes
1
wAdee above
SO.00
$000
mdkided above
6r292016
SOT
CrockenBad wet �wtiago
FL Forever Par.emhu
8
5
Suits knows
1
rcludec above
SO OO
SO 00
mduded above
6292013
SOT
Crxlert$ac+«eN Swr wgo
Fl Forever - ra ntrh;
8
0
Sdas kn wies
1
rduded above
$O 00
$000
uickrded above
632018
SOT
CrowertBtac+weil Soup
pl Forever - ParrwOv
8
7
Sias Ktgwies
1
rcided above
10.00
SO 00
mduoed above
6292013
807
Croc*#r B46*011 Sarnago
FL Forever - Parrerhtr
5
8
Sias hnowies
1
rdudec above
SO OG
$000
mduded abo:e
WNW
SOT
Crocketbiac1 wettSamW
FL Forever . Parmersnrr
8
9
Sias Knowles
1
rckAac above
$O 00
$O 00
mduded above
6292018
407
CrodetBlad *ASvnaga
Fl Forever - Parre,05
8
10
Sias l•.rowes
1
r abdec above
SG 00
SC OC
riduded above
"I IV
SOT
CrocirertBtaci wet'Sarnago
FL Forever - ParnwOir
8
1 t
Sias I, M wes
1
rdudea above
ZOO
SO OC
mduded above
6292018
SOT
Crockea' Bad wet Sarnago
FL Forever • ParmershR
8
12
Sias h nowes
1
r&ded above
SO OC
$O 00
MCkided above
6,2912016
DOT
Crock enBiadwelkSarnago
al Forever - Panr*4c
8
13
Sias Krowes
1
rAded above
S000
SG OG
exduded above
6292013
SOT
Crockett Baci wellSarGago
FL Forever - Par ershir
8
14
50as hnowws
1
r—A ded above
$000
S0 00
ndi"d above
629.2013
SOT
C roo en NO welliartiago
FL Forever - Pamerhir
8
15
Sdaonatries
1
wcUeo above
$00C
$300
ndWedabove
6292013
SOT
CrockettBadwet'Srriigo
oLForever-Parmersh4
8
10
Siashrowes
1
r*deeabove
$000
S000
mduded above
6292018
SOT
CrocsenBadweltSarrtiaguv
°l Forever - Parmershw
8
1'
Sias h.noeies
1
rciudeo above
$000
SO 00
included above
6292018
30T
CrodenBadwet'Swr cap
FL Forever- Pamwshtl;
31
palm Via
1
rdkided above
SG 00
SO 00
ndtided above
6.2s2018
SOT
Croc►enHari wet Saroago
FL Forever - Parnersbrp
31
2
Palm V•dta
1
O cu" above
SG 00
$O OC
mduded above
6292018
SOT
Crodet&ackwet Santiago
"l Forever - PamwsNp
31
3
Pain Vila
1
rdudeo above
woo
SC OG
riduded above
6292013
SOT
Crodet'Backwet Samiago
FL Forever - Parmershc
31
4
Pakeviea
1
rckvdedabore
S000
SOOC
mehicidabo•e
61292018
SOT
CrodetBaci wet,Sarrtago
Fl Forever - ParmenrV
31
5
Palm Vila
1
rcludec above
1000
SO OC
ndtaed above
6292018
SOT
Crod omBad wa05artrage
FL Forever, ParmersMv
31
5
Palm Vila
1
rc4udk above
$O 00
S0 00
mduded above
6N2018
DOT
CrockemBadwetlt`_amiago
FL Forever, Pamwsh;
31
Pant Vila
1
rduded above
SO 00
SO 00
mduded above
6292013
SOT
Croo wtBad wetSwtiago
IL Forever - Panrcrshir,
31
8
Palm Mira
1
rdtrdea above
$O 00
$O 00
mduded above
6292013
SOT
CrockembWwet'Sarttago
FL Forwer- Pa"tsf,ip
31
9
Patin Vila
1
rdudrd above
$000
SO OC
mduded above
6,29,2018
SOT
Crocklin Bad wet-Sarrwgo
FL Forever - Pamttst r
31
10
Palm ";03
1
rduded above
Woo
$0 OC
mdwed above
Page 6 of 8
Land Acquisition Expenditures by Monroe County Land Authority Monroe County BOCC and Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
Closed Transactions for Conservation and Non -Conservation Density Reduction - 71i% to 12/31118
[late
Buer
Ole[
Proper T•pe
Biocl
_01
Subdw6wn
Parcel
TD?s',etred
YCLAsCo^s-
BOCC;Cow
DEPsCos`
6292018
BOT
CrocketiBlactwell,Sa^sago
CLForeeer- Pavrrersnw
31
1
2aan!irI
1
rck,decabowe
$000
$0.00
ncWedabo:e
6.292018
SOT
Cro0et'9taciwellSs-sago
'LForever- Partnership
31
1_
Calm; ,
1
rcLdec above
S0.00
$0.00
mekwedabove
6;29.2018
BOT
CrockenSaciwel Santiago
^L Fore;er - Partnershq
31
13
Capri :
1
rcUec above
$0.00
$0.00
mduoed above
6,29r2018
SOT
Crtl0,ea'Bla6A*4S3rnago
FL Forever - Partnershq
31
14
pain':! >
1
rch,deeabove
$000
SO.00
mcivaedabove
6i52018
ROT
Croclet'Blacd we4'sa-tiage
"L Forever - Partrerorrp
31
1,
Calm r _•
1
r k ded above
SOOC
50.00
rtckded above
6242018
SOT
Cmae, 54c, l:anoago
FL Forever • Pamershp
31
16
Calm
1
rc udec above
SOOC
$0.00
mduded above
2018
SOT
CrodkexBlack wel sa^nago
'L Forever - Partnership
31
1'
pain .
1
rdudec above
SO OC
$0.00
included above
&2&'2018
SOT
CrodimBxrwet `arnago
=LForever-Pam rlir
31
t8
Pain'.
1
rdudecabove
S00C
S0.00
mcludedabo,e
6232018
SOT
CrockettBladwet Santiago
cLForever- Partnership
31
19
pain'-
1
rdudedabove
S0.00
$000
mctudedabove
6292018
SOT
CrxketvBlao stel Santiago
L Forever • Parcenhrp
31
20
"Sim d ;
1
rck,dec above
$0.00
$000
mduoed above
6292018
90T
Crockett'Btadwelltutiago
^^"L Faevet • Paraxrshrc.
31
2!
Palm Vila
1
rch dire above
$0.00
$000
mrkrled above
629i2018
SOT
Crockem'filadweltramwgo
-L Forever - Pare+ershir
31
22
Cahn Vila
1
r-Adec above
$000
$000
mducied above
6292018
SOT
CrocketiBlaclwel'Sartnago
zL Forever - Pamershio
31
23
Calm vita
1
rck.ded above
$0.00
$0,00
mcluded above
&•292018
BOT
Crode-tswi,vel'sanuago
'LForever- Partrerhip
31
24
PalmV43
1
rck,dedabove
$000
$000
mcludedabo.e
11r2018
BOCC
141 PPH �r . *s LLC
Nor-Conser+atan Deism Feducrror
6
3
C~ Island
1
10
so 0C
S86.357.25
$3 OC
762018
MCLA
Matthtw. Joseph & Lrsa
Conservation
23
4
Eden Pmes Color, Th-ro Addawr
1
10
S31.04100
$0.00
$000
7,11-2018
MCLA
Stephenson Ka%-
Conservation
11
17
Edo PmesColon,
1
10
S20.98350
SUG
5000
7f1&2018
SOT
Jenkms Cian
zL Forever - PanwshK
8
2
Ramrod Shoes Mama Ser or
1
10
$0.00
MID
S38 474 75
7,19,2018
SOT
Jenkins Clan
�L Forever - Pamer0w
3
3
Ramrod Stores Mama Sedan
1
10
$o OC
$000
mduded above
7r252018
MCLA
Kuhlman
Conservation
1'•
5
Eden Pores Color.
1
10
$2093350
$900
$000
&142018
SOT
c4nc,
`L Forever - Partrershts
t t
Par of 37
North Sugarloaf Acres Sec Two
1
30
woo
S3 OC
S296 5C
&27 2018
SOT
Dove-
=L Fore.et - ParnershK.
1
7
Torchwooe West Une One
1
10
SO OC
SO 00
S72.599 51
&272018
90T
Doug-
FL Forever - Parrv*ir
7A
Te chwooc West Une Two
30
$0.00
SOW
nduded above
&r27:2018
SOT
Doug•
`L Forever • Partnerhrp
1
3
Torchwood West Jna Ore
1
10
SO OC
$0.00
mcluded above
&27.2018
BOT
Down
=l Forever • Parrrershw
8A
Torchwood West Jnn Two
00
S0.00
$0.00
mduded above
&31.2018
MCLA
Marv*
Corservatwn
9
9
Center Island
1
10
522.283 50
$D.00
S0 00
9%2018
MCLA
Wadnp
Conservation
5
11
Come, Island
1
10
57115462
$000
$000
in-2018
MCLA
EDS Peak LLC
Corserv~
4
19
CenterIVX4
1
10
S71.27100
$000
S300
1062018
MCLA
M&rmwtor
Conservatwn
5
12
DoaorsArm FirstAddioor
1
10
$3104950
$0.00
$000
10'192018
MCLA
**s deal Elect% nc
Conser.arwn
12
Center Wv%d
1
10
$61.213 50
$0.00
S3 00
101&2018
MCLA
Uois deal Electric tic
Conservation
s
16
CenterWV4
1
10
S6121350
$000
$300
10252018
SOT
Thompson _ra
rLForever- Parmershp
V
SummenandKr•
1
03
SOX
SOOC
S1043604
432018
SOT
HaggufO0n'McDougk
FL Forever - Parcurship
Tees
& bounds (nordt-1I
Kr; Largo
1
11
$0.00
$000
$501.32325
11%'2018
SOT
r'aggat%em McDougle
cl. Forow - Partnership
re•es
& bounds lnoc+-2)
Kr, Largo
rnduded above
$000
SO OC
mcwded above
1162018
BOCC
V r,*k
Non C onservatwn Deism Pedomor
a
Z
Tropical 3a; Thad Addam
1
1 G
SO OG
S46 03618
3O C0
11.21,2018
SOT
Mam.nez Damon & Los
rl Forever - P3,inerOtd
10
PT
1
1 C
$000
S000
S33104 33
11r312018
SOT
Calzacdta
PLForever- Pamir,hiv
metes andbourds
acreage
1
3:
$000
$000
$105.13441
1128'2018
SOT
Calzad4la
'L Forever - Paro+ershr
metes and bourds
acreage
1
trAded above
$000
S0.00
mduded above
112&2018
SOT
CalzadAa
'L Forever - PannershrC
metes and bourds
acreage
1
included above
S0.00
ZOO
mduded above
11132018
SOT
Wood
=L Forever - Panrenht;
metes and W,rds
aaeage
1
136
$0.00
$0.00
S524,010.91
1I,=18
MCLA
Marksr3oss
Conservabon
3
14
E PresI- olor,`vstAddmor
1
10
$42112,75
S0.01)
SO00
113012p18
MCLA
Sh*lds
Corsenvatwn
7
6
CaNO P,nes and Palms
1
1 C
$56134 75
$0.00
$000
11%1 2013
MCLA
Shwds
Corservatwn
Cahr4Pmesand -alms
1
10
S56.18475
$000
S000
Doge' of 8
BY"4� :41N!
1...018
K A
Svcm-m
1"1112J13
3DOC
G%en
1213'M1
MCLA
4a1
IZ13113
34-
iarin
1112313
KU
ULVsq:r
11-1327t3
51+�_c
=cu3an32,
1r23x 3
S?_C
_mrm
Land AcquisiLen Expenditure: oy Monroe Court, Land Autnen,y, Monrce Courts, BOCC. and Florida De:atnent J cn�;rronrnental Prolector
Cloud Transactions icr .r_•nseroation and %on-Conser,aten Dens tv Recvdian - vim to i 3ir �
3ry w-%-Ism
Block _c,
Iari3rx
Yarce: 1'sP41-0
'r!'V5C S
KX5Cry.
DCE:sCow
�rsrva6on
'9
cAipi-esand Pair;
1 to
t561S4i5
rA.00
50.Q;
4r-C^f,!;em6mNLesshae2ee
'6
Sirse*Pcir.
1 1Q
to90
Sw.i13.50
S000
Cxserraeon
a 7
Ecen Fines Cclar
1 IQ
131341 CO
SC.00
S0 00
-LFxarer--a,-versrw
i-Z:zpan cfYl'i
CWd eim.
1 113
tool)
M.00
M.619,63
%—Cmsermar Die-sk • Pcd:cnar
0 5
Platman SW
1 1 G
tool)
S96AK-5
S0.00
`1•r+crosanatix 3; -ass TI•an =ee
35
Dochrs Arm
WOO
545,005.50
SO Od
Ys�Cxseroahx 3= -ess Ths* z*e
12
Soddleka %ores
1 li
U-00
S',)1229.50
So or
Taal m
Ths DE-1 toss shy arm sr b ez rc cenh roxan la• JEP Jw tifg r.< xsu it a 1, m asr < ay r e 3�� C i at pail uure�+eh+ ba rerkws A E^ D'_P am Gric :s DER pass
p3r8ofQ
_1254 S5.5frl.T:b.3? 51.35U.5J1.•ti t2.055,£r45.3/
MONROE COUNTY
THE FLORIDA KEYS AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN
BUILD -OUT CHALLENGES FACING THE FLORIDA KEYS
Tie PotentaalPrice qI Preserving Paradise..
nOrw
1 � F
The Florida Keys are designated as an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) by the State Legislature. A Rate
of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) was implemented in order to provide for the safety of residents in the event of a
hurricane evacuation and to protect the significant natural resources of Monroe County (MC), as required by the
State of Florida. ROGO established a competitive permit allocation system whereby those applications with the
highest scores are awarded building permits. The State of Florida allows issuance of 197 building permits per
year for new residential development (Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C.), within unincorporated MC.
In 2012, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) completed the
hurricane evacuation clearance time modeling task and found that with 10 years' worth of building permits, the
Florida Keys would be at a 24 hour evacuation clearance. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) [see
Exhibit I] was entered into by and between DEO, the Florida Division of Emergency Management, MC and the
municipalities to stipulate the input variables and assumptions for the hurricane model. Based upon the MOU
and the resulting 24 hour evacuation clearance, DEO determined the remaining allocations for the Florida Keys
(3,550 additional permits countywide).
In March 2013, the Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the State Administration Commission, approved the
recommendation to allocate 10 years' worth of growth (197 x 10 = 1,970 permits) to MC while maintaining an
evacuation clearance time of 24 hours, through the year 2023. Table 1 demonstrates the challenges
unincorporated MC may face, as there are 8,168 privately owned vacant parcels (minimum value of
$248,314,487). With just 197 permits per year, it would take over 41 years' worth of annual allocations (at the
current rate of 197) to absorb these parcels. This may result in a balance of 6,198 privately held vacant parcels
at risk of not obtaining permits in the future (minimum value of $188,424,716). This deficit of building permit
allocations could trigger takings suits against both the State and MC, if no additional permits are allowed
beyond the year 2023.
Table 1: Analysis of Vacant Parcels in Unincorporated Monroe County, Florida
TIER
NUMBER OF
VACANT PARCELS
YEARS TO
ALLOCATE
PERMITS
THEORETICAL
MAXIMUM
DENSITY**
No Tier (ORCA, etc.)
235
766
Tier I
3,979
4,806
Tier II
393
590
Tier III -A
260
553
Tier III
3,301
5,048
TOTAL
8,168*
41.5
11,763
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS
1,970
POTENTIAL LIABILITY
6,198*
*Assumes one (1) unit per parcel and does not take into account additional density potential.
** Theoretical density analysis is based on acreage multiplied by the maximum allocated residential density
for each FLUM category. This data is provided for illustrative purposes only; conditions specific to the
individual parcel, including physical size, environmental sensitivity, zoning and tier designation and other
regulatory constraints, such as ROGO are the final determinant of development potential.
I I P a g e
BOCC July 18. 2013
In recognition of the possibility that the inventory of vacant parcels exceeds the permits MC can award, the
BOCC has already adopted some strategies to help transition land into public ownership to reduce the potential
takings claims, and address the future build out of the Florida Keys by incentivizing development that eliminates
privately owned vacant parcels. These strategies include:
ADOPTED COUNTY STRATEGIES
• Incentivize Dedication of Land — the BOCC adopted an amendment to encourage additional land
dedication by providing additional points in ROGOINROGO.
• Discouragement Policy— the BOCC adopted an amendment to discourage private applications for FLUM
amendments that increase density and intensity, as required by Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., unless mitigated
by providing land (acreage or Improved Subdivision [IS] parcels) to MC.
• Created Commercial FLUM category (no residential component) - the BOCC adopted an amendment to
provide options to re -designate property for other nonresidential uses (Provides alternative uses of
property).
• Revised NROGO to make the process simpler and encourage nonresidential redevelopment and
development.
While these adopted strategies, if utilized, help off -set the costs for direct acquisition of land, the projected costs
outlined in Table 2 (below) suggest that these efforts will not serve to completely close the gap between the
number of vacant parcels that may seek a permit and the number of permits the County is currently authorized
by the State to issue, based on ROGO.
Current Land Acquisition Stratea-v
At present, there are two recurring dedicated funding sources for purchasing land within the County. The first is
through half of a 1 cent Tourist Impact tax (pursuant to § 125.0108, F.S.), which provides an annual revenue for
the Florida Keys ACSC of approximately $1.2 million. This tax also generates approximately $1.6 million
annually for the Key West ACSC. The second recurring revenue is provided through a State Park surcharge that
generates approximately $400,000 annually. For the total revenue (on average $1.6 million) in the Florida Keys
ACSC, the Land Authority has historically allocated 60% (approximately $900,000) to the acquisition of
conservation land, with the remainder going towards purchase of parcels for affordable housing, or occasionally
for active recreation areas. These funding sources alone will not be sufficient to meet the land acquisition needs
of MC in the future.
As demonstrated in Table 2, at current funding levels and with the State discontinuing its aggressive land
acquisition in the Florida Keys, adding 3,550 allocations for dwelling units through the year 2023, it would take
approximately 272 years to generate the funds equal to the tax assessed value and offer to purchase the
remaining inventory of private, vacant parcels in the Florida Keys (unincorporated and incorporated).
Note: The analysis in this paper is limited to tax assessed value of parcels and does not consider: the future
willingness of owners to sell; if the value assumed will be equal to the acquisition price; sufficiency of funds; if
the parcels have a marketable title; the suitability of public ownership of certain parcels; the feasibility and
costs of managing parcels; etc.
2 1 P a g e 13000 J U I N 18. 'u I
Table 2: Inventory of Vacant Parcels in Florida Keys and Approximate Land Value
ESTIMATED
YEARS TO
APPROXIMATE
FUNDING
GENERATE
NO.
AVERAGE
LAND VALUE
Based on Historic
THE FUNDS
AREA
VACANT
PARCEL
(December 2012
Rates For
EQUAL TO
PARCELS
VALUE***
MC Property
Acquisition of
THE TAX
Appraiser data)
Conservation
ASSESSED
Lands
VALUE
Key West ACSC*
104
$355,045
$ 36,924,754
S 270.000
137
Unincorporated MC
8,168
$ 30,400
$ 248,314,487
$ 900,000
276 '�
Marathon
1,680
$ 49,845
$ 83,740,226
93
Layton
34
$ 51,080
$ 1,736,724
2
Key Colony Beach
109
$129,746
$ 14,142,347
16
Islamorada
1,269
$ 60,877
$ 77,253,680
86 +
TOTAL PARCELS
W11,364
$40,664
:' $ 462,112,218
TOTAL
3,550
3,550 County �\ide including cities. \Lith 1,970 units for unincorporated MC
ALLOCATIONS
PARCELS TO
PURCHASE
7,814
$40,664**x
$ 317,748,496
$ 1,170,000
272**
(COUNTYWIDE)**
* The Monroe County Land Authorit), has historically allocated approximately, 18% (S270,000/),1) Ql'the Key West
ACSC portion of tourist impact tax revenue to the purchase of conservation and recreation lands. The remainder
of Key West ACSC tourist impact tax revenue has been allocated for the purchase of affordable housing sites.
** The total vacant parcels (11,364) less the 3,550 allocations available results in 7,814 parcels to purchase. At an
average cost of S40, 664 it will take MC 272 years to acquire these parcels utilizing S1.17M (900, 000+270, 000).
** * This analysis assumes no growth in property value over time. Note property values could change exponentially.
0 Land values for each jurisdiction are divided by the $900, 000 estimated funding figure.
The County staff recognizes the need for ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES aimed at reducing the total inventory of
privately owned vacant land. To that end, MC staff is currently evaluating the potential for future policy and
program strategies that could apply within the unincorporated and incorporated areas of the Florida Keys,
including:
ADDITIONAL STATE & FEDERAL LAND ACOUISITION STRATEGIES
1. Request the State of Florida Division of State Lands to continue to aggressively acquire vacant,
privately owned land as a State partner in the ACSC program. The County should encourage the state
government to target the acquisition of Tier I land within their acquisition boundaries.
- 7,589 Tier I parcels within the State's Florida Forever Boundary are owned by public and nonprofit
agencies. 3,351 Tier I parcels within the State's Florida Forever Boundary remain privately owned and
vacant. The 3,351 Tier I privately owned vacant parcels have an approximate value of $14,731,730.
2. Request the Federal Government to continue to aggressively acquire vacant, privately owned land. The
County should encourage the federal government to target the acquisition of lands containing suitable
habitat for and known populations of federally -designated wildlife species (Endangered Species Act).
- 12,147 parcels within the Federal Species Focus Area and Buffer Areas are owned by public and
nonprofit agencies. 7,193 parcels within remain privately owned and vacant. The 7,193 privately
owned vacant parcels have an approximate value of $240,088,014.
3 1 P a g e
BOCC July 18. '01',
Table 3: Past State of Florida Division of State Lands Acquisition Strategy in Monroe County
State of Florida
Total
Total
Land Acquisition Programs
YearsNu
of
Acres
Total Cost
sacr
Transactions
Land Acquisition Trust Fund
1966 - 1979
100
1623.42
$ 12,097,641
Conservation & Recreation Land (CARL)
1982 - 1993
143
3028.64
$ 74,669,999
Trust Fund
Save Our Coast Trust Fund
1983 - 1993
4
39.03
$ 2,400,000
Preservation 2000 (P-2000) Trust Fund
1993 - 2002
798
3689.1
$ 73,687,905
Florida Forever Trust Fund
2002 - 2009
808
1192.45
$ 77.502,431
1853
9572.64
$ 240,357,976
Since 2009, funding has not been available for the Division of State Lands to continue its partnership with Monroe
County and purchase additional conservation lands (see Exhibit 2 - maps of the current Monroe County lands owned
by public and nonprofit agencies).
ADDITIONAL COUNTY POLICY STRATEGIES
3. Reduce the current yearly allocation rate of 197 units per year with a MC Comprehensive Plan amendment,
thereby extending the timeframe of the recently awarded allocations (3,550 County wide including cities,
with 1,970 units for unincorporated MC). This would provide additional time to implement other strategies,
such as land acquisition.
4. Further Incentivize Lot Aggregation by encouraging additional aggregation by increasing points awarded
in ROGO. Currently, 3 positive points are awarded for each vacant, legally platted lot which is aggregated
in a designated Tier 11 or III area on BPK/NNK, and 4 positive points are awarded for each vacant, legally
platted lot which is aggregated in a designated Tier III area in the Upper or Lower Keys (not BPK/NNK).
These also require a legally binding restrictive covenant limiting the number of dwelling units on the
aggregated lots. This policy could be revised to encourage the aggregation of additional lots from any Tier
designation.
5. If no additional permits are authorized after 2023, allow the transfer of dwelling units (market rate,
affordable and transient) so that property owners with more than one lawfully established unit can move
the additional units to another location. The County could consider allowing transfers from:
a) site to site within a subarea in MC (Upper to Upper, Lower to Lower, BPK/NNK to BPK/NNK);
b) between ROGO sub -areas; (Upper to Lower or Lower to Upper; BPK/NNK to BPK/NNK, Lower or
Upper; BPK/NNK to BPK/NNK and Lower); and/or
c) between jurisdictions (MC and cities).
For example, a parcel owner with 2 or 3 lawfully established residential units may transfer 1 or 2 units to
another vacant parcel, thereby reducing the need for a new ROGO allocation for those vacant parcels.
6. Re -designate and/or rezone land to commercial categories that do not allow residential use.
The County could review existing mapping inconsistencies and consider re -designating certain lands,
particularly along U.S.1, within a commercial category.
7. Continue land acquisition programs to purchase additional undeveloped parcels and re-evaluate land
acquisition priorities to balance growth management, habitat protection, retirement of development rights,
reduction of density & intensity, future build -out of the Florida Keys, climate change, sea level rise,
affordable housing, etc.
8. Seek federal legislation to prohibit subsidized flood insurance for new development on vacant land
containing suitable/critical habitat for federally listed species within Monroe County.
9. Exercise the power of eminent domain and directly condemn parcels to avoid acquisition costs or payment
of takings compensation.
10. Purchase the tax certificates and tax deeds on property with delinquent real estate taxes. Requires
coordination with the Monroe County Property Appraiser's Office and the Monroe County Tax Collector.
41Pagc
13OC C Jul, 13. 2013
ADDITIONAL COUNTY LAND ACQUISITION FUNDING STRATEGIES
These strategies assume there are willing sellers.
11. Increase the 1 cent Tourist Impact Tax. Currently 50% of the 1 cent tax is dedicated to land acquisition
within the areas from which it is derived and used by MC Land Authority to purchase land for conservation
or affordable housing. This tax is collected on hotel rooms rentals and other transient accommodations.
12. Dedicate 10% of current 1 cent infrastructure sales surtax Q 212.055(2)(f)3., F.S.). Currently the
County may designate 10% of this tax for "other purposes," which could be for land acquisition.
13. Increase sales tax. Currently at 7.5% and dedicate 100% of the revenue generated by the increase to land
acquisition. This tax is collected on all qualifying sales at the time of purchase.
14. Establish a special taxing authority, a dedicated revenue stream and corresponding bond issue, by
referendum for an ad -valorem tax to be dedicated to land acquisition.
15. Explore a toll on US 1 with a portion of the funds generated to be used to fund acquisition, restoration
and maintenance of conservation lands (similar to Alligator Alley toll for Everglade's restoration).
16. Work with non -governmental organizations, such as the Trust for Public Lands and the Nature
Conservancy, to supplement governmental acquisition efforts.
Further Details on County Land Acquisition FUNDING Strategies (#11-15 Above)
Increasing Tourist Impact Tax — (Strategy #11)
Currently, the 1 cent Tourist Impact Tax yields approximately $5.6 million annually. This amount is split
between the general fund ($2.8M) and the County Land Authority ($2.8M). Of the $2.8M that goes to the Land
Authority, $1.2M is for MC outside Key West (along with $400,000 from state park surcharges) equaling $1.6M
for MC, excluding Key West, and $1.6M goes to Key West.
Of the approximate total revenue ($1.6M) in the Florida Keys ACSC:
• MC Land Authority has historically allocated 60% (approximately $900,000) to the acquisition of
conservation land, with the remainder going towards purchase of parcels for affordable housing, or
occasionally for active recreation areas in areas outside Key West.
Of the approximate total revenue ($1.6M) in Key West ACSC:
• MC Land Authority has historically allocated 17% (approximately $270,000) to the acquisition of
conservation land, with the remainder going toward affordable housing.
If the County passed by referendum, after amending State legislation, an additional 0.5% to the Tourist Impact
Tax and dedicated the full amount to land acquisition, this would yield an additional $2.8 million which could
be split as follows:
• The Florida Keys ACSC ($602,000 [43%] additional); and
• Key West ACSC ($798,000 [57%) additional)
[NOTE: An additional amendment to the state legislation would be needed in order to allow the additional
0.5% to be spent within the entire County, rather than the area from which the tax is derived.]
TOTAL additional funds available of $2.8M, in addition to the $1.17M (900,000+270,000 historically allocated
for the acquisition of conservation lands), equals $3.9M. If this was accomplished, the Land Authority would be
able to generate the funds equal to the tax assessed value for the remaining 7,814 parcels within 80 years (see
Table 3).
Note: The overall tourist tax revenues collected on a tourist unit currently consist of a total tax of 12.5% (7.5% sales tax and 5%
tourist impact tax) and if this strategy is implemented with an increase of 0.5% to the tourist impact tax, the total tax would be
13% (7.5% sales tax and 5.5% tourist impact tax).
5 1 P a g e
B 0 C C July 18. 2013
Table 3: Vacant Parcels and Years to Acquire with an Increase to Tourist Impact Tax
PEARS TO
APPROXIMATE
ANNUAL
GENERATE THE
NO.
AVERAGE
LAND VALUE
BUDGET FOR
FUNDS EQUAL
AREA
VACANT
PARCEL
(December 2012
LAND
TO THE TAX
PARCELS
VALUE
MC Property
ACQUISITION
ASSESSED
Appraiser data)
VALUE
PARCELS TO
$40,664
PURCHASE
7,814
(analysis assumes no
$ 317,748,496
$ 3,970,000
80*
growth in property value
*The total vacant parcels (11,36.1) less the 3,550 allocations available results in 7,814 parcels to purchase. At an average
cost of $40,664 it will take MC 80 years to acquire these parcels utilizing $1.17M (900,000+270,000) + an additional
$2.8M from 0.5% additional tourist tax if passed by referendum, after State Legislature authorization to hold a referendum,
for a total of $3.97M annually.
Dedicating 10% of Current Infrastructure Sales Surtax (Stratepn' #12)
One cent of sales tax produces the following revenue for the various entities:
* $16,500,000 — Unincorporated Monroe County (60%)
* $ 1,700,000 — Islamorada (6%)
* $ 200,000 — Key Colony Beach (0.72%)
* $ 6,800,000 — Key West (25%)
* $ 50,000 — Layton (0.18%)
* $ 2,300,000 — Marathon (8%)
* $27,550,000 — Entire county
The BOCC can make a policy decision to allocate 10% of the amount of sales tax received for unincorporated
Monroe County for land acquisition without a referendum or state authorization. This would result in an
additional $1.65M annually toward this program. If this was accomplished, MC would be able to generate the
funds equal to the tax assessed value for the remaining 7,814 parcels within 81 years (see Table 4).
Table 4: Vacant Parcels and Years to Acquire with a Dedication of 101/6 of Infrastructure Sales Surtax
YEARS TO
APPROXIMATE
ANNUAL
GENERATE
NO.
AVERAGE
LAND VALUE
BUDGET FOR
THE FUNDS
AREA
VACANT
PARCEL
(December 2012
LAND
EQUAL TO THE
PARCELS
VALUE
MC Property
ACQUISITION
TAX ASSESSED
Appraiser data)
VALUE
PARCELS TO
$40,664
PURCHASE
7,814
(analysis assumes no
$ 317,748,496
$ 3,925,000
81*
(COUNTYWIDE)'
growth in property value
over time)
MC PARCELS TO
$30,400
PURCHASE
6,198
(analysis assumes no
$ 188,419
$ 2,550,000
74** `
(UNICORPORATED)**
growth in property value
over time)
* The total vacant parcels (1 /,364) less the 3,550 allocations available results in 7,814 parcels to purchase. At an average
cost of $40,664 it will take MC 81 years to acquire these parcels utilizing 1.17d4 (900,000+2 70, 000) + an additional
$2. 755M from 10% of sales tax if authorized by Board of County Commissioners for a total of $3. 925AI.
** The total vacant parcels (8,168) less the 1, 970 allocations available results in 6,198 parcels to purchase. At an average
cost of $30, 400 it will take MC 74 years to acquire these parcels utilizing $900, 000 + an additional $1.65M from 10% of
sales surtax if authorized by Board of County Commissioners for a total of $2.55AI.
6 1 P a g e BOCC 3uly 18. 2013
Increasing Sales Tax (Strategy #13)
One cent of sales tax produces the following revenue for the various entities:
* $16,500,000 — Unincorporated Monroe County (60%)
* $ 1,700,000 — Islamorada (6%)
* $ 200,000 — Key Colony Beach (0.72%)
* $ 6,800,000 — Key West (25%)
* $ 50,000 — Layton (0.18%)
* $ 2,300,000 — Marathon (8%)
* $27,550,000 — Entire county
If the County passed by referendum, after legislative authorization, adding an additional 1 cent sales tax, an
additional $27,550,000 could be available County -wide toward this program. If this was accomplished, MC
would be able to generate the funds equal to the tax assessed value for the remaining 7,814 parcels within 11
years (see Table 3).
Table 5: Vacant Parcels and Years to Acquire with an Increase in the Sales Tax
YEARS TO
APPROXIMATE
ANNUAL
GENERATE
NO.
AVERAGE
LAND VALUE
BUDGET FOR
THE FUNDS
AREA
VACANT
PARCEL
(December 2012
LAND
EQUAL TO
PARCELS
VALUE
MC Property
ACQUISITION
THE TAX
Appraiser data)
ASSESSED
VALUE
PARCELS TO
$40,664
PURCHASE
7,814
(analysis assumes no
$ 317,748,496
$ 28,720,000
11*
(COUNTYWIDE)*
R'owlh in property valve
aver time)
MC PARCELS TO
$30,400
PURCHASE
6,198
(analysis assumes no
$ 188,419,200
$ 17,400,000
11**
CORPORATE **
growth in property value
over time)
*The total vacant parcels (11,364) less the 3,550 allocations available results in 7,814 parcels to purchase. .AI an average
cost of $40,664 it will take MC 11 years to acquire these parcels utilizing $1.17M (900,000+270,000) + an additional
$27.5M from additional I cent sales tax if authorized by Board of County Commissioners and State of Florida and passed
by voters for a total of $28, 720, 000.
** The total vacant parcels (8,168) less the 1,970 allocations available results in 6,198 parcels to purchase. At an average
cost of $30,400 it will take MC I years to acquire these parcels utilizing $900,000 + an additional $16.5Mfrom 10% of
sales tax if authorized by Board of County Commissioners for a total of S17.4M.
Special Taxing Authority (Strategy #14)
Establishing a County -wide Environmental Land Acquisition Ordinance contingent upon adopting an ad
valorem tax designated specifically for the purchase and management of conservation lands would generate
additional revenue for land acquisition. This option has had wide application in Florida, with 20+ Counties and
20+ municipalities adopting an environmental lands program based on this model. Each community has adopted
programs tailored to their specific needs and voter preferences. As can be seen in Table 6 below, some have
established specific revenue caps, while others have established a time frame with no revenue cap. In addition,
some of the Counties elected to bond the cap amount (Osceola, Lee and Volusia) and use the tax to pay for the
bonds.
7 1 P a g e
BOCC July 18. 2013
Table 6: Summary of Ad Valorem Tax Initiatives
COUNTY
YEAR ADOPTED
MILLAGE RATE
TOTAL REVENUE
TERM
LAKE
2004
0.33
$ 36 MILLION (cap)
5 YRS (bond issue)
LEE
1996
0.5
$ 400 MILLION
ANNUAL RENEWAL
MIAMI-DADE
1990
0.75
$ 90 MILLION
2 YRS
OSCEOLA
2004
0.25
$ 60 MILLION (cap)
20 YRS (bond issue)
VOLUSIA
2000
0.20
$ 40 MILLION (cap)
20 YRS (bond issue
Process for Establishing Countywide Taxing Authority by County
Although the enabling legislation and implementation may vary, in general, the process followed by the
majority of jurisdictions researched has been:
1) Formation of a grass -roots citizens group to highlight and support the issues, initiated by residents or by
the County (for example: via contracting with an organization such as The Trust for Public Lands, etc.)
2) BOCC passes enabling legislation purchase program and proposed tax
3) Voter approval referendum for ad valorem tax for purchases or bond issue
4) BOCC adopts conservation land selection standards
5) BOCC approves funding for either or both
a) A bond issue to borrow funds for purchase
b) Establishing a Conservation Land Fund to purchase as revenue is collected
Approximate Annual Revenue from Special Taxing Authority
According to data from the Monroe County Property Appraiser (MCPA), the total taxable value for real
property in the Florida Keys (unincorporated and incorporated) in 2012 was approximately $18,691,323,445.
Using this value, the table below depicts approximate annual revenues associated with a range of millage rates
and the time in years to acquire all privately owned vacant parcels, after ROGO allocation through the year
2023.
Table 7: Summary of Potential Revenue Generation & Acquisition Timeframe
TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE (MCPA - 2012)
ANNUAL REVENUES
0.75 MIL
0.50 MIL
0.25 MIL
$ 18,691,323,445
$ 14,018,492
$ 9,345,661
$ 4,672,830
POTENTIAL LIABILITY AFTER
ALLOCATIONS
YEARS TO GENERATE THE FUNDS EQUAL TO
THE TAX ASSESSED VALUE
$ 317,748,496
23
34
68
Toll on US 1 (Strategy #15)
Seek and support Federal and State legislation that would authorize the imposition of a toll on U.S. 1. This
strategy would require a change to existing legislation that authorizes the expenditure of tolls paid for use of
Alligator Alley for acquisition, restoration, and maintenance of conservation lands in the Everglades to include
an authorization for land acquisition in the Keys. Alternatively, entirely new legislation could be sought. Prior
discussions with state and federal officials exploring the possibility of imposing a toll on U.S. 1 as a means of
raising money to fund wastewater have conclusively demonstrated that any such effort would require state and
federal legislation.
8 1 P a g e BOCC Jule 18. 201 3
Summary ofAdditional County Land Acquisition Funding Strategies
In summary, with the 3,550 ROGO allocations recently awarded by the State of Florida, it may take
MC up to 272 years to generate the funds equal to the tax assessed value for the remaining 7,814
privately owned vacant parcels in the Florida Keys (Cities and County - Table 2, Page 3), based upon
the average 2012 property values and the current funding levels.
To continue to preserve the County's quality of life and reduce the potential takings claims against the
State and the County, which would ultimately be paid by the taxpayers, the remaining vacant, privately
owned parcels (7,814), at a total value of $317,748,496 (based on average 2012 parcel value) may need
to be addressed by a combination of policy and funding strategies.
Staff has outlined five (5) possible funding strategies (from the above list of strategies) that would
create additional revenues to pursue land acquisition. Each one has pros and cons and requires
extensive administrative achievements, including changing state law and/or approval by voter
referenda. The following table highlights the various time periods it would take to generate revenue,
based on today's dollars, given revenue estimates that could be achieved.
Table 8: Summary of Potential Revenue Generation of Various Strategies & Acquisition Timeframe
Annual Revenue Toward Land
Based Upon Today's Dollars
Strategy
Acquisition
Years To Generate The
(Countywide)
Funds Equal To The Tax
Assessed Value
Historic Status Quo (50% of tourist
impact tax and revenue from park entrances —
$ 1,170,000
272
allocated at the historic rates for the
(estimated based on historic rates)
acquisition of conservation lands)
Additional revenue
Total revenue
11. Increase the Tourist Impact tax
$ 2,800,000
$ 3,970,000
80
12. Dedicate 10% of current
$ 2,755,000
$ 3,925,000
81
infrastructure sales tax
13. Increase sales tax
$ 27,550,000
$ 28,720,000
11
14. Establish a taxing authority
0.75 MIL
$ 14,018,492
$15,188,492
21
0.50 MIL
$ 9,345,661
$10,515,661
30
0.25 MIL
$ 4,672,830
$ 5,842,830
54
15. Toll on US 1
1 TBD
TBD
TBD
Note:
The analysis in this paper
is limited to tax assessed
value of parcels and does
not consider: the future
willingness of am-ners to
sell: if the value assumed
Hill be equal to the
acquisition price;
sufficiency gffunds; i(the
parcels have a
marketable tide; the
suitability ofpublic
ownership for certain
parcels; thefeasibility
and costs of managing
parcels; etc.
911'aue
BOCC July 18. 2013
CURRENT DISTRIBUTION
ROGO Year
Market rate
July
Julc
x
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
126
U: 61, L:57, BPK/NNK: 8
July 13, 2021- July 12, 2022
126
U: 61, L:57, BPK/NNK: 8
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
126
U: 61, L:57, BPK/NNK: 8
Total
1,260
OPTION B1
Do NOT accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and
Extend ROGO allocations through 2026
ROGO Year
Market rate
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
4" -
U: a,1, L3314, BPK/NNK: g
July 13, 2021-July 12, 2022
}g6 fr`s
IT:4L, :,T;54. ,RPK/NNK•4
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
446
U: a 31, LP i' ,, BPKtMIL* g
Total
1,260
OPTION g2
Accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and Extend ROGO allocations
through 2026
ROGO Year
Market rate
July
126
JUIN
126
I UI1
126
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
42614
U: 61- j, L:37 ;., BPK/NNK: g
July 13, 2021-July 12, 2022
4261,
U:41- , L.'-P ., BPK/NNK, 4
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
426
U: & , LAP , BPK/NNK: g
U: 41•, , L:34 , BPK/NNK: 4
2 2025
U: 4 , L.*-P ., BPK/NNK: g
;z
Total
- -,M
OPTION M
Accept the 300 early evacuation affordable ROGOs and DO NOT Extend ROGO
allocations through 2026
ROGO Year
Market rate
126
July 2015-July
126
126
July 13, 2020- July 12, 2021
420- )7
U: 4 j 3, L,. 9P i2, BPK/NNK: g
July 13, 2021- July 12, 2022
426-2 1
U: & +, L.57 _, BPK/NNK: g.
July 13, 2022- July 12, 2023
46
U: 61- , L:67 , BPK/NNK: g
Total
-1,M
Alicia Roemmele-Putney
2150 No Name Drive
No Name Key, FL 330+3-5202
(305) 872-8888 — Home
(305) 30+-9212 — Cell
January 30, 2019 BOCC Special Meeting
Marathon,Florida,Agenda Items B-1,B-2 and B-3
ROGO Workshop -Direction to Staff
Background:
The 1986 Comprehensive Plan addressed the great potential for loss of life and property
damage from hurricanes and the difficulties of evacuation to safe shelters. The 1986 Plan
reported that evacuation to adequate shelters in Dade County would require a clearance time
of 34 hours.
In 1991,while we were writing our second Comprehensive Land Use Plan, an Interim
Development Agreement was passed by the BOCC as an emergency measure to slow down
growth until the County could get a handle on this life-threatening situation.
In 1992, after a series of workshops,the BOCC passed what became known as the Rate of
Growth Ordinance,which was based on public input, staff recommendations and the
direction of the County's Consultants WRT.
The 30o Units:
The 1992 Rate of Growth Ordinance is the backbone of growth management in the Keys and
needs to be protected.Accepting 30o additional ROGO allocations will open the door to
uncontrolled growth by destroying the heretofore legally defensible position of the Rate of
Growth Ordinance and will worsen the current tenuous safe evacuation of the Florida Keys.
The concept that all visitors, mobile home dwellers and the military will have 48 hours of
notice of a major storm is a far too dangerous policy to begin with, and,the concept of
expanding this early evacuation policy with newly created ROGO units flies in the face of
reason and logic.Why do something that will decrease the safety of resident and visitors of
the Florida Keys? It is simply a bad idea,which should be rejected.
Extension of ROGO Allocations:
The Rate of Growth Ordinance is a known entity. But,what happens when we reach build-
out is a completely unknown situation? The only prudent choice is to extend the ROGO
allocations we have for as long as it is feasible.
The 1992 Rate of Growth Ordinance reduced the historic rate of growth in Monroe County by
a little more than half(from 552 single family residential units per year to 255 single family
residential units per year). We could make an even more drastic reduction right now in 2019.
A reduction greater than fifty percent would extend the ROGO beyond 2026 and give the
County even more time to work out the necessary funding and acquisition schedules with all
three levels of government. Please give serious thought to this concept. Thank you.