Item K1
K.1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
C ounty of M onroe
Mayor Sylvia Murphy, District 5
Mayor Pro Tem Danny Kolhage, District 1
TheFloridaKeys
Michelle Coldiron, District 2
Heather Carruthers, District 3
David Rice, District 5
County Commission Meeting
February 20, 2019
Agenda Item Number: K.1
Agenda Item Summary #5064
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: County Attorney's Office
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Bob Shillinger (305) 292-3470
1:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: An Attorney-Client Closed Session in the matters of AshBritt, Inc.
v. Monroe County, FL and Florida Department of Transportation, Case No. CA-K-17-802.
ITEM BACKGROUND: Per F.S. 286.011(8), the subject matter of the meeting shall be confined
to settlement negotiations or strategy sessions related to litigation expenditures. Present at the
meeting will be the Commissioners, County Administrator Roman Gastesi, County Attorney Bob
Shillinger, Assistant County Attorneys Chris Ambrosio and Christine Limbert-Barrows, special
litigation counsel Jeff Hochman and a certified court reporter.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
12/19/18 (P1) BOCC scheduled a closed session for January 23, 2019 in Marathon, FL at 1:30 p.m.
or as soon thereafter as may be heard.
1/23/19 (J1) BOCC continued the closed session to February 20, 2019 in Key West, FL at 1:30 p.m.
or as soon thereafter as may be heard.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DOCUMENTATION:
REV Closed Session Script AshBritt BOCC 2 20 19 ( 1 23 19 kp)
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date: N/A
Expiration Date:
Packet Pg. 1562
K.1
Total Dollar Value of Contract: N/A
Total Cost to County: Court Reporter Costs
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted: Yes
Source of Funds: 67501-530330
CPI: N/A
Indirect Costs: N/A
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing: If yes, amount:
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required:
Additional Details:
N/A
REVIEWED BY:
Chris Ambrosio Completed 12/19/2018 3:29 PM
Bob Shillinger Completed 01/02/2019 12:01 PM
Kathy Peters Completed 01/02/2019 1:41 PM
Board of County Commissioners Completed 01/23/2019 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 1563
K.1.a
Mayors Script
For the day of Closed Session
The following should be read at the appropriate point during the day of the closed session.
1. Prior to going into closed session.
A closed attorney-client session pursuant to Section 286.011(8), Florida Statutes, will nowbe held. It is
estimated that this meeting will take approximately thirty (30) minutes. The persons attending the meeting will
be the County Commissioners, County Administrator Roman Gastesi, County Attorney Bob Shillinger,
Assistant County Attorneys Chris Ambrosio and Christine Limbert-Barrows, special litigation counsel Jeff
Hochman, Esq, and a certified court reporter.
Since the law prohibits any other person from being present at the closed session, the commissioners, the
County Administrator, the attorneys for the County and the court reporter will now remaininthismeeting
room, and all other persons are required to leave the room. When the closed session is over, we will re-convene
and re-open the public meeting. This public meeting is now closed.
2. At the beginning of the closed session.
Inow call this closed session to order. For the record, this meeting is being held upon the request of the County
Attorney Bob Shillinger who announced at a prior BOCC Meeting held on 12/19/2018 that he needed advice in
the matter of AshBritt, Inc. v. Monroe County, FL and Florida Department of Transportation, Case No. CA-K-
17-802. At that meeting, the Board approved holding a closed session and public notice was giventhrough
public announcement of the meeting at the 12/19/18 BOCC meeting and through publicationofthe1/23/19
BOCC meeting agenda on the County website. At the 1/23/19 meeting, the Board continued the closed
session to 2/20/2019 and public notice was given through public announcement at the 1/23/19 BOCC meeting
and through publication of the 2/20/19 BOCC meeting agenda on the County website.
For the record, and the benefit of the court reporter, each of us will state our name and position starting
with the commission.
(After all have identified themselves) Thank you.
Just as a reminder, we will only be discussing settlement negotiations and strategy relatingtolitigation
expenditures. We cannot take any decisive action at this meeting. We can only provide informationand
direction to the attorneys. Any decisions this Board makes concerning this case must be done in a meeting open
to the public.
Letart our discussion with the County Attorney.
3. At the end of the closed session, prior to going into open session.
This closed session is now terminated and we will not reconvene in the public meeting.
4. After the public session has been re-opened.
The attorneyclient session has been terminated, and we are now re-opening this public meeting.
Attachment: REV Closed Session Script AshBritt BOCC 2 20 19 ( 1 23 19 kp) \[Revision 1\] (Attorney-Client Closed Session (Ashbritt))
Packet Pg. 1564
' W, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Monroe + � Ifu�� �, Mayor Craig Cates,District 1
ti Mayor Pro Tem Holly Merrill Raschein,District 5
The Florida Keys ra Michelle Lincoln,District 2
James K.Scholl,District
Robert B.Shillinger,County Attorney** tdw David Rice,District 4
Pedro J.Mercado,Sr.Assistant County Attorney**
Cynthia L.Hall,Sr.Assistant County Attorney**
Christine Limbert-Barrows,Assistant County Attorney** Office of the County Attorney
Derek V.Howard,Assistant County Attorney** I I11 12'Street,Suite 408
Peter H.Morris,Assistant County Attorney ** Key West,FL 33040
Patricia Fables,Assistant County Attorney (305)292-3470 Office
Joseph X.DiNovo,Assistant County Attorney** (305)292-3516 Fax
Kelly Dugan,Assistant County Attorney
Christina Cory,Assistant County Attorney
Nathalia Archer,Assistant County Attorney
**Board Certified in City,County&Local Govt.Law
April 28, 2023
Kevin Madok, CPA
Clerk of the Court, 16'Judicial Circuit
500 Whitehead Street
Key West, FL 33040
In Re: Ashbritt, Inc. v. Monroe County, Case No.: 17-CA-802-K
Dear Mr.Madok:
Please find attached scans of transcripts of six (6) closed attorney-client sessions of the Monroe County Board
of County Commissioners, with regard to the above-entitled civil matter. The closed sessions occurred on:
05/16/2018; 02/20/2019; 05/08/2020; 05/25/2021; 09/12/2022; and, 02/13/2023. Under F.S. 286.011(8), these
transcripts may be made part of the public record, as the litigation has concluded.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact me should you have any questions.
Sincerely
Digitally signed by Robert B.Shillinger
Robert B. Shillinger ou cn=Robert B.Shillinger, ,Monroe County BOCC,
ou=Monroe County Attorney,email=shillinger-
bob@monroecounty-fl.gov,c=uS
Date:2023.04.28 15:04:07-04'00'
Robert B. Shillinger
Monroe County Attorney
Attachments: Six closed session transcripts dated 05/16/2018;02/20/2019;05/08/2020;05/25/2021;09/12/2022,02/13/2023
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
2 IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
3 CASE NO . : CA-K-17-802
4
5 ASHBRITT, INC .
6 Plaintiff,
7 vs .
8 MONROE COUNTY, FL and
9 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
10 Defendant .
11 /
12
13 CLOSED SESSION MEETING
14
15 February 20 , 2019
16 1 : 48 p .m. - 2 : 21 p .m.
17
18 Murray E . Nelson Government Center
19 102050 Oversea Highway
20 Key Largo, FL 33037
21
22
23 Electronically Reported By:
24 NICOLETTE GRECO
25
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 2
1 APPEARANCES :
2
3 Danny Kolhage, Mayor Pro Tem, District 1
4 Michelle Coldiron, Commissioner, District 2
5 Heather Caruthers, Commissioner, District 3
6 David Rice, Commissioner, District 4
7 Sylvia Murphy, Mayor, District 5
8 Roman Gasti , County Administrator
9 Chris Ambrosio, Esquire, Assistant County Attorney
10 Christine M. Limert-Barrows, Esquire, Assistant County
11 Attorney
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 3
1 INDEX
2 PAGE
3 Closed session 4
4 Certificate of Reporter 27
5 Certificate of Transcriptionist 28
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 4
1 P R O C E E D I N G S
2 Closed session taken under oath before Nicolette
3 Greco, Electronic Reporter and Notary Public in and
4 for the State of Florida at Large, in the above cause .
5
6 THE COURT REPORTER : The next item is item
7 K1 . An attorney-client closed session in the matters
8 of Ashbritt Inc . versus Monroe County Florida and the
9 Florida Department of Transportation . Case CA-K-17-
10 8020 .
11 MR . SHILLINGER : An attorney-client closed
12 session will be held pursuant to Florida Statute
13 2860 . 11 . It' s estimated this meeting will take,
14 approximately, thirty minutes . The persons attending
15 the meeting will be the County Commissioners . County
16 Administrator, Roman Gastesi . County Attorney, Bob
17 Shillinger . Assistant County Attorney' s, Chris
18 Ambrosio and Christine Limert-Barrows . And a certified
19 court reporter . Since the law prohibits any other
20 person from being present at the closed session, the
21 commissioners, the administrator, the attorneys for
22 the county and the court reporter will now remain in
23 the meeting room, and all other persons are required
24 to leave the room. When this closed session is over,
25 we will reconvene and re-open to a public meeting.
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 5
1 Madame Mayor, I ' ll speak on your behalf and declare
2 the open meeting closed.
3 MS . MURPHY : Thank you.
4 MR . SHILLINGER : Again, speaking on your
5 behalf , I ' ll declare the meeting and closed session to
6 order. And, for the record, it ' s being held at my
7 request . I announced at a meeting held on December 19 ,
8 2018 , that I needed your advice in the matter of
9 Ashbritt versus Monroe County Florida and Florida
10 Department of transportation, case CAK17802 . At that
11 meeting, The Board approved holding a closed session,
12 and public notice was given through a public
13 announcement of the meeting at the December 19 , 2018 ,
14 BOCC meeting through publication of the agenda for the
15 January 23 , 2019 meeting . At that meeting, I asked
16 that it be postponed until today' s date, February 20 ,
17 2019 . Public notice was given through public
18 announcement at the January 23 , 2019 meeting and
19 through publication of the February 20 , 2019 , BOCC
20 agenda on the county' s website . For the record and
21 benefit of the court reporter, each of us will swallow
22 and then state our name and position, starting with
23 the commission .
24 MS . CARRUTHERS : Commissioner Carruthers,
25 District 3 .
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 6
1 MR . KOLHAGE : Danny Kolhage, District 1 .
2 MS . MURPHY : Sylvia Murphy, District 5 .
3 MS . COLDIRON: Michelle Coldiron, District
4 2 .
5 MR . GASTESI : Roman Gastesi , County
6 Administrator.
7 MR . SHILLINGER : Bob Shillinger, County
8 Attorney.
9 MR . AMBROSIO : Chris Ambrosio, Assistant
10 County Attorney.
11 MS . LIMERT-BARROWS : Christine Limbert-
12 Barrows, Assistant County Attorney.
13 MR . RICE : David Rice, District 4 .
14 MR . SHILLINGER : Thank you. Just as a
15 reminder, we' ll only be discussing settlement
16 negotiations and a strategy related to litigation
17 expenditures . We cannot take any decisive action at
18 this meeting; we can only provide information and
19 direction to the attorneys . Any decision the Board
20 makes concerning this case must be done at a meeting
21 that is open to the public . So, this is the Ashbritt
22 case, and Chris has a spreadsheet and that spreadsheet
23 details the amounts that we have been billed to date
24 as well as paid today as well as what' s still in
25 dispute . To summarize it , as you' ll see, it' s still in
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 7
1 dispute; it is $1, 091, 610 . 15 . That ' s based on three
2 invoices that they have supplied. Two for putrefied
3 waste, and one for additional haul out costs because
4 they had to take the waste beyond the 130 miles up to-
5 they took it , basically, 147 miles to the waste
6 disposal site . So, as you' ll see on the spreadsheet,
7 so far to date they' ve billed us $17 , 529 , 296 . 97 of
8 which we have processed for payment or actually paid
9 $16 , 269 , 177 . 37 or 92 . 8% of what they've billed us . So,
10 we' re down to the last little bit . Chris has been
11 engaged in settlement negotiations with Ashbritt ;
12 there was settlement conference held back in December
13 21st right after the commission meeting. That didn' t
14 get everything done but, in the meantime, additional
15 information has been exchanged, we've paid some of the
16 invoices , and now we' re down to these three invoices ;
17 amounts which we dispute entirely. We believe we have
18 valid defenses that they were adequately already
19 covered in the contract . Nevertheless, we have a
20 settlement proposal , they' ve offered to take fifty
21 cents on the dollar. So, $545 , 805 . 07 . Chris can give
22 you some background, our recommendation is not to take
23 the $545 , 805 . 07 but we want to get a comfort level for
24 our counter offer so that as a business decision we
25 can figure out a way to wrap this case up without
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 8
1 further litigation expenses, that we can make a
2 counter-proposal . So, I ' ll turn it over to Chris to
3 kind of give you a few more details, but I wanted to
4 set the context .
5 MR . KOLHAGE : Are we saying that the
6 disputed amount never took place or that they are
7 duplicated or what ' s the argument?
8 MR . AMBROSIO : The argument is that the
9 disputed amount consists of work that Ashbritt
10 performed but that they are not entitled to, pursuant
11 to the contract, to be reimbursed for.
12 MR . SHILLINGER : The reimbursement is
13 covered in other parts of the contract . The contract
14 party contemplates how they would be paid for those .
15 MR . KOLHAGE : That we have paid those parts?
16 MR . AMBROSIO : We have . Absolutely.
17 MS . CARRUTHERS : Give me an example because
18 I ' m not familiar .
19 MR . AMBROSIO : Some of the management costs
20 that we already paid for, the putrefied waste
21 according to Judy in the lot , that was part of the
22 contract .
23 MS . CARRUTHERS : So, they weren' t supposed
24 to bill us for the putrefied waste .
25 MR . GASTESI : Right . So, they' re billing us
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 9
1 separate for putrefied waste . But she thinks ,
2 strongly, that that was part of what they' ve already
3 been paid for. Did I say that right?
4 MR . AMBROSIO : That sounds right . In
5 addition to that , Ashbritt , as a proposer to the
6 request for proposals, had submitted many questions
7 with respect to requests for information and
8 clarifications with respect to our solicitation; and
9 they never requested that item at all . And it was all
10 contained. The putrefied waste, for example, as Roman
11 was saying, the putrefied waste was contained within
12 the fees that they were paid for handling white goods .
13 That ' s the example for putrefied waste . Also, for
14 additional haul-out, there is an explosive contract
15 provision that lays out haul-out of waste or debris
16 from 130 miles or more . For claims for additional
17 haul-out , Ashbritt ' s claiming 147 miles . Well , the
18 term in the contract provides for greater than 130
19 miles . So, that' s the example for additional haul-out .
20 MR . SHILLINGER : But we've paid them for a
21 haul-out at the 130 rate or are we disputing that
22 amount?
23 MR . AMBROSIO : No . We've paid them up to the
24 130 .
25 MR . SHILLINGER : They' re looking for
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 10
1 additional money beyond that .
2 MR . AMBROSIO : Right .
3 MR . KOLHAGE : Can I skip to the bottom of
4 your chart . Do you have any idea about what you are
5 categorizing as risk of fees and costs?
6 MR . AMBROSIO : I don' t have a great idea of
7 it , but I can tell you that they, at one point ,
8 Ashbritt had three different law firms handling this
9 matter . There were many proceedings I attended where
10 they had attorneys from every one of the firms . They
11 had sometimes multiple attorneys from one or two of
12 the firms attend. With respect to an-
13 MR . KOLHAGE : Our risk . What is our risk?
14 MR . AMBROSIO : Well , our risk to fees and
15 costs would be those reasonable fees , and costs that
16 Ashbritt would be able to prove to the court were
17 necessary and reasonable incurred to prosecute their
18 claim.
19 MR . SHILLINGER : If we lost . But with
20 comparison we have paid Johnson and Silno, our outside
21 firm, $85 , 000 in fees . They bill at $175 an hour . It ' s
22 not the rate that I believe that the Moscowitz Firm or
23 Mark Smith would be charging Randy Perkins . For the
24 record, Commissioner Rice is stepping out of the room.
25 MR . AMBROSIO : So, let me just add one more
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 11
1 item to the additional haul-out portion. What they are
2 attempting to do by submitting their additional haul-
3 out invoice, which is 013 , is they' re trying to add on
4 an extra dollar amount to the haul-out mileage . So,
5 there increasing the amount of distance that they had
6 already traveled. They' re trying to add dollar value
7 to the mileage that they were paid for if that
8 explains it . Just as Bob said, we' ve already paid them
9 for that . But they' re trying to add on to a portion of
10 that . For example, the difference between 130 miles
11 and 147 miles ; they are hoping to add on for the
12 additional 17 miles . And like we said, the term is
13 already included in the contract as 130 or greater .
14 MR . KOLHAGE : Is this the only outstanding
15 dispute that we have with Ashbritt , this case?
16 MR . SHILLINGER : Yeah. This is the only
17 pending dispute . And the reason I say pending, they
18 have filed a notice that they have a claim against
19 Adventure Environmental on something with debris . But
20 they haven' t brought us into it because- their dispute
21 with Adventure is they, apparently, had a business
22 arrangement and they believe they' re owed some of
23 Adventure Environmentals profits . We' re not a party to
24 that dispute . Our payments could be subject to a
25 garnishment if they got that far, but we' re not in
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 12
1 that at that point . So, I don' t, in my mind, consider
2 that to be the dispute between us and Ashbritt right
3 now, but I wanted to make sure that you understood.
4 MR . KOLHAGE : Okay.
5 MR . AMBROSIO : And, just to follow up a
6 little bit with Bob' s introduction about the
7 settlement conference that Ashbritt requested in
8 December of last year-
9 MR . SHILLINGER : For the record,
10 Commissioner Rice just came back in the room.
11 MR . AMBROSIO : So, we met at that settlement
12 conference, it was an informal conference requested by
13 Ashbritt ; it wasn' t attended by a mediator . And, we
14 addressed all of the concerns and questions and
15 disputes that existed at that point, December 2018 . We
16 prepared all the materials that were needed for
17 Ashbritt , and we were reiterating exactly what Judy
18 has been informing them of for a year. And,
19 ultimately, we were able to resolve-
20 MR . SHILLINGER : Just for the record, we are
21 working through lunch because of a tight schedule
22 today.
23 MR . AMBROSIO : So, we were able to resolve
24 most of the items and invoices that were in dispute
25 after Ashbritt supplemented and amended and corrected
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 13
1 the invoices which we asked them to do over a year ago
2 but subsequent to the meeting they then provided Judy
3 with the necessary materials . And, as Bob said, we
4 have paid out and paid on all of those invoices that
5 were not in dispute . The only remaining ones are those
6 three, 003 , 011, and 013 .
7 MR . KOLHAGE : Madame Mayor, I , by a head
8 not, I would like to see you go forward with the
9 counter offer that you've expressed.
10 MR . GASTESI : I understand the business
11 decision but , you know, Soufa still haunts me every
12 now and then when I hear that we settled with them or
13 we gave them money because we made a business
14 decision . Is there any way to express it or to make
15 this counter offer but it' s not, and say that it ' s a
16 business ; it ' s not that we' re giving in? It just seems
17 like- I don' t know about you guys but that Soufa thing
18 bothers me every time I read it, that we gave in to
19 them. And it was the same thing because I think the
20 number was in the 300 , 000 range and we gave them
21 45 , 000 or 48 , 000 . So, is there any way to express it
22 when we do give them counter-offer that it ' s not-
23 MR . SHILLINGER : Sure . It ' s not an admission
24 of any wrongdoing or liability. It ' s done to resolve
25 how they contested-
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 14
1 MR . GASTESI : To save us legal fees .
2 MR . SHILLINGER : Correct . That language is
3 in all agreements so you' re going to have that risk.
4 But we can certainly work towards that . And, in this
5 regard, I believe Ashbritt , based on what Chris' s
6 conversations he' s relayed with their general counsel ,
7 they' re looking to settle . As opposed to Soufa, they
8 were looking to make a public relations case . You know
9 Randy Perkins better than I , whether he' s going to
10 make a public relations issue out of this or not .
11 MR . GASTESI : The other lawsuit ; we can' t
12 mention it in this?
13 MR . SHILLINGER : No, they' re separate .
14 MR . KOLHAGE : I don' t know, you all can work
15 that out . I will say this ; I understand your concern
16 Roman, but I will also say I think, from what I ' ve
17 heard over the years , the public doesn' t like the
18 county being involved in litigation, it goes on and on
19 and on . They don' t like that , either . It is a
20 balancing act and looking at the proposal , it seems
21 reasonable to me, and that ' s how I feel .
22 MR . SHILLINGER : Chris, tell us a little
23 about the conversations with Mr. Moscowitz , the
24 outside counsel for Mr . Moscowitz Senior .
25 MR . AMBROSIO : Sure . The most recent
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 15
1 conversations, I would say starting from the
2 settlement conference, was indicated that- first of
3 all , leading up to it, Mr. Moscowitz asked for us to
4 hurriedly please have a settlement conference prior to
5 Christmas ; there are changes that are occurring so,
6 please hurry. So, we did. Judy, Jeff Hawkman and
7 myself , we hurried for them. At the settlement
8 conference, his discussions were geared towards
9 resolving the invoices that were in dispute, and he
10 definitely attempted to avoid any of the arguments
11 that we have that Jeff and I believe are very
12 favorable for us to continue to defend these disputed
13 items . Mr. Moscowitz wasn' t interested in trying to
14 make those arguments against us because the law, I
15 can' t give any guarantees for results, but the law is
16 so favorable for us on these disputed items that
17 aren' t express terms in the contract . Mr . Moscowitz
18 didn' t want to confront that situation; he steered the
19 course of conversation right back to hoping to resolve
20 and settle . It seemed that in the way that he was
21 expressing himself at that conference, it appeared
22 that he and his firm were not going to be serving as
23 Ashbritt ' s counsel much longer . A lot of conversation
24 in past tense, as if he had been representing
25 Ashbritt . Then after the conference, he' s reached out
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 16
1 to us several times to ask what the likelihood is of
2 Ashbritt obtaining this $545 , 000 some odd dollars from
3 the county. He' s reached out several times to find out
4 where the county is at in terms of approving some sort
5 of continuing settlement negotiations, how much longer
6 do they have to wait . And, also on occasion, Mr. Bart
7 Smith would step in and begin to communicate with Jeff
8 and I , rather than Mr. Moscowitz . So, it ' s kind of
9 indicating that Mr . Moscowitz isn' t going to be
10 onboard as counsel much longer, but he' s still the
11 main contact for us in terms of settlement
12 discussions . In addition to that , he certainly
13 approved a continuation of the scheduling order. And
14 in litigation, as you know, that ' s the critical court
15 order that sets all due dates where we have to comply
16 with discovery deadlines and filing deadlines and
17 marching towards a trial docket date . Mr . Moscowitz
18 was eager to push that back and extend it out . In
19 fact , we have a hearing later this month in which they
20 don' t oppose that, and Ashbritt requests that . That,
21 of course, coming from a plaintiff , that indicates
22 that this is a plaintiff that has no intention or very
23 little intention to prosecute its case .
24 MR . KOLHAGE : Okay.
25 MR . SHILLINGER : The reason I say that is , I
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 17
1 think that they hungry to settle for a number lower
2 than this .
3 MR . KOLHAGE : Okay. Well , wait a minute . I
4 understood it to be your recommendation. Is it not?
5 MR . SHILLINGER : The recommendation is to
6 offer fifty to settle .
7 MR . KOLHAGE : Is Mr. Moscowitz , is he still
8 their counsel?
9 MR . SHILLINGER : There' s two Mr .
10 Moscowitz ' s . There is the outside counsel who is the
11 father to Jared Moscowitz who used to be their general
12 counsel . He' s left Ashbritt and is now the director of
13 the department of emergency management .
14 MR . KOLHAGE : Yes, I know.
15 MR . SHILLINGER : Both of them were involved
16 in this case at some level .
17 MR . KOLHAGE : Okay. That leads back to my
18 question . Giving you my head nod on what your
19 recommendation is, and I 'm taking your assurance that
20 we have no intersection with this company in the
21 future .
22 MR . SHILLINGER : We have terminated the
23 relationship with them.
24 MR . KOLHAGE : Okay.
25 MR . SHILLINGER : Not our contractual
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 18
1 relationship . I can' t tell you that we don' t get
2 dragged into their fight with Adventure Environmental .
3 But, again, that would be more as garnishment role . If
4 we owe money to Adventure, they may get a court order
5 to divert some of those monies .
6 MR . KOLHAGE : We have no FEMA issues
7 relative to this?
8 MR . SHILLINGER : I ' m told that the base camp
9 invoice, which is Number 7 on that list, has been
10 rejected and the L & B staff working with a consultant
11 has prepared an appeal on that .
12 MS . CARRUTHERS : Rejected by whom?
13 MR . SHILLINGER : FEMA.
14 MR . KOLHAGE : When did that happen?
15 MR . GASTESI : Last week?
16 MR . SHILLINGER : I don' t know, very
17 recently.
18 MS . CARRUTHERS : And, did we already pay
19 them for this?
20 MR . SHILLINGER : Yes . This is a total
21 reimbursement . We pay out ; then we seek reimbursement
22 from the clients .
23 MR . KOLHAGE : How is it that you guys don' t
24 know about it if this happened very recently? Because
25 I ' ve been hearing this from months ago . That ' s why
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 19
1 I ' ve asked at several county commission meetings what
2 the status of the base camp is . And, now we have
3 received-
4 MR . SHILLINGER : I learned about it
5 yesterday from you .
6 MR . KOLHAGE : Okay. So, you don' t think; I
7 don' t want to prejudice anything we' re doing here
8 relative to that , you don' t think there' s an
9 involvement there?
10 MR . SHILLINGER : No .
11 MR . KOLHAGE : Okay. And, this is your
12 recommendation?
13 MR . AMBROSIO : Commissioner, this is our
14 recommendation . I ' d add to that ; it' s inevitable that
15 once we do, with your approval , come to Ashbritt with
16 a counter offer of 50 , 000 ; there is most likely going
17 to be discussions back and forth about the numbers
18 coming closer and closer . The number that they began
19 with is 545 , our counter offer being 50 , 000 . There' s
20 inevitably going to be some discussions and wiggling
21 back and forth. We would suggest that The Board
22 approve a range of value for us to continue to
23 negotiate with. And, that range suggestion is 50 to
24 125 , 000 . That would be a range in which we can work
25 with, starting with 50 , but work up to if necessary,
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 20
1 125 max.
2 MR . SHILLINGER : Another approach- I see you
3 shaking your head no . Another approach would be to go
4 back with the 50 and if they don' t take it , proceed to
5 summary judgment . And, if we win on summary judgment ,
6 then the answer is zero; they' re trying to push back
7 on those arguments . The risk is we don' t win on that ,
8 and then we get set for trial . We can always come back
9 and have further discussions .
10 MR . KOLHAGE : But you' re telling us that
11 they don' t have any appetite for further litigation.
12 MR . SHILLINGER : They' re giving those
13 signals . But these guys have been blowing smoke and
14 putting up false flags from the beginning.
15 MR . GASTESI : I just thought of something.
16 How about whatever the settlement number is, we don' t
17 pay them until the canal cleanup is done . That way
18 they can' t muck up that . Because my fear is that
19 they' re going to get their settlement and they' re
20 going to turn around and go after Adventure and then
21 shut down that project , or at least do some kind of
22 injunction or something.
23 MR . SHILLINGER : We have made it clear to
24 them, and Adventure has too, if they go after that we
25 will seek that they' re going to have to post the bond
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 21
1 for the entire amount of the federal subsidy for the-
2 MR . GASTESI : They know that?
3 MR . SHILLINGER : Yes . They know that, very
4 pointedly, in four letter words .
5 MR . AMBROSIA: Speaking of holding on to the
6 money; part of my suggestion is that we don' t rush to
7 contact Ashbritt tomorrow morning on the 21st, the day
8 following The Board' s closed session . We don' t rush to
9 contact them on the Friday following The Board' s
10 session. We have a hearing at the end of this month in
11 which we anticipate The Court is going to extend that
12 scheduling order . That ' s going to push the deadlines
13 against Ashbritt . It ' s their case; they' re the ones
14 that are obligated to prove the case . I would even
15 recommend that we wait until that hearing is concluded
16 and we get a scheduling order, which then applies more
17 pressure to Ashbritt that this case could take you
18 longer to have to prosecute and get the trial . And
19 still , we haven' t communicated The Board' s counter-
20 offer to them yet . One thing that might do is, have
21 them bid against themselves . Which is that Ashbritt is
22 getting antsy to resolve and settle the case, they' re
23 not getting an immediate response from the county;
24 they' re basically hovering at $545 , 000 as their offer.
25 They may reduce that number if we do not immediately
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 22
1 respond to them and we wait for the next hearing to
2 take place . I ' ve had plaintiffs that have reduced
3 their settlement demands by fifty percent by making
4 them wait another week . I don' t know if that ' s going
5 to happen with Ashbritt, as Bob explained to the fact
6 of the people we' re dealing with, but it ' s possible
7 that they may reduce their number. And it' s possible
8 that they withdraw it and we go to trial , and they say
9 it ' s off the table .
10 MS . CARRUTHERS : Which of the Moscowitz is
11 the one we' re dealing with now?
12 MR . AMBROSIO : It ' s Michael Moscowitz .
13 MS . CARRUTHERS : Why do you think they' re
14 letting him go? Do you think that they' re frustrated
15 with his performance on this because he will or won' t
16 settle?
17 MR . AMBROSIO : I think that there' s several
18 reasons . The indication is that they' re letting him
19 go . That ' s sort of reading the tea leaves, not that
20 he' s ever said that ; but that' s the indication that we
21 got . Main reason, Jared Moscowitz position now with
22 FDEM . And there seems to be some sort of conflict if-
23 they may see conflicts between their father
24 representing them in cases in litigation that they
25 still have outstanding cases in the other areas of the
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 23
1 state when which they' re suing local governments . And
2 then, of course, Jared is now placed. I also think
3 that quite frankly commissioner, I think that and it
4 was said several times ; his bills are astronomical .
5 The chief executive officer of Ashbritt made those
6 type of comments several times during the conference .
7 I ' m getting tired of paying your bills ; I ' m getting
8 tired of seeing your invoices .
9 MS . CARRUTHERS : Well , in that case, we
10 should probably not give the counter offer because
11 we' re striking it out strong . Wait until after the
12 court hearing thing; I like that suggestion.
13 MR . AMBROSIO : It ' s an old tactic I 've used
14 in the past in which you see all the indications that
15 a plaintiff is really trying to get their case
16 settled. It' s an indication; the plaintiff doesn' t
17 want to go to trial , they don' t like the arguments
18 that they have, they don' t feel the law is on their
19 side, they' re not eager to try to get this in front of
20 a jury or a judge, and you wait them out . It ' s the old
21 wait game, and there is some risk that applies to it .
22 Especially with certain personalities . But that my
23 suggestion if we wait and see how this court hearing
24 goes on the 27th. Ideally, we get the new scheduling
25 order in place . Ashbritt ' s looking at a much longer
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 24
1 time frame for this litigation to extend out . And
2 then, maybe we come to them after that hearing with
3 our approved counter offer . And, I would suggest that
4 we do this just verbally, so this would just be a
5 phone call between Jeff Hawkman and myself and Mr.
6 Moscowitz , of course, Bob if he' s involved in that .
7 But that ' s it ; it is a phone call . And that' s the way
8 that we respond to their settlement offer which wasn' t
9 an email . We just pick up the phone, and we' re going
10 to talk to counsel .
11 MR . SHILLINGER : See where we get from
12 there . If the number comes closer to 50 or it comes
13 down to the five-figure level under 100 ; is there an
14 appetite to that range to make a business decision or
15 are we-
16 MR . KOLHAGE : Come back to The Board.
17 MR . SHILLINGER : Come back? Okay. We' ll be
18 happy to do that .
19 MS . MURPHY : Is that the only one you have?
20 MR . SHILLINGER : This is the only one we
21 have . It ' s prepared for this discussion.
22 MS . CARRUTHERS : Do you need me to give it
23 back to you?
24 MR . SHILLINGER : It ' s probably nothing super
25 secret that we would mind you having out there . So, if
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 25
1 you want to take it so you can have it for the report,
2 there' s no strategy in there . The offer is a public
3 record as well . They sent it to us in an email .
4 MS . LIMERT-BARROWS : It ' s not possible a
5 counter settle-
6 MR . SHILLINGER : Line through the item 27 ,
7 Line 27 Box B .
8 MR . AMBROSIO : Otherwise, the other data
9 that ' s included in there is basically information
10 straight from their invoices and our payment
11 documents .
12 MR . KOLHAGE : You' ve got your legal fees in
13 there too . I 'm going to give this back to you.
14 MS . CARRUTHERS : And, that base camp number,
15 we can' t get that back .
16 MR . KOLHAGE : We' re going to try.
17 MR . SHILLINGER : We' re still appealing
18 FEMA' s denial . Are you asking can we get it back from
19 Ashbritt? Probably not .
20 MS . CARRUTHERS : What is their basis for the
21 denial?
22 MR . SHILLINGER : Tina would be the one to
23 talk to about that , specifically. If I had to guess at
24 this point , it would have to do with the fact that it
25 wasn' t procured pursuant to- it didn' t have that part .
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 26
1 MS . CARRUTHERS : So that just came because-
2 was that Ashbritt? What do you mean it wasn' t procured
3 competitively? It should have been procured separately
4 from-
5 MR . SHILLINGER : Or had a specific line item
6 in the contract for that .
7 MR . AMBROSIO : The service of base camp was
8 derived as an option placed in Ashbritt' s response to
9 the solicitation . So, once we determined we would want
10 base camps ; we had to go to their optional services as
11 part of their proposal . Base camps were an optional
12 service . We referred to that , we asked them are you
13 able to provide this optional service of base camps?
14 The answer was , yes . It wasn' t in our agreement with
15 them.
16 MR . SHILLINGER : Alright . We have our
17 direction unless you have further questions ; we' ll
18 wrap up this closed session. Madame Mayor, are you
19 declaring this closed session closed?
20 MS . MURPHY : Yes, the closed session is now
21 over .
22 (Meeting concluded at 2 : 21 p .m. )
23
24
25
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 27
1 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER
2
3 STATE OF FLORIDA
4 COUNTY OF MONROE
5
6 I , NICOLETTE GRECO, do hereby certify that I was
7 authorized to and did electronically report the
8 foregoing proceedings ; and that the foregoing
9 transcript is a true record of my electronic
10 recording.
11
12
13 I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am not a relative,
14 employee, or attorney, or counsel of any of the
15 parties, nor am I a relative or employee of any of the
16 parties ' attorney or counsel connected with the
17 action, nor am I financially interested in the action.
18
19 DATED thism7th day of M ch, 2019 .
20
21
22 NICOLETE GRECO, ECR
23
24
25
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 28
1 CERTIFICATE OF TRANSCRIPTIONIST
2
3 I , TOBI RAY, do hereby certify that I transcribed
4 the electronic recording produced by NICOLETTE GRECO
5 of the foregoing proceedings and that the foregoing
6 transcript is a true transcript of said electronic
7 recording.
8
9 I FURTHER CERTIFY that I am not a relative,
10 employee, attorney, or counsel of any of the parties ,
11 nor am I a relative or employee of any of the parties '
12 attorney or counsel connected with the action, nor am
13 I financially interested in the action .
14
15 Dated this 7th day of ch 2019 .
16 Sj d
17
18 TOBI RAY
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 1
23 5 : 15 , 18 according 11 : 6 , 8 , 13
$ 2860 . 11 4 : 13 8 : 21 18 : 18
act 14 : 20 also 9 : 13
$1, 091, 610 . 15 3 action 6 : 17 14 : 16 16 : 6
7 : 1 actually 7 : 8 always 20 : 8
$16, 269, 177 . 37 3 5 : 25 add 10 : 25 AMBROSIA 21 : 5
7 : 9 300, 000 13 : 20 11 : 3 , 6 , 9 , 11 Ambrosio 4 : 18
$17 , 529, 296 . 97 19 : 14 6 : 9 8 : 8 , 16 , 19
7 : 7 addition 9 : 5 9 : 4 , 23 10 : 2 ,
$175 10 : 21 4 16 : 12 6 , 14 , 25 12 : 5 ,
$545, 000 16 : 2 4 6 : 13 additional 11, 23 14 : 25
21 : 24 45, 000 13 : 21 7 : 3 , 14 9 : 14 , 19 : 13
$545, 805 . 07 48 , 000 13 : 21 16 , 19 10 : 1 amended 12 : 25
7 : 21, 23 11 : 1, 2 , 12 amount 8 : 6 , 9
$85, 000 10 : 21 addressed 9 : 22 11 : 4 , 5
5 12 : 14 21 : 1
0 adequately amounts 6 : 23
5 6 : 2 7 : 18 7 : 17
003 13 : 6 50 19 : 23 , 25 administrator an- 10 : 12
20 : 4 4 : 16121 6 : 6 and 4 : 3 , 8 , 18 ,
O1 13 : 6 50 , 000 19 : 16 , admission 22 , 23 , 25 5 : 1,
013 11 : 3 13 : 6 19
13 : 23 5 , 6 , 9 , 12 , 18 ,
545 19 : 19 Adventure 20 , 22 6 : 16 ,
1 11 : 19 , 21, 23 18 , 22 7 : 3 , 16
18 : 214 20 : 20 , 9 : 7 , 8 , 9 10 : 5 ,
1 6 : 1 7 24 14 , 15 , 17 , 20
125 20 : 1 7 18 : 9 advice 5 : 8 11 : 11 , 12 , 17 ,
125, 000 19 : 24 after 7 : 13 22 12 : 2 , 5 , 13 ,
130 7 : 4 9 : 16 , 12 : 25 15 : 25 14 , 17 , 18 , 24 ,
18 , 21 , 24 8 20 : 20 , 24 25 13 : 3 , 4 , 6 ,
11 : 10 , 13 12 , 15 , 19 , 20
8020 4 : 10 again 5 : 4 147 7 : 5 9 : 17 18 : 3 14 : 4 , 18 , 19 ,: 6 , 9 ,
15, 21
11 : 11 against 11 : 18 20 20
17 11 : 12 9 15 : 14 21 : 13 , 11, 215
0 , 22 13 ,
19 5 : 7 , 13 92 . 8% 7 : 9 21
16 , 18 , 20
agenda 5 : 14 , 17 : 12 19
2 A 20 18 : 10 , 18
ago 13 : 1 19 : 2 , 11 , 17 ,
2 6 : 4 18 : 25 18 , 20 , 21, 23
able 10 : 16
20 5 : 16 , 19 agreements 20 : 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 ,
12 : 19 , 23
2018 5 : 8 , 13 about 10 : 4 14 : 3 13 , 19 , 20 , 24
12 : 15 all 4 : 23 9 : 9 21 : 16 , 18 , 22
2019 5 : 15 , 17 , 14 : 23 18 : 24
12 : 18 12 : 14 , 16 13 : 4 announced 5 : 7
18 , 19 19 : 4 , 17 20 : 16 14 : 3 , 14 15 : 3 announcement
21st 7 : 13 16 : 15 5 : 13 , 18
above 4 : 4 already 7 : 18
21 : 7 Another 20 : 2 ,
Absolutely 8 : 20 9 : 2
3
8 : 16
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 2
answer 20 : 6 15 : 22 , 24 Attorney' s benefit 5 : 21
anticipate 16 : 10 , 14 18 : 3 4 : 17 better 14 : 9
21 : 11 21 : 24 avoid 15 : 10 between 11 : 10
antsy 21 : 22 Ashbritt 4 : 8 12 : 2
any 4 : 19 5 : 9 6 : 21 7 : 11 B beyond 7 : 4
6 : 17 , 19 10 : 4 8 : 9 9 : 5 10 : 8 , 10 : 1
13 : 14 , 21, 24 16 11 : 15 back 7 : 12 bid 21 : 21
15 : 10 , 15 12 : 2 , 7 , 13 , 17 , 12 : 10 15 : 19 bill 8 : 24
20 : 11 25 14 : 5 15 : 25 16 : 18 17 : 17 10 : 21
anything 19 : 7 16 : 2 , 20 17 : 12 19 : 17 , 21 billed 6 : 23
apparently 19 : 15 21 : 7 , 20 : 4 , 6 , 8 7 : 7 , 9
11 : 21 13 , 17 , 21 background
Ashbritt' s g billing 8 : 25
appeal 18 : 11 7 : 22 bit 7 : 10 12 : 6
appeared 9 : 17 15 : 23 balancing blowing 20 : 13
15 : 21 14 : 20 Board 5 : 11
appetite asked 5 : 15 Barrows 6 : 12 6 : 19 19 : 21
20 : 11 13 : 1 15 : 3 Bart 16 : 6
19 : 1 Board' s 21 : 8 ,
applies 21 : 16 Assistant base 18 : 8 9 , 19
approach 20 : 3 4 : 17 6 : 9 , 12 19 : 2 Bob 4 : 16 6 : 7
approach- based 7 : 1 11 : 8 13 : 3
20 : 2 assurance 14 : 5
17 : 19 Bob' s 12 : 6
approval at 4 : 4 , 20 basically 7 : 5 BOCC 5 : 14 , 19
19 : 15 5 : 6 , 7 , 10 , 13 , 21 : 24 bond 20 : 25
approve 19 : 22 15 , 18 6 : 17 , 20 because 7 : 3 Both 17 : 15
approved 5 : 11 9 : 9 , 21 10 : 7 , 13 : 1 119 bothers 13 : 18
16 : 13 21 12 : 1 , 11, 15 15 : 14 19
approving 14 : 20 15 : 7 , 21
15 : 14 18 : 24 bottom 10 : 3
16 : 4 20 : 18 brought 11 : 20
16 : 4 17 : 16 business 7 : 24
approximately 19 : 1 20 : 21 because-
4 : 14 21 : 10 , 24
11 : 20 11 : 21 13 : 10 ,
16
are 4 : 23 8 : 5 , attempted been 6 : 23 13 , 7
6 , 10 9 : 21 15 : 10
7 : 10115 9 : 3 but : 14 , 23
10 : 4 11 : 1 , 11 12 : 18 15 : 24 8 : 3 , 10 9 : 1, 20
attempting 10 : 7 , 19 11 : 9 ,
12 : 20 13 : 5 11 : 2 18 : 9 , 25 20 : 13
15 : 5 , 11 21 : 14 before 4 : 2 19 , 25 12 : 3
attend 10 : 12 13 : 2 , 11 , 15 , 17
aren' t 15 : 17 attended 10 : 9 began 19 : 18 14 : 4 , 16 15 : 15
argument 8 : 7 , 12 : 13 begin 16 : 7 16 : 10 18 : 3
8 attending beginning 19 : 25 20 : 10 ,
arguments 4 : 14 20 : 14 13
15 : 10 , 14 20 : 7 Attorney 4 : 16 behalf 5 : 1 , 5 by 11 : 2
around 20 : 20 6 : 8 , 10 , 12 being 4 : 20 12 : 12 , 13 13 : 7
arrangement attorney- 5 : 6 14 : 18 18 : 12
11 : 22 client 4 : 7 , 11 19 : 19
as 6 : 14 , 24 , 25 attorneys believe 7 : 17 C
7 : 6 , 24 9 : 5 , 10 4 : 21 6 : 19 10 : 22 11 : 22
10 : 5 11 : 8 , 13 10 : 10 , 11 14 : 5 15 : 11 CA-K-17- 4 : 9
13 : 3 14 : 7
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 3
CAK17802 5 : 10 clarifications consultant counter-
came 12 : 10 9 : 8 18 : 10 proposal 8 : 2
camp 18 : 8 cleanup 20 : 17 contact 16 : 11 county 4 : 8 ,
19 : 2 clear 20 : 23 21 : 719 15 , 16 , 17 , 22
can 6 : 18 clients 18 : 22 contained 5 : 9 6 : 5 , 7 , 10 ,
7 : 21, 25 8 : 1 closed 4 : 2 , 7 , 9 : 10 , 11 12 14 : 18
10 : 3 , 7 14 : 4 , 11, 20 , 24 5 : 2 , contemplates 16 : 3 , 4 19 : 1
14 19 : 24 20 : 8 5 , 11 21 : 8 8 : 14 21 : 23
canal 20 : 17 closer 19 : 18 contested- county' s 5 : 20
cannot 6 : 17 Coldiron 6 : 3 13 : 25 course 15 : 19
can' t 14 : 11 come 19 : 15 context 8 : 4 16 : 21
15 : 15 18 : 1 20 : 8 continuation court 4 : 6 , 19 ,
20 : 18 comfort 7 : 23 16 : 13 22 5 : 21 10 : 16
Carruthers coming 16 : 21 continue 16 : 14 18 : 4
5 : 24 8 : 17 , 23 15 : 12 19 : 22 21 : 11
19 : 18
18 : 12 , 18 commission continuing covered 7 : 19
case 4 : 9 5 : 10 5 : 23 7 : 13 16 : 5 8 : 13
6 : 20 , 22 7 : 25 19 : 1 contract 7 : 19 critical
11 : 15 14 : 8 Commissioner 8 : 11, 13 , 22 16 : 14
16 : 23 17 : 16 5 : 24 10 : 24 9 : 14 , 18 11 : 13
21 : 13 , 14 , 17 , 12 : 10 19 : 13 15 : 17 D
22 contractual
commissioners
categorizing 4 : 15 21 17 : 25 Danny 6 : 1
10 : 5 communicate conversation date 5 : 16
cause 4 : 4 16 : 7 15 : 19 , 23 6 : 23 7 : 7
cents 7 : 21 communicated conversations 16 : 17
certainly 21 : 19 14 : 6123 15 : 1 dates 16 : 15
14 : 4 16 : 12 company 17 : 20 Correct 14 : 2 David 6 : 13
certified comparison corrected day 21 : 7
4 : 18 10 : 20 12 : 25 deadlines
changes 15 : 5 comply 16 : 15 costs 7 : 3 16 : 16 21 : 12
charging concern 14 : 15 8 : 19 10 : 5 , 15 debris 9 : 15
10 : 23 concerning could 11 : 24 11 : 19
chart 10 : 4 6 : 20 21 : 17 December 5 : 7 ,
Chris 4 : 17 concerns counsel 14 : 6 , 13 7 : 12 12 : 8 ,
6 : 9 , 22 7 : 10 , 12 : 14 24 15 : 23 15
21 8 : 2 14 : 22 concluded 16 : 10 17 : 8 , decision 6 : 19
Christine 21 : 15 10 , 12 7 : 24 13 : 11, 14
4 : 18 6 : 11 conference counter 7 : 24 decisive 6 : 17
Christmas 7 : 12 12 : 7 , 12 13 : 9 , 15 declare 5 : 1 , 5
15 : 5 15 : 2 , 4 , 8 , 21 , 19 : 16 , 19 defend 15 : 12
Chris' s 14 : 5 25 counter- defenses 7 : 18
claim 10 : 18 21 : 19
confront definitely
11 : 18 15 : 18 counter-offer 15 : 10
claiming 9 : 17 consider 12 : 1 13 : 22 department
claims 9 : 16 consists 8 : 9 4 : 9 5 : 10
17 : 13
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 4
details 6 : 23 dollars 16 : 2 exchanged find 16 : 3
8 : 3 done 6 : 20 7 : 15 firm 10 : 21 , 22
did 9 : 3 15 : 6 7 : 14 13 : 24 existed 12 : 15 15 : 22
18 : 14 , 18 20 : 17 expenditures firms 10 : 8 ,
didn' t 7 : 13 don' t 10 : 6 6 : 17 10 , 12
15 : 18 12 : 1 13 : 17 expenses 8 : 1 first 15 : 2
difference 14 : 14 , 19 explains 11 : 8 flags 20 : 14
11 : 10 16 : 20 18 : 1, explosive Florida 4 : 4 ,
different 16 , 23 19 : 6 , 7 , 9 : 14 8 , 9 , 12 5 : 9
10 : 8 8 20 : 4 , 7 , 11 , express follow 12 : 5
direction 16 21 : 6 , 8 13 : 14 , 21 following
6 : 19 down 7 : 10 , 16 15 : 17 21 : 8 , 9
21
director 20 : expressed for 4 : 4 , 21
17 : 12 dragged 18 : 2 13 : 9 5 : 6 , 14 , 20
discovery due 16 : 15 expressing 7 : 2 , 3 , 8 , 23
16 : 16 duplicated 15 : 21 8 : 11, 14 , 20 , 24
discussing 8 : 7 extend 16 : 18 9 : 1 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 10 ,
6 : 15 21 : 11 12 , 13 , 16 , 18 ,
discussions E extra 11 : 4 19 , 20 , 25
15 : 8 16 : 12 10 : 23 11 : 7 , 9 ,
19 : 17 , 20 20 : 9 each 5 : 21 10 , 11 12 : 9 ,
F disposal 7 : 6 eager 16 : 18 16 , 18 , 20
dispute 6 : 25 either 14 : 19 14 : 24 15 : 3 , 7 ,
p fact 16 : 19 1215 , 16
7 : 1 , 17 11 : 15 , Electronic false 20 : 14 1 , 11 17 : 1
17 , 20 , 24 4 : 3 12 : 2 , 24 13 : 5 emergency familiar 8 : 18 18 : 19 19 : 22
15 : 9 far 7 : 7 11 : 25 20 : 8 , 11 21 : 1
17 : 13 disputed 8 : 6 , end 21 : 10 father 17 : 11 forth 19 : 17 ,
favorable 21
9 15 : 12 , 16 engaged 7 : 11
disputes 15 : 12 , 16 forward 13 : 8
entire 21 : 1 12 : 15 entirely 7 : 17 fear 20 : 18 four 21 : 4
disputing February Friday 21 : 9
9 : 21 entitled 8 : 10 5 : 16 , 19 from 4 : 20
distance 11 : 5
Environmental federal 21 : 1 9 : 16 10 : 10 , 11 District 5 : 25 11 : 19 18 : 2 feel 14 : 21 14 : 16 15 : 1
6 : 1 , 2 , 3 , 13 Environmentals fees 9 : 12 16 : 2 , 21
divert 18 : 5 11 : 23 10 : 5114 , 15 , 21 18 : 22 , 25 19 : 5
estimated 14 : 1 20 : 14 21 : 23
do 10 : 4 11 : 2 4 : 13
FEMA 18 : 6 , 13 further 8 : 1
13 : 1, 22 16 : 6 even 21 : 14 20 : 9 , 11
19 : 15 20 : 21 few 8 : 3
21 : 20 , 25 every 10 : 10 fifty 7 : 20 future 17 : 21
docket 16 : 17
13 : 11118 17 : 6
fight 18 : 2
doesn' t 14 : 17 everything 9' G
doing197 7 : 14 figure 7 : 25
: exactl 12 : 17
dollar 7 : 21 �' filed 11 : 18 garnishment
11 : 4 , 6 example 8 : 17 filing 16 : 16 11 : 25 18 : 3
9 : 10 , 13 , 19
11 : 10
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 5
Gastesi 4 : 16 happen 18 : 14 hoping 11 : 11 10 : 17
6 : 5 8 : 25 happened 15 : 19 indicated
13 : 10 14 : 1, 11 18 : 24 hour 10 : 21 15 : 2
18 : 15 20 : 15 has 6 : 22 hovering indicates
21 : 2 7 : 10 , 15 12 : 18 21 : 24 16 : 21
gave 13 : 13 , 16 : 22 18 : 9 , 11 how 8 : 14 indicating
18 , 20 20 : 24 13 : 25 14 : 21 16 : 9
geared 15 : 8 haul 7 : 3 16 : 5 18 : 23 inevitable
general 14 : 6 haul- 11 : 2 20 : 16 19 : 14
17 : 11 haul-out hungry 17 : 1 inevitably
get 7 : 14 , 23 9 : 14 , 15 , 17 , hurried 15 : 7 19 : 20
18 : 1, 4 20 : 8 , 19 , 21 11 : 1, 4 hurriedly informal
19 21 : 16 , 18 haunts 13 : 11 15 : 4 12 : 12
getting have 6 : 23 hurry 15 : 6 information
21 : 22 , 23 7 : 2 , 8 , 17 , 19 6 : 18 7 : 15 9 : 7
give 7 : 21 8 : 15 , 16 10 : 4 , I informing
8 : 3 , 17 13 : 22 6 , 20 11 : 15 , 18 12 : 18
15 : 15 13 : 4 14 : 3 idea 10 : 4 , 6 injunction
given 5 : 12 , 17 15 : 4 , 11 16 : 6 , if 10 : 19 20 : 22
giving 13 : 16 15 , 19 17 : 20 , intention
11 : 7 , 25 15 : 24
17 : 18 20 : 12 22 18 : 6 19 : 2 18 : 3 , 24 19 : 25 16 : 22 , 23
go 13 : 8 20 : 3 , 20 : 9 , 11 , 13 , 20 : 4 , 5 , 24 interested
20 , 24 23 , 25 21 : 10 , 21 : 25 15 : 13
goes 14 : 18 18 , 20 immediate intersection
going 14 : 3 , 9 haven' t 11 : 20 21 : 23 17 : 20
15 : 22 16 : 9 21 : 19
Hawkman 15 : 6 immediately into 11 : 20
19 : 16 , 20 21 : 25 18 : 2
20 : 19 , 20 , 25 he 15 : 9 , 18 , in 4 : 3 , 4 , 7 , 22 introduction
21 : 11 , 12 20 , 22 , 24
16 : 12 17 : 7 5 : 8 6 : 24 , 25 12 : 6
goods 9 : 12 7 : 11, 12 , 14 , 19 invoice 11 : 3
got 11 : 25 head 13 : 7 8 : 13121 9 : 4 ,
18 : 9
great 10 : 6 17 : 18 20 : 3 18 10 : 21 invoices 7 : 2 ,
greater 9 : 18 hear 13 : 12 11 : 13 , 25 16 12 : 24
11 : 13 heard 14 : 17 12 : 117 , 10 , 24 13 : 1, 4 15 : 9
Greco 4 : 3 hearing 16 : 19 13 : 5 , 16 , 18 , 20 involved
guarantees 18 : 25 21 : 10 , 14 : 3 , 4 , 12 , 18 14 : 18 17 : 15
15 : 15 15 15 : 9113 , 17 , involvement
guys 13 : 17 held 4 : 12 20 , 24 16 : 4 , 7 , 19 : 9
18 : 23 20 : 13 5 : 6 , 7 7 : 12 11, 12 , 14 , 18 , is 4 : 6 , 24
here 19 : 7 19 17 : 16 , 20 6 : 21 7 : 1, 22
he' s 14 : 6 , 9 19 : 24 21 : 4 , 10 8 : 8 , 12 9 : 14
H 15 : 25 16 : 3 , 10 Inc 4 : 8 10 : 13 , 24
had 7 : 4 9 : 6
17 : 12 included 11 : 3 , 12 , 14 ,10 : 8 , 10 , 11 himself 15 : 21 11 : 13 16 , 21 13 : 14 ,
11 : 5 , 21 15 : 24 his 15 : 8 , 22 increasing 21 14 : 2 , 19
handling 9 : 12
holding5 : 11 11 : 5 15 : 15 16 : 1, 4 ,
10 : 8 21 : 5 incurred 22 , 25 17 : 4 , 5 ,
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 6
7 , 10 , 12 , 19 judgment 20 : 5 letter 21 : 4 marching
18 : 9 , 20 , 23 Judy 8 : 21 level 7 : 23 16 : 17
19 : 2 , 11 , 13 , 12 : 17 13 : 2 17 : 16 Mark 10 : 23
16 , 19 , 23 15 : 6 liability materials
20 : 6 , 7 , 16 , 17 , just 6 : 14 13 : 24 12 : 16 13 : 3
18 21 : 6 , 11, 10 : 25 11 : 8 like 11 : 12 matter 5 : 8
15 , 20 , 21 12 : 5 , 10 , 20 13 : 8 14 : 17 , 19 10 : 9
isn' t 16 : 9 13 : 16 20 : 15 like- 13 : 17 matters 4 : 7
issue 14 : 10 likelihood max 20 : 1
issues 18 : 6 K 16 : 1 may 18 : 4
it 5 : 16 6 : 25 likely 19 : 16 21 : 25
7 : 1 , 5 8 : 2 9 : 9 K1 4 : 7 Limbert- 6 : 11 Mayor 5 : 1
10 : 7 11 : 8 , 20 kind 8 : 3 16 : 8 Limert-barrows 13 : 7
12 : 12 , 13 20 : 21 4 : 18 6 : 11 me 8 : 17 10 : 25
13 : 14 , 16 , 18 , know 13 : 11 , 17 list 18 : 9 13 : 11 , 18
19 , 21 14 : 12 , 14 : 8 , 14 16 : 14 litigation 14 : 21
18 , 19 , 20 17 : 14 18 : 16 ,
15 : 3 , 20 , 21 6 : 16 8 : 1 meantime 7 : 14
24 21 : 2 , 3 14 : 18 16 : 14 mediator
16 : 18 17 : 4 Kolhage 6 : 1 20 : 11 12 : 13
18 : 23 , 24 19 : 4 8 : 5 , 15 10 : 3 ,
20 : 4 , 23 little 7 : 10 meeting 4 : 13 ,
13 11 : 14 12 : 4 12 : 6 14 : 22 15 , 23 , 25 5 : 2 ,
item 4 : 6 9 : 9 13 : 7 14 : 14
16 : 23 5 , 7 , 11, 13 , 14 ,
11 : 1 16 : 24 17 : 3 , 7 ,
items 12 : 24 longer 15 : 23 15 , 18 6 : 18 , 20
14 , 17 , 24 16 : 5 , 10 21 : 18 7 : 13 13 : 2
15 : 13 , 16 18 : 6 , 14 , 23
its 16 : 23 looking 9 : 25 meetings 19 : 1
19 : 6 , 11 20 : 10 14 : 7 , 8 , 20 mention 14 : 12
it' s 4 : 13 5 : 6
6 : 25 10 : 21 lost 10 : 19 met 12 : 11
13 : 15 , 16 , 22 , L lot 8 : 21 Michelle 6 : 3
23 , 24 16 : 8 language 14 : 2 15 : 23 might 21 : 20 19 : 14 21 : 13 lower 17 : 1 milea e 11 : 4 ,
I' d 19 : 14 Large 12 : 8 18: 10 lunch 12 : 21 7
g
I' ll 5 : 1 , 5 last 18 : 15 miles 7 : 4 , 5
8 . 2 9 : 16 , 17 , 19
later 16 : 19 M
I'm 8 : 18 11 : 10 , 11, 12
17 : 19 18 : 8 law 4 : 19 10 : 8 Madame 5 : 1 mind 12 : 1
15
I've 14 : 16 15 : 141 13 : 7 minute 17 : 3
18 : 25 19 : 1 lawsuit 14 : 11 made 13 : 13 minutes 4 : 14
lays 9 : 15 20 : 23 money 10 : 1
leading 15 : 3 main 16 : 11 13 : 13 18 : 4
J leads 17 : 17 21 : 6
make 8 : 1 12 : 3
January 5 : 15 , learned 19 : 4 13 : 14 14 : 8 , 10 monies 18 : 5
18 least 20 : 21 15 : 14 Monroe 4 : 8
Jared 17 : 11 leave 4 : 24 makes 6 : 20 5 : 9
Jeff 15 : 6 , 11 left 17 : 12 management month 16 : 19
16 : 7 legal 14 : 1 8 : 19 17 : 13 21 : 10
Johnson 10 : 20 let 10 : 25 many 9 : 6 10 : 9 months 18 : 25
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 7
more 8 : 3 9 : 16 must 6 : 20 numbers 19 : 17 once 19 : 15
10 : 25 18 : 3 my 5 : 6 12 : 1 one 7 : 3 10 : 7 ,
21 : 16 17 : 17118 O 10 , 11 , 25
morning 21 : 7 20 : 18 21 : 6 21 : 20
Moscowitz myself 15 : 7 oath 4 : 2 ones 13 : 5
10 : 22 14 : 23 , obligated 21 : 13
24 15 : 3 , 13 , 17 N 21 : 14 only 6 : 15 , 18
16 : 8 , 9 , 17 obtaining 11 : 14 , 16 13 : 5
17 : 7 , 11 name 5 : 22 16 : 2 open 5 : 2 6 : 21
Moscowitz' s necessary occasion 16 : 6 oppose 16 : 20
17 : 10 10 : 17 13 : 3 occurring opposed 14 : 7
most 12 : 24 19 : 25 15 : 5 or 7 : 8 , 9 8 : 6 ,
14 : 25 19 : 16 needed 5 : 8 odd 16 : 2 7 9 : 15 , 16 , 21
Mr 4 : 11 5 : 4 12 : 16 of 4 : 4 , 8 , 9 10 : 11 , 22
6 : 1 , 5 , 7 , 9 , 13 , negotiate 5 : 8 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 11 : 13 13 : 12 ,
14 8 : 5 , 8 , 12 , 19 : 23 19 , 21 7 : 7 , 9 , 14 , 21 , 24
15 , 16 , 19 , 25 14 : 10 16 : 22
9 : 4 , 20 , 23 , 25 negotiations 15 8 : 3 , 9 , 13 ,
6 : 16 7 : 11 19 , 21 9 : 2 , 15
1 20 : 21 , 22
14 , 19 , 25 13 , 16 : 5 10 : 3 , 5 , 6 , 10 , order 5 : 6
11 : 14 , 16 never 8 : 6 9 : 9 11, 24 11 : 5 , 91 16 : 13 , 15 18 : 4
Nevertheless 22 12 : 8 , 14 , 21 : 12 , 16
20 , 23 13 : 7 , 18 , 21 , 24 other 4 : 19 , 23
20 , 23 13 : 7 , 7 : 19
next 4 : 6 13 : 4 , 24 14 : 10 8 : 13 14 : 11
10 , 23 14 : 1, 2 , 10 , 19 , 23 our 5 : 22
11, 13 , 14 , 22 , Nicolette 4 : 2 15 : 21 7 : 22 , 24 9 : 8
16 : 1, 4 , 5 , 8 ,
23 , 24 , 25 no 9 : 23 14 : 13 11, 13 , 21 10 : 13 , 14 , 20
15 : 3 , 13 , 17 16 : 22 17 : 20 17 : 12 , 13 , 15 11 : 24 17 : 25
16 : 6 , 8 , 9 , 17 , 18 : 6 19 : 10 24 , 25 17 : 3 , 5 , 20 : 3 18 : 5 19 : 2 , 16 , 19 : 13 , 19 7 , 9 , 14 , 15 , 17 , nod 17 : 18 22 20 : 15 , 21 out 7 : 3 , 2521 : 1, 5 , 6 , 10 9 : 15 10 : 24
22 , 24 , 25 not 7 : 22 offer 7 : 24 11 : 3 13 : 4
18 : 6 , 8 , 13 , 14 , 8 ; 10 , 18 10 : 22 13 : 9 , 15 17 : 6 14 : 10 , 15
15 , 16 , 20 , 23 11 : 23 , 25 19 : 16 , 19 15 : 25 16 : 3 , 18
19 : 4 , 6 , 10 , 11, 13 : 5 , 8 , 15 , 16 , 21 : 20 , 24 18 : 21
13 20 : 2 , 10 , 23 14 : 10
12 , 15 , 23 15 : 22 17 : 4 , 25 offered 7 : 20 outside 10 : 20
21 : 2 , 3 , 5 21 : 23 , 25 Okay 12 : 4 14 : 24 17 : 10
MS 5 : 3 , 24 16 : 24 17 : 3 , outstanding
not- 13 : 22 1
6 : 2 , 3 , 11 Notary 4 : 3 7 , 24 19 : 6 , 11 11 : 14
8 : 17 , 23 on 5 : 1 , 4 , 7 , 20 over 4 : 24 8 : 2
notice 5 : 12 ,18 : 12 , 18 17 11 : 18 7 : 1 , 6 , 21 13 : 1 14 : 17
much 15 : 23 11 : 3 , 9 , 11 , 19 owe 18 : 4
16 : 5 , 10
now 4 : 22 7 : 16 13 : 4 14 : 5 , 18 , owed 11 : 22 muck 20 : 18 12 : 3 13 : 12 19 15 : 16 16 : 6
17 : 12 19 : 2 17 : 18 18 : 9 , 11
multiple number 13 : 20 20 : 5 , 7 21 : 5 , P
10 : 11 17 : 1 18 : 9
Murphy 5 : 3 19 : 18 20 : 16 7 , 9 paid 6 : 24
6 : 2 onboard 16 : 10
21 : 25 7 : 8 , 15 8 : 14 ,
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 8
15 , 20 9 : 3 , 12 , 10 : 9 range 13 : 20 remain 4 : 22
20 , 23 10 : 20 processed 7 : 8 19 : 22 , 23 , 24 remaining
11 : 7 , 8 13 : 4 profits 11 : 23 rate 9 : 21 13 : 5
part 8 : 21 9 : 2 prohibits 10 : 22 reminder 6 : 15
21 : 6 4 : 19 rather 16 : 8 reporter 4 : 3 ,
parts 8 : 13 , 15 project 20 : 21 re-open 4 : 25 6 , 19 , 22 5 : 21
party 8 : 14 proposal 7 : 20 reached 15 : 25 representing
11 : 23 14 : 20 16 : 3 15 : 24
past 15 : 24 proposals 9 : 6 read 13 : 18 request 5 : 7
pay 18 : 18 , 21 proposer 9 : 5 reason 11 : 17 9 : 6
20 : 17 prosecute 16 : 25 requested 9 : 9
payment 7 : 8 10 : 17 16 : 23 reasonable 12 : 7 , 12
payments 21 : 18 10 : 15 , 17 requests 9 : 7
11 : 24 prove 10 : 16 14 : 21 16 : 20
pending 11 : 17 21 : 14 received- required 4 : 23
performed provide 6 : 18 19 : 3 resolve 12 : 23
8 : 10 provided 13 : 2 recent 14 : 25 13 : 24 15 : 19
Perkins 10 : 23 provides 9 : 18 recently 21 : 22
14 : 9 provision 18 : 17 , 24 resolve-
person 4 : 20 9 : 15 recommend 12 : 19
persons 4 : 14 , public 4 : 3 , 25 21 : 15 resolving
23 5 : 12 , 17 6 : 21 recommendation 15 : 9
place 8 : 6 14 : 8 , 10 , 17 7 : 22 17 : 4 , 5 , respect 9 : 7 , 8
plaintiff publication 19 19 : 12 , 14 10 : 12
16 : 21 , 22 5 : 14 , 19 reconvene response
lease 15 : 4 , 6 4 : 25 21 : 23
P pursuant 4 : 12
point 10 : 7 8 : 10 record 5 : 6 , 20 results 15 : 15
12 : 1, 15 push 16 : 18 10 : 24 12 : 9 , 20 Rice 6 : 13
pointedly 20 : 6 21 : 12 reduce 21 : 25 10 : 24 12 : 10
21 : 4 putrefied 7 : 2 regard 14 : 5 right 7 : 13
portion 11 : 1, 8 : 20 , 24 9 : 1 , reimbursed 8 : 25 9 : 3 , 4
9 10 , 11 , 13 8 : 11 10 : 2 12 : 2
position 5 : 22 putting 20 : 14 reimbursement 15 : 19
post 20 : 25 8 : 12 18 : 21 risk 10 : 5 , 13 ,
postponed Q reiterating 14 14 : 3 2 0 : 7
5 : 16 12 : 17 role 18 : 3
prejudice question rejected Roman 4 : 16
19 : 7 17 : 18 18 : 10 , 12 6 : 5 9 : 10
14 : 16d late 6 : 16
prepared questions 9 : 6 re room 4 : 23 , 24
12 : 16 18 : 11 12 : 14 relations
10 : 24 12 : 10
14 : 8 , 10
present 4 : 20 pressure R relationship rush 21 : 6 , 8
21 : 17 17 : 23 18 : 1
prior 15 : 4 Randy 10 : 23 relative 18 : 7 S
proceed 20 : 4 14 : 9 19 : 8
proceedings relayed 14 : 6 said 11 : 8 , 12
13 : 3
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 9
same 13 : 19 11 : 16 12 : 9 , 20 spreadsheet taken 4 : 2
save 14 : 1 13 : 23 14 : 2 , 6 : 22 7 : 6 taking 17 : 19
say 9 : 3 11 : 17 13 , 22 16 : 25 staff 18 : 10 tell 10 : 7
13 : 15 14 : 15 , 17 : 5 , 9 , 15 , 22 , starting 5 : 22 14 : 22 18 : 1
16 15 : 1 16 : 25 25 18 : 8 , 13 , 15 : 1 19 : 25 telling 20 : 10
saying 8 : 5 16 , 20 19 : 4 , 10 state 4 : 4 tense 15 : 24
9 : 11 20 : 2 , 12 , 23 5 : 22 term 9 : 18
schedule 21 : 3 status 19 : 2 11 : 12
12 : 21 shut 20 : 21 Statute 4 : 12 terminated
scheduling signals 20 : 13 steered 15 : 18 17 : 22
16 : 13 21 : 12 , Silno 10 : 20 step 16 : 7 terms 15 : 17
16 Since 4 : 19 stepping 16 : 4 , 11
see 6 : 25 7 : 6 site 7 : 6 10 : 24 than 9 : 18
13 : 8 20 : 2 situation still 6 : 24 , 25 14 : 9 16 : 8
seek 18 : 21 15 : 18 13 : 11 16 : 10 17 : 2
20 : 25 skip 10 : 3 17 : 7 21 : 19 Thank 5 : 3
seemed 15 : 20 Smith 10 : 23 strategy 6 : 16 6 : 14
seems 13 : 16 16 : 7 strongly 9 : 2 that 5 : 8 , 10 ,
14 : 20 smoke 20 : 13 subject 11 : 24 15 , 16 6 : 21,
Senior 14 : 24 so 6 : 21 7 : 6 , submitted 9 : 6 22 , 23 7 : 2 , 13 ,
separate 9 : 1 7 , 9 , 21, 24 submitting 18 , 24 8 : 1 , 5 ,
14 : 13 8 : 2 , 23 , 25 11 : 2 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 ,
serving 15 : 22 9 : 19 10 : 25 20 , 21 9 : 2 , 3 ,
subsequent session 4 : 2 , 11 : 4 12 : 1 , 11, 13 : 2 4 , 5 , 9 , 12 , 15 ,
7 , 12 , 20 , 24 23 13 : 21 14 : 3 21 10 : 1 , 7 , 15 ,
5 : 5 , 11 21 : 8 ,
15 : 5 , 6 , 16 subsidy 21 : 1 22 11 : 5 , 7 , 9 ,
suggest 19 : 21
10 16 : 8 19 : 6 gg 10 , 15 , 18 , 24 ,
set 8 : 4 20 : 8 solicitation suggestion 25 12 : 1 , 2 , 3 ,
9 : 8 19 : 23 21 : 6 7 , 11, 15 , 16 , 24
sets 16 : 15 settle 14 : 7 some 7 : 15 , 22 summarize 13 : 4 , 9 , 12 , 15 ,
8 : 19 11 : 22 6 : 25 16 , 17 , 18 , 22
21 : 2 17 : 1, 6 16 : 2 , 4 17 : 16 summary 20 : 5 14 : 2 , 3 , 4 , 15 ,
: 22 18 : 5 19 : 20 supplemented 19 15 : 5 , 9 , 11,
settled 13 : 12 20 : 21 12 : 25 16 , 18 , 20 , 21 ,
settlement something supplied 7 : 2 22 16 : 9 , 12 ,
6 : 15 7 : 11 , 12 , 11 : 19 20 : 15 , supposed 8 : 23 15 , 18 , 20 , 21 ,
20 12 : 7 , 11 22 22 , 25 17 : 1,
15 : 2 , 4 , 7 sure 12 : 3 17 , 19 18 : 1, 3 ,
16 : 5 , 11 sometimes 13 : 23 14 : 25 8 , 9 , 11, 14 , 23
20 : 16 , 19 10 : 11 swallow 5 : 21 19 : 8 , 14 , 18 ,
sort 16 : 4 Sylvia 6 : 2
several 16 : 1, y 21, 23 , 24
3 19 : 1 Soufa 13 : 11 , 20 : 7 , 10 , 17 ,
shaking 20 : 3 17 14 : 7 T 18 , 21 , 24 , 25
she 9 : 1 sounds 9 : 4 21 : 2 , 3 , 6 , 11 ,
Shillinger speak 5 : 1 take 4 : 13 14 , 15 , 17 , 20 ,
4 : 11, 17 5 : 4 speaking 5 : 4 6 : 17 7 : 4 , 20 , 21, 25
6 : 7 , 14 8 : 12 21 : 5 22 20 : 4 21 : 17 that- 15 : 2
9 : 20 , 25 10 : 19
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 10
that' s 7 : 1 20 : 6 , 12 , 19 , 25 24 14 : 1 , 3 , 7 , understood
9 : 13 , 19 14 : 21 21 : 13 , 22 , 24 8 , 9 , 21 15 : 3 , 12 : 3 17 : 4
16 : 14 18 : 25 they've 7 : 7 , 4 , 10 , 12 , 13 , until 5 : 16
21 : 12 9 , 20 9 : 2 18 , 19 , 22 20 : 17 21 : 15
the- 21 : 1 thing 13 : 17 , 16 : 113 , 6 , 7 , 9 , up 7 : 4 , 25
their 10 : 17 19 2 1 : 2 0 12 , 15 , 18 , 23 9 : 2 3 12 : 5
11 : 2 , 20 14 : 6 think 13 : 19 17 : 1, 4 , 5 , 6 , 15 : 3 19 : 25
17 : 8 , 11 18 : 2 14 : 16 17 : 1 11, 17 18 : 4 , 5 , 20 : 14 , 18
20 : 19 21 : 13 , 19 : 6 , 8 7 19 : 7 , 8 , 14 , us 5 : 21 7 : 7 , 9
24 thinks 9 : 1 15 , 17 , 20 , 22 , 8 : 24 , 25 11 : 20
them 9 : 20 , 23 thirty 4 : 14 23 , 25 20 : 3 , 4 , 12 : 2 14 : 1 , 22 11 : 8 12 : 18 this 4 : 13 , 24 6 , 19 , 20 , 23 , 25 15 : 3 , 12 , 14 , 16
13 : 1, 12 , 13 , 6 : 18 , 20 , 21 21 : 5 , 6 , 8 , 11 , 16 : 1, 11 19 : 22
, 17 , 18 ,, 14
19 , 20 , 22 15 : 7 7 : 25 10 : 8 12 12 20 : 10
, 14
17 : 15 , 23 11 : 14 , 15 , 16 used 17 : 11
18 : 19 20 : 17 , to- 7 : 4
13 : 15 14 : 4 ,
24 21 : 9 , 20 , 21 10 , 12 , 15 today 6 : 24 V
themselves 16 : 2 , 19 , 22 12 : 22
21 : 21 17 : 2 , 16 , 20 today' s 5 : 16 valid 7 : 18
then 5 : 22 18 : 7 , 19 , 20 , told 18 : 8 value 11 : 6
13 : 2 , 12 15 : 25 24 , 25 19 : 11 , tomorrow 21 : 7 19 : 22
18 : 21 20 : 6 , 8 , 13 21 : 10 , 17 too 20 : 24 versus 4 : 8
20 21 : 16 those 8 : 14 , 15 took 7 : 5 8 : 6
5 : 9
there 7 : 12 10 : 15 13 : 4 , 5 total 18 : 20 very 15 : 11
9 : 14 10 : 9 15 : 14 18 : 5 towards 14 : 4 16 : 22 18 : 16 ,
11 : 5 13 : 14 , 21 20 : 7 , 12 15 : 8 16 : 17 24 21 : 3
15 : 5 17 : 10 thought 20 : 15 transportation
19 : 9 , 16 three 7 : 1 , 16 4 : 9 5 : 10
there' s 17 : 9 10 : 8 13 : 6 W
traveled 11 : 6
19 : 8 , 19 through 5 : 12 , trial 16 : 17
wait 16 : 6
these 7 : 16 14 , 17 , 19 20 : 8 21 : 18 17 : 3 21 : 15
15 : 12 , 16 12 : 21
20 : 13 trying 11 : 3 , want 7 : 23
tight 12 : 21 6 , 9 15 : 13 15 : 18 19 : 7
they 6, 10 , 4 time 13 : 18 20 : 6 wanted 8 : 3
18 9 : 9 , 10 , 14 , times 16 : 1, 3 turn 8 : 2
23 9 : 9 , 12 12 : 3
to 4 : 12 , 24 , 25 20 : 20
10 : 7 , 10 , 21 was 5 : 12 , 17
5 : 5 6 : 16 , 19 , two 7 : 2 10 : 11 7 : 12 8 : 21
11 : 1, 5 , 7 , 11 , 21, 23 , 25 7 : 4 , 17 : 9
17 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 9 : 2 , 9 , 11
22 , 25 13 : 2 , 25 5 , 7 , 10 , 16 , 20 , 12 : 12 13 : 19 ,
14 : 7 , 19 16 : 6 ,
22 , 23 , 25 8 : 2 , U 20 15 : 2 , 20
3 , 10 , 11 , 21, 24
19 17 : 1 18 : 4 16 : 18
19 : 18 20 : 4 , 9 : 5 , 7 , 8 , 23 ultimately wasn' t 12 : 13
11, 18 , 24 10 : 3 , 12 , 14 , 12 : 19 15 : 13
21 : 2 , 3 , 25 16 , 17 11 : 1, 2 , under 4 : 2 waste 7 : 3 , 4 , 5
3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 11,
they' re 8 : 25 23 , 24 7 , 9 , 11, understand 8 : 20 , 24 9 : 1 ,
9 : 25 11 : 3 , 6 , 23 , 24 3 112 : 2 , 3 , 13 : 10 14 : 15 10 , 11 , 13 , 15
9 , 22 14 : 7 , 13 2 , 8 , 14 , 18 , 21,
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com
Closed Session Meeting
February 20 , 2019 11
way 7 : 25 what' s 6 : 24 19 : 21 , 24 20 : 3
13 : 14 , 21 8 : 7 21 : 14
15 : 20 20 : 17 when 4 : 24 wrap 7 : 25
we 4 : 25 6 : 17 , 13 : 12 , 22 wrongdoing
18 , 23 7 : 8 , 17 , 18 : 14 13 : 24
19 , 23 , 24 8 : 1, where 10 : 9
5 , 15 , 16 , 20 16 : 4 , 15 Y
9 : 21 10 : 19 , 20 whether 14 : 9
11 : 12 , 15 which 7 : 8 , 17 Yeah 11 : 16
12 : 11 , 13 , 15 , 11 : 3 13 : 1 year 12 : 18
17 , 19 , 20 , 23 16 : 19 18 : 9 13 : 1
13 : 1, 3 , 12 , 13 , 19 : 24 21 : 11 ,
18 , 20 , 22 year- 12 : 8
16 , 21 years 14 : 17
14 : 4 , 11 15 : 6 , white 9 : 12
7 , 11 16 : 15 , 19 Yes 17 : 14
17 : 20 , 22 who 17 : 10 , 11 18 : 20 21 : 3
18 : 1, 4 , 6 , 18 , whom 18 : 12 yesterday
21 19 : 2 , 15 , why 18 : 25 19 : 5
21, 24 20 : 5 , 7 , wiggling yet 21 : 20
8 , 16 , 23 , 24 19 : 20 you 5 : 3 6 : 14
21 : 6 , 8 , 10 , 11, will 4 : 12 , 13 , 7 : 22 8 : 3
15 , 16 , 19 , 25 15 , 22 , 25 5 : 21 10 : 4 , 7 12 : 3
website 5 : 20 14 : 15 , 16 13 : 8 , 11 , 17
week 18 : 15 20 : 25 14 : 8 , 14 16 : 14
well 6 : 24 win 20 : 5 , 7 17 : 18 18 : 1, 23
9 : 17 10 : 14 with 5 : 22 19 : 5 , 6 , 8 20 : 2
17 : 3 7 : 11 9 : 7 , 8 21 : 17
were 7 : 18 10 : 12 , 19 your 5 : 1 , 4 , 8
9 : 12 10 : 9 , 16 11 : 15119 , 21 10 : 4 14 : 15
11 : 7 12 : 16 , 12 : 6 13 : 3 , 8 , 17 : 4 , 18 , 19
17 , 19 , 23 , 24 12 14 : 6 , 23 19 : 11 , 15 20 : 3
13 : 5 14 : 8 16 : 7 , 16 you' ll 6 : 25
15 : 8 , 9 , 22 17 : 20 , 23 7 : 6
17 : 15 18 : 2 , 10 you' re 14 : 3
weren' t 8 : 23 19 : 15 , 19 , 23 , 20 : 10
we' ll 6 : 15 25 20 : 4 you've 13 : 9
we' re 7 : 10 , 16 within 9 : 11
11 : 23 , 25 without 7 : 25
13 : 16 19 : 7
words 21 : 4 Z
we've 7 : 15 work 8 : 9 zero 20 : 6
9 : 20 , 23 11 : 8 14 : 4 , 14
what 7 : 9 9 : 2 19 : 24 , 25
10 : 4 , 13 11 : 1 working 12 : 21
12 : 17 14 : 5 , 16 18 : 10
16 : 1 17 : 18 would 8 : 14
19 : 1 10 : 15116 , 23
whatever 13 : 8 15 : 1
20 : 16 16 : 7 18 : 3
U. S . LEGAL SUPPORT
www.uslegalsupport . com