Item C18 C.18
t, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Monroe Mayor Sylvia Murphy,District 5
The Florida Keys � � �l'U � Mayor Pro Tern Danny Kolhage,District 1
�pw° Michelle Coldiron,District 2
Heather Carruthers,District 3
David Rice,District 4
County Commission Meeting
April 17, 2019
Agenda Item Number: C.18
Agenda Item Summary #5386
BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Airports
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Richard Strickland (305) 809-5200
none
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of Time Extension only (no increase in original cost)
with Jacobs Project Management Co. for Task Order No. 12/14-47 Services Authorized:
Supplemental 2- EYW Master Plan Update at Key West International Airport.
ITEM BACKGROUND: This Task Order is to update the 2003 Airport Master Plan at Key West
International Airport(EYW), as described in Exhibit A.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
: Approval of Task Order No. 12/14-47 with Jacobs Management Co. dated October 21, 2015 item
D-10.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
This amendment extends the term of the original task order execution date from 720 days to 1,825
days.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
DOCUMENTATION:
PS041214-47 Time Ext.-Jacobs
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date: Upon Execution
Expiration Date: Services will cease by 1,825 days.
Total Dollar Value of Contract: $0
Total Cost to County: n/a
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted:
Packet Pg. 757
C.18
Source of Funds:
CPI:
Indirect Costs:
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing: If yes, amount:
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required:
Additional Details:
REVIEWED BY:
Beth Leto Completed 03/26/2019 7:40 AM
Richard Strickland Completed 03/26/2019 8:56 AM
Pedro Mercado Completed 03/26/2019 9:20 AM
Budget and Finance Completed 03/26/2019 1:09 PM
Maria Slavik Completed 03/26/2019 1:27 PM
Kathy Peters Completed 03/28/2019 12:18 PM
Board of County Commissioners Pending 04/17/2019 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 758
C.18.a
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
Effective Date Upon Execution Task Order No. 12/14-47
.t
Client Project No. �' -IS30Y Engineer Project No. E9Y16747 (S2)
This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master
Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ("Client") and JACOBS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated February 15, 2017 ("Agreement"). The
Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
Services Authorized—Supplemental No. 2—EYW Master Plan Update
cv
Ir-
Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and (n
incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and
consists of 85 page(s).
Pricing U
N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement. 0
X Firm Fixed Price of$ 855,598.00
N/A Other(Describe):
0
Schedule (THIS IS A TIME EXTENSION REQUEST)
Services may commence on Execution (Date approved by Monroe County,10W15)
Services will cease by 1,825 days
Other
(SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
By_
Mayor/Chairman
CONSULTANT:
JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO
Title
V.P. Geographical Operations Manager
NEY
�„ w... ....
File: MSTR APS Monroe County
J.WROADO
A8815T
Page 1 of 1 Date
`—� "'- '
Packet Pg. T59
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED lUUY 21 2015)
Table of Contents
Overview...................................................................................................<.................................................................
Purposeof Study.......................................................................................................................................................6
Scopeof Services......................................................................................................................................................9
cv
T_
1. Propect Initiation Administration........................................................................................................10 o
1.1 Establish Technical Review Committee....................................................................................10
1.2 Project Administration, Monthly Billing&Reports...............................................................10
2. Aerial Surveying and Mapping................................................................................................................IlIl U)
2.1 Aerial Mapping&Surveying
2.2 Establish Geodetic Control................. ............... .......12
x
2.3 Pre-Survey Preparation Activities.............................................................................................12
0
2.4 Photographic mapping_remote sensing................................................................................14
2.5 Airspace Surfaces&Obstacle Analysis............................ .....16
3. Inventory of Existing Conditions............................................................................................................18 ad
3.1 Inventory of Airport.Physical Facilities....................................................................................29
3.2 Data Collection of Air Traffic and Aviation Activity...............................................................20 ..
3.3 Off- import Land Use and tz nd Use Controls........................................................................._20 �
3.4 Land Holdings and Existing Leaseholds.................................................................................21 �
3.5 Known Environmental areas of Concern......<....... .....21
3.0 Meteorological Conditions.................................................................<........................,..............21
3.7 Airport Financial Data.......................................................................................................®.........21
.8 Review of Other Reports................................................................................__........,...............22
3.9 Prepare Inventory Of Existing Conditions Report..................................................................22
4. Aviation Activity Forecasts....... ..............................................................<................................................23
master Pi an t„pdate
Cal
Packet Pg. 760
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 UPDATED JULY 21, 2015�
4.1 Collect and Analyze Socioeconomic Data_.,.............................. ............................24
4.2 Develop irline Passenger Forecasts.......®®,.®.®®®..®®>.,®®®®.®®,,.®.®.....»®..®®®®.®.®.®....®®®®®®®....®®®®.®.®.........
24
4.2.1 REVIEW EXISTING FORECASTS............................................................................................................................24
4.2.2 DEVELOP PASSENGER ACTIVITY FORECASTS....................................................................................................24
4.3 Develop it Cargo Forecasts,®.,®.....,,<>.»......®,.®.............®.,.®,®®®.®.,.........®....®.®...................®®............2
4.4 Develop General Aviation Forecasts.®..........,®.....®....®®.®,.®®».®...®®....,...®..®..»........®®..........®®®.........®2
4.4,1 REVIEW GENERAL AVIATION INDUSTRY TRENDS AND PREPARE DERIVATIVE FORECASTS FROM
THEFAA TAF..................................................................................................................................................................26 iz
4.4.2 PREPARE GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX PROJECTIONS..................................I——.,...........26
43 DevelopMilitary Aircraft Activity Forecasts .................................................. .................._ 7
o
4.6 DeverAlternate Demand Scenario...................._........................................................d,d,._ 7 (n
4.
op
orecasts
4 7 Establish AircrafteanPeakingOperations C Faraceristics and... ,....................®®,.........®...,®®...®,. ..,.®®..,.,2
Design Day Flight .Schedules ules ...y...............2
4.9 Prepare Aviation Activity Forecasts Report®......®.......__._................ ®,,.....®o.................,......28 U)
O
S, Facility a uire en ..................................................................m...._....................®®...„..........................29 0
5.1 Airfield.,®.,,®®®..®®..,...®.®.®®®,..®...,.®®®...............®..........,„.®,®.,....,.,.®®®®...,........,,........®,....................._.........29
5.1.1 DEMAND,,/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT........ .............................................................29 as
5.1.2 DESIGN AIRCRAFT AND RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS....................................................................30
5.1.3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS,__._.... ...................,,....,,.,........................................,.....30
5.2 Passenger Terminal..........w,........................,-.,.....,,..............m....m................»................................... '1
v
5.2.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT....... .. . ..... ..........31
5.2.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS.......... ............ ., .....31
S3 On-Airport Curbsides and Roadways..........................................................,............,.o.....,.......32
5.3.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT............... ......... .
5.3.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS......................................................................................................,.....,........................ 33 c�
.4 Public Parking....................... ................. ......................... ........ .........___33
5.4.1 DEMAND/CAPAC ASSESSMENT............................................................._..................,..............,...,.....,,...,....33
5.4.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................ .........................34
S.S Air Cargo...... ............................................................ ............................._.........................-.......34
S.S.1 DEMAND/CAPACrrY ASSESSMENT............................................................................ -...........34
55,2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS......... ..............................................................................................,.....35
5.6 General Aviation.....,.„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„®<....<®.,,..._..,.>..,.,.®>®..,,....,...........____........................__........35
5.6.1 DEMAND�CAPACTTY ASSESSMENT...................................................................,......,........._..............................35
Master Pi an 44pdate
(21
Packet Pg. 761
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 201S gUPDATED)LILY 21 2015,Y
5.6.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS ........ ......... ......35
5.7 Support Facilities........................................................................................................................36
5.7.1 DEMAND/CAPACrrY ASSESSMENT.... ................................................................................ 36
5.7.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS....--...,....a-- ................__..................................................................36
S.8 Prepare Demand/Capacity&Facility Requirements Report...............................................36
61 Alternatives Analysis and Recommended Development Plan..........................................................37
6.1 Airfield Alternatives..............-.................................. .......................................................37 iz,
6.2 Terminal Alternatives.„®.............................................................---..................................38
Ir-
C14
6.3 Roadway Alternatives,.,..,....a,,,.„.®................®„.®,........,....,,,,,®,....®.®,.,®..,.....®...............................38 Ir-
0
6.4 Airport Public Parking Facility Alternatives.................... ..................................................39 (n
(L
6.5 Cargo Facility Alternatives.........................................................................................................39
6.6 General Aviation Facility Alternatives.....................................................................................39
6.7 Support Facility Alternatives.....................................................................--........................39 U)
.0
0
6.8 Joint Use Evaluation.......................... ............... ......--................................................40
ca
6.9 Evaluate Development Alternatives--.............................................................................40
X
6.10 Refine Recommended Airport Development Plan..... ........... ................................................40 W
0
6.11 Prepare Airport Development Alternatives Report............--...............................................41 E
V.-
Iq
EnvironmentalOverview.......................................................................................................................42 1
7.1 Existing Conditions......-..-.........-.-....... ..................................__...................----.43 C14
7.2 Evaluation of Proposed Development......... .....................................................---.............-44 0
(n
(L
7.3 Airport Noise Evaluation............................................ ............................................-44
7.31 REVISE INM AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX.......................... .......... ...........--.......--45
E
73-2 ESTABLISH AIR TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROFILE......... ........... ......
7.3.3 ESTABLISH BASELINE(EXISTING) NOISE CONTOURS..... ........... ...........--45
7.3.4 ESTABLISH LONG TERM(10-YEAR) NOISE CONTOURS .......... 45
'7.4 Prepare Environmental Overview Report...-......................... ............................................45
8, Sustainability Initiatives......................... ......... ......... ..............................47
8.1 Establish Baseline Conditions...,..®..,......,-'-................. .............................................---47
8.2 Facilitate Sustainability Workshop........... ........................ ....... .....................--...47
8.3 Formulate Sustainability Framewo&... ....... ............. .............. --.47
Master P(an Update
[31
Packet Pg. 762
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015,UPDATED IULY 21, 2015)
6.4 Prepare Simplified Recycling, Reuse and Waste Reduction Plan.............................,..w.......49
6.5 Draft Sustainability Chapter.®...„...............„....,,,.,®..,......®.................„..m,®,.................„..„.........49
9. Implementation Plan....,m.m.......®...........................m.®,,,.,,...,,.,®.......®,,.,,....®....,,,,,.,,,.,..s..,.............................50
9.1 Define Individual Development Projects®,a,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,®.,,,,,..,®.,.,....................„........®...............50
.2 Develop Estimates of Rough Order of Magnitude Cost(ROM)m....m.,.,,,.e....®>.......................51
.3 Coordinate Project Sequencing,.„®.,.„.®.,.,..,..e.,.<...,...<.®»®.....................„.„.,..............................51
9.4 Prepare Project Summaries and Exhibits„......®..m..m.„..„..®........................................................52 iz
10. Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis,..,,,,,,.„...,........®.„..®®„...................„....... „.........53
1 .1 Develop Financial Model..........................................................................................................-54 o
IL
10.2 Prepare Financial Plan.®.,,,..m,,...®.,,.,.®.....®®....................®.®.®.,.,.....,.,mm.,..,,,,.....>...............................S4
10.3 Prepare Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis Report................<,..,,,...........................55
11. Update of the Airport Layout Plan Set,...„...®,.,......„.>m.„...............a.,®.,..,...,....,®,................„..................56 t)
0
21.1 Title Sheet®..............®m...,.......®..,,.>..,.,,m..........>m,..®....®......,....,.®®®.........®®....®..,,,.....................„........„57
11.2 Existing Airport Layout...........................
x
11.3 Airport Layout Plan.,.......m...,®.............®...,......,..,,,,.,®..,...®,,,,..,.,,....m..........,.>,.,,.............................S8 0
11.4 Airport Airspace Drawing..,,,,,.,..®>....................>®.,,,,,.,....®......,..®,.,....,...,.,..................................58
17
11.5 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings
11.6 Terminal Area Drawing(s).............m,..,,.,....,.........................................,...........„............„m„.......5 y
11.7 Ladd Use Drawing...............®,.,,,.,.®.,...,,,,.,.,,,,...,,,,®®,....,..........>...m..<........®..,.,,...>®.„..............„......60
11.6 Airport Property Map..................®,.,,,,,...®.............a................. a......,,.,,,.,......„.......................60
IL
11®9 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal.................„..... .....®61
11.10 Final Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal....®„..,.®,...„®®......,.<.m..„...............................................61
11.11 Final Airport Plans Set „......62
11.12 Narrative Report.............................ga.........®®....... e,.......................„....62
11.13 Coordination Meetings...,.......„.......®,>.„...........®. e................................6
12. Documentation„a»..—......e,,.®,................................................................„.m„........„.„.,. .........m,,..............- 4
12.1 Prepare Executive Summary........................- ..............®.....,...a........ ®......................64
12.2 Prepare Draft Airport Master Plan Update Report„,....e....,....,e.............®.....d,.,m.µ...............„..64
12.3 Prepare Final Airport Master Plan Update Report.x.....................„......... ..<„....--............„65
master Plan i[Jpdate
l4,l
Packet Pg. 763
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT iFERRUARY 23 2015 IUPDATED JULY 21.. 2015,
13, Outreach and Participation Program..........................--....................................................................66
13.1 Conduct Public Meetings..........................................................................................................66
13.2 Elected Officials Briefing Support............................................................................................67
13.3 Technical Review Committee Meetings and Stakeholder Briefings....................................67
14. SUPPLEMENTAL TASKS............................................................................................................................68
14.1 Evaluate Aircraft Turning Movements..................................................................................—68
14.2 ei•ine Setback Requirements based an Engine Jet Blast.....................................................69
14.3 Prepare Airfield Alternatives and Establish Declared Distances..........................................69
C14
T-
14.4 Establish Markings, Lighting,and Signage Requirements ..................................................69 o
(n
14.5 Prepare Interim Airport Layout Plan(ALP)............................................................................70 IL
co
14.6 Develop Noise Contour...............................................................................................................71
24.7 Prepare Categorical Exclusion(CATER) Form......................................................................71
U)
14.8 Prepare Technical Memorandum.............................................................................................71 .0
0
0
14.9 Coordination Meeting.................................................................................................................72
X
W
0
E
C14
0
(n
IL
4i
E
Master Nan Update
Packet Pg. 764
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 20151
Overview
Key West International Airport(EYW or the Airport) operates as the southernmost airport in the United States
(U.S.). The Airport is located near the southern tip of the Florida Keys, on the northeast end of the island of
Key West, just minutes from downtown Key West and about 180 miles southwest of Miami International
Airport. Although EYW is considered a commercial airport general aviation traffic accounts for the majority of
airport use, with 61 percent of total operations (based on FY2013 data'). The Airport is owned and operated
by the County of Monroe.
The Airport,which has one runway(9/27) measuring 4,801 by 100 feet, covers approximately 334 acres. The C14
original terminal, which opened in 1957, has been repurposed for the accommodation of arriving passengers. o
In February 2009, a new 30,000 square feet terminal opened for the handling of departing passengers IL
IL
including ticketing areas and security screening checkpoints. In FY 2013, EYW had 395,333 total
enplanements, an increase of 34 percent in enplanements from FY 2003. As of February 2015,the Airport was
classified as a small hub in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), Current Parking facilities
at EYW consist of 300 vehicles spaces at ground level beneath the newer terminal including 150 spaces for U)
rental cars and 150 for the public. 0
Purpose of Study X
UJI
0
The intent of the study is to update the 2003 Airport Master Plan for the Airport. This document is over 12 E
years old and needs to be updated to reflect new facilities, current projections of airport activity, new
I
environmental and other regulatory constraints, and to plan for an appropriate mix of Rand uses to support 17
Iq
projected aviation and non-aviation needs. Since 2003, many changes have occurred not only in the Key T_
C14
West community, but also in the aviation industry. Some of the changes that have occurred at the Airport
Include: the operations of larger aircraft including narrowbody jets such as Boeing 737, a significant increase 0
in passenger demand (from 295,079 enplanements in FY 2003 to 395,333 in FY 2013), the completion of a IL
IL
two-level passenger terminal (2009), the installation of an EMAS system on both runway ends, the
construction of an automobile parking garage, and the acquisition of additional property. As a result, the
E
Master Plan Update will need to address a number of key issues including but not limited to: runway length
requirements, passenger terminal capacity,curbside and parking capacity, aircraft parking positions and apron
capacity and configuration, runway and taxiway geometry, and future general aviation facility requirements
among other airport facilities and systems. The Master Plan Update will also evaluate how the
reestaNishment of new diplomatic relations with Cuba could impact passenger demand at the Airport near,
term and long-term, and assess the pros and cons associated with the possible joint-use of the Naval Air
Station Key West.
Federal Aviation Admimstration,Terminal Area Forecasts,,TAF),January 2015
Master Plan Update
Packet Pg. 765
C.18.a
.,.�...m,.m _._ ... . M..n
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
n ,FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 1 15)
r ..
The Master Plan Update will be conducted in accordance with FAA AC 150/5070-66,Airport Master Plans,and
the FDOT Guidebook for Airport Master Planning and will use guidance from other relevant FAA Advisory
Circulars and Orders, publications from the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP), Transportation
Security Administration(TSA)regulations,and other aviation industry publications. As part of the Master Plan
Update,an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) drawing set that depicts the full buildout of aviation-and non-aviation-
related facilities associated with the preferred development will be developed. This ALP drawing set will
adhere to the FDOT and FAA's prescribed design guidelines and be developed within a GIS platform,
conforming to ACs 150/5300-16A, 150/5300-17b,and 150/5300-18B. The ALP set will also include a property
inventory map("Exhibit A")that will reflect the latest Airport property acquisitions.
The Master Plan Update will outline a plan for the provision of future facilities to accommodate the projected
passenger and aircraft demand. This plan will insure that short-term actions and recommendations do not
preclude long-range planning options and provide a financially sound implementation plan for short-,
intermediate-, and long-term improvements. The following key issues have been identified through (IL
n
discussions with Airport management:
Airside Issues
• The need to identify the critical aircraft given the fleet mix operating at the Airport U)
• The existing aircraft ramp layout and the need to maximize the number of aircraft parking positions in
front of the passenger terminal including power in/power out taxiing
• The proximity of the general aviation and commercial aircraft ramps and the need to preserve the
integrity of the security identification display area(SIDA)
• Passenger and vehicle circulation on the ramp and the need to evaluate whether the installation of as
passenger boarding bridge could improve the level of service at the Airport
• The need to identify areas for the staging of ground support equipment(GSE)
• The need to identify runway length, runway width, runway centerline to parallel taxiway centerline,
and runway safety area grading requirements considering the existing and projected aircraft fleet mix
at the Airport
• The need to identify runway extension impacts on the adjacent communities including potentialIL
impacts to the World War U"bunker"located west of the Runway 9 end
• The need to evaluate the existing taxiway layout including the departure taxiway routes and the
access points between the existing and proposed apron and the runway
• The accommodation of large general aviation aircraft including business jets on the ramp and
possible encroachments into the existing Taxiway A safety areas.
• The lack of aircraft queuing to the Runway 27 end
• The lack of interior service road for access to the airfield areas
• "Sea rise'and the need to keep adjusting(raising)the surfaces
Passenger Terminal Issues
• The need to reevaluate the capacity of the existing passenger terminal and to define a financially.
sound expansion program that accommodates immediate, mid-term,and longterm needs.
• Congestion in the baggage claim area and the need to relocate the rental car counters
Master Plan Update
ill
Packet Pg. 766
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015)
• The need to maximize passenger convenience and level of service
• The lack of holdroom spaces and the lack of concessions
• The need for improvement in the handling and processing of baggage
Airport Access and Parking Issues
• A comprehensive assessment of traffic flows within the terminal area
• The need to evaluate the existing airport access road and curbside capacity to eliminate traffic
bottlenecks and congestion (including a review of the existing taxi staging areas)
• The need to assess (from a facility and business perspectives) and evaluate the existing parking
product capacities and the supply of non-revenue generation parking.
• Access to the existing Fixed Based Operator(F )
v
• Rental car facilities—the need to evaluate capacity and location
• The need to assess the interior service network o
IL
CID
General Aviation Issues
• The need to evaluate the general aviation apron capacity
• The need for additional aircraft storage facilities,including larger t-hangars U)
• The need to assess location of east and west overflow ramp areas
• The fuel farm location and the routing of fueling vehicles
Airport Land Use Issues
• The best use for airport property not required to accommodate future aviation demand including the 0
recreational park("Pines Park")located adjacent to the Fort East Martello
• The potential for non-aviation revenue enhancing uses on the Public Works property to be vacated
• The need to develop an "Exhibit A" Airport Property Map to reflect land acquisitions since the FAA-
approval of the last ALP drawings set.
• The identification of jurisdictional wetlands to help identify development areas
(n
IL
Airport Support Issues
• Access point to the existing fuel farm
• The potential relocation of facilities that support airline and other airport operations such as ground
service equipment, fuel farm, aircraft rescue firefighting facilities, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection facilities
• The need to assess existing and future U.S.Customs and Border Protection facility requirements
Other Items that Should be Considered as part of the Master Plan
• The possible joint-use of the Naval Air Station Key West("Boca Chica Key")
• The aircraft traffic and passenger demand at the Airport should full diplomatic relations with Cuba be
re-established
• Equipment upgrades(e.g. NAVAIDS)
-
R,laster Plan Update
Packet Pg. 767
EY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
-------
Scope of Services
The Airport/County staff has provided specific direction regarding the elementstobe included in the Master
Plan Update to address the current and future needs at the Airport.The following work program describes the
effort required to successfully complete the Master Plan Update for the Airport within the FAA and FDOT
framework.
The work elements and tasks identified in this scope of services and the associated fee for completing that
wu,kis based ona set of assumptions.The major assumptions are idendfiedasfollows: ~T
�
C14
^ Aerial Surveying and Mapping: The basemap for EYVV will be prepared in compliance with FAA's T_
prescribed design guidelines within a GlE p|atfbnn, conforming to all applicable FAA advisory circulars (n
and regulations. This proposal, however, excludes the production of an AGlS eALP since the FAA's eALP [L
module remains in development phase. *m
^ Range of Alternatives to Analyze:A major cost'driverto any master plan is the number ofalternatives to [u
be identified and the degree to which they are to be evaluated in support of recommendation and/or
decision.The supporting information needed to reach adedsion as well a,the plan decisions themselves
are owner/operator driven. This work elements described in the next sections indicate the number of
alternatives that will be developed for each of the Airport elements (air5e|d, lands\de' termina|, cargo,
general av/adon' support facilities, others). These alternatives will be evaluated with Airport staff and the X
UU
Technical Review Committee and the preferred alternative will ultimately be incorporated into the Airport 0
Layout Plan (ALP) for FAA approval. lfadditional alternatives are subsequently Ey required (beyond
mentioned in this document),this scope of work would likely need to be expanded.
^ Environmental Overview—Review of Existing Conditions:This task does not include field reviews, analysis ~�
or other scientific evaluation of resources. The summary ofexisting conditions will include the gathering C14
of information from existing databases, maps' and published information available from applicable
resource agencies and is intended to reference known or potential environmental conditions identified in v«
recent environmental efforts conducted on the airfield that could be affected by proposed airport.
^ SustainabUity: The Master Plan Update will include chapter that addresses the Airport sustainabUity
policy, establish possible goals to minimize the impact or consumption tn reduce the airport's overall
environmental footprint,and identify and describe a range ofQxneric systainabi|ityinidadves to help the
airport achieve each set goal. This proposal, however, dues not include any field surveys and energy
audits and does not provide for the development of an implementation plan to guide the implementation
of sustainabi|ityin/tiatives.
^ Project Schedule:Although the estimated cost to complete the Master Plan Update is based on the level
of effort anticipated for each task, schedule also has a significant influence.The fee estimate is based on
an 18'month completion schedule for the work elements defined in the next section of this Scope of
Services. If additional services are subsequently added,the schedule would likely need to be extended.
^ Utility. This project does not include an assessment of future utility system requirements to serve the
Airport.
Master Plan Update
Packet Pg. 768
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAi', AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 201S[UPDATED!LILY 21 2015a
® Project Initiation & Administration
1.1 Establish Review Committee
Cd
T—
Firm Responsible for Completing this 5ubtask: lacobsIRlcondo&Associates Inc o
IL
A Technical Review Committee comprised of representatives of the Airport staff,airlines,Fixed Base Operators, CID
air cargo tenants, terminal area tenants including ground transportation providers (taxi, rental cars, and etc.)
Will be established at the initiation of the project for the purpose of providing technical guidance, review and
comment on each element of the master plan. Each member of the technical committee will be provided with U)
a three ring project notebook binder for working papers. A total of 20 binders will be provided to members
of the technical review committee.
Project1.2 ii e Monthly Billing
0
Firma Responsible for Completing this 5ubtask: locobsORicondo&Associates, Inc. �-
This task will involve the necessary project coordination between the Planning Team members over the course
of the planning period and between the client and the team to ensure distribution of informaton and
guidance on project related items This task will also include the development of project status reports on a
monthly basis and invoicing of the project. This task will include several specific coordination efforts IL
IL
including:
Feet with the Airport/County staff to develop and review the project schedule:
Prepare monthly status reports for inclusion with the invoice. Status reports will describe progress on a
task-by-task basis;
Miscellaneous meetings through web conferences (typically on a monthly basis)to facilitate coordination,.
provide updates and present draft reports.
FAA&FD OT coordination
,Master Plan tjpadate
Packet Pg. 769
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT fEBRUARY 23 2015 6UPDATED iMY 21 2015�
2. Aerial Surveying end Mapping
Firm Responsible for Completing this Task Jacobs
2.1 Aerial Mapping & Surveying
Firm Responsible for Completing this Task Jacobs
C14
The key objectives of this task are to: (1)obtain geodetic control and survey for the identified runway ends;(2) T_
collect aer4 photogrammet6c imagery of the area necessary under current FAA guidance to collect o
plarilmetric mapping to support an eALP base map;(3)develop and analyze the appropriate airspace surfaces IL
and identify object penetrations and potential mitigation measures to obtain the lowest possible approach
minimums. The data collected through this effort will also provide many of the elements that will serve as the
foundation for the creation of an Airport Layout Plan(ALP).
U)
.0
The basemap for EYW will be prepared in compliance with FAA's prescribed design guidelines within a GIS 0
0
platform, conforming to ACs 1.50/5300,16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys
Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; 150/5300-17b, General
x
Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and Submission to the W
National Geodetic Survey„ 150/5300 1813, General Guidance and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical 4)
E
Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards: 150/5300-13A
Change 1, Airport Design; and Orders 8260.313, The United States Standard for 'ferminal Instrument V.-
Procedures(TERPS),and 8260.54A,The Urilted States Standard for Area Navigation.
C14
rHs basemap will ultimately serve for the development of a comprehensive Master Plan for the Xrport that 0
wdl include an ALP drawing set highlighting the long-term development plan for the Airport. The primary (n
IL
airport planning services and related defiv&'ables to be performed and completed in this task include:
E
* Geodetic Control &Surveying
* Aerial Photography and Planimetric Mapping
* Airspace Surfaces and Obstacles Analyses
22 Estabhsh Geode-tic Contr6
The geodetic control and ground survey will be prepared in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 1.50/5300-
16A & 150/S300-18B for establishing imagery controt and tie-in with the airports Primary and Secondary
Airport Control Stations (PALS and SACS). Prior to concluct'ng the ground survey and control, an in,person
..........Master Plan Update
Packet Pg. 770
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015I
interview will be conducted with appropriate airport staff to complete the required forms. Survey subtasks for
will include:
2.3 Pre-Surveyr r iActivities
The following tasks provide information that will be reviewed to prepare for the survey prior to going into the
field.Generally,addressing each item listed below prepares the survey team to begin the survey:
• Review list of prepared questions to discuss with the Airport/County staff or proponent about the survey. 17
• Develop an FAA approved Safety Risk Management Plan for ground survey crew coordination with Airport
Operations.
(n
• Ensure a thorough understanding of the specifications and requirements for the type of survey required. IL
® Determine areas of private or government property and arrange for access.
• Review the descriptions for control stations identified for use in the project. .�
U)
® Acquire and review an accurate airport diagram for use on the airport.
® Review FAA Form 5010, Airport Master Record,at http://www.gcri.com/5010web/.
® Coordinate with airport authorities. x
w
2.3a.1 Reconnaissance 0
• A review of statloli descriptions in the NGS database will be performed. The Primary and Secondary
Airport Control Stations (PALS & SACS) need to be researched and their current data sheets obtained 17
from the National Geodetic Survey(NGS)website.
cv
Mark recovery. The surveyor will use the following process for the "recovery' of a control staton, with a
physical visit to the station to determine its usability Check each control station to determine proper rn
identity. Check the mark type® disk type, and stamping against the NGS datasheet. Ascertain its apparent IL
unmoved position.
Selection of PALS® SACS and NSRS ties. The surveyor will utilize Trimble GPS mapping grade equipment
for"station reconnaissance" (navigating to known PACS&SACS points) After the stations are recovered
and observed to be in apparent un-disturbed condition, preparation of the required descriptions,
sketches, photographs and other documentation will begin. The unmoved position and elevation of the
recovered PAC and SACS points will be verified by the surveyor through the use of GPS measurements
and/or EDM and Level measurements.
Preparation of required descriptions, sketches, photographs and other documentation by the surveyor
and the Planning Team:
An Airport Control plot (modeled on appendix 5 of AC 150/5300-16A) will be prepared. All
stations will be labeled with the corresponding designation and description(PACS, SACS, etc...).
Master Plan Update
Packet Pg. 771
C.18.a
K1"J wd:S11' E19d0»6FtlV'ATi@1&d'aiAOr 0AV68Pd."9!d.r_ __ ... rlLPtdtOPARrr 2$ )ddR a(UPDATED
„,..,.. ......._.. _ _. ,.
Photographs (JPEG format) of the recovered points will be taken and submitted (per AC
150/5300-18 section 1.6.2).
A FAA Station Location Sketch and Visibility Diagram will be prepared and submitted for each
recovered point.
A FAA Survey Station Description and Recovery Form will be prepared and submitted for each
recovered point.
- A pencil rubbing ('if required) utilizing FAA Pencil Rubbing Form will be taken at each of the
recovered points.
A FAA Station Table and Reconnaissance Checklist will be prepared.
• Compilation of a Project Survey Plan will not be completed as the project will not be created in the FAA v
T_
AGIS system.
(n
IL
2.3.1.2 Verification of Pre Survey
The Planning Team, prior to submission„ will verify that correct forms and processes have been followed using
the appropriate FAA supplied forms for use in contact with the Airport Manager and Air Traffic Control'
Interview. Jacobs will also verify the surveyor,uses the appropriate Field Survey Operations forms as supplied t)
by the F on the aGIS web page. o
The Planning Team will perform the following verification tasks associated with the survey work:
x
• Review list of PACS and SACS. 0
• Review/confirm recovered existing Primary Airport Control Station (PALS) and the associated Secondary
Airport Control Stations(SACS)at the airport is done. 17
1"
Iq
• Review verification that if either the PACS and/or SACS are not found, or are destroyed, or damaged,. or T_
are not usable for some other reason, contact has been made with the FAA Airport Surveying—GIS
Program Manager. 0
IL
• Review the submittal of the recovery report for the PACS and SACS to the NGS
.3.1.3 GPS Occupation (Ground Survey) E
The surveyor will take horizontal and vertical measurements of safety critical items to include:
• Aerial Photo Control Points (as identified by the aerial mapping firm). Per AC 150/5300-17B,a FAA Station
Location and Visibility Form wN be prepared and submitted. Additionally, a photograph (JPEG format) of
each control point will be taken and submitted. Existing features are anticipated to be used as Photo
Control Points(targets will not be pre-set by Welch Associates),
• Five check points (as described in AC 150/5300-17B Section 6)wild be occupied with a GPS station and the
measurements submitted to NGS OPUS..
• Existing Runway End points. FAA Navigational Aid Facility/Runway End Sketches will be prepared for each
point.
Master Plan Update
(131
Packet Pg. 772
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED )ULY 21, 20159
• Dispiaced thresholds.
• Ctn4rport Navigational Aids.
Coordinate System/Datum:
Generated Horizontal Coordinates will be State Plane Coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of
1983 (NA 3). Elevations will be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1966(NAV 66).
211.4 Deliverables.- Geodetic Control/Ground Survey
® Final Coordinates, Elevations,and Runway Profile Data Submitted in Autodesk DWG format,. 17
Iq
• Raw observational data'including:Data Collector Files, GS receiver files,, OPUS solutions,- y
T_
• Final Processing/Adjustment/Reduction Files;
(n
• Scans/copies of field notes and sketches; IL
CID
• Checklists and Forms listed elsewhere within this scope,
"If PACS & SACS points are found to be destroyed or damaged, new control points may need to be
established utilizing the guidelines set forth in AC 150/5300-16A. This work is not anticipated or included in I)
this Scope 0
2.4 Photographicf — remote sensing
0
The Planning Team will enlist the serveces of a qu6fied photog ram metric/remote sensing mapping firm toIq
acquire aerial imagery and perform the planimetric mapping tasks in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300-18
Iq
and -179 Unless otherwise directed, the datum used for development of survey control will be NAVD 56 and y
NACU 63 (1996) and will be tied into NGS disks which have been previously set at the airport per AC 150/5300
17K
IL
The aerial imagery and mapping will be captured to the extents of the Vertically Guided Instrument Approach
Surfaces for MTH as outlined in FAA AC 150/'5300.18f3,
2,41.1 Airport Imagery Acquisition Planning
The Planning Team will work with The Sanborn Mapping Co. to create an imagery flight plan and ground.
control diagram for submission to the Monroe County Airports Authority
2.4.1.,2 Aerial Photography Acquisition
Sanborn will acquire the leaf-on aerial photography of the 64 square mile project area conforming to the
General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and Submission to
the National Geodetic Survey, Advisory Circular 150/5300-178 dated 9-29-08. The 24 cm resolution digital
aerial photography will be acquired with a 60%forward overlap and 30%side overlap to provide for complete
stereoscopic aerial photography coverage out to the Vertically Guided Conical Surface(VCS)and include the
Master Plan Update
[141
Packet Pg. 773
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT peonm^n, 23, uo/s�upo^rsomLv o a
�m�
VertioodyGuided Approach Surfaces that extend beyond the vertically guided conical surface as described in
FAA ACISO/S3O0l8B Section 2I1I.
2/41.3 Aehal[ Photography Ground Control
The ground contm� surveying will becoor6nated as required to accurately support the aerial photography
and subsequent phmtogrammetric mapping deliverables. Sanborn will provide the ground control diagram
with the general location of required control points. The ground control diagram vfiH include the runway
thresholds and runway physica< ends,which is also a requirement under 16A.
2.4.I.4 Airport Obstruction Mapping 7
�
Natural ground features and man-made and non-man made elevated features within the VertcaUy Guided C14
Conical Surface and the Vertically Guided Approach will be stereoscopically compiled.The aerial photography r~
obstruction mapping will include identifying and locating the top most vis/Ue part ofnatural objects and m0
man-made elevated features utilizing the Runways with Vertical Guidance specifications and associated *m
figures included in Chapter 2.7 of AC No: 150/5300 18B dated May 8, 2008.In large wooded areas within the
Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces, Vertically Guided Connection 5udaces, Vertically Guided Transitional
Surfaces,Ver6cally Guided Horizontal Surfaces and Vertically Guided Conical' Surfaces the highest tree within a
200^ by 200^ area will be identified and collected at the top mostvisib>a part of that object utilizing leaf-on
aerial photography. cu
2AL5 Digitat Drthoimagery X
With the latest release of AC 150/5300 17B dated � 2� D8 the development and delivery FAA of 0
- . E
orthoimaQery and FGDC compliant metadata has been added asade>ivenab|er
Sanborn wNi develop natural color digita� orthmphotoQ/aphy imagery mfthe VertcaDy Guided Conical Surface ~�
and include the Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces that extend beyond the Vertically Guided Conical C14
Surface. The co|ororthophotognaphy w6U be developed at the resolution of the ongina| aerial photography
�nnagery,which isbelng planned aL24cmmrO75feet. The color orthophotog,aphy imagery will bedelivered m0
in uncompressed TIFF format onDVDorUS8 hard drive.
Accuracy and Datum: Sanborn's proposed Aerial PhotogouphyAcquisit�on and Ground Control Diagram will
be designed to accurately support the obstruction mapping and digital orthophotogoaphy delivery
conform�ngtoASPR6 Class U Accuracy Standards for l^=2O0' scale maps ^^
The analytical aerial triangulation, obstruction mapping and color orthophotographywill be referenced to the
FL State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 83/2007 (N5R5) and NAVD GO. The unit of measurement wN be the
US Survey Foot.
2,4.1,6 P|amimmetric Mapping
Within the VGRPS, VGP[S, VGATS and VGPS imaginary surfaces, thefoiUmwmg eiqportp{animetric Features
Groups that are visible and identifiable on the aerial imagery will be captured at a scale of I' = 200'� Airfield,
Airspace,Man-madeStmgone� Surface Transportation and V§Uty.
Master pwnUpdate
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAQ, AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015;
2.4.,L7 Deliverables - Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing
The following items will be delivered as a result of the Photographic Mapping:
• Aerial Photography acquisition report
• Digital Orthoirnagery on DVD or hard drive for review and acceptance
• Planietric and Obstruction mapping in AutoCAD drawing file format (stereoscopically collected vector
data will also be converted for compliance to 18B AutoCAD standards) for airport obstruction analysis
tasks.
• Three 36"x 36"°color aerial prints on medium weight glossy photo paper. I
cv
2.5 AirspaceSurfaces cl Analysis (n
IL
CID
Once the photogrammetric data has been received, the obstacle elevation and location data will be analyzed
to identify penetrations to applicable FAA FAR Part 77 airspace surfaces as detailed in the tasks below. FAR
Part 77 airspace surfaces will be mapped and integrated into a composite airspace surface to give the airport t)
a means by which to screen future proposed vertical development projects in the vicinity of the airport using a o
point and click query method.
2,5.1.1 Obstacle Analysis
The airspace surfaces will be imported by the Planning Team into a Geographic Information System (CIS). 3- E
dimensional representations of the a'Irspace surfaces will be created In ArcView for analysis against the
planimetric data. Current penetrations (man-made and vegetative) as well as objects within 10 feet of each
airspace surface (vegetative only) will be identified Coior coding and symbology will be used to clearly
identify each object. Unique identification numbers will be given to each object. In certain instances, an
object may penetrate multiple surfaces, In those cases, each surface that is penetrated by the object, or is
within 10-feet above the object,will be noted and included in the master database. The database will contain IL
IL
the following information for each object:
• Object CD
• Data source
• Obstruction type
• Elevation
• Longitude/Latitude
• Airspace surface
• Airspace surface height
• Height difference from object to airspace surface
Master Plan Update
(16I
Packet Pg. 775
C.18.a
_..m..._... _..... .,,w_-.. _, w ..._,.. ...........w, .. _._-.I
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015
•
Property information(if cadastral information is available from MassGIS)
• Airport property line(if available from Airport)
• Avigation easements(if available from Airport)
The mapping shall show the location of all objects (man-made and vegetative) that penetrate the airspace
surfaces as well as those which may be within 10 feet below the respective surfaces (vegetative only). Objects
shall be identified as numbered tags. Each tag number will be listed on a separate appendix table with
information to include the top elevation, the amount of penetration relative to the imaginary surface, the object
height relative to the ground,and a short descriptor as to the type of obstruction. The tag will be color-coded to
show whether the object is above or below the imaginary surface. Edges of the surfaces will be shown,along with
contours of these surfaces shown at a 10-foot interval. Planimetric mapping will include all visible ground features y
within the mapping limits, including edges of roadway and airfield pavements, airfield pavement markings,
buildings, structures, poles, tree and brush drip lines, water bodies, etc. Obstruction mapping plans will utilize a (n
digital orthographic photo (obtained as part of Task 2.3.2) as a backdrop to all obstruction information data as CL
CID
well as planimetric information obtained as part of Task 2.3.2.
Deliverables for this task include one(1)set of hard copy color plots of the obstruction mapping areas plotted on -
24"x 36"sheets. U)
0
x
0
cv
(n
CL
4i
C
0
Master rABan Update
117
Packet Pg. 776
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 WDATED JULY 21 2015�
3. Inventory of Existing Conditions
The purpose of this section is to assemble and organize existing relevant information and data pertaining to
the Airport. A series of inventory efforts are necessary to collect and organize a variety of spii
environmental, technical, and financial data. The Planning Team will perform inventories of all physical
facilities and existing land use within the present boundaries of the Airport, and will inventory existing land
use outside the Airport boundaries but inside the Airport environs. All available plans, specifications, maps,
photographs, drawings and other data, including FAA Form 5010-1 and NOAA Obstruction Charts, will be
obtained. The inventory will identify and generally describe existing facilities as they relate to type and
condition and will include, but not be limited to,the following subtasks,
C14
Where applicable, airport facility data and information previously developed and maintained by the Monroe o
County will be referenced and documented. Additional data shall be collected through the inspection, review (n
IL
and use of Airport Layout Plan's,aerial photographs, FAA and FDOT databases. For budgeting purposes, it has CID
been assumed that a two-day site visit by a mid-level planner and the Project Manager will be conducted.
Data&Resources Required From the Monroe CourtylAirport U)
.0
The Planning Team's proposed budget to complete this study assumes that the following information will be 0
provided by others, or in lieu thereof, the ability to consult with the Monroe County airport staff to jointly
define the assumptions to be used as the basis for the Master Plan.
X
W
* Previous Airport Master Plan/Noise Compatibility Studies 0
E
* Current Airport Layout Plan Drawings(digital required)
* Area Land Use and Zoning Information
* Air-field PCI Study(if available)or FOOT Pavement Management Report
* Current Capital Improvement Program C14
* Airport Property Map and Detailed Property Information
* Area Transportation Plans and Existing Traffic Counts 0
* City of Key West s Adopted Comprehensive Plan IL
Dplimrables
A detailed narrative report summarizing the results of the inventory of existing conditions
including supporting graphic exhibits and tables
Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft Inventory working paper for Airport
review/comment
Five(5)copies of a final draft Inventory of working paper for the airport
review/comment
A final Inventory report in electronic format(PDF)
Comprehensive leasehold map integrated from current lease agreement documents and
electronic Res
E.'stimated Task Duration
60 Days
Yvlasrer Pan i.kl
ICI
Packet Pg. 777
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAi, AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 20L5 QUPOATE®JUJ,Y 21. 2015?
3.1 Inventory of Airport Physical Facilities
Firms Responsible for Completing this Su task: Ricardo&Associates, fnc.,•Ai, Inc, McFarland Johnson and TBD
(Lanside traffic counts and surveys)
Airfield (R A)_Runway, taxiway and ramp configuration including pavement strength and condition„
marking, signing, lighting, navigational aids, aircraft circulation, and access to the Airport operational
areas will be reviewed. Particular attention will be given to the FAR Wart 77 surfaces and the
obstructions located within certain approaches or imaginary surfaces.
Terminal Area (R .A) - Airside and landside components of the current terminal area willl be
inventoried. Attention will be paid to the number and configuration of aircraft parking positions, y
aircraft and passenger circulation, distribution of space by functional use within the terminal building
o
(ticketing, security screening, holdroorns, concessions, baggage claim, etc.) face€ity utilization, existing
level of service and age and condition of the terminal building. An inventory and utilization IL
assessment of parking facilities in the terminal area will be addressed as well. A key outcome of the
terminal inventory wound be a list of specific functional elements that may be depcient and in need of
immediate improvements.
U)
Cargo Facilities (All)) The existing cargo facilities and apron areas, east of the passenger terminal,
will be reviewed. Additionally, cargo operators including all-cargo carriers„ integrated express
operators„ and air,forwarders will be inventoried.
X
Airport Access and Vehicle Parking (R A and CH Perez)-The inventory will also include review of the
following areas: roadways and intersections,terminal curbfront,rental car facilities,commercial vehicle
staging areas„ public transportabon and general ground access, public parking and interface with the
I-
local roadway network. 17
® FBO/General Aviation Facilitlies and Other Tenant Facilities (McFarland Johnson) Structures devoted y
for the use of general aviation, including fixed base and corporate operators will be identified and
evaluated as to their size„ use(maintenance hangar, storage hangar,office, etc.),age and/or condition,
and tenant lease lot uses.Also included in the inventory will be a description of the services provided IL
by the unique FBO, General aviation facilities including ramp areas, number of tiedowns,• and hangars
by type (conventional and 'T-hangar) will be identified and quantified by area or other appropriate
measure. Age or condition of the facility will be identified, as will the utilization and location of the �
facility on the Airpoi7. Additionally a survey questionnaire will be created for distribution to Airport
tenants. The survey well be developed in conjunction with the Airport and will solicit information such
as services provided, satisfaction with current facilities, level of activity conducted from the Airport,
based aircraft, itinerant aircraft serviced, future expansion plans, and perceived airport needs.
Responses will be tabulated and used in subsequent analyses. Results of the survey will be included in
an appendix to the Master Plan.
® Support Facilities(ACID) -Airport support facilities to be inventoried will include, but not necessarily be
limited to, the Air Traffic Controi Tower, fueling facilities, Airport Maintenance, and Aircraft Rescue
and Firefighting(ARFF).
master Pian�,pdate _.....
19)
Packet Pg. 778
KEY wEsr INTERNATMNA&, AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015{UPDATED JULY 21, 2015�
Airport Utility Systems (AID) — To the extent this information is available, utilities supporting the
Airport will be reviewed.The Planning Team will gather existing maps and record drawings of recent
on-Airport utility improvements from the Monroe County/Airport, to prepare a map of the utility
systems The water system, sewer system, storm water system, gas distribution system, electrical
distribution system, and telephone/communications systems will be inducled. No field verification of
information will be performed.
3.2 Data Collection of Air Traffic and Aviation Activity
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask, Ricondo&Associates W,
C14
T_
• Historic and Current Air Traffic Activity Aviation activity statistics for the last 1.0 years of operations at o
the Airport will be assembled and organized. Information concerning air carrier, cargo, general (n
IL
aviation and military operations by local and itinerant categories, as well as enplaned/deplaned
passengers and mail, and fleet mix and based aircraft lby aircraft type will be obtained. Information
concerning peak hour, daily, monthly, and annual activity will be obtained and quantified if available.
Data will be obtained from Airport records, Airport users including the fixed base operator, the Air U)
Traffic Control Tower,and various sources at the FAA. 0
• Air Traffic Control and Airspace:Air traffic control facilities responsible for handling traffic into and out
of the Air-port will be identified and their procedures as they relate to the Airport,will be reviewed,An
X
inventory of the area airspace will be undertaken, based on Air Traffic Control documents, with W
emphasis on the identification of airways, restricted areas, intersections, and obstructions. This task E
will identify operational limitations due to traffic interactions with other airports, reserved airspace,
and noise abatement procedures, airfield facilities and design, air traffic control towers, and existing
or programmed NAVAIDS at the Airport. The Nanning Team will coordinate with Air Traffic Control
C14
for military airports
0
W
IL
3.3 Off irport Land Use and Land Use Controls
E
r"irm Responsible for Completing this,Subtask- McFarland Johnson
Existing land use mapping, aerial photography, comprehensive plans, and other documentation pertaining to
current and future land use in the vicinity of the Airport (up to one mile from the Airport boundary) will be
reviewed. Existing zoning districts will be reviewed to determine locations where potential incompatible land
uses could develop. Further, local planning agencies will be interviewed to obtain future land use or zoning
plans and to identify the potential for future residential, commercial, and industrial development in the vicinity
of the Airport. Particular attention will be paid to identifying land uses and zoning that could affect both in a
positive and negative fashion,the future development of the Airport.
Malty Plan update
i201
Packet Pg. 779
KEY WEST INTERNAIIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015r
3.4 Land Holdings and Existing Leaseholds
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
Land holdings interests and existing leaseholds will be identified. The land holdings interest informat on will
be incorporated into the Airport Property Map Drawing of the Airport Plans Package and the inventory of
existing leaseholds information will be obtained from the Monroe County to coflect relevant information on
the existing leases on-airport, including lease agreements and leasehold drawings in electronic format
3.5 Known Environmental Areas of Concern
C14
T—
o
Firm Responsible for Completing this Sid btask Ricondo&Associates,Inc (n
CL
The Planning Team will review existing reports and studies to identify known environmentally sensitive areas
to develop a base map for use in subsequent tasks, The Planning Team will obtain AutoCAD base map
drawings prepared for previous airport projects and assembIle a new project base map with existing features
and sensitive areas to be used during the development of concept plans for the Airport. U)
.0
0
0
This subtask will also inClUde an inventory of noise abatement measures including existing zoning laws and
Focal regulations, as well as any other lo(:al zorring and land use restrictions instituted by the City and County
which may impact potential on or contiguou Xs cornpatible development, W
0
E
3.6 Meteorobgical Conditions
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc, C14
The Planning Team will assembile and analyze 10-years of historical wind and weather data. Ceiling, visibility, 0
(n
wind speed and direction will be analyzed to develop a wind rose, assess existing wind coverage and CL
j
determine the percentage of observations in visual and instrument meteorological conditions, .;
as
3.7 Airport Financial Data
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates Inc
This subtask consist in the assembly of airport financial information including, but not limited to, airport grant
�history, audit statements, capital improvement program, existing debt service schedules, operating budgets
vs. actuals, rates and charges model, and aviation fuel sale/delivery records. This information will be used as
part of the financial analysis tasks (Task 9),
The objective of this task is to gather documents which affect the financial management of airport
maintenance, operations, and capital development and to develop an understanding of the structure,
Master Plan Update 211
Packet Pg. 780
KEY WESr MTERNArIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015;UPDATED M,Y 21, 2015)
............---
constraints, requirements,and opportunities for financing airport activities as related to the development of a
capital improvement program.
3.8 Review of Other Reports
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates,Inc
In an effort to reduce duplication of work and develop a common base of information, other studies that have
been recently completed would be reviewed and coordinated as applicable. This would include but not be
limited to previous master planning efforts, transportation studies, and other reports as appropriate. Where
possible, the Monroe County/Airport will provide copies of existing studies for the Planning Team's reference N
T-
and use. 0
ras
3.9 Prepare Inventory Of Existing Conditions Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricando&Associates, Inc U)
.0
0
The Inventory Chapter will discuss the issues and information obtained during the inventory phase of the
project. This chapter will present, in narrative and graphic format, information relating to airport facilities, the
roadway access system serving the airport, natural features affecting the current airport property and tracts
X
immediately adjacent to the airport,and data related to land use compatibility. W
0
E
The findings of the inventory task will be summarized as a draft chapter to the final report. No additional
I-
draft reports will be provided prior to the draft Master Plan report. 17
C14
0
(n
(L
E
master Pian update
221
Packet Pg. 781
KEY WEST wrEvw^ruomw^ ^IRponr pennu^ev z» au1swpoArso mazz mzr
�� �'~ °°��~�'���� �^��~��~�«« �����*�������^�
��, ����N������° " ���.�� � 8 ��� F'~=° ~�~������~~
Firm Responsible for Completing this Submak Ricondo&Assmoates,Inc, (unless otherwise noted)
The Plannlng Team w8\prepare forecasts of aviation traffic activity suitable for guiding the update to the EYVV
master plan. Utilizing the inventory of aeronautical activity data collected in the inventory tasks and data
gathered in the forecasting effort, activity projections for the 5', IO- and 20'year time frames would be
prepared The updated projections of future aviation activity will provide the basis for evaluating the
adequacy of the existing airport facUibes. These forecasts wi|i also provide activity measurements or
thresho(ds that w1U be used in con unction with other portions of the master plan study to determine the ~�
need' t�ming,and extent of future airport facility development. C14
o
Forecasts of aviation activity will provide projections mf air carrier, cargo (aircraft operations and tons carned). (^
IL
general aviation and military operations, enplaned and dep|aned passengers, as well as based aircraft, |ooU *m
and itinerant openations, and fleet mix by design group, identifying the critical aircraft for each p|anning
period. Traffic projections tabe developed in this task include: �u
~ Annual Passenger Enp!anemenb(and Tota| Passengem)
° Annual Air Cargo Tonnage
° Annual Aircraft Operations(including aidme, cargo, miHtary, andgenmra( av�mUonoperabons>
° Annual Based Aircraft X
° Peak Hour Forecasts&Design Day F§ghtSchedule W�
" Critical Aircraft E
�
Previous airport and other transportation related forecasts will be reviewed including,but not limited to-
° Most recent FAA Terminal Area Fonecasts(TAF) C14
° Most recent FDOT Florida Aviation System Plan(FASP) Forecasts
° Most recent forecasts used as part of the I4[FR Part lSOstudy (n
IL
It is anbcipated that three planning activity levels (PALS) will be established as part of the aviation activity
forecasts(defined in terms mf annual passengen). The PALS are intended tobe independent mfa specific year
since demand projections are uncertain and growth rates can fluctuate considerably over the course of
forecast period. Therefore, the PALS represent demand �eve|s, not necessarily specific year, which can be
used as benchmarks for planning designing, or constructing Airport development projects. ^�
De/wenoble
° Excel spreadsheets and graphs summarizing the aviation activity forecasts
" Five(S)copies af a preliminary draft chapter for Airport review and comment
" Five(5)copies ofa final draft chapter for Airport review and comment
° Five(S)copies ofa preliminary draft chapter for FAA review and comment
^ Five(S)copies ofa final draft chapter for FAA review and comment
. A final forecast report in electronic format kP0F>as approved by the FAA
oviwme, Plan update
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 20M
Estimated Task Duration
12O Days(including a 60Fday review period by the FAA)
41 Collect and Analyze Socioeconomic Data
This aubtaskwiU consist in the definition of the airport's catchment area and the assembly of historical and
forecast socioeconomic data for the region and the nation. This will include data from the U.S.Census Bureau,
regional economic development organizations, regional and national socioeconomic data sourced through
Woods Ek Poole Economics, {nc, and any other relevant sources. ~�
�
�
4,2 DevelopAirline Passenger Forecasts0
�
IL
4,21 REVIEW EXISTING FORECASTS
As an initim) step in the planning process, recent forecasts developed for the Airport will be identified and ~�
reviewed to defne their applicability tu the master plan and to provide a base ofcomparison for this forecast
effort. Ata minimum, this review will address forecasts that were completed asa part of the l4CFR Part l50
and subsequent adjustments that may have been made to these projections. The Planning Team will also
comrdinatew0 the FDOTAviation and Spaceports, office relative to any forecasts that this agency may have �X
relating to EYVY, Forecasts previously approved by the FAA to includeW�he most 0
the forecasts are prepared will be included in the Forecast Preliminary Draft Chapter. E
�
4. .�2 DEVELOP PASSENGER ACTIVITY FORECASTS
~�
The Planning Team will provide demand based, unconstrained passenger forecasts for the Airport using C14
several forecast techniques including socioeconomic regression analysis and market share analyses, Asa part
of this process it is anticipated that data concerning passengers, fares and yields will be sourced through the (n
U.S. Department of Transportation (USQQT) Q&D survey (0BIB) and TIOD data sources, as wei| as through IL
Airport'provided activity statistics. These data will be analyzed in conjunction with regional and nat�,one|
socioeconomic information.
This task will include an identification of potential new markets that could be served from the Airport, A key
�
element in addressing future activity levels at the airport will be the identification of how changes in airline
business plans and service patterns may influence future activity at EYVx and the ability of the Airport to
attract new or expanded service by existing carriers,and airport users as well as the potential for the Airport to
secure new service and users. The potential influence that expanded competition in the low fare carrier
market will have and the role that new entrant and/or expanded service by regional carriers, such as Silver
Airways, might have at EYVVwill also be investigated.
Mautvp/a"Update
KEY WESI WERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 WDATED ii,AY 21 2015!
Additionally, since stage length is a central component to the determination of runway length requirements it
is imperative to define the potential for connectivity to new locales that may extend or reduce the non-stop
stage lengths flown from EYW.
The forecast will be presented in three scenarios: high-growth,low-growth, and baseline growth (the baseline
scenario). Forecasted passenger traffic will be presented as domestic or international, It is anticipated the
forecast will focus on four time-periods ® years 2020, 2025, and 2035. The recommended forecast would
ultimately become the Master Plan forecast(as approved by FAA).
The activities conducted under this subtask, however,are not intended as an air service market analysis or as a iz,
Iq
means of luring potential users to the airport, but rather to identify those trends occurring in the industry that I
Iq
may have the potential to come into play relative to the level of activity or the type of activity at the Airport. T_
C14
T_
The Planning Team will meet with airport staff and management to aid in the definition of various trends that o
are deemed of significance. Additionally, it is the intention of the Planning Team to also coordinate with (n
IL
senior management of selected passenger airlines to discuss emerging trends and their perceptions of the
likelihood of those trends impacting EYW. This task will also include a review of the market leakage analysis
included in the Airport Air Service Profile that was published by the FOOT in 2012.
U)
.0
0
4.3 Develop Air Cargo Forecasts
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricarido&Associates, ifn XW
0
Projections of future air cargo volumes will be generated using historical cargo growth trends to develop both E
trend and/or market share based analyses. Other activities to be completed under this task will include the
V.-
development of a cur-rent and projected volume mix of dedicated freight and mail volumes versus freight and 17
mail carried as belly haul cargo in passenger aircraft(b4ag.9 sto6cal: data o he Air Jt,
_L_ _L_ i 9kr
and the identification of the current and projected fleet of cargo aircraft anticipated to serve cargo demand at C14
the Airport, 0
(n
IL
Belly cargo torinage will be derived by converting projected air carrier, operations into belly cargo tonnage
using historical belly cargo tonnage per operation ratios and aircraft fleet utilization and corresponding cargo 0
E
capacities by EYW carriers. This information will be cross correlated to the actual cargo tonnage carried by
individual carrier as delineated airport activity statistics and/or landing fee reports.
Considering the limited arnount of cargo handled at the Airport, this task excludes the following: cargo
industry overview and trend analysis, regional market assessment; local market assessment of cargo activity
associated with potential adjacent development; competitive analysis and assessment of airport position,
target identification and scenario development;detailed regression or market share projection approaches for
baseline forecast or alternate demand scenarios.
Master Pian update
(251
Packet Pg. 784
KEY WEST INTERNATIONk AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 (UPDATED JULY 21, 20159
4.4 Develop General Aviation Forecasts
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk McFarland Johnson
4.4.1 REVIEW GENERAL AVIATION INDUSTRY TRENDS AND PREPARE DERIVATIVE FORECASTS
FROM THE FAA TAF
The Planning Team will review national general aviation trends based on the FAA Aerospace Forecasts FY
2014-2034,the General Aviation Statistical Databook & Industry Outlook from the General Aviation
Manufacturers Association (LAMA)„ and the existing Airport Noise&Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS)
database. The data collected under this subtask will help assess local and nationwide short- and long-term
trends including projections of active general aviation aircraft by type. In turn, these projections wN be C14
evaluated to assess whether these trends are likely to influence future general aviation aircraft fleet mix o
projections at the Airport. (L
The development of derivative forecasts will provide the foundation for the facility requirements anatiysis and
include a review of projected annual demand and peak period demand. Historical data on peak month
demand will be used to develop assumptions regarding the future share of peak month activity in relation to U)
forecast annual demand. Peak month average day(PMAD)activity levels will be derived from the peak month 0
activity.
X
For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed than the Planning Team 411 not be responsible for developing W
any new projections of aviation activity and the FAA TAF will provide the sale basis for the development of the 0
E
derivative forecasts.
442 PREPARE GENERAL.AVIATION AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX PRO.JECTIONS
C14
Based on the FAA TAF projections and assumptions regarding the projected aircraft fleet mix, R&A will
provide a breakdown of projected aircraft operations by aircraft type: The based aircraft forecast will directly 0
influence the type and number of aircraft storage facilities and apron tie down that will be needed.Projections (L
of based aircraft will also provide an indication of anticipated growth in flight activity that is expected to occur
at the airport.Based on the FAA TAF projections for based aircraft,the FAA 5010 Airport Record,the review of
E
the industry trends, and interviews with representatives of the FBO and airport management, the Planning
Team will provide a breakdown of projected aircraft operations by the following types: single-engine,
multi,engine, turboprop,and turbojet.
Master Plan Update
1261
Packet Pg. 785
C.18.a
KEY wES"r INTERNATIONAI, AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015 @UPDATED AlLY 21. 2015➢
4.5 Develop Military Aircraft Activity Forecasts
Considering the limited number of military operations at the Airport(less than 500 annual operations ),it has
been assumed that the Planning Team will not be responsible for developing any new projections of aviation
activity and the FAA TAF will provide the sole basis for the military aircraft activity forecasts.
4.6 Develop It r t Der nand c ri
This subtask will define the anticipated v6ume of aircraft traffic at the Airport should full diplornat c relations
with Cuba be re.established. Considering the Airport location, at the southernmost point in the continental
United States (U.S.) and only 05 mates from Cuba, the Airport could experience an increase In traffic should o
traffic restrictions between the United States and Cuba be eased. Future air service from Cuba is likely to IL
focus on hubs and cities in the United States that have high concentration of Cuban-American population. As
such, air traffic between Cuba and Key West would likely be tourist driven. This subtask would likely include a
benchmark review of airports that serve as entry points to the I.J.S. and that are located in close proximity to a
foreign island country. For budgeting purposes, however,, it has been assumed that no more than five (5) I)
airports would be benchmarked. 0
It is anticipated that the definition of the fleet mix associated witlh V)ro s scenario would be necessary. The
information developed under this scenario wiH be used in subsequent tasks to define alternative laeaking W
factors that will be used to determine the extent to whl'ch the scenario results in changes in facility E
requirements. !-
.7 Develop Aircraft Operations Forecasts
(s
Based on the outcome of Tasks 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5. the Planning Team will provide a forecast of aircraft IL
activity by aircraft type (fleet mix) for the Airport. This forecast will be driven by industry and other airline
trends such as; load factors, seats per departure, aircraft types used for various types of routes, aircraft orders,
and aircraft manufacturing trends.
Summarized aircraft movements wily be presented for the Airport as domestic passenger, international
passenger, commuter/regional, cargo, military, and general aviation. The forecast will cover the years 2020,
2025, and 2030, Three scenarios will be provided; high-growth, low growth, and baseline. The baseline
forecast becomes the Master Plan forecast(as approved by FAA),
F'AA'I earn nau Area Forecast.,Issued February 2014
master Ptan Update
I27l
Packet Pg. 786
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 IUPDATEO JULY 21, 2015}
4.8 Establish Demand Peaking Characteristics and Design Day
Flight Schedules
Airport planning requires airport activity in various time elements, including peak month, design day, and
peak hour. This information is key to determining required capacity enhancements including timing and
sizing. Forecasts for these elements will be derived from the annual forecast of airport activity. The following
information will be documented and put into tables for easy reference and inclusion into the draft working
paper. iz,
® Average and peak month for operations and enplanements: C14
T_
* Design day enplanements and operations,- 0
® Design day peak hour operations by carrier and peak hour enplanements by airline. (n
(L
As part of this subtask, the Planning Team will prepare design day flight schedules for three planning activity
levels based on annual to design day factors The flight schedules will be similar to the format of the OAG
and will include information on airlines, aircraft types, times,origins/destinations,seat capacity, and passenger
volumes. U)
.0
0
49 Prepare Aviation Activity Forecasts Report
x
W
0
A Forecast of Aviation Demand report wI be prepared to summarize the forecast of aviation demand for E
EYW, A preliminary draft version of the Forecast of Aviation Demand report will be submitted to the Airport
and FAA for review and comment. The Airport and FAA review and comment process for the Aviation Activity
Forecasts Report will incorporate four revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and
C14
T_
comment (2) final draft for the Airport review and comment, (3) preliminary draft for FAA review and
comment, and (4) final draft for FAA review and comment. The fourth round of comments/revisions will be 0
(n
incorporated into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan, (L
As necessary, the Planning Team will prepare supplemental documentation comparing the FAA TAF and the E
EYW Master Plan forecasts and attend meetings with the FAA Orlando ADO and FAA APO to review forecast
findings.
Master Plan Update
II
Packet Pg. 787
KEY WEST INrERNAYIONA(, AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015�UPDAYED JULY 21 2015)
5. Facility Requirements
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc, and AID,Inc (unless otherwise noted)
The facility requirements analysis will address the Airport's ability to accommodate airside, terminal and
landside facility needs based on the updated aviation activity forecasts and the selection of the current and
future design aircraft. The updated facility requirements analysis will quantify demand and existing airside,
terminal, and iandsicle facilities will be analyzed to determine the type and magnitude of aviation
improvements ultimately required for the Airport The facilities requirements analysis will focus on the physical
facilities and associated improvements needed to safely and efficiently accommodate projected aviation
C14
demand on those aviation facilities for the twenty year planning period (2015-2035). T—
o
(n
(L
Deliverables
* Five(5)copies of the Facility Requirements chapter for Airport review and comment
® Five(5)copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment
* A final Facility Requirements report in electronic format(PDF) U)
.0
EsNmated Task Duration 0
60 Days
X
W
5.1 Airfield E
511 DEIMAND/CApAMY ASSESSMENT'
C14
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtnsk- Ricondo&Associates,irw
0
Using the FAA's methoclotogy for assessing airfield capacity and delay as described in the FAA Advisory (n
Circular 150/5060-5, an assessment of the current and future level of airfield capacity and associated aircraft (L
delay wilt be developed. This analysis will consider the airfield conffguraton, including runway orientation,
parallel taxiways and exit taxiways, weather conditions, aircraft fleet mix, current and forecast operations at E
each 5,, 1.0-and 20-year time frame.The result of the assessment will be expressed in terms of the hourly and
annual service volume of the airfield, minutes of delay per aircraft operation, and total estimated annual delay. Z
This information will assist in validating recommendations of previous planning analyses or to identify
potential new considerations regarding the potential need and timing of taxiway enhancements over the 5,
10, 15, 20, and 25 year planning horizon. An assessment will also be undertaken to identify potential
improvements to the system of taxiways and exit taxiway connectors that could enhance the movement of
aircraft to and from the airfield to use areas on the airport and the impact that these improvements might
have an the efficiency of movements on the airfield.
dMaster Pian Update [291
Packet Pg. 788
KEY WEST iNTERNATIONAL AiRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 iUPDATED JULY 21 2015I
5,12 DESIGN AIRCRAFT AND RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask,- Ricondo&Associates, Inc.&Flight Engineering, LLC
Using information generated in previous planning studies at EYW and using the information and projections
developed from the inventory and forecast elements of this update, the characteristics of the current and
projected mix of aircraft operating at EYW will be identified paying particular attention to the level of
operations, fleet mix/aircraft type, and stage length of operations by commercial service(passenger, cargo &
charter)jet aircraft. A similar fleet mix analysis will also be undertaken for the based and itinerant general
aviation fleet for use in facility planning of facilities to meet general aviation needs From these analyses,
design aircraft will be identified for use in determining short-term and long-term runway length requirements,
the approach category, and design group for use in airfield layout planning. The design, or critical aircraft,
may consist of a single aircraft type or may need to be identified by approach category, wingspan and/or by C14
weight for different airport components. The design aircraft consists of that aircraft currently conducting a o
minimum of 500 itinerant operations annually. CL
CL
CID
This subtask includes an analysis of takeoff runway length requirements for spedfic range/stage lengths
and/or city pairs. Aircraft weight at take-off will be determined by the aircraft's operating empty weight
(OEW) plus payload for specific range/stage lengths for domestic flights. The range/stage lengths to be U)
evaluated will be defined by the Planning Team, in collaboration with Airport staff. For budgeting purposes, it 0
is assumed that no more than ten (10) air carrier aircraft will be considered in this analysis, In addition, for
each aircraft type,a specific range/stage length will be established in coordination with Airport staff.
X
W
5J3 FACILItY REQUIREMENTS 0
E
Fu-m Responsible for Complehng this Subtask, Ricondo&Associmes, 0c, V.-
Using the results of the capacity/delay cost analysis and the assessment of runway length requirements along
with relevant airfield planning criteria, the Planning Team wlll prepare a preliminary listing of a%rfield facility C14
T_
requirements necessary to meet projected levels of demand for the 5, 10, and 20-year time frames,, and to
0
address capacity needs beyond the 20-year planning horizon. These facility requirements will be based upon (n
CL
both accepted airport planning criteria, input from the Airport Management and staff, and the forecast of
aviation activity for the Airport. Airfield characteristics to be assessed include:
E
• Runway length,width and shoulders
• Necessity for addition/removal of taxiways
• Relocation of runway thresholds and associated runway extensions
• Pavement strength
• Taxiway requirements
® FAA separation standards
• Lighting and marking
• Navigational aids
master Pan Update
301
Packet Pg. 789
XEY WEST iNTERNATIONAO, AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015(
FAR Part 77 surfaces
Airfield facility needs will be identified in terms of linear feet, strength, separation, clearances, etc.and will be
compared to existing facilities to identify excess or deficient facility capacity or capability. The output of the
adjusted forecasts relating to the level of commercial service that is forecast will be accounted for in the
analysis of Airfield Facility needs, particularly as it relates to runway length, dimensional layout requirements
and taxiway/aircraft ramp development needs. Where appropriate the airfield facilities will be linked to
activity demand thresholds or triggers as a means of determining the point at which demand is sufficient to
warrant the improvement. Additionally, existing airfield components will be evaluated to ensure that they
comply with the changes of the recently updated Airport Design Advisory Circular.
C14
T_
5.2 Passenger Terminal o
(n
IL
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask- Ricondo&Associates, hv_
521 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
The Planning Team will identify demand for various functional areas of the passenger terminal using industry U)
.0
standards for the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios. The demand for the various facilities 0
0
will be compared to the current capacity to determine facility requirements throughout the planning horizon.
The functional areas to be considered would Include, but are not limited to:
X
W
Aircraft gates and gate frontage 0E
Passenger hold rooms
Baggage claim
C14
Public circulation area
0
Airline lease space (ticket counters,operations areas, bag make-up area) (n
IL
Security space
Concession(food, gifts &news, business centers, etc.l, E
U.S.Customs facilities
• Other terminal space(administration, utilities, etc
• Rental car facilities
5.2,2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Based on the demand/capacity assessment, terminal facility requirements to meet future demand expressed in
the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios will be identified. Facility needs will be defined in
terms of the various categories identified above.
Master P4 ,;pdate
i311
Packet Pg. 790
KEY WEST nv,smw^nomA� AIRPORT peasu^ev 23 2015wpo^r u/mm 21 2015�
5.3 On-Airport Curbsides and Roadways
Firm Responsible for CompWing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc
53,1 DEKMANC/CAPACITYASSESSMENT
Based upon the inventory of ground transportation components performed in Task 3 and the Aviation Activlty
Forecasts developed in Task4 the demand for the Xrport access terminal road (Fa^aldo {3pde Drive) and
other on-airport roadways wU� be compared to current capacity to determine facility requirements, This
assessment, however, excludes the analysis of off-airport roadways.
�
° Data Requirements:It is antic(pated that the foilowing data will be collected in Task 3 and available for use C14
in this task.-
- Automadc traffic recorder(ATR)traffic counts co|ected for a busy three-day period IL
- Vehicle classificatlon counts collected for a consecutive 3-hour period along the curbside frontage
- Vehicle dwell time counts collected during the peak 3'hourpehod
~ Prepare Future Traffic Demands: A spreadsheet model will be prepared to define the traffic voumes by
mode (e.g., private vehicles, taxicabs' buses, etc.), vehicle travel paths, vehicle curbside zone destinations,
and other parameters requied for preparing traffic assignment and demand estimates, Emphasis wou|d
be placed on developing mode split characteristics and associated vehicle traffic activity by tenmina| lX
departures and arrivals zones. Future roadway and curbside traffic demands will W be based on �
the assumption that traffic activity increases in proportion with growth in peak hour airline passenger E
�
demands. For purposes ofthiisanalys�s, future traffic demands will be calculated for the peak departures
hour and the peak arrivals hour for the future years mf20Dl2Q3S and 2O3S. 7
�
" Curbside Demond/Capacity:Develop a terminal curbside demand/capacity spreadsheet model to estimate C14
existing curbside demand in linear feet by vehicle mode for the departures peak hour and arrivals |evell
peak hour Curbside demand is calculated based on peak hour traffic volume by mode vehicle dwell (n
time,time, and vehicle length. Prepare curbside level of service�
ceOS)ana|ysio by assessing the"utilization"of IL
the curbside facilities which is calculated by comparing the estimated curbside demand in linear feet to
the available curbside.
° Roadway Demand/Capacity: Develop a roadway demand/capacity spreadsheet model to estimate the
roadway demands and capacity for the on-airport roadway system on a |ink'by'|inhbasis. Roadway
capacity will vary based on the number ofroadway lanes and characteristics of roadway segment using
a`,port'spedficindoatry~standa/d capacity assumptions based on roadway speed. [a|cu|eteon'aiqport
roadway system UOS for the existing roadway system as a function of roadway demand divided by
capacity.
~ Prepare VlGSlM Model of Existing Curbside and Roadway Configuration: Prepare a simplified VlS5lM
model of the existing terminal area roadway (Fansldm Circle Drive) and departures and arrivals curbside
zones. The model will be based on existing physical roadway configuration and simulate the effects of
congestion from departures and arrivals activities on Fara\dmCirde Drive.
Master Plan Update
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATFD JULY 21 20151
Simulate Future Roadway and Curbside Demand: The VISSIM model will be loaded with peak hour traffic
volumes representing the future design-day conditions for the arrivals peak and the departures peak
periods. Animation will be reviewed to depict anticipated congestion "hot spots' along the curbside
roadway Performance metrics comprised of curbside vehicle throughput, roadway densities, and queue
lengths will be calculated.
53.2 FACILrTY REQUIREMENTS
On-airport roadways and curbside requirements will be based on future demand, and discussed in terms of
number of traffic lanes, access points, intersection congestion, and level of service. Specifically the following
requirements will be developed: iz,
• Curbside Requirements: Identify anticipated curbside deficiencies and calcu8ate the curbsAe length
C14
required to achieve the target desired LOS for the future years 2020, 2025 and 2035. T_
o
• Roadway Requirements:Identify anticipated roadway lane deficiencies and the number of additional lanes (
(L
required to provide an acceptable level of service for the future years 2020, 2025 and 2035. CID
Off-airport roadways will also not be assessed from demand-capacity standpoint however, existing traffic
studies and existing planning studies will be reviewed to identify off-airport roadway networks that support
traffic to/from the Airport which will require improvements by FDOT or other local planning agencies in order U)
.0
to support the traffic volumes expected to be generates by EYW. 0
5A Public Parking X
W
0
E
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, (ne
5A.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
Based upon the inventory of public parking facilities performed in Task 3, the public parking analyses wM C14
T_
include nclude an evaluation of current public parking activity and demand profiles, an assessment of current and
0
future (on a yearly basis) public parking needs based on forecasts of passenger activity-and the identification (n
of additional parking capacity for the airport's parking system needed to serve projected demand growth.The (L
4i
future term parking needs will be evaluated based on future demand projection for the next 20 years. The
following task elements form the basis of the analysis: E
Data Requirements: Collection and review of EYW parking data, price structures, and inventories of
existing parking facilities, parking facility demand data, passenger activity reports, and Ksto6cai
parking statistics obtained from the Airports parking management company (assumes availability
from revenue control system)to include the following:
Inventory of existing spaces provided within each facility.
Daily peak occupancy counts and daily overnight occupancy counts by facility for calendar year
2014, by facility.
Parking transactions and revenues by duration category(e.g.,0-1 hour, 1-2 hours, 2-3 hours, etc.)
on a monthly basis for calendar year 2014, by facility.
master Phan Update
(33]
Packet Pg. 792
- Annual parking transactions and gross revenue for the last five�years, by facRity,
° Public Parking Damamd/Capa city: Using data collected previously assess historical daily peak and
overnight parking demand for the most recent 365 day period to identify the seasonality of parking
demands and the typical design-day parking demand by facility. In addition, and to the extent data
are available, prepare parking demand spreadsheet model based on transaction data bypadWng
duration VJtmSO minutes, 3O minutes tol hour, Ito2hours,etzJto identify parking demands bythe
following duration cabegohes: short'dunadon (Uto 3 hours)' mid-duration 8 to24houo1 and long.
duration (greater than 24 hours), The model would be used to estimate the number of spaces by
facility currently required to accommodate each duration category mfparWng actvity. The model
would be calibrated to the existing short-duration and long-duration components of demand ~�
accommodated in each facility during the typical design-day period. The parking demand mpdet C14
would be used to predict parking demand by duration category for each on-airport parking facility for r~
the existing and future design-day conditions, Future demand would be estimated based on the mn
CL
assumption that parking demand will increase in proportion to the expected increase in annual *m
originating airline passengers.
5�4 2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
The Planning Team will use the data collected under Task 5.4.1 to prepare public parking system requirements
atGYVV for the 20'yearp|anning horizon. Requirements will be presented in a manner mo that the Airport can
determine not only the times that parking demand is expected to exceed the supply of pa&ng, but also the
total number ofadditional spaces will be required to meet demand. Specifically, existing design'day on- lX
W
airport public parking demand would be converted to parking ''equ�rements'^ which include anadditional 0
level-of-service based "buffer" of parking spaces such that parking facility is not 100 percent occupied on E
�
the typical design day. The estimated public parking requirements would be compared with avaNable po'k�ng
spaceaande*dmatedde§ciencies(orsurp|us)inavai|ab|espaceswou|dbeidentified. 7
C14
No finanda| and economic analysis (assessment of future rate structure adjustments) mr development ofa
parking revenue model will be performed as part of this effort. Projections and capacity analysis for employee 0
parking and rental car facilities will be based on anecdc*a| and. to the extent available, actua� occupancy CL
counts provided by the Airport. Future year requirements wA| be estimated assuming base year estimates of
employee and rental car spaces will increase in proportion to growth in forecast annua� aWne passenger
demand (no detailed analyses would be conducted as part of this Master Plan Update),Coordination with the
Airport management will be undertaken to confirm the appropriate space-tm-demand rat�oto consider in
�
allocating future space for the alternatives analysis.
5.5 Air Cargo
Forri Responsible for Completing this Sub8rsk, A�ClInc
5 5 1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
The Planning Team will assess the capadty of existing cargo processing faci�ities and dete/nn'ne future
requirements for buildings, aircraft parking aprons, and ground access Cad|[tias.
Master Man Update
[34�
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL A[RPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(MATED DULY 21 2015s
55,2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
As each type of cargo operation (integrated carriers, freight forwarders, all cargo operators, combination
carriers, belly freight carriers) has somewhat different site requirements, a range of spaces will be considered
for cargo development.In planning for future air cargo facilities,,the Planning Team will consider:
• The type of cargo companies expected to expand or initiate operation (this will include a survey of
potential businesses);
• Annual air cargo operations projected for all operators;
® The number of existing apron parking spaces,- iz,
• Projected growth in annual enplaned tonnage;
C14
T-
• The availability of ground access for the heavy commercial trucks associated with cargo activity and o
(n
Immigration and customs operations CL
CID
Changes associated with clearance of cargo by foreign governments
the Planning Team will consider providing a means of separating cargo vehicles from other airport traffic for
security purposes, U)
.0
0
5.6 General Aviation
X
W
0
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask,- McFarland Johnson E
5.6.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
Using standard methodology for assessing general, aviation demand and capacity, an evaluation of current
and future demand and capacity for general aviation facilities will be completed. The analysis will consider C14
facility requirements for: 0
(n
CL
• Xrcraft ramp and parking area
® Aircraft storage hangar positions by haingar type
E
• T l--fangar positions
• Conventional hangar facilities
• Fixed Base Operator(FBO)facilities access and vehicle parking areas
56,2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
General aviation facility requirements will be identified as needed to meet projected levels of demand
expressed in the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios based on the demand/capacity analysis
for GA facilities, Facility requirements will be expressed in terms of gross area, linear feet, or other basic units
to determine excess or deficient capacity. This assessment will quantify future development items needed to
maintain an adequate level of service, function, and operation at the Airport.
Master Man Update 351
Packet Pg. 794
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAi AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015)
5.7 Support Facilities
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask- AID,Inc
5.7.1 DEMAND/CAPACF[Y ASSESSMENT
Using pertinent FAA regulations, advisory circulars, and information gained from discussions/surveys of
aarport users, the Planning Team will determine the capacity of the existing Xrcraft Rescue and Firefighting
Facilities (ARFF), fuel storage facility,airfield maintenance center facilities, and NAVAIDS facilities.
57,2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
C14
Future support facility requirements 41d be based on the baseline forecast and the alternate demand T-
scenarios, and discussed in terms of expansion of existing facilities or procurement of additional eqw'prnent o
including any required NAVAIDS.
to
5.8 Prepare Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Report
U)
.0
0
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Rtcondo&Associates, Inc
A draft Airport Development Alternatives report summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will
X
be prepared and provided to Airport staff and fechnicai Review Committee for their review. The Pianning W
'ream will prepare exhibits as necessary to clarify and sure-marize the various items addressed in the 0
E
alternatives section.
The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Cornmittee review and comment process for the Airport
Development Alternatives Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and C14
T-
comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of comr-nents/revisions will be
0
incorporated into fire final draft chapter of the Master Plan. (n
IL
E
Master Ptan update
1361
Packet Pg. 795
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015J
® Alternatives Ana,lysis and Recommended
Development Plan
The Planning Team will prepare sketches and evaluate alternative airport development concepts to
accommodate the range of requirements needed to satisfy forecast demands for the 5-, 10-and 20-year time
frames. The Airport will review the concepts and work with the Planning Team to determine suitability of the
airport to accommodate future airport improvements. Based on Airport comments, the Planning Team will iz,
prepare the recommended alternative development plans.
C14
T_
Dehverables o
* Five(5)copies of the Airport,Development Alternatives chapter for Airport review and comment (n
CL
* Five(5) copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment
* A final Alternative Ciev6oprnent Alternatives report in electronic format(PDF)
Estimated Task Durcition
U)
.0
45 Days 0
6.1 Airfield Alter-natives X
W
0
E
Firm Resporisibie for Compieting thm.Subtask, Ricondo&Associates,,inc,&Jacobs(Cost estirriating)
I-
On the basis of the Airport facility requirements established previously, preliminary airfield development 17
alternatives wifl be developed. Airfield alternatwes will be based on schemes for development within existing
C14
or expanded airport boundaries and will show necessary major runway and taxiway development for each of
5-, 10- and 20-year time frame. This task will be conducted simultaneously with the following tasks and will 0
result in a series of overall development options for the Airport. Airfield alternatives will be developed based (n
CL
on the identified facility requirements, environmental considerations, engineering factors, costs, and overall 4i
C
feasibility for implementation. Airfield alternatives will also be analyzed to cletern'llne their potenfal for 0
E
creating or being affected by line of sight considerations as well as FAR Part 77 and TERPS surfaces, Based on
the findings, an evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the following factors for the various
alternatives:
• The ability of particular runway length to satisfy fleet mix and anticipated aircraft activity
• The ability to improve geometric clearances and apron 4ayout in the terminal area;
• The need to improve passenger and vehicle circulation on the ramp and to identify areas for the
staging of CASE;
• The ability to improve the existing taxiways system including the departure taxiway routes and the
access points between the existing and proposed apron and the runway,
• The need to provide an interior service road for access to the airfield areas;
® The level of impacts associated with each airfield alternative;
master Plan Update 1371
Packet Pg. 796
C.18.a
j KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 (UPDATED IULY 21 2015f
The impacts on current or planned development;and
The order-of-magnitude costs associated with each of the airfield alternatives.
Up to three (3) airfield alternatives will be prepared for inclusion in the final Master Plan document. No
aWiel'.d modeling or simulation will be provided as part of this task.
6.2 Terminal Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk; Ricondo&Associates, Wc. 17
Iq
On the basis of terminal facility requirements established in Task 5.2, up to five alternatives will be developed v
to provide for a plan that is `balanced"and meets or exceeds customer expectations for level of service. The
o
terminal area plan will include analyses of how the terminal complex can be expanded to meet projected
demand while minimizing the impact that the expansion would have on existing operations. . Terminal
CID
alternative opt;ons will be explored to solve deficiencies and functions that may be experiencing capacity
issues including,, but not limited to:
I)
Congestion in the baggage claim area
The lack of holdroom spaces and the lack of concessions
The need for improvement in the handling of baggage
x
The analyses of terminal expansion will also include consideration of the airline operations area, security 0
facilities curbfront requirements (for existing and future terminal development), concessions, support _
facilities, and various other terminal-related functions that will have a direct impact on terminal expansion
strategies. An evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the various alternatives. 17
Iq
Ir-
cv
6.3 Roadway Akernatives
(s
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask, Jacobs �
Based upon information developed during the review and analysis of the existing ground access/roadway
systems conducted in the demand-capacity task, the Planning Team will develop optional schemes for
providing additional ground access capacity. Specifically, the Planning Team will prepare conceptual plans
and illustrate these in scaled exhibits depicting alternative ground access roadways and circulation schemes
that meet the facility requirements for the 20-year planning horizon. It is anticipated that up to three
conceptual plans will be developed and will depict ground access options for the fully expanded/renovated
terminal area. An evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the following factors for the various
alternatives:
® The ability to satisfy the vehicular demands and anticipated activity;
The ability to accommodate the needs for other land use developments;and
Master Plan Iipdate
13'3g
Packet Pg. 797
KEY WEST INTERNAMNA; AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 NUPDATED JULY 21 2015;
The degree to which off-Xrport improvements would be needed to make the aVternative
functional.
6.4 Airport Public Parking Facility Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc
Alternatives for supplementing the existing parking system supply will be identified. Examples include
expansion of existing parking surface parking facilities and the r6ocation of employee parking out of the
public parking facilities to free up additional spaces. Up to three airport public parking facility(3)alternatives
will be prepared as part of this task.
cv
6.5 Cargo Facility AItem ativ (nes (L
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask AID,Inc
The cargo facility requirements determined previously will serve as a base to develop alternatives favorable to U)
.0
the cargo development at the Airport. The cargo building, ape-on and acreage requirements will be used to 0
0
produce alternatives that meet the projected demand. Alternatives will be evaluated based on their ability to
satisfy the identified facHity requirements, ease of implementation, and environmental considerations. Up to
X
three cargo faciQy(3)alternatives will be prepared as part of thls task, W
0
E
6.6 General Aviation Facility Nternatves
C14
Firm Respons&e for Completing this Subtask McFarland Johnson
Based on the general aviation area facility requirements determined previously preliminary general aviation 0
development within or beyond existing airport boundaries will be formulated. General aviation alternatives (L
will be evaluated on the basis of their efficiency in meeting identified facHity requirements, ability to group
tenants Jn the same general areas; engineering factors, ease Of irnplementatlon, costs, and environmental E
considerations.This will lead to the selection of the options best satisfying the identified need, Up to three(3)
general aviation fabIlity alternatives will be prepared as part of this task.
6.7 Support Facility Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing thisSubtask A0, Inc
Alternatives for the development of required support facility improvements shall be developed and evaluated
to assess preferred layouts on the basis of the ability to serve the projected demand, expandability, and
operational consideraVons.Up to three(3) support facility alternatives will be prepared as part of this task.
Master Plan Update 39]
Packet Pg. 798
KEY WEST INTERNAMNA! AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015)
6.8 in Use Evaluation
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc,
During the 1990s a feasibility study was performed to analyze a joint use scenario. As part of this task, the
Planning Team will review the 1990 Study and assess what has occurred since then, and how conditions have
changed in order to determine if the conclusions and recommendations issued in the 1990 Study are still
valid® or if there is any justification and merit in reassessing those conclusions and recommendations as part
of a subsequent, stand-alone study(outside of the Master Ran, or as a supplemental task to the Master Plan). iz,
If the latter is concluded (i.e.,a reassessment or further study of a joint use scenario should be Undertaken), a
general outline of the scope of work that should be considered for the reassessment/study will be prepared C14
and included as part of the Master Plan deliverables, o
(n
IL
Information on existing military missions and operations conducted at the Naval Air Station Key West will be CID
identified using the best information publicly available and through one discussion meeting with the Naval Air
Station staff. It is assumed that the Monroe County/Airport management will be responsible for setting up
the meeting with the Naval Air Station staff.
0
0
cu
6.9 Evaluate Development Alternatives
X
W
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.&Jacobs(Cost estimatingi 0
E
The Planning Team will conduct an evaluation of the development alternatives based on criteria developed 6n
I-
conjunction with the goals and objectives of the Study and through dialogue between the Planning Team and 17
Iq
the Airport staff. These will include: ability of the concept to provide required capacity and capability: T_
C14
potential environmental impacts; relative costs (using labor and materials price data from recent Airport
construction projects; and constructability/ease of implementation. Criteria may be weighted to reflect 0
importance in the evaluation process. An evaluation matrix will be prepared to compare the various IL
IL
alternatives in terms of the evaluation criteria. This task will result in the revision of options or the
combination of individual alternatives into a single alternative for implementation.
E
6.10 Refine Recommended Airport Development Plan <
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask, Ricondo&Associates, Inc,
As needed, the Planning Team will refine the near-term recommended alternatives identified in the previous
tasks, including airfield, terminal, and roadway access (on and off-airport). Based on input from the Airport
refinements to the recommended development plan will be made.
Mastee Plan Update
l401
Packet Pg. 799
KEY WEST mTEnw,nmw^i, ^mpom psenu^xv a zo1swpo^�m/um �z� zm�
6,11 Prepare Airport Development Alternatives Report
FinnResponsibfe for Completing this Suhtazk Ricomdo&Associates,Inc
A draft Airport Development Alternatives report summari�ng the findings of each of the preceding tasks will
be prepared and provided to Airport staff and Technical Review Cornm�ttea for their review. The P|enning
Team wQ prepare exhibits as necessary to clarify and summarize the various items addressed in the
alternatives section.
The Xrport/[ounty staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Airport 17
�
OevelupmentA|temahves Report will �noorpormte two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review
�
comment, and Q0 0ne| draft for review and comment The second round of comments/revisions will be r~
incorporated 4,ito the final draft chapter of the Master Plan. y
IL
�
0
E
�
C14
IL
Mooxw,Plan Update
C.18.a
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 IUPOATEO JU1 Y 21 20151
Environmental Overview
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk• Ricondo age Associates„ Inc (unless otherwise rated)
The environmental overview to be completed as part of this Master Plan will assist in selecting a preferred
development alternative that minimizes potential environmental impacts. It will identify potential areas of
environmental concern, whether any components of the preferred development plan might affect significant
environmental resources, and the level of environmental documentation required by FAA prior to i
implementation of the recommended faster Plan projects. The Planning Team will review each element of
the proposed development plan so the Airport/County staff is made aware of: y
T-
o
e Potential environmental concerns U)
® The anticipated environmental documentation required prior to implementation
• Whether the proposed improvements are likely to require Federal and/or State Permits.
The environmental overview® will identify environmental concerns based on the guidance provided in FAA's
Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures and Order 5050.4 ,, National Environmental 0
0
Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions or the current versions of those documents.
The first step will be to review existing environmental reports prepared for the Airport and gather informaton
from existing databases, maps, and published information available from applicable resource agendas to
establish existing conditions. 0
Deliverobles
w A detailed narrat,ve report summarizing the results of the findings of the environmental overview
including supporting graphic exhibits and tables y
Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft working paper for Airport review/comment
Five(5)copies of a final draft working paper for Airport review/comment
A.final Environmental Overview report in electronic format(PDF)
Estimated Task Duration E
Documentation of Existing Conditions- 30 Days
Noise analysis&determination of probable environmental documentation and permitting requirements for
the preferred alternative—30 days
Note that FAA°intends to irelease an update to Order 10SG➢..11E,n a aay 2015 i f Order.m.050 1F:s released poor to corrnirnerurernent of the
E.nvii-o amnental Onremew,Order 1050.1.E wHI be autal'Iaed. If Order'1.050-IF is released alter initiation of ale EmAroun mental Owemew,, R&A
wflI review to deterrnu ne whether it wwrraulld cause.any charnge i n repu4vrnents or anMysls. R&A Ali discuss any scrape,coast or schedule
impluca6ons w4h the Airport staff.
Master Plan Update
[42]
Packet Pg. 801
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT fEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015)
7^1 Existing Conditions
Firm Responsible for Completing this SubtaskRicomdo&Associates,Inc.
Utilizing existing maps of the Airport environs and existing environmental documents, the Planning Team will
prepare an environmental inventory/overview of the environmental setting and operating environment. No
formal coordination with federal o, state agencies will be conducted as part of this work element. Informal
coordination may occur during the process of obtaining existing documents, etc.from various agencies.
This task does not include field reviews, analysis or other scientific evaluation of resources. The summary is
intended to reference known o,potential environmental conditions identified in recent environmental efforts ~�
conducted on the airfield that could be affected by proposed airport �� T_
o
The environmental overview will provide a baseline of current environmental constraints, and will be used to IL
direct the development oy improvement alternatives to avoid and minimize impact. The Planning Team will *m
conduct a records search of|ocv|' state, and federal regulatory agencies and review previous environmental
studies completed for the Airport to identify potential environmental constraints. The Planning Team will,
review the environmental categories included /n FAA Order 10501E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures; however,the results of the overVew wil,l not meet,and is not intended to meet,the requirements
of the National Environmental Policy Act. Information will be used to determine environmental constraints
when developing airport improvement alternatives.
X
W
The Planning Team will gather and review existing published studies and secondary source data concerning 0
environmental factors related to airport development and provide summary/applicable excerpts to be =
included in the Master Plan Report. Information gathered will include information on:
° Fish,wildlife,and plants including endangered species C14
° Incompatible land uses
° Air and water quality, (n
IL
° Waste water and solid waste treatment and/or dispoe|�
° Construction impacts,drainage and hydrology;
° F|oodplains and Wetlands;
° Historic,archaeological,architectural,and cultural resources;
° Parks and recreational aeas ^^
� �
° Coastal resources and review of airport's impact on the Atlantic Ocean;
° Land use and zoning surrounding the Airport including noise sensitive receptors;
IMaster Plan Update
| [43}
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 IUPDAHD DULY 21 2015'I
................................................. -,............................... ......
7.2 Evaluation of Proposed Development
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk Ricondo&Associates, Inc.
By using data collected in the previous task, the preferred development alternative will be evaluated to identify
potential environmental issues. This subtask will also include the identification of possible environmental
documentation and permitting requirements for the preferred alternative.
7® Airport Noise Evaluation 17
C14
T_
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask, Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates, LLC o
The Planning Team will conduct a noise analysis, resulting in noise contours that are representative of the inIL
existing base year (2015),, and future ten-year (2025) aeronautical activity and existing/future (preferred
alternative)airfield configuration consistent with the Airport Master Plan,
The noise contours will be prepared for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used for the U)
.0
purpose of 1.4 CFR FAR Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) or 1\16se Compatibility Prograrn (NCP). The 0
0
methodology used to develop the contours, however, will comply with that recommended by the FAA; the
FAA's Integrated Noise Model aNM), version 7D will be used for the noise modeling (or, if required, the
X
Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDTJ version 2b shall be used)..The noise contours will be placed on a W
current aerial photograph base map or USGS quadrangle map, depending on the area of noise exposure that 0
E
extends beyond the airport.
It is anticipated this effort will build on the model that was developed as part of the 2013 14 CFR FAR Part 150
Study. Fleet mix information and airfield conditions, however, will be updated to reflect the FAA-approved C14
activity forecasts(Task 4)and the future airfield conditions Jor example, runway extension, threshold changes, 0
or safety areas)to be defined as part of the Master Plan(Task 6.1) in
IL
The noise analysis will identify and depict noise exposure associated with the projected aeronautical activity at
E
the Airport and will include an identification of noise sensitive land uses. The DNL 65 dB and higher noise
contours will be generated for each modeled scenario. Federal noise standards recognize DNL 65 clB as the
threshold for evaluating noise impacts, which will be noted on all figures or drawings depicting noise <
contours.
The existing and 10-year noise contours will also be depicted on the airport land use plan drawing A narrative
description of airport noise exposure, compatibility with adjacent land uses, and a summary of feclera4 noise
compatibility guidelines will be prepared for inclusion in the environmental overview working paper
master PWi Update
k441
Packet Pg. 803
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 20M
7,31 REVISE INM AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX
The aircraft fleet mix representing the average annual day aircraft operations for the existing and future
airfield conditions WIN be used for noise modeling. Helicopter operations will modeled in the same manner as
in the 2013 14 CFR Part 150 Study.
The following data sources wall be collected,reviewed, and compiled into the 2015 aircraft fleet mix:
• Aircraft Situational; Display for Industry(ASDI),
• Air Traffic Control Tower(ATCT)records/interviews, iz,
• Fixed Base Operator(FBO)record sfi n tervi ews,
• FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System(ATADS),
C14
• FAA Traffic Row Management Systems Count CTFMSC), and T—
o
• FAA Form 5010(Airport Master Records), (n
(L
The future year (2025) fleet mix and operatons will be sourced from the Master Plan forecasts. The
corresponding I /AEDT aircraft types will be determined for each category of aircraft included in the Master
Plan forecasts. U)
.0
0
7.3,2 ESTABILISH AIR TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROFILE
The air traffic operational ljrcifiGe (i.e., aircraft fFght tracks, runway utilization, and flight track utilization) was
established as part of the 2013 14 CFR Par 1.50 Study. As such, it is anticipated that dils effort wdl be limited X
W
to tl--ie update of the INM inodel to reflect the future/proposed airfield confiquration, For budgeting
purposes, it has been assurned that the assurnptrons regarding flight track and runway use frorn the 2013 14 ll®E
CFR Par 1.50 Study rerna4i valid and won't need to be uloclated.
733 ESFABLISH BASELINE (EXIS"I"ING) NOISE CONTOUIRS Cq
Ir-
l"he aircraft noise contours of,DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB resulting from the average annual day operations for the
0
existing baseline condition will be created using the FAA's INM '7.Od or AEDi' 2b. The arlrlual aircraft (n
(L
operations for the existing baseline conditions will be based on the FAA's ATCT annual counts for the Airport,
73.4 ESTABLISH LONG TERM(10 YEAR) NOISE CONTOURS E
The aircraft noise contours of DNL 65, 70,and 75 dB resulting from the average annual day operations for the
future year condition (2025) will be created using the FAA s INM, version 7D or AEDT 2b. The annual aircraft <
operations and the fleet mix will be estimated based on data developed as part of Task 4.
'7.4 Prepare Envirorunental Overview Report
Firm Responsible for Con-�plebing this Sub task Rtcondo&Associates,, Inc
A draft Environmental Overview summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and
provAed to Airport staff for their review. This report will address the environmental conditions at EYW as
master Plan Update I451
Packet Pg. 804
C.18.a
[KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBBRUARY 23, 201.5(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
determined through a review of existing reports and through contacts with various state and federal agencies.
The overview will identify potential effects on environmental resources as a result of projects proposed in the
updated Airport Master Plan.
The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Environmental
Overview Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2)
final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the
final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
cv
T-
o
IL
U)
0
x
0
cv
(n
IL
Master Pharr Update
(4o"71
Packet Pg. 805
KEY WEST lNTERNATlONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 1UPDATED ju1Y 21, 2015)
8. Sustainability Initiatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk Ricondo&Associates, Inc. (unless otherwise noted)
This task will address the Airport sustainability policy, establish possible goals to minimize the impact or
consumption to reduce the airport's overall environmental footprint, and identify and describe a range of
generic sustainability iritiatives to help the airport achieve each set goal.
Deliverables
* Five(5) copies of the Sustainability Initiatives chapter for A rport review and comment C14
T_
* Five(5)copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment o
* A final Sustainal Initiatives report in electronic format(.PDF) (n
(L
Estimated Task Duration
45 Days
U)
.0
0
8.1 Establish Baseline Conditions
The Planning Tearn will conduct a baseline: inventory or assessrnent of each deFined sustairlabflity category, xW
such as environmental resource usage (e,g,, water consumption per yeair or i::)e, passenger, etc.), emissions E4)
inventory, Surface transportation rrlainageunent, larid uses, and etc. For budgeting purposes, A has been
asSurried that ti-tis effort wilil require a site visit at the Airport that wN nclrude interviews of key Air-port staff. V.-
cv
8.2 Facilitate Sustainability Workshop
0
(n
(L
The Planning "ream will attend and help facilitate a half-day workshop to define the Airport's sustainability
goals, outline the sustainability categories at the Airport, such as socioeconomics, airport facilities and
E
procedures, environmental resources (e.g, noise, water, air quality, etc.), and identify and describe a range of M
specific sustainability initiatives to help the airport achieve its goals.
The Planning Team will be responsible for developing M support materials for facilitating the Suslainability
Workshop rhese materials will include presentations, meeting agenda,cluestionnal and etc.
83 ForrnWate SustainabiRy Framework
Based on the outcornes of the sustainability workshop the Pianning Team will formulate a sustainabitity
frat'nework for the Airport that will identify the following:
maste, Plan Update [411
Packet Pg. 806
C.18.a
KEY WEST MERNATIONAG AIRPoR'r FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015
® Sustainability Policy
Sustainability Strategies(if applicable)
® Long-and short-term objectives
® Priorities List
Timeline and Responsibilities
Upon approval of the airport's sustainability framework. the Planning Team will develop a Sustainabilcty
Initiatives chapter for inclusion in the Faster Plan Update.
Prepare8.4 i i
o
(s
CL
Based on Section 133 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012„ airports are required to prepare a
Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction plan as part of their Raster Plan. This plan will address the feasibility
of solid waste recycling, minimizing the generation of solid waste, operation and maintenance requirements,
the review of waste management contracts, and the potential cost savings or generat*n of revenue. r)
0
This task will include, in collaboration with Airport staff, the identification of the types of solid waste
generated at the Airport,as well as the factors likely to influence the scope and nature of the Airport recycling
prograrn (e.g. loc.-al markets for recyclable commodities; cost for transport and processing recyclables; local
recycling infrastructure; willingness of an airport and its tenants to imptlement recycling programs; airport 0
layout and logistics.)
It is anticipated the recyciing, reuse, and waste reduction plan will include a description of the scope of the
existing recycling and waste management programs, the identification of the drivers for y
implementing/maintaining a recycling program,a description and inventory of infrastructure in place, both on
and off- airport, that supports airport recycling,and a description of the airport's current solid waste recycling„
reuse, and waste reduction efforts including instances when tenants recycle materials. CL
C
0
Results of previously completed waste audits will be documented as part of the plan. however, no Aaste
writs will he conducted as art of this Master Plan. Technical and economic factors, as well as logical 0
constraints, that currently affect the airport's ability to recycle will be reviewed and Federal, state, or local
guidelines or policies that aid or hinder recycling efforts will be identified.
This task will also include a brief review of existing waste management contracts including a description of
current contracting for waste management at the airport, the identification of tenant leases and service
contracts with corresponding expiration, extension, arid/or renewal dates, and a description of how waste
handling and recycling is funded.
Potential for cost savings or revenue generation and recommendations to minimize solid waste will be
identified. No_detailed financial anal.ysis,arill,m9deling, ,hgWgM#L,Will—be cn,frrytlpte ....;s_.part,a f this
effar
master Plana update
(481
Packet Pg. 807
KEY WEST INTERNAHONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 IUPOATED JULY 21 20M
8.5 Draft Sustainability Chapter
A draft Sustainability Chapter summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and
provided to Airport staff for their review. The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review
and comment process for the Sustainability Initiatives chapter will incorporate two revision rounds; (1)
preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of
comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
C14
T-
o
(JO
(L
CID
U)
.0
0
x
W
0
E
V.-
C14
0
(JO
(L
E
Master Piaui jpdate
f,4%
Packet Pg. 808
C.18.a
ARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015I
_ AIRPORT � 0a��.., - .,��. ®, mw ,emee
KEY WEST BPVTERh1ATEtaM1BAL AP
m
Implementation Plan
m
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc.(unless otherwise noted)
The implementation plan will consist of the Implementation Schedule and the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP). The recommended development plan will be subdivided into distinct projects for which estimates of
probable costs wiH be prepared and funding sources which will be phased over the development period. The
CIP will be coordinated with airport management and the existing CIP to include bath currently programmed iz
and master plan-related capital improvements for the Airport.
cv
The development schedule will be based on the improvements needed to satisfy demand at each of the 5-,
10- and 20 year time frames, which will be assumed to occur as determined under the Baseline Demand DO
IL
Scenario developed in the forecasting task. Individual development projects will be phased to al ow
improvements to be designed, constructed, and operational to meet demand.The phasing process wiH be an
iterative process with the financial analysis to ensure that the CIP is both implementable and economically
feasible.
0
Deliverables
m A report Including the project summaries and supporting graphic exhibits
Give(5)copies of a preliminary draft Implementation Plan working paper for Airport x
review/comment E
Five(5)copies of a final draft Implementation Plan report for the Airport
review/comment �.
A final Implementation Plan report in electronic format(PDF)
cv
Estimated Task Duration
30 Days
9.1 Define Individual Development Projects E
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc &Jacobs
Based on the various facility requirements and development alternatives, the Planning Team will identify and
define the individual capital improvement projects that make up the recommended actions. These will
become the basis for the CIP schedule and cost estimates.
master Nan Update
ll7'I
Packet Pg. 809
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 GUPOATED JULY 21 2015r
9.2 Develop Estimates of Rough Order of Magnitude Cost (ROM)
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Jacobs
Using labor and materials price data from recent Airport construction projects, supplemented by current
industry data, the Planning Team will determine costs for each project in the CIP, which well include design,
engineering, administrative, land acquisition, and construction costs. These will be prepared on a conceptual,
budgetary level.
9.3 Coordinate Project Sequencing
C14
T_
o
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask, Ricondo&Associates,Inc, Jacobs (n
IL
The Planning Team will Review the most current CIP for the Airport and coordinate project Sequencing with
Air-part staff, This task will include the identification of the rer,.ornmencled short-, mid, and long-range Capital
Improvement projects to comprise the CIP list. The anticipated sequence for each project will be based on the
improvements needed to satisfy demand at the various PAL's (which will be assumed to occur as determined U)
under the BaseFne Demand Scenario developed in the forecasting task), funding considerations, the Monroe .0
0
County objectives, and prerequisite project requirements where necessary. The various facility development
projects wilt be prioritized and correlated with the staging plans for the airport development program
resulting from the selected alternatives. The CIP phasing will be determined for the short- (0-5 years), x
W
intermediate-(6-10 years), and long term(11-20 years)planning periods.The requirements for the short-term 0
will be determined on a year,by,year basis. These estimates will provide sufficient detail to develop a E
reasonable financial plan for the Airport
The phasing process will be an iterative process with the financial analysis to ensure that the CIP is both C14
T_
implementable and economically feasible. The revised phasing will be closely coordinated with the airport
0
management and senior airport staff. (n
IL
4i
The development schedule will include a bar graph showing the timing of each project and color drawings
illustrating recommended phasing for project implementation to satisfy the needs of short term f5 year), E
intermediate term(10-year), long term(20-year)forecast aviation demands and beyond 20 year time frame.
The short-term (5-year) plan will make up the 5 year CIP. The intermediate term (10-year), long-term (20-
year) and beyond 20 year improvements will be described and incorporated into a long-term development
plan,which,with the short-term CIP, 411 make up the basis for the financial plan.
M, ast ev Plan"plot [511
Packet Pg. 810
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015 gLJPDATED JULY 21 2015)
9.4 Prepare Project Summaries and Exhibits
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricando&Associates, Inc.
The Planning Team will prepare and provide graphic exhibits for applicable capital improvement projects to
clarify limits of construction and other assumptions related to the estimated project budgets. In addition,
summary sheets will be developed for each project that identifies typical CIP entry fields to facilitate future
programming of each project in the JACIP for the airport. The findings of the implementation plan task,
including the project summaries and exhibits, will be summarized in a draft report and provided to airport
management and staff for review and comment.
C14
The Airport/County staff review and comment process for the Implementation Plan Report will incorporate o
two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2) final draft for the (n
(L
Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final CID
draft chapter of the Master Plan.
U)
.0
0
X
W
0
E
C14
0
(n
(L
E
Master Nan Update
(52)
Packet Pg. 811
KEY WEST IWERNATEONAL AIRPORT fEBRUARY 23 2015 UPDATED WLY 21 20151
10. Financial Feasibility and Funding
Analysis
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates,fric (unless otherwise noted)
The results of the master planning analyses described in the prior tasks will be evaluated from a financial
standpoint, taking into consideration existing debt and expected levels of available PFC, FDOT, FAA iz,
entitlement, and FAA discretionary funding, as well as the Airport's capacity to issue revenue bonds, 17
availability of local funds, and any opportunities for third party funding. The analyses will help establish a
phasing plan for the recommended improvements identified for the Airport that can be implemented in C14
accordance with projected demand growth and emerging facility needs. o
(L
The financial plan will be prepared to outline the actions and initiatives necessary to carry out the CIP in a
financially sound manner. Included in the financial plan will be the identification of specific funding sources
projections of revenues and expenses, and development of a preferred strategy for undertaking the CIP.
U)
.0
Data&Resources Required Frorn the Monroe CountylAirport 0
Financial data will be collected to support the financial analyses of this study and wolf include-
Airport. Airline Ilse and Lease agreements
X
Lease disclosure data W
Ffistorical and upcoming capital projects 0
E
Prior funding assistance
Revenue sharing agreements,
Airport financial staternents as well as applicable information pertaining to state/iocal financial
support C14
Terminal building square footage, by type of space, by tenant
Air-port Leases Surnmary, if available;J not, copies of tenant leases 0
Projected debt service schedule, if applicable (L
projected capital projects and funding sources for upcoming five years'
as
E
I)ehirerabiles
ca
A Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis report:
Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis <
working paper for Airport review/comment
Five(5)copies of a final draft Financial Feasibility and Fund'ng Analysis report for the
Airport review/comment
A final Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis report in electronic format(PDF)
incfude prqects That are NOT Ind uded n Master Plan
d,Aasaer pan Update
Packet Pg. 812
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 (UPDATED JULY 21, 201S)
Estimated Task Duration
30 Days
10.1 Develop Financial Model
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Rkondo&Associates, Inc
The Planning Team will develop a Gnani:4 model to assess the financial viability of the proposed
development plan. The model will include multiple years, and annual growth assumptions to enable the
Planning Team to develop projected revenues and expenses to serve as the baseline for the financial plan.
C14
The financial model will estimate revenues, expenses, capital' development expenditures and cash flows, and T_
assess funding requirements for each development scenario. Specifically, R&A will input the planned capital o
funding into the financial model to develop the multi-year financial projections and determine the airline
revenues resulting from undertaking the planned Master Plan capital development. Outputs from this task
will be used in the development of the financial plan.
in
.0
10.2 Prepare Financial Plan 0
0
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc X
W
Based on output from the financial model, the Planning Team will prepare a financial plan necessary to carry 0
out the capital program. Included in the financial plan will be the identification of and quantification of the E
need for specific funding sources, projections of revenues and expenses, a cash flow analysis, and a debt
capacity analysis for the CIP. This task will include a review of the proposed development projects,including
scheduling,and adjustments to the project costs to represent cost increases assumed from 2015 to the year in C14
which each respective project would be undertaken.
0
(n
For the capital projects identified, available funding sources will be determined and applied as appropriate to Ill
the respective projects. These funding sources may include federal discretionary and entitlement grants, State
and local funds, as well as other potential sources of funding for the identified projects. Non-traditicl E
furiding sources, including public private funding, will be examined in the context of individual demand and
developrnent scenarios. This analysis of funding sources wffl incorporate any necessary financing costs
including specific assumptions such as interest rates, debt service reserve requirements, capitalized interest,
Financing costs and timing of issuance(s),
Based on the projection of Airport revenues and expenses, the capital program funding assumptions will be
incorporated to determine the initial feasibility of undertaking the program. Basic feasibility will be measured
primarily by calculating the impacts on tenant rates and charges, and airport cash flow,
Master Plan�jpdate
i541
Packet Pg. 813
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDAVED JULY 21 2015;
During the development of a recommended financial plan, specific projects will be reviewed with airport
management to confirm project costs and timing as well as to review the strategy for available funding
sources,all in an effort to maximize the financial feasibility of the capital program.
10.3 Prepare Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc
The findings of the financial plan task will be summarized in a draft report and provided to the Master Plan
Technical Review Committee and airport management and staff for review and comment.
C14
The Airport/County staff review and comment process for the Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis T-
Report will incorporate two revision rounds,: (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2) o
(n
final draft for the Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated (L
CID
into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
U)
.0
0
x
W
0
E
V.-
C14
0
(n
(L
E
master PQan Update
Packet Pg. 814
C.18.a
KEY WEST INrERNATIC?NAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015;
ll. Update of the Airport Layout Plan Set
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk.• Ricondo&Associates, Inc.(careless otherwise notedk
This effort is intended to produce the necessary documents (including the ALP drawing set and associated
Narrative Report) required for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Florida Department of
Transportation(FDOT)to review and conditionally approve the proposed development plan for the Airport.
The Airport Layout Plan will be prepared in accordance with FAA standards as defined in FAA Advisory Circular
150/5070-7, Airport Master Plans, and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A, Change 1, Airport Design. The y
ALP set will be prepared as a paper-copy ALP and does not include preparation of an electronic ALP (eALP).
Data will be submitted in CAD format and is not intended to be provided in CIS format for use in an eALP
IL
submittal to the FAA.
All components of the ALP drawing set described herein will be developed in accordance wroth the provisions
of AC 150/5070-613, Airport Master Plans, and the FAA ARP Standard Operating Procedure(SOP) 2.00, Review a)
and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (ALPs). To support the submittal of this updated planning product, the
Planning team wall also review,complete,and submit the checklist that is provided in the FAA SOP 2.00.
Deliveraable.s
* Five(5)copies of the preliminary draft ALP set for distribution to the Airport 0
® 1.3 copies of the draft ALP set for distribution to the FAA(9 copies), FDOT Avoa6on and
Spaceports Office(2 copies), and airport staff(2 copies).
15 copies of the final ALP set for distribution to the FAA(9 coppes), FOOT Aviation and Spaceports
Office(2 copies), and airport staff(4 copies). y
A narrative report d&ussing the components of the ALP Plan Set and the proposed development
pGan reflected on the sheets of the ALP 0
Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft ALP Narrative Report working paper for Airport IL
review/comment
., Five(5)copies of a final draft working paper for the Airport review/comment �
A final ALP Narrative Report in electronic format(PDF)
Estimated'Fask Durotwn
120 Days(including a 60-day review period by the FAA)
Plaster Plan Update.
1.56)
Packet Pg. 815
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORr FEBRUARY 23 2015 6UPDATEO JULY 21, 20M
11.1 Title Sheet
A title sheet will be prepared in accordance with the FAA checklist" to serve as the drawing set cover sheet.
This title sheet will include pertinent information such as the airport name, owner/operator, location, and plan
set preparer,An index of drawings,graphic representations of the airport location (including the identification
of the county the Airport is located in)and airport vicinity will also be presented on the Ill sheet,
11.2 Existing Airpot tLayout 17
C14
Utihzing new digital mapping for the Ae:rport, a new drawing will be created to identify facilities and T—
o
geograpNical, features at the Airport as they currently exist. This drawing wild include existing structures, (n
IL
pavements, imaginary surfaces, NAVAIDs (visual and instrument), ground contours, runway protection zones, CID
runway safety areas, property interests, and other pertinent dimensional data recommended by the FAA.
Based on the new dlgitai mapping obtained for the Airport, this drawing will reflect projects and other airport U)
improvements that have materialized since the cuoent ALP was last approved in June 2003.This drawing will .0
0
also depict the configuration and general dimensioning of the existing airport fa.,,Wties, including surveyed
building heights of M builclmgs on airport property, The Airport Reference Point(ARP), key elevations, runway
end latitudeAongitude coordinates, and runway approach surfaces will also be identified.The drawing will also X
W
include a tiegend and applicable notes section, wind roses and wind coverage tables to be developed under 0
Task 3.6, as well as a runway data and building data tables. The runway data table will include information ll E
such as Approach and Departure Reference Code (APRC and DPRQ Runway Reference Code (RRQ, runway
Iq
length, runway width, runway end elevation, runway lighting, rUnway mal pavement type, pavement I
Iq
strength and NAVAIDs(visual and instrument).The "true"and magnetic north will also be depicted, which will T—
C14
T—
require the calculation of the magnetic declination at the Airport. Any deviations to FAA design standards will
0
be identified and noted appropriately. (n
IL
4i
The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the existing airport layout contains the
information required for submittal to the FAA. E
The scale of the drawing will be defined at the time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to
provide a cleady legibie drawing with all requisite data readily discernible.The scale of the drawing, however,
will fall within the range of 1" = 200" and 1" = 600, in accordance with the FAA checklist,
FAA ARP Standard Operail PraceduresrSOI�i Stondard Procedure for MA R"ew and Approval ofAarport Layout Plan,Ocr Ober l 2013
Ill Plan Update
Packet Pg. 816
C.18.a
KEY WVES'r iNTERNATGONA( AMPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 rUPDATED JULY 21, 2015k
11.3 Airport Layout Plan
Utilizing new digital mapping and other available resources, R&A will create an ALP to reflect the
recommended development plan to accommodate the future facility needs as identified in the updated
Master Plan. Specifically, the ALP will illustrate existing and proposed airfield pavements, roadway &parking
pave men t/structures, trails/gravel roads, runway markings, on-airport structures, appropriate levels of
vegetation, key drainage features, NAVAIDs (visual and instrument), off-airport structures that are located in
the immediate vicinity of the Airport, and other miscellaneous natural and man-made items. Established
survey monuments located on or in the immediate vicinity of the Airport will also be identified.
cv
Ground contours, runway protection zones, runway safety and object free areas, future property'interests, and
other pertinent dimensional data recommended by the FAA will also be depicted on the plan. The ARP
(existing and proposed), the Approach and Departure Reference Code (APRC and DPRC), and Runway IL
CID
Reference Codes (RRCs) for each runway, key elevations, runway end latitude/longitude coordinates, and
runway approach surfaces will also be identified. Any proposed improvements and/or changes to these items
will be depicted graphically and identified.
tag
0
The ALP will be developed in accordance with the FAA checklist.Thus, each of the components of the ALP will
contain the information necessary to obtain approval from the FAA. Like the Existing Airport Layout, any
deviations to FAA design standards will be identified and noted on the ALP,
0
The scale of the drawing will be defined at the time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to _
provide a clearly legible drawing with all requisite data readily discernible. The scale of the drawing, however,
will fall within the range of 1" = 200'and 1" = 600', in accordance with the FAA checklist. 17
Iq
cv
11.4 Airport Airspace Drawing
(s
IL
Firm Responsible for Completing tdus Subtask Jacobs �
This drawing will depict all relevant Federal Aviabon Regulations (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces as they
relate to the Airport's immediate airspace in a plan and profile view. The plan view will be prepared at an
approximate scale of V = 2,000' and will be overlaid onto a USGS 7-minute quadrangle basernap (or
orthophotography) of the surrounding area. The profile view will be prepared at a horizontal scale of 1' =
1,000'and a vertical scale of 1" = 100'.
The plan will illustrate the ultimate runway configuration of the airfield with key elevations of the surfaces and
stationing from the runway ends being referenced. Fifty (50) foot contour intervals will be shown for all FAR
Part 77 sloping imaginary surfaces. This sheet will depict objects violating FAR Part 77 surfaces that have not
been identified on the ALP or inner approach drawings. The top elevation of each obstruction will be
identified on the drawing as will the disposition of the obstruction in a tabular format.The dimensions of the
approach suffaces and transitional surfaces will be charted.obstruction heights will be obtained from the new
._ aster Plw)Update _._ .
581
Packet Pg. 817
KEY WEST ENtERNATiONAL AiRPORf FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015;
digital mapping and other available resources. In addition, all, known obstructions to navigable airspace off
airport will be identified through the use of the latest USGS mapping, the NOAA Obstruction Chart, and the
aeronautical sectional chart as applicable. No field obstruction surveys, however, will be completed as part of
this effort.
The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed)to confirm that the airport airspace drawing contains the
information required by the FAA.
11.5 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings 17
C14
T-
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Jacobs o
T (nhese drawings will depict plan and profile views of the inner portion of the approach to each ultimate runway l
end at the Airport.These drawings will uC ize a 1" = 200' horizontal scale for the plan and profile views and a (s)
1" = 20' vertical scale for the profile views. The plan/profile extents will cover from the referenced runway out
to a point where the approach surface reaches a 100-foot height above the runway end. The new digital base
mapping will be used to identify obstructions to navigable airspace, as well as those documented on the latest U)
.0
U SGS 7,minute quadrangle mapping and the NOAA Obstruction Chart. 0
In accordance with the FAA checklist, these drawings Mi depict the obstacle identification surfaces contained
X
in 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, threshold siting surfaces, Glideslope Qualification W
Surfaces (GQS)if applicable, and any other applicable surfaces associated with the United States Standards for 0
E
Instrument Procedures(TERPS), Changes I through 26.
Obstructions will be listed numerically in a tabular format for each approach with data describing the
obstruction type, the surfaces penetrated, top elevat:on, allowable elevation, amount of penetration, and C14
T-
proposed dispositions. Elevations of roads, railroads, power poles, trees, buildings, and other objects that are
0
located within the approaches will also be shown,
The drawings will also depict the threshold siting surfaces associated with each runway end. These surfaces
will be defined based on the type of instrument approaches anticipated and the critical aircraft for each E
M
runway end in accordance with the standards defined in Table 3-2, Approach/Departure Standards Table, of
FAA AC 5300-13A, Change 1,Airport Design. <
Additionally, any local zoning ordinances or protection zones will also be reflected in the inner portion of the
approach surface drawings, where applicable,
11.6 Termina9 Area Dry ill
Similar to the ALP, the terminal area drawil will depict existing and proposed development at a larger
scale(within a range of 1" = 50'and 1" = 1001 of the terminal area and other adjacent facilities.
Maste, Plain Update 591
Packet Pg. 818
At this sode the terminal area drawing(s) will provide further detail in terms of dimensional criteria
annotations, aircraft parking pos�tions, exiging and proposed facilities. A building data table that list details
specific to each facility will also beincluded.
11,7 Land Use Drawing
This doming will depict the existing and recommended use of all| Airport property and all |and in the
immediate vicinity of the Airport (to the 65 DML contour as specified in FAA RGL- 5870.1). The land uses wi||
be depicted by general use categories such as aviation, commercial, residenbei' industrial, recreaVmna�. pub|ic �
use, etc. The specific designations to land uses within the airport property limits will, be discussed with airport C14
representatives and revised as directed to e0 ca
tegories �esthetanedesired� Theo�'a�rpo |and uses in r~
the immediate vicinity of the Airport (to the GS DNL contour) w0 be defined based on the Monroe county m0
IL
zoning and land use maps. *m
The66 DNLwiH be developed as part of Task 7.3 using the FAA s Integrated Noise Model ONKM>Version 7.OD,
and based on the aviation activity projected as part of the Master P|an's hznacaat In addition 0o the 6S QNL, ~~
the 7V and 7SDNL will also be depicted the land use drawing.
The FAA check|)st will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the land use drawing contains the
information required by the FAA. X
0
E
11,8 Airport Property Map
Firm Responsible for the Property Line Survey, To be Determined C14
This drawing will be prepared at scale equal to that of the ALP and will depict the existing airport property
boundary aswell as proposed acquisition areas.Property boundary bearings and distances will be denoted on IL
the drawing where appropriate and ifavailable.
The updating of the property map will conform with the guidelines discussed in the FAA's Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP 3.00) for FAA Review o[Emhibh'A' Ai/port Property Inventory Maps(dated October l' 201])
FAA SOP 2.00 also provides same Airport Property K4ep/Exh{b�tAguidelines. To support the submittal of this <
updated planning product, the Planning team will also review, complete, and submit the Exhibit ^A' Review
Checklist that ia provided in the FAA SOP 38&
The Planning Team will research the acquisition history of property for EYVV to validate data from previous
documents.Anticipated tasks include researching the Airport records,documents held at the City of Key West
and/or the Monroe County, FOOT records, and FAA records in Orlando. Specific attention to grant data Wi|/
be researched, The Property Map and will also cross reference the individual parcels depicted on the Property
Map drawing to tabular data summarizing the size of the parcel (in acres), the ORB Record Reference and the
date of record (if available), and the sources of funds(FAA, PFC, local, other), if available, used to acquire the
Master Ran wnma,e
[601
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015;UPDATED JW Y 21 2015'
property. It is anticipated that a property line survey and the preparation of the Airport boundary legal
description will be required for this subtask,
The drawing will indicate in matrix form how, when, and from whom the various parcels were acquired. In
accordance with the FAA checklist,the data table will include(if available):
® Number or letter and area of each parcel or easement
® Date property was acquired or property status
® Federal Aid project number under which the property acquisition was reimbursed iz,
• Type of Acquisit;on (i.e, AIP-noise, AIR entitlement, PFC, surplus property, local purchase, gocal donation,
C14
condemnation, other) T-
o
• Grantor of property
® Acreage
11.9 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal U)
.0
0
Five draft copies of the drawings developed WH be assembled and distributed to the EYW staff for review and
comments. Revisions will be made as appropriate based on comments received. The drawings to be included X
W
in the preliminary ALP set are as follows: 0
E
. Title Sheet.
. Existing Airport layout
C14
. Airport Layout Plan
0
. Airport Airspace Drawing
. Inner Portion of the Appilloach Surface Drawing-Runway 9
0 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing- Runway 27
E
. Terminal Area Drawing(s)
0 Land Use Drawing
. Airport Property MaC:y
11.10 Fina9 Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal
Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate), 13 copies of the final draft Airport Plans
set will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FAA (nine copies), FDOT Aviatlon and
Spaceports Office (two copies), and airport staff (two copies). An electronic version of the drawings set will
master Plan u pdate
(611
Packet Pg. 820
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL A[RPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 tUPDATED JULY 21, 201SI
aiso be provided. Drawings will be provided in both AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat (PDF) formats. As part of
this submittal, R&A will also prepare a transmittal letter to the FAA that will list the key changes that have
been made to the Airport Layout Plan. The FAA checklist will also be completed and included in this
transmittal.
11.11 Final Airport Plans Set
Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate) fifteen copies of the final Airport Plans
set and associated FAA checklist will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FDOT Aviation
and Spaceports Office and to the FAA. It is assumed that Monroe County will be responsible for forwarding
C14
T_
the Airport Plans set to the FAA local ADO for their review, coordination, approval, and signature. An o
electronic version of the drawings set will also be provided. The final drawings will be provided in both (n
IL
AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat(PDF formats). CID
11.12 Narrative Report
U)
0
This task will include the preparation of an ALP Narrative Report that will document, in narrative form, the
proposed development plan reflected on the sheets of the Al P set for formal review and comment by the
Airport staff. This narrative will include discussions of any modifications to FAA standards, including the x
W
justification of any new modification requests, In addition, a half-size version of the ALP set (11"xV') will be 0
E
printed and included in the report,
The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the ALP Narrative
Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment and (2) C14
T_
final draft for the Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions wili be incorporated
0
into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
11.13 Coordination Meetings E
R&A anticipates participating in up to four (4) web conference sessions using GoToMeeting or similar <
software. These web conference sessions will provide an opportunity to review the base map layering, review
the draft ALP set with Airport staff and discuss required modifications to the drawings.
In addition to the web conference sessions, two meetings at the Airport are anticipated with EYW staff and
management. These meetings will provide an opportunity to review the draft ALP sets prior to distributing
copies to the FAA and FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office for review and comment.
Master Plan Update
(621
Packet Pg. 821
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015)
Similarly,two meetings at the FAA Orlando ADO in Orlando are anticipated. These meetings will provide an
opportunity to present the draft ALP sets to the ADO staff and to go over the proposed projects to be reflect
on the future ALP. These meetings will be attended by R&A staff,currently located in Orlando.
C14
T-
o
(n
CL
U)
.0
0
x
W
0
E
C14
0
(n
CL
4i
C
0
E
Master Na n Update l631
Packet Pg. 822
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT rEBRUARV 23, 2015 yUPDATED JULY 21 20151
.............. 111111---,.................. ........................................................... , - ...............
12. Documentation
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask- Ricondo&Associates, Inc, (unless otherwise noted)
The final Master Plan Update deliverables will represent the formal documentations that will become a matter of
public record approvals.These documents will include an Executive Summary, a Draft Master Plan Update Report
and a Final Master Plan Update Report
Deliverables
® SO copies of the Executive Summary and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat(PDF)format C14
o 10 copies of the Draft Airport Master Plan Update Report and an electronic file version in Adobe 0
Acrobat(PDF)format IL
IL
0 25 copies of the Final Airport Master Plan Update Report and ten (10) PDF versions to be provided on (0
CD's.
Estimated Task Duration U)
.0
120 Days(including a 90 day review period by the FAA) 0
X
12.1 Prepare Executive Summary W
0
E
1,irm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Assanotes, inc,
The Planning ream will prepare and submit a draft Executive Summary that summarizes the results of the
aviation forecasts, the facility requirements, the recommended plan and Capital Improvement Program. The
C14
T-
Executive Summary shall include approximately 15 to 25 pages with color exhibits. A total of 50 copies and an
0
electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat(PDF)format of the Executive Summary wH be provided.
12.2 Prepare Draft Airport Master Plan Update Report
E
Firm ResponObte for Completing this Subtosk: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.lJacobs <
To insure proper coordination of the planning effort and assure agreement between the Planning Team, City
of Key West, Monroe County, and FAA,a Draft Airport Master Plan Report will be submitted for formal review.
The draft report will contain all working papers (revised based on comments provided on original drafts), ALP
drawings and the financial evaluation. The draft documents and plans will also be submitted to the FAA for
review. A total of ten (10) copies and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format of the draft
report will be provided.
Master Plan Update G641
Packet Pg. 823
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRpowr Vsmmwwnv za 2015wPoArEoAILY21 2015
12.3 Prepare PrepaFe Final A~7C]oxt Master Plan Update Report
Firm Responsible for Completing thnSubtask Rico�ndo&Associates, /nc.lJocobs
The final airport master p|an update report cunso|ida6ng all previous analyses wi�,�| be prepared after a||
agency and participants have made their comments on the draft final report and Airport Management has
directed the Planning Team to incorporate these comments �nto a final report. Twenty^five (25) conmb bound
final reports of the Key West lnternationa� Airport Master Plan Update will be prepared for d,sthbution. Of
these copies,two (2)wiN be forwarded directly to the FAA Orlando Airports Distnct Office and one(l)will be
forwarded directly to the FDOT Aviation and Spaceports office.The remaining twenty-two (22)wW be sent to ~�
the Monroe County/Airport, Dglta| files of all final chapters and associated graphics will be provided to the
Monroe County and Airport Management in a readab|e CID format. Atotal often (lO) PDF versions will be T_
o
provided onCD's, (n
(L
�
0
E
�
�
mas,e.p/aoUpdate
~ °
� � Outreach
������ ������°��U����U���� ����������
��~�" ��*� �» w���~�n � ��° °�� Participation�^n�������u��nx Program
Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask, Ricondo&Associates,Inc, Deborah Murphy Lagos&Assudates,
LLC'and McFarland Johnson
The update of the Master Ran has implications fora variety of parties within the community. These parties
range from the tenants who operate from the airport including corporate users, airlines, cargo carriers,
general aviation pilots,and fixed base operators, to businesses and governmental agencies who rely upon the
Airport to provide connection to regional, national and international destinations and markets. Additionally �
the Master Plan Update has implications for those persons who reside adjacent to or in proximity to the C14
facility. Tm this end airport management has established the need conduct three public meetings r~
IL
Delivemzbles *m
w Power Point Presentations for each mf the three(3) public workshops
n Presenta#on0oards
• Technical Review Committee Binders
w Briefing Materials,Graphics and Presentations for the Bected Offidais Briefings
13,1 Conduct PuN'c Meetings �X
0
E
Firm Responsible for Completing this,Subtosk Ricondo&Associates Inc, Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates, LLC,
V.-
Jacobs 17
Iq
Three public workshops. in an open house format, will be conducted to brief residents and interested ��
stakeholders about the project and to receive public comments. The first two presentations are tentatively
scheduled to occur when each the following tasks are completed: (I) Data collection and Aviation Activity y
Forecasts and (2) Airport Development Concepts. The final presentation will take place prior to the Final IL
Master Plan Update submittal. At minimum, R&A`s Officer in Charge and/or Project Manager will attend
each of these meetings and participate in the ndedes�red and requested by airport staff, In mddition, the
meetings will be moderated by Deborah Murphy Lagos. The meetings will be scheduled to coincide with
Technical Review Committee meetings(same day or consecutive day)'whenever possible.
�
The Planning Team will prepare briefing materials for the public workshops and will have appropriate
personnel in attendance to respond to questions and comments from the public. The Planning Team will
prepare the meeting notice for mailing to the public and the meeting advertisement for publication. The
Planning Team will prepare and collect comment forms, and will review and summarize the comments. The
Planning Team will also arrange for meeting refreshments and any necessary audio-visual equipment.
For budgetng purposes, however, it has been assumed that the Monroe County and/or Airport staff will
secure the meeting location, mail meeting notices, and arrange for and pay for any public advertisements for
the meeting,
_ __-' -- -- -- -- — -- --- -- --- — --- ----
Master Plan Update
[661
KEY wEsr INTERNAMNAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015;
13.2 Elected Officials Briefing Support
firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask, Ricondo&Associates Inc Jacobs
Over the course of the Master Plan Update, it will be necessary to provide briefings for elected officials at the
local level. It has been anticipated that representatives of the Planning Team will likely need to be in
attendance to provide technical support during the briefings, Additionally the Planning Team will prepare
briefing materials, graphics and presentations to support the Airport in these activities. For scoping purposes
it has been assumed that a total of three(3) briefings of various elected officials will occur over the course of
the planning process for which consultant parVicipation and support would be needed.
cv
13.3 Technical Review Committee Meetings and Stakeholder (n
IL
Briefings
r-irm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc., McFarland.Johnson, and Jacobs U)
.0
It is anti6pated that up to three (3) presentations on the work status of the Xrport Master Pian study w4l be 0
0
presented to the I echnlcal Review Committee. These presentations wdl occur on the same days as the public
meetings. "i"hese presentations are intended to present pro ect status updates as well as to receive feedback
and guidance fro the Committee When necessary. R&A's Office-In-Chai ge and Project Manager will attend x
W
each of these areeW,igs and participate v'i the role desired and requested by the Airport'Manager, 0
E
C14
0
(n
IL
E
master P'an update l6�J
Packet Pg. 826
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(UPDATED JULY 21 2015t
14. SUPPLEMENTAL TASKS
Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask- Ricondo&Associates,Inc, Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates,
LLC,and Jacobs.
Airport management is considering allowing the use of the pavement area that is currently available between
the Runway 9 end and the recently installed EMAS for takeoff run. It is anticipated that the additional
pavement area could provide as much as 271 feet of additional distance for the calculation of the Takeoff Run
Available JORA),Takeoff Distance Available(TODA),and Accelerate-Stop Distance Available(ASDA).
C14
T_
The following sections provide an overview of the planning tasks that will be required for the development of o
an interim ALP and Categorical Exclusion form in preparation for the implementation of declared distances at (n
the Airport. These tasks include the evaluation of aircraft turning movements and jet blasts to establish a new IL
runway threshold, the development of airfield alternatives reflecting the implementation of declared
distances, and the preparation of an interim Airport Layout Plan (ALP). Considering the timing for the
implementation of the declared distances at the Airport, it is assumed that the aerial surveying and mapping U)
to be completed as part of the Master Plan Update will not be available. As a result the Planning Team will .0
0
prepare an interim ALP,which will be developed based on the 2003 FAA-approved ALP set.
Deliverables X
W
® Five (5)copies of a brief draft Technical Memorandum documenting Aircraft Turning Movements and 0
E
Proposed Declared astances for the Airport review/comment
• Five(5)copies of a final draft Technical Memorandum for distribution to the FAA V.-
• Five(5)copies of a final Technical Memorandum Iq
• Noise Contours Reflecting OperaVng Procedures Utilizing Declared Dlstances C14
• Categorical Exclusion Form
0
• Two(2)copies of the preliminary draft Interim ALP set for distribution to the Airport foii, review and (n
IL
comment
• Nine(9)copies of the draft Interim ALP set for distribution to the FAA
• A transmittal letter detailing the changes that were made to the existing ALP set E
14.1 Evaluate Aircraft Turning Movements <
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk Rrcondo&Associates, Inc., and Jacobi,
Using PathPlanner, R&A will evaluate aircraft turn movements on the section of pavement located between
the Runway 9 end and the recently installed EMAS and determine at which point aircraft may be able to
initiate their takeoff run.The site constraints and minimum setback requirements from the existing EMAS bed
will be defined in collaboration with Zodiac Aerospace. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that a
maximum of five (5) aircraft types would be evaluated as part of this analysis based on the existing and
projected aircraft fleet mix. The"design aircraft"will be defined in collaboration with Airport staff.The results
master Pian�pdate
1681
Packet Pg. 827
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015,UPDATED JULY 21 20151
of this simulation modeling will provide the foundation for estabUshing the relocated runway threshold
location.
14.2 Define Setback Requirements based, on Engine Jet It
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk Zodiac Aerospace and Ricando&Asosciatesinc.(Support role only)
The Planning Team will evaluate the jet blast contours of the design aircraft to establish the minimum
required setback distance between the start of the takeoff run and the EMAS in order to protect the integrity 17
and functionality of the EMAS bed. This information, along with aircraft turning movement analysis, will help
establish the proposed runway end and will provide the foundation for the development of airfield C14
T-
alternatives reflecting the implementation of declared distances at the Airport. o
14.3 Prepare Airfield Alternatives and Establish Declared Distances
U)
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc. .0
0
This task includes the development of up to two &60d alternatives based on the results of the aircraft
turning movement and jet, blast analyses. Using the criteria established in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A
Change 1, the Planning Team will develop up to two airfield alternatives reflecting the application of declared x
W
distances at the Airport. For each alternative, the Planning Team will calculate and illustrate the TO RA, TODA, 0
ASDA, and Landing Distance Available (LDA). These alternatives will be evaluated with Airport staff and the ll E
preferred alternative will ultimately be incorporated into the Interim ALP for FAA approval
This task does not include an analysis of obstructions in the approaches. The establishment of declared
C14
Ir-
distances will be based solely on the analysis of additional available pavement area beyond the Runway 9 end.
0
14.4 Establish Markings, Lighting, and Signage Requirements
E
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask. Jacobs.
Using the FAA criteria established in Advisory Circulars 150/5340-1L, Standards for Airport Markings, <
150/5340-30G, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids and 150/5340-18F, Standards for Airport
Sign Systems, the Planning Team will clefne the runway marking, lighting and signage requirements for the
preferred alternative. This information will provide the foundation for the development of cost estimates for
this project,others.
Master Puan Update l691
Packet Pg. 828
14.5 Prepare Interim Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk Ricomdo&4ssmciates, Inc
The Planning Team wk update the Airport Layout Plan (ALP)to reflect the declared distances to be calculated
under Task I4.3. Considering the timing for the implementation of the declared distances at the Airport, it is
assumed that the aerial surve�ng and mapping to be completed as part of the Master Plan Update will not be
available.As e result, the P|enn�ng Team will prepare an interim ALP, which will be developed based on the
2DQ3 FAA-approved ALP set.
Using the 3003 FAA-approved ALP set, comprised of seven (7} drawing sheets, R&Aw�|| prepare an updated C14
ALP drawing to reflect the adoption of declared distances and incorporate as-built drawings of all projects —
that materialized since the current ALP was last approved. Future modifications to the ai,fie|dgeometry will be in
IL
incorporated as part of a future ALP update (Refer to Task ll). This interim update will be limited to a "Pen *m
and Ink" change to be handled by the Orlando ADO program manager. For budgeting purposes, it has been
assumed that Jacobs and/or Monroe County will provide the AutoCAD files associated with the FAA-approved
ALP for the Airport including external references, USGS quad map, aerial photo, etc R&A will aism use the ~�
AutoCAD layering structure and naming conventions from the existing ALP,
Interim ALP Update
The fo||mwing information will be updated as part of this task. W
0
E
° Data Table:Update outdated information including Runway Data tables
° Airport Layout Plan (existing and future): develop declared distances table, incorporate proposed
project including associated pavement marking and lighting, and integrate as-bui|t drawings of afl ~�
projects that materialized since the current ALP was last approved. C14
The sheets assumed to not be updated as part of this task include the following- in
IL
* Cover Sheet
° Airport Airspace Plan
= Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings
m Terminal Area Plan ^^
�
° On Airport Land Use Plan
° Airport Property Map
Two draft copies of the drawings developed under this task will be assembled and distributed to Monroe
County for review and comment. Once comments have been received and addressed (aaappropr�ate). the
final ALP set package will be submitted to the FAA for review and approval. For budgeting purposes and
based on recent"Pen and Ink"ALP submittals completed by R&A, it has been assumed that nine copies would
need to be distributed to the FAA. As part of the submittal to the FAA, R&A will also prepare a transmittal
letter detailing the changes that were made to the ALP.
master Plan Update
KEY WEST INTERNATrONAt AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015[UPDATED dUt,Y 21 20151
14.6 Develop Noise Contour
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates
The Planning Team will conduct a noise analysis that will account for the proposed declared distances,
resulting in noise contours that are representative of the proposed airfield configuration. The noise contour's
will be prepared for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used for the purpose of 14 CFI
Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) or the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) The methodology n.,isecl to
develop the contours, however, wile comply with that required by the FAA. The FAA's Integrated Noise Moclea
(INN), version TOO will be used for the noise modelling (or, if required, the Aviation Environmerital Design
Tool QAEDTJ version 2b shall be used). It is anticipated this effort will build an the model inputs developed as C14
part of the 2013 14 CFI Part 150 Study The noise analysis will identify and graphically depict noise exposure o
associated with the projected aeronautical activity at the Aerport and will include an sdentification of noise (n
IL
sensitive land uses(developed by others on the Team).
The aircraft noise contours of DNI..65, 70, and 75 dB resulting from the proposed declared distances wii[ ll)e
created using the INN 7,,0d or AEDT 2b The 20 L5 _p
av".ra g..pnn_ualJa o _ration nd fleet mix will be used to V q in
.0
establish the noise contours based on the proposed declared distances 0
ca
143 Prepare Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) Form X
W
0
E
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, lew,
R&A will prepare a SOP 500, CategorcaR Exclusion form for t1ne proposed project in accordance wrtl-i FAA
requirements. Cost estirnate assurnes that the proyect qualifies for a Categorical Exclusion based on FAA
C14
Orders 1050,1E and 5050AB and that no exVaordinary circumstances exist that wotAd require preparation of
an Environmental Assessment. R&A will incorporate information frorn the noise analysis(to be perforrined by 0
(n
others) into the SOP 500 to demonstrate no significant change in noise exposure to sensi,tive noise receptors IL
would result. R&A would prepare a draft form for review by airport staff address comments from airport 4i
C
staff, then .submit a draft form to FAA for review. PEA would address any FAA comments, and prepare a final 0
E
SOP 500 form for submittal to FAA
14.8 Prepare Technical morn urn
The Planmrig Tearn will surnmarize the findings of the analyses in a brief technical report. Vhe Planning Tearn
will provide five(5)copies of the draft technical mernorandurn for the Air-port review/comment, as well as one
electronic copy (PDFs on CD), Once cornments have been received and addressed (as appropriate), five (5)
copies of the final draft technical memorandum will be submitted to the Airport for distribution to the FAA.
Once the FAA comments have been received and addressed, five (5) copies of the final tecllnical
mernorandurn will be submitted to the Airport
Master Plan Update
Intl
Packet Pg. 830
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAi, AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23 2015(;UPDATED JULY 21 2015;
14.9 Coordination Meeting
Firm Responsible for Complevng this SubtasV Ricondo&Assoc(ates, Inc,and Jacobs
The Planning Team anticipates participating in up to two (2)web conference sessions using GoToMeeting or
similar software. These web conference sessions will provide an opportunity to discuss the aircraft turning
movement exhibits,airfield alternatives, interim ALP,etc.
In addition to the web conference sessions, one meeting at the Airport is anticipated with EYW staff and iz,
management.This meeting will provide an opportunity to review the airfield alternatives.
C14
T-
o
in
(L
U)
.0
0
X
W
0
E
C14
0
in
(L
E
Master Pgan updaTe
I?2
Packet Pg. 831
C.18.a
5� 888SS 88S$$ $ $St
a n N m A
� N
IiE
N N N M N M N N N M M M N M M
A Qq O m A m S 2
nmm 31m��^^i�e�ppw m pap ao N ee�mmpnn
p N Q N m A N N Q A O b l
3
s
NN NM N M N MNNMM N MM axe yyc�
$gS$ $ $$ $$$$9i! A 4. q b $7n
�miJ om� emse�$$ N A A m ti
a Auo a— nn o�Ti3 n g
r
N
o
W 8 8 8 8 8 8m d
8 8888 , 8 Is 8 4 g � W�I a p O-O O ..( p m O m �i
N �i Om�I
N M N M N M M M N N M M N N N M N e
g ' g ' e r
M M N N N M M N M N N N M N M N N N
8 88888 8888852V� Sept as
t0 N Ipp� aA N `n f pp�� A v1 A
M NNN M N M M N N N N � M N N CN
W r
OQ88888 88888 R SS V O r
N N N R^ Y m lV $ m n g O
Y (^.
M M M M M N N M N N M M N N N M N I.L
O
IL g$
g 8 ga 2
u N d N
Esc@ �
a a Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O... .0 O O
2C .-N Pl Y N m A m m O , m 0
F Ul N 6
Packet Pg. 832
C.18.a
N
CL
a W
s s �
O
V
•-u s a �
1 k
s W
Y C�
1
o � �
r
N
r a
Packet Pg. 833
C.18.a
-
7 7 !A! 7 � 1 1 1 � 7 9 ! A A ! A• �! �
r € N
I �
d
( W
to
i O
V
!E
r
�P U
a.
r
N
j i�
} tl 3
Packet Pg. 834
............
------ ..... .
..
.. .. . ...... ..... . ...
.. . ... .. ................... .............. ............ .
... .................. .................. .... O
U)
a.
to
x
LU
if Co
1111111 11111 I H) If If If I I I I If If 1 11 1 1 1 a.
I
Packet Pg. 835
11111p 11! all !!!I I AD M Hlfl
....... ............. ..........
lilt....
...... .... ...... .............
i i
.. .... ....... ............. .. .....
111 it 1111!f! *Is all pp
...... •------- ... ......................... ....... ............... ........... .
.. .... ....... ......... ...... i
C4
0
U)
a.
0
x
LU
CNA
if I i lilt I III If I lill3ii HII W fill I I If j, 3 i i I If I it ill-all Ili a.
If fill 11011 11 j 1,
1
I
I H
Packet Pg. 836
C.18.a
:wziesi.ew tl:rw.,..�.-•..itl i Pa f is >Hoo as
HIm I
+ a s 1 fa f a f
1 Hsm a I am a , I
oP m • 1 , 1 r
sw ••m + r sm r ]sen ]
r
Dim to,
...e....�w.f.if.rrxm ] I 1 1> f]af I 1 r
i e fmm i i 1
.......�.�.r.,�'� i �.+a f i�ma f ie • , I as I m: s , f I]fn i i 1 Q
�. U)
•...eP..�tl..a.....x+:.+�, f xa 1 1 ffn 1 I w
a.
f.0 �u••�v•fY�• Him 1 1 D AAfx as I 1 1 1 bf f
w Nar7urmpr I I X 1 ab i � mm 1 IST f 1 TI
�`aa i ] r � i i DDz I 1 sfn fm iwm 1 ,�, + ;.e•x i W
�r,MW�•I rwYNWi i ; ; ; X M 1 I> IAm f I.,� • IDtl f1a
w•wa�. I 1 I D 1 a� I(/�1�r
w••�•tltltlWi HP , 1 I fa o • f i 1 I 1 ff7 f 1 ii
u•.W',rdAw�C..��u•n Y�•,•As......, 1T— C
V
•IrMu�w• yP 1 1 - 1 1
i�Ooa+wu.• - 1 : 1 1 f r ;] 1 .Vi • ,+• •ac
Haw e f Y AIm I] fD
..-li•n.n f 3 f DY ; u
X
I Om W
']wwe-a.• 1 H]m • Iqa f fb W ' a !gym 1 Dm r + 1 ffn , 1 1f.•ruu LI_
�1 f�llfxl
f ,N
a
af.a•n f 51.wIW1.,•f u1rv,.WCpf
M
r
N
Co
a
r
c
m
E
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 837
C14
a.
P
cn
0
L)
x
LU
E
ti
a.
Packet Pg. 838
C.18.a
f
v
v
0
a.
k
W
� � N
1CL
1 � cn
Q
Packet Pg. 839
C.18.a
i
i
o
a.
4
1 N
d
s s
Packet Pg. 840
C.18.a
I
a
ti
I
04
U)
a
0
4 U
Z �
x
LU
�# O
3 l a
! � a
I -
Packet Pg. 841
C14
0
CL
0
of x
LLJ
4)
E
CL
Packet Pg. 842
C.18.a
0
N
� d
cn
P
O
I � m
x
LU
E
i � N
r
Packet Pg. 843
m'
3 R:H: A t
.l4
HIM Ih.
•�tSRR�t R �
ti
r
N
I �
0
iI d
V
S �
7
..�.. W
9 cc
a
R C
H
' Co
a
r
c
pp E
YX�YYY
V
2ej
b
Packet Pg. 844