12/14-47 EYW Master Plan Update 2nd Supplement Kevin Madok, CPA
so •� ��y'�� Clerk of the Circuit Court&Comptroller—Monroe County, Florida
44.;coo;.
DATE: April 26, 2019
TO: Beth Leto, Airports
Business Manager '
FROM: Pamela G. Hanc. f1).C.
SUBJECT: April 17th BOCC Meeting
Attached are electronic copies of the following items for your handling:
C13 Change Order No. 9 with Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc. awarding Bid Additive #2 in
the amount of$406,510.40 for the Key West International Airport Drainage Improvements
Project Phase 2&3.Total project cost to be funded by the FAA Grant 37-56 (90%) and Airport
Operating Fund 404 (10%).
C18 Time Extension only (no increase in original cost) with Jacobs Project Management
Co. for Task Order No. 12/14-47 Services Authorized: Supplemental 2- EYW Master Plan
Update at Key West International Airport.
C19 Time Extension only (no increase in original cost) with Jacobs Project Management
Co. for Task Order No. 12/14-64 Services Authorized: Supplemental 1-Strengthen/Rehabilitate
Commercial Apron Construction Support and RPR Services at Key West International Airport.
C20 Time Extension only (no increase in original cost) with Jacobs Project Management
Co. for Task Order No. 12/14-66 Services Authorized: Supplemental 1- Drainage Improvements
Phase 2&3 Construction Support and RPR Services at Key West International Airport.
C21 Time Extension only (no increase in original cost) with Jacobs Project Management
Co. for Task Order No. 12/14-67 Services Authorized: Supplemental 1- MTH Master Plan
Update at The Florida Keys Marathon International Airport.
C22 Time Extension only (no increase original cost) with Jacobs Project Management Co.
for Task Order No. 12/15-07 Services Authorized: Supplemental 1-MTH Exfiltration Trench and
pond Modification at The Florida Keys Marathon Airport.
C25 Jacobs Project Management Co.'s Task Order#12/15-49 in the amount of
$120,110.00 for Supplemental No. 1-Master Plan Update for the Key West International Airport,
to be funded by FDOT Grant G0E77 (50%) and PFC #15 (50%).
Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at(305) 292-3550.
cc: County Attorney
Finance
File
KEY WEST MARATHON PLANTATION KEY PK/ROTH BUILDING
500 Whitehead Street 3117 Overseas Highway 88820 Overseas Highway 50 High Point Road
Key West,Florida 33040 Marathon,Florida 33050 Plantation Key,Florida 33070 Plantation Key,Florida 33070
305-294-4641 305-289-6027 305-852-7145 305-852-7145
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
Effective Date Upon Execution Task Order No. 12/14-47
40(0 - b,PPsa -53049rD
Client Project No. G.A-K I44-S30610 Engineer Project No. E9Y16747 (S2)
This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master
Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ("Client") and JACOBS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated February 15, 2017 ("Agreement"). The
Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
Services Authorized—Supplemental No. 2—EYW Master Plan Update
Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and
consists of 85 page(s).
Pricing
N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement.
X Firm Fixed Price of$ 855,598.00
N/A Other(Describe):
Schedule (THIS IS A TIME EXTENSION REQUEST)
Services may commence on Execution(Date approved by Monroe County,tOI44/15).
-s will cease by 1,825 days
6 .._
i „,„ '1 )„TJ�
a ? E BOARD OF COUNTY COlISSIOlR
�'� h . MA K, CLE OF MONROE COUNTY, FL A -a rn
•*OOY,
By -,:th;-.7:: 1 ii/40 t :
ayor/Chairman _ r, :a-
CONSULTANT: r- .,
JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO
Ctila .
By
• Title V.P. Geographical Operations Manager
M2 Colt NEY
File: MSTR APS—Monroe County J.MEgCADO
ASSIST oRNEY 3 7 i
Page 1 of 1 WO
Exhibit A
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Table of Contents
Overview 6
Purpose of Study 6
Scope of Services 9
1. Project Initiation&Administration 10
1.1 Establish Technical Review Committee 10
1.2 Project Administration, Monthly Billing&Reports 10
2. Aerial Surveying and Mapping 11
2.1 Aerial Mapping&Surveying 11
2.2 Establish Geodetic Control 11
2.3 Pre-Survey Preparation Activities 12
2.4 Photographic mapping-remote sensing 14
2.5 Airspace Surfaces&Obstacle Analysis 16
3. Inventory of Existing Conditions 18
3.1 Inventory of Airport Physical Facilities 19
3.2 Data Collection of Air Traffic and Aviation Activity 20
3.3 Off-Airport Land Use and Land Use Controls 20
3.4 Land Holdings and Existing Leaseholds 21
3.5 Known Environmental Areas of Concern 21
3.6 Meteorological Conditions 21
3.7 Airport Financial Data 21
3.8 Review of Other Reports 22
3.9 Prepare Inventory Of Existing Conditions Report 22
4. Aviation Activity Forecasts 23
Master Plan update
(11
IKEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
4.1 Collect and Analyze Socioeconomic Data 24
4.2 Develop Airline Passenger Forecasts 24
4.2.1 REVIEW EXISTING FORECASTS 24
4.2.2 DEVELOP PASSENGER ACTIVITY FORECASTS 24
4.3 Develop Air Cargo Forecasts - 25
4.4 Develop General Aviation Forecasts 26
4.4.1 REVIEW GENERAL AVIATION INDUSTRY TRENDS AND PREPARE DERIVATIVE FORECASTS FROM
THE FAA TAF 26
4.4.2 PREPARE GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX PROJECTIONS 26
4.5 Develop Military Aircraft Activity Forecasts 27
4.6 Develop Alternate Demand Scenario 27
4.7 Develop Aircraft Operations Forecasts 27
4.8 Establish Demand Peaking Characteristics and Design Day Flight Schedules 28
4.9 Prepare Aviation Activity Forecasts Report - 28
5. Facility Requirements 29
5.1 Airfield 29
5.1.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 29
5.1.2 DESIGN AIRCRAFT AND RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS 30
5.1.3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 30
5.2 Passenger Terminal 31
5.2.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 31
5.2.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 31
5.3 On-Airport Curbsides and Roadways 32
5.3.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 32
5.3.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 33
5.4 Public Parking 33
5.4.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 33
5.4.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 34
5.5 Air Cargo 34
5.5.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 34
5.5,2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 35
5.6 General Aviation -- • 35
5.6.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 35
Master Plan Update
[2]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015J
5.6.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 35
5.7 Support Facilities 36
5.7.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT 36
5.7.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 36
5.8 Prepare Demand/Capacity&Facility Requirements Report 36
6. Alternatives Analysis and Recommended Development Plan 37
6.1 Airfield Alternatives - 37
6.2 Terminal Alternatives 38
6.3 Roadway Alternatives 38
6.4 Airport Public Parking Facility Alternatives 39
6.5 Cargo Facility Alternatives 39
6.6 General Aviation Facility Alternatives 39
6.7 Support Facility Alternatives 39
6.8 Joint Use Evaluation 40
6.9 Evaluate Development Alternatives 40
6.10 Refine Recommended Airport Development Plan 40
6.11 Prepare Airport Development Alternatives Report 41
7. Environmental Overview 42
7.1 Existing Conditions 43
7.2 Evaluation of Proposed Development 44
7.3 Airport Noise Evaluation 44
7.3.1 REVISE INM AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX 45
7.3.2 ESTABLISH AIR TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROFILE 45
7.3.3 ESTABLISH BASELINE(EXISTING)NOISE CONTOURS 45
7.3.4 ESTABLISH LONG TERM(10-YEAR)NOISE CONTOURS 45
7.4 Prepare Environmental Overview Report 45
B. Sustainability Initiatives 47
8.1 Establish Baseline Conditions 47
8.2 Facilitate Sustainability Workshop 47
8.3 Formulate Sustainability Framework 47
Master Plan Update
[3]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
8.4 Prepare Simplified Recycling, Reuse,and Waste Reduction Plan 48
8.5 Draft Sustainability Chapter 49
9. Implementation Plan 50
9.1 Define Individual Development Projects 50
9.2 Develop Estimates of Rough Order of Magnitude Cost(ROM) 51
9.3 Coordinate Project Sequencing 51
9.4 Prepare Project Summaries and Exhibits 52
10. Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis 53
10.1 Develop Financial Model 54
10.2 Prepare Financial Plan 54
10.3 Prepare Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis Report 55
11. Update of the Airport Layout Plan Set 56
11.1 Title Sheet 57
11.2 Existing Airport Layout 57
11.3 Airport Layout Plan 58
11.4 Airport Airspace Drawing 58
11.5 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings 59
11.6 Terminal Area Drawing(s) 59
11.7 Land Use Drawing 60
11.8 Airport Property Map 60
11.9 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal 61
11.10 Final Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal 61
11.11 Final Airport Plans Set 62
11.12 Narrative Report 62
11.13 Coordination Meetings 62
12. Documentation 64
12.1 Prepare Executive Summary 64
12.2 Prepare Draft Airport Master Plan Update Report 64
12.3 Prepare Final Airport Master Plan Update Report - 65
Master Plan Update
[4]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015)UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
13. Outreach and Participation Program 66
13.1 Conduct Public Meetings 66
13.2 Elected Officials Briefing Support 67
13.3 Technical Review Committee Meetings and Stakeholder Briefings 67
14. SUPPLEMENTAL TASKS 68
14.1 Evaluate Aircraft Turning Movements 68
14.2 Define Setback Requirements based on Engine Jet Blast 69
14.3 Prepare Airfield Alternatives and Establish Declared Distances 69
14.4 Establish Markings, Lighting,and Signage Requirements 69
14.5 Prepare Interim Airport Layout Plan(ALP) 70
14.6 Develop Noise Contour 71
14.7 Prepare Categorical Exclusion(CATEX) Form 71
14.8 Prepare Technical Memorandum 71
14.9 Coordination Meeting 72
Master Plan Update .�
(53
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Overview
Key West International Airport(EYW or the Airport) operates as the southernmost airport in the United States
(U.S.). The Airport is located near the southern tip of the Florida Keys, on the northeast end of the island of
Key West, just minutes from downtown Key West and about 180 miles southwest of Miami International
Airport. Although EYW is considered a commercial airport, general aviation traffic accounts for the majority of
airport use, with 61 percent of total operations (based on FY2013 data'). The Airport is owned and operated
by the County of Monroe.
The Airport,which has one runway(9/27) measuring 4,801 by 100 feet, covers approximately 334 acres. The
original terminal, which opened in 1957, has been repurposed for the accommodation of arriving passengers.
In February 2009, a new 30,000 square feet terminal opened for the handling of departing passengers
including ticketing areas and security screening checkpoints. In FY 2013, EYW had 395,333 total
enplanements,an increase of 34 percent in enplanements from FY 2003. As of February 2015,the Airport was
classified as a small hub in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Current Parking facilities
at EYW consist of 300 vehicles spaces at ground level beneath the newer terminal including 150 spaces for
rental cars and 150 for the public.
Purpose of Study
The intent of the study is to update the 2003 Airport Master Plan for the Airport. This document is over 12
years old and needs to be updated to reflect new facilities, current projections of airport activity, new
environmental and other regulatory constraints, and to plan for an appropriate mix of land uses to support
projected aviation and non-aviation needs. Since 2003, many changes have occurred not only in the Key
West community, but also in the aviation industry. Some of the changes that have occurred at the Airport
include:the operations of larger aircraft including narrowbody jets such as Boeing 737, a significant increase
in passenger demand (from 295,079 enplanements in FY 2003 to 395,333 in FY 2013), the completion of a
two-level passenger terminal (2009), the installation of an EMAS system on both runway ends, the
construction of an automobile parking garage, and the acquisition of additional property. As a result, the
Master Plan Update will need to address a number of key issues including but not limited to: runway length
requirements, passenger terminal capacity, curbside and parking capacity,aircraft parking positions and apron
capacity and configuration, runway and taxiway geometry, and future general aviation facility requirements
among other airport facilities and systems. The Master Plan Update will also evaluate how the
reestablishment of new diplomatic relations with Cuba could impact passenger demand at the Airport near-
term and long-term, and assess the pros and cons associated with the possible joint-use of the Naval Air
Station Key West.
1 Federal Aviation Administration,Terminal Area Forecasts(TAF),January 2015.
IMaster Plan Update
161
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 (UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
The Master Plan Update will be conducted in accordance with FAA AC 150/5070-6B,Airport Master Plans,and
the FDOT Guidebook for Airport Master Planning and will use guidance from other relevant FAA Advisory
Circulars and Orders, publications from the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP), Transportation
Security Administration (TSA)regulations,and other aviation industry publications. As part of the Master Plan
Update, an Airport Layout Plan (ALP) drawing set that depicts the full buildout of aviation-and non-aviation-
related facilities associated with the preferred development will be developed. This ALP drawing set will
adhere to the FDOT and FAA's prescribed design guidelines and be developed within a GIS platform,
conforming to ACs 150/5300-16A, 150/5300-17b,and 150/5300-18B. The ALP set will also include a property
inventory map("Exhibit A")that will reflect the latest Airport property acquisitions.
The Master Plan Update will outline a plan for the provision of future facilities to accommodate the projected
passenger and aircraft demand. This plan will insure that short-term actions and recommendations do not
preclude long-range planning options and provide a financially sound implementation plan for short-,
intermediate-, and long-term improvements. The following key issues have been identified through
discussions with Airport management:
Airside Issues
• The need to identify the critical aircraft given the fleet mix operating at the Airport
• The existing aircraft ramp layout and the need to maximize the number of aircraft parking positions in
front of the passenger terminal including power in/power out taxiing
• The proximity of the general aviation and commercial aircraft ramps and the need to preserve the
integrity of the security identification display area(SIDA)
• Passenger and vehicle circulation on the ramp and the need to evaluate whether the installation of
passenger boarding bridge could improve the level of service at the Airport
• The need to identify areas for the staging of ground support equipment(GSE)
• The need to identify runway length, runway width, runway centerline to parallel taxiway centerline,
and runway safety area grading requirements considering the existing and projected aircraft fleet mix
at the Airport
• The need to identify runway extension impacts on the adjacent communities including potential
impacts to the World War II"bunker"located west of the Runway 9 end
• The need to evaluate the existing taxiway layout including the departure taxiway routes and the
access points between the existing and proposed apron and the runway
• The accommodation of large general aviation aircraft including business jets on the ramp and
possible encroachments into the existing Taxiway A safety areas.
• The lack of aircraft queuing to the Runway 27 end
• The lack of interior service road for access to the airfield areas
• "Sea rise"and the need to keep adjusting(raising)the surfaces
Passenger Terminal Issues
• The need to reevaluate the capacity of the existing passenger terminal and to define a financially-
sound expansion program that accommodates immediate, mid-term,and long-term needs.
• Congestion in the baggage claim area and the need to relocate the rental car counters
Master Plan Update
[7]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
• The need to maximize passenger convenience and level of service
• The lack of holdroom spaces and the lack of concessions
• The need for improvement in the handling and processing of baggage
Airport Access and Parking Issues
• A comprehensive assessment of traffic flows within the terminal area
• The need to evaluate the existing airport access road and curbside capacity to eliminate traffic
bottlenecks and congestion (including a review of the existing taxi staging areas)
• The need to assess (from a facility and business perspectives) and evaluate the existing parking
product capacities and the supply of non-revenue generation parking.
• Access to the existing Fixed Based Operator(FBO)
• Rental car facilities—the need to evaluate capacity and location
• The need to assess the interior service network
General Aviation Issues
• The need to evaluate the general aviation apron capacity
• The need for additional aircraft storage facilities,including larger t-hangars
• The need to assess location of east and west overflow ramp areas
• The fuel farm location and the routing of fueling vehicles
Airport Land Use Issues
• The best use for airport property not required to accommodate future aviation demand including the
recreational park("Pines Park")located adjacent to the Fort East Martello
• The potential for non-aviation revenue enhancing uses on the Public Works property to be vacated
• The need to develop an "Exhibit A" Airport Property Map to reflect land acquisitions since the FAA-
approval of the last ALP drawings set.
• The identification of jurisdictional wetlands to help identify development areas
Airport Support Issues
• Access point to the existing fuel farm
• The potential relocation of facilities that support airline and other airport operations such as ground
service equipment, fuel farm, aircraft rescue firefighting facilities, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection facilities
• The need to assess existing and future U.S.Customs and Border Protection facility requirements
Other Items that Should be Considered as part of the Master Plan
• The possible joint-use of the Naval Air Station Key West("Boca Chica Key")
• The aircraft traffic and passenger demand at the Airport should full diplomatic relations with Cuba be
re-established
• Equipment upgrades(e.g. NAVAIDS)
Master Plan Update
[8]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 (UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Scope of Services
The Airport/County staff has provided specific direction regarding the elements to be included in the Master
Plan Update to address the current and future needs at the Airport.The following work program describes the
effort required to successfully complete the Master Plan Update for the Airport within the FAA and FDOT
framework.
The work elements and tasks identified in this scope of services and the associated fee for completing that
work is based on a set of assumptions.The major assumptions are identified as follows:
• • Aerial Surveying and Mapping: The basemap for EYW will be prepared in compliance with FAA's
prescribed design guidelines within a GIS platform, conforming to all applicable FAA advisory circulars
and regulations. This proposal, however, excludes the production of an AGIS eALP since the FAA's eALP
module remains in development phase.
• Range of Alternatives to Analyze:A major cost-driver to any master plan is the number of alternatives to
be identified and the degree to which they are to be evaluated in support of a recommendation and/or
decision.The supporting information needed to reach a decision as well as the plan decisions themselves
are owner/operator driven. This work elements described in the next sections indicate the number of
alternatives that will be developed for each of the Airport elements (airfield, landside, terminal, cargo,
general aviation, support facilities, others). These alternatives will be evaluated with Airport staff and the
Technical Review Committee and the preferred alternative will ultimately be incorporated into the Airport
Layout Plan (ALP) for FAA approval. If additional alternatives are subsequently required (beyond what is
mentioned in this document),this scope of work would likely need to be expanded.
• Environmental Overview—Review of Existing Conditions:This task does not include field reviews, analysis
or other scientific evaluation of resources. The summary of existing conditions will include the gathering
of information from existing databases, maps, and published information available from applicable
resource agencies and is intended to reference known or potential environmental conditions identified in
recent environmental efforts conducted on the airfield that could be affected by proposed airport.
• Sustainability: The Master Plan Update will include a chapter that addresses the Airport sustainability
policy, establish possible goals to minimize the impact or consumption to reduce the airport's overall
environmental footprint, and identify and describe a range of generic sustainability initiatives to help the
airport achieve each set goal. This proposal, however, does not include any field surveys and energy
audits and does not provide for the development of an implementation plan to guide the implementation
of sustainability initiatives.
• Project Schedule:Although the estimated cost to complete the Master Plan Update is based on the level
of effort anticipated for each task, schedule also has a significant influence.The fee estimate is based on
an 18-month completion schedule for the work elements defined in the next section of this Scope of
Services. If additional services are subsequently added,the schedule would likely need to be extended.
• Utility. This project does not include an assessment of future utility system requirements to serve the
Airport.
Master Plan Update
[9l
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
1. Project Initiation & Administration
1.1 Establish Technical Review Committee
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs/Ricondo&Associates,Inc:
A Technical Review Committee comprised of representatives of the Airport staff, airlines,Fixed Base Operators,
air cargo tenants, terminal area tenants including ground,transportation providers (taxi, rental cars, and etc.)
will be established at the initiation of the project for the purpose of providing technical guidance, review and
comment on each element of the master plan. Each member of the technical committee will be provided with
a three ring project notebook binder for working papers. A total of 20 binders will be provided to members
of the technical review committee.
1.2 Project Administration, Monthly Billing & Reports
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs/Ricondo&Associates, Inc.
This task will involve the necessary project coordination between the Planning Team members over the course
of the planning period and between the client and the team to ensure distribution of information and
guidance on project related items. This task will also include the development of project status reports on a
monthly basis and invoicing of the project. This task will include several specific coordination efforts
including:
• Meet with the Airport/County staff to develop and review the project schedule;
• Prepare monthly status reports for inclusion with the invoice. Status reports will describe progress on a
task-by-task basis;
• Miscellaneous meetings through web conferences (typically on a monthly basis)to facilitate coordination,
provide updates and present draft reports.
• FAA&FDOT coordination
Master Plan Update
(10)
•
•
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
2. Aerial Surveying and Mapping
Firm Responsible for Completing this Task: Jacobs
2.1 Aerial Mapping & Surveying
Firm Responsible for Completing this Task: Jacobs
The key objectives of this task are to: (1)obtain geodetic control and survey for the identified runway ends;(2)
collect aerial photogrammetric imagery of the area necessary under current FAA guidance to collect
planimetric mapping to support an eALP base map;(3) develop and analyze the appropriate airspace surfaces
and identify object penetrations and potential mitigation measures to obtain the lowest possible approach
minimums.The data collected through this effort will also provide many of the elements that will serve as the
foundation for the creation of an Airport Layout Plan(ALP).
The basemap for EYW will be prepared in compliance with FAA's prescribed design guidelines within a GIS
platform, conforming to ACs 150/5300-16A, General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Surveys:
Establishment of Geodetic Control and Submission to the National Geodetic Survey; 150/5300-17b, General
Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and Submission to the
National Geodetic Survey; 150/5300-188, General Guidance and Specifications for Submission of Aeronautical
Surveys to NGS: Field Data Collection and Geographic Information System (GIS) Standards; 150/5300-13A,
Change 1, Airport Design; and Orders 8260.3B, The United States Standard for Terminal Instrument
Procedures(TERPS),and 8260.54A,The United States Standard for Area Navigation.
This basemap will ultimately serve for the development of a comprehensive Master Plan for the Airport that
will include an ALP drawing set highlighting the long-term development plan for the Airport. The primary
airport planning services and related deliverables to be performed and completed in this task include:
• Geodetic Control &Surveying
• Aerial Photography and Planimetric Mapping
. Airspace Surfaces and Obstacles Analyses
2.2 Establish Geodetic Control
The geodetic control and ground survey will be prepared in accordance with FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-
16A & 150/5300-18B for establishing imagery control and tie-in with the airports Primary and Secondary
Airport Control Stations (PACS and SACS). Prior to conducting the ground survey and control, an in-person
Master Plan Update
[111
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
interview will be conducted with appropriate airport staff to complete the required forms. Survey subtasks for
will include:
2.3 Pre-Survey Preparation Activities
The following tasks provide information that will be reviewed to prepare for the survey prior to going into the
field.Generally,addressing each item listed below prepares the survey team to begin the survey:
• Review list of prepared questions to discuss with the Airport/County staff or proponent about the survey.
• Develop an FAA approved Safety Risk Management Plan for ground survey crew coordination with Airport
Operations.
• Ensure a thorough understanding of the specifications and requirements for the type of survey required.
• Determine areas of private or government property and arrange for access.
• Review the descriptions for control stations identified for use in the project.
• Acquire and review an accurate airport diagram for use on the airport.
•. Review FAA Form 5010,Airport Master Record,at http://www.gcr1.com/5010web/.
• Coordinate with airport authorities.
2.331.1 Reconnaissance
• A review of station descriptions in the NGS database will be performed. The Primary and Secondary
Airport Control Stations (PACS & SACS) need to be researched and their current data sheets obtained
from the National Geodetic Survey(NGS)website.
• Mark recovery. The surveyor will use the following process for the "recovery" of a control station, with a
physical visit to the station to determine its usability. Check each control station to determine proper
identity. Check the mark type, disk type, and stamping against the NGS datasheet. Ascertain its apparent
unmoved position.
• Selection of PACS, SACS, and NSRS ties. The surveyor will utilize Trimble GPS mapping grade equipment
for"station reconnaissance" (navigating to known PACS &SACS points) After the stations are recovered
and observed to be in apparent un-disturbed condition, preparation of the required descriptions,
sketches, photographs and other documentation will begin. The unmoved position and elevation of the
recovered PAC and SACS points will be verified by the surveyor through the use of GPS measurements
and/or EDM and Level measurements.
• Preparation of required descriptions, sketches, photographs and other documentation by the surveyor
and the Planning Team:
- An Airport Control plot (modeled on appendix 5 of AC 150/5300-16A) will be prepared. All
stations will be labeled with the corresponding designation and description(PACS, SACS,etc...).
IMaster Plan Update
[12l
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
- Photographs (JPEG format) of the recovered points will be taken and submitted (per AC
150/53D0-18B section 1.6.2).
- A FAA Station Location Sketch and Visibility Diagram will be prepared and submitted for each
recovered point.
- A FAA Survey Station Description and Recovery Form will be prepared and submitted for each
recovered point.
- A pencil rubbing (if required) utilizing FAA Pencil Rubbing Form will be taken at each of the
recovered points.
- A FAA Station Table and Reconnaissance Checklist will be prepared.
• Compilation of a Project Survey Plan will not be completed as the project will not be created in the FAA
AGIS system.
2.3.1.2 Verification of Pre Survey
The Planning Team, prior to submission,will verify that correct forms and processes have been followed using
the appropriate FAA supplied forms for use in contact with the Airport Manager and Air Traffic Control
Interview. Jacobs will also verify the surveyor uses the appropriate Field Survey Operations forms as supplied
by the FAA on the aGIS web page.
The Planning Team will perform the following verification tasks associated with the survey work:
• Review list of PACS and SACS.
• Review/confirm recovered existing Primary Airport Control Station (PACS) and the associated Secondary
Airport Control Stations(SACS)at the airport is done.
• Review verification that if either the PACS and/or SACS are not found, orare destroyed, or damaged, or
are not usable for some other reason, contact has been made with the FAA Airport Surveying-GIS
Program Manager.
• Review the submittal of the recovery report for the PACS and SACS to the NGS
2.3.1.3 GPS Occupation (Ground Survey)
The surveyor will take horizontal and vertical measurements of safety critical items to include:
• Aerial Photo Control Points (as identified by the aerial mapping firm). Per AC 15D/5300-17B,a FAA Station
Location and Visibility Form will be prepared and submitted. Additionally, a photograph (JPEG format) of
each control point will be taken and submitted. Existing features are anticipated to be used as Photo
Control Points(targets will not be pre-set by Welch Associates).
• Five check points (as described in AC 150/5300-17B Section 6)will be occupied with a GPS station and the
measurements submitted to NGS OPUS.
• Existing Runway End points. FAA Navigational Aid Facility/Runway End Sketches will be prepared for each
point.
I Master Plan Update
[13]
•
1 KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
• Displaced thresholds.
• On-airport Navigational Aids.
Coordinate System/Datum:
Generated Horizontal Coordinates will be State Plane Coordinates referenced to the North American Datum of
1983 (NAD83). Elevations will be referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988(NAVD 88).
2.3.1.4 Deliverables—Geodetic Control/Ground Survey
• Final Coordinates, Elevations,and Runway Profile Data submitted in Autodesk DWG format;
• Raw observational data including:Data Collector Files, GPS receiver files, OPUS solutions;
• Final Processing/Adjustment/Reduction Files;
• Scans/copies of field notes and sketches;
• Checklists and Forms listed elsewhere within this scope;
*If PACS & SACS points are found to be destroyed or damaged, new control points may need to be
established utilizing the guidelines set forth in AC 150/5300-16A. This work is not anticipated or included in
this Scope
2.4 Photographic mapping — remote sensing
The Planning Team will enlist the services of a qualified photogrammetric/remote sensing mapping firm to
acquire aerial imagery and perform the planimetric mapping tasks in accordance with FAA AC 150/5300-18B
and -17B. Unless otherwise directed, the datum used for development of survey control will be NAVD 88 and
NAD 83 (1996)and will be tied into NGS disks which have been previously set at the airport per AC 150/5300-
17B.
The aerial imagery and mapping will be captured to the extents of the Vertically Guided Instrument Approach
Surfaces for MTH as outlined in FAA AC 150/5300-18B.
2.4.1.1 Airport Imagery Acquisition Planning
The Planning Team will work with The Sanborn Mapping Co. to create an imagery flight plan and ground
control diagram for submission to the Monroe County Airports Authority.
2,4,1.2 Aerial Photography Acquisition
Sanborn will acquire the leaf-on aerial photography of the 64 square mile project area conforming to the
General Guidance and Specifications for Aeronautical Survey Airport Imagery Acquisition and Submission to
the National Geodetic Survey, Advisory Circular 150/5300-17B dated 9-29-08. The 24 cm resolution digital
aerial photography will be acquired with a 60%forward overlap and 30% side overlap to provide for complete
stereoscopic aerial photography coverage out to the Vertically Guided Conical Surface(VGCS)and include the
Master Plan Update
{ [143
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces that extend beyond the vertically guided conical surface as described in
FAA AC 150/5300-18B Section 2.7.1.1.
2.4.1.3 Aerial Photography Ground Control
The ground control surveying will be coordinated as required to accurately support the aerial photography
and subsequent photogrammetric mapping deliverables. Sanborn will provide the ground control diagram
with the general location of required control points. The ground control diagram will include the runway
thresholds and runway physical ends,which is also a requirement under 16A.
2.4,1.4 Airport Obstruction Mapping
Natural ground features and man-made and non-man made elevated features within the Vertically Guided
Conical Surface and the Vertically Guided Approach will be stereoscopically compiled.The aerial photography
obstruction mapping will include identifying and locating the top most visible part of natural objects and
man-made elevated features utilizing the Runways with Vertical Guidance specifications and associated
figures included in Chapter 2.7 of AC No:150/5300 18B dated May 8,2008.In large wooded areas within the
Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces, Vertically Guided Connection Surfaces, Vertically Guided Transitional
Surfaces,Vertically Guided Horizontal Surfaces and Vertically Guided Conical Surfaces the highest tree within a
200' by 200' area will be identified and collected at the top most visible part of that object utilizing leaf-on
aerial photography.
2.4.1.5 Digital Orthoimagery
With the latest release of AC 150/5300-17B dated 9-29-08, the development and delivery to FAA of digital
orthoimagery and FGDC compliant metadata has been added as a deliverable.
Sanborn will develop natural color digital orthophotography imagery of the Vertically Guided Conical Surface
and include the Vertically Guided Approach Surfaces that extend beyond the Vertically Guided Conical
Surface. The color orthophotography will be developed at the resolution of the original aerial photography
imagery,which is being planned at 24 cm or 0.75 feet. The color orthophotography imagery will be delivered
in uncompressed TIFF format on DVD or USB hard drive.
Accuracy and Datum: Sanborn's proposed Aerial Photography Acquisition and Ground Control Diagram will
be designed to accurately support the obstruction mapping and digital orthophotography delivery
conforming to ASPRS Class II Accuracy Standards for 1"=200'scale maps.
The analytical aerial triangulation, obstruction mapping and color orthophotography will be referenced to the
FL State Plane Coordinate System, NAD 83/2007 (NSRS) and NAVD 88. The unit of measurement will be the
US Survey Foot.
2.4.1.6 Planimetric Mapping
Within the VGRPS, VGPCS, VGATS and VGPS imaginary surfaces, the following airport planimetric Features
Groups that are visible and identifiable on the aerial imagery will be captured at a scale of 1" = 200':Airfield,
Airspace,Man-made Structures,Surface Transportation and Utility.
Master Plan Update
[15]
•
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
2.4.1.7 Deliverables -Aerial Photography and Remote Sensing
The following items will be delivered as a result of the Photographic Mapping:
• Aerial Photography acquisition report
• Digital Orthoimagery on DVD or hard drive for review and acceptance
• Planimetric and Obstruction mapping in AutoCAD drawing file format (stereoscopically collected vector
data will also be converted for compliance to 18B AutoCAD standards) for airport obstruction analysis
tasks.
• Three 36"x 36"color aerial prints on medium weight glossy photo paper.
2.5 Airspace Surfaces & Obstacle Analysis
Once the photogrammetric data has been received, the obstacle elevation and location data will be analyzed
to identify penetrations to applicable FAA FAR Part 77 airspace surfaces as detailed in the tasks below. FAR
Part 77 airspace surfaces will be mapped and integrated into a composite airspace surface to give the airport
a means by which to screen future proposed vertical development projects in the vicinity of the airport using a
point and click query method.
2.5.1.1 Obstacle Analysis
The airspace surfaces will be imported by the Planning Team into a Geographic Information System (GIS). 3-
dimensional representations of the airspace surfaces will be created in ArcView for analysis against the
planimetric data. Current penetrations (man-made and vegetative) as well as objects within 10-feet of each
airspace surface (vegetative only) will be identified. Color coding and symbology will be used to clearly
identify each object. Unique identification numbers will be given to each object. In certain instances, an
object may penetrate multiple surfaces. In those cases, each surface that is penetrated by the object, or is
within 10-feet above the object,will be noted and included in the master database. The database will contain
the following information for each object:
• Object ID
• Data source
• Obstruction type
• Elevation
• Longitude/Latitude
• Airspace surface
• Airspace surface height
• Height difference from object to airspace surface
Master Plan Update
[161
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
• Property information(if cadastral information is available from MassGIS)
• Airport property line(if available from Airport)
• Avigation easements(if available from Airport)
The mapping shall show the location of all objects (man-made and vegetative) that penetrate the airspace
surfaces as well as those which may be within 10 feet below the respective surfaces (vegetative only). Objects
shall be identified as numbered tags. Each tag number will be listed on a separate appendix table with
information to include the top elevation,the amount of penetration relative to the imaginary surface, the object
height relative to the ground, and a short descriptor as to the type of obstruction. The tag will be color-coded to
show whether the object is above or below the imaginary surface. Edges of the surfaces will be shown,along with
contours of these surfaces shown at a 10-foot interval. Planimetric mapping will include all visible ground features
within the mapping limits, including edges of roadway and airfield pavements, airfield pavement markings,
buildings, structures, poles, tree and brush drip lines, water bodies, etc. Obstruction mapping plans will utilize a
digital orthographic photo (obtained as part of Task 2.3.2) as a backdrop to all obstruction information data as
well as planimetric information obtained as part of Task 2.3.2.
Deliverables for this task include one(1)set of hard copy color plots of the obstruction mapping areas plotted on
24"x 36"sheets.
Master Plan Update
[17]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
3. Inventory of Existing Conditions
The purpose of this section is to assemble and organize existing relevant information and data pertaining to
the Airport. A series of inventory efforts are necessary to collect and organize a variety of specific
environmental, technical, and financial data. The Planning Team will perform inventories of all physical
facilities and existing land use within the present boundaries of the Airport, and will inventory existing land
use outside the Airport boundaries but inside the Airport environs. All available plans, specifications, maps,
photographs, drawings and other data, including FAA Form 5010-1 and NOAA Obstruction Charts, will be
obtained. The inventory will identify and generally describe existing facilities as they relate to type and
condition and will include, but not be limited to,the following subtasks.
Where applicable, airport facility data and information previously developed and maintained by the Monroe
County will be referenced and documented.Additional data shall be collected through the inspection, review
and use of Airport Layout Plan's,aerial photographs, FAA and FDOT databases. For budgeting purposes, it has
been assumed that a two-day site visit by a mid-level planner and the Project Manager will be conducted.
Data&Resources Required From the Monroe County/Airport
The Planning Team's proposed budget to complete this study assumes that the following information will be
provided by others, or in lieu thereof, the ability to consult with the Monroe County airport staff to jointly
define the assumptions to be used as the basis for the Master Plan.
• Previous Airport Master Plan/Noise Compatibility Studies
• Current Airport Layout Plan Drawings (digital required)
• Area Land Use and Zoning Information
• Airfield PCI Study(if available)or FDOT Pavement Management Report
• Current Capital Improvement Program
• Airport Property Map and Detailed Property Information
• Area Transportation Plans and Existing Traffic Counts
• City of Key West's Adopted Comprehensive Plan
Deliverables
• A detailed narrative report summarizing the results of the inventory of existing conditions
including supporting graphic exhibits and tables
o Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft Inventory working paper for Airport
review/comment
a Five(5)copies of a final draft Inventory of working paper for the airport
review/comment
o A final Inventory report in electronic format(PDF)
• Comprehensive leasehold map integrated from current lease agreement documents and
electronic files.
Estimated Task Duration
60 Days
Master Plan Update
[18]
•
I KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
3.1 Inventory of Airport Physical Facilities
Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.;AID, Inc., McFarland Johnson and TBD
(Landside traffic counts and surveys)
• Airfield (R&A)-Runway, taxiway and ramp configuration including pavement strength and condition,
marking, signing, lighting, navigational aids, aircraft circulation, and access to the Airport operational
areas will be reviewed. Particular attention will be given to the FAR Part 77 surfaces and the
obstructions located within certain approaches or imaginary surfaces.
• Terminal Area (R&A) - Airside and landside components of the current terminal area will be
inventoried. Attention will be paid to the number and configuration of aircraft parking positions,
aircraft and passenger circulation, distribution of space by functional use within the terminal building
(ticketing, security screening, holdrooms, concessions, baggage claim, etc.) facility utilization, existing
level of service and age and condition of the terminal building. An inventory and utilization
assessment of parking facilities in the terminal area will be addressed as well. A key outcome of the
terminal inventory would be a list of specific functional elements that may be deficient and in need of
immediate improvements.
• Cargo Facilities (AID)- The existing cargo facilities and apron areas, east of the passenger terminal,
will be reviewed. Additionally, cargo operators including all-cargo carriers, integrated express
operators,and air forwarders will be inventoried.
• Airport Access and Vehicle Parking (R&A and CH Perez)-The inventory will also include review of the
following areas:roadways and intersections,terminal curbfront, rental car facilities,commercial vehicle
staging areas, public transportation and general ground access, public parking and interface with the
local roadway network.
• FBO/General Aviation Facilities and Other Tenant Facilities (McFarland Johnson)-Structures devoted
for the use of general aviation, including fixed base and corporate operators will be identified and
evaluated as to their size, use(maintenance hangar, storage hangar,office, etc.),age and/or condition,
and tenant lease lot uses.Also included in the inventory will be a description of the services provided
by the unique FBO.General aviation facilities including ramp areas, number of tiedowns,and hangars
by type (conventional and T-hangar) will be identified and quantified by area or other appropriate
measure. Age or condition of the facility will be identified, as will the utilization and location of the
facility on the Airport. Additionally, a survey questionnaire will be created for distribution to Airport
tenants.The survey will be developed in conjunction with the Airport and will solicit information such
as services provided, satisfaction with current facilities, level of activity conducted from the Airport,
based aircraft, itinerant aircraft serviced, future expansion plans, and perceived airport needs.
Responses will be tabulated and used in subsequent analyses. Results of the survey will be included in
an appendix to the Master Plan.
• Support Facilities (AID) -Airport support facilities to be inventoried will include, but not necessarily be
limited to, the Air Traffic Control Tower, fueling facilities, Airport Maintenance, and Aircraft Rescue
and Firefighting(ARFF).
Master Plan Update
[19]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
• Airport Utility Systems (AID) — To the extent this information is available, utilities supporting the
Airport will be reviewed.The Planning Team will gather existing maps and record drawings of recent
on-Airport utility improvements from the Monroe County/Airport, to prepare a map of the utility
systems. The water system, sewer system, storm water system, gas distribution system, electrical
distribution system, and telephone/communications systems will be included. No field verification of
information will be performed.
3.2 Data Collection of Air Traffic and Aviation Activity
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,inc.
• Historic and Current Air Traffic Activity:Aviation activity statistics for the last 10 years of operations at
the Airport will be assembled and organized. Information concerning air carrier, cargo, general
aviation and military operations by local and itinerant categories, as well as enplaned/deplaned
passengers and mail, and fleet mix and based aircraft by aircraft type will be obtained. Information
concerning peak hour, daily, monthly, and annual activity will be obtained and quantified if available.
Data will be obtained from Airport records, Airport users including the fixed base operator, the Air
Traffic Control Tower, and various sources at the FAA.
• Air Traffic Control and Airspace:Air traffic control facilities responsible for handling traffic into and out
of the Airport will be identified and their procedures, as they relate to the Airport,will be reviewed.An
inventory of the area airspace will be undertaken, based on Air Traffic Control documents, with
emphasis on the identification of airways, restricted areas, intersections, and obstructions. This task
will identify operational limitations due to traffic interactions with other airports, reserved airspace,
and noise abatement procedures, airfield facilities and design, air traffic control towers, and existing
or programmed NAVAIDS at the Airport. The Planning Team will coordinate with Air Traffic Control
for military airports.
3.3 Off-Airport Land Use and Land Use Controls
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: McFarland Johnson
Existing land use mapping, aerial photography, comprehensive plans, and other documentation pertaining to
current and future land use in the vicinity of the Airport (up to one mile from the Airport boundary) will be
reviewed. Existing zoning districts will be reviewed to determine locations where potential incompatible land
uses could develop. Further, local planning agencies will be interviewed to obtain future land use or zoning
plans and to identify the potential for future residential, commercial, and industrial development in the vicinity
of the Airport. Particular attention will be paid to identifying land uses and zoning that could affect both in a
positive and negative fashion,the future development of the Airport.
Master Plan Update
[an
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 (UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
3.4 Land Holdings and Existing Leaseholds
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
Land holdings interests and existing leaseholds will be identified. The land holdings interest information will
be incorporated into the Airport Property Map Drawing of the Airport Plans Package and the inventory of
existing leaseholds information will be obtained from the Monroe County to collect relevant information on
the existing leases on-airport,including lease agreements and leasehold drawings in electronic format.
3.5 Known Environmental Areas of Concern
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
The Planning Team will review existing reports and studies to identify known environmentally sensitive areas
to develop a base map for use in subsequent tasks. The Planning Team will obtain AutoCAD base map
drawings prepared for previous airport projects and assemble a new project base map with existing features
and sensitive areas to be used during the development of concept plans for the Airport.
This subtask will also include an inventory of noise abatement measures including existing zoning laws and
local regulations, as well as any other local zoning and land use restrictions instituted by the City and County
which may impact potential on or contiguous compatible development.
3.6 Meteorological Conditions
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.
The Planning Team will assemble and analyze 10-years of historical wind and weather data. Ceiling, visibility,
wind speed and direction will be analyzed to develop a wind rose, assess existing wind coverage and
determine the percentage of observations in visual and instrument meteorological conditions.
3.7 Airport Financial Data
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
This subtask consist in the assembly of airport financial information including, but not limited to, airport grant
history, audit statements, capital improvement program, existing debt service schedules, operating budgets
vs. actuals, rates and charges model, and aviation fuel sale/delivery records. This information will be used as
part of the financial analysis tasks(Task 9).
The objective of this task is to gather documents which affect the financial management of airport
maintenance, operations, and capital development and to develop an understanding of the structure,
Master Plan Update
[21]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
constraints, requirements,and opportunities for financing airport activities as related to the development of a
capital improvement program.
3.8 Review of Other Reports
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
In an effort to reduce duplication of work and develop a common base of information,other studies that have
been recently completed would be reviewed and coordinated as applicable. This would include but not be
limited to previous master planning efforts, transportation studies, and other reports as appropriate. Where
possible, the Monroe County/Airport will provide copies of existing studies for the Planning Team's reference
and use.
3.9 Prepare Inventory Of Existing Conditions Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.
The Inventory Chapter will discuss the issues and information obtained during the inventory phase of the
project. This chapter will present, in narrative and graphic format, information relating to airport facilities,the
roadway access system serving the airport, natural features affecting the current airport property and tracts
immediately adjacent to the airport,and data related to land use compatibility.
The findings of the inventory task will be summarized as a draft chapter to the final report. No additional
draft reports will be provided prior to the draft Master Plan report.
Master Plan Update
1 [22]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
4. Aviation Activity Forecasts
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.(unless otherwise noted)
The Planning Team will prepare forecasts of aviation traffic activity suitable for guiding the update to the EYW
master plan. Utilizing the inventory of aeronautical activity data collected in the inventory tasks and data
gathered in the forecasting effort, activity projections for the 5-, 10- and 20-year time frames would be
prepared. The updated projections of future aviation activity will provide the basis for evaluating the
adequacy of the existing airport facilities. These forecasts will also provide activity measurements or
thresholds that will be used in conjunction with other portions of the master plan study to determine the
need,timing,and extent of future airport facility development.
Forecasts of aviation activity will provide projections of air carrier, cargo (aircraft operations and tons carried),
general aviation and military operations, enplaned and deplaned passengers, as well as based aircraft, local
and itinerant operations, and fleet mix by design group, identifying the critical aircraft for each planning
period. Traffic projections to be developed in this task include:
• Annual Passenger Enplanements(and Total Passengers)
• Annual Air Cargo Tonnage
• Annual Aircraft Operations (including airline, cargo, military, and general aviation operations)
▪ Annual Based Aircraft
• Peak Hour Forecasts&Design Day Flight Schedule
▪ Critical Aircraft
Previous airport and other transportation related forecasts will be reviewed including, but not limited to:
• Most recent FAA Terminal Area Forecasts(TAF)
• Most recent FDOT Florida Aviation System Plan(FASP) Forecasts
• Most recent forecasts used as part of the 14 CFR Part 150 study
It is anticipated that three planning activity levels (PALs) will be established as part of the aviation activity
forecasts (defined in terms of annual passengers).The PALS are intended to be independent of a specific year
since demand projections are uncertain and growth rates can fluctuate considerably over the course of a
forecast period. Therefore, the PALS represent demand levels, not necessarily a specific year, which can be
used as benchmarks for planning, designing, or constructing Airport development projects.
Deliverables
• Excel spreadsheets and graphs summarizing the aviation activity forecasts
▪ Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft chapter for Airport review and comment
• Five(5)copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment
• Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft chapter for FAA review and comment
• Five(5)copies of a final draft chapter for FAA review and comment
• A final forecast report in electronic format(.PDF)as approved by the FAA
Master Plan Update
[23]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Estimated Task Duration
120 Days(including a 60-day review period by the FAA)
4.1 Collect and Analyze Socioeconomic Data
This subtask will consist in the definition of the airport's catchment area and the assembly of historical and
forecast socioeconomic data for the region and the nation. This will include data from the U.S.Census Bureau,
regional economic development organizations, regional and national socioeconomic data sourced through
Woods&Poole Economics, Inc.,and any other relevant sources.
4.2 Develop Airline Passenger Forecasts
4.2.1 REVIEW EXISTING FORECASTS
As an initial step in the planning process, recent forecasts developed for the Airport will be identified and
reviewed to define their applicability to the master plan and to provide a base of comparison for this forecast
effort. At a minimum, this review will address forecasts that were completed as a part of the 14 CFR Part 150
and subsequent adjustments that may have been made to these projections. The Planning Team will also
coordinate with the FDOT Aviation and Spaceports office relative to any forecasts that this agency may have
relating to EYW. Forecasts previously approved by the FAA to include the most current TAF at the time that
the forecasts are prepared will be included in the Forecast Preliminary Draft Chapter.
4.22 DEVELOP PASSENGER ACTIVITY FORECASTS
The Planning Team will provide demand based, unconstrained passenger forecasts for the Airport using
several forecast techniques including socioeconomic regression analysis and market share analyses.As a part
of this process it is anticipated that data concerning passengers, fares and yields will be sourced through the
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) O&D survey (DB1B) and T100 data sources, as well as through
Airport-provided activity statistics. These data will be analyzed in conjunction with regional and national
socioeconomic information.
This task will include an identification of potential new markets that could be served from the Airport. A key
element in addressing future activity levels at the airport will be the identification of how changes in airline
business plans and service patterns may influence future activity at EYW and the ability of the Airport to
attract new or expanded service by existing carriers,and airport users as well as the potential for the Airport to
secure new service and users. The potential influence that expanded competition in the low fare carrier
market will have and the role that new entrant and/or expanded service by regional carriers, such as Silver
Airways,might have at EYW will also be investigated.
Master Plan Update
[24]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Additionally, since stage length is a central component to the determination of runway length requirements it
is imperative to define the potential for connectivity to new locales that may extend or reduce the non-stop
stage lengths flown from EYW.
The forecast will be presented in three scenarios:high-growth,low-growth, and baseline growth (the baseline
scenario). Forecasted passenger traffic will be presented as domestic or international. It is anticipated the
forecast will focus on four time-periods — years 2020, 2025, and 2035. The recommended forecast would
ultimately become the Master Plan forecast(as approved by FAA).
The activities conducted under this subtask, however,are not intended as an air service market analysis or as a
means of luring potential users to the airport, but rather to identify those trends occurring in the industry that
may have the potential to come into play relative to the level of activity or the type of activity at the Airport.
The Planning Team will meet with airport staff and management to aid in the definition of various trends that
are deemed of significance. Additionally, it is the intention of the Planning Team to also coordinate with
senior management of selected passenger airlines to discuss emerging trends and their perceptions of the
likelihood of those trends impacting EYW. This task will also include a review of the market leakage analysis
included in the Airport Air Service Profile that was published by the FOOT in 2012.
4.3 Develop Air Cargo Forecasts
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
Projections of future air cargo volumes will be generated using historical cargo growth trends to develop both
trend and/or market share based analyses. Other activities to be completed under this task will include the
development of a current and projected volume mix of dedicated freight and mail volumes versus freight and
mail carried as belly haul cargo in passenger aircraft(based on historical data to be provided by the Airport),
and the identification of the current and projected fleet of cargo aircraft anticipated to serve cargo demand at
the Airport.
Belly cargo tonnage will be derived by converting projected air carrier operations into belly cargo tonnage
using historical belly cargo tonnage per operation ratios and aircraft fleet utilization and corresponding cargo
capacities by EYW carriers. This information will be cross correlated to the actual cargo tonnage carried by
individual carrier as delineated airport activity statistics and/or landing fee reports.
Considering the limited amount of cargo handled at the Airport, this task excludes the following: cargo
industry overview and trend analysis; regional market assessment; local market assessment of cargo activity
associated with potential adjacent development; competitive analysis and assessment of airport position;
target identification and scenario development;detailed regression or market share projection approaches for
baseline forecast or alternate demand scenarios.
Master Plan Update
(2S]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
•
4.4 Develop General Aviation Forecasts
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: McFarland Johnson
4.4.1 REVIEW GENERAL AVIATION INDUSTRY TRENDS AND PREPARE DERIVATIVE FORECASTS
FROM THE FAA TAF
The Planning Team will review national general aviation trends based on the FAA Aerospace Forecasts FY
2014-2034,the General Aviation Statistical Databook & Industry Outlook from the General Aviation
Manufacturers Association (GAMA), and the existing Airport Noise&Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS)
database. The data collected under this subtask will help assess local and nationwide short- and long-term
trends including projections of active general aviation aircraft by type. In turn, these projections will be
evaluated to assess whether these trends are likely to influence future general aviation aircraft fleet mix
projections at the Airport.
The development of derivative forecasts will provide the foundation for the facility requirements analysis and
include a review of projected annual demand and peak period demand. Historical data on peak month
demand will be used to develop assumptions regarding the future share of peak month activity in relation to
forecast annual demand. Peak month average day(PMAD)activity levels will be derived from the peak month
activity.
For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that the Planning Team will not be responsible for developing
any new projections of aviation activity and the FAA TAF will provide the sole basis for the development of the
derivative forecasts.
4.4.2 PREPARE GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX PROJECTIONS
Based on the FAA TAF projections and assumptions regarding the projected aircraft fleet mix, R&A will
provide a breakdown of projected aircraft operations by aircraft type: The based aircraft forecast will directly
influence the type and number of aircraft storage facilities and apron tie down that will be needed.Projections
of based aircraft will also provide an indication of anticipated growth in flight activity that is expected to occur
at the airport.Based on the FAA TAF projections for based aircraft,the FAA 5010 Airport Record,the review of
the industry trends, and interviews with representatives of the FBO and airport management, the Planning
Team will provide a breakdown of projected aircraft operations by the following types: single-engine,
multi-engine,turboprop, and turbojet.
Master Plan Update
[26]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
4,5 Develop Military Aircraft Activity Forecasts
Considering the limited number of military operations at the Airport (less than 500 annual operationsZ),it has
been assumed that the Planning Team will not be responsible for developing any new projections of aviation
activity and the FAA TAF will provide the sole basis for the military aircraft activity forecasts.
4.6 Develop Alternate Demand Scenario
This subtask will define the anticipated volume of aircraft traffic at the Airport should full diplomatic relations
with Cuba be re-established. Considering the Airport location, at the southernmost point in the continental
United States (U.S.) and only 95 miles from Cuba, the Airport could experience an increase in traffic should
traffic restrictions between the United States and Cuba be eased. Future air service from Cuba is likely to
focus on hubs and cities in the United States that have high concentration of Cuban-American population.As
such, air traffic between Cuba and Key West would likely be tourist driven.This subtask would likely include a
benchmark review of airports that serve as entry points to the U.S.and that are located in close proximity to a
foreign island country..For budgeting purposes, however, it has been assumed that no more than five (5)
airports would be benchmarked.
It is anticipated that the definition of the fleet mix associated with this scenario would be necessary. The
information developed under this scenario will be used in subsequent tasks to define alternative peaking
factors that will be used to determine the extent to which the scenario results in changes in facility
requirements.
4.7 Develop Aircraft Operations Forecasts
Based on the outcome of Tasks 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5, the Planning Team will provide a forecast of aircraft
activity by aircraft type (fleet mix) for the Airport. This forecast will be driven by industry and other airline
trends such as:load factors, seats per departure, aircraft types used for various types of routes,aircraft orders,
and aircraft manufacturing trends.
Summarized aircraft movements will be presented for the Airport as domestic passenger, international
passenger, commuter/regional, cargo, military, and general aviation. The forecast will cover the years 2020,
2025, and 2030. Three scenarios will be provided: high-growth, low-growth, and baseline. The baseline
forecast becomes the Master Plan forecast(as approved by FAA).
s FAA Terminal Area Forecast,Issued February 2014.
1 Master Plan Update
•
` KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015j
4.8 Establish Demand Peaking Characteristics and Design Day
Flight Schedules
Airport planning requires airport activity in various time elements, including peak month, design day, and
peak hour. This information is key to determining required capacity enhancements including timing and
sizing. Forecasts for these elements will be derived from the annual forecast of airport activity. The following
information will be documented and put into tables for easy reference and inclusion into the draft working
paper.
• Average and peak month for operations and enplanements;
• Design day enplanements and operations;
• Design day peak hour operations by carrier and peak hour enplanements by airline.
As part of this subtask, the Planning Team will prepare design day flight schedules for three planning activity
levels based on annual to design day factors. The flight schedules will be similar to the format of the OAG
and will include information on airlines,aircraft types,times, origins/destinations, seat capacity,and passenger
volumes.
4.9 Prepare Aviation Activity Forecasts Report
A Forecast of Aviation Demand report will be prepared to summarize the forecast of aviation demand for
EYW. A preliminary draft version of the Forecast of Aviation Demand report will be submitted to the Airport
and FAA for review and comment. The Airport and FAA review and comment process for the Aviation Activity
Forecasts Report will incorporate four revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and
comment, (2) final draft for the Airport review and comment, (3) preliminary draft for FAA review and
comment, and (4) final draft for FAA review and comment. The fourth round of comments/revisions will be
incorporated into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
As necessary, the Planning Team will prepare supplemental documentation comparing the FAA TAF and the
EYW Master Plan forecasts and attend meetings with the FAA Orlando ADO and FAA APO to review forecast
findings.
Master Plan Update 2g
[ I
•
•
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
5. Facility Requirements
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc. and AID,Inc. (unless otherwise noted)
The facility requirements analysis will address the Airport's ability to accommodate airside, terminal and
landside facility needs based on the updated aviation activity forecasts and the selection of the current and
future design aircraft. The updated facility requirements analysis will quantify demand and existing airside,
terminal, and landside facilities will be analyzed to determine the type and magnitude of aviation
improvements ultimately required for the Airport.The facilities requirements analysis will focus on the physical
facilities and associated improvements needed to safely and efficiently accommodate projected aviation
demand on those aviation facilities for the twenty year planning period (2015-2035).
Deliverables
• Five(5)copies of the Facility Requirements chapter for Airport review and comment
• Five(5)copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment
• A final Facility Requirements report in electronic format(.PDF)
Estimated Task Duration
60 Days
5.1 Airfield
5.1.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
Using the FAA's methodology for assessing airfield capacity and delay, as described in the FAA Advisory
Circular 150/5060-5, an assessment of the current and future level of airfield capacity and associated aircraft
delay will be developed. This analysis will consider the airfield configuration, including runway orientation,
parallel taxiways and exit taxiways, weather conditions, aircraft fleet mix, current and forecast operations at
each 5-,10-and 20-year time frame.The result of the assessment will be expressed in terms of the hourly and
annual service volume of the airfield, minutes of delay per aircraft operation, and total estimated annual delay.
This information will assist in validating recommendations of previous planning analyses or to identify
potential new considerations regarding the potential need and timing of taxiway enhancements over the 5,
10, 15, 20, and 25 year planning horizon. An assessment will also be undertaken to identify potential
improvements to the system of taxiways and exit taxiway connectors that could enhance the movement of
aircraft to and from the airfield to use areas on the airport and the impact that these improvements might
have on the efficiency of movements on the airfield.
Master Plan Update
[291
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
5.1.2 DESIGN AIRCRAFT AND RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.&Flight Engineering, LLC.
Using information generated in previous planning studies at EYW and using the information and projections
developed from the inventory and forecast elements of this update, the characteristics of the current and
projected mix of aircraft operating at EYW will be identified paying particular attention to the level of
operations, fleet mix/aircraft type, and stage length of operations by commercial service (passenger, cargo &
charter)jet aircraft. A similar fleet mix analysis will also be undertaken for the based and itinerant general
aviation fleet for use in facility planning of facilities to meet general aviation needs. From these analyses,
design aircraft will be identified for use in determining short-term and long-term runway length requirements,
the approach category, and design group for use in airfield layout planning. The design, or critical aircraft
may consist of a single aircraft type or may need to be identified by approach category, wingspan and/or by
weight for different airport components. The design aircraft consists of that aircraft currently conducting a
minimum of S00 itinerant operations annually.
This subtask includes an analysis of takeoff runway length requirements for specific range/stage lengths
and/or city pairs. Aircraft weight at take-off will be determined by the aircraft's operating empty weight
(OEW) plus payload for specific range/stage lengths for domestic flights. The range/stage lengths to be
evaluated will be defined by the Planning Team, in collaboration with Airport staff. For budgeting purposes, it
is assumed that no more than ten (10) air carrier aircraft will be considered in this analysis. In addition, for
each aircraft type,a specific range/stage length will be established in coordination with Airport staff.
5.1.3 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
Using the results of the capacity/delay cost analysis and the assessment of runway length requirements along
with relevant airfield planning criteria, the Planning Team will prepare a preliminary listing of airfield facility
requirements necessary to meet projected levels of demand for the 5, 10, and 20-year time frames, and to
address capacity needs beyond the 20-year planning horizon. These facility requirements will be based upon
both accepted airport planning criteria, input from the Airport Management and staff, and the forecast of
aviation activity for the Airport. Airfield characteristics to be assessed include:
• Runway length,width and shoulders
• Necessity for addition/removal of taxiways
• Relocation of runway thresholds and associated runway extensions
• Pavement strength
• Taxiway requirements
• FAA separation standards
• Lighting and marking
• Navigational aids
Master Plan Update
[30]
` KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
FAR Part 77 surfaces
Airfield facility needs will be identified in terms of linear feet, strength, separation, clearances, etc.and will be
compared to existing facilities to identify excess or deficient facility capacity or capability. The output of the
adjusted forecasts relating to the level of commercial service that is forecast will be accounted for in the
analysis of Airfield Facility needs, particularly as it relates to runway length, dimensional layout requirements
and taxiway/aircraft ramp development needs. Where appropriate the airfield facilities will be linked to
activity demand thresholds or triggers as a means of determining the point at which demand is sufficient to
warrant the improvement. Additionally, existing airfield components will be evaluated to ensure that they
comply with the changes of the recently updated Airport Design Advisory Circular.
5.2 Passenger Terminal
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, inc.
5.2.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
The Planning Team will identify demand for various functional areas of the passenger terminal using industry
standards for the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios. The demand for the various facilities
will be compared to the current capacity to determine facility requirements throughout the planning horizon.
The functional areas to be considered would include, but are not limited to:
• Aircraft gates and gate frontage
• Passenger hold rooms
• Baggage claim
. Public circulation area
• Airline lease space (ticket counters,operations areas, bag make-up area)
. Security space
• Concession (food, gifts &news, business centers, etc.)
. U.S.Customs facilities
• Other terminal space(administration, utilities,etc.)
• Rental car facilities
5.2.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Based on the demand/capacity assessment,terminal facility requirements to meet future demand expressed in
the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios will be identified. Facility needs will be defined in
terms of the various categories identified above.
Master Plan Update
(31)
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
5.3 On-Airport Curbsides and Roadways
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask; Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
5.3.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
Based upon the inventory of ground transportation components performed in Task 3 and the Aviation Activity
Forecasts developed in Task 4, the demand for the Airport access terminal road (Faraldo Circle Drive) and
other on-airport roadways will be compared to current capacity to determine facility requirements. This
assessment, however, excludes the analysis of off-airport roadways.
• Data Requirements:It is anticipated that the following data will be collected in Task 3 and available for use
in this task:
- Automatic traffic recorder(ATR)traffic counts collected for a busy three-day period
- Vehicle classification counts collected for a consecutive 3-hour period along the curbside frontage
- Vehicle dwell time counts collected during the peak 3-hour period
• Prepare Future Traffic Demands: A spreadsheet model will be prepared to define the traffic volumes by
mode (e.g., private vehicles, taxicabs, buses, etc.), vehicle travel paths, vehicle curbside zone destinations,
and other parameters required for preparing traffic assignment and demand estimates. Emphasis would
be placed on developing mode split characteristics and associated vehicle traffic activity by terminal
departures and arrivals zones. Future roadway and curbside traffic demands will be calculated based on
the assumption that traffic activity increases in proportion with growth in peak hour airline passenger
demands. For purposes of this analysis,future traffic demands will be calculated for the peak departures
hour and the peak arrivals hour for the future years of 2020,2025 and 2035.
• Curbside Demand/Capacity:Develop a terminal curbside demand/capacity spreadsheet model to estimate
existing curbside demand in linear feet by vehicle mode for the departures peak hour and arrivals level
peak hour. Curbside demand is calculated based on peak hour traffic volume by mode, vehicle dwell
time, and vehicle length. Prepare a curbside level of service(LOS)analysis by assessing the "utilization"of
the curbside facilities which is calculated by comparing the estimated curbside demand in linear feet to
the available curbside.
• Roadway Demand/Capacity: Develop a roadway demand/capacity spreadsheet model to estimate the
roadway demands and capacity for the on-airport roadway system on a link-by-link basis. Roadway
capacity will vary based on the number of roadway lanes and characteristics of roadway segment using
airport-specific industry-standard capacity assumptions based on roadway speed. Calculate on-airport
roadway system LOS for the existing roadway system as a function of roadway demand divided by
capacity.
• Prepare VISSIM Model of Existing Curbside and Roadway Configuration: Prepare a simplified VISSIM
model of the existing terminal area roadway (Faraldo Circle Drive) and departures and arrivals curbside
zones. The model will be based on existing physical roadway configuration and simulate the effects of
congestion from departures and arrivals activities on Faraldo Circle Drive.
Master Plan Update
[321
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
• Simulate Future Roadway and Curbside Demand:The VISSIM model will be loaded with peak hour traffic
volumes representing the future design-day conditions for the arrivals peak and the departures peak
periods. Animation will be reviewed to depict anticipated congestion "hot spots" along the curbside
roadway Performance metrics comprised of curbside vehicle throughput, roadway densities, and queue
lengths will be calculated.
5.3.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
On-airport roadways and curbside requirements will be based on future demand, and discussed in terms of
number of traffic lanes, access points, intersection congestion, and level of service. Specifically, the following
requirements will be developed:
• Curbside Requirements: Identify anticipated curbside deficiencies and calculate the curbside length
required to achieve the target desired LOS for the future years 2020, 2025 and 2035.
• Roadway Requirements:Identify anticipated roadway lane deficiencies and the number of additional lanes
required to provide an acceptable level of service for the future years 2020, 2025 and 2035.
Off-airport roadways will also not be assessed from demand-capacity standpoint however; existing traffic
studies and existing planning studies will be reviewed to identify off-airport roadway networks that support
traffic to/from the Airport which will require improvements by FDOT or other local planning agencies in order
to support the traffic volumes expected to be generates by EYW.
5.4 Public Parking
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
5.4.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
Based upon the inventory of public parking facilities performed in Task 3, the public parking analyses will
include an evaluation of current public parking activity and demand profiles, an assessment of current and
future (on a yearly basis) public parking needs based on forecasts of passenger activity;and the identification
of additional parking capacity for the airport's parking system needed to serve projected demand growth.The
future term parking needs will be evaluated based on future demand projection for the next 20 years. The
following task elements form the basis of the analysis:
• Data Requirements: Collection and review of EYW parking data, price structures, and inventories of
existing parking facilities, parking facility demand data, passenger activity reports, and historical
parking statistics obtained from the Airport's parking management company (assumes availability
from revenue control system)to include the following:
- Inventory of existing spaces provided within each facility.
- Daily peak occupancy counts and daily overnight occupancy counts by facility for calendar year
2014, by facility.
- Parking transactions and revenues by duration category(e.g.,0-1 hour,1-2 hours, 2-3 hours, etc.)
on a monthly basis for calendar year 2014, by facility.
Master Plan Update
[331
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
- Annual parking transactions and gross revenue for the last five(5)years, by facility.
Public Parking Demand/Capacity: Using data collected previously, assess historical daily peak and
overnight parking demand for the most recent 365 day period to identify the seasonality of parking
demands and the typical design-day parking demand by facility. In addition, and to the extent data
are available, prepare a parking demand spreadsheet model based on transaction data by parking
duration (0 to 30 minutes, 30 minutes to 1 hour, 1 to 2 hours, etc.)to identify parking demands by the
following duration categories: short-duration (0 to 3 hours), mid-duration (3 to 24 hours), and long-
duration (greater than 24 hours). The model would be used to estimate the number of spaces by
facility currently required to accommodate each duration category of parking activity. The model
would be calibrated to the existing short-duration and long-duration components of demand
accommodated in each facility during the typical design-day period. The parking demand model
would be used to predict parking demand by duration category for each on-airport parking facility for
the existing and future design-day conditions. Future demand would be estimated based on the
assumption that parking demand will increase in proportion to the expected increase in annual
originating airline passengers.
5.4.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
The Planning Team will use the data collected under Task 5.4.1 to prepare public parking system requirements
at EYW for the 20-year planning horizon. Requirements will be presented in a manner so that the Airport can
determine not only the times that parking demand is expected to exceed the supply of parking, but also the
total number of additional spaces will be required to meet demand. Specifically, existing design-day on-
airport public parking demand would be converted to parking "requirements," which include an additional
level-of-service based "buffer" of parking spaces such that a parking facility is not 100 percent occupied on
the typical design day. The estimated public parking requirements would be compared with available parking
spaces and estimated deficiencies (or surplus)in available spaces would be identified.
No financial and economic analysis (assessment of future rate structure adjustments) or development of a
parking revenue model will be performed as part of this effort. Projections and capacity analysis for employee
parking and rental car facilities will be based on anecdotal and, to the extent available, actual occupancy
counts provided by the Airport. Future year requirements will be estimated assuming base year estimates of
employee and rental car spaces will increase in proportion to growth in forecast annual airline passenger
demand (no detailed analyses would be conducted as part of this Master Plan Update).Coordination with the
Airport management will be undertaken to confirm the appropriate space-to-demand ratio to consider in
allocating future space for the alternatives analysis.
5.5 Air Cargo
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID, Inc.
5.5.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
The Planning Team will assess the capacity of existing cargo processing facilities and determine future
requirements for buildings, aircraft parking aprons, and ground access facilities.
i Master Plan Update
(34]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
5.5.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
As each type of cargo operation (integrated carriers, freight forwarders, all cargo operators, combination
carriers, belly freight carriers) has somewhat different site requirements, a range of spaces will be considered
for cargo development.In planning for future air cargo facilities,the Planning Team will consider:
• The type of cargo companies expected to expand or initiate operation (this will include a survey of
potential businesses);
• Annual air cargo operations projected for all operators;
• The number of existing apron parking spaces;
• Projected growth in annual enplaned tonnage;
• The availability of ground access for the heavy commercial trucks associated with cargo activity;and
• Immigration and customs operations
▪ Changes associated with clearance of cargo by foreign governments
The Planning Team will consider providing a means of separating cargo vehicles from other airport traffic for
security purposes.
5.6 General Aviation
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: McFarland Johnson
5.6.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
Using standard methodology for assessing general aviation demand and capacity, an evaluation of current
and future demand and capacity for general aviation facilities will be completed. The analysis will consider
facility requirements for.
• Aircraft ramp and parking area
• Aircraft storage hangar positions by hangar type
• T Hangar positions
• Conventional hangar facilities
• Fixed Base Operator(FBO)facilities access and vehicle parking areas
5.6.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
General aviation facility requirements will be identified as needed to meet projected levels of demand
expressed in the baseline forecast and the alternate demand scenarios based on the demand/capacity analysis
for GA facilities. Facility requirements will be expressed in terms of gross area, linear feet, or other basic units
to determine excess or deficient capacity. This assessment will quantify future development items needed to
maintain an adequate level of service, function,and operation at the Airport.
Master Plan Update
[35]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
5.7 Support Facilities
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: AID,Inc.
5.7.1 DEMAND/CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
Using pertinent FAA regulations, advisory circulars, and information gained from discussions/surveys of
airport users, the Planning Team will determine the capacity of the existing Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting
Facilities (ARFF),fuel storage facility,airfield maintenance center facilities, and NAVAIDS facilities.
5.7.2 FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Future support facility requirements will be based on the baseline forecast and the alternate demand
scenarios, and discussed in terms of expansion of existing facilities or procurement of additional equipment
including any required NAVAIDS.
5.8 Prepare Demand/Capacity & Facility Requirements Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc
A draft Airport Development Alternatives report summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will
be prepared and provided to Airport staff and Technical Review Committee for their review. The Planning
Team will prepare exhibits as necessary to clarify and summarize the various items addressed in the
alternatives section.
The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Airport
Development Alternatives Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and
comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be
incorporated into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
Master Plan Update
[36]
•
I KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 201S)
6. Alternatives Analysis and Recommended
Development Plan
The Planning Team will prepare sketches and evaluate alternative airport development concepts to
accommodate the range of requirements needed to satisfy forecast demands for the 5-, 10-and 20-year time
frames. The Airport will review the concepts and work with the Planning Team to determine suitability of the
airport to accommodate future airport improvements. Based on Airport comments, the Planning Team will
prepare the recommended alternative development plans.
Deliverables
• Five(5)copies of the Airport Development Alternatives chapter for Airport review and comment
• Five(5)copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment
• A final Alternative Development Alternatives report in electronic format(.PDF)
Estimated Task Duration
45 Days
6.1 Airfield Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask; Ricondo&Associates,Inc.&Jacobs(Cost estimating)
On the basis of the Airport facility requirements established previously, preliminary airfield development
alternatives will be developed.Airfield alternatives will be based on schemes for development within existing
or expanded airport boundaries and will show necessary major runway and taxiway development for each of
5-, 10- and 20-year time frame. This task will be conducted simultaneously with the following tasks and will
result in a series of overall development options for the Airport. Airfield alternatives will be developed based
on the identified facility requirements, environmental considerations, engineering factors, costs, and overall
feasibility for implementation. Airfield alternatives will also be analyzed to determine their potential for
creating or being affected by line of sight considerations as well as FAR Part 77 and TERPS surfaces. Based on'
the findings, an evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the following factors for the various
alternatives:
• The ability of particular runway length to satisfy fleet mix and anticipated aircraft activity;
• The ability to improve geometric clearances and apron layout in the terminal area;
• The need to improve passenger and vehicle circulation on the ramp and to identify areas for the
staging of GSE;
• The ability to improve the existing taxiways system including the departure taxiway routes and the
access points between the existing and proposed apron and the runway;
• The need to provide an interior service road for access to the airfield areas;
• The level of impacts associated with each airfield alternative;
Master Plan Update T
[37]
•
•
IKEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015(
• The impacts on current or planned development;and
• The order-of-magnitude costs associated with each of the airfield alternatives.
Up to three (3) airfield alternatives will be prepared for inclusion in the final Master Plan document. No
airfield modeling or simulation will be provided as part of this task.
6.2 Terminal Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc
On the basis of terminal facility requirements established in Task 5.2, up to five alternatives will be developed
to provide for a plan that is "balanced"and meets or exceeds customer expectations for level of service. The
terminal area plan will include analyses of how the terminal complex can be expanded to meet projected
demand while minimizing the impact that the expansion would have on existing operations. . Terminal
alternative options will be explored to solve deficiencies and functions that may be experiencing capacity
issues including, but not limited to:
• Congestion in the baggage claim area
• The lack of holdroom spaces and the lack of concessions
• The need for improvement in the handling of baggage
The analyses of terminal expansion will also include consideration of the airline operations area, security
facilities, curbfront requirements (for existing and future terminal development), concessions, support
facilities, and various other terminal-related functions that will have a direct impact on terminal expansion
strategies. An evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the various alternatives.
6.3 . Roadway Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs
Based upon information developed during the review and analysis of the existing ground access/roadway
systems conducted in the demand-capacity task, the Planning Team will develop optional schemes for
providing additional ground access capacity. Specifically, the Planning Team will prepare conceptual plans
and illustrate these in scaled exhibits depicting alternative ground access roadways and circulation schemes
that meet the facility requirements for the 20-year planning horizon. It is anticipated that up to three
conceptual plans will be developed and will depict ground access options for the fully expanded/renovated
terminal area. An evaluation matrix will be developed to compare the following factors for the various
alternatives:
• The ability to satisfy the vehicular demands and anticipated activity;
• The ability to accommodate the needs for other land use developments;and
Master Plan Update
[38]
LKEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
• The degree to which off-Airport improvements would be needed to make the alternative
functional. •
6.4 Airport Public Parking Facility Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
Alternatives for supplementing the existing parking system supply will be identified. Examples include
expansion of existing parking surface parking facilities and the relocation of employee parking out of the
public parking facilities to free up additional spaces. Up to three airport public parking facility(3) alternatives
will be prepared as part of this task.
6.5 Cargo Facility Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Sub task: AID,Inc.
The cargo facility requirements determined previously will serve as a base to develop alternatives favorable to
the cargo development at the Airport. The cargo building, apron and acreage requirements will be used to
produce alternatives that meet the projected demand. Alternatives will be evaluated based on their ability to
satisfy the identified facility requirements, ease of implementation, and environmental considerations. Up to
three cargo facility(3)alternatives will be prepared as part of this task.
6.6 General Aviation Facility Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: McFarland Johnson
Based on the general aviation area facility requirements determined previously, preliminary general aviation
development within or beyond existing airport boundaries will be formulated. General aviation alternatives
will be evaluated on the basis of their efficiency in meeting identified facility requirements, ability to group
tenants in the same general areas; engineering factors, ease of implementation, costs, and environmental
considerations.This will lead to the selection of the options best satisfying the identified need. Up to three(3)
general aviation facility alternatives will be prepared as part of this task.
6.7 Support Facility Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Sub task: AID,Inc.
Alternatives for the development of required support facility improvements shall be developed and evaluated
to assess preferred layouts on the basis of the ability to serve the projected demand, expandability, and
operational considerations. Up to three(3) support facility alternatives will be prepared as part of this task.
Master Plan Update
[391
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
6.8 Joint Use Evaluation
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc
During the 1990s a feasibility study was performed to analyze a joint use scenario. As part of this task, the
Planning Team will review the 1990 Study and assess what has occurred since then, and how conditions have
changed in order to determine if the conclusions and recommendations issued in the 1990 Study are still
valid, or if there is any justification and merit in reassessing those conclusions and recommendations as part
of a subsequent, stand-alone study(outside of the Master Plan, or as a supplemental task to the Master Plan).
If the latter is concluded (i.e., a reassessment or further study of a joint use scenario should be undertaken), a
general outline of the scope of work that should be considered for the reassessment/study will be prepared
and included as part of the Master Plan deliverables.
Information on existing military missions and operations conducted at the Naval Air Station Key West will be
identified using the best information publicly available and through one discussion meeting with the Naval Air
Station staff. It is assumed that the Monroe County/Airport management will be responsible for setting up
the meeting with the Naval Air Station staff.
6.9 Evaluate Development Alternatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc. &Jacobs(Cost estimating),
The Planning Team will conduct an evaluation of the development alternatives based on criteria developed in
conjunction with the goals and objectives of the Study and through dialogue between the Planning Team and
the Airport staff. These will include: ability of the concept to provide required capacity and capability;
potential environmental impacts; relative costs (using labor and materials price data from recent Airport
construction projects; and constructability/ease of implementation. Criteria may be weighted to reflect
importance in the evaluation process. An evaluation matrix will be prepared to compare the various
alternatives in terms of the evaluation criteria. This task will result in the revision of options or the
combination of individual alternatives into a single alternative for implementation.
6.10 Refine Recommended Airport Development Plan
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
As needed, the Planning Team will refine the near-term recommended alternatives identified in the previous
tasks, including airfield, terminal, and roadway access (on and off-airport). Based on input from the Airport,
refinements to the recommended development plan will be made.
Master Pian Update
[40I
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
6.11 Prepare Airport Development Alternatives Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc..
A draft Airport Development Alternatives report summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will
be prepared and provided to Airport staff and Technical Review Committee for their review. The Planning
Team will prepare exhibits as necessary to clarify and summarize the various items addressed in the
alternatives section.
The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Airport
Development Alternatives Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and
comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be
incorporated into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
Master Plan Update
t41)
•
{ KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
7. Environmental Overview
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates,Inc. (unless otherwise noted)
The environmental overview to be completed as part of this Master Plan will assist in selecting a preferred
development alternative that minimizes potential environmental impacts. It will identify potential areas of
environmental concern, whether any components of the preferred development plan might affect significant
environmental resources, and the level of environmental documentation required by FAA prior to
implementation of the recommended Master Plan projects. The Planning Team will review each element of
the proposed development plan so the Airport/County staff is made aware of:
Qs Potential environmental concerns
• The anticipated environmental documentation required prior to implementation
Q Whether the proposed improvements are likely to require Federal and/or State Permits.
The environmental overview will identify environmental concerns based on the guidance provided in FAA's
Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures' and Order 5050.4B, National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions or the current versions of those documents.
The first step will be to review existing environmental reports prepared for the Airport and gather information
from existing databases, maps, and published information available from applicable resource agencies to
establish existing conditions.
Deliverables
A detailed narrative report summarizing the results of the findings of the environmental overview
including supporting graphic exhibits and tables
o Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft working paper for Airport review/comment
O Five(5) copies of a final draft working paper for Airport review/comment
o A final Environmental Overview report in electronic format(PDF)
Estimated Task Duration
Documentation of Existing Conditions-30 Days
Noise analysis&determination of probable environmental documentation and permitting requirements for
the preferred alternative—30 days
' Note that FAA intends to release an update to Order 1050.1E in early 2015;if Order 1050.1F is released prior to commencement of the
Environmental Overview,Order 1050.1F will be utilized. If Order 1050.1F is released after initiation of the Environmental Overview,R&A
will review to determine whether it would cause any change in requirements or analysis. R&A will discuss any scope,cost or schedule
implications with the Airport staff.
i Master Plan Update
[42]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
7.1 Existing Conditions
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc
Utilizing existing maps of the Airport environs and existing environmental documents, the Planning Team will
prepare an environmental inventory/overview of the environmental setting and operating environment. No
formal coordination with federal or state agencies will be conducted as part of this work element. Informal
coordination may occur during the process of obtaining existing documents,etc.from various agencies.
This task does not include field reviews, analysis or other scientific evaluation of resources. The summary is
intended to reference known or potential environmental conditions identified in recent environmental efforts
conducted on the airfield that could be affected by proposed airport.
The environmental overview will provide a baseline of current environmental constraints, and will be used to
direct the development of improvement alternatives to avoid and minimize impact. The Planning Team will
conduct a records search of local, state, and federal regulatory agencies and review previous environmental
studies completed for the Airport to identify potential environmental constraints. The Planning Team will
review the environmental categories included in FAA Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures; however,the results of the overview will not meet, and is not intended to meet,the requirements
of the National Environmental Policy Act. Information will be used to determine environmental constraints
when developing airport improvement alternatives.
The Planning Team will gather and review existing published studies and secondary source data concerning
environmental factors related to airport development and provide summary/applicable excerpts to be
included in the Master Plan Report. Information gathered will include information on:
• Fish,wildlife,and plants including endangered species
• Incompatible land uses;
• Air and water quality;
• Waste water and solid waste treatment and/or disposal;
• Construction impacts,drainage and hydrology;
• Floodplains and Wetlands;
• Historic,archaeological,architectural,and cultural resources;
• Parks and recreational areas;
• Coastal resources and review of airport's impact on the Atlantic Ocean;
• Land use and zoning surrounding the Airport including noise sensitive receptors;
Master Plan Update
[431
I KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
7.2 Evaluation of Proposed Development
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.
By using data collected in the previous task, the preferred development alternative will be evaluated to identify
potential environmental issues. This subtask will also include the identification of possible environmental
documentation and permitting requirements for the preferred alternative.
7.3 Airport Noise Evaluation
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask; Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates, LLC.
The Planning Team will conduct a noise analysis, resulting in noise contours that are representative of the
existing base year (2015)„ and future ten-year (2025) aeronautical activity and existing/future (preferred
alternative)airfield configuration consistent with the Airport Master Plan.
The noise contours will be prepared for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used for the
purpose of 14 CFR FAR Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) or,Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The
methodology used to develop the contours, however, will comply with that recommended by the FAA; the
FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM), version 7D will be used for the noise modeling (or, if required, the
Aviation Environmental Design Tool [AEDT] version 2b shall be used)..The noise contours will be placed on a
current aerial photograph base map or USGS quadrangle map, depending on the area of noise exposure that
extends beyond the airport.
It is anticipated this effort will build on the model that was developed as part of the 2013 14 CFR FAR Part 150
Study. Fleet mix information and airfield conditions, however, will be updated to reflect the FAA-approved
activity forecasts(Task 4)and the future airfield conditions(for example, runway extension, threshold changes,
or safety areas)to be defined as part of the Master Plan (Task 6.1).
The noise analysis will identify and depict noise exposure associated with the projected aeronautical activity at
the Airport and will include an identification of noise sensitive land uses. The DNL 65 dB and higher noise
contours will be generated for each modeled scenario. Federal noise standards recognize DNL 65 dB as the
threshold for evaluating noise impacts, which will be noted on all figures or drawings depicting noise
contours.
The existing and 10-year noise contours will also be depicted on the airport land use plan drawing.A narrative
description of airport noise exposure, compatibility with adjacent land uses, and a summary of federal noise
compatibility guidelines will be prepared for inclusion in the environmental overview working paper.
Master Plan Update
[44]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
7.3.1 REVISE INM AIRCRAFT FLEET MIX
The aircraft fleet mix representing the average annual day aircraft operations for the existing and future
airfield conditions will be used for noise modeling. Helicopter operations will modeled in the same manner as
in the 2013 14 CFR Part 150 Study.
The following data sources will be collected,reviewed, and compiled into the 2015 aircraft fleet mix:
• Aircraft Situational Display for Industry(ASDI),
• Air Traffic Control Tower(ATCT)records/interviews,
• Fixed Base Operator(FBO) records/interviews,
• FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System(ATADS),
• FAA Traffic Flow Management Systems Count(TFMSC),and
• FAA Form 5010(Airport Master Records).
The future year (2025) fleet mix and operations will be sourced from the Master Plan forecasts. The
corresponding INM/AEDT aircraft types will be determined for each category of aircraft included in the Master
Plan forecasts.
7.3.2 ESTABLISH AIR TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROFILE
The air traffic operational profile (i.e., aircraft flight tracks, runway utilization, and flight track utilization) was
established as part of the 2013 14 CFR Par 150 Study. As such, it is anticipated that this effort will be limited
to the update of the INM model to reflect the future/proposed airfield configuration. For budgeting
purposes, it has been assumed that the assumptions regarding flight track and runway use from the 2013 14
CFR Par 150 Study remain valid and won't need to be updated.
7.3.3 ESTABLISH BASELINE(EXISTING) NOISE CONTOURS
The aircraft noise contours of DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB resulting from the average annual day operations for the
existing baseline condition will be created using the FAA's INM 7.0d or AEDT 2b. The annual aircraft
operations for the existing baseline conditions will be based on the FAA's ATCT annual counts for the Airport.
7.3.4 ESTABLISH LONG TERM (10-YEAR) NOISE CONTOURS
The aircraft noise contours of DNL 65, 70,and 75 dB resulting from the average annual day operations for the
future year condition (2025) will be created using the FAA's INM, version 7D or AEDT 2b. The annual aircraft
operations and the fleet mix will be estimated based on data developed as part of Task 4.
7.4 Prepare Environmental Overview Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtosk: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.
A draft Environmental Overview summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and
provided to Airport staff for their review. This report will address the environmental conditions at EYW as
Master Plan Update
[451
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
determined through a review of existing reports and through contacts with various state and federal agencies.
The overview will identify potential effects on environmental resources as a result of projects proposed in the
updated Airport Master Plan.
The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the Environmental
Overview Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2)
final draft for review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the
final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
Master Plan Update
[46]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
8. Sustainability Initiatives
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc. (unless otherwise noted)
This task will address the Airport sustainability policy, establish possible goals to minimize the impact or
consumption to reduce the airport's overall environmental footprint, and identify and describe a range of
generic sustainability initiatives to help the airport achieve each set goal.
Deliverables
• Five(5)copies of the Sustainability Initiatives chapter for Airport review and comment
• Five(5)copies of a final draft chapter for Airport review and comment
• A final Sustainability Initiatives report in electronic format(.PDF)
Estimated Task Duration
45 Days
8.1 Establish Baseline Conditions
The Planning Team will conduct a baseline inventory or assessment of each defined sustainability category,
such as environmental resource usage (e.g., water consumption per year or per passenger, etc.), emissions
inventory, surface transportation management, land uses, and etc. For budgeting purposes, it has been
assumed that this effort will require a site visit at the Airport that will include interviews of key Airport staff.
8.2 Facilitate Sustainability Workshop
The Planning Team will attend and help facilitate a half-day workshop to define the Airport's sustainability
goals, outline the sustainability categories at the Airport, such as socioeconomics, airport facilities and
procedures, environmental resources (e.g., noise, water, air quality, etc.), and identify and describe a range of
specific sustainability initiatives to help the airport achieve its goals.
The Planning Team will be responsible for developing all support materials for facilitating the Sustainability
workshop.These materials will include presentations, meeting agenda,questionnaires,and etc.
8.3 Formulate Sustainability Framework
Based on the outcomes of the sustainability workshop, the Planning Team will formulate a sustainability
framework for the Airport that will identify the following:
Master Plan Update
[47)
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
▪ Sustainability Policy
•
• Sustainability Strategies (if applicable)
• Long-and short-term objectives
▪ Priorities List
• Timeline and Responsibilities
Upon approval of the airport's sustainability framework, the Planning Team will develop a Sustainability
Initiatives chapter for inclusion in the Master Plan Update.
------ -- --------- ------ ---------------------
8.4 Prepare Simplified Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction Plan
Based on Section 133 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, airports are required to prepare a
Recycling, Reuse, and Waste Reduction plan as part of their Master Plan. This plan will address the feasibility
of solid waste recycling, minimizing the generation of solid waste, operation and maintenance requirements.
the review of waste management contracts,and the potential cost savings or generation of revenue.
This task will include, in collaboration with Airport staff, the identification of the types of solid waste
generated at the Airport, as well as the factors likely to influence the scope and nature of the Airport recycling
program (e.g. local markets for recyclable commodities; cost for transport and processing recyclables; local
recycling infrastructure; willingness of an airport and its tenants to implement recycling programs; airport
layout and logistics.)
It is anticipated the recycling, reuse, and waste reduction plan will include a description of the scope of the
existing recycling and waste management programs, the identification of the drivers for
implementing/maintaining a recycling program, a description and inventory of infrastructure in place,both on
and off- airport,that supports airport recycling, and a description of the airport's current solid waste recycling,
reuse, and waste reduction efforts, including instances when tenants recycle materials.
Results of previously completed waste audits will be documented as part of the plan. However, no waste
audits will be conducted as part of this Master Plan. Technical and economic factors, as well as logical
constraints, that currently affect the airport's ability to recycle will be reviewed and Federal, state, or local
guidelines or policies that aid or hinder recycling efforts will be identified.
This task will also include a brief review of existing waste management contracts including a description of
current contracting for waste management at the airport, the identification of tenant leases and service
contracts with corresponding expiration, extension, and/or renewal dates, and a description of how waste
handling and recycling is funded.
Potential for cost, savings or revenue generation and recommendations to minimize solid waste will be
identified. No detailed financial analysis and modeling, however, will be completed as part of this
effort.
Master Plan Update
[481
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
8.5 Draft Sustainability Chapter
A draft Sustainability Chapter summarizing the findings of each of the preceding tasks will be prepared and
provided to Airport staff for their review. The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review
and comment process for the Sustainability Initiatives chapter will incorporate two revision rounds; (1)
preliminary draft for review and comment, and (2) final draft for review and comment. The second round of
comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
Master Plan Update
[49]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
9. Implementation Plan
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.(unless otherwise noted)
The implementation plan will consist of the Implementation Schedule and the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP). The recommended development plan will be subdivided into distinct projects for which estimates of
probable costs will be prepared and funding sources which will be phased over the development period. The
CIP will be coordinated with airport management and the existing CIP to include both currently programmed
and master plan-related capital improvements for the Airport.
The development schedule will be based on the improvements needed to satisfy demand at each of the 5-,
10- and 20-year time frames, which will be assumed to occur as determined under the Baseline Demand
Scenario developed in the forecasting task. Individual development projects will be phased to allow
improvements to be designed, constructed, and operational to meet demand.The phasing process will be an
iterative process with the financial analysis to ensure that the CIP is both implementable and economically
feasible.
Deliverables
A report including the project summaries and supporting graphic exhibits
O Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft Implementation Plan working paper for Airport
review/comment
o Five(5)copies of a final draft Implementation Plan report for the Airport
review/comment
o A final Implementation Plan report in electronic format(PDF)
Estimated Task Duration
30 Days
9.1 Define Individual Development Projects
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc. &Jacobs
Based on the various facility requirements and development alternatives, the Planning Team will identify and
define the individual capital improvement projects that make up the recommended actions. These will
become the basis for the CIP schedule and cost estimates.
I Master Plan Update
(501
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 20151
9.2 Develop Estimates of Rough Order of Magnitude Cost (ROM)
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs
Using labor and materials price data from recent Airport construction projects, supplemented by current
industry data, the Planning Team will determine costs for each project in the CIP, which will include design,
engineering,administrative, land acquisition,and construction costs. These will be prepared on a conceptual,
budgetary level.
9.3 Coordinate Project Sequencing
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask; Ricondo&Associates,Inc.&Jacobs
The Planning Team will Review the most current CIP for the Airport and coordinate project sequencing with
Airport staff. This task will include the identification of the recommended short-, mid-and long-range Capital
Improvement projects to comprise the CIP list.The anticipated sequence for each project will be based on the
improvements needed to satisfy demand at the various PAL's (which will be assumed to occur as determined
under the Baseline Demand Scenario developed in the forecasting task), funding considerations, the Monroe
County objectives, and prerequisite project requirements where necessary. The various facility development
projects will be prioritized and correlated with the staging plans for the airport development program
resulting from the selected alternatives. The CIP phasing will be determined for the short- (0-5 years),
intermediate-(6-10 years), and long-term(11-20 years)planning periods.The requirements for the short-term
will be determined on a year-by-year basis. These estimates will provide sufficient detail to develop a
reasonable financial plan for the Airport.
The phasing process will be an iterative process with the financial analysis to ensure that the UP is both
implementable and economically feasible. The revised phasing will be closely coordinated with the airport
management and senior airport staff.
The development schedule will include a bar graph showing the timing of each project and color drawings
illustrating recommended phasing for project implementation to satisfy the needs of short term (5 year),
intermediate term(10-year),long term(20-year)forecast aviation demands and beyond 20 year time frame.
The short-term (5-year) plan will make up the 5-year CIP. The intermediate term (10-year), long-term (20-
year) and beyond 20 year improvements will be described and incorporated into a long-term development
plan,which,with the short-term CIP,will make up the basis for the financial plan.
Master Plan Update
[51]
IKEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
9.4 Prepare Project Summaries and Exhibits
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc
The Planning Team will prepare and provide graphic exhibits for applicable capital improvement projects to
clarify limits of construction and other assumptions related to the estimated project budgets. In addition,
summary sheets will be developed for each project that identifies typical CIP entry fields to facilitate future
programming of each project in the JACIP for the airport. The findings of the implementation plan task,
including the project summaries and exhibits, will be summarized in a draft report and provided to airport
management and staff for review and comment.
The Airport/County staff review and comment process for the Implementation Plan Report will incorporate
two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2) final draft for the
Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated into the final
draft chapter of the Master Plan.
Master Plan Update
(52)
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
10. Financial Feasibility and Funding
Analysis
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc'(unless otherwise noted)
The results of the master planning analyses described in the prior tasks will be evaluated from a financial
standpoint, taking into consideration existing debt and expected levels of available PFC, FDOT, FAA
entitlement, and FAA discretionary funding, as well as the Airport's capacity to issue revenue bonds,
availability of local funds, and any opportunities for third party funding. The analyses will help establish a
phasing plan for the recommended improvements identified for the Airport that can be implemented in
accordance with projected demand growth and emerging facility needs.
The financial plan will be prepared to outline the actions and initiatives necessary to carry out the CEP in a
financially sound manner. Included in the financial plan will be the identification of specific funding sources,
projections of revenues and expenses, and development of a preferred strategy for undertaking the CIP.
Data&Resources Required From the Monroe County/Airport
Financial data will be collected to support the financial analyses of this study and will include:
• Airport-Airline Use and Lease agreements
• Lease disclosure data
• Historical and upcoming capital projects
• Prior funding assistance
• Revenue sharing agreements
• Airport financial statements as well as applicable information pertaining to state/local financial
support
• Terminal building square footage, by type of space, by tenant
• Airport Leases Summary, if available;if not, copies of tenant leases
• Projected debt service schedule, if applicable
• Projected capital projects and funding sources for upcoming five years'
Deliverables
• A Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis report:
o Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis
working paper for Airport review/comment
o Five(5)copies of a final draft Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis report for the
Airport review/comment
o A final Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis report in electronic format(PDF)
Include projects that are NOT included in Master Plan
i Master Plan Update
[53]
•
•
•
I KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Estimated Task Duration
30 Days
10.1 Develop Financial Model
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask Ricondo&Associates, Inc
The Planning Team will develop a financial model to assess the financial viability of the proposed
development plan. The model will include multiple years, and annual growth assumptions to enable the
Planning Team to develop projected revenues and expenses to serve as the baseline for the financial plan.
The financial model will estimate revenues, expenses, capital development expenditures and cash flows, and
assess funding requirements for each development scenario. Specifically, R&A will input the planned capital
funding into the financial model to develop the multi-year financial projections and determine the airline
revenues resulting from undertaking the planned Master Plan capital development. Outputs from this task
will be used in the development of the financial plan.
10.2 Prepare Financial Plan
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask; Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
Based on output from the financial model, the Planning Team will prepare a financial plan necessary to carry
out the capital program. Included in the financial plan will be the identification of and quantification of the
need for specific funding sources, projections of revenues and expenses, a cash flow analysis, and a debt
capacity analysis for the CIP. This task will include a review of the proposed development projects,including
scheduling,and adjustments to the project costs to represent cost increases assumed from 2015 to the year in
which each respective project would be undertaken.
For the capital projects identified, available funding sources will be determined and applied as appropriate to
the respective projects. These funding sources may include federal discretionary and entitlement grants, State
and local funds, as well as other potential sources of funding for the identified projects. Non-traditional
funding sources, including public-private funding, will be examined in the context of individual demand and
development scenarios. This analysis of funding sources will incorporate any necessary financing costs
including specific assumptions such as interest rates, debt service reserve requirements, capitalized interest,
financing costs and timing of issuance(s).
Based on the projection of Airport revenues and expenses, the capital program funding assumptions will be
incorporated to determine the initial feasibility of undertaking the program. Basic feasibility will be measured
primarily by calculating the impacts on tenant rates and charges, and airport cash flow.
Master Plan update
[54j
•
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
During the development of a recommended financial plan, specific projects will be reviewed with airport
management to confirm project costs and timing as well as to review the strategy for available funding
sources,all in an effort to maximize the financial feasibility of the capital program.
10.3 Prepare Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
The findings of the financial plan task will be summarized in a draft report and provided to the Master Plan
Technical Review Committee and airport management and staff for review and comment.
The Airport/County staff review and comment process for the Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis
Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2)
final draft for the Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated
into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
i Master Plan Update
(551
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
11. Update of the Airport Layout Plan Set
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.(unless otherwise noted)
This effort is intended to produce the necessary documents (including the ALP drawing set and associated
Narrative Report) required for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT)to review and conditionally approve the proposed development plan for the Airport.
The Airport Layout Plan will be prepared in accordance with FAA standards as defined in FAA Advisory Circular
150/5070-7, Airport Master Plans, and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A, Change 1, Airport Design. The
ALP set will be prepared as a paper-copy ALP and does not include preparation of an electronic ALP (eALP).
Data will be submitted in CAD format and is not intended to be provided in GIS format for use in an eALP
submittal to the FAA.
All components of the ALP drawing set described herein will be developed in accordance with the provisions
of AC 150/5070-6B, Airport Master Plans, and the FAA ARP Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 2.00, Review
and Approval of Airport Layout Plans (ALPs). To support the submittal of this updated planning product, the
Planning team will also review,complete, and submit the checklist that is provided in the FAA SOP 2.00.
Deliverables
• Five(5) copies of the preliminary draft ALP set for distribution to the Airport
• 13 copies of the draft ALP set for distribution to the FAA(9 copies), FDOT Aviation and
Spaceports Office(2 copies),and airport staff(2 copies).
• 15 copies of the final ALP set for distribution to the FAA(9 copies), FDOT Aviation and Spaceports
Office(2 copies),and airport staff(4 copies).
• A narrative report discussing the components of the ALP Plan Set and the proposed development
plan reflected on the sheets of the ALP
o Five(5)copies of a preliminary draft ALP Narrative Report working paper for Airport
review/comment
o Five(5) copies of a final draft working paper for the Airport review/comment
o A final ALP Narrative Report in electronic format(PDF)
Estimated Task Duration
120 Days(including a 60-day review period by the FAA)
Master Plan Update
[56)
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
11.1 Title Sheet
A title sheet will be prepared in accordance with the FAA checklists to serve as the drawing set cover sheet.
This title sheet will include pertinent information such as the airport name, owner/operator,location, and plan
set preparer.An index of drawings, graphic representations of the airport location (including the identification
of the county the Airport is located in)and airport vicinity will also be presented on the title sheet.
11.2 Existing Airport Layout
Utilizing new digital mapping for the Airport, a new drawing will be created to identify facilities and
geographical features at the Airport as they currently exist. This drawing will include existing structures,
pavements, imaginary surfaces, NAVAIDs (visual and instrument), ground contours, runway protection zones,
runway safety areas, property interests, and other pertinent dimensional data recommended by the FAA.
Based on the new digital mapping obtained for the Airport,this drawing will reflect projects and other airport
improvements that have materialized since the current ALP was last approved in June 2003.This drawing will
also depict the configuration and general dimensioning of the existing airport facilities, including surveyed
building heights of all buildings on airport property.The Airport Reference Point(ARP), key elevations, runway
end latitude/longitude coordinates, and runway approach surfaces will also be identified.The drawing will also
include a legend and applicable notes section, wind roses and wind coverage tables to be developed under
Task 3.6, as well as a runway data and building data tables. The runway data table will include information
such as Approach and Departure Reference Code (APRC and DPRC), Runway Reference Code (RRC), runway
length, runway width, runway end elevation, runway lighting, runway marking, pavement type, pavement
strength and NAVAIDs(visual and instrument).The "true"and magnetic north will also be depicted,which will
require the calculation of the magnetic declination at the Airport. Any deviations to FAA design standards will
be identified and noted appropriately.
The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the existing airport layout contains the
information required for submittal to the FAA.
The scale of the drawing will be defined at the time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to
provide a clearly legible drawing with all requisite data readily discernible.The scale of the drawing, however,
will fall within the range of 1" = 200'and 1" = 600', in accordance with the FAA checklist.
5 FAA ARP Standard Operating Procedures(SOP),Standard Procedure for FM Review and Approval of Airport Layout Plan,October 1.2013.
1 Master Plan Update
{ [571
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
11.3 Airport Layout Plan
Utilizing new digital mapping and other available resources, R&A will create an ALP to reflect the
recommended development plan to accommodate the future facility needs as identified in the updated
Master Plan. Specifically, the ALP will illustrate existing and proposed airfield pavements, roadway &parking
pavement/structures, trails/gravel roads, runway markings, on-airport structures, appropriate levels of
vegetation, key drainage features, NAVAIDs (visual and instrument), off-airport structures that are located in
the immediate vicinity of the Airport, and other miscellaneous natural and man-made items. Established
survey monuments located on or in the immediate vicinity of the Airport will also be identified.
Ground contours, runway protection zones, runway safety and object free areas,future property interests, and
other pertinent dimensional data recommended by the FAA will also be depicted on the plan. The ARP
(existing and proposed), the Approach and Departure Reference Code (APRC and DPRC), and Runway
Reference Codes (RRCs) for each runway, key elevations, runway end latitude/longitude coordinates, and
runway approach surfaces will also be identified. Any proposed improvements and/or changes to these items
will be depicted graphically and identified.
The ALP will be developed in accordance with the FAA checklist.Thus, each of the components of the ALP will
contain the information necessary to obtain approval from the FAA. Like the Existing Airport Layout, any
deviations to FAA design standards will be identified and noted on the ALP.
The scale of the drawing will be defined at the time the ALP set is commenced and will be determined so as to
provide a clearly legible drawing with all requisite data readily discernible.The scale of the drawing, however,
will fall within the range of 1" = 200'and 1" = 600', in accordance with the FAA checklist.
11.4 Airport Airspace Drawing
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs
This drawing will depict all relevant Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces as they
relate to the Airport's immediate airspace in a plan and profile view. The plan view will be prepared at an
approximate scale of 1" = 2,000' and will be overlaid onto a USGS 7-minute quadrangle basemap (or
orthophotography) of the surrounding area. The profile view will be prepared at a horizontal scale of 1" =
1,000'and a vertical scale of 1" = 100'.
The plan will illustrate the ultimate runway configuration of the airfield with key elevations of the surfaces and
stationing from the runway ends being referenced. Fifty (50) foot contour intervals will be shown for all FAR
Part 77 sloping imaginary surfaces. This sheet will depict objects violating FAR Part 77 surfaces that have not
been identified on the ALP or inner approach drawings. The top elevation of each obstruction will be
identified on the drawing as will the disposition of the obstruction in a tabular format.The dimensions of the
approach surfaces and transitional surfaces will be charted.Obstruction heights will be obtained from the new
• Master Plan Update
[58]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
digital mapping and other available resources. In addition, all known obstructions to navigable airspace off-
airport will be identified through the use of the latest USGS mapping, the NOAA Obstruction Chart, and the
aeronautical sectional chart as applicable. No field obstruction surveys, however, will be completed as part of
this effort.
The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed)to confirm that the airport airspace drawing contains the
information required by the FAA.
11.5 Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs
These drawings will depict plan and profile views of the inner portion of the approach to each ultimate runway
end at the Airport.These drawings will utilize a 1" = 200' horizontal scale for the plan and profile views and a
1" = 20'vertical scale for the profile views. The plan/profile extents will cover from the referenced runway out
to a point where the approach surface reaches a 100-foot height above the runway end.The new digital base
mapping will be used to identify obstructions to navigable airspace, as well as those documented on the latest
USGS 7-minute quadrangle mapping and the NOAA Obstruction Chart.
In accordance with the FAA checklist,these drawings will depict the obstacle identification surfaces contained
in 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, threshold siting surfaces, Glideslope Qualification
Surfaces (GQS) if applicable, and any other applicable surfaces associated with the United States Standards for
Instrument Procedures(TERPS), Changes 1 through 26.
Obstructions will be listed numerically in a tabular format for each approach with data describing the
obstruction type, the surfaces penetrated, top elevation, allowable elevation, amount of penetration, and
proposed dispositions. Elevations of roads, railroads, power poles, trees, buildings, and other objects that are
located within the approaches will also be shown.
The drawings will also depict the threshold siting surfaces associated with each runway end. These surfaces
will be defined based on the type of instrument approaches anticipated and the critical aircraft for each
runway end in accordance with the standards defined in Table 3-2, Approach/Departure Standards Table, of
FAA AC 5300-13A,Change 1,Airport Design.
Additionally, any local zoning ordinances or protection zones will also be reflected in the inner portion of the
approach surface drawings, where applicable.
11.6 Terminal Area Drawing(s)
Similar to the ALP, the terminal area drawing(s) will depict existing and proposed development at a larger
scale(within a range of 1" = 50'and 1" = 100')of the terminal area and other adjacent facilities.
Master Plan Update
[59]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
At this scale, the terminal area drawing(s) will provide further detail in terms of dimensional criteria,
annotations, aircraft parking positions, existing and proposed facilities. A building data table that list details
specific to each facility will also be included.
11.7 Land Use Drawing
This drawing will depict the existing and recommended use of all Airport property and all land in the
immediate vicinity of the Airport(to the 65 DNL contour as specified in FAA RGL- 5070.1). The land uses will
be depicted by general use categories such as aviation, commercial, residential, industrial, recreational, public
use, etc.The specific designations to land uses within the airport property limits will be discussed with airport
representatives and revised as directed to reflect the categories that are desired. The off-airport land uses in
the immediate vicinity of the Airport (to the 65 DNL contour) will be defined based on the Monroe county
zoning and land use maps.
The 65 DNL will be developed as part of Task 7.3 using the FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM)Version 7.0D,
and based on the aviation activity projected as part of the Master Plan's forecast. In addition to the 65 DNL,
the 70 and 75 DNL will also be depicted the land use drawing.
The FAA checklist will be reviewed (and completed) to confirm that the land use drawing contains the
information required by the FAA.
11.8 Airport Property Map
Firm Responsible for the Property Line Survey: To be Determined
This drawing will be prepared at a scale equal to that of the ALP and will depict the existing airport property
boundary as well as proposed acquisition areas. Property boundary bearings and distances will be denoted on
the drawing where appropriate and if available.
The updating of the property map will conform with the guidelines discussed in the FAA's Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP 3.00) for FAA Review of Exhibit'A' Airport Property Inventory Maps (dated October 1, 2013).
FAA SOP 2.00 also provides same Airport Property Map/Exhibit A guidelines. To support the submittal of this
updated planning product, the Planning team will also review, complete, and submit the Exhibit "A" Review
Checklist that is provided in the FAA SOP 3.00.
The Planning Team will research the acquisition history of property for EYW to validate data from previous
documents.Anticipated tasks include researching the Airport records, documents held at the City of Key West
and/or the Monroe County, FDOT records, and FAA records in Orlando. Specific attention to grant data will
be researched. The Property Map and will also cross reference the individual parcels depicted on the Property
Map drawing to tabular data summarizing the size of the parcel (in acres), the ORB Record Reference and the
date of record (if available), and the sources of funds (FAA, PFC, local, other), if available, used to acquire the
Master Plan Update
[60]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015 (UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
property. It is anticipated that a property line survey and the preparation of the Airport boundary legal
description will be required for this subtask.
The drawing will indicate in matrix form how, when, and from whom the various parcels were acquired. In
accordance with the FAA checklist,the data table will include(if available):
• Number or letter and area of each parcel or easement
• Date property was acquired or property status
• Federal Aid project number under which the property acquisition was reimbursed
• Type of Acquisition (i.e. AIP-noise, AIP entitlement, PFC, surplus property, local purchase, local donation,
condemnation, other)
• Grantor of property
• Acreage
11.9 Preliminary Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal
Five draft copies of the drawings developed will be assembled and distributed to the EYW staff for review and
comments. Revisions will be made as appropriate based on comments received. The drawings to be included
in the preliminary ALP set are as follows:
• Title Sheet
• Existing Airport Layout
• Airport Layout Plan
• Airport Airspace Drawing
• Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing—Runway 9
• Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawing—Runway 27
• Terminal Area Drawing(s)
• Land Use Drawing
• Airport Property Map
11.10 Final Draft Airport Plans Set Submittal
Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate), 13 copies of the final draft Airport Plans
set will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FAA (nine copies), FDOT Aviation and
Spaceports Office (two copies), and airport staff (two copies). An electronic version of the drawings set will
Master Plan Update
[61]
•
•
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
also be provided. Drawings will be provided in both AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat (PDF) formats. As part of
this submittal, R&A will also prepare a transmittal letter to the FAA that will list the key changes that have
been made to the Airport Layout Plan. The FAA checklist will also be completed and included in this
transmittal.
11.11 Final Airport Plans Set
Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate) fifteen copies of the final Airport Plans
set and associated FAA checklist will be submitted to Monroe County for distribution to the FDOT Aviation
and Spaceports Office and to the FAA.It is assumed that Monroe County will be responsible for forwarding
the Airport Plans set to the FAA local ADO for their review, coordination, approval, and signature. An
electronic version of the drawings set will also be provided. The final drawings will be provided in both
AutoCAD and Adobe Acrobat(PDF formats).
11.12 Narrative Report
This task will include the preparation of an ALP Narrative Report that will document, in narrative form, the
proposed development plan reflected on the sheets of the ALP set for formal review and comment by the
Airport staff. This narrative will include discussions of any modifications to FAA standards, including the
justification of any new modification requests. In addition, a half-size version of the ALP set (11"x17") will be
printed and included in the report.
The Airport/County staff and Technical Review Committee review and comment process for the ALP Narrative
Report will incorporate two revision rounds; (1) preliminary draft for the Airport review and comment, and (2)
final draft for the Airport review and comment. The second round of comments/revisions will be incorporated
into the final draft chapter of the Master Plan.
11.13 Coordination Meetings
R&A anticipates participating in up to four (4) web conference sessions using GoToMeeting or similar
software.These web conference sessions will provide an opportunity to review the base map layering, review
the draft ALP set with Airport staff and discuss required modifications to the drawings.
In addition to the web conference sessions, two meetings at the Airport are anticipated with EYW staff and
management. These meetings will provide an opportunity to review the draft ALP sets prior to distributing
copies to the FAA and FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office for review and comment.
Master Plan Update
[621
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
Similarly,two meetings at the FAA Orlando ADO in Orlando are anticipated. These meetings will provide an
opportunity to present the draft ALP sets to the ADO staff and to go over the proposed projects to be reflect
on the future ALP. These meetings will be attended by R&A staff,currently located in Orlando.
Master Plan Update
[63]
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
12. Documentation
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc. (unless otherwise noted)
The final Master Plan Update deliverables will represent the formal documentations that will become a matter of
public record approvals.These documents will include an Executive Summary, a Draft Master Plan Update Report,
and a Final Master Plan Update Report.
Deliverables
• SO copies of the Executive Summary and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat(PDF)format
• 10 copies of the Draft Airport Master Plan Update Report and an electronic file version in Adobe
Acrobat(PDF)format
• 25 copies of the Final Airport Master Plan Update Report and ten (10) PDF versions to be provided on
CD's.
Estimated Task Duration
120 Days(including a 90-day review period by the FAA)
12.1 Prepare Executive Summary
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc
The Planning Team will prepare and submit a draft Executive Summary that summarizes the results of the
aviation forecasts, the facility requirements, the recommended plan and Capital Improvement Program. The
Executive Summary shall include approximately 15 to 25 pages with color exhibits. A total of 50 copies and an
electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat(PDF)format of the Executive Summary will be provided.
•
12.2 Prepare Draft Airport Master Plan Update Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates. Inc./Jacobs
To insure proper coordination of the planning effort and assure agreement between the Planning Team, City
of Key West, Monroe County, and FAA,a Draft Airport Master Plan Report will be submitted for formal review.
The draft report will contain all working papers (revised based on comments provided on original drafts), ALP
drawings and the financial evaluation. The draft documents and plans will also be submitted to the FAA for
review. A total of ten (10) copies and an electronic file version in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format of the draft
report will be provided.
Master Plan Update 64
( ]
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
12.3 Prepare Final Airport Master Plan Update Report
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,,lnc./Jacobs
The final airport master plan update report consolidating all previous analyses will be prepared after all
agency and participants have made their comments on the draft final report and Airport Management has
directed the Planning Team to incorporate these comments into a final report.Twenty-five (25) comb bound
final reports of the Key West International Airport Master Plan Update will be prepared for distribution. Of
these copies,two (2)will be forwarded directly to the FAA Orlando Airports District Office and one (1)will be
forwarded directly to the FDOT Aviation and Spaceports office.The remaining twenty-two (22)will be sent to
the Monroe County/Airport. Digital files of all final chapters and associated graphics will be provided to the
Monroe County and Airport Management in a readable CD format. A total of ten (10) PDF versions will be
provided on CD's.
IMaster Plan Update
[65]
IKEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
13. Outreach and Participation Program
Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.,Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates,,
LLC.,and McFarland Johnson
The update of the Master Plan has implications for a variety of parties within the community. These parties
range from the tenants who operate from the airport including corporate users, airlines, cargo carriers,
general aviation pilots, and fixed base operators, to businesses and governmental agencies who rely upon the
Airport to provide connection to regional, national and international destinations and markets. Additionally,
the Master Plan Update has implications for those persons who reside adjacent to or in proximity to the
facility. To this end airport management has established the need conduct three public meetings.
Deliverables
• Power Point Presentations for each of the three(3) public workshops
• Presentation Boards
• Technical Review Committee Binders
Briefing Materials,Graphics and Presentations for the Elected Officials Briefings
13.1 Conduct Public Meetings
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc., Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates, LLC.,
Jacobs
Three public workshops, in an open house format, will be conducted to brief residents and interested
stakeholders about the project and to receive public comments. The first two presentations are tentatively
scheduled to occur when each the following tasks are completed: (1) Data collection and Aviation Activity
Forecasts and (2) Airport Development Concepts. The final presentation will take place prior to the Final
Master Plan Update submittal. At a minimum, R&A's Officer in Charge and/or Project Manager will attend
each of these meetings and participate in the role desired and requested by airport staff. In addition, the
meetings will be moderated by Deborah Murphy Lagos. The meetings will be scheduled to coincide with
Technical Review Committee meetings(same day or consecutive day),whenever possible.
The Planning Team will prepare briefing materials for the public workshops and will have appropriate
personnel in attendance to respond to questions and comments from the public. The Planning Team will
prepare the meeting notice for mailing to the public and the meeting advertisement for publication. The
Planning Team will prepare and collect comment forms, and will review and summarize the comments. The
Planning Team will also arrange for meeting refreshments and any necessary audio-visual equipment.
For budgeting purposes, however, it has been assumed that the Monroe County and/or Airport staff will
secure the meeting location, mail meeting notices, and arrange for and pay for any public advertisements for
the meeting.
' Master Plan Update
[661
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
13.2 Elected Officials Briefing Support
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc Jacobs
Over the course of the Master Plan Update, it will be necessary to provide briefings for elected officials at the
local level. It has been anticipated that representatives of the Planning Team will likely need to be in
attendance to provide technical support during the briefings. Additionally the Planning Team will prepare
briefing materials, graphics and presentations to support the Airport in these activities. For scoping purposes
it has been assumed that a total of three (3) briefings of various elected officials will occur over the course of
the planning process for which consultant participation and support would be needed.
13.3 Technical Review Committee Meetings and Stakeholder
Briefings
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.,McFarland Johnson, and Jacobs
It is anticipated that up to three (3) presentations on the work status of the Airport Master Plan study will be
presented to the Technical Review Committee. These presentations will occur on the same days as the public
meetings. These presentations are intended to present project status updates as well as to receive feedback
and guidance from the Committee when necessary. R&A's Office-in-Charge and Project Manager will attend
each of these meetings and participate in the role desired and requested by the Airport Manager.
Master Nan Update
[671
•
l KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
14. SUPPLEMENTAL TASKS
Firms Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.;Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates,
LLC.,and Jacobs.
Airport management is considering allowing the use of the pavement area that is currently available between
the Runway 9 end and the recently installed EMAS for takeoff run. It is anticipated that the additional
pavement area could provide as much as 271 feet of additional distance for the calculation of the Takeoff Run
Available(TORA),Takeoff Distance Available(TODA), and Accelerate-Stop Distance Available(ASDA).
The following sections provide an overview of the planning tasks that will be required for the development of
an interim ALP and Categorical Exclusion form in preparation for the implementation of declared distances at
the Airport. These tasks include the evaluation of aircraft turning movements and jet blasts to establish a new
runway threshold, the development of airfield alternatives reflecting the implementation of declared
distances, and the preparation of an interim Airport Layout Plan (ALP). Considering the timing for the
implementation of the declared distances at the Airport, it is assumed that the aerial surveying and mapping
to be completed as part of the Master Plan Update will not be available. As a result, the Planning Team will
prepare an interim ALP,which will be developed based on the 2003 FAA-approved ALP set.
Deliverables
e Five(5) copies of a brief draft Technical Memorandum documenting Aircraft Turning Movements and
Proposed Declared Distances for the Airport review/comment
O Five(5)copies of a final draft Technical Memorandum for distribution to the FAA
• Five(5)copies of a final Technical Memorandum
• Noise Contours Reflecting Operating Procedures Utilizing Declared Distances
• Categorical Exclusion Form
▪ Two(2)copies of the preliminary draft Interim ALP set for distribution to the Airport for review and
comment
a Nine(9) copies of the draft Interim ALP set for distribution to the FAA
• A transmittal letter detailing the changes that were made to the existing ALP set
14.1 Evaluate Aircraft Turning Movements
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc., and Jacobs.
Using PathPlanner, R&A will evaluate aircraft turn movements on the section of pavement located between
the Runway 9 end and the recently installed EMAS and determine at which point aircraft may be able to
initiate their takeoff run.The site constraints and minimum setback requirements from the existing EMAS bed
will be defined in collaboration with Zodiac Aerospace. For budgeting purposes, it has been assumed that a
maximum of five (5) aircraft types would be evaluated as part of this analysis based on the existing and
projected aircraft fleet mix. The"design aircraft"will be defined in collaboration with Airport staff.The results
II Master Plan Update
[68)
jKEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
of this simulation modeling will provide the foundation for establishing the relocated runway threshold
location.
14.2 Define Setback Requirements based on Engine Jet Blast
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Zodiac Aerospace and Ricondo&Asosciates,lnc.(Support role only)
The Planning Team will evaluate the jet blast contours of the design aircraft to establish the minimum
required setback distance between the start of the takeoff run and the EMAS in order to protect the integrity
and functionality of the EMAS bed. This information, along with aircraft turning movement analysis, will help
establish the proposed runway end and will provide the foundation for the development of airfield
alternatives reflecting the implementation of declared distances at the Airport.
14.3 Prepare Airfield Alternatives and Establish Declared Distances
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
This task includes the development of up to two airfield alternatives based on the results of the aircraft
turning movement and jet blast analyses.Using the criteria established in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A
Change 1, the Planning Team will develop up to two airfield alternatives reflecting the application of declared
distances at the Airport. For each alternative, the Planning Team will calculate and illustrate the TORA,TODA,
ASDA, and Landing Distance Available (LDA). These alternatives will be evaluated with Airport staff and the
preferred alternative will ultimately be incorporated into the Interim ALP for FAA approval.
This task does not include an analysis of obstructions in the approaches. The establishment of declared
distances will be based solely on the analysis of additional available pavement area beyond the Runway 9 end.
14.4 Establish Markings, Lighting, and Signage Requirements
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Jacobs.
Using the FAA criteria established in Advisory Circulars 150/5340-1L, Standards for Airport Markings,
150/5340-30G, Design and Installation Details for Airport Visual Aids and 150/5340-18F, Standards for Airport
Sign Systems, the Planning Team will define the runway marking, lighting and signage requirements for the
preferred alternative. This information will provide the foundation for the development of cost estimates for
this project.others.
Master Plan Update �_..._,._.
[691
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23. 2015(UPDATED JULY 21, 2015)
14.5 Prepare Interim Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask: Ricondo&Associates, Inc.
The Planning Team will update the Airport Layout Plan (ALP)to reflect the declared distances to be calculated
under Task 14.3. Considering the timing for the implementation of the declared distances at the Airport, it is
assumed that the aerial surveying and mapping to be completed as part of the Master Plan Update will not be
available. As a result, the Planning Team will prepare an interim ALP, which will be developed based on the
2003 FAA-approved ALP set.
Using the 2003 FAA-approved ALP set, comprised of seven (7) drawing sheets, R&A will prepare an updated
ALP drawing to reflect the adoption of declared distances and incorporate as-built drawings of all projects
that materialized since the current ALP was last approved. Future modifications to the airfield geometry will be
incorporated as part of a future ALP update (Refer to Task 11). This interim update will be limited to a "Pen
and Ink" change to be handled by the Orlando ADO program manager. For budgeting purposes, it has been
assumed that Jacobs and/or Monroe County will provide the AutoCAD files associated with the FAA-approved
ALP for the Airport including external references, USGS quad map, aerial photo, etc. R&A will also use the
AutoCAD layering structure and naming conventions from the existing ALP.
Interim ALP Update
The following information will be updated as part of this task:
• Data Table: Update outdated information including Runway Data tables
• Airport Layout Plan (existing and future): develop declared distances table, incorporate proposed
project including associated pavement marking and lighting, and integrate as-built drawings of all
projects that materialized since the current ALP was last approved.
The sheets assumed to not be updated as part of this task include the following:
• Cover Sheet
• Airport Airspace Plan
• Inner Portion of the Approach Surface Drawings
• Terminal Area Plan
• On Airport Land Use Plan
• Airport Property Map
Two draft copies of the drawings developed under this task will be assembled and distributed to Monroe
County for review and comment. Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate), the
final ALP set package will be submitted to the FAA for review and approval. For budgeting purposes and
based on recent"Pen and Ink'ALP submittals completed by R&A,it has been assumed that nine copies would
need to be distributed to the FAA. As part of the submittal to the FAA, R&A will also prepare a transmittal
letter detailing the changes that were made to the ALP.
Master Plan Update
[70]
•
•
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
14.6 Develop Noise Contour
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask:Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates
The Planning Team will conduct a noise analysis that will account for the proposed declared distances,
resulting in noise contours that are representative of the proposed airfield configuration. The noise contours
will be prepared for informational purposes only and are not intended to be used for the purpose of 14 CFR
Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) or the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The methodology used to
develop the contours, however, will comply with that required by the FAA.The FAA's Integrated Noise Model
(INM), version 7.0d will be used for the noise modeling (or, if required, the Aviation Environmental Design
Tool [AEDT] version 2b shall be used). It is anticipated this effort will build on the model inputs developed as
part of the 2013 14 CFR Part 150 Study. The noise analysis will identify and graphically depict noise exposure
associated with the projected aeronautical activity at the Airport and will include an identification of noise
sensitive land uses(developed by others on the Team).
The aircraft noise contours of DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB resulting from the proposed declared distances will be
created using the INM 7.0d or AEDT 2b. The 2015 average annual day operations and fleet mix will be used to
establish the noise contours based on the proposed declared distances.
14.7 Prepare Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) Form
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask:Ricondo&Associates,Inc.
R&A will prepare a SOP 500, Categorical Exclusion form for the proposed project in accordance with FAA
requirements. Cost estimate assumes that the project qualifies for a Categorical Exclusion based on FAA
Orders 1050.1E and 5050.48 and that no extraordinary circumstances exist that would require preparation of
an Environmental Assessment. R&A will incorporate information from the noise analysis (to be performed by
others) into the SOP 500 to demonstrate no significant change in noise exposure to sensitive noise receptors
would result. R&A would prepare a draft form for review by airport staff, address comments from airport
staff,then submit a draft form to FAA for review. R&A would address any FAA comments,and prepare a final
SOP 500 form for submittal to FAA.
14.8 Prepare Technical Memorandum
The Planning Team will summarize the findings of the analyses in a brief technical report. The Planning Team
will provide five(5)copies of the draft technical memorandum for the Airport review/comment, as well as one
electronic copy (PDFs on CD). Once comments have been received and addressed (as appropriate), five (5)
copies of the final draft technical memorandum will be submitted to the Airport for distribution to the FAA.
Once the FAA comments have been received and addressed, five (5) copies of the final technical
memorandum will be submitted to the Airport.
Master Plan Update
[71]
Table A
EYW Master Plan Update•Project Cost Summary
Total Budget Amount
Tasks JCB RBA AID(DBE) MFJ DIAL(DBE) Total Labor Budget Expenses
1 0 Proiecl Initiation 8 Administration S 21,08000 S 11.121 03 $ 1.992.00 $ 1 46000 S - S 36,873.00 S 29,337.00 $ 6,336.00
2 0 Aerial Surveying and Mapping S150 01945 $ - 3 - $ $ $ 160,019.46 $ 21,860.00 $ 128,359.46
3.0 Inventory of Existing Conditions S 1.56000 $22,676 00 $ 11 116 00 S 9 710 00 S $ 46,062.00 $ 42,810.00 $ 2,252.00
4 0 Aviation Activity Forecasts S 1.560 00 $49,568 00 $ - $ 14 040.00 $ S 65,168.00 S 63,258.00 S 1,910.00
5 0 Facility Requirements S 1.560 00 $60 714 00 S 10 136 00 $ 14 370 DO $ - $ 86,780.00 $ 66,070.00 $ 21,710.00
6 0 Alternatives Analysis and Recommended Development Plan 5 24.220 CO S 30 733 00 $ 11 352 00 $ 14 050 00 $ - $ 80,355.00 $ 78,787.00 S 1,568.00
7 0 Environmental Overview $ 1.560 00 $ 17,281.00 $ - S - $ 24 900(1) $ 43,741.00 $ 21,676.00 S 22,066.00
8 0 See Below
9 0 Implementation Plan S 20 640 00 S 11,414 00 S - S - S S 32,064.00 S 30,086.00 $ 1,988.00
100 Financial Feasibility and Funding Analysis $ 1.56000 $41.76000 S - S - $ - $ 43,320.00 $ 42,194.00 $ 1,126.00
11 0 Update of the Airport Layout Plan Set S 49 898 00 S 42.464 00 S •
S - S S 92,362.00 $ 41,938.00 $ 50,424.00
12 0 Documentation S 13040 00 $ 28.645 00 $ - S - $ $ 36,686.00 $ 32,010.00 $ 4,675.00
13 0 Outreach and Participation Program S 27 850 00 S 29.004 50 $ - $ 3 330 00 $ 12 780 00 $ 72,964.50 $ 41,854.00 S 31,110.50
Subtotal(ALP Update) $309,647.45 $345,380.50 S 34,596.00 $ 56,980.00 $ 37,680.00 $ 784 183.95 $ 510,880.00 S 273,503.95
Tasks Not Included in the Original Scone of Work
8 0 Sustainabil y Initiatives $ 1 560 00 S 27 767 00 S - S - S S 29,327.00 $ 28,682.00 $ 2,646.00
14 0 Supplemental Tasks $ 6 750 00 S 31 576 50 S - S - S 3/60 0O S 42,086.50 $ 33,358.00 $ 8,728.50
$ $ . S - $ $ $
Total: $317,857.46 1404,724.00 S 34,596.00 S 56,980.00 S 41,440.00 $ 656,597.45 ,/
Share 37.2% 47.3% 4.0% 6.7% 4.8% 100.0%
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise
Amount S 34,696.00 $ 41,440.00 S 76,036.00
Share 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 4.8% 8.9%
Sources Jacobs Ricondo&Associates Inc American Infrastructure Development Inc McFarland Johnson Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates LLC
Prepared by Ricondo 8 Associates Inc April 2015
KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FEBRUARY 23, 2015(UPDATED JULY 21. 2015)
14.9 Coordination Meeting
Firm Responsible for Completing this Subtask:Ricondo&Associates,Inc.,,and Jacobs
The Planning Team anticipates participating in up to two (2) web conference sessions using GoToMeeting or
similar software. These web conference sessions will provide an opportunity to discuss the aircraft turning
movement exhibits,airfield alternatives,interim ALP,etc.
In addition to the web conference sessions, one meeting at the Airport is anticipated with EYW staff and
management.This meeting will provide an opportunity to review the airfield alternatives.
Master Plan Update
f72)
-~-
9p-
-
'
_
,�
U.,
:::.: : •
. • mit • .• •
•• • •
• nr•••• ...tn.=:=1
••• • 1 I y• • • • I mi.•••• ...................,
- — .••••••••••••1•110.1•11-•--- — — ...w..e.. •••••.......-.1-...,..,......- --
• I 1•••• : .1 7;
...
... : i ,... i ... i i . . "." ...................--„-.,
...,...........
.... . • .,. —...-........
..., : : ... : ... 1 4 •• a or••••• ,...•••••••••••••••e••••,
.....*.......••••••-•.•
•••• • • • ro ................-.
•,..•••••••••••............,
..• - ' -
o n • • • • • ry
on 2 • •• w •,•
• 11.•
IMMINIMMIINVIt
1101--....7....." In •• WM 1100 •••••••••••••..
... I • of ••••••••.....••••.
..........m.
awl • • . ••
••• •••••••...-•.............
• ' sr ..".....'.-*.'"•::::;=.:-...
• • ..
•••• 0 • • ow . . . I w WV....wow.
4•••• • • , ww....www......•
M. • i ..... • • ... • ,•••••••............,.........•.=::.......=.7
OW. $ . w , •• •.•
•• a 0. VW Vt• ...."....".'""WEalIPPINF
N W 0 • . - . . ..
--":6r-1 -minor'--....m's'-'..1-.'--•:-, . —•••••cr-macr•.••••—war-••••••••••••:— .' '''.......'nnswe•••••1
11.•••••••••
. I 10 1 le t •• • iN I •iI 1 w/ -1
. ,
-
fi i i II,I ft tl ! I I.]; I i f 1 1 •i HMI I Pi i frig! 1 i
11' 111 ii ti ii II V.Iiiitill i fill! 111.01- i !lilt', 1 i pi 11 110
II i i I 11 { I ll 111) ii! i VI!' PM!' ! 11110 i I r id 0 11 III
1 11 i 1 i 1111 i 1 11 111 Plii itilli; 1100 '1 1 I I, i' Ill'
i iii i dill! I i I li ill I I
, I ' { 1 1 01 1 .
1.1 I
I 1 ; II 1 1 1 II
, 1 I
I. ti if i I 4 I I if ff El Eft f tiff1 iffffif; i fiffif i i fi ' :: fit I
' I
1 I
i
1 . . .... It
• - - ... .
! i
ii
I ! 1
I 4
i i
L . i I
-- - -. --. —
I
I
et et es•sa • Ss... (It- • •
• (
I
[
• il
1 I 1
1
i 1 1 i
I I
i i i t it t; , t i I it ii ii Ill I iiiii MB i iiim a i ii ' II e*i 11
i I '
/ r ! r I I I II I ;
.
•
-- ---
. [
I ; — — I I, I
i r I i' I ;7.! ii I I I I ii il I! 111 r: i iiii iii:i i 1i/1/1 / I I , ii h'
, 1 t
iff I Wit! 1. f il it i '
' , i ' I . I tli IL; 1 UHF t f fl, ' f fit
pi ii.J i Hill- i 0 i ii
ill g•1111.1 p /fp >II i ," If , lit,lit P.'. 1 J• ? " • tit r- 1 • ITI
11 inlii i! 1,1 1- Ili '- I I- I I it ifEdit fill 11
e . It . I t j rr. lifiN il I 4 ' ' ?III / I/ 1 ' ir
, 1
1 Il 'III li illi iii I II f- f l' 1E1 hfire•
r i lif
I II' 1 1. I I 1 1.1 11 t 11 1E-1111/ I 11 it 1 i I
' iii 1 i i I f {
iir1 1 1 1
, i r
t i
in Unlit EF f if f fEI If E -,1 HU Eif fflf trz"ft i if fi I fiE44' i 1 .., 1 if
1 t •
. 1 4
1 ,
I i
• ... . •
i I 1 I I Il
•
41 °: •
1 !
' . • •
li
.1.c.
.. ..
I
, . .„. „ . ., ... ... ........ • ii. :1 • .. ,
[• . .
. ,
. ,......•Sill : I 4 {
1 1
R 1
ii i ' SItt fit Sit ti. S ii il il i i - t iii!
. i e
_ 11
iii ei ii i I ii I i i 1 ei e ' Hie ;;; iii iiiitiv ; :1 eis ;11 i i i i Ho ,
,
8L
l'll ors
De OoSeepte1...See
IX t CC ft
eel t or s
Ad_ 31C1.1.11.3
reree I. e ., t• .CPt . sou r...�.4...'...-..�......
. ` ma.r. ...
V. seams IOW.
'K•w.... soolO.
.I t Ye •SC I «1. A [ u at • I tie. ......I1+1100.0..r
- 4 -i 1A id I. - i i ¢. I i 1 .•..n•—....:.....
VI t I I I C 4 11t[l i OM {WV e _����..•W:•.�•'.
Ole I
IF• I l I t Wt I l { l m% I Yilt,1 s Y Or I Matt t r!. l ..r...s{oo..a
Il4
.xx
1eI
C .. ._.. ax t fi i Y, t
res
{ y 1 o utt 1 • i 1 1 «a , YO , r e RC i art - y; 4 n.•+•^. i
u I1 ..IY/ let t .x 1 , f
Tew f I tY t i i »- re
1 xa
...,
Riiimimewanimummemiiiliw[ « I i oN 1 Sm rcww
.I
..R I 1
i «« 1 a. Ort I
1 «moo m_
—r
•a:
' of Le•
1 =tat Orel 1 t1 Iti C.{ I I « t x
'-6--2-I
=INIXf=g/ift& - - ---• - -
.1 I • • •••• . n • • .. n...........•••••••••...n.no.,....-•.....,
on ii • • •••• • n • • a.
.
NEINM..
_____
wort 9 . I OW • 1 • • .........7=7.77:,,."
ra.••••••••••••••••...b.,.....-
.71 j I
i
• 7: .....••••="....Li.%
1L. —..-- .
Ili ---
.„, . . • -. . •
. m.o...*an.••••••••••••....•,.......
_ , , •••••• ••• •._ _ • ...-
- — -— — ——
M. • a I . Le 1 • • • ,,,_.,= •••y e••• •••
Ima al ••••••
16••••no — •••••••••=••••••
og • n il . 1. .1. • .......4•0
— --- — -- .— - — — ammo.••••••••••••••••••••••••,••••••••••••
L=.:I_I
I .1
I I .
I
1 ,
, .
I 1
1 1
1
1 I ,
1
. 1 I
: I
i .
f i
Ii
I
, I
. .
I
. 1
, Ii •1. !-4 I (
I .
,
I 1 1,1
I 1
li t 1
.._ _...
••
on. • • ••••• I a •d•• ••••••••••••.••••1•••••••••••••••••••••••10.•••11
...—. —.............. -...... -
• 0.1•
0 •
::: i i =7 ': i := .......0•.•
•••••••••••••••••,......,
1••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
. ..,, ...-.-- --- .,.....-- -.............-
IL •
4.•
""' : IL •
•
"'" : : Of. : """".....:•===••••••
[
. -
0 •
am • • ow• o ••• n •••• ....M.M.0.00M0•1•••....•••••••••1•••••••40
• •
•owe • • •••' • •• r.• ...mar.,••••ego min....1...wow
1••••••••••••.••••••••••4nosomb..Imo,
— — — - ——
_ — — — — —
.r. I •••. • • ••
•••••••• ANN
•-1.1----.....r- 001.0101.-''',0010,-.--110101- -MEM- 1.0110.111 •••••=.1 im••• • ..••••=w1 ...ma •••••
'7......-- ..wim..••••.•••
Er . IN • ... . . 0 IN • Iiii , NW • 0•110.11.1
•••••••••••••••,••••••=•••••••••n
--........ -
s
{ .
1
i
i ,
E
1
I � } j
11
11
. .
ba i
li!II!
dili IF.III3
I - 4
I. .
1
1!1111
,
. 1
I .
I
1
I
1
1 '
1 111111
i 1 I I
A .,
i ' i'.•
i. lilt I. I 11 0 II
14 1
•i 1 . 'I!
, , I , -i!li1itill
i.t
,.. "
. .
m
•
j• a 1 f '
1
.
t I
77 t
t 1
, „ .
. .
1 I
I
I
I
I I
i
I
I j
I
I I
11 i
I I Ij
i I
ji 1 I
I
ii { Iii'" nI
fi fj s1
1 .
1.°' I $
=� It 3
1m
iflif
1 dr
1
mXRmmm §I
I
w
V. _ -
i
- y
. r '
1
_
t
i
L
1f _
73
I I
•C
t
$ $ rAlLCF
7