Loading...
Item C09 C.9 t, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS County of Monroe Mayor Sylvia Murphy,District 5 The Florida Keys � � �l'U � Mayor Pro Tern Danny Kolhage,District 1 �pw° Michelle Coldiron,District 2 Heather Carruthers,District 3 David Rice,District 4 County Commission Meeting May 22, 2019 Agenda Item Number: C.9 Agenda Item Summary #5485 BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Airports TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Richard Strickland (305) 809-5200 none AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of Jacobs Project Management Co.' s Task Order No. 12/15-52 in the amount of $809,460.00 for the Taxiway A Extension and Commercial/General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment at the Key West International Airport, to be funded with FDOT Grants GOE77 and/or future anticipated PFC418. ITEM BACKGROUND: This task order is for Jacobs to perform an Environmental Assessment including biological assessments and surveys and public and agency meetings for the proposed extension of Taxiway A 264 feet to the West, expansion of the existing commercial and general aviation (GA) aprons, removal of existing non-licensed vehicle road connecting to the GA apron, construction of a new road connecting to the GA apron, and adding a new section of aircraft operations area fence on the north side of runway 9-27. The taxiway extension is key to increasing operational efficiencies and safety at the Airport. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: none CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. DOCUMENTATION: Jacobs PSO 1215-52 EYW EA FINANCIAL IMPACT: Effective Date: Upon Execution Expiration Date: Services will cease by 1,095 days Packet Pg. 246 C.9 Total Dollar Value of Contract: $809,460.00 Total Cost to County: Current Year Portion: Budgeted: Source of Funds: FDOT Grant GOE77, and/or PFC#18 CPI: Indirect Costs: Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: Revenue Producing: No If yes, amount: Grant: County Match: Insurance Required: Additional Details: REVIEWED BY: Beth Leto Completed 04/16/2019 12:59 PM Richard Strickland Completed 04/16/2019 1:39 PM Pedro Mercado Completed 04/16/2019 1:48 PM Budget and Finance Completed 04/18/2019 8:10 AM Maria Slavik Completed 04/22/2019 1:04 PM Kathy Peters Completed 04/25/2019 8:59 AM Board of County Commissioners Pending 05/22/2019 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 247 C.9.a MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER FORM Effective Date Task Order No. 12/15-52 Client Project No. Engineer Project No. E9Y37952 This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida ("Client") and JACOBS Ln PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated February 15, 2017 ("Agreement"). The Ln Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order. Services Authorized—Taxiway `A' Extension and Commercial/General Aviation Apron o Expansions Environmental Assessment Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and consists of 20 page(s). Ln Pricing N/A Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement. uJ X Firm Fixed Price of$ 809,460.00 N/A Other(Describe): uJ N Schedule Ln N Services may commence on Execution Services will cease by 1095 da sa. Other 0 (SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK OF MONROE COUNTY,FLORIDA E By Mayor/Chairman � CONSULTANT: JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO y "w By W• p Vice President Geographic Operations Manager tness- Title File""JySTR APS N COU Monroe County M APrRO D ATr � ,, G R.. ' Page 1 of 1 "° PEDRO J. ERCADC ASSISTANT ATTORNEY p� Date Packet Pg. 248 C.9.a Exhibit A(12/15-52) Scope of Services Monroe County Airports Key West International Airport Taxiway 'A' Extension and Commercial/General Aviation Apron Expansion Environmental Assessment SCOPE OF WORK Ln The attached Scope of Work outlines the tasks Jacobs and the Ricondo &Associates,Inc.Team Ln propose to perform for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment(EA)for the following04 proposed project elements at Key West International Airport: 6 • Extension of Taxiway'A'264 feet to the west. • Expansion of the existing commercial apron. �- • Expansion of the existing general aviation(GA)apron. • Removal of the existing non-licensed vehicle road(NLVR)connecting to the GA apron. • Construction of a new NLVR road connecting to the GA apron. Ln • New section of the Aircraft Operations Area fence on the north side of Runway 9-27. LU LU 04 Ln 04 IL E Page 1 of 1 Packet Pg. 249 C.9.a KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT—EXHIBIT A—SCOPE OF WORK(12115—52) MARCH 2O19 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS PartI........................................................................................................................................................... Task1. PreliminaryDesign.................................................................................................................. Task1.1 Data Collection.............................................................................................................................................................2 Task1.2 Preliminary Design......................................................................................................................................................2 Ln Task2. Agency and Public Scoping.................................................................................................... 04 Task 2.1 Public and Agency Scoping Meetings................................................................................................................3 6 Task2.2 Scoping Report............................................................................................................................................................4 PartII.......................................................................................................................................................... PurposeTask 3. ................................................................................................................... TaskAlternatives Analysis.............................................................................................................. Ln Task Affected Environment............................................................................................................ Task S.1 Description and Identification of Study Area...................................................................................................6 Task5.2 Affected Environment Chapter..............................................................................................................................6 5.2.1 Biological Assessment...................... Uj Uj 04 5.2.2 Wetlands Assessment................................................................................................................................................7 Ln 04 5.2.3 Cultural Resources Assessment Survey..............................................................................................................8 Task Environmental Consequences................................................................................................ IL Task6.1 Air Quality......................................................................................................................................................................9 0 Task6.2 Biological Resources................................................................................................................................................10 Task6.3 Climate..........................................................................................................................................................................10 Task 6.4 Coastal Resources............................ ..................................10 Task 6.5 Department of Transportation, Section 4 .............................10 Task 6.6 Hazardous Materials, Solid Waste,and Pollution Prevention.................................................................10 Task 6.7 Historical,Architectural, Archaeological, and Cultural Resources.........................................................11 Task6.8 Land Use......................................................-...................................,...........................................................................11 Task 6.9 Natural Resources and Energy Supply..............................................................................................................11 Task 6.10 Noise and Noise-Compatible Land Use...........................................................................................................11 6.10.1 Aircraft Noise Analysis............................................................................................................................................11 6.10.2 Construction Noise Analysis.................................................................................................................................13 Taxiway A Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment I i Scope of Work Packet Pg. 250 ' KEY we�mnewAnow^'^mponr-vman�x-SCOPE oF Wonxn�n,-Sw mmxc*ms � � DRAFT Task6lI Socioeconomics, Environmental Justice, and [hi|den's Environmental Health and Safety Risks 13 Task6.l2 Visual Effects...........................................................................................................................................................I3 6,12.1 Light Emissions...........................................................................................................................................................l3 6.12.2 Visual Resources and Visual Character.............................................................................................................l4 Task6I3Water Resources.......................................................................................................................................................l4 6.I3.1 Wetlands......................................................................................................................................................................I4Ln w Ln 6I3.2 F|oodplains..................................................................................................................................................................l4 04 6.l33 �urboeVVa�eo I4 `- � ----------_---------_-_----------_----------- 6 6l3� Groundwater...............................................................................................................................................................14 �� Task6.l4 Mitigation Measures.............................— .......................................................................... ..........................l4 � TaskGl5 Cumulative[ gs I5� Impacts-------_-----------_--------_------------' m Task7. Documentation .,......~...,..-...................~..,,.,.,,~,.,,...~...,....~...,~.~..~..............,16 «» Task7l Preliminary and administrative Draft EA..........................................................................................................lb TaskT2Draft EA.........................................................................................................................................................................I7 UJ Taskl3Preliminary Final BA.................................................................................................................................................l7 Task7.4 Final EA.........................................................................................................................................................................I7 "= Task0L Agency and Public Coordination/Involvement................................................................18 `n 04 Task 8.1 Project Kick-off Meeting with Key STakeholdeo.........................................................................................18 � 0 U) Task82 Agency Web-Based Conference Calls............................................................................................................. l8 m- TaskO] Draft EA Public Meeting........................................................................................................................................lO Task 9. Project Administration and Coordination..........................................................................19 Task 10. Management of the Administrative File.............................................................................20 Task 11. Tropical Hardwood Hammock Assessment (Optiosa|).....................................................20 nmwayxExtension,SQCUrity Fencing and Contmercial and General Aviation Apron Expansions awironm mW Ascesment | ni scope ofwoi k KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT mxIBITx-sropsopwoxxpzos-sz> MAnc* zm19 DRAFT TAXIW����������� � ������������N� � �� N� �~������ ������ N � �� N� AY m �� EXTENSION w�w�~r���m� ��m� �� ����m�mw�mm~m�������~ ��m� �� 6��N� �� � � ������������ � �����8� ����� 0�������� GENERAL AVIATION��� m ���m� APRON EXPANSIONS �������������� ������& N ������� ������F w�w� � �m~��m�w�mm�m� u ���~ ��~�~�m~~o~mw�wm~m� m ��x������ ��� �������u��� SCOPE m �~ ��m SERVICES m� � �"��~� This scope of work outlines the tasks Jacobs and the Nicondo&Associates, Inc.(Ricondm)Team propose toperform for the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA)for the following proposed project elements at Key West Ln International Airport(the Airport orEYVV): `n � extension ���Taxk�ayA354fe1othewest �04 � expansion of the existing commercial apron Z � expansion of the existing general aviation (GA)apron l� 0 � removal of the existing non-licensed vehicle road (NLVR)connecting to the GA apron � construction ufu new N[VR road connecting 10 the GAapron "— Ln � new section of the Aircraft Operations Area(AOA)fence on the north side of Runway 9,27 Taxiway A would be extended to the west to provide access to the usable runway pavement end. Because Taxiway Ainierseus at the runway threshold riot atthe end mf the displaced threshold, a back taxi is required to utilize the um full length of the existing mnway. AfuU-|ength parallel taxiway would provide additional takeoff runway length without back taxiing and increasing both operational efficiencies and safety. Ui � 6YVV commercial traffic continues to grow and expanding the cmmmeoial terminal apron is necessary to `n 04 accommodate additional aircraft pa/king during peak periods and during irregular operations. The expansion of `- thecommeuia| apron is key in the future growth at EYVV 0 IL The GA apron expansion would include an additional 40,000 square yards of parking apron and up to two connector taxiways tm Taxiway A,the removal o(the existing NLVR'and the oonstmctionofa new MLVR0o the ex�ndedapron. � The GA apron area would be constructed to FAA design standards,and include access,shoulders,signage,marking, -� and lighting, as required to park, fuel, and tie-down transient and based aircraft. A new section ofAOA fence would be installed on the north side oy the runway. The fencing could bea buoy yystem across the water with support posts in the upland area.The surrounding water is used for recreational canoeing and kayaking. The fencing is needed to prevent unauthorized access to the airfield. This Scope of Services is divided into two parts. Part I consists of the preliminary design and scoping tasks and Part O is the remainder of the EA. The Ricmndo Team requests the opportunity to revisit the scope for Part II after the scoping task is complete to make updates, if any are needed,to reflect unanticipated or major issues that emerged out mfscoping that are not currently accounted for in this scope and fee. The EA shall conform to and be processed in a manner consistent with applicable federal,regional,and local statutes, regulations, and guidelines. The final product shall conform to the National Environmental Policy Act (WEP/) (42 U.S.[. 432letseq.). Council on Environmental Clua|i,y ([EQ) regulations (40 [.F.R. Parts lSOO I5O8)' applicable Department of Transportation (DOT) Orders, and FAA Orders 1050.IF. Environmental Impacts: Policies and Taxiway x Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial | z | Scope^rWork KEY WEST mrsnwArmwxLx�pmmr mx��x-SCOPE OF WORK(x�us-sa) MAnCxznz* � DRAFT Procedures and 5O5Q�13, National Environmental Policy Act (N£PA) Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions. Personnel assigned to this project will possess a thorough working knowledge of these documents. The EA will document the purpose and need' proposed acdmn, alternatives, affected environment, and environmental consequences of the proposed project,focusing efforts only on those environmental resources where potential environmental effects will be anticipated. Environmental resources that will not be affected o/ are not present within o/ near the project site will be briefly identified as not being present or affected by the proposed project o/alternatives. During preparation of the EA' issues may arise that will necessitate modification of this scope of work and the UH associated budget. If such changes are required, changes to this scope of work will be coordinated with and `n approved by Airport staff. While this scope of work identifies all items believed necessary for completion of the EA, �04 additional work items may arise from comments submitted during agency coordination and agency and public 6 Z review periods associated with the Draft EA. The following sections provide descriptions of the various tasks to be performed. i5 0 ��� ��� � � PART � +- Ln TASK������ � PRELIMINARY �����u�N� � .�. m m�m��~mn�m�m���m� m ��u~~v���m� ~~ � TASK 1.1 DATA COLLECTION � LU As part mY the data collection task Jacobs will: 04 Ln 0 utilize as-built data and survey information from past projects to the greatest extent possible to support04 preliminary design efforts to accurately depict the areas of impact. Additional survey will be acquired if `- 0 necessary. mn IL 11111 investigate options of the type of fence to be installed on the north side of Runway 9-27. � Coordinate with survey subconsu|ianL � � TASK 1.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN Jacobs will perform preliminary designs for the various elements that will be included in the EA. The purpose ofthe preliminary design will beto establish the following: JIM Proposed footprint, geometry, and layout mf the proposed project elements. M4 Determine areas of impact through the development of preliminary grading plans and conceptual drainage solutions. Im Submit preliminary designs to the FAA and the Airport for review and comment. M Develop construction cost estimates for each element. 111111 Develop preliminary construction schedules,production rates,construction equipment,truck trips, and phasing plans. Taxiway x Extension secvmw Fencing,and Commercial 121 Scope mWork C.9.a KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT- EXHIBIT A-SCOPE OF WORK(12/15-52) MARCH 2O19 DRAFT aau Develop and submit a 7460 form and exhibit to FAA for each project element. Mi Attend a pre-application meeting with the South Florida Water Management District OR Conduct an in-house QA/QC review. The in-house QA/QC check will involve an experienced independent individual, depending on each discipline,to conduct a comprehensive check on all documents to be submitted (i.e.plans,specifications,estimates, etc.). Time will be required for engineers and CADD technicians to correct items listed under the in-house QA/QC review. Assumptions: Ln Ln a The design will be in accordance with the most current FAR-AIP Advisory Circular listing. 04 It is assumed that there will be a total of 2 public/agency meetings. (10 It is assumed that there will be a total of 4 coordination meetings to be held at Key West International Airport. 0 Geotechnical exploration is not included in this project. 0 mi Final design is not included in this project. NO It is assumed that Jacobs will perform preliminary design on one preferred layout established by Ricondo & Ln Associates and approved by Monroe County. 0 Any cost estimates provided by Jacobs will be on a basis of experience and judgment. Since consultant has no control over market conditions or bidding procedures, Jacobs does not warrant that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from these cost estimates. TASK 2. AGENCY AND PUBLIC SCOPING Ln 04 TASK 2.1 PUBLICMEETINGS IL This task will focus on the dissemination and gathering of information from the public, federal, state, and local agencies, and other organizations regarding the project. One agency scoping meeting and one public scoping meeting will be held for this project on the same day (agency scoping meeting will be held in the morning or afternoon; public scoping meeting will be held in afternoon/evening). Ricondo will draft a letter introducing the project, preliminary purpose and need, the Proposed Action, and alternatives considered for mailing to appropriate federal, state, and local agencies, after review and approval by Airport staff and the FAA. The letter will serve to initiate informal consultation with appropriate agencies,and announce the date,time, and location for the scoping meetings. The Ricondo Team will draft a Notice of Scoping for publication in up to two local newspapers announcing the date, time, location, and purpose of the public scoping meeting. Once approved by Airport staff and the FAA, Ricondo will be responsible for publication of the Notice of Scoping. The agency scoping meeting will be held at Airport offices; the Ricondo Team will provide a PowerPoint presentation, appropriate boards, and informational materials, and participate in the scoping meeting as directed by Airport staff. Up to four Ricondo Team staff members will attend the agency scoping meeting and prepare meeting minutes. The public scoping meeting will be held in an accessible location to be determined and will be conducted as a public information workshop. The Ricondo Team will provide boards explaining the NEPA process, the preliminary purpose and need, the Proposed Action, alternatives considered, information on environmental issues of potential concern, and the EA schedule. Sign-in sheets, handouts, directional signs, comment forms, and Taxiway A Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial 13 1 Scope of Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment Packet Pg. 254 KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL sx*�n*-scopaopwmnxn�us-,u Muxc*om9 � � � DRAFT commentbox(es)will 6eprovided. Up0m five Ricondo Team staff members will attend and staff the public scoping meeting. RicondowiU coordinate with Airport tm determine appropriate staff members to attend the scoping meetings based on the potential issues anticipated to arise during scoping and agency attendees. Translators will be made available upon advance request. TASK 2.2 SCOPING REPORT At the end o(the scoping comment period, RicundowiU prepare dnaftScmping Report that will include copies of ,he scoping letter, Notice ofScopin9'comment letters' comment forms,and presentation materials. All comments 04 received as part ofthe scoping process will be compi|ed, reviewed with Airport and FAA, and used in formulation `n mJ the Draft U EA. Nicondm�iprnvideane|ectmnicompyforrev{evvandcommenL After receiving comments onthe Ln draftScoping Report, �Ricondawi|1 produce final Scoping Report that become an appendix to the EA, An �04 electronic copy of the final Scoping Report will be submitted to Airport staff. 6 Additional meetings with federal,state,and local agencies may be required to discuss specific environmental issues, 20 permitting requirements, and any required mitigation. These meetings will be conducted as part of Task 5 or Task 0 @. Other agency meetings will take place at the discretion mf Airport K e stabasedoncommentsceivedandinterest -U) expressed in response to the scoping letters. +- Lr) Deliverables: 0), Scuping |e{ter ~~ � w' Nmd�emf�cuping nmeetings � 111111 Powe/Peintpresentatiun M Presentation boards (up to lU. generally describing the proposed project and the environmental assessment �`n process), 04 � m Sign-in sheets, handouts, directional signs, comment forms 0 � � * [ommentbox(es) * Electronic copies of Draft ScopingReport � A% Electronic copies ny Final ScopingReport Assumptions: � Site reconnaissance by staff members in preparation for the scoping meeting � One in person meeting for public scoping with upto6team members - we( One in person meeting for agency scoping with upto0team members naxi°°v^Extension,secuoity Fencing,avid cormmerc/a/ |4 > Scope o/Work and smnelrj./*'.aaon Apron E"pany/o"s`nv/mnniemM*ssessmem KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXHIBIT A-SCOPE uF WORK(o/15-o) wmncwao1* DRAFT ���� � ��/� w ��w� v �� ����� � �� 0������ � N��� N� ���� m ��~�m� .�^ PURPOSE��~�w� ��w� �� w�*�m~�� RiomndowiU prepare a preliminary EA chapter that will include background information on the Airport; discuss the purpose and need for the proposed project;identify the proposed action,requested federal actions,and timeframe for implementing the proposed action. Monroe County staff will provide supporting documentation including 04 memos, chapters, or other data to support the operational problems to be corrected by the Proposed Action. The «7 preliminary EA chapter will be submitted e|ectnonicaU VV ytoEYsta#8z/re°iewandcomment. Ln w � Ricon6o will compile all comments,then discuss them with EYVYstaff, After concurrence byEYVV staff mnresponses 6 Z to the comments, Ricondo will revise the text for submittal toFAA. Ricondo will revise the text in response toFAA's comments. After concurrence by FAA staff on responses to the comments, Ricondo will revise the text for inclusion 20 as Chapter Iin the Preliminary Draft EA. 0 Deliuerablea /w Preliminary Purpose and Need chapter «» � Response to Monroe County staff comments � � Revised Preliminary Purpose and Need chapter um m Response to FAA comments � m Final Preliminary EA chapter I �� Ln C4 l����� �� ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS � m ��~�m� ~�. ��m� w m�w�w��� w � � /�.� ��w���n� w °��~� 0 U) IL This effort will include development ofthe alternatives chapter ofthe EA to reflect Monroe [ounty's proposed solution and the feasibility of implementing the alternatives. The EA chapter will document the alternatives � considered and how each will meet ornot meet the purpose and need for the project. Given the potential impacts -� to sensitive environmental resources,alternatives that avoid or minimize impacts will be considered. An alternatives analysis will then be conducted to screen Out those that do riot meet purpose and need. Ricondmwi|| prepare a preliminary EA chapter documenting the identification and consideration of alternatives and submit it electronically to Monroe County staff review. For costing purposes' the Proposed Action' the No Action A|ternative, and up to -:t one additional feasible alternative are assumed to be carried forward in the EA. Ricondomi|| compile all comments on the chapter and discuss the comments with Monroe County staff during a meeting orteleconference. After concurrence by Monroe County staff on responses to the comments, Ricondo will revise the text for review and comment by FAA staff. Ricondo will compile all FAA comments on the revised preliminary chapter and discuss the comments with Monroe County and FAA staff. After concurrence by Monroe County and FAA staff on responses to the comments, Ricundovvi|| revise the draft chapter for inclusion as chapter 2 in the Preliminary Draft EA. T'a"/°avx Extension,Security Fencing and commemal | S i Scope ofWork and aene�a/Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment , KEY wsrIwrmwxnowx�mxpnm mmmr�-�cop�o�wmxx(z�/��-5o wmmCemm � � DRAFT Deliverables: IN Preliminary Alternatives chapter m Response to Monroe County staff comments 111 Revised Preliminary Alternatives chapter m Response 1m FAA comments w Final Preliminary EA Chapter 2 Ln ����� � � ��������� �N�'�����1� ���|�� � m ��~ww� .�- AFFECTED w��� m w��, ENVIRONMENT z� � 04 TASK 5-I DESCRIPTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF STUDY AREA Z Ricondo will identify the study area for the EA based on the potential effects of the Proposed Action and reasonable 20 0 alternatives. A brief description of the study area along with an exhibit depicting the geographic limits of the study area will be prepared. This scope of work assumes a recent aerial photo of the Airport is available from the master � � plan, v» TASK 5.2 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER � Ricmndm will prepare the affected environment chapter oYthe EA, including a description of the project area and um baseline information on existing conditions. The micondo Team will develop study areas that will be used throughout the EA, A "project study area"will be identified that incorporates the Proposed Action and covers the LU 04 areas needed for construction and operation. The project study area will be used for all environmental impact �� categories that could result in impacts due to physical construction or operation of the project. A "general study `n 04 area"will be used for all environmental impact categories that could result in impacts to areas outside the proposed `- project si^e(s), such as air quality, noise,and visual impacts. 0 IL This chapterwill include discussion on the project setting,existing and planned land uses,the political jurisdictions(s) the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives will affect,demographic information,and population estimates 0 for the affected area. This chapter will also identify those resources that are not present and will therefore not be W affected by the Proposed Action. Farmlands, off-Airport traffic, and wild and scenic rivers are assumed not to be either present or would not be affected and will require very limited discussion. The regulatory setting and affected environment will be described for each of the following resource categories: � � Air quality m Biological resources(including fish,wildlife,and plants) UP Coastal Resources E Climate is Department uf Transportation Act, Section 4(f) • Hazardous materials,solid waste, and pollution prevention • Historical,architectural, archeological,and cultural resources Taxiway A Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial | * | Scope of Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment KEY W�sr�wrmw»nnwx�mxpoxr m*��x'�copEo��oxxu�o5-5� *mwc* 2nzy � � � � � � � � DRAFT * Land use * Natural resources and energy supply w Noise and noise compatible land use I Socioeconomics, environmental justice,and chi|6mn's environmental health and safety risks 01 Visual effects(including light emissions) VY Water resources(including wetlands,floodplain, surface waters, and groundwater) A Biological Assessment,Wetlands Assessment,and Cultural Resources Assessment Survey(CRAS)will be conducted ~Ln to support the Affected Environment chapter.These separate reports will become appendices to the EA. 04 z� � 5.2.1 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 6 Z To support the BA, the Ricmndo Team will prepare a Biological Assessment (B/) to document the biological and natural resources analysis including the wetlands habitat. The RicmndoTeann will identify the area within which � 0 indirect effects to biological and natural resources could occur. Agenero| description of the biological and natural resources that exist within this general study area will be prepared. � Ln The BA will focus on identifying any biological and natural resources that may be affected within the project study area or indirectly affected within the general study area. The Biological Study Area (BSA) will be considered the same as the general study area. The biological and natural resources present will be determined based upon existing =^ � published documents such as Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (RWC) Bald Eagle Nest Locator, Florida Natural um Areas Inventory report, RNC Wading Bird Rookery data, National Marine Fisheries Service (NyWFS)Areas of Critical Habitat' USFVYS Consultation Areas, field reconnaissance, and information gathered from appropriate natural um 04 resource agencies.es �� Ln P1condm Team will conduct one site visit to provide a general reconnaissance oJ the general am � m area �4 of the project study. The site visit will include general protected species survey and habitat assessment of the 0 uplands and wetlands within the area mJ direct impact, Sensitive habitats within the BSA will be identified based on m- avni|ab|e |iteratuneorvisualcwnfirmadondudngthegenem| neconnaissancesitevisit.Adetai|eddocunnentahonmf findings within the proposed area of direct impact will beprovided. � � The Ricondo Team assumes that the habitat within the project study area does not include any tropical hardwood hammock. If tropical hardwood hammock is found during the site visit and would be impacted by the Proposed Action, then' a specialized survey wfthe tropical hardwood hammock will be required and is included as Optional Task lI.This task would require special authorization from Monroe County tocomplete. �— � After completion of the impact analysis (Task6.2) and the mitigation planning (Task6l4)' the BA will be given to Monroe County and FAA for review.The Ricnndo Team will respond to two(2) rounds of comments. The Draft BA will be finalized and provided to FAA to circulate to U6RNI and NMFS. The Ricondm Team will respond to agency comments.The revised Draft B4 will be included asan appendix tm the Draft EA. 5.2.2 WETLANDS ASSESSMENT Agenera| description of the surface water habitat and wetlands that exist within the general study area will be prepared. Birkitt will conduct a site visit tm identify existing resources in the area of direct impact and delineate wetlands or waters of the United States that would be affected by the Proposed Action. Wetlands will bedelineated according to the criteria found in F.A.C. 62-340 — "Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Taxiway A Extension,Security Fencing and Commercial | 7 | Scope of Work KEY WEST omsnw^rmm��mmponr' o'*��x-S�m= �pWmm,o�,�-s,� munc*mm � � � � � DRAFT VVaters^' and the~I987U.S. Army Corps cf Engineers(USA[E) Manual" and "Regional Supplement for the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regions^ Wetlands and surface water boundahesvviUbedehneatedandmarkedub/izinga GPS, and a map will be generated showing the location of wetlands and waters on the site. The Florida Unified Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAK4) functional assessment methodology will be utilized to evaluate existing habitat condition and function. Appropriate forms will be completed, and photo-documentation will be provided. A detailed documentation of findings within the proposed area of direct impact will be provided. 5.2.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT SURVEY The Ricondo Team will coordinate NEPA and Section I06 reviews with FAA and complete additional required Ln identification and evaluation surveys for archaeological and historic architectural resources within the Area of `n Potential Effects(APE) in accordance with Section 106. 04 z� � The Ricondo Team be responsible for: 6 w Identifying Section IOG Consulting Parties' Native American Tribes, and individuals and organizations with a 20 demonstrated interest in history/resources located within the Area ofPotential Effects(APE). Required Section 0 IOG consultation with members of the public will take place es part of the general stakeholder coordination. -� � m Delineating an APE for direct and indirect(if necessary)effects for FAA review and comment.The APE may differ v» from the project study area; rM Submitting the direct and indirect (if necessary)APE and accompanying survey approach and methodology to ~~ � FAA for submittal tmthe State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO)for review and comment; um jjjf�, Conducting background research and developing an appropriate historic context; � � Conducting an archaeological survey including a pedestrian survey to assess existing conditions and conduct �� subsurface testing, iffeasible. `n 04 � Conducting an historic resources survey of the APE to ensure that resources that date from 1971 nr earlier are `- 0 identified, mapped, and photographed. mn IL Ricondmwi|| prepare a preliminary EA chapter documenting the affected environment and submit it electronically to Monroe County staff review. Ricondo will compile all comments on the chapter and discuss the comments with � Monroe County staff during a meeting o/teleconference. After concurrence by Monroe County staff onresponses -� tm the comments, Ricondowi|| revise the text for review and comment by FAA staff. Ricundovvi|| compile all FAA comments on the revised preliminary chapter and discuss the comments with Monroe County and FAA staff. After concurrence by Monroe County and FAA staff on responses to the comments, Ricondo will revise the draft chapter for inclusion as chapter 3 in the Preliminary Draft EA. Defiwenables: 0, Biological Assessment N Wetlands and Surface Water Report 93 Cultural Resources Assessment Survey 11J Preliminary Affected Environment chapter 0), Response tn Monroe County staff comments ID Revised Preliminary Affected Environment chapter Taxiway x Extension,Security Fencing and Commercial 18 | Scope v/Work KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXHIBIT«-SCOPE oFwoxxu2��-o) wmncn2nxe DRAFT � Response to FAA comments � Final Preliminary EA Chapter 3 Assumptions: m One site visit to conduct the biological and natural resource surveys and wetlands and surface waters delineation and Uk8AK4 assessment isincluded. m This scope of work assumes that no additional archaeological (Phase IB/Phase 11 and/or intensive-level historic architectural surveys) would be necessary, R additional surveys are required' m separate scope would be prepared for FAA approval. -nLn � w � ����� � �N�'�����0� �� �|��� N CONSEQUENCES 6 m ��~�w� ��. o�m� � �m���w� w�mm~m� x ���~ ����m�.�m�����m�m���m�.� Z The environmental consequences chapter of the EA will include an evaluation of the potential environmental impacts 0 of the No Action A|ternative, Proposed Action, and any reasonable alternatives. Ricondo assumes that the base year (existing conditions) will be 20I8 and that environmental impact analyses for two future years will be I� conducted. The two future years will be the year of project completion and five years after project completion. «» Opening year is currently assumed imbe2023'with 5 years hence being ZQ28. The following environmental impact categories will be assessed to determine if construction and operation of the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives,when compared to the No Action Alternative,would potentially affect these resources and whether anyLIJ impacts would be significant. Resources that are not present o/ will not be affected will be identified in the beginning of this chapter and dismissed from further consideration. Supporting documentation for the following sub-sections may be included asan appendix and summarized within the EA. �� Ln Specific effects during construction that may create adverse environmental impacts include noise ofconstruction 04 equipment on the site, noise and dust from delivery of materials through residential streets' potential disturbance `- of soil,and waste pollution from stnrmwater runoff and erosion. These impacts are not anticipated tobesignificant U)m_ in nature and are expected to be temporary, short-term impacts tmthe surrounding environment. Agenera| description of the type and nature ofconstruction activities anticipated and measures to betaken to minimize potential adverse effects will be included under each environmental resource category as appropriate. TASK 6.1 AIR QUALITY A construction emissions analysis of the construction of the taxiway' aprons, and access road will be required to demonstrate that the construction emissions will not exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards(NAAQS). For this scope of work, it is assumed that aircraft operational emissions will not need to be assessed quantitatively. The increase in taxiway distance is minimal and would only affect takeoffs on Runway S. Ricondo assumes that the number and type of aircraft operations at EYW will be the same with or without the Proposed Action. The Proposed Action will not affect vehicular trips and will not result in a notable change in vehicle miles traveled. There[one, a qualitative operational air quality analysis will be prepared and documented. It is assumed that no analytical operational emissions assessment will berequired. Taxiway Ac,trnsinn,s(mu,/type^c/no and Commercial Scope of Work ^ KEY WEST INTExwAnow»Lmmpom' mxm�x-�com p o�woxx2o5-o> Mxmc* aoz � DRAFT TASK 6-2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES In the Biological Assessment, the Ncondo Team will evaluate and quantify impacts to biological and natural resources affected by the Proposed Action. The nature and extent of anticipated impacts to natural communities, essential fish habitat, and protected species and habitat within the Project Study Area will be assessed. Permits or approvals required from the regulatory agencies will be identified. . TASK 6-3 CLIMATE Ricondo will document the limited effects of the alternatives on climate by conducting a greenhouse gas emissions Ln inventory associated with construction. Like Air Quality, no operational analysis will be required. ,n � w TASK 6 � �(�J���/�[ ���<�K]���� `- . 6 The Airport lies within the purview of the Florida Coastal Management Program (F[Mp). This section will state that the Proposed Project is within the coastal zone and that coastal zone consistency determination is required. 20 0 Ramifications for the No Action Alternative and the Proposed Project will be discussed' and the consistency determination process will be described. Typically, w preliminary consistency determination is issued by the FCMP � � during the development of the E4^ and a final consistency determination is issued later during the Environmental v» Resource Permitting process. TASK 6.5 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, SECTION 4/�\ - ' um The Ricondu Team will consult with the National Park Service; Florida Department mfEnvironmental Protection' Division of Recreation and Park; Monroe County Facilities Maintenance Department responsible for Monroe County Ca parks and beaches;and the �yofKeyVVest De partment ��Q Ln the U.S. Department of ��t c�I9b� �a�imn 4(� and Land and VVzter�on�emodmn Fund A�'Section� � 04 6(f)in the general study area. The Ricondo Team will use the concurrent Section 106 consultation process to identify historic properties pnmpeuieo qualifying as Section 4(f) resources, including NRHP-|isted or eligible parks, and to inventory �) contributing and non-contributing features and character-defining attributes in supportof a Section 4(f) use IL determination. Properties subject tmthe provisions ofSection 4(f) and Section 6(f) within the general study area will be identified -� on a GI6 base map. Documentation of each Section 4(f)and Section 6(0 property located within the general study area will be compiled to provide a general understanding of the resource,its existing attributes,and adetermination regarding a Section4(f)use caused by the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives, TASK 6.6 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SOLID WASTE, AND POLLUTION PREVENTION Several federal laws regulate the production, transport, and disposal uf hazardous waste, including the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (R[RA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation. and Liability Act ([ERCLA). Ricmnd* will review existing information on known environmental issues on the Airport, specifically within or near the project study area, and document potential effects of the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives. RioondowjU utilize existing Airport environmental documents and search federal, state' and local databases for any known or potentially hazardous waste sites in or near the general study area. An GDR report will be run but a Phase l environmental survey will not beprepared. Taxiway x Extension,Security Fencing and Commercial | 10 | Scope ofWork KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AImpmmv ex*IBox-Scopcmpwmmxp�ns-su mAwcxmm � � � � DRAFT Ricondo will identify whether the implementation of the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives will generate hazardous wastes and the means of compliance with applicable regulations. 0condo will also determine whether the capacity and availability of existing disposal facilities can handle the projected quantities and types of solid waste associated with the implementation of the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives. TASK 6.7 HISTORICAL, ARCHITECTURAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Building on the work in Task 5.2.3,The Ricondo Team will evaluate the effects of the proposed undertaking on any 04 historic properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places within the APE. The draft «7 CRASwiU present the methods' findings, evaluations, and recommendations of the study. The draft CRAS will be LID submitted to the FAA for re t vmmand�wmmenThehna|[RASvvi|ibepnmidedtoFAAford|stributimn0otheSHPO' �04 and federally recognized Native American Tribes for review and/or concurrence. The Ricmndo Team will 6asyistv�th Z the final agency coordination as directed byFAA. TASK 6.8 LAND USE The existing land uses around the Airport will be documented and the Proposed Action and any reasonable �— alternativesU wibere U reviewed The EA LID conflicts between the Proposed Action, any reasonable alternatives, and the objectives of federal, regional, state, and local land use plans,policies and controls near the Airport as well as public controversy based on environmental impacts. W TASK 6-9 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY SUPPLY = � Kicmndo will evaluate and document the potential effects of the alternatives on energy supplies and natural `ID resources. Based on engineering estimates and proposed construction methods, Ricondo will identify the 04 commitment of natural resources the project alternatives will require, if any. 0 U) IL Because no changes in the number of aircraft operations or fleet mix are andcipated, an energy analysis is not required. TASK 6'10 NOISE AND NOISE-COMPATIBLE LAND USE 6.10.1 AIRCRAFT NOISE ANALYSIS The Ricnndo Team will conduct an aircraft-related noise analysis, resulting in noise contours that are representative of the existing base year (20I0). future year 3033' and future year 2020 aeronautical activity and existing/future (Proposed Action) airfield configuration consistent with the Airport Master Plan. Day-night average sound level (DNQ contours of 65,70,and 75 decibels(dB)will be prepared for this project for the following scenarios: M 28I8 Existing Conditions m 3O23 Future NoAction * 202] Future Proposed Action Alternatives &� ZO38 Future NoAction m 2O20 Future Proposed Action Alternatives Taxiway»Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial Scope of Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment KEY WEST INrnw«nomA�mnpmmr' cmam�w-scnpsop WORK(z�zs-�q mxnc*zmzy � � � � � DRAFT The proposed project would not increase airfield capacity, the number of aircraft gates, accommodate different aircraft fleet nix, or significantly alter flight paths or procedures at the Airport. The focus of the aircraft noise analysis will be to quantify potential aircraft noise impacts associated with the No Action Alternative and Proposed Action. Noise analyses will be conducted to assess projected aircraft noise resulting from implementation of the Proposed Action and to identify potential impacts according to FAA noise analysis guidance defined in Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)OnderlO5O.lF. The Aviation Environmental Design Tool (\EDT) input files prepared for the Runway Q Displaced Threshold and Application of Declared Distances Categorical Exclusion in March 2016 will be updated to reflectthe Proposed Action. 04 Fleet mix infmrmadmn, however, will be updated to reflect the FAA approved activity forecasts developed for the m Ln Master Plan. A narrative description nf the airport noise analysis methodology and exposure will be prepared for z� inclusion as an appendix in the EA.The noise contours and flight tracks will be shown on an aerial photograph base �04 map. 6 Revise Aircraft Fleet Mix The aircraft fleet mix representing the average annual day aircraft operations for the existing and future airfield 0 conditions will be used for noise modeling. Helicopter operations will be modeled in the same manner as in the � � Runway 9 Displaced Threshold and Application of Declared Distances Categorical Exclusion. v» Data will be needed to update the fleet mix ina manner that is consistent with the Runway 9 Displaced Threshold and Application o/Declared Distances Categorical Exclusion. � � The following data sources will be collected, reviewed' and compiled into the 2Olg aircraft fleet mix: � Aircraft Situational Display for Industry(ASD0' = � � Airport Traffic Control Tower<ATC;record s/iniervimws. `n 04 � Fixed Base Operator(FB0) records/interviews, `- 0 U) 9 FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System(ATADS)' m- � FAA Traffic Flow Management Systems Count(TFyWSQ.and � FAA Form 5Ol8(Airport Master Reco/ds). The future years (2023 and 2028) fleet mix and operations will be sourced from the Master Plan forecasts. The corresponding AEDT aircraft types will be determined for each category of aircraft included in the Master Plan forecasts. Establish Air Traffic Operational Profile The air traffic operational profile was established as part of the Runway Displaced Threshold and Application o/ Declared Distances Categorical Exclusion. As such, itis anticipated that this effort will be limited tn the update of the AEDT model data to reflect thefuture/proposed airfield configuration. For budgeting purposes' it has been assumed that the assumptions regarding flight track and runway utilization from the Runway 9 Displaced Threshold and Application of Declared Distances Categorical Exclusion remain valid and won't need to be updated. Establish Baseline(Existing) Noise Contours The aircraft noise contours mfDNL65' 7U' and 75 d8 resulting from the average annual day operations for the existing baseline condition will be created using the AEDT. The annual aircraft operations for the existing baseline Taxiway x Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial | 12 | Scope o/Work ^ KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT' EXHIBIT x-sCopaopwOmx/z�ns-5� mxnc*ma � � DRAFT conditions will be based on the sources discussed above. The contours will be mapped in GIS format, and noise sensitive impacts calculated. Establish Future Year(2023 And 2028)No Action Alternative and Proposed Action Noise Contours The aircraft noise contours of DNL 65,70, and 75 dB resulting from the average annual day operations for the two future year conditions will be created using /heAEDT. The annual aircraft operations and the fleet mix will be estimated based on data developed in the Master Plan. The contours will be mapped' in 6/Sfnrmat. and noise sensitive impacts calculated. Develop Narrative Report on Aircraft Noise Contours um Ln A narrative report will be prepared detailing the data analysis and results of the airport noise evaluation. The report04 z� will include text tables, and noise contour exhibits for existing and future airport and aircraft operations. The `- 6 methodology and findings will be summarized in the noise sections of the Affected Environment and Environmental Z Consequences chapters of the EA. The narrative report will bean appendix to the EA. 6.10.2 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS ^^ Construction noise will be evaluated at the closest noise sensitive land use using typical sound levels produced by � pieces of equipment that would typically be required to implement the types of construction projects proposed for «» EYVV. � TASK 6-1I SOCIOECONOMICS, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND � CHILDREN^S ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS Ricondo will evaluate the alternatives to determine potential socioeconomic impacts and environmental justice = impacts Ricondowi|| also assess the potential for environmental health nr safety risks that may disproportionately �imna�e|y `n affect children, pursuant to Executive Order 13045. "Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and 04 Safety Risks". These environmental health risks and safety risks are risks that are attributable to products or `- 0 substances that a child is likely to encounter o/ingest. mn IL The socioeconomic statistics for the general study area will determine if there are minority or low-income populations in the study area. If there are low-income or minority populations within the general study area, the � EA will determine if the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives could cause disproportional high and -� adverse effects to these populations. Traffic impacts are considered under socioeconomic impacts. The No Action Alternative, Proposed Action,and any reasonable alternatives would not affect on- or off-Airport roadways. Traffic will be addressed qualitatively rather �— � than quantitatively. TASK 6-12 VISUAL EFFECTS 6.12.1 LIGHT EMISSIONS The Ricondm Team will describe the extent towhich any hyhdny associated with the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives would createan annoyance for people inthegeneral studyarea or interferewith theirnormal activities. If necessary, the documentation will identify any mitigation measures that would be applied to reduce light emission impacts. faxiwAy A Extension,Security[:enang,amlco:awnercial Scope of Work. C.9.a KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT- EXHIBIT A-SCOPE OF WORK(12/15-52) MARCH 2O19 DRAFT 6.12.2 VISUAL RESOURCES AND VISUAL CHARACTER The Ricondo Team will describe the change in visual resources and visual character that would occur with the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives. TASK 6.13 WATER RESOURCES 6.13.1 WETLANDS The Ricondo Team will quantify impacts to the wetlands and associated surface waters affected by the Proposed Action. The Florida Unified Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) functional assessment methodology will be Ln utilized to evaluate functional loss and identify state and federal mitigation requirements. Permitting requirements Ln for proposed impacts to wetland and surface waters will be identified. This task does not include an Individual 04 Permit application to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. 6 6.13.2 FLOODPLAINS Floodplain impacts will be discussed for the No Action Alternative„ the Proposed Action, and any reasonable 0 alternatives. The impact to the 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries within the project study area will be assessed using GIS to calculate the acreage of 100-year floodplains that occur within areas that will be filled due to the construction of the Proposed Action. The floodplain analysis will be incompliance with Executive Order 11988, Ln Floodplain Management and DOT Order 5650.2,Floodplain Management and Protection. The analysis will document avoidance of floodplains if a practicable alternative exists. If no practicable alternative exists, the analysis will document actions to minimize or mitigate adverse impacts to the floodplain's natural and beneficial values.The text LLJ will state that the final design will provide one to one flood storage volume compensation for volume that is lost due to placement of fill for construction of the Proposed Action. 04 6.13.3 SURFACE WATERS Ln 04 Potential for impacts to water quality of surface waters around EYW will be examined for the No Action Alternative and the Proposed Action and any reasonable alternatives.This section will state whether the Proposed Action would result in any fill within surface waters, and if so will describe the surface areas impacted and the acreage of the IL U) impact. If the Proposed Project would discharge to any 303(d) listed surface waters, it will be reflected in the text. o If so, measures that will be used to prevent the Proposed Action from contributing to water quality impairment of the receiving waters will be described. The amount of new impervious surface that would be created will be included along with an explanation of how treatment will be provided for runoff from those impervious surfaces in general terms. Sediment and erosion control methods to be employed during construction will be described briefly. 6.13.4 GROUNDWATER The potential for impacts to groundwater because of implementation of the No Action Alternative or the Proposed Action or any reasonable alternatives will be discussed. Protection of groundwater provided by implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan during construction will be described. The Airport is not located above a sole source aquifer or a recharge area for a sole source aquifer. The Proposed Action would not impair drinking water sources. TASK 6.14 MITIGATION MEASURES The Ricondo Team will identify and document any mitigation measures required for implementation of the Proposed Action. Where appropriate, mitigation measures will be defined to mitigate any potentially significant impacts of Taxiway A Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial 114 I Scope of Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment Packet Pg. 265 KEY WEST mnenw�onm����ppmr' cmx��x-soopcopwmmxp2us-sq m�nc* zuxo � � � � DRAFT implementation cf the Proposed Action. The Ricondo Team anticipates that mitigation will be required for impacts to biological resources and wetlands. The Ricondo Team will identify biological resources mitigation measures required for implementation of the Proposed Action. Measures for avoidance or minimization of protected species impacts will also be identified. The Ricondo Team will identify wetlands mitigation measures required for implementation of the Proposed Action. The Florida UMAM functional assessment methodology will be utilized to assess wetlands mitigation requirements and evaluate mitigation opportunities. Where appropriate, mitigation measures will be defined to mitigate impacts of implementation of the Proposed Project. Measures for avoidance or minimization of wetlands will also be Ln identified. `n 04 The Ricondo U cmndoTeamv� identJyuphofi �ve� compensatorywedandsmitiAationmptiunsbasedonconsu!tationvith � state,federal,and local government representatives and airport personnel. The RicendmTeam will select up to three Z (3)mitigation options based on basic screening criteria. The Ricondo Team will conduct a site reconnaissance survey of up to three (3) identified mitigation options. Efforts to locate acceptable mitigation will focus initially on � opportunities toexpand previous mitigation for Airport operations. New mitigation opportunities will also be identified based on discussions with agencies and local government representatives. The EA will identify � compensatory mitigation options and required permits. Conceptual plans and planning level costs (not including «» land costs)for compensatory mitigation will be provided. Deliverables: � IN Mitigation measures for biological resources,xvet|ands, and other environmental categories as necessary LU Assumptions: LU � 01 The Team will work with federal, state' and local government representatives and other appropriate entities to `n determine possible compensatory mitigation for consideration. 04 � 0 An agency formal determination mf the wetland extents will not be required. Informal consultation with NK4FS 0mn � Protected Species Division and USFVVSamd coordination with DSA[E are included in Task 02. m No impacts toseagrasxor the salt ponds are proposed. In Up to five (5) potential compensatory mitigation sites or plans will be initially evaluated with up to three (3) ^ potential sites being evaluated further. m Upto two (2) site visits will be conducted to assist in identification or evaluation of compensatory mitigation opportunities. � TV The Team will identify acceptable mitigation opportunities including identifying willing sellers if property is needed to be purchased but, will not be responsible for leading negotiations regarding costs or purchase agreement ur related financial or legal questions. � Mitigation to meet state and federal regulatory requirements can be identified following completing of consultation outlined in scope ofwork. TASK 6.15 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS NEPA requires that consideration of the impacts of the alternatives along with impacts from other past, present, or reasonably foreseeable projects within the affected project area need to be considered. This includes other projects Taxiway»Extension,Security p°""/"o and Commercial | zs | Scope of Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT emaanx-soopc�p��nw/z�us-�o mAxc*zmzp � � DRAFT occurring at the Airport that have already been approved, and projects taking place within the general study area not under the juhsdic1ionofEYYVor FAA that may also impact the resources potentially impacted hy the alternatives considered. Ricondo,in coordination with EYW staff,will develop the timeframe and geographic area to be utilized in the cumulative impacts analysis. A discussion of potential cumulative impacts from these projects will be developed. Assumptions: m Jacobs and Ricondo will assemble a list and brief description of past projects completed within the last five years at EYVVand a list mf current and upcoming projects at EYVV from the EYVVCapital Improvement Plan for use in 04 the Cumulative Impacts analysis. r Ln 01 Projects and actions considered for inclusion in the Cumulative Impacts narrative will be selected using best w professional judgement and will be limited to selected projects that are either on EYW property, on Key West, Z or within the same Florida Department of Environmental Protection Cumulative Impact Basin as EYW. Deliverables: � 0 IM Preliminary Environmental Consequences chapter � Response to Monroe County staff comments in m The Environmental Consequences chapter will be delivered to the FAA for review as part of the Preliminary Draft EA � � ���� � ������� N�� �N���������N� � ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~— ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ � ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ um � Ln The Ricondo Team will be responsible for the production of a Preliminary Draft EA for review by Monroe County 04 staff, an Administrative Draft EA for review by FAA,a Draft EA to be made available for public and agency review,a `- 0 preliminary Final EA that will include draft responses to comments received during the public meeting and the public mn review period for review by Monroe County staff, a draft Final EA for review bythe FAA, and a Final EA to be — transmitted to FAA for their use in producing an environmental determination on the Proposed Action. TASK 7.1 PRELIMINARY AND ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT EA RicmndmwiU produce preliminary Draft EA for Monroe County staff review. Twu (2) printed copies and one electronic copy of the first draft document will be distributed on the Monroe County for review and editing. Ricondm will compile all comments for discussion with Monroe County staff during a teleconference. RicundmwiU respond +^ tm comments and make necessary revisions tmthe Preliminary Draft EA and produce an Administrative Draft E& Once Monroe County staff has concurred with the Administrative Draft EA one electronic copy will be provided to the FAA Airports District Office (ABO) for review and comment. RicondowiU compile all comments and prepare responses tmcomments for FAA and Monroe County staff review. Ricmndo will attend one meeting at the Airport to discuss the comments received with FAA and Monroe County staff. &second electronic copy will be provided to Monroe County and FAA to concur with the revisions made in response to FAA's initial comments. After concurrence by FAA and Monroe County staff mn responses to the comments the 0icondo Team will produce the Draft EA for public and agency review. T'a,/way A Extension,Security�:enci^u,and Cmwmerc.ta/ | 16 Scope ofWork and oe"erA Aviation Apron s"pansionssavim^meota/A,ses»ment KEY wor�rmmxr�wx�mxrom' mmx�x-�cop�o�woxx(z4o�'o> muncw000+ � � � � � DRAFT TASK 7-2 DRAFT EA Ricondo will produce five (S) printed copies, and an electronic copy of the Draft EA for distribution. Electronic distribution can be posted on a website, or distributed via USB dhm; or both. A notice of the availability of the Draft EA will be published in the local newspaper and mailed toagencies, elected officials, public interest groups, and individuals as directed by Monroe County staff. The Draft EA will also be sent to the local library for access by the public; an electronic version in PDF6ormat will also be provided to Monroe County staff for posting on the Airport web site. TASK 7.3 PRELIMINARY FINAL EA Ln Ln KicpndowiU catalog all mm| (obtained from transcripts recorded at the public meeting/pub|icheahng) and written04 z� comments received on the Draft EA during the public comment period. Public comments will be summarized, and `- 6 the issues addressed in a general response in the Final EA. Ricondo will draft responses to each of the agencies' Z comments. 0/aft responses to comments will be submitted to Monroe County staff for their review and comment. Ricundo will meet with Monroe County staff and FAA in person or via teleconference to discuss the response to � comments. A revised response to comments and draft public involvement appendix will he assembled and submitted tm Monroe County staff and FAA for their review and comment. � Ln Ricondo will meet with Monroe County staff to discuss any necessary revisions to the Draft EA based oncomments received during the public comment period. The Ricon6o Team assumes that comments received will not necessitate re-evaluation of project impacts o,additional assessments for wetlands mitiRadmn If ~~ � � is required,an amendment iu the scope of work may benecessary. Kicondu will produce a preliminary Final EA for um Monroe County staff review. Ricondowi|| compile all comments on the preliminary Final EA and discuss the == comments with Monroe County staff during a meeting or teleconference. Ricondo will respond to comments and UJI 04 revisions preliminary Final EA produce second preliminary document Once �� make ne«essaryrev. `n Monroe County staff has concurred with the draft Final B\ it will be released to FAA for review and comment. 04 RicondowiU compile all comments and prepare responses to comments for FAA and Monroe County staff mvievv — � 0 R1mondo will attend one meeting to discuss the comments received with FAA and Monroe County staf. After mn IL concurrence by FAA and Monroe County staff on responses to the comments, the Rimmndm Team will revise the preliminary Final EA and produce the Final EA. TASK 7'4 FINAL EA Ricondo will produce ten(10)printed copies of the proposed finding and Final EA for distribution. The Final EAand proposed finding will be mailed to agencies' elected officials, public interest groups, and individuals, including contacts added during the public meeting process,as directed by Monroe County staff. The availability mf the FAA's determination and availability of the Final EA will be published in the local newspaper.An electronic version of FAA's finding, and the Final EA in P0F format will also be provided to Monroe County staff for posting on the Airport's web site. Deliverables: � Two(2) printed copies and one(1)electronic copy of Preliminary Draft EA for Monroe County staff review m One(I) electronic copy nf Administrative Draft EA for FAA review w Five(5) printed copies, and one(1)electronic copy of the Draft EA for distribution Ta"twiy A Extension,sep,itv Fencing,and Commercial | zr | scope of Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment ' KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXHIBIT A-SCOPE oF WORK(z2/o-o) wmnc*2oxp DRAFT � Draft EA notice of the availability m Oral and written comments catalog with responses 0ocomments � One Preliminary Final EA for&4mnnme County staff review m One Preliminary Final EA for FAA review m Ten(10) printed copies and one(1)electronic copy of the Final EA for distribution VA Notice of availability o(the Draft and Final EAu published in local newspaper Ln ������ � �/�������� � N� N� �NN�N ��~ �������N���� �������� � � m ��~mm� ��. ����w�w��� w ��w� �� PUBLIC ������m�������� m ���m�� z� 04 INVOLVEMENT � �w� � ��m~ � m�n�wm�w� n 6 z TASK 8.1 PROJECT KICK-OFF MEETING WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS �E 0 The Monroe County Department of Airports will hold a project kick-off meeting with key stakeholders including the Board of County Commissioners (80[[) and affected tenants to explain the NEPA prmcess, the scope of the I� Proposed Action and the environmental categories to be evaluated in the environmental assessment Ricmndovvi!| «» assist the Airport sponsor by preparing the presentation materials for the stakeholder meeting. Ricondo will provide up to three staff members at the meeting. For costing purposes,the project kick-off meeting was assumed to occur the day before the agency and public scoping meetings. TASK 8'2 AGENCY WEB-BASED CONFERENCE CALLS Ca � Coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sewice, National Marine Fisheries Service - Habitat Conservation and `n Protected Resource Divisions, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and/or South Florida Water 04 Management District, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and other appropriate natural resource `- agendeswi1| beundertakentoidendfyanyhydera||ymrState |istedupedes' essentia|fishhabi\at'oruniquenatura| mn IL communities within the general and project study areas. Coordination will be conducted as needed with South Florida Water Management District and the USACE and federal resource agencies regarding surface waters and wetlands impacts and permitting requirements. The calls will be web-based conference call. This task includes one (I)web-based conference call with regulatory agencies after the affected environment and environmental consequences are identified to share the findings and seek agency input on mitigation needed and potential locations to consider. Comments received will be documented and incorporated into EA and BA. � Includes a second web-based or conference call with regulatory agencies after mitigation locations have been identified to seek input on preferred mitigation plan.A second web-based conference call with regulatory agencies will be held after mitigation locations have been identified to seek input on preferred mitigation plan. Comments received will be documented and incorporated into EA and 8A. TASK 8.3 DRAFT EA PUBLIC MEETING FAA Order 5O5OAB discusses the need for public involvement in Poragmphs4O3 through 406. Additionally, some laws protecting specific resources, such osf|oodp|ains' wetlands, and historic and cultural resources, have public involvement requirements. If it is determined that the project would affect these resources orifEYVV or FAA staff Taxiway^Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial | 18 | Scope mWork KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXHIBIT A-SCOPE mp WORK(12/ns-s2) wmn�* mu/ � � DRAFT determines that enough public interest isexpressed concerning the project, then a public information workshop and/or meeting on the Draft EA may berequired. Ricondo will discuss the need for a public meeting with EYVVand FAA staff during preparation o(the Draft EA. For purposes mf this scope o/work and associated budget,itisassumed that one public information workshop/meeting would be required after release of the Draft EA. Budget associated with this task would only beexpended upon approval byEYVYstaff. A Notice mfAvailability(scmped in Task&2)would be published in local newspapers announcing that a Draft EA is available for review, locations where the Draft EA can be viewed' the time and date of a public information workshop/meeting, and when and where comments on the Draft EA should be submitted. The public information 04 workshop/meeting vvnu|d be held no sooner than 30 days after publication of the Notice of Availability and Ln Ln distribution of the Draft EA. � 04 The public meeting would be run as public information workshop. EYYVwmu|6 be responsible for securing the workshop location;Riconclowould be responsible for coordinating the logistics for the workshop(including securing Z tables, chairs, comment box, the number mfeasels required' directional signzge, and audio-visual equipment, if needed); and preparing handouts, announcements, presentation boends, court reporter, and presentations, if 0 necessary. In advance of the public information workshop, members of Ricondo would meet with EYVVand FAA staff to review workshop materials in draft form. Comments from this meeting would be incorporated into the final workshop materials. Up to five Ricondo Team members would attend. Ricondo would coordinate with EYVV to «» determine appropriate staff members tmattend the public meeting/public information workshop based on the issues that will be presented. � Defiwemmblas UJ m: Handouts(project summary) 6m Nil[ PPresentation Boards (up to 15 new boards, describing the proposed project, summarizing the identified `n potential effects of the project, providing public guidance as to how to provide comments on the project, and 04 the next steps in the project approval process) `- U) 111111 Meeting Forms(sign in sheets, comment forms,speaker cards) m- 11JJ11 PowerPointPresentadmn 7����� � PROJECT � N����N������ ������N� � �� N� m ��~�m� ~*. m m�����~�� w ADMINISTRATION ��w� �� �~����������� ��������� ~�����m����x��� m ���m� This task covers additional day-to-day project administration and coordination required for the project for purposes of scope and budget development.If public and agency scoping move expeditiously and additional study items or unusual public and agency controversy are not revealed in scoping the Ricondo Team can provide the Preliminary Draft EA to the FAA in 10 months. Additional coordination with FAA,federal,state and local agencies,and the public will follow. For budgeting purposes,a conservative total project duration of IQ-months was assumed. W The Ricondo Team will coordinate with Monroe County staff via conference calls on a monthly basis over the expected lO-month duration of the project. This coordination is assumed to require two(2)hours per meeting to prepare for, conduct, and prepare meeting notes as needed, The number of attendees will vary for each bi- weekly meeting depending on the topics to be covered. Effort associated with additional meeting attendees Taxiway^Extension,Security Fencing,and Commercial | ze | Scope v/Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment KEY WEST mnsnwxnum�/umpomr smx��x-scoPsopwmmsn�ms-sz) mxeCxaozy DRAFT beyond the project manager and project coordinator is accounted for in the technical tasks described below. This task provides coordination and documentation support for each meeting. iff The Ricmndo Team will prepare and submit monthly invoices and progress reports. This task is assumed to require four(4) hours per month for subcnnsu|tantcoordination, reconciliation of invoices and budgets, and completion and preparation of invoices and status reports. V10 Ricondo will maintain a current project schedule and provide updates monthly,as part of the monthly progress reports. Deliverables. Ln Ln m 10 monthly coordination conference calls, meeting notes and agendas z� w g Monthly invoices and progress reports `- 6 Z 0 Project schedule and monthly updates ������ � �� �� � N� �m�����N��[ ��� ��N�� � N����N���7�� ������� FILE m ��~�m� .���. MANAGEMENT ��w THE mm~ ADMINISTRATIVE m � Ln This task provides for the assembly, management, and maintenance of the Administrative File for EA. The Administrative File provides a digital catalog and electronic and paper copy of all information used in developing �u the methodology, analysis, and the decision-making process for the 8\.The information contained in this file may °:t � have to be included in the Administrative Record.This file serves as a centrally located, organized library for use by the project staff. >_ UJ 04 The Ricundo Team will m maintain and update File throughout the project so that all project �� Ln documents are being recorded and captured. C4 0 U) TASK 11 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK IL �������������� (OPTIONAL)ASSESSMENT ���w m ���w���m~� � � If Tropical Hardwood Hammock or other protected upland habitat is found to occur within the project study area during the site visits,this additional task can be authorized by Monroe County. Quantitative vegetation surveys will be conducted within the project study area. Data will be analyzed and summarized and required mitigation and associated costs will be estimated. This task does not include species specific wildlife surveys. ~~ �miwayA Extension,seorityFewunm,anurnmwr,ua/ 30 Scope.of Work and General Aviation Apron Expansions Environmental Assessment C.9.a JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE Monroe County Airport: Key West International Airport Project: Taxiway'A'Extension and Commercial I General Aviation Apron Expansion Environmental Assessment(12I15-52) FEE SUMMARY BASIC SERVICES Hours Fee DBE AMOUNT Tasks 1-11-JACOBS $ 144,711 Ln Total Basic Services Lump Sum Fee 0 $ 144,711 $ Ln SPECIAL SERVICES Hours Fee DBE AMOUNT 04 Tasks 1-11-Sub Consultants O Ricondo&Associates,Inc. $ 423,446 Michael Baker International $ 36,111 Birkitt Environmental Services $ 139,938 �- Janus Research $ 26,080 Deborah Murphy Lagos&Associates,Inc. $ 39,174 $ 39,174 Total Special Services Lump Sum Fee 0 $ 664,749 $ 39,174 Ln TOTAL LUMP SUM PROJECT FEE 0 $ 809,460 $ - DBE Percentage 4.84% 04 e Ln 04 IL Packet Pg. 272 , r,RrmJ9P ewe,MA w V3 MAlez=m!sqo , mu G p 5 � r i®®~$■N i/ 42«■ ))§ i / ) )} }i } \ )))\ i}a}k§& k! 2&J& k&! i = ■ ! BE 2 � \! , !} ! 2 as • , #§ \ ; ;! e §� ° )| ! « \ f \} r f 77 !! °® ; § ;aa@ 4@aa!!a ■: ®;a* e a e .a , - !)! ;;«; �,�„;� ;® , ! m T-12,! |2 f ! © ! ; } is \ : ! { - ! 7 )\(! ) (\\)){ \§ k )! \/ s0g, {f!§!!! 7!!!];; - ) / / #