The URL can be used to link to this page

Item P5 �" P.5 County ®1 �/�OI�®e �� c��'° BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS lrl Mayor Sylvia Murphy,District 5 -Ile InOI1da Keys Mayor Pro Tern Danny Kolhage,District 1 Michelle Coldiron,District 2 Heather Carruthers,District 3 David Rice,District 4 County Commission Meeting June 19, 2019 Agenda Item Number: P.5 Agenda Item Summary #5621 BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Emily Schemper(305) 289-2506 3:00 PM PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEM WORDING: A public hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Mixed Use / Commercial (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) to Commercial (COMM), for a portion of property located at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club; as proposed by Ocean Reef Club Inc. ITEM BACKGROUND: On April 11, 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department received an application from the Joel Reed of RC3WORLD Inc. on behalf of the Ocean Reef Club Inc. "the Applicant," to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation for a portion of property located at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club. On July 18, 2018, the Applicant submitted a revised application to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from Mixed Use/ Commercial (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) to Commercial (COMM). The Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use District (Zoning) map amendment for the subject property from Suburban Commercial (SC), Native Area (NA) and Park and Refuge (PR) to Commercial 1 (C 1). The subject of this staff report is the proposed FLUM amendment. { Packet Pg. 1540 P.5 Existing FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation The Applicant states that the reason for the proposed amendment is "The site has three (3) land use districts and three (3) associated Future Land Use districts. It can be seen from the associated map that there evidently was a mapping error as to how the boundary lines were created for these parcels. We are requesting a Land Use District (LUD) map change to Commercial 1 District (Cl) and a Future Land Use (FLU) Map change to Commercial (COMM) for both parcels." The Applicant's full explanation and justification of the proposed amendments is included in the file for the application (File 42018-075). In accordance with LDC Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on September 5, 2018 at 5:30 PM at the subject property to discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment and corresponding Land Use District (Zoning) Map amendment, and to provide for public participation. There was one (1) attendee who did not provide any input. At a regular meeting held on December 11, 2018, the Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the proposed FLUM map amendment, provided for public comment and recommended approval through DRC Resolution 22-18. At a regular meeting held on December 12, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed FLUM map amendment through PC Resolution P38-18 and provided for public comment. The proposed density during review was as follows: Maximum development Existing FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon density/intensity 1 du(DR, MU, MI) 3 du(SC) Mixed Residential 6 du(UC) Use/Commercial 0.87 units Allocated Density Commercial Apartments (MC) (RV) Total Upland 2 du(MI) Area: 0.29 acres 6-18du (SC) (12,655 sf) TDR/Market Rate 12 du(UC) Residential Max Net 12-18 du(MU) 1.39 units 0.23 buildable Density 18 du(DR) acres (0.29 ac— 0.20 open space ratio) Affordable 2 du(MI) Residential Max Net 6-18du (SC) 4.18 units Density 12 du UC Packet Pg. 1541 P.5 12-18 du(MU) 18 du(DR) Transient 10-15 rooms/spaces 4.36 rooms/spaces Allocated Density 0.10— 0.45 (SC, UC, DR, MU) Nonresidential Maximum Intensity <2,500 SF (RV) 7,593 sf 0.30-0.60 MI FAR Residential 0 du(CD) 0 units Allocated Density Conservation (C) TDR/Market Rate N/A Residential Max Net 0 units Total Upland Area: Density 0.19 acres Affordable (8,397 sf) Residential Max Net N/A 0 units 0.02 buildable acres Density (0.19 ac—0.90 open Transient 0 rooms/spaces 0 rooms/spaces space ratio) Allocated Density Nonresidential 0.05 (CD) 420 sf Maximum Intensity Residential 0 du 0 units Allocated Density Recreation (R) TDR/Market Rate N/A Residential Max Net 0 units Total Upland Area: Density 0.76 acres Affordable (33,229 sf) Residential Max Net N/A 0 units 0.08 buildable acres Density (0.76 ac—0.90 open Transient 2 rooms or spaces 1.53 rooms/spaces space ratio) Allocated Density Nonresidential 0.20 6,646 sf Maximum Intensity Maximum development Proposed FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon density/in ensi Commercial Residential 0 du 0 units market rate (COMM) Allocated Density Packet Pg. 1542 P.5 TDR/Market Rate Total Upland Residential Max Net N/A 0 units market rate Area: 1.25 acres Density (54,281 sf) Affordable N/A 1.0 buildable acres Residential Max Net 0 units affordable (1.25 ac— 0.20 Density open space ratio) Transient 0 rooms/spaces 0 rooms/spaces Allocated Density Nonresidential 0.15 — 0.40 (C1) Maximum Intensity 27,141 sf 0.35 — 0.50 C2 Residential Market Rate Allocated: -0.87 units Net Change in TDR/Market Rate Residential Max Net: -1.39 unit Development Affordable Residential Max Net: -4.18 units Potential Based on FLUM Transient Allocated: -5.89 rooms/spaces Nonresidential: +12,482 sf As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment would result in a decrease in 0.87 units in permanent allocated residential development potential; a decrease of 1.39 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the use of TDRs; a decrease of 4.18 units in affordable residential development potential; a decrease of 5.89 rooms or spaces for transient units; and an increase in nonresidential development potential of 12,482 square feet. ------------------ Comprehensive Plan Amendments may be proposed by the Board of County Commissioners, the Planning Commission, the Director of Planning, or the owner or other person having a contractual interest in property to be affected by a proposed amendment. The Director of Planning shall review and process applications as they are received and pass them onto the Development Review Committee and the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing. The Planning Commission shall review the application, the reports and recommendations of the Department of Planning & Environmental Resources and the Development Review Committee and the testimony given at the public hearing. The Planning Commission shall submit its recommendations and findings to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). The BOCC holds a public hearing to consider the transmittal of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, and considers the staff report, staff recommendation, and the testimony given at the public hearing. The BOCC may or may not recommend transmittal to the State Land Planning Agency. The amendment is transmitted to State Land Planning Agency, which then reviews the proposal and issues an Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report. Upon receipt of the ORC report, the County has Packet Pg. 1543 P.5 180 days to adopt the amendments, adopt the amendments with changes or not adopt the amendment. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: On January 30, 2019, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the BOCC held a public hearing to consider transmittal of the proposed text amendment, considered the staff report, and provided for public comment and public participation in accordance with the requirements of state law and the procedures adopted for public participation in the planning process. The BOCC adopted Resolution 035-2019 transmitting the proposed amendment to the State Land Planning Agency (Department of Economic Opportunity—DEO)for review and comment. Following their review of the proposed amendment, DEO issued an Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) report on May 6, 2019 (attached). The ORC report did not identify any objections, recommendations or comments. The County has 180 days from the date of receipt of the ORC to adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the amendment with changes or not adopt the amendment. CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. DOCUMENTATION: 2018-075_Staff Report_BOCC_06.19.19 Exhibit 1 to Staff Report- MONROE CO. 19-OIACSC ORC report Exhibit 2 to Staff Report - 11X17_OceanReef FLUM_2018-075 Ordinance Ex.l to Ordinance - FLUM_Ord_Map_2018-075 FINANCIAL IMPACT: Effective Date: N/A Expiration Date: N/A Total Dollar Value of Contract: N/A Total Cost to County: N/A Current Year Portion: N/A Budgeted: N/A Source of Funds: CPI: N/A Indirect Costs: N/A Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: N/A Revenue Producing: N/A If yes, amount: N/A Packet Pg. 1544 P.5 Grant: N/A County Match: N/A Insurance Required: N/A Additional Details: N/A REVIEWED BY: Emily Schemper Completed 05/31/2019 12:38 AM Assistant County Administrator Christine Hurley Completed 05/31/2019 10:32 AM Steve Williams Completed 05/31/2019 12:57 PM Maureen Proffitt Completed 05/31/2019 1:03 PM Budget and Finance Completed 05/31/2019 3:15 PM Maria Slavik Completed 06/02/2019 4:35 PM Kathy Peters Completed 06/03/2019 11:58 AM Board of County Commissioners Pending 06/19/2019 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1545 P.5.a 2 14 3v v. ,., ., i 4ILm.,ww 5 MEMORANDUM 6 MONROE COUNTY PLANNING&ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 7 We strive to be caring,professional and fair 8 9 To: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners � 10 11 Through: Emily Schemper, AICP, CFM, Senior Director of Planning & Environmental Resources 12 E 13 From: Cheryl Cioffari, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager 14 15 Date: May 28, 2019 16 c 17 Subject: An ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending 18 the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Mixed Use / Commercial (MC), 19 Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) to Commercial (COMM), for a portion of 20 property located at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club; as proposed 21 by Ocean Reef Club Inc. (2018-075) 22 a� 23 Meeting: June 19, 2019 c� 24 25 26 I. REQUEST 27 °> 28 On April 11, 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department received an application a� 29 from the Joel Reed of RC3WORLD Inc. on behalf of the Ocean Reef Club Inc. "the Applicant," to 30 amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation for a portion of property 31 located at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club. On July 18, 2018, the Applicant 6 32 submitted a revised application to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from 33 Mixed Use/ Commercial (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) to Commercial (COMM). The 34 Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use District (Zoning) map amendment for the 35 subject property from Suburban Commercial (SC), Native Area (NA) and Park and Refuge (PR) to 36 Commercial 1 (C1). The subject of this staff report is the proposed FLUM amendment. 37 LO i 00 CD cv BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 1 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1546 P.5.a z O H IL Aw O Q ti .., p 0 - � o _J N N _ Q 2 Existing FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation U_ 3 C 4 II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION c 5 Q 0 6 Site Information: 7 Address: 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club 8 Parcel ID: 00572797-003600 and 00572797-003603 9 Owner/Applicant: Ocean Reef Club, Inc. 10 Size of Property: 1.246 acres (54,281 SF) per survey completed by Eduardo M. Suarez, PSM p 11 of Longitude Surveyors dated May 29, 2014 and updated on August 8, 2018 12 FLUM Designation: Mixed Use/ Commercial (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) 13 Land Use District: Suburban Commercial (SC), Native Area (NA) and Park and Refuge (PR) •2 14 Tier Designation: none 15 Flood Zones: AE (EL 10) 16 CBRS: No 17 Existing Use: Nonresidential building (Ocean Reef Community Association and the Monroe 18 County Planning/Building Department) and a cell tower of 19 Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land and Hammock v 20 Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include single-family m 21 residential uses south and west, multi-family residential uses to the north and a golf course toi 22 the east. C a 23 24 The property currently has a Land Use District (Zoning) designation of Suburban Commercial (SC), 25 Native Area (NA) and Park and Refuge (PR) and a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation of co 26 Mixed Use / Commercial (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C). The property was within the ti 27 GU (general use) and RU-3 (multiple-family residential) zoning districts prior to September 15, o 28 1986. The property was re-designated as Native Area (NA) and Sparsely Settled (SS) with the final c 29 adoption of the LUD map in 1992. With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan's FLUM in 1997, 30 the property was given the current FLUM designation of Mixed Use/ Commercial (MC), Recreation 31 (R) and Conservation (C). 32 a r r Q BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 2 of 14 File#2018-075 Packet Pg. 1547 P.5.a I The Applicant is also requesting proposed Land Use District (Zoning) Map amendment for the 2 property from Suburban Commercial (SC), Native Area (NA) and Park and Refuge (PR) to 3 Commercial 1 (C1). The subject of this staff report is the proposed FLUM amendment. 0 4 IL 5 The Applicant states that the reason for the proposed amendment is "The site has three (3) land use 6 districts and three (3) associated Future Land Use districts. It can be seen from the associated map 7 that there evidently was a mapping error as to how the boundary lines were created for these parcels. 8 We are requesting a Land Use District (LUD) map change to Commercial 1 District (C1) and a 9 Future Land Use (FLU) Map change to Commercial (COMM) for both parcels." The Applicant's00 10 full explanation and justification of the proposed amendments is included in the file for the 11 application (File 42018-075). 12 13 Staff has reviewed the Applicant's position and supporting documentation, and is also reviewing the 14 proposed amendment for consistency with State Statutes (including 163.3187, F.S., above), Rules, 15 internal consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and balancing all the requirements and policy U- 16 issues. 0 17 18 Community Meeting and Public Participation 19 In accordance with LDC Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on September 5, 2018 20 at 5:30 PM at the subject property to discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM) 21 amendment and corresponding Land Use District (Zoning) Map amendment, and to provide for 22 public participation. There was one (1) attendee who did not provide any input. 23 24 Development Review Committee and Public Input 25 At a regular meeting held on December 11, 2018, the Development Review Committee (DRC) 26 considered the proposed FLUM map amendment, provided for public comment and recommended .2 27 approval through DRC Resolution 22-18. 28 29 Planning Commission and Public Input 30 At a regular meeting held on December 12, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval 31 of the proposed FLUM map amendment through PC Resolution P38-18 and provided for public 32 comment. 33 U 34 Previous Relevant BOCC Action and Public Input i 35 On January 30, 2019, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the BOCC held a public hearing to consider 0 36 transmittal of the proposed text amendment, considered the staff report, and provided for public 0 37 comment and public participation in accordance with the requirements of state law and the 38 procedures adopted for public participation in the planning process. The BOCC adopted Resolution 39 035-2019 transmitting the proposed amendment to the State Land Planning Agency (Department of L� 40 Economic Opportunity—DEO)for review and comment. 00 41 42 Following their review of the proposed amendment, DEO issued an Objections, Recommendations 43 and Comments (ORC) report on May 6, 2019 (attached). The ORC report did not identify any 44 objections, recommendations or comments. The County has 180 days from the date of receipt of the 45 ORC to adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the amendment with changes or not adopt the 46 amendment. BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 3 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1548 P.5.a 1 III. AMENDMENT REVIEW 2 3 Maximum Allocated Density and Intensity by Future Land Use Map Designation 4 a. Maximum Existing FLUM Type Adopted development potential Standards based upon densit /intensi 00 1 du(DR, MU, MI) 3 du(SC) Residential Commerc al 0.87 units Allocated Density Apartments (RV) 0 2 du(MI) Mixed Use/Commercial TDR/Market Rate 6-18du (SC) MC 12 du(UC) ( ) Residential Max Net 1.39 units Density 12-18 du(MU) Total Upland Area: 0.29 18 du(DR) acres 0 (12,655 sf) 2 du(MI) Affordable 6-18du (SC) 0.23 buildable acres Residential Max Net 12 du(UC) 4.18 units (0.29 ac—0.20 open space Density 12-18 du(MU) ratio) y 18 du(DR) Transient 10-15 4.36 rooms/spaces Allocated Density rooms/spaces �i 0.10 —0.45 (SC, UC, DR, MU) CO Nonresidential <21500 SF (RV) 7,593 sf a� Maximum Intensity 0.30-0.60 (MI) FAR 1 Conservation (C) Residential 0 du (CD) 00 Allocated Density 0 units Total Upland Area: 0.19 TDR/Market Rate N acres Residential Max Net N/A 0 units a (8,397 sf) Density c� Affordable N/A 0 units 0.02 buildable acres Residential Max Net BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 4 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1549 P.5.a (0.19 ac—0.90 open space Density ratio) Transient 0 rooms/spaces 0 rooms/spaces Allocated Density a. 0 Nonresidential 0.05 (CD) 420 sf Maximum Intensity LO Residential 0 du Q Allocated Density 0 units 00 Recreation (R) TDR/Market Rate N/A Residential Max Net 0 units Total Upland Area: 0.76 Density acres Affordable (33,229 sf) Residential Max Net N/A 0 units Density LL 0.08 buildable acres Transient 2 rooms or 0 (0.76 ac—0.90 open space Allocated Density spaces 1.53 rooms/spaces ratio) Nonresidential 0.20 6,646 sf Q Maximum IntensityIr- Maximum Proposed FLUM Type Adopted development potential Standards based upon density/intensity density/intensity 0 Residential 0 du Allocated Density 0 units market rate a� Commercial (COMM) TDR/Market Rate N/A Residential Max Net 0 units market rate Total Upland Area: 1.25 Density acres Affordable (54,281 sf) Residential Max Net N/A 0 units affordable Density 1.0 buildable acres Transient 00 (1.25 ac—0.20 open space 0 rooms/spaces 0 rooms/spaces � 1 ratio) Allocated Density 0 Nonresidential 0.15 — 0.40 (C 1) 0.35 — 0.50 (C2) 27,141 sf tt: Maximum Intensity LO i Residential Market Rate Allocated: -0.87 units V.- 00 TDR/Market Rate Residential Max Net: -1.39 unit cv Net Change in Development Affordable Residential Max Net: -4.18 units Potential Based on FLUM Transient Allocated: -5.89 rooms/spaces Nonresidential: +12,482 sf BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 5 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1550 P.5.a I The above table provides an approximation of the development potential for residential, transient 2 and commercial development. Section 130-156(b) of the Land Development Code states: "The 3 density and intensity provisions set out in this section are intended to be applied cumulatively so that p 4 no development shall exceed the total density limits of this article. For example, if a development a 5 includes both residential and commercial development, the total gross amount of development shall o 6 not exceed the cumulated permitted intensity of the parcel proposed for development." Q 7 8 As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed o 9 FLUM amendment would result in a decrease in 0.87 units "" °r° 10 in permanent allocated residential development potential; a CD 11 decrease of 1.39 units in max net density residential 12 potential for market rate units with the use of TDRs; a 13 decrease of 4.18 units in affordable residential Q 14 development potential; a decrease of 5.89 rooms or spaces 15 for transient units; and an increase in nonresidential U_ 16 development potential of 12,482 square feet. 0 17 18 Compatibility with the Surrounding Area Q 0 19 a. Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land o 20 b. Existing Tier Designation: none 21 c. Number of Listed Endangered or Threatened 22 Species: Four 23 d. Existing Use: Nonresidential building (Ocean Reef Number of Protected Sped � 0 24 Community Association and the Monroe County 25 Planning/Building Department) and a cell tower 26 e. Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include single-family 27 residential uses south and west, multi-family residential uses to the north and a golf course to 28 the east. 29 CD 30 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the 31 surrounding area. c 32 33 Concurrency Analysis (Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.1.1) p 34 Traffic Circulation (Comprehensive Plan Policy 301.1.1) 35 The subject property is located on Anchor Drive within Ocean Reef, which is accessed by County a 36 Road 905. The property is only accessible by via US 1. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, the 4) 37 level of service standard for US 1 is LOS of"C." According to the 2017 US 1 Arterial Travel Time tt: 38 and Delay Study, US 1 overall is operating at a LOS of"C" and Segment 23 on Key Largo (MMco 39 99.5 to MM 106)is operating at a LOS of"A." 40 q 41 The proposed FLUM amendment would result in a decrease in residential potential and a slight c 42 increase in nonresidential potential. For 2017, there is a maximum reserve volume for Segment 23 of N r 43 8,333 trips, and the maximum reserve volume for US 1 as a whole is 18,547 trips. 44 E 45 The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts to the Traffic Circulation LOS. r 46 Q BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 6 of 14 File#2018-075 Packet Pg. 1551 P.5.a I Potable Water(Comprehensive Plan Policy 701.1.1) 2 Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority's water treatment facility in Florida City has a maximum water 3 treatment design capacity of 29.8 million gallons per day (MGD) and is capable of treating up to 0 4 23.8 MGD. There are also two saltwater Reserve Osmosis (RO) plants, located on Stock Island and 5 Marathon, which are able to produce potable water under emergency conditions. The RO 0 6 desalination plants have design capacities of 2.0 and 1.0 MGD of water, respectively. The County's 7 2015-2016 water demand were 17.89 & 17.66 MGD respectively. 8 The proposed FLUM amendment could result in a net decrease in demand from this site of 896 00 9 gallons per day. 10 Potable Water Max Potential Residential Residential Persons/ Total Total LOS FLUM LOS Standard Development Household Persons Demand Net Change (Policy 701.1.1) (dwelling units) MC,C and 100 gal/cap/day 4 2.24 2.24 896 gal/day I- R (224 gal/du/day) c -896 gal/day Proposed: 100 gal/cap/day 0 2.24 0 0 gal/day COMM (224 gal/du/day) 4- 11 � 12 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Potable Water LOS. 13 14 Solid Waste (Comprehensive Plan Policy 801.1.1) 0 15 Monroe County has a contract with Waste Management authorizing the use of in-state facilities 16 through September 30, 2024; thereby, providing the County with approximately six (6) more years of 17 guaranteed capacity for solid waste. Currently, there is adequate capacity for solid waste generation. Ln 18 All commercial solid waste is handled by private contract. 19 20 The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Solid Waste LOS. 21 22 Sanitary Sewer(Comprehensive Plan Policy 901.1.1 23 The County has adopted water quality treatment standards for wastewater facilities and within the U 24 Sanitary Wastewater Treatment Master Plan, Exhibit 3-8, has stated the LOS standard for residential � 25 and nonresidential flow is 145 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The proposed � 1 26 FLUM amendment would leave the allocated density on the site at zero (0) dwelling units, which 0 27 would not increase the required flow. Any proposed development on the site will either need to 28 connect to the North Key Largo Utilities Corporation system, or provide on-site sewage treatment M 29 and disposal that meets the LOS standards in Policy 901.1.1. 30 `� 31 The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Sanitary Sewer LOS. 00 32 N 33 IV.CONSISTENCY WITH THE MONROE COUNTY YEAR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE 34 PLAN, THE KEY LARGO COMMUNIKEYS PLAN, THE FLORIDA STATUTES,AND 35 PRINCIPLES FOR GUIDING DEVELOPMENT 36 BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 7 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1552 P.5.a I A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the 2 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Note: compliance with Policy 101.5.26 must 3 be established prior to BOCC adoption of the proposed FLUM amendment). Specifically, it 0 4 furthers: IL 5 6 Goal 101: Monroe County shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life, ensure the 7 safety of County residents and visitors, and protect valuable natural resources. 8 9 Objective 101.500 10 Monroe County shall regulate future development and redevelopment to maintain and enhance 11 the character of the community and protect natural resources by providing for the compatible 12 distribution of land uses consistent with the designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. 13 14 Policy 101.5.8 :D 15 The principal purpose of the Commercial (COMM) future land use category is to provide for the U- 16 establishment of commercial zoning districts where various types of commercial retail; highway- 0 17 oriented sales and services; commercial recreation; light industrial; public, institutional and 18 office uses may be permitted at intensities which are consistent with the community character 19 and the natural environment. The commercial zoning districts established within this category 20 are intended to serve the immediate vicinity or serve the Upper or Lower subarea. This category 21 is not intended to accommodate transient or permanent residential development. 22 23 In order to protect environmentally sensitive lands, the following development controls shall 24 apply to all Tier I lands within this land use category: 25 1. only low intensity commercial uses shall be allowed; and 26 2. a maximum floor area ratio of 0.15 shall apply. 27 > 28 Policy 101.5.25 29 Monroe County hereby adopts the following density and intensity standards for the future land 30 use categories, which are shown on the FLUM and described in Policies 101.5.1101.5.20. 31 [F.S. § 163.3177(6)(a)l.] 32 Future Land Use Densities and Intensities Minimum �I Residential n> Nonresidential Open Space 00. Future Land Use 0 Category and Maximum Net DensityMaximum Ratio Corresponding Zoning Allocated Density�a> <a>ro> Intensity (per upland acre) (per buildable acre) (floor area ratio) L0� L0 Commercial(COMM) 0 du N/A (Cl and C2 zoning) 0 rooms/spaces N/A 0.15-0.50 0.20 Conservation(C) 0 du N/A 0.05 0.90 (CD zoning) 0 rooms/spaces N/A BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 8 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1553 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................. I du (DR,MU,MI) 2 du(MI) 0.10-0.45 0 Mixed Use/Commercial 3 du(SC) 6-18 du(SC)(k) (SC,UC,DR, CL 6 du(UQ 12 du(UQ MU) 0 (MC)(SC,UC,(t)(g)DR,RV,MU and Commercial 12-18 du(MU)0 MI zonin Apartments 18 du(DR) <2,500 SF(RV) 0.20 g) (RV)(h) 10-25 rooms/spaces 0.30-0.60(MI) 00 5-15 rooms/spaces ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................... C E Recreation(R) 0 du N/A 0.20 0.90 (PR zoning) 2 rooms/spaces N/A ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... �Notes: u- ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... (a) The allocated densities for submerged lands,salt ponds,freshwater ponds,and mangroves shall be 0 and the 0 maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. C (b) The Maximum Net Density is the maximum density allowable with the use of TDRs,or for qualifying affordable housing development.TDRs can be utilized to attain the density between the allocated density standard up to the maximum net density standard.Deed restricted affordable dwelling units may be built up to the maximum net density without the use of TDRs. "N/A"means that maximum net density bonuses shall not be C available.Buildable acres means the portion of a parcel of land that is developable and is not required open space. as (c) Additional open space requirements may apply based on environmental protection criteria; in these cases,the — most restrictive requirement shall apply. C .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 0 (d) Future land use categories of Agriculture/Aquaculture,Education,Institutional,Preservation,Public Buildings/Lands,and Public Facilities,which have no directly corresponding zoning,may be used with new or existing zoning districts as appropriate. (e) Within the Mainland Native future land use district,campground spaces and nonresidential buildings shall only be permitted for educational,research or sanitary purposes. (t) For properties consisting of hammocks,pinelands or disturbed wetlands within the Mixed Use/Commercial and Mixed Use/Commercial Fishing future land use categories,the maximum floor area ratio shall be 0.10 and the maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. 0 (g) A mixture of uses shall be maintained for parcels designated as MI zoning district that are within the MC future land use category.Working waterfront and water dependent uses,such as marina,fish house/market,boat 0 CL repair,boat building,boat storage,or other similar uses, shall comprise a minimum of 35%of the upland area of the property,adjacent to the shoreline,pursuant to Policy 101.5.6. �(h) In the RV zoning district,commercial apartments shall be allowed,not to exceed 10%of total spaces allowed ,or in existence on the site,whichever is less. LO (i) The allocated density for the CFSD-20 zoning district(Little Torch Key)shall be I dwelling unit per acre,or 00 I dwelling unit per parcel for those parcels existing as of September 15, 1986,whichever is less,and the C14 maximum net density bonuses shall not be available.Residential density shall be allowed in addition to the permitted nonresidential uses and intensity(i.e.,density and intensity shall not be counted cumulatively). C E (j) Within IS subdivisions with primarily single family residential units,IS-D zoning maybe used with a RM future land use designation for platted lots which have a duplex that was lawfully established prior to September 15, 1986. BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 9 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1554 (k) The maximum net density shall be 25 du/buildable acre for the UR zoning district and shall be 18 du/buildable acre for the MU and SC zoning district for development where all units are deed restricted affordable Z dwelling units.For the UR zoning district market rate housing may be developed as part of an affordable or 0 employee housing project with a maximum net density not exceeding 18 du/buildable acre. IL (1) Vessels,including live-aboard vessels,or associated wet slips are not considered dwelling units and do not 0 count when calculating density. (in) Within the Residential Low future land use category,the maximum net density for platted lots of less than LO 0.40 gross acres within the SR zoning district shall be I dwelling unit per platted lot,provided all of the following conditions are met: 00 1) The parcel must be one full platted lot shown on a plat approved by the County and duly recorded prior to C14 January 2, 1996; 'a �2) The platted lot may not be identified for any other use or purpose on the plat(e.g., "park," "common area," etc.); 3) The platted lot must have a Tier designation of Tier 111; U_ �4) Notwithstanding Policy 101.13.2,the maximum net density may only be reached with the transfer of one(1) 0 full TDR to the SR lot,regardless of the size of the lot and the allocated density assigned to it; ca ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. �5) The TDR must meet all requirements and procedures specified in Policy 101.13.3 and Section 130-160 of the Land Development Code; 6) TDRs under this provision may not be transferred into noise zones of 65 DNL or greater; and ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... �7) The subject parcel must comply with Policy 301.2.5 regarding legal access. 2 Objective 101.19 0 3 Monroe County shall address local community needs while balancing the needs of all Monroe ;=1 4 County communities. These efforts shall focus on the human crafted environment and shall be .r_ 5 undertaken through the Livable CommuniKeys Planning Program. 2 6 7 Policy 101.19.2 8 The Community Master Plans shall be incorporated into the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as a part M 9 of the plan and be implemented as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following Community (0 10 Master Plans have been completed in accordance with the principles outlined in this section and 11 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners: 12 0 13 0 14 5. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is incorporated by reference into the 2010 15 Comprehensive Plan. Only the Strategies denoted with a green checkmark in this Master Plan tr_ 16 have been adopted and approved as equivalent to the term Objectives in the Comprehensive 17 Plan. Only the Action Items denoted with a green checkmark in this Master Plan have been LO 18 adopted equivalent to the term Policy in the Comprehensive Plan. Strategies and Action Items 19 without a green checkmark next to them are not considered to be consistent with the 00 20 definitions of"Objective" and "Policy" and therefore do not serve as equivalents. Adopted by N 21 Ordinance 012-2007. 22 E 23 24 B. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Key Largo Livable Communikeys Plan. 25 Specifically, it furthers: BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 10 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1555 P.5.a 1 2 Strategy 1.3 3 Continue to utilize the Land Use District Map and supporting FLUM to regulate land use type, 0 4 density and intensity on individual parcels within the planning area. 5 0 6 Strategy 9.3 7 Enhance current passive recreational areas to provide adequate accessibility and outdoor 8 education opportunities to all users, while maintaining the sensitive natural and cultural 00 9 resources within the planning area. 10 11 Action Item 1.3.1: Continue to use the FLUM and Land Use District Maps to regulate 12 development of individual parcels with respect to density, intensity, bulk regulations, and all 13 other land development regulation. This will protect the existing conformance status of most uses 14 and promote orderly development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 15 LL 16 Action Item 1.3.2: Revise the FLUM and Land Use District Maps to resolve nonconformities in 0 17 the planning area where appropriate. 18 19 Action Item 1.3.3: Revise the FLUM and Land Use District Maps to resolve conflicts and 20 inconsistencies between the FLUM and Land Use District Maps. 21 22 C. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development for the 23 Florida Keys Area, Section 380.0552(7), Florida Statutes. 0 24 25 For the purposes of reviewing consistency of the adopted plan or any amendments to that plan with 26 the principles for guiding development and any amendments to the principles, the principles shall be 2 27 construed as a whole and no specific provision shall be construed or applied in isolation from the 28 other provisions. 29 30 (a) Strengthening local government capabilities for managing land use and development so that 31 local government is able to achieve these objectives without continuing the area of critical 32 state concern designation. 33 (b) Protecting shoreline and benthic resources, including mangroves, coral reef formations, 0 34 seagrass beds, wetlands, fish and wildlife, and their habitat. COi 35 (c) Protecting upland resources, tropical biological communities, freshwater wetlands, native � 36 tropical vegetation (for example, hardwood hammocks and pinelands), dune ridges and 37 beaches, wildlife, and their habitat. 38 (d) Ensuring the maximum well-being of the Florida Keys and its citizens through sound 39 economic development. LOI 40 (e) Limiting the adverse impacts of development on the quality of water throughout the Florida 00 41 Keys. 42 (f) Enhancing natural scenic resources, promoting the aesthetic benefits of the natural N 43 environment, and ensuring that development is compatible with the unique historic character a 44 of the Florida Keys. E 45 (g) Protecting the historical heritage of the Florida Keys. 46 (h) Protecting the value, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and amortized life of existing and 47 proposed major public investments, including: BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 11 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1556 P.5.a 1 2 1. The Florida Keys Aqueduct and water supply facilities; 3 2. Sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities; 0 4 3. Solid waste treatment, collection, and disposal facilities; 5 4. Key West Naval Air Station and other military facilities; 0 6 5. Transportation facilities; 7 6. Federal parks, wildlife refuges, and marine sanctuaries; 8 7. State parks, recreation facilities, aquatic preserves, and other publicly owned 00 9 properties; 10 8. City electric service and the Florida Keys Electric Co-op; and 11 9. Other utilities, as appropriate. 12 (i) Protecting and improving water quality by providing for the construction, operation, 13 maintenance, and replacement of stormwater management facilities; central sewage 14 collection; treatment and disposal facilities; and the installation and proper operation and 15 maintenance of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems. LL 16 (j) Ensuring the improvement of nearshore water quality by requiring the construction and 0 17 operation of wastewater management facilities that meet the requirements of ss. 18 381.0065(4)(1) and 403.086(10), as applicable, and by directing growth to areas served by 19 central wastewater treatment facilities through permit allocation systems. 20 (k) Limiting the adverse impacts of public investments on the environmental resources of the 0 21 Florida Keys. 22 (1) Making available adequate affordable housing for all sectors of the population of the Florida 23 Keys. 24 (m)Providing adequate alternatives for the protection of public safety and welfare in the event of 25 a natural or manmade disaster and for a postdisaster reconstruction plan. r_ 26 (n) Protecting the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Florida Keys and 2 27 maintaining the Florida Keys as a unique Florida resource. 28 29 Pursuant to Section 380.0552(7) Florida Statutes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the 30 Principles for Guiding Development as a whole and is not inconsistent with any Principle. 17 31 32 D. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.). U� 33 Specifically, the amendment furthers: 0 34 00i 35 163.3161(4), F.S. — It is the intent of this act that local governments have the ability to preserve 0 36 and enhance present advantages; encourage the most appropriate use of land, water and 0 37 resources, consistent with the public interest; overcome present handicaps; and deal 38 effectively with future problems that may result from the use and development of land within 39 their jurisdictions. Through the process of comprehensive planning, it is intended that units L� 40 of local government can preserve, promote, protect, and improve the public health, safety, 00 41 comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, law enforcement and fire prevention, and 42 general welfare; facilitate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water, 43 sewerage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing, and other requirements and 44 services; and conserve, develop, utilize, and protect natural resources within their 45 jurisdictions. 46 BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 12 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1557 P.5.a 1 163.3161(6), F.S. — It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans shall have the 2 legal status set out in this act and that no public or private development shall be permitted 3 except in conformity with comprehensive plans, or elements or portions thereof, prepared 0 4 and adopted in conformity with this act. 5 0 6 163.3177(1), F.S. — The comprehensive plan shall provide the principles, guidelines, standards, 7 and strategies for the orderly and balanced future economic, social, physical, environmental, 8 and fiscal development of the area that reflects community commitments to implement the 9 plan and its elements. These principles and strategies shall guide future decisions in a00 10 consistent manner and shall contain programs and activities to ensure comprehensive plans E 11 are implemented. The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and 12 strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local E 13 government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, 14 modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner. It is not :D 15 the intent of this part to require the inclusion of implementing regulations in the U- 16 comprehensive plan but rather to require identification of those programs, activities, and land 0 17 development regulations that will be part of the strategy for implementing the comprehensive 18 plan and the principles that describe how the programs, activities, and land development 19 regulations will be carried out. The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards 20 for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of 21 more detailed land development and use regulations. 22 23 163.3201, F.S. — Relationship of comprehensive plan to exercise of land development regulatory 24 authority. It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans or elements thereof 25 shall be implemented, in part, by the adoption and enforcement of appropriate local 26 regulations on the development of lands and waters within an area. It is the intent of this act U) 27 that the adoption and enforcement by a governing body of regulations for the development of .5 28 land or the adoption and enforcement by a governing body of a land development code for an 29 area shall be based on, be related to, and be a means of implementation for an adopted 30 comprehensive plan as required by this act. 31 32 V. PROCESS 33 U 34 Comprehensive Plan Amendments may be proposed by the Board of County Commissioners the i 35 Planning Commission, the Director of Planning, or the owner or other person having a contractual 0 36 interest in property to be affected by a proposed amendment. The Director of Planning shall review 37 and process applications as they are received and pass them onto the Development Review 38 Committee and the Planning Commission. 39 L� 40 The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing. The Planning Commission shall 00 41 review the application, the reports and recommendations of the Department of Planning & 42 Environmental Resources and the Development Review Committee and the testimony given at the 43 public hearing. The Planning Commission shall submit its recommendations and findings to the 44 Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). The BOCC holds a public hearing to consider the 45 transmittal of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, and considers the staff report, staff 46 recommendation, and the testimony given at the public hearing. The BOCC may or may not BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 13 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1558 P.5.a I recommend transmittal to the State Land Planning Agency. The amendment is transmitted to State 2 Land Planning Agency, which then reviews the proposal and issues an Objections, 3 Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report. Upon receipt of the ORC report, the County has 0 4 180 days to adopt the amendments, adopt the amendments with changes or not adopt the IL 5 amendment. 0 6 7 VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 8 9 Staff recommends approval of the proposed FLUM amendment from Mixed Use / Commercial00 10 (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) to Commercial (COMM). 11 � as 12 VII. EXHIBIT 13 14 1. DEO ORC dated May 6, 2019 15 2. 11" by 17" FLUM Amendment Maps L 0 16 3. FLUM Ordinance 17 4. FLUM Ordinance Map a� a� i i 0 LO i 00 cv BOCC Adoption SR 06.19.19 Page 14 of 14 File 42018-075 Packet Pg. 1559 P.5.b Ron DeSantis Ken Lawson GOVER19OR _ Ek.0)11VE a1RECIF'd R FLORIDA ILECONOMICOPPORTUNITY May 6,2019 00 The Honorable Sylvia Murphy Mayor, Monroe County 102050 Overseas Hwy,Suite 234 Key Largo, Florida 33037 Dear Mayor Murphy: The Department of Economic Opportunity("Department") has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for Monroe County(Amendment No. 19-01ACSC),which was received and determined complete on March 25,2019. We have reviewed the proposed amendment in accordance with the state coordinated review process set forth in Sections 163.3184(2) and (4), Florida Statutes(F.S.),for compliance with Chapter 163, Part II, F.S.The Department does not identify any objections or comments to the proposed amendment and this letter serves as the Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. Review comments received by the Department from the appropriate reviewing agencies, if any,are enclosed. The County should act by choosing to adopt,adopt with changes, or not adopt the proposed amendment. For your assistance,we have enclosed the procedures for final adoption and transmittal of the comprehensive plan amendment.The second public hearing,which shall be a hearing on whether U to adopt one or more comprehensive plan amendments,must be held within 180 days of your receipt of the Department's attached report,or the amendment will be deemed withdrawn unless extended by agreement with notice to the Department and any affected party that provided comment on the amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(4)(e)1., F.S. If you have any questions related to this review, please contact Daniel Hubbard, Planning Analyst, by telephone at(850)717-8488 or by email at daniel.hubbard@deo.myflorida.com. U Si rely, J es D.Stansbfu hikef 0. reau of Community Planning and Growth 0 JDSJdh Enclosure: Procedures for Adoption Agency Comments cc:Christine Hurley,County Administrator, Monroe County Isabel Cosio Carballo, Executive Director,South Florida Regional Planning Council Florida Department of Economic Opportunity{Caldwell Building a 107 Ee Madison Street I Tallahassee, FL 32399 � w.twittter.com1FLDEO Jwww facea�aiook.comIFLDEO c� An equal opportunity employerlprogram.Auxiliary aims and service are available upon request to individuals with disabilities.All voice telephone numbers on this document may be reached by persons using TTYITTD equipment via the Florida Relay Service at 711. Packet Pg. 1560 P.5.b SUBMITTAL OF ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS IL FOR STATE COORDINATED REVIEW Section 163.3184(4),Florida Statutes NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED: Please submit three complete copies of all comprehensive plan materials,of which one complete paper copy and two complete electronic copies on CD ROM in Portable Document Format(PDF)to the Department of Economic Opportunity and one copy to each entity below that provided timely comments to the local government:the appropriate Regional Planning Council;Water Management District; Department of Transportation; Department of Environmental Protection; Department of State;the appropriate county(municipal amendments only);the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (county plan amendments only); and the Department of Education (amendments relating to public schools);and for certain local governments,the appropriate military installation and any other local government or governmental agency that has filed a written request. SUBMITTAL LETTER: Please include the following information in the cover letter transmitting the adopted amendment: Department of Economic Opportunity identification number for adopted amendment package; 1� 0 Summary description of the adoption package, including any amendments proposed but not adopted; Ordinance number and adoption date; Certification that the adopted amendment(s) has been submitted to all parties that provided timely comments to the local government; U Name,title, address,telephone, FAX number and e-mail address of local government contact; Letter signed by the chief elected official or the person designated by the local government. ADOPTION AMENDMENT PACKAGE: Please include the following information in the amendment package: In the case of text amendments,changes should be shown in strike-through/underline format; 0 In the case of future land use map amendment, an adopted future land use map, in color format,clearly depicting the parcel, its existing future land use designation,and its adopted designation; x A copy of any data and analyses the local government deems appropriate. Effective:lure 2,2031(Updated June 2018) Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 1561 P.5.b Note: If the local government is relying on previously submitted data and analysis, no additional data and analysis is required; Q. Copy of executed ordinance adopting the comprehensive plan amendment(s); Suggested effective date language for the adoption ordinance for state coordinated review: 00 "The effective date of this plan amendment,if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be the date the state land planning agency posts a notice of intent determining that this amendment is in compliance. If the amendment is timely challenged,or if the state land E planning agency issues a notice of intent determining that this amendment is not in compliance, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance." I- 0 List of additional changes made in the adopted amendment that the Department of Economic Opportunity did not previously review; 4- List of findings of the local governing body, if any,that were not included in the ordinance and which provided the basis of the adoption or determination not to adopt the proposed amendment; Statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes not previously reviewed by the Department of Economic Opportunity to the ORC report from the Department of Economic Opportunity. Ci 0 CL x 4i Effective:June 2, 2011(Updated June 2018) Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 1562 From: Ma-Rofiew F To: 0 i— Cc: IL Subject: Monroe County 19-IACSC Proposed 0 Date: Tuesday,April 23,2019 4:34:39 PM Attachments: To: Ray Eubanks,DEO Plan Review Administrator 00 It- CD Re: Monroe County 19-1 ACSC—State Coordinated Review of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment E The Office of Intergovernmental Programs of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(Department)has reviewed the above-referenced amendment package under the provisions of Chapter 163,Florida Statutes. The Department conducted a detailed review that U_ focused on potential adverse impacts to important state resources and facilities, specifically: 0 air and water pollution;wetlands and other surface waters of the state; federal and state-owned lands and interest in lands, including state parks, greenways and trails,conservation easements; solid waste;and water and wastewater treatment. 4- Based on our review of the submitted amendment package,the Department has found no provision that, if adopted,would result in adverse impacts to important state resources subject to the Department's jurisdiction. 0 Please submit all future amendments by email to plan r.cndtl wj�fk,Iridadgp,4()Y,. if your 1� 0 submittal is too large to send via email or if you need other assistance, contact Lindsay Weaver at(850) 717-9037. 0 W 0 W z 0 0 0 x W E Packet Pg. 1563 P.5.b I OMQVIIfNwu'Nil snxutaw �U diue. �FD , 0 Muan" , V Iloricic 31 7 800 00 April 3, 2019 Ray Eubanks, Plan Processing Administrator Department of Economic Opportunity Community Planning and Development 1 7 East Madison Street I- Caldwell Building, MSC 160 Tallahassee, Florida 32399 4— Subject: Comments for the Proposed ComprehensivePlan Amendment, Monroeunt #19-11ACSC Dear Mr. Eubanks: The Florida Department of Transportation, District Six, completed a review of the 1� Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Monroe County 1 1ACSC. The District has reviewed the amendment package per Chapter 163 Florida Statutes and has found no adverse impacts to transportation resources and facilities of State importance. �s Please contact me at 305-470-5393 if you have any questions concerning our response. Sincerely, U " ... Shereen Yee Fong Transportation Inner I 0 Id Desdunes, ., Florida Department of Transportation, District t Huynh P.E., Florida ep f Transportation, District Kenneth Jeffries, Florida Department of Transportation, District Emily Schemper, Monroe County Isabel Cosio Carballo, South FloridaRegional Planning Council Isabel Moreno, South Florida Regional Planning Council ,us Packet Pg. 1564 F From: i10 'PQ=UWWQa=MQUt-x Cc: WAkta—Um IL Subject: Monroe County 19-IACSC(Resolution 035-2019) 0 Date: Tuesday,April 02,2019 11:03:30 AM Dear Ms. Schemper: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff has reviewed the proposed comprehensive plan amendment in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. We have no comments, recommendations, or objections related to listed species and their E habitat or other fish and wildlife resources to offer on this amendment. M If you need any further assistance,please do not hesitate to contact our office by email at -J U- If you have specific technical questions, L 0 please contact Christine Raininger at(561) 882-5811 or by email at Sincerely, Jason Hight Biological Administrator 11 Office of Conservation Planning Services Division of Habitat and Species Conservation 0 620 S.Meridian Street,MS 5B5 � 0 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600 (850) 228-2055 Monroe County 19-1ACSC 38574 0 d U W 0 W z 0 0 0 x W E Packet Pg. 1565 0 �� UU�� ' o�nn—x��o�x-�o��uvn AGENDA ITEM#IV.0 00 DATE: 4PR|LZ, 2019 TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS � FROM: STAFF SUBJECT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AND ADOPTED AMENDMENT 0ONSENTAGENDA � � � Pursuantto the 1974|nter|mca|Agreement creating the South Florida Regional Planning Council(Cound|) � '' the Council isdirected by its memberomuntieoto"assure the orderly,economic,and balancedgrowth and development of the Region, consistent with the protection of natural resources and environment ofthe Region and to protect the heak wel fare e|fereandquaUtyof|ifeoftheneuidentsoftheReQion." 0 `~ In fulfillment of the |nter|oca| Agreement directive and its dudes under State law, the Council reviews CL local government Comprehensive Plan amendments for consistency with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan/orSouth Florida(S0PP). Pursuant to Section 163.3184,Florida Statues ms presently im effect,Council review of comprehensive plan amendments is limited to 1\ adverse effects on regional resources and — facilities identified |n the SRPP and 2\ extra-jurisdictional impacts that would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of any affected local government within the Region. The Counci|^s review of amendments is conducted in two stages: (y) proposed or transmittal and (2) adoption. Council staff reviews the contents of the amendment package once the Department of Economic Opportunity certifies ~� its completeness. ' . d A written report of Council's evaluation pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, is to be provided to the local government and the State Land Planning Agency within 30 calendar days of receipt of the amendment. 0 Recommendation CL Find the proposed and adopted plan amendments from the local governments listed in the tables below generally consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida. Approve this report for transmittal to the local governments with a copy tothe State Land Planning �0 Agency. 0|� � South Florida Regional Planning Council z Oakwood Boulevard,Suite 254 Hollywood,Florida 33nzo 9S4'9z4'365]Phone,954'9u4-3654FAX = P.5.b PROPOSED AMENDMENTS IL Local Council Local Government Governing Government Proposed Adopted Review Date Transmittal or Body and Plan Adoption Public Adoption Amendment Bearing and Meeting Vote 00 Number cv Broward County 19-1ESR d N/A 04-15-19 02-26-19 9-0 (received 03-01-19) 1.The proposed amendments to Broward County's Comprehensive Plan are to the Broward County I- 0 Land Use Plan map (PC 19-2) and the Broward County Land Use Plan text (PCT 19-5). These amendments seek to re-designate 140.7 acres of land currently designated for Recreation & Open Space(132.7 acres),Low-Medium Residential(6.0 acres),and Low Residential (2.0 acres)to Irregular (2.88)Residential.The estimated net effect of this re-designation is the addition of 335 dwelling units to the currently permitted 70 dwelling units per the Broward County Land Use Plan. With the new designation, it's estimated that up to 405 dwelling units would be permitted, resulting in the reduction of 132.7 acres of Recreation&Open Space. 2.The proposed amendments impact a total of 140.7 acres.The site is located in Section 17,Township 49 South, Range 42 East; generally located on the west side of Northwest 21st Avenue, between Commercial Boulevard and Northwest 44th Street. 0 0 CL 3. This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities; however, Council review notes that the regional trend of golf course repurposing is significant. The t3 issues of loss of aquifer recharge and of open space that serves as wildlife habitat and provides positive community aesthetics may have cumulative impact regionally. More locally, Council recommends stormwater management planning during golf course repurposing that addresses the t3 additional potential hazards of emerging flooding trends and extreme weather events. Monroe County 19-2ACSC d N/A 04-15-19 11-20-18 5-0 (received 03-25-19) 1. The proposed amendment to the Monroe County's Comprehensive Plan seeks to allow for the award of Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROGO)allocations to Tier I and Tier III-A for the redevelopment CL C of lawfully existing ROGO exempt market rate dwelling units with replacement Affordable Dwelling Units. The amendment package also amends Policy 101.3.7 of the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan by extending the duration of temporary emergency housing after a natural 0 disaster to allow for temporary emergency housing to be placed at mobile home parks and RV parks. 2.The amendment would affect areas throughout Monroe County. 3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. x 2 Packet Pg. 1567 P.5.b Local Council Local Government Governing IL Government Proposed Adopted Review Date Transmittal or Body and Plan Adoption Public Adoption Amendment Hearing and Meeting Vote Number �- Monroe 00 County 19-1ACSC d N/A 04-15-19 01-23-19 5-0 (received 03-26-19) 1.The proposed amendment to the Monroe County's Comprehensive Plan seeks to amend the land use designation of a parcel on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM)from mixed used/commercial(MC), recreation(R),and conservation (C),to commercial(COMM). 2. The amendment affects a portion of the property at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo, at the Ocean Reef Club,a site that is 1.246 acres. 3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resourcesJfacilities. City of Doral 19-1ESR d N/A 04-15-19 03-27-19 4-0 (received 1 Absent 04-04-19) 1. The proposed amendment to the City of Doral's Comprehensive Plan seeks to amend the Goals, 1� Objectives,and Policies(GOPs)of the Transportation Element,and the Parks and Recreation Element. o CL Transportation Element proposed changes include creation of a maximum parking regulation, development of parking requirements for electric vehicle (EV) charging stations,the establishment of Transit Oriented Development(TOD) nodes along NW 12th Street, including at NW 82nd Avenue, NW 107th Avenue,and NW 97th Avenue.The proposed amendment also includes goals of expanding the bicycle network by 5%per year and increasing transit ridership on the Doral trolley system by 5% per year.The Parks and Recreations Element amendment changes include an increase in the number of multi-purpose trails in the City by 18.5 miles by 2030 through new trail development, and redevelopment of current infrastructure. 2.The amendment affects areas throughout the City of Doral. U 3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. City of Key West 19-1ACSC d N/A 04-15-19 02-05-19 7-0 0 (received 02-28-19) 1.The proposed amendment to the City of Key West's Comprehensive Plan is a text amendment to Table 1-1.1.5 and Policy 1-1.1.10 to allow for deed restricted affordable housing development at a 0 0 maximum of 16 dwelling units per acre as a conditional use within the Historic Public and Semipublic Services District(HPS)zoning district. 2.The HPS zoning district is found ten times in the Zoning Map of the City of Key West. Based on the x densities of abutting districts which range from 8 to 22 dwelling units per acre, the 16 du/acre has been deemed compatible. 3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. E ca 3 Packet Pg. 1568 P.5.b Local Council Local Governm lent Governing IL Government Proposed Adopted Review Date Transmittal or Body and Plan Adoption Public Adoption Amendment Hearing and Meeting Vote Number City of 00 Marathon 19-1ACSC N/A 04-15-19 02-2649 5-0 (received 0344-19) 1.The proposed amendment to the City of Marathon's Comprehensive Plan seeks to amend land use designation of a parcel on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM)from Residential Medium(RM)to Mixed Used (MU) and Residential Medium (RM) for a portion of the Ferrucci property. The intent of the amendment is to allow for six workforce housing units to be built. 2.The approximately 0.84-acre property is located at 222 99th Street,Marathon, Florida on Vaca Key near mile marker 52. 3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. 4- 0 CL City of North Miami g, 19-1ESR d. N/A 04-15-19 02-26-19 5-0 (received t 3 03-11-19) 1.The proposed amendment to the City of North Miami's Comprehensive Plan seeks to revise Policy 1.18.3 of the Future Land Use Element to allow residential use within the NW 7th Avenue Planned Corridor.Development (PCD) Overlay, instead of restricting use to the standard C-1, Commercial District,which does not allow residential use.This amendment allows for compatibility with the City's U other PCD Overlay Districts. 2.This amendment affects the NW 7th Avenue Planned Corridor Development Overlay District. 3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. 0 0 x 4 Packet Pg. 1569 P.5.b Local Council Local Government Governing IL Government Proposed Adopted Review date Transmittal or Body and Plan Adoption Public Adoption Amendment Hearing and Meeting Vote Number �- City of 00 Oakland Park 19-1ESR Y N/A 04-15-19 02-26-19 9-0 (received 03-01-19) 1. This amendment proposes to change the Future Land Use Map designation of 140.7 acres from Parks/Recreation to Irregular (2.88) Residential within a Dashed-Line Area to facilitate the future development of up to 405 residential units,subject to rezoning and site plan approval. L 2. The subject property is located on the west side of NW 21st Avenue between NW 44th Street and o Commercial Boulevard.The property consists of 139+/-net acres and 140.7+/-gross acres which includes half of the adjacent right of way for NW 21st Avenue and West Prospect Road. 3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities;however, Council review notes that the regional trend of golf course repurposing is significant.The issues of loss of aquifer recharge and of open space that serves as wildlife habitat and provides positive community aesthetics may have cumulative impact regionally. More locally, Council recommends stormwater management planning during golf course repurposing that addresses the additional potential hazards of emerging flooding trends and extreme weather events. Additionally, the City is required to revise its Water Supply Facilities Work Plan(Work Plan) within 18 months after approval of the Lower East Coast 1� (LEC) Water Supply Plan Update by the District's Governing Board. The District's Governing Board o CL approved the LEC Water Supply Plan Update on November 8,2018.Therefore,the City's Work Plan needs to be updated and adopted by May 2020.Council review notes that the City should enhance its existing affordable/workforce housing programs to increase the supply of affordable housing for very low, low- and moderate-income households by working with the public and private sectors; allowing and encouraging accessory dwelling units is an effective strategy towards this goal. 4.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. City of Wilton Manors U 19-1ER Y N/A 04-15-19 03-12-19 5-0 (received 04-08-19) 1. The proposed amendment to the City of Wilton Manor's Comprehensive Plan are Evaluation and Appraisal Review(EAR)based changes.The amendments reflect changes in state requirements since 0 the last time the Comprehensive Plan was updated and updates the plan based on current local o conditions and data. It also updated the plan to reflect a focus on sustainability, resiliency, climate change and sea level rise. 2.The amendments affect the City of Wilton Manors in its entirety. 0 3. Council staff recommends that under "Joint Planning Areas" that it be stated that the City coordinates with the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA). The City has proactively participated in planning for a potential future station area of the proposed Coastal Link Corridor, which would provide commuter rail on the historic FEC rail corridor. The City could also reflect this coordination and planning under other headings of the Comprehensive Plan.For example, Objective 12"Transit Oriented Corridor"could also reference the SFRTA Transit Development Plan. o 4.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. 5 Packet Pg. 1570 P.5.b ADOPTED AMENDMENTS IL Local Council Local Government Governing Government Proposed Adopted Review Date Transmittal or Adulation Body and Plan iF Public Hearing and Adoption Amendment Meeting Vote 00 Number Broward County 18-6ESR N/A d 04-15-19 02-26-19 9-0 (received 03-01-19) 1. The adopted text amendment to the Broward County's Comprehensive Plan (BCCP) reduced L 500,000 square feet of office use and revised the dwelling unit types within the "Miramar Activity o Center II" to reflect the local Comprehensive Plan amendment from the City of Miramar's Transit Oriented Corridor(TOC). 2. Miramar TOCJActivity Center II is generally located east of SW 66th Avenue and bound on the north by Pembroke Road,on the east by SR 7j US 441,and on the south by County Line Road. 3.The local government adopted the amendment as proposed. Miami-Dade County 18-5ESR N/A d 04-15-19 01-24-19 13-0 1� (received o 03-21-19) 1.The adopted amendment to the Miami-Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan encourages Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) along the SMART Plan rapid transit corridors.The amendment affected the unincorporated area within 1 mile of the existing Metrorail corridor and the SMART Plan rapid transit corridors, except for the East-West Corridor which includes the area within 1 mile of the proposed alignment. Mixed use projects within % mile of the SMART Plan corridors are eligible for a residential density of 60 dwelling units per acre and up to 1.5 floor to area ratio(FAR).Mixed use projects located in the portion of the East-West SMART Plan Corridor between d mile and 1 mile are eligible for 18 dwelling units per acre and up to 1.25 FAR. The amendment establishes a timeline for completion of Urban Center area plans for rapid transit stations located in unincorporated Miami-Dade County, the specific location of which, in the case of the SMART Plan corridor,will be determined in ongoing and future studies. 2. The County staff analysis uses a 30% modal split for future planning purposes. Council staff is performing a detailed analysis for the Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization on mode o CL split,to be completed byJune of 2019.The forthcoming Council mode split analysis will identify mode split for each corridor,and any potential modifications to the assumed mode split for each corridor can be used far future planning purposes.Council staff notes that the increases in density that would occur as a result of this adopted amendment will need to be addressed in the water supply planning for the County as the additional demand on the system will be significant.Council staff recommends addressing the increase in water demand and wastewater infrastructure concurrently with the ®_ amendment process. Council staff also recommends that storm water management area plans be developed for all Urban Centers during the area plan processes. Creating a resilient transit network requires addressing potential flooding risks and solutions in station areas that will experience future increased urbanization and density. 3.The local government adopted the amendment as proposed. 6 Packet Pg. 1571 0 Local Council Local Government Governing IL Government Proposed Adopted Review Date Transmittal or Adoption Body 0 and Plan Public Hearing and Adoption Amendment Meeting Vote Number Islamorada, Village of Islands 19-1ACSC N/A V 04-15-19 04-04-19 5-0 (received E 04-11-19) 1 1 1 2 1. The adopted amendment to the Village of Islamorada's Comprehensive Plan established an U_ ordinance to amend Chapter 3 "Housing Element" and the associated objectives and policies, This L 0 establishes Goal 3-2 "Workforce-Affordable Housing Initiative" to allow for an allocation of an additional 300 workforce-affordable housing permits. The permits are to be allocated for the development of multi-family rental units and are to be identified as the"Affordable-Early Evacuation Pool." 2. The amendment affects the portion of the Village of Islamorada that falls outside of the V-Zone and Coastal Barrier Resource Systems. 3.The local government adopted the amendment as proposed. 0 1� 0 CL 0 d U w 0 W z 0 0 CL 0 x w E 7 Packet Pg. 1572 From: ��Tar= To: Cc: IL Subject: Monroe County,DEO#19-IASCS and*19-2ACSC,Comments on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment ~� Packages � Date: Monday,April z5,zoz9*:ao:s5pm Dear Mr. �Eubank�� ww The South Florida Water Management District (District) has completed its review of the two proposed amendment packages from the Monroe County (County). Amendment #19'1A(S[ E � includes one Future Land Use Map Amendment and Amendment #19'2A[SC includes text amendments concerning affordable housing and temporary emergency housing. There appear to be D U_ no regionally significant water resource issues; however, the District offers the hn||ovvinQ technical guidance regarding Regional Water Supply Planning: � The County is required to revise its Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Work Plan) within 18 months after approval of the Lower East Coast (LEC) Water Supply Plan Update by the District's Governing Board. The District's Governing Board approved the LEC Water Supply � Plan Update on NovennberO, 3018. Therefore, the [ountv's VVn/k Plan needs to be updated and adopted by May 202O. The Work Plan must cover at least 10-yearp|anninQ period, include updated water demand projections, identify alternative and traditional water supply 0� projects, and describe conservation and reuse activities needed to meet the projected future demands. Planning tools are available on the Disirict'svvebsite for your use and District Staff �L are available to provide technical assistance to update the Work Plan, including reviewing draft Work Plans prior to formal plan amendment submittal. The planning tools are located at 0 this link: The District offers its technical assistance to the County and the Department of Economic � Opportunity in developing sound, sustainable solutions to meet the Cmunt/s future water supply needs and to protect the raQion's water resourceo� P|eexe fonward a copy of the adopt�� amendments to the District. Please contact meifyou need assistance oradditional information. Sincerely, 0 � Ms.Terry Manning, Policy and Planning Analyst CL South Florida Water Management District � Water Supply Implementation Unit 33U1 Gun Club Road °p West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Phone: 561-682-6779 Fax: 561'681-6I64 PC �NOI1dO0V (SLO 860Z)Puawy Wflld joyautl 006;aab uea30) SLO 860Z Wflld;aabuea30 L6X66 ;jodabe;g o;Z;igiyx3:;uawy3e33tl v u� c 'J" V - N o O �A Q P LL k 1 �? C� 1 L Z '•" ^1 0 O U r 0 — O a Q rtp r� d 2 N O E E O y^ * O o u HIM a E �oo�000©oo® E E in Eo CD � _ > z a € oonouoo - C O v w m o tt a m - O o O` N v N U Q ❑ o _ v O C Ep T N E o a n r x 'r N (6 C O O a) E ` 4 O N T N a O O / 4 N oo LS U 0 — 0) C wa 0 O 177/m, o o o O o� oU z U O oa � X 17 oa r� a a m S o / IT m I� ra iuewpuewv ash pua-1 aanln:j Ajunoo aoauoW P.5.d 2 3 6 7 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA 8 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ORDINANCE NO. - 201'9 1a I IL 1.2 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD CAE 13 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE MONROE 14 COUNTY T' FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM I E IT'S J 15 COMMERCIAL (MC), RECREATION (R) AND CONSERVATION 00 � 1.6 (C) TO COMMERCIAL (COMM), FOR A PORTION OF 17 PROPERTY LOCATED AT' I00 ANCHOR DRIVE, KEY LARGO, 18 OCEAN EEC' CLUB, HAVING REAL ESTATE NUMBERS 19 00 727 7-003 00 AND 0057279.7-0 6 : ; AS PROPOSED BY E 20 OCEAN REEF CLUB INC.; PROVIDING FOR SEVERS ILIT ; 21 PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTINGPROVISIONS; 22 PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND u- L 23 PLANNING AGENCY AND THE SECRETARY' STATE; 24 PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE MONROE COUNTY 25 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOR AMENDMENT TO THE 26 FUTURE URA+, LAND USE AP; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE 27 DATE. 28 29 30 WHEREAS, on. April 11„ 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources Depart:N-ent 0 31 received an application from the Ocean Reef Club Inc. (the "Applicant")to amend the.Monroe County � 32 Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from Mixed Use f Commercial (MC), Recreation(R) and Conservation 33 (C) for property located at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo; and 34 35 WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department 36 received a revised application from the Applicant to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map � 7 (FLUM) from Mixed Use f Commercial (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) to Commercial 38 (COMM) for property located at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo,. and � 3 40 WHEREAS, the Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use (Zoning) District 41 map amendment for the suhaject property frorn Suburban Commercial (SC),Native Area (NA)and.Park 42 and Refuge (PR) to Commercial 1 (C1); and 43 44 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Development Review Committee (URC) considered the 45 proposed amendment at a regularly scheduled meeting held on December 11, 2018; and 46 Ord, No, - 2019 File 2018-075 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 1575 P.5.d 1 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the 11`h day 2 of December, 2018, for review and recommendation on the proposed Future Land Use Map 3 amendment; and 4 5 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission made the following findings of fact 6 and conclusions of law: 7 8 1. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the 9 surrounding area; 10 2. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Comprehensive Plan 11 adopted Level of Service (LOS); 12 3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the 13 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and 14 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development for 15 the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern, Sec. 380.0552(7),F.S.; 00 16 5. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part H of Chapter 163,Florida Statute; and 17 6. The proposed amendment will not result in an adverse change in community character to 0 18 the sub-area which a proposed amendment affects or to any area in accordance with the 19 Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys master plan pursuant to findings of the BOCC. 20 21 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P38-18 22 recommending to the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners approval of the proposed 23 amendment; and 24 25 WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of January, 2019, the Monroe County 26 Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing to consider the transmittal of the proposed 27 amendment, considered the staff report and provided for public comment and public participation in 28 accordance with the requirements of state law and the procedures adopted for public participation in 29 the planning process; and 0 30 0 31 WHEREAS, at the January 30, 2019,public hearing, the BOCC adopted Resolution No. 035- 32 2019, transmitting the amendment to the State Land Planning Agency; and 33 0 34 WHEREAS, the State Land Planning Agency reviewed the amendment and the County 35 received its Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) report on May 6, 2019; and 36 37 WHEREAS, the ORC report did not identify any objections, or comments to the proposed 38 amendment; and 39 40 WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting on the 19th day of June, 2019, the BOCC held a 41 public hearing to consider adoption of the proposed FLUM amendment; 42 43 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF 44 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: 45 Ord.No. -2019 File 2018-075 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 1576 I Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of the Monroe County 2030,Comprehensive Plan is amended as 2 follows: 3 4 The property located at 100 Anchor Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club, having Real 5 Estate Numbers 00572797-003600 and 00572797-003603, is changed from Mixed Use 6 / Commercial (MC), Recreation (R) and Conservation (C) to Commercial (COMM) as 7 shown on Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein. 8 9 Section 2. Severabilfty, If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, change, or provision of this 10 ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such validity, 0 1 IL 12 Section 3. Repe d of Inconsistent Provisions. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with 0 13 this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict. 14 15 Section 4. Transmittal. This ordinance shall be transmitted by the Director of Planning to the State 16 Land Planning Agency pursuant to Chapter 163 and 380, Florida Statutes. 00 17 18 Section 5. Filing and Effective Date. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the secretary of 19 the State of Florida but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the State Land Planning 20 Agency or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance, and if challenged, until E 21 such challenge is resolved pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, 22 U- 23 Section 6. Inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The foregoing amendment shall be incorporated I- 0 24 in the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan and included on the Future Land Use Map. 25 26 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, 27 Florida, at a regular meeting held on the day of 4- 28 29 Mayor Sylvia Murphy , District 5 30 Mayor Pro Teni Danny L. Kolhage, District I 31 Commissioner Michelle Coldiron, District 2 32 Commissioner Heather Carruthers, District 3, 0 33 Con-imissioner David Rice, District 34 35 36 0 37 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 38 OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA E 39 40 BY 41 Mayor Sylvia Murphy 42 43 (SEAL) 44 45 ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK 46 ABS I ST i. f' , 47q. 48 DEPUTY CLERK Ord. No. - 2019, File 2018-075 Page 3 of 3 1 Packet Pg. 1577 Exhibit 1 to Ordinance# -2019 EASTA LL KE RD O IL 00 Elio � O w y P�\ ,00572797-003603 00572797-003600 �� ov LO 00 LL ------------ gRgo� I JJ C The Monroe County Future Land Use District is amended as indicated above. Future Land Use District change a portion of two parcels of land in Ocean Reef having Real Estate Numbers 00572797-003600 and 00572797-003603 from Mixed Use/Commercial(MC), Recreation(R)and Conservation(C)to Commercial(COMM). N Packet Pg. 1578