Item J5J.5
t, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Monroe Mayor Sylvia Murphy, District 5
The Florida Keys l'U � Mayor Pro Tern Danny Kolhage, District 1
�pw° Michelle Coldiron, District 2
Heather Carruthers, District 3
David Rice, District 4
County Commission Meeting
August 21, 2019
Agenda Item Number: J.5
Agenda Item Summary #5858
BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Cioffari (305) 289-2506
n/a
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval of the 2019 Monroe County Area of Critical State
Concern (ACSC) Annual Work Program Report, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which will be
sent to the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO).
ITEM BACKGROUND: Attached is the Monroe County ACSC Annual Work Program Progress
Report, pursuant to Rule 28- 20.140, F.A.C. The Report (see attached matrix) includes Monroe County
comments (4tn and 5tn column) related to progress that has been made over the past year toward the tasks
in the Work Program.
The State Land Planning Agency or DEO (formerly the Department of Community Affairs) will use the
information provided by Monroe County to develop its Area of Critical State Concern Annual Report to
the Administration Commission (Governor and Cabinet), pursuant to Section 380.0552(4), F.S., and Rule
28-20.140(3)(a), F.A.C. This report is reviewed by the Administration Commission to evaluate the
progress each governmental entity has made toward achieving the work program task objectives and to
determine whether to recommend a decrease in annual allocations for housing units.
In summary, Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., includes a Work Program for Monroe County with 52 tasks to
complete (between 2011 until 2015) under four major topics: 1. Carrying Capacity Study
Implementation; 2. Wastewater Implementation; 3. Wastewater Project Implementation and 4.
Stormwater Treatment Facilities. The County has achieved 48 of the Work Program tasks. The attached
Report (matrix provided by the State to the County) includes 4 incomplete but in progress tasks, as
follows:
Incomplete but in progress:
One (1) Incomplete Carrying Capacity Task/requesting Rule revision:
into the Comprehensive Plan (Rule task (5)(a)1).
o County requested Rule amendment to eliminate this requirement
February 20, 2014 (see attached letters).
policy to adopt Tier Maps
on August 22, 2013 and
Packet Pg. 1354
J.5
• Three (3) Incomplete Wastewater Tasks: complete all remaining connections to Hawk's Cay
WWTP; South Lower Keys WWTP and Cudjoe Regional WWTP (Rule tasks (5)(c)1.h.; 2.f., 3.b.
& 4.d.).
o Hawk's Cay WWTP — 100% Conch/Coral Keys, 100% Hawk's Cay and 96% Duck Key
o South Lower Keys WWTP (Big Coppitt) — 92% connected
o Cudjoe Regional WWTP — 68% connected
Contributors to the status report include: Planning & Environmental Resources Department, Monroe
County Land Authority, Code Compliance Department, Public Works & Engineering Department, Key
Largo Wastewater Treatment District, and the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
On July 17, 2013, the BOCC directed staff to write a letter to the Administration Commission to request
that Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., be amended to remove the requirement to adopt the Tier Overlay Zoning
Maps into the Comprehensive Plan.
On February 19, 2014, the BOCC directed staff to write a letter to the Department of Economic
Opportunity to request that Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., be amended to require the adoption the Tier Overlay
Zoning Maps into the Comprehensive Plan upon requesting the removal of the designation.
On September 17, 2014, the BOCC approved the 2014 Monroe County Area of Critical State (ACSC)
Annual Work Program Report, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was submitted to the
Department of Economic Opportunity.
On November 17, 2015, the BOCC approved the 2015 Monroe County Area of Critical State (ACSC)
Annual Work Program Report, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was submitted to the
Department of Economic Opportunity.
On September 21, 2016, the BOCC approved the 2016 Monroe County Area of Critical State (ACSC)
Annual Work Program Report, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was submitted to the
Department of Economic Opportunity.
On October 18, 2017, the BOCC approved the 2017 Monroe County Area of Critical State (ACSC)
Annual Work Program Report, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was submitted to the
Department of Economic Opportunity.
On November 20, 2018, the BOCC approved the 2018 Monroe County Area of Critical State (ACSC)
Annual Work Program Report, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was submitted to the
Department of Economic Opportunity.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
n/a
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
DOCUMENTATION:
Monroe —Matrix —annual report_2018-2019
County letters to revise Rule for Tier Map task
FY19-23_Adopted-Capital-Budget-Summary
Packet Pg. 1355
J.5
Land Acquisition Report Budget Status
MCLA Grant Proposal 190709
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Total Dollar Value of Contract:
Total Cost to County:
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted:
Source of Funds:
CPI:
Indirect Costs:
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing:
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required:
Additional Details:
REVIEWED BY:
If yes, amount:
Cheryl Cioffari
Completed
Steve Williams
Completed
Assistant County Administrator Christine
Hurley
07/29/2019 4:48 PM
Budget and Finance
Completed
Maria Slavik
Completed
Kathy Peters
Completed
Board of County Commissioners
Pending
07/29/2019 12:36 PM
07/29/2019 3:58 PM
Completed
07/31/2019 9:50 AM
08/02/2019 11:22 AM
08/02/2019 11:58 AM
08/21/2019 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 1356
(oaU 1u a V U06 s——Z u d -0 w
m�
a-
QV
E�
o E
U 3
O
O
C
E
K
� K�
O
_ o�
E -
`o
¢m'
r
a
o.
m
41
U `o
v - _ m m -in
gym_ '0v SE
U-�a�i- - o. - `o�o -
__ y�N cc
-_ E m E o
.SUa _m� n.Eoa� o
E -
rE rn� -_ - < <o-R'v
mom u i.nE 2• mU`m�o�Em='
o'ro o- >EEp',o A' 1.'s o¢m� >-
o ° a o r U m r m o y -. a o a.1 U V o v ti
U o m V,v-"
H m " n m- 2 �m a 2 m-0 2 E
o�.�_.NU mo o,P`m`oE �.m_r oo -oQ
A m ' Q m E I 'E c o 0 E m a% oa wo VE �ON WE 1m _
E .E w�F� �� •.gym LL�- _w2 6-o -
N c - o - - E 2v2=Ev oF'� E0nyo��o E kUo c 'E0 ` a -0
a; �Z�m' 'vwaF
N _
=gaE
v on OE �m - tm�_ mEomra
o .2E�= No - o���
> v . _ O> C c�v o
r m g v C L v_u 2" W ..
- 20
C F,r Vo R°
M o c o v-u
m v
c E m 5¢ 01 m 'a rv~ s=o -
E ii�j m 'y a - w g`m a
n�L'-' .F2�-
o �or LLd -o
O =a � =
oa s'= 'o dAaa o_
ff
-a9n 32 "m.
E _N o> 0
F2-
0 0 0 0 0 0
U o a d U U U U U U
Q Z 1�
=Ulw
m w `o. a' a
- v ¢ o n E - E v E v€uoi D
C>
w - o ' Eo C A -�Y_-a U10 o Eo � oj o A 7 ¢o a j-
n Y C
D m a a o
v Y m E`m E m o w r o O o a w._, 0 5 o
`m o E v" v' o o - m 2 o,o F'r�o Q Y o 0
r v a Y n r - rn E r� w w o m o-
rF - - v,p o- - ag
�o �- ov-,o��J-o2E ��"ate
ci ,1 0 1O w� v--� - o`
LL n avo it r mz yA o-� A_ mad
Eo <E - - - oyv>� w
v y a - - m'`a >u o o E v
¢_m aE - -:2E-0 wv mm
mE -�o v mE v m-
m nE v�o - r 0 U-Uo��? 0 Y A
w o m F w 0'o �'� m m n rv_ m m v
rzrj - - -n-O U U
dF
F - _ ° � a - o `w W. sa w - - -ow E �Eo NO 22,F - -
y A -- 0. - vs
V ow vU E >.E
z E o �v
n ovo?_ o �E E I
. UcU U "o U oE U ; � '� o> �- -�Ow E
v c U m o`v. o o E 'o o ` o z E 3 m`� m a¢m v
m �v 2 F N �" E� �m m w'-- a a E d- w y
o 5 v m- o - o U m E N1 _ A
00 K e `�>� - - x - _xo -v 0v i o
�to- E. r EE E
mz
02 EE 'w wry 0 oE ` m-
m E En> nE oE: >2U 6ULLaF2
u
/ . . m . . -, /
!| �
!!
{- a a
:!
10
\ \
\\0.
'\\
( ~
\ w io oo
o/ }}E
) //)))
) 7) -
] $| / / / / / / /{
_ E _ 6
-f§§ - § ]z\!
2{)« _ - - [!`)`f
! - - _: 1 w _/;j{!
)\ /0
0ij0 _
$a[/:2 !w> ! _ __-ww
-
- - !{emr; a!-! -/{f -
. _ _ =#f;= §#;{ - _ -
\)//j\ /- _ -i _ _
: §]f ;7! - {§/{
!i{ƒk - `: - kE�� k\){) E
-60 ww \0 - --{) & f� -
§;{E00
;f «� 1 - -
\ - -- - {)/ --_
® �)\}\\ \ \ _ §}§»# _ -
| k /o 2 w w
_ _ _ _ )(
- «_ _ ®` - :t}9/
o_ _WE 0
1 �\�{} ! §!f!
-\\f/ __-
\�0)� \ ?: \ \ \ \_OC: _ \�
! } wo
|{;a! }{$ - - _
| ! a;;7Z! 6-a -0 / |#]|7f ///;! /)f;\ /!§;{ki
° . m . . --
OE \
/
f a
/\
{ �§
{ 2 2 2 2 2 2
zg
) j-
<E <E
f! f!
!] !]
\e 1L
42
10
�E55 )\\ 20
\ 50. /\` /\\
o
0,0
Cc 0
) {) {)
) 7) - - - - - -
] $| / / /{ / /{ / /{ / /
- : ]{_i4 -_ _-- _ _
)k » \
)[ §[ )/})\ \ _ -
) »( ff )k�\/ ({& ) `
- - %) / -
§&00
_ \§/\§ - }§ j_ <
- ` [\\)) : j (fi �� :
- )\\ \1\§ )( /
k - : \((\k ;_ §t r - _
){{ _ _ - _ _\
- \)\ 10
E�) - :
k -- - )\§ )_ : _
§ f {} )�- - { 0
§ k o
-\{)\ -- ;§)_
cq
{})r {- - \
o
_- oo
/ \\ \ \ -
\ \ }} \\\ \ \\ \}\ }/
:, ,ev,a D\ \
/ . . m . . —, /
!| �
!!
/k
:!
\ \10
0 mo
\
/\ z { \2
(10
go
08
-
�
10
\
)
) 7) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
] $| / / 0 / / / / / / / / / / / { / {
kk . ( c \
\\\ / ` ( \
! - \ 7
- \ \ \ } \
5{ ( ) : -
) - 10
: % i 7 7 _
/ ) _
k\ _ _ _ \ / .0 _ :
- - ƒ )
{ k \ k -
: 00
!
} \ {\ _ _ _ =y \ _ _ _ ! ;
\\/o / !` �t ® \
w | - : - - - ! \
\ � \\\\ / kk - - - - - - - - « - - - - - IN Ili
> �® - - - E - - - - -
\\)) k - -
| $ /§!I ! f|) } / f / { f 6 / 2 }$ -6 6 / { f / } /
/ . . m . . —, /
!! -
E
\\\E
E 2 2 2
) \\
(
\ k }
)
) 7) - - - - - - - - - - -
] $| / / / / / / / / { / /
OC
{\ / \ � ; \ -
\ o - / \ } - , E \
/ / } ow & )) ) / } {
) ! ) ) �\
-\ ) ) { } 22
) ¥ \/ : : - : ) { \d 0 _ )Ew \ \\\)
k k - :: - : . _ - »
\ \\< \\_ /\_ �} Sc
m- \ / } \ /\ \ / \\\/
k -00 \ k \ \{)j
k ) - : -
§ !_ £ .| }| \/ -
& \\ \ )
\§� ) -- - ! ` -- - - - - _-
\ / \� / \ \ \E , \ \\\\
County of Monroe
The Florida Keys
LeAl ex-ri-6 "VE C)
BOARD OF COUNTY COMAUSSIOMRS
Mayor Sylvia I Murphy, District 5
Mayor Pro Ten-4 Danny L. Kolhage, District I
George Neugent, District 2
Heather Carruthers District 3
David Rice, District 4
Mayor Sylvia J. Murphy
Murray Nelson Center
1*2*5 it
Key Largo, FL 33037
Vn? 11 JrraIt'JIvJ-JFWM7TI• PT171orr"11719
Florida Department of Economic Opportunity
107 E. Madison Street
Caldwell Building, MSC 160
Tallahassee, FL 23299
Dear Mr. Killingsworth:
Administration Commission Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was ratified by the Legislature in
2011, 'includes six Work Program Tasks [28-2IMF .140(5)(a)l, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6] requiring the County
to adopt policies relating to the Tier System into the Comprehensive Plan, adjust Tier boundaries
on the Tier Zoning Overlay maps [(5)(a)2] and amend its Comprehensive Plan to adopt the Tier
System Maps as an overlay onto the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Series [(5)(a)l, 3 and 4],
Previously the County sent a letter to the Administration Conunisision, dated August 22, 2013
(attached), requesting that Rule 28-20,140, F.A.C. be amended to remove the requirement to adopt
the Tier Overlay Zoning Maps into the Comprehensive Plan [28-20.140(5)(a)l, 3 and 4].
Since that time, the Monroe County Attorney and Growth Management staff have met with staff
within your department to discuss this request. Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) staff
have requested that Monroe County amend its requests to include both a Rule amendment and
Comprehensive Plan amendment to, include the following language: Prior to the County adopting
a resolution recommending the removal of the designation of It County as an Area of
Critical State Concern, pursuant to Section 380.0552(4)�(b)3, F.S., Monroe County shall adopt the
Tier Maps into the Comprehensive Plan as an overlay to the Future Land Use Map.
The County continues to make progress in achieving the Administration Commission's Work
Program and we: are pleased to continue to work with you and DEO to protect all significant
resources of the Florida Keys and maintain our economic prosperity.,
Sincerely
am=
W 1= I - 61 in, KWIMMOMITIM-UMT-RiT, =1
CC: Mayor Pro Tem Danny Kolhage
Commissioner David Rice
Commissioner George Neugent
Commissioner Heather Carruthers
Roman Gastesi, County Administrator
Bob Shillinger, County Attorney
Christine Hurley, Growth Management Director
Jesse Panuccio, Executive Director, Florida DEO
Robert N. Sechen, General Counsel, Florida DEO
Rebecca Jetton, Area of Critical State Concern Administrator, Florida DEO
The Honorable Rick Scott, Governor
Pam Bondi, Attorney General
Adam Putnam, Commissioner of Agriculture
Jeff Atwater, Chief Financial Officer
0
A d 'si-y-et
COnInlieSs I &VL ork ri cl, mey S,
HQ"2 OF -COUNTY99—MMSIONERS
Mayor George Neugent, District 2
County of Monroe Mayor Pro Tern, Heather Carruthers, District 3
rMe Florida Keys Danny L. Kolliage, District I
David Rice, District 4
Sylvia 1. Murphy, District 5
Mayor George k Neugent
25 Ships Way
Big Pine Key, Florida 33043
Ne gk-
-Ao rLgqKgg2mgn-kgg�gogatu.,,!!,L.gy
August 22,,2013
W
The Honorable Pick Scott, Governor Pam Bondi, Attorney General
a
The Capitol The Capitol
0
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001 Tallahassee, Florida, 32399- 1050
`�
0
Adam Putnam, Commissioner of Agriculture Jeff Atwater, Chief Financial Officer
CL
The Capitol The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0810 Tallahassee, FL 332399-0300
Dear Governor and Cabinet:
cy
AtIministration Commission Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was ratified by the Legislature in 2011, includes six Work
an
Program Tasks [28-20.140(5)(01, 2, 3, 4. 5, and 61 requiring the County to adopt policies relating to; the Tier System
2
into the Comprehensive Plan, adjust Tier boundaries on the Tier Zoning Overlay maps [(5)(a)21 and amend its
CL
Comprehensive Plan to adopt the Tier System Maps as an overlay onto the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Series
M
2
[(5)�(a)l, 3 and 41.
Monroe County has completed Work Program task (5)(a)2 with the adoption of four (4) ordinances [Ordinance 005.
2011, 006-2011, 007-2011, and 0018-201 1) on May 4, 2011, revising or assigning the tier overlay designation for 3,394
parcels based upon recommendations from the Tier Designation Review Committee Work Group, Monroe County
staff, the Planning Commission, Board of County Commissioners and the public. The Administration Commission and
the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have also reported that the County has completed Work Program
task (5)(a)2, which is to amend the Tier Overlay Maps to more accurately reflect the criteria for, each Tier as amended
by Final Order DCA07-OMI 66 (DOAH Case No. 06-24490M — Petitioners: Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, Inc,
Protect Key West and the Florida Keys, Inc, and Last Stand; Respondents: Department of Community Affairs and
Monme County).
The County processed additional revisions to the tier designations for 393 parcels that were not included in the
challenge (DOAH Case No. 06-2449GM) but requested by the plaintiff. Further, the County identified 77 offshore
island parcels for review because these parcels were not given a tier designation at the time of the adoption oftlic
original Tier Ordinances in 2006. These were adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on March 20, 2013.
The amendments (Ordinances 14-2013 and 15-2013) have been approved by DEO and became effective on July 12,
2011
At this point, all 44,000 parcels in the County presently have a Tier designation, Throughout the proem of updating
information and adopting the tier amendments, the County was concerned with the possibility of new administrative
proceedings pursuant to Section 120.569 and 120.57, F.S., which could delay the effectiveness of the ordinances and
create significant cost and, legal demands on the County,
The County could not proceed with the next steps of completing Work Program Tasks (5)(a)l, 3 and 4 to adopt of the
entire set of Tier Overlay maps into the Comprehensive Plan as an overlay to the FLUM until all 44,000 parcels had an
effective tier designation, Now that all of the undesignated or invalidated parcels have a tier designation and are
effective as an overlay district on the County's Land Use District (Zoning) Maps, starting the process over and
Page I of 3
adopting the maps (approximately 44,000 parcels) as a Comprehensive Plan FLUM overlay district would expose the
County and every parcel with a Tier designation to potential challenges by affected persons, as defined by Section
163,3184(1)(a), F.S, County legal staff has studied the legal differences in the maps being in the Comprehensive Plan
and Land Use District (Zoning) Maps. A legal opinion is attached.
On July 17, 2013, the Monroe County Board Of County Commissioners, discussed the requirement of the
Administration Commission Rule to adopt the Tier Overlay Zoning Maps into the Comprehensive Plan, This
discussion included the significant exposure (including restarting the appeal clock and adding possible takings claims
against the County), costs, personnel demands and attorney fees to the County. Further discussing the duplication of
maps in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps seems to be unnecessary and a redundant process when DEO
reviews both FLUM and Zoning Maps in an Area of Critical State Concern and has the ability to approve or reject
proposed zoning map amendments or file a petition with the Division of Administrative Hearings on a proposed
FLUM amendment.
Following a presentation by County Growth Management and legal staff, the BOCC unanimously approved a motion
to direct staff to write a letter to the Administration Commission to request that Rule 28-20:,140, RA.C. be amended to
remove the requirement to adopt the Tier Overlay Zoning Maps into the Comprehensive Plan.
Monroe County respectfully requests the Administration Commission consider amending Rule 28-20.140 F.A.C., to
delete Work Program Tasks (5)(a)), 3 and 4:
1. By July, 1, 2012, Monroe County shall adopt the conservation planning mapping (the Tier Zoning
Overlay Maps and System) into the Comprehensive Plan based upon the recommendations of the Tier
Designation Review Committee with the adjusted Tier boundaries.
3. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall crease Goal 106 to complete the 10 Year Work Program
found in Rule 28-20.110, F.A.C, and to establish objectives to develop a build -out horizon in the
Florida Keys and adopt conservation planning mapping into the Comprehensive Plan.
4. By July J, 2012, Monroe County shall create Objective 106.2 to adopt conservation planning
mapping (Tier Maps) into the Monroe Comprehensive Plan based upon the recommendations of the
Tier Designation Review Committee Work Group,
Such action will not impede DEO's authority to review and approve all future amendments to the adopted Tier Zoning
Overlay Maps, will not lessen any protection of habitat, and will protect both the State and Monroe County from new
potential challenges to the Tier Overlay Zoning Map System which is presently in effect.
While Monroe County is requesting the deletion of tasks which require the adoption of the tier maps into the
Comprehensive Plan, the County will pursue the completion of Work Program Tasks (5)(a)2, 5,and 6:
Z By July 1, 201Z Monroe County shall adjust the Tier I and Tier INA (SPA) boundaries to more
accurately reflect the criteria for that Tier as amended by Final Order DCA07-GUI66 and implement
the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study, utilizing the updated habitat data, and based upon the
recommendations of the Tier Designation Review Committee Work Group.
5. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall adopt Policy 106.2.1 to require the preparation of updated
habitat data and establish, a regular schedule for continued update to coincide with evaluation and
appraisal report timelines.
6. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall adopt Policy 10622 to establish the Tier Designation Work
Group Review Committee to consist of representatives selected by the Florida Department of
Community Affairs from Monroe County, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, United
States Fish & Wildlife Service, Department of Environmental Protection and environmental and other
relevant interests. This Committee shall be tasked with the responsibility of Tier designation review
utilizing the criteria jeer Tier placement and best available data to recommend amendments to ensure
implementation of and adherence to the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity, Study, These proposed
amendments shall be recommended during 2009 and subsequently coincide with the Evaluation and
Appraisal report timelines beginning with the second Evaluation and Appraisal review which follows
the adoption of the revised Tier System and Maps as required above adopted in 2011. Each evaluation
and appraisal report submitted following the 2011 evaluation and appraisal report shall also include
an analysis and recommendations based upon the process described above.
I
These tasks require the adoption of policies which require the continued update of the habitat data and the adjustment
to the tier boundaries, coinciding with the State Evaluation and Appraisal Report timelines, following a review by the
Tier Designation Review Committee Work Group.
The County continues to make progress in achieving the Administration Commission's Work Program and we are
pleased to continue to work with you and DEO to protect all significant resources of the: Florida Keys and maintain our
economic prosperity. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincere
/&orge Neat- Mayor
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
CC: Mayor Pro Tern Heather Carruthers
Commissioner David Rice
Commissioner Sylvia Murphy
Commissioner Danny KDIhage
Roman Gastes,i, County Administrator
Bob Shillinger, County Attorney
Christine Hurley, Growth Management Director
Jesse Panuccio, Executive Director Florida DEO
Robert N. Sechen, General Counsel, Florida DEO
William B. Killingsworth, Director of Community Development, Florida DEO
Rebecca Jeuon, Area of Critical State Concern Administrator, Florida DEO
Enclosures. Legal Opinion
Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C.
BOCC AIS, Item
Page 3 of 3
CCrUNTY MONROE
0�oi KEY WEST J FLDFUDA 33040
,-
Robert B. ShMinger, County AMrney**
Pedro J. Mercado, Assistant County Attorney **
Susan M. Grimsley, Assistant County Attorney**
Natileenc W. Cassel, Assistant County Attorney"*
Cynthia L. Hall, Assistant County Attorney **
Christine Limbert-Barrows, Assistant County Attorney
Derek V. Howard, Assistant County Attorney**
Lisa Granger, Assistant County Attorney
Steven T. Williams, Assistant County Attorney
** Board Certified in City, County & Local Govt, Law
1 11111 111 1 111 1111111111 11111111111111 F iiliil— —
FROM: Susan Grimsley, Assistant County Attorney
Mayor George Neugent, District 2
Mayor Pro Terra Heather Carruthers, Distric
Danny L. Kolhage, District I
David Rice, District 4
Sylvia J. Murphy, District 5
Office, of the County Attorney
I I I I IV Street, Suite 408
Key West., FL 33040i
(3 05) 292-3470 — Phone,
(305) 292-3516 — Fax
irrLLure And use map amenament, arm
who may challenge each type of amendment.
For purposes of this memo, I will assume you are talking about adoption of the Tier Overlay Maps in the
s W the
Monroe County Land Development Re lations on the Land Use District (Zoning) Map, which was Irmentl
911 ecentl
rec
completed, and the adoption of a tier overlay on the Monroe County Future Land Use Map as part of the
Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. The initial Tier Maps were adopted in 2006 by Ordinance
013-2006 along with other land development regulations implementing their use, Environmental groups:
whose 110111111 Al 4 1
tkc jl4-Zj!n
and 015-2013, which included other parcels, that the challengers wanted reviewed along with some un-ti,ered
properties. The entire process for all 44,00101 parcels to be assigned a tier and be effective took approximately
7'years.
III 11111P, 111 11 1 1;1111��!111111111111! 11111111111
In an area of critical state concern, land development regulations are reviewed by the state: land planning
agency and a final order is published mi the Florida Administrative Register.' The tier maps, as part of the
'Fla. Stat. §380.05(6) (2012).
1111�11�11p;111111�11 111111111lit 1111111� ;;I111111lilillitili
There are further requirements for standing of an association to show it is substantially affected. Those
requirements are: (1) A substantial number of its members, although not necessarily a majority, are
substantially affected; (2) The subject matter is within the association's general scope of interest and activity;
4
(3) The relief is of the type appropriate for an association to receive on behalf of its members.
Were is. in the cas-e.-n-La
individual standing and the standing of associations, and therefore, some limitation on standing to challenge FT
the County's Land Development Regulations pursuant to Florida Statutes, Section 380.05(6) and Florida
Statutes, Chapter 120.
2. Challenges to the Comprehensive Plan including the Future Land Use Map
o moised local 011411
Challenges to the comprehensive plan are brought pursuant to Florida Statutes,, Section 163.3184 6 Which
states as follo;ws:
(a) Any affected person as defmcd 'in paragraph (1)(a); may file a petition with the Division of
Administrative Hearings pursuant to ss. 120.569, and 120.57, with a copy served on the affected
local ovemme-,tt, to MgurIL&fgj-.M! I
0 0: M
'Id. ("No proposed land development regulation within an area of critical state concern becomes effective under, [§380.05(6)]
until the state land planning agency issues its final order or, if'the final order is challenged, until the challenge to the order is
resolved pursuant to Chapter 120,"),
3 See Palm Beach County Envtl. Coalition v. Fla. Dept of Envd. Prot., 14 So. 3d 1077 (Fla. Dist, Ct, App. 4th Dist. 2009);
see also Donna Melzer er al. v. Martin County, 2010 Fla. ENV LEMS I C9, Case No, DCA I O-GM-063, I RA.L.R. 170 (Fla.
Dept Community Aff. 2010); see also Agrico Chem. Co. v. Dept of EnvtL Regulation, 406 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct, App:, 2d
Dist. 1981).
4 See Melzer et al., supra note 3, at 12; see also Rosenzweig v, DOT, 979 So, 2d 1050 (Ra. Dist, Ct, App. 1st Dist. 2008); see
also NAACP v. Fla. B'd. of Regents, 822 SD. 2d I (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. I st Dist. 2002); see also Fla. Home Builders, Asso v.
Dep't of Labor & Employment Sec., 412 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 1982).
'Fla. Stat. [1163.3184(13) (2012),
5 See Fla. Stat. § 163-3184(5); see also Fla. Stat. §380.05(6) (20,12),
UNTMOMMM33=019
(a) "Affected person" includes the affected local government; persons owning property, residing, or
fo
subst ial impacts on the increased need for publicly funded infrastructure or substantial impacts on areas
designated for protection or special treatment within their jurisdiction,
-r -
am_ 161FITTiTzi I#— $ M
Sa:*-]' I aISO Bal r—h�LIPH-LUM Otal](Uivallolls, Or ODJUULIUIIS LU KLIC, IUCal gov.-!n2n
ent and On ml
during the period of time beginning with the transmittal hearing for the plan or plan amendrn Td%
with the adoption of the plan or plan amendment,
The definition of "affected person" as provided in the statute is broader than those of a person whose
"subistantial interests" are affected for a challenge to the ordinances which approved the Tier Maps in the
Monroe County Land Development Regulations since the definition of an affected person for purposes of
challenging a cornprehe—n-si�pnlan amendment re,,nuires on] v residencv--nrP
business within the boundaries of the local government or jurisdiction, whereas a challenger to a Land
Development Regulation must demonstrate some sort of injury to establish standing. Clearly, the category of
challengers to a comprehensive plan amendment is far more expansive than what is usually required "in a
Chapter 120! proceeding.
will open the door to more challenges to the adoption of the tier maps into the comprehensive plan than the
MY I F, of the: tier mauo h s iTtte .WT
11!1�
ir ij, 11 1111 0 " 41
WomIw epa=enE oi Economic 41pporfunity, DuT simply nas to ne it wilim 3111 days of me adoption of
the amendment. The state land plannmig agency may not intervene in an action by an affected piarty; the
County is left to defend the adoption. 7
'Ra. Stat. § 1 63.3184(5)(a) (2012).
28-20.140 Comprehensive Plan,
(1) The Monroe County Comprehensive Plan Policy Docunicrit as the same exists on January 1, 2011, is hereby amended to
read as follows:
(2) Policy 101.2.13 Monroe County Work Program Conditions and Objectives.
(a) Monroe County shall establish and maintain a Permit Allocation System for new residential development. The Permit
Allocation System shall supersede Policy 101.2.1,
(b) The number of permits issued annually for residential development under the Rate of Growth Ordinance shall not exceed a
total annual unit cap of 197, plus any available unused ROGO allocations from a previous ROGO year. Each year's ROGO
allocation of 197 units shall be split with a minimum of 71 units allocated for affordable housing in perpetuity and market rate
,allocations not to exceed 126 residential units per year. Unused ROGO allocations may be retained and made available only for
affordable housing and Administrative Relief from ROGO year to ROGO year. Unused allocations for market rate shall be available
wo
for Administrative Relief. Any unused affordable allocations will roll over to affordable housing, A ROGO year means the twelve-
o
month period beginning an July 13.
(c) This allocation represents the total number of allocations for development that may be issued during a ROGO year. No
0
CL
exemptions, or increases in the number of allocations may be allowed, other than that which may be expressly provided for in the
comprehensive plan or for which there is an existing agreement as of September 27, 2005, for affordable housing between the
Department and the local government in the critical areas,
(d) Through the Permit Allocation Systems, Monroe County shall direct new growth and redevelopment to areas served or that
would be served by a central sewer system by December 2015 that has committed or planned funding. Committed or planned
funding is funding that is financially feasible and reflected in a Capital Improvements Element approved by the Department of
Community Affairs, Prior to the ranking and approval of awards for an allocation authorizing development of new principal
structures, Monroe County, shall coordinate with the central wastewater facility provider and shall increase an applicant's score by
four points for parcels served by a collection line within a central wastewater facility service area where a central wastewater
U)
2
treatment facility has been constructed that meets the treatment standards of Section 403,086(10), F.S., and where treatment capacity
CL
is available, The points shall only be awarded if a construction permit has been issued for the collection system and the parcel lies
2
within the service area of the wastewater treatment facility,
(3) Reporting and Oversight.
(a) Beginning November 30, 2011, Monroe County and the Department of Community Affairs shall annually report to the
0
Administration Commission documenting the degree to which the work program objectives for the work program year have been
4-
achieved. The Commission shall consider the findin gs and recommendations provided in those reports and shall determine whether
progress has been achieved, If the Commission determines that progress has not been made, the unit cap for residential development
0
shall be reduced by 20 percent for the following ROGO year.
.0
(b) If the Commission determines that progress has been made for the work program year, then the Commission may restore the
2
unit cap for residential development for the following year up to a maximum of 197 allocations per ROGO year.
0
(c) Notwithstanding any other date set forth in this plan, the dates set forth in the work program shall control where conflicts
U)
exist.
P
(d) Wastewater treatment and disposal in Monroe County is governed by the requirements of Sections 381,0065(4) and
403,096(10), F.S. Nothing in this rule shall be construed to limit the authority of the Department of Environmental Protection or the
Department of Health to enforce Sections 381.0065(4) and 403,086(10), F.S.
(4) Policy 216.1.19. Hurricane Modeling.
For the purposes, of hurricane evacuation clearance time modeling purposes, clearance time shall begin when the Monroe County
Emergency Management Coordinator issues the evacuation order for permanent residents for a hurricane that is classified as a
Category 3-5 wind event or Category C-E surge event. The termination point shall be U.S. Highway One and the Florida Turnpike
in Homestead/Florida City.
(5) WORK PROGRAM.
(a) Carrying Capacity Study Implementation,
I , By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall adopt the conservation planning mapping (the Tier Zoning Overlay Maps, and System)
into the Comprehensive Plan based upon the recommendations of the Tier Designation Review Committee with the adjusted Tier
boundaries.
2, By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall adjust the Tier I and Tier IIIA (SPA) boundaries to more accurately reflect the criteria
for that Tier as amended by Final Order DCA07-GM166 and implement the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study, utilizing the
updated habitat data, and based upon the recommendations of the Tier Designation Review Committee Work Group,
3, By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall create Goal 106 to complete the 10 Year Work Program found in Rule 28-20.110,
F.A.C., and to establish objectives to develop a build -out horizon in the Florida Keys and adopt conservation planning mapping into
the Comprehensive Plan.
4By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall create Objective 106.2 to adopt conservation planning mapping (Tier Maps) into the
Monroe Comprehensive Plan based upon the recommendations of the Tier Designation Review Committee Work Group,
5, By July 1, 2012,1Monroe County shall adopt Policy 106.2.1 to requirethe preparation of updated habitat data and establish a
regular schedule for continued update to coincide with evaluation and appraisal report timelines.
0
6 By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall adopt Policy 106.2.2 to establish the Tier Designation Work Group Review Committee
W
a
to consist of representatives selected by the Florida Department of Community Affairs from Monroe County, Florida Fish &
0
Wildlife Conservation Commission, United States Fish & Wildlife Service:, Department of Environmental Protection and
`�
environmental and other relevant interests. This Committee shall be tasked with the responsibility of Tier designation review
0
CL
utilizing the criteria for Tier placement and best available data to recommend amendments to ensure implementation of and
W
adherence to the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study. These proposed amendments shall be recommended during 2009 and
subsequently coincide with the Evaluation and Appraisal report timelines beginning with the second Evaluation and Appraisal
review which follows the adoption of the revised Tier System and Maps as required above adopted in 2011. Each evaluation and
appraisal report submitted following the 2011 evaluation and appraisal report shall also include an analysis and recommendations
M
based upon the process described above,
7'. By July 1, 2012 and each July thereafter, Monroe County and the Monroe County Land Authority shall submit a report
annually to the Administration Commission on the land acquisition funding and efforts in the Florida Keys to purchase Tier I and
Big Pine Key Tier U lands and the purchase of parcels where a Monroe County building permit allocation has been denied for four
U)
M
(4) years or more. The report shall include an identification of all sources of funds and assessment of fund balances within those
CL
sources available to the County and the Monroe County Land Authority.
8. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall adopt Land Development Regulations to require that administrative relief in the form
2D
of the issuance of a building permit is not allowed for lands within the Florida Forever targeted acquisition areas or Tier I lands
unless, after 60 days from the receipt of a complete application for administrative relief, it has been determined the parcel will not be
0
purchased by any county, state, federal or any private entity, The County shall develop a mechanism to routinely notify the
4-
.2
Department of Environmental Protection of upcoming administrative relief requests, at least 6 months prior to the deadline for
administrative relief.
9. By July 1, 20,12, in order to implement the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study, Monroe County shall adopt a
U)
>
Comprehensive Plan Policy to discourage private applications for future land use changes which increase allowable
2
density/intensity.
0
10. By July 1, 20111, Monroe County shall evaluate its land acquisition needs and state and federal funding opportunities and
U)
apply annually to at least one state or federal land acquisition grant program.
11. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Department of Community
Affairs, Division of Emergency Management, Marathon, Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach, and Uyton after a notice and
comment period of at least 30 days for interested parties. The memorandum of understanding shall stipulate, based on professionally
acceptable data and analysis, the input variables, and assumptions, including regional considerations, for utilizing the Florida Keys
0
U
Hurricane Evacuation Model or other models acceptable to the Department to accurately depict evacuation clearance times for the
population of the Florida Keys,
12, By July 1, 2012, the Florida Keys Hurricane Evacuation Model shall be run with the agreed upon variables from the
E
memorandum of understanding to complete an analysis of maximum build -out capacity for the Florida Keys Area of Critical State
M
Concern, consistent with the requirement to maintain a 24-bour evacuation clearance time and the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity
<
Study constraints. This analysis shall be prepared in coordination with the Department of Community Affairs and each municipality
in the Keys.
13, By July 1, 2012, the County and the Department of Community Affairs shall update the data for, the Florida Keys Hurricane
Evacuation Model as professionally acceptable sources of information are released (such as the Census, American Communities
Survey, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, and other studies). The County shall also evaluate and address appropriate
adjustments to the hurricane evacuation model within each Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
14. By JWy 1, 2012, the Department of Community Affairs shall apply the derived clexuce time to assess and determine the
remaining allocations for the Florida Keys Areas of Critical State Concern. The Department will recommend appropriate revisions
to the Administration Commission regarding the allocation rates and distribution, of allocations to Monroe County, Marathon,
Islamorada, Key West, Layton and Key Colony Beach or identify alternative evacuation strategies that support the 24 hour
evacuation clearance time, If necessary, the Department of Community Affairs shall work with each local government to amend the
Comprehensive Plans to reflect revised allocation rates and distributions or propose rule making to the Administration Commission.
15. By July 1, 2013, if necessary, the Department of Community Affairs shall work with each local government to amend the
Comprehensive Plan to reflect revised allocation rates and distribution or propose rule making to the Administration Commission,
(b) Wastewater Implementation,
W
1. By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall annually evaluate and allocate funding for wastewater implementation. Monroe
0
County shall identify any funding in the annual update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. By December 1, 2013, Monroe County shall work with the owners of wastewater facilities and onsite systems throughout the
COL
County and the Department of Health (DOH) and the Departinent of Environmental Protection (DEP) to fulfill the requirements of
Sections, 403.086(10) and 381.0065(3)(h) and (4)(1), F.S., regarding implementation of wastewater treatment and disposal, This will
include coordination of actions with DOH and DEP to notify owners regarding systems that will not meet the 2015 treatment and
disposal standards,
3. By July 1, 20111, Monroe County shall annually draft a resolution requesting the issuance of $50 million of the $2010 million
of bonds authorized under Section 215.619, F.S., and an appropriation of sufficient debt service for those bonds, for the construction
of wastewater projects within the Florida Keys.
El�
,4. By July 1, 2011„ Monroe County shall develop a mechanism to provide accurate and timely information and establish the
-'x
County's annual funding allocations necessary to provide evidence of unmet funding needs to support the issuance of bonds
U)
authorized under Section 215,619, F.S., and to assure the timely completion of work as necessary to fulfill any terms and conditions
CL
associated with bonds.
5, By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall evaluate its wastewater needs and state and federal funding opportunities and apply
annually to at least one state or federal grant program for wastewater projects and connections.
6. By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall develop and implement local funding programs necessary to timely fund wastewater
0
construction and future operation, maintenance and replacement of facilities.
T By December 1, 2013, the County shall provide a report of addresses and the property appraiser's parcel numbers of any
property owner that fails or refuses to connect to the central sewer facility within the required timefratne to the Monroe County
0
Health Department, Department of Environmental Protection, and the Department of Community Affairs. This report shall describe
U)
the status of the County's enforcement action.
(c) Wastewater Project Implementation.
0
1, Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Facility, Key Largo Wastewater Treatment District is responsible for wastewater treatment
U)
in its service area and the completion of the Key Largo Wastewater Treatment Facility.
a. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall complete construction of the South Transmission Line;
b. By July 1, 2013, Monroe County shall complete design of Collection basin C. E, F, G, H. 1, J, and K;
c. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall complete construction of Collection, basins E-H;
d. By December 1, 2011, Monroe County shall schedule construction of Collection basins I -Km
0
U
e. By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall complete construction of Collection basins I-K;
4i
f. By July 1, 2011, Monroe Countysball complete 50% of hook-ups to Key Largo Regional WWTP;
g. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall complete 75% of hook-ups to Key Largo Regional WWTP;
E
h. By July 1, 2013„ Monroe County shall complete all remaining connections to Key Largo Regional WWTP,
2. Hawk's Cay, Duck Key and Conch Key Wastewater Treatment Facility,
a, By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall complete construction of Hawk's Cay WWTP upgrade/expansion, transmission, and
collection system,
b. By July 1, 2013, Monroe County shall complete construction of Duck Key collection system;
c. By July 1, 2012, Monroe County shall initiate property connections to Hawk's Cay WWTP;
d. By December 1, 2012, Monroe County shall complete 50% of hook-ups to Hawk's Cay WWTP;
e. By July 1, 2013, Monroe County shall complete 75% of hook-ups to Hawk's Cay WVITP, and
f By July 1, 2014, Monroe County shall complete all remaining connections to Hawk's Cay WWTP.
3. South Lower Keys Wastewater Treatment Facility (Big Coppitt Regional System).
& By July 1, 2012„ Monroe County shall complete 75% hookups to South Lower Keys, WWTP; and
b. By July 1, 2013, Monroe County shall complete all remaining connections to the South Lower Keys WWTP.
4, Cudjoe Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility.
a. By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall complete planning and design documents for the Cudjoe Regional Wastewater
Treatment Facility, the Central Area (Cudjoe, Surnmerland, Upper Sugarloaf) collection system and the Central Area Transmission
Main;
0
b. By October 1, 2012, Monroe County shall initiate construction of Wastewater Treatment Facility, Central Area Collection
W
System and Central Area Transmission Main;
a
0
c. By July 1, 2014, Monroe County shall initiate construction of Wastewater Treatment Facility, Central Area Collection
'
1�
System and Central Area Transmission Main,
0
d. By February 1, 2012, Monroe County shall complete construction of Wastewater Treatment, Outer Area Collection System
CL
0
and Transmission Main;
e. By February 1, 2015, Monroe County shall complete construction of Outer Area collection and transmission main;
f, By July 1, 2014, Monroe County shall initiate property connections - complete 25% of hook-ups to Cudjoe Regional WWTP;
g. By July 1, 2015, Monroe County shall complete 50% of hook-ups to Cudjoe Regional WINTP; and
h. By December 1, 2015, Monroe County shall complete remaining hook-ups to Cudjoe Regional WWTP,
(d) Stormwater Treatment Facilities.
Q
1. By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall evaluate and allocate funding for stormwater implementation, Monroe County shall
identify any funding in the annual update to the Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan,
U)
2, By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall apply for stormwater grants from the South Florida Water Management District.
CL
3. By July 1, 2011, Monroe County shall complete Card Sound Road stormwater improvements.
Rufem4king Authority 380.0552(9), 38O.05(22) FS. Law Implemented 380,0552 FS. History -New 6-17-11,
Meeting Date; July .1,7,2013 Division: Growth Manas&MOL—
Bulk Item: Yes _ No X Staff Contact Person/Phone #: Christine Hurley, 289-2517
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Discussion and direction on the requirement of Administration
Commission Rule to adopt the Tier Overlay Zoning Maps into the Comprehensive Plan.,
ITEM BACKGROUND- Administration Commission Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., which was ratified by
the Legislature in 2011, includes six Work Program Tasks (28-20.140(5)(a)ll, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6]
requiring the County to adjust Tier boundaries Tier Zoning Overlay maps [(5)(a)2 ] and amend its
Comprehensive Plan to adopt the Tier System Maps onto the Future Land Use Ma Series [(5)(a)l, 3 W
p a
and 41. 0
Monroe County has completed Work Program task (5)(a)2 with the adoption of four (4) ordinances 0
[Ordinance 005-2011, 006-2011, 007-2011, and 008-2011] on May 4, 2011, revising or assigning the
tier overlay designation for 3,394 parcels based upon recommendations from the Tier Designation
Review Committee Work Group, Monroe County staff, the Planning Commission, Board of County
Commissioners and the public. The Administration Commission and the Department of Economic
Opportunity (DEO) have also reported that the County has completed Work Program task (5)(a)2,
which is to amend the Tier Overlay Maps to more accurately reflect the criteria for that Tier as
amended by Final Order DCA07-GM 166.
Additionally, the plaintiff in DOAH Case No. 06-2449GM requested additional revisions to the tier
designations — for 393 parcels that were not included in the challenge. Further, the County identified
77 offshore island parcels for review because these parcels were not given a tier designation at the time
of the adoption of the original Tier Ordinances in 2006. Collectively, the County refers to these
additional Tier designation revisions as the 'Volume A amendments.'
The Volume A amendments [Ordinances 014-2013 and 015-2013] were adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners on March 20, 2013. These amendments are currently under review by DEO;
with an anticipated final order publish date of June 21, 2013. Assuming the June 2 1 st publish date and
no challenges, the Volume A amendments will be effective by July l2th. The County has, been
awaiting the completion of the DEO review, the expiration of the appeal period, and for the Volume A
Tier designation amendments to become effective — to initiate the discussion of the County adopting
the Tier Maps, into the Comprehensive Plan (which is required by Work Program Tasks (5)(a)l, 3 and
4).
Through2pt,the Brocess Of u datitt information and ado tin. the six 6) ordLng-aces, the Qyn&
has been concerngd,ffift.the 2pigibUigy ofnew administrative .,proceedingl pursuag to Section,
120.569 and 120.57, F.S.. which could deln the, effectiveness of the ordinances and create
signiflapt gost and demands to the Coun1j.
Completing Work Program Tasks (5)(a)l, 3 and 4 (adoption of the entire set of Tier Overlay maps into
the Comprehensive Plan) could expose the County and every parcel (-44,00:0) with a Tier designation
to a potential challenge,
Monroe County Legal and Growth Management staff met with staff of the Department of Economic
Opportunity on June 17, 2013, to discuss this issue.
On May 4,2011, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinances Nos. 0F,5.
2011, 006-2011, 007-2011 and 008-20 1, revising or assigning the tier overlay designation for 3,3 94
parcels.
On March 20, 2013, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinances Nos. uj
Oil 4-2013 and 015-2013 (Volume A amendments). a
0
CONTRACT/AGREEMIENT CHANGES: n/a 0
CL
0
STAFF RECOMMNDATIONS- Discussion of the pros and cons of completing Work Program
TOTAL COST- n/a INDIRECT COST: BUDGETED: Yes
DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE:
COST' TO COUNTY: SOURCE OF FUNDS:
CL
REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes — No x AMOUNT'PER MONTH— Year
APPROVED BY: County Atty _ OMB/Purchasing _ Risk Management
DOCU?VIENTATION.- Included , x Not Required
0
4-
DISPOSITION: AGENDAITEM# 2
J.5.b
'� 'l r�, F
�. �,
✓�✓ ✓
,n � Y � *' � ✓ M � J' / " " / .. E � a . . .- '��, ! rn.✓ " / it Y
Y ✓✓ r r i, � . ,,, ., , r ,, P✓ ., ,r ✓,
r :✓ P', r xr r tr✓ r � rrr yr ✓✓ ✓ ✓r'P
• ♦ ✓ f r ♦ r ✓ � . r . r r .
/' ✓ N
a rr, � r p; r e t ✓ ✓ ✓ r " ✓ ✓m '/ /.P
„!�
4;
r� 1 ✓ r,a r P xr✓� pP !a a ,✓ � ✓,.r✓ P'.r P:
P. ✓ P . P r�,:r ✓� , e � r,r..
✓ +' w a r r r r -✓ � ♦ �.s r r t'r �^r�✓' r,:
.W ...
j,
r r�r ✓ r' `✓rr P ^rr � r., ;. , ✓ �✓' P .K P r.x
✓rr r✓rP ^✓ �; r � r r r ✓ r rra ✓ e .✓r,, ✓ ,✓ r r r r,
✓'. ✓ l ! ! ✓r/ ✓ I: ,. fl.. !. N A P ♦-: ✓, / M /, r 1/. # r.t',°� '.r,r:>;
IMOPMent Review Committee (DRC)
Commission (PC)1
BOCC transmittal hearing
The final orde:r could be appealed to the Ist or 3rd District Court, of Appeal.
Add 6 -12 months to timeframe for an, Administrative Appeal
Add an additional 6-12 months to firnefirarne for an Appeal to a District Court
of Appeal
p If no appeal, the Comprehensive Plan amendment becomes effective. ----I
Capital Improvement Plan
The Capital Improvement Plan is a resource that assists Monroe County in ensuring that decisions on projects and funding
made wisely and in a well -planned manner. The quality of life for a Monroe County resident depends on the reliability of ro;
and bridges, the accessibility of culture and recreation, the efficiency of waste disposal, and many other essential public servic
Capital Assets
A capital asset is a new or rehabilitated physical asset that is nonrecurring and has a useful life of more than five years and cc
at least $50,000.
Capital Project
A capital project is undertaken to acquire a capital asset. Examples of capital projects include construction and rehabilitatior
public buildings, major street improvements, parks and recreation projects, and acquisition of fire trucks.
0
Annual Capital Budget
The annual capital budget represents the first year of the capital improvement plan. It is the appropriation of capital spend 2
legally adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. The annual capital budget is adopted in conjunction with Mon
County's annual operating budget and provides legal authority to proceed with specific projects.
Capital Improvement Plan
Capital Infrastructure is essential to the Monroe County community. Monroe County's capital improvement plan is a multi-y
program that identifies capital projects to be funded during a five year period. It specifies each capital project to be undertak
the year it will begin, the anticipated expenses for each year, and the method of financing. Projects and financing sources in
capital improvement plan for years other than the current budget year are not authorized until the annual budget for thi mE
years is legally adopted. The out years serve only as a guide for future planning and are subject to further review
modification. The five year capital plan total is currently $298,421,423.
FY 2019 Capital Budget
The following chart shows the capital funding for each fiscal year from FY10 through FY19. The total FY19 capital budge
$66,714,728. This is a 37% decrease from the adopted FY18 capital budget of $105,731,059. The main decreases in cap
funding are completed wastewater projects, completed general government projects, and the final payment of the 2(
Revenue bond. The County also remains commited to focusing on and completing its existing projects.
The capital projects planned for FY19 include construction and renovation of the Plantation Key Courthouse, construction c
new library in Marathon, renovation of Higg's Beach, preservation of working waterfront, Hurricane Irma cost share paymer
continued road & bridge repair and repaving, and general county asset improvements.
i
Packet Pg. 1378
Project Types
Chart 1 illustrates the types of projects in the FY19 capital budget. In FY19, 42% or $28,039,866 of the capital budget will ft
"Other", which encompasses debt service payments, reserves, and budget transfers. 23% or $15,283,176 of the capital bud
will fund transportation projects. Chart 2 shows the types of projects in the FY19 — FY23 Capital Improvement Plan. The Cap
Improvement Plan continues to meet its existing debt payment requirements, which are funding current projects such as
Plantation Key Courthouse, Marathon Library, and Rowell's Marina. The plan also focuses on transportation projects in order
maintain the County's roads and bridges.
Chart 1
FY 2019
Total CIP $66,714,728
Other (Debt,
Reserves,
Transfers
$28,039,8(
42%
Culture &
Recreation
$8,815,679
13%
Trar
$15,283,176
23%
rA -ral
ment
193
Chart 2
FY 2019 - FY 2023
5-Year Total CIP $298,421,423
Other (Debt,
Reserves,
Transfers)
$163, 349,08
55%
Culture
lic Safety Recreatic
320,386 $16,738,5
13% 6%
Physical
Environment
$5,486,428
8%
Trans_.
$56,217,085
19%
General
wernment
.2, 055,101
4%
iblic Safety
36, 201,085
12%
Physical
Environment
$13, 860,473
5%
The capital projects planned for FY 2019 — FY 2023 include the Higg's Beach renovation and construction of the Cudjoe Key I
Station.
FY 2019 - FY 2023 Capital Funding
2
Packet Pg. 1379
Budget By Fund Summary
The following table shows the budget by fund summary for the FY 2019 capital budget and the FY 2019 - FY 2023 Cap
Improvement Plan.
FY 2019 — FY 2023
Budget By Fund Summary
Funding Source
FY 2019 Budget
%
FY 2019 - FY
2023 Total
%
Road & Bridge -Fuel Taxes (Fund 102)
16,930,804
25.38%
70,580,968
23.65%
Impact Fees -Roads (Fund 130)
1,504,127
2.25%
4,670,145
1.56%
Impact Fees -Parks (Fund 131)
602,296
0.90%
3,339,488
1.12%
Impact Fees -Libraries (Fund 132)
1,152,383
1.73%
1,152,383
0.39%
Impact Fees -Solid Waste (Fund 133)
101,165
0.15%
101,165
0.03%
Impact Fees -Police Facilities (Fund 134)
128,116
0.19%
128,116
0.04%
Impact Fees -Fire & EMS (Fund 135)
102,430
0.15%
514,316
0.17%
One Cent Sales Tax (Fund 304)
21,196,059
31.77%
134,618,572
45.11%
Clerk of Court Network Adm (Fund 306)
100,000
0.15%
300,000
0.10%
2007 Revenue Bond (Fund 308)
317,752
0.48%
317,752
0.11%
Big Coppitt Waste Water (Fund 310)
712,000
1.07%
3,560,000
1.19%
Duck Key Waste Water (Fund 311)
162,325
0.24%
811,625
0.27%
Cudjoe Waste Water (Fund 312)
6,262,777
9.39%
18,488,529
6.20%
2014 Revenue Bond (Fund 314)
13,421,535
20.12%
51,817,405
17.36%
Long Key Waste Water (Fund 315)
303,177
0.45%
303,177
0.10%
Land Acquisition (Fund 316) ($10 million)
3,717,782
5.57%
7,717,782
2.59%
Total
66,714,728
100.00%
298,421,423
1 100.00%
Debt Service
The following table shows the County's debt service commitments for the Capital Improvement Plan.
Debt Service Schedule
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year
Debt Service
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2033
CWSRF - Big Coppitt
682,000
682,000
682,000
682,000
682,000
4,432,970
CWSRF - Cudjoe
4,410,935
8,821,870
8,821,870
8,821,870
8,821,870
136,738,985
2014 Revenue Bond
4,284,202
4,281,292
4,281,376
4,279,336
4,280,172
4,283,766
KLWTD-Mayfield Loan
2,125,000
2,125,000
2,125,000
2,125,000
2,125,000
4,625,000
2016 Revenue Bond
1,118,754
1,118,754
1,119,135
1,124,263
1,119,053
11,921,455
12,620,891
17,028,916
17,029,381
17,032,469
17,028,095
162,002,176
Total Debt Service
Revenue Source
Big Coppitt Special Assessments
332,000
332,000
332,000
332,000
332,000
1,432,970
Infrastructure Sales Tax
7,877,956
11,371,273
14,754,673
14,757,761
14,753,387
139,295,337
Cudjoe Special Assessments
4,410,935
5,325,643
1,942,708
1,942,708
1,942,708
21,273,869
Total Revenue
12,620,891
17,028,916
17,029,381
17,032,469
17,028,095
162,002,176
Packet Pg. 1380
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Funds:
Road & Bridge (Fund 102) accounts for the operation of the Road Department and repair and maintenance of county roads and bridl
State and county fuel taxes are the main revenue source for this fund.
Impact Fees — Roads (Fund 130) accounts for roadway impact fees (Licenses & Permits) collected within the County's Impact Fee distri
Funds are used for the capital expansion of the county's major road network system in the district where the fees are collected.
Impact Fees — Park & Recreation (Fund 131) accounts for park impact fees (License & Permits) collected within the County's Impact
districts. Funds are used for the capital expansion of the county's community park facilities in the sub district where the fees have b
collected.
Impact Fees — Libraries (Fund 132) accounts for library impact fees collected within the County's Impact Fee districts. Funds are used for
LU
capital expansion of the county's library facilities. On June 21, 2017, The Board of County Commissioners voted to amend the Library Imr
Fee to $0.00 beginning on January 1, 2018.
0
CL
Impact Fees — Solid Waste (Fund 133) accounts for solid waste impact fees collected within the County's Impact Fee districts. The funds
be used for the purpose of construction and expansion of solid waste facilities in Monroe County and also the purchase of new incinerai
and equipment. On June 21, 2017, The Board of County Commissioners voted to amend the Solid Waste Impact Fee to $0.00 beginning
OC
January 1, 2018.
Impact Fees — Police Facilities (Fund 134) accounts for police impact fees collected within the County's Impact Fee districts. Funds are u
for the purpose of capital expansion of police and jail facilities, and the acquisition of new patrol cars. On June 21, 2017, The Board of Cou
`�
Commissioners voted to amend the Police Facilities Impact Fee to $0.00 beginning on January 1, 2018.
Impact Fees — Fire & EMS (Fund 135) accounts for fire facility impact fees collected within the County's Impact Fee districts. Funds can
used for the capital expansion of the County's fire facilities, including wells and hydrants.
One Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax (Fund 304) accounts for major Physical Environment, General Government, Culture & Recreational,
Public Safety projects along with debt service for capital improvement projects and Project Management. In November 2012, Monroe Cou
residents approved a referendum providing an extension of the One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax to 2033.
Clerk of Court Network Administration (Fund 306) accounts for the Clerks network system. It is funded by the One Cent Infrastructure Si
Tax.
2007 Revenue Bond (Fund 308) accounts for capital improvement projects financed by the 2007 Revenue Bond. The Bond is funded by
One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax.
Big Coppitt Waste Water Project (Fund 310) accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the construction of the Big
Coppitt Waste Water Project.
Duck Key Waste Water Project (Fund 311) accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the construction of the Duck Key Wz
Water Project.
Cudjoe Waste Water Project (Fund 312) accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the construction of the Cudjoe Waste W�
Project.
2014 Revenue Bond (Fund 314) accounts for capital improvement projects financed by the 2014 Revenue Bond. The Bond is funded by
One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax.
Long Key Waste Water Project (Fund 315) accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the construction of the Long Key Wz
Water Project.
Land Acquisition (Fund 316) was established for the conservation, habitat protection, and mitigation of potential future takings liability.
Packet Pg. 1381
One Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax Revenue History
The following graphs show the history of the One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax revenue since its inception in 1990. The
allows for one percent tax on most purchases in the county. This one percent, or one penny, is collected on every dollar sp
by both residents and visitors who purchase goods in the county.
One Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax History
One Cent Infrastructure
Fund304
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
20,692,528
19,503,732
20,462,546
17,580,261
11,370,143
14,269,883
Revenue
21,325,707
21,897,500
22,182,500
22,625,200
23,076,754
Expense
1 22,514,503
1 20,137,245
1 24,779,7851
28,392,618
1 19,725,4601
20,226,896
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
1 19,503,732
20,462,546
17,580,261
11,370,143
1 14,269,883
1 17,119,741
*As of 7/11/18, the State is estimating the FY 2019 Sales Tax Revenue to be $23.38 million; however, we are estimating conservatively at $21.1 million
Actual revenue will change the ending fund balance estimates.
FY 2019 State Estimates as of July 11, 2018
1 1% Tax Rate -Default Formula
Local Government
Distribution Percentage '
Estimated
Distribution
MONROE BOCC
60.873997
Islamorada
6.083297
$ 2,336,238
Key Colony Beach
0.772192
$ 296,554
Key West
23.653312
$ 9,083,853
Layton
0.178864
$ 68,691
Marathon
8.438338
$ 3,240,672
Countywide Tota I
100.000000
$ 38,404,148
5
Packet Pg. 1382
Fuel Tax History
The following graphs show the County's fuel tax revenues received for the ten year period from 2007 through 2017.
Ten Year Fuel Tax History
Sales Tax County 9th Cent
55,562
47,421
39,960
366,734
479,072
524,108
470,739
528,181
541,261
562,954
564,
Fuel T ax Local Option
1,426,441
1,389,386
1,216,424
1,585,859
1,601,155
1,807,383
1,553,841
1,824,025
1,871,727
1,971,908
1,979,
County Fuel Tax
1,157,301
1,090,571
1,063,612
1,041,922
1,023,313
994,743
1,012,612
1,018,966
1,072,482
1,120,983
1,147,
Constitutional Gas Tax 20%
525,824
496,350
486,663
473,478
466,369
456,897
455,896
470,180
402,087
333,591
561,
Constitutional Gas Tax80%
2,103,295
1,985,398
1,946,653
1,893,911
1,865,478
1,827,587
1,823,584
1,880,721
1,824,132
2,190,910
2,247,
Constitutional Gas Tax The two cents per gallon tax is placed on motor fuel and collected by the Florida State Departmeni
Revenue (DOR). The allocation formula is based on the geographic area, population, and a collection component. This facto
then calculated annually for each county in the form of weighted county -to -state ratios. To determine each county's mont
distribution, the monthly statewide tax receipts are multiplied by each county's distribution factor.
County Fuel Tax The Florida Legislature has levied a one cent per gallon tax on motor fuel for distribution to cou
governments pursuant to the same formula used to distribute the Constitutional Gas Tax.
Local Option and Ninth -Cent Fuel Taxes In addition to the two cent constitutional gas tax and the one cent County Gas 1
counties may impose up to 12 cents of local option fuel taxes in the form of three separate levies. The first is a tax of 1 cent
every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within the county. This is known as the "Ninth" cent fuel tax. The second is a ta)
1 to 6 cents on every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within the county. The third tax is a 1 to 5 cent levy upon every
gallon of motor fuel sold within the county. The third tax is not subject to diesel fuel. Monroe County now levies ten of
twelve cents on motor fuel and seven of the seven cents on diesel fuel. Monthly distribution on motor fuel is based on reps
from terminal suppliers, wholesalers and importers as the destination of the gallons distributed for retail sale or use. Taxes
diesel are distributed according to Florida Statute proceeds.
Road & Bridge
Fund 102
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
14,664,072
8,134,306
3,880,120
2,467,419
2,457,944
2,184,93
Revenue
6,353,310
6,472,763
6,809,815
6,943,608
7,080,078
7,219,27
Expense
12,883,076
10,726,949
8,222,516
6,953,083
7,353,083
1 7,253,08
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
1 8,134,306
3,880,120
2,467,419
2,457,944
2,184,939
2,151,13z
6
Packet Pg. 1383
Life to Date
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
Total
Project Name
Project #
Fund
FY 2017
Estimated
Proposed
Project
Physical Environment
Big Coppitt Waste Water Project
Various
310
40,623,981
747,000
712,000
712,000
712,000
712,000
712,000 Ongoing Assessm
Canal Master Plan
PE1302
304
7,062,866
2,719
0
0
0
0
0
7,065,
Cudjoe Waste Water Project
Various
312
179,205,652
194,979
219,979
219,979
218,922
218,922
218,922 Ongoing Assessm
Duck Key Waste Water Project
Various
311
13,305,821
83,500
162,325
162,325
162,325
162,325
162,325 Ongoing
Assess m
Long Key Waste Water Project
Various
315
768,555
531,445
303,177
0
0
0
0 Ongoing
Assess
Gulf View Park Boat Ramp Repairs
PE1506
304
2,457
10,000
170,000
0
0
0
0
182,
Land Acquisition
316
0
2,282,218
3,717,782
0
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,400,000
10,000,
Solid Waste Impact Fees
30500
133
0
104,090
101,165
0
0
0
0
Waste Water Upgrade County Owned Facilities
PE1301
304
944,402
15,760
0
0
0
0
0
960,
Waste Water U rade Count Owned Facilities
PE1401
304
204,861
14,437
100,000
0
0
0
0
319,
General Government
0„
Jefferson Browne
CG 1516
314
193,716
650,000
0
0
0
-
-
843,
MCDC HVAC
CG 1614
308
0
179,807
26,193
0
0
0
0
206,
MCSO Reroofing
CG 1714
308
0
180,000
118,000
0
0
0
0
298,
MCSO Windows
CG 1713
308
0
20,000
25,000
0
0
0
0
45,
Ocean Reef Emergency Building Purchase
CG1720
304
0
0
600,000
600,000
0
0
0
1,200,
°J_-
0
Culture & Recreation
Bernstein Park -Stock Island
CC1603
314
7,829,895
490,000
0
0
0
0
0
8,319,
Big Pine Swimming Hole
CC1405
304
86,536
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
106,
Dist l Park Prjs (BaypointTennis Court)
29519
131
0
0
1,800
0
0
0
0
Dist l Park Prjs (BayPoint)
29515
131
0
0
16,856
0
0
0
0
Dist 1 Park Prjs (Big Coppitt)
29516
131
0
0
6,645
0
0
0
0
Higg's Beach Master Plan
CC1402
304
615,838
135,000
1,856,000
2,644,572
0
0
0
5,251,
Rowell's Marina
CC1901
304
0
0
1,080,000
0
0
0
0
1,080,
Library Automation Update
30002
132
128,703
25,000
25,000
0
0
0
0
Library Impact Fees
30000
132
0
55,736
1,127,383
0
0
0
0
Marathon Library
CC1501
314
393,757
268,850
4,125,000
2,541,149
7,328,
Parks &Reclmpact Fees (All Districts)
131
0
50,033
576,995
641,023
669,873
698,723
727,573
P_
Cudjoe Fire Station
CP1501
314
731,134
2,000,000
2,317,389
0
0
0
0
5,04E
Fire &Ambulance Fire Truck Purchase
CP1901
304
0
0
643,305
0
0
0
0
64-
i
Fire &Ambulance Hydrants District
CP1603
304
155,800
100,000
0
0
0
0
0
25� i
Fire & EMS Impact Fees (All Districts)
Various
135
0
102,384
102,430
102,646
102,863
103,080
103,297
KL Fire Hydrants
CP1403
304
539,225
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000
0
0
1,13c C
Layton Fire Station Property Purchase
CP1800
304
0
577,000
0
0
0
0
0
57, 8
PKJaiI &Courthouse
CP1406
314
742,259
1,758,000
4,979,146
15,100,000
12,068,813
0
0
34,64E
1st Street/Bertha CR1605 304 0 200,000 1,359,598 751,168 0 0 0 2,310,
Key Colony Beach Road Project
29004
130
-
0
33,820
34,220
34,620
35,020
35,420
Key Largo/Burton Drive Road
CR1607
304
0
0
280,000
1,880,000
0
0
0
2,160, 4
t
Kohen Sub Division
CR1901
304
0
0
0
0
0
861,438
0
861,
Lake Surprise
CR1501
304
3,577,594
320,000
0
0
0
0
0
3,897, C
C
Paving Backlog
102
0
1,941,852
1,350,846
0
0
0
0
3,292, C
Paving Backlog
CR1401
304
99,484
0
0
250,000
750,000
1,000,000
2,017,248
Ongc a
Road & Bridge
102
0
7,443,611
10,224,885
8,220,452
6,951,019
7,827,303
7,259,263
Ongc L
Roadway Impact Fee (All Districts)
130
0
77,483
540,787
630,401
714,590
798,779
882,968
Sexton Cove
CR1502
304
1,403,146
22,632
0
0
0
0
0
1,425, 9
Stock Island I Project
CR1503
304
336,828
3,658,156
0
0
0
0
0
3,994,
Stock Island II Project
CR1604
304
147,344
414,795
563,720
0
0
0
0
1,125,
Budgeted Transfers-308
85570
308
0
0
148,559
0
0
0
0
Budgeted
AnnL
Clerk of Court Network System
306
0
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
0
0
Budgeted
AnnL
Debt Service - Fund 304
86502
304
0
9,767,047
6,877,956
10,371,273
14,754,673
14,757,761
14,753,387
Debt Service - Fund 312
312
0
10,813,162
5,942,798
5,325,643
1,942,708
1,942,708
1,942,708
Engineering Admin, 7 Mile Bridge, Canal
Maintenance
304
0
1,185,000
1,579,717
1,494,716
1,200,000
1,377,833
1,377,833
Budgeted
AnnL
Reserves - Fund 304
85532
304
0
0
1,816,952
4,950,000
6,603,224
6,485,376
3,349,858
Budgeted
AnnL
Reserves/Budgeted Transfers - 102
102
0
520,047
5,355,073
5,679,662
4,423,526
6,670,473
6,618,466
Budgeted
AnnL
Reserves/Budgeted Transfers -312
312
0
18,000,000
100,000
0
65,080
65,080
65,080
Budgeted
AnnL
Reserves-314
314
0
0
2,000,000
1,000,000
2,900,000
3,865,908
920,000
Transfer to Other Funds -Fund 304
86502
304
0
4,178,428
4,118,811
6,388,056
11,447,241
1,478,428
1,578,428
Budgeted
AnnL
Totals
71,437,046 f
66,714,728
69,949,285
67,2,71,477
Sp 361,157
"44,124,776
*Budget amounts for Impact Fees are based on the availability of funds.
**Budget amounts for Debt Service are budgeted
annually based on current obligations.
7
Packet Pg. 1384
J.5.c
Overview
The Physical Environment section contains capital improvement projects designed to facilitate the provision of services by
different branches of Monroe County government with regards to wastewater management and land preservation. Mz
Physical Environment capital projects in FY19 include land acquisition and county owned wastewater upgrades.
Funding Sources
Physical Environment projects are funded by One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax revenue, bond proceeds, special assessmel
and various impact fees.
Fund 316
68
FY 2019 Physical Environment
Project Appropriations by Fund
Fund 133
? Fund 304
FY 2019 — 2023
Physical Environment Projects
1 310
Fund 311
3%
Fund 312
4%
nd 315
6%
Project
Fund
Project #
Life to Date
FY 2017
FY2018
Estimated
FY2019
Proposed
FY20 - FY23
Total Proposed
Total
Project
Big Coppitt Waste Water Project
310
Various
40,623,981
747,000
712,000
2,848,000
OngoingAssessmE
Cudjoe Waste Water Project
312
Various
179,205,652
194,979
219,979
876,745
OngoingAssessmE
Duck Key Waste Water Project
311
Various
13,305,821
83,500
162,325
649,300
OngoingAssessmE
Gulf View Park Boat Ramp Repairs
304
PE1506
2,457
10,000
170,000
0
182,,
Long Key Waste Water
315
Various
768,555
531,445
303,177
Ongoing AssessmE
Land Acquisition
316
2,282,218
3,717,782
4,000,000
10,000,1
Solid Waste Impact Fees
133
30500
104,090
101,165
0
Waste Water Upgrade County Owned Facilities
304
PE1301
944,402
15,760
0
960,.
Waste Water Upgrade
County Owned Facilities
304
PE1401
204,861
14,437
100,000
319,.
l
*Budget amounts for Impact Fees are based on the availability of funds.
8
Packet Pg. 1385
Overview
The General Government section contains capital improvement projects designed to facilitate the provision of services by
legislative and administrative branches of Monroe County government. The major General Government capital project budge
in FY 2019 include the Ocean Reef Emergency Building purchase.
Funding Sources
General Government projects are funded by One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax revenue and bond proceeds.
Fund 30R
6%
FY 2019 General Government
Project Appropriations by Fund
FY 2019 — 2023
General Government Projects
Fund 304
22
Project
Fund
Project #
Life to Date
FY 2017
FY2018
Estimated
FY2019
Proposed
FY20 - FY23
Total Proposed
Total
Project
Jefferson Browne
314
CG1516
193,716
650,000
843,'
MCDC HVAC
308
CG1401
179,807
26,193
0
206,(
MCSO Reroofing
308
CG1708
180,000
118,000
0
298,(
MCSO Windows
308
CG1708
20,000
25,000
0
45,(
Ocean Reef Emer
enc Buildin
9Purchase
304
CG1720
600,000
1 600,000
1,800,(
r U
Packet Pg. 1386
Overview
The Culture & Recreation section contains capital improvement projects designed to facilitate the provision, maintenance,
operation of culture and recreation facilities and activities. Major Culture and Recreation projects budgeted in FY19 include
Marathon Library and Higg's Beach Master Plan.
Funding Sources
Culture and Recreation projects are funded by One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax revenue, bond proceeds, and various imp
fees.
Fund 314
47
FY 2019 Culture & Recreation
Project Appropriations by Fund
Fund 131
FY 2019 — 2023
Culture & Recreation Projects
J 132
3%
Fund 304
33
Project
Fund
Project #
Life to Date
FY 2017
FY2018
Estimated
FY2019
Proposed
FY20 - FY23
Total Proposed
Total
Project
Dist 1 Park Prjs (Bay poi ntTennis Court)
131
29519
1,800
0
Dist 1 Park Prjs(Bay Point
131
29515
16,856
0
Dist 1 Park Prjs (Big Coppitt)
131
29516
6,645
0
Higg's Beach Master Plan
304
CC1402
615,838
135,000
1,856,000
2,644,572
5,251,.
Rowell's Marina
304
CC1901
1,080,000
1,080,1
Library Automation Update
132
30002
128,703
25,000
25,000
0
Library Impact Fees
132
30000
55,736
1,127,383
0
Marathon Library
314
CC1501
393,757
268,850
4,125,000
2,541,149
7,328,
Parks & Rec Im act Fees All Districts
131
50,033
576,995
2,737,192
i l l i
*Budget amounts for Impact Fees are based on the availability of funds.
10
Packet Pg. 1387
Overview
The Public Safety section contains capital improvement projects designed to facilitate the provision of public services by Mon
County government. Major Public Safety capital projects in FY19 include the PK Courthouse and Cudjoe Fire Station.
Funding Sources
Public Safety projects are funded by One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax revenue, bond proceeds, and various impact fees.
Fun
87
FY 2019 Public Safety
Project Appropriations by Fund
Fund 134 Fund 135
FY 2019 — 2023
Public Safety Projects
M4
Project
Fund
Project #
Life to Date
FY 2017
FY2018
Estimated
FY2019
Proposed
FY20 - FY23
Total Proposed
Total
Project
Cud oe Fire Station
314
CP1501
731,134
2,000,000
2,317,389
0
5,048
Fire &Ambulance Fire Truck Purchase
304
CP1901
643,305
0
643
Fire & EMS Impact Fees All Districts
135
3150*
102,384
102,430
411,886
KL Fire Hydrants
304
CP1403
539,225
150,000
150,000
300,000
1,139
PKJaiI &Courthouse
314
CP1406
742,259
1,758,000
4,979,146
27,168,813
34,648
Police Facilities Impact
Fees
134
31000
1 144,951
1 128,116
1 0
*Budget amounts for Impact Fees are based on the availability of funds.
11
Packet Pg. 1388
Overview
The Transportation section contains capital improvement projects designed to facilitate the provision of services by Mon
County government with regards to the County's roads and bridges. Major transportation capital projects in FY19 incli.
continuing the five year road project plan to repair and pave various roads and bridges in Monroe County.
Funding Sources
Transportation projects are funded by One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax revenue, state and county fuel taxes, and impact fees
Fund 304
15%
FY 2019 Transportation
Project Appropriations by Fund
Fund 130
10%
FY 2019 — 2023
Transportation Proiects
Fund 102
75 %
Project
Fund
Project #
Life to Date
FY 2017
FY2018
Estimated
FY2019
Proposed
FY20 - FY23
Total Proposed
Total
Project
1st Street/Bertha
304
CR1605
200,000
1,359,598
751,168
2,310,
Key Colony Beach Road Project
130
29004
33,820
139,280
Key Largo/Burton Drive Road
304
CR1607
280,000
1,880,000
2,160,1
Key Largo/Burton Drive Road
304
CR1607
861,438
861,,
Paving Backlog
102
1,941,852
1,350,846
0
3,292,1
Paving Backlog
304
CR1401
99,484
4,017,248
Ongo
Road & Bridge
102
7,443,611
10,224,885
30,258,037
Ongo
Roadway Impact Fee (All Districts)
130
77,483
540,787
3,026,738
Stock Island II Project
304
CR1604
147,344
414,795
563,720
0
1,125,1
Truman Pedestrian Bridge Widening -Duck Key
1 130
29012
929,520
0
*Budget amounts for Impact Fees are based on the availability of funds.
12
Packet Pg. 1389
Road & Bridge (Fund 102) This fund accounts for the operation of the Road Department and repair and maintenance of count
roads and bridges. State and county fuel taxes are the main revenue source for this fund.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Fuel Taxes
2,612,000
2,612,000
2,612,000
2,612,000
2,612,000
13,060,000
Intergovernmental Rev. -State Shared Fuel Tax
4,075,000
4,075,000
4,075,000
4,075,000
4,075,000
20,375,000
Services -Transportation
66,000
66,000
66,000
66,000
66,000
330,000
Interest
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
175,000
Miscellaneous Revenue
22,700
22,700
22,700
22,700
22,700
113,500
Less 5%
-340,535
-340,535
-340,535
-340,535
-340,535
-1,702,675
Fund Balance Forward
10,460,639
7,429,949
4,904,380
8,027,611
7,407,564
38,230,143
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
County Engineer Roads & Brid es
485,106
485,106
485,106
485,106
485,106
2,425,530
Local Option Gas Tax Projects
362,583
362,583
362,583
362,583
362,583
1,812,915
Constitutional Tax Projects 80%
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
2,500,000
Pa vi ng Ba ckl og
1,350,846
1,350,846
SustainabilityRoads
1,000,000
500,000
1,500,000
Twin Lakes/Sands Subdivision Pilot Project
1,300,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
800,000
4,100,000
Truman Bridge Replacement
600,000
800,000
1,400,000
Sugarloaf Blvd Bridge
1,573,866
769,433
2,343,299
Bimini Drive Bridge
200,000
200,000
Harbor Drive Bridge
200,000
200,000
Seaview Ave Bridge #904602
500,000
500,000
Road Department
4,408,639
4,408,639
4,416,883
4,416,883
4,416,883
22,067,927
Street Lighting
194,691
194,691
194,691
194,691
194,691
973,455
Budget Transfers
4,040,829
520,047
520,047
520,047
520,047
6,121,017
Reserves
1,314,244
5,159,615
3,895,235
6,618,466
6,098,419
23,085,979
Road & Bridge
Fund 102
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
14,664,072
8,134,306
3,880,120
2,467,419
2,457,944
2,184,93
Revenue
6,353,310
6,472,763
6,809,815
6,943,608
7,080,078
7,219,27
Expense
12,883,076
10,726,949
8,222,516
6,953,083
i 7,353,083
7,253,08
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
8,134,306
3,880,120
2,467,419
2,457,944
2,184,939
2,151,13
13
Packet Pg. 1390
Impact Fees - Roads (Fund 130) This fund accounts for roadway impact fees (Licenses & Permits) collected within the County'
Impact Fee districts. Funds are used for the capital expansion of the county's major road network system in the district wh
the fees are collected.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Impact Fees -Roads
66,000
66,000
66,000
66,000
66,000
330,000
Interest
50,525
50,525
50,525
50,525
50,525
252,625
Less 5%
-5,826
-5,826
-5,826
-5,826
-5,826
-29,130
Fund Balance Forward
1,393,428
553,922
1 638,5111
723,100
807,689
4,116,650
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
KeyColony Beach Road Projects
33,820
34,220
34,620
35,020
35,420
189,761
Truman Pedestrian Brid e Widenin - Duck Key
929,520
929,520
Roadwa x Im act Fees
(AII Districts)
540,787
630,401
714,590
798,779
882,968
3,645,008
Impact Fees - Park & Recreation (Fund 131) This fund accounts for park impact fees (License & Permits) collected within
County's Impact Fee districts. Funds are used for the capital expansion of the county's community park facilities in the
district where the fees have been collected.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Impact Fees -Police Facilities
41,200
41,200
41,200
41,200
41,200
206,000
Interest
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
6,000
Less 5%
-2,120
-2,120
-2,120
-2,120
-2,120
-10,600
Fund Balance Forward
562,016
600,743
1 629,593
1 658,443
687,293
3,138,088
N
/0
l
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
District 1 Park Projects (Bay Point Tennis Co
1,800
1,800
District 1 Park Projects (Ba Point)
16,856
16,856
District 1 Park Projects (Big Co itt)
6,645
6,645
Parks & Rec Impact Fees (All Districts)
576,995
641,023
1 669,873
1 698,723
1 727,573
1 3,314,187
RN NO,
/
/
l
14
Packet Pg. 1391
Impact Fees — Libraries (Fund 132) This fund accounts for library impact fees collected within the County's Impact Fee district!
Funds are used for the capital expansion of the county's library facilities. On June 21, 2017, The Board of County Commission
voted to amend the Library Impact Fee to $0.00 beginning on January 1, 2018.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Interest
2,700
2,700
Less 5%
-135
(135)
Fund Balance Forward
1,149,818
1,149,818
FY2019
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Expenses
Proposed
Total
Library Automation Update
25,000
25,000
Li b ra ry I m pa ct Fees
1,127,383
1,127,383
r'
Impact Fees — Solid Waste (Fund 133) This fund accounts for solid waste impact fees collected within the County's Impact Fee
districts. The funds can be used for the purpose of construction and expansion of solid waste facilities in Monroe County,
also the purchase of new incinerators and equipment. On June 21, 2017, The Board of County Commissioners voted to amE
the Solid Waste Impact Fee to $0.00 beginning on January 1, 2018.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Interest
300
300
Less 5%
-15
-15
Fund Balance Forward
100,880
100,880
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Solid Waste Impact Fees
101,165
101,165
77777V�, l
15
Packet Pg. 1392
Impact Fees — Police Facilities (Fund 134) This fund accounts for police impact fees collected within the County's Impact I
districts. Funds are used for the purpose of capital expansion of police and jail facilities and the acquisition of new patrol ci
On June 21, 2017, The Board of County Commissioners voted to amend the Police Facilities Impact Fee to $0.00 beginning
January 1, 2018.
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Police Facilities ImpactFees
128,116
128,116
Impact Fees — Fire & EMS (Fund 135) This fund accounts for fire facility impact fees collected within the County's Impact I
districts. Funds can be used for the capital expansion of the County's fire facilities including wells and hydrants.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Interest
230
230
230
230
230
1,150
Less 5%
-13
-13
-13
-13
-13
-65
Fund Balance Forward
102,213
102,429
102,646
102,863
103,080
513,231
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Fire & EMS Impact Fees (All Districts)
102,430
102,646
102,863
103,080
103,297
514,316
16
Packet Pg. 1393
One Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax (Fund 304) This fund accounts for major Physical Environment, General Government,
Culture & Recreational, and Public Safety projects, along with debt service for capital improvement projects and Project
Management. In November 2012, Monroe County residents approved a referendum providing an extension of the One
Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax to 2033.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax
22,000,000
23,000,000
23,300,000
23,766,000
24,241,320
116,307,320
Interest
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
250,000
Less 5%
-1,102,500
-1,152,500
-1,167,500
-1,190,800
-1,214,566
-5,8271866
Transfer from 308
148,559
0
0
0
0
148,559
Fund Balance Forward
100,000
7,582,285
12,722,638
3,335,636
23,740,559
l
W.
/WA/
111
5,� i<.,
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Gulf View Park Boat Ramp Repairs
170,000
0
0
0
0
170,000
Waste Water Upgrade County Owned Facilities
100,000
0
0
0
0
100,000
Ocean Reef Emergency Building Purchase
600,000
600,000
0
0
0
1,200,000
H i gg's Beach Master Plan
1,856,000
2,644,572
0
0
0
4,500,572
Rowe I I's Ma ri n a
1,080,000
0
0
0
0
1,080,000
Fire & Ambulance Fire Truck Purchase
643,305
0
0
0
0
643,305
KLFire Hydrants
150,000
150,000
150,000
0
0
450,000
1st Street/Bertha
1,359,598
751,168
0
0
0
2,110,766
Key Largo/Burton Drive Road
280,000
1,880,000
0
0
0
2,160,000
Kohen Sub Division
0
0
0
861,438
0
861,438
Paving Backlog
0
250,000
750,000
1,000,000
2,017,248
4,017,248
Stock Island 11 Project
563,720
0
0
0
0
563,720
Debt Service
6,877,956
10,371,273
14,754,673
14,757,761
14,753,387
61,515,050
Administrative Costs Engineering
1,579,717
1,494,716
1,200,000
1,377,833
1,377,833
7,030,099
Reserves
1,816,952
4,950,000
6,603,224
6,485,376
3,349,858
23,205,410
Transferto Other Funds
4,118,811
6,388,056
11,447,241
1,478,428
1,578,428
25,010,964
One Cent Infrastructure
Fund 304
2018
Estimate
2019.
Estimate
2020,
IEsflmate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estu muate
BegiimnikiglFUndBalance
20,692„528
20,462,546
17,580,261
11,370,143
14,269,99
Reveniuue
21,325,707
1l�rr�19„503,732
������Illllllll����lll��rf
21,897,500
22,182,500
22„625,20,0,
23,076,75
Expense
22,514,03�
20,13'7,2�45
24,779,785
2�8,392,61,81
19„725,460
20,226r,S,9
Est�mate'd EndkilgFund Balance
19,503,732
20,462,546
17,580„261
11,3701,1431
14,269„883
17,119,,74
*As of 7111118, the State is estimating the FY 2019 Sales Tax Revenue to be $23.38 million; however, we are estimating conservatively at $21.1 million.
Actual revenue will change the ending fund balance estimates.
State Estimates as of July 11, 2018
1%Tax Rate - Default Formula
Lotall Government
Distribution Percentage
Estimatet[ Distribution ;
MONROE BOCC
60.873997
Islamorada
6.083297
$ 2,336,238
Key Colony Beach
0.772192
$ 296,554
Key West
23.653312
$ 9,083,853
Layton
0.178864
$ 68,691
Marathon
8.438338
$ 3,240,672
Cou ntywide Tota 1
100.000000
$ 38,404,148
17
Packet Pg. 1394
Clerk of Court Administration (Fund 306) This fund accounts for the Clerks network system. It is funded by the One C
Infrastructure Sales Tax.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Fund Balance Forward
100,000
100,000
100,000
300,C
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Clerk of Court Network System
100,000
100,000
100,000
300,0
2007 Revenue Bond (Fund 308) This fund accounts for capital improvement projects financed by the 2007 Revenue Bond. -
Bond is funded by the One Cent Infrastructure Sales Tax.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Fund Balance Forward
317,752
317,7
i
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
MCDC HVAC
26,193
26,1
MCSO Windows
25,000
25,C
MCSO Reroofing
118,000
118,C
Reserves
1 148,559
1
1
1
1
1 148,
Big Coppitt Waste Water Project (Fund 310) This fund accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the constructior
the Big Coppitt Waste Water Project.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Special Assessments
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
330,000
1,650,C
Transfers in from Sales Tax Surtax Fund 304
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
1,750,(
Interest
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
25,C
Less 5%
1 -34,000
-34,000
-34,000
-34,000
-34,000
-170,
Fund Balance Forward
61,000
61,000
61,000
61,000
61,000
305,C
i
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Big Copp WW assessment program
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
150,(
Debt Service
682,000
682,000
682,000
682,000
682,000
3,410,C
MUNWRIFUUMMUM
i
18
Packet Pg. 1395
Duck Key Waste Water Project (Fund 311) This fund accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the constructior
the Duck Key Waste Water Project.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Special Assessments
80,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
80,000
400,C
Interest
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
3,500
17,E
Less 5%
-4,175
-4,175
-4,175
-4,175
-4,175
-20,
Fund Balance Forward
183,000
1 83,000
1 83,000
1 83,000
1 83,000
1 415,C
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Duck KeyWW assessment program
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
175,(
Reserves
127,325
127,325
127,325
127,325
127,325
636,E
Duck Key Waste Water Project
Fund311
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
166,044
241,544
286,569
331,594
376,619
421,64
Revenue
83,500
79,325
79,325
79,325
79,325
79,32
Expense
8,000
34,300
34,300
34,300
34,300
34,30
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
1 241,544
286,569
331,594
376,619
421,644
466,66
Cudjoe Waste Water Project (Fund 312) This fund accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the construction of
Cudjoe Waste Water Project.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Special Assessements
2,275,400
2,275,400
2,275,400
2,275,400
2,275,400
11,377,(
State Grant Funds
68,505
68,505
68,505
68,505
68,505
342,E
Less 5%
-117,195
-117,195
-117,195
-117,195
-117,195
-585,
Fund Balance Forward
1 4,036,067
1 3,318,912
1
1
1
1 7,354,5
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Cudjoe WW Assessment Program
219,979
219,979
218,922
218,922
218,922
1,096,i
Mayfield Grant
1,531,863
1,531,E
Clean WaterSRF Loan Debt Service
4,410,935
5,325,643
1,942,708
1,942,708
1,942,708
15,564,i
Reserves
100,000
65,080
65,080
65,080
295,2
Cudjoe Regional Waste Water Project
Fund312
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
18,799,004
7,265,162
3,471,290
294,573
501,848
709,12
Revenue
17,474,299
2,343,905
2,343,905
2,343,905
2,343,905
2,343,90
Expense
29,008,141
6,137,777
5,520,622
2,136,630
2,136,630
2,136,63
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
1 7,265,162
3,471,290
294,573
501,848
709,123
916,39
19
Packet Pg. 1396
2014 Revenue Bond (Fund 314) This fund accounts for capital improvement projects financed by the 2014 Revenue Bond. -
Bond is funded by the Infrastructure Sales Tax.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Transfer in from Fund 304
-
7,709,628
14,868,813
3,865,908
900,000
27,344,3,
Fund Balance Forward
13,421,535
10,931,521
100,000
20,000
24,473,0
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Marathon Library
4,125,000
2,541,149
6,666,1,
Cudjoe Fire Station
2,317,389
2,317,31
PK1ail &Courthouse
4,979,146
15,100,000
12,068,813
32,147,9
Reserves
2,000,000
1,000,000
2,900,000
3,865,908
920,000
1 10,685,91
2014 Revenue Bond
Fund314
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
12,930,202
26,843,056
15,421,521
2,490,000
390,000
390,00
Revenue
19,080,000
0
4,709,628
9,968,813
0
Expense
1 5,167,146
11,421,535
1 17,641,1491
12,068,813
1 0
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
1 26,843,056
15,421,5211
2,490,0001
390,0001
390,0001
390,00
Long Key Waste Water Project (Fund 315) This fund accounts for the revenue and expenditures related to the constructior
the Long Key Waste Water Project.
FY2019
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Revenues
Proposed
Total
Fund Balance Forward
303,177
303,1
i
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Long
Key WW assessment
program
303,177
303,1
Long Key Waste Water
Fund315
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
833,333
303,177
0
0
0
Revenue
1,289
0
0
0
0
Expense
531,445
303,177
0
0
0
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
1 303,177
0
0
0
0
20
Packet Pg. 1397
Land Acquisition (Fund 316) This fund was established for the conservation, habitat protection, and mitigation of poten
future takings liability.
Revenues
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Transfer in from Fund 304
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,400,000
4,000,C
Fund Balance Forward
3,717,782
3,717,7
i AME,
Expenses
FY2019
Proposed
FY2020
FY2021
FY2022
FY2023
5 Year
Total
Land Acquisition
3,717,782
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,400,000
7,717,1
i„ /
i„
Land Acquisition
Fund316
2018
Estimate
2019
Estimate
2020
Estimate
2021
Estimate
2022
Estimate
2023
Estimate
Beginning Fund Balance
5,686,782
3,717,782
2,737,782
1,757,782
2,077,782
2,397,78
Revenue
31,000
20,000
20,000
1,320,000
1,320,000
1,420,00
Expense
2,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,00
Estimated Ending Fund Balance
3,717,782
2,737,782
1,757,782
2,077,782
2,397,782
2,817,78
yr'
21
Packet Pg. 1398
f0 ol:podeN IenuuV MZ) snjejS jabpnS-:polo uoi;isinboV pue-I quawLjoel;V a,
.O w
M_
Lf7
V V O CO 00 CO ; N V ' 0 CO CO O CO 0 ' 0) LO ' I-- 0 ' CO co V V d
0 M 00 LO V Il- 00 Q M Q O LO I� Ch O � O) O Cl) N O Ch
0 (D O) O- � O O Ch 0 0 Ch O O 00 N Lo CO Ifl V N CO . It Y
U O N CO ( CO Lo N 0 0 ; 0 Ch 00 N ; O _Ch V U
N N co V Ch Ch (� . N Ch . Ch V V C>) Lo Ch I� O co O m
Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi Hi m Hi Hi H3 Hi Hi Hi Hi N Hi 64 63 LO 64 d
� Ef3 Ef3 Ef3 Ef3
N N N N N N N N N N N
> > > > > > > > > > >
O O O O O O O O O O O
to 'a OOOOOOO 0 -0 -0 � O OOOOOO 00 O � 00 -0 -0 � lflOOCO
d 0000000 cp cp cp0 — m m cps 000000 cp 00 O cp 00 m m mN — O —
L
d N N N w w w N N N N N
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
U U U U U U U U U U U
N N lfl C C C I� C C C C? N C`') C . . C`'. C O . C C C -7 cl V CO
i 0000000 00 N 000000 0 — O — O — Ch000
V
Q
to - - — — — — V V ; Lo — — — — — N 00 N N Ch
V
L
a
c 4) O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o Fo O O O O O O 0 o Fo O O O O O O O O O O O
E _ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzo ZZZZZZZzo zzzzzzzzzzz
U U
L N N N N N N N — N N — — — - - - - - - - - - - -
0 O O O O O O
-a C U U U U U U U
m
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -0 T T T T T T T O O O O O O O O O O O
d O O O O O O O
> C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a) N N N N N N N T O O O O O O O O O O O
N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N iC iC iC iC iC iC iC .L000U0000000
p N N N N N N N N N N N
N CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ Q (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 L CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ
E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E - m in in in in in in in in in in in in in iCL
n in in Q cn cn cn in in in in in in in in
Q75 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o vNi vNi vNi vNi vNi vNi vNi o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O -3 d Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll J J J J J J J Cp Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll Ll N
0 o J O o
.>'
O O 3 N
R r� U U U d
N T C C O
d j U) U O C
Q 3 3 O
rE 00 .
L D Y Y 'N C H
_d w O 0 0 > M C C
U U .O O o
O o Q .o .o .- .= 53� O cn cn a)O
0 0 o O C C C C o T T T UQN OHO
LL Qlur
a H tp
Mn Q D U pON N )
" � 5 32E2E
L H
0 0 11 0 0 m a) a) a) a) 0 0 0 Op Op W
Q D UU � tttt U U U
O U) U E N N E E o
N Q Q U U U U �° Q m m c U U o o o o
> a a a a O o 0 0 0 a a a o 2 o o U 3 3 3 3 o� o�
m w w g w w g c c c c p E E E E Q o aai aai aai � � E � E Emm � _r_
_r_
_r_
_r_
E E � 2 Q a) 0 U a) 0 U C C C C
fn W W 0 W W ODUUU Jofofofo H0 W W W ddU ofofZHHHHU
to to
C
O
_ O O m
S f/1 S m -0 -0
JQ lfl N V N (� 0 N N (� D N O N m 0 0) 0 CO � Q N m I- Qrl- 00 W � -0 0
Cn Cn
MnL 'n s o 0
3
Q E E
Q
U
x U
u R O N
O (Om V - — — — — m V � � co 00 00
C C to
0 0 i
� U U ~
d d 00 00 00 00 00 m m m m m m m m m md 00 00 (� (� (� 0) 0) 0) p 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d M LO LO 00 Chi V V V V V 0000 L-000 CO 00 V () 6363 00 V I- r- r- r—LoM 00
N O N C� O O O O O O N N O N l6 N N N N N N N N
d l6 O I- r- O � N V V V V V Lo U7 U7 U7 O — N N LO LO 0 0 0 0 Il- � 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 �
cn 00 — 0 000000000 2 � � 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O O O O O - - - -
f ol:podeN IenuuV MZ) snjejS j96pnS®:pol9 upi;isinboV pue-I :ju9wLjoe;;V o
.p o
ui
v
O N Ch CO O U) O O 00 N O a
N N � O U) Il- � V Ch (f3 C) 00 00
V O CO 00 V Cl U) V LO (� (� I� d
Y
N CO 64rl- COO N ON 00 : W r 0) O U
U) 64 N M 64 64 64 It N I� O
a
(14 (14(14 � � N N (0�1 N
> > > > Ef3 Ef3 60)
to 'O 0 0 V 0 0 0 U) U) O O 0 0 U) O V O V
d (6 (6 CO O O V O . O O Cp Cp . O N O N
( N - O - N -p -p O) O O) O) 00
~ 06 06 06 06 N Ch V N
7 7 7 7 LO
U U U U W
N C C (`') (`') O N O . co. C C V O (`') V LO
i O N O O M - 0 0 N O I LO
Q EH
to - - - - - - - N O O V O) Ch O to
d I N Ch V -�; i
R V R
a M
w
c w O O O O O O O O O O O O io C
°' zzzzzzzzzzzz o p w
Q c m
z R
L - - - - - - - - - - - a 2
d
L 00
Lfl �
M
n.N 3
c
LO m
p O +�
R w rn
J C C C C C C C C C C C C O 'O i
O O O O O O O O O O O O N H
V Q O
N N N N N N N N N N N N M M 'a
d N N N N N N N N N N N N L R
C C C C C C C C C C C C lO
d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
U U U U U U U U U U U U ° p L m
O N N N N N N N N N N N N O - p d
N N CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CZ CL ".' M L
O N i E E E E E E E E E E E E L O
E r m in in in in in in in in in in in in
Q CHO
3 O 0 -3 a LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Q u O Li N
C7 0 o O o
0 OfOTO O O 'O i m N
(6
C6 M S N Q C L
L % Q 3 -t-- m c V
_d 3
O ° H
N a' O o L T
r E Q N Na rn ms
L o ° O > Q o d
0O N Of T U O N a d l6 d
T T T O .O O 2 •-- •-- w t W
� mC O O E .5 .5m
L L L .o ( Q° ° ° O U 0
2 N Q
C
U N N N N 0 E
N
N O N N Of 0 0 m R p E
Q O
's o Q > > > N O N7 U) U) E adN °
Na
O
O O O O O O
M OOO o
o Y ° s vp
E w w ° 2 2 2 E o -0 o o o a) E i mU a- U UUU M R ad U o U)
dud � in °�
rn m R 3
J -0 -0 -� QO -C -� Y CO 0 0 0 CI 0 a O +w m
mmm � mm °�' � � s N
w c ° ° r a m a�
° m ° ° u Q V w '� °
p
N N N N N N T'0 U O C U
E E E N E E QJ m p E
0.
Y Q C C d 0 H
3 3 T
N � � � +�O O O > O
m U U -
O d d R a
C a a O N Ln
O O N
o
4) 00 00 00 00 O) O) O) O) O) O) O) O) 0
0 a-.
cm
00 00 00 00 N C) 0) V N N N
+' d N N N �7 0 0 N R L L d L N
<na OOOOOOOO ~ ~ H i z
J.5.d
Monroe County Land Authority FY 2019 Budget Status
as of July 24, 2019
Acquisitions Within FL Keys Area of Critical State Concern
General Acquisitions
Budget
$
4,002,371
Less expenditures
$
(2,441,788)
Less encumbered funds
$
(1,014,449)
Balance
$
546,134
Reserve for ROGO Administrative
Relief
Budget
$
3,293,248
Less expenditures
$
-
Less encumbered funds
$
-
Balance
$
3,293,248
General Reserves
Contingency
$
500,000
End of Year Cash
$
500,000
Acquisitions Within Key West Area of Critical State Concern
Budget $ 6,507,916
Less expenditures $ -
Less encumbered funds $ (6,507,916)
Balance $ -
Packet Pg. 1401
J.5.e
Monroe County Land Authority Proposal
Page 1 of 4
ACQUISITION PROPOSAL
for use of
U.S. ACOE LAND ACQUISITION FEES
TO PURCHASE OR TRANSFER PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
FOR PERPETUAL PRESERVATION
NAME OF PARCEL AND/OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Please attach map
identifying the property and showing other parcels in proximity which are
already in public/conservation ownership):
The subject property, known as the Jack Tsavdaris property, is described as
Block 13, Lot 2, Center Island and is located on South Bahama Drive on Duck
Key near mile marker 61. The property is located within an area of freshwater
wetlands. See Map 1 — Property Boundaries.
REAL ESTATE NUMBER: 00381810-000000
SIZE/ACREAGE: 7,513 square feet per MCPA website
7,525 square feet per GIS measurement
COUNTY TIER DESIGNATION: Tier 3 — Infill Area
TYPE(S) OF HABITAT AND APPROXIMATE ACREAGE FOR EACH:
When the Monroe County Land Authority purchased the subject property in 2017,
it was mapped as buttonwood and exotic vegetation. See Map 2 — Pre -
acquisition Habitat Delineations.
The approximate acreage of each habitat type was as follows:
Buttonwood 4,088 square feet
Exotics 3,437 square feet
The invasive exotic vegetation (mostly Australian pine) was removed by a
contractor working for Monroe County in April 2019. Therefore the entire lot
should now be considered buttonwood habitat.
The subject property received a KEYWEP score of 6.0 by the ADID assessment
team. The Monroe County Land Authority found no evidence of previous
disturbance by dredging or filling activity on the subject property, therefore there
do not appear to be any opportunities for wetland restoration.
Packet Pg. 1402
J.5.e
Monroe County Land Authority Proposal
Page 2 of 4
IMPORTANCE FOR CONSERVATION AND LISTED SPECIES THAT WOULD
DIRECTLY BENEFIT [address potential for development (ie: allowable uses
under current zoning and land use regulations) if not preserved]:
The subject property is located within an area of freshwater wetlands in the
center of Duck Key and the Monroe County Land Authority has been purchasing
lots for conservation within and around this freshwater wetland area. As of
September 30, 2018, the Land Authority had acquired a total of 92 conservation
lots on Duck Key, including all but one lot in the subject property's block. See
Map 3 — Nearby Conservation Lands.
The current zoning of the subject property is Improved Subdivision (IS).
Properties zoned IS have the potential for residential development at a density of
one unit per lot. Development of this environmentally sensitive area would result
in the loss of native vegetation and fragmentation of habitat, thereby conflicting
with the recommendations of the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study.
Typical vegetation within the buttonwood / saltmarsh habitat includes
buttonwood, sea ox-eye daisy (Borrichia spp), yellowtop (Flaveria linearis),
seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum), seagrape, and poisonwood. The site
provides habitat for animal species such as butterflies and migrating songbirds.
The US Fish and Wildlife's FEMA Biological Opinion and Permit Referral
Program identify the subject property as potentially suitable habitat for the
following federally protected species: Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corgis
couperi).
WILL PARCEL OWNERSHIP BE TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER AGENCY?
YES NO X
If so, intended/potential recipient(s):
The subject property is outside the acquisition boundaries of the Florida Keys
Ecosystem project of the State's Florida Forever program. The Monroe County
Land Authority is open to the possibility of transferring ownership of the property
to the State but there are no plans to do so at this time.
IS PARCEL NOW, OR WILL IT BE, PLACED UNDER A CONSERVATION
EASEMENT OR DEED RESTRICTION PRIOR TO TRANSFER?
YES NO X
If yes, please provide details:
The subject property has been purchased for conservation by the Monroe County
Land Authority and therefore is protected pursuant to Section 380.0666(3),
Florida Statutes.
Packet Pg. 1403
J.5.e
Monroe County Land Authority Proposal Page 3 of 4
BRIEFLY EXPLAIN MECHANISMS and/or FUNDING SOURCES WHICH WILL
PROVIDE FOR LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT/MAINTENANCE OF THE
PARCEL:
The subject property will be managed as conservation land by the Monroe
County Land Authority. Funding for land stewardship activities is provided by the
Monroe County Environmental Land Management and Restoration Fund through
the collection of County mitigation fees charged for permitted development
activities. Additional funding is provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission's Invasive Plant Management Section.
POTENTIAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR PURCHASE OR EASEMENT
REQUIREMENTS? None
HAS PARCEL BEEN OR WILL IT BE EVALUATED FOR POTENTIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS? (if no, please explain why you felt evaluation
was not necessary)
YES X NO
Findings: Based on inspections of the property and a review of the surrounding
land uses, the potential for environmental hazards was determined to be low and
did not warrant further investigation.
Phase I or II Environmental Status? A formal Phase I or II ESA report was
not obtained.
Please list all current or known prior uses of the parcel(s) in question:
The property is currently being managed as conservation land. There are no
known prior uses of the property.
IS THIS PARCEL A FEE SIMPLE DONATION WHICH WILL SATISFY ACOE
PERMIT MITIGATION? YES NO X
ESTIMATED COST OF PARCEL (please note that regardless of estimated
value, final reimbursement cannot exceed 100% of the appraised value of
the parcel(s) in question):
Monroe County Land Authority's total acquisition costs were as follows:
Purchase price: $49,435.00
Closing Costs: $ 1,153.13
Total Cost: $50,588.13
IS OWNER A WILLING SELLER? Yes.
ESTIMATED CLOSING DATE: The Monroe County Land Authority purchased
the subject property on October 26, 2017.
Packet Pg. 1404
J.5.e
Monroe County Land Authority Proposal
Page 4 of 4
ESTIMATED COST OF DUE DILIGENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PURCHASE:
Not to exceed: $1,153.13
Please provide a listing of minimum items required by your agency to
satisfy due diligence:
The Monroe County Land Authority's due diligence activities for this transaction
included a site inspection, title search, legal review, and title insurance policy.
The purchase price was based on comparable sales in the area but no formal
appraisal report was obtained. There are no developed parcels bordering the
subject property and no encroachment issues were identified during the site
inspection, therefore no boundary survey was obtained.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF LAND ACQUISITION FUNDING REQUESTED (including
any due diligence):
Minimum: $50,588.13
Not to exceed: $50,588.13
By his or her signature, the applicant acknowledges that they have read the
attached guidelines for submittal and agree to provide all supporting
documentation prior to reimbursement of funds.
N,4 j OL^-
Charles G. Pattison, Executive Director
Monroe County Land Authority
APPROVED BY:
Curtis Kruer, Vice President
Keys Restoration Fund
Ingrid Gilbert
US Army Corps of Engineers
7�1 �1
Date
Date
Date
Packet Pg. 1405
J.5.e
Map 1 - Property Boundaries
Jack Tsavdaris Property
Duck Key
E
Packet Pg. 1406
J.5.e
Map 2 - Pre -acquisition Habitat Delineations
Jack Tsavdaris Property
Duck Key
Legend
Habitat 2009
= <all other values>
DESCRIPTION
Beach Berm
Buttonwood
Developed Land
Exotic
Freshwater Wetland
Hammock
Impervious Surface
Mangrove
Pineland
Salt Marsh
Scrub Mangrove
Undeveloped Land
Water
Packet Pg. 1407
J.5.e
Map 3 - Nearby Conservation Lands
Jack Tsavdaris Property
Duck Key
(Public lands are shown in red hatching)
Packet Pg. 1408