Item Q4 Q.4
G BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Monroe Mayor Sylvia Murphy,District 5
The Florida Keys l'U � � Mayor Pro Tern Danny Kolhage,District 1
�pw° Michelle Coldiron,District 2
Heather Carruthers,District 3
David Rice,District 4
County Commission Meeting
August 21, 2019
Agenda Item Number: Q.4
Agenda Item Summary #5874
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Cheryl Cioffari (305) 289-2506
1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: A public hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance by the
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending the Monroe County Future Land Use
Map from Education (E) to Mixed Use / Commercial (MC), for property located at 255 Crane
Boulevard, Sugarloaf Key, approximately Mile Marker 19.3, as proposed by The School Board of
Monroe County (File 42018-139)
ITEM BACKGROUND: On July 27, 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department
received an application from the School Board of Monroe County, Florida (the "Applicant") to
amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (FLUM). On September 12, 2018, the Applicant
submitted a revised application to amend the FLUM designation of the property from Education (E)
to Mixed Use / Commercial (MC) for a 2.81-acre portion of property located at 255 Crane
Boulevard on Sugarloaf Key. The Applicant has also requested a corresponding a Comprehensive
Plan text amendment to create a subarea policy that would provide additional development
restrictions on the subject parcel, including a limitation that the only permitted use on the property
would be affordable housing and accessory uses. The proposed subarea policy and FLUM
amendment would be processed as "small-scale comprehensive plan amendments" pursuant to
Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, based on the size of the site and the limitation of development to
affordable housing.
Packet Pg. 2075
Q.4
r r/ b%r /„/// r r ,fl rv„ „r r/, RC f�. i j/O/ �/�r r�r I / f✓ 'ir:/�J /�, r�,,,,,�//r/yr,,..
RC
f��� P �G� l r r .✓��I i f
".;.,.. ,.;..RL,. a%/r/ ifl r� il ��, �I ✓ r i .., ._RL ,,,. / rrj�/rj r /r J /
u Jv 1
RC rY
Existing FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation
Community Meeting and Public Participation
In accordance with LDC Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on October 22, 2018 at
5:05 PM at the subject property to discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment
and to provide for public participation. There were approximately 15 people in attendance who
provided feedback on the item. Issues identified included: the maximum development potential of
the property, the total number of affordable units the School Board wishes to develop, development
of affordable units in Key West, potential text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to limit the
total number of units of affordable housing on the property, how will the units be managed and how
will tenants be selected.
Development Review Committee and Public Input
The Development Review Committee considered the proposed amendment at a regular meeting on
January 15, 2019 and received public input.
Planning Commission and Public Input
At a regular meeting held on April 23, 2019, the Planning Commission (PC) recommended approval
of the proposed text amendment through PC Resolution P07-19 and provided for public comment.
The proposed density is as follows:
Maximum Allocated D nsity and Intensityby Future Land Use MapDesi nation
Maximum development
Existing FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon
density/intensity
Education(E) Residential 0 du
Allocated Density 0 units
Total Upland Area: 2.81 TDR/Market Rate
acres Residential Max Net NSA 0 units
(122,458.33 SF) Density
Packet Pg. 2076
Q.4
Affordable Residential N/A
2.25 buildable acres Max Net Density 0 units
(2.81 ac—0.20 open
space ratio) Transient
N/A 0 rooms or spaces
Allocated Density
Nonresidential 0.30 FAR 36,737 sf
Maximum Intensity
Maximum development
Proposed FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon
density/intensity
1 du(DR,MU,MI)
3 du(SC)
Residential 6 du(UC) 3 units market rate
Allocated Density Commercial Apartments
(RV)
2 du(MI)
TDR/Market Rate 6-18du(SC)
Mixed Use/Commercial Residential Max Net 12 du(LTC) 13 units market rate
Densit 12-18 du(MU)
(MC)Total Upland y 18 du(DR)
Area:2.81 acres
(122,458.33 SF) 2 du(MI)
6-18du(SC)
2.25 buildable acres Affordable Residential 12 du(UC)
(2.81 ac—0.20 open Max Net Density 12-18 du(MU) 40 units affordable
space ratio) 18 du(DR)
Transient 10-15 rooms/spaces 28 rooms/spaces
Allocated Density
0.10—0.45(SC,UC,DR,
Nonresidential MU) 73,475 sf
Maximum Intensity <2,500 SF(RV)
0.30-0.60(MI)FAR
Piroq')osed FLIJM wltllrn Pull-Piroq')osed S:mlll:1.1111—ca Maxiiumswin Mweloq')iuneiicnt
Type )q teiiltial Ilhased :mllsm Ill
2urmu�ll au�s��°nl �. :mllJ:�aur�;: PolicyPolicySt llhaiii-ea Policy Deiiislty
Mixed Use/Commercial
Residential 0 nfl/Licle, 0 tinfis uun:ul�:(A uLM"
Allocated Density
(MC)Total Upland Area:
2.81 acres TDR/Market Rate
(122,458.33 SF) Residential Max Net 0(fil/Licle, 0 tinfis lun:ul�:(A uLM"
2.25 buildable acres Density
(2.81 ac—0.20 open space
ratio Affordable Residential
Max Net Density 20(W 20 nunfis Lfl1balLille,
Packet Pg. 2077
Q.4
Transient Allocated Density 0 1001YIS 01 Spr.ce's/L.C.e, 0 1OO1n.s%spL1c(°s
Nonresidential
0 FA R 0Maximum Intensity
Residential Market Rate Allocated: +3 units
TDR/Market Rate Residential Max Net:+13 units
Net Change in
Development Potential Affordable Residential Max Net:+40 units affordable
Based on FLUM
Transient Allocated:+28 rooms/spaces
Nonresidential: +36,738 sf
Resmdeiicstial Maiii-liet Rate Allocated. -3 smusmts
Net(ll�sa1isde fill i DR/Mail-liet Rate Resmdooimtmal Max:INet. -13 smusmts
De vloq,)iuneiimt Poteii tial li'oii-dallile Resmdoi tiai Max:INet. 20.mummt�alimuur.Wall�ir
ased maul FLUM wi lllm
2111'01llsmuse.W ssmll Maur.°;: pqm lmsy Fiiraiiisiciicst Allocated. m-28 urmua.aicross/sll�;:s..s
7muumur.smd.umtmai. -36,738 sl
The above table provides an approximation of the development potential for residential, transient
and commercial development. Section 130-156(b) of the Land Development Code states: "The
density and intensity provisions set out in this section are intended to be applied cumulatively so that
no development shall exceed the total density limits of this article. For example, if a development
includes both residential and commercial development, the total gross amount of development shall
not exceed the cumulated permitted intensity of the parcel proposed for development."
As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment would result in an
increase of three(3)units in permanent allocated residential development potential; an increase of 13
units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the use of TDRs; an increase
of 40 units in affordable residential development potential; an increase of 28 rooms or spaces for
transient units; and an increase in nonresidential development potential of 36,738 square feet.
As shown in the orange portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment with the proposed
Subarea Policy would result in a decrease of 3 units in permanent allocated residential development
potential; a decrease of 13 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the
use of TDRs; an increase of 20 units in affordable residential development potential; a decrease of
28 rooms or spaces for transient units; and a decrease in nonresidential development potential of
36,738 square feet.
------------------
Packet Pg. 2078
Q.4
Assuming the BOCC approves the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, the executed
ordinances will be filed with the Secretary of State. Pursuant to Section 163.3187, F.S., a small
scale amendment may not become effective until 31 days after adoption and any affected person
may file a petition with the Division of Administrative Hearings pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
120.57, F.S., to request a hearing to challenge the compliance of a small scale development
amendment with this act within 30 days following the local government's adoption of the
amendment.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed FLUM amendment
from Education (E) to Mixed Use/Commercial (MC) contingent on adoption and effectiveness of the
proposed corresponding subarea policy restricting development on the site to affordable housing
dwelling units at a maximum of 20 units.
DOCUMENTATION:
2018-139 BOCC SR 08.21.19
FLUM Amendments 11 X 17 00118050-000000
2018-139 FLUM Ordinance
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date: N/A
Expiration Date: N/A
Total Dollar Value of Contract: N/A
Total Cost to County: N/A
Current Year Portion: N/A
Budgeted: N/A
Source of Funds:
CPI: N/A
Indirect Costs: N/A
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: N/A
Revenue Producing: N/A If yes, amount: N/A
Grant: N/A
County Match: N/A
Insurance Required: N/A
Additional Details: N/A
Packet Pg. 2079
Q.4
REVIEWED BY:
Cheryl Cioffari Completed 07/30/2019 11:00 AM
Steve Williams Completed 07/30/2019 11:14 AM
Maureen Proffitt Completed 07/30/2019 11:38 AM
Assistant County Administrator Christine Hurley Completed
08/02/2019 2:17 PM
Budget and Finance Completed 08/05/2019 9:08 AM
Maria Slavik Completed 08/05/2019 2:03 PM
Kathy Peters Completed 08/05/2019 2:26 PM
Board of County Commissioners Pending 08/21/2019 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 2080
Q.4.a
{n
2
3
4m.ww
5 MEMORANDUM
6 MONROE COUNTY PLANNING&ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
7 We strive to be caring,professional and fair a
8
9 To: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
10
11 From: Cheryl Cioffari, AICP, Acting Senior Director of Planning & Environmental 2
12 Resources U-
13
14 Date: July 29, 2019 c
15
16 Subject: An Ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending
17 the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Education (E) to Mixed Use /
18 Commercial (MC), for property located at 255 Crane Boulevard, Sugarloaf Key, 0
19 approximately Mile Marker 19.3, as proposed by The School Board of Monroe o
20 County (File 42018-139) c
21
22 Meeting: August 21, 2019
23
24 I. REQUEST
25
26 On July 27, 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department received an application T
27 from the School Board of Monroe County, Florida (the "Applicant") to amend the Monroe County
28 Future Land Use Map (FLUM). On September 12, 2018, the Applicant submitted a revised
29 application to amend the FLUM designation of the property from Education (E) to Mixed Use /
30 Commercial (MC) for a 2.81-acre portion of property located at 255 Crane Boulevard on Sugarloaf 00
31 Key. The Applicant has also requested a corresponding a Comprehensive Plan text amendment to �i
32 create a subarea policy that would provide additional development restrictions on the subject parcel,
33 including a limitation that the only permitted use on the property would be affordable housing and
34 accessory uses. The proposed subarea policy and FLUM amendment would be processed as "small- 0
35 scale comprehensive plan amendments" pursuant to Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, based on the
36 size of the site and the limitation of development to affordable housing. 17
37 �
38
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 1 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2081
Q.4.a
r � � r� / r
/i�,,,, � �/ � y � �lllr / iu � Il it f"" /�%�G /%�/� rt i rf r✓i "� I I
,ul, x i III ��1 � � I �YI i{,�Vll�n //%//ri �� 1✓ rr i /� r�rRM ..rir�P �tlia�'m1��1�I
ff� r fG�Ifn'�%l<✓ rlr ;,r
R� k RL
717-
RL i l% /l ° / /✓ //i%iii�;
✓Il/
,�4 ,,,,,, /i /i/RC �]/r5/ ✓lr!F%/, �/////rr�� y A,,, � <i RC /i/ '�� �//�/ /i✓jib/`
'��/%///�/iir/hNS ` ' ,' � � "ta,,',. ��/D�r��, ,,�/���i INS r // � %r;%✓/✓
r
nir�i RRVJ�
skdrr,,%r RC ,,, m "GC µ y,r"�x� RC +?>r,�,�"::.;,:�
001
U-
2 Existing FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation 0
3
cm
4 II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
5
6 Site Information:
7 Location: MM 19.3, Sugarloaf Key co
8 Address: 255 Crane Boulevard 6
9 Description: A part of Government Lot 2, Section 36,
10 Township 66 South, Range 27 East, Sugarloaf Key,
11 Monroe County, Florida
12 Parcel ID Number: 00118050-000000
13 Owner/Applicant: The School Board of Monroe
14 County, Florida ,2
15 Size of Affected Portion of Property: 122,458.33 SF >
16 (2.81 acres) per survey by Eric A. Isaacs, Florida Keys
17 Land Surveying, dated 7/17/18.
18 FLUM Designations: Education (E) and Residential 00
19 Conservation (RC)
/ / i'
20 Land Use Districts: Suburban Commercial SCr o�,, u�l °Im�� /III ' " y W
��I r � � t'� I I� �g � �p y�/��i k.
hlogU „'1°1���1 "�'tl"�f f,�°j ViO tii MIIIM1I ll,u%%rI°ill" W1
21 Suburban Residential (SR) and Native Area(NA) I��,,,�J��,� �,,,� �
22 Tier Designation: III-A (special protection area) 5/1/"
!%!/%/ ' j%/,23 Flood Zones: AE EL 11r f' ''�r
24 CBRS: No
25 Existing Use: Developed with baseball field and parking areas which are accessory to the 00
26 Sugarloaf School.
27 Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land, Freshwater Wetland and Hammock
28 Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include vacant land, a
29 residential and institutional uses to the west; vacant land and residential uses to the north;
30 vacant land, residential and commercial uses to the east, and open water to the south across M
31 US1.
32
33 The property currently has a Land Use District (Zoning) designation of Suburban Commercial (SC),
34 Suburban Residential (SR) and Native Area (NA) and a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation
35 of Education (E) and Residential Conservation (RC). The property was within the SC district
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 2 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2082
Q.4.a
I (suburban commercial), NA district (native area) SR (suburban residential) prior to September 15,
2 1986. With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan's FLUM in 1997, the property was given the
3 current FLUM designation of Education (E), Residential Low (RL) and Residential Conservation
4 (RC).
5
6 The property is currently developed with the Sugarloaf School and accessory uses and structures. A
7 vegetation survey/existing conditions report was not submitted with the application to confirm the E
8 habitats.
9 a
10 The Applicant states that the reason for the proposed amendment is:
There is an increased need for affordable housing options to be made available to District employees.The �
lack of affordable housing options, particularly in the louver Keys, has begun to negatively affe6t
4-
the'recruitment and retention bf teachers.The requested FLUM amendment will permit the School
Board to pursue developimerit of approximately 12 affordable housing units for-school employees
11
12
13 The Applicant's full explanation and justification of the proposed amendment is included in the file a
14 for the application (File 42018-139). 0
15 6
16 Staff has reviewed the Applicant's position and supporting documentation, and agrees with the
17 position that inadequate availability of affordable housing is currently a primary issue facing (n
18 permanent residents of unincorporated Monroe County. In 2015, the BOCC acknowledged the
19 County's workforce housing issues and adopted Resolution 189-2015, assigning additional duties to
20 the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee directing the committee to make recommendations for
21 steps the County may take to address the need for more workforce housing options. The committee 2
22 presented their recommendations to the BOCC at their regular meeting on August 17, 2016. The
23 BOCC held a special meeting on December 6, 2016, to discuss the recommendations, and provided W
24 direction to staff to move forward on several measures to encourage and incentivize the provision of
25 affordable and workforce housing within the County.
26 00
27 While staff agrees with the position that inadequate availability of affordable housing is currently a
28 primary issue facing unincorporated Monroe County, staff is also reviewing the proposed
29 amendment for consistency with State Statutes (including 163.3187, F.S., above), Rules, internal
30 consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and balancing all the requirements and policy issues.
31
32 Community Meeting and Public Participation
00
33 In accordance with LDC Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on October 22, 2018 at
34 5:05 PM at the subject property to discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment
35 and to provide for public participation. There were approximately 15 people in attendance who
36 provided feedback on the item. Issues identified included: the maximum development potential of E
37 the property, the total number of affordable units the School Board wishes to develop, development
38 of affordable units in Key West, potential text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to limit the
39 total number of units of affordable housing on the property, how will the units be managed and how
40 will tenants be selected.
41
42
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 3 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2083
Q.4.a
I Development Review Committee and Public Input
2 The Development Review Committee considered the proposed amendment at a regular meeting on
3 January 15, 2019 and received public input.
4
5 Planning Commission and Public Input
6 At a regular meeting held on April 23, 2019, the Planning Commission (PC) recommended approval
7 of the proposed text amendment through PC Resolution P07-19 and provided for public comment.
8
9 III. AMENDMENT REVIEW a
10 Maximum Allocated Densi and Intensity by Future Land Use Map Desi nation
Maximum
Existing FLUM Type Adopted Standards development
potential based upon 4-
density/intensity M
c
Residential 0 du
Allocated Density 0 units
cas
TDR/Market Rate
Education(E) N/A
Residential Max Net 0 units
Density CO0
Total Upland Area: 2.81 acres _
(122,458.33 SF) Affordable Residential N/A c
0 units c
Max Net Density
2.25 buildable acres t/s
(2.81 ac—0.20 open space Transient
ratio) Allocated Density N/A 0 rooms or spaces
Nonresidential 0.30 FAR 36,737 sf
Maximum Intensity
T
Maximum
Proposed FLUM Type Adopted Standards development
potential based upon 17
density/intensity
1 du(DR,MU,MI) 06
Residential 3 du(SC)
Allocated Density 6 du(UC) 3 units market rate
�
Commercial Apartments(RV) 3
2 du(MI)
Mixed Use/Commercial TDR/Market Rate 6-18du(SC) �
MC Total U land Area: 12 du(UC)
( ) p Residential Max Net 13 units market rate 17
2.81 acres Density 12-18 du(MU) 00
(122,458.33 SF) 18 du(DR)
2.25 buildable acres 2 du(MI)
(2.81 ac—0.20 open space 6-18du(SC) E
ratio) Affordable Residential 12 du(LTC) 40 units affordable
Max Net Density 12-18 du(MU)
18 du(DR)
Transient 10-15 rooms/spaces 28 rooms/spaces
Allocated Density
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 4 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2084
Q.4.a
Nonresidential 0.10—0.45(SC,UC,DR,MU)
<2,500 SF(RV) 73,475 sf
Maximum Intensity 0.30-0.60(MI)FAR
l/la X i IIiims.l iiims
duroq,)osed ➢7LlJM witlllm diii-oq,)osed D.:.seioq,)uineiimt
l sllll.1r1111-e s Policy Type Puler durmu'llC')osed ls:lll1®sur.°a Policy l')q teiiltlai Ill�ased smllsoaics
i s:lll1®surea Policy �
Deiiislty as
E
Residential 0 ti f1s lnafl IL n�
Allocated Density 0 sic/s.:°.as
TDR/Market Rate
Residential Max Net 0 sis/Llcle, 0 tinfis lnafl.(A uLM', U-
Mixed Use/Commercial(MC) Density M
Total Upland Area: 2.81 acres
(122,458.33 SF) Affordable Residential cm
Max Net Densi 20 si 20 cs.uhs Lfl1b sisl�le, �ty
2.25 buildable acres
(2.81 ac—0.20 open space ratio)
Transient 0 laal.s�s al sJsss�,s/s.°.��a� �4.��aalrr.s/slsLice'sCO
Allocated Density
6
0
Nonresidential 0 1°L y �
Maximum Intensity ��sl
Residential Market Rate Allocated:+3 units
TDR/Market Rate Residential Max Net: +13 units U)
aU)
Net Change in Development
Potential Based on FLUM Affordable Residential Max Net: +40 units affordable _
Transient Allocated:+28 rooms/spaces
ry
00
Nonresidential: +36,738 sf
I
Resideiiimtial l daurls...t Rate Allocated. -3: slits �I
l"D] /Maurliet Rate Residoi tlai Ryas Net. -13 smiislts �
Net(Iiaiiiige ium D.we@oq,)iiineiicst
potellitiai Il3ased oiicm FLlJM wi llrs Llloiirdalll�i..Residoi tea@ Max Net. p20 smiislts sllmuairdalll.�l.�. �I
F111'011[)Osed Ssmlll1a1ir.°a Policy
Vii-aiicssiciiit Allocated.-28 urom fins/^sll�,)aces 00
dmu�umur...si.l.ustls@. -36,738 sf
1 �
2 The above table provides an approximation of the development potential for residential, transient
3 and commercial development. Section 130-156(b) of the Land Development Code states: "The
4 density and intensity provisions set out in this section are intended to be applied cumulatively so that
5 no development shall exceed the total density limits of this article. For example, if a development
6 includes both residential and commercial development, the total gross amount of development shall
7 not exceed the cumulated permitted intensity of the parcel proposed for development."
8
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 5 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2085
Q.4.a
I As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment would result in an
2 increase of three(3) units in permanent allocated residential development potential; an increase of 13
3 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the use of TDRs; an increase
4 of 40 units in affordable residential development potential; an increase of 28 rooms or spaces for
5 transient units; and an increase in nonresidential development potential of 36,738 square feet.
6
7 As shown in the orange portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment with the proposed a
8 Subarea Policy would result in a decrease of 3 units in permanent allocated residential development
9 potential; a decrease of 13 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the E
10 use of TDRs; an increase of 20 units in affordable residential development potential; a decrease of
11 28 rooms or spaces for transient units; and a decrease in nonresidential development potential of 2
12 36,738 square feet. -J
13 -
14 Any proposed new residential, transient or nonresidential use would be subject to the requirements
15 of Chapter 138 of the Land Development Code related to the Residential Rate of Growth Ordinance
16 (ROGO/NROGO)permit process.
17
18 Compatibility with the Surrounding Area �'�'�'�'�' 0
19 a. Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land, 013
6
20 Freshwater Wetland and Hammock c
21 b. Existing Tier Designation: III-A (SPA)
22 c. Number of Listed Endangered or Threatened
23 Species: Six
" r auiillli'77i01iJl/
24 d. Existing Use: Developed with baseball field
� m�s
�,� �i�,r�i�rla��t�ua��y 1� �
25 and parking areas which are accessory to the ar ,, �, � rpu* o� c
26 Sugarloaf School. ; %% f f� T
27 e. Community Character of Immediate Vicinity:
28 Adjacent land uses include vacant land
29 residential and institutional uses to the west;
30 vacant land and residential uses to the north 00
31 vacant land, residential and commercial uses to ��
32 the east, and open water to the south across
33 US 1.
34
it
35 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely
36 impact the community character of the surrounding area.
00
37
38 Concurrency Analysis (Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.1.1)
39 Traffic Circulation (Comprehensive Plan Policy 301.1.1)
40 The subject property is located at the intersection of US 1 and Crane Boulevard on Sugarloaf Key at E
41 approximately mile marker 19.3. The property is only accessible by via US 1. Pursuant to the
42 Comprehensive Plan, the level of service standard for US 1 is LOS of"C." According to the 2017
43 US 1 Arterial Travel Time and Delay Study, US 1 overall is operating at a LOS of"C" and Segment
44 5 on Sugarloaf Key (MM 16.5 to MM 20.5)is operating at a LOS of"A."
45
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 6 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2086
Q.4.a
I A Level 1 traffic impact study submitted by the Applicant states that of development of fifteen (15)
2 affordable dwelling units in an apartment building on the site would generate 110 daily trips.
3 According to the 2017 US 1 Arterial Travel Time and Delay Study, the maximum reserve volume
4 for Segment 5 is 7,944 trips. The maximum reserve volume for US 1 as a whole is 18,547 trips.
5
6 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts to the Traffic Circulation LOS.
7
8 Potable Water(Comprehensive Plan Policy 701.1.1)
9 Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority's water treatment facility in Florida City has a maximum water E
10 treatment design capacity of 29.8 million gallons per day (MGD) and is capable of treating up to
11 23.8 MGD. There are also two saltwater Reserve Osmosis (RO) plants, located on Stock Island and 2
12 Marathon, which are able to produce potable water under emergency conditions. The RO _j
13 desalination plants have design capacities of 2.0 and 1.0 MGD of water, respectively. The County's -
14 2015-2016 water demand were 17.89 & 17.66 MGD respectively. c
15 as
16 The proposed FLUM amendment could result in a net decrease in demand from this site of-25,088
17 gallons per day.
18 0
Potable Water Max Potential
Residential Residential Persons/ Total Total LOS 0
FLUM Net Change
LOS Standard Development Household Persons Demand
(Policy 701.1.1) (dwelling units)
Current: 100 gal/cap/day
E (224 gal/du/day) 0 2.24 0 0 gal/day
+8,960 gal/day g
Proposed: 100 gal/cap/day 0
MC (224 gal/du/day) 40 2.24 89.6 0 gal/day
19
20 The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Potable Water LOS.
21 �i
22 Solid Waste (Comprehensive Plan Policy 801.1.1)
cas
23 Monroe County has a contract with Waste Management authorizing the use of in-state facilities
24 through September 30, 2024; thereby, providing the County with approximately six (6) more years of
O
25 guaranteed capacity for solid waste. Currently, there is adequate capacity for solid waste generation. i
26 All commercial solid waste is handled by private contract.
27 The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Solid Waste LOS. 00
28
cv
29 Sanitary Sewer(Comprehensive Plan Policy 901.1.1
30 The County has adopted water quality treatment standards for wastewater facilities and within the
31 Sanitary Wastewater Treatment Master Plan, Exhibit 3-8, has stated the LOS standard for residential
32 and nonresidential flow is 145 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The proposed
33 FLUM amendment would increase the maximum net density on the site by 40 dwelling units, which
34 would increase the required flow by 5,800 gallons per day. Any proposed development on the site
35 will either need to connect to the Cudjoe Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant system, or provide
36 on-site sewage treatment and disposal that meets the LOS standards in Policy 901.1.1.
37
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 7 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2087
Q.4.a
I The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Sanitary Sewer LOS.
2
3 IV.CONSISTENCY WITH THE MONROE COUNTY YEAR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE
4 PLAN, THE LOWER KEYS COMMUNIKEYS PLAN, THE FLORIDA STATUTES,AND
5 PRINCIPLES FOR GUIDING DEVELOPMENT
6
7 A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the a
8 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Specifically,it furthers:
9
10 Goal 101: Monroe County shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life, ensure the
11 safety of County residents and visitors, and protect valuable natural resources.
12
LL
13 Objective 101.1 -
14 Monroe County shall ensure that all development and redevelopment taking place within its
15 boundaries does not result in a reduction of the level-of-service requirements established and
16 adopted by this comprehensive plan. Further, Monroe County shall ensure that comprehensive
17 plan amendments include an analysis of the availability of facilities and services or demonstrate
18 that the adopted levels of service can be reasonably met. [§163.3177 & 163.3180, F. S.] 0
19 00
20 Objective 101.5 0
21 Monroe County shall regulate future development and redevelopment to maintain and enhance
22 the character of the community and protect natural resources by providing for the compatible
23 distribution of land uses consistent with the designations shown on the Future Land Use Map.
24
25 Policy 101.5.6
26 The principal purpose of the Mixed Use/Commercial (MC) future land use category is to provide T
27 for the establishment of mixed use commercial land use (zoning) districts where various types of
28 commercial retail and office may be permitted at intensities which are consistent with the
29 community character and the natural environment. Employee housing and commercial
30 apartments are also permitted. In addition, Mixed Use/Commercial land use districts are to 00
31 establish and conserve areas of mixed uses, which may include maritime industry, light industrial
32 uses, commercial fishing, transient and permanent residential, institutional, public, and
33 commercial retail uses.
34
35 This future land use category is also intended to allow for the establishment of mixed use
36 development patterns, where appropriate. Various types of residential and nonresidential uses
00
37 may be permitted; however, heavy industrial uses and similarly incompatible uses shall be
38 prohibited. The County shall continue to take a proactive role in encouraging the preservation
39 and enhancement of community character and recreational and commercial working waterfronts.
40 In order to protect environmentally sensitive lands, the following development controls shall E
41 apply to all hammocks,pinelands, and disturbed wetlands within this land use category:
42 1. only low intensity commercial uses shall be allowed;
43 2. a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10 shall apply to nonresidential development; and
44 3. maximum net residential density shall be zero.
45
46 *****
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 8 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2088
Q.4.a
I Policy 101.5.13
2 The principal purpose of the Educational (E) future land use category is to provide for public
3 educational facilities. The County shall coordinate with the School Board to balance educational
4 facility land requirements with other land use objectives. In recognition of Monroe County's
5 environment and the linear distribution of its population, the County shall encourage schools to
6 accommodate building and facility requirements on existing sites. When new school sites are
7 required, school shall be encouraged to locate proximate to urban residential areas and other E
8 public facilities. [§163.3177(6)(a)7., F.S.]
9
10 Policy 101.5.25
11 Monroe County hereby adopts the following density and intensity standards for the future land 2
12 use categories, which are shown on the FLUM and described in Policies 101.5.1 - 101.5.20.
u-
13 4-
Future Land Use Densities and Intensities
as
Minimum
Residential�'> Nonresidential
Future Land Use Open Space
Category And Maximum Net Densit Ratio °)
Corresponding Allocated Density(a) (a)(b> y Maximum Intensity 0
Zoning (per upland acre) (per buildable acre) (floor area ratio)
1 du(DR,MU,MI) 2 du(MI) 0.10—0.45 (SC,UC,
3 du(SC) 6-18du(SC) DR,MU)
Mixed Use/ 6 du(UC) 12 du(UC) 0.20
Commercial(MC) Commercial Apartments 12-18 du(MU) <2,500 SF(RV)
(RV) 18 du(DR) 2
0.30-0.60(MI)FAR y
as
Notes:
(a) The allocated densities for submerged lands, salt ponds, freshwater ponds, and mangroves shall be 0 and the17
maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. �
(b) The Maximum Net Density is the maximum density allowable with the use of TDRs,or for qualifying affordable 00
housing development. TDRs can be utilized to attain the density between the allocated density standard up to the
maximum net density standard. Deed restricted affordable dwelling units may be built up to the maximum net
density without the use of TDRs. "N/A"means that maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. 3
Buildable acres means the portion of a parcel of land that is developable and is not required open space.
0
(c) Additional open space requirements may apply based on environmental protection criteria; in these cases, the
most restrictive requirement shall apply.
(d) Future land use categories of Agriculture/Aquaculture, Education, Institutional, Preservation, Public
00
Buildings/Lands, and Public Facilities, which have no directly corresponding zoning, may be used with new or
existing zoning districts as appropriate. cd
(e) Within the Mainland Native future land use district, campground spaces and nonresidential buildings shall only
be permitted for educational,research or sanitary purposes. E
(f) For properties consisting of hammocks,pinelands or disturbed wetlands within the Mixed Use/Commercial and
Mixed Use/ Commercial Fishing future land use categories, the maximum floor area ratio shall be 0.10 and the
maximum net density bonuses shall not be available.
(g) A mixture of uses shall be maintained for parcels designated as MI zoning district that are within the MC future
land use category. Working waterfront and water dependent uses, such as marina,fish house/market,boat repair,
boat building, boat storage, or other similar uses, shall comprise a minimum of 35% of the upland area of the
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 9 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2089
Q.4.a
property,adjacent to the shoreline,pursuant to Policy 101.5.6.
(h) In the RV zoning district, commercial apartments shall be allowed, not to exceed 10% of total spaces allowed or
in existence on the site,whichever is less.
(i) The allocated density for the CFSD-20 zoning district(Little Torch Key) shall be 1 dwelling unit per acre, or 1
dwelling unit per parcel for those parcels existing as of September 15, 1986,whichever is less, and the maximum
net density bonuses shall not be available. Residential density shall be allowed in addition to the permitted
nonresidential uses and intensity(i.e.,density and intensity shall not be counted cumulatively).
0) Within IS subdivisions with primarily single family residential units, IS-D zoning may be used with a RM future
land use designation for platted lots which have a duplex that was lawfully established prior to September 15,
1986.
(k) The maximum net density shall be 25 du/buildable acre for the UR zoning district and shall be 18 du/buildable
acre for the MU and SC zoning district for development where all units are deed restricted affordable dwelling <
units. For the UR zoning district market rate housing may be developed as part of an affordable or employee
housing project with a maximum net density not exceeding 18 du/buildable acre. U_
(1) Vessels, including live-aboard vessels, or associated wet slips are not considered dwelling units and do not count 4-
when calculating density. c
1 cm
c
2 Policy 101.19.2
3 The Community Master Plans shall be incorporated into the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as a part
4 of the plan and be implemented as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following Community 0
5 Master Plans have been completed in accordance with the principles outlined in this section and 00
6 adopted by the Board of County Commissioners: 0
7
8 6. Lower Keys: The Lower Keys Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is incorporated by
9 reference into the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan. Adopted by Ordinance 031-
10 2012.
11 �
12 Goal 102: Monroe County shall direct future growth to lands which are most suitable for .0
13 development and shall encourage conservation and protection of environmentally sensitive lands
14 (wetlands, beach berm and tropical hardwood hammock).
15
16 Policy 105.2.1 00
17 Monroe County shall designate all lands outside of mainland Monroe County, except for the
18 Ocean Reef planned development, into three general categories for purposes of its Land
i
19 Acquisition Program and smart growth initiatives in accordance with the criteria in Policy
20 205.1.1. These three categories are: Natural Area (Tier 1); Transition and Sprawl Reduction 0
21 Area (Tier II) on Big Pine Key and No Name Key only; and Infill Area (Tier III). The purposes,
22 general characteristics, and growth management approaches associated with each tier are as 17
23 follows: �
CD
24
25 `N
26 3. Infill Area (Tier III): Any defined geographic area, where a significant portion of a
27 land area is not characterized as environmentally sensitive as defined by this Plan,
28 except for dispersed and isolated fragments of environmentally sensitive lands of M
29 less than four acres in area, where existing platted subdivisions are substantially
30 developed, served by complete infrastructure facilities, and within close proximity
31 to established commercial areas, or where a concentration of nonresidential uses
32 exists, is to be designated as an Infill Area. New development and redevelopment
33 are to be highly encouraged, except within tropical hardwood hammock or
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 10 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2090
Q.4.a
I pineland patches of an acre or more in area, where development is to be
2 discouraged. Within an Infill Area are typically found: platted subdivisions with
3 50 percent or more developed lots situated in areas with few sensitive
4 environmental features; full range of available public infrastructure in terms of
5 paved roads, potable water, and electricity; and concentrations of commercial and
6 other nonresidential uses within close proximity. In some Infill Areas, a mix of
7 nonresidential and high-density residential uses (generally 8 units or more per E
8 acre) may also be found that form a Community Center.
9 a
10 Policy 105.2.2
11 Monroe County shall maintain overlay map(s) designating geographic areas of the County as one
12 of the Tiers in accordance with the guidance in Policy 105.2.1, which shall be incorporated as an
13 overlay on the zoning map(s) with supporting text amendments in the Land Development -
14 Regulations. These maps are to be used to guide the Land Acquisition Program and the smart
15 growth initiatives in conjunction with the Livable CommuniKeys Program (Policy 101.19.1).
16
17 Policy 601.1.9
18 Monroe County shall maintain land development regulations which may include density MO
19 bonuses, impact fee waiver programs, and other possible regulations to encourage affordable 00
20 housing. 0
21
22 B. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Lower Keys Livable Communikeys Plan.
23 Specifically,it furthers:
24
25 Objective 1.1
26 Monroe County shall continue to manage the rate of residential and non-residential growth in the T
27 Lower Keys to maintain adequate levels of service and ensure a balance of land use to serve the
28 existing and future population. Use of the Tier System as the primary means to conserve natural
29 areas, focus state and county acquisition programs, manage growth in transition areas, and guide
30 development to areas most appropriate for new infill development and redevelopment. 00
31
32 Objective 1.2
33 Monroe County shall continue to use the Land Use District Map and Future Land Use Map
34 categories to regulate land use by type, density, and intensity.
35
36 Policy Item 1.2.1: Monroe County shall continue to recognize the FLUM categories and land use
00
37 districts as the primary regulatory tools for evaluating development proposals.
38
39 Goal
40 Monroe County shall pursue locations, solutions, and partnerships to establish an affordable E
41 housing base for the Lower Keys residents and workers, while also ensuring compatibility
42 between new and existing residential development.
43 Objective 4.2
44 Monroe County shall encourage affordable and workforce housing in areas identified appropriate
45 for higher intensity commercial, mixed-use, and residential development.
46
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 11 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2091
Q.4.a
I C. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development for the
2 Florida Keys Area, Section 380.0552(7), Florida Statutes.
3
4 For the purposes of reviewing consistency of the adopted plan or any amendments to that plan with
5 the principles for guiding development and any amendments to the principles, the principles shall be
6 construed as a whole and no specific provision shall be construed or applied in isolation from the
7 other provisions.
8
9 (a) Strengthening local government capabilities for managing land use and development so that a
10 local government is able to achieve these objectives without continuing the area of critical
11 state concern designation.
12 (b) Protecting shoreline and benthic resources, including mangroves, coral reef formations,
13 seagrass beds, wetlands, fish and wildlife, and their habitat. -
14 (c) Protecting upland resources, tropical biological communities, freshwater wetlands, native
15 tropical vegetation (for example, hardwood hammocks and pinelands), dune ridges and
16 beaches, wildlife, and their habitat.
17 (d) Ensuring the maximum well-being of the Florida Keys and its citizens through sound
18 economic development. 0
19 (e) Limiting the adverse impacts of development on the quality of water throughout the Florida 00
20 Keys. 0
21 (f) Enhancing natural scenic resources, promoting the aesthetic benefits of the natural
22 environment, and ensuring that development is compatible with the unique historic character
23 of the Florida Keys.
24 (g) Protecting the historical heritage of the Florida Keys.
25 (h) Protecting the value, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and amortized life of existing and
26 proposed major public investments, including: T
27
28 1. The Florida Keys Aqueduct and water supply facilities;
29 2. Sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities;
30 3. Solid waste treatment, collection, and disposal facilities; 00
31 4. Key West Naval Air Station and other military facilities;
32 5. Transportation facilities;
33 6. Federal parks, wildlife refuges, and marine sanctuaries;
�s
34 7. State parks, recreation facilities, aquatic preserves, and other publicly owned
35 properties;
36 8. City electric service and the Florida Keys Electric Co-op; and
00
37 9. Other utilities, as appropriate.
38 N
39 (i) Protecting and improving water quality by providing for the construction, operation, r_
40 maintenance, and replacement of stormwater management facilities; central sewage E
41 collection; treatment and disposal facilities; and the installation and proper operation and
42 maintenance of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems.
43 (j) Ensuring the improvement of nearshore water quality by requiring the construction and
44 operation of wastewater management facilities that meet the requirements of ss.
45 381.0065(4)(1) and 403.086(10), as applicable, and by directing growth to areas served by
46 central wastewater treatment facilities through permit allocation systems.
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 12 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2092
Q.4.a
I (k) Limiting the adverse impacts of public investments on the environmental resources of the
2 Florida Keys.
3 (1) Making available adequate affordable housing for all sectors of the population of the Florida
4 Keys.
5 (m)Providing adequate alternatives for the protection of public safety and welfare in the event of
6 a natural or manmade disaster and for a postdisaster reconstruction plan.
7 (n) Protecting the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Florida Keys and E
8 maintaining the Florida Keys as a unique Florida resource.
9
10 Pursuant to Section 380.0552(7) Florida Statutes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the
11 Principles for Guiding Development as a whole and is not inconsistent with any Principle.
12
13 D. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.). -
14 Specifically, the amendment furthers:
15
16 163.3161(4), F.S. — It is the intent of this act that local governments have the ability to preserve
17 and enhance present advantages; encourage the most appropriate use of land, water, and
18 resources, consistent with the public interest; overcome present handicaps; and deal 0
19 effectively with future problems that may result from the use and development of land within CO
20 their jurisdictions. Through the process of comprehensive planning, it is intended that units 0
21 of local government can preserve, promote, protect, and improve the public health, safety,
22 comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, law enforcement and fire prevention, and
23 general welfare; facilitate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water,
24 sewerage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing, and other requirements and
25 services; and conserve, develop, utilize, and protect natural resources within their
26 jurisdictions. T
27
28 163.3161(6), F.S. — It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans shall have the
29 legal status set out in this act and that no public or private development shall be permitted
30 except in conformity with comprehensive plans, or elements or portions thereof, prepared 00
31 and adopted in conformity with this act.
32
33 163.3177(1), F.S. — The comprehensive plan shall provide the principles, guidelines, standards,
�s
34 and strategies for the orderly and balanced future economic, social, physical, environmental
35 and fiscal development of the area that reflects community commitments to implement the CO
36 plan and its elements. These principles and strategies shall guide future decisions in a
00
37 consistent manner and shall contain programs and activities to ensure comprehensive plans
38 are implemented. The sections of the comprehensive plan containing the principles and
39 strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives, and policies, shall describe how the local a
40 government's programs, activities, and land development regulations will be initiated, E
41 modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a consistent manner. It is not
42 the intent of this part to require the inclusion of implementing regulations in the
43 comprehensive plan but rather to require identification of those programs, activities, and land
44 development regulations that will be part of the strategy for implementing the comprehensive
45 plan and the principles that describe how the programs, activities, and land development
46 regulations will be carried out. The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 13 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2093
Q.4.a
I for the use and development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of
2 more detailed land development and use regulations.
3
4 163.3201, F.S. — Relationship of comprehensive plan to exercise of land development regulatory
5 authority. It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans or elements thereof
6 shall be implemented, in part, by the adoption and enforcement of appropriate local
7 regulations on the development of lands and waters within an area. It is the intent of this act E
8 that the adoption and enforcement by a governing body of regulations for the development of
9 land or the adoption and enforcement by a governing body of a land development code for an E
10 area shall be based on, be related to, and be a means of implementation for an adopted
11 comprehensive plan as required by this act.
12
13 VI. PROCESS 4-
14
15 Comprehensive Plan Amendments may be proposed by the Board of County Commissioners, the
16 Planning Commission, the Director of Planning, or the owner or other person having a contractual
17 interest in property to be affected by a proposed amendment. The Director of Planning shall review
18 and process applications as they are received and pass them onto the Development Review 0
19 Committee and the Planning Commission. 00
20 0
21 The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing. The Planning Commission shall
22 review the application, the reports and recommendations of the Department of Planning &
23 Environmental Resources and the Development Review Committee and the testimony given at the
24 public hearing. The Planning Commission shall submit its recommendations and findings to the
25 Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). For a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment,
26 pursuant to Section 163.3187, F.S., the BOCC holds one public hearing to consider the adoption of T
27 the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, and considers the staff report, staff recommendation,
28 and the testimony given at the public hearing.
29
30 00
31 i
32
33 VIL STAFF RECOMMENDATION
34
35 Staff recommends approval of the proposed FLUM amendment from Education (E) to Mixed i
36 Use/Commercial (MC) contingent on adoption and effectiveness of the proposed corresponding
00
37 subarea policy restricting development on the site to affordable housing dwelling units at a
38 maximum of 20 units.
39
40
41 VIII. EXHIBITS
42
43 1. Map Series 11 x 17
44 2. Ordinance
BOCC SR 08.21.19 Page 14 of 14
File No. 2018-139
Packet Pg. 2094
■■■ eeeeeeeee��� .;._._ � �_ ■ ■■ eeeeeeeee:`- ..:�._ � _ �.
■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ �■1■■■■■■�■■®■■% ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■��■ ■■®■■� i■■■■a
' IN ■■ eeeeee�����e�e ■■���■��s.a� ► ■■ ■■ ■eeeee����-.a ■■■���■■■■ ■�o��
�■ . - . .�■ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee®��■■■■■� �■ . . .�■ eeeeeeeeeeeee■■■■®�■■■■■
�■■■■■ �■■■■■
low.OE■ ■■■ ■■ '
■■■■ ■■■■
Future Land Use Designations A-Agriculture AD Airport District C Conseniation:E=Education li-lnduRstrial�!�jt,,
ii■■_=HHHHH111.MOM.—, 1■■■■■ — Growth Managementu■■■ — ■■■_
MV
1■■■■ r, I■■s ® , , 1■■■i ■■
i■ ■lennnn _ _ I _..._� � 14
• ■u Im■■■r jneee
■ ■ NINE., i���- . . ... ■■■■ ae. ■■■■■en n■nnmeen�■■■■■nee nueeeen�-nn■n� ■■■■ m n ® ,_ ■■■ a■■ i■■■■■m e�n■ne■■■■■■■n■,
��■ o
MI be amended as indicated above and briefly described as:
RON
1 ■ n a ■ ■■■■.■■■■■�■, I■■■■F
nnnnmm�n��■■s■""®
T,11111101 Key:Sugarloaf Key Mile Marker:20 Map Amendment# h1pmKow.
■■■■■ 11Acreage:2.79 Land Use District Map#: 468
0 1■■■■■
�■■■■ I1■■■ Ordinance No.
Date. ... .
Proposal: Rc�enfial L�(RL), nd R�idential�Rbn(RG)t, 991 ADM
• op- DescriptionNA UN
NA
' aW }7 O
� � 1 B
NA WA
hyA
-
Q.4.c
4
2t
6 MO OE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IDA
7 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
8 ORDINANCE NO. -2019
9
10 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF E
1.I COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AMENDING THE MONROE
1.2 COUNTY T Y FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM EDUCATION ( ) TO E
I3 MIXED USE / COMMERCIAL (MC'), FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
1.4 AT 255 CRANE OUL,EVAI D, SUGARLOAF KEY, MILE
15 MARKER19.3, AS PROPOSED BY THE SCHOOL BOARD OIL,
4-
1 ONROE COUNTY; PROVIDING FOR SE RA:BIILIT ,
17 PROVIDING PEAL OF CONFLICTING R ISI S; �
18 PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND
19 PLANNING LSE AND THE SECRETARY F STATE cis
20 PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE MONROE COUNTY
21 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOR AMENDMENT T" T THE M
22 FUTURE LANDUSE MAP; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
23 DATE. (Pile 20 -139) �
24 W
25
2
27 WHEREAS, on July 27, 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department �
28 received an application from the School Board of Monroe County, Florida (the "Applicant") to
29 amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map (1°LUM) from Education (F?) to Residential
i
30 Medium (l M) for property located at 255 Crane Boulevard, Sugarloaf Key; and
31
32 WHEREAS, on September: 1.2, 2018, the Planning and Environmental Resources �
33 Department received a revised application from the Schaal Beard of Monroe County, Florida (the 17
34 "Applicant") to amend the Monroe County Future land. C..P;se Map (FLUM) from. Education (l ) to00
35 Mixed Use/Commercial (MC) for property located at 255 Crane Boulevard, Sugarloaf Ivey; and
3
37 WHEREAS,the applicant held a community Meeting on October 22,2018, as required by
38 the Comprehensive flan. and Land Development Code; and �
39
40 WHEREAS,the Monroe County Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the
41 proposed amendment at a regularly scheduled meeting held on November 13, 2018; and.
42
43 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission held a public hearing and
44 provided for public comment at a regularly scheduled meeting held on February 27, 2019; and.
45
Ordinance -2019
File 4 20I 8-139 Page 1 of 3
Packet Pg. 2096
I WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission considered the application, the
2 staff report, and the comments from the public in their discussion; and
4 WHEREAS,the Monroe County Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P07-1918
5 recommending to the BOCC approval of the proposed amendment; and
6
7 WHEREAS, the proposed PLUM amendment qualifies as a small-scale comprehensive
8 plan amendment pursuant to Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, for which the BOCC holds one
9 public hearing to consider the adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, and E
10 considers the staff report, staff recommendation, and the testimony given at the public hearing;
11 and E
12
13 WHEREAS,at a regular meeting held on the 2 I't day of August,2019, the Monroe County
LL
4-
14 Board Of County Commissioners held a public hearing to consider adoption of the proposed FLUM
15 amendment, considered the staff report and provided for public comment and public participation
16 in accordance with the requirements of state law and the procedures adopted for public
17 participation in the planning process;
18
0
19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY co
-6
20 COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA: 0
21 (n
22 Section 1. 'I"'he Future Land Use Map of the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan is
23 amended as -follows, contingent on effectiveness of the corresponding subarea
24 policy:
25
26 The property located 255 Crane Boulevard, Sugarloaf Key, approximately Mile 0
27 Marker 19.3), legally described as:
28 U_
29 A part of Government Lot 2, Section 36, Township 66 South, Range 27 East,
30 Sugarloaf Key, Monroe County, Florida, being more particularly described as 00
31 follow: N
32
33 COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 36, thence N89'4735"W E
34 along the North line of the said Section 36 for a distance of 1550.96 feet to the
35 Northeast corner of lands described in Official Records Book 2350�, at Page 420 of <
36, the Public Records of Monroe County, Florida, said point bearing S89'47'35"E
37 along the said North line of Section 36 adistance of 1089.00 feet measured from
38 the East Right of Way line of Crane Boulevard; thence SOO'l I'l TV along the
.39 East boundary line of the said lands described in Official Records Book 2350, at
40 Page 420 of the Public Records of Monroe County , Florida, for a distance of 65.66
41 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel of land hereinafter described,; thence
42 continue SOO'I I'l 2"W along the previously described course for a distance of
Ordinance -2019
File # 2018-139 Page 2 of 3
1 Packet Pg. 2097
1 334.34 feet to the Southeast corner of lands described in Official Records Book
2 2350, at Page 420 of the Public Records of Monroe County , Florida, for a distance
3 of 366.27 feet to a point; thence N009 112"E for a distance of 3')4.34 feet to
4 appoint; thence S89'47'35"E for a distance of 366.27 feet back to the Point of
5 Beginning. Said parcel of land contains 122,458,33 square feet, more or less," is
6 changed from Education(E)to Mixed Use/Commercial (MC) as shown on Exhibit
7 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
8
9 Section 2. Severabflity. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, change, or
E
10 provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not
11 be affected by Such validity.
E
12
13 Section 3. Re cal of Inconsistent Provisions. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
U-
14 conflict with this ordinance .are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict. 4-
15
16 Section 4. Filing and Effective Date. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the
17 Secretary of the State of Florida and shall become effective as provided by law.
18
0
19 Section 5. Inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The -foregoing amendment shall be co
-6
20 incorporated in the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan and included on the Future 0
21 Land Use Map.
22
23 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County, Florida,
24 at a regular meeting held on the day of
25
26 Mayor Sylvia Murphy, District 5
27 Mayor Pto Tem Danny L. Kolhage, District 1 0
28 Commissioner Michelle Coldiron, District 2
29 Commissioner Heather Carruthers, District 3
U-
30 Commissioner David Rice, District 4
00
32 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
33 OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA C14
34
35 BY E
36 Mayor Sylvia Murphy
37 (SEAL)
38
39 ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK COU14
40
41 —SWIN.R Tva—; Mrm�*
42 DEPUTY CLERK ASSISTANTC U TYATTORNEY
Date
Ordinance -2019
File # 2018-139 Page 3 of 3,
1 Packet Pg. 2098
Exhibit 1 to Ordinance# .2019
ACOSTA"Rtr
CANAL DR
HANSEN TRL
DATE PALM DR
PELUCC RD
00 11 8050-00�0000 E
E
-----------
z
<
U MC U-
4-
RL
ROCKY RD -----------
.2
RC
E
0
co
-6
0
RC
00
T-
Q
C14
E
The Monroe County Future Land Use Map is amended
as indicated above.
Future Land Use change of one parcel of land in Sugarloaf Key having Real Estate Number 001,18050-000000 from
Education (E), Residentiai!Low(RL), and Residential Conservation (RC)to N
Mixed Use/Commercial(MC),Education(E), Residential Low(RL),and Residential Conservation(RC). A,
Packet___ Pg. 20991