Item F4LAND AUTHORITY GOVERNING BOARD
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Division:
Meeting Date: Land Authority
April 20, 2011
Bulk Item:Contact / Phone #:
Yes No X Mark Rosch / 295-5180
__________________________________________________________________________________
Agenda Item Wording:
Approval of the 2011 Acquisition List.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Item Background:
Each year the Land Authority Advisory Committee prepares an updated Acquisition
List. Although this process takes place on an annual basis, the list may be, and often is, amended over
the course of the year as well. The Advisory Committee has prepared the attached list for 2011 after
holding public meetings on January 26, 2011; February 23, 2011; and March 30, 2011.
Per section 380.0667, Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners, sitting as the Land
Authority Governing Board, "shall approve the list of acquisitions, in whole or in part, in the order of
priority recommended by the Advisory Committee."
Listing a property on the Acquisition List is a preliminary, non-binding step indicating the Board’s desire
to pursue acquisition. Further Board action is required before entering into a purchase contract.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Advisory Committee Action:
On March 30, 2011 the Committee voted 4/0 to approve and forward
the list to the Governing Board.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Previous Governing Board Action:
The Board has approved an Acquisition List each year since the
Land Authority was established.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Contract/Agreement Changes:
N/A
__________________________________________________________________________________
Staff Recommendation:
Approval
__________________________________________________________________________________
Total Cost:Indirect Cost:Budgeted:
$ N/A $______ Yes No .
Cost to Land Authority:Source of Funds:
$ N/A
Approved By:
Attorney X County Land Steward .
Documentation:
Included: X To Follow: Not Required: .
Disposition:
Agenda Item ____
MONROE COUNTY LAND AUTHORITY
2011 ACQUISITION LIST
PropertyAcquisition ObjectivesIntended DevelopmentUltimate Owner / Manager
PROPERTY IN FLORIDA KEYS AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN
Property RenderedProperty Rights ProtectionNoneMCLA, State, or Federal
Unbuildable by County RegulationsEnvironmental ProtectionGovernment
Property Eligible for ROGOProperty Rights ProtectionNoneMCLA, State, or Federal
Administrative ReliefEnvironmental ProtectionGovernment
Property Designated Tier 1,Property Rights ProtectionNoneMCLA, State, or Federal
Tier 2, or Tier 3-AEnvironmental ProtectionGovernment
Big Pine HCP Mitigation
The MCLA Advisory Committee will consider adding to the Acquisition List, on a case-by-case basis, affordable housing sites
to be acquired by government partners provided the sites do not include environmentally sensitive habitat or possible wetlands.
Favorable factors in the analysis and consideration of affordable housing sites will include the record of the partner in the
project; quality of the project; ability of the project to serve individuals, couples and families; leverage from additional non-
MCLA funds brought to the project; and the MCLA funds price per unit.
PROPERTY IN KEY WEST AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN
712-716 Eisenhower DriveAffordable HousingMulti-family rentalsKWHA with lease to
703-705 Pearl StreetHabitat for Humanity
of Key West and Lower
Florida Keys, Inc.
1911-1913 Patterson AvenueAffordable HousingDuplex rentalsKWHA with lease to
AH of Monroe County, Inc.
(AIDS Help)
The MCLA Advisory Committee will consider adding to the Acquisition List, on a case-by-case basis, affordable housing sites
to be acquired by government partners provided the sites do not include environmentally sensitive habitat or possible wetlands.
Favorable factors in the analysis and consideration of affordable housing sites will include the record of the partner in the
project; quality of the project; ability of the project to serve individuals, couples and families; leverage from additional non-
MCLA funds brought to the project; and the MCLA funds price per unit.