The URL can be used to link to this page

Item I7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: Au ust 21 2013 Bulk Item: Yes x No Division: Growth Management Department: Plannine&Env Resources ENDA ITEM WORDING: Staff Contact Person/Phone#: Trish Smith 304-0412 AG Approval of staff recommendations for the 2013 Transportation Alternative Program Funding Cycle. ITEM BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) recently announced the 2013 Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) Cycle for counties and municipalities in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. A total of $24,398,289 is available for distribution between the years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 for qualified projects. Multi-modal/altemative transportation links that enhance community quality life are typically funded under this program. The BOCC will establish local priorities. The final awards will be determined by the FDOT. Eight new applications were submitted for this cycle. Staff determined that all of the projects are good candidates for funding and should be forwarded to FDOT for consideration. Together, the projects total $7,461,159, which represents 30 percent of the total available funding for Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. The recommended project ranking is as follows: Pro'ect Key Largo Bayside Shared Use Path Amount S onsor Priorit Lower Keys Scenic Overlook(Big Pine SwimmingHole $1,000,000 Monroe Co. 1 Crane Boulevard—OHT Sidewalk Extension ) $1,200,000 Monroe Co. 2 Geraldine Street Enhancements $ 351,444 Monroe Co. 2 Southard Street Enhancements $ 999,409 Key West 4 Angela Street Enhancements $ 765,435 Key West 5 Fort Street Enhancements $1,765,435 Key West 6 Rowell's Marina Master Plan $1,994,871 Key West 6 $ 150,000 Monroe Co. 8 The ranking criteria and score sheets are included as back up to this agenda item. The recommended ranking differs slightly from the actual ranking results due to a request by the City of Key West to prioritize their own projects so that they can minimize construction delays in the City. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:N/A CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:Approval of the eight project applications, as described. TOTAL COST:—p INDIRECT COST: 0 — ----- Yes —No_ DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE: 0 COST TO COUNTY• 0 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 0 REVENUE PRODUCING: Yes— No AMOUNT PER MONTH Year APPROVED BY: County Atty OMB/Purchasing Risk Management DOCUMENTATION:Included Not Required— DISPOSITION: AGENDA ITEM# BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Coup of Monroe Mayor George Neugent,District 2 Mayor Pro Tem,Heather Carruthers,District 3 The Florida Keys Danny L.Kolhage,District 1 y David Rice,District 4 Sylvia J.Murphy,District 5 TO: Christine Hurley,AICP Growth Management Division Director FROM: Trish Smith,AICP Transportation Planning Manage G�z THROUGH: Townsley Schwab Sr. Director of Planning and Environmental Resources DATE: July 18, 2013 SUBJECT: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Transportation Alternative Program Cycle Applications—2013 The Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)recently announced the 2013 Transportation Alternative Program (TAP) Cycle for counties and municipalities in Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. A total of $24,398,289 is available for distribution between the years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. Qualified projects include a variety of "alternative transportation projects" including bike paths, sidewalks, storm water improvements, ADA upgrades,and scenic overlooks. A list of activities that qualify for this program is attached. Phase 1 of the application review process was conducted by local staff to determine local priorities. Staff recommendations will be submitted to the Monroe County BOCC on August 21, 2013 for final approval. Following BOCC approval, the applications will be forwarded to FDOT for consideration. The local application deadline was June 28, 2013. Eight new applications were received by Monroe County Planning Department: Project Sponsor Amount Lower Keys Scenic Overlook(Big Pine Swimming Hole) Monroe County $1,000,000 Fort Street Enhancements City of Key West $1,994,871 Geraldine Street Enhancements City of Key West $ 351,444 Rowell's Marina Master Plan Monroe County $ 150,000 Southard Street Improvements City of Key West $ 999,409 Angela Street Enhancements City of Key West $1,765,435 Key Largo Bayside Shared Use Path Monroe County $1,000,000 Crane Boulevard/FKOHT Sidewalk Connection Monroe County 200,00 $7,461,159 An evaluation meeting was held on July 18, 2013 at the Monroe County Government Center. Representatives from Key West, Key Colony Beach, City of Layton, Village of Islamorada, and City of Marathon were invited by Monroe County Planning Department to participate in the evaluation process. Karen Olson, City of Key West and Trish Smith, Monroe County,attended the meeting. Ms. Olson and Ms. Smith discussed each project and how it met the TAP criteria provided by FDOT. Following the discussion, it was determined that all of the projects were good candidates for funding and 1 should be considered for ranking. Together, the projects total $7,461,159, which represents 30 percent or 1/3 of the total available funding for Miami-Dade and Monroe Counties. Ms. Olson and Ms. Smith individually scored each project according to FDOT criteria. Individual member scores were added together and averaged to obtain a project ranking(see attached).The final results are: Project Average Score Priority Bayside Shared Use Path 97 1 Lower Keys Viewing Area(Big Pine Swimming Hole) 90 2 Crane Boulevard—OHT Sidewalk Extension 90 2 Geraldine Street Enhancements 85 4 Fort Street Enhancements 84 5 Southard Street Enhancements 80 6 Angela Street Enhancements 80 6 Rowell's Marina Master Plan 55 8 Ms. Smith and Ms. Olson then discussed the feasibility and timing of each project based on the final ranking. Ms. Olson requested that the City of Key West be allowed to set the priority order of their applications to minimize construction disturbances throughout the city. Both committee members agreed that this would be appropriate.Ms.Olson requested the following ranking for her applications: 1) Geraldine Street Enhancements 2) Southard Street Enhancements 3) Angela Street Enhancements 4) Fort Street Enhancements The revised project ranking that will be submitted to the BOCC for approval is as follows: Project Priori Bayside Shared Use Path 1 Lower Keys Viewing Area(Big Pine Swimming Hole) 2 Crane Boulevard—OHT Sidewalk Extension 2 Geraldine Street Enhancements 4 Southard Street Enhancements 5 Angela Street Enhancements 6 Fort Street Enhancements 6 Rowell's Marina Master Plan 8 Phase 2 of the project evaluation will be conducted by the FDOT. Award notices are anticipated by the end of this year. Project applications for unincorporated Monroe County were selected by reviewing the county's draft Capital Improvement Plan and in consultation with Public Works,Growth Management,and the County Administrator's office. 'Key Largo Bayside Path was awarded$475,000 in last year's TAP cycle to construct a pedestrian bridge at Adams Cut.This project has also been awarded a$1.4 million state CIGP grant,which will require a 50%local match by the county,bringing the total reimbursable amount to$1,275,000. 2 O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O ++ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 01 C1 c O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O I- r% O O O L6 d O Lr O (d O O O O O O O t O O O R 00 O r- to 00 Ln co Ln O O 0) V E 1, N N .-+ O %--1 C Or-I N O to G1 a a a a a a a a Q a s a a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a Q Q Q Q a C O C w C 00 uw w O U O U c • C ai +J E u _c E +� o E cc c oo c o E o c IA CLc u d N \ '^ m \ v�i i \ L m i m i Q' i m d c p o c c a c c 4- c a •� a c _ a W O OA N N N Q u N \ N U c N O O c c a a) o aU o o (U O (U O eo c � C L 01 cn O r-I N M M O m m O O r-I N -0 -0 -0 - d 0 O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N T-4 m O cli E m c N c^ t c rl O E N O N fO N N m N (Ua -p C 3 O N D -0 a N m 3 a L IA O L L .N Q �. -a -d G 3 m L a� m a� ,o v"'i (U o c L o Q O (u � a E E (u p c m L Y c 4- N O C y0„ H m Y O N 0 OA Y 3 3 u 0 w L oL m ° a0 o a � o- OE — Oo o a ao a, o 0o ° ° ai c w 0 a c 3 C Q O > E oc_o w �-° a (U c 0 L, O o°Jo o w t LJ U m (UO S O U 0 ' _ � a uU c = a n O L a0+ Y "a y a u E E Ov N j +' O m > N m N O U = m 7 C N O V) w O O 7 O 4- u N N ++ U L m v o u a U O o w o � c Y `~ E w Y c - v a (U fAO c (n c L O J - u O O u m O E N m � m O o O ai 0 0 ;_ >; fO m m a ,n a a 0 �- a s v- O � u w u = 0 L O N O N v N Y O H a� 7 N 3 O 7 O Y O i n ++ C v C c O m m �, O N o 0 c 2 w c 3 w a L 4, u m O 4L OA (U Q •� U •+�'-.+ E U 7 N d w +c-+ c w c a- ° E c c o E E c m a' c t v"i o v c O Ln 0 O 4' N L m N N U C 1� } O O LL O O c v c (u N a c c m a c o v E +, aU moo u .� c c� t c> > a O a aci c �- c ` a� m ro v " � a Y C 7 a m 7 U m 7 Y m a m G. to O vYi CL m O m O E a m L c 4- a � L N C � � C z Y �, C V O C O C C � m E N N YO Y w N r.4 N .� OA m N N 'd t� O N .� o } pp ti N c N 'd c 'a 'N C C 1•+ 'N 'a C N 4- u > o 'N O aJ p N O O O `� C m O N O 7 GJ p o p tLo 'p O N N V N OL a C U w 7 U > m U U U m U �n ti .� Q .� in Q a N O v N ` C - d � b -0•c N 'a a` m 2 m OA m m N OA m a CL c v N ++ C a a m m W -0 ._ a 3 in in N N O LU c •L > E 0 N �' lz Ln m �' o W LA C C d H 4- O 2 7 in m ti G v c = "a v > > O OA O oc u c c u u a z o coLi c a Q N Q E N c c C v c�n m Vn V) �= a Y w u Z s}uaw9jueyu3 hails Jjo j slu9wa:)ue4u3 laalS ejaSuy O Q fl sluawa3ueyu3 laaals auipleaag sluawa:)ueyu3 10 laaalS pae4lnoS Z> uoil:)auuo:)Ilemams p Q iHO-paenajno8 auea:) <�- Al O a filed ash paaeyS apisAe8 Qs- _ z zz ueld aaisew sliamoa uj Q 1= Z 0 (a1OH Suiww'MS Q J auid his :eke) eaad c� —. bQS' o Sul alA sAa>1 aaMlyo,.,3 NO (U Y w Y Y Y z O C O C O C O C C C < N N � N N cu = OV f— a ��,, a�.r f6 N t6 H I— F0 O N ~ s v m m L y O 0 O A t ° E W C m = V 0 i N u° � c H m W p O O ,J O 00a Q _Z O v U Z' W Z U > < 41 cc slu9w93ueyu3 WAS IJo3 � Ilk sluawa:)ueyu3 laals elasuy �— L sluawa3ue4u3 laajls aulpleaag i s;uawa:)ueyu3 laaj3S pae43noS puol}:)auuo:)41emapls \ 1HO-pJenalnos auejD y;ed ash pajeyS aplsAes ueld aaIseVY sllannoa W u1 W (alOH CL � CL � Sulwwlnns au!d S!s :ele) V � ZO eaay su!malA sAaN aaMol O �1u a`, o W N O CL i r, C m w O. C N O z � ° i a°�i 3 0 Z W C O O C C m CL _E a c. o O C +� O w � c _N a1 Ln O• 3 (A N O. E ' Q. j C ° o a) s o u v CD u N Q a - - C v U O. y O. L Q. O° O O w O O Ln z CL tO(O E oQ ° T f ou f c ` O m N to ° O C CL m O. C C o 'a E aL, o E = v v N E 3 aL3+ 2 4vO° u°V L+ 0 O E N^ E s w a ` y Eu C. p i C tO. N 7 zt O O 0 a 0O CL O 'A -0 CLOQO L ° m mi a, 0 CL Q �c- .+;,C+; •Cf`,,0;co O E EW ° E O O 'o ° aio N O > CO iOO md 0 (7 c�aaO C CL w () 0 to O p0 wVN O O Y .0zCL H (v p n Z> ° C E O C O m O Ira CL o a tw ° t Z N L o CL u w CL a Zo E a) l L CL N O d u 'n m Qi C O m H Z c ai W c-4 a N m M •a ate+ 4 m N w •N ^ u C 00 M W m 0 t%1 C1 S;uaw03ue4u3laaJ;S Voj � 1 sluawa3ue4u3 laa3s elasu A,n tom, Q O O �� s4uawa3ue4u3 ` laaa}Sauipleaao s4u8wa3ue4u3 Wails Pae43no cr `.R jw ® \•� �,� ual:Pauuo:)JIBAWPi 1 _ 3 LHo-pienalno8 aueio V 44ed ash paJe4S aplsAeg ueld JalseW spannaa W N 4c (alOH SOulww'MS quid 018:ele) Q eaay SulnnalA sAaA jannol 1 v� y CL pp� C ~ m o o v 3 3 E v g o a v c O c 0 +• o ar c m 3 E a � a o c c o Q CL v H o. $ m a u o w u d o 0 O of r V m gc bo 0 w CL Q. E O N C m 3 O. w.. y� 'm �i y y O 7 N _c � r 07 N j s. 0 �+ p O' 3 u O '�' 'E Ln t d 0 a c 0 �491 c +; = O m ` E = m w Ln CL o p _ o _ a d = o E a�i o y n aEi �, u O N ,^�, R c u E C! 67 Q. O W W O ` N OCLL C O © Q_ c c a c o y O ,�. = C mL tca m h ,On '0 a�O+ c am' +' a ai w` . d E 41 E o o p a 'v o E a o 0 C ec CCA c C C O C C +r+ .O C q- 'Q fa 01 W Z of H •C 0 W O •O o c 2 E 9 9 c� C va a " C Z O CL Z u bD E to Q c �° a O a C� ` c i v N c > u}i a c IQ R Y c 8 r+ R' N m m =a v m ,n y c�i a oo a O an oC .� in o =ti Florida Department o, Transportation RICKSCOTT GOVERNOR 1000 N.W. 111` Avenue ANANTH PRASAD,P.E. GOV Miami,Florida 33172-5800 SECRETARY April 26, 2013 Mr. Roman Gastesi, Jr. County Administrator Monroe County 1100 Simonton Street, Suite 205 Key West, FL 33040 Subject: Transportation Alternatives Program Application Cycle Dear Mr. Gastesi: The purpose of this letter is to announce the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) application cycle for this year. The TAP is an element of the Federal Highway Administration's Surface Transportation Program. Under the new federal transportation legislation, MAP 21, TAP replaces the former Transportation Enhancement Program; the two programs are similar but not identical. FDOT has prepared a new TAP application to reflect program eligibility changes (attached). Applicants are invited to submit project proposals based on what the agency expects to be able to implement between the years of 2014-2018. The federal funding allocation for the TAP is now divided into subcategories based on population and geographic designation (e.g.: urban, rural, any area). FDOT will program TAP-funded projects to correspond with the funding available per category in each fiscal year. In addition, projects selected to receive TAP funds will be programmed based on the year the project phase is ready to use the funding with the understanding that funding is subject to the availability of federal funds and an annual appropriation by the legislature (spending authority). The TAP is administered through the FDOT District 6 Program Management Office which will be responsible for coordination with the local governments and applicants. Following is a brief process overview. Eligible projects for which design has been completed by the sponsoring agency will be given preference in the ranking process. 1) April 2013—TAP application cycle announcement letter to local governments and agencies via e-mail with the TAP Selection Criteria and Application Form 2) April to June 28, 2013—Local agencies prepare and submit applications to Monroe County 3) July 26, 2013—Applications in electronic format are due in the District Program Management Office www.dot.state,fl.us Mr. Roman Gastesi, Jr. April 26, 2013 Page 2 4) August, 2013—The District conducts Technical Evaluation, Phase I review of applications and sends results to Monroe County's Transportation planner 5) September-October 2013—District schedules applicants for project presentations before the District 6 Scoping Committee, the Phase II final review 6) October- November 2013 -The District Scoping Committee's final ranking/project prioritization recommendation sent to senior management and notification letters will be sent to local governments and agencies. The District begins programming of new TAP projects into the tentative work program. 7) December 2013—Monroe County Commission reviews and acknowledges that the Tentative Work Program was presented Thank you for your ongoing partnership with the Department in implementing these important projects. Please contact Harold Desdunes, at 305-470-5464, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Gus Pego, P.E. District Secretary Enclosures cc: Harold Desdunes, P.E., Director of Transportation Development Debora Rivera, P.E., Director of Transportation Operations Carl Filer, P.E., Program Management Engineer Aileen Boucle, Inter-modal Systems Planning Administrator Christine Hurley, Monroe County Growth Management Townsley Schwab, Monroe County Planning Judith Clarke, Monroe County Engineer Phil Steinmiller, Planning Manager TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES SELECTION AND PRIORITIZATION CRITERIA FOR FDOT DISTRICT SIX Applications for the next Transportation Alternatives Program(TAP)funding cycle are due at county agencies by 5:00 pm on June 28,2013. An original application package,an electronic copy, and ten hard copies, should be sent to the Miami- Dade MPO (Miami-Dade County applications),or to the Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department(Monroe County applications): David Henderson Patricia Smith Enhancements Program Coordinator Transportation Planning Manager Miami-Dade MPO Monroe County Planning and Environmental 111 NW First Street,Suite 920 Resources Department Miami, FL 33128-1999 2798 Overseas Highway,Suite 400, Marathon, FL 33050 Email: davidh@miamidade.gov Email: smith-patricia@monroecounty-fl.gov Phone: 305-375-1647 Phone: 305-304-0412 The application package(application form, drawings, photos,etc) may not exceed 10 pages. Letters of support can be included in a separate appendix and will not be counted against this page limit. Eligible Categories for Transportation Alternatives Program(TAP) Projects: • Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks,bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals,traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety- related infrastructure,and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 • Construction, planning,and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children,older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs. • Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists,or other nonmotorized transportation users • Construction of turnouts,overlooks,and viewing areas • Inventory,control,or removal of outdoor advertising • Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities • Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species,and provide erosion control • Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a transportation project eligible under title 23 of the US Code • Any environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and pollution abatement activities and mitigation to: address stormwater management,control,and water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff, including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11),328(a),and 329; or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats TAP Selection Criteria 040513.docx Last Modified 041213 And: • The Safe Routes to School(SRTS) program under section 1404 of the SAFETEA-LU: Infrastructure-related projects on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements,traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements,on-street bicycle facilities,off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities,secure bicycle parking facilities,and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools. Noninfrastructure-related activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders, traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs. j Note. For SRTS projects,fill in only page 1 of the TAP application, check the SRTS box, and complete the Florida's Safe Routes to School Infrastructure application. The SRTS application must be submitted to be considered for funding.j • Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Eligible Project Sponsors Transportation Alternatives applications must be submitted by a sponsor that is a recognized government body or agency with the ability to enter into a binding contract with the State of Florida. Eligible sponsors are:a municipal government,a county government,a state agency,a federal agency, or an Indian Tribal Council. The sponsor must be willing to provide any funding match that may be required;enter into any required maintenance agreements with the Department;and/or support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. The application package must include a resolution of support for the project from the sponsor agency. Applications may be prepared by incorporated non-profit groups; however, all applications must have an eligible sponsor. The application should include a report of all previous funding awards,the status of the each project, and the amount of funds utilized toward project completion. Applicant should identify projects which were deferred from the year originally programmed,the number of fiscal years the funding was deferred,and a brief summary of the reason for each deferral. This report will not count against the 10-page limit. TAP Selection Criteria 040513.docx Last Modified 041213 General Criteria for Selection 1) No more than$1 million in TAP funds will be awarded to any single project in any single application cycle, and no more than$3 million dollars in enhancement funds will be awarded toward the completion of any single project. Therefore,applicants whose project costs will exceed$1 million must demonstrate that they have the additional resources to complete the project. No local match is required but evaluation points are awarded to applications that include a local funding commitment. 2) This is not a grant program. Applicants should expect to pay for the work and be reimbursed from their award. Items eligible for reimbursement include, project planning and feasibility studies, environmental analysis or preliminary design, preliminary engineering, land acquisition, and construction costs. County Agency Project Evaluation The county agency will evaluate each application according to the following criteria (100 possible total points): 1) Up to 15 points for demonstrating how the project will improve safety for bicycle riders and/or pedestrians 2) Up to 15 points for improving intermodal transportation linkages,including those that will provide access to transit stations and/or facilities 3) Up to 15 points for contribution to mobility enhancement or community development for disadvantaged groups(i.e.children,the elderly,the poor,those with limited transportation options, the disabled) 4) Up to 10 points for a local funding contribution or the completion of previous phases of project development. 5) Up to 10 points for improving neighborhood or community quality of life 6) Up to 10 points for improving environmental air, noise,water quality, and/or reducing the need for single occupancy vehicle trips 7) Up to 10 points for evidence of community support,including minutes of public meetings, newspaper clippings, petitions, letters of support from local business owners, property owners, nonprofit organizations, political leaders and other groups 8) Prioritization a) Miami-Dade County Projects- Up to 5 points for top priorities identified by the MPO's Citizen's Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC),Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC),and Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC). Each committee will score 5 points(a maximum total of 15 points). b) Monroe County Projects—Up to 15 points for top priorities identified by the Senior Director of Monroe County's Department of Planning and Environmental Resources Department. County agency scoring/ranking shall be approved by either a)the Miami-Dade MPO or b)the Monroe County Commission prior to transmittal to FDOT District Six. TAP Selection Criteria 040513.docs 3 Last Modified 041213 FDOT District Six Project Evaluation The District will evaluate each project in two phases as follows: c Phase I Technical Evaluation,and e Phase II Project Presentation(if applicable). The projects with the highest Technical Evaluation scores will be selected for the Phase II Project Presentation evaluation.The number of projects selected to present will be based on the amount of funding available. - Phase I Technical Evaluation The District Six Scoping Committee will evaluate each application according to the following criteria (100 possible total points). Emphasis is placed on detail for project description including right-of-way status,cost estimate in detail, scheduling(including permitting), and readiness to proceed to construction. 1) Up to 25 points for ability to implement the project. Status of project design/implementation plan and production scheduling including all permitting is evaluated. 2) Up to 25 points for project cost estimating based upon the level of detail provided ranging from order of magnitude estimates to an opinion of probable costs using unit prices including estimates for required professional services. 3) Up to 25 points for current and past performance administering Enhancement-funded/LAP projects;timely and accurate project invoicing practices,and ability to meet project schedules. 4) Up to 25 points for county agency prioritization. The top ranked project from each county agency receives 25 points,the second ranked receives 24 points,the third ranked receives 23 points,etc. Applicants of the top ranked projects will be required to present their projects to the FDOT District Six Scoping Committee. - Phase II Project Presentation The District Six Scoping Committee scores each project up to 100 points.Scores are added to the Technical Evaluation score for a maximum of 200 points. The Districtwide ranking is then submitted to FDOT District Six Oversight Committee for review and approval.Once approved,the District Secretary issues letters of award to each successful application. Project Implementation Projects prioritized in this funding cycle are programmed into the FDOT 5-Year Work Program. Project sponsors are responsible to work with FDOT to execute project funding agreements in a timely manner. Federal law requires that each project be administered under the rules and procedures governing federally funded transportation projects including right-of-way certification,environmental review and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)compliance. Project sponsors must enter into a Local Agency Program(LAP)agreement with FOOT prior to the start of any work for which they wish to be reimbursed.The LAP will control the project funding process. Funds spent by the sponsor before execution of a LAP agreement cannot be reimbursed by FDOT. Please note: LAP projects must meet federal requirements and standards. More information on the FDOT Local Agency Program can be found at: www.dot.state.fl.us/proiectmanagementoffice/lap/. If you have any questions,contact the listed county agency representatives. TAP Selection Criteria 040513.docx 4 Last Modified 041213 Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Page 1 of 4 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: r a ojp Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal counc ,1 U N 2 6 2013 Monroe County, Florida Contact Trish Smith. AICP. Planning & Environmental Resources Title T ((PIR J Address _2798 Overseas HigbMMv. Marathon. FL 33050 Phone 305 304 0419 FAY Email: smith-oatricia0monroecounty-fl.00v Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor) Name of Applicant(If other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities, transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies, school districts, local education agencies, or schools; tribal governments, other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. 1. Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined in Title 23 USC, Section 213(b) which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section(101) Construction, planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ❑ Construction, planning and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ■Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas ■ Community Improvements including: ❑ Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising ❑ Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities ■ Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species and provide erosion control; and ❑ Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—MOT District 6 Page 2 of 4 ❑ Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for 0 Stormwater management, control, water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11), 32(a) and 329 0 Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program(Section 1404). Note.,if you check one of these please also submit a Safe Routes application. ❑ Infrastructure-related projects: Planning, design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements, traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities, and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Non-infrastructure-related activities:to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders,traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training, volunteers,and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed? (check all that apply) ❑ Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. ■ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acquisition ■Construction INConstruction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). The Lower Keys Scenic Viewing Area/s located on US 1 adjacent to the state highway system and along the route of the Florida Keys Scenic Highway and the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail. The scenic highway is Florida's only Ali American Road,a prestigious federal designation for scenic highways throughout the country. The Overseas Heritage Trail is a designated state trafl that is part of the Florida Greenways and Trails system. MOT has been a strong supporter of both the scenic highway and the trail programs. Both the trail and the scenic highway attract millions of visitors each year to the Florida Keys. US 1, being the main artery along the Island chain,provides sweeping views of the Atlantic Ocean and Florida Bay;however, there are limited areas where vehicles driving along the scenic highway or trail users on the Overseas Heritage Trall can stop to enjoy the scenic vistas. The Lower Keys Scenic Viewing Area will provide a place for travelers to stop, park, and enjoy the ocean views. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 Page 3 of 4 (c) Where is the project located(and what are the termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. The project Is located on the south side of US I (northbound lane)just east of the North Pine Channel Bridge at approximately MM 29. A location map Is attached. (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Summarize any special characteristics of project The project will Include design and construction of a scenic viewing area at the old"Big Pine Swimming Hole". it will Include a boardwalk around the existing canal cut,a kayak/canoe launch, klosks to promote the National Key Deer Refuge, and a potential rest room facility for travelers. It will also Include removal of exotic vegetation on the parcel and from the adjacent right of way. The existing driveway connection is located on a curve near the North Pine Channel Bridge,so the design will address Improving vehicular safety by shifting the existing driveway to the east. i (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). The Lower Keys Scenic Overlook Is owned by the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund MITF).it is currently managed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)as part of the Overseas Heritage Trail. Due to funding shortfalls, the FDEP has agreed to release Its lease with the T11TF and allow Monroe County to enter Into a lease directly with the MTF to develop a passive park that is compatible with the goals of the Overseas Heritage Trail project The Monroe BOCC voted unanimously at their June meeting to pursue the lease. County and trail staff are coordinating to ensure that the needs of both the Overseas Heritage Trail and the Overseas Paddling Trail are incorporated into the lease and the project design. The site has been gated and closed to the public for several years. The Transportation Alternatives Program will allow the site to be opened for public access,and we anticipate that it will reduce the number of vehicles who park illegally on the trail. (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. The parcel will remain in state ownership with a lease to Monroe County for long term maintenance and management The adjacent parcel to the north is FDOT right of way. In order to improve safe access to the property, the county anticipates coordinating with FDOT to surplus or secure a lease on a portion of the right of way. The long term management of this project will be the responsibility of Monroe County. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. County staff has begun negotiations with the Division of State Lands for a long term lease on the site. The Monroe BOCC unanimously approved a motion at their June meeting to direct county staff to move forward with the lease agreement. Monroe County completed a conceptual plan for the site as part of the Big Pine Key Liveable Communikeys Plan, a locally driven comprehensive planning effort This plan Is Incorporated into the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan by reference. The Overseas Heritage Trail staff currently provide trash removal at the site. The Monroe County Land Steward coordinates with the FDEP staff to remove exotic vegetation from the adjacent right of way. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 Page 4 of 4 (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. This project has been embraced by the lower keys community, the Monroe County government, and the FDEP as a means to provide public access to the lower keys waterfront. There are currently no established public restroom facilities or kayak launches in the vicinity. The cornerstone of FDOT's scenic highway program is the access to scenic overlooks and vistas that will provide a positive experience for travelers along the state scenic highway system. 3. Project Implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. It is Important to provide as detailed and accurate a project schedule and cost estimate as possible. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house)and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial, environmental and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal requirements. The design and construction of this project will be managed through the Local Agency Program. Monroe County will hire an FDOT approved design consultant utilizing the Competitive Consultant Negotiation process After the final design and bid package have been approved by FOOT,Monroe County will advertise the project for construction. Monroe County has a successful record of performing LAP projects for the FOOT. (b) Provide a detailed project schedule including any permitting and/or land/right-of-way acquisition required FOOT Project Award—December 2013 Design and Permitting—January 2014—December 2014 FOOT Construction NTP—July 2015 Substantial Completion—December 2015 (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project. (Examples include written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution, financial donations or other appropriate means). The project is included in the Big Pine Liveable Communikeys Plan,a locally driven planning effort that has been approved by the Monroe BOCC and incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan by reference. The Monroe County Recreation and Parks Advisory Board recommended improvements to the site as part of Monroe County's passive parks inventory. Both FDEP and Monroe County staff believe that the public will benefit when the park/s opened for public use. (d)Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. The State of Florida will continue to own the property, and it will be leased to Monroe County. Monroe County will be responsible for the long term maintenance and management of the project. (e) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability/use. Matching funds will be in the form of long term maintenance costs that will be Incurred by Monroe County to keep the site clean and monitored for the State of Florida. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. Page 5 of 4 The site was purchased by the State of Florida In the last decade as part of a larger conservation purchase through Florida Forever. The site was Initially managed by US Fish and Wildlife Service through a lease with the TIITF,however, the USFWS Refuge Manager petitioned to be removed from the lease due to low habitat value. USFWS recommended that the site be opened to public access as a trail head or rest area for the Overseas Heritage Trail and the Florida Keys Scenic Highway. 4. Project Cost: What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ 100,000 Right of Way Acquisition. $ Construction. $ gs,nno Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ 50.000 Other. (Describe) $ TOTAL: $ 1,000,000 How will the project be funded? FDOT Alternatives Funds$ 1,00o,000 +Looal Q0 = Total$1,000,000 FDOT Alternatives Funds ion %+ Local n % = 100% Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 Page 6 of 4 CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certif that the proposed project herein described is supported by 9/J2 L l� /VT' ( (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council) and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (2) enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4)support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. Signature Townsley Schwab Name (please type or print) Sr Administrator Planning and Environ. Resources Title 0124 13 ate FOR MOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 w i i f c. 1 • I r, fi �ul ' I I 9Y Y V 7 i V AMC y t w4 T +� k K• F7 + Ile Jr- j ,n� A d J 'yY A rn= 3� 3 eE o oN a �, Z w � . o � H 0 a; 0 caroi ro00 0 N 0 0 �.+ c � Id'0 c 's a) B A o uN 3E cu a r c c° m 3Lro '° Cf N U) O C a¢ 0 3 0 G yy cv � Y c �••� C w O C O a O t! O + N ++ = 0 O1 _ V � N rD 03 C 1. c +c+ ~ Ea Y 0 'tC� 1O � a`0O O ro 3 "03 Y Ol 0. m ?" w 2 ro Y 1=i to C�. O N y N C_ W ro 3 O O O ' N 3 y > � c ry CCL k: O v� In !0 ro N .V 7 •O � cse�n .L CL 0 o. a a E E ��p d : z d Is CO ram, m rorO m Vf 63x c Document Type: CURRENT UPLAND LEASE #5 Instrument: [ J Parent Lease [ X]Amendment to Lease [ ]Assignment of Lease [ ] Release [ ] Partial Release [ ]Easement [ ]Use Agreement [ ]Sublease [ ] Amendment to Sublease [ ] Release of Sublease [ ]Other Lease Number: 4341 Date: 04-20-2009 Original County: MONROE Section: 1 27 269 27, 28 Township: 1668 668 Range 129E 28E Total Area/Area Unit: I I X Acreage I Square Feet County Bk/Pg/Type B P o Instrument Number: I COMMENTS: I AMEND #5 To LEASE #4341 TO OGT FOR THE FLORIDA KEYS HERITAGE TRAIL DATE PREPPED: F. CARD • INvzNToRY #: 12757; 5/26/2009 22779 25355 MAA'D For Rescan & Additional Pgs Date: ,.5 D Al TO: Kathy Miidus, Planning Manager Title and Land Records Section Bureau of Survey and Mapping (MS 108) FROM: rt,� 60-ad 4/� (STAFF NAME Bureau of Public nd Administration (MS 130) ) SUBJECT: Transmittal of Land Documents to Title: Easement# or Deed # or (conveyance such as surplus sale) Lease Document# LJ .� Associated with Lease# _ (use when sending easements or.deeds as needed) Project Name 1) 6 7- Received by: ` (Title and Land Records Section Staff) Received Date: O-4 0- O Please rpturn opy qf 91grpd and dated transmittal memorandum t of BPLA, MS #130. (initials of BPLA staff preparer) Attachments cc; BPLA Fite Log RECEIVED MAY 2 0 2009 TITLE&LAND RECORDS SURVEY&MAPPING �59& -4 12 7S7 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL n4PROVEIMNT TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ANENDt4ENT MR4BER FIVE TO LEASE NUMBER 4341 THIS LEASE At+R'.ND NT is entered into this 2a6say of 2009, by and between the HOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL DUMVEMENT TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR" and the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, OFFICE OF GREENWAYS AND TRAILS, hereinafter referred to as "LESSEE"; W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, LESSOR, by virtue of Section 253.03, Florida Statutes, holds title to certain lands and property for the use and benefit of the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2001, LESSOR and LESSEE entered into Lease Number 4341; and WHEREAS, LESSOR and LESSEE desire to amend the lease to add land to the leased premises. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The legal description of the leased premises set forth in Exhibit "A" of Lease Number 4341 is hereby amended to include the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and by reference made a part hereof. 2. It is understood and agreed by LESSOR and LESSEE that in each and every respect the terms of the Lease Number 4341, except as amended hereby, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect and the same are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed by LESSOR and LESSEE as of the date of this amendment. 3. It is understood and agreed by LESSOR and LESSEE that this Amendment Number four to Lease Number 4341 is hereby binding upon the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. BOARD OS TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA By:. �1 0 f►D _ (SEAT.) ss GWRIA C. BARBER, OPERATIONS AND MANA�NT CONSULTANT Priest MANAGER, BUREAU OF PUBLIC LAND Type Witness N ADMINISTRATION, DIVISION or STATE LANDS, STATE OF FLORIDA DEFARTMPNT OF ENV.IRONNENTAL PROTECTION W1 eas ,//� `^� v 1 '-` "LESSOR" Print Type 17 tness Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEON Th foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2�day of 2009, by Gloria C. Barber, Operations and Management Con ultant Manager, Bureau of Public Land Administration, Division of State Lands, State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, as agent for and on behalf of the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida. is nally known to me. `��pPv.•••• ••..�;1�'�i�y Notary Public, State of Flor a Print Type Notary Name � OD078gZ03 Commission Number: � ,c'•7..... .' Commission Expires: //,�//// iH Appro dwil orm Legality By; . Attox1pey je Nu � ILS Wi ess " �� (SEAL) i �?A d M. W00 Print/' pe Witness Name Name W s� Title: i ko, 1t�2.c�'br "LE88EF;�� P nt Witness Name STATE OF FLORnM COUNTY OF LEON ® foregoing instrument was ack wl® ed fore ID thi da of 2009, by asL-Jon behalf of the Office of GreenweAlft, and Trails, State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection.= is personal known to me or No Public, Sta a of F orid 17 & Y Shannon Franklin jnmm Commission#t DD510275 Pr t/Type Notary Name Exp��es May 2.3u?Oeo xsro,i Commission Number:-VD+j'10 27 5• Commission Expires- MO-4 2-S, 2.0) C) w �b1901 COUNTY •ThlydlOfrtwaotPreparedByand �• OFFFICIAL RSCOEDB i Pleaseltell m To: _ 131 Whidoek PnTk i 9-- J Axuedcan Home Tide Insutsace,Inn. 81 t l 6 ¢ 5 6703 N.Itimes Avemrc _ g ' PQ 91 5 7 6 Tam�,FL 33614 .. ... ... _ _.-- AHTFS305 RCD+Aug 16 2890 19e29AH I • V, : .1. .11 HOY•I) ROLHAGSr CLINK WARRAMrYvgw (STATUTORY FORM-SLCnON619.02,FS.) � '"Dggg DOt7 STAtf 49.00 ' 1 99/16/2090 DEP CLIt kAL.ATHIS t1YMIN TURN, rude tide —,L day of h .D _ �aCC A .im.between linsEi 7�l.oa,as to an —divided 1111%loteres!and Cynttd•M.Oisoq as to an undividell 48% interest,snow addresses aloe William Jiff Olacas 8663 Bins.Wangor Mf 49MI Cyn" M. Obons 4910 Kialgameadow Lsn% .ladmonvilK FL 32117, Ssmmr, and 14e BOARD OF•TRMITM OF TW MTZMAL D IPROWNSINT TRUST FUND OH TITS SLATS OF FLOMDA,wboem ppomit offbea mdlI is 4o Florida Depaelmead of RaWronmentel Protection, Divieioa of State Leads, 3900 ConmoatreR 111 Boulevctd. Mali Soadon 115, Tallabassee,EL 3nff-3W%Sman, - (� (Waararar ad e.da tha•eeas■paamr"sad•sraieba■iodic all the Perdu b dh Immon st and their tndra ' 11/ emcees Red aelpa m Vrear■and`warn,•arena her d01101 sad Ptsrak a the ammat bPl repeaeahtteet larlade all geadem) regalep sad 16a aaa at a�q Pdtr eaall V WITNBSBS Wo That Ike aid grantor:for told In coadderadoa of the sum of Teo Dams sad odw pad and valuable and considerations, �i��In had paid by said gtmow Ike tseeipi wismais y aelosow r hasVented,baipload Meares Cana�y, 99t,and J O aueruon mod assigns forever,the foU01 damtbed iwda(maea,lylsig send being to Fhlrtda,to-wib Seo Ssklbb"A"shacked herein and by g9wence made a post thmne Properly Approber's Fared Ideodileadon Noatber: 31762.0000,M767.0000 This Conveyanos it n&Jwtto tasemmb,restriction.lbailetl® m s and conditions of old if any now exist,but any seek Interests dent my have been tumioated ste trot hateby re-imposed. AND do said grantor does hereby My warrant Ike tide to said lend,and will defend the same sgsinst dw.lawRd eletms of all pusons whomsoever. IN VVMSSS VAMMOF the grantor has Lerolmlo art gtRMW#hand and seal,the day and year Test above written Signed,sealed and delivered in Ike presence of: ate• � t ASt,�,r ( tore offirat MulamZ.Olson,u to an UTUHVNW 60%interest (P�ted,type or Osman" name of r�it ilnbm) (Signaturs of seeandd .A r M_ ) .� sad,typed or stamped now of wllossi) %"&ye d 4F=4 Avv (Signattire of UM m t W URN as to an latim — mtlftt4�[.�• ry iT4{�OW4 ( e or a ped lane of first Wit ) ' APAOVP (Sigoatere of second tom AS TO FORM AN tJiBM" (P nleLtypedorrtampe stone eeoo wltaaO) Noy 116 20M tN • • • •- a-l• #'L8 �1794495 'STATSUF - • 09#1 6 4 A P0#2. 5 7 7 COUTiTY OF -. ....._. ... ._ . _ Tha fotegoiag hanumtaat Was adutowiedgod before ms Ihts,=[_day of 2000,by WMm L Olson. ft h Penoa(s)(Notary Public moat chock appUaable bank f�Q is PEMMUY(mown to me. T j] Psvdceed a cottvat dt;ret Uaate, [ produced se IdmfiUeatton. otary Pu c (prima;Typ ad or Stantpa( cuielf�,lo Commdssl=No.: Yr l gD1I01Q1 My Coaanirsioo � (NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) BTAT$OF - UlSyr o p,-" COUNTY OF The foregohtg Imhtment wn aekeowledfad belbre no tbia ci " day of 2W0,by,Cynthia m Olrom sub Ptxaoo(s)(Notary Public mast chock applicable box).- Is pemooally ho m to ma. [p'J� produced a currant driver lice=s. Produced as identl9rgdon. 1402W Poona 33r.h Sc4I COOP-- Jn*ftd6 Typed or tamps amps o Kwasyic Conuabniou No.: CC SO S!n 3 My Conunitalon Bryltes a 43 (NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) ado Game COWW . 6�bast�+ni.ra4ta:ro FILB 3. 1 3 4 4 5► 5 BR# 1 6 4 E PG#1 5 7 E exHtem�a� COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTUNE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1.SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 66 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.% HIGH'NAY NO. 1, BEAR WEST ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OP U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1. FOR A DISTANCE OF 450 FEET,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT OF LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED;FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, BEAR SOUTH AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST UNE OF GOVERNMENT' LOT 1, SECnON A TOWNSHIP 60 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, FOR A DISTANCE OF 327.1I FEET, TO A POINT-. THENCE BEAR WEST AT RIGHT ANGLES AND ON A LINE PARALLEL:WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF GOVERNIVOW LOT 1. FOR A DISTANCE ,OF 300 FEET,MORE OR L.EGG TO THE SHORELINE OF PINE CHANNEL;THENCE MEANDER THE SHORELINE OF PINE CHANNEL IN A NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION FOR A DISTANCE OF 280 FAT MORE OR LESS.TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO 1. THENCE RUN HAUnStLY ALONG THE SOUTH MQHT OF WAY UNE OF U& HIGHWAY NO, 1 FOR A DISTANCE OF 458.14 FEET MORE OR LEss,BiAC.K To TWc POINT Ole AISAINNINO. TOGETHER WITH A PARCEL OF SUBMERGED LAND IN NORTH PINE CHANNEL,WESTERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO A PART OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2 IN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 80 SOUTH, RANGE 20 EAST.MONROE COUNTY,FLORIDA.BEfNK,1 MORE PAR71OULAMY DE8CRWED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP BB SOUTH.RANGE 20 EAST AND'MB SOUTH RIGHT-OK-WAY LINE OF U.S.HIGHWAY NO. 1;THENCE RUN N 88.80'02'W ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF U.B. HIGHWAY NO. 1.A DISTANCE OF 450.00 FT.; THENCE 8 00.15'42'W. PARALLEL WITH THE EAST UNE OF U.S.GOVERNMENT LOT 1.A DISTANCE OF 224.06 FT.To THE INTERsecnON WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF U.S.GOVERNMENT LOT 1,SAME BEING THE NORTH UNE OF U.S GOVERNMENT LOT 2, THENCE IN U.S.GOVERNMENT LOT 2, OONTINU9 8 OO.1V42'W, 102.24 FT,THENCE N 88.57SW W. PARALLEL WRIT THE NORTH UNE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 36T 50 FEET. MORE OR LESS TO THE MEAN HKIH WATER LINE OF NORTH PINE CHANNEL. FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 6 44'43'SO' W, 150.00 PT.; THENCE N 45-18'1 o' W, 12.80 FT; THENCE N Mr2V4W W, 73.13 FT.; THENCE N 28.OWW W. 94.69 FT.;THENCE N 00'3s 44' W,A DISTANCE OF 09.54 FT.TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY No.1 PER STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTIONS 9oozo AND 90020.2533.THENCE RUN N 77.08-W E ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.A DISTANCE OF 153.40 FT.TO THE MEAN HIGH WATE14 LINE OF NORTH PINE CHANNEL;THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE APPROXIMATED 9Y THE FOLLOWING COURSES; 41 00'36'44' E, 65.51 FT.;THENCE S 28'00'52'E, 14.60 FT.;THENCR S 80.28.48'E,49A9 FT.;THENCE S 45.16'i 0' E. A DISTANCE OF 32,78 FT.TO THE POINT OF 9EOMNING, BIKING AND LYING IN SECTION 27. TOWNSHIP fill SOUTHI RANG0 29 PAST.MONROE COUNTY,FLOISDA. LESS AND EXCEPT. COMMENCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST UNE OF U.S.GOVERNMENT LOT 1, BECnON 27. TOWNSHIP 66 SOUTH. RANGE 29 EAST AND THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF WAY LINE 019 U.S HIGHWAY No.1, PER STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT RIGHT-OFLWAY MAPS wGmoNs 9w20 AND 60020-2333,' THENCE RUN N 88'50Vr W ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGKr OI~WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO.1, A DISTANCE OF 450.00 FT. FORA EMNI OF =INNING; THENCE RUN B QO'1F'4T W PARALLEL WITH THE SAID FAST UNE OF U.S.GOVERNMENT LOT 1. A DISTANCE OF 00.00 FT.; THENCE N 89"44"18' W. PERPENDICULAR WITH LAST DESCRIBED UNE, A VISTANCE OF 30.00 FT.;THENCE N 00'15'4T E.PARALLEL WITH SAID FAST LINE OF U S. Pape i of 2 IR1548 4 PGA 2 5 7 9 GOVERNMENT LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 60.29'FT- TO THE AFORESAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U,S. HIGHWAY NO. 1 AND A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CURVE WHOSE RADIUS POINT UES S 00'2Y14" W, IB59.06 FT; THENCE RUN EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGW4W-WAY LINE AND THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF acr4s-44 A DISTANCE OF 29.37 FT. TO THE P.T. OF SAID CURVk;THENCE 8 8reWor E. ALCING BAIT) SOUTH RIGHT-Or-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF&19a Fr.TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,BEING AND LYING IN SECTION 27.T17WN8HIP go SOUTH,RANGE 29 EAST.MONROE COUNTY.FLORIDA. ��•No Rbk COUNTY - OFFICIAL RECORDS 1 08=Olson BSM APPROVED Parcels MR IL mu ��D>ltfi�t,�1r 00 Revised Desafplion Includes Submerged Parcel Pape 2 of 2 . U This Instrument Prepared By and Please Return To: l Tony Blair '. American Government Services Corporation DoaQ 1618735 12/28/2N6 2:52PM 3812 W.Linebaugh Avenue Filed d Recorded in Official Records of Tampa,Florida 33618 t'IONROE COUNTY •ORNNY L. KOLHAGE AGS#16834 12/20/2000 2:52PM WARRANTY DEED DEED aoc STMP a.: Pu =zss.ee (STATUTORY FORM-SECTION 689.02,F.S.) h inTH S NDENTURE, made this day of ,'AD, 2006, between Jane Crotidea TovrDaend, D'w 1616T3EF whose a dress is 94 00 SW 981h Street, Mlami, FL 33176, grantor, and the Bkq 2266 1`9111 874 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, whose post office address is do Florida Department of Envimnmental Protection,Division of State Lands,3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Slallon 115, Tallahnsaee, FL 32399-3000, grantee, (Wherever and berda the terms"grantor"and"grantee"Include all the parties to this Instrument and their heirs, legal representatives, lot caa,rs and assigns. "Grantor"and"grantee"are used for dopier and plural,as Ike contest requires and the NOW any gender shag Include all genders.) WITNESSETH:That the said grantor,for and in consideration of Ike sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable considerations, Io said grantor in hand paid by said grantee,the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted,bargained and sold to the said grantee,and grantees successors and assigns fomver,the following described land aitunic,lying and being Jn Monroe County,Florida,to-wit: See Exhibit"A"attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. Property Appraiser's Parch)Identification Number:00193750-000000 This conveyance is subject to easements,restrictions,limitations,and conditions of record if any now exist, but any such interests that may have been terminated arc not hereby re-imposed. This property is not the homestead property of the grantor,nor contiguous to homestead property,as such homestead is defined under Florida law. AND the said grantor does hereby iblly warrant the title to said land,and will defend the some against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal,die day and year first above written. Signed,sealed and delivered in th= of (Signs a of First Witness) Jane Crowden Townsend �0(LcQJA V-0b.S (Printed,Typed or Stamped Name of First Witness eie�G ignature of Second Witness) os .�elf ranted,Typed or Stamped Name of Second Witness) Doex 1618735 Bkq 2280 P9p 87j STATE OF COUNTY OF%Auas: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,1_day of , Jane Crowden Townsend. Such person(Notary Public must check appfioable box): 2006,by ( }is personally known to me. produced a ti r Tian produced as identification. T JAI fxa (NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) No ublic (Printed,Typed or Stamped Name of Notary PubJic) NI C Jeannette Mat tlnez -WM6WM 0 DDWwj Commission No.: '•"�� Plr eye.- 21. R0iro My Commission Expires: (� L'%'vable Commune Ks e Ptoigtam y Mas n f0jr uture Developme t of Big P F1i-4,e Key Ad No Na m Key K Monroe County AMENDED Planning and Environmental EFFECTIVE Resources Department 09-17-09 p9 BY ORD. 020-2009 August 2004 �� SEE ATTACHED COUNTY OF MONROE Big Pine Key/US 1 Corridoi- Area Enhancement P1,111 STATE-OWNED LAND' WADS V"RRVAnaJ WMW4WAL. AZISA6 1VTW MV$M ARMT. Will a; R6,66MLY&EAWD 4F 6xisn4c FOAP PRJQ* USES rporosw FOR 4,0mmoft/ AVAR,ARL6 FOR LAW U W_9F.A*n6WAi_ SS 5eAM IMPROVEMENTSI Vlew ; TO % L rwAf eANKFL 0 ? J -A TU MT' f rn Lu� . ...... j TO IATnZ 1 r 1Z I f �, ..... i TORCH KZYI 401 *4&01 J, ! •� '�. o •, KEY WEST 1 ! il i . L :,C Z L_j _L J L • 0PF'0J2TUW ITY TO arMIMN rrr e?-FATU WeeTrpWl W560WD*"e 'QJNCET ' 6ATeWA1( QWL, FOWr 4J S IDo1.. T19 free W%Tartw 50crlow H16HWA OF "PRIP012 OPPORTUNITIEFt AND CONSTRAINT-S Due to the status of US 1 as a major thoroughfare and Big Pine Key's location as the northernmost of the Lower Keys,the corridor is nfe with various opportunities for improved traffic management,revitalization,image building and revitalization. The opportunities for gateways/portals and places of public interest exist at either end and at the center of the corridor. The tracts of land at the eastern and western sections of the US 1 corridor may be enhanced to define ingress and egress to/from the corridor 0 2003 HELLMUTH,OBATA+KASSABAUM,INC thel101(PlannftGroup new!JrbanStudo COUNTY OF RO • • d• .L _ 1 - 1 - 1 - .1.. _ L J_ _ _ J cr — � — T — ' — T._ T — T — T _ T _ T._ T — T _ T _ T--) a. A a b C - r _ r - t.' I 7 Vision Plan Special Areas:The West Park Similar to the proposed East Park,the West Park forms a gateway on the corridor. In this instance,however,it is largely an'exit gate- way'for traffic leaving Big Pine Key and heading further south to the rest of the Lower Keys. As such,it is also vital that a lasting final impression of Big Pine Key is left with departing visitors. As with East Park and the overall landscape enhancements along the corridor, naturally occurring native plant species are to be utilized. The West Park is a more activity-based,resident-oriented public amenity. Apart from serving as a buffer to eastbound traffic on US 1 and forming a gateway on this end of the corridor,the West Park is also ideally located for water based activities and famous Key sunsets. a. A double bracket trellis forms a gateway to the West Park. This mirrors the bracket trellises at the East Park;together, these park features anchor both ends of the US 1 through Big Pine Key,create finite visual boundaries and"bookend"the corridor with a unified image. b. The character of the West Park is loose and naturalized with hedgerows and tree rows which help to screen undesirable views of the highway traffic as well as screen and absorb vehicular noise. c The park would be the western terminus for the enhanced Big Pine Key walking and biking trails with a development of shelters and public pavilions. A special arrangement is provided at the water's edge along North Pine Channel for view- ing sunsets. ®2003 HELLMUTH,OBATA+KASSABAUM,INC theHOKPhnrWiSGroup newurbanStudio Livable Commun&eys Master Plan for Original BOCC Adoption 08/2004: Sig Pine Bey and No Name Key Amended by Ordinance 020-2009 GOAL b Provide facilities for the active and passive recrea- tional needs of all age groups in the community while avoiding unnecessary impacts to the protected species Current Conditions Summary The LCP process identified a strong need for recreational facilities. The final vision included addition of a major park and recreational facility somewhere within the planning area and the possible addition of some smaller parks. The county is moving forward immediately with plan- ning for the major park. The old Mariner's Resort property on the eastern shoreline of Big Pine Key has been purchased and the county is proceeding with plans for major recreational facilities at that site. Scarified land both north and south of US-1 at the western end of Big Pine Key is �--- also publicly owned and was identified as an area that may be appropriate for a passive sunset park- Other major county-owned recreational sites within the planning area include Watson's Field and the Blue Heron facility. Scattered"pocket parks"maintained by the county or by individual neighborhoods also exist throughout the planning area The county has a branch library located in the Winn Dixie Shopping Center and arrangements have been made to expand the library into existing vacant floor area at that site. This expansion may be able to accommodate some meet- ing facilities for the community although the extent of this is not yet known. For public hearings and meetings the community uses facilities located at the Big Pine School or at one of the com- munity organization buildings on Big Pine Key. Analysis of Community Needs Develop Major Recreational Facilities Monroe County has recently purchased the old Mariner's Resort property for development of major recreational facilities on Big Pine Key. The planning process for this site has begun. This will fulfill the need for one large recreational site anticipated during the LCP/HCP process. Two more sites of approximately 3 acres each were also anticipated. These will most likely be lo- cated near U.S. 1. During the LCP process,a desire by the Catholic Church to possibly build an athletic field on their property was also identified. Expand County Branch Library The Big Pine branch of the Monroe County Library is in need of expansion. The Big Pine com- munity is also in need of reliable meeting facilities that may or may not be connected to the li- brary. Therefore, an allowance for a 7,500 square foot facility (5,000 s.£ expansion over exist- ing)was included in the HCP modeling effort. Although the library is planning to expand at its current leased site, the accommodation of a new building should remain in the Master Plan to allow planning flexibility over the entire twenty-year horizon. Land Use and Redevelopment Element 51 Livable CommunMeys Master Plan for Original BOCC Adoption 08,2004: Big Pine Key and No Name Key Amended by Ordinance 020-2009 Plan Neighborhood Recreation. The extent of existing neighborhood recreational facilities such as playgrounds and boat ramps needs to be identified and the sites evaluated. These areas should be evaluated for utilization of existing facilities and the need for new facilities. The HCP modeled up to seven new `pocket park"sites in designated subdivisions. Recommended Strategies and Actions Strategy 6.1 Plan for recreational and community facilities over the next twenty years to be consistent with the community vision and development plan selected through the Livable CommuniKeys plan- process to meet the needs of Big Pine Key and No Name Key residents. Planned facilities shall also be consistent with the incidental take permit and the accompanying Habitat Conserva- tion Plan for the Florida Key Deer and Other Protected Species. Action Item 6.1.1: Designate and develop the property currently known as "Mariner's Re- sort" for the purpose of meeting the active recreation needs of the community over the twenty-year planning horizon. Action Item 6.1.2: Allow up to three new public parks on disturbed and/or scarified uplands to be located within the U.S. 1 Corridor Area. The intent of this Action Item is to provide for the needs of the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail and the U.S. 1 Corridor Area design guidelines (see Community Character Element). Therefore, these two purposes shall be given priority for park designation. Action Item 6.1.3: Allow up to seven new neighborhood"pocket parks"on disturbed and/or scarified lands in any of the following subdivisions: Pine Channel Estates Cahill Pines and Palms Doctor's Arm Palm Villa Sands Eden Pines Colony Port Pine Heights Neighborhood parks are intended to provide minor local recreational opportunities within walking and/or biking distance of most residents served. Pocket parks may include passive and or active recreational uses such as green space, boat ramps, tennis courts, volleyball courts,playgrounds and similar uses. Action Item 6.1.4: Allow expansion of the existing county library to be located on scarified/ disturbed uplands within the U.S. 1 Corridor Area Land Use and Redevelopment Element 52 Marathon-Sunshine Key-Big Pine Key-No Name Key-Uttle,Middle&Big Torch KeyRammd KeySummedaftd KeyCudjoe i(ey-Sugarloaf Key ryi c � VOLUME 13, No. 20 JUNg 21, 2013 FREE a.a.a ftp1 But if that 1:11111111 Tourists Devehtpm�Cmal vwd mad of which Dw P jiaga, swim /dole gets.approval But residents lost use of the situ biicka end Cattily OfBolela ate keen an a`� duds" two that alter a sacxsefbl rebAbllitodom could BB In the bhtsdre. tltb water access the elders for a pod of 40linded pilot The Out Step Is to Acquire the uefor e Pitovides, tttrpaD of the plane whales about a decade agm,Dgp, 1 lease fkom i7gP w teat Lek et�cagop lauauhea xncemed with the wafer . can am an the project�ys by bly a dingy dock for use isles on the•site,after the to Trish mltb. c trassparts.Ye, Y Uveabosrd boaters iu whales spent months iu the Old don*rim�base Is inucor�t� borrow pit three.Closed the area Place.the design an the me f remain in to public use, can go fbtsrotd And it di PWM the site will also bomt an :tinned over to the co f� o�� lower far viewing N APPM IAL tie fat lilt Y 11Wa Prof- and educadatmi kdoska that will u �team faf Jell outline whet peopia ore Boeing in There have ioP�m gtto. the warms in fttrui of them. been swim-anal The area used to lisle popular �6 hole�Pro�ttty ov the er thewas ninagedd gathering spot for r to loadEbb when it Mity lrllesa� aa.almeaoo Yews Barometer rna a _APPROVAL from ftge A It was reopened briefly a few years ago when the the Pto*L bike path was being built.but has since been gated That area wait delineated in the Uveable and padlocked. Cummuni-Keys plan for Big Pine Key as part of the Other pans of the old plats for the site include a Corridor Enhancement Plan as an entrance way boardwalk through the foliage surrounding the site pork for the Island when that document was devel- �Y St gYg eBTaB with educational placards detailing the host of oped nearly a decode ago. wve.aee native plans that grow on the site. Without state motley.'The$l million is enough Designers have had issues with vehicular axes to make that site usable as a passive park for the res- It appears as though the old swimming hole at the western to the area,winch is located on the ocean side of Big Wants of Big Pine Key sold the visitors that use the entrance toBig Pine Key may finally be on a path to re-open for Pine dhectly across the street from Strike Zone trail,"said County Englaw Kevin Wilson. nubile use. Chatters on the west end Part of the aceeill roues DEP also owns the vacant land no the north side 'he Monroe Board of County Commissioners Tuesday agreed to %temmed from sight distmrce issues with the curve of LS I at that location,but there are currently no ,uthodze up to$1 million from future capital funds to develop a that enters Big Pine northbound on US I on that end plans in the works for that piece of property. panive park on the site that has been closed to public use for near- of The island.But shove concerns were addressed by The LCP also suggested that another gateway iy a decade. The land is owned by the state Department of tratiic plonaers. park be developed on the east and of Bit Pine Key !3mironmental Protection. Smith says she is currently in die muddle of a where the triangle is now between the end of the At Wednesday's meeting, the BOCC agreed to pursue a lease grant cycle for overlook monies,so it shouldn't be curve on US 1 and Avenue A.but no mention has 'ram that state apri y for the site,clearing the way for actual that long before money to develop the site comes been me&of that facility since the pion was adnpt- 'esign work to begin at the location, available.From there,it will depend on how long it rid eight years ago. But mnney from county coffers may never be an issue for the old takes project management to design,bid and build Ilse site might be underway in a year. wimming hole pmjei.t.County staff Is currently working on state a■.� __ !rants through the Overseas Heritage Trail scenic overlook Pro- mm that would pmhobly drover the entire cost of the project. `�dPP1t011111 on Prop 8 Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Page 1 of 4 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: Bahama Village Connectivity Project-Fort St. Enhancements Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council): City of Key West Contact Carolyn Sheldon Title Senior Grants - ,/idlpinistrator„�, Address 3140 Flaciler Avenue,Key West, Florida 33040 Phone 305 809-3741 ' FAx1305)809-3739 Email: csheldon@keywestcity.com Priority(relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor) 4 Name of Applicant(if other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities, transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies,school districts, local education agencies,or schools; tribal governments,other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. 1.Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined in Title 23 USC, Section 213(b)which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section(101) ® Construction, planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle Infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals,traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure; and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ❑ Construction, planning and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers,Including children,older adults,and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians,bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ❑ Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas ❑ Community Improvements including: 0 Inventory, control,or removal of outdoor advertising • Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities • Vegetation management practices In transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against Invasive species and provide erosion control;and O Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. Traaaportation Alt=atiM Prom Application—FDOT Distriol 6 Page 2 of 4 ❑ Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for 0 Stormwater management, control,water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11), 32(a)and 329 0 Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning,designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program (Section 1404).Note:ff you check one of these,please also submit a Safe Routes application. ❑ Infrastructure-related projects: Planning,design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements,traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements,on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities,and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Icon-infrastructure-related activities:to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders,traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment,and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed?(check all that apply) ❑ Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. ❑ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acquisition ® Construction ❑ Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function,proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). (c) Where is the project located(and what are the termini, If appropriate)?Indude location map. (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Summarize any spedal characteristics of project (a) Describe the projects existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented(i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition,expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. TnmpwUlim Alt=Mives PmgM1n Application—FDOT District 6 Page 3 of 3. Project Implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. It is Important to provide as detailed and accurate a project schedule and cost estimate as possible. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing(i.e. contract or In-house)and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial,environmental and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal requirements. (b) Provide a detailed project schedule including any permitting and/or land/right-of-way acquisition required (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project. (Examples include written endorsement,formal declaration, resolution,financial donations or other appropriate means). t (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability/use. (a) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. 4. Project Cost: What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ 0 Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ 0 Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ Right of Way Acquisition. $ 0 Construction. Please note• Cycle 1 Funding $ 1,000,000.00 Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ 0 Other. (Describe) $ 0 TOTAL: $ 0.00 How will the project be funded? FDOT Altematives Funds$ 1,000,000.00+ Local $ 0 = Total$1,000,000.00 FDOT Altematives Funds 100 % + Local 0 % = 100% --- Tnwspondim Altallatives Amgmm Application—FDOT District 6 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by City of Key West (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council)and that said entity will: (1)provide any required funding match; (2)enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation;(3)-comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and(4)support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. ignatu 'V dan Vitas Name(please type or print City Manager Title ��I-ZFJ2 Datd FOR MOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program Transportation Alternatives Program Application—Fmorr District 6 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT SIX 2013 TAP APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2.b. The proposed improvements will provide an ADA compliant access route along with a vehicular way that will meet or exceed the minimum design standards. 2.c. The project is located in the"Old Town"area of Key West and more specifically the Bahama Village neighborhood. Please see attached location map. 2.d. The contemplated project includes multimodal connectivity opportunities with an emphasis on"walkable community"features, development of uniform design standards for the public realm including existing and proposed bicycle paths, streets, sidewalks, lighting, entry features, signage, landscaping, street furniture, drainage, sewer, electric, and related issues. Please see attached typical sections. 2.e. Fort Street is documented on the 1874 T.J Ashe Plat of the City of Key West as a 30.0' right-of-way. 2.f. No right-of-way acquisition required. 2.g. Currently there or no other phases of this project underway. 2.h. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase multimodal connectivity on and between Duval Street and the Truman Waterfront Parcel in order to facilitate movement between the existing historic community fabric and the proposed waterfront development area. The corridors addressed by this multiple phased project are shown on the attached location map, and include portions of two north/south roads(Duval Street and Fort Street), as well as portions of Southard Street, Angela Street, Geraldine Street, Petronia Street, Olivia Street, Truman Avenue, Julia Street, Virginia Street and Amelia Street which are generally located between the Truman Waterfront Parcel and Duval Street. 3.a. The City will competitively bid the project to obtain an FDOT pre-qualified contractor and CEI. City staff will perform grant and project administration. Please see attached Report of Previous Funding Awards. 3.b. Please see attached project schedule. 3.c. Please see attached City Commission Resolution#08-163 3.c. The City of Key West will retain full ownership and responsibility of these right-of-way improvements. 3.d. The City will provide in-kind services (project administration)during construction and include, as a matter of procedure, any required match in its capital improvement plan and annual budget. 3.e. The City held four public meetings during the design phase to provide "community awareness"of this proposed project. If funded, it is the City's policy to hold a public meeting, prior to construction, to keep the residents informed. At all times City staff is available to address residents questions/concerns about the project. � ITMAASH iLJ SIMOWON Sr. L ML ST I _0wD0 1 DWAL ST. r---�— —r —T— � � DUISST. � � I� %MiREHEAD ST. I I , WH�TEHEAD ST. /HrrEHEAD I I TERRY LN. I I I THonue sr. � � � I nionaAs sr. iL Iao,Asr. I I I (Q � I j I � ` ll g _ a a ! ! I I. ! f - D 1 1 i �W RAw Nom a! 41, —— EXTERNAL ROADWAY HANCEMENT CITY OWNED TRUMAN WATERFRONT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP COST ESTIMATE DETAIL Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs $1,263,895.00 Estimated Construction Cost Increase (CPI + 3%/yr) 201 306.00 Sub-Total $1,465,201.00 Key West Factor(15% markup) $ 219,780.00 Construction, Engineering and Inspection (7.5%) $ 109,890.00 High Power Transmission Line Relocation (2) 1 200,000.00 Total Estimated Project Costs $1,994,871.00 (knHorn �and+ Inc PROJECT:Bahama Village/Truman Waterfront Connectivity Projects PROJECT#: 144481000 CLIENT:City of Key West Monday, February 28,2011 FORT STREET-OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Roadway,Drainage,Landscape,Hardscape,and Roadway LlghSng "Mho Engineer has no control ovw the coat of labor;matgdal%squlpment orsendcas furnished by offiwa,or ovw the COnbaetor's method.of detwndning Pulse.,Or orwcMPSUUve WddbW wmarind condlCons. OPInkns ofyoboble costs provided heroin are based on the lnlbrmatlon known to We Englne.r at"Coss and represent only the Eng/neer"s Judgment as s design WaGsalonal f "War wHh drs construcdon Imlushy. The Engbrew cannot and does not gum mes that proposals,bkls,or eMal condrocCon casts wM act vary hom Its opinion of probable costs.• ROADWAY PAY IT8M8 PAY DESCRU-MN UNR PROJECT UNIT PROJECT REM NO. gUANTRY t:08T COST 101-1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 000 000 102-1 MAINTENANgg OF TRAFFIC LS 1 6 000.00 525= 104-103 PREVENTION CONTROL&ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION LS 1 WO 100-1 AS-BUILTS LS 1 $W000.00 $10.000 110.1-1 CLEARING&GRU19BING LS $36.0D0.00 $35 000 110.14A CLEARING&GRUBBING SELF LS S10.000.00 $10.DDO 120.1 GULAR EXCAVATION CY 1,747 DO 13 878 120-6 EMBANKMENT CY 27 $115.00 S4 05 1804 TYPE"B•STABILIZATION BY 4 852 $2.50 311 830 7D4 CEMENTED COQUINA BASE BR 100 BY 21.7 17JT0 38p 708 CEMENTED COOLNNA BABE R 100 1 SY 3,840 vapp 1-13 SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE(TRAFFIC C TN 412A $176.00 372170 7-7-32 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE FRICTION COURSE ITRAFFIC C FC3.5 RUBBER TN 308 $2DO.00 1 Z6-1,201 INLETS CURB P3 c10' EA 8 .00 1 26.1,209 INLETS CLIRB J-B 0 EA 2 83".001 $7,000 251-711 INLETS at rTTEnl Mc1 FA 1 $z=.0G1 S2.Wo 2B•231 MANHOLES P-8)(clCn EA 3 SUD0.00 HOLES -g (PARTIAL) FA 2 100.00 25-2-71 OLES J e1 FA 1 S4.6M.00. $4,5pp 26.6.1 MANHOLE-ADJUST ES EA 7 .00 Km 268 VALVEBOX-ADJUST EA 12 S300.00 SUM 30-174-118 CONC.PIPE CULVERT 1 SD LF 3 40 174-124 CONC.PIPE CULVERT 4-SDI LF 276 JXl 4 750 1-10 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER E LF $30.00 9 Z0.&4 CONCRETE CURB LF 331 .00 75 2 8 CONCRETE CURB FADER ! LF 378 I&M 586 1 fX1NCRETE SIDEWALK 4"THICK BY 1 .Op 1920 •2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8"THICK BY 86.4 0. 00 1-2 ARC MURAL P VERS BY 121 N&OC 11 AN 10-220 FENCING(TYPE B 5.1'-6.1 (STANDARD) LF 200.5 1000 006 FENCE GATE fTYPE B (DOUBLE)24.11-30.0' OPENING RELOCATEI EA 1 .DO 080.16 METER SOX EA 30 5676.00 17 Z60 QADWAY SUBTOTAL- > 3M FORT Pape 17 SIGNNG&PAVEMENT MARKNO PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT REM NO. QUANTITY COST COST 11 SINGLE VAST SIGN LESS THAN 12 SF AS 32 1475.00 16 20-11C VEHICULAR WYAYRNOING SIGN MINGLE POST 2 000.00 12 000 11-11-121 THERMOPLASTIC MANQ46RD H SOLID LF 3 1.50 S28 11-11-124 THERMOPLASTIC XTANDARD HITE SWD1 flAnLF 49 VLDD 147 11-11- THERMOPLASTIC ANDARO HTTE 80L1D 24 LF 47 54.00 1 88 1-11141 THEI MbPLASTIC STANDAFW H SIGP LF 61 1.00 $61 711-11-180 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD)(WMTq WEMAGp FA 24 M.00 47 ,200 11-11-180 THERMOPLASTIC CSTAHDARD TTE YIELD LINE LF 10 l-W t15 11-11-221 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD UW (SOLID)6 LF 738 00 1a 11-11.421 I THERMOPLASTIC[STANDARD) UE)[soLID1 LF 128 1.50 192 NINQ A PAVMT MARK=SUBTOTAL m m LANDSCAPE PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT TT®1NO. QUANTITY COST COST 519-78 STREET BOLLARD FA 6 1 550 19-78A BIKE EA 3 .� IY1-2 PERFORMANCETURF SOO COMMON SERAIII SY 634 .00 67 12A MULCH BY 15.8 .OD j 02 5T0 -1A TOPSOIL CY 139.0 15,t)D -1A E MP MALL SHRUBS EIHE�7EA JASS 110-00 14 1-16 LANDSCAPE COMPLETE N3MALUMEDIUM M AKTS EA 5 1 550 1-2 LANDSCAPE CQRGIIXT .LARGE PLANTS EA 5 .0D 1-74-1 TRA69H RECEPTA EA 8 .00 1 1-75-1 BENCHES EA 4 .OD 10000 1 77 BIKE RACK 52,250 EA 3 50,00 LANDSCAPE SUBTOTAL m $211787 LIGHTING PAY ITM PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT I PROJECT UNNNT PROJECT TT®lNO. QUANTITY COST coBT 162-11 CONDUIT SCHEDULE UNDERGROUND 2M1G� 4B0 T154,300A LIGHT POLE COMPLETE FURNISH&INSTALL EA 4B .00 912 6-7-11 LOAD CENTER 8 CONDARY VOLTAGE EA 1 87 5P0.00 VAN 15-14-11 PULL BOX CONCRETE [ROADSIDE) EA 51 $3.0n hjumma inuijwrmrvr SM2,Na ALTERNATE BID ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITM NO. QUANTITY COST COST 52S-1-20 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CROSSWALKS SY 121 a u,ikU TERNATE BID SUBTOTAL m T RAND TOTAL m 111.14820 ENCYm 10% $114JM PROJECT TOTAL m St 895 Pay Item Footnote; 1.Opinion of probable cost(OPC)Is based upon 100%construction Plana dated February 2011. I 0 KT Peps is t i 6 Y � 3 a } � y mW c a zd i e f V OC ' O 2 m rO N H Sw L N w N U Z a Q 2 Z w H w w CC R LL U �e w he I O � a > m _ Z w 0 w w Yt d n z LU 3 a � Q v QM A ux� o o an Sd g s N W ¢ 0 O a W b ¢ $ C9 Z any u L ' e m ` 3xAs•1six3 O Q}Z3F O ap,1 l dos C� hh 's + m 5 of �� ml !! 8 a - x 3mn AVa'15YX3 W Y� WQ a` 3:lL J i ' W 14 �iNil N O 3N(7 ev_a•1SlX3 IN gh N + il 1 N Q h m N P W 3 a WQ e `) r M: A i au r 3 ,N/N'lSlx3 SR 100 01 to V � F- ea 01 Vl Q _ j 3Nn wa is1x3— k� r e al a N m � Q ~ Lp 4 _ � Z a PREVIOUS FUNDING HISTORY M tp t0 C O 'a N vLl Q C 1 U Z z z Z C z \ z z E ti• a a a a E a a a d � •�, z z z z � � z z z C CD CDE d N \ 1 \ N E �N„ N N cn c i o o Ncn n N p N ec3ii ONO Ln � 1!1 N DD O m N M H n � H +n .n vy 4^ v► v> v> v► a CD g0 ; Ln' w L6 a yyyyll '��r o iGGGff u1 to m Ln ui of i N M �/} Vy v► sn. v► y} yh g o m ern o �7 p 0 rn o `� N No p m Ln +� a rn m cn tm Ln Ln n M Li .,. t/? t/f t1f i/? to N V► iA 0 c a Otj � ° m c c c � o h �' M y c a c e a .a _o a` _o a N c ii ii ii c`3 z - Q Q a c a d y a+ C �U+ E D oc u o+ cu 4 Ln Ln Ol CD 0 22H N :0% 16 cm ` " $ \ wm1 � � o � n � mavr`i d � v In O u1 O \ pyp M \ V PR \ "a n `, ZD 0 viLLa Ito LLa LLahLLa S c� LL. aaLLazLLa u a � c a a a a a a a a a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z z co a a a a a a a a a a a a •g z z z z z z z z z z z z � o z z z z z z z z z z z z z IL E °� o c §1 o g �' o $� c �+ a1 c o c _.. jz! �. g N N N O O tp tD tD l0 �D to lD 3 N N N M M ei ry �y �y Im c d 8 p Cp O Gp p Cp ..+ , i O O o O O O O M CD a p M C N 00 00 4 O O M CO N . M o N 01 V} V? V? in V1 to V} y} m A tL O O caq Lr? S ILn O O pOp O S [ND VMS t0 n N ppipp LO M 01 N pOppp N d 1n 00 OD 00 1 1 1 U 1 N 1D N N 17p1 Qpp n N I- f- 00 10 h' N 1D' 1D � ri N �. l0 �Y 0�0 M H rq ri o W L Vl V} i/} V? K/f V} V? V} V? N 1/1 V► d p p q 01/1_ 0 p OLI) p O ci In p § 0 N rn M co m ►l o o w O r,n 3 ILn o m P. ccoo n M m N N N N W U V V V V U U �O! U U O) C C C C C C C C G C C c a c a c Q e ° ,° ,° ro ° Z c Q I rL InLL U LL CDlL 0) LL U IL Ol IL W IL 7J tL 0) LL 0 Il W LL N V 8 tVj a a a < ¢ a a a a a a a a g ro Ln I» �1 Ln oo r� c a1 Ln Ln a o .� In m e�i a o a L us a c a ay-I rrI Do p00 N N . .M-1 '�7 N N �r rNi ' eyi N a�- CC I }r Ina In a s In a a a y a ee a a Ln y1 IA N 00 N N \ N C1 YI N a N y N Z N C N M G N \ C lD \ is \ WQ a ° a N N st as v N v .1 st .--I '� v .1 ° v rl n. W4 LL a 1 LL a 4 g a g a 0 LL a LL a LL a W LL a 5 LL a LL ¢ 3 LL a W LL a v In ko o0 01 N rn ri Ln 4� : � 4 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z qk O Z 0 z z z z z z z z z CM � 00 00 00 00 00 t\D t0 l`p � 4 S pp 61 a tLoD. fm O n V1 000 O O N {C b M cn � coaN Ln Ln 06 0 Ln Om 1QC� !� 01 N N W O O M c N m m Lf o a w �? +n in Ito in V? v} en V? 44 m a Ln a o 0 0 Ln 0Ng O (n G coC co 0�0 m m O N m N Iq at Ln Cr ll1 m lekDD tl01' lmD Ch M N W C Q 122 V1 v ^ iI} 4I! d p pp O O O O O ppp p p p N N 00 h nj O ppO m a 1n 00 �-1 ct In M N O Infl Crl LnD t�r1 00 •� � a o v 00 aN °c4 ca tlf +n N v} to v> cn yr v> v► T c c c c c _ p a u u c c c p c CL c a c '�°� r m +� a c a S c a U. LL V l.L V LL V LL U LL U N C 1L {w{,� U- 0J a a Q a Q U m 00 8 U a N Q a 61 00 N M M U ir Ix V v m A A. � � Q c c s rq = o .-1 .-1 Q -4 a .i q a r., .-i s`{ a N c-1 4 rl � d N m d o h dh w v ui ¢w 2 m 00 w 8 r: +n E 6 N ,6 m ob Ln m tD `� E lD `� .+ In �D \ h N lD \ `� ,ail g N ' aw`� � `_-° vim a a � °ssarn my a ^ 'A ►LU- I.La $ LL LlLLa § LLacU- a UairU- a cD n 00 rn o rry m N N N CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION Please note: The Resolution included in this application submittal was passed to ratify the LAP Agreement for the project. This demonstrates the City has planned to see the project through construction. RESOLUTION NO. 08-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, RATIFYING THE ATTACHED LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT -- FPN #415406-2, BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR DUVAL STEET/TRUMAN ANNEX IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $491,964.00; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 : That the attached Local Agency Program is hereby ratified. Section 2 : That this Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and adoption and authentication by the signature of the presiding officer and the Clerk of the Commission. Passed and adopted by the City Commission at a meeting held this 3rd day of June , 2008 . Authenticated by the presiding officer and Clerk of the Commission on June 4 , 2008 . Filed with the Clerk June 4 2008 . MORGAN HERSON, MAYOR ATTE T: CHERYL SMITV CITY CLERK of rr�ci TO: JIM SCHOLL, CITY MANAGER FROM: ROLAND FLOWERS P.E., CITY ENGINEER DATE: April 23, 2008 Subject: Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements FPN No. 415406-2, LAP Agreement Project Issues The City of Key West and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) would like to enter into an agreement known as a Local Area Program (LAP) agreement to support the Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2. The City of Key West is proposing to upgrade and or create ingress/egress routes construction/upgrade of roads, sidewalks, etc. Enhance the livable communities i.e. benches, bike racks, etc. along with interior recreation trails from Duval Street to the Truman Annex grounds. The FDOT is designated by the Federal Government to manage and distribute the funding and oversee the project from design to construction. The total amount for the project is $491,964.00. In order to receive the money budgeted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)the City of Key West will need to allocate the total amount budgeted for the FDOT project and initially pay for the project. Then the City of Key West will be reimbursed by FDOT through the Local Agency Program (LAP) division of District 6. This is standard procedure for FDOT projects involving Local Agencies utilizing the LAP program. The Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement assures the project is being performed according FDOT standards and guidelines. This also enables LAP to monitor the progress of the project and coordinate with the City of Key West any changes or modifications to approved plans. All reimbursement of budgeted FDOT money will be released through the Local Agency Program (LAP). Options 1. Authorize the LAP Agreements for Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 2. Do not authorize the LAP Agreements Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 Advantages/Disadvantages 1. The project will create safer conditions in traffic for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic by performing the above mentioned construction and improvements. 2. The disadvantage is that funding from FDOT will not be released for reimbursement unless the City of Key West enters into the Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement required by FDOT. Financial Issues FDOT has budgeted money in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) for the projects. The City will have to submit to FDOT for reimbursement as construction progresses. Recommendation Ratify the LAP Agreement Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) If I can be of further assistance or you require additional information, please call at 809-3965. Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Page I of 4 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: Bahama Village Connectivity Project Geraldine St, Enhancements Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council): City of Key West Contact Carolyn Sheldon Title Senior Grants Administratpl� Address 3140 Flagler Avenue, Key West Florida 33040 Phone 305 809-3741 ' FAx (3051809-Q739 Email: csheldon ke estci .corn Priority(relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor) Name of Applicant(if other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities,transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies, school districts, local education agencies,or schools; tribal governments, other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. I.Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined in Title 23 USC, Section 213(b)which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section(101) ® Construction,planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals,traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure,and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ❑ Construction, planning and design of Infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ❑ Construction of turnouts,overlooks and viewing areas ❑ Community Improvements Including: • Inventory, control,or removal of outdoor advertising O Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities 0 Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against Invasive species and provide erosion control;and • Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. Trnnsp"tion Alternatives Program Application—MOT District 6 Page 2 of 4 ❑ Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for ❑ Stormwater management, control,water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff Including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11). 32(a)and 329 O Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning,designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program(Section 1444).Note:if you check one of these, please also submit a Safe Routes application. ❑ Infrastructure-related projects: Planning, design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk Improvements,traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities,and traffic diversion Improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Non-infrastructure-related activities: to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders,traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health,and environment,and funding for training,volunteers,and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work Is being proposed?(check all that apply) ❑ Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. ❑ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acquisition ® Construction ❑ Construction Engineering and Inspection Activitles (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). (c) Where is the project located(and what are the termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects.Summarize any special characteristics of project (e) Describe the projects existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (Le plats, deeds, prescriptions,certified surveys). (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. (9) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. Tr=sportalioo Alitmatives Program Application—FDOT District b Page 3 or4 3. Project implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. ft is knpMtant to prov We as detailed end accurate s project Schedule and Cog a naft es possible. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing(i.e. contract or in-house)and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial, environmental and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal requirements. (b) Provide a detailed project schedule including any permitting and/or land/right-of-way acquisition required (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project.(Examples include written endorsement,formal declaration, resolution,financial donations or other appropriate means). (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability/use. (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. 4.Project Cost:What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ 0 Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ 0 Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ 0 Right of Way Acquisition. $ p Construction. $ 318 237.00 Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ 33,207.00 Other. (Describe) $ 0 TOTAL: $ 351444.00 How will the project be funded? FDOT Aitematives Funds$ 351,444.00 +Local $ 0 = Total $ 351,444.00 FDOT Altematives Funds 100 % + Local 0 % = 100% Transpottation Altumatives Program Application—FDOT DiMliet 6 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by City of Key West (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council)and that said entity will: (1)provide any required funding match; (2)enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3)comply wdh the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4)support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. Sign BoQdan Vitas Name(please type or print City Manager Title Da FOR MOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program Tmnsportalion Altematives Program Application—MM Distriet 6 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT SIX 2013 TAP APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2.b. The proposed improvements will provide an ADA compliant access route along with a vehicular way that will meet or exceed the minimum design standards. 2.c. The project is located in the"Old Town"area of Key West and more specifically the Bahama Village neighborhood. Please see attached location map. 2.d. The contemplated project includes multimodal connectivity opportunities with an emphasis on "walkable community"features, development of uniform design standards for the public realm including existing and proposed bicycle paths, streets, sidewalks, lighting, entry features, signage, landscaping, street furniture, drainage, sewer, electric, and related issues. Please see attached typical sections. 2.e. Geraldine Street is documented on the 1874 T.J Ashe Plat of the City of Key West as a 30.0' right-of-way. 21 No right-of-way acquisition required. 2.g. Currently there or no other phases of this project underway. 2.h. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase multimodal connectivity on and between Duval Street and the Truman Waterfront Parcel in order to facilitate movement between the existing historic community fabric and the proposed waterfront development area. The corridors addressed by this multiple phased project are shown on the attached location map, and include portions of two north/south roads (Duval Street and Fort Street), as well as portions of Southard Street, Angela Street, Geraldine Street, Petronia Street, Olivia Street, Truman Avenue, Julia Street, Virginia Street and Amelia Street which are generally located between the Truman Waterfront Parcel and Duval Street. 3.a. The City will competitively bid the project to obtain an FDOT pre-qualified contractor and CEI. City staff will perform grant and project administration. Please see attached Report of Previous Funding Awards. 3.b. Please see attached project schedule. 3.c. Please see attached City Commission Resolution##08-163 3.c. The City of Key West will retain full ownership and responsibility of these right-of-way improvements. 3.d. The City will provide in-kind services(project administration)during construction and include, as a matter of procedure, any required match in its capital improvement plan and annual budget. 3.e. The City held four public meetings during the design phase to provide "community awareness" of this proposed project. If funded, it is the City's policy to hold a public meeting, prior to construction, to keep the residents informed. At all times City staff is available to address residents questions/concerns about the project. M ARSH �J — I i TON ON ONTO ST- __I D^.� Ivw If`a� aco"I son ,.�� _ DWAL ST. -I Eo%osT. IW HREHEAD ST. WHrMKEAD . CD CAI i W a i TERRYLN. I Is I it Z THON"ST. to W - i - ❑� s � � I 6 NOM I NAVY 1 Wly i EXTERNAL ROADWAY HANCEMENT � �a CITY OWNED TRUMAN WA RONT PROPERTY p y F LOCATION MAP, COST ESTIMATE DETAIL Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs $245,869.00 Estimated Construction Cost Increase (CPI + 3%lyr) $ 30,859.00 Sub-Total $278,728.00 Key West Factor(15% markup) $ 41,509.00 Construction, Engineering and Inspection (12%) 33 207.00 Total Estimated Project Costs $351,444.00 Jmley-Hom 1=1 and Associates,Inc. PROJECT:Bahama Viliage/Truman Waterfront Connectivity Projects PROJECT 4: 144481000 CLIENT: City of Key West Monday, February 28,2011 GERALDINE STREET-OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Roadway,Drainage,Landscape,Handscape,and Roadway Lighting 'The EVhworhas no control over the cost orlabor,matedab:,o Wpment or ewvk*o rumh~by oVW a,or over the Conbactm a methods o/ determMing prkws,or over=nPWthre bidding ormarket cond(OW& Opkdons orprobable costs provided herein are based on the Inrororadon known to the Enghrear at rMe gore and represent only the EnphwerW]udgment as a dosbn prorasekn&f leml0er with the eonsbucdon hWusby The Eng►naer cannot and does not guarantee that propoads,blds,or actual conabuctton coats will not vary rrmn Its opkrlon or probable costs." ROADWAY PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM NO. QUANTITY COST COST 101-1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10000.00 100D0 102-1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1 S7,600-00S7 600 104-10.3 PREVENTION CONTROL b TEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION LS 1 pp � 105.1 AS43UILTS LS 1 D0 3000 110-1-1 CLEARING 6 GRUBBING LS 1 12 000.00 312 110.1-1A CLEARING S GRUBBING 8E 000 LS 1 000.00 120.1 REGULAR EXCAVATION L`Y 9B4 JXI 912 $ 000 1604 TYPE`S°STABILIZATION SY 615 M 708 CEMENTED COQUINA BABE(LBR 100 101 SY B00 .00 $15.000 1-13 SUPERPAVEASPHALTICOONCRETE RAFFIC C TN 65 $175.00 $11 37 7-7-M PHALTIC CONC FRICTION COURSE FIC C.FC-.6 RUBBER TN 40 2&&1 MANHOLE-ADJUST LITIES EA 2 OD.00 25.8 VALVE BOX-ADJUST EA 10 .00 $3 1-8 CONCRETE CURB GU1TT R F MODIFIED LF 432 1 620.1-10 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER LF 69 .00 070 24 CONCRETE CURB D LF 246 00 150 1 00 000 52D3 VALLEY GUTTER CO LF 229 ,DO 4 -9 CONCRETE CURB(HEADER) 12' LF 28 1b.00 5396 1 CONCRETE SIDEW 4°THK2C SY 273 W $16 380 2 CONCRETE SI B'THICK SY 10.5 0.00 735 12 ARCHITECTURAL PAVERS OADVYA SY 1t .00 1b ME 1 046 1 TER BOX U EA 12 5575.00 OADWAY SUBTOTAL- $138,11,111 SIGNING 6 PAVEMENT MARKING PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM NO. QUANTITY COST COST 00 20-11 SINGLE POST SIGN F81 LESS TFVW 12 AS 7 75.00 11-11-121 THERMOPLASTIC ANDARD H SOLID (r) LF 778 $1.50 1164 �11-11-1126 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD SOLID W LF 12 .00 11-11-160 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD IT MESSAGE EA 13 .00 900 11-11.170 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD HTTE ARROW EA 2 T ismal $1,100 SIGNING 8 PAVMT MARKING SUBTOTAL a SSM7 GERALpINE papa to LANDSCAPE PAY ITEM PAY DESCRIPTION UNR PROJECT I UNIT PROJECT R®1 NO.18-78 QUANTITY C08i COST STREET � 2 .� 1>;`78A BIIO:BOLLARD 5460 EA 1 00 0-1-2 PERFORMANCE TURF COMMON BERMUDA BY 87 .00 1-2A MUL Cy Cy 17 S7 1-2B TOPSOIL 1:3 1 00 1-1 LANDStAPECOMPLETE BMALLSHRUBS EA 820 1000 1-1 LANDSCAPE PLETE BMALLIMEDIUM PLANTS EA 7 .00 S2 4Wt 1-741 TRASH RECEPTACLE EA 1 1-751 BENCHES EA 1 0D M 1-77 BIKE RACK EA 1 60,00 7 51 E SUBTOTAL- $18.5% LNiHTINQ PAY RENB F DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNR PROJECT QUAMTRY COST COST CONDUR PVC 8CHEDt1LE UNDERGROUND LF 33fi1600LIGHT POLE COMPLETE URNIBN 8IN8TALL � 7MMOND 56W LOAD CENTER BECONDARY VOLTAGE EA 1 500.00 171W 15-4-11 PULL BOX(CONCRETE) D EA 7 E00 LIGNT$10 SUBTOTAL. isa ALTERNATE BID REM$ PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRO ECT UNR PROJECT RE7/NO. QUANTITY cm I C08T 1 ZB ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CROSSWALKS SY awp0 TERNATE BID SUBTOTAL a TOTAL- SM.517 ENCY- Pay Item Foobrote. 1. Opinion of probable oust(OPC)is based upon 100%oondnmoon Plena dated FeWumy 2011. MALDME Pop 20 a Y Y f s s a - g a 'a i a 3 a dt' m �W a If 2 3Pc a W u w {N 4'Y f w LU SZ � G W x V W o Q 2 � W w L N '•A r W W N W J M Q i W W a. u w m ? Zw ZY O � V a w Q "a W 0 C 6 C c° Q v m o ui E < z C Z N m At $ a o i 301 N4 T 3AV7"'lAX3 + 121, S R RI y p ~� c i4 O R Q I rill y}T m 3,W7 AVN'lAX3 : CA W 3 N R rQ qx t � N� � N PREVIOUS FUNDING HISTORY M lC N (O C O .fl u L h � 1Cp gy � o z z z z � z z z LU m a ' aUL 6 CD QQQ11 �.� �� \ \ •� E N N N p p N % N o m �a�pa Ln Tt N v Il1 1p O0 N 4 C M N M M a%-(i p C = W ""� N O An V1.1 ri N tL y a rn d al00 3 'a n m N a fm to M M N C1j �r N CL 6to c M M en m iA Vf O S O pM M O O p Ci to Ln Ol l0 O pp C1 ON1 lMC Ln ' C L1 •M-4 000 I N t} C w a N N t? to to LL Vf Vf y 3 H Op c u u u O y O V� Do ui O ra M p a+ C C C O O m C N LL U LL u LL u u a o. 3 a a a a bQ h CN L Q v�i Q y a lla� :0% LL. C V) t/� Y d a u1 +In �+ w y d+ t ob N \ O \ 00 \ y N R' M V1 m OD V1 dl ri tt he N d N c N if (+�J N N �i LO p`p h 01 �. \ ,w t�.q \ N \ a `S a er F $° a C v Q v c e d' a cCN {�V�+ `� c CN c C7 -H U- < W LL a � lL a N �L a F LL a s LL a z° LL a V d a a a a a a a a a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z z o g 1 a a a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z zz �e c � � z z z z z z z z z z z z z c pppO� ppOppll �, $ g g o V ��Eppp �`� ry ry N N N N N N N N O) N N N O O t\D {\O t\p t\Cl t\p t\D Cc IS ILt\D t\O t\G It\D t\ODo t\p 8 �u 14 g o ob g g in e qa� 3 �i m �O o iS '7 N Q ab Vf V! in i/} i/F VL in .n in +n an v► m C pp pp p i O O ONO_ rL LI O Ln C O O o 8 m m O 14 &n C G Opp N NO 3 a Ln 00 O 0000 tp at Ln N tD N Ln g c^n c^o 00 m L m rn � N a LL Q � of v> an +n in v� v► v► v} in. .uy d o g uoi, o uoi g o o v� tri ri m o LA to en o gn o Ln to P, O 00 N m ut m 00 Qa a Ln m of ^ o o co to m v 00 n m M N E v N .i .� ., Q e LL of to in a/1 an ih to in sn to v aw v w d v c c u u u u u u u a c a c c Q c a c c ° m e c a a c a c a c a c �° N LL lvl LL U lL U LA- N LL U LL U LL w l.L N Il 4t) LL V 11 u {- w a 4 Q a Q Q a a a 4 Q Q Ln m Ln o °i LnLn m Op�pp .� p0npp H6 H4 o� '0 w '" at '" .ti .i Q a a� OO 00 OC K m K n N Yi m cc ^ w = pb cc n \ ^ \ ^ 00 m a °� uN1 a s Lm a uNi a N a ,' a a Q ry Q �+ N N C N \ •+ 1p \ �p \ w \ �p \ �p \ a tC \ C d m CQ \ N tC \H M L tf N d ^ d. a' N d 0.�ad ~ Va ;c � a a W a v Ln w ^ 00 ch o 4 m m V z z z z z z z z z lz z z z •S y Q z z z z z z z z z as `o z z z z z z z z z EO O O O 01 O Op DO CC OO OO o g S y l\D ` to t\O Ln t\O t\O {\D t\O w ILtD O (\p t\O C tD m O O h Ln a40 O N p OC N tG co rm O N t�F N 0 1 (n Ln obi H a1 N N O tt H tD O O t+'f a = m enp o n M Q N K L} Sh N v► N N t? L} y d a ` g S S a?m Ln N N u`Vi m °� m m o 0 ti m M .�-4 .-i m r N d a t`no O1 rn n U. v> +� of +� v> w in to of v► ��ppp 8 S G d tt M 00 sCIA C14n-I In N O LNn n C N Ln 3 H � LL N An in t? i? iA V1 in N OJ N w O1 N G1 r N N V u u V V C Q. u u C C a c fl c a, c a c Q n' u° c a u tL tL u tt' u LL u lL V y (L 01 IJ. Gl u a a a a a a m y a a 0 CL Ln CL L !0 N J d N14 m « aacH $+ w cc2Mcc Eb, N doo � aroo L'S Ln dl y W N y� N CO d a a r v a v m et ^ eo nin IL LL a LL a a LL a g Q � a LL a M a CL ¢ " N N N rn N N CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION Please note: The Resolution included in this application submittal was passed to ratify the LAP Agreement for the project. This demonstrates the City has planned to see the project through construction. RESOLUTION NO. 08-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, RATIFYING THE ATTACHED LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT -- FPN #415406-2, BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR DUVAL STEET/TRUMAN ANNEX IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $491,964.00; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 : That the attached Local Agency Program is hereby ratified. Section 2 : That this Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and adoption and authentication by the signature of the presiding officer and the Clerk of the Commission. Passed and adopted by the City Commission at a meeting held this 3rd day of June , 2008 . Authenticated by the presiding officer and Clerk of the Commission on June 4 , 2008. Filed with the Clerk June 4 2008 . ATTE T: MORGAN DrHERSON,IMAYOR CHERYL SMITIO CITY CLERK tie y� B1s r ar, TO: JIM SCHOLL, CITY MANAGER FROM: ROLAND FLOWERS P.E., CITY ENGINEER DATE: April 23, 2008 Subject: Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements FPN No. 415406-2, LAP Agreement Project Issues The City of Key West and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) would like to enter into an agreement known as a Local Area Program (LAP) agreement to support the Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2. The City of Key West is proposing to upgrade and or create ingress/egress routes construction/upgrade of roads, sidewalks, etc. Enhance the livable communities i.e. benches, bike racks, etc. along with interior recreation trails from Duval Street to the Truman Annex grounds. The FDOT is designated by the Federal Government to manage and distribute the funding and oversee the project from design to construction. The total amount for the project is $491,964.00. In order to receive the money budgeted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) the City of Key West will need to allocate the total amount budgeted for the FDOT project and initially pay for the project. Then the City of Key West will be reimbursed by FDOT through the Local Agency Program (LAP) division of District 6. This is standard procedure for FDOT projects involving Local Agencies utilizing the LAP program. The Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement assures the project is being performed according FDOT standards and guidelines. This also enables LAP to monitor the progress of the project and coordinate with the City of Key West any changes or modifications to approved plans. All reimbursement of budgeted FDOT money will be released through the Local Agency Program (LAP). Options 1. Authorize the LAP Agreements for Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 2. Do not authorize the LAP Agreements Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 Advantages/Disadvantages 1. The project will create safer conditions in traffic for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic by performing the above mentioned construction and improvements. 2. The disadvantage is that funding from FDOT will not be released for reimbursement unless the City of Key West enters into the Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement required by FDOT. Financial Issues FDOT has budgeted money in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) for the projects. The City will have to submit to FDOT for reimbursement as construction progresses. Recommendation Ratify the LAP Agreement Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) If I can be of further assistance or you require additional information, please call at 809-3965. Page 1 of 4 Florida Department of Transportation, District Six 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: 1 Tr.lti Il ^'ill '�; �! Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or trib 111 jc` ncil): ��. Monroe County, Florida 2 6 2013 �,,,J Contact Trish Smith, AICP. Plannina & Environmental Resources. nager Address 2798 Overseas Highway. Marathon. FL 33050 Phone 305 304 0419 FAX Email: smith-oatricia®monroecounty-fl.gov Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor) Name of Applicant (If other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities, transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies, school districts, local education agencies, or schools; tribal governments, other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. 1. Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined in Title 23 USC, Section 213(b)which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section(101) Construction, planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 i Construction, planning and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ■Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas ❑ Community Improvements including: ❑ Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising ❑ Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities ❑ Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species and provide erosion control; and ❑ Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. I Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDo r Distnct 6 Page 2 of 4 ❑ Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for ❑ Stormwater management, control,water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11), 32(a) and 329 ❑ Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program (Section 1404). Note:if you check one of these, please also submit a Safe Routes application. ❑ Infrastructure-related projects: Planning, design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements,traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities, and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Non-infrastructure-related activities: to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders,traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed? (check all that apply) ' Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. ❑ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acquisition ❑ Construction ❑ Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). Rowell's Marina/s one of the last remaining large scale, waterfront properties on US 1 In Key Largo. Monroe County has plans to purchase the property for public access and recreation. The site lies adjacent to the US 1 right of way on the bayside and/s connected via a shared use path to the Key Largo community. A state trail(Overseas Heritage Trail)is located across US 1 in the northbound right of way. When the site/s opened to public access, h will become a stop along the Florida Keys Scenic Highway and the Overseas Heritage Trail. (c) Where is the project located (and what are the termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. The site is situated between US 1 and Florida Bay at MM 104.5/n Key Largo.A location map/s 1 attached. I Transportation Altematives Program Application—FDOT Distnct 6 Page 3 of 4 (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Summarize any special characteristics of project The Key Largo community has a strong desire for public access to the water. The community has asked Monroe County to pursue the purchase of Rowell's Marina, an abandoned a acre waterfront site on Florida Bay. The residents have asked to participate in a visioning process to develop a master plan for the site. It is anticipated that this site will be a stopping point and parking area for the Overseas Heritage Trail and the Florida Keys Scenic Highway. It will allow access to the Key Largo community via a shared use path on the bayside of US 1 and the Overseas Heritage Trail on the Oceanside of US 1. The county plans to hire a qualified consulting firm to facilitate the visioning process and to develop a final master plan for the site. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). The property is privately held. Monroe County is In the process of obtaining appraisals for the site In preparation for the pending acquisition. FDOT owns the US 1 right of way adjacent to the property. (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. No right of way acquisition is required for the master planning process. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. Monroe County has contracted for two separate property appraisals. The results of those appraisals are anticipated by the end of June 2013. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. This Is the last remaining large scale parcel in the upper Florida Keys. It provides an opportunity for upper Keys residents to enjoy waterfront activities In a controlled manner without Impacts to the US 1 right of way. We anticipate that a well-designed access management and parking plan will Improve conditions along the US 1 corridor and minimize the number of vehicles that park Illegally along the roadway. There are minimal opportunities for travelers along the scenic highway to experience publicly accessible scenic vistas and overlooks In the upper Keys. The master planning process will incorporate the goals and objectives of the Florida Keys Scenic Highway Master Plan and the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Master Plan. 3. Project Implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. It is important to provide as detailed and accurate a project schedule and cost estimate as possible. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house) and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial, environmental Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal Page 4 of 4 requirements. Monroe County will hire a qualified consultant through the Competitive Consultant Negotiation Process to facilitate the master planning process and to develop the final master plan. The project will be managed by Monroe County through FDOrs Local Agency Program. (b) Provide a detailed project schedule including any permitting and/or land/right-of-way acquisition required FDOT Award Notice—December 2013 FDOT Notice to Proceed—January 2014 Master Plan Complete—December 2014 (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project. (Examples include written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution,financial donations or other appropriate means). This project was requested by the Key Largo community as part of the Liveable Communikeys Program, a locally driven comprehensive planning Initiative. The Key Largo Liveable Communikeys Plan is Incorporated Into the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan by reference. (d)Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. N/A -Planning funds are being requested. No capital Improvements are being requested as part of this application. (e) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability/use. Monroe County has Incurred the cost of appralsa/s In preparation for acquisition negotiations. (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. 4. Project Cost:What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ $150,000 Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ Right of Way Acquisition. $ Construction. $ Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ Other. (Describe) $ TOTAL: $ $150,000 Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FD0rr District 6 Page 5 of 4 How will the project be funded? FDOT Alternatives Funds $ 150-0n0 + Local 80 = Total $150,000 FDOT Alternatives Funds inn %+ Local % = 100% CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereb certify that the propos d project herein described is supported by /AON g �dtuyf (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council) and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (2) enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4) support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. oe gnature Townsley Schwab Name (please type or print) Sr Director, Planning and Environmental Resources Title June 25, 2013 Date FOR MOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program i Transportation Alternatives Program Application—I DOT District 6 i CL m LIND - a 40 03 cr CLf w w-w� hem- u � . 77, rJr ' r 41 Y+ r, a� r � t ' d�� ftb W r Finance your fun and get Boat,RV&Motorcycle loans g - aster. MSARdmi t. NG aay e Y ADM tet CA 109 1934000•Go to RiyM.Mg w to I BEWAADt , F L O R I D A KEYS -O.RO COUNTY County prioritizes projects 9VWMWAMW = ,'"m°t Overall,$57 million is designated —' braewl4yrommm dd c ■ for parks,old Seven We,more A Bst of Noothd ppoo}} raeedaLln Ley Wennmed dcapy low adIDtdO.I ab• '71aWng b m ume ao0l al v pace end au bWg ma�ltbbry Fbrnta ma Mly sordid fwayea .—RtnWllx tar am— septaabeh'MeOetamgi m ryA y ��ndBbemmave Keyareddona—LlW apebe sraL pimmspma 5A mB• am toulmly Swuwat Dnd ba¢,a WDhe appmre4 •127rmlum fin tbetalm Wale:Adaab Badewddat m ILe oW Swn MIk atNje Bin yeeormA ey De Sono• AD Wem ua aJ�td m =U adoma4pEae1 q1 Some of Eeck relnfn m Hips Beech.ilw vwW w MamMo. a rytk a peer ltmtiotimwwuemlm ��tthb�I�Dino tried oum• 7kdrartMOt bDImmP dW o1a Benson MIb&IC o Seam mine you oa Iha R I u.,molpilel hrploraamn. here.'Conmiumna Dmq a tente, :'a-eel lneldo. embrold m ona%Is mD16a =cun or din nsA.make Ulm aW lfi�a B Cgmdolmea yue► Laike�e aw4�Camtly r�n re 0.,wrll r overa r WS am"DurbdAe'ua ell• okmovemon at xey KM Bpa>amgeatimatnbrmme AJml�atm Rbpe Oaveal N• ,,irk wnun:ycn�pY Cmye NaWem CrQW aBF wins tmtedw a fork In and edlendVamas heads. rare.rmnoy Fl veto bav n ud.n dW min Oeyaanaa •Sea Court",3A R NE RESEARCH I toamermumteSaaarsAAnn f".°d3rt;;.::„ The cue abnp AWBon Bouk%wd In Stated=mid undergo myv chartgea L a prapned Wal ath Coots ��y onn.to huhlonModny the mid B(et as to the left U Ton. k 4 UL onedhoodnlBnep loathedtyhoo mMwins Aviation's curve may be changing ' It would be -W of 0e mere than 40 ea ' slaters Coen r ArIWm an of larger wmWdavenobemwed %s bike-path plan sera epappereent preferred By RYAN MCL4MY wino melm they w-mWWbe rmmMy t"ot min in ib.pond behind the sk. Part rbxe The edy or edwathen is Cauraibnaa Dick Rmmy pbnnma a myor orrehed In be ban pmWny anollm dW Ariatlm Buelevard bd. oPon,e lb owe der poles am mBdulaoeWhtcmtleadre• mlrud din sad sod redesign . tb chaps n ntr shop uses theaare mmad Ne,amtba 9-91DaAOua kabnB ban dW let&" opdmcaddbed-*tar- TM°Aquadw under bnlabhe undo on euipke or RW&ImemabtW UNwrshr.FamMA the Urdverehy asa behrol Flalda Ley. -W m%mend g on b Sent or Nosh Cwolm�M.Ingtm Motivated 16 ttylofr.AbpmmU31. .�a` Another Cousteau dives In CananWtwl b a • • We„oR.bm Oe moo � ty Ndm end ordeday. ripen d mate Mung 0Ire or a!din sting .add Imti,ds �a1 rW pWhmy e, WWWoy Omleo�eld.Obee[a dW Cam belwem ins nm Fa din pokammweono Grandson Of • sweaty din erkintloe.d ad aapal Be-b"b" eX lorer lens ^J3� aa"r ink orOe Aquafm Bin dany to wood sins •Sin ANauela>u P P � f Aquarius work FN��a tgmm o 9y LEVIN WADLOSF ><iaxe wim a�iev Sustainability �°' — I '�-%° :ad m b a mbute to It. .akmB Wren Fabien will drive permits rmmwad psndra0a. . ' Cmmou m leurWh dW pdveadaoeee p,maas Wendoveralrea r tr : mo meuYe,we rat"`mmM r,qt,,�� rase in "r The eu3'bamY Ismved uteri amod din Aquuiu.. ,, ad aa,raw seen .mas trying to et tnatnr,•alloalloli vd- dW eaderva b0 a uW '7' 9 9 wd-into f73ADD apiece Fla.Le„Say market rate units she um send ody WNtd ms at 3l.■amain By SEAM NINNEY homing. ref about 73 dhwp minim pWvd m h ma.mdGwprm l(eys w• Mining.Them me abaefl teas On.t,ram out It sablesCowmmekemybgmtheananaaeraie lapacy ua deao-hadd Cawran Wmay.izrmtermm erehadri r dqa Rbmehae efM.e* or hh pranduther,hcque-ries CA Sam With the Ne aoca red m Vend- V a Orc of dW eh L.W poi. ardeme ord "'Aarpe m hWtbn 31 pro9rem raara ad tuba on epe0• chy Rey Wee m nelmunmo 0 Sammie; Sind. ad Iam aboud din Icamc propene m sinus,ra the Wamrr itomnp,wrrkn t. Ipmpe.edthe Ism-A mat Say I.S.dun dW Cao,Irtlf aonnerery of a rraauo� C.Inea reeurh vasseL ad hen Ik.In Ito dmim, pamvm` >m 0e Atamd net uodawuaegdpnml B adm=b 1963 dw dh W Ieecy aB br our ip+� dmvu the Anmw Rho. building Censors allacilimf aaC C�ntenuwny mAdW 1N.'imr�pare'IW VmdOBc. Iawpes.Yen fakv,'PaAm.ad 1101' bunim 31. or oeW eommadom a dad- m aataal•bvap'acWty d tam a fire Doty makes Comamr,ptaaredam mnta- The Aquino Red Baer Cmme>o Plena to wcbde 19mas Wow I.&bendy dW Thutw Wuafrom.n dW v...r...hard and lab In de Imt u e Rd Sa eabmt.7be owned by uW Nauonal eatemae —am wd0 jxi eyba m 6a a.e o<the my t P—due she farm- woAA'Fable Cauuei Acaduny A�ud•almby (kpob ad A market-tmefl= ty ban bah makmaate W nW m a lw 11 Wei. k «Amu 'o 'wdaue can domnmay.U. esm. Adddusdon ,ea roe eapaimm dW eewtemm The Censor[allom!b e o art The 53 rut 'A.pccrw.moot,inn Son,'depua Gre f the ra m Inch opmtmo ty y a arnuu ay.eaplonamad um n.dud by ns<aus The 5 b d11ket110 caropka d y. ■mnub a of IS use hint Cmlhtl[LL Wert.63 —LW—thy of ry r a ,cod&,Drown apw- ad dd W din Ke„'pod a W be I ID aoW. der„ rW,w.Ii De der fun 'Nat only w 0 as Bm m 63 fen m w,ra a No mavens haw ate a 24haur huotaon evarm- Wadwv wenfn 1.5—1,91 Ibon Agimnw ea homed a edm or brat Irw good Conch Berl oLblmaada. p1we-Mad Aqmdm tits rue,The atlaalm,some mb.loo o!ties late is Dose eploation,but It "We a Flu M mbuda} nav the mess orpeu ut ne •Sm Paenrle42A The 31 days w(.m Be orre Shen mi cide,m1b the 31kh sic about brumoe 31 and •Sea mwtas%ZA 'NDEX v Amtoat ck"'Bea' ...BB V nmeydd Fishingthe ,B newydm On the move Bwlners SA em'Nor rul ®taco Florida Keys the FAA reieca the v Obhusde.. ..lA fiewain wanes Planned bnUon eta heirs brought plemy dedicated emeyenry of dolphin to the nays oPe'stam term m SportsfOtctdaos...18 bw.ha Is problem strider Kays Marathon Cnaswmd........48 a a @f t'aptmnccalumn iB A".t.Story.ZA ' mate► _ _ _, Wednesday,June 19,2013 3A GOVERNMENT SPEND Rowell's likely a go Budget season starts Ftan CoutrtytlA Cdw a aalme m2J poderce Wi mewmdo15 Taxing agencies ddng,Jdyl podalmm impttbW aamaauama gmkmred.ebr6u,pw Musdmhwyonmeb; wuotr m he other ma tgat9amnCRy Hero. Food da2013-llptopxad emdsad.Mafmmzad- able NUS 11113 mIUlm), Nee'soodtlryfpsW,bm get to work on The comry'. Imlatlm meal trod 6udpct d m fnu a doad"Id rorarolm d den Mkbsu K•Y tarSo.-lColbap Wd. 2013 14s spending robe er411w�dNmuAe°P�eO andMLVJM ell`°mod m u°R°eemmsraa` a..ao"m Wd°ui16 I, Raubwl, w,a pre g cmmy w* pun s7f=ft4 mwthe 1oSWKey walla meow Iwitne Und.0-11- RrAN McG11Mr Ctm�an July 17 In July v a the Malubm level ofBeene part or Id the Plaol"m° Key S)M n blwphy and`Ace By Kry West. Dove®eatCamemr- t Stuck Wad bymWe lima Govaanitam caner Ifl0 m+dna to up..++raw limn mmrtby0kearaeasm Oo luy 29 ad 3D"the spetblrevamead aoetplm foulmsdm ROotWgIsmo. ealrlw:a or stuanae ed ptthlm v.e .I tl:.rT do,'I Henry Gavarmw Cm1er and budaeLL public aaymp -For,o paaglol pupole, Ke)Ike aladm W numlmX we Iure tit npaY n°[ The keel goueWmw tKry West,lM mealy W a w mac held dtr- a mtaan bu'tl�a rcw mdaalearadmyceumm os adabk"a nvwnable wmmerhdgasamp Ita6om a.yyaeNdd�or"tg athemtted m mg m.A.&27 and sept to park"mmey PuMk W6de cotud Key all atiWail. pnw not to err it lwaie re lea full swing In the Keys hWher disrrm thebdptad Coiold aicu°2c Dueana Kest Worm. Rmadl*.Made tell. ga:r.inms- KryColany Baoh m- caplW lmpror®rm.Flog The eery I Key 9Am b Commualmaa aged peed man at t e tt.alga Cemouowstr David thug,df wrath as total dent,toms and aim for find ubetld to held.reef attlamvwws at Belmmm Mhde Tbemay Rln rnmryrd io b•tk•t Mmd+r P•��kp w.rhest budge raehop1 13,l6 Parkarc'.uum" Kneor and Counter- Wwomm vpalthatc rd thv WaNSIg, w Md"m The MWga" UrAW ad 17.TMtw Vtddk -st realm toiropoYa .more Negev C-dm planar` rum Irabe Caouy lad a span!on" Head he Imlawe wodnhopl laa6gs oc ImWlrely dated the WATX l HIS prc Key ailed abet Ih° "king o"n.suwo.cnul as den Ins�YtodWwpanof «h[mddfa3-30PA,m y Iasep.5andSepel7, -Wbmhyhold"ofPlm PrimgaelackofwateBant dean.The■nerFromm ns Racal year 3013-I1 a-& Lv u qq Nta ad,it ma Tlota For the AWky Cannot aaea k IM lase Keye. Pet.•Nora prrply.,)a e bill woot of health arc, my.101 hri g a Aug.19 aohah bee Other s have mI b other crpkd projrea admemdmoaneapmeead he auw van s ay t..nn .aided and bq-ew Cape- momNy mmaeeera�g in Maaanhm ameretce. bit typically pw.anoily rd roe opaertgnallelr pit, ea dU cVa node.. d Iapeream plan The dhdd food public brain at 9,m The 111e pub Theeraat•aK•)•g• .Sala.5 dyyaMo- Wlumhta-firp to OldwAl' FAA key to proposal teglere K is Io flume: ale Sege S d Its Key pan.Ha madya ore.Old old btShmag Mdm Ike Ptdm WporkeadSept taut a Ilailan Oteem suet Keys MosgdlmM•nd,Cmuo1 Smdk Islmd of ne Sod'an In ble"Me"dr NWp Fmm AWNUM TA _ Dhukt m Y Ian slued mbga at 3J0 pork CaodlkkkaaHbdgetsrim Mmd m U.-whedWed for 7be dly of Wnthml Man wuh■July v wts1� Wp.A prcpary, Canary 1 pea u the m+uklafrm an Oan bdR•meedn5 h slue m Olscoa me prod And 1 IU7dt sues. fa Jdy 1g"S pn.aim enterprise rods and peered- Airports DI1esYm Pets Kerr Calory Beach foe atden"F1ad.K•ys my..email popply Vd. Wla Ihm m m Couldn't ewe a a� WyagAdmlmsuaa Ren Marathon Aarport The City not.Rl ehedoledfor 3 pm Fades"kAdjuaMmthea• Sumo orb ma aryl 4tdgt Council will amp,pro er the Fardm part .ppo�te "'•"' wade lltelIf b.w .p pow IN�my'tor:mte,l but- Qeomwty Career. Of�mmp-r� .py�. I�f;'�• NTYCO SSION r+ �� "M FAA mrmauy n tend thw bad ad Sewer landscape up for approval w,m m Rationale:Plants ti mr- t"� �u p are better than •Iaold m Momoe tm".myl,tte wamWam im yaAwal.cavmOM.aa�ibl watwrowlmanaaawrtaa Caaayl debt of my m Me a 16 provided nary dp be�pom mu.sue Thy b•dry pl•rning 0epubnan radMlg d den cure• lift stations IstarLL amummmce Cannata. ban to be m in order to M Avildon 0°utevatd H etecok pole are ttmsed aA fly_ 'ibaeli11uu1muuoaN t mama aMe hue• mate mom fa lM _ $anbrSwWrim WAIWADILGIN the�HIfte-pped- popery cr a A ft�en more de fame �Gmrm �W�°n la lmMrg Read a U we maul pale kwadstwNryratermm often Duet Key.mdadm Nark In the Cot®Idm n ad dent dmW but den mmf3odm KrpMarodmn Akportpopen Although the hommwrt• 170p=.btaatbdreooma pen•W.add tale n Imit h oevemnm0 hem°Wu o gW m ab3etalm Dom m° ere taslag ptder puttgls m a v m mum�0% tame to Camat Gy Mon Rl In me phony stages d the Rom but a hobbeb Florida Keya Aquarian nevi fare K•ya ewe ay► �•o ur owmJm Ratio.who rea dpd ear•'he role.`t fee ova hmlaa,could be were Atttbdry ere owary me tem Wand be o ae aNUy radon ad U.S. II forpukm5. Wm an,Iirmllmd.we'd Ink "rdryl Mrome Cmay mardy —pojwm R than the typical gavby ed. N1' s m addldm mwtg w er d fmmk Safety Cor"dnim tMusmm WOW Col m"now code Iaem aysc"m An7m me u wmM take curve o"worm ahupm an u cis elµal ad me Tun one an mdayl agan- plaldblu new h.dsapmg m Camdatmm also are -I-.taw m gt paouLL Wordy drktaote scratch of pea of am td rumol m for the Mattda= me dght Nary. mppeessl1d m approue an but aw some non m red aaaNnf m pleadog Sow saw me bent pore Gorwmml cermrper hum Cooud.tmna to May Sg)300 mulbdm Imoul reaudp Ire red'he odd Daptm.mt -damSs pnajm 1.or bd1dN I. a Dadt Kry ahwm imom. .pad due b1alsoo and nedmaWng dr p{Sms Key rdelti__m Ranlpyl prc- ■naelmd go ba week's Cry the late Department of A•i and aeWas. new ptminp rake for, ferry,service milt Jan.ell. felted open crew uadna aganm. lhmponadm,fi-V�a.,r ON world"low hd- tea view man wmmwate 7be f231.27D thee Nth 7MI eplo.her hoer of City P. Wet, work plus but eou he', wpta plmu WU Wd a awem,and pw preWd- Peseta,Divers be.am is lu own,uoa mtWy a Manager Calm Sons hen opemlaec h MW happan DNrk 1r•7'watee ate Her Am appovat m We Auk tuned by alum Depam.mt amW �° or prporq adt--uomrg ea poi tthe oo bmue olaeom m tCouba wMls, Key appeLL A seed vim N Temspmatlm pact adbela o tMUmMatum alepal Laidy 6 w buing �may my. we rcw odlmmo rWed crew. raby,smiled fa 9•JO 517.3a3 hoe Ike dry o[ dCourt In Wl1e ride err AWdoa both aplms. wre .p eked and the appanm0y for aha am.would oanWm rim. Mmmm p ad R son Meow"aawwma m t addalntt 1M County 7M note c° mats Belkviry a o•ad LL der 'Bomrldesnave rlRamo- to rem doe In two fella." add pokey m cite Wade- WM eaerlda a code eharye ,tarWlg u 9 ,.m.at Ibe city dped an property boanm and ups and dwon. he add wale woda, eou aWWa aka Mmmwa• Mandan Gosesmw Cella The Desk Key Property ere aamddmm-but nor "area mukaa53 bgatle. Go,ma Awanlm installed IdlNdmm u rmhemte Overseas Lounge under contract A Attomeysays or wlaegtedWe me nwon beanie d rim 5.. property and q.w mt am rode a sale to be done btakad R a®teapoeby as dollar ag•mml bNee der • in two months a ba� >�u [ede Boadbaydommy swi mwear epee pttoo.li Bml atone apedmdap By RYAN MdlkmHr a s73oA00 sale to John comma woh hor ter as" fostet 2011. a.taotl0d N t fdlurc to mmomlypaNtomtmro Both Name anal Zna";;den illy eedmalm O'Comdl',atwmy.Tim W aria Ww.proper- iM Alan gO'-'ARm 7f• Jam gg'1 AstmID- Tw fotarr 0",*me a C;ri mlmddwpmd• ba,um the le to Llgmr a lamp papery mg eat dating a Cum O'COMWA from Hof" mar WAIN maker 49 In Cmmlhma Bow hearing N.Y. could be co uls r Choos@ from our Entire Stock of Mumhmbmmagammda Ilan WedeamY.Wnpu Is -'Worm 300 0 yes: _ Maxine, catran to be sold also empmyd by tM city as -U ere ma &a* aW=d=omeaa coil a Adepemdw m"tad I°the wev hen a logo,Uetll. _ Penbrooke&Ceeb a mka4olb•d acre'-a m Code Bond W am JanHay them ur erg Ind wart:gong ma "it's.eO t Coo den den• cooled) pope."Wane Popery to H1.Isom a gmm pdd,an he's pion -.L dmeg me row ark ? Shas 8-18-Reg.SW 99.$60.99 Tttttotlry 0' He-a fors K*M Pretend ad pane would be 5s00.000 r' cry taXedo ad Ime derel• we•m gelding a tvaipmd Wane her 90 my.to IIIJJ spa and Iatra�llsm"aria- m vdam wars••Wtig1e ease appie fa a umer sg3 pester, / Only! •eY Rkeae Warne old The Ardelkm ter via m wh"a goal far smtba NO rcpwae l der ® -tdwmmnnenudmedya dbatgys a" fa d od°dwlmm lgOdaqym,oW bR . • a • or loapb Aremkm•womb tewa.yaw apkd Mlarth beg Man hl fan■lateral .. awe the hMede bdbl6y on k31a.TWhye lode end Ire Itmd eomagbe m me sews.yr .'�'" ��':. (X2=1mearyetaasiant WakmWscW the ante Iw.For width W CUy popes F •• --''T ry owesaa mgntdblt. N-------- ___,_ - Warner has eWlmed tla city has on roomy to C..utee m IS■RiA1'ig_sssl- ---- I / t a Q Arryr One Regular ! Marston retires goes to county Take4 o OfRe ' He led ci 5 y H. lI =boa my eked d via- ; oFF- ITEM I, be trader g gar�a ` 'err aara.adwt.w,srla"St. emergency mina fire- Thaw can be anything ------------------------ ----` tx lighten and ran"a kM1anmlmldatama ) operations , a lanleen [ahuemmmmgory"mo -------- ----- I ream Tara- Tuley Pal"ntlelear power BY SFAN KINNEY .{ o n Io K•Y plan to a vim rrmj. .. 1 a slua.ryel.r•atraam l Wee tor- hmnomt Q/Q My One Regular MAMIGN It.I I o.a I Alm U. m y,ar I Ta ice w Reduced t I 1 a kfmr 30)man wren me A rp or l,' mparmem v"emo m Key via Fun Depam.it Res Roscoe ewer,.Was now roves.:ore impecra OFF' ITEM C+dg wlaWy anancN" CaWbm rid'He lus,by caplala vim m of enaagmmy olanagmkmt j.bad lobdmri cry" Maram Avelem begin / +[mtdlam nseea-- -- mdmtWy,atemmSeRa- ArNM»rouft kola carve to I99g ad M% ••---- ---------•.------------.----a use Frtdry w,m the Coy r.nor5men5 .evil u a ddra/mgbo" Rw Macoet vita dal one uorgercY operalime dung an flu uapma.He elan mspmd to topeas for tam- b.akana ad new copal S6s n3 per year neu.Wmt'I be leaving der weather. Hun"m wawn MarsenoR."eat 1993. r r pu Ifire MYgmrKuaor veld loaf amr,kryWo and nerd I Irra0ghler oaroa a t a pevlouv Inue m up damp ea make Ha ;;`�;,�. w��y Mac Mum Canary Fire Reeve Or ors KeiY Mamm cans S91.980 annually. �efO Mealy.,led Fla Reactor d%.mud itw lampkmi N Uepamnrol ,pure- t K•y Logo:M M 91F W TM.HS2d)f S aalbum Clear .tenth e=Z-y op.:-: wmlm A.ysm Ceao Vud y�s.at-a,MW&dmwK 41M SO 1�•r /al)SSS am hn ma Iob."S70.1V7 pmOk iNnt ors Is A s fa been mace munpk caulks- +a��sa Gpw%Darly 9 30 )30 SanAaY ehwtk S 10 a I-m M-by hu rkama but ore plan for duct d uamrtg aadr-W L. .ten KEY9WEST Rordde Keys.'Only Deily pro IF., er,Est 1878 VYednad�l June 10,2018•Vol.197•Na 170♦A paged, Be Gnu Senior housing lease on the ropes el'OUO m m TUfswhmagmcWi t. hKdtypspMW polm the de.eloperL fro. sew the derelopmsold the Ca.Ud medowmdwkytothesub. Tempm OMrednTuesdryY Commissioners were fee is tar temWaMan and lea of S law betwera 111e metUng,with a dean bark-Split on that rum 4.3,with assuming W raks.Including To tow the proposed doerbitenandthedybu6 N of the pmpmed l 10-udt Mayor Cnlg Cato and management of the mmpbm cedar am housitq pmleet ferepm.Mond71001Efary human NWge senior cue Commissioners Mark fioaak that enew run part 53 yearn 1et'•mn°m'Pm on the MUM" W4terScm Hm&31OGfnu Sr. wmples dmmerksiy waD- BWy Mrdlmr and f1mmy Ross!asked,'Yours not ta+w�.�°a-Y 7dmr from the cvtdag room Woo Tuesday night11 4-3 mew Wg ore of du meedog when Weekday on bound for ■getting,fight air the bat.■ u 3.ems USlb/TA ukauomofthrssdrymm-vote was shoe Sae was of It hemme dam them wesenl MOM developeh fun fun cheekforSMAbd' MISSenMVAUlarminiwitds she required'Super malim-enough vacs to mote the Nbrdover Noudngrannere skin by Monday eight. Irye needed 10 Wrom Ims-hem mmmding Sticking 1e0 Sharkey,who mine- erAmteae hn0 IS. Nonprofit cat rescue group suffering Fiscal L3tlA1at5�.Fl4dd.lp r �--�,-r -- w► wish 1�Q 11aIr Smah$WOW-ttg r'i v • " � u, ' list l a. pdroha•'blkldytodl7aarty �,T rz DotemlsiddRa$eratam 4 ' A , J 5 .° set for Dog aleeed Tuesday mom B • 43 paocm of woes 4ppmw , n/ .ri► ,. .i.. of the lob Sena a ding and r . , yy' Oner 40 pattern bar.hatable 2013-14 $88M for capital S..bi cam mom%wens pwhforthmmmdntp projects proposed __ (_.. Sr?nA ny WN WI F maps sac m� 0� • f# +? The Momoe County Com. IM90140021: Derean y: mbri-aV-d to mare fu- eSMmsis my feat U 5 0000 wad on SA mWun In capital •ere Hiked Tuesday at W ..� Improvement prou over lec area eapum Mr nave In (l \ the mat Ste years,ins Oren smyhrg Rmwd,.MSnwmUNIVICIS Saw dor it" hrY Wltd by Indism Sm.nFey ' - IaRo and t.ldng otor sire Dlo F Seven Mae Srldge team the a mmar no ratim be they 6 ! .Mr State badmodretimb �, Comedssbnenwtedonthe praises,Tuesday at the am ROM�tab Thuer2013.14 Srcalymarbielpet haft f the year W WMWPON bM �'�"w� vein he aneWd In September. WASInNG10"ballergs. " +af.• 1 So the new Ssml year Starts 1. Ed It/pmlmtm Shim., Monrm County Commis- theme. throw. Noose Goner Danny Whep war Republicans Adtvn4ed kg• j ° the only om agabat bupng da an hwmy m trait down an b—WRmr a" L_.. SrmwR papal Ppq In the United Suter a the Contra lurched She" am Sdmsuer calm S Nam kah Sp fw ebPGM N.Mg Ed hrdaalM bn IS Nmna. ��~a.. on a dnmtlhtRy dieuw ppotm emUW Cho hope "` darimbiNun agpTA�`"me Auer 16 years,Forgotten Felines runs low on help,funds BP cages ayAUCK"M udkdsbmdmuWabm SmndwrawwdrAdup 'M.tlngSNOtoadeynthe dropped for 1 mum SW donedtw saidnotpmeamon mwg. thdSUmewoutohammep- eyARWUMmMW Bar the wlumeersuq a&n51>mdda'Nb depend Uwml d4yi SdumWer said. aura no hit"Round kwem to the Madbonpoupmwbufewu an demount now meplady'Nb spend SZWO a month an Ian—Mega bate been Skin to helpers and ee as omwghfundS mfpap mmeraMfeed[m' fwdlom.'a 3 redam'.lndlamem was �a lYuaa deSp a soura y W&thmh to kmp 11 numMtg the way it The Rodeo Thrift Stom Despite US odds,StbrMidv, dropped aSilosr a Whame q-ftt peewn"a" to Forgotten Fsihrn a bed has for So pantSymn 3m Otaamtingfiwag is line Yge Na man sawed of W- dm.bwdouwWetmsmtSe ruutproel that ae Spell 'IM support male Rater poupkaamdomc Sr cnu.PyM tng a fmuduem Deeperster Itod'Am oil Spier roam.after he was deemed reentaNy a"-m'�'� ..a. �C'• W Inmmpetemmamd Uls, 1r0MIasN3 ftm a�00.0.USE Board to pay up on HOB project atttorsney.�tom ddcne rumeeedam, and U.S. ByTFSIRiRNNma 'The Domin Court 4A�s�ewsaY*mommmr eeern Ind Spa told.truncated baud ' Ndv Ime E .erarkadA mdyntAm u.dmrtmmuryralledteSnd- � Medner hd0 .if#UK on Lama The School Hoed on Tuesday tun the dam-" �� aheumgNm owning wad to Sudwdm the -Cscept fun ■ sew minor It to which rand kilaA4atM•t5 a rem `,� final payment to Its metre reaches.We the alpugs.and l V US.Auanw w -' tar after then porn men m the the pegm-this mbtp nery� F�S 't 10 r n e y a-r q Itemm Market mmwctlan MkIghadtoretn' '� T h o m.t �Ceg8218WB.COfa project wmedthemthewheal `d n.a..wrer legendtoW Sr saes Papua napmpaermappRRRR soda lolpl mdsomm SeatD."SA 0li1gIR106NNm gSM®Ot00Y Whg aN m Was mboNe-esS61eN W" 3yNan sire goleR NdptnmNe OelamblR Surgerywith less gain mtrSmtlyNbMiee lrocali nNtl Md naaet and a quicker recovery? % ;% �criv tedft 411 G C.' Tq,1111b1NSA01NYR®gP TIMOVA Sy ,ff kr•e.f AMggAIalglgMe110W9 111=11 gEf18L AN nun.rthroad n IM kkyael3spafRSe33saaaglMyhrglaNyou .*ACram PURR 0 etAigpmaaa-4-111 MMMI-aA wamanmf-ar GnaWem-Se era CAaNme•M oMMMIM-M SPURS m TId Kr Wan Cnm..t Weomtar.1"1%2013 aA p A P X� V P �q 0ua_M! icU%W MA161=011 xrtrxrW ashes lot ter* ( Meeft an Major Care MB. - Peeeooal wateecraft erae6eB A Moms C-niy SOM 0111. TheCkyCmamh.[..Wllholdaspe• G lye riescrift deputy paUld his pan or Morality dd melli g a e pm.Monday a aroachuuM Old 'F 7Mv Pan*an a pm0eul thwal mominngg.� ,a the Redd& � rrne Nea 510 G St.to dhmml wenhmvken Wytan maderMondryto Man negedatlam with the develop. ofWar hart= ope lust mM of FAYWaL a wr ft to the Deputy Michael lmaph Sidick 31,d behind wo, smfthmWgondu 1 t - Cam Goad. limed"culture the 2010 Mom ThmanNkteboN. County SheelOy 0®m Ford Crown Lammlsohamm pm ths project fie" Themmandwomm—tMhuma by Ncomis into a bridge on stork Key , barkenuraBlunemtowarkmabw �. was tot trimmed wave aeacved t a Coin Gain!but ham Sector Fly Oriver330am.,tepmts—)I I apeem eat with th.city lot Me IV VAX SMMr drove onro tM aster rand MM-.Calm mMus wbkk .r merino before bhtUg the brides, wmhladudaassined mmeurlms, 'a and Is ahb ageonthe Cast '''} Guard bon with had t ob waled I repo-sap iM alp6y a I lQudl mmpbe r T "' II but tke wootan teed to be gaud a IIswe wearba—IbeLL Nallher -odd employ shad-lemma mode I a room bssk4 acmdYg to.Can doge oar.looted wee tartan a the to.lbw aw•kuamu sedan ro Use - •. .. wrd^.wrrw Guad press Mere tt Noadusnesrye 1hpe. Alp Mw Odlrbaa lea drharatopmd by as leas 6 They rop andlPaUodthe�umtl2 No other rabitlti wen brvpbed and a 2007,Mom approved a million Ib/sk"ftadeeawr.dba pwBawd NfNAf 1lwW Na)e market Bodtwem wuriglifelatlen m edmaaf cltugr were expected to dam a raerse a pan d du Thosmas Nei"Meta kmhwrylh Naawi Boeb.dAregewk IM nor win taken to lowerbe Kees Mid nit FHPu Kathy Valley Wad erI lersuckhooray,said. woes Iw{tmBlaaus a.dJ* Pm•edn thdP- MedhalCenuc aft BPManor 11I n the Sidney M.Claims FrUhy with fake Amnogte federal court- employment And Income Asir coloow1m►•e,$a Mum 30)Simonton St In paperwork In ads In sup K,YWML ponIslrecbimfeflmwages 1 Watw Riagenld deter• The Tomb defendant.acmdhgaal5•papndin- MD"that Adrian Glen Coon Major was amtenced tom handed down July 27 In am" was -patiently Ito month to more than■MlamcpAM locomprm to araM hid doe yore In prison folarred Major.dated a prepar- aM would OMty bemmo by three years of probathm eB false Wlma but denied iit w ooy with an Imolmary and ordered.atoeg with the berg the ringleader a an y coarse of treatment with other C04dmdaw,to pay obletlion filed before the and psychotZ according 006,22B to rtiUtmkm tom as fa As well a slit.psp ..`", •._: tocouarnmds prosecutors said Major letter he wren The Cltnen Baines.37,had lima at spearheaded A scheme In from WL whom be is awW- :;: BumrladrtalCorramiand which the fear man provided Ing aen res: . Coapie,a Burnet NC„ the BFfanded Gulf Coast uhdudtpkayamwamm • .r >2 snare December undergo• Ing menW health evslida. r tam KEYMDE CLASSIFIED. •.> Mammorderedrbateri ore AuS.291or the'purpoe 1uBato aad.kmepk BaleOa walk aru ON tom ken Y eW.�p .dm�r C4ie¢ a understanding of he 305.292.7777 Owed%aed*%-low pl+m k am Ma and At Was d as arty pot net=and consequences of the promedinp gaunt rescue vessels. him or the tmDmy to wise �y /y�T�DAY rty to his defeaW Bu ftet UadoW Ca CmThis msuchu"Oa�vld to build a rrn s Bre wUm on hf ud[N SIwo has CAR OF 111E DA , C&M.0 as Nip IA Plus add.'1 think Ivha wit Suamede al IIAN$12 milli- concluded Met this miter. m saying b than wa will be to Milo a BreOgaer teaming with respect sole*to Snit 2013 Nissan Paweak and Wring ova the reviewing this ice the future.If academy-Cowl Key and defendant.n InaMclenUy old bridge saying them wr the fWpedoad rspot say It 513 milli-a mph"the Important to warnal sock. 370Z tot emugh bdmm.tion-=0111MIWBbetbe0mm co-tya dlspurh and coin. Ing an Involuntary trer- thelolg•temBmmldnml• my thul dorh soppml m.' mudmdom sptema mmoderhmmtbaaowv Readouts to mate alarmed Koaga h cosumd show About$33 MM-d the 1\ktn-Flugerald wants In decisions;right tow,Me aged the condition d the bridge many needed a hind the the motion to dlsmks the the probed'oppooMthaO blow the waterline mind the paleae-Will tome hom a IndiaMML tot needs. .0s as cot of maintaining onnry Infrastructure fund. BamtswMholmnsfrmad -1 Mve a drpeemm whh Ike bridge M sand and the county would bantr from Baton to Mandate tbaso pm�cn being pal- 'TogmtelddUar SIBMp thermLCmumyAdmlNstrum County Detention Centel the fivayer plant'Kollap Dom would be A bargain for Boman Ganelsold on Stock mbrd,where he sold Talk vine ow this r 1 FWr.'KWh psal& TM County Commission still Ms-basted(eloay anisevored downand wit am The commltU-agreed to lobo tenodvely App� battery and Isms Imprls- aam-' eat ubk 52.7 md0-m ntm• Gored ghag-shim minty, moment o-n pending In County Mayo George fit Me OM Seen Mile IhM,yr employes a 3 patient malt state"urt Neupot announced that pmleLSI-01ion fill the pur Wit Department buds ll.bad faced.madmen the Florida Drpartrom of im of Ik.rllt Manna.sl would evaluate IMn mphry- d2ayews a federal pmson Bb fame.Blder.084eq and Imp pmmahl ban am TrImp-nitre WWII ten-million a mum dw load a m a dammi.a ifthry gwAW on the federal win fraud bdem The 2013 3701e b fore With Pakistani: ani: tutbdy agreed to pal man ftomdtUgp Buck K32mU• fled far the raise charge. 332Aomepdww,iPdbb Inches.Piddle ohylana and a money lowed rettdahg W Ilia to!eap!eve BMWAn his The core-mum Ma not Meanwhile, two co- pedktl LV47 w@W dbtdbullom,Vww ban Mang OM Seven MOe Bridge-d-m an Stock Island.33 million w ore a tentative properly in defen imas David Dwaym gee r for mom than 40 feet Dft iM lrub And dtnfy&Brad to pay hall of build a sure,Marathon Mealy alma a the cowry pmpary( Bunn.S3.will Donald any tom sea for puemB an Nor 8Me 8 fiervtBl the Ull a1Mm cord.but nor aid II asue to make the eg AppMaYY Office he nit yet Sargent.36,both accepted ban offered to pay for wry Pisu swimming teak a passive wtl0ed tM property value(plus agreements In Ismsry 85 peekanldthepmlectffthe park far the year Controlled.— that can fora orwdmwm comory takes ownership of the matadanlon usoaaaad aM bold siesM budget wok. sonaenced20yemepris. brings And Indention h.TM in in amide$104 rdMon to Mops on July 29 ad 30 Th. on followed by up to Bm CITIZEN OF THE MY dun of Me mtmBe rW=IMFbnml=MYIW countywiilbeJpnllsBulbud• yearedaepervhed Mane worir would be m toS1 7 m14 and munhouse$1.9 million In hearings an Septa Borh m arbedubd to beban lyee.alt wed to puRMae tight am are tabsruk pirims em f amenced July 15 6efaR _ OBITUARY ._.-— -- �_ -- . VICEBTK POW IL NcemewaYcdfortheciryd you Aar of 11e Sea Abewanda I On kne la 2013.Fathda KryNM fmaboute5 yvan vie Thenwill bus fonW Mass trade will be a gar toilethera Day.Viacom Ith his petition tore d At a 3 pat Friday has 21.2011 the Seed Nan Nall nor to Farr It-in his wife 7nln.He did b a ba Tsai m a The Builla d Saint Mary the church 6 to meat his joha to Uw tltyt bor the cod M p orn bhm ism of lawnemtaI.n. 7 I Ila bed d Sm m ad Bach.He bad taken cue gem thumb and anythhg he 9TH NNIL\I. yearn Isr 12 G "6 tNtheslhd meeacL !iJfhRg vOFsr Ism lurldtabon Ke.F Flwpyrr of[/n Flurida/irv2 Ili n low (we When M wan younger he wed by bls warted rem)cob,moray,mar JULS 4'111 PICNIC .� mghwl%Mity.Areas And ould con i at y Sam his-.da help aeyoone,q w N1 all—the F1PVU)I'c FUb%%Ohms*xiri,a nir1 %lava data. Kenny&ad AdtkmR shin off his back NtO\uwe *t.lm%stt3Nr it fitm A)" and Stephanie and It b now Ilene to inn tit We L P P Vr! 11'1,1\!y PtCNlt't('FF1.7 1 rwMSamand:aM hbpat. gtaadckabbon a--%H yfia amuwmcr .S:() vm UX rl).9:oorlm ro and Brtndon,11.Is also rim• ti e wa`rrap Cr\S,\`I.\RI\.4 .hod by two bahele lard wrnr.wrwdvww—roc mddgm ad Mu Dehoym..rusaere.wwmewrweis y,14))"ear ih Yw,fit I\\ aMtheb BnNd wewalw.lmraawr Cyr WeL IMa PtTSr.�I•;:T)Iwl:'I f. E Tim Yea. awwrmswrsovaerr _ mwew aonwa mores aaa 1e 1I-I—( ,,I(h I)N VlhlC 7'oo It s r emaw rrrlwsmrw .� er.w.aw rrswrra 1319 WILL1 MM STHF1,17rwwwurwwwmww MrfRwrluw .ecwwew.r„low nrvr .r(15_mild.4.111)\1-1(1 O.dd Ce.rbh-Faris,Fa,.dMOa.dlo BryBhe,l 1\\\\\.\KAIIOSVIf'f 1'F1S,ft, to!20 pus.Cater 6 MUM ad@map Me ralaad at.. "bore of byWM that door Me to IM mbar Below ORDINANCE NO. 012 -2007 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE YEAR 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING THE KEY LARGO LIVABLE COMMUNIKEYS MASTER PLAN; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TO FORWARD A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan Objective 101.20 identifies the Livable CommunKeys Planning Program as a planning program designed to address community needs while balancing the needs of all of Monroe County;and of fact:WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners makes the following findings I. Policy 101.20.1 of the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan directs Monroe County to develop a series of Community Master Plans while shall include specific criteria, including close coordination with other community plans ongoing in the same area and sets out twelve principles to direct development of the master plans. 2. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is the product of the Livable CommunKeys program as outlined in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan Objective 101.20. 3. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan identified the following community objectives: resolve issues relating to non-conforming uses and structures, secure community access to the waterfront, ensure the protection of the terrestrial and marine environmental resources, provide a framework to encourage and improve the availability of affordable housing,and develop and apply guidelines that help bring about a sense of identity to the community and improve the aesthetics of the US-1 corridor. 4. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan will be adopted as a part of the Comprehensive Plan, and therefore any conflicts between the two must be resolved. 5. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan was reviewed during a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 26,2006. 6. The Strategies and Action Items in the Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan are the equivalent to the Objectives and Policies in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY,FLORIDA,THAT: Sec don 1. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is adopted as an amendment to the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. Sec.,.tlon 2. Amend Policy 101.20.2 in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan to read as follows: POLICY 101.20.2 The Community Master Plans shall be incorporated into the 2010 Comprehensive Plan as a part of the plan and be implemented as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following Community Master Plans have been completed in accordance with the principles outlined in this section and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners: 5. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is incorporated by reference into the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. The term Strategies in the Master Plan is equivalent to the term Objectives in the Comprehensive Plan and the term Action Item is equivalent to the term Policy; the meanings and requirements for implementation are synonymous. Secdon . If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,item, change or provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity. Section 4.All ordinances or parts of ordinance in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict. The repeal of an ordinance herein shall not repeal the repealing clause of such ordinance or revive any ordinance which has been repealed thereby. Section 5. This ordinance shall be forwarded by the Planning and Environmental Resources Department to the Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Chapter 163 and 380,Florida Statutes. Section 6. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida, but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission Approving the ordinance. Adoption of Key Largo Livable CommaniKeys Master Plan PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County,Florida, at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of-Way ,A.D.,2007. Mayor Mario DiGennaro y" Mayor Pro Tem Dixie Spehar —en Commissioner George Neugent Too Commissioner Charles"Sonny"McCoy ye Commissioner Sylvia Murphy yes BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY,FLORIDA BY Mayor/Chairperson (SEAL) N_ ATTEST: DANNY L.KOLHAGE, CLERK c M o�x b 7 _G-IA t0 DEPUTY�CL �� w C3 n _ MON E COIIMTY ATTQpNE11 OY�p A3 Ta o Key Largo Community Master Plan Executive Summary Monroe County's Livable CommuniKeys Program (LCP) is a community-driven planning process that addresses the individual needs of the island communities in the Florida Keys. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Plan covers the area between Mile Markers (MM) 97 and 107, excluding the offshore islands. The Key Largo LCP process, which started in May 2004, engaged the community in a comprehensive planning process, determined important island features, identified issues affecting these conditions, and related the stated desires of the community to future development activities. The Key Largo LCP's foundation was established through public input at workshops where community participants identified their perceptions and desires for Key Largo. Based upon the discussion in the public meetings and by interpreting responses received from the Community Survey,the following community vision statement was identified: "Key Largo will continue to be a livable island community where protection and enjoyment of the significant natural resources support a unique sense of place as the first island in the Florida Keys. We shall maximize our future by preserving our nationally recognized undersea environments, improve the visual character of our built environments through innovative redevelopment that enhances our quality of life,and strive to increase the sense of a small coastal town ambiance". The consensus goals identified by the community were: Land Use and Redevelopment 1) Direct future growth to lands that are most suitable for development and encourage preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. Community Character 2) Preserve and enhance important community qualities within the planning area that define Key Largo's casual village style atmosphere and natural environment and that enhance its status as the first island of the Florida Keys. 3) Protect and enhance historic, cultural and archeological resources within Key Largo to maintain the integrity of the community's unique character. Housing 4) Maintain the availability of affordable housing and workforce housing for local residents while preserving the character of the community. Environmental Protection S) Preserve, manage, and restore where appropriate, the natural resources within the planning area by providing open space, protecting water quality and acquiring and managing environmentally sensitive lands. ES-1 As of RUM Key Largo Community Master Plan Economic Development 6) Encourage redevelopment and infill development that supports and enhances the tourist- based economy of the planning area. 7) Recognize water-dependent and water-related commercial uses as an important source of economic sustainability within the planning area. Transportation 8) Provide residents and visitors of the planning area with a safe and useable transportation system for vehicles,bicycles and pedestrians with opportunities for transit systems where appropriate. Recreation 9) Provide additional resources for enhancement of existing facilities, expansion of active and passive land-based recreation opportunities and seek to expand public shoreline access for water-based recreational activities for all age groups within the community. Community Facilities 10)Provide adequate public facilities to serve the existing and future needs of the planning ` area. Community Involvement 11)Continue to support the localized sense of community, which encourages citizen involvement,implementation and monitoring of the Master Plan for Key Largo. From a planning perspective, and in order to achieve the community goals, the following objectives were identified: ■ Resolve issues relatinlVo non-conforming uses and structures. The LCP provides an opportunity to address non-conformities. ■ Secure community access to the waterfront. Key Largo, while surrounded by water, has relatively few water access points for the community. Ensure the protection of the terrestrial and marine environmental resources. ■ Provide a framework to encourage and improve the availability of affordable housing. ■ Develop and apply design guidelines that help bring about a sense of identity to the community and improve the aesthetics of the US-1 corridor. As part of the planning process, the community supported the application of neo-traditional community design principles to establish more pedestrian on .ntCC Q„mmu�ti__by creating walkable environments where people live, work and play in close proximity to their daily needs. These principles include: ■ Identify important community locations that can be redeveloped to provide increased public realm activity. ■ Preserve important natural resources. ■ Promote the creation of mixed-use developments that provide access to daily needs within a safe and walkable environment. ES-2 is af5/24196 Key largo Community Master Plan ■ Identify a full range of housing options for members of the community to live in the community throughout their entire life cycle. ■ Increase attention to aesthetic improvements so that both public infrastructure and private developments are attractive locales where people want to spend time, and ■ Include multiple transportation modes (e.g., pedestrian, bicycle, automobile, or transit) throughout the community to increase mobility and safety. As a result of the public input, technical analysis, and policy evaluation completed for the planning area, the following design concepts are proposed to guide subsequent activities and communicate the study's key recommendations. ■ Establish community focal areas. The planning area lacks strong community identity, or "sense of place" locations. These are locations where walkable environments support mixed-use development and people congregate for their daily needs. Several important geographic locations exist where enhanced development and public realm facilities could add to community identity. The need for compact, mixed-use centers requires complementary land uses in closer proximity to residential areas than typically created in conventional suburban development. The intent of crc Zting such activity centers is to preserve environmentally sensitive areas and promote pedestrian walkability through expanded travel choices for residents, visitors and employees. ■ Improve US-1 Corridor conditions. In the Florida Keys, US-1 functions as both the major highway and a "main street" for the local communities. Improvements are needed to increase bicycle/pedestrian accommodation and to enhance and define public realm aesthetics while maintain existing LOS requirements. Controlling speed and providing improved aesthetics within the corridor are important to residents and visitors alike. Visitors should easily be able to discern where they are located and where important community uses occur. ■ Establish design guidelines for new developJttent. Define appropriate scale and develop architectural and site design guidelines for community identity center locations that reflect market demand and support local community character enhancement. ■ Promote multiple transportation modes. Recognize that US-1 must function as a multi- modal transportation corridor. Identify enhancements within quality redevelopment and new development that features transit-supportive and pedestrian-friendly site design and new infrastructure. Invest in public transportation strategies that reduce dependence on automobile travel between Community Centers for local trips by providing an integrated network of bicycleJpedestrian facilities and convenient island transit service linking key origins and destinations with connections to the regional system. ES-3 as of 5/24106 DRAFT Key Largo Livable ComrnunlKey o Plan s ti zi �.7.. ..,1�S .'�L"!-.o .% 1•. T .mod.. �� .i� �. ,•. Y .r P� f �� _,� Z s —��f III� ,r�"•f`.'��+� �!ij.r�: �;� �• i` "' Key • • Community Master Monroe County, Florida May 2006 Key Largo Community Master Plan Executive Summary Monroe County's Livable CommuniKeys Program (LCP) is a community-driven planning process that addresses the individual needs of the island communities in the Florida Keys. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Plan covers the area between Mile Markers (MM) 97 and 107, excluding the offshore islands. The Key Largo LCP process, which started in May 2004, engaged the community in a comprehensive planning process, determined important island features, identified issues affecting these conditions, and related the stated desires of the community to future development activities. The Key Largo LCP's foundation was established through public input at workshops where community participants identified their perceptions and desires for Key Largo. Based upon the discussion in the public meetings and by interpreting responses received from the Community Survey,the following community vision statement was identified: "Key Largo will continue to be a livable island community where protection and enjoyment of the significant natural resources support a unique sense of place as the first island in the Florida Keys. We shall maximize our future by preserving our nationally recognized undersea environments, improve the visual character of our built environments through innovative redevelopment that enhances our quality of life, and strive to increase the sense of a small coastal town ambiance". The consensus goals identified by the community were: Land Use and Redevelopment 1) Direct future growth to lands that are most suitable for development and encourage preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. Community Character 2) Preserve and enhance important community qualities within the planning area that define Key Largo's casual village style atmosphere and natural environment and that enhance its status as the first island of the Florida Keys. 3) Protect and enhance historic, cultural and archeological resources within Key Largo to maintain the integrity of the community's unique character. Housing 4) Maintain the availability of affordable housing and workforce housing for local residents while preserving the character of the community. Environmental Protection 5) Preserve, manage, and restore where appropriate, the natural resources within the planning area by providing open space, protecting water quality and acquiring and managing environmentally sensitive an . S-1 As of 5/I4M6 Key Largo Community Master Plan Economic Development y`�i 6) Encourage redevelopment and infill development that supports and enhances the tourist- based economy of the planning area. 7) Recognize water-dependent and water-related commercial uses as an important source of economic sustainability within the planning area. Transportation 8) Provide residents and visitors of the planning area with a safe and useable transportation system for vehicles,bicycles and pedestrians with opportunities for transit systems where appropriate. Recreation 9) Provide additional resources for enhancement of existing facilities, expansion of active and passive land-based recreation opportunities and seek to expand public shoreline access for water-based recreational activities for all age groups within the community. Community Facilities 10)Provide adequate public facilities to serve the existing and future needs of the planning area. Community Involvement 11)Continue to support the localized sense of community, which encourages citizen involvement, implementation and monitoring of the Master Plan for Key Largo. From a planning perspective, and in order to achieve the community goals, the following objectives were identified: ■ Resolve issues relating to non-conforming uses and structures. The LCP provides an opportunity to address non-conformities. ■ Secure community access to the waterfront. Key Largo, while surrounded by water, has relatively few water access points for the community. • Ensure the protection of the terrestrial and marine environmental resources. ■ Provide a framework to encourage and improve the availability of affordable housing. ■ Develop and apply design guidelines that help bring about a sense of identity to the community and improve the aesthetics of the US-I corridor. As part of the planning process, the community supported the application of neo-traditional community design principles to establish more pedestrian oriented communities, by creating walkable environments where people live, work and play in close proximity to their daily needs. These principles include: ■ Identify important community locations that can be redeveloped to provide increased public realm activity. ■ Preserve important natural resources. ■ Promote the creation of mixed-use developments that provide access to daily needs within a safe and walkable environment. ES-2 As a15124rob Key Largo Community Master Plan ■ Identify a full range of housing options for members of the community to live in the s4, community throughout their entire life cycle. ■ Increase attention to aesthetic improvements so that both public infrastructure and private developments are attractive locales where people want to spend time,and ■ Include multiple transportation modes (e.g., pedestrian, bicycle, automobile, or transit) throughout the community to increase mobility and safety. As a result of the public input, technical analysis, and policy evaluation completed for the planning area, the following design concepts are proposed to guide subsequent activities and communicate the study's key recommendations. ■ Establish community focal areas. The planning area lacks strong community identity, or "sense of place" locations. These are locations where walkable environments support mixed-use development and people congregate for their daily needs. Several important geographic locations exist where enhanced development and public realm facilities could add to community identity. The need for compact, mixed-use centers requires complementary land uses in closer proximity to residential areas than typicall created in conventional suburban development. The intent of creating such activity centers is to preserve environmentally sensitive areas and promote pedestrian walkability through expanded travel choices for residents,visitors and employees. ■ Improve US-1 Corridor conditions.In the Florida Keys,US-1 functions as both the major highway and a "main street" for the local communities. Improvements are needed to increase bicyclelpedestrian accommodation and to enhance and define public realm aesthetics while maintain existing LOS requirements. Controlling speed and providing improved aesthetics within the corridor are important to residents and visitors alike. Visitors should easily be able to discern where they are located and where important community uses occur. ■ Establish design guidelines for new development. Define appropriate scale and develop architectural and site design guidelines for community identity center locations that reflect market demand and support local community character enhancement. ■ Promote multiple transportation modes. Recognize that US-1 must function as a multi- modal transportation corridor. Identify enhancements within quality redevelopment and new development that features transit-supportive and pedestrian-friendly site design and new infrastructure. Invest in public transportation strategies that reduce dependence on automobile travel between Community Centers for local trips by providing an integrated network of bicyclelpedestrian facilities and convenient island transit service linking key origins and destinations with connections to the regional system. ES-3 As of 5114M6 Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Page 1 of 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: Bahama Villa a Connectivity Pro'ect-Southard St. Enhancements Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council): City of Key West Contact Carolyn Sheldon _ Title Senior Grants Administrator Address _3140 Flanler Avenue, Key West, Florida 33040 Phone (305) 809-3741 ' F,a X (305)809-3739 Email: csheldon ke est ' .cam Priority(relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor) 2 Name of Applicant(If other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities, transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies, school districts, local education agencies, or schools; tribal governments, other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. 1. Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined in Title 23 USC, Section 213(b)which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section(101) ® Construction, planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks; bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals,traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ❑ Construction, planning and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, Including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access dally needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ❑ Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas ❑ Community Improvements including: ❑ Inventory, control,or removal of outdoor advertising ❑ Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities ❑ Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species and provide erosion control; and ❑ Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. Transportation Altematives Program Application—fiDOT District 6 Paga 2 of 4 ❑ Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for O Stormwater management, control,water pollution prevention or abatement related to highwe construction or due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11). 32(a)and 329 O Reduce vehicle-Mused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program(Section 1404).Note:ff you check one of thea please also submit a Safe Routes appft-aft ❑ Infrastructures-related projects: Planning,design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail In the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements,traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements,on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities,and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Non-infrastructure-related activities:to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders,traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training,volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to.respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed?(check all that apply) ❑ Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. C3 Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acquisition ® Construction Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). (c) Where is the project located(and what are the termini, If appropriate)? Include location map. (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects.Summarize any special characteristics of project (a) Describe the projects existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions,certified surveys). (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition,expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability,and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. ThnepwWoon Alta dvm Proem Application—MOT District 6 Page 9 of 4 3. Project Implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. Xis!MPOrtant tv pride as detailed and accurate a project schedule (a) Describe the proposed method of performing(Le. contract or in-house)and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial,environmental and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal requirements. (b) Provide a detalled project schedule Including any permitting and/or land/right-of-way acquisition required (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project. (Examples include written endorsement,formal declaration, resolution,financial donations or other appropriate means). (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability/use. (a) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. 4. Project Cost:What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ 0 Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ 0 Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ 0 Right of Way Acquisition. $ 0 Construction. $ 937,462.00 Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ 61,947.00 ` Other. (Describe) $ TOTAL: $ 999,409.00 How will the project be funded? FDOT Alternatives Funds$ 999,409.00 +Local $ 0 = Total$ 999�409.00 FDOT Alternatives Funds 100 % + Local 0 % = 100% TamsPorWon Akaentiv"Program Application—MOT DiSUW 6 Page 4 of4� CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR 1 I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by City of Key West (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council)and that said entity will- (1)provide any required funding match; (2)enter into a maintenance agreement with the Fionda Department of Transportation; (3)-comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4)support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases In these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. iZn Bitas Name(pleas®type or print) City Manager Tdiee G 'z Date/ FOR MOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include In Work Program I Transportation Allcmatives Program Application—FDOT DiStTiJt 6 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT SIX 2013 TAP APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2.b. The proposed improvements will provide an ADA compliant access route along with a vehicular way that will meet or exceed the minimum design standards. 2.c. The project is located in the"Old Town" area of Key West and more specifically the Bahama Village neighborhood. Please see attached location map. 2.d. The contemplated project includes multimodal connectivity opportunities with an emphasis on "walkable community"features, development of uniform design standards for the public realm including existing and proposed bicycle paths, streets, sidewalks, lighting, entry features, signage, landscaping, street furniture, drainage, sewer, electric, and related issues. Please see attached typical sections. 2.e. Southard Street is documented on the 1829 William Whitehead Survey of the City of Key West as a 50.0' right-of-way. 2.f. No right-of-way acquisition required. 2.g. Currently there or no other phases of this project underway. 2.h. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase multimodal connectivity on and between Duval Street and the Truman Waterfront Parcel in order to facilitate movement between the existing historic community fabric and the proposed waterfront development area. The corridors addressed by this multiple phased project are shown on the attached location map, and include portions of two north/south roads (Duval Street and Fort Street), as well as portions of Southard Street, Angela Street, Geraldine Street, Petronia Street, Olivia Street, Truman Avenue, Julia Street, Virginia Street and Amelia Street which are generally located between the Truman Waterfront Parcel and Duval Street. 3.a. The City will competitively bid the project to obtain an FDOT pre-qualified contractor and CEI. City staff will perform grant and project administration. Please see attached Report of Previous Funding Awards. 3.b. Please see attached project schedule. 3.c. Please see attached City Commission Resolution#08-163. 3.c. The City of Key West will retain full ownership and responsibility of these right-of-way improvements. 3.d. The City will provide in-kind services (project administration) during construction and include, as a matter of procedure, any required match in its capital improvement plan and annual budget. 3.e. The City held four public meetings during the design phase to provide"community awareness" of this proposed project. If funded, it is the City's policy to hold a public meeting, prior to construction, to keep the residents informed. At all times City staff is available to address residents questions/concerns about the project. HITMARSH LN Q ffi SIMONTON ST. SIMDNTON ST. ONTON ST. Z J g � D z DUVAL ST. 700 —IT——900——r—1 7-1 DUVAL ST. gl ofI I snl Z I gl ° 1 JI DI 3I I ujI � 1 > WHITEHEAD ST.F I I a 1 WHITEHEAD ST i I I I I WHITEHEAD ST. z I F I�I�I t I I W 1 TERRY LN. I I I LL N � 1 1 I I I I I ° THOMAS ST. ' I THOMAS ST.I I I I I I I I 10 ,1FI 0 N sco ILLJ��I I I I I 1 O D 1 EMMA ST. �❑ O o1 I o11 IST � �� f al II' Z Q NOAA y�5� NAVY j NAVY a 41 A�� EXTERNAL ROADWAY ENHANCEMENT y�P q ® CITY OWNED TRUMAN WATEaFRONT PROPERTY e0 LOCATION MAP COST ESTIMATE DETAIL Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs $733,853.00 Estimated Construction Cost Increase (CPI + 3%/yr) $ 92,105.00 Sub-Total $825,958.00 Key West Factor (13.5% markup) $111,504.00 Construction, Engineering and Inspection (7.5%) $ 61,947.00 Total Estimated Project Costs $999,409.00 Fr Kimley+tom l _. andASWodatea,Inc. PROJECT: Bahama Vlllaga Truman Waterfront Connectivity Projects PROJECT#: 144481000 CLIENT: City of Key West Monday, February 28,2011 SOUTHARD STREET-OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Roadway,Drainage,Landscape,Handscape,and Roadway Lighting 'The Enghraerhaa no eonW aver Me aoat 0/labor,avehWadr,eg0fpmar t orservleea Iarrdahed by oMam,or ow Me Contrectora meowte of deDerodnhy pdcm,ora*w eompeNNve blMug o►mvaet amcft%na Opbbes o)probable costa provided hardn ere baaed m Sra bdormalloa bmm to the Brgbreer et MIS dmo and ropresont 0My fire Enghwer'sJudgment as a des(gn WotembpW tamahv wM are consbuWon brdusby. T7re DWImw eamrot and does not guerarrtoe Bret proposals,btft or sdeal eombuatbn ooste WM not MY fte,Na apbbn of probebla wets.• ROADWAY PAY IIE1Mi8 PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT REP NO. QUANTITY COST Cow 101-1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 000 000 10,2.1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS $15,000.00 15 0m 104-10-3 PREVENTION CONTROL&ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION LS 1 $16.000.00 $15.WO 108-1 A84BUILTS LS 1 57.5W.001 $7,500 110-1-1 CLEARING 8 GRUBBING LS 1 OOO.Op 000 110.1.1A CLEARINGS GRUBBING SELEC LS SIZOW 120.1 REGULAR EXCAVATION CY 493 33.484 12" EMBANKMENT LTN 6 ism704 C COQUINA E LBR 100 5 Sy 17.8 17.50 285-704A M NTED COQUINA BASE LBR 1 8 CURB PAD BY W3 15.00 WOO .70.1 MILLING EJOWTING AM44ALT PAVEMENT 1'-W AVG.DEPTH 228 91 334-1-13 8 AVE TIC CONCRETE(TRAFFIC Cl 25 617&00 54.3581 7-32 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE FRICTION COURSE C.FC-9.6 RUB R 1.S TN 191 $20o.00 S38.2001 25•i-M INLETS CURB P-fi (PARTIAL) EA 1 IZM.00 26-1-205 INLETS C P-8 EA 4 $3,0W.00 1 000 25-5-1 MANHOLE-ADJUST I 3 EA 10 .00 25.6 VALVE BOX UST EA 15 S300.00 $4,501) 174-1 8 CONC.PIPE CULVERT Ir Wl LF 170 $80.00 $13,600 520-1-10 CO CURB A GUTTER LF 1548 .00 US.440 -1 CONCRETE AWWWALK 4'THICK Sy 1 109 2 PMM0=Cdr=WAB' K BY 247.2 JX1 $17,304 -108 LOOP ASSEMBLY F F AS 5 94(M nni S6.000 lowla MEIER BOX JUST FA 30 S575.001 17 250 1644-700 FIRE HYDRANT ADJUST tl MODIFY) EA 1 I slA00=11 ROADWAY SUBTOTAL $34ues STONING A PAVEMENT MARONO PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRwECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM Moo QUANTRY COST COST 11 SINGLE POST SIGN,(FIU)(LE HAN 12 AS 22 75.00 10 50 roD.M11B PEDESTRIAN WAYRN DING WON AS 1 $4 . $4.5W 00.20-11C VEHICULAR WAYFINDING SIGN SINGLE AS 1 0m. 000 11-11421 THERMOPLASTIC(STANDARD) HITS SOLID LF 1938 $1.50 82,907 11-11-123 THERMOPLASTIC(STANDARD)(WHITE)(SOLID) 1 LF 217 $2.00 11.11-125 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD H SOLID LF B0 $3.50 0 11-11441 THERMOPLASTIC STIC STANDARD HITS SKIP 8'-10' LF 48 1 zo 572 11-11-160 1 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD HITS MESSAGE EA 8 $100.00 11.11-170 THERMOPLASTIC(STANDARD](WHITE)ARROWS EA 2 .00 SSW 11-11-221 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD OW SOLID 8�0 .00 ZONING&PAVMT MARI(MO SUBTOTAL- lj27 13 SOUTHARD LANDSCAPE PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM NO. I QUANTITY COST COST 18-78 STREET BOLLARD EA 5.00 9x 510.78A BIKE SOLLARD EA 2 1- P WOMMM TURF COMMONBERMUDA SY 282 fS.OD 1410 a1-2A MLLCH CY 28.0 .00 f1 570.1-28 TOPSOIL CY 251 t 755 68G.ImIA L4bDBCAPE COMPLETE SMALL SHRUBS EA 2.589 2,10AO WSW 1-18 LANDSCAPE COMPLETE MALLIMEDRJM PLANTS) EA 4 .00 31 21-74-1 TRASH RECEPTACLE EA 2 $750.00 1 1-75.1 N EA 2 f2500.00 000 721 77 880E RACK EA 2 3750.00 t 500 1.M FLEXI-PAVE THICK 001.014REDWOM 404 Fmoo 826 LANDSCAPE SUBTOTAL a S411,851 LIGHTING PAY ITEIIIS DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT QUANTITY COST COST [jPAY:M CONDUIT SCHEDULE UNDERWOUND 1674 $16.09 10 t LIOHT POLE COMPLETE FIJRN d INSTALL EA 32 .00 715-7.11 LOADCENTER SECON VOLT EA M.00 715-14-11 PULL BOX IO EA D911 g SUBTOTAL 0 TAL $07,139 NCY 10% >i88,714 OTAL= iT Pay horn Footrests: 1. Opinion of prdmble cost(OPC)Is based upon 100%construction plans dated Febm"2011. SOUFHAFtD Prm 2 i f t a Q E O � 3 7 K Q S 7 t0 G Y a a � z R a z m F u 0 N H Zm w o � z w U G Z o Q = W m Z w W H w w oC H N Q a L= N r Z ' O cN U w_ O a Q a u H U w Z Z O u W g mm LLJ N U J � m D C w W 3 E a LL E U Q a ° o c 3 o o m k ie u a m u a u c Z A17 AVM'1SIX3 ��Y 1 -- r i � ERv ti a a IRol y ti o; Llco o 3M17 AVM'151X3 � 44WIN t ci3c m1 do � i 3N17CZ AVM'15/X3 tb a� q $ 10 w P , aW ti a _ ¢ g AR ac � ~1 'I i j I + 3¢330 EX4 iC�l N ~ ��p IQ-, a h J 3N17 AVM'15/X3 =ti ~ � � y3a�Wcp�W3N y�aN �i34 3J1 ` ywa� yW�of �` tiysx� N § � ; � ® % ) a y| � W � ! � 3mn AVU*ISIX9—— � \ si qd ■ m # q @ ■ } § ■ _ I b � � m k § J @ � k §K ) k __.x3 — k # � | | � : § r � im e �$ k k� \ %q �■� � /� ƒJ � % w� � ■ �� aw• ak + / IZ � d7/§ � & PREVIOUS FUNDING HISTORY m �o c � � o � v d vLi C C o c c V N N do C Z Z Z Z C z z Z d C U. y ii m y z z z .s z z z z z z 01 z z z o w o o w O d C > a C > ` E o 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 d E Ol n N 41 f0 O \ en N cri rs c o o v `" a 19IR-4 o N QI IA n M Ln p1 d Ln M N 0 N 'O m Ln cl O Lp a N 'O M N m V 7 O C Ln w co N N = c n 0 LL r a M .--� O c LL •--� n lD 4 LV 1L � Vf Vf Vf Vf N t V? Vf Vf � Gi tw Z w y m O pm1 O^0 n 3 w doco M O � d! W W W a O 2 rl O d O ,n .1 W O co 10 O to ct v .1 E $ N rn v n d E a m w m Q z ri N Q z LL V5, LL t 0 0 0 m m P 0 0 0 M w O pal w N O �+ Q a l0 O M Ln c Q Ol Ilil0 C� 00 N a M M m p Ln .--I co E co m w Ln r, E v m rl m Q C N a Q C LL LL t/f t/f t/f Vf N t/f t/f V► O o CL C U U U N N 3 N O to N C C C U v u m w c a a a MFA c O L O A. O m O LLcu LL u LL u L 0 U U s C a a a 3 a D �^ a o f0 m C n�i v `n Ln 'C c ° m m 3 c F N Q '1 F in a M J � J 3 'V a w m N N 'i K Op N .O pL LL E o`n Ln uo o y ccoo y m oe m m mLn v n Y y d a rN a C NN la0 lND O N CO '" W Ln c ^ L O ° oc � U � � � ode � � � g z o o g CL CL o g a C �� d LA LL Q LL Q in LL Q in LL Q LL Q Q LL Q Z LL Q LN M a .--I N m u a �o t w 0 0 w c O o a a a a a a a a a a a a oc z ZI z z z ZI z z z z z z v a a a a a a a a a a a a w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } z z z z z z z z z z z z � � z Q w z z z z z z z z z z z z a G � W 00 00 00 01 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 f0 E N N N N N N N N N N N N 'O w A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ w y N N N O O lD tD lD w tD lD tD OQ N N N m M r-I -4 ri "I a--1 a--1 •--� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ C d tD wlD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD O u d °�° o 0 0 0 0 0 o m u o 00 o o v o o Sri c w wl � O a0 O O 00 M m a c m u `1 `° o LL N u w A D_ C y O O N O O O O O O O O 1, 1L r. W O O OR Ui O V1 O O O O O lD O & I-t M It M O •--4 N Ln O O O N N �+ 0) In ID rl N 00 w m 0) Ln 00 O � , ' O � Ln00 00 00 w 0) LnN w N I N O O 1- N - n 1 00 lD 1- N lD lD �Ln-1 ON 00 N V l0 m am-1 �N-1 � a ; o` 'E o O o O o O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln o Ui o 0 0 o O o f0 4 m N m O Ln lD LA O to O 1� O 3 0) Ln V1 rl O 00 N m LnM 00 + Q O Ln (1 0) 1, O O w w m O O 01 -F n n 00 r- N lD lD O C aLni N N N lD 0�0 N m aM-1 aN-1 E s Q ? W w w w w w w w w w w w w U U U U U U U U U U U U YI _ C _ c _ c _ C _ C _ c _ c _ c _ c _ c _ C _ C M Y Y I �"� c Y f0 Y N 03 Y N 03 +�+ 10 10 Y A a CL c n n a a a a a a a a +� 11 w LL w 11 w LL w LL w 11 w LL w lL w LL w LL w LL w LL w N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U a Q a a Q a a Q a Q a a a a Q 0 In m r-1 00 N c 0) O In lD O r-1 Ln Ln Ln in v v o a Ln a v v v Ln Ln Ln m m m ;, m m enc m en en N -4 N .1 n -4 a Q c .1 a w Q a .1 Q a a Q cr cc cc 00 00 > lD 00 0C O 01 0: N w m D: a+ n OC 00 K �' a-i w N •--� 00 'i 00 Q a--1 OO N Q w N Q m a-i a 1�0 N Q N Q y a--4 a O -, Q H •..� a •..� a n cc n n Ln Ln a �n �n 3 Ln Ln .. Ln L+ H N \ r N \ C N \ �+ lD \ > lD \ 10 lD \ w lD \ O lD \ f0 lD \ O lD \ w lD \ VI lD \ N 00 VI N O A N 0) H N kD a N Ln N �--� t N -4 '= N r-1 c N Ln w N Ln C N N N O « ^ 'It '4* ; 4 m C N U N y N ,aw_+ ry W N �--4 0. � •--I � � a--1 a w a a ai w a w � a a �--1 LL Q N LL Q LL- Q J LL Q C LL Q LL- Q lL Q W LL Q lL Q Q lL Q (.� LL Q W LL Q Ln 00 0) N m Ili Ln m t w d c o w c O 10 c z z z z z z z z z V m y c } z z z z z z z z z u � � d Z 'o d o z z z z z z z z z d 0) 0) 0) M rn 00 00 E O O O o O O O o O aO.1 aw-1 .0.1 -4 -4 Ln N N N l\O tm W l0 l\O l\O l\O c 6 0 u t0 M O O V7 O O O O .-i y l0 M O O I� V1 0o O .1 N Y 'O N M 01 -0*' 0000 rn V Ln 00) cn Ln to '6 .-i 01 N N O V -4 l0 O O M CL > > N N rq O Lf 0 Y LL V M M ^ cn aY ' to c 0 Ln U. y m t^O O O N uOi N O 01 n O M 00 N N m w 00 N M N 00 N 00 m M M O O O .1 Ln Lnm a tOD a t�D rnn N 'O LL v► � � v► v► v► v► v► v► N a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N .-i 00 N l0 N O O O c a a L cl - v � a No o rl Ln o c r, -crc., Ln m v o v o a m E c 1 �o 3 LL L► L► V? V? L► L► L► V1 L► fA Y T N C N N VI c C C C c C 0 C C c a c Q c Q c a c a c o turf 0 :° :° n a H LL U LL U LL U LL U LL U LL U N c 11 W lL OJ Q Q Q Q Q Q Jr- ;-A Q Q LL N 0 07 �+ 0.10 v a Ln 3 v o _ ran - o o O .1 Q .1 Q Q .1 Q � .1 Q .1 a fC0 N � a .--i J a N J N o s wl d, s v Ln s m «° is u+ E LL r-I O y �--� a-i Ln LnM 00 h .-i N 7 O N > y > n N N �p ,C N M N a Vf N a 'O N a 'D N ^ -40 y N � y N 00 fm d E a _4 a .1 __ v .1 r a -4 «: a .i t M > � 00 v � 00 v ^ o y a o a a N a c a c a LL m LL ro a O a LL LL Q W) LL Q lL Q r1 LL Q O LL Q O LL Q G Il Q {L LL Q {L LL Q W Il 00 01 O .-i N M V N N N N N CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION Please note: The Resolution included in this application submittal was passed to ratify the LAP Agreement for the project. This demonstrates the City has planned to see the project through construction. RESOLUTION NO. 08-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, RATIFYING THE ATTACHED LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT -- FPN #415406-2, BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR DUVAL STEET/TRUMAN ANNEX IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $491,964.00; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 : That the attached Local Agency Program is hereby ratified. Section 2 : That this Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and adoption and authentication by the signature of the presiding officer and the Clerk of the Commission. Passed and adopted by the City Commission at a meeting held this 3rd day of June , 2008 . Authenticated by the presiding officer and Clerk of the Commission on June 4 , 2008. Filed with the Clerk June 4 2008 . MORGAN THERSON,JMAYOR ATTE T: CHERYL SMITIO CITY CLERK of tit r� VIV u � r Rt�g� • TO: JIM SCHOLL, CITY MANAGER FROM: ROLAND FLOWERS P.E., CITY ENGINEER DATE: April 23, 2008 Subject: Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements FPN No. 415406-2, LAP Agreement Project Issues The City of Key West and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) would like to enter into an agreement known as a Local Area Program (LAP) agreement to support the Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2. The City of Key West is proposing to upgrade and or create ingress/egress routes construction/upgrade of roads, sidewalks, etc. Enhance the livable communities i.e. benches, bike racks, etc. along with interior recreation trails from Duval Street to the Truman Annex grounds. The FDOT is designated by the Federal Government to manage and distribute the funding and oversee the project from design to construction. The total amount for the project is $491,964.00. In order to receive the money budgeted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)the City of Key West will need to allocate the total amount budgeted for the FDOT project and initially pay for the project. Then the City of Key West will be reimbursed by FDOT through the Local Agency Program (LAP) division of District 6. This is standard procedure for FDOT projects involving Local Agencies utilizing the LAP program. The Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement assures the project is being performed according FDOT standards and guidelines. This also enables LAP to monitor the progress of the project and coordinate with the City of Key West any changes or modifications to approved plans. All reimbursement of budgeted FDOT money will be released through the Local Agency Program (LAP). Options 1. Authorize the LAP Agreements for Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 2. Do not authorize the LAP Agreements Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 Advantages/Disadvantages 1. The project will create safer conditions in traffic for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic by performing the above mentioned construction and improvements. 2. The disadvantage is that funding from FDOT will not be released for reimbursement unless the City of Key West enters into the Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement required by FDOT. Financial Issues FDOT has budgeted money in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) for the projects. The City will have to submit to FDOT for reimbursement as construction progresses. Recommendation Ratify the LAP Agreement Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) If I can be of further assistance or you require additional information, please call at 809-3965. Florida Department of Transportation, District Six h9c i of 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: Bahama Village Connectivity Project-Angela St Enhancements Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state,or federal agency, or tribal council): City of Key-West Contact Carolyn Sheldon Tide Senior Crante Administrator _ - _ _ . inistrator Address 3140 Fla ler Avenue Key West Florida 33040 Phone 305 809-3741 ' Fax(305)809.3739 Email: csholdontMkevwestcity.com Priority(relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor)` 3 Name of Applicant(if other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities,transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies, school districts, local education agencies,or schools; tribal governments, other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. 1. Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined In Title 23 USC, Section 213(b)which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section(101) ® Construction, planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals,traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure,and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ❑ Construction,planning and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ❑ Construction of turnouts,overlooks and viewing areas ❑ Community Improvements Including: ❑ Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising ❑ Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities 0 Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to Improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species and provide erosion control;and O Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. 7Yan9portahon Altemativcs Pmgram Application—FpoT district 6 Page 2 of 4 ❑ Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for GI Stormwater management, control,water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff including activities described In 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11), 32(a)and 329 Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning,designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program (Section 1404).Nofe. ff you check one of these.please also submit a Safe Routes applfcaffon. ❑ Infrastructure-related projects: Planning, design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail In the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk Improvements,traffic calming and speed reduction Improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements,on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities,secure bicycle parking facilities, and traffic diversion Improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Non-infrastructure-related activities: to encourage walking and bicycling to school,including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders,traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment,and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed?(check all that apply) ❑ Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. ❑ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acquisition ® Construction ❑ Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). (c) Where is the project located(and what are the termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Summarize any spedal characteristics of project (e) Describe the projects existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats,deeds,prescriptions, certified surveys). (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability,and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way, (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. (h) Other specific project Information that should be considered. TrsnVwMiou Altexmtives Program Application—FDOT Dis HO 6 Pagc 3 of 4 3. Project Implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. It is important to provide as detailed and accurate a project p � schedule and cost estimate as possible. (a Describe theproposed method ) of performing(i.e. contract or in-house)and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial, environmental and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal requirements. (b) Provide a detailed project schedule including any permitting and/or land/dght-of-way acquisition required (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project. (Examples include written endorsement,formal declaration, resolution,financial donations or other appropriate means). (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availabiifty/use. (a) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. 4. Project Cost: What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ 0 Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ 0 Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ — 0 Right of Way Acquisition. $ Construction. I Please note: Cycle 1 Funding $ 1,000,000.00 Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ 0 Other. (Describe) $ TOTAL: $ 00. 0 How will the project be funded? FDOT Alternatives Funds$ 1 OO�OLO 00.00 + Local $ 0 = Total$1,000,000.00 FDOT Alternatives Funds 100 % + Local 0 % = 100% t _s__ Tiansponation Alternatives Program Appikadon—Mar Dinrkt 6 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by City of Key West (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council)and that said entity will: (1)provide any required funding match; (2)enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3).comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and(4)support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. =danV4as Name(please type or print) City Manager Title Dale FOR MOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FUOT District 6 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT SIX 2013 TAP APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 2.b. The proposed improvements will provide an ADA compliant access route along with a vehicular way that will meet or exceed the minimum design standards. 2.c. The project is located in the "Old Town" area of Key West and more specifically the Bahama Village neighborhood. Please see attached location map. 2.d. The contemplated project includes multimodal connectivity opportunities with an emphasis on "walkable community"features, development of uniform design standards for the public realm including existing and proposed bicycle paths, streets, sidewalks, fighting, entry features, signage, landscaping, street furniture, drainage, sewer, electric, and related issues. Please see attached typical sections. 2.e. Angela Street is documented on the 1874 T.J Ashe Plat of the City of Key West as a 30.0' right-of-way. 2.f. No right-of-way acquisition required. 2.g. Currently there or no other phases of this project underway. 2.h. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase multimodal connectivity on and between Duval Street and the Truman Waterfront Parcel in order to facilitate movement between the existing historic community fabric and the proposed waterfront development area. The corridors addressed by this multiple phased project are shown on the attached location map, and include portions of two north/south roads(Duval Street and Fort Street), as well as portions of Southard Street,Angela Street, Geraldine Street, Petronia Street, Olivia Street, Truman Avenue, Julia Street, Virginia Street and Amelia Street which are generally located between the Truman Waterfront Parcel and Duval Street. 3.a. The City will competitively bid the project to obtain an FDOT pre-qualified contractor and CEI. City staff will perform grant and project administration. Please see attached Report of Previous Funding Awards. 3.b. Please see attached project schedule. 3.c. Please see attached City Commission Resolution#08-163 3.c. The City of Key West will retain full ownership and responsibility of these right-of-way improvements. 3.d. The City will provide in-kind services (project administration)during construction and include, as a matter of procedure, any required match in its capital improvement plan and annual budget. 3.e. The City held four public meetings during the design phase to provide "community awareness" of this proposed project. If funded, it is the City's policy to hold a public meeting, prior to construction, to keep the residents informed. At all times City staff is available to address residents questions/concerns about the project. Rt4ARSH Lh BT. SPAONTON Mr. L 0 ONT ON IcKjU —J.ew DUVALST. �_— 7�_�_�_�_� ��_ —� DUVAL ST. I I 6tu I WHITEHEAD 6T. I ! I "nV4EAD ST� ! I I WHREHE4D Sr. Lu ��i ■+ =11111LN. a!I � 7HOMAs ST. IUIL�J I I I I� U .� i � 7HOMAS ST. Z i � a 170I I I Ig l aI FORT ST. l i I� � 1 Zi I NOA a NAVY I If NAVY I �l -- EXTERNAL ROADWAY ANCEMENT � ® CrTY OWNED TRUMAN WA FRONT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP COST ESTIMATE DETAIL Engineer's Opinion of Probable Costs $1,243,167.00 Estimated Construction Cost Increase (CPI + 3%/yr) $97,974.00 Sub-Total $1,"1,171.00 Key West Factor(15% markup) $ 216,176.00 Construction, Engineering and Inspection (7.5%) $ 108,088.00 Total Estimated Project Costs $1,765,435.00 �� burley-Hour and AwwWt ,Inc. PROJECT: Bahama Village/Truman Waterfront Connectivity Projects PROJECT M 144481000 CLIENT:City of Key West Monday, February 28,2011 ANGELA STREET-OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Roadway,Drainage, Landscape,Handscape,and Roadway Lighting 'Tha engtnaar has no conb010ver the can orlab0r,matodah4 oqulpmatt or swvleea&rl&hsd by others.or aver the Coadactoes nepoWda of datsnnbdng pdcas or over comPatlgv®bhtding ormerket oondltlons 00d0ns at probable costa Pro~herefi are band on the hdonnsgon knwm to the EM&—et this Nme and rapraaent oely the 6tgbtasetAdgmem as a dasfgn Wouss/onal&maw with the aons&wUm hwuatry. nn ewbM ar cannot and does notguamntee flat pmposels,bids,o►ockW s0nstruetron costs wig not vary hom Rs aph*w o/Wobable costa,+ ROADWAY PAY nWS PAY DBSCRIPTI6N UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM NO. QUANTITY COST COST 101-1 MOINMATIO LS 1 S50 OD0.00 102-1 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC LS 1MIL000m S36 1U4-1-3 PREVENTION CONTROL&ABATEMENT OF EROSION ANV WATER POLLUTION LS U5.000.00 S25.00al 108-1 AS-SU0-T8 LS 1 15 000.00 16 000 110-1-1 CLEARING A GRUB G La 1S36.000 110,4AA CLEARING&MUSSING J$ELE 1 120-1 REGULAR EXCAVATION M. Cy 1810 Op 12P4 EMBMIKMENT CY 21 ISM 1 1l10.4 TYI STABILRATION SY 4.246 .50 310.6161 709 CEMENTED COQUINA BABE LBR 100 10- SY 7 3 7 W.00 17 1-13 SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CO RAFFICC TN 361 6176= 176 W-7-32 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE FRICTION COURSE(TRAFFIC C,MRS RUBBER 1.b TN 271 .00 25-1 INLETS CURB P-6 PARTIAL EA 1 90000 900 26-1481 INLETS C J$)(.clon EA 1 25-1-201 INLETS CURB P-S)(.clwl EA 11 000.01) 3 25-i INLETS CUR PE"I <1 EA 8 53.500.001 $28,000 261-711 INLETS GUTTER (TYPE CO FA 1 26I-M NLEfB BI C <1 EA 1 65 6000 $i EA 1 100.00 1 26283 MANHOLES P-B (PARTIAL) EA 1 100. 1 2S2 61 MANHOLES I EA 2 $3,0004C000 1 ADJUST UTILITIES EA 10 .00 VALVE BOX-ADJUST EA 1b 30.174-112 CON_.PIPE Ct1LVERT 12'gD LF 18 00 1 170 174-110 CONC.PIPE CUL 18-SD LF 322 Sal—Vol 18 C.ONCRET'E CURB 8 F MODIFIED LF 2427 OO 67 1-10 CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER rrYPE F1 LF 414 J)0 13 320 4 CONC E D LF ,0p -S CONCRETE CURB E 1 113 25 LF 113 25.00 980 VALLEYGIITTF1i CONCRET MODIFIED LF 42 .00 1 CONCRETE SIOEW 4-THICK SY 1 136 S60.00 568.1001 -2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6-THICK SY 832.7 $70.00 Snag8 1-2 ARCHITECTURAL PAVE]TS OADWA SY 1 192 5915.00 16 20 1-2A ARCHITECTURAL PAVERS REMOVE AND RESET) SY 140 125.00 17 1050-12,220 UTILITY PIPE RELOCATE C ATER LF 120 $76.00 19,000 1080-15 METER BOX EA 35 5,p0 1 1644-800 I FIRE HYDRANT MOCATE EA 1 $1.5m.00 1 AN ROADWAY SUBTOTAL- WIL784 ANGELA Pape 3 SIGNING A PAVEMENT NARKING PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM NO. QUANTITY COST COST molm-11 SINGLE POST SIGN I SS THAN 12 SFI AS 30 $475.00 14 0-1 A BUS STOP WAYFINDING SIGN AS 2 11,200.00 11-11-121 THERMOPLASTIC ANDARD HIT SOLID it 1.50 358 11-11-125 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD H SOLD LF 138 ,00 11-11-141 TH PLASTIC STANDARD H SKIP -4 8 LF 48 1.00 11-11-180 THBRMOPL EIC STANDARD HITS ME EA 26 300.00 7 500 711-11-221 THERMOPLASTIC STANDARD OW SOLID LF 1120 $3.00 ISIGNING A PAVMT MARKING SUBTOTAL a $18A10 LANDSCAPE PAY ITEMS L-2AY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT QUANTITY COST COST BOLLARD EA 4 BIKE POLLARD EA 3 PERFORMANCE TURF 90D COMOMU SY 499.1 00L CY 20.8 oO TOPSOIL CY 18616.00 780 IANDSCAPE COMPLETE SMALL SHRU88 EA 1 7UT 10.00 17 0 E SMALUND DIUM PIJWT EA 18 00 1-2 LANDSCAPE COMPLETE LARGE PLANTS EA 4 DO 174-1 TRASH RECEPTACLE EA 2 57wm 91.500 21-75-1 SEWHES EA 2 $2,5Wm $5000 1-77 SINE RACK EA 3 Li0.o0 LANDSCAPE SUBTOTAL a sal LKNITBNG PAY ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM NO. QUANTITY COST COST 15 2-11 CONDUIT PVC SCHEDULE UNDERGROUND LF lAas 515 00 76 154-300A LIGHT POLE COMPLETE FURNISH A INSTALLI EA 33 12XM.w 4 16-7-11 LOAD CENTER SECONDARY VOLTAG EA 1 600.00 7 1514-11 PULL BOX(CONCRETE)R EA 347�� LIGHTING SUBTOTAL- st881,e76 ALTERNATE BID ITEMS PAY DESCRIPTION UNIT PROJECT UNIT PROJECT ITEM NO. QUANTITY COST COST 1-28 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE CROSSWALKS BY 1B2 ma. 411.5 ALTERNATE BID SUBTOTAL Isil,820 GRAND TOTAL s $1 1 162 NTINGENCY• 10% I113.018 PROJECT TOTAL• SI JA.167 Pay Item Footnote: 1.Opinlon of probable post(OPC)Is based upon 11)0%con*ucOm plena dated February 2011, 4v".€L.a Pap 4 , § 7 _ f K % I I � - _ ! t | } | k \ . � . . k \. � ( Z \ . � � k w � z - Q � w . . 2 � w w § cr- F- � w (D $ � Q \ \ � t U w w O 2� 3 a % > \ � & w � Z � Z O ! � - � ® e < w w > 7 • p k J f ■ ! � { e � [ ui / \ k / \\ 2 .2- } } ` § � ! © V) Cal b Ml 3ffn MU'15lX3 Q N N gin I X3 '2 33l - a 1 I � 1 , Sal i 3xn ova•ssrx3 — :� � a � ®�.s�� a W d L 2 a� a W N Q' Z O N ♦ � � �W 4 ►''a ' In Sal 1 , zo ftA 1 1 1 1 ? qn ..22¢__CCRR$S5 9 5j� Wyg�yoy�� 3Nn AVN'LSIX3 • o '•W j2 II Q « 1, `-`•, v~i & m a � � j2 a 5,vn,wd•�sx3 a�`.. � y�� 3u RR 1, 3Hn#vd'ISiX3 _— m 10 w + £ � o '61 �^ w h At Ll AO � W 3Nn MM'1S/X3 —.— In Luy ♦ 7`� 3u i Rig all 2 PREVIOUS FUNDING HISTORY IN IN w t N Q e o_ � '�:, z z cm Im E O 8 O 8 O O`1 n N N E \ N N v IMD N b Ln CD O S Q : M N M tF Ln N N ONOco OD N !�pp .� IN7'1 a~-I N L? VL 4/► 4A N p a S Ol OnO. 10► N M Ln M at �' M P 01 01 � .. en a E rn ;,� r-i �,,,.v,f• N aA VF 'N Q 4A N to O M E S O O C7 S S M N 45; '� o Ln m 0. n LF t/► i/F iA LL t N O C of �^ H e W p "' °' m a m a c m p O L W 0 LL W [i U a cl m e N LL u a Q aao OO QQu V to co w fMri N lall c A a o �. LL Ln 4AN ~ H GNO 61 tz Ob N Cf p cc g `� a g a 1 g z La c C9 H LL Q U- Q FALL Q In LL Q �L U Q Q LL Q Z LL Q U a ~ N M N M T c a a a a a a a a a a a z z z z z z z z z z z z z F` m z z z z z z z z z z> � z z z z z z z z z z z z z d � � 0Q1 p pppp ppp�y pQ� a oe rn pp� ppp�� cm E N N N ry N N N N N N L' N r4 \ \ \ \ \ \ G0 N N N m m ` \ �+ l\C 1\D l\O I SO l0 lD, t0' lD l\O l\C l\C C 8 00 p p p p p v O S O O O O p M ' 0^0 O CD p t} p M �p 'p 00 N l0 O Nt m M LL M ~ O N to Q a K aA K K K K K K v> v> to K$C a V? oLn 8 $ o 0 0 M M O 'A N Ln O C C rt t r pppp C? { O d' u1 C^0 ONO 00 w (�OMpp1 Ln N 2 N Tj 'C L N 00 N � w 00 ^ N 1p ICI C ri gal M M ei .N-I Q VpppT An vp► K +A +A K K opf tpp/� vp> of E O O N O Ln o O O O O O M N M Co7 Ln �C lA O N O ri Q Q N cm Q01 n O O cmp OcpO M O 'y N N tQ t0 00 T M M N 7 LL Kaj CA U V V V U U U V U V C C C C C CL a a a c p c a a +° o f0 ns {V� LL V LL V LL V LL OJ LL V U. V LL V W (D LL w LL 0J LL Ol Q a Q a a a `cj V a a a a a a a Ln ma Ln Ln Ln Ln LM Ln W Ln 00 4d 5 a a ce 00 C4a a s N a Ol n 1 a a+ n a t oo r .ti a N �+ N \ �+ N �' C N +� t�0 \ lNC \ O. \ \ lt2 \ m b \ O tf1 a y Ln a a+ a ix N 00 a N (� 01 rV 01 N N �p Q N lC \ C t0 \ IA \ tt ^ E ^ C '7 Y C.J a N c a N C N C � 2 4 �_ LL V N_ eni 41 ILL a fV U- a i�� a Q G LL a WI� U- Q 5 U- a W a y a � O tpq a O a V LL Q W g Q er Ln 00 01 CD ti ti N z z z z d z z •S �, z z z z z z z z z as z z z z z z z z z IL cm m S C> 00 C> CDO0 l\D t\O l\O \14 t\O t\D t\O W \ \ \ N N tO 4 to 1\D G� a�pp m M 00 O N V1 00 LO P cm N N O .�1 p C M O Qa N M w [/► V? N Vl V► [/► Vf Vl N N m m pp p0 p pp pp�� a O O N Ln ppNp O O1 P C CN N l!1 Ln 00 tf N a0 t!1 O1LA n Q 't LA M ti CD0�1 Ln cm y . LD a 1O M D � Q LL Vp! iI} VpY Vp1 V} t4 tp/} V? Np V► s � O O O O O O O pO O S C Q N N N n W ONO O O qr VI 00 ri V IA Ol N O in W V U U U V OJ C40 N C C C C C _ C C _C a C p. C Q C +� N rn 00 O N ++ t4 �,,, CL LL LL U LL u IJ. U d ii U H LL 0) ii a Q Q Q Q Q m t Q Q a � ~ \ dQ .M~-'I \Qa u oo 00� Q 1 Ln \jN t Q ~V v a V . ^ ZD toN tD N 0 P. F.y s Q♦ 171 « � 00 ILW6 1c1. Q N Q 7 LL Q r4 LL Q LL Q :7LLQ C LL Q {L LL Q LCL Q F' Ne�-1 O e-1 N M N N N N N CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION Please note: The Resolution included in this application submittal was passed to ratify the LAP Agreement for the project. This demonstrates the City has planned to see the project through construction. RESOLUTION NO. 08-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, RATIFYING THE ATTACHED LOCAL AGENCY PROGRAM AGREEMENT -- FpN #415406-2, BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR DUVAL STEET/TRUMAN ANNEX IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $491,964.00; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That the attached Local Agency Program is hereby ratified. Section 2 : That this Resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its passage and adoption and authentication by the signature of the presiding officer and the Clerk of the Commission. Passed and adopted by the City Commission at a meeting held this 3rd day of June 2008 . Authenticated by the presiding officer and Clerk of the Commission on June 4 , 2008. Filed with the Clerk June 4 2008 . ATTE T: MORGAN HERSON, MAYOR ("fL-'jj- CHERYL SMITIJ CITY CLERK TO: JIM SCHOLL, CITY MANAGER FROM: ROLAND FLOWERS P.E., CITY ENGINEER DATE: April 23, 2008 Subject: Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements FPN No. 415406-2, LAP Agreement Project Issues The City of Key West and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) would like to enter into an agreement known as a Local Area Program (LAP) agreement to support the Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2. The City of Key West is proposing to upgrade and or create ingress/egress routes construction/upgrade of roads, sidewalks, etc. Enhance the livable communities i.e. benches, bike racks, etc. along with interior recreation trails from Duval Street to the Truman Annex grounds. The FDOT is designated by the Federal Government to manage and distribute the funding and oversee the project from design to construction. The total amount for the project is $491,964.00. In order to receive the money budgeted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)the City of Key West will need to allocate the total amount budgeted for the FDOT project and initially pay for the project. Then the City of Key West will be reimbursed by FDOT through the Local Agency Program (LAP) division of District 6. This is standard procedure for FDOT projects involving Local Agencies utilizing the LAP program. The Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement assures the project is being performed according FDOT standards and guidelines. This also enables LAP to monitor the progress of the project and coordinate with the City of Key West any changes or modifications to approved plans. All reimbursement of budgeted FDOT money will be released through the Local Agency Program (LAP). Options 1. Authorize the LAP Agreements for Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 2. Do not authorize the LAP Agreements Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 Advantages/Disadvantages 1. The project will create safer conditions in traffic for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic by performing the above mentioned construction and improvements. 2. The disadvantage is that funding from FDOT will not be released for reimbursement unless the City of Key West enters into the Local Agency Program (LAP) agreement required by FDOT. Financial Issues FDOT has budgeted money in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) for the projects. The City will have to submit to FDOT for reimbursement as construction progresses. Recommendation Ratify the LAP Agreement Duval Street/Truman Annex Improvements Project FPN No. 415406-2 in the amount of four hundred ninety one thousand nine hundred sixty four dollars ($491,964.00) If I can be of further assistance or you require additional information, please call at 809-3965. Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Page 1 of 4 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: QuAldo Shared Ugo PjdhL&, &2 Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal cou6 2013Monroe County. FloridaContact Trish Smith. AICP. Plannina & Environmental Resources. Title '1 ' r Address 2798 Overseas Highway. Marathon. FL 33050 Phone 105,3040419 Fnx Email: smith-oatricia®monroecounty-fl.gov Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor) Name of Applicant(If other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities, transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies, school districts, local education agencies, or schools; tribal governments, other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. 1. Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined in Title 23 USC, Section 213(b)which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section (101) Construction, planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals,traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ■Construction, planning and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ❑ Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas ❑ Community Improvements including: ❑ Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising ❑ Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities ❑ Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species and provide erosion control; and ❑ Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FFDOT District 6 Page 2 of 4 ❑ Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for ❑ Stormwater management, control, water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11), 32(a) and 329 ❑ Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program(Section 1404). Note:if you check one of these please also submit a Safe Routes application. ❑ Infrastructure-related projects: Planning, design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements,traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities, and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Non-infrastructure-related activities: to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders, traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed? (check all that apply) ❑ Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. ❑ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acqulsitton ■ Construction a Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). The Bayside Shared Use Path will be located within the FDOT US 1 right of way in Key Largo. US 1 is a very busy divided highway that Is the main transportation artery from the Florida Keys to mainland Florida. The Overseas Heritage Trail is located on the Oceanside of US 1;however, there is no sane alternative transportation system on the bayside(southbound lane)of US 1. FDOT is installing a series of pedestrian crossings as part of their road resurfacing project at MM 99.5, MM 101,and MM 102 to provide safe access across US 1 in the Key Largo area. Monroe County is taking the lead to incorporate a bayside path into the overall transportation network. The county's project will link to the FDOT improvements and the statewide Overseas Heritage Trail project to businesses and communities along the highway corridor. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 Page 3 of 4 (c) Where is the project located (and what are the termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. The county has been coordinating the alignment of this project with the FDOT shoulder projects, FDOT landscaping projects, and FDOT surplus requests. The county's project will begin at approximately MM 100 and traverse the southbound lanes of the US 1 corridor to approximately MM 106.A location map is included as an attachment to this application. (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Summarize any special characteristics of project This project is an 8-10 It wide shared use path that will connect businesses, tourists and residents to the US 1 corridor in a safe manner. There are currently no sidewalks or bike paths located on the bay side of the divided highway. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (i.e. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). The project will be located In the FDOT right of way along US 1 (southbound lane). (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. No additional right of way will need to be acquired for this project. The project was surveyed by Monroe County to ensure that the design is limited to the FDOT right of way. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. Monroe County completed the design of the bayside path using local funds. The project was designed to federal standards due to its location in the FDOT right of way. Permitting is underway and/a being coordinated with FDOT District We permitting contractor. The pro jest is slated for construction following completion of the FDOT resurfacing projects In the first quarter of 2014. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. Monroe County has a separate and pending Transportation Alternatives application for a pedestrian bridge across Adams Cut in Key Largo. This newer application includes the land based trail component of the overall project. It does not include a request for funds for the pedestrian bridge. 3. Project Implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. It is Important to provide as detailed and accurate a project schedule and cost estimate as possible. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house) and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial, environmental Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal Page 4 of 4 requirements. The project design was completed using the Competitive Consultant Negotiation Act process to obtain a qualified FDOT approved consultant(Metric). Construction will be managed as a LAP project through the county's Engineering Department. The project will be bid to a qualified contractor using the appropriate(federal, state, and local procedures We are also requesting CEI funds to hive a qualified FDOT consultant to manage the construction and assist In the federal reporting requirements. (b) Provide a detailed project schedule including any permitting and/or land/right-of-way acquisition required Construction Documents—complete Permitting Complete—October 2013 Construction and CEI Project Award—December 2013 Construction NTP—June 2014 Substantial Completion—December 2014 (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project. (Examples include written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution,financial donations or other appropriate means). This project was requested by the citizens of Key Largo as a component of the Liveable Communikeys Plan, a locally driven comprehensive planning effort The citizenry wholeheartedly embraced making Key Largo a safer place for bicycles and pedestrians. The homeowners association and the Chamber of Commerce sent letters and resolutions to FDOT and the county to ensure that Key Largo will become a walkable community. (d)Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. The project will be located in the FDOT right of way and maintained by Monroe County through a local maintenance agreement. (e) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability/use. The Engineer's construction estimate for this project/s$2.4 million. Monroe County has invested$360,000 to complete the permitting and design of this project. The county has also committed a$700,000 match to a CIGP grant that will be used to construct a portion of the project We are seeking federal transportation alternative funds to finish the remainder of the project and to secure CEI funds to oversee the construction acdvides and to ensure that federal reporting and audit requirements are met (f) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. This project Is shovel ready, and it can be programmed as early as 2014. 4. Project Cost:What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ p Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ 0 Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT Distnct 6 Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ 0 Page S of 4 Right of Way Acquisition. $ n Construction. $90o,non Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $1 on.a00 Other. (Describe) $ n TOTAL: $1,000,000 How will the project be funded? FDOT Alternatives Funds$ 1 M) 00 + Local 14700.000+CIGP $700,000= Total$ 2,400,000 FDOT Alternatives Funds inn %+ Local n o /o = 100/o Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 Page 6 of CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by I+JP-01- �� (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council)and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (2) enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4) support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. Ignature To nw sley Schwab Name (please type or print) Sr. Director Planning and Environmental Resources Title June 25, 2013 Date FOR MOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program Transportation Alternatives Program Application—MOT District 6 U rr yirl t �Ilf llll�I„�l QJ i t iJ� f •Y .9 �W ^1 . t IIII A� )II v r�t�s111114ti i'f� rr i � 11 D7 ,,,, s r NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN that on March 20,2012 from S:00pm to 7:00pm, the Monroe County Planning Department will sponsor a public workshop in the community room at the Murray Nelson Government Center, 102050 Overseas Highway,Key Largo Mile Marker 102,for: THE BAYSIDE SHARED USE PATH PROJECT AND THE 905 BIKE LANE PROJECT This is an informal, interactive workshop where participants will be able to comment on the proposed layout of the Key Largo Bayside Shared Use Path. The path is proposed to be constructed from Mile Marker 99.5 (intersection of Atlantic Blvd and US 1)to approximately MM 106.5.Participants will also be able to comment on the installation of proposed bike lanes along CR 905 in North Key Largo. For more information, please contact Trish Smith,Monroe County Transportation Planner,at(305)304-0412. ADA ASSISTANCE: If you are a person with a disability who needs special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding, please contact the County Administrator's Office, by phoning (305) 292-4441, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. -5:00 p.m., no later than five(5)calendar days prior to the scheduled meeting, if you are hearing or voice impaired, call "711". Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, notice is given that if a person decided to appeal any decision made by the Board with respect to any matter considered at such hearings or meetings,he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Publication date(s)• The Key West Citizen -Saturday,March 10,2012 Keynoter—Saturday,March 10,2012 Reporter—Friday,March 9,2012 DISPLAY AD: HEADING TO BE PRINTED IN 18-POINT TYPE, at a minimum of 2 columns by 10-TO BE PUBLISHED ONE (1) TIME ONLY, Summary of Comments on Public Meeting for US-1 Bayside Shared Use Path Comments Written On Roll Plot 1. A comment was made from station 851+60 to station 855+60 that the trail could be moved closer to US-1 and farther from the internal traffic of the shopping center if the wood poles were removed in this area. Ck r ar, 2. The following text was added as a comment"Path needs to be aligned closer to highway. Move wooden poles toward concrete poles. Wooden poles also restrict width to 10 feet not acceptable." w , �r . d r N OIL Vj 3. The following text was added as a comment"Suggest plantings all along path similar to bike path in Islamorada where people canoe/etc." C �i'� '907 vet M e. u 1 R• u 4. A comment was made that"Hobos Cafd" has moved and is no longer located at station 1049+00. W xW P ftl4l. 100 S ti. ISLAND OF KEY LARGO FEDERATION OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS INC. PO BOX 702 KEY LARGO,FL 33037 BUTTONWOOD BAY HOMEOWNER ASSOC.,HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.OF CORAL COAST,CAPTAIN JAX HOMEOWNER ASSOC..GATEWAY-TO-THE-SEA HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.,HAMMER POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., HIBISCUS PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.,KEY LARGO VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC., LARGO SOUND PARK CLUB INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.,PIRATES COVE HOMEOWNERS&BOATING ASSOC., PORT LARGO RESIDENTIAL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.,ROCK HARBOR CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOC.,ROCK HARBOR ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.,SEXTON COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.SILVER SHORES HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.. STILLWRIGHT PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSOC. TAYLOR CREEK VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.,THE HARBORAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC.,WYNKEN BLYNKEN&NOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. "Vever doubt that a stnall gaup of committed citizens can change the vwrld.Indeed it is die only thing that ex er has Mattaret Mend April 19,2010 Patricia Ivey,Project Administrator for Monroe County Florida Department of Transportation,District Six 3100 Overseas Highway Marathon,Florida 33050 And Key Largo Trade Winds Plaza Owners& Management Company,Kimco Realty 1 Oakwood Blvd. Hollywood,Florida 33027 To All Involved: The Island of Key Largo Federation of Homeowner Associations members are concerned and voted unanimously to respectfully request the Florida Department of Transportation, The Trade Winds Plaza Owners and any others necessary to implement the following safety solutions on the Island of Key Largo: 1) CREATE: SAFE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OF NORTH& SOUTH BOUND LANES OF US#1,BETWEEN MM 99—MM 100 AS PLANNED. REF: "THE KEY LARGO LIVABLE COMMUNIKEYS MASTER PLAN(KL LCP) AND US#1 CORRIDOR ENHANCEMENT PLAN(CEP)"). STRATEGY 8.1 OF THE KL LCP WAS ADOPTED IN 2006 INTO THE MONROE COUNTY 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. STRATEGY 8.1 IMPLEMENTS THE TRANSPORTATION PORTIONS OF THE KEY LARGO/US#1 CORRIDOR ENHANCEMENT PLAN WHILE MAINTAINING TRAFFIC LOS STANDARDS, 2)CREATE: SAFER PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OF NORTH& SOUTH BOUND US#1 AT ENTRY/EXIT OF TRADE WINDS SHOPPING PLAZA MM 101.4 AT TRAFFIC LIGHT AND(HOURLY)BUS STOP. 1 3)CREATE: PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS AS NONE EXISTS FROM US#1 INTO TRADE WINDS PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER THIS IS A DANGEROUS SITUATION FOR EMPLOYEES TO WALK TO AND FROM BUSES; LOCAL EMPLOYEES,AND CITIZENS FROM NEARBY NEIGHBORHOODS WALK IN AND OUT ON THE "HEAVY TRAFFIC"LANES USED BY AUTOMOBILES/TRUCKS. Thank you. Sincerely, Ron Miller PRESIDENT Copy: Gus Pego,Secretary FDOT District 6 Alice Bravo,Director of Transportation Development Marianne A. Trussell, Chief Safety Officer Bob Crim P,E.,State Project Manager Patricia Smith,FDOT Monica Woll,Dept. DEP of Fla. Monroe County Growth Management Director,Christine Hurley Monroe County Planning Director,Townsley Schwuab Monroe County BOCC 2 C`Z. tiQy4 � r � D� L Q +� L y .pA x �jq ORDINANCE NO._ 012 -2007 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE YEAR 2010 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADOPTING THE KEY LARGO LIVABLE COMMUNMEyS MASTER PLAN; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT HEREWITH; AND DIRECTING THE PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TO FORWARD A COPY OF THIS ORDINANCE TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan Objective 101.20 identifies the Livable CommunKeys Planning program as a planning program designed to address community needs while balancing the needs of all of Monroe County; and of fact:WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners makes the following findings 1. Policy 101.20.1 of the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan directs Monroe County to develop a series of Community Master Plans while shall include specific criteria, including close coordination with other community plans ongoing in the same area and sets out twelve principles to direct development of the master plans. 2. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is the product of the Livable CommunKeys program as outlined in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan Objective 101.20. 3. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan identified the following community objectives: resolve issues relating to non-conforming uses and structures, secure community access to the waterfront, ensure the protection of the terrestrial and marine environmental resources, provide a framework to encourage and improve the availability of affordable housing,and develop and apply guidelines that help bring about a sense of identity to the community and improve the aesthetics of the US-1 corridor. 4. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan will be adopted as a part Of the Comprehensive Plan, and therefore any conflicts between the two must be resolved. S. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan was reviewed during a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 26, 2006. 6. The Strategies and Action Items in the Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan are the equivalent to the Objectives and Policies in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY,FLORIDA,THAT: Seed=1 The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is adopted as an amendment to the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. see en 2. Amend Policy 101.20.2 in the Monroe County Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan to read as follows: POLICY 101.20.2 The Community Master Plans shall be incorporated into the 2010 Comprehensive Plan as a part of the plan and be implemented as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following Community Master plans have been completed in accordance with the principles outlined in this section and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners: S. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Master Plan is incorporated by reference into the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. The term Strategies in the Master Plan is equivalent to the tern Objectives in the Comprehensive Plan and the term Action Item is equivalent to the term Policy; the meanings and requirements for implementation are synonymous. SMItion 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, change or provision of this ordinance is held invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity. S.�,�All ordinances or parts of ordinance in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict. The repeal of an ordinance herein shall not reps the repealing clause of such ordinance or revive any ordinance which has been repealed thereby. Section S.This ordinance shall be forwarded by the Planning and Environmental Resources Department to the Department of Community Affairs pursuant to Chapter 163 and 380,Florida Statutes. Section This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida, but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission Approving the ordinance. Adoption of Key Lar`o Livable CommanlKsys Master Wan PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County,Florida,at a regular meeting held on the 21at day of A.D.,2007. Mayor Mario DiGennaro Mayor Pro Tem Dixie Spehar Commissioner George Neugent _ Yee Commissioner Charles"Sonny,McCoy ye1 Commissioner Sylvia Murphy ye` BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MONROE COUNTY,FLORIDA BY Mayor/Chairperson (SEAL) ATTEST: DANNY L. KOLHAGE, CLERK o a !4 c c�'t ss !' C.._ . 4c)s MC in DEPUTY CL to C3 p rn W p dMFD AS T'�0�� Key Largo Community Master Plan Executive Summary Monroe County's Livable CommuniKeys Program (LCP) is a community-driven planning process that addresses the individual needs of the island communities in the Florida Keys. The Key Largo Livable CommuniKeys Plan covers the area between Mile Markers (MM) 97 and 107, excluding the offshore islands. The Key Largo LCP process, which started in May 2004, engaged the community in a comprehensive planning process, determined important island features, identified issues affecting these conditions, and related the stated desires of the community to future development activities. The Key Largo LCP's foundation was established through public input at workshops where community participants identified their perceptions and desires for Key Largo. Based upon the discussion in the public meetings and by interpreting responses received from the Community Survey,the following community vision statement was identified: "Key Largo will continue to be a livable island community where protection and enjoyment of the significant natural resources support a unique sense of place as the first island in the Florida Keys. We shall maximize our future by preserving our nationally recognized undersea environments, improve the visual character of our built environments through innovative redevelopment that enhances our quality of life, and strive to increase the sense of a small coastal town ambiance". The consensus goals identified by the community were: Land Use and Redevelopment 1) Direct future growth to lands that are most suitable for development and encourage preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. Community Character 2) Preserve and enhance important community qualities within the planning area that define Key Largo's casual village style atmosphere and natural environment and that enhance its status as the first island of the Florida Keys. 3) Protect and enhance historic, cultural and archeological resources within Key Largo to maintaimthe integrity of the community's unique character. Housing 4) Maintain the availability of affordable housing and workforce housing for local residents while preserving the character of the community. Environmental Protection 5) Preserve, manage, and restore where appropriate, the natural resources within the planning area by providing open space, protecting water quality and acquiring and managing environmentally sensitive lands. ES-I I u(5124/06 Key Largo Community Master Plan Economic Development 6) Encourage redevelopment and infill development that supports and enhances the tourist- based economy of the planning area. 7) Recognize water-dependent and water-related commercial uses as an important source of economic sustainability within the planning area. Transportation 8) Provide residents and visitors of the planning area with a safe and useable transportation system for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians with opportunities fot transit systems where 10014 appropriate. Recreation 9) Provide additional resources for enhancement of existing facilities. expansion of active and passive land-based recreation opportunitiee''azi&seek to expand,,public shoreline access for water-based recreational activities for all age groups within the community. Community Facilities 10)Provide adequate public facilities to serve the existing and future needs of the planning area. Community Involvement 11)Continue to support the localized sense O&community, which encourages citizen involvement, implementation and monitoringpf the Wiaste Plan for Key Largo. From a planning perspective, and in order to achieve the community goals, the following objectives were identified: ■ Resolve issues relaWig to non-conformin&uses and structures. The LCP provides an opportunity to address non-conformities. ■ Secure community,access to the waterfront. Key Largo, while surrounded by water, has relatively few watchccess points for the community. • Ensure the protection of the terrestrial and marine environmental resources. • Provide a framework to encourage and improve the availability of affordable housing. ■ Develop and apply design guidelines that help bring about a sense of identity to the community and improve the aesthetics of the US-1 corridor. As part of the planning process, the community supported the application of neo-traditional community design principles to establish moES_p&4rstrian oriented ��mmunities by creating walkable environments where people live, work and play in close proximity to their daily needs. These principles include: ■ Identify important community locations that can be redeveloped to provide increased public realm activity. ■ Preserve important natural resources. ■ Promote the creation of mixed-use developments that provide access to daily needs within a safe and walkable environment. ES-2 1s of 5124106 Key Largo Community Master Plan a Identify a full range of housing options for members of the community to live in the community throughout their entire life cycle. ■ Increase attention to aesthetic improvements so that both public infrastructure and private developments are attractive locales where people want to spend time,and ■ Include multiple transportation modes (e.g., pedestrian, bicycle, automobile, or transit) throughout the community to increase mobility and safety. As a result of the public input, technical analysis, and policy evaluation completed for the planning area, the following design concepts are proposed to guide subsequent activities and communicate the study's key recommendations. ■ Establish community focal areas. The planning area lacks strong community identity, or "sense of place" locations. These are locations where walkable,,environments support mixed-use development and people congregate for their daily needs, Several important geographic locations exist where enhanced devylopment and public realm facilities could add to community identity. The need for compact, mixed-use centers, requires complementary land uses in closer proximity twresidentw areas than typically created in conventional suburban development. The intent of crWing such activit3(centers is to preserve environmentally sensitive areas and promtte pedestrian walkability through expanded travel choices for residents, visitors and employees. ■ Improve US-1 Corridor conditions. In the Florida Keys, &N-1 functions as both the major highway and a "main street" for the 1$ealscommunities. Improvements are needed to increase bicycletpedestrian accommodation and to enhance and define public realm aesthetics while maintain existing LOS requirements pontrolling speed and providing improved aesthetics within the corridor are important to residents and visitors alike. Visitors should easily be able to discerm,where they are located and where important community uses occur. ■ Establish design guidelines for new development. Define appropriate scale and develop architectural and site design guidelines for community identity center locations that reflect market demand and support local community character enhancement. • Promote multiple transportation modes. Recognize that US-1 must function as a multi- modal transportation corridor. Identify enhancements within quality redevelopment and new development that features transit-supportive and pedestrian-friendly site design and new infrastructure. Invest in public transportation strategies that reduce dependence on automobile travel between Community Centers for local trips by providing an integrated network of bicycle/pedestrian facilities and convenient island transit service linking key origins and destinations with connections to the regional system. ES-3 is of 5124106 , <\�y ° • \ / / \ � "Ou© � $ @ � ;rt Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 1000 NW 111 Avenue OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Miami, Florida 33172-5800 SECRETARY March 18, 2011 Mr. Roman Gastesi Jr., County Administrator Monroe County 1100 Simonton Street Key West, FL 33040 Dear Mr. Gastesi: Subject: County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP) Award for the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail to Monroe County FM#4241971 This letter is sent in response to your letter dated January 21 6t, 2011. The Department held a teleconference with Monroe County staff on March 3, 2011 to discuss the County's request to reprogram the County Incentive Grant Program funding for FM#4241971 for the Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail programmed in 2014 for the construction of the Bayside Trail in Key Largo. The Department is willing to reprogram the CIGP funds if Monroe County provides 100% design plans for the Bayside Trail. For this to occur, at a minimum the design plans must satisfactorily address drainage impacts to swales and ditches, drop off treatments in areas of steep slope conditions, potential encroachment and impacts to wetlands, and identify logical termini. The Department will provide the CADD files for all our resurfacing projects in the Key Largo area, for your design team to use in this effort. The Department has resurfacing projects within the proposed area of the Bayside Trail in Key Largo; see the attached map showing the planned construction with project limits and letting dates. Therefore, the construction of the Bayside Trail cannot begin until the Department completes the construction of its projects within the proposed Bayside Trail area. The Department is not able to reimburse eligible construction expenses until there is an approved joint participation agreement between the Department and Monroe County. The CIGP funds are currently programmed in fiscal year 2014, which begins July 1, 2013. Any construction costs or expenses incurred prior to the execution of the joint participation agreement will not be eligible for reimbursement. Also, Monroe www.dot.state.tLus Mr. Roman Gastesi, Jr. March 18, 2011 Page 2 County will need to enter into a Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement for the Bayside Trail prior to the authorization the joint participation agreement. I have appointed Mr. Kenneth Jeffries at 305.470.5840 to be the Department's point of contact for this project and to coordinate the Department's review of the Bayside Trail design plans in the electronic review system. The Department looks forward to working with you on this important project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 305.470.5464. Sincerely, Harold Desdunes, P.E. District Director of Transportation Development Attachment cc: Gus Pego, FDOT D6 Debora Rivera, FDOT D6 Mark Croft, FDOT D6 Aileen Boucle, FDOT D6 Chris Tavella, FDOT D6 Phil Steinmiller, FDOT D6 Linda Glass Johnson, FDOT D6 Christine Hurley, Growth Management Division Judy Clarke, Engineering Services Townsley Schwab, Planning Department Trish Smith, Planning Department Florida Department of Transportation, District Six Page 1 of 2013 Application for Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Projects Project Title: Q ti' Project Sponsor(municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribtcouncil): JUN 2 6 2013 Monroe County, Florida Contact Trish Smith.AICP Planning& Environmental Resources Title Tr n MOPdRQE%CO. PIAt~;wf':G DEBT. Address 27913 Overseas Highwau, II,FL 33050 Phone 305 ana 0419 FAX Email: smith-oatdciatmonroecounty-fl oov Priority(relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor) Name of Applicant(If other than Project Sponsor) Eligible Entities to Receive TAP Funds: Local governments, regional transportation authorities, transit agencies, natural resource or public land agencies, school districts, local education agencies, or schools; tribal governments, other local or regional government entity the State determines to be eligible. 1. Qualifying Transportation Alternatives Activities: Check the activity as outlined in Title 23 USC, Section 213(b)which the proposed project will address. Transportation Alternatives, Section(101) ■ Construction, planning and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety-related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ■ Construction, planning and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs ❑ Conversion of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non- motorized transportation ❑ Construction of turnouts, overlooks and viewing areas ❑ Community Improvements including: ❑ Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising ❑ Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities ❑ Vegetation management practices in transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species and provide erosion control; and ❑ Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of a TAP-eligible transportation project. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 Page 2 of 4 Environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and abatement activities for ❑ Stormwater management, control, water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff including activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(11), 32(a)and 329 ❑ Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity between land or water habitats ❑ Planning, designing or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways. Safe Routes to School Program (Section 1404). Note:if you check one of these Dlease also submit a Safe Routes avvlicaion ❑ Infrastructure-related projects: Planning, design and construction on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements, traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements, on-street bicycle facilities, off-street bicycle and pedestrian facilities,secure bicycle parking facilities, and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools ❑ Non-infrastructure-related activities: to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders, traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs ❑ Safe Routes to School coordinator 2. Project Description: Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being proposed? (check all that apply) ❑ Planning Activities ❑ Project Development and Environmental Studies. ■ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work ❑ Right of Way Acquisition SConstructlon ■Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). Monroe County Is working in partnership with Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT)and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection(FDEP)to construct an alternative transportation system(aka: Overseas Heritage Trail)along US 1 In the Florida Keys This popular attraction Includes an asphalt path, landscaping, and boardwalks adjacent to the 106 mile long stretch of roadway, When complete, the trail will connect communities and provide a means for pedestrians and bicyclists to safely traverse the highway, which Is also considered the county's "Main Street". One recently completed trail segment on Upper Sugarloaf Key Includes a beautiful oceanfront boardwalk that meanders over the water and provides a spectacular wildlife viewing area. The boardwalk Is located across the street from Sugarloaf School, a regional school that educates children from preschool through eighth grade. To provide safe access from the school to the Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 Fd"ign affic Operations has agreed to install a Page 3 of a pedestrian actuated signal at the f Crane Boulevard and US 1. Monroe County plans to install a sidewalk along the d Crane Boulevard to the new"pod head'; This application covers the costs to onstruct the sidewalk from the school to the pedestrian crossing. the project located (and what are the termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. This project is located on Crane Boulevard near MU 19. It Includes a total of approximately 500 feet of ADA accessible sidewalk that will be Installed between the entrance to Sugarloaf School and the intersection of US 1. A location map is attached. (d) Provide a detailed project scope. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. Summarize any special characteristics of project According to the Federal Highway Administration, ,sidewalks lbrm the backbone of the pedestrian transportation network According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Technical Council Committee 5A-5(1996),sidewalks "reduce the incidence of pedestrian collisions, Injuries, and deaths In residential areas and along two-lane roadways." Without sidewalks,public rights-of-way are Inaccessible to all pedestrians, including people with disabllitles. When sidewalks are not available,pedestrians area forced to share the street with motorists, access to public transportation is restricted, and children might not have safe play arms.so Monroe County proposes to design and Install a 5'wide ADA accessible sidewalk along the east side of Crane Boulevard to connect the school to the newly constructed Overseas Heritage Trail. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way ownerships. Identify when the right of way was acquired and how ownership is documented (Le. plats, deeds, prescriptions, certified surveys). Crane Boulevard/s a county owned read The sidewalk will be constructed In the county right of way. No additional right of way will be required. (f) Describe any proposed right of way acquisition, expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way No right of way acquisition is required for this project. The sidewalk will be constructed In the county's right of way on Crane Boulevard. The county will maintain the sidewalk. FDEP just completed Overseas Heritage Trail In this area. This trail segment was funded by the federal government through the Transportation Alternatives Program at a cost of$3.5 million. (g) Describe any related project work phases that are already complete or currently underway. FDEP just completed the Overseas Heritage Trall across the street from the school. FDOT Traffic Operations has the design underway for a pedestrian actuated signal on US 1 at Crane Boulevard. The sidewalk construction/s recommended for FY 2015 to ensure a coordinated pedestrian system. (h) Other specific project information that should be considered. This/s a safety Improvement that will enhance the Overseas Heritage Trail project and will provide safe access for children to cross US 1 from Sugarloaf School to the Oceanside boardwalk. It Is Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FUDT District 6 Page 4 anticipated that this boardwalk will be used by the school district for environmental education ca opportunities. 3. Project Implementation Information: You may attach documentation as exhibits to this application. It is Important to provide as detailed and accurate a project schedule and cost estimate as possible. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in-house)and administering each work phase of the project. Document that your agency or sponsor has the fiscal, managerial, environmental and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal requirements. Monroe County Is a LAP certified agency. We propose to retain an FDOT qualified consultant In accordance with the Competitive Consultant Negotiation Act to design the project. The project will be managed through our Engineering Department. We propose to construct the project in accordance with federal, state, and local requirements. Monroe County has a good track record of managing LAP projects and coordinating Off Wdve/y with FDOT District B to most the agency's requirements (b) Provide a detailed project schedule including any permitting and/or land/right-of-way acquisition required December 2013—Project Award from FDOT July 2014—NTP for advertising and design services December 2014—Design and permits approved by FDOT p January 2015—NTP for construction March 2015—Project complete (c) Describe any public and/or private support of the proposed project. (Examples include written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution,financial donations or other appropriate means). A pedestrian safety issue was Inadvertently created at Crane Boulevard with the recent installation of the Overseas Her tage Trail and the new timing of the Crane Boulevard traffic light. Pedestrians(especially children at Sugarloaf School)do not have a means to cross US 1 safely because the traffic signal has been turned off. It operates `on demand"for vehicle traffic during school hours, but the light cannot be triggered by pedestrians in Its current configuration. I In June 2013, Ramon Sierra, FDOT Traffic Operations, Todd McGee, FDEP Overseas Heritage Trail, Judy Clarke,Monroe County, and Trish Smith, Monroe County all met on site to evaluate potential safety Improvements at Crane Boulevard that would fix the unforeseen safety concern. FDEP agreed to shift Its trail alignment at the Intersection to Improve pedestrian flow. FDOT agreed to Install a pedestrian actuated signal on US 1. Monroe County agreed to Install a sidewalk from the school to the Intersection. The meeting and the outcome represent a strong partnership effort between the three agencies to provide safe access for pedestrians on and near the state highway system. f (d)Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. Monroe County will continue to own the right of way on Crane Boulevard and will be responsible for maintenance of the sidewalk. (e) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability/use. Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 This s/dewa/k/s ro Page 5 of 4 p posed to be designed and constructed with federal transportation funds to provide safe connections to Florida's statewide trall system. alternative (f) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. Monroe County has a good track record of managing LAP projects in cooperation with FDOT. We strive to meet all FDOT deadlines for project design, implementation, and audldng. 4. Project Cost:What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded through this application? Attach cost estimate detail. Planning Activities. $ Project Development and Environmental Studies. $ Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. $ 40,000 Right of Way Acquisition. $ Construction. $ i�5 ,non Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. $ 1nnnn Other. (Describe) $ TOTAL: $ How will the project be funded? FDOT Alternatives Funds $ Pon + Local�0 Total $ 200.000 FDOT Alternatives Funds inn %+ Locate n % - 100% Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FAT District 6 Page 6 of CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by n T (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council) and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (2) enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies.Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4) support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. r4atcuRe"r T s ey Schwab Name (please type or print) Sr. Director, Planning and Environmental Resources Title June 25, 2013 Date FOR FOOT USE ONLY YES NO Application Complete Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include In Work Program Transportation Alternatives Program Application—FDOT District 6 A µ' • �r y F kX z4o.�, Qd At u i'el T if f r 45 „w,: A A. di LM Ili �I P Q d a i „ 111 73 av • O LM r � y a r� ,Ter 00 r. m n m cu to n�) ;. L P O v `a LM Vf ' O m L "�i �t V Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Master Plan Prepared for and pardelly funded by: THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA August 2000 WJth pard8f funding and planning review by the: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Prepared by: MICHAEL DESIGN ASSOCIATES PLANNING TEAM RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY CLEAN FLORIDA KEYS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS BORRELLI g ASSOCIATES URS GRIENER WOODWARD CLYDE i s 7 . location of the proposed trail and upcoming on the Atlantic side, crossing the Lower Historic Bridges on the Atlantic side for the Sugarloaf Bridge and then the Harris next 18.9 miles. Future trail traffic could Channel Bridge, using the existing U.S. 1 justify a continued trail alignment along the shoulder. An existing crossing, located at Atlantic side of U.S. 1 in Big Coppitt, but in South Point Drive (MM 16.5)and a proposed an effort to minimize costs, only crossing at Sugarloaf Boulevard (MM 16.7), improvements to the existing bike path are are incorporated into the trail alignment as recommended initially. optional user activated crossings to access the Lower Sugarloaf Community Center on Boca Chico Road to Ship's Way Gap(MM the Bay side. The trail will not continue on 10.7 to MM 29.6) - A gap begins at Boca the Bay side through Lower Sugarloaf (MM Chico Road (MM 10.7) on the Atlantic side 16.5 to MM 18)as previously recommended and continues until Ships Way (MM 29.6). in both the BA Plane and the Conceptual Communities located in this segment include Plans. The South Point Drive crossing is a Bay Point, Lower Sugarloaf, Upper dangerous and unnecessary crossing for Sugarloaf, Cudjoe Key, Summerland Key, such a short distance. There were two Ramrod Key, Middle Torch Key, Little Torch crashes in this area, including a fatal crash Key, and the beginning of Big Pine. The trail in 19952. A majority of the neighborhoods alignment in this section is on the Atlantic (trail trip generators) are located on the R side due to the location of several Historic Atlantic side, as well as the upcoming Bridges including Shark Channel Bridge Historic Bridges. The trail width through the (MM 11.5), Saddlebunch No. 5 Bridge (MM Lower Sugarloaf Community should be 12.7), Saddlebunch No. 4 Bridge (MM 13), scaled down to the urban width due to right Saddlebunch No.3 Bridge (MM 14.2), of way constraints (see Section 8.1 and Saddlebunch No. 2 Bridge (MM 14.5), Lower Figure 8.1.5). The trail in this section should Sugarloaf Bridge (MM 15.5), Park Channel be incorporated into the Implementation of Bridge (MM18.6), Bow Channel Bridge (MM the Master Plan for Turn Lanes Study° Area 20.1), Kemp Channel Bridge (MM 23.5), #4. This study proposes adding a separate Niles Channel Bridge (MM 25.3). and South turning lane for both northbound and Pine Channel Bridge (MM 28.5). The southbound U.S. 1 traffic, enhanced street Historic Bridges will provide roadway lighting, and a crosswalk for the bike path at separation and scenic views. Destinations the Sugarloaf Boulevard intersection. in this segment include Bay Point Park (MM Advanced crosswalk signage, a continuous 15), Baby's Coffee (MM 15), Bat Tower left turn lane, reduced speed signage, and Historic Site (16.6), Sugarloaf Fire Station an emergency signal at the Sugarloaf Fire (MM 16.6), Sugarloaf Elementary & Middle Station are also proposed. These School (MM 19.3), and the Sheriff's enhancements will help to calm traffic Substation (MM 20.9). Bike lane making the area safer for trail users. connections include Boca Chico Bike Lane (MM 10.7), CR 939 Bike Lane Loop (MM The Harris Gap Channel (MM 17.5) and 16.7 to MM 20), Cudjos Key Recreation Trail North Harris Channel (MM 17.7)do not have (MM 21 to MM 23), Puerto Bello Drive Bike Historic Bridges, therefore, a trail in the Lane (MM 23), Old S.R. 4A Recreation Trail bridge shoulder, aligned on the Atlantic side, (MM 23.9 to MM 25), West Shore Bike Lane is temporarily recommended. A new and (MM 24.9), West Indies Drive Bike Lane separated shared use trail bridge is (MM 27.3), S.R. 4A Future Lane (MM 28.2), recommended once trail traffic increases. and Barry Avenue Bike Lane(MM 28.6). The Park Key Historic Bridge will lead trail users into the Upper Sugarloaf Community. From MM 11 to MM 15, there is adequate A crossing is proposed at the Crane room for the optimum trail cross section (see Boulevard intersection (MM 19.3), which is Section 8.1 and Figure 8.1.1). The Bay the location of the Sugarloaf Elementary and Point Park (MM 15) was proposed for a Middle School and a proposed FKOHT rest trailhead in the Conceptual Plans. stop. Improvements to this intersection are Improvements to this traiihead include proposed In the Turn Lane Study', Area #5 adding a shelter and restroom facility. including adding a crosswalk, increasing turn Leaving Bay Point Park, the trail continues lane storage length to accommodate buses, Flonda Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Master Plan 38 I' Trail Corridor Recommendations (s60 symbol legend at and of table) I Trail Items: MM Trail Trallheads&Rest Stops Tray Alignment Crosskrps, Item Posh Rea C Basic Tmillread Facilities I r� TraUheada&Rest Stops.and Bridges Marker Exist New Status to U81 Width U C SheG Restr. Water Park. Su rloaf Fire Station Rest Stop18.6 New Bay 1 0 1 0 I Community Crossing S anloaf BIvdL 18.7 New to Bay 12 0 1 Rated Comm.Crossing 11 Hamfs Gap Channel Bddoe 17.5 US 1 Ad 12' 12 NorMt Harris Channel RW 17.7 US 1 Ad 12' I13 Par*Channel Brld 1&6 Hlst Ad 22' School Crossing Crane Blvd Bike Path 19.3 New to Bay 12' 0 1 JProposed School Crossln Su doaf Elementary&Middle School 19.3 New Say1 1 1 10 'CR 939 Bike Lane Loo 16.7-2D' New At 14 Bow Channel Bdd 20.1 Hlat Ad 22- Sheriffs Substation 20.9 New. Ad 1 1 tj 5 Crossln Drost Drhro 20.9 New to Ba 12' 0 1 O anal Access Crossing Cud Recreation Trail 21-23 Exist 12, Crossln erdarm RdJCutthroat Or. 22.8 New varies 12' 0 1 Optional Access Crosel 'Puerto Bello Drive Bike Lane 23' w Atl Ne 18 Kem Channel B 123.5 Hist Ad 12' Crossing 24 New to Beyl 12' 0 1 O oval Access crossI21 Old S.R.4A- Recreation Trail 23.9-25 Exist Bay 12' Crossing Shore Drive 24.9 New to Ba 12' 0 1 13ptional Access Crossing 'West Shore Drive Bike Lane 24.9' Exist Atl 16 Nil"Channel B►ld 25.3 Hlst Ad 22' 'West Indies Drive Bike Lane 27.3' Exist AV 1171 Torah Ramrod ad 127.4 US 1 —Ad 12' 18 Torch Channel 128 US 1 AV 12' 'S.R.4A Future Lane 28.2' Now AU 'Bs Avenue Bike Lane 28.8' New Atl 19 South P/ne Channel B►!d 28.5 Hlst Ad 22' 20 Pine Channel Brld 29.5 US 1 Ad 12' 1 7— END Ga (Ships W 29.6 see b in New 'to Bay 12' 0 1 Proposed Trail Crossing BEGIN Trall Bt Pine Bike Path 29.8 1.6 Exist Say12' "Watson Field&Blue Heron Park 30.3' Exist Say Exist Exist Exist NA K Deer Refs a ova varies New Bay 12 Lower Keys Chamber of Commerce 30.8 New Bay 1 1 1 NA END Trail 5th Street 31.2 see in Exist Bay17 BEGIN Ga 5th Street) 31.2 113.81 New I Bay 12' Florida Keys Overseas Heritage Trail Master Plan Table page 2 of 7 Table 8.2.1 >%L; —= SOO Fl a� . ' j o- 8 U Y Om 4 4 !' � r Q r' O '� � • s�. PP CD a ',� `` ', `�.• V.Y. g W (per � •1/\� \ I ^. / N ►_� a -� € mom° JI) tb �� c. J�rf � � d � T. � � r, j ,� •� ty- yLI -•• �` r r: 0 y Sri See FigurO 8,Z.2 ��; , sr MM 0