Loading...
Item P08 � P.8 � � �, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS County of Monroe � ��r�i �r � s�� Mayor Heather Carruthers,District 3 The Florida.Keys Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Coldiron,District 2 Craig Cates,District 1 David Rice,District 4 Sylvia J.Murphy,District 5 County Commission Meeting May 20, 2020 Agenda Item Number: P.8 Agenda Item Summary #6918 BULK ITEM: Yes DEPARTMENT: Sustainability TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Rhonda Haag (305) 453-8774 N/A AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Approval to enter into Task Order 48A with Wood Environment & Infrastructure to provide a no-cost time extension retroactive from October 30, 2019 to April 30, 2020 for work in developing the final phase of the Canal Management Master Plan funded by EPA Grant X7-OOD83418-0; under the general project management services on-call contract for Category A services. ITEM BACKGROUND: This item is to provide a no-cost time extension to work being performed under Task Order 48 for EPA grant X7-OOD83418-0, retroactive from October 30, 2019 to April 30, 2020. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: 08/17/16: Approval to advertise on call professional engineering services for the canal restoration program, including Category A — Canal Master Plan Program Planning Services, Category B —Canal Infrastructure Engineering Services for Projects and Category C — Environmental Engineering Services. 11/22/16: Approval to negotiate an on-call contract with Amec Foster Wheeler, Inc., the highest ranked respondent, for canal masterplan program planning services. 12/14/16: Approval requested to enter into an on call contract with Amec Foster Wheeler, Inc. for Category A canal masterplan program planning services. 10/17/18: Approval to enter into Task Order 48 with Wood Environment& Infrastructure to develop the final phase of the Canal Management Master Plan in the amount of $100,456.00 which is 100% funded by EPA Grant X7-OOD83418-0; under the general project management services on-call contract for Category A services. CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: NO cost time extension to April 30, 2020 Packet Pg. 2973 P.8 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval DOCUMENTATION: Wood Task Order 8A EPA Grant work for CMMP Update- Category A - (3) Task Order No. 8 10/17/2018 Insurance Certificate FINANCIAL IMPACT: Effective Date: October 30, 2019 Expiration Date: April 30, 2020 Total Dollar Value of Contract: 8A :$0 Total Cost to County: $0 Current Year Portion: N/A Budgeted: N/A Source of Funds: N/A CPI: No Indirect Costs: Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: N/A Revenue Producing: No If yes, amount: Grant: N/A County Match: $0 Insurance Required: Yes - attached Additional Details: 10/17/18 304-23000 - PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT $0.00 REVIEWED BY: Rhonda Haag Completed 05/05/2020 3:04 PM Pedro Mercado Completed 05/05/2020 3:24 PM Purchasing Completed 05/05/2020 4:11 PM Budget and Finance Completed 05/05/2020 4:25 PM Maria Slavik Completed 05/05/2020 4:38 PM Kathy Peters Completed 05/05/2020 7:21 PM Board of County Commissioners Pending 05/20/2020 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 2974 P.8.ai 0 TASK ORDER #8A UNDER THE CATEGORY A CONTRACT , FOR WORK RELATED TO THE FLORIDA KEYS co CANAL MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN (CMMP) UPDATE TO DEVELOP A GUIDANCE PLAN FOR CANAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND MASTER PLANNING SERVICES le BETWEEN MONROE COUNTY BOCC ANDCh WOOD ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, INC. This Task Order No 8A is entered into on May 20, 2020 in accordance with the Continuing Contract for On Call Professional Engineering Services made and entered on the 14th day of December, 2016, Amendment No.1 dated December 13t", 2017 and Amendment No.2 dated June 20t" 201 between Monroe County Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" where design services are allowed if construction costs do not exceed $2,000,000. All terms and conditions of the referenced Contract for On Call Professional Engineering Services apply to the Task Order, unless the Task Order modifies an Article of the Agreement of which will be specifically referenced in this Task W Order and the modification shall be precisely described. c WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the COUNTY received grant agreement No. OOD83418 from EPA for the update to the canal management master plan "CMMP" to develop a guidance plan document for canal master planning; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY amended the grant agreement from October 30, 2019 to December 31, 2019 due to schedule delays with government shutdowns; and 0 WHEREAS, this no-cost time extension will allow the CONSULTANT to assist the COUNTY with completing the grant and associated close out documents including reimbursement and final reports; and WHEREAS, the task order will be effective retroactive to October 30, 2019 and shall expire April 30, 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements stated herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree to modify the Agreement as follows- 0 0 Article 1.1 Terms Of Agreement: Article 2.2 Scope of Services: 1 Packet Pg. 2975 P.8.ai 0 The Consultant shall perform the following Tasks in accordance with the Scope of work below and in accordance with EPA Grant NO. OOD83418 attached as Exhibit B: le Task 1: Update CMMP database This task will set the frame work for the following tasks, in refining the CMMP database to include updating water quality summaries from CMMP Phase III-A along with the additional data obtained from the completion of the canal restoration demonstration projects and FIU water quality and benthic monitoring. Background: During the Phase II CMMP, various ranking factors where applied to the canals such as ease of permitting and implementation to select a list of demonstration projects. Phase III-A CMMP, DO readings were collected using the modified FDEP DO standard along with the collection sediment cores to refine the thickness of organic muck within the canals. With the completion of the canal restoration demonstration projects and FIU monitoring along with the aforementioned water quality data, the CMMP database will be updated to provide �? the County and municipalities a range of information for selecting projects based on W applicable technology and funding availability . Methods: The CMMP database will be updated with the expanded DO and bathymetric data along with relevant cost and monitoring information from the completed demonstration projects. The database will then be analyzed to determine the applicable either traditional restoration technology or an alternative technology vetted during the EPA Grant for Water Quality Improvement. Date Due: March 30, 2020 Deliverable: An executive summary and database in excel format will be submitted to Monroe County and municipalities detailing the results of the water quality summaries along with the cost and water quality effectiveness of the Canal Restoration Demonstration projects and monitoring results. 0 Task 2: Update to the CMMP to develop a Guidance Plan Aspects of the demonstration projects that directly affect restoration costs include design, permitting, and construction constraints. Using lessons learned during the Demonstration Projects implementation, engineers will identify cost LU constraints that impacted the price of the demonstration projects andco implementation strategies that can limit the number of canal restorations required to achieve the regulatory water quality objectives. This task will include the creation of a technical advisory group to provide the County and the municipalities a tool to select and track projects from the planning, design, construction and the OM&M phases. Background: Monroe County and the municipalities are financially challenged to undertake further canal restoration efforts due to a lack of resources and long-term operation and maintenance funding strategy. Therefore the County and 2 Packet Pg. 2976 P.8.ai 0 municipalities will look to better allocate those resources through smart planning , which puts an emphasis on economies of size, potential for greatest impact on the co near shore waters, and low operations and maintenance cost. Methods: A group of technical advisors will examine the CMMP and determine 0 the necessary action items to develop the guidance document. The results from the y group will be summarized and brought before the FKNMS WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee for discussion prior to moving forward with the update. Following the inclusion of any suggested updates from the Subcommittee, the guidance document will be prepared and presented to the FKNMS WQPP Steering Committee for discussion and approval. Upon approval from the Steering committee the guidance document will be finalized to be utilized by the County and municipalities for the implementation of canal restoration projects. Date due. March 30, 2020 Deliverable: The guidance document will be submitted to Monroe County and municipalities that details the strategies for selecting projects based on the strategies identified in the technical advisory group and subsequent committee meetings. The document will be provided to the County and municipalities to be used to prioritize and select projects based on applicable technology and funding limitations. W IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party caused the Task Order to be executed by its duly authorized representative. CONSULTANT: WITNESS: WOOD ENVIRONMENT STRUCTURE SOLUTIONS INC. 05/05/2020 05/05/2020 0 Signature Date Sign ure7 Date c Office Manager Title (SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: by: Deputy Clerk Mayor/Chairman Date: 3 Packet Pg. 2977 GJ�t GOURTB° o: Kevin Madok, CPA .. .... Clerk of the Circuit Court& Comptroller— Monroe Count Florida 0 •ROE COUNT. Yf CL U DATE: November 30, 2018 c. TO: Rhonda Haag, Director Sustainability& Projects 0 Lindsey Ballard, Aide to the County Administrator E FROM: Pamela G. Hancock, D.C. 0 U SUBJECT: October 17' BOCC Meeting c co e( Attached is an electronic copy of Item 06, Task Order No. 8 with Wood Enx ironment& Infrastructure to develop the final phase of the Canal Management Master Plan in the amount of $100,456.00 which is 100%funded by EPA Grant X7-OOD83418-0;under the General Project 0 Management Senrices On-Call Contract for Category A senrices,for your handling. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at (305) 292-3550. Thank you. CJ CJ cc: County Attorney_ CJ Finance co File co m KEY WEST MARATHON PLANTATION KEY PK/ROTH BUILDING 500 Whitehead Street 3117 Overseas Highway 88820 Overseas Highway 50 High Point Road Key West,Florida 33040 Marathon,Florida 33050 Plantation Key,Florida 33070 Plan 305-294-4641 305-289-6027 305-852-7145 305- Packet Pg. 2978 P.8.b TASK ORDER#8 FOR WORK RELATED TO THE FLORIDA KEYS 2 CANAL MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN (CMMP) UPDATE TO DEVELOP A GUIDANCE PLAN UNDER THE CATEGORY A CONTRACT _ FOR CANAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND MASTER PLANNING SERVICES BETWEEN ca MONROE COUNTY AND WOOD 2 This Task Order No 8 is entered into on October 17, 2018 in accordance with the N Continuing Contract for On Call Professional Engineering Services made and entered on the 14th day of December, 2016, Amendment No.1 dated December X 13th, 2017 and Amendment No.2 dated June 20th, 2018 between Monroe County, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" where design services are allowed if construction costs do not exceed $2,000,000. All terms and conditions of the referenced Contract for On Call Professional Engineering Services apply to the Task Order, unless the Task Order modifies an Article of the Agreement of which will be specifically referenced in this Task Order and the modification shall be precisely described. WHEREAS, County staff, with Wood's assistance, prepared a grant application for._the final phase of the Canal Implementation Plan, in the amount of $100,456 LU of-grant funds, with $0 local match, and submitted the grant application on June 13, 2018; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has received grant agreement No. -OOD83418 from EPA for the update to the canal management master plan "CMMP" to develop a guidance plan document for canal master planning; and WHEREAS; this grant will be utilized to continue the initiative in improving the water quality in the Florida Keys; and WHEREAS; -the CMMP database will be updated by the Consultant with water co `o quality summaries from the former CMMP Phase III-A along with the additional data obtained from the completion of the canal restoration demonstration projects and the FIU final report on water quality and benthic monitoring; and co WHEREAS, using lessons learned - during the Demonstration Projects implementation, Consultant will identify cost constraints that impacted the price of the demonstration projects and implementation strategies that can limit the number of canal restorations required to achieve the regulatory water quality objectives; and Packet Pg. 2979 P.8.b WHEREAS, the creation of a Technical Advisory Group by the Consultant will 2 provide the County and the municipalities a tool to select and track projects for the planning, design, construction and the O&M phases; and WHEREAS, the task order will be effective as of October 17, 2018 and shall expire October 30, 2019. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements stated herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged., COUNTY and CONSULTANT .2 agree to modify the Agreement as follows: X Article 1.1 Terms Of Agreement: Article 2.2 Scope of Services: U 0 The Consultant shall perform the following Tasks in accordance with the Scope of work below and in accordance with EPA Grant NO. OOD83418) 94 attached as Exhibit B: Task 1: Update CMMP database This task will set the frame work for the following tasks, in refining the CMMP database to include updating water quality summaries from CMMP Phase III-A LU along with the additional data obtained from the completion of the canal restoration demonstration projects and FIU water quality and benthic monitoring. Background: During the Phase II CMMP, various ranking factors where applied -to the-canals such as ease of permitting and implementation to select a list of demonstration projects. Phase III-A CMMP, DO readings were collected using the modified FDEP DO standard along with the collection sediment cores to refine the thickness of-organic muck within the canals. With the completion of the canal restoration demonstration projects and FIU monitoring along - with the aforementioned water quality data, the CMMP database will be updated to provide the County and municipalities a range of information for selecting projects based on. �? applicable technology and funding availability . co co CD Methods: The _CMMP database will be updated with the expanded DO and bathymetric data along with relevant cost and monitoring information from the completed demonstration projects. The database will then be analyzed to determine co the.applicable either traditional restoration technology or an alternative technology vetted during the EPA Grant for Water Quality Improvement. Date Due: March 30, 2019 Deliverable: An executive summary and database in excel format will be submitted to Monroe County and municipalities detailing the results of the water quality summaries along with the cost and water quality effectiveness of the Canal Restoration Demonstration projects and monitoring results. . 2 Packet Pg. 2980 P.8.b Task 2: Update to the CMMP to develop a Guidance Plan Aspects of the demonstration projects that directly affect restoration costs include design, permitting, and construction constraints. Using lessons learned during the Demonstration Projects implementation, engineers will identify cost constraints that impacted the price of the demonstration projects and implementation strategies that can limit the number of canal restorations required to LU achieve the regulatory water quality objectives. This task will include the creation of a technical advisory group to provide the County and the municipalities a tool to Ch select and track projects from the planning, design, construction and the OM&M phases. X Background: Monroe County and the municipalities are financially challenged to 0) undertake further canal restoration efforts due to a lack of resources and long-term y operation and maintenance funding strategy. Therefore the County and 0 municipalities will look to better allocate those resources through smart planning which puts an emphasis on economies of size, potential for greatest impact on the near shore waters, and low operations and maintenance cost. co Methods: A group of technical advisors will examine the CMMP and determine the necessary action items to develop the guidance document. The results from the . group will be summarized and brought before the FKNMS WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee for discussion prior to moving forward with the update. Following the inclusion of any suggested updates from the Subcommittee, the LU guidance document will be prepared and presented to the FKNMS WQPP Steering Committee for discussion and approval. Upon approval from the Steering committee the guidance document will be finalized to be utilized by the County and > municipalities for the implementation of canal restoration projects. Date due: October 30, 2019 Deliverable: The guidance document will be submitted to Monroe County and municipalities that details the strategies for selecting projects based on the strategies identified in the technical advisory group and subsequent committee meetings. The document will be provided to the County and municipalities to be �? used to prioritize and select projects based on applicable technology and funding co limitations. Article 7.1 Payment Sum: The amount of the task order is a Not to Exceed of One Hundred Thousand Four Hundred and Fifty Six Dollars and Zero Cents co ($100,456.00.) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party caused the Task Order to be executed by its duly authorized representative. y 3 Packet Pg. 2981 P.8.b MAGGIE PROENZA-KANAKIS- ?_°. Notary Public-State of Florida * R =•« .•E My Comm.Expires Mar 20,2019 i «oz CONSULTANT: WITNESS: -;, Commission#FF 179176 - �°� °PO` WOOD ENVIRONMENT Bon d through National Notary Assn. & INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS INC. I ld 2 �i Signature D e I ure Da e o c c OFF,�cE �1.�,✓A�z '� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v, ATTE.Sl�y KEVIN MADOK, CLERK OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA co y: by: i Deputy Clerk Mayor/Chairman 'I11 Date: O P E CAU ATT RMN PEDR J.MERCADO ._ ASSISTANT OU ' - C,rz, e rn ' ca 4 Packet Pg. 2982 P.8.b �Exh b; B.Proposal Work Plan-Activity W. 10: Improve Water Quality in Residential Canals 1.0 Introduction LL CL La Situation,Need,and Previous Efforts— CL The Water Quality Protection Program (WQPP) Action Plan of the Florida Keys National 0 Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) identifies impaired water quality in residential canals as a priority for corrective action (FDEP, 2013). Using these priorities, the Canal Restoration Advisory X Subcommittee(Subcommittee) was created to provide scientific and objective oversight of the Canal Restoration Program including the development of the Canal Management Master Plan (CMMP). U 0 Phase I of the CMMP developed a set of project goals and objectives that were initially approved by co the Subcommittee. The objectives that were identified and adopted by the Subcommittee are as a, follows: (1) Water Quality — Eutrophication and DO-Related Issues; (2) Water Quality — Organic y Material (e.g., Weed Wrack); (3) Sediment Quality; (4) Habitat Quality and (5) Public involvement c, in the canal management process. Phase II of the CMMP included the assessment of the 502 , residential canals in the Keys using biological indicators and the FDEP dissolved oxygen(DO) _standard as identified in the 2012 edition of 62-302.530, FAC, for Class III Marine Waters. The standard stated that DO shall never be measured at less than 4.0 mg/L at any point or at any time. The DO conditions in conjunction with biological indicators were used to summarize the water quality of each canal as follows: co T_ CD DO Conditions Biological Conditions Water Quality Summary >4.0 mg/L Positive Good co >4..0 mg/L Negative Fair m 3.0-4.0 mg/L Positive Fair 0 3.0-4.0 mg/L Negative Poor 1 Packet Pg. 2983 P.8.b <3.0 mg/L I N/A I Poor CL Of the 502 residential canals in the Keys, 311 canals were ranked Fair or Poor since they did not CL meet the State's water quality standards, and are a source of nutrients and other pollutants to near 0 shore waters. c Phase IIIA of the CMMP included the collection of sediment cores from a subset of canals that X have documented organic detritus bottom sediment loading greater than 0.75 feet in thickness to evaluate the potential for reusing canal sediments in their planning and cost evaluation along 0 0 with refined DO data for all 311 Fair or Poor ranked canals using the modified FDEP DO Co standard from the 4 mg/L (at any location at any time) threshold to percent saturation as follows: 1. The daily average DO percent saturation shall not be below 42 percent ; le 2. The weekly average DO percent saturation shall not be below 51 percent; and LU 3. The monthly average DO percent saturation shall not be below 56 percent. Of the 311 Fair or Poor ranked canals in the Keys, 38 did not meet the current FDEP water quality > standard for dissolved oxygen based on grab samples collected in February 2017. Additionally, diel �? monitoring completed at ten selected canals in May 2017 indicates that the dissolved oxygen measurements collected by grab sample may be insufficient to characterize the predominant dissolved oxygen saturation in a water body. For example, of the ten canals selected for diel Co - CD monitoring, only one canal exhibited a DO saturation below 42 percent during the grab sampling cV activities. Additionally, canal 82 exhibited a DO saturation of 80 percent in the grab sample, but Co exhibited a daily average DO saturation of 36 percent based on the diel measurements. c The updated dissolved oxygen and bathymetry data, along with results from the completed le Cn canal restoration demonstration projects, have yet to be fully incorporated into the CMMP 2 Packet Pg. 2984 P.8.b database; including as the basis for an update to water quality rankings for restoration projects. Additionally, the County and municipalities are lacking an implementation plan to evaluate the CL cost along with the DO improvements to determine strategies to reduce costs as part of a CL countywide implementation of canal restoration technologies. 0 Lb Objective(s) - The Monroe County CMMP identified canals impaired due to low dissolved .2 oxygen, high organic matter, poor flushing, and poor water clarity. The objective of the proposed °' X scope of work is to update the CMMP to develop a guidance document to be used to select and track projects from the planning, design, construction, and operation, maintenance and monitoring 0 0 (OM&M) phases. The plan will include the following items: 1) update water quality summaries co (Good, Fair and Poor), lessons learned from the implementation of the canal restoration demonstration projects, and FIU water quality and benthic monitoring results in the CMMP, and; 2) le the guidance document will evaluate strategies to reduce costs as part of a countywide implementation of canal restoration technologies, such as economies of scale, effect of grouping e similar technologies into a single project, grouping restorations on a geographical basis, pre- > qualifying vendors, and how policy and assessment criteria might impact program cost to �? achieve the highest water quality improvement. 76 Lc Applications, Benefits; and Importance - A key goal of the CMMP is to identify and implement pilot projects that demonstrate innovated approaches to restoring water quality in the co CD canal systems in the Florida Keys.The two tasks identified here would update the CMMP to develop c® a guidance document for the County and Municipalities to investigate cost effective ways to improve co existing restoration practices, provide additional water quality improvement alternatives to those c already identified or implemented via the CMMP, and develop funding strategies to help assure they can be implemented in the long-term. These tasks would improve and maintain the overall water e 3 Packet Pg. 2985 P.8.b quality of the canals, near shore and coastal waters of the FKNMS. In EPA's FKNMS Water Quality Protection Program (WQPP) 2013 Report to Congress it states that "Addressing the CL complexities of canal restoration is a high priority future activity"(EPA 2013). CL 2.0 Methods and Approach 0 2.d Description of Major Tasks - In order to achieve the objectives defined above, Monroe County proposes to conduct the following tasks. Task 1: Update CMMP database E This task will set the frame work for the following tasks, in refining the CMMP database to 0 0 include updating water quality summaries from CMMP Phase III-A along with the additional data co obtained from the completion of the canal restoration demonstration projects and FIU water quality and benthic monitoring. le Background: During the Phase II CMMP, various ranking factors where applied to the canals such as ease of permitting and implementation to select a list of demonstration projects. Phase III-A CMMP, DO readings were collected using the modified FDEP DO standard along with the collection sediment cores to refine-the thickness of organic muck within the canals. With the completion of the canal restoration demonstration projects and FIU monitoring along with the ca . aforementioned water quality data, the CMMP database will be updated to provide the County and - municipalities- a-range of information for selecting projects based.on applicable technology and co CD funding availability. Methods: The CMMP database will be updated with the expanded DO and bathymetric data co d along with relevant cost and monitoring information from the completed demonstration projects. The database will then be analyzed to determine the applicable either traditional restoration le 4 Packet Pg. 2986 P.8.b technology or an alternative technology vetted during the EPA Grant for Water Quality Improvement. CL Task 2: Update to the CMMP to develop a Guidance Plan CL Aspects of the demonstration projects that directly affect restoration costs include design, LU 0 permitting, and construction constraints. Using lessons learned during the Demonstration Projects implementation, engineers will identify cost constraints that impacted the price of the demonstration projects and implementation strategies that can limit the number of canal restorations required to achieve the regulatory water quality objectives. This task will include the creation of a technical 0 0 advisory group to provide the County and the municipalities a tool to select and track projects from CO the planning,design,construction and the OM&M phases. Background: Monroe County and the municipalities are financially challenged to undertake y further canal restoration efforts due to a lack of resources and long-term operation and maintenance funding strategy. Therefore the County and municipalities will look to better allocate those resources through smart planning which puts an emphasis on economies of size, potential for greatest impact on the near shore waters, and low operations and maintenance cost. Methods: A group of technical advisors will examine the CMMP and determine the necessary c, action items to develop the guidance document. The results from the group will be summarized and ca brought before the FKNMS WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee for discussion prior CO C, CD cv to moving forward with the update. Following the inclusion of any suggested updates from the Subcommittee, the guidance document will be prepared and presented to the FKNMS WQPP CO d Steering Committee for discussion and approval. Upon approval from the Steering committee the guidance document will be finalized to be utilized by the County and municipalities for the implementation of canal restoration projects. 5 Packet Pg. 2987 P.B.b 2.e Environmental Impact-This effort will assist with assuring long term improvement of the water quality of the Keys canals, nearshore waters of the Keys and waters of the in the National CL Marine Sanctuary. It supports the goals and objectives of the FKNMS WQPP, Florida Keys Water CL Quality Improvements Act(FKWQIA) and the FKWQIP, and is in compliance with relevant federal LU 0 and state regulatory requirements and mandates. .2 2.f Future Efforts — Following completion of these tasks to update the CMMP to develop a guidance document will need to be integrated into the strategy for selecting canals in order to achieve the desired environmental benefits with the limited funds available. Two existing stakeholder groups 0 0 —the FKNMS WQPP Steering Committee and its Canals Restoration Advisory Subcommittee—will CO review the guidance document to verify it is technically sound and thorough. These two groups are broadly based, and include a number of relevant federal, state and local government agencies, and have-a proven track record on successful environmental management in the Keys. LU 3.0 Project Management 3.g Administration > The Principal Investigator (PI) is responsible for and has the experience and authority to plan, �? control and monitor, manage and direct the project's human and other resources to best meet project objectives. The PI will track project metrics such as the scope, timeline, work in progress, work completed, and budget use, and is responsible to the project stakeholders for achieving the project's CO T_ CD objectives in terms of scope,schedule,cost, and quality. 3.h Roles/Assignments and Participation Time CO The project team includes the following members: c • Principal Investigator—Rhonda Haag; Sustainability Director,Monroe County Packet Pg. 2988 P.8.b • Chief Engineer and Principal Reviewer - Ricardo Fraxedas PE,Wood (formerly Amec Foster Wheeler) CL • Senior Project Manager(Tasks 1 &2) —Greg Corning,Wood CL • Senior Engineer(Tasks 1 &2) —Stephen Hanks,PE,Wood 0 • Senior Scientist(Tasks 1 &2) —Jeremy Paris,PWS,Wood • Principal Financial Analyst(Task 2)-Elizabeth Treadway,PWLF,Wood X • Administrative Support(Tasks 1 &2)-Maggie Kanakis,Wood The estimated number of hours required by each of the above team members to complete each of U 0 the four tasks in this proposal is presented in Table 1 included in the Section S: Budget Summary. ' co 4.0 Support Requirements and Conditions 41 Cooperation from other Organizations y No formal approval form other agencies is required for execution of the proposed scope. The LU members. of the FKNMS WQPP Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee, as well as Monroe County leadership,are in support of identifying funding mechanisms for the update of the CMIVIP to develop a guidance document. 4 j Data or Facility Access There are no issues with obtaining data or accessing facilities through other organizations.Wood ca has generated substantial data in previous canal restoration projects including canal condition, _ co CD `o sediment quality,water quality, and detailed project costing that will be used for the current efforts. 5.0 Results/Outputs and Deliverables co 5.k Bi-Annual Reports — Bi-annual progress reports will be prepared and submitted to the m Project Officer on May 30th and November 30th of each year. These reports will consist of updates 0 7 Packet Pg. 2989 P.8.b on progress toward work objectives, approach, results to date, any problems encountered, actions taken to resolve problems,discussion of remaining tasks, and expenditures to date. CL 5.1 Final Report — A final draft report will be prepared summarizing the objectives, methods, CL approach, results, an significance of the completed work. The draft final report will be reviewed by 0 the Project Officer and comments will be addressed in a final report due within six months of the .2 completion of the project. °' X 5.m Deliverable Items and Schedule E Task 1—Update CMMP database: An executive summary and database in excel format will be 0 0 submitted to Monroe County and municipalities detailing the results of the water quality summaries along co with the cost and water quality effectiveness of the Canal Restoration Demonstration projects and monitoring results. Schedule: within 6 months of Notice-to-Proceed(NTP). le Task 2 — Update to the CMMP to develop a Guidance Plan: The guidance document will be submitted to Monroe County and municipalities that details the strategies for selecting projects based on the strategies identified in the technical advisory group and subsequent committee meetings. The document will be provided to the County and municipalities to be used to prioritize and select projects based on applicable technology and funding limitations. Schedule: within 12 months of NTP. 6.0 Environmental Results—Outcomes and Outputs ca co 6.n Outputs,Outcomes and Results cv (i) Outputs (project products) - The project will produce the following products. Task 1 will co update the canal rankings as having poor or fair water quality and analyze the cost and water quality d effectiveness of the Canal Restoration Demonstration projects. Task 2 will results in the le development of an guidance document which will assist the County and the municipalities in 8 Packet Pg. 2990 P.8.b selecting canals based on the greatest water quality and cost savings for the limited fund they have available. CL (ii) Outcomes (project objectives) - A key goal of tasks 1 and 2 is to develop a guidance CL document that incorporates the greatest water quality improvement and cost savings for the County 0 and municipalities to select and track projects from the planning, design, construction, and OM&M .2 phases. These tasks would improve and maintain the potential for long term projects that will restore the overall water quality of the near shore and coastal waters of the FKNMS. (iii) Link to EPA Strategic Plan - The project products and objectives support EPA's Strategic 0 0 Plan(Fiscal Year 2014—2018) Goal 2 Protecting America's Waters and meet the EPA objective 2.2 co of `Protect and restore watersheds and protect coastal and ocean resources and ecosystems by improving water quality of oceans, estuaries, and watersheds.' This project will help to meet these objectives by improving water quality within the canal systems of the Florida Keys that discharge into adjacent LU nearshore and coastal waters. 6.o Tracking Outputs and Outcomes — The update to the CMIVIP to develop a guidance document > will establish an adaptive management process,which will identify the specific programmatic steps that will be taken by the WQPP Steering Committee and the Canals Subcommittee to periodically assess the effectiveness of the canal management actions, measure progress toward goals, and (when necessary) redirect efforts in more productive directions. co 7.0 Literature Cited T- CD EPA(U.S.Environmental Protection Agency). 2013.Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Water Quality Protection Program Report to Congress. co d Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2013. Water Quality Assessment Report, Florida Keys. FDEP Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration,Tallahassee,FL. 271 pp. y 9 Packet Pg. 2991 . P.8.b Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. 2007. Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Revised Management Plan. FKNMS,Marathon,FL.382 pp. CL 8.0 Budget Summary The proposed project budget is$100,456.00 and is presented in Table 1.All costs are for contractualCL 0 services .and are detailed for each proposed task. Not included are costs for the technical advisory members from the local, state, and federal staff and facilities.These are being provided at no cost. X 9.0 Biographies and Qualifications m The proposed project team is presented below. Please refer to the proposed staff resumes in U 0 Attachment 1. Ms. Rhonda L.Haag,Principal Investigator,has extensive experience successfully CO managing EPA federal grants addressing environmental sustainability issues, and she also has extensive project management experience, including the County's $7 Million Canal Demonstration Program and projects. Ms. Haag will receive.overall administrative direction and support from Mr. Roman Gastesi (Monroe County Administrator). Mr. Rick Fraxedas, PE Principal Reviewer, is a Chief Engineer with 35 years of experience in environmental consulting and regulatory affairs. Mr. Fraxedas was the Principal Reviewer of the Monroe County CMMP Phase I and II, the Monroe County Canal Demonstration Project Selection and Design/Permit Projects as well as numerous 01 grants related to the canal restoration program. Mr. Greg Corning, PE, Senior Project Manager has project management experience for environmental projects throughout South Florida and the Keys. ti CO Mr. Corning is the project manager for the Canal Restoration Program and was the lead field engineer for Phase II of the Monroe County CMMP and the EPA Water Quality Improvement Grant CO investigating alternative technologies as well as the CMMP Part III-A. Mr. Jeremy Paris, MS d PWS, Senior Scientist, has more than a decades experience as an environmental consultant working in South Florida and the Keys. Mr. Paris was the lead scientist for Phase I and Phase II of the Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan and was the Wood's project manager for the EPA 10 Packet Pg. 2992 P.8.b Water Quality Improvement Grant investigating alternative technologies as well as the CMMP Part III-A. Mr. Stephen Flanks, PE, CFM, LEED AP, Senior Engineer, is a valuable resource in GIS, 0. hydraulic modeling, and nutrient loading evaluations.Mr.Hanks has been the design engineer for the Demonstration Canal Restoration projects and the EPA Water Quality Improvement Grant 0 investigating alternative technologies as well as the CMMP Part III-A.. Ms. Elizabeth Treadway, PWLF, Financial Analyst, has over 30 years of experience with 16 years directly managing governmental environmental programs. Her technical expertise includes business and financial planning, management assessments, and implementation of water resource, solid waste, hazardous 0 0 waste and secondary environmental projects for local government. Various other staff, including CO pre-approved sub consultants,will be enlisted to assist with the completion of this project as needed. 10.0 Programmatic Capability and Past Performance Ms.Haag of Monroe County successfully administered a$2.6 million federal pass-through grant °® awarded through the Florida Energy and Climate Commission. The Grant was a partnership with the City of Key West,.City of Marathon and Islamorada, Village of Islands. During the period FY 2011 > to present,the County has also successfully administered nearly$1 million in FDEP and EPA canal- c i related grants. Through careful adherence to accepted fiscal and project management principles and practices, those projects have been managed very successfully: They have met all of the reporting requirements including timely reporting of progress toward achieving expected outputs andCO �? T_ outcomes. Also, acceptable final technical reports were submitted under the agreements These EPA and FDEP grants include: CO 1.2016 EPA Grant#OOD40915-2 Monroe County Canal Management Master Plan Phase IIIA d 2.2016 FDEP Grant S0939 Big Pine Key Canal#290 Air Curtain Design, Permitting, and Installation (Monroe County) 3.2016 FDEP Grant S0911 Tropical Bay Estates Canal#277 Culvert Installation 11 Packet Pg. 2993 P.8.b 4.2015 EPA Grant#OOD40915 Water Quality Improvement Canal Restoration Alternative Technology Evaluation and Identification of Funding Mechanisms for Future Canal Restorations CL 5.2013 EPA Grant##OOD03712 Monroe County Water Quality Protection Canal Management CL Master Plan Phase H, $100,000. 0 6.2014 EPA Grant#OOD26914 Florida Keys Water Watch and Master Plan Education Program, $75,000 x 7.2014 FDEP Grant S0723 Engineering Construction Support Services and the Installation of a Culvert on Canal#472 Geiger Key, $100,000. 0 0 8.2013 FDEP Grant S0679 Culvert Design and Permitting at Canal#472 and Sediment CO Characterization of two Monroe County Canals,$100,000. 9.2013 FDEP Grant S0640 Bathymetric Survey of Residential Canals and Sediment Characterization and.Reporting, $100,000. 11.0 Voluntary cost sharelmatch and other leveraged funds > The proposed project will be carried out in conjunction with the FKNMS WQPP Water Quality �? Steering Committee and its Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee. Committee members include EPA,FDEP,NOAA,U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service, City of Marathon;Key Colony Beach, Key West, and Islamorada, among others. It builds upon strategic plans already in place such as the CO - CD CMMP, the FKNMS Revised Management Plan, the Monroe County Sanitary Wastewater Master Plan and the Monroe County Stormwater Master Plan. Informal support of these project have been CO acknowledged by the members of Canal Restoration Advisory Subcommittee of the WQPP. c Monroe County and the municipalities have provided over 7 million dollars for the implementation of canal restoration projects for improving the water quality within the canal 12 Packet Pg. 2994 P.8.b systems throughout the Florida Keys. To continue the investment efforts, the County and municipalities are working with Federal and State agencies to leverage local funds for continued CL canal restoration projects. That being said,because of the impact of Hurricane Irma Monroe CL County has expended all its resources and revenues in preparation, mitigation, and cleanup 0 actions. The County and municipalities are prepared to provide local assistance and management of the CMMP update in-kind services and look forward to working with our partners on this important project. E 0 U 0 CO LU CO _ ca T_ CD CD T_ CO E 13 Packet Pg. 2995 Amec Foster Wheeler Environment&Infrastructure, Inc. 2017 Schedule of Fees CL I. Personnel U A. Professional(Engineer,Geologist,Scientist and Project Management) CL LU Staff I $71.00/hour Staff II $77.00/hour Project $86.00/hour Senior $109.00/hour Principal/Project Manager $155.00/hour Senior Principal/Senior Project Manager $159.00/hour Chief Engineer/Scientist $194.00/hour y 0 U 0 B. Technical Services(Engineering and Science) CO ' Technician I $45.00/hour Technician II $55.00/hour Senior Technician I $60.00/hour Senior Technician II $70.00/hour Project Administrator/Project $75.00/hour U Coordinator/Subcontract Administrator/Project LU Accountant Technical Writer/Document Production $ 78.00/hour CADD/Draftsperson (includes PC/CAD) I $66.00/hour > CADD/Draftsperson (includes PC/CAD) 11 $101.00.hour — Admin 1 $40.00/hour Admin II $52.00/hour C. Surveying Services Field Surveyor I $43.00/hour Field Surveyor II $47.00/hour CO Survey Technician I $67.00/hour T- Survey Technician 11 $72.00/hour Survey Chief $75.00/hour CO D. Information Management o Software Engineer $92.00/hour Data Technician $132:00/hour Senior Software Engineer $162.00/hour Business Analyst $132.00/hour Packet Pg. 2996 • P.8.b E. Contract labor From time to time,Amec Foster Wheeler retains outside Professional and Technical labor on a temporary basis to meet peak workload demands. Such contract labor will be charged at 10%markup. CL II. Expenses CL 0 A. Travel Expenses 1. Transportation:Company pickup truck/personal vehicle, per mile—current allowable rate per X County and Florida State Statutes a. Common carrier or car rental multiplies by(to be the amounts authorized by Section 112.062, Florida Statutes 2. Per Diem Expenses:direct expenses in accordance with Florida State Statutes U 0 co B. Disposal of Hazardous Waste Samples Samples of waste will be disposed by permitted methods after a determination is made that the waste is defined by RCRA to be hazardous. Due to the requirements for some hazardous assessments, disposal and invoicing of incurred expenses may take place after invoicing of the originally contracted work. C. Equipment/Other Expenses (Does not include personnel) Digital Field Documentation Equipment(cameras, $75.00/day(min 2 days water level&measuring tape,GPS units,etc.) CJ Geophysical Equipment(GPR Equipment) $1,000.00/day(min 2 days) Underwater Camera Equipment/Video up to 50 $1,900.00/day 01 feet depth and low turbidity Environmental Monitoring&Sampling $100.00 to$450.00/day Equipment(dust, OVA,Air monitoring, Noise Depending upon the equipment and scale Meter, Light Meter) required Special equipment or supplies, permits,shipping Actual cost x 1.15 co charges,special printing or other items not C" customarily provided by Amec D. Communications co In-house costs for long distance phone,telex,telecopier, postage—project labor charges x 5% Z m III. Subcontract Subcontract services will be invoiced at a cost multiplied by 1.15 Packet Pg. 2997 P.B.c DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) A �® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 03/23/2020 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES 0 BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. cu N IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on _ this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT CL Aon Risk services Southwest, Inc. PHONE FAX Houston TX Office (A/C.No.Ezt): (866) 283-7122 (A/C.No.): (800) 363-0105 5555 San Felipe ADDRESS:E-MAIL Suite 1500 Houston TX 77056 USA INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# CL LLI INSURED INSURERA: AIG Specialty Insurance Company 26883 7WGUSA Holdings, Inc. INSURER B: ACE American Insurance Company 22667 Wood Group USA, Inc. and its subsidiaries and Affiliates INSURERC: American International Group UK Ltd AA1120187 — 17325 Park Row Houston TX 77084 USA INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: !v COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 570080995123 REVISION NUMBER: _ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD ¢ INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS N CERTIFICATE MAYBE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, Limits shown are as requested U INSR ADOL SUBR EFF POLICY EXP LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (POLICYMM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS B X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY HDOG71570009 07 01 2019 07 0112020 EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES(Ea occurrence) $2,000,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $5,000 L. PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $2,000,000 GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMITAPPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $4,000,000 POLICY PRO ❑LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $4,000,000 -� ECT OTHER: B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ISA H25300312 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $2'000'000 (Ea accident) LU X ANYAUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) 2 OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIREDAUTOS NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE y ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) UMBRELLA LIAB HOCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE _ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE (� DED I RETENTION B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WLRC66039262 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 X PER STATUTE ORTH- _ EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N Work Comp— AOS t8 B ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/ EN N/A RWCC66039304 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1,000,000 EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER (Mandatory in NH) Work Comp— WI E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1,000,000 E IDfyes,describe under $1,000,000 SCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT C Archit&Eng Prof �PSDEI`1900726 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 Aggreagate Limit $5,000,000 _ Claims Made- Prof. Liab. Any one Claim $5,000,000 = SIR applies per policy terTis & condi ions +� DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,maybe attached if more space is required) see attached addendum for Additional Named Insured Wood Companies. RE: Agreement for On Call Professional Engineering services for Category A Canal Infrastructure Engineering services. Monroe County its successors and assigns are included as am 4— Additional Insured in accordance with the policy provisions of the General Liability and Automobile Liability policies. �1 ikh 0) s � CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. y y� i Monroe County BOCC AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1100 Simonton street Key West FL 33040 USA A c� J. t8 ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Packet Pg. 2998 AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 570000021966 LOC#: A ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page _ of _ AGENCY NAMED INSURED Aon Risk services southwest, Inc. ]wGUSA Holdings, Inc. POLICY NUMBER See Certificate Numbe 570080995123 M CARRIER NAIC CODE See Certificate Numbe 570080995123 EFFECTIVE DATE: ADDITIONAL REMARKS CL THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability InsuranceCL Ca INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# LU O INSURER INSURER INSURER X INSURER ADDITIONAL POLICIES If a policy below does not include limit information,refer to the corresponding policy on the ACORD O U certificate form for policy limits. O Z POLICY POLICY IN"SR ADDL SURR POLICY NTNIRER LLNIITS WD LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD V EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION DATE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) L. OTHER A Env contr Poll CPL12456119 07/01/2019 07/01/2020 Aggregate $5,000,000 (n claims Made- Poll. Liab. Limit tJ Per Loss Limi $5,000,000 U tJ tJ tJ U U U tJ U U U ACORD 101(2008/01) ©2008 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Packet Pg. 2999 AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 570000021966 LOC#: A ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page _ of _ AGENCY NAMED INSURED Aon Risk services southwest, Inc. JWGUSA Holdings, Inc. POLICY NUMBER O See Certificate Numbe 570080995123 cu M CARRIER NAIC CODE See Certificate Numbe 570080995123 ERRECTIVE DATE: ADDITIONAL REMARKS CL THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance Additional Named Insured CL Named Insureds: Uj JWGUSA Holdings, Inc. O AMEC Construction Management, Inc. ¢ AMEC E&E, P.C. AMEC Engineering and Consulting of Michigan, Inc. Amec Foster Wheeler Energia, S.L.U. Amec Foster wheeler Industrial Power Company, Inc. Amec Foster wheeler Kamtech, Inc. x Amec Foster Wheeler Martinez Inc. Amec Foster wheeler North America Corp Amec Foster Wheeler Power Systems, Inc. Amec Foster wheeler USA Corporation Amec Foster Wheeler Ventures, Inc. N BMA Solutions, Inc. O U C E C Controls Company, Inc. O Cape Software, Inc. Foster wheeler Intercontinental Corporation Ingenious, Inc. John wood Group PLC Kelchner Inc. MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, P.C. MASA Ventures, Inc. Mustang International , LID Mustang International , Inc. Rider Hunt International USA, Inc. N RHI Talent, Inc. RWG (Repair & overhauls) USA, Inc. tJ Swaggart Brothers Inc. Uj wood Environment & Infrastructure solutions Inc. wood Group Alaska, LLC Wood Group PSN, Inc ' Wood Group USA, Inc. wood Massachusetts, Inc. > Wood Programs, Inc. Wood Group Asset Integrity Solutions, Inc. CJ CJ CJ O CJ O O ACORD 101(2008/01) ©2008 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Packet Pg. 3000