Item R7 �s R.7
r`,
County of Monroe
�y,4 ' �, "tr, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County �a� Mayor Heather Carruthers,District 3
�1 `ll Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Coldiron,District 2
The Florida.Keys` )-.���` Craig Cates,District 1
David Rice,District 4
w � Sylvia J.Murphy,District 5
County Commission Meeting
September 16, 2020
Agenda Item Number: R.7
Agenda Item Summary #7254
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Emily Schemper(305) 289-2500
1:30 PM PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: A Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of an Ordinance by the
Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending the Monroe County Future Land Use
Map from Residential High (RH) to Institutional (INS) for 32 Ocean Reef Drive, Key Largo, Ocean
Reef Club, as proposed by Ocean Reef Chapel, Inc. (2019-220)
ITEM BACKGROUND:
On November 12, 2019, the Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources Department
received an application from Smith/Hawks, PL (the "Agent") on behalf of Ocean Reef Chapel, Inc.
(the "Property Owner" and the "Applicant") to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map
(FLUM) from Residential High (RH) to Institutional (INS) for 32 Ocean Reef Drive, Key Largo,
Ocean Reef Club (the "Property"). The Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use
District (Zoning) map amendment for the Property from Urban Residential (UR) to Suburban
Commercial (SC) with an Institutional Overlay. The subject of this staff report is the proposed
FLUM amen}dment.
i
,3
Existing FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation
Packet Pg. 3485
R.7
The Applicant is proposing the FLUM amendment in order to redevelop the nonconforming
institutional use (church) on the property, the Ocean Reef Chapel, with a larger floor area than
currently exists.
The Applicant's full explanation and justification of the proposed amendments is included in the file
for the application (File 42019-220).
Community Meeting and Public Participation
In accordance with LDC Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on January 8, 2020, at
5:05 P.M. at the Property to discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment and
corresponding Land Use District (Zoning) Map amendment, and to provide for public participation.
There was one (1) attendee who had questions about the design process.
Development Review Committee and Public Input
At a regular meeting held on February 25, 2020, the Development Review Committee (DRC)
considered the proposed FLUM map amendment, provided for public comment and recommended
approval through DRC Resolution 05-20.
Planning Commission and Public Input
At a regular meeting held on May 27, 2020, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
consider the proposed amendment, provided for public input, and recommended approval of the
proposed FLUM amendment through PC Resolution P13-20.
The proposed density during review was as follows:
Maximum
development
Existing FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based
upon
density/intensity
Residential 6 du(UR)
Allocated Density Idu/lot(URM,URM-L) 7.66 units
2 du/tot IS-D
TDR/Market Rate
Residential High(RH) Residential Max Net 12-25 du(UR)W 25.54 units
Density
Total Upland Area: 1.277 acres
(55,626.12 sf) Affordable Residential 12-25 du(UR)W 25.54 units
Max Net Density
1.02 buildable acres
(1.277 ac—0.20 open space ratio) Transient 0-10 rooms/spaces 12.77 rooms/spaces
Allocated Density
Nonresidential 0 0 sf
Maximum Intensity
Maximum
development
Proposed FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based
upon
density/intensity
Packet Pg. 3486
R.7
Residential 0 du 0 units market rate
Allocated Density
TDR/Market Rate
Residential Max Net N/A 0 units market rate
Institutional(INS) Density
Total Upland Area: 1.277 acres
(55,626.12 sf) Affordable Residential N/A 0 units affordable
Max Net Density
1.02 buildable acres
(1.277 ac—0.20 open space ratio) Transient 24 rooms/spaces 24.52 rooms/spaces
Allocated Density
Nonresidential 0.30 16,688 sf
Maximum Intensity
Residential Market Rate Allocated: -7.66 units
TDR/Market Rate Residential Max Net: -25.54 unit
Net Change in Development Potential Affordable Residential Max Net: -25.54 units
Based on FLUM
Transient Allocated:+11.75 rooms/spaces
Nonresidential: +16,688 sf
As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed FLUM amendment would result in a
decrease in 7.66 units in permanent allocated residential development potential; a decrease of 25.54
units in max net density residential potential for market rate units with the use of TDRs; a decrease
of 25.54 units in affordable residential development potential; an increase of 11.75 rooms or spaces
for transient units; and an increase in nonresidential development potential of 16,688 square feet.
------------------
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan may be proposed by the Board of County Commissioners,
by the Planning Commission, by the Director of Planning, or by the owner or other person having a
property or contractual interest in the real property to be affected by a proposed amendment. The
Director of Planning shall review and process applications as they are received and pass them onto
the Development Review Committee and the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing. The Planning Commission shall
review the application, the reports and recommendations of the Department of Planning &
Environmental Resources and the Development Review Committee and the testimony given at the
public hearing. The Planning Commission shall submit its recommendations and findings to the
Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). The BOCC holds a public hearing to consider the
transmittal of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, and considers the staff report, staff
recommendation, and the testimony given at the public hearing. The BOCC may or may not
recommend transmittal to the State Land Planning Agency. The amendment is transmitted to State
Packet Pg. 3487
R.7
Land Planning Agency, which then reviews the proposal and issues an Objections,
Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report. Upon receipt of the ORC report, the County has
180 days to adopt the amendments, adopt the amendments with changes, or not adopt the
amendment.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
On June 17, 2020, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the BOCC held a public hearing to consider
transmittal of the proposed text amendment, considered the staff report, and provided for public
comment and public participation in accordance with the requirements of state law and the
procedures adopted for public participation in the planning process. The BOCC adopted Resolution
184-2020 transmitting the proposed amendment to the State Land Planning Agency (Department of
Economic Opportunity —DEO)for review and comment.
Following their review of the proposed amendment, DEO issued an Objections, Recommendations
and Comments (ORC) report on July 27, 2020 (attached). The ORC report did not identify any
objections, recommendations or comments. The County has 180 days from the date of receipt of the
ORC to adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the amendment with changes or not adopt the
amendment.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
DOCUMENTATION:
2019-220 BOCC SR 09.16.2020
FLUM_Amendments_l 1 X 17 00081740-000100_reduced
2019-220 MONROE CO. 20-20ACSC (P) ORC
FLUM Ordinance
Ex.l to FLUM Ordinance MAP
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date: N/A
Expiration Date: N/A
Total Dollar Value of Contract: N/A
Total Cost to County: N/A
Current Year Portion: N/A
Budgeted: N/A
Source of Funds:
CPI: N/A
Indirect Costs: N/A
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts: N/A
Packet Pg. 3488
R.7
Revenue Producing: N/A If yes, amount: N/A
Grant: N/A
County Match: N/A
Insurance Required: N/A
Additional Details: N/A
REVIEWED BY:
Emily Schemper Completed 08/26/2020 1:16 AM
Peter Morris Completed 08/26/2020 2:20 AM
Assistant County Administrator Christine Hurley Completed
08/26/2020 12:40 PM
Purchasing Completed 08/26/2020 1:07 PM
Budget and Finance Completed 08/26/2020 3:18 PM
Maria Slavik Completed 08/26/2020 3:21 PM
Liz Yongue Completed 08/26/2020 3:47 PM
Board of County Commissioners Pending 09/16/2020 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 3489
R.7.a
rs
2 Ell'
3 �
4
5 MEMORANDUM
6 MONROE COUNTY PLANNING&ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
CL
7 We strive to be caring,professional and fair
8 e�C
9 To: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners
10
11 Through: Emily Schemper, CFM, AICP, Senior Director of Planning & Environmental Resources
12 N
13 From: Cheryl Cioffari, AICP, Assistant Director of Planning
14
15 Date: August 24, 2020
16
17 Subject: An ordinance by the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners amending U-
18 the Monroe County Future Land Use Map from Residential High (RH) to
19 Institutional (INS) for 32 Ocean Reef Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club; as
20 proposed by Ocean Reef Chapel, Inc. (2019-220)
21
22 Meeting: September 16, 2020
23 N
24 I. REQUEST
25
26 On November 12, 2019, the Planning and Environmental Resources Department received an
27 application from Smith/Hawks, PL (the "Agent") on behalf of Ocean Reef Chapel, Inc. (the
28 "Property Owner" and the "Applicant") to amend the Monroe County Future Land Use Map
29 (FLUM) from Residential High (RH) to Institutional (INS) for 32 Ocean Reef Drive, Key Largo,
30 Ocean Reef Club (the "Property"). The Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use
31 District (Zoning) map amendment for the Property from Urban Residential (UR) to Suburban `T°
32 Commercial (SC) with an Institutional Overlay. The subject of this staff report is the proposed a)i
33 FLUM amendment. e�
1' U
ti F i
�
' j
N
IN
ft E
34 -
35 Existing FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 1 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3490
R.7.a
1 IL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2 Site Information:
3 Address: 32 Ocean Reef Drive, Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club
4 Parcel ID: 00081740-000100 _
5 Owner/Applicant: Ocean Reef Chapel, Inc.
6 Size of Property: 1.277 acres per survey completed by Kenneth J. Buchanan, P.S.M. of P
7 Watham Group, Inc. dated and signed November 2, 2019
8 FLUM Designation: Residential High (RH)
9 Land Use District: Urban Residential (UR) '
10 Tier Designation: none
11 Flood Zones: AE(EL 9)
12 CBRS: No
13 Existing Use: Institutional (Ocean Reef Chapel)
14 Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land
15 Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include single-family
16 residential uses to the northeast, multi-family residential uses to the east (formerly the medical
17 center),nonresidential uses to the south. U_
18
19 The Property currently has a Land Use District (Zoning) designation of Urban Residential (UR) and
20 a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation of Residential High (RH). The Property was within the
21 BU-2 (medium business district) zoning district prior to September 15, 1986. The Property was re-
22 designated as UR (urban residential) with the final adoption of the LUD map in 1992. With the
23 adoption of the Comprehensive Plan's FLUM in 1997, the Property was given the current FLUM
24 designation of Residential High(RH).
25
26 The Applicant is also requesting proposed Land Use District (Zoning) Map amendment for the
27 property from Urban Residential (UR) to Suburban Commercial (SC) with an Institutional Overlay.
28 The subject of this staff report is the proposed FLUM amendment.
W
29 CD
30 The Applicant states that the reason for the proposed amendment is: c„
scck to Alipl cam -' rc(l , l q arid, ex°p; nr d l exist�N g
cl'isa pep oil the Pree i,<i1y, During 201'�. rf c � "�������r made subsi �iu'a��' <lN 't�r'tie�tr��a7,� fb:= the rg;'=��r'[ p. 111�an`N,, ��
Tm.:I nded rtn,isrN. ns to tflr'," 1,11T) (JisuNct rlk ,axitlnlltl
nc_P r ;i'dci1't1'at faarid itse As part of the A twIr finefils, Oic 'oui-61y cn rc(luc:A N:pC:
rd7 Gl3rNINI'1 lr"k N1 N �, f i (,' t"c: riing d,".r'll`�k' t°i`rN;T'r t`�"(rT,,,, . ' l7et, . 'BN to, r N. t" €fig it) 2 Ca
.yypl5i��N p° yp�.pt IHy.:dS ��g IIr 1 i'Iblt ryrY w py.�..[ 1=�yyqq, ryr r-I y��p�y.l��ayn���p�i��q�r �;�q�,.I1���:.i'{I;r`rk��w.�; �.°�p+�t.��y�.°:�� i
imder ,a U' ad$��.itiA .�f�N.:strly`r....,, �vhl�.h al kn,,,c a thtr `,, '9,'10) �7�„.n�4eA4,I. lFli$�k�sNNNvurn rid&rNr��.siderr lal Nri:'�r'�.srry tV
N l rlN ""„ ,Q�N.Nr' ?�!e Prof:e, t". N Ir �14�`N'"'NNN � a because'd! $ !'i nN'4 3 Nn; V{R:'M1 !N�3B t(,a �'�"�, R"i
0 and tlhcr�-�Y,�r d.t �;l;'N'�„NN'ch is � rid"Pt`�c�'�N"4tr�6i'tmn �4ie. 4`4'dcx,cloplvc�,nt 9
r.4 0"ic church is hruited m ific cv sling cquai,c i"ricitage. av,h�ch is 6,5f"'1 sqn.nair feet. The Proposecl
31 Ain rir;VNnerrls Litt t o, Applicant:an lrr r ,,,ckgi and cxpaiid the C-akfii lg r f1M'01. �
32
33 The Applicant's full explanation and justification of the proposed amendments is included in the file
34 for the application (File 42019-220).
35
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 2 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3491
R.7.a
I Staff notes that, although the Applicant states that the County "errantly reduced the maximum
2 intensity for UR zoning districts from thirty (30) percent to zero," as part of the 2016/2017 update to
3 the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code (LDC), the referenced change to the LDC
4 was not in error, as the corresponding RH FLUM already had a nonresidential intensity of zero prior
5 to the update. Had the Applicant proposed to redevelop the church use prior to the update, it still
6 would have been limited to its existing square footage.
CL
7 0
8 Staff has reviewed the Applicant's position and supporting documentation, and is also reviewing the
9 proposed amendment for consistency with State Statutes (including 163.3187, F.S., above), Rules,
10 internal consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and balancing all the requirements and policy
11 issues. �+
12
13 Community Meeting and Public Participation
14 In accordance with LDC Section 102-159(a), a community meeting was held on January 8, 2020 at
15 5:05 PM at the Property to discuss the proposed Future Land Use Map (FLUM) amendment and <
16 corresponding Land Use District (Zoning) Map amendment, and to provide for public participation.
17 There was one (1) attendee who had questions about the design process.
18
19 Development Review Committee and Public Input
20 At a regular meeting held on February 25, 2020, the Development Review Committee (DRC)
21 considered the proposed FLUM map amendment, provided for public comment and recommended
22 approval through DRC Resolution 05-20.
23 N
24 Planning Commission and Public Input
25 At a regular meeting held on May 27, 2020, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
26 proposed FLUM map amendment through PC Resolution P13-20 and provided for public comment.
27
28 Previous Relevant BOCC Action and Public Input
29 On June 17, 2020, at a regularly scheduled meeting, the BOCC held a public hearing to consider
30 transmittal of the proposed text amendment, considered the staff report, and provided for public
31 comment and public participation in accordance with the requirements of state law and the T�
32 procedures adopted for public participation in the planning process. The BOCC adopted Resolution
33 184-2020 transmitting the proposed amendment to the State Land Planning Agency (Department of W
34 Economic Opportunity —DEO)for review and comment. UI
35
36 Following their review of the proposed amendment, DEO issued an Objections, Recommendations a®ai
37 and Comments (ORC) report on July 27, 2020 (attached). The ORC report did not identify any
38 objections, recommendations or comments. The County has 180 days from the date of receipt of the
39 ORC to adopt the proposed amendment, adopt the amendment with changes or not adopt the c,
N
40 amendment.
41 a
42 III.AMENDMENT REVIEW
43
44 Maximum Allocated Density and Intensity by Future Land Use Map Designation
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 3 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3492
R.7.a
Maximum development
Existing FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon
density/intensity
6 du(UR) _
Residential Idu/lot(URM, z
Allocated Density URM-L) 7.66 units
2 du/lot IS-D
Residential High(RH) TDR/Market Rate
Residential Max Net 12-25 du(UR)(k) 25.54 units
Total Upland Area: 1.277 acres Density
(55,626.12 sf) N
Affordable Residential
Max Net Density12-25 du(UR)(k) 25.54 units
1.02 buildable acres
(1.277 ac—0.20 open space W
Transient
ratio) Allocated Density 0-10 rooms/spaces 12.77 rooms/spaces
E
Nonresidential 0 0 sf
Maximum Intensity
Maximum development I.:
Proposed FLUM Type Adopted Standards potential based upon
density/intensity
Residential
0 du 0 units market rate
Allocated Density
N
TDR/Market Rate
Institutional(INS) Residential Max Net N/A 0 units market rate
Density
Total Upland Area: 1.277 acres
(55,626.12 sf) Affordable Residential N/A
Max Net Density 0 units affordable 0
1.02 buildable acres
(1.277 ac—0.20 open space N
Transient
ratio) Allocated t Density 24 rooms/spaces 24.52 rooms/spaces
w
CD I
Nonresidential
Maximum Intensity 0.30 16,688 sf U)
CJ
CJ
Residential Market Rate Allocated: -7.66 units
TDR/Market Rate Residential Max Net: -25.54 unit N
N
Net Change in Development Affordable Residential Max Net: -25.54 units
Potential Based on FLUM N
Transient Allocated: +11.75 rooms/spaces
Nonresidential: +16,688 sf
1 The above table provides an approximation of the development potential for residential, transient
2 and commercial development. Section 130-156(b) of the Land Development Code states: "The
3 density and intensity provisions set out in this section are intended to be applied cumulatively so that
4 no development shall exceed the total density limits of this article. For example, if a development
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 4 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3493
R.7.a
I includes both residential and commercial development, the total
2 gross amount of development shall not exceed the cumulated
3 permitted intensity of the parcel proposed for development."
(t ri- � S }
5 As shown in the blue portion of the table, the proposed FLUM r,' � " .�'
6 amendment would result in a decrease in 7.66 units in permanent ��� x' ` '�l` �� 0
0.
7 allocated residential development potential; a decrease of 25.54
8 units in max net density residential potential for market rate units
9 with the use of TDRs; a decrease of 25.54 units in affordable
10 residential development potential; an increase of 11.75 rooms or
�
11 spaces for transient units; and an increase in nonresidential �tFts «u��u�t, art
12 development potential of 16,688 square feet.
13 Compatibility with the Surrounding Area
1A1i111,1ial
14 a. Existing Vegetation/Habitat: Developed Land
15 b. Existing Tier Designation: None �' ,� g <C
16 c. Number of Listed Endangered or Threatened Species:
ti
17 None U_
18 d. Existing Use: Institutional (Ocean Reef Chapel)
19 e. Community Character of Immediate Vicinity: Adjacent land uses include single-family
20 residential uses to the northeast, multi-family residential uses to the east (formerly the
21 medical center), nonresidential uses to the south.
22
23 The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character of the
24 surrounding area.
25
26 Concurrency Analysis (Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.1.1)
27 Traffic Circulation (Comprehensive Plan Policy 301.1.1)
28 The subject property is located on Ocean Reef Drive within Ocean Reef, which is accessed by
29 County Road 905. The property is only accessible by via US 1. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan,
30 the level of service standard for US 1 is LOS of"C." According to the 2017 US 1 Arterial Travel
31 Time and Delay Study, US 1 overall is operating at a LOS of"C" and Segment 23 on Key Largo
32 (MM 99.5 to MM 106)is operating at a LOS of"A."
33 e�
34 The proposed FLUM amendment would result in a decrease in residential potential and an increase Ui
35 in nonresidential potential. For 2017, there is a maximum reserve volume for Segment 23 of 8,333
36 trips, and the maximum reserve volume for US 1 as a whole is 18,547 trips. M1
37 N
38 The proposed FL UM is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts to the Traffic Circulation LOS.
39
40 Potable Water(Comprehensive Plan Policy 701.1.1)
41 Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority's water treatment facility in Florida City has a maximum water 0)
42 treatment design capacity of 29.8 million gallons per day (MGD) and is capable of treating up to
43 23.8 MGD. There are also two saltwater Reserve Osmosis (RO) plants, located on Stock Island and M
44 Marathon, which are able to produce potable water under emergency conditions. The RO <
45 desalination plants have design capacities of 2.0 and 1.0 MGD of water, respectively. The County's
46 2015-2016 water demand were 17.89 & 17.66 MGD respectively.
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 5 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3494
R.7.a
1
2 The proposed FLUM amendment could result in a net decrease in demand from this site of 896
3 gallons per day.
4
Potable Water Max Potential .�
FLUM Residential Residential Persons/ Total Total LOS Net Change
LOS Standard Development Household Persons Demand
(Policy 701.1.1) (dwelling units)
Current: 100 gal/cap/day 25.54 2.24 2.24 5,720.96 gal/day
RH (224 gal/du/day) N
-5,720.96
Proposed: 100 gal/cap/daygaUday C
INS (224 gal/du/day) 0 2.24 0 0 gal/day
5
6 The proposed FLUMis not anticipated to adversely impact the Potable Water LOS.
7
8 Solid Waste (Comprehensive Plan Policy 801.1.1)
9 Monroe County has a contract with Waste Management authorizing the use of in-state facilities
10 through September 30, 2024; thereby, providing the County with approximately six (6) more years of
11 guaranteed capacity for solid waste. Currently, there is adequate capacity for solid waste generation.
12 All commercial solid waste is handled by private contract.
13
14 The proposed FLUMis not anticipated to adversely impact the Solid Waste LOS.
15
16 Sanitary Sewer(Comprehensive Plan Policy 901.1.1
17 The County has adopted water quality treatment standards for wastewater facilities and within the M
18 Sanitary Wastewater Treatment Master Plan, Exhibit 3-8, has stated the LOS standard for residential
19 and nonresidential flow is 145 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The proposed
20 FLUM amendment would leave the allocated density on the site at zero (0) dwelling units, which
21 would not increase the required flow. Any proposed development on the site will either need to
22 connect to the North Key Largo Utilities Corporation system, or provide on-site sewage treatment a)
23 and disposal that meets the LOS standards in Policy 901.1.1.
24 U)
25 The proposed FLUMis not anticipated to adversely impact the Sanitary Sewer LOS.
26
27 IV.CONSISTENCY WITH THE MONROE COUNTY YEAR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE i
28 PLAN,THE FLORIDA STATUTES AND PRINCIPLES FOR GUIDING DEVELOPMENT N
29
30 A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the C44
31 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Note: compliance with Policy 101.5.26 must
32 be established prior to BOCC adoption of the proposed FLUM amendment). Specifically, it E
33 furthers:
34
35 Goal 101: Monroe County shall manage future growth to enhance the quality of life, ensure the
36 safety of County residents and visitors, and protect valuable natural resources.
37
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 6 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3495
R.7.a
I Objective 101.5
2 Monroe County shall regulate future development and redevelopment to maintain and enhance
3 the character of the community and protect natural resources by providing for the compatible
4 distribution of land uses consistent with the designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. _
5 z
6 Policy 101.5.12
7 The principal purpose of the Institutional (INS) future land use category is to provide for
8 institutional uses by federally tax-exempt, nonprofit facilities, including, but not limited to,
9 educational, scientific, religious, social service, cultural, healthcare, and recreational '
10 organizations. Related institutional residential and nonresidential uses, including student and
11 employee housing, shall be allowed. [F.S. § 163.3177(6)(a)]
12
13 Policy 101.5.25
14 Monroe County hereby adopts the following density and intensity standards for the future land
15 use categories, which are shown on the FLUM and described in Policies 101.5.1101.5.20.
16 [F.S. § 163.3177(6)(a)l.]
17 U_
Future Land Use Densities and Intensities
Residential Nonresidential
Minimum
Future Land Open Space
Use Category Ratio(0
And Allocated Density(a) Maximum Net Density Maximum Intensity
Corresponding (per upland acre) (floor area ratio) N
Zoning (per buildable acre)
m
6 du(UR) 12-25 du(UR)
Residential ldu/lot(URM,URM-L) N/A(IS-D,URM,
High(RH) 2 du/lot(IS-D) URM-L) CD
0 0.20 N
0-10 rooms/spaces 0-20 rooms/spaces N
Institutional 0 du N/A Per
(INS) 15 rooms/spaces 24 rooms/spaces 0.30 underlying
zoning
Notes:
CJ
(a) The allocated densities for submerged lands, salt ponds, freshwater ponds, and mangroves shall be 0 and the ca i
maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. N
(b) The Maximum Net Density is the maximum density allowable with the use of TDRs,or for qualifying
affordable housing development. TDRs can be utilized to attain the density between the allocated density
standard up to the maximum net density standard. Deed restricted affordable dwelling units may be built up N
to the maximum net density without the use of TDRs. "N/A"means that maximum net density bonuses shall r_
not be available. Buildable acres means the portion of a parcel of land that is developable and is not required E
open space.
(c) Additional open space requirements may apply based on environmental protection criteria; in these cases,the
most restrictive requirement shall apply.
(d) Future land use categories of Agriculture/Aquaculture, Education, Institutional, Preservation, Public
Buildings/Lands, and Public Facilities,which have no directly corresponding zoning,may be used with new
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 7 of I
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3496
R.7.a
or existing zoning districts as appropriate.
(e) Within the Mainland Native future land use district, campground spaces and nonresidential buildings shall
only be permitted for educational,research or sanitary purposes.
(f) For properties consisting of hammocks,pinelands or disturbed wetlands within the Mixed Use/Commercial _
and Mixed Use/Commercial Fishing future land use categories, the maximum floor area ratio shall be 0.10 z
and the maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. CL
h-
(g) A mixture of uses shall be maintained for parcels designated as MI zoning district that are within the MC
future land use category. Working waterfront and water dependent uses, such as marina, fish house/market,
boat repair, boat building, boat storage, or other similar uses, shall comprise a minimum of 35% of the '
upland area of the property,adjacent to the shoreline,pursuant to Policy 101.5.6. N
(h) In the RV zoning district,commercial apartments shall be allowed,not to exceed 10%of total spaces allowed
or in existence on the site,whichever is less.
(i) The allocated density for the CFSD-20 zoning district(Little Torch Key) shall be 1 dwelling unit per acre,or
i dwelling unit per parcel for those parcels existing as of September 15, 1986, whichever is less, and the
maximum net density bonuses shall not be available. Residential density shall be allowed in addition to the m
permitted nonresidential uses and intensity(i.e.,density and intensity shall not be counted cumulatively). et
(j) Within IS subdivisions with primarily single family residential units, IS-D zoning may be used with a RM
future land use designation for platted lots which have a duplex that was lawfully established prior to
September 15, 1986. U_
(k) The maximum net density shall be 25 du/buildable acre for the UR zoning district and shall be 18
du/buildable acre for the MU and SC zoning district for development where all units are deed restricted
affordable dwelling units. For the UR zoning district market rate housing may be developed as part of an
affordable or employee housing project with a maximum net density not exceeding 18 du/buildable acre. r_
(1) Vessels, including live-aboard vessels, or associated wet slips are not considered dwelling units and do not W
count when calculating density.
1 C44
2
3 B. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development for the
4 Florida Keys Area, Section 380.0552(7), Florida Statutes.
5
6 For the purposes of reviewing consistency of the adopted plan or any amendments to that plan with
7 the principles for guiding development and any amendments to the principles, the principles shall be CD
8 construed as a whole and no specific provision shall be construed or applied in isolation from the
9 other provisions. a)
10 i
11 (a) Strengthening local government capabilities for managing land use and development so that local U)
12 government is able to achieve these objectives without continuing the area of critical state concern U�
13 designation.
14 (b) Protecting shoreline and benthic resources, including mangroves, coral reef formations, seagrass beds, CO
i
15 wetlands, fish and wildlife, and their habitat. N
16 (c) Protecting upland resources, tropical biological communities, freshwater wetlands, native tropical `44
17 vegetation (for example, hardwood hammocks and pinelands), dune ridges and beaches, wildlife, and
18 their habitat. `44
19 (d) Ensuring the maximum well-being of the Florida Keys and its citizens through sound economic
20 development. E
21 (e) Limiting the adverse impacts of development on the quality of water throughout the Florida Keys.
22 (f) Enhancing natural scenic resources, promoting the aesthetic benefits of the natural environment, and
23 ensuring that development is compatible with the unique historic character of the Florida Keys.
24 (g) Protecting the historical heritage of the Florida Keys.
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 8 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3497
R.7.a
I (h) Protecting the value, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and amortized life of existing and proposed major
2 public investments,including:
3
4 1. The Florida Keys Aqueduct and water supply facilities;
5 2. Sewage collection, treatment, and disposal facilities;
6 3. Solid waste treatment, collection, and disposal facilities;
7 4. Key West Naval Air Station and other military facilities; CL
8 5. Transportation facilities;
9 6. Federal parks,wildlife refuges, and marine sanctuaries;
10 7. State parks,recreation facilities, aquatic preserves, and other publicly owned properties;
11 8. City electric service and the Florida Keys Electric Co-op; and N
12 9. Other utilities, as appropriate. �+
13 (1) Protecting and improving water quality by providing for the construction, operation, maintenance, N
14 and replacement of stormwater management facilities; central sewage collection; treatment and -�
15 disposal facilities; and the installation and proper operation and maintenance of onsite sewage
16 treatment and disposal systems. E
e(
17 (j) Ensuring the improvement of nearshore water quality by requiring the construction and operation of 2
18 wastewater management facilities that meet the requirements of ss. 381.0065(4)(1) and 403.086(10),
19 as applicable, and by directing growth to areas served by central wastewater treatment facilities U_
20 through permit allocation systems.
21 (k) Limiting the adverse impacts of public investments on the environmental resources of the Florida W
22 Keys. e�
23 (1) Making available adequate affordable housing for all sectors of the population of the Florida Keys.
24 (m)Providing adequate alternatives for the protection of public safety and welfare in the event of a
25 natural or manmade disaster and for a postdisaster reconstruction plan. 0
26 (n) Protecting the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Florida Keys and maintaining
27 the Florida Keys as a unique Florida resource.
28
29 Pursuant to Section 380.0552(7) Florida Statutes, the proposed amendment is consistent with the
30 Principles for Guiding Development as a whole and is not inconsistent with any Principle.
31 CD
32 C. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part II of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S.).
33 Specifically, the amendment furthers:
34
35 163.3161(4), F.S. — It is the intent of this act that local governments have the ability to preserve and
36 enhance present advantages; encourage the most appropriate use of land, water, and resources, v)
i
37 consistent with the public interest; overcome present handicaps; and deal effectively with future U
38 problems that may result from the use and development of land within their jurisdictions. Through the
39 process of comprehensive planning, it is intended that units of local government can preserve, cai
40 promote, protect, and improve the public health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance, N
41 convenience, law enforcement and fire prevention, and general welfare; facilitate the adequate and
42 efficient provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, recreational facilities, housing, N
43 and other requirements and services; and conserve, develop, utilize, and protect natural resources
44 within their jurisdictions.
45 E
46 163.3161(6), F.S. — It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans shall have the legal status
47 set out in this act and that no public or private development shall be permitted except in conformity
48 with comprehensive plans, or elements or portions thereof, prepared and adopted in conformity with
49 this act.
50
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 9 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3498
R.7.a
1 163.3177(1), F.S. - The comprehensive plan shall provide the principles, guidelines, standards, and
2 strategies for the orderly and balanced future economic, social, physical, environmental, and fiscal
3 development of the area that reflects community commitments to implement the plan and its
4 elements. These principles and strategies shall guide future decisions in a consistent manner and shall
5 contain programs and activities to ensure comprehensive plans are implemented. The sections of the
6 comprehensive plan containing the principles and strategies, generally provided as goals, objectives,
7 and policies, shall describe how the local government's programs, activities, and land development CL
8 regulations will be initiated, modified, or continued to implement the comprehensive plan in a
9 consistent manner. It is not the intent of this part to require the inclusion of implementing regulations
10 in the comprehensive plan but rather to require identification of those programs, activities, and land -�
11 development regulations that will be part of the strategy for implementing the comprehensive plan N
12 and the principles that describe how the programs, activities, and land development regulations will �+
13 be carried out. The plan shall establish meaningful and predictable standards for the use and N
14 development of land and provide meaningful guidelines for the content of more detailed land -�
15 development and use regulations.
16 E
e(
17 163.3201, F.S. - Relationship of comprehensive plan to exercise of land development regulatory 2
18 authority. It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans or elements thereof shall be
19 implemented, in part, by the adoption and enforcement of appropriate local regulations on the U-
20 development of lands and waters within an area. It is the intent of this act that the adoption and a
21 enforcement by a governing body of regulations for the development of land or the adoption and W
22 enforcement by a governing body of a land development code for an area shall be based on,be related
23 to, and be a means of implementation for an adopted comprehensive plan as required by this act.
24
25 V. PROCESS
26
27 Comprehensive Plan Amendments may be proposed by the Board of County Commissioners, the
28 Planning Commission, the Director of Planning, or the owner or other person having a contractual
29 interest in property to be affected by a proposed amendment. The Director of Planning shall review
30 and process applications as they are received and pass them onto the Development Review
31 Committee and the Planning Commission.
32 N
33 The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing. The Planning Commission shall
34 review the application, the reports and recommendations of the Department of Planning &
35 Environmental Resources and the Development Review Committee and the testimony given at the
36 public hearing. The Planning Commission shall submit its recommendations and findings to the
37 Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). The BOCC holds a public hearing to consider the
38 transmittal of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, and considers the staff report, staff ci
39 recommendation, and the testimony given at the public hearing. The BOCC may or may not
40 recommend transmittal to the State Land Planning Agency. The amendment is transmitted to State
41 Land Planning Agency, which then reviews the proposal and issues an Objections,
42 Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report. Upon receipt of the ORC report, the County has
43 180 days to adopt the amendments, adopt the amendments with changes or not adopt the W
44 amendment.
45
46 VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
47
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 10 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3499
R.7.a
I Staff recommends approval of the proposed FLUM amendment from Residential High (RH) to
2 Institutional (INS).
3
4 VIL EXHIBIT
5 _
6 1. 1 F by 17" FLUM Amendment Maps
7 2. DEO ORC Report 07.27.2020
8 3. FLUM Ordinance
cv
cv
cv
cv
r9
CD
cv
cv
Ca
i
i
i
CD
cv
cv
cv
BOCC SR 09.16.2020 Page 11 of 11
File 42019-220
Packet Pg. 3500
(NoaidOOV-(ozz-6�OZ)puawv wn1-A•a(i jaaN ueaoo zs;aaN ueaoo) paonpaa 00�000-ObL�8000 L�x��—sivawpuawv wn~r-A:ivawLioeiiv c r
r
�t 14
��111
l
ss �
I
s�
r �? �`� r `` �u,svttss�sslyst� s1
tss„ ss !1
t(st�
e r !� Stlh 1 rr Ilt
�
� t r y
� r} rs
is�t sl�alV\i �i%�iVl}s�t1 s I� ryyssty �'�E� r
�� �• � �til ter� � f,
s; 'ts Sytss4ia } �_ filtrU 'is .,
yfi�s�ytlt t��h1 � u u
� 0-2
-o
s)ttl4f l sirst+�l 4r11ip �r r �� m n awi E i
it ttsJ isi�tti� Si s� ts¢s "s �- - w.o E
�
in
w E
a) � ❑� Q �
� `�➢` � d4�?t�,rs�, r 1 'fir y�;U,<.�1`I'9i �11, .I1 � � ,°'n� m � '
13
a) ®oo®000®oo
Q � 13
— J z M
o o N o
fifi RRs 1 .l °� w
¢ o 0 a- p_�
s �
IQ
I y
m �
Y
�F
t
C
ry l
S :r
I{t�sl
y �r
It '
C
jmq�r
I eK § ys 11'Siilr ti� ¢ss�� s f
��, try
t s g
RV,�
4 RK
K
-
z'
R.7.c
J
Ron DeSantis Ken Lawson
GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
FLORIDA DEFVURTMEWrof
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
July 27, 2020
The Honorable Heather Carruthers
Mayor, Monroe County
102050 Overseas Highway,Suite 234
Key Largo, Florida 33037 W
Dear Mayor Carruthers:
The Department of Economic Opportunity("Department") has completed its review of the
proposed comprehensive plan amendment for Monroe County(Amendment No. 20-02ACSC),which
was received and determined complete on June 24, 2020. We have reviewed the proposed amendment
in accordance with the state coordinated review process set forth in Sections 163.3184(2)and (4),
Florida Statutes(F.S.),for compliance with Chapter 163, Part II, F.S.The Department does not identify
any objections or comments to the proposed amendment and this letter serves as the Objections,
Recommendations and Comments Report. Review comments received by the Department from the
appropriate reviewing agencies, if any, are enclosed. 0
r9
The County should act by choosing to adopt,adopt with changes,or not adopt the proposed
amendment. For your assistance,we have enclosed the procedures for final adoption and transmittal of
the comprehensive plan amendment.The second public hearing,which shall be a hearing on whether
to adopt one or more comprehensive plan amendments, must be held within 180 days of your receipt 0
of the Department's attached report,or the amendment will be deemed withdrawn unless extended by
agreement with notice to the Department and any affected party that provided comment on the
amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(4)(e)1., F.S.
If you have any questions related to this review, please contact Justin Stiell, Planning Analyst, by
telephone at(850) 717-8523 or by email at justin.stiell@deo.myflorida.com.
N
SiVerel , y
Lu
J s D.Stansbury,Chief
eau of Community Planning and Growth
JDS/js
cv
Enclosure: Procedures for Adoption
Agency Comments
cv
cc: Isabel Cosio Carballo, Executive Director,South Florida Regional Planning Council
Christine Hurley,County Administrator, Monroe County
Florida Department of Economic Opportunity I Caldwell Building 1 107 E.Madison Street I Tallahassee,FL 32399
850.245.7105 1 www.Florid aJobs.or
www.twitter.com/FLDEO lwww.facebook.com/FLDEO
An equal opportunity employer/program.Auxiliary aids and service are available upon request to individuals with disabilities.All voice
telephone numbers on this document may be reached by persons using TTy/TTD equipment via the Florida Relay Service at 711.
Packet Pg. 3502
R.7.c
SUBMITTAL OF ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
FOR STATE COORDINATED REVIEW
CL
Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statutes
NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED: Please submit three complete copies of all comprehensive plan
cv
materials,of which one complete paper copy and two complete electronic copies on CD ROM in
Portable Document Format(PDF)to the Department of Economic Opportunity and one copy to each
entity below that provided timely comments to the local government:the appropriate Regional Planning
W
Council; Water Management District; Department of Transportation; Department of Environmental
Protection; Department of State;the appropriate county(municipal amendments only);the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
(county plan amendments only); and the Department of Education (amendments relating to public
schools); and for certain local governments,the appropriate military installation and any other local
government or governmental agency that has filed a written request.
SUBMITTAL LETTER: Please include the following information in the cover letter transmitting the
adopted amendment:
cv
r9
Department of Economic Opportunity identification number for adopted amendment package;
Summary description of the adoption package, including any amendments proposed but not
adopted;
Ordinance number and adoption date;
Certification that the adopted amendment(s) has been submitted to all parties that provided
timely comments to the local government;
Name,title,address,telephone, FAX number and e-mail address of local government contact; n'
cv
Letter signed by the chief elected official or the person designated by the local government.
ADOPTION AMENDMENT PACKAGE: Please include the following information in the amendment
package:
In the case of text amendments,changes should be shown in strike-through/underline format;
cv
In the case of future land use map amendment, an adopted future land use map, in color cv
format, clearly depicting the parcel, its existing future land use designation, and its adopted designation,
A copy of any data and analyses the local government deems appropriate.
Effective:June 2, 2011(Updated June.2018) Page 1 of 2
Packet Pg. 3503
R.7.c
Note: If the local government is relying on previously submitted data and analysis, no additional data
and analysis is required;
Copy of executed ordinance adopting the comprehensive plan amendment(s);
CL
Suggested effective date language for the adoption ordinance for state coordinated review:
"The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be
the date the state land planning agency posts a notice of intent determining that this
amendment is in compliance. If the amendment is timely challenged, or if the state land cv
planning agency issues a notice of intent determining that this amendment is not in compliance,
this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the
Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in
compliance."
List of additional changes made in the adopted amendment that the Department of Economic
Opportunity did not previously review;
List of findings of the local governing body, if any,that were not included in the ordinance and
which provided the basis of the adoption or determination not to adopt the proposed amendment;
cv
Statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes not previously reviewed by the
Department of Economic Opportunity to the ORC report from the Department of Economic Opportunity.
cv
cv
cv
cv
cv
Effective:June 2,2011(Updated June 2018) Page 2 of 2
Packet Pg. 3504
R.7.c
From: le
,:,.
x,c ,
Subject: [EXTERNAL]-Monroe County,DEO#20-2ACSC Comments on Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment F-
Package CL
Date: Thursday,July 23,2020 10:00:40 AM
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
cv
cv
The South Florida Water Management District (District) has completed its review of the proposed
amendment package from Monroe County (County). The package includes a Future Land Use Map W
amendment. There appear to be no regionally significant water resource issues; therefore, the
District forwards no comments on the proposed amendment package.
The District requests that the County forward a copy of the adopted amendments to the District.
Please contact me if you need assistance or additional information.
Sincerely,
Ms.Terry Manning, Policy and Planning Analyst
South Florida Water Management District
cv
Water Supply Implementation Unit
3301 Gun Club Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Phone: 561-682-6779
Fax: 561-681-6264 0
E-Mail: tm.an.ring.@.sfwt7ld..gov U
cv
CD
cv
cv
cv
cv
ns
Packet Pg. 3505
R.7.c
DocuSign Envelope ID:CB75946F-4DB7-4FBE-96D7-BB3596440E68
FDOT
0
Florida S rtCL
RON DESANTIS 1000 NW 1 1 I Avenue KEVIN J.'THIBAU T,P.E.
GOVERNOR Miami, FL 3317 -5800 Sl+,f' ETAR17
N
June 25, 2020
N
Ms. Cheryl Cioffari, AICP E
Assistant Director of Planning
Monroe County Planning and Environmental Resources
2798 Overseas Highway, Suite 400
Marathon, Florida 33050
Subject: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Monroe County- FDEO#20-02ACSC
N
Dear Ms. Cioffari:
The Florida Department of Transportation, District Six, completed a review of the
subject amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes (F.S.), in its role
as a reviewing agency as identified in Section 163.3184(1)(c), F.S. The purpose of the
amendment is to update the future land use map, from residential high to institutional,
for a property located at 32 Ocean Reef Drive, Key Largo.
The District review found that there would be no adverse impacts to transportation
resources and facilities of State importance as a result of the amendment. N
The District encourages Monroe County to continue promoting pedestrian and N
bicycle facilities, and to create a walkable and connected community consistent with
ss. 163.3177, Florida Statutes. The District also encourages planning to address all
modes of travel, including public transportation.
N
N
N
U
WWW d tgov
Packet Pg. 3506
DocuSign Envelope ID:CB75946F-4DB7-4FBE-96D7-B6359644oE68
R.7.c
Ms. Cheryl Cioffari
June 25,2020
Page 2 of 2
Please contact me at 305-470-5393 if you have any questions concerning our 0
response.
Sincerely, ,
..DocuSi9ned by:
N
�a N
S� ieeen Yee Fong CD
N
Transportation Planner IV
Cc: Emily Schemper, Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources
Daniel Iglesias, P.E., FDOT, District 6
Dat Huynh, P.E., FDOT, District 6
Kenneth Jeffries, FDOT, District 6
Jennifer Carver, AICP, FDOT Central Office
Ray Eubanks, Department of Economic Opportunity
Isabel Cosio Carballo, South Florida Regional Planning Council
Kathe Lerch, South Florida Regional Planning Council
N
N
CD
N
N
www.fdot.gov
Packet Pg. 3507
R.7.c
From:
To:
Cc: K 4...,2„t .gL?
Subject: [EXTERNAL]-Monroe County 20-02ACSC(Resolution No.184-2020,Ocean Reef Chapel,Inc.) 0
Date: Monday,July 20,2020 9:36:35 AM
CL
Dear Ms. Cioffari:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff reviewed the proposed
comprehensive plan amendment in accordance with Chapter 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes. ,
We have no comments,recommendations, or objections related to listed species and their
habitat or other fish and wildlife resources to offer on this amendment.
If you have specific technical questions,please contact Jim Keltner at(239) 332-6972 x9209
or by email at �, � � �: t r ;`q tom. All other inquiries maybe directed to our office
by email
Sincerely,
Josh Cucinella
Biological Administrator 11
Office of Conservation Planning Services
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 0
1239 SW loth Street
Ocala,Florida 34471
(352) 620-7330
Monroe County 20-02ACSC 42021
CJ
CJ
CJ
cV
cV
CJ
CD
cV
cV
r
cV
U
Packet Pg. 3508
R.7.c
From: K dL,: i ;f
To: f i �r"..",.1s r{ s-,y g; � `�.:�"rn tat (I NO rn�
fax,I v,- �r�a(f '17Y frlr :Y'rP } fi xi. 1,ari1 ad( filt Y9.E rC �f
Dilin
r..., x r 3•y r hi t I- 1a r t7a,- dt,`,pgjqwPI achfl,1 7 ( r r rr r 1f
r 1 1r Yf _y&c,,„�t, ._.___e_.._ti.. �.. __�,[;J✓8, :,!,rJ.�" .�..�!.f.rrl
�. . :C !t�i :a: u, 't..__�f.:kTzfi. ... etrf�if s �i _..,:�� rrlf �r 1f:, ,�•
f 1 r I s re fi 1 r 7 fk ".} fE llJ 1rr 1 1 1r y i ri rz
fl G::; Q
Je.rl " ..,,.:.F ffoi, 1 f.pt )__b - I' fY7
.. a. t, �a
w
Cc: 1:1 �t % (rtrJ Ci v- r( r .�k t # xn C 1 l,i;`, t tf 4"f rt 7
N
fresilfi
la�_.. i_lr-'. '^,.. 7 r1r gyp.._- ;:r.... IYIU,
f t..�f s fYl Y,1 _....� '�
Subject: [EXTERNAL]-SFRPC Virtual Council Meeting July 27,2020.Agenda Item IV.C: Broward 20-03ESR; Monroe 20- W
01,20-02,20-04ACSC;Cutler Bay,Miami,Miami Beach,N Miami Beach,Pembroke Pines,Plantation,20-01ESR;
Lauderhill 20-01ER;Miramar 20-02ESR
Date: Friday,July 17,2020 11:24:34 AM
Attachments: W M"a'(
r .iD A f°
......„ .,,,,,�„�,.,... �, . - - ...,w,.,,m.,�.. U-
i
N
The staff report and upcoming meeting agenda for Monday,July 27, 2020,
of the South Florida Regional Planning Council is attached.
ns
The South Florida Regional Planning council Meeting 0
Go To Meting ca
Should you have any questions, contact Isabel Cosio Carballo,
Executive Director, at(954)924-3653 or i�i
Broward County Commission SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-03ESR;
N
Dale V. C. Holness HenrySniezek/Deanne D. Von Stetina/Jo Sesodia/Barbara U
Blake Boy
m , ....... _ ........_r
N
Monroe County Commission SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-01,20-02,20-04ACSC;
. or _ cc
N
Heather Carruthers Emily Schemper/Heidi Siegel/Cheryl Cioffari
i,
Packet Pg. 3509
R.7.c
Town of Cutler Bay SFRPC Agenda IV.C, 20-01ESR;
M:vim= ._ _ CC .
Tim Meerbott Alex David/Rafael Casa ls/rcasals@cutlerbay-
fl.gov;
1 i r
r
City of Lauderhill SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-1ER; N
Mawr
Ken Thurston Chris Torres
City of Miami SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-1ESR;
L)r 0r U,
Francis Suarez Francisco Gorcia/Sue Trone
pW
W
City of Miami Beach SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-1ESR;
Moor cc �
Dan Gelber Thomas Mooney
},.(?`�4x7 14.: ......?... .......I......w ...,m. M..,..., .�.. .....�
City of Miramar SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-02ESR;
Ma�,or
Wayne M. Messam Eric Silva W
City of North Miami Beach SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-1ESR;
Mayor _...............cc. e
U
Anthony F. DeFillipo Richard Lorber
..LiI is
..
N
�m .
N
City of Pembroke Pines SFRPC Agenda IV.C,#20-01ESR;
Fronk C. Ortis Michael Stamm/Sharon Williams
N
Cityof Plantation SFRPC Agenda IV.0 #20-1ESR• N
g ,
ly1 7rr Cc N
Lynn Stoner Peter Dokuchitz/Danny A. Holmes
Packet Pg. 3510
R.7.c
ate z r r.Lerch
Adrn;n'straflve Assistant
CL
Phone,, 954-924-3653
04
mMSFRPC
South F.Iorida Regional Planning Council
South Florida Regional
rr
Proudly serving uth Florida since 197
cv
r9
CJ
CJ
CJ
cv
cv
CJ
CD
cv
cv
cv
U
Packet Pg. 3511
R.7.c
0
CL
DRAFT AGENDA
MONDAY,JULY 27, 2020
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
Council Meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. W
VIRTUAL MEETING ONLY
Please join my meeting from your computer,tablet or smartphone.
You can also dial in using your phone.
United States Toll Free): 1, 877 309 2073m
United States:+i �5 )3 t.7- 129
Telephone Access Code:809-739-317 0
cv
r9
I. Pledge of Allegiance and Roll Call
II. Approval Council Agenda
III. Guest Presentations: 0
CJ
The Looming Eviction/Foreclosure Crisis
Mr.Jeffrey M. Hearne, Esq., Director of Litigation at Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc. _
Mr. Harold L. "Trey" Price, Executive Director, Florida Housing Finance Corporation
CJ
IV. Action Items
cv
A. Minutes of Previous Meeting cv
B. Financial Report
C. Consent: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Reviews
Proposed
• Broward County 20-03ESR
• Monroe County 20-02ACSC
• Monroe County 20-03ACSC CD
• Town of Culter Bay 20-01ESR
• City of Miami 20-01ESR
• City of Miami Beach 20-01ESR
• City of Miramar 20-02ESR
South Florida Regional Planning Council
z Oakwood Boulevard,Suite 25o,Hollywood,Florida 33020
954-924-3653 Phone,954-924-3654 FAX
Packet Pg. 3512
R.7.c
• City of North Miami Beach 20-01ESR
• City of Pembroke Pines 20-01ESR
• City of Plantation 20-01ESR
Adopted
CL
• Monroe County 20-01ACSC
• City of Lauderhill 19-01ER
Public Hearing N
N
D. Regional Issues:Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review-None
E. FY 2020-21 Membership Fees W
F. Audit Contract—Correction of Scrivener's Error
G. Appointment of Council Members to FRCA Policy Board
Public Comments
V. Discussion Items
A. Executive Director's Report
B. Legal Counsel Report
C. Councilmembers Report
D. Ex-Officio Report
E. Florida Regional Councils Association
r9
VI. Program Reports and Activities
A. SFRPC Revolving Loan Funds Status Report
B. Development of Regional Impact Status Report-None
C. Economic Development District 0
D. Council Highlights U
VII. Announcements and Attachments
A. Attendance Form
B. Correspondence and Articles
C. Upcoming Meetings N
1) August- No Meeting(Summer Recess) CD
2) September 21,2020, 10:30 a.m.TBD-(SFRPC, Hollywood)
3) October 16, 2020, 10:00 a.m. TBD-(Joint Meeting with TCRPC/SFRPC)
4) November 23, 2020, 10:30 a.m.TBD-(SFRPC, Hollywood)
Vill. Adjournment
CD
Pursuant to Chapter 286.0105, Florida Statutes,if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council
with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he may need to ensure that a verbatim ,
record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal CD
is based.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act,any person requiring special accommodations
to participate in this hearing is asked to advise the Agency at least 5 days before the hearing by contacting the
South Florida Regional Planning Council at one of the following: (1) One Oakwood Boulevard, Suite 250,
2
Packet Pg. 3513
R.7.c
Hollywood, Florida 33020; (2) Phone 954-924-3653; (3) Fax 954-924-3654; or (4) w A;+ , i :, ,s r . If you
are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the Agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1 (800) 955-8771
(1TY/VCO), 1(800)955-8770(Voice), 1(800)955-8773(Spanish).
CL
Agenda packets for upcoming Council meetings will be available at the Council's website,
ten days prior to the meeting.
cv
If you would like to be added to the e-mail list to receive the link to the agenda,please e-mail the
Council at ,r ..<,
cv
r9
CJ
CJ
CJ
cv
cv
CJ
CD
cv
cv
cv
U
3
Packet Pg. 3514
R.7.c
0
0
MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM#IV.0
cv
cv
w
T-
DATE: JULY 27,2020
TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: STAFF
SUBJECT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROPOSED AND ADOPTED AMENDMENT
CONSENT AGENDA
Pursuant to the 1974 Interlocal Agreement creating the South Florida Regional Planning Council(Council),
the Council is directed by its member counties to"assure the orderly,economic,and balanced growth and 0
development of the Region, consistent with the protection of natural resources and environment of the
Region and to protect the health,safety,welfare and quality of life of the residents of the Region."
In fulfillment of the Interlocal Agreement directive and its duties under State law, the Council reviews
local government Comprehensive Plan amendments for consistency with the Strategic Regional Policy
Plan forSouth Florida(SRPP). Pursuant to Section 163.3184,Florida Statues as presently in effect,Council 0
review of comprehensive plan amendments is limited to 1) adverse effects on regional resources and U
facilities identified in the SRPP and 2) extra-jurisdictional impacts that would be inconsistent with the
comprehensive plan of any affected local government within the Region. The Council's review of
amendments is conducted in two stages: (1) proposed or transmittal and (2) adoption. Council staff
reviews the contents of the amendment once the Department of Economic
package p Opportunity certifies
its completeness.
cv
A written report of Council's evaluation pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, is to be provided cv
to the local government and the State Land Planning Agency within 30 calendar days of receipt of the
amendment.
Recommendation
Find the proposed and adopted plan amendments from the local governments listed in the tables below CD
generally consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida.
Approve this report for transmittal to the local governments with a copy to the State Land Planning
Agency.
OR
South Florida Regional Planning Council
1 Oakwood Boulevard, Suite 25o, Hollywood, Florida 33020
954-924-3653 Phone,954-924-3654 FAX
Packet Pg. 3515
R.7.c
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Local Local Government Governing
CL
Government Proposed Adopted Council Review Transmittal or Body Adoption
and Plan Date Adoption Public Vote
Amendment Hearing and Meeting
Number
Broward County `�
20-03ESR
(Received N/A 07-27-20 06-02-20 7-0 W
06-22-20)
1.The proposed amendment to Broward County's Comprehensive Plan seeks to make changes to the Capital
Improvements Element Objective CI1,Policy CI1,and Policy CI1.14 to incorporate funds generated by Broward
County's new transportation surtax,a 30-year one percent sales surtax for local transportation projects.
2.This amendment affects Broward County.
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
Monroe County
20-02ACSC �
cv
(received N/A 07-27-20 06-17-20 5-0
06-25-20) 03
1. The proposed amendment to the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan amends land use designation
of a specific property in Key Largo from Residential High (R-H) to Institutional (INS) on the Future Land Use 0
Map(FLUM).
2.This amendment affects a property located at 32 Ocean Reef Drive in Key Largo.
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
Monroe County �� U
20-03ACSC ca
(received �/ N/A 07-27-20 06-17-20 5-0
06-30-20) CD
cv
1. The proposed amendments to the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan amends Policy 101.5.25 to U
reduce the open space ratio for the Recreation (R)future land use category.The intent of the amendments is
to allow the County to meet the needs of constituents'requests for additional active recreational facilities and
allow for American Disabilities Act(ADA) improvements.
2.The amendments affect the areas of Monroe County that are designated Recreation.
3.The amendments do not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
Town of Cutler
Bay
20-01ESR N/A 07-27-20 06-17-20 5-0
(received
06-25-20)
— ........
2
Packet Pg. 3516
R.7.c
Local Local Government Governing p
Government Proposed Adopted Council Review Transmittal or Body Adoption
and Plan Date Adoption Public VoteCL
e=
Amendment Hearing and Meeting
Number
1.The amendment to the Town of Cutler _proposed er Bay's Growth Management Plan updates the Town's Water '
Supply Facilities Work Plan for a 10-year planning period,as mandated by Florida Statutes 163.3177(6)(C). The cv
Work Plan updates the plan for water supply sources and facilities needed to serve existing and new i
development within the Town's jurisdiction.
2.This amendment affects the incorporated area of the Town of Cutler Bay. W
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
4. The Council recommends the Town addresses the technical assistance comments provided by the South
Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The comments from the SFWMD include recommending
updates to Cutler Bay's Comprehensive Plan Infrastructure Element Policies,as well as,updates to the 10-Year
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan.
City of Miami
20-01ESR
(received �/ N/A 07-27-20 06-11-20 5-0
06-29-20) P 0
r9
m
1. The proposed amendment to the City of Miami's Comprehensive Plan would allow hotels/motels in the
Industrial Land Use (1)category,subject to the conditions of the applicable land development regulations, up
to 65 units per acre. Any such use would have to meet the level of service requirements in the City's
concurrency management system. _
2.This amendment affects the areas within the City of Miami that are designated Industrial Land Use (1).
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
4. The Council recommends that the City continues to promote a robust transit system, and pedestrian and
bicycle facilities in orderto create walkable and connected communities.
CJ
City of Miami
Beach
cv
20-01ESR N/A 07-27-20 06-24-20 5-0
(received U
06-25-20)
.... .
1.The proposed amendment to the City of Miami Beach's Comprehensive Plan would provide flexibility in the
Public Facility land use category to allow public/private redevelopment of the Miami Beach Marina, including
resiliency improvements and a public park. N
2.This amendment affects the areas within the City of Miami Beach that fall under the Public Facility land use
category. cv
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
4. The Council commends the efforts of the City to improve resiliency, maintain public marina access, and m
employ green infrastructure.
3
Packet Pg. 3517
R.7.c
_
Local Local Government Governing
Government Proposed Adopted Council Review Transmittal or Body Adoption
and Plan Date Adoption Public Vote
Amendment Hearing and Meeting CL
Number
City of Miramar
20-01 ES R N
(received N/A 07-27-20 05-20-20 5-0 N
06-29-20)
cv
1.The proposed amendments to the City of Miramar's Comprehensive Plan seek to updatethe Comprehensive
Plan to incorporate the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, as mandated by Florida Statutes
163.3177(6)(C). Specific elements that will be updated include the Future Land Use Plan (FLUP),the Potable
Water/Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element, the Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element, and the Capital Improvements
Element.
2.The amendments affect the City of Miramar.
3.The amendments do not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
4.The Council recommends the City addresses the technical guidance comments provided by the South Florida
Water Management District(SFWMD).
N
r9
City of North
Miami Beach
20-01ESR N/A 07-27-20 06-16-20 7-0
(received
06-29-20) �
s
1. The proposed amendment to the City of North Miami Beach's Comprehensive Plan seeks to update the
Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, as mandated by Florida
Statutes 163.3177(6)(C). Specific elements that will be updated include the Future Land Use Element,
Infrastructure Element, Conservation Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and the Capital
Improvement Element.
2.This amendment affects the City of North Miami Beach.
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
uJ
City of Pembroke
Pines
20-01ESR ,/ N/A 07-27-20 06-17-20 5-0
(received N
06-22-20)
s
1. The proposed amendment to the City of Pembroke Pines' Comprehensive Plan seeks to update the City's
Water Supply Facilities Work Plan for a 10-year planning period, as mandated by Florida Statutes m
163.3177(6)(C). The Work Plan updates.the plan for water supply sources and facilities needed to serve
existing and new development within the City's jurisdiction.Specific elements that will be updated include the
Future Land Use Element, Infrastructure Element, Conservation Element, Intergovernmental Coordination
Element, and the Capital Improvement Element.
Packet Pg. 3518
R.7.c
Local Local Government Governing
Government Proposed Adopted Council Review Transmittal or Body Adoption
and Plan Date Adoption Public Vote
CL
Amendment Hearing and Meeting
Number
2.This amendment affects the incorporated area of the City of Pembroke Pines. _
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
4. The Council recommends the City addresses the technical assistance comments provided by the South
Florida Water Management District(SFWMD).
cv
City of Plantation
20-01ESR
(received ✓ N/A 07-27-20 05-27-20 5-0
06-16-20)
1. The proposed amendment to the City of Plantation's Comprehensive Plan seeks to update the
Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. The amendment will
update the Potable Water Sub-Element of the Infrastructure Element,and the Conservation Element.
2.This amendment affects the City of Plantation.
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. N
r9
4.The Council recommends the City address the comments provided by the South Florida Water Management
District(SFWMD).
__...............
CJ
CJ
CJ
cv
cv
CJ
cv
cv
cv
U
5
Packet Pg. 3519
R.7.c
ADOPTED AMENDMENTS
Local Local Governing
Government Proposed Adopted Council - Government Body Adoption
and Plan Review Date Transmittal or Vote
Amendment Adoption
Number Public Hearing '
and Meeting N
Monroe N
County
20-01ACSC N/A W
/ J 07-27-20 06-17-20 5-0
(received
06-30-20)
1.The adopted amendment to Monroe County's Comprehensive Plan updates the Comprehensive Plan to
include the 10-year Water Supply Plan update to be consistent with the South Florida Water Management
District Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan update of 2018. The update provides a plan for water supply
sources and facilities needed to serve existing and new development within the County's jurisdiction.
2.The amendment affects Monroe County.
3.This amendment does not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities.
4. The Council previously reviewed this amendment when proposed. Monroe County adopted the
amendment as proposed. N
r9
City of
Lauderhill
19-01ER N/A 07-27-20 06-08-20 5-0 0
(received
06-25-20)
1.The adopted amendments to the City of Lauderhill' p -�
s Comprehensive Plan are the Evaluation and �.-
Appraisal Report(EAR) based amendments and include the following intents: (a)to meet the Peril of
Flood requirements, (b)to reflect changes in local conditions,(c)to reflect policies related to
Resiliency/Sustainability and Climate Change,and (d)to ensure concurrence with the Broward County N
Land Use Plan (the County's Comprehensive Plan,entitled BrowardNext). '
2.The amendments affect the incorporated area of the City of Lauderhill.
N
3.These amendments do not create any adverse impact to state or regional resources/facilities. c,
4.The Council previously reviewed these amendments when proposed.The local government adopted
the, in response to a Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO)objection. Following concurrence from
DEO staff,the change was formally made to the Capital Improvements Element Goals,Objectives and
Policies to include a 5-Year Capital Improvements Schedule.
CD
6
Packet Pg. 3520
�l
t,
2 j� a
4
6
7 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
8 MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS _
9 ORDINANCE NO. -2020 °CL
®
10
11 �
12 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY a
13 COMMISSIONERS AMENDING THE MONROE COUNTY FUTURE LAND
14 USE MAP FROM RESIDENTIAL HIGH (RH) TO INSTITUTIONAL (INS),
15 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 32 OCEAN REEF DRIVE, KEY LARGO,
16 MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA, HAVING PARCEL ID 00081740-000100, AS
17 PROPOSED BY OCEAN REEF CHAPEL, INC.; PROVIDING FOR E
18 SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING
19 PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND
20 PLANNING AGENCY AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE;PROVIDING FOR U-
21 INCLUSION IN THE MONROE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND r�
22 FOR AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PROVIDING FOR
23 AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (File 2019-220)
24
25 0
26 WHEREAS, on November 12, 2019, the Planning and Environmental Resources
27 Department received an application from the Smith/Hawks, PL (the "Agent") on behalf of Ocean
28 Reef Chapel,Inc. (the"Property Owner' and the"Applicant")to amend the Monroe County Future
29 Land Use Map (FLUM) from Residential High (RH) to Institutional (1) for 32 Ocean Reef Drive,
30 Key Largo; and
31
32 WHEREAS,the Applicant has also requested a corresponding Land Use(Zoning)District
33 map amendment for the subject property from Urban Residential (UR) to Suburban Commercial
34 (SC)with an Institutional Overlay; and
35
36 WHEREAS,the Monroe County Development Review Committee (DRC) considered the
37 proposed amendment at a regularly scheduled meeting held on February 25, 2020; and
38
39 WHEREAS,the Monroe County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the May
40 27, 2020,for review and recommendation on the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment; and
41
42 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission made the following findings of
43 fact and conclusions of law:
44
45 1. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the community character
46 of the surrounding area;
Ord.No. -2020
File 2019-220 Page 1 of 3
Packet Pg. 3521
1 2. The proposed FLUM is not anticipated to adversely impact the Comprehensive Plan
2 adopted Level of Service (LOS);
3 3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the
4 Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan; and
5 4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Principles for Guiding Development
6 for the Florida Keys Area of Critical State Concern, Sec. 380.0552(7), F.S.;
7 5. The proposed amendment is consistent with Part II of Chapter 163,Florida Statute; and
8 6. The proposed amendment will not result in an adverse change in community character
9 to the sub-area which a proposed amendment affects. CL
10
11 WHEREAS, the Monroe County Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P13-20
12 recommending to the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners approval of the proposed
13 amendment; and
N
14
15 WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of June, 2020, the Monroe County
16 Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) held a public hearing to consider the transmittal of the
17 proposed amendment, considered the staff report and provided for public comment and public E
18 participation in accordance with the requirements of state law and the procedures adopted for
19 public participation in the planning process; and
20 U-
21 WHEREAS, at the June 17, 2020,public hearing,the BOCC adopted Resolution No. 184-
22 2020, transmitting the amendment to the State Land Planning Agency; and
23
24 WHEREAS, the State Land Planning Agency reviewed the amendment and the County
25 received its Objections,Recommendations and Comments (ORC)report on 27th day of July,2020;
26 and C44
27
28 WHEREAS,the ORC report did not identify any objections, or comments to the proposed
29 amendment; and
30
31 WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting on the 16t' day of September, 2020, the
32 BOCC held a public hearing to consider adoption of the proposed FLUM amendment;
33
34 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF
35 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
36
37 Section 1. The Future Land Use Map of the Monroe County 2030 Comprehensive Plan is amended
38 as follows:
39
40 The property located at 32 Ocean Reef Drive,Key Largo, Ocean Reef Club, having
41 Parcel ID Number 00081740-000100, is changed from Residential High (RH) to
42 Institutional (INS) as shown on Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
43
44 Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, item, change, or provision of
45 this ordinance is held invalid,the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such validity.
46
Ord.No. -2020
File 2019-220 Page 2 of 3
Packet Pg. 3522
I Section 3. Repeal of Inconsistent Provisions. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict
2 with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of said conflict.
3
4 Section 4. Transmittal. This ordinance shall be transmitted by the Director of Planning to the
5 State Land Planning Agency pursuant to Chapter 163 and 380, Florida Statutes.
6
7 Section 5. Filin2 and Effective Date. This ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the Secretary
8 of the State of Florida but shall not become effective until a notice is issued by the State Land
9 Planning Agency or Administration Commission finding the amendment in compliance, and if 0.
10 challenged, until such challenge is resolved pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. 0
11 �
12 Section 6. Inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. The foregoing amendment shall be
13 incorporated in the Monroe County Comprehensive Plan and included on the Future Land Use
14 Map.
15
16 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Monroe County,
17 Florida, at a regular meeting held on the day of E
18
19 Mayor Heather Carruthers, District 3
20 Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Coldiron, District 2 U-
21 Commissioner Craig Cates, District 1 r�
22 Commissioner David Rice, District 4
23 Commissioner Sylvia Murphy, District 5
24
25 0
26
27 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
28 MONROF COUNTY ATTORNEY OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
� - S O FOR
Dole:
30 BY
31 MAYOR HEATHER CARRUTHERS
32
33 (SEAL)
34
35 ATTEST: KEVIN MADOK, CLERK
36
37
38 AS DEPUTY CLERK
a�
Ord.No. -2020
File 2019-220 Page 3 of 3
Packet Pg. 3523
Exhibit 1 to Ordinance# -2020
CL
_____ CD
_cygtiti
F� CD
Cn
5�
o
O
® RH to INS m
The Monroe County Future Land Use Map is amended
as indicated above:
Future Land Use change of a parcel of land in Ocean Reef having Real Estate Number 00081740-000100 from
Residential High(RH)to Institutional (INS).
N
Packet Pg. 3524
Exhibit 1 to Ordinance# -2020
CL
N
N
aQ' c��
CL
5�
AFT W
O,A
I
I
® RH to INS
The Monroe County Future Land Use Map is amended
as indicated above:
Future Land Use change of a parcel of land in Ocean Reef having Real Estate Number 00081740-000100 from
Residential High(RH)to Institutional (INS).
N
Packet Pg. 3525