12/15-86 CATEX Documentation - Concourse A MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TASK ORDER FORM
Effective Date Upon execution Task Order No. 12/15-86
404-630187-GAKD135 &/OR
Client Project No. 404-630203-GAKD147 Engineer Project No. E9Y37986
This Task Order is entered into on the effective date noted above pursuant to the "Master
Agreement for Professional Services" between Monroe County, Florida("Client") and JACOBS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO. ("Consultant"), dated February 15, 2017 ("Agreement"). The
Agreement is incorporated herein and forms an integral part of this Task Order.
Services Authorized-CATEX Documentation-Concourse A
Client authorizes Consultant to perform the Services described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein, which Exhibit A is marked with the above noted Task Order No. and
consists of 6 page(s).
Pricing
___.NIA Time and Expense per Agreement and Appendix B to the Agreement.
X Firm Fixed Price of$ 43,094.00
N/ Other(Describe): NFL A
Schedule rf# GV
Services may commence on 'Execution Pgt 0.
Services will cease by _ 548 days ASSIS
Date 10/30/20
Recommended: Approved:
Digital t - 'goad by Roman Gasses
DN R nGastes o Monroe County
Roman G a st e s i SOCC b ardun^d edy@monroec mini nounty A gov
By gy U5
___-- Date:2020.11.02 0845 56 05 00
irector of Ai portm - `
Asst./County Administrator
CONSULTANT:
JACOBS PROJECT MANAGEMENT CO
DigJeffrey D. DN:cn Jeftally frey D.Acton,a-Jacobs
} IJPMCo).011,
ActonAemall�JeffreyActoniplae0bs,com,c®US
Dpoatry a d%aac4u�ne tieatl y Date.'.20.10.25 13:55:47-04'00'
Jacqueline D7d 6nalat�U�tR®RtlBt 4+4dS
e�7ace�ErtprneannE Region
1AA rAA emea+ja4�Ulhna6aDS 8asal�cata r\G ®11 I•�1o1 4lof
DR10 20201028075612.0a00 Title Svcs. GroupL d
Witness OSS 9
File: .11STR APS Monroe County
Page 1 of 1
Exhibit A—(12/16 -86)
Scope of Services
Monroe County Airports
Key West International Airport
CATEX Documentation—Concourse A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
This scope of services outlines the tasks required to support the Federal Aviation
Administration's(FAA's)review of the proposed 51,300-square-foot Concourse At and 22,000-
square-foot renovated areas at Key West International Airport(the Airport or EYW)pursuant to
the National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA). The scope covers preparation of materials to
support a categorical exclusion(CATEX)determination by the FAA.
This scope of services assumes that the FAA will concur that a CATEX determination for the
project is appropriate and that the level of analysis defined in this scope of services is appropriate.
With FAA's concurrence,the Jacobs Team would prepare CATEX documentation that will
conform to and be processed in a manner consistent with applicable federal,regional,and local
statutes,regulations,and guidelines.The final product shall conform to NEPA(42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), Council on Environmental Quality(CEQ)regulations(40 CFR Parts 1500-1508),
applicable Department of Transportation(DOT)Orders,and FAA Orders 1050.1 F,
Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures and 5050.4B,National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) Implementing Instructions for Air port Actions.
This scope of services includes three tasks to(1)review the project description with FAA to
support FAA's confirmation of CATEX applicability;(2)prepare the CATEX documentation;
and(3)conduct project administration and coordination. The scope of services also includes an
optional task that the FAA may identify as needed during review of the project description for
confirmation of CATEX applicability.
During preparation of the CATEX documentation, issues may arise that will necessitate
modification of this scope of services and the associated budget. If such changes are required,
changes to this scope of services will be coordinated with Airport staff. While this scope of
services identifies all items believed necessary for completion of the CATEX documentation,
additional work items may arise from coordination with the FAA and/or further review of the
project that necessitates additional analyses or preparation of an Environmental Assessment(EA).
TASK 1-PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Jacobs Team will prepare the CATEX documentation using a project description that has
been reviewed by the FAA to confirm CATEX applicability. In support of finalizing the project
description,the Jacobs Team will review one draft of the project description materials(text and
exhibits)to support project review with FAA. The Jacobs Team will attend one web meeting with
FAA and Airport staff to review the project description with FAA to confirm CATEX
applicability and assumptions documented in this scope of services regarding level of analysis
needed for the CATEX documentation.
Including the pedestrian bridge connecting Concourse A to the main terminal building.
Page 1 of 6
It is assumed that the project description will state that the project would not affect aircraft
operations or passenger activity and that the purpose is to accommodate existing and forecast
passenger demand levels at an acceptable level of customer service.
Deliverable(s)
Comments on the Draft Project Description including exhibits with the FAA
TASK 2-CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DOCUMENTATION
The Jacobs Team will prepare the CATEX documentation using the project description confirmed
in Task 1. Further justification or definition of the project is not included in this scope of services.
The CATEX documentation will be prepared using the form provided in Appendix A of FAA
Office of Airports(ARP)Standard Operating Procedures(SOPS)for CATEX Determinations
(ARP SOP version 5.1,effective June 2,2017).
The following points describe the level of analysis anticipated to support FAA's CATEX
determination. It is assumed that analysis conducted in support of the EA for Taxiway A
Extension,Apron Expansion, and Security Fencing Improvements(referred to herein as the 2020
EA)will provide background information to support this analysis, as described below.
• The project site is a fully developed,previously disturbed site. Documentation would note
that the following resources would not be affected by implementation of the project
because the resources are not present or due to the disturbed nature of the site:
a Archaeological resources
• Biological resources (Endangered and Threatened Species, resources protected
under the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, wetlands or Waters of the United
States,National Marine Sanctuary resources, Wilderness Areas)
• Wilderness Areas
• Farmlands
• Wild and Scenic Rivers
• Historic resources—It is assumed that a Section 106 finding is not required. A description
of the recent cultural resources assessment conducted for the 2020 EA will be referenced
to demonstrate that historic/architectural/tribal resources would not be directly affected by
the project and that no changes due to project implementation would occur in the vicinity
of the East Martello Tower that would affect this nearby resource.
• Department of Transportation Act Section 4(f) and 6(f) resources—No physical use of a
Section 4(f)resource would result from the project and a brief explanation will document
no constructive use by the project would occur at two potential Section 4(f) resources at
the roadway entrance to the terminal—Pines Park and the East Martello Tower.
• Floodplains—The project is located in a floodplain;however,the floodplain impact is not
expected to represent a significant floodplain encroachment,and analysis will be consistent
with the analysis in the 2020 EA.
Page 2 of 6
• Coastal —An appendix will be prepared to document the consistency of the project with
the enforceable policies of the Florida Coastal Management Program(FCMP);however,a
consistency determination would not be made until the environmental permitting process
that would occur after the CATEX documentation is complete. This scope of services
assumes that review through the Florida State Clearinghouse would not be conducted to
support review of consistency with the FCMP. Furthermore, CATEX documentation
would state that the project would not be located in and thus would not affect lands
designated as part of the Coastal Barrier Resource System or National Marine Sanctuaries.
• Energy Supply and Natural Resources—A statement would be provided that use of energy
and consumable natural resources during construction and additional energy to support
operation of the new facility would not be expected to exceed available supply or require
consumable natural resources that are not readily available and typical of the construction
industry.
• Solid Waste Management—Documentation consistent with the 2020 EA would be included
that adequate disposal capacity exists to accommodate solid waste generated during
construction of the project and that the quantity or type of solid waste would not change
after construction.
• Socioeconomic—Documentation that the project would not require the relocation of any
business or residents, and that minority and low-income populations are not located near
the project area based on recent analysis conducted for the 2020 EA.
• Surface Transportation—The project description would demonstrate that the project would
not induce aircraft operations or passenger activity,so the project would not affect surface
traffic. Surface traffic would not be modeled.
• Noise — The project description would demonstrate that the project would not induce
aircraft operations,so aircraft noise would not be modeled or discussed in detail.
• Air Quality—Monroe County is an area of attainment for all National Ambient Air Quality
Standards(NAAQS).The proposed project,including Concourse A and 22,000 square feet
of renovated areas, is assumed to qualify as a "presumed to conform action" per FAA's
Federal Presume to Conform Actions Under General Conformity2 for terminal and
concourse upgrade projects. The presumed to conform qualification will be documented
and no emissions modeling(for construction or operations)will be prepared.See optional
Construction Emissions Modeling (Task 4) if disclosure of construction emissions is
required.
• Water Quality — Water resources in the project vicinity will be described based on
documentation in the 2020 EA. The Proposed Action would not change stormwater runoff
because it would not change impervious area or the type or level of activities conducted in
the area following construction. Measures to protect water resources before and after
construction will be described.The CATEX documentation will list water quality permits.
Federal Register,Vol,72,No. 145,July 30,2007,pp 41565.
Page 3 of 6
• Controversy on Environmental Grounds — The potential for controversy will be
documented based on controversy of the 2020 EA,which recognizes the Concourse project
as a cumulative project.
• Federal, State, and Local Laws—The documentation will demonstrate that the project is
consistent with plans,goals,policy,zoning,and local controls adopted for the area in which
the Airport is located.
• Light Emissions — The documentation will demonstrate that changes in light emissions
associated with Concourse A would be minor and that the project would be visually and
aesthetically consistent with the project setting.
• Hazardous Materials—Documentation will be provided to demonstrate that construction
of the project would include measures to address hazardous materials should they be
encountered. The project would not change activities at the Airport after construction that
would produce new hazardous and/or solid waste.
• Public Involvement—This scope of work assumes a public involvement program(scoping,
notices,workshops, etc.) is not needed to support a CATEX determination.
• Indirect/Secondary/Induced Impacts — The project is not expected to result in
indirect/secondary/or induced impacts because it is intended to improve the passenger
experience (i.e., level of service) associated with existing and forecast passenger and
aircraft activity levels. Discussion will be provided about the potential for cumulative
impacts, consistent with the analysis in the 2020 EA and other existing sources.
• Permits and Environmental Commitments — A list of required permits identified in the
CATEX documentation and environmental commitments will be provided.
Deliverable(s):
• Draft CATEX Documentation in Adobe PDF format(no hard copies)
• Final CATEX Documentation in Adobe PDF format(no hard copies)
TASK 3 -PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND COORDINATION
This task covers additional day-to-day project administration and coordination required for the
project a period of 2 months,the expected duration of the project. Specific tasks include:
• Up to 3 team coordination calls with Airport staff, which are assumed to require a total of
2 hours per call,
Deliverable(s):
• 3 coordination conference calls—brief agendas and action item lists
• Monthly invoices and progress reports
TASK 4-CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ANALYSIS—OPTIONAL TASK
If needed,the Jacobs Team will prepare a construction emissions inventory for the Concourse A
project and will document results as a technical report for inclusion as an appendix to the CATEX
documentation.The Jacobs Team will base the analysis on the project description and proposed
project construction schedule.
Page 4 of 6
A construction emissions inventory will be prepared for carbon monoxide(CO), ozone precursors
—oxides of nitrogen(NOx)and volatile organic compounds(VOC)—oxides of sulfur(SOx),
particulate matter(PMio), and fine particulate matter(PM2.5), using the Airport Construction
Emissions Inventory Tool(ACEIT).ACEIT uses the US Environmental Protection Agency's
(USEPA's)Nonroad Equipment Emissions Model(NONROAD2008a)for nonroad construction
vehicle and equipment emissions and the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator(MOVES2010b)
for onroad emissions. Because MOVES2010b has been replaced with MOVES2014b,the Jacobs
Team would use MOVES2014B outside of the ACEIT model to derive onroad emissions factors
for use in the analysis.
For purposes of this scope, it is assumed that the construction emissions inventory would show
that emissions are below applicable de,ninimis thresholds and that a general conformity
determination is not required. It is assumed that aircraft operational emissions,both during and
after construction, would not need to be modeled. The Jacobs Team assumes that the number and
type of aircraft operations and vehicular trips at EYW would be the same with or without the
project.
Deliverable(s)
• Concourse A Construction Emissions Inventory (draft and final technical report
included with Draft and Final versions of CATEX documentation)
SCHEDULE
Tasks 1 through 3 have an anticipated schedule of 6 weeks.The schedule is dependent on
receipt of the Notice to Proceed(NTP)and a final project description approved by the FAA,and
therefore Tasks 1 and 2 may not be concurrent. The 6-week schedule is based on the following
assumptions:
• Task 1 (Project Description)has an assumed duration of 1 week and is dependent on:
* Receipt of draft project description for review
* Scheduling of web meeting with FAA
• Task 2(Categorical Exclusion Documentation)has an assumed duration of 5 weeks.
The task start is dependent on:
FAA concurrence on CATEX scope of services in Task 1
* Receipt of final project description and exhibits that incorporates feedback
from FAA received during Task 1
Task 2's 5-week duration includes:
0 2 weeks for the Jacobs Team to prepare the Draft CATEX
0 2 weeks for FAA review of Draft CATEX
a 1 week for the Jacobs Team to review and finalize CATEX for the Airport's
submittal to the FAA
• Task 3 (Project Administration and Coordination)duration concurrent with Tasks
1 and 2
Page 5 of 6
Optional Task 4(Construction Emissions Analysis)would extend the project duration by up to
2 weeks:
• 2 weeks to prepare the analysis upon receipt of the final project description
• 1 week to document analysis results(assumed to be concurrent with Task 2)
Assumptions/Design Parameters
1. This proposal does not include the permit application costs nor fees.
2. The Jacobs Team cannot guarantee that a CATEX will be issued or a timeframe in which it
would be approved.
3. Jacobs will reasonably rely upon the accuracy,and completeness of the information/data
provided by the Client or other third parties.
4. All work will be performed pursuant to the 2-15-2017 agreement signed between the parties.
Page 6 of 6
Jacobs JOB HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Monroe County
Airport:
Key West International Airport
Project:
CATEX Documentation
FEE SUMMARY
Hours Fee DBE AMOUNT
TASK I-PROJECT DESCRIPTION 32 $ 9,436
TASK 2-CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DOCUMENTATION 0 $ 17,684
TASK 3-PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND COORDINATION 0 $ 4,512
TASK 4-CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ANALYSIS-OPTIONAL TASK 14 $ 11,462 $ -
Total Services Lump Sum Fee 46 $ 43,094 $ -
FDOT
Florida Department of Transportation
RON DESANTIS 1000 NW 111 Avenue KEYIN J.THIBAULT,P.E.
GOVERNOR Miami,FL 33172 SECRETARY
October 30, 2020
Beth Leto
Sr. Airport Business Manager
Key West International Airport
Monroe County Airports
3491 South Roosevelt Blvd.,
Key West, FL 33040
RE.: Key West International Airport Planning Studies
FM4439285-1-94-01 Contract GOE77
Dear Ms. Leto:
The Modal Development Office is in receipt of Monroe County's request to use EYW Planning Studies
Grant GOE77 to fund 50% of PSO 12/15-86 for Jacobs Project Management Co.,the approval as follows:
• PSO 12/15-86, services will include reviewing the project description with the FAA to support
FAA's confirmation of CATEX applicability, preparing the CATEX documentation and
conducting project administration and coordination. In the event that GOE77 funds are exhausted,
cost reimbursement can be submitted under GIQ04 for services begun after GIQ04 execution
date, to be completed within 548 days, in the amount of$43,094.00.
Based on the information provided, FDOT concurs with Monroe County's request. Only expenses
incurred on or after the date of the fully executed JPA/PTGA and otherwise eligible under the Agreement
shall be reimbursed to Monroe County Airports—Key West International Airport.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to call me at (305) 470-
5441.
Sincerely,
Brittany Williams-Sanders
Aviation& Seaport Program Administrator
Office of Modal Development
District Six
Cc: Dionne Richardson
File
Improve Safety, Enhance Mobility, Inspire Innovation
www.fdot.gov