Loading...
Item C11BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: October 19, 2011 Division: County Administrator Bulk Item: Yes Department: Airports Staff Contact Person/Phone #: Peter Horton. 809-5200 AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Ratification of the previously executed Federal Aviation Administration Grant #3-12-0037-044-2011 providing funding to "Construct Terminal Building" at the Key West International Airport. ITEM BACKGROUND: Projects will be funded 95% by FAA, with match from Passenger Facility Charge Revenue and Operating. PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION: Approval for the Mayor to execute Airport Grants from FAA and FDOT as received in order to meet deadlines, with ratification at next BOCC meeting, Item C-2, 5-19-2010. CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES: New grant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. TOTAL COST: $2,103,657 INDIRECT COST: NA BUDGETED: Yes DIFFERENTIAL OF LOCAL PREFERENCE: NA COST TO COUNTY: None SOURCE OF FUNDS: FAA, PFC, Operating COST TO AIRPORT: $45,500 COST TO PFC: $59,682 REVENUE PRODUCING: NA APPROVED BY: County Attorney X_ DOCUMENTATION: Included X DISPOSITION: AMOUNT PER YEAR: NA OMB/Purchasing Risk Management Not Required AGENDA ITEM # MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONTRACT SUMMARY Contract # Contract with: Federal Aviation Administration Effective Date: Execution (FAA) Expiration Date: Open Contract Purpose/Description: Grant funding to "Construct Terminal Building" at the Key West International Airport. Contract Manager: Peter Horton # 5200 Airports - Stop # 5 (name) (Ext.) (Department/ Stop) for BOCC meeting on: October 19, 2011 Agenda Deadline: October 4, 2011 Total Dollar Value of Contract: $2,103,657 Budgeted? Yes Grant: Yes - FAA County Match: PFC, Operating Estimated Ongoing Costs: n/a (not included in dollar value above) CONTRACT COSTS Current Year Portion: 0 F1 I Account Codes: pending set-up for Grant #037-44 9 W UILFJ13, - l.Iq , 654 -(o1 - t ADDITIONAL COSTS ' -- i _ -1j5 For: eg. maintenance, utilities, janitorial, salaries, etc. CONTRACT REVIEW Changes Date In Needed Reviewer Date Out Yes No Airports DirectorX Risk Management O.M.B./Purc ing /ter' / / / ( ) ( ( ) (o'� Ite�`HorSton ; ,.' 1 . for Risk Management ,vf / 4 / 9LJ t� tbf OMB County Attorney // ( ) ( ) Pedro Mercado 9/ 8 /11 County Attorney Comments: J Q 0 L U 4- ru E pl C a=+ L Q 0 U U 4- E 0 0 Ln r) � LL O O O O O O O O r�l O O O Ln O O M N r� m N 00 . i 00 O O O O O O Ln Ln O -q M O O n Ln M O N O O O O Lr Ln L Ln Ln u 00 00 (a N N E 00 00 00 00 U LL Ln Ln Ln 000 C oOoOOo LnLnLn r� n N r� n 00 Ln q d\ M ,--� q q +--� - Q LL M 00 00 m m O O � L- Ln T 0) O i M Q O N 00 � 1 C c fu L' cn CL 1 0) C C C fo U Z LL Q- N o � ,�i Q _0 0) W m OO QQ o C:) ���a aLn0' J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 LM O ,o O 11 l� Ln N O \ M l� M 00 lfl M ,-q M Ol M Ln oo M O fb O +! O O O aU+ fa ,o O oo Ln O O E 1-1m k.0 � 0 � 1-1 N Ol 1-1 Ln M � a=+ (O L Q 0 U U 4- E 0 0 Ln r) LL L Ln Ln u 00 00 f0 N N E 00 00 00 00 U LL a-Ln Ln O M n r�, O oo Ln � Ln ,o ,o fb Ln m M Ol - Ln O CD m mLn Ln C C Cm C oOoCo �-qrn�M� r" � oo Ln 0 - rvi �z. � ll ll — M O Ln r� N m m O O E fu U Q) cn f0 cn 4- Q cn ,E ru O fU U 41 Z CL O Ln ro 70 0) � '� CO Q Q H 0 OO m m 0 0a o LiLnOO a U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration September 6, 2011 Mr. Peter Horton Director of Airports 3491 S. Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, Florida 33040 Dear Mr. Horton: RE: Key West International Airport; Key West, FL AIP Number 3-12-0037-044-2011 Grant Offer Orlando Airports District Office 5950 Hazeftine National Dr., Suite 400 Orlando, FL 32822-5003 Phone: (407) 812-6331 Fax: (407) 812-6978 We are enclosing the original and one copy of a Grant Offer for AIP Project No. 3-12-0037-044-2011 for Key West International Airport, in response to your Application for Federal Assistance dated June 23, 2011. Your acceptance of this Offer will constitute a Grant Agreement by which the government will participate in the allowable costs of the project amounting to $1,998,474 (Federal share). Once the authorized official has executed the Agreement and the official's signature has been notarized and sealed/stamped, the attorney for the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners must certify that the Sponsor's acceptance complies with local and state law and constitutes a legal and binding obligation on the part of the Sponsor. Please note that the Agreement is not legal unless the attorney signs it AFTER the Sponsor. If the terms of this Offer are satisfactory, please execute the document as soon as possible, but not later than September 13, 2011. To assist us in administrative reporting requirements you are requested to notify this office by emailing a PDF of signature page of the grant immediately upon executing the grant. Only the original executed grant needs to be returned to this office. The remaining copy is for your file. Please allow approximately 30 days after returning final executed grant to this office before attempting any drawdowns from the letter -of -credit account If a drawdown is necessary before this time please contact the Orlando Airports District Office prior to initiating the draw. Sincerely W. Dean Strin( Manager 2 Enclosures cc: w/enclosure (grant) Dionne Henry, FDOT/6 f�% GRANT AGREEMENT U. S. Department of Transportation Fedora! Avisdon Administration Date of Offer: September 6, 2011 Project Number: 3.12-0037.044.2011 Recipient: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners (Herein called Sponsor) Airport. Key West international OFFER THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay, as the United States' share, ninety-five percent (95%) of the allowable costs incurred in accomplishing the project consisting of the following: "Construct Terminal Building' as more particularly described in the Project Application dated June 23, 2011. The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this Offer shall be $1,998,474 for airport development authorized under The Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2010, Part IV, and appropriated under the terms of The Continuing Appropriations and Surface Transportation Extensions Act, 2011. This offer is made in accordance with and for the purpose of carrying out the appiic abbte provisions of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, codified at Title 49 of the United States Code. Acceptance and execution of this offer sh I comprise a Grant Agreement, as provided by Title 49 of the United States Code, constituting the contractual obliga s and rights of th United States and the Sponsor. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA /J FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION rporfs trict Office ACCEPTANCE The Sponsor agrees to accomplish the project in compliance with the terms and conditions contained herein and in the document 'Terms and Conditions of Accepting Airport Improvement Program Grants" dated March 22, 2011. 4-h Executed this Say of Q �' , 20 1 I Q N!'�O LOUI.STti (Seal) Name of Sport Attest Signature of s Designated Official Representative Title Title CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY I, PIU 2 C, J - i2-1 /Z C 4Dl; , acting as Attorney for the Sponsor do hereby certify: That in my opinion the Sponsor is empowered to enter into the foregoing Grant Agreement under the laws of the State of Florida. Further, I have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement, and the actions taken by said Sponsor relating thereto, and find that the acceptance thereof by said Sponsor and Sponsors official representative has been duly authorized and that the execution thereof is in all respects due and proper and in accordance with the laws of the said State and the applicable provisions of lie Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, c Aified at Title 49 of the United States Code. in addition, for grants involving projects to be carried out on property not owned by the Sponsor, there are no legal impediments that will prevent full performzrtce by the Sponsor. Further, it is my opinion that the said Grant Agreement constitutes as legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in accordance with the terms thereof, !A(,/ Signature of Sponsor Attom Date MON CQUN" ATT tic* PAS TO t l�� G (/L .c PEDF10 J. L4E ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY �� March 22, 2011 U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Terms and Conditions of Accepting Airport Improvement Program Grants This document was compiled from multiple government source documents. j This document contains the terms and conditions of accepting Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of Title 49, United States Code. These terms and conditions become applicable when the Sponsor accepts a Grant Offer from the FAA that references this document. The FAA may unilaterally amend the terms and conditions by notification in writing, and such amendment will only apply to grants accepted after notification. DEFINITIONS A. Sponsor —An agency that is legally, financially, and otherwise able to assume and carry out the certifications, representations, warranties, assurances, covenants and other obligations required in this document and in the accepted Grant Agreement, B. Project —Work as identified in this grant Agreement. C. Primary Airport —A commercial service airport the Secretary of Transportation determines to have more than 10,000 passengers boarding each year. D. "this grant" — In this document the term "this grant" refers to the applicable grant agreement or grant agreements that incorporate(s) these Terms and Conditions as part of the grant agreement. CERTIFICATIONS Title 49, United States Code, section 47105(d), authorizes the Secretary to require certification from the Sponsor that it will comply with statutory and administrative requirements in carrying out a project under the AIP. The following list of certified items includes major requirements for this aspect of project implementation. However, the list is not comprehensive, nor does it relieve sponsors from fully complying with all applicable statutory and administrative standards. In accepting this grant, the Sponsor certifies that each of the following items was or will be complied with in the performance of grant agreements. If a certification cannot be met for a specific project, the Sponsor must fully explain in an attachment to the project application. A. Sponsor Certification for Selection of Consultants. General standards for selection of consultant services within Federal grant programs are described in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and Part 18.36. Sponsors may use other qualifications -based procedures provided they are equivalent to specific standards in 49 CFR 18 and Advisory Circular 150/5100-14, Architectural, Engineering, and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant Projects. 1. Solicitations were (will be) made to ensure fair and open competition from a wide area of interest. 2. Consultants were (will be) selected using competitive procedures based on qualifications, experience, and disadvantaged enterprise requirements with the, fees determined through negotiations. 3. A record of negotiations has been (will be) prepared reflecting considerations involved in the establishment of fees, which are not significantly above the Sponsor's independent cost estimate. 4. If engineering or other services are to be performed by Sponsor force account personnel, prior approval was (will be) obtained from the FAA. 5. The consultant services contracts clearly establish (will establish) the scope of work and delineate the division of responsibilities between all parties engaged in carrying out elements of the project. 6. Costs associated with work ineligible for AIP funding are (will be) clearly identified and separated from eligible items in solicitations, contracts, and related project documents. T Mandatory contact provisions for grant -assisted contracts have been (will be) included in consultant services contracts. 8. The cost -plus -percentage -of -cost methods of contracting prohibited under Federal standards were not (will not be) used. 9. If the services being procured cover more than the single grant project referenced in this certification, the scope of work was (will be) specifically described in the advertisement; and future work will not be initiated beyond five years. B. Sponsor Certification for Project Plans and Specifications. AIP standards are generally described in Advisory Circulars 150/5100-6, Labor Requirements for the Airport Improvement Program; 150/5100-15, Civil Rights Requirements for the Airport Improvement Program; and 150/5100-16, Airport Grant Assurance One —General Federal Requirements. A list of current advisory circulars with specific standards for design or construction of airports, as well as procurement/installation of equipment and facilities, is referenced in standard airport sponsor Grant Assurance 34 in this document. 1. The plans and specifications were (will be) prepared in accordance with applicable Federal standards and requirements; so no deviation or modification to standards set forth in the advisory circulars, or State standard, is necessary other than those previously approved by the FAA. 1of19 2. Specifications for the procurement of equipment are not (will not be) proprietary or written so as to restrict competition. At least two manufacturers can meet the specifications. 1 The development included (to be included) in the plans is depicted on the airport layout plan approved by the FAA. 4, Development that is ineligible for AIP funding has been (will be) omitted from the plans and specifications or otherwise identified to assure that no reimbursement will be made for the cost of the ineligible item(s). 5. The process control and acceptance tests required for the project by standards contained in Advisory Circular 150/5370-10 are (will be) included in the project specifications. 6. If a value engineering clause is incorporated into the contract, concurrence was (will be) obtained from the FAA. 7. The plans and specifications incorporate (will incorporate) applicable requirements and recommendations set forth in the Federally approved environmental finding. 8. For construction activities within or near aircraft operational areas, the requirements contained in Advisory Circular 150/5370-2 have been (will be) discussed with the FAA, as well as incorporated into the specifications; and a safety/phasing plan has FAA's concurrence, if required. 9. The project was (will be) physically completed without Federal participation in costs due to errors and omissions in the plans and specifications that were foreseeable at the time of project design. C. Sponsor Certification for Equipment/Construction Contracts. General standards for equipment and construction contracts within Federal grant programs are described in Title 49, CFR, Part 18,36. AIP standards are generally described in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5100-6, Labor Requirements for the Airport Improvement Program; 15015100-15, Civil Rights Requirements for the Airport Improvement Program; and 15015100-16, Airport Grant Assurance One -General Federal Requirements. Sponsors may use State and local procedures provided procurements conform to these Federal standards. 1. A code or standard of conduct is (will be) in effect governing the performance of the Sponsors officers, employees, or agents in soliciting and awarding procurement contracts. 2. Qualified personnel are (will be) engaged to perform contract administration, engineering supervision, construction inspection, and testing, 3. Unless the FAA approved (has approved) otherwise, the procurement was (will be) publicly advertised using the competitive sealed bid method of procurement. 4. The bid solicitation clearly and accurately describes (will describe): a. The current Federal wage rate determination for all construction projects; and b. All other requirements of the equipment and/or services to be provided. 5. Concurrence was (will be) obtained from FAA prior to contract award under any of the following circumstances: a. Only one qualified person/firm submits a responsive bid; b. The contract is to be awarded to other than the lowest responsible bidder; c. Life cycle costing is a factor in selecting the lowest responsive bidder; or a. Proposed contract prices are more than 10 percent over the Sponsor's cost estimate. 6. All contracts exceeding $100,000 require (will require) the following provisions: a, A bid guarantee of 5 percent, a performance bond of 100 percent, and a payment bond of 100 percent; b. Conditions specifying administrative, contractual, and legal remedies, including contract termination, for those instances in which contractors violate or breach contact terms; and c. Compliance with applicable standards and requirements issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 USC 1857(h)), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1368), and Executive Order 11738. 7. All construction contracts contain (will contain) provisions for: a. Compliance with the Copeland "Anti -Kick Back" Act; and b. Preference given in the employment of labor (except in executive, administrative, and supervisory positions) to honorably discharged Vietnam -era veterans and disabled veterans. 8. All construction contracts exceeding $2.000 contain (will contain) the following provisions: a. Compliance with the Davis -Bacon Act based on the current Federal wage rate determination; and b. Compliance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 USC 327-330), Sections 103 and 107, 9. All construction contracts exceeding $10,000 contain (will contain) appropriate clauses from 41 CFR Part 60 for compliance with Executive Orders 11246 and 11375 on Equal Employment Opportunity. 10. All contracts and subcontracts contain (will contain) clauses required from Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and 49 CFR 23 and 49 CFR 26 for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. 11, Appropriate checks have been (will be) made to assure that contracts or subcontracts are not awarded to those individuals or firms suspended, debarred, or voluntarily excluded from doing business with any U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) element and appearing on the DOT Unified List. ►�SiE; D. Sponsor Certification for Real Property Acquisition. General requirements on real property acquisition and relocation assistance are in Title 49, CFR, Part 24 and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Uniform Act). 1. The Sponsor's attorney or other official has (will have) good and sufficient title and title evidence on property in the project. 2. If defects and/or encumbrances exist in the title that adversely impact the Sponsor's intended use of property in the project, they have been (will be) extinguished, modified, or subordinated. 3. If property for airport development is (will be) leased, the following conditions have been (will be) met: a. The term is for 20 years or the useful life of the project; b. The lessor is a public agency; and c. The lease contains no provisions that prevent full compliance with this grant agreement. 4. Property in the project is (will be) in conformance with the current Exhibit "A" property map, which is based on deeds, title opinions, land surveys, the approved airport. layout plan, and project documentation. 5. For any acquisition of property interest in noise sensitive approach zones and related areas, property interest was (will be) obtained to ensure land is used for purposes compatible with noise levels associated with operation of the airport. 6. For any acquisition of property interest in runway protection zones and areas related to 14 CFR 77 surfaces, property interest was (will be) obtained for the following: a. The right of flight; b. The right of ingress and egress to remove obstructions; and c. The right to restrict the establishment of future obstructions. 7. Appraisals prepared by qualified real estate appraisers hired by the Sponsor include (will include) the following: a. Valuation data to estimate the current market value for the property interest acquired on each parcel; and b. Verification that an opportunity has been provided the property owner or representative to accompany appraisers during inspections. 8. Each appraisal has been (will be) reviewed by a qualified review appraiser to recommend an amount for the offer of just compensation, and the written appraisals and review appraisal are (will be) available to FAA for review. 9. A written offer to acquire each parcel was (will be) presented to the property owner for not less than the approved amount of just compensation. 10. Effort was (will be) made to acquire each property through the following negotiation procedures: a. No coercive action was (will be) taken to induce agreement; and b. Supporting documents for settlements are (will be) included in the project files. 11. If a negotiated settlement is not reached, the following procedures were (will be) used: a. Condemnation was (will be) initiated and a court deposit not less than the just compensation was (will be) made prior to possession of the property; and b. Supporting documents for awards were (will be) included in the project files. 12. If displacement of persons, businesses, farm operations, or non-profit organizations is involved, a relocation assistance program was (will be) established, with displaced parties receiving general information on the program in writing, including relocation eligibility, and a 90-day notice to vacate. 13. Relocation assistance services, comparable replacement housing, and payment of necessary relocation expenses were (will be) provided within a reasonable time period for each displaced occupant in accordance with the Uniform Act. E. Sponsor Certification for Construction Project Final Acceptance. General requirements for final acceptance and closeout of Federally funded construction projects are in Title 49, CFR, Part 18.50. The Sponsor shall determine that project costs are accurate and proper in accordance with specific requirements of this grant Agreement and contract documents. 1. The personnel engaged in project administration, engineering supervision, construction inspection, and testing were (will be) determined to be qualified as well as competent to perform the work. 2. Daily construction records were (will be) kept by the resident engineer/construction inspector as follows: a. Work in progress b. Quality and quantity of materials delivered c. Test locations and results d. Instructions provided the contractor e. Weather conditions f. Equipment use g. Labor requirements h. Safety problems i. Changes"required. 3. Weekly payroll records and statements of compliance were (will be) submitted by the prime contractor and reviewed by the Sponsor for Federal labor and civil rights requirements (Advisory Circulars 150/5100-6 and 150/5100-15). 4. Complaints regarding the mandated Federal provisions set forth in the contract documents have been (will be) submitted to the FAA. 3of19 5. All tests specified in the plans and specifications were (will be) performed and the test results documented as well as made available to the FAA. 6. For any test results outside of allowable tolerances, appropriate corrective actions were (will be) taken. 7. Payments to the contractor were (will be) made in compliance with contract provisions as follows: a. Payments are verified by the Sponsor's internal audit of contract records kept by the resident engineer; and b. If appropriate, pay reduction factors required by the specifications are applied in computing final payments; and a summary of pay reductions are made available to the FAA. 8. The project was (will be) accomplished without significant deviations, changes, or modifications from the approved plans and specifications, except where approval is obtained from the FAA. 9. A final project inspection was (will be) conducted with representatives of the Sponsor and the contractor, and project files contain (will contain) documentation of the final inspection. 10, Work in this grant agreement was (will be) physically completed, and corrective actions required as a result of the final inspection are completed to the satisfaction of the Sponsor. 11. If applicable, the as -built plans, an equipment inventory, and a revised airport layout plan have been (will be) submitted to the FAA. 12. Applicable close out financial reports have been (will be) submitted to the FAA. F. Sponsor Certification for Seismic Design and Construction. 49 CFR Part 41 sets forth the requirements in the design and construction of the building(s) to be financed with the assistance of the FAA. Compliance will be met by adhering to at least one of the following accepted standards: 1. Model codes found to provide a level of seismic safety substantially equivalent to that provided by use of the 1988 National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) including: a. The 1991 International Conference of Building Officials (IBCO) Uniform Building Code, published by the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 South Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601; b. The 1992 Supplement to the Building Officials and Code Administration International (BOCA) National Building Code, published by the Building Officials and Code Administrators, 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478-5795; and c. The 1992 Amendments to the Southern Building Code Congress (SBCC) Standard Building Code, published by the Southern Building Code Congress International, 900 Montclair Road, Birmingham, Alabama 35213-1206. 2. Revisions to the model codes listed above that are substantially equivalent or exceed the then current or immediately preceding edition of the NEHRP recommended provisions, as it is updated, may be approved by the DOT Operating Administration to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 41. 3. State, county, local, or other jurisdictional building ordinances adopting and enforcing the model codes, listed above, in their entirety, without significant revisions or changes in the direction of less seismic safety, meet the requirement of 49 CFR Part 41, G. Drug -Free Workplace. General requirements on the drug -free workplace within Federal grant programs are described in Title 49, CFR, Part 29 and the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988. Sponsors are required to certify they will provide, or will continue to provide, a drug -free workplace in accordance with the regulation. 1. A statement has been (will be) published notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the Sponsor's workplace, and specifying the actions to be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition. 2. An ongoing drug -free awareness program has been (will be) established to inform employees about: a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; b. The Sponsor's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace; c. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. 3. Each employee to be engaged in the performance of the work has been (will be) given a copy of the statement required within item 1 above. 4. Employees have been (will be) notified in the statement required by item 1 above that, as a condition of employment under this grant, the employee will: a. Abide by the terms of the statement; and b. Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction. 5. The FAA will be notified in writing within ten calendar days after receiving notice under item 4b above from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title of the employee, to the FAA. Notices shall include the project number of each affected grant. 4of19 6. One of the following actions will be taken. within 30 calendar days of receiving a notice under item 4b above with respect to any employee who is so convicted, a. Take appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or b. Require such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. 7. A good faith effort will be made to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through implementation of items 1 through 6 above. Ill. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. The allowable costs of the project shall not include any costs determined by the FAA to be ineligible for consideration under Title 49 U.S.C. B. Payment of the United States' share of the allowable project costs will be made pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of such regulations and procedures as the Secretary shall prescribe. Final determination of the United States' share will be based upon the final audit of the total amount of allowable project costs, and settlement will be made for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of costs. C. The Sponsor shall carry out and complete the Project(s) without undue delays and in accordance with the terms hereof, and such regulations and procedures as the Secretary shall prescribe. D. The FAA reserves the right to unilaterally terminate this grant if the Sponsor does not make at least one draw down of funds under their Letter of Credit or submit at least one written Request for Reimbursement, as applicable, in each twelve month period after grant acceptance. E. The Sponsor agrees to monitor progress on the work to be accomplished by this grant. For engineering services, the Sponsor agrees to make payment only for work that has been satisfactorily completed and that ten percent (10°%) of the total value of the engineering services contract will not be paid to the Engineer until acceptable final project documentation is provided. F. The Sponsor agrees to submit final grant closeout documents to the FAA within 60 days after physical completion of the project(s), but no greater than four (4) years from the date of the grant, unless otherwise agreed to by the FAA. G. The FAA reserves the right to amend or withdraw this grant offer at any time prior to its acceptance by the Sponsor. H. This grant offer will expire, and the United States shall not be obligated to pay any part of the costs of the project unless this grant offer has been accepted by the Sponsor on or before 30 days after this grant offer but no later than September 30 of the federal fiscal year this grant offer was made, or such subsequent date as may be prescribed in writing by the FAA. 1. The Sponsor shall take all steps, including litigation if necessary, to recover Federal funds spent fraudulently, wastefully, or in violation of Federal antitrust statutes, or misused in any manner in any project upon which Federal funds have been expended. For the purposes of this grant agreement, the term "Federal funds" means funds however used or disbursed by the Sponsor that were originally paid pursuant to this or any other Federal grant agreement. It shall obtain the approval of the Secretary as to any determination of the amount of the Federal share of such funds. It shall return the recovered Federal share, including funds recovered by settlement, order or judgment, to the Secretary. It shall furnish to the Secretary, upon request, all documents and records pertaining to the determination of the amount of the Federal share or to any settlement, litigation, negotiation, or other efforts taken to recover such funds. All settlements or other final positions of the Sponsor, in court or otherwise, involving the recovery of such Federal share shall be approved in advance by the Secretary. J. The United States shall not be responsible or liable for damage to property or injury to persons that may arise from, or be incident to, compliance with this grant agreement. K. If, during the life of the project, the FAA determines that this grant amount exceeds the expected needs of the Sponsor by $5,000 or five percent (5%), whichever is greater, this grant amount can be unilaterally reduced by letter from FAA advising of the budget change. Conversely, with the exception of planning projects, if there is an overrun in the eligible project costs, FAA may increase this grant to cover the amount of the overrun not to exceed the statutory fifteen (15%) percent limitation for primary airports or either by not more than fifteen percent (15%) of the original grant amount or by an amount not to exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the total increase in allowable project costs attributable to the acquisition of land or interests in land, whichever is greater, based on current credible appraisals or a court award in a condemnation proceeding for non -primary airports. FAA will advise the Sponsor by letter of the increase. Planning projects will not be increased above the planning portion of the maximum obligation of the United States shown in this grant agreement. Upon issuance of either of the aforementioned letters, the maximum obligation of the United States is adjusted to the amount specified. In addition, the Sponsor's officially designated representative, is authorized to request FAA concurrence in revising the project description and grant amount within statutory limitations. A letter from the FAA concurring in the said requested revision to the project work description and grant amount shall constitute an amendment to this Grant Agreement. L. If requested by the Sponsor and authorized by the FAA, the letter of credit method of payment may be used. It is understood and agreed that the Sponsor agrees to request cash withdrawals on the letter of credit only when actually needed for its disbursements and to timely reporting of such disbursements as 5of19 required. It is understood that failure to adhere to this provision may cause the letter of credit to be revoked. M. Unless otherwise approved by the FAA, it will not acquire or permit any contractor or subcontractor to acquire any steel or manufactured products produced outside the United States to be used for any project for airport development or noise compatibility for which funds are provided under this grant. The Sponsor will include in every contract a provision implementing this condition. N. If this grant agreement includes pavement work that equals or exceeds $250,000, the Sponsor will perform the following: 1. Furnish a construction management program to FAA prior to the start of construction which shall detail the measures and procedures to be used to comply with the quality control provisions of the construction contract, including, but not limited to, all quality control provisions and tests required by the Federal specifications. The program shall include as a minimum: a. "fhe name of the person representing the Sponsor who has overall responsibility for contract administration for the project and the authority to take necessary actions to comply with the contract. b. Names of testing laboratories and consulting engineer firms with quality control responsibilities on the project, together with a description of the services to be provided. c. Procedures for determining that testing laboratories meet the requirements of the American Society of Testing Materials standards on laboratory evaluation, referenced in the contract specifications (D3666, C1077). d. Qualifications of engineering supervision and construction inspection personnel. e. A listing of all tests required by the contract specifications, including the type and frequency of tests to be taken, the method of sampling, the applicable test standard, and the acceptance criteria or tolerances permitted for each type of test. f. Procedures for ensuring that the tests are taken in accordance with the program, that they are documented daily, that the proper corrective actions, where necessary, are undertaken. 2. Submit at completion of the project, a final test and quality control report documenting the results of all tests performed, highlighting those tests that failed or did not meet the applicable test standard. The report shall include the pay reductions applied and reasons for accepting any out -of -tolerance material. An interim test and quality control report shall be submitted, if requested by the FAA. 3. Failure to provide a complete report as described in paragraph 2, or failure to perform such tests, shall, absent any compelling justification, result in a reduction in Federal participation for costs incurred in connection with construction of the applicable pavement. Such reduction shall be at the discretion of the FAA and will be based on the type or types of required tests not performed or not documented and will be commensurate with the proportion of applicable pavement with respect to the total pavement constructed under this grant agreement. 4. The FAA, at its discretion, reserves the right to conduct independent tests and to reduce grant payments accordingly if such independent tests determine that Sponsor tests results are inaccurate. 0. For a project to replace or reconstruct pavement at the airport. the Sponsor shall implement an effective must conform with the following provisions: Pavement Maintenance Management Program An effective pavement maintenance management program is one that details the procedures to be followed to assure that proper pavement maintenance, both preventive and repair, is performed. An airport sponsor may use any form of inspection program it deems appropriate. The program must, as a minimum, include the following: 1. Pavement Inventory. The following must be depicted in an appropriate form and level of detail: a. Location of all runways, taxiways, and aprons; b. Dimensions; c. Type of pavement, and; d. Year of construction or most recent major rehabilitation. For compliance with the Airport improvement Program (RIP) assurances, pavements that have been constructed, reconstructed, or repaired with federal financial assistance shall be so depicted. Inspection Schedule. a. Detailed Inspection. A detailed inspection must be performed at least once a year. If a history of recorded pavement deterioration is available; i.e., Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey as set forth in Advisory Circular 150/5380-6, "Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements," the frequency of inspections may be extended to three years. b. Drive -By Inspection. A drive -by inspection must be performed a minimum of once per month to detect unexpected changes in the pavement condition. 3. Record Keeping. Complete information on the findings of all detailed inspections and on the maintenance performed must be recorded and kept on file for a minimum of five years. The 6of19 types of distress, their locations, and remedial action, scheduled or performed, must be documented. The minimum information to be recorded is listed below: a. Inspection date; b. Location; c. Distress types; and d. Maintenance scheduled or performed. For drive -by inspections, the date of inspection and any maintenance performed must be recorded. 4. Information Retrieval. An airport Sponsor may use any form of record keeping it deems appropriate, so long as the information and records produced by the pavement survey can be retrieved to provide a report to the FAA as may be required. S. Reference. Refer to Advisory Circular 150/5380-6, "Guidelines and Procedures for Maintenance of Airport Pavements," for specific guidelines and procedures for maintaining airport pavements and establishing an effective maintenance program. Specific types of distress, their probable causes, inspection guidelines, and recommended methods of repair are presented. P. Takeover of Instrument Landing System and Associated Equipment in Project. If this grant includes an instrument landing system and associated equipment and the FAA has agreed to takeover the system and equipment, the Sponsor must check the facility prior to its commissioning to assure it meets the operational standards. The Sponsor must also remove, relocate, or lower each obstruction on the approach, or provide for the adequate lighting or marking of the obstruction if any aeronautical study conducted under FAR part 77 determines that to be acceptable, and mark and light the runway, as appropriate. Q. Airport -Owned Visual or Electronic NAVAIDS In Project. if this grant includes a visual or electronic navigational aid, the Sponsor must provide for the continuous operation and maintenance of any navigational aid funded under the AIP during the useful life of the equipment and check the facility prior to its commissioning to assure it meets the operational standards. The Sponsor must also remove, relocate, or lower each obstruction on the approach or provide for the adequate lighting or marking of the obstruction if any aeronautical study conducted under FAR Part 77 determines that to be acceptable, and mark and light the runway, as appropriate. The FAA will not take over the ownership, operation, or maintenance of any sponsor -acquired equipment other than an AIP-funded instrument landing system and associated equipment where FAA agrees to take over the system and equipment. R. Non-AIP Work in Application. it is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that notwithstanding the fact that a Project Application may include therein the construction of work not included in this grant agreement project description, said work shall not be a part of this project and, if or to the extent accomplished by the Sponsor, such accomplishment shall be without any participation in the costs thereof by the United States under this project. It is further understood and agreed that, in the event the work which is excluded from the project is accomplished by the Sponsor, the Sponsor shall maintain as a portion of the cost records covering this project, separable cost records pertaining to the above -identified work excluded from Federal participation under this project, which records shall be made available for inspection and audit by the FAA to the end that the cost of the excluded work may be definitely determined. It is further understood and agreed that the Sponsor will submit a Program Statement/cost estimate depicting the excluded costs or a cost estimate depicting only those costs eligible for Federal participation in this project. S. Utility Relocation in Project. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the United States shall not participate in the cost of any utility relocation unless and until the Sponsor has submitted evidence satisfactory to the FAA that the Sponsor is legally responsible for payment of such costs. FAA participation will be limited to those utilities located on private right-of-way or utilities that exclusively serve the Airport. T. Revenue from Real Property — Land in Project. The Sponsor agrees that all net revenues produced from real property purchased in part with Federal funds in this grant shall be used on the airport for airport planning, development or operating expenses, except that all income from real property purchased for noise compatibility purposes or for future aeronautical use be used only to fund projects which would be eligible for grants under the Act. Income from noise or future use property may not be used for the Sponsor's matching share of any airport grant. Airport fiscal and accounting records shall clearly identify actual sources and uses of these funds. U. Future Development Land. If this grant includes acquisition of land for future development, the Sponsor agrees to implement within five years of such grant the airport development that requires this land acquisition, unless the FAA agrees to a different duration. Furthermore, the Sponsor agrees not to dispose of the land by sale or lease without prior consent and approval of the FAA. In the event the land is not used within ten years for the purpose for which it was acquired, the Sponsor will refund the Federal share of acquisition cost or the current fair market value of the land, whichever is greater, unless the FAA agrees to a different duration. V. Runway Protection Zones. The Sponsor agrees to take the following actions to maintain and/or acquire a property interest, satisfactory to the FAA, in the Runway Protection Zones; 1. Existing Fee Title Interest in the Runway Protection Zone: The Sponsor agrees to prevent the erection or creation of any structure or place of public assembly in the Runway Protection Zone, except for NAVAIDS that are fixed by their functional purposes or any other structure approved by the FAA. Any existing structures or uses within the Runway Protection Zone will be cleared or discontinued unless approved by the FAA. 7of19 2. Existing Easement Interest in the Runway Protection Zone: The Sponsor agrees to take any and all steps necessary to ensure that the owner of the land within the designated Runway Protection Zone will not build any structure in the Runway Protection Zone that is a hazard to air navigation or which might create glare or misleading lights or lead to the construction of residences, fuel handling and storage facilities, smoke generating activities, or places of public assembly, such as churches, schools, office buildings, shopping centers, and stadiums. 3. Future Interest in the Runway Protection Zone: The Sponsor agrees that it will acquire fee title or less -than -fee interest in the Runway Protection Zones that presently are not under its control under an agreed schedule with the FAA. Said interest shall provide the protection noted in above Subparagraphs 1 and 2. W. Noise Projects on Privately Owned Property. No payment shall be made under the terms of this grant agreement for work accomplished on privately owned land until the Sponsor submits the agreement with the owner of the property required by Assurance 5d of the ASSURANCES Airport Sponsors, and such agreement is determined to be satisfactory. As a minimum, the agreement with the private owner must contain the following provisions: 1. The property owner shall subject the construction work on the project to such Inspection and approval during the construction or installation of the noise compatibility measures and after completion of the measures as they may reasonably be requested by the Secretary or the Sponsor. 2. The property owner shall assume the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the items installed, purchased, or constructed under this grant agreement. Neither the FAA nor the Sponsor bears any responsibility for the maintenance and operation of these items. 3. If Federal funds for the noise compatibility measures are transferred by the Sponsor to the owner of the private property, or the owner's agent, the property owner shall agree to maintain and make available to the Secretary or the Sponsor, upon reasonable request, records disclosing the amount of funds received and the disposition of those funds. 4. The property owner's right to sue the owner of the noise -impacting Airport for adverse noise impacts will be abrogated if the property owner deliberately or willfully acts to reduce or destroy the effectiveness of the noise compatibility measures during the useful life of such measures. This obligation shall remain in effect throughout the useful life of the noise compatibility measures, but not to exceed 20 years from the date of the Sponsor's acceptance of federal aid for the project. K Update Approved Exhibit "A" For Land in Project. it is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that notwithstanding the fact that this grant offer is made and accepted upon the basis of the current Exhibit "A" Property Map, the Sponsor hereby covenants and agrees that upon completion of an AIP funded land acquisition project, it will update said Exhibit "A" Property Map to standards satisfactory to the FAA and submit said documentation in final form to the FAA. It is further mutually agreed that the reasonable cost of developing said Exhibit "A" Property Map is an eligible administrative cost for participation within the scope of this project. Y. Friction Measuring Devices. If this grant includes acquisition of friction measuring devices, the Sponsor assures that it will properly calibrate, operate, and maintain the friction measuring equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines and instructions and Advisory Circular 150/5320-12. The friction measuring equipment and tow vehicle (if applicable) shall not be used for any other purpose other than for conducting friction measuring tests on airport pavement surfaces and directly related activities, such as training and calibration. Z. Low Emission Systems. If this grant includes low emission systems work, the Sponsor agrees to the following conditions under the Voluntary Airport Low Emission (VALE) program: 1. Vehicles and equipment purchased with assistance from this grant shall be maintained and used for their useful life at the airport for which they were purchased. Moreover, any vehicles or equipment replaced under this program shall not be transferred to another airport or location within the same or any other nonattainment or maintenance area. No airport -owned vehicles or equipment may be transferred to, taken to, or used at another airport without the consent of the FAA in consultation with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and State air quality agency. 2. All vehicles and equipment purchased with assistance from this grant shall be clearly labeled using the VALE program emblem designed by the FAA. 3. The Sponsor shall maintain annual reporting records of all vehicles and equipment purchased with assistance from this grant. These public records shall contain detailed information involving individual vehicles and equipment, project expenditures, cost effectiveness, and emission reductions. The Sponsor certifies that it shall replace any disabled or seriously damaged vehicle or equipment purchased with assistance from this grant, at any time during its useful life, with an equivalent vehicle or unit that produces an equal or lower level of emissions. The Sponsor assumes all financial responsibility for replacement costs. The Sponsor also certifies that it shall fulfill this replacement obligation, beyond the useful life of the affected vehicle or equipment, for the possible longer life of Airport Emission Reduction Credits that were granted to the Sponsor for this vehicle or equipment. IV. ASSURANCES The following FAA document titled ASSURANCES Airport Sponsors, dated March 2011, is incorporated as part of these Terms and Conditions: 8of19 Assurances Airport Sponsors March 2011 A. General. 1. These assurances shall be complied with in the performance of grant agreements for airport development, airport planning, and noise compatibility program grants for airport sponsors. 2. These assurances are required to be submitted as part of the project application by sponsors requesting funds under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended. As used herein, the term "public agency sponsor" means a public agency with control of a public -use airport; the term "private sponsor" means a private owner of a public -use airport; and the term "Sponsor" includes both public agency sponsors and private sponsors. 3. Upon acceptance of this grant offer by the Sponsor, these assurances are incorporated in and become part of this grant agreement. B. Duration and Applicability. 1. Airport development or Noise Compatibility Program Projects Undertaken by a Public Agency Sponsor. The terms, conditions and assurances of this grant agreement shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of the facilities developed or equipment acquired for an airport development or noise compatibility program project, or throughout the useful life of the project items installed within a facility under a noise compatibility program project, but in any event not to exceed twenty (20) years from the date of acceptance of a grant offer of Federal funds for the project. However, there shall be no limit on the duration of the assurances regarding Exclusive Rights and Airport Revenue so long as the airport is used as an airport. There shall be no limit on the duration of the terms, conditions, and assurances with respect to real property acquired with federal funds. Furthermore, the duration of the Civil Rights assurance shall be specified in the assurances. 2. Airport Development or Noise Compatibility Projects Undertaken by a Private Sponsor. The preceding paragraph 1 also applies to a private sponsor except that the useful life of project items installed within a facility or the useful life of the facilities developed or equipment acquired under an airport development or noise compatibility program project shall be no less than ten (10) years from the date of acceptance of Federal aid for the project. 3. Airport Planning Undertaken by a Sponsor. Unless otherwise specified in this grant agreement, only Assurances 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 18, 30, 32, 33, and 34 in section C apply to planning projects. The terms, conditions, and assurances of this grant agreement shall remain in full force and effect during the life of the project. C. Sponsor Certification. The -Sponsor hereby assures and certifies, with respect to this grant that 1. General Federal Requirements. It will comply with all applicable Federal laws; regulations, executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this project including but not limited to the following: Federal Legislation a. Title 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended. b. Davis -Bacon Act - 40 U.S.G. 276(a), et seg.' c. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act - 29 U.S.C. 201, et seg. d. Hatch Act — 5 U.S.C. 1501, et sea.2 e. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 Title 42 U.S.C. 4601, a se .' 2 f. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 - Section 106 - 16 U.S.C. 470(f).' g. Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 - 16 U.S.C. 469 through 469c.' h. Native Americans Grave Repatriation Act - 25 U.S.C. Section 3001, et sea. i. Clean Air Act, P,L. 90-148, as amended. j. Coastal Zone Management Act, P1. 93-205, as amended. k. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 - Section 102(a) - 42 U.S.C. 4012a.' I. Title 49, U.S.C., Section 303, (formerly known as Section 4(f ) m. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - 29 U.S,C. 794. n. Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Title VI - 42 U.S.C. 2000d through d-4. o. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 - 42 U.S.C. 6101, et sea. p. American Indian Religious Freedom Act, P.L. 95-341, as amended. q. Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 -42 U.S.C. 4151, et sea.' r. Power plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 - Section 403- 2 U.S.C. 8373.' s. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act - 40 U.S.C. 327, et seg.' t. Copeland Anti kickback Act - 18 U.S.C. 874.1 9Of19 u. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 - 42 U.S.C. 4321, et sea.' v. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, P.L. 90-542, as amended. w. Single Audit Act of 1984 - 31 U.S.C. 7501, et sea.2 x. Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988 - 41 U.S.C. 702 through 706, Executive Orders Executive Order 11246 - Equal Employment Opportunity' Executive Order 11990 - Protection of Wetlands Executive Order 11998 — Flood Plain Management Executive Order 12372 - Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs Executive Order 12699 - Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted New Building Construction' Executive Order 12898 - Environmental Justice Federal Regulations a. 14 CFR Part 13 - Investigative and Enforcement Procedures. b. 14 CFR Part 16 - Rules of Practice For Federally Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings. c. 14 CFR Part 150 - Airport noise compatibility planning. d. 29 CFR Part 1 - Procedures for predetermination of wage rates.' e. 29 CFR Part 3 - Contractors and subcontractors on public building or public work financed in whole or part by loans or grants from the United States.' f. 29 CFR Part 5 - Labor standards provisions applicable to contracts covering federally financed and assisted construction (also labor standards provisions applicable to non -construction contracts subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act).' g. 41 CFR Part 60 - Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor (Federal and federally assisted contracting requirements). h. 49 CFR Part 18 - Uniform administrative requirements for grants and cooperative agreements to state and local governments.3 i. 49 CFR Part 20 - New restrictions on lobbying. j. 49 CFR Part 21 - Nondiscrimination in federally -assisted programs of the Department of Transportation - effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. k. 49 CFR Part 23 - Participation by Disadvantage Business Enterprise in Airport Concessions. I, 49 CFR Part 24 - Uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition for Federal and federally assisted programs.' 2 m. 49 CFR Part 26 — Participation By Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Programs. n. 49 CFR Part 27 - Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance.' o. 49 CFR Part 29 — Government wide debarment and suspension (non procurement) and government wide requirements for drug -free workplace (grants). p. 49 CFR Part 30 - Denial of public works contracts to suppliers of goods and services of countries that deny procurement market access to U.S. contractors. q. 49 CFR Part 41 - Seismic safety of Federal and federally assisted or regulated new building construction.' 10 of 19 Office of Management and Budget Circulars a. A-87 - Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments. b. A-133 -Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations These laws do not apply to airport planning sponsors. s These laws do not apply to private sponsors. 49 CFR Part 18 and OMB Circular A-87 contain requirements for State and Local Governments receiving Federal assistance. Any requirement levied upon State and Local Governments by this regulation and circular shall also be applicable to private sponsors receiving Federal assistance under Title 49, United States Code. Specific assurances required to be included in grant agreements by any of the above laws, regulations or circulars are incorporated by reference in this grant agreement. 2. Responsibility and Authority of the Sponsor. a. Public Agency Sponsor: It has legal authority to apply for this grant, and to finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. b. Private Sponsor: It has legal authority to apply for this grant and to finance and carry out the proposed project and comply with all terms, conditions, and assurances of this grant agreement. It shall designate an official representative and shall in writing direct and authorize that person to file this application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein; to act in connection with this application; and to provide such additional information as may be required. 3. Sponsor Fund Availability. it has sufficient funds available for that portion of the project costs which are not to be paid by the United States. It has sufficient funds available to assure operation and maintenance of items funded under this grant agreement which it will own or control. 4. Good Title. a. It, a public agency or the Federal government, holds good title, satisfactory to the Secretary, to the landing area of the airport or site thereof, or will give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that good title will be acquired. b. For noise compatibility program projects to be carried out on the property of the Sponsor, it holds good title satisfactory to the Secretary to that portion of the property upon which Federal funds will be expended or will give assurance to the Secretary that good title will be obtained. 5. Preserving Rights and Powers. a. It will not take or permit any action which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this grant agreement without the written approval of the Secretary, and will act promptly to acquire, extinguish or modify any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would interfere with such performance by the Sponsor. This shall be done in a manner acceptable to the Secretary. b. It will not sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise transfer or dispose of any part of its title or other interests in the property shown on Exhibit A to this application or, for a noise compatibility program project, that portion of the property upon which Federal funds have been expended, for the duration of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this grant agreement without approval by the Secretary. If the transferee is found by the Secretary to be eligible under Title 49, United States Code, to assume the obligations of this grant agreement and to have the power, authority, and financial resources to carry out all such obligations, the Sponsor shall insert in the contract or document transferring or disposing of the Sponsor's interest, and make binding upon the transferee all of the terms, conditions, and assurances contained in this grant agreement. c. For all noise compatibility program projects which are to be carried out by another unit of local government or are on property owned by a unit of local government other than the Sponsor, it will enter into an agreement with that government. Except as otherwise specified by the Secretary, that agreement shall obligate that government to the same terms, conditions, and assurances that would be applicable to it if it applied directly to the FAA for a grant to undertake the noise compatibility program project. That agreement and changes thereto must be satisfactory to the Secretary. It will take steps to enforce this agreement against the local government if there is substantial non- compliance with the terms of the agreement. d. For noise compatibility program projects to be carried out on privately owned property, it will enter into an agreement with the owner of that property which includes provisions specified by the Secretary. It will take steps to enforce this agreement against the property owner whenever there is substantial non-compliance with the terms of the agreement. e. If the Sponsor is a private sponsor, it will take steps satisfactory to the Secretary to ensure that the airport will continue to function as a public -use airport in accordance with these assurances for the duration of these assurances, f. if an arrangement is made for management and operation of the airport by any agency or person other than the Sponsor or an employee of the Sponsor, the Sponsor will reserve sufficient rights and authority to insure that the airport will be operated and maintained in accordance Title 49, United 11 of 19 States Code, the regulations and the terms, conditions and assurances in this grant agreement and shall insure that such arrangement also requires compliance therewith. g. It will not permit or enter into any arrangement that results in permission for the owner or tenant of a property used as a residence, or zoned for residential use, to taxi an aircraft between that property and any location on airport. 6. Consistency with Local Plans. The project is reasonably consistent with plans (existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport. T Consideration of Local Interest. It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located. 8. Consultation with Users. In making a decision to undertake any airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport at which project is proposed. 9. Public Hearings. In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway, or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary. Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project. 10, Air and Water Quality Standards. In projects involving airport location, a major runway extension, or runway location it will provide for the Governor of the state in which the project is located to certify in writing to the Secretary that the project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated so as to comply with applicable air and water quality standards. In any case where such standards have not been approved and where applicable air and water quality standards have been promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, certification shall be obtained from such Administrator. Notice of certification or refusal to certify shall be provided within sixty days after the project application has been received by the Secretary. 11. Pavement Preventive Maintenance. With respect to a project approved after January 1, 1995, for the replacement or reconstruction of pavement at the airport, it assures or certifies that it has implemented an effective airport pavement maintenance -management program and it assures that it will use such program for the useful life of any pavement constructed, reconstructed or repaired with Federal financial assistance at the airport. It will provide such reports on pavement condition and pavement management programs as the Secretary determines may be useful. 12, Terminal Development Prerequisites. For projects which include terminal development at a public use airport, as defined in Title 49, it has, on the date of submittal of the project grant application, all the safety equipment required for certification of such airport under section 44706 of Title 49, United States Code, and all the security equipment required by rule or regulation, and has provided for access to the passenger enplaning and deplaning area of such airport to passengers enplaning and deplaning from aircraft other than air carrier aircraft. 13. Accounting System, Audit, and Record Keeping Requirements. It shall keep all project accounts and records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of this grant, the total cost of the project in connection with which this grant is given or used, and the amount or nature of that portion of the cost of the project supplied by other sources, and such other financial records pertinent to the project. The accounts and records shall be kept in accordance with an accounting system that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. b. It shall make available to the Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, for the purpose of audit and examination, any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to this grant. The Secretary may require that an appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in which an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor relating to the disposition of the proceeds of a grant or relating to the project in connection with which this grant was given or used, it shall file a certified copy of such audit with the Comptroller General of the United States not later than six (6) months following the close of the fiscal year for which the audit was made. 14. Minimum Wage Rates. It shall include, in all contracts in excess of $2,000 for work on any projects funded under this grant agreement which involve labor, provisions establishing minimum rates of wages, to be predetermined by the Secretary of Labor, in accordance with the Davis -Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5), which contractors shall pay to skilled and unskilled labor, and such minimum rates shall be stated in the invitation for bids and shall be included in proposals or bids for the work. 15. Veteran's Preference. It shall include in all contracts for work on any project funded under this grant agreement which involve labor, such provisions as are necessary to insure that, in the employment of labor (except in executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), preference shall be given to Veterans of the Vietnam era and disabled veterans as defined in Section 47112 of Title 49, United States Code. However, this preference shall apply only where the individuals are available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates. 16. Conformity to Plans and Specifications. It will execute the project subject to plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the Secretary. Such plans, specifications, and schedules shall be submitted to the Secretary prior to commencement of site preparation, construction, or other performance under this grant agreement, and, upon approval of the Secretary, shall be incorporated into this grant agreement. Any 12 of 19 modification to the approved plans, specifications, and schedules shall also be subject to approval of the Secretary, and incorporated into this grant agreement. 17, Construction Inspection and Approval. It will provide and maintain competent technical supervision at the construction site throughout the project to assure that the work conforms to the plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the Secretary for the project. It shall subject the construction work on any project contained in an approved project application to inspection and approval by the Secretary and such work shall be in accordance with regulations and procedures prescribed by the Secretary. Such regulations and procedures shall require such cost and progress reporting by the sponsor or sponsors of such project as the Secretary shall deem necessary. 18. Planning Projects. In carrying out planning projects: a. It will execute the project in accordance with the approved program narrative contained in the project application or with the modifications similarly approved. b. It will furnish the Secretary with such periodic reports as required pertaining to the planning project and planning work activities. c. It will include in all published material prepared in connection with the planning project a notice that the material was prepared under a grant provided by the United States. d. It will make such material available for examination by the public, and agrees that no material prepared with funds under this project shall be subject to copyright in the United States or any other country. e. It will give the Secretary unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use any of the material prepared in connection with this grant. f. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the Sponsor's employment of specific consultants and their subcontractors to do all or any part of this project as well as the right to disapprove the proposed scope and cost of professional services. g. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the use of the Sponsor's employees to do all or any part of the project. h. It understands and agrees that the Secretary's approval of this project grant or the Secretary's approval of any planning material developed as part of this grant does not constitute or imply any assurance or commitment on the part of the Secretary to approve any pending or future application for a Federal airport grant. 19. Operation and Maintenance a. The airport and all facilities which are necessary to serve the aeronautical users of the airport, other than facilities owned or controlled by the United States, shall be operated at all times in a safe and serviceable condition and in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by applicable Federal, state and local agencies for maintenance and operation. It will not cause or permit any activity or action thereon which would interfere with its use for airport purposes. It will suitably operate and maintain the airport and all facilities thereon or connected therewith, with due regard to climatic and flood conditions. Any proposal to temporarily close the airport for non - aeronautical purposes must first be approved by the Secretary. In furtherance of this assurance, the Sponsor will have in effect arrangements for- 1) Operating the airport's aeronautical facilities whenever required; 2) Promptly marking and lighting hazards resulting from airport conditions, including temporary conditions: and 3) Promptly notifying airmen of any condition affecting aeronautical use of the airport. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require that the airport be operated for aeronautical use during temporary periods when snow, flood or other climatic conditions interfere with such operation and maintenance. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the maintenance, repair, restoration, or replacement of any structure or facility which is substantially damaged or destroyed due to an act of God or other condition or circumstance beyond the control of the Sponsor. b. It will suitably operate and maintain noise compatibility program items that it owns or controls upon which Federal funds have been expended. 20, Hazard Removal and Mitigation. It will take appropriate action to assure that such terminal airspace as is required to protect instrument and visual operations to the airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) will be adequately cleared and protected by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards. 21, Compatible Land Use. It will take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, if the project is for noise compatibility program implementation, it will not cause or permit any change in land use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility program measures upon which Federal funds have been expended. 22. Economic Nondiscrimination. a. It will make the airport available as an airport for public use on reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination to all types, kinds and classes of aeronautical activities, including commercial aeronautical activities offering services to the public at the airport. 13 of 19 b. In any agreement, contract, lease, or other arrangement under which a right or privilege at the airport is granted to any person, firm, or corporation to conduct or to engage in any aeronautical activity for furnishing services to the public at the airport, the Sponsor will insert and enforce provisions requiring the contractor to- 1 ) furnish said services on a reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, basis to all users thereof, and 2) charge reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, prices for each unit or service, provided that the contractor may be allowed to make reasonable and nondiscriminatory discounts, rebates, or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. c. Each fixed -based operator at the airport shall be subject to the same rates, fees, rentals, and other charges as are uniformly applicable to all other fixed -based operators making the same or similar uses of such airport and utilizing the same or similar facilities. d. Each air carrier using such airport shalt have the right to service itself or to use any fixed -based operator that is authorized or permitted by the airport to serve any air carrier at such airport. e. Each air carrier using such airport (whether as a tenant, non tenant, or subtenant of another air carrier tenant) shall be subject to such nondiscriminatory and substantially comparable rules, regulations, conditions, rates, fees, rentals, and other charges with respect to facilities directly and substantially related to providing air transportation as are applicable to all such air carriers which make similar use of such airport and utilize similar facilities, subject to reasonable classifications such as tenants or non tenants and signatory carriers and non signatory carriers. Classification or status as tenant or signatory shall not be unreasonably withheld by any airport provided an air carrier assumes obligations substantially similar to those already imposed on air carriers in such classification or status. f. It will not exercise or grant any right or privilege which operates to prevent any person, firm, or corporation operating aircraft on the airport from performing any services on its own aircraft with its own employees [including, but not limited to maintenance, repair, and fueling] that it may choose to perform. g. In the event the Sponsor itself exercises any of the rights and privileges referred to in this assurance, the services involved will be provided on the same conditions as would apply to the furnishing of such services by commercial aeronautical service providers authorized by the Sponsor under these provisions. h. The Sponsor may establish such reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, conditions to be met by all users of the airport as may be necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the airport. i. The Sponsor may prohibit or limit any given type, kind or class of aeronautical use of the airport if such action is necessary for the safe operation of the airport or necessary to serve the civil aviation needs of the public. 23. Exclusive Rights. It will permit no exclusive right for the use of the airport by any person providing, or intending to provide, aeronautical services to the public. For purposes of this paragraph, the providing of the services at an airport by a single fixed -based operator shall not be construed as an exclusive right if both of the following apply: a. It would be unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical for more than one fixed -based operator to provide such services, and b. If allowing more than one fixed -based operator to provide such services would require the reduction of space leased pursuant to an existing agreement between such single fixed -based operator and such airport. It further agrees that it will not, either directly or indirectly, grant or permit any person, firm, or corporation, the exclusive right at the airport to conduct any aeronautical activities, including, but not limited to charter flights, pilot training, aircraft rental and sightseeing, aerial photography, crop dusting, aerial advertising and surveying, air carrier operations, aircraft sales and services, sale of aviation petroleum products whether or not conducted in conjunction with other aeronautical activity, repair and maintenance of aircraft, sale of aircraft parts, and any other activities which because of their direct relationship to the operation of aircraft can be regarded as an aeronautical activity, and that it will terminate any exclusive right to conduct an aeronautical activity now existing at such an airport before the grant of any assistance under Title 49, United States Code. 24. Fee and Rental Structure. It will maintain a fee and rental structure for the facilities and services at the airport which will make the airport as self-sustaining as possible under the circumstances existing at the particular airport, taking into account such factors as the volume of traffic and economy of collection. No part of the Federal share of an airport development, airport planning or noise compatibility project for which a grant is made under Title 49, United States Code, the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, the Federal Airport Act or the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970 shall be included in the rate basis in establishing fees, rates, and charges for users of that airport. 25. Airport Revenues. a. All revenues generated by the airport and any local taxes on aviation fuel established after December 30, 1987, will be expended by it for the capital or operating costs of the airport; the local airport system; or other local facilities which are owned or operated by the owner or operator of the airport and which are directly and substantially related to the actual air transportation of passengers or property; or for noise mitigation purposes on or off the airport. Provided, however, that if covenants or assurances in debt obligations issued before September 3, 1982, by the owner or operator of the airport, or provisions enacted before September 3, 1982, in governing statutes controlling the owner or operator's financing, provide for the use of the revenues from any of the airport owner or operator's 14 of 19 facilities, including the airport, to support not only the airport but also the airport owner or operator's general debt obligations or other facilities, then this limitation on the use of all revenues generated by the airport (and, in the case of a public airport, local taxes on aviation fuel) shall not apply. b. As part of the annual audit required under the Single Audit Act of 1984, the Sponsor will direct that the audit will review, and the resulting audit report will provide an opinion concerning, the use of airport revenue and taxes in paragraph (a), and indicating whether funds paid or transferred to the owner or operator are paid or transferred in a manner consistent with Title 49, United States Code and any other applicable provision of law, including any regulation promulgated by the Secretary or Administrator. c. Any civil penalties or other sanctions will be imposed for violation of this assurance in accordance with the provisions of Section 47107 of Title 49, United States Code. 26. Reports and Inspections. It will: a. submit to the Secretary such annual or special financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request and make such reports available to the public; make available to the public at reasonable times and places a report of the airport budget in a format prescribed by the Secretary; b. for airport development projects, make the airport and all airport records and documents affecting the airport, including deeds, leases, operation and use agreements, regulations and other instruments, available for inspection by any duly authorized agent of the Secretary upon reasonable request; c. for noise compatibility program projects, make records and documents relating to the project and continued compliance with the terms, conditions, and assurances of this grant agreement including deeds, leases, agreements, regulations, and other instruments, available for inspection by any duly authorized agent of the Secretary upon reasonable request; and d, in a format and time prescribed by the Secretary, provide to the Secretary and make available to the public following each of its fiscal years, an annual report listing in detail: I. all amounts paid by the airport to any other unit of government and the purposes for which each such payment was made; and Il. all services and property provided by the airport to other units of government and the amount of compensation received for provision of each such service and property. 27. Use by Government Aircraft. It will make available all of the facilities of the airport developed with Federal financial assistance and all those usable for landing and takeoff of aircraft to the United States for use by Government aircraft in common with other aircraft at all times without charge, except, if the use by Government aircraft is substantial, charge may be made for a reasonable share, proportional to such use, for the cost of operating and maintaining the facilities used, Unless otherwise determined by the Secretary, or otherwise agreed to by the Sponsor and the using agency, substantial use of an airport by Government aircraft will be considered to exist when operations of such aircraft are in excess of those which, in the opinion of the Secretary, would unduly interfere with use of the landing areas by other authorized aircraft, or during any calendar month that — a. Five (5) or more Government aircraft are regularly based at the airport or on land adjacent thereto; or b. The total number of movements (counting each landing as a movement) of Government aircraft is 300 or more, or the gross accumulative weight of Government aircraft using the airport (the total movement of Government aircraft multiplied by gross weights of such aircraft) is in excess of five million pounds. 28. Land for Federal Facilities. It will furnish without cost to the Federal Government for use in connection with any air traffic control or air navigation activities, or weather -reporting and communication activities related to air traffic control, any areas of land or water, or estate therein, or rights in buildings of the Sponsor as the Secretary considers necessary or desirable for construction, operation, and maintenance at Federal expense of space or facilities for such purposes. Such areas or any portion thereof will be made available as provided herein within four months after receipt of a written request from the Secretary. 29, Airport layout Plan. a. It will keep up to date at all times an airport layout plan of the airport showing (1) boundaries of the airport and all proposed additions thereto, together with the boundaries of all offsite areas owned or controlled by the Sponsor for airport purposes and proposed additions thereto; (2) the location and nature of all existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways, taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars and roads), including all proposed extensions and reductions of existing airport facilities; and (3) the location of all existing and proposed nonaviation areas and of all existing improvements thereon. Such airport layout plans and each amendment, revision, or modification thereof, shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary which approval shall be evidenced by the signature of a duly authorized representative of the Secretary on the face of the airport layout plan. The Sponsor will not make or permit any changes or alterations in the airport or any of its facilities which are not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary and which might, in the opinion of the Secretary, adversely affect the safety, utility or efficiency of the airport. b. If a change or alteration in the airport or the facilities is made which the Secretary determines adversely affects the safety, utility, or efficiency of any federally owned, leased, or funded property on or off the airport and which is not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary, the owner or operator will, if requested, by the Secretary (1) eliminate such adverse effect in a manner approved by the Secretary; or (2) bear all costs of relocating such property (or replacement thereof) to a site acceptable to the Secretary and all costs of restoring such property (or replacement thereof) to the level of safety, utility, efficiency, and cost of operation existing before the unapproved change in the airport or its facilities. 15 of 19 30. Civil Rights. It will comply with such rules as are promulgated to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or handicap be excluded from participating in any activity conducted with or benefiting from funds received from this grant. This assurance obligates the Sponsor for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of personal property or real property or interest therein or structures or improvements thereon in which case the assurance obligates the Sponsor or any transferee for the longer of the following periods: (a) the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, or (b) the period during which the Sponsor retains ownership or possession of the property. 31. Disposal of Land. a. For land purchased under a grant for airport noise compatibility purposes, it will dispose of the land, when the land is no longer needed for such purposes, at fair market value, at the earliest practicable time. That portion of the proceeds of such disposition which is proportionate to the United States' share of acquisition of such land will, at the discretion of the Secretary, (1) be paid to the Secretary for deposit in the Trust Fund, or (2) be reinvested in an approved noise compatibility project as prescribed by the Secretary, including the purchase of nonresidential buildings or property in the vicinity of residential buildings or property previously purchased by the airport as part of a noise compatibility program. b. For land purchased under a grant for airport development purposes (other than noise compatibility), it will, when the land is no longer needed for airport purposes, dispose of such land at fair market value or make available to the Secretary an amount equal to the United States' proportionate share of the fair market value of the land. That portion of the proceeds of such disposition which is proportionate to the United States' share of the cost of acquisition of such land will, (1) upon application to the Secretary, be reinvested in another eligible airport improvement project or projects approved by the Secretary at that airport or within the national airport system, or (2) be paid to the Secretary for deposit in the Trust Fund if no eligible project exists. c. Land shall be considered to be needed for airport purposes under this assurance if (1) it may be needed for aeronautical purposes (including runway protection zones) or serve as noise buffer land, and (2) the revenue from interim uses of such land contributes to the financial self-sufficiency of the airport. Further, land purchased with a grant received by an airport operator or owner before December 31, 1987, will be considered to be needed for airport purposes if the Secretary or Federal agency making such grant before December 31, 1987, was notified by the operator or owner of the uses of such land, did not object to such use, and the land continues to be used for that purpose, such use having commenced no later than December 15, 1989. d. Disposition of such land under (a) (b) or (c) will be subject to the retention or reservation of any interest or right therein necessary to ensure that such land will only be used for purposes which are compatible with noise levels associated with operation of the airport. 32. Engineering and Design Services. It will award each contract, or sub -contract for program management, construction management, planning studies, feasibility studies, architectural services, preliminary engineering, design, engineering, surveying, mapping or related services with respect to the project in the same manner as a contract for architectural and engineering services is negotiated under Title iX of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 or an equivalent qualifications - based requirement prescribed for or by the Sponsor of the airport. 33. Foreign Market Restrictions, it will not allow funds provided under this grant to be used to fund any project which uses any product or service of a foreign country during the period in which such foreign country is listed by the United States Trade Representative as denying fair and equitable market opportunities for products and suppliers of the United States in procurement and construction. 34. Policies, Standards, and Specifications. It will carry out the project in accordance with policies, standards, and specifications approved by the Secretary including but not limited to the advisory circulars listed in the Current FAA Advisory Circulars for AIP projects, dated (the latest approved version as of this grant offer) and included in this grant, and in accordance with applicable state policies, standards, and specifications approved by the Secretary. 35. Relocation and Real Property Acquisition. (1) It will be guided in acquiring real property, to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the land acquisition policies in Subpart B of 49 CFR Part 24 and will pay or reimburse property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Subpart B. (2) It will provide a relocation assistance program offering the services described in Subpart C and fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance to displaced persons as required in Subpart D and E of 49 CFR Part 24, (3) It will make available within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, comparable replacement dwellings to displaced persons in accordance with Subpart E of 49 CFR Part 24. 36. Access By Intercity Buses. The airport owner or operator will permit, to the maximum extent practicable, intercity buses or other modes of transportation to have access to the airport; however, it has no obligation to fund special facilities for intercity buses or for other modes of transportation. 37. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of any DOT -assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26. The Recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure non discrimination in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26, and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose 16 of 19 sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801). 38. Hangar Construction. If the airport owner or operator and a person who owns an aircraft agree that a hangar is to be constructed at the airport for the aircraft at the aircraft owner's expense, the airport owner or operator will grant to the aircraft owner for the hangar a long term lease that is subject to such terms and conditions on the hangar as the airport owner or operator may impose. 39. Competitive Access. a. If the airport owner or operator of a medium or large hub airport (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, U.S.C.) has been unable to accommodate one or more requests by an air carrier for access to gates or other facilities at that airport in order to allow the air carrier to provide service to the airport or to expand service at the airport, the airport owner or operator shall transmit a report to the Secretary that- 1. Describes the requests; 2. Provides an explanation as to why the requests could not be accommodated; and 3. Provides a time frame within which, if any, the airport will be able to accommodate the requests. b. Such report shall be due on either February 1 or August 1 of each year if the airport has been unable to accommodate the request(s) in the six month period prior to the applicable due date. 17 of 19 Pearson -April From: Susan.Moore@faa.gov Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 20114:05 PM To: Pearson -April Cc: Horton -Peter Subject: RE: This morning's telcon w. you re EYW44 use of Entitlement funding. April Thanks for taking care of that so fast. I'll let you know if I need anything else, but that should work for now... ------------> From: ------------> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pearson -April <Pearson-April@monroecounty-fl.gov> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ > To: ------------> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISusan Moore/ASO/FAA@FAA >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ > Cc: ------------> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Horton -Peter <Horton -Peter@ Mon roeCounty-FL.Gov>, "Henry, Dionne G. (Dionne. Hen ry@dot.state.fLus)" <Dionne.Hen ry@dot.state.fl.us> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ > Date: ------------> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 08/24/2011 03:59 PM >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ > Subject: ------------> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RE: This morning's telcon w. you re EYW44 use of Entitlement funding. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Susan, 1 I have updated the JACIP as requested, with a slight modification. I spoke to Dionne about what to do, so I hope this is OK with you. As always, we will be happy make any other changes you request. As you know, there were two existing projects already in the JACIP - one older one for ALP and one newer one for MP update. However, since the newer MP update already had FDOT funding allocated for 2017, 1 left that project as is, so we didn't disrupt future FDOT funding. I did change the older ALP (project PFL-000-6476, FAA project ID 353-651) to the "New Master Plan / Airport Layout Plan" and also changed the funding year and sources as per your email below, using $400,000 PAX E$, with $10,520 each for FDOT and local match. I will be out of the office Thursday and Friday, so if you would like us to do anything differently, please let me know and I will make the changes as soon as I get back in the office on Monday. As always, thank you. (Dionne, you can either lock the JACIP, and re -open it next week if necessary, or leave it open until next week, whichever is best for you. Thanks for your help.) April Pearson Key West International Airport 305-809-5204 -----Original Message ----- From: Horton -Peter Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:48 PM To: 'Henry, Dionne G.' Cc: Pearson -April Subject: RE: This morning's telcon w. you re EYW44 use of Entitlement funding. Okay, Dionne. Thanks. April is going to go in and make the updates and she'll let you know. Peter -----Original Message ----- From: Henry, Dionne G.[maiIto: Dionne. Hen ry@dot.state.fLus] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:35 PM To: Susan. Moore@faa.gov; Horton -Peter Subject: RE: This morning's telcon w. you re EYW44 use of Entitlement funding. Good Afternoon, JACIP is unlocked, please let me know I what dated it should be locked. Dionne G. Henry Aviation/Seaport Program Administrator Florida Department of Transportation 1000 NW 111 Avenue Miami, FL 33172 305-470-5292 phone dionne.henry@dot.state.fl.us email -----Original Message ----- From: Susan. Moore@faa.gov [mailto:Susan.Moo re@faa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 11:58 AM To: Peter Horton Cc: Henry, Dionne G. Subject: This morning's telcon w. you re EYW44 use of Entitlement funding. Importance: High Peter This will confirm our discussion on the work items for the EYW44-2011 proposed grant. Since we cannotjustify an "ALP Update" that essentially just incorporates "As-builts" required of completed projects; we agreed that you would withdraw that item from your request & expectation for inclusion in the EYW44 grant. We agreed also that the bag claim item you requested is included in the proposed grant description "Terminal Construction". So, the EYW44 grant will only contain one item"Terminal Construction", which will use ALL the FY11 EYW Entitlement $ available ($1,998,474). As far as the MP/ALP situation, given that as you stated, a full one has not been done since 2003; we agreed that that would be more appropriately addressed as a New MP/ALP in the FY12 funding, using your entitlement $ (estimated for this item @ $400,000). 1 have discussed this with Rebecca Henry & she has concurred. This should serve to completely update any completed projects that have not been shown on the ALP, as well as provide long-term planning. By copy of this email, I am requesting that your FDOT/6 representative, unlock the JACIP, so you can delete any separate references to ALP or MP Update(s) & enter a project for FY12 (as soon as possible, since we will be starting the FY12 gaming in October 2011) for a new MP/ALP. Let me know if I have missed anything. Thanks for your help. Key West International Airport 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, FL 33040 June 22, 2011 Mr./Ms. Susan Moore Program Manager Federal Aviation Administration Orlando Airports District Office 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400 Orlando, FL 32822 Dear Mr./Ms. Susan Moore Subject: Key West International Airport; Key West, Florida FY 2011 Airport Improvement Program Applic ation Enclosed please find an FY 2011 Airport Improvement Program grant application for the following projects at the Key West International Airport: 1. Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction 2. Part 150 Noise Update 3. Baggage Claim (Design & Construction) 4. ALP Update The following items are enclosed for each of the above projects: ✓ Federal Assistance Request Checklist ✓ Standard Form 424 - Application for Federal Assistance ✓ Detailed Project Information Sheet ✓ Individual Project Cost Breakdowns and Total Cost Summary Bid Tabulations and Recommendation for Award ✓ Project Sketch — One for each or one drawing with all projects ✓ Environmental Determination Documentation for each project / work item shown above ✓ Individual Project Schedule Appraisals (for Land Acquisition) ✓ Independent Cost Estimates (Professional Services 5 S100k) Based on the amount requested in our pre -application dated December 2, 2010. We are requesting a Letter of Credit method of payment for this grant agreement. There have been no changes in our Exhibit "A" Property Map or Exhibit "C" Title Opinion since our last grant (AIP 3-12-0037-043-2010 from 08- 16-10). �c Peter Horton Airport Manager/Executive/Director Airport Improvement Program Orlando Airports District Office Federal Assistance Request Checklist APPLICATION CHECKLIST Airport: KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Sponsor: MONROE COUNTY City, State: KEY WEST, FLORIDA Date of Application: JUNE 22, 2011 Cover Letter: X Letter of Credit method of payment requested. X Project(s) identified. (Any changes from previous meetings/discussions should be discussed prior to submission.) If pre -application, proposed application date identified. If application, any changes to requested amount are identified and reasons provided. If application, identify if any changes have taken place on Exhibit "A" Property Map since last grant. If application, identify if any changes have taken place on Exhibit "C" Title Opinion since last grant. Application (Revise Pre -Application Documentation) X Standard Form 424 -- Application for Federal Assistance X Detailed Project Information Sheet X Individual Project Cost Breakdowns and Total Cost Summary Bid Tabulations and Recommendation for Award X Project Sketch — One for each or one drawing with all projects X Environmental Determination Documentation for each project X Individual Project Schedules Appraisals (Land Acquisition Projects) X Independent Cost Estimates (Design Only or Construction Phase Services >$100K) AI'I'LIGAIIVN FUR 2. DATE SUBMITTED ApplicaM Wentifiw FEDERAL ASSISTANCE June 22, 2011 1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: 3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State APpticatlon IdenMer Application ® Construction Preapplication ❑ Construction 4, DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Identifier ® Non -Construction ❑ Non -Construction 5. APPLICANT INFORMATION Legal Name: Monroe County, Florida Organizational Unit! Department: Board of County Commissioners OrganiZational DUNS: 15-256-1486 Division: Address: Name and telephone number of person to be contacted on matters involving this application (give area code) treet: 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Prefix: Mr. First Name: Peter City: Key West Middle Name: J. County: Monroe Last Name: Horton State: Florida Zip Code: 33040 Suffix: _ Country : uS Email: horton-peter@monroecounty-fl.gov B. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER E/M Phone number (give area code): FAX number (give area code): 5 9- 6 0 0 0 7 4 9 (305) 809-5200 (305) 292-3578 8. TYPE OF APPLICATION: 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (See back of form for Application Types) ® New ❑ Continuaton El Revision If Revision, enter appropriate letter(s) In box(es): El (See back form for description Other (Specify) of of letters) 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY Omer (specify) Federal Aviation Administration -Orlando Airport District Office 11, DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT: See attachment "A" for descriptive title. 10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER 2 0_ 1 0 6 TITLE: 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (cities, counties, states, etc.): Ke West, Monroe, Florida 13. PROPOSED PROJECT 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF Start Date Ending Date 07-01-11 09-01-12 a. Applicant b. Project 15th 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING 15th 18. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS a. Yes. ❑ THIS PREAPPLICATIONAPPLICATION WAS MADE a. Federal $ 2,410,46$ AVAILABLE TO THE STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 b. Applicant $ PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON c. State $ UU DATE: b. No. ❑ PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E. O. 12372 ® OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR d. Local $ VU e. Other $ 126,867 uu REVIEW f. Program income $ 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? ❑ves If "Yes' attach an explanation ® No g. TOTAL $ 2,537,335 18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION/PREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED. A. Authorized Representafive Prefix Mr. First Name Peter Middle Name J. Last Name Horton Suffix b. Title AirportDirector c. Telephone number (give area code) 305 809-5200 d. Signature of Authorized Represent ive e. Date Signed —2 —r Previous Editions Not tlsahie Auararwaro t-orm 4Z4 (Rev.9-Z003Authorized for Local Reproduction t` _/� Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 June 22, 2011 KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ATTACHMENT "A" PROJECT APPLICATION (3-12-0037-044-2011) GRANT DESCRIPTION AND COST BREAKDOWN SHEET 1. Grant Description A) Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction Construct a new Terminal Building, rehabilitation and remodeling the existing Terminal Building in compliance with the County Building Department and the Americans with Disabilities Act. These funds will pay for bond funds use for eligible project costs. B) Baggage Claim (Design and Construction) This project is to provide an additional bag belt to handle the increased passenger load carried by the 737's_ C) ALP Update A key and important component of the airport planning process is the Airport Layout Drawing (ALD). This drawing documents existing airport conditions and identifies the Airport Sponsor's proposed modifications to the airport. It also serves as a project program document for use by local, state and federal agencies. The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Drawing Set is a collection of drawings as prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150i5070-6B. Current ALP was last revised on June 2003 and since then significant improvements have occurred in the airport, e.g. new terminal, RSA, t-hangars and hangars development. D) PART 150 Noise Update Several changes in the aircraft operations at EYW have occurred since the NEMs were accepted in 2008, including the introduction of passenger jet service by several air carriers. The updated NEMs prepared under this Scope of Services will reflect the currently existing condition, as well as a future forecast condition. Monroe County Ad -Hoc Committee on Airport Noise feels that is time to update Part 150 Study, which will include both the Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program, technology has changed and new noise abatement strategies and measures should be investigated. 11, Cost Breakdown ENTITLEMENT FUNDS A) Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction Bond repayment $ 1.193 007.00 Project application $ 650.00 _ _ _ Subtotal $ 1193,657.00 B) Baggage Claim (Design and Construction) Administration $ 1200.00 En ineErnnq_ jDesign) $ 70,666,00 Bid and Award_ $ 5074,00 Construction Management $ 19,798.00 Construction $ 536,999.00 Project application $ -" 300.00 Quarterly Report and Asbuilt Information $ 4,500.00 DBE $ 56,200.00 Subtotal — -$ 694,737.00 F4ey—W- MOIEGTAH+—TId 'M IEGT APRM. WW —AA C) ALP Update Administration $ 500.00 Planni /En ineering $ 181,263.00 Project a ication -- - $ 200.00 in -de -pendent Fee Estimate $ 2,000.00 DBE-- _ $ 31,300.00 Subtotal 215,263.O0 0) PART 150 Noise Update ministration $ 2,500.00 Planning_ $ 431,178.00 Subtotal $ 433,678.00 Total Grant Amount (95%) 2,537,335.00 2,410,468.25 Others (5%) $ 126,866.75 � �CfAA PROIEG! MR_GTKIMM„ PROJECT AP9UCATgNMYrH`nv RYa Detailed Project Information Sheet Airport Improvement Program Grant Application Airport: Key West International Airport City, ST: Key West, Florida Project Title: Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction Project Description: Construct a new Terminal Building, rehabilitation and remodeling the existing Terminal Building in compliance with the County Building Department and the Americans with Disabilities Act. These funds will pay for bond funds use for eligible project costs. Project Justification: The new terminal facility will provide the terminal area needed for the present and near future for adequate operation as stated in the Terminal Study and approved Master Plan. Special Circumstances: N/A Project Cost Information: Total Cost 100% FAA Share 95 % State Insert % Local 5 % $ 1,193,657 1 $ 1,133,974 $ Amnt $ 59,683 Type of Funding Proposed 1 FAA Share Only) Fund Type Funds Available Funds to be Used Funds Remaining P, NP, C, SA, D & FY (e.g., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY e.g., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY e. ., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt Total ---Am Wnt $ Amnt $ Amnt Alternate Funding Plan: NIA City, ST: Project Title: Project Description: Project Justification Special Circumstances Project Cost Information: Detailed Project Information Sheet Airport Improvement Program Grant Application Key West Intemational Airport Key West, Florida Baggage Claim (Design & Construction) This project is to provide an additional bag belt. To handle the increased passenger load carried by the 737's. NIA Total Cost 100% FAA Share (95 % State Insert % Local 5 $694,7371 $ 660,000 $ Amnt 1 $ 34,737 Type of Funding Proposed FAA Share Onl Fund Type Funds Available Funds to be Used Funds Remaining P, NP, C, SA, D & FY (e.g., NP201 Q $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY e. ., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY (e.g., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt Total $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt Alternate Funding Plan: NIA Detailed Project Information Sheet Airport Improvement Program Grant Application Airport: Key West International Airport City, ST: Key West, Florida Project Title: ALP Update Project Description: A key and important component of the airport planning process is the Airport Layout Drawing (ALD). This drawing documents existing airport conditions and identifies the Airport Sponsor's proposed modifications to the airport. It also serves as a project program document for use by local, state and federal agencies. The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Drawing Set is a collection of drawings as prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-613. Project Justification: Current ALP was last revised on June 2003 and since then significant improvements have occurred in the airport, e.g. new terminal, RSA, t-hangars and hangars development. Special Circumstances: N/A Project Cost Information: Total Cost 100%Y FAA Share 95 % State Insert % Local 5 $215,2631 $ 204,50Q $ Amnt $ 10,763 Type of Funding Proposed FAA Share Only) Fund Type Funds Available Funds to be Funds Remaining Used P, NP, C, SA, D & FY (e.g., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY (e.g., NP201 Q $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY e. ., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt Total $ Amnt�$Amnt $ Amnt Alternate Funding Plan: N/A Detailed Project Information Sheet Airport Improvement Program Grant Application Airport: Key West International Airport City, ST: Key West, Florida Project Title: Part 150 Noise Update Project Description: Monroe County Ad -Hoc Committee on Airport Noise feels that is time to update Part 150 Study, which will include both the Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program. Project Justification: Several changes in the aircraft operations at EYW have occurred since the NEMs were accepted in 2008, including the introduction of passenger jet service by several air carriers. The updated NEMs prepared under this project will reflect the currently existing condition, as well as a future forecast condition. Technology has changed and new noise abatement strategies and measures should be investigated. Special Circumstances: N/A Project Cost Information: Total Cost 100% FAA Share 95 % State Insert % Local 5 $433,6781 $ 411,994 J $ 21,684 Type of Funding Proposed FAA Share Only) Fund Type Funds Available Funds to be Funds Remaining Used P, NP, C, SA, D & FY (e.g., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY (e.g., NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt P, NP, C, SA, D & FY NP2010 $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt �� Total $ Amnt $ Amnt $ Amnt Key West International Airport PROJECT COSTS Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction Cost (100%) Construction $ 1,193,657 Subtotal Amount Baggage Claim (Design R Construction) Design Construction Services Construction DBE ALP Update Engineering DBE Subtotal Amount Subtotal Amount Part 150 Noise Update (Discretionary Funds) Engineering Subtotal Amount Total Estimated Project Cost (100%) $ 2,537,335 Total FAA Share Cost (95%) $ 2,410,468 $ 1,193,657 Cost (100% $ 77,240 $ 24,298 $ 536,999 $ 56,200 $ 694, 737 Cost (100%) $ 183,963 $ 31,300 $ 215,263 Cost (100%) $ 433,678 $ 433,678 FAA (95%) $ 1,133,974 $ 1,133,974 FAA (95% $ 73,378 $ 23,083 $ 510,149 $ 53,390 $ 660,000 FAA (95%) $ 174,765 $ 29,735 $ 204,500 FAA (95%) $ 411,994 $ 411,994 Key West International Airport Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Proposed Proiect Schedule: Completion of Plans and Specifications, and Eng. Report Submit Plans and Specs to FAA Advertisement of Project for Bids Receipt of Bids Submittal of Project Application to FAA Execution of FAA Grant Notice to Proceed to Contractor Completion of Construction Final Inspection Project Close -Out Dates: N/A N/A N/A N/A 06/30/11 08/30/11 N/A N/A N/A Key West International Airport Baggage Claim (Design & Construction) PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Proposed Project Schedule: Dates: Completion of Plans and Specifications, and Eng. Report 10/01/11 Submit Plans and Specs to FAA 10/15/11 Advertisement of Project for Bids 11/01/11 Receipt of Bids 12/01/11 Submittal of Project Application to FAA 06/30/11 Execution of FAA Grant 08/30/11 Notice to Proceed to Contractor 12/15/11 Completion of Construction 06/30/12 Final Inspection 07/10/12 Project Close -Out 07/15/12 Key West International Airport ALP Update PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Proposed Project Schedule: Dates: Completion of Plans and Specifications, and Eng. Report 08/30/12 Submit Plans and Specs to FAA 09/15/12 Advertisement of Project for Bids N/A Receipt of Bids N/A Submittal of Project Application to FAA 06/30/11 Execution of FAA Grant 08/30/11 Notice to Proceed to Contractor N/A Completion of Construction N/A Final Inspection N/A Project Close -Out N/A Key West International Airport Part 150 Noise Update PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Proposed Troiect Schedule: Dates: Completion of Plans and Specifications, and Eng. Report 08/30/12 Submit Plans and Specs to FAA 09/15/12 Advertisement of Project for Bids N/A Receipt of Bids N/A Submittal of Project Application to FAA 06/30/11 Execution of FAA Grant 08/30/11 Notice to Proceed to Contractor N/A Completion of Construction N/A Final Inspection N/A Project Close -Out N/A DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Airport: Key West International Airport Detailed Project Description (attach project drawing and additional pages as necessary): Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction: Construct a new Terminal Building. rehabilitation and remodeling the existing Terminal. Is the proposed project(s) listed as categorically excluded in one or more ofparagraphs 307-312 of FAA Order 1050.IL? Please identify which paragraph(s): In order for the FAA to determine the appropriate course of action, as a Categorical Exclusion, the sponsor must certify that the proposed action does NOT (1) involve any of the following circumstances, and does NOT (2) have a significant effect. A determination as to whether the proposed project (s) may have a significant environmental effect is made by considering any requirements applicable to the specific resource (see FAA Order 1050.1E Appendix A). a Have an adverse effect on cultural resources protected under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. b. Have an impact on properties protected under section 4(}} of the Department of Transportation Act. c. Have an impact on natural, ecological (e.g. invasive species), or scenic resources of Federal, Tribal, State, or local significance (for example: Federally listed or proposed endangered, threatened, or candidate species or designated or proposed critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act), resources protected by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act; wetlands; floodplains; prime, unique, State or locally important farmlands; energy supply and natural resources; and wild and scenic rivers, including study or eligible river segments and solid waste management. d Cause a division or disruption of an established community, or a disruption of orderly, planned development or an inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community in which the project is located. e. Cause an increase in congestion from surface transportation (by causing a decrease in Level of Service below acceptable level determined by appropriate transportation agency, such as a highway agency). f. Have an impact on noise levels of noise -sensitive areas. g. Have an impact on air quality or violate local, State, or Federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. h. Have an impact on water quality, sole source aquifers, a public water supply system, or State or Tribal water quality standards established under the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act. i. Have effect(s) on the quality of the human environment that are likely to be highly controversial on environmental grounds. The term "controversial" means a substantial dispute exists as to the size, nature, or effect of a proposed Federal action. The effects of an action are considered highly controversial when reasonable disagreement exists over the project's risks of causing environmental harm. Opposition on environmental grounds by a Federal, state, or local government agency or by a Tribe or by a substantial number of the persons affected by the action should be considered in determining whether or not reasonable disagreement regarding the effects of a proposed action exists. j. Likelihood to be inconsistent with any Federal, State, Tribal, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. k. Likely to directly, indirectly, or cumulatively create a significant impact on the human environmental, including, but not limited to, actions likely to cause a significant lighting impact on residential areas or commercial use of business properties, likely to cause a significant impact on the visual nature of surrounding land uses likely to be contaminated with hazardous materials based on Phase I or Phase 11 Environmental Due Diligence Audit (EDDA's), or likely to -A use such contamination I ertify at the project(s) described above meet(s) the test for a Categorical Exclusion in accordance with FAA Order 1050.IE a dwaraQrrphs a thru k above. Signature orAuil�orized Airport Representative FAA Determination (by program manager signature): Categorically Excluded: 2-3,1 Date: Requires further environmental analysis: Date: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CHECKLIST (FY 2011) Airport: Key West International Airport Proposed Project(s): Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction,• Construct a new Terminal Buildingu rehabilitation and remodeling the existing Terminal Prepared and certified by: Andres Gutierrez Date: 06-03-11 YES NO COMMENTS IS THIS PROPOSED PROJECT LISTED AS CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED IN FAA ORDER 1450.1E paragraphs 307-312 X THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL AFFECT: Coastal Resources X Section 4 Land X Farmland X Endangered or Threatened Species (Federal or State listed X Floodplains X Hazardous Materials or Solid Waste Management X Historic/Architectural,Archaeological/Cultural Resources _ X Light Emissions or Cause Visual Impacts X Natural Resources or Energy Supply X Low Income or Minority Populations or Children X Wetlands X Wild and Scenic Rivers (study or eligible) X THIS PROPOSED PROJECT IS LIKELY TO: Be highly controversial on environmental grounds including opposition by Federal, state, local, or Tribal or a substantial number of persons affected by the action. X Be inconsistent with any Federal, State, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. X Cause community disruption or inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community X Cause an increase of 1.5 DNL over noise sensitive areas X Displace persons or businesses X Disrupt local traffic patterns and substantially reduce levels of service (LOS) of roads serving the airport and surrounding communities X Result in a substantial loss in community tax base X Impact water quality, sole source aquifers, public water supply system, or state or tribal water quality standards X Impact or violate local, state, Tribal, or Federal air .quality standards X Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion. DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Airport: KeyWestInternational Airport Detailed Project Description (attach project drawing and additional pages as necessary): Baggage Claim (Design and Construction): This project is to provide an additional bag belt to handle the increased passenger load carried by the 737s. Is the proposed project(s) listed as categorically excluded in one or more of paragraphs 307-312 of FAA Order 1050.1 L? �'Fease �i��iztrfy �ha.��t pgr���(sj'., In order for the FAA to determine the appropriate course of action, as a Categorical Exclusion, the sponsor must certify that the proposed action does NOT (1) involve any of the following circumstances, and does NOT (2) have a significant effect. A determination as to whether the proposed project (s) may have a significant environmental effect is made by considering any requirements applicable to the specific resource (see FAA Order 1050.1E Appendix A). a. Have an adverse effect on cultural resources protected under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended- b. Have an impact on properties protected under section 4(1) of the Department of Transportation Act. c. Have an impact on natural, ecological (e.g. invasive species), or scenic resources of Federal, Tribal, State, or local significance (for example: Federally listed or proposed endangered, threatened, or candidate species or designated or proposed critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act), resources protected by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act; wetlands; floodplains; prime, unique, State or locally important farmlands; energy supply and natural resources; and wild and scenic rivers, including study or eligible river segments and solid waste management. d. Cause a division or disruption of an established community, or a disruption of orderly, planned development or an inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community in which the project is located. e. Cause an increase in congestion from surface transportation (by causing a decrease in Level of Service below acceptable level determined by appropriate transportation agency, such as a highway agency). f. Have an impact on noise levels of noise -sensitive areas. g. Have an impact on air quality or violate local, State, or Federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. h. Have an impact on water quality, sole source aquifers, a public water supply system, or State or Tribal water quality standards established under the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act. i. Have effect(s) on the quality of the human environment that are likely to be highly controversial on environmental grounds. The term "controversial" means a substantial dispute exists as to the size, nature, or effect of a proposed Federal action. The effects of an action are considered highly controversial when reasonable disagreement exists over the project's risks of causing environmental harm. Opposition on environmental grounds by a Federal, state, or local government agency or by a Tribe or by a substantial number of the persons affected by the action should be considered in determining whether or not reasonable disagreement regarding the effects of a proposed action exists. j. Likelihood to be inconsistent with any Federal, State, Tribal, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. k. Likely to directly, indirectly, or cumulatively create a significant impact on the human environmental, including, but not limited to, actions likely to cause a significant lighting impact on residential areas or commercial use of business properties, likely to cause a significant impact on the visual nature of surrounding Iand uses likely to be contaminated with hazardous materials based on Phase I or Phase 11 Environmental Due Diligence Audit (EDDA's), or likely to cause such contamination I ce at the project(s) described above meet(s) the test for a Categorical Exclusion in accordance with FAA Order 50.1E aragra hs a tkru k above. L-237U SiJ ature of Aut azed Airy epresentative Date FAA Determination (by program manager signature): Categorically Excluded: Date: Requires further environmental analysis: Date: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CHECKLIST (FY 2011) Airport: Key West International Airport Proposed Project(s): Baggage Claim (Design and Construction): This project is to provide an additional balz belt to handle the increased passenger load carried by the 737's. Prepared and certified by: Andres Gutierrez Date: 06-03-11 YES NO COMMENTS IS THIS PROPOSED PROJECT LISTED AS CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED IN FAA ORDER 1050.1E, paragraphs 307-312 X THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL AFFECT: Coastal Resources X Section 4 Land X Farmland X Endangered or Threatened Species (Federal or State listed X Flood lairs X Hazardous Materials or Solid Waste Mana ement X Historic!Architectural,Archaeological/Cultural Resources X Light Emissions or Cause Visual impacts X Natural Resources or En Su ly X Low Income or Minority Populations or Children X Wetlands X Wild and Scenic Rivers (stuqy. or eligible) X THIS PROPOSED PROJECT IS LIKELY TO: Be highly controversial on environmental grounds including opposition by Federal, state, local, or Tribal or a substantial number of persons affected by the action. X Be inconsistent with any Federal, State, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. X Cause community disruption or inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community X Cause an increase of 1.5 DNL over noise sensitive areas X _ Dis lace persons or businesses X Disrupt local traffic patterns and substantially reduce levels of service (LOS) of roads serving the airport and surrounding communities X Result in a substantial Ioss in communi tax base X Impact water quality, sole source aquifers, public water supply system, or state or tribal water quality standards X Impact or violate local, state, Tribal, or Federal air quality standards X Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion. DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Airport: Key West International AirW Detailed Project Description (attach project drawing and additional pages as necessary): ALP Update: A key and important component of the airport planning process is the Airport Layout Drawing (ALD) This drawing documents existing airport conditions and identifies the Airport Sponsor's proposed modifications to the airport. It also serves as a proiect program document for use by IocaL state and federal agencies. Is the proposed project(s) listed as categorically excluded in one or more ofparagraphs 307-312 of FAA Order 1050.IE? Please identify which paragraph(s): In order for the FAA to determine the appropriate course of action, as a Categorical Exclusion, the sponsor must certify that the proposed action does NOT (1) involve any of the following circumstances, and does NOT (2) have a significant effect. A determination as to whether the proposed project (s) may have a significant environmental effect is made by considering any requirements applicable to the specific resource (see FAA Order 1050.1E Appendix A). a. Have an adverse effect on cultural resources protected under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. b. Have an impact on properties protected under section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. c. Have an impact on natural, ecological (e.g. invasive species), or scenic resources of Federal, Tribal, State, or local significance (for example: Federally listed or proposed endangered, threatened, or candidate species or designated or proposed critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act), resources protected by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act; wetlands; floodplains; prime, unique, State or locally important farmlands; energy supply and natural resources; and wild and scenic rivers, including study or eligible river segments and solid waste management. d. Cause a division or disruption of an established community, or a disruption of orderly, planned development or an inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community in which the project is located. e. Cause an increase in congestion from surface transportation (by causing a decrease in Level of Service below acceptable level determined by appropriate transportation agency, such as a highway agency). f. Have an impact on noise levels of noise -sensitive areas. g. Have an impact on air quality or violate local, State, or Federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. h. Have an impact on water quality, sole source aquifers, a public water supply system, or State or Tribal water quality standards established under the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act. i. Have effects) on the quality of the human environment that are likely to be highly controversial on environmental grounds. The term "controversial" means a substantial dispute exists as to the size, nature, or effect of a proposed Federal action. The effects of an action are considered highly controversial when reasonable disagreement exists over the project's risks of causing environmental harm. Opposition on environmental grounds by a Federal, state, or local government agency or by a Tribe or by a substantial number of the persons affected by the action should be considered in determining whether or not reasonable disagreement regarding the effects of a proposed action exists. j. Likelihood to be inconsistent with any Federal, State, Tribal, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. k. Likely to directly, indirectly, or cumulatively create a significant impact on the human environmental, including, but not limited to, actions likely to cause a significant lighting impact on residential areas or commercial use of business properties, likely to cause a significant impact on the visual nature of surrounding land uses likely to be contaminated with hazardous materials based on Phase I or Phase II Environmental Due Diligence Audit (EDDA's), or likely to cause such contamination I certi the project(s) described above meet(s) the test for a Categorical Exclusion in accordance with FAA Order 1OS .1E and ragraphs a ru k above. &--2 3--11 Signature of Authori�ed`)�irport Representative Date FAA Determination (by program manager signature): Categorically Excluded: Requires further environmental analysis: Date: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CHECKLIST (FY 2011) Airport: Kgy West International Airport Proposed Project(s): ALP Update: A key and important component of the airport planning process is the Airport Layout Drawing (ALD). This drawing documents existing airport conditions and identifies the Airport S nuo sor's proposed modifications to the airport. It also serves as a project program document for use by local, state and federal agencies. Prepared and certified by: Andres Gutierrez Date: 06-03-11 YES NO COMMENTS IS TMS PROPOSED PROJECT LISTED AS CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED IN FAA ORDER 1050.1E, paragraphs 307-312 X THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL AFFECT: Coastal Resources X Section Land X Farmland X Endangered or Threatened Species (Federal or State listed X Flood lairs X Hazardous Materials or Solid Waste Management X Historic/Architectural,Archaeological/Cultural Resources X Light Emissions or Cause Visual Impacts X Natural Resources or Energy Supply X Low Income or Minority Populations or Children X Wetlands X Wild and Scenic Rivers(study or eligible) X TIIIS PROPOSED PROJECT IS LIKELY TO: Be highly controversial on environmental grounds including opposition by Federal, state, local, or Tribal or a substantial number of persons affected by the action. X Be inconsistent with any Federal, State, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. X Cause community disruption or inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community X Cause an increase of 1.5 DNL over noise sensitive areas X Displace persons or businesses X Disrupt local traffic patterns and substantially reduce levels of service (LOS) of roads serving the airport and surrounding communities X Result in a substantial loss in community tax base X Impact water quality, sole source aquifers, public water su 1 stern or state or tribal water quality standards X Impact or violate local, state, Tribal, or Federal air quality standards X Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion. DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Airport: Key West International Aim Detailed Project Description (attach project drawing and additional pages as necessary): PART 150 Noise Update: Mourne County Ad -Hoe Committee on Airport Noise feels that is time to update Part 150 Study, which will include both the Noise Exymare Maps and Noise Compatibility Program Is the proposed project(s) listed as categorically excluded in one or more of paragraphs 307-312 of FAA Order 1050.1E? Please identify which paragraph(s): In order for the FAA to determine the appropriate course of action, as a Categorical Exclusion, the sponsor must certify that the proposed action does NOT (1) involve any of the following circumstances, and does NOT (2) have a significant effect. A determination as to whether the proposed project (s) may have a significant environmental effect is made by considering any requirements applicable to the specific resource (see FAA Order 1050. IE Appendix A). a. Have an adverse effect on cultural resources protected under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. b. Have an impact on properties protected under section 4(fl of the Department of Transportation Act. c. Have an impact on natural, ecological (e.g. invasive species), or scenic resources of Federal, Tribal, State, or local significance (for example: Federally listed or proposed endangered, threatened, or candidate species or designated or proposed critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act), resources protected by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act; wetlands; floodplains; prime, unique, State or locally important farmlands; energy supply and natural resources; and wild and scenic rivers, including study or eligible river segments and solid waste management. d. Cause a division or disruption of an established community, or a disruption of orderly, planned development or an inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community in which the project is located. e. Cause an increase in congestion from surface transportation (by causing a decrease in Level of Service below acceptable level determined by appropriate transportation agency, such as a highway agency). f. have an impact on noise levels of noise -sensitive areas. g. Have an impact on air quality or violate local, State, or Federal air quality standards under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. h. Have an impact on water quality, sole source aquifers, a public water supply system, or State or Tribal water quality standards established under the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act. i. Have effect(s) on the quality of the human environment that are likely to be highly controversial on environmental grounds. The term "controversial" means a substantial dispute exists as to the size, nature, or effect of a proposed Federal action. The effects of an action are considered highly controversial when reasonable disagreement exists over the project's risks of causing environmental harm. Opposition on environmental grounds by a Federal, state, or local government agency or by a Tribe or by a substantial number of the persons affected by the action should be considered in determining whether or not reasonable disagreement regarding the effects of a proposed action exists. j. Likelihood to be inconsistent with any Federal, State, Tribal, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. k. Likely to directly, indirectly, or cumulatively create a significant impact on the human environmental, including, but not limited to, actions likely to cause a significant lighting impact on residential areas or commercial use of business properties, likely to cause a significant impact on the visual nature of surrounding land uses likely to be contaminated with hazardous materials based on Phase I or Phase II Environmental Due Diligence Audit (EDDA's), or likely to cause such contamination I certify that the project(s) described above meet(s) the test for a Categorical Exclusion in accordance with FAA Order I q8U.—I—E—andparagraphs a thru k above. -2 of Aulfioriled Airport Representative Date FAA Determination (by program manager signature): Categorically Excluded: Date: Requires further environmental analysis: Date: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CHECKLIST (FY 2011) Airport: Key West International Airport Proposed Project(s): PART 150 Noise Update: Monroe County Ad -Hoc Committee on Airport Noise feels that is time to update Part 150 Study, which will include both the Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program. Prepared and certified by: Andres GutierreZ Date: 06-03-11 YES NO COMMENTS IS THIS PROPOSED PROJECT LISTED AS CATEGORICALLY EXCLUDED IN FAA ORDER 1050.1E, paragraphs 307-312 X THIS PROPOSED PROJECT WILL AFFECT: Coastal Resources X Section 4 Land X Farmland X Endangered or Threatened Species (Federal or State listed X Floodplains X Hazardous Materials or Solid Waste Management X Historic/Architectural,Archaeological/Cultural Resources X Light Emissions or Cause Visual Impacts X Natural Resources or Energy Supply X Low Income or Minority Populations or Children X Wetlands X Wild and Scenic Rivers (study or eligible) X THIS PROPOSED PROJECT IS LIKELY TO: Be highly controversial on environmental grounds including opposition by Federal, state, local, or Tribal or a substantial number of persons affected by the action. X Be inconsistent with any Federal, State, or local law relating to the environmental aspects of the proposed action. X Cause community disruption or inconsistency with plans or goals that have been adopted by the community_ X Cause an increase of 1.5 DNL over noise sensitive areas X Displace Nrsons or businesses X Disrupt local traffic patterns and substantially reduce levels of service (LOS) of roads serving the airport and surrounding communities X Result in a substantial loss in community tax base X Impact water quality, sole source aquifers, public water supply stem or state or tribal water quality standards X Impact or violate local, state, Tribal, or Federal air quality standards X Attach detailed comments for all "yes" answers on a separate sheet, and explain your justification for a request for a determination of Categorical Exclusion. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION PART 111 PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION SECTION A Item 1. Name of Governing Body: Does this assistance request require State, local, regional, or other priority rating? Priority: ❑ Yes 0 No Item 2. Name of Agency or Board: Does this assistance request require State, or local (Attach Documentation) advisory, educational or health clearances? ❑ Yes I No Item 3. (Attach Comments) Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review in accordance with OMB Circular A-957 ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 4. Name of Approving Agency: Does this assistance request require State, local, regionat or other planning approval? Date: ❑ Yes Q No Item 5. Is the proposal project covered by an approved comprehensive plan? ❑ Yes [X-] No Item 6. Will the assistance requested serve a Federal installation? ❑ Yes ❑X No Check one: State Local Regional Location of Plan: Name of Federal Installation: Federal Population benefiting from Project: Item 7. Name of Federal installation: Will the assistance requested be on Federal land Location of Federal Land: or installation? ❑ Yes [—X] No Percent of Project OMB No. 2120-0569 1113012001 Item 8. See instruction for additional information to be Will the assistance requested have an impact or effect on provided the environment? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 9. Number of: Will the assistance requested cause the displacement of Individuals: individuals, families, businesses, or farms? Families: ❑ Yes ❑X No Businesses: Farms: Item 10. See instructions for additional information to be Is there other related Federal assistance on this provided. project previous, pending, or antic) ted? M Yes ❑X No FAA Forth 5100-100 (6-73) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-1 (9-03) Page 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2120-0669 PART II - SECTION C The Sponsor hereby represents and certifies as follows: 1. Compatible Land Use. - The Sponsor has taken the following actions to assure compatible usage of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport: 2. Defaults. - The Sponsor is not in default on any obligation to the United States or any agency of the United States Government relative to the development, operation, or maintenance of any airport, except as stated herewith: 3. Possible Disabilities. - There are no facts or circumstances (including the existence of effective or proposed leases, use agreements or other legal instruments affecting use of the Airport or the existence of pending litigation or other legal proceedings) which in reasonable probability might make it impossible for the Sponsor to carry out and complete the Project or carry out the provisions of Part V of this Application, either by limiting its legal or financial ability or otherwise, except as follows: 4. Consistency with Local Plans. — The project is reasonably consistent with plans existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport. 5. Consideration of Local Interest - It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located. 6. Consultation with Users. In making a decision to undertake any airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport which project is proposed. 7. Public Hearings. — In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary. Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project. 8. Air and Water Quality Standards. — In projects involving airport location, a major runway extension, or runway location it will provide for the Governor of the state in which the project is located to certify in writing to the Secretary that the project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated so as to comply with applicable and air and water quality standards. In any case where such standards have not been approved and where applicable air and water quality standards have been promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, certification shall be obtained from such Administrator. Notice of certification or refusal to certify shall be provided within sixty days after the project application has been received by the Secretary. FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 3a U.B. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION oMe No. 2120-OM PART 11- SECTION C (Continued) 9. Exclusive Rights — There Is no grant of an exclusive right for the conduct of any aeronautical activity at any airport owned or controlled by the Sponsor except as follows: 10. Land. — (a) The sponsor holds the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport subject to the following exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A': The Sponsor further certifies that the above is based on a title examination by a qualified attorney or title company and that such attorney or title company has determined that the Sponsor holds the above property interests. (b) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, but in any event prior to the start of any construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* on which such construction work is to be performed, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A": (c) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, and if feasible prior to the completion of all construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport as it will be upon completion of the Project, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A" *State character of property interest in each area and list and identify for each all exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests of every kind and nature, including liens, easements, teases, etc. The separate areas of land need only be identified here by the area numbers shown on the property map. FAA Foan 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100(4-76) Page 3b U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRAPON OMB No. 212MSfig PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION - CONSTRUCTION SECTION A - GENERAL 1. Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No ................................ -10 2. Functional or Other Breakout .................................................... SECTION B -CALCULATION OF FEDERAL GRANT Cost Classlticatlon Use only for revisions Total Amount Required Latest Approved Amount Adjustment + or (-} 1. Administration expense $ $ $ 2. Preliminary expense 3. Land, structures, right-of-way 4. Architectural engineering basic fees 5. Other Architectural engineering fees & Project inspection fees 7. Land development 8. Relocation Expenses 9. Relocation payments to Individuals and Businesses 10. Demolition and removal 11. Construction and project improvement 12. Equipment 13. Miscellaneous 14. Total (Lines 1 through 13) 15_ Estimated Income (if applicable) 16. Net Project Amount (Line 14 minus 16) 17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions 18. Add: Contingencies 19. Total Project Amt. (Excluding Rehabilitation Grants) 1,193,657 20. Federal Share requested of Line 19 1,133,974 21. Add Rehabilitation Grants Requested (100 Percent) 22. Total Federal grant requested (lines 20 & 21) 1,133 974 23. Grantee share 59,683 24. Other shares 26. Total Project (Lines 22,23 & 24) $ $ $ 1,193,657 FAA roan 51uu-1UU ("J) bUVtrtstut5 FAA r-URM 51ao-100 (6-73) Page 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVLAnrM Aniu*utcrwenrw SECTION C - EXCLUSIONS Classification Ineligible for Participation 1 Excluded From Contingency Provision z a. $ $ b. C. d. e. f. Totals $ $ SECTION D - PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING NON-FEDERAL SHARE 27. Grantee Share $ a. Securities b. Mortgages c. Appropdations (By Applicant) d. Bonds 59,683 e. Tax Levies f. Non Cash g. Other (Explain) h. TOTAL - Grantee share 59,683 28. Other Shares a. State b. Other c. Total Other Shares 29. TOTAL $ 59,683 SECTION E - REMARKS PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Attach - See Instructions) FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 5 PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Suggested Format) MPARTYPNT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATKMI AMUNISTRATION ONa No. 2120-ONO PROJECT: Bond Repayment for Terminal Construction AIRPORT: Key West International Airport 1.Objective: Construct a new Terminal Building, rehabilitation and remodeling of existing Terminal Building. 2. Benefits Anticipated: Accommodate present and near requirements per Terminal Concept Study. 3. Approach : (See approved Scope of Work in Final Application) Consultant's means and methods using standard construction practices. 4. Geographic Location: This project is going to take place at the Key West International Airport, located on 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard, Key West, Florida. 5. If Applicable, Provide Additional Information: N/A B. sponsor's Representative: (include address & telephone number) Peter J. Horton. 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, Florida 33040 -Telephone # 305 809-5200 FAA Form 5100-100 (9.03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (643) Page 6 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIA71ON ADMINISTRATION PART II PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION SECTION A oMs No. 2120-0569 11/3012007 Item 1. Does this assistance request require State, local, regional, Name of Governing Body: or other priority rating? Priority: ❑ Yes IX No Item 2. Does this assistance request require State, or local Name of Agency or Board: (Attach Documentation) advisory, educational or health clearances? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 3. Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review (Attach Comments) in accordance with OMB Circular A-95? ❑ Yes F-X] No Item 4. Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Approving Agency: regional or other planning approval? Date: ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 5. Check one: State Is the proposal project covered by an approved Local comprehensive plan? Regional ❑ Yes ❑X No Location of Plan: Item 6. Name of Federal Installation: Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Federal Population benefiting from Project: installation? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 7. Name of Federal Installation: Will the assistance requested be on Federal land Location of Federal Land: or installation? ❑ Yes ❑X No Percent of Project: Item 8. Will the assistance requested have an impact or effect on See instruction for additional information to be provided the environment? ❑ Yes ❑X No Number of: Item 9. Will the assistance requested cause the displacement of Individuals: Families: individuals, families, businesses, or farms? ❑ Yes ❑X No Businesses: Farms: Item 10. See instructions for additional information to be Is there other related Federal assistance on this provided. project previous, pending, or anticipated? Yes ❑X No FAA Forth 5100-100 (6-73) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-1 (9-03) Page 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2120-0569 PART It - SECTION C The Sponsor hereby represents and certifies as follows: 1. Compatible Land Use. - The Sponsor has taken the following actions to assure compatible usage of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport: 2. Defaults. - The Sponsor is not in default on any obligation to the United States or any agency of the United States Government relative to the development, operation, or maintenance of any airport, except as stated herewith: 3. Possible Disabilities. - There are no facts or circumstances (including the existence of effective or proposed leases, use agreements or other legal instruments affecting use of the Airport or the existence of pending litigation or other legal proceedings) which in reasonable probability might make it impossible for the Sponsor to carry out and complete the Project or carry out the provisions of Part V of this Application, either by limiting its legal or financial ability or otherwise, except as follows: 4. Consistency with Local Plans. — The project is reasonably consistent with plans existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport. 5. Consideration of Local Interest - It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located. 6. Consultation with Users. In making a decision to undertake any airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport which project is proposed. 7. Public Hearings. — In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary. Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project. 8. Air and Water Quality Standards. — In projects involving airport location, a major runway extension, or runway location it will provide for the Governor of the state in which the project is located to certify in writing to the Secretary that the project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated so as to comply with applicable and air and water quality standards. In any case where such standards have not been approved and where applicable air and water quality standards have been promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, certification shalt be obtained from such Administrator. Notice of certification or refusal to certify shall be provided within sixty days after the project application has been received by the Secretary. FAA Form 51MI00 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100100 (6-73) Page 3a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB NO. 2120-0569 PART If - SECTION C (Continued) 8. Exclusive Rights — There is no grant of an exclusive right for the conduct of any aeronautical activity at any airport owned or controlled by the Sponsor except as follows: 10. Land. — (a) The sponsor holds the following property interest in the following areas of land` which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport subject to the following exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A": The Sponsor further certifies that the above is based on a title examination by a qualified attorney or title company and that such attorney or title company has determined that the Sponsor holds the above property interests. (b) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, but in any event prior to the start of any construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* on which such construction work is to be performed, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A": (c) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, and if feasible prior to the completion of all construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport as it will be upon completion of the Project, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A" *State character of property interest in each area and list and identify for each all exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests of every kind and nature, including liens, easements, leases, etc. The separate areas of land need only be identified here by the area numbers shown on the property map. FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100(476) Page 3b U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ouB No. 2120-0569 PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION - CONSTRUCTION SECTION A - GENERAL 1. Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No. ............ ..... ---- 20-106 2. Functional or Other Breakout .................................................... SECTION B -CALCULATION OF FEDERAL GRANT Cost Classification Use only for revisions Total Amount Required Latest Approved Amount Adjustment + or (-} 1. Administration expense $ $ $ 2. Preliminary expense 3. Land, structures, right-of-way 4. Architectural engineering basic fees 5. Other Architectural engineering fees 6. Project inspection fees 7. Land development 8. Relocation Expenses 9. Relocation payments to Individuals and Businesses 10, Demolition and removal 11. Construction and project improvement 12. Equipment 13. Miscellaneous 14. Total (Lines 1 through 13) 15. Estimated Income (if applicable) 16. Net Project Amount (Line 14 minus 15) 17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions 18. Add: Contingencies 19. Total Project Amt. (Excluding Rehabilitation Grants) 694,737 20. Federal Share requested of Line 19 660,000 21. Add Rehabilitation Grants Requested (100 Percent) 22. Total Federal grant requested (lines 20 & 21) 660,000 23. Grantee share 34,737 24. Other shares 25. Total Project (Lines 22, 23 & 24) $ $ 694,737 FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB NO. 2120-OMO SECTION C - EXCLUSIONS Classification Ineligible for Participation 1 Excluded From Contingency Provision 2 a. $ $ b. C. d. e. f. 9. Totals $ $ SECTION D - PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING NON-FEDERAL SHARE 27. Grantee Share $ a. Securities b. Mortgages c. Appropriations (By Applicant) d. Bonds e. Tax Levies f. Non Cash g. Other (Explain) 34,737 h. TOTAL - Grantee share 34,737 28. Other Shares a. State b. Other c. Total Other Shares 29. TOTAL $ 34,737 SECTION E - REMARKS PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Attach - See Instructions) FAA Farm 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 6 PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Suggested Format) OMB No. 2120-0569 PROJECT: Baggage Claim (Design and Construction) AIRPORT: Key West International Airport 1. Objective: This project is to provide an additional bag belt. 2. Benefits Anticipated: This project is to provide an additional bag belt to handle the increased passenger load carried by the 737's. 3. Approach : (See approved Scope of Work in Final Application) Consultant's means and methods using standard construction practices. 4. Geographic Location: This project is going to take place at the Key West International Airport, located on 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard, Key West, Florida. 5. If Applicable, Provide Additional Information: N/A 6. Sponsor's Representative: (include address & telephone number) Peter J. Horton. 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, Florida 33040 Telephone # (305) 809-5200 FAA Farm 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-160 (6-73) Page 6 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION oMB No. 2120-0589 11/30/2007 PART II PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION SECTION A Item 1. Name of Governing Body: Does this assistance request require State, local, regional, or other priority rating? Priority: ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 2. Name of Agency or Board: Does this assistance request require State, Or local (Attach Documentation) advisory, educational or health clearances? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 3. Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review (Attach Comments) in accordance with OMB Circular A-95? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 4. Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Approving Agency: regional or other planning approval? Date: ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 5. Check one: State Is the proposal project covered by an approved Local comprehensive plan? Regional ❑ Yes 0 No Location of Plan: Item 6. Name of Federal Installation: Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Federal Population benefiting from Project: installation? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 7. Name of Federal Installation: Will the assistance requested be on Federal land Location of Federal Land: or installation? ❑ Yes ❑X No Percent of Project: Item 8. Will the assistance requested have an impact or effect on See instruction for additional information to be the environment? provided ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 9. Number of: Will the assistance requested cause the displacement of Individuals: Families: individuals, families, businesses, or farms? ❑ Yes ❑X No Businesses: Farms: Item 10. Is there other related Federal assistance on this See instructions for additional information to be project previous, pending, or anticited? provided. [1 Yes ❑X No FAA Form 5100-100 (6-73) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-1 (9-03) Page 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2120-060 PART II - SECTION C The Sponsor hereby represents and certifies as follows: 1. Compatible Land Use. - The Sponsor has taken the following actions to assure compatible usage of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport: 2. Defaults. - The Sponsor is not in default on any obligation to the United States or any agency of the United States Government relative to the development, operation, or maintenance of any airport, except as stated herewith: 3. Possible Disabilities. - There are no facts or circumstances (including the existence of effective or proposed leases, use agreements or other legal instruments affecting use of the Airport or the existence of pending litigation or other legal proceedings) which in reasonable probability might make it impossible for the Sponsor to carry out and complete the Project or carry out the provisions of Part V of this Application, either by limiting its legal or financial ability or otherwise, except as follows: 4. Consistency with Local Plans. — The project is reasonably consistent with plans existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport. 5. Consideration of Local Interest - It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located. 6. Consultation with Users. In making a decision to undertake any airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport which project is proposed. 7. Public Hearings. — In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary. Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project. S. Air and Water Quality Standards. — In projects involving airport location, a major runway extension, or runway location it will provide for the Governor of the state in which the project is located to certify in writing to the Secretary that the project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated so as to comply with applicable and air and water quality standards. In any case where such standards have not been approved and where applicable air and water quality standards have been promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, certification shall be obtained from such Administrator. Notice of certification or refusal to certify shall be provided within sixty days after the project application has been received by the Secretary. FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 3a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 21204569 PART II - SECTION C (Continued) 9. Exclusive Rights — There is no grant of an exclusive right for the conduct of any aeronautical activity at any airport owned or controlled by the Sponsor except as follows: 10. Land. — (a) The sponsor holds the following property interest in the following areas of land` which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport subject to the following exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A": The Sponsor further certifies that the above is based on a title examination by a qualified attorney or title company and that such attorney or title company has determined that the Sponsor holds the above property interests. (b) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, but in any event prior to the start of any construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* on which such construction work is to be performed, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A": (c) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, and if feasible prior to the completion of all construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport as it will be upon completion of the Project, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A" *State character of property interest in each area and list and identify for each all exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests of every kind and nature, including liens, easements, leases, etc. The separate areas of land need only be identified here by the area numbers shown on the property map. FAA Form 5100-100 ("3) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100(4-76) Page 3b U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION oMa No. 2120-0669 PART Ili - BUDGET INFORMATION - CONSTRUCTION SECTION A - GENERAL 1. Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No....... .......... — ... — ...... 20-106 2. Functional or Other Breakout.. .................................... ............. SECTION B -CALCULATION OF FEDERAL GRANT Cost Classification Use only for revisions Total Amount Required Latest Approved Amount Adjustment + or (-) 1. Administration expense $ $ $ 2. Preliminary expense 3. Land, structures, right-of-way 4. Architectural engineering basic fees 5. Other Architectural engineering fees 6. Project inspection fees 7. Land development 8. Relocation Expenses 9. Relocation payments to Individuals and Businesses 10. Demolition and removal 11. Construction and project improvement 12. Equipment 13. Miscellaneous 14. Total (Lines 1 through 13) 15. Estimated Income (if applicable) 16. Net Project Amount (Line 14 minus 15) 17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions 18. Add: Contingencies 19. Total Project Amt. (Excluding Rehabilitation Grants) 215,263 20. Federal Share requested of Line 19 204,500 21. Add Rehabilitation Grants Requested (100 Percent) 22. Total Federal grant requested (lines 20 & 21) 204,500 23. Grantee share 10,763 24. Other shares 25. Total Project (Limes 22, 23 & 24) $ $ $ 215,263 FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) rage 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADIMNISTRATION OMa No. 2120-0569 SECTION C - EXCLUSIONS Classification Ineligible for Participation 1 Excluded From Contingency Provision 2 a. $ $ b. C. d, e. f. 9. Totals $ $ SECTION D - PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING NON-FEDERAL SHARE 27. Grantee Share $ a. Securities b. Mortgages c. Appropriations B Applicant) d. Bonds e. Tax Levies f. Non Cash g. Other (Explain) 10,763 h. TOTAL - Grantee share 10,763 28. Other Shares a. State b. Other c. Total Other Shares 29. TOTAL $ 10,763 SECTION E - REMARKS PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Attach - See Instructions) FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 5 PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Suggested Format) nua No. 2120-0669 PROJECT: ALP Update AIRPORT: Key West International Airport 1. Objective: A key and important component of the airport planning process is the Airport Layout Drawing (ALD). This drawing documents existing airport conditions and identifies the Airport Sponsoes proposed modifications to the airport. It also serves as a project program document for use by local, state and federal agencies. The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Drawing Set is a collection of drawings as prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6B. 2. Benefits Anticipated: Current ALP was last revised on June 2003 and since then significant improvements have occurred in the airport, e.g. new terminal, RSA, t-hangars and hangars development. 3. Approach : (See approved Scope of Work in Final Application) Consultant's means and methods using standard construction practices. 4. Geographic Location: This project is going to take place at the Key West International Airport, located on 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard, Key West, Florida. 5. If Applicable, Provide Additional Information: N/A 6. Sponsor's Representative: (include address & telephone number) Peter J. Horton. 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, Florida 33040 Telephone # (305) 809-5200 FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 6 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB No. 2120-0569 11/3012007 PART 11 PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION SECTION A Item 1. Does this assistance request require State, local, regional, Name of Governing Body: or other priority rating? Priority: ❑ Yes LN No Item 2. Does this assistance request require State, or local Name of Agency or Board: advisory, educational or health clearances? (Attach Documentation) ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 3. Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review (Attach Comments) in accordance with OMB Circular A-95? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 4. Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Approving Agency: regional or other planning approval? Date: / ! ❑� Yes ❑X No Item 5. Check one: State Is the proposal project covered by an approved Local comprehensive plan? Regional e9 ❑ Yes ❑X No Location of Plan: Item 6. Name of Federal Installation: Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Federal Population benefiting from Pro1ect:installation? ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 7. Name of Federal Installation: Will the assistance requested be on Federal land or installation? Location of Federal Land: ❑ Yes ❑X No Percent of Project: Item 8. Will the assistance requested have an impact or effect on See instruction for additional information to be the environment? provided ❑ Yes ❑X No Item 9. Number of: Will the assistance requested cause the displacement of Individuals: Families: individuals, families, businesses, or farms? ❑ Yes ❑X NO Businesses: Farms: Item 10. See instructions for additional information to be Is there other related Federal assistance on this provided. project previous, pending, or anticipated? Yes 0 No FAA Form 5100-100 (6-73) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-1 (9-03) Page 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB NO.2120-0569 PART II - SECTION C The Sponsor hereby represents and certifies as follows: 1. Compatible Land Use. - The Sponsor has taken the following actions to assure compatible usage of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport: 2. Defaults. - The Sponsor is not in default on any obligation to the United States or any agency of the United States Government relative to the development, operation, or maintenance of any airport, except as stated herewith: 3. Possible Disabilities. - There are no facts or circumstances (including the existence of effective or proposed teases, use agreements or other legal instruments affecting use of the Airport or the existence of pending litigation or other legal proceedings) which in reasonable probability might make it impossible for the Sponsor to carry out and complete the Project or cant' out the provisions of Part V of this Application, either by limiting its legal or financial ability or otherwise, except as follows: 4. Consistency with Local Plans. — The project is reasonably consistent with plans existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport. 5. Consideration of Local Interest - It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located. 6. Consultation with Users. In making a decision to undertake any airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport which project is proposed. 7. Public Hearings. — In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary. Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project. 8. Air and Water Quality Standards. — In projects involving airport location, a major runway extension, or runway location it will provide for the Governor of the state in which the project is located to certify in writing to the Secretary that the project will be located, designed, constructed, and operated so as to comply with applicable and air and water quality standards. In any case where such standards have not been approved and where applicable air and water quality standards have been promulgated by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, certification shall be obtained from such Administrator. Notice of certification or refusal to certify shall be provided within sixty days after the project application has been received by the Secretary. FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) page 3a U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION PART If - SECTION C (Continued) OMB No. 2120-0569 9. Exclusive Rights — There is no grant of an exclusive right for the conduct of any aeronautical activity at any airport owned or controlled by the Sponsor except as follows: 10. Land. — (a) The sponsor holds the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport subject to the following exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A": The Sponsor further certifies that the above is based on a title examination by a qualified attorney or title company and that such attorney or title company has determined that the Sponsor holds the above property interests. (b) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, but in any event prior to the start of any construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* on which such construction work is to be performed, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A": (c) The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, and if feasible prior to the completion of all construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport as it will be upon completion of the Project, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit "A" *State character of property interest in each area and list and identify for each all exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests of every kind and nature, including liens, easements, leases, etc. The separate areas of land need only be identified here by the area numbers shown on the property map. FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100(4-76) Page 3b U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB NO. 2120-0569 PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION - CONSTRUCTION SECTION A - GENERAL 1. Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No ................................. 20-106 2. Functional or Other Breakout... ............. -- .................. ............. SECTION B -CALCULATION OF FEDERAL GRANT Cost Classification Use only for revisions Total Amount Required Latest Approved Amount Adjustment + or (-) 1. Administration expense $ $ $ 2. Preliminary expense 3. Land, structures, right-of-way 4. Architectural engineering basic fees 5. Other Architectural engineering fees 6. Project inspection fees 7. Land development 8. Relocation Expenses 9. Relocation payments to Individuals and Businesses 10. Demolition and removal 11. Construction and project improvement 12_ Equipment 13. Miscellaneous 14. Total (Lines 1 through 13) 15. Estimated Income (if applicable) 16. Net Project Amount (Line 14 minus 15) 17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions 18. Add_ Contingencies 19. Total Project Amt. (Excluding Rehabilitation Grants) 433,678 20. Federal Share requested of Line 19 411,994 21, Add Rehabilitation Grants Requested (100 Percent) 22, Total Federal grant requested (lines 20 & 21) 411,994 23. Grantee share 21,684 24. Other shares 25. Total Project (Lines 22, 23 & 24) $ $ $ 433,678 rAH corm 51uu-mv (v-uj) z�,urtrc5tut5 i-AA ruHm !)wu-1uu (ti-/3) Page 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL. AVIATION ADMINISTRATION owt Nn_ 212n_05A9 SECTION C - EXCLUSIONS Classification Ineligible for Participation 1 Excluded From Contingency Provision 2 a. $ $ b. C. d. e. f. 9. Totals $ $ SECTION D - PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING NON-FEDERAL SHARE 27. Grantee Share $ a. Securities b. Mortgages c. Appropriations 8 Applicant) d. Bonds e. Tax Levies f. Non Cash g. Other (Explain) 21,684 h. TOTAL - Grantee share 21,684 28. Other Shares a. State b. Other c. Total Other Shares 29. TOTAL $ 21,684 SECTION E - REMARKS PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Attach - See Instructions) FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 5 PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Suggested Format) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ouR No. 2120-0569 PROJECT: PART 150 Noise Update AIRPORT: Key West International Airport 1. Objective: Monroe County Ad -Hoc Committee on Airport Noise feels that is time to update Part 150 Study, which will include both the Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Program, technology has changed and new noise abatement strategies and measures should be investigated. 2. Benefits Anticipated: Several changes in the aircraft operations at EYW have occurred since the NEMs were accepted in 2008, including the introduction of passenger jet service by several air carriers. The updated NEMs prepared under this Scope of Services will reflect the currently existing condition, as well as a future forecast condition. 3. Approach : (See approved Scope of Work in Final Application) Consultant's means and methods using standard construction practices. 4. Geographic Location: This project is going to take place at the Key West International Airport, located on 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard, Key West, Florida. 5. If Applicable, Provide Additional Information: N/A 6. Sponsor's Representative: (include address & telephone number) Peter J. Horton. 3491 South Roosevelt Boulevard Key West, Florida 33040 Telephone # (305) 809-5200 FAA Form 5100-100 (9-03) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-100 (6-73) Page 6 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN UPDATE AND ALP NARRATIVE REPORT Key West International Airport INTRODUCTION A key and important component of the airport planning process is the Airport Layout Drawing (ALD). This drawing documents existing airport conditions and identifies the Airport Sponsor's proposed modifications to the airport. It also serves as a project program document for use by local, state and federal agencies. To be considered for federal and sometime state funding assistance, projects must be depicted on the ALD. The ALD receives acceptance/approval at the conclusion of the local, state, and federal review process. The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Drawing Set is a collection of drawings as prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 15015070-6B, Airport Master Plans, dated July 29, 2005. The FAA requires that a Narrative Report accompany the submittal of the ALP set of plans. The ALP Narrative Report as defined by the FAA, must address 1) basic aeronautical forecasts 2) proposed items for development, 3) unusual design features and/or proposed modifications to FAA design standards, and 4) 20-year Capital Improvement Program prepared for three stages (0-5 year, 6-10 year, 11-20 year). The AC also identifies items in the FAA's ALP checklist, which lend themselves to be included in the ALP Narrative Report document, that include: an FAA review checklist, both on -airport and off -airport land use plans, and a discussion of airspace issues that includes obstacles and obstructions in the surrounding area. The following is a scope of services for updating the Key West International Airport (KWIA) ALP Drawing Set of drawings and ALP Narrative Report. Task 1.0 MOBILIZATION Task 1.1 KICK-OFF MEETING Upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the Airport Director (client Monroe County Board of County Commissioners- BOCC), URS Corporation Southern (the Consultant) will begin work on the ALP Drawing Set update for KWIA. The first step in the process will consist of a "kick-off" meeting with the Consultant working closely with Airport Management to: Ensure that key planning issues have been identified. F1keywest\FAA PROJECT APPLICATION14411 PROJECT APPIJCATIONWdWonal O$cumentsNKMA ALP SOS 2011 REVt.dod618=11Key West International Airport ALP Update Scope of Services Update and finalize the project goals, objectives, and planning study tasks identified for consideration. • Collect and review the current KWIA Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and potential line item development projects. • Review Consultants' airport planning inventory checklist and the FAA ALP Drawing Set checklist with Airport Management. Identify all available and the location of reference material from the County to complete this assignment. 0 Establish a review process and schedule to interface between the Consultant and Airport Management to discuss technical issues. Task 2.0 UPDATE EXISTING CONDITIONS Task 2.1 UPDATE ALP BASE MAP INFORMATION This Task serves to update the existing base sheet mapping/drawings currently in use. Collect "as builts" and verify relevant items with the Airport. Examples of the various updated elements of the ALP base map would include: Airfield pavements that have been added or removed, Airfield pavements that have been strengthen or overlaid, • Runway Safety Areas that have been modified or those that have Modification to Design Standards, Terrain features; salt ponds, Passenger terminal building and parking structure, • Stormwater drainage features, • Buildings/hangars/other on -airport structures, • Roads and surface parking lots, • Property lines, lease lines/easements, and • Surrounding land uses, new land use developments, and other physical changes in the vicinity of KWIA. Task 2.2 NEW AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY This Task involves the generation of a new color ortho-rectified aerial photograph of the entire airport and adjacent airport property through the use of commercial aerial photography techniques. This will be used to update the base mapping and verify existing conditions both on and off the airport. The digital aerial photograph will be used as a base for the ALP approach plan view sheets. In addition, the digital aerial photography will be used in the ALP Narrative Report and for County and staff presentations and all other FAkeywesAFAA PROJECT APPLICATKW4411 PROJECT APPLICATIOMAddidonal LaCumentSUKWIA ALP SOS 2011 REV1.doa'W2011 Key test International Airport ALP Update Scope of Services ancillary planning efforts. Color aerial photographs will be made available to the County for their use and display. Task 2.3 COMPLETED AND ONGOING PROJECTS AND STUDIES Collect documentation of completed airport development projects completed by others, or any other relevant follow-on airport development studies. (Consultant will prepare a list of information in -hand), Review status and collect information of ongoing capital improvement projects that are proposed, planned, designed or under construction, and Inventory and determine status and means of incorporation into the ALP Drawing Set for completed, scheduled, designed, and approved projects. (Consultant will request electronic files from other contractors, as necessary, for incorporation into the plan). Task 2.4 AIRSPACE AND INSTRUMENT PROCEDURES Review existing navigable airspace for KWIA as prescribed by 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, §77.25, Civil Airport Imaginary Surfaces. Obtain known and charted obstruction data as compiled by sources that would include, but not limited to, the FAA's Digital Aeronautical, Information series as compiled by the National Aeronautical Charting Office and the Airport Obstruction Chart for the airport as surveyed and compiled by the National Ocean Service. Task 2.5 COMPLIANCE WITH AND MODIFICATIONS TO FAA STANDARDSIAIRPORT REFERENCE CODE Review status of existing modifications to FAA Design Standards. Collect FAA compliance issue (correspondence) information from County. (Consultant has some of this information on file) Verify current and future Airport Reference Code (ARC) and the "Critical Design Aircraft". Discuss and verify the airfield movement area as it relates to the critical aircraft for airport planning and airfield design purposes. Task 3.0 AERONAUTICAL FORECASTS Task 3.1 UPDATE ACTIVITY FORECASTS The KWIA aviation activity forecast review and/or update will be developed using data and information derived from KWIA activity records, the FAA Aerospace Forecasts Fiscal Years 2011-2031, and FAA 2010 Terminal Area Forecast. The preferred forecast "Base Year" will represent the 2010 12-month calendar year. The forecast will cover a 20-year period and delineated by three time periods (0-5, 6-10 and 11-20 years). The Aviation Activity Forecast will cover: 1) Annual operations - Project total annual operations for each of the three forecast F:\keywestWAAPFZOJECTAPPUCATIONN4411 PROJECT APPLICATIONWd6bonal C®asneritslKWiA ALP SOS 2011 REV1.doc(6/W011 Key West International Airport ALP Update Scope of Services periods; 2) Annual itinerant operation- Update aircraft mix for purposes of terminal and air cargo apron utilization and configuration. Where appropriate, estimates of future aircraft fleet mixes that may utilize KWIA will be discussed; 3) Based aircraft - Update forecasts of based aircraft for use in planning general aviation transient apron needs and hangar site requirements; 4) Enplaned Passengers- Update enplaned passenger activity; and 5) Enplaned Air Cargo- Update enplaned air cargo activity. Task 3.2 FORECAST SUMMARY A comparison of the KWIA "Preferred" Aviation Activity Forecast to that of the FAA Aerospace Forecasts 2011-2031, 2010 FAA Terminal Area Forecast will be prepared. Where applicable, average annualized growth rates will be developed using FAA fiscal year data; Comparisons and summaries of the KWIA "Preferred" Aviation Activity Forecast to that of the FAA 2010 TAF for KWIA will be presented using the FAA's Comparing Airport Planning and TAF Forecasts and Summarizing and Documenting Airport Planning Forecasts template format; and Prepare Aeronautical Forecast Summary Paper for County's submittal to the FAA Airports District Office (ADO) and possibly (if required by ADO) Southern Region for review and approval. Task 4.0 NEW PLANNING Task 4.1 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING TASKS At the kick-off meeting (Task 1.1), clarification of the level of planning effort for selected development opportunities will be defined following discussions with Airport Management. Review the KWIA Airport Master Plan (2003) facility requirements program and discuss with Airport Management the various anticipated aviation -related facility requirements (i.e., terminal requirements, air cargo operational requirements, airport support facilities, FBOs, and sizes and locations of corporate hangars). As part of the development of a Preliminary Facility Requirements program, the Consultant will review and analyze airport development opportunities for the following: Airfield Geometric/NAVAID plan - Prepare exhibit(s) that depict all FAA standard dimensional criteria (RSA's, OFA's, RPZ's, BRL's, etc.) as prescribed by AC 150/5300-13, Airport Design, (Changes 1-16 inclusive); Terminal site plan modifications/expansion (see Task 4.2); C Akeyweat\FAA PROJECT APPLICATIONX4411 PROJECT APPLICATION1Addftlonal D$anantsUKW IA ALP SOS tau REV? AOC161872a11 Key West International Airport ALP Update Scope of Services • Ground transportation site plans (access roads, taxi, limo, bus, etc.); • Airport access (entrance road); Public parking (parking structure; remote public parking); • Rental car (ready, return, maintenance, storage); Potential air cargo site development or enhancement; • T-hangar/Corporate hangar site opportunities; • FBO site enhancements expansion opportunities; • Terminal support facility planning (GSE, ramp equipment staging areas); • Airport support facility planning (airport maintenance/fuel farm, etc.); • Future non -aviation site development opportunities (if any); • Stormwater/drainage system and retention/detention pond areas; and • Buffered zones/salt ponds/environmental preserves/green space planned areas. Task 4.2 TERMINAL AREA PLAN Task 4.2.1 Terminal Data Compile old and new ("as -built") terminal buildings and terminal site related information, i.e., building plans, floor plans (first and second level terminal floor plan layouts), utility plans, etc. Prepare existing 2011 conditions terminal area site layout. Task 4.2.2 Terminal Requirements Review with the Airport Management the proposed Facility Requirements Program and Terminal Area Plan that was documented in the 2003 KWIA Master Plan Report. Items from that report to be reviewed and verified include: • Terminal floor space requirements (public, leased space, administrative/operations); • Public, employee, and rental car parking lot requirements; • Apron utilization requirements (airplane design groups); • Security requirements; and • Access and curbside requirements. F44eywestkFAA PROJECT APPLICATION!4411 PROJECT APPLICATIONWdditional trcim ntsY(WIA ALP SOS 2011REV1.doJ8/812011 Key West intemationai Airport ALP Update Scope of Services Also, the fleet mix has changed as a result of the 737 aircraft equipment that now serves KWIA. The air carrier apron requirements/parking positions need to review and updated. The purpose of this review is to arrive at a consensus as to what requirements are valid and what new facilities need to be considered. Task 4.2.3 Terminal Site Plan Based on discussions with Airport Management on a preliminary requirements program, the Consultant will prepare an updated terminal area site plan that includes the following: • Terminal Building, • Public and employee parking, • Rental car parking lots, • Ground Transportation (taxi, limo, bus), • Terminal curbside, service/delivery access, entrance road, • Long-range terminal building expansion, • Revise terminal apron utilization layout (includes 737's), and • Remote aircraft parking/transient positions. The Consultant will present the site plans to Airport Management. Please note, the air carrier apron utilization and configuration could change as a result of the new Key West air service using 737 aircraft equipment. Based on direction from Airport Management, the Consultant will revise the terminal area site plan. The plan shall be drawn at 1" = 50' scale and will show all critical dimensions. Task 4.3 SUMMARIZE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Prepare Working Papers/Progress Reports with color graphics that summarize the conceptual planning accomplished under Task 4.1 and 4.2. Color graphic presentation boards will also be prepared for use by County. Task 4.4 MEET WITH AIRPORT MANAGEMENT TO REVIEW PLANNING OPTIONS The Consultant will meet with Airport Management to present and discuss development and planning topics and their respective options developed for the items listed in Task 4.1. Task 4.5 RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVES The Consultant will refine development options/alternatives based on the result of the presentation and F�*eywesAFAA PROJFCT APPt_ICATIOM4411 PROJECT APPLICATIONMdManal trqcumentsV(WIA ALP SOS 2011REVI doct&wo11 Key/ West International Airport ALP Update Scope of Services discussion with Airport Management, Task 4.6 MEET WITH AIRPORT MANAGEMENT ON PREFERRED PLAN The Consultant will present the preferred site plan as developed for final inclusion in the ALP update. Task 5.0 UPDATE ALP DRAWING SET Task 5.1 ALP DRAWING SET This Task involves the preparation of the drawings that make up the ALP Drawing Set that provides a graphic representation of the long-term development plan for an airport. The primary drawing in this set is the ALD. The ALD depicts existing airport facilities and proposed developments as determined from the review of the aviation activity forecasts, facility requirements, and alternatives analysis. The ALP Drawing Set will be developed to serve as a set of technical planning drawings that (by their nature) are not intended to provide design engineering accuracy. Individual items such as runway coordinates, obstruction survey data, and application of airport design standards, however, will comply with current FAA design standards and reporting requirements. The Consultant will work closely with the County, and the FAA Airports District Office, to define any new requirements, standards, and criteria to be employed. Drawings that are included in the ALP drawing set are described below and those that are required as minimum ALP drawings are identified as such: ALP Drawing Set Cover Sheet — A separate cover sheet, airport location and vicinity maps, and other pertinent information as required by the FAA AC 150/5070-613, Airport Master Plans, has been developed. Airport Layout Drawing — A drawing depicting the existing and future airport facilities will be updated. The ALD includes required facility identifications, future airport development, description labels, imaginary surfaces, Runway Protection Zones, Runway Safety Areas and airport and runway data tables. Airport Airspace Drawing — A single large-scale plan view drawing will be developed depicting Civil Airport Imaginary Surfaces as prescribed by 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. The update of the drawing will depict known (surveyed and/or charted) objects and denote each within each of the various obstacle identification surfaces for the full extent of all airport development. The update of the drawing will also depict airspace obstructions for the portions of the surfaces excluded from the Inner Portion of the Approach Surface 40:1 Departure Surface drawing and 62.5:1 One -Engine Inoperative Obstacle Identification Surface drawings. Inner Approach Surface Drawing R/W 9127— A set of drawings containing the plan and profile view of the inner portion of the approach surface to each runway has been developed. A listing of key surface penetrations in tabular format will be added to the drawing. The drawings will depict the obstacle identification approach surfaces contained in 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. F:tkeywes1TAA PROJECT APPUCATIONWII PROJECT APPuCATIONtAddWona1 D7cumantsWWIA ALP SOS 2611REV1.doc/6/8/2011 Key West International Airport ALP Update Scope of Services 40:1 Departure Surfaces Drawing — This drawing will be derived from existing available data and information and produced at a horizontal scale of 1"=1,000' and a vertical scale of 1" =100'. The 40:1 Departure Surface plan and profile will depict ground profile along the extended runway centerline out to a distance of 10,200 feet from the end of the existing or future end of the runway. 62.5:1 One -Engine Inoperative Obstacle Identification Surface Drawings — These drawings will be derived from existing available data and information and produced at a horizontal scale of 1"=2,000' and a vertical scale of 1" =100'. The 62.5:1 Obstacle Identification Surface plan and profile will depict ground profile along the extended runway centerline out to a distance of 50,200 feet from the end of the existing or future end of the runway. Terminal Area Drawing — This drawing may consist of several drawings that present a large-scale depiction of areas with significant airport facility development will be updated. Specific to KWIA, these drawings will reflect proposed airport development plans for the terminal area, air cargo area, northeast aviation -related building area, and northwest aviation -related building area. Land Use Drawing — A drawing depicting the land uses within the airport property boundary will be updated. Airport Property Map (Existing and Ultimate) — This drawing, which depicts the airport property boundary, the various tracts of land that were acquired to develop the airport, and the method of acquisition, will be updated. If any obligations were incurred as a result of obtaining property or an interest therein, they will be noted. Obligations that stem from federal grant or an FAA -administered land transfer program, such as surplus property programs, will also be noted. Incorporate completed, ongoing, designed, and approved capital improvements and developments into the current ten sheet KWIA ALP set listed as follows: Sheet No. Title Cover Sheet 1 of 10 Airport Layout Drawing 2 of 10 Airport Airspace Plan 3 of 10 Inner Approach Surface Plan and Profile R/W 9 4 of 10 Inner Approach Surface Plan and Profile R/\N 27 5 of 10 40:1 Departure Surfaces for Runway 9/27 6 of 10 62.5:1 One -Engine Inoperative Obstacle Identification Surface for Runway 9 7 of 10 62.5:1 One -Engine Inoperative Obstacle Identification Surface for Runway 27 8 of 10 Terminal Area Plan 9 of 10 Land Use Plan 10 of 10 Airport Property Map (Existing and Ultimate) Task 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Task 6.1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The Consultant will review and revise the Short -Term (0- to 5-year) and Near -Term (6- to 10-year) Capital Improvement Program (CiP). Task 6.2 COST ESTIMATES AND FUNDING SOURCES The Consultant will prepare brief project descriptions and develop construction and project cost estimates. The Consultant will identify potential FAA funding sources for the 10-year recommended CIP. FAkeywestWAA PROJECT APPLtCAMM4411 PROJECT APPLICATIOMAd6tional [Wurnents\KWIA ALP SOS 2011REV1.doc/M/201 iKe,y West ainfemationaf Airport ALP Update Scope of Services Task 7.0 NARRATIVE REPORT Task 7.1 PREPARE ALP NARRATIVE REPORT In reference to FAA guidelines for updating an ALP Drawing Set, the Consultant will prepare an ALP Narrative Report to explain and document any new or updated planned airport development as depicted in the ALD and supporting drawings. The narrative report will also include a forecast update and document the updated existing airport condition which includes building area plans and terminal floor plan diagrams of both the old and new Terminal buildings. In addition, the 10 year capital improvement program will be prepared and presented in 0-5 and 6-10 year planning periods. The primary purpose of the narrative report is to provide useful and understandable information and guidance to the airport sponsor. It also provides the FAA with important information needed to review and ultimately approve the ALD. The ALP Narrative Report will, at a minimum, contain the following elements: • Update existing conditions, • Update aeronautical forecasts, • Identify and discuss airside/landside proposed items of development, • Rationale for unusual design features and/or modifications to FAA Airport Design Standards, • Define the various stages of airport development and layout sketches of the major items of development in each stage, and • Prepare construction/project cost estimates. Task 8.0 FINAL ALP DRAWING SET AND NARRATIVE REPORT Task 8.1 MEET WITH AIRPORT MANAGEMENT AND BOCC TO PRESENT FINAL DRAFT PLAN The Consultant will meet with Airport Management and BOCC to present the draft ALP Drawing Set update and draft Narrative Report. Task 8.2 PREPARATION OF FINAL ALP DRAOING SET AND NARRATIVE REPORT The Consultant will incorporate Airport Management and BOCC comments into the final ALP Drawing Set and ALP Narrative Report update. Task 8.3 AGENCY/CLIENT COORDINATION This task involves agency (FAA Airports District Office and FDOT) and client coordination of the project. Obtain and append to the report evidence that the ALP was coordinated with appropriate local and state F:VkaywestTAA PROJECT APPLICAMm4o i PROJECT nPPUCATIOMA"ftnaiigcumenrsuKww ALP sos zo v REv1.eocremrzoi 1 Key West lntemational Airport ALP Update Scope of Services governmental units (as identified by the County) and found to be consistent with their plans. Task 8.4 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION This is an ongoing task from the project's start to end date to provide project administration including monthly invoicing with required County back-up/progress reports. DELIVERABLES Aeronautical Forecast Summary Paper- 2 copies; submit one copy to FAA for approval, Draft Narrative ALP report- 6 copies, Final Narrative ALP report- 12 copies, Final Narrative ALP report- 1 CD, Draft ALP set -9 sets (client, FAA and FDOT review copies), Final ALP set-12 sets, FAkeywaOFAA PROJECT APPLICADOtd1AII PROJFCTAPPLICATIMAddit+cnal 40umen %KWIA ALP SOS 2011REV1.dort81W2011Key West International Airport ALP Update Scope of Services MONTGOMERY PLANNING I ENVIRONMENTAL I ENGINEERING: TRANSPORTATION I AVIATION I INFRASTRUCTURE June 17, 2011 Mr. Peter Horton, Director of Airports County of Monroe, Florida Key West International Airport 3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd. Key West, Florida 33040 Sent via email Reference: Independent Fee Estimate Key West International Airport Airport Layout Plan Update and ALP Narrative Report Dear Mr. Horton: We have performed an independent fee estimate for professional services associated with the above referenced project. The independent estimate is based on the scope of work narrative and the pro - forma fee proposal format using the established hourly rates provided by your consultant (URS Corp.) We have attached a breakdown of the labor -hour estimates and expenses including deliverables, travel and other out-of-pocket expenses for your review. Based on the attached, the Independent Fee Estimate for professional services fees for the Airport Layout Plan Update and Narrative Report is $193,691. Our analysis provides one approach to completing the scope of work for the project. We would recommend that you not compare fees for each subtask but compare the overall fee calculated for the project. Should our independent estimate be substantially different from your consultants (greater or lesser than 10%), we will need to ascertain additional details of the project. We have assumed new aerial photogrammetry acquired for this project will not be required to meet the specifications and standards in the FAA Advisory Circulars 150/5300-16A, -17B, and -18B, and the ALP update will not provide Airport Geographic Information System (AGIS) deliverables; however, you and your consultant may want to verify with the FAA -ADO office if this is acceptable. Meeting these new FAA Advisory Circular requirements would substantially increase the cost of this project. Please feel free to contact me at (407) 539-7030, extension 15 at your convenience to discuss this independent estimate. We have enjoyed this opportunity to provide services to Monroe County. Yours very truly, r Monty Gettys President 341 N. Maittand Ave. I Suite 340 1 Maittand, FL l tet 407 539 7030 1 fax 407 539 7035 1 vAAAv.mcgi-us.com g g g e m rQA1 _ ttpp �yNy N N M K Q -m W OQ W W ptl N N bt � St c o p o 8 g g 8 N e pN N d d W fNy IP M d ^1 d N d N� d� W V pgpgpq� N N 8 O� p p N N N N Y `e s Q a 0 o o OK C E< q e e A r 0 0 c O N O g O 6 p` yq O n Q N N nry N lb O O Gp N by n N N {Npp ,m '' _ o[ N S I F. � qoq o g N G N N Co a0 ap N pN H N T g4 LIE N Cu y� iTil 1-H o 0 1 8 ° _ c a 2 n 8 a a 3 0 O a 0 a .. m e m g g g o m r z a a LL A r2 �~ y ? 5 2 01 c c m Ecr m a a � a � � � a $ � e q � a i z � tl � b E € ' e Z � .a-� � � .a..r �• c � � c t aXe a a oco ASr�� tire. 17sz'3 aavagu o`oo�$`mP ba Baas"m3 gz nd$�g eau°O$`o3 � a F E y.ggi a9aa.z= N y N vi vl ✓� N ✓� Jv v: v: F b �p N P P � 0 o u OC P aa0 P k k k% !aa Wa a8gaa$# aaaa@a a ) a§aaq @8%maa m 5=5&5 }§\E\\ § \ ol � \ - ~ ` ] 4 $ t± 7�§ / »\7\{ �kkT \ /;/¥a a°&«t$ \a §)(Z �}\�\\ f =J \ ! KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT KEY WEST, FLORIDA TITLE 14 CFR PART 150 STUDY UPDATE URS CORPORATION SCOPE OF SERVICES 30-May-2011 KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TITLE 14 CFR PART 150 STUDY UPDATE SCOPE OF SERVICES INTRODUCTION The last title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) for Key West International Airport (EYW) was approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 7-May-1999. Updated Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) were accepted by the FAA on 27-August-2008. Several changes in the aircraft operations at EYW have occurred since the NEMs were accepted in 2008, including the introduction of passenger jet service by several air carriers. The updated NEMs prepared under this Scope of Services will reflect the currently existing condition, as well as a future forecast condition. After the NEMs have been completed and submitted to FAA for review and acceptance, a decision will be made regarding the necessity to update the NCP. This Scope of Services outlines the tasks to be completed by URS Corporation and its subcontractors, hereafter referred to as "Consultant" to assist Monroe County in the preparation of updated NEMs, and potentially an updated NCP, for EYW. The updated NEMs and, if necessary, the NCP will be prepared in accordance with the requirements and guidance outlined in title 14 CFR part 150. PHASE 1 - NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS TASK 1 MOBILIZATION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT Task 1.1 Mobilization This task involves the mobilization, coordination, and management of the non -technical aspects of Phase 1 of the project. This would include a Kick -Off meeting in Key West to discuss the study goals, objectives, and protocols. This task includes one two-day/one-night trip to Key West by up to three Consultant staff (Project Manager, Deputy PM, Sr. Noise Consultant). Task 1.2 Project Management Throughout the duration of the project, the Consultants' Project Manager will be coordinating as necessary with EYW staff and others to ensure that the project and schedule are progressing as planned. This on -going coordination will provide EYW staff with a consistent, single point -of -contact throughout the duration of the project. Progress Reports will be prepared monthly and provided to EYW staff, with copies to the FAA. This task will include any coordination meetings required outside the scope of the meetings associated with the Ad -Hoc M Page 1 of 26 Committee on Noise, which are described in Task 7.2, not to exceed two two-day / one-night trips to Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager. TASK 2 LAND USE MAPPING The Consultant has been working at EYW since completing the Part 150 Study in 1999. As part of the requirements of the 1999 Part 150 Study, the Consultant has performed a Noise Contour Update annually. A detailed Geographical Information System (GIS) database of land use, population and housing data was developed during the previous Part 150 Study. To maintain consistency between the impacts associated with the 1999 Part 150 Study and the annual Noise Contour Update, the GIS database has not been revised to reflect current conditions. Therefore, it is appropriate to update the GIS database for this study, to ensure that compatible and noncompatible land uses in the study area are accurately identified. Any future Noise Contour Updates will utilize the updated GIS database prepared in this task. Task 2.1 Update Land Use, Zoning, Population, and Housing Data Updates to local comprehensive plans; existing and future land use maps; zoning maps and regulations; land development regulations; and other existing land use plans, transportation plans, approved subdivision plats, and other approved development plans will be obtained from the City of Key West and Monroe County. These documents, as well as the Airport Layout Plan (ALP), and Airport Master Plan, will be reviewed to determine any existing and potential future conflicts between the airport and the surrounding communities. If needed, meetings will be scheduled with appropriate local agencies to collect, review, and/or discuss the aforementioned documents. Current digital information (e.g., graphic and statistical databases, land use and land cover data, Digital Line Graphs, U.S. Census TIGER/line files, and U.S. Census P.L. 94-171 population data) will be assembled to update the existing GIS. Updated parcel data will be obtained from the Monroe County Property Appraiser's office to determine tax assessed property values and ownership. EYW will facilitate obtaining the necessary information from the City of Key West and Monroe County. Field review will be accomplished in order to verify changes, if any, to noise -sensitive areas, specific noise sensitive sites, and verify and obtain additional detail regarding current land uses in and around the airport property. The field review will be accomplished during trips to Key West that are scheduled for the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings in Task 7.2. Task 2.2 Update GIS Databases and Mapping The extensive existing digital GIS developed for the 1999 Part 150 Study will be updated and utilized for base mapping and to delineate current land use, jurisdictions, zoning, population, housing, noise sensitive sites, airport related easements, and airport facilities/property. The GIS will be used to estimate noise exposure within the noise contours developed for this study. Page 2 of 26 Copies of the GIS databases will also be provided to EYW and the FAA in digital format upon completion of the project. Task 2.3 Web -Based GIS Mapping The Consultant will make the Part 150 Study mapping electronically accessible to EYW and the public via a web -based application. A link to the mapping will be available on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site. The Consultant will utilize ESRI ArcServer software to develop the web -based mapping. The Consultant will host the web site on a commercially available external server. This Scope of Services includes the cost of hosting the web site for a period of three years from the date of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) for these services. The mapping portion of the web site will provide a variety of layers that can be turned on and off by the user, including, but not limited to: DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours, Noise Insulation Program (NIP) boundaries, RPZs for all runways, existing land use, and property over which Monroe County holds an Avigation Easement as a result of the NIP. Search functions will be provided that allow the user to search by specific address, street name, and parcels within specified noise contours. Standard web -based functions will be provided including, but not limited to: zoom in, zoom out, previous extent, select, pan, and print. Task 2.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review Detail Checking is a verifying procedure whereby all information of a deliverable is verified for correctness, completeness and technical accuracy by a Senior Professional who is part of the project team as assigned by the Project Manager. Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results. Task 2.5 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on land use, jurisdictions, zoning, population, and housing will be prepared in the form of Section 2, Jurisdictions and Land Use in the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation. (Note: Section 1 will be the Introduction to the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation.) Section 1 and 2 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdfo version and a MS WORDOversionon each. TASK 3 INVENTORY OF AIRPORT AND AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS This task consists of collecting data, issuing and collecting questionnaires, and analyzing all information ultimately obtained. M Page 3 of 26 Task 3.1 Update Aircraft Operations Data The Consultant has produced multiple annual Noise Contour Updates at EYW, therefore this task will commence with a review and validation of the data used for the most recent Noise Contour Update. This review will allow the Consultant to determine what existing data may no longer be valid, and will assist the Consultant in determining which sources would provide the most accurate and verifiable data. Historical air traffic activity records will be collected, reviewed, verified, and updated with the latest available statistics. Commercial aviation data collection will include origin/destination information leading to determination of city pairs, route distances, estimated takeoff weights, actual and probable flight tracks, and any other information that will contribute to the Part 150 Study. This task includes one three-day/two-night trip to Key West by two Consultant staff (Deputy PM and Sr. Noise Consultant) to collect and update data. Data will include: Commercial aircraft operations for the following: • Passenger Air Carriers • Cargo Carriers • Air Taxi + Charters • Aircraft Fleet Mix General aviation activity including the following: • Itinerant vs. Local Operations • Number and Type of Based Aircraft • Aircraft Fleet Mix Military activity including the following: • Itinerant vs. Local Operations • Aircraft Fleet Mix Current data will be collected to aid in the determination of existing and future aircraft operational characteristics. The operational data will form the basis for development of the noise contours. Data to be collected and analyzed will include the following. - Fleet Mix • Number and Type of Operations • Origin/Destination • Radar Flight Tracks • Ground Run-up and Maintenance Activities • Airspace and Air Traffic • Day/Night Usage • Runway Usage • VFR and IFR Operations UM Page 4 of 26 Aviation related data will be obtained from various sources including: • Airport Traffic Control Tower • NAS Key West • EYW Passenger and Cargo Landing Fee Reports • EYW Passenger and Cargo Airline Schedules • FAA Air Traffic Activity Data System (A TADS) • FAA Terminal Area Forecast (TAF) • Florida Aviation System Plans (FASP) Forecast Task 3.2 Review Existing Aviation Plans and Studies Specifically, collection and review of the following information will occur: • National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) • FAA Terminal Area Forecasts (TAF) • Current Airport Layout Plan (ALP) • Current Airport Master Plan • Studies accomplished specifically for, or relevant to, the airport Task 3.3 Analyze Radar Data and Develop INM Flight Tracks In order to obtain accurate flight track and performance profile data for aircraft currently using EYW, radar data will be collected for periods of time which are representative of various operational configurations (east flow/west flow) of the airport. This radar data must be obtained from NAS Key West, and must be coordinated through appropriate chains of command. Flight track data will be obtained to extract appropriate information on time, velocities, flight tracks, altitude profiles, aircraft type and airline. NAS Key West has a Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS). STARS receives radar data and flight plan information and presents the information to air traffic controllers allowing the controller to monitor, control, and accept hand-off of air traffic. The STARS system should be capable of providing 45 days of archived data. However, the Consultant will attempt to obtain additional data to capture both east and west flow at maximum activity levels. The length of available data will determine the effort required to process this data. The Radar Data Processing Software Developer and Radar Data Processing Specialist will review and evaluate the data in its native format. The Radar Data Processing Software Developer, with input from the Radar Data Processing Specialist, will then write a computer program to translate the radar data from its native format into a format that can be imported to the GIS. The Radar Data Processing Specialist will review the data to determine parameters by which the data can be screened to remove data that is not relevant to EYW. The Radar Data Processing Software Developer will then write additional computer code to remove the data that is not relevant to EYW. Analysis will include comparison of radar tracks to INM flight tracks developed previously for the 2008 NEM Update. Costs associated with this activity are based on obtaining 45 days of radar data. «RS Page 5 of 26 This information will be used to update flight track utilization records for the INM noise modeling analysis. Furthermore, nominal and dispersed flight tracks along with representative flight profiles will be updated for input into INM using actual radar data. This provides for a highly accurate representation of the existing conditions at EYW during the noise modeling process. Task 3.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results. Task 3.5 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on existing and future airport and aircraft operations will be prepared in the form of Section 3, Airport and Aircraft Activity in the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation. Section 3 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf" version and a MS WORD® version on each. TASK 4 EXISTING NOISE CONTOURS Task 4.1 Develop Existing Noise Contours Airport and aircraft operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. This information will be formatted for input into the most current version of FAA's Integrated Noise Model (INM) available at the start of modeling, currently INM 7.0b. INM default database aircraft and departure and approach profiles will be used to model existing aircraft operations at EYW. If FAA releases a new version of INM during the development of the NEMs, they may require that the study be updated to use the latest version of INM. If this occurs, required revisions to the study will be addressed in a supplemental agreement. If the radar data analysis determines that EYW regularly uses non-standard approach and/or departure procedures, the FAA, the Airport, and the Consultant will decide if the INM profiles will need to be modified to accurately portray these profiles. If the FAA deems it necessary for the Consultant to customize INM flight profiles to represent actual conditions at EYW, the FAA's Airports District Office (ADO) Project Manager will initiate coordination with the FAA Regional Noise Program Manager and the FAA Office of Environment and Energy (AEE) Noise Division. This modification and FAA AEEs' approval for the use of modified flight profiles will be considered an Additional Service and is not covered under this Scope of Services or Fee Estimate. Aircraft engine run-up operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. This information will be formatted for input into the INM. INM default database engine run-up identifiers will be used to Page 6 of 26 model existing engine run-up operations at EYW. Noise contours representing the combination of flight and engine run-up operations will be generated at DNL 60, 65, 70, and 75 dB. The DNL 60 dB may be used to define preventive land use measures boundaries, but will not be used to quantify noise impacts. The INM standard grid analysis feature will be used to calculate DNL values at up to 20 noise -sensitive sites. Task 4.2 Evaluate Impacts of the Existing Condition Noise Contours The DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours which were developed in Task 4.1 will be incorporated into the GIS database in order to more accurately quantify noise exposure in terms of population, households, and land use. The DNL 60 dB contour may be used to define preventative land use measures and may be provided for informational purposes, but will not be used to quantify noise impacts, nor will it be used for remedial land use measures. Tables will be developed from the GIS to describe the noise exposure estimates for the Existing Condition. Graphics will be provided to illustrate the noise contours superimposed over the base mapping and land use. Noise compatibility will be determined by comparing the modeled DNL noise levels with existing land use and the FAA Land Use Compatibility Guidelines provided in Table 1 of Appendix A in title 14 CFR part 150. Task 4.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results. Task 4.4 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on existing condition noise contours will be prepared in the form of Section 4, Existing Conditions Noise Exposure in the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation. Section 4 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD* version on each. TASK 5 MEASUREMENT OF EXISTING NOISE LEVELS There are several residential areas that historically have been located just outside the DNL 65 dB noise contour. As a result, the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) recommendations from the 1999 Part 150 Study excluded these areas from the Noise Insulation Program (NIP) for EYW. The purpose of this task is to conduct monitoring in areas just outside the current NIP boundary where there have been a lot of inquiries regarding eligibility for the NIP. The results of the noise monitoring will assist in presenting the validity of the noise contours to any interested parties and r p Page 7 of 26 assist in determining if there are other factors affecting the propagation of aircraft noise not accounted for within the modeling parameters. Monroe County's Ad -Hoc Committee on Airport Noise specifically recommended that this task be included in the Part 150 Update. In the absence of empirical noise measurements, the general public tends to distrust the validity of noise contours developed using computer modeling. The general public is more likely to accept the validity of the noise contours if it can be demonstrated that they are accurate using noise measurements. The likelihood of acceptance increases with the length of time measurements are taken. Task 5.1 Noise Monitoring The Consultant will prepare for, and coordinate with, airport staff and property owners for setting up four noise monitors in the vicinity of the airport. A total of three (3) days will be required for the Consultant to set-up and confirm the working condition of the monitoring equipment. The first day will primarily be spent setting up one noise monitor at each of the four sites to measure the exterior noise conditions for a period of four weeks. Also on the first day, coordination will occur with each property owner representative concerning the procedures for overseeing the noise monitor. Two additional days will be spent in Key West recording details of aircraft and other human produced noise events. These details will include, when identifiable, noise source, type of activity, time of day, and measured noise levels. During the second and third day, noise events will be recorded at each site including aircraft operations and other background noises. Typical aircraft operations that are expected to create each unique noise event would include the following: • Arrivals to Runway 09 and/or Runway 27; • Departures from Runway 27 and/or Runway 09; • Reverse thrust from Runway 27 arrivals and/or Runway 09 arrivals; • Start of takeoff roll noise for Runway 09 departures and/or Runway 27 departures; and • Engine runups prior to Runway 09 and/or Runway 27 departures. This recorded information will aid in the identification of measured aircraft events during the month of unattended operation. Using a cell modem and datalogger, noise data will be remotely downloaded on a daily basis to monitor any system issues and to backup all measured data. The noise monitors will transfer data continuously to a datalogger computer. This data includes all measured noise data as well as system parameters such as battery voltage and system settings. At least once a day, the monitoring data will be downloaded from the datalogger to the servers, where the data can be accessed and downloaded through the Internet. Data will be monitored every few days by the Manager of Noise Monitoring to ensure the system is collecting data. Page 8 of 26 At the end of the four -week measurement period, the Consultant will shut down the noise monitors, takedown and pack the monitors, and arrange for return shipment. This task includes one four-day/four-night trip to Key West by three staff from Tampa (Deputy PM, Sr. Noise Consultant, Jr. Noise Consultant) and one five-day/five-night trip to Key West by the Manager of Noise Monitoring from Boston for initiation of the monitoring. At the end of the monitoring period the Consultant will make another trip to Key West from Tampa for removal of the monitoring system. They will ship the equipment back to Boston. The removal of the monitoring system will be accomplished during a trip to Key West that is scheduled for the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings in Task 7.2. Task 5.2 Measured Noise Impact Analysis At the end of the four -week measurement period, all measured DNL data will be evaluated by the Manager of Noise Monitoring and the Director of Noise Monitoring. Using the data collected and the event logging performed in Task 5.1, the Manager of Noise Monitoring will analyze total measured DNL levels and aircraft -only DNL noise levels. With the measured total and aircraft -only DNL noise data, the exterior acoustical conditions and measured DNL noise levels will be quantified at each site. The measured DNL will be compared to the modeled DNL contour levels to determine if there may be noise propagation characteristics not accounted for in the INM inputs and if the INM input data and INM default data accurately represent the characteristics of the acoustical conditions at EYW. Task 5.3 Modeled Noise Impact Analysis Noise measurement data collected over an extended period (e.g., one month) may be used to confirm INM modeling results or justify a reevaluation of the INM noise contours. There are multiple issues that warrant a review of the modeling results. Some of these issues are significant and some are minor, but even the minor ones may be important for an area located just outside the DNL 65 dB noise contour produced by INM. Several issues that may directly impact the residential areas where monitoring was conducted could result in producing measured results higher than the INM predicts. These include the following • Overwater sound propagation; • Behind takeoff roll directivity; • Business jet noise power distance curves; and • Business jet departure profiles. INM is based on over land sound propagation where the reflection of sound off the intervening terrain results in significant sound attenuation. That "lateral attenuation" is greatly reduced when sound propagates overwater as is partially the case with these areas. In addition, the directivity Page 9 of 26 behind the start of takeoff roll used in INM is based on the directivity patterns of air carrier jets. INM does not have specific directivity patterns of smaller business jets. Also, the noise power distance curves and procedural and point profiles in INM, while generally reasonable, may not reflect procedures used at EYW. All of these factors may cause INM to under predict the actual noise and will be used to support the validity of the measured noise data. If the noise monitoring comparison indicates one or all of these factor's may not be represented properly in the INM modeling, any modification to the INM default modeling characteristics will require the Airport Sponsor and the Consultant to request that the FAA ADO initiate the review and approval process with FAA AEE. If the analysis determines that default modeling characteristics do not accurately represent the characteristics at EYW, the FAA, the Airport, and the Consultant will decide if, and which, INM data will need to be modified to accurately portray these characteristics. If the FAA deems it necessary for the Consultant to customize INM input data to represent actual conditions at EYW, the FAA's Airports District Office (ADO) Project Manager will initiate coordination with the FAA Regional Noise Program Manager and the FAA Office of Environment and Energy (AEE) Noise Division. This modification and FAA AEEs' approval for the use of modified flight profiles will be considered an Additional Service and is not covered under this Scope of Services or Fee Estimate. Task 5.4 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results. Task 5.5 Documentation A draft technical memorandum will be prepared by the Director of Noise Monitoring and the Manager of Noise Monitoring detailing the measurement procedures, data analysis, data results and INM issues related to the selected sites. Also, if measured results differ from the modeled DNL levels, the Consultant will report the likely cause(s) for these differences. A final technical memorandum will be produced incorporating any comments received on the draft document. The technical memorandum will become an appendix in the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation. The monitoring locations and a summary of the results will be included in Section 4, Existing Conditions Noise Exposure in the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation. This memorandum will be provided to the FAA with Section 4 for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf® version and a MS WORDOversion on each. TASK 6 FUTURE NOISE CONTOURS Task 6.1 Develop Future Condition Noise Contours UM Page 10 of 26 The future aircraft and airport operations, developed in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day for the established forecast period (five years or more beyond the Existing Condition). This information will be formatted for input into the most current INM version, currently 7.0b. INM default database aircraft and departure and approach profiles will be used to model future aircraft operations at EYW. If FAA releases a new version of INM during the development of the NEMs, they may require that the study be updated to use the latest version of INM. If this occurs, required revisions to the study will be addressed in a supplemental agreement. If, in Task 4, it was determined that non-standard flight profiles are regularly used at EYW and should be included in this Part 150 Study, the development and approval process will be considered an Additional Service. If custom profiles are developed for Task 4, these profiles will be used in place of the default profiles for the Future Conditions. Aircraft engine run-up operations data, prepared in Task 3, will be compiled and analyzed to determine the operational characteristics for the average annual day. INM standard database engine run-up identifiers will be used to model future engine nun -up operations at EYW. Noise contours representing both flight operations and engine run-up operations will be generated at DNL 60, 65, 70, and 75 dB. (The DNL 60 dB may be used to define boundaries for preventive land use measures.) The INM standard grid analysis feature will be used to calculate DNL values at up to 20 noise -sensitive sites. Task 6.2 Evaluate Impacts of the Future Condition Noise Contours The DNL 65, 70, and 75 dB noise contours for the future conditions which were developed in Task 6.1 will be incorporated into the GIS database in order to more accurately quantify noise exposure in terms of population, households, and land use. The DNL 60 dB contour may be used to define preventative land use measures and may be provided for informational purposes, but will not be used to quantify noise impacts, nor will it be used for remedial land use measures. Tables will be developed from the GIS to describe the noise exposure estimates for each of the future conditions. Graphics will be provided to illustrate the noise contours superimposed over the base mapping and land use. Noise compatibility will be determined by comparing the anticipated DNL noise levels with existing land use and the FAA land use compatibility guidelines provided in Table 1 of Appendix A in Part 150. Task 6.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results. Task 6.4 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on future condition noise contours and supplemental UM Page 11 of 26 evaluation metrics will be prepared in the forrn of Section 5, Future Condition Noise Exposure in the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation.. Section 5 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pe version and a MS WORDP version on each. Page 12 of 26 TASK 7 NEM CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The project will include consultation and public involvement necessary to meet the requirements of the Part 150 process. The airport operator must afford interested persons adequate opportunity to submit their views, data, and comments concerning the correctness and adequacy of the draft Noise Exposure Map and descriptions of forecast aircraft operations. Task 7.1 Notify § 150.21 (b) "Consulted Parties" Title 14 CFR part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, § 150.21 (b) requires that each Noise Exposure Map and related documentation must be developed and prepared in consultation with states, and public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the map, FAA ADO, ATO and Regional officials, and other Federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map. This consultation must include regular aeronautical users of the airport. The Consultant, in coordination with EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee, will identify these parties. A letter and/or e-mail will be sent to the identified parties informing them that Monroe County has initiated a title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Exposure Map Update. The letter will provide information regarding opportunities for agency involvement in the process. Task 7.2 Attend Ad -Hoc Committee Meetings The Consultant will attend the regular Ad -Hoc Committee meetings in order to present the progress of the study. The appropriate information will be approved by the FAA prior to being distributed to the Ad -Hoc Committee in advance of each meeting. The information will also be provided to Monroe County for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee website in advance of each meeting. This task includes six two-day/two-night trips to Key West by up to two Consultant staff (Project Manager, Deputy PM). These meetings are open to the public and will be advertised as such for the purpose of providing public information sessions throughout the Part 150 Process. In addition, each of the parties identified in Task 7.1 will be notified of these meetings and their attendance requested to provide input and comment on the Part 150 and the Part 150 process. The Consultant will coordinate with EYW staff to prepare the public notice for publication in The Key West Citizen to announce the time and location of the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings. EYW will be responsible for the cost of publishing the notices. The public notice will be published once during the week preceding the meeting. EYW staff will obtain proof of publication from The Key West Citizen for each publication of the public notice. EYW will be responsible for arranging/providing for the necessary facilities for the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings. The Consultant will be responsible for providing or arranging for easels and presentation boards, and A/V equipment at each Ad -Hoc meeting, if needed. If needed, the initial Ad -Hoc meeting will consist of up to twenty (20) presentation boards, with no more than five Uri Page 13 of 26 (5) new boards for each subsequent meeting. Task 7.3 Provide Information for Posting on Ad -Hoc Committee Website Prior to each Ad -Hoc meeting, the Consultant will provide information regarding the study for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site. The Web site will be used as a dynamic means of informing and educating the public on the Part 150 process and status, and the role of the FAA in the Part 150 process. The Web site includes the Consultant Project Manager's email address to which members of the public can submit comments/questions about the Part 150 process. This scope and accompanying cost estimate anticipate that all materials to be posted on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site will be developed by the Consultant in a format that is ready to be uploaded directly to the web -site (Adobe and/or HTML formatted language) by Monroe County staff. Task 7.4 Present Information to the Monroe County BOCC The Consultant will attend one BOCC meeting in order to present the findings of the study and obtain BOCC approval to submit the NEMs to FAA. The Consultant will prepare the information for distribution to the BOCC and provide one electronic (PDF format) to EYW staff for inclusion in the BOCC agenda package. A copy of Version 3 of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation will be provided on CDs for distribution to the BOCC in advance of the meeting. This task includes one two-day/two-night trip to Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager. Task 7.5 Compile and Analyze Public Comments All comments received on the Part 150 Study, including letters, e-mails, and comment forms, will be compiled and analyzed. Responses will be drafted as appropriate. Additionally, calls to the airport's noise hotline will be documented and summarized. A summary of the comments will be included in Section 6, Consultation and Public Participation, and copies of all comments will be included in an appendix to the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation. Postcards will be mailed to all parties who submitted comments (and legibly provided their name and address), to let them know their comments were received and included in the study. TASK 8 NEM REPORT PREPARATION Sections 1 through 7 will be compiled and formatted to create the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation, which will be submitted to FAA for their consideration under title 14 CFR part150. Five versions of the NEM document will be prepared over the course of the study. A separate Executive Summary will be prepared. The CD will include both the NEM document and the Executive Summary. Quantities of each version are estimates of the needs of both the FAA and Monroe County. Exhibits will be provided in color. The cost estimate is based on the quantities indicated below. If additional copies are determined to be necessary, they will be printed and charged to the County on a per copy basis. A web -friendly version of the final NEM document will be made available for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee Website. URS Page 14 of 26 Task 8.1 Quality Review (NEM Version 1) Prior to the submittal of the document to Monroe County, an independent technical review (ITR) of the NEM Document and Executive Summary will be performed by qualified Consultant staff not directly involved in writing the document. The purpose of the quality review is to ensure that all study deliverables are high quality, technically sound documents. Version 1 will incorporate the FAA's comments on preliminary NEM document Sections 1 through 5. V 1 Document Distribution . 'Monroe ca n FAA . " Consultant : NEM Document (Hard Copy) 0 0 1 Executive Summary 0 0 1 NEM Document & Executive SummaryCD 0 0 1 Task 8.2 Monroe County Staff and Ad -Hoc Committee Review Document (NEM Version 2) Version 2 of the NEM will be prepared and submitted to the Monroe County staff and Ad -Hoc Committee for their review and comment. The FAA will be provided three (3) CD copies of Version 2 to review the incorporation of the FAA's comments provided during the initial review by the FAA. The NEM Executive Summary will be provided in hard copy and the NEM document will be provided on a CD for distribution to the Ad -Hoc Committee members. One hard copy of the NEM documentation will be provided to Monroe County. Monroe County staff will be responsible for distribution of the documents to the Ad -Hoc Committee members. V2 Document Distribution Monroe',C60n FAA Consultant NEM Document Hard Copy) 1 0 1 Executive Summary 25 0 1 NEM Document and Executive Summary (CD) 25 3 1 Task 8.3 Board of County Commissioners and Public Review (NEM Version 3) Version 3 of the NEM will incorporate the comments from the FAA, the Monroe County staff, and the Ad -Hoc Committee and will be made available to the public and provided to the BOCC for their formal acceptance. Copies of the NEM will be placed in the public libraries, at the County Commissioners' Office and the Airport Administration Office for the public to review. Copies will be provided to the BOCC in advance of the BOCC meeting during which BOCC acceptance of the document will be requested. The NEM Executive Summary will be provided in hard copy and the "S Page 15 of 26 NEM document will be provided on a CD for distribution to the BOCC. Hard copies of the NEM document will be provided to Monroe County staff and/or placed in the public libraries. Monroe County staff will be responsible for distribution of the documents to the BOCC. The Consultant will send copies to the public libraries. Three CDs containing the NEM Executive Summary and the NEM Document in electronic format (MS Word and .PDF) will be provided to the FAA for review. 3,ddAribut_iotY Mdoroo:Coon FAA Consuttarit NEM Document Hard Copy) 6 1 1 Executive Summary 20 1 1 NEM Document and Executive Summary (CD) 20 3 1 Task 8.4 FAA Formal Review (NEM Version 4) Version 4 of the NEM will document the public involvement process, and be provided to the FAA for their formal review and acceptance. Five (5) hard copies and five (5) CDs of the Executive Summary and NEM Document will be provided for the FAA's review and comment The Consultant will distribute the documents to various FAA Lines of Business as directed by the FAA Program Manager. V4 Dodumerit Distribution -Monroe County FAA Consultant ' NEM Document (Hard Copy) 0 5 1 Executive Summary 0 5 1 NEM Document and Executive Summary (CD) 0 5 1 Task 8.5 Final NEM Document (NEM Version 5) Version 5 of the NEM document will include the FAA's notice of acceptance and documentation of compliance with Section 107 of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979, and will represent the final NEM document for the project. The Executive Summary will be updated to reflect the public involvement process, FAA's acceptance of the NEMs, and documentation of compliance with Section 107 of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979. Copies will be provided to the FAA ADO, Region, and Headquarters. Monroe County staff will be responsible for distribution of documents within Monroe County. V5 Document Distribution ` Monroe County FAA Consultant NEM Document (Hard Co 5 3 1 Executive Summary 25 3 1 NEM Document and Executive Summary (CD) 25 3 1 UM Page 16 of 26 TASK 9 PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS TO LIMIT RECOVERY OF DAMAGES After FAA acceptance of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation, the Consultant will follow all procedural requirements outlined in Section 107 of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979 (PL 96-193, 49 USG 2101) which provides a process whereby a person acquiring property in an area surrounding an airport for which a Noise Exposure Map has been submitted shall be limited in the recovery of damages with respect to noise attributable to the airport. The Act outlines the requirements and exceptions to this limitation. The Consultant will ensure that these requirements are met so as to further protect the airport. The Consultant will prepare a camera-ready public notice for publication in The Key West Citizen. EYW will arrange for publication of the public notice at a size of approximately 3 columns by 6 inches. The public notice will be published once a week for three consecutive weeks. EYW will obtain proof of publication from The Key West Citizen for each publication of the public notice and provide this documentation to the Consultant for inclusion in the Final NEM (Version 5). Page 17 of 26 PHASE 2 - NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM This is a preliminary Scope of Services to develop the NCP for this Part 150 Update, This Phase 2 Scope of Services may be revised as needed based on findings of the NEM. TASK 10 PROJECT MANAGEMENT This task involves the mobilization, coordination, and management of the non -technical aspects of Phase 2 of the project. Progress Reports will be prepared monthly and provided to EYW staff, with copies to the FAA. Project management meetings will be held in Key West as needed to coordinate with EYW staff regarding Phase 2 of the project. This task includes up to two two-day/one-night trips to Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager. TASK 11 REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF PAST PART ISO MITIGATION MEASURES On May 7, 1999, the FAA approved the following six land use measures as the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) for EYW: 1. Provide Noise insulation in Exchange for Avigation Easements, 2. Purchase Homes, Provide Noise Insulation, then Resell with Easements, 3. Update Noise Contours Annually, 4. Rezone Vacant Parcels, 5. Acquire Vacant Parcel, and 6. Establish Compatible Land Use Zoning In addition to the noise mitigation measures approved in the NCP, EYW has several long-standing noise abatement measures in place. These include: 1. Voluntary Curfew, 2. Use of NBAA Close -In Departure Procedure, 3. Restriction on Engine Warm -Ups, 4. Use of Flight Tracks to Reduce Noise Exposure, and 5. Noise Complaint Hotline. A summary and status of these measures was provided in Section 1.3 of the Noise Exposure Maps and Supporting Documentation which was accepted by the FAA on August 27, 2008. The information provided therein will be updated to reflect the current status of each measure. This discussion of these measures will be documented in Section 7, Introduction to the Noise Compatibility Program. Furthermore, each of the measures listed above will be reviewed and evaluated to determine if they should be included as measures recommended for FAA approval in this Part 150 Update or whether they should remain as voluntary noise abatement measures for which the airport sponsor has adequate implementation authority. Measures that will be recommended for FAA approval tTRS Page 18 of 26 will be discussed in the appropriate sections of the NCP document that are described below in Tasks 12, 13, and 14. TASK 12 REVIEW AND UPDATE OPERATIONAL NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES Operational measures which are required by the FAA to be considered as part of the Part 150 process will be evaluated for their applicability and effectiveness at EYW. Title 14 CFR part 150 §8150.7(b) indicates that the following operational measures should be analyzed: The construction of barriers and acoustical shielding, including the soundproofing of public buildings. • The implementation of a preferential runway system. • The use of flight procedures (including the modifications of flight tracks) to control the operation of aircraft to reduce exposure to individuals (or specific noise -sensitive areas) to noise in the area around the airport. • The implementation of any restriction on the use of the airport by any type or class of aircraft based on the noise characteristics of those aircraft. • Other actions or combinations of actions, which would have a beneficial noise control or abatement impact on the public. Part 150 mandates a range of general noise compatibility actions, which must be considered during a Part 150 Study. These actions, supplemented with the actions suggested by the Ad -Hoc Committee, general public, airport users, and past efforts will be considered. This task constitutes an identification of various types of aircraft noise abatement techniques, which could be applied realistically to EYW. Task 12.1 Alternative Airport Use Modifications Altemative use modifications at EYW will be investigated for their potential to reduce noise levels associated with aircraft operations. Included within this task will be assessments of runway use programs, time -of -day incentives, and user category incentives. Procedural alternatives will be addressed which reduce noise impacts on residences and other noise sensitive land uses situated near the airport and beneath major flight tracks. This process may result in "working groups" of the Ad -Hoc Committee evaluating specific noise abatement measures. The FAA will figure importantly in the examination of the feasibility of any of these measures. Airport use modifications at EYW could be effective in reducing noise exposure within the airport environs but must not be prohibitive with regard to airfield capacity, safety, or economic feasibility. UM Page 19 of 26 Task 12.2 Alternative Aircraft Operational Changes This task will involve the evaluation of various aircraft operational changes, which may be effective noise abatement procedures at EYW. Task 12.3 Airport Facility Modifications Facility modifications will be evaluated for noise abatement. Noise abatement measures involving physical changes to the airport itself will be reviewed. These could include construction of acoustical barriers, such as noise walls or berms; isolating aircraft maintenance activity, and others as appropriate. It is understood that runway extensions are not feasible alternatives at EYW. Facility modifications at EYW could be effective in reducing noise exposure but must not be prohibitive with regard to airfield capacity, safety, or economic feasibility. Task 12.4 Development of Noise Abatement Measures Using those procedures found to be potentially effective in reducing aircraft noise levels under the previous tasks, airport noise abatement measures for EYW will be developed. A variety of measures will be included in this task, such as operational measures, facility measures and administrative measures. Measures can be identified and prioritized for immediate implementation, measures for future consideration and measures that are unlikely to be feasible or productive. Task 12.5 Evaluation of Measures Refined noise abatement measures will be developed based on discussions held with Airport staff, committee members, the FAA and the general public. These will consist of a combination of operational, procedural and facilities altematives, as found feasible under earlier tasks. This effort will focus on the formulation of the optimum achievable measures. Task 12.6 Model Alternative Scenarios Up to three (3) operational noise abatement alternatives will be modeled using the INM for the future conditions, in order to estimate the possible benefits of operational noise abatement measures. Task 12.7 Evaluate Noise Impacts of Alternative Scenarios Noise exposure for up to three (3) alternative scenarios will be determined with the GIS and quantified in terms of population, households, and land use. A summary of the measures examined and their advantages and disadvantages will be developed and coordinated with the Page 20 of 26 FAA, EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee in order to identify the preferred alternatives for implementation. Each scenario will be modeled in INM to establish noise patterns for the forecast operations. Maps of each run will be prepared indicating 5 DNL incremental contours ranging from 55 to 75 DNL. Task 12.8 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results. Task 12.9 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on operational noise abatement measures will be prepared in the form of Section 8, Operational Noise Abatement Measures in the Noise Compatibility Program. (Note: Section 7 will be the Introduction to the Noise Compatibility Program.) . Sections 7 and 8 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdP version and a MS WORDo version on each. TASK 13 LAND USE NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES Land use noise mitigation measures which are required by the FAA to be considered as part of the Part 150 process will be evaluated for their applicability and effectiveness at EYW. Task 13.1 Evaluate Remedial Land Use Mitigation Measures Remedial actions seek to alleviate existing conflicts between land use and airport noise. Changes in the use of noise -impacted land or changes in occupancy, to uses or occupations less sensitive to noise, are practical strategies for resolving conflicts. Noise insulation and acquisition of full or partial interest in the land are also examples of possible actions that can be used to mitigate noise impacts. Existing non -compatible land uses will be identified in detail and potential corrective land use measures will be evaluated. A summary of the measures examined, and their advantages and disadvantages, will be developed and coordinated with the FAA, EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee in order to identify the preferred alternatives for implementation. Task 13.2 Evaluate Preventive Land Use Measures Land use and development controls that seek to prevent the introduction of additional non -compatible and noise -sensitive land uses within existing and future noise contours are referred to as preventive measures. The controls which are generally most useful are: zoning, TIRS Page 21 of 26 easements, transfer of development rights, establishing minimum acoustical insulation standards for building codes, and land acquisition. The land use controls and regulations identified in Task 2.1 will be analyzed to determine their capability in order to ensure and maintain compatibility with airport operations. Additional land use controls and regulatory mechanisms will be examined, if necessary. These controls and mechanisms will be coordinated with EYW staff and any other appropriate jurisdictions and/or planning agencies. A summary of the measures examined and their advantages and disadvantages will be developed and coordinated with the FAA, EYW staff and the Ad -Hoc Committee to identify the preferred alternatives for implementation. Task 13.3 Quality Assurance Detail Checking and Review Before inclusion into the Documentation, a Detail Check will be performed on all data and assumptions developed or obtained for this task, and on any subsequent output and results. Task 13.4 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on land use measures will be prepared in the form of Section 9, Land Use Measures in the Noise Compatibility Program. Section 9 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pde version and a MS WORD® version on each. TASK 14 CONTINUING NOISE PROGRAM MEASURES The success of the Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) requires a continuing effort to monitor compliance and identify new or unanticipated problems and changing conditions. The Consultant will identify measures that could become components of such a program. Examples of such measures include: • Ongoing voluntary noise abatement procedures, Permanent noise compatibility program management staff, • Ongoing public involvement programs, • Annual update of noise contours, and • Acquisition of noise and/or flight track monitoring system/equipment. Task 14.1 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on continuing noise program measures will be prepared in the form of Section 10, Continuing Noise Program Measures in the Noise Compatibility Program. Section 10 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdfc'version and a MS WORD®version on each. M Page 22 of 26 TASK 15 NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS The results of Tasks 11 through 13 will be compiled, and the measures which collectively appear to represent the best set of actions for EYW will be identified as the recommended Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program. EYW will be responsible for selecting those actions which are desired for inclusion in the Part 150 NCP. For each individual action, the Consultant will provide additional information regarding the schedule and responsibilities for implementation of the action and its affect upon improving noise compatibility. Task 15.1 Documentation Preliminary text, tables, and exhibits on the recommended measures and implementation plan will be prepared in the form of Section 11, Recommended Noise Compatibility Program in the Noise Compatibility Program. Section 11 will be provided to the FAA for review prior to inclusion into the NEM Documentation. The FAA will be provided with three (3) hard copies and three (3) CDs with a pdf version and a MS WORD®version on each. TASK 16 NCP CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Phase 2 will include coordination and public involvement necessary to meet the requirements of the Part 150 process. Prior to and during the development of a program, and prior to submission of the resulting draft program to the FAA, the airport operator must afford adequate opportunity for the active and direct participation of the public, to submit their views, data, and comments on the formulation and adequacy of that program. Task 16.1 Notify § 150.23 (c) "Consulted Parties" Part 150, Airport Noise Compatibility Planning, § 150.23 (c) requires that each noise compatibility program must be developed and prepared in consultation with FAA regional officials, the officials of the state and of any public agencies and planning agencies whose area, or any portion of whose area, of jurisdiction is within the DNL 65 dB contour depicted on the noise exposure map, and other Federal officials having local responsibility for land uses depicted on the map. Consultation with the FAA's Airports (ARP) and Air Traffic (ATO) Lines of Business shall include, to the extent practicable, informal agreement from FAA on proposed new or modified flight procedures. For air carrier airports, consultation must include any air carriers and, to the extent practicable, other aircraft operators using the airport. The Consultant will send a letter and/or e-mail to the parties identified in Task 7.1 informing them that Monroe County has initiated a title 14 CFR part 150 Noise Compatibility Program Update. The letter will provide information regarding opportunities for agency involvement in the process. UM Page 23 of 26 Task 16.2 Attend Ad -Hoc Committee Meetings The Consultant will attend the regular Ad -Hoc Committee meetings in order to present the progress of the study. The appropriate information will be distributed to the Ad -Hoc Committee in advance of the each meeting. The information will also be provided to Monroe County for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee website in advance of each meeting. This task includes six two-day/two-night trips to Key West by up to two Consultant staff. These meetings are open to the public and will be advertised as such for the purpose of providing public information sessions throughout the Part 150 Process. In addition, each of the parties identified in Task 7.1 will be notified of these meeting and their attendance requested to provide input and comment on the Part 150 and the Part 150 process. The Consultant will coordinate with EYW staff to prepare the public notice for publication in The Key West Citizen to announce the time and location of the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings. EYW will be responsible for the cost of publishing the notices. The public notice will be published once during the week preceding the meeting. EYW staff will obtain proof of publication from The Key West Citizen for each publication of the public notice. EYW will be responsible for arranging/providing for the necessary facilities for the Ad -Hoc Committee meetings. The Consultant will be responsible for providing or arranging for easels and presentation boards, and A/V equipment at each Ad -Hoc Committee meeting, if needed. If needed, the initial Ad -Hoc meeting will consist of up to twenty (20) presentation boards, with no more than five (5) new boards for each subsequent meeting. Task 16.3 Provide Information for Posting on Ad -Hoc Committee Website Prior to each Ad -Hoc meeting, the Consultant will provide information regarding the study for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site. The Web site will be used as a dynamic means of informing and educating the public on the Part 150 process and status. The Web site includes the Consultant Project Manager's email address to which members of the public can submit comments/questions about the Part 150 process and status, and the role of the FAA in the Part 150 process. This scope and accompanying cost estimate anticipate that all materials to be posted on the Ad -Hoc Committee web site will be developed by the Consultant in a format that is ready to be uploaded directly to the web -site by Monroe County staff (Adobe and/or HTML formatted language). Task 16.4 Present Information to the Monroe County BOCC and Hold Public Hearing Following the completion of Task 14, a Public Hearing will be held during a regularly -scheduled BOCC meeting. The Consultant will present the final recommendations for the Noise Compatibility Program, solicit public comments, and obtain BOCC approval to submit the NCP to FAA. The Consultant will provide comment forms at the meeting for individuals who wish to submit written comments. The Consultant will prepare information for distribution to the BOCC M Page 24 of 26 and provide one electronic (PDF format) to EYW staff for inclusion in the BOCC agenda package. A copy of Version 3 of the Noise Compatibility Program will be provided on CDs for distribution to the BOCC in advance of the meeting. Information to be included in the agenda package must be submitted a month in advance of the meeting. This task includes one two-day/two-night trip to Key West by the Consultant's Project Manager. Copies of the NEM and NCP documents will be placed in the Monroe County Public Library and the EYW Administrative office prior to the Public Hearing, for the public to review. In addition the public notice normally provided by Monroe County regarding BOCC meetings and public hearings, the Consultant will prepare a camera-ready public notice for publication in The Key West Citizen to announce the time and location of the Public Hearing for the Part 150 Study. EYW will arrange for publication of the public notice. The public notice ad will be published once during the week preceding the meeting and once on the Sunday preceding the Public Hearing. EYW will obtain proof of publication from The Key West Citizen for each publication of the public notice and provide this documentation to the Consultant. Task 16.5 Compile and Analyze Public Comments All comments received on the Part 150 Study, including letters, e-mails, comment forms, and oral transcripts will be compiled and analyzed. Responses will be drafted as appropriate. Additionally, calls to the airport's noise hotline will be documented and summarized. A summary of the comments will be included in Section 12, Consultation and Public Participation, and copies of all comments will be included in an appendix to the Noise Compatibility Program. Postcards will be mailed to all parties who submitted comments (and legibly provided their name and address), to let them know their comments were received and included in the study. TASK 17 NCP REPORT PREPARATION Sections 7 through 12 will be compiled and formatted to create the Noise Compatibility Program, which will be submitted to FAA for their consideration under title 14 CFR part 150. Five versions of the NCP document will be prepared over the course of the study. A separate Executive Summary will be prepared. The CD will include both the NCP document and the Executive Summary. Quantities of each version are estimates of the Monroe County's needs. Exhibits will be provided in color. The cost estimate is based on the quantities indicated below. If additional copies are determined to be necessary, they will be printed and charged to the County on a per copy basis. A web -friendly version of the final NCP document will be made available for posting on the Ad -Hoc Committee Website. Task 17.1 Quality Review (NCP Version 1) Prior to the submittal of the document to Monroe County, an independent technical review (ITR) of the NCP Document and Executive Summary will be performed by qualified Consultant staff not m Page 25 of 26 directly involved in writing the document. The purpose of the quality review is to ensure that all study deliverables are high quality, technically sound documents. Version 1 will incorporate the FAA's comments on preliminary NCP document Sections 7 through 11. Y1 Daculrent`Dtstributiori Mciryroe=County Consuitanit:; _ NCP Document (Hard Copy) 0 0 1 Executive Summary 0 0 1 NCP Document & Executive 0 0 1 Summary (CD) Task 17.2 Staff and Ad -Hoc Committee Review Document (NCP Version 2) Version 2 of the NCP will be prepared and submitted to the Monroe County staff and Ad -Hoc Committee for their review and comment. The FAA will be provided three (3) CD copies of Version 2 to review the incorporation of the FAA comments provided during the FAA's initial review and comment. The NCP Executive Summary will be provided in hard copy and the NCP document will be provided on a CD for distribution to the committee members. One hard copy of the NCP document will be provided to Monroe County, and one hard copy will be provided to the FAA Program Manager. Monroe County staff will be responsible for distribution of documents to the Ad -Hoc Committee members. V3 4cdumeni ©ftrbutio Mbrfrne Cvu FAQ Consultant ; NCP Document (Hard Copy) 1 1 9 Executive Summary 25 1 1 NCP Document and Executive 25 3 1 Summary (CD) Task 17.3 Board of County Commissioners and Public Review (NCP Version 3) Version 3 of the NCP will incorporate the comments from the FAA, the Monroe County staff, and the Ad -Hoc Committee and will be made available to the public and provided to the BOCC for their formal acceptance. Copies of the NCP will be placed in the public libraries, at the County Commissioners' Office and the Airport Administration Office for the public to review. Copies will be provided to the BOCC in advance of the BOCC meeting during which BOCC acceptance of the document will be requested. The NCP Executive Summary will be provided in hard copy and the NCP document will be provided on a CD for distribution to the BOCC. Hard copies of the NCP document will be provided to Monroe County staff, the FAA and/or placed in the public libraries. Monroe County staff will be responsible for distribution of the documents to the BOCC. The Consultant will send copies to the public libraries. Three (3) CDs containing the NCP Executive Summary and the NCP Document in electronic format (MS Word' and pde) will be provided to the FAA for review. UM Page 26 of 26 V3, Document -Distribution Mnnr-oe County:::FAA: Consultant" NCP Document (Hard Cop 6 1 1 Executive Summary 20 1 1 NCP Document and Executive Summary (CD) 20 3 1 Task 17.4 FAA Format Review (NCP Version 4) Version 4 of the NCP will document the public involvement process, and be provided to the FAA for their formal review and acceptance. The Consultant will send 10 copies of the documents to the FAA Program Manager. The FAA's 10 copies will be distributed by the Consultant as directed by the FAA Program Manager. NCP Document (Hard Copy) 0 10 1 Executive Summary 0 10 1 NCP Document and Executive 0 10 1 Task 17.5 Final NCP Document (NCP Version 5) Version 5 of the NCP document will include the FAA's Record of Approval (ROA) and will represent the final NCP document for the project. The Executive Summary will be updated to reflect the public involvement process and FAA's approval of the NCP. Copies will be provided to the FAA ADO, Region, and Headquarters. Monroe County staff will be responsible for distribution of documents within Monroe County. UM Page 27 of 26 gg arr anar... ..«a»ar ----- »a»ra« a»aa.. «»aa»»" rrr»a» a gg ggpf IR x$$ q ..ate -- ..... .. - - 4oR = XR93&3 6!�8 R i4R?'4 Y,:Sk 11 374x8:' ai38Yc- B?899(�-.� .. wR3., o000 000 00 oaoo. o ro os'" . .R'_ .e eeeo eve oeo. save. e e _, a.R. Oe - �-, 59 oo e ; o0 0000 00o eeoo oee ee ease ee e. 'e n o r Y ata� as , Y »» r»» »a »»» a« ... .. r- I O a a z O } ~ O a r z a Z O a r wa o a a > W Y �v Lu 7 i mj!§jm !pp » _ ---------- ----- ,n---- ------ . ..... ....»w gg. - i _ . 8 R ....,... «.. aRAR3611 R� _. R8 Bi .. £ Y ..._ p_SYC �:. _ .».._ .. RC�iip� .. A .m.w--if 1 nm wq .... m.a. asm•v m - '� =va. a� ."a:k Q oo o o o- ommm om000 Y e g� 8 d S - t &mlmR o Ism 3 9 �Mll !.21211 � _"-e-- �'•.. ...m.... � ....� a .C.�.B _ ...y � � - @ A3iRulmR mu R Riml $ e ....... s 11 z :$ jMj $5 Film dA;I s u �; a»z.» S3S»� - _ SSSS:: Y & P. maa S six SSk: SS 22 z»»9 R o x R&8a iA 5 ¢ �o SSS': S$SS9.S ' SSSSSS„ w$„4SSs`: $.o•.SS S NN o., ,,.,.w»„�'� $ g - 3��"�"8d�"!°'s.� a Pais g gg ..S_ .--A5� dS « Us rv�y. NH Na< nrvNn ronr —, n � � R `e s w= h =s O n d J Q Z 0 F- y' Q � z D a: �- w `) � o Z Q W 1L Y N s xxtizR52£«j a SAS S £ s*soix n b HagTgS9�� � <2>I ggS It s Q�ig4q$3 2 a$s�2_, A K$w$8 MN2M w my e m =-d d om n emeem� 929 0 Z .41 g•ppSSB8 'siE3a 45�$ w a ryx a a a Him f9 Ifill] N� I.L O IL Z 0 Z w w F- Z F- CO W W Y t0 o�o06N -' c N w N m ti N r. y vi vi ev vi N M N N N ei N N C N 0 w- 0 U Y N V N N tttOOO A d � yX � v N � U mavoop 0 c NN MM ��pp m M % O R � A J O OtS u mw 0 O � a O $ N "ww N G K (n J N O O. � N F uj viz ism a a o al 0 m � cs z 9 o _ o m a o a m e n J �¢Lu N tu m m cc r � aWm� Y n m c > {� n o n = t7 M ♦'f ' M - �� w J » § \\ 3 \ \ \ ]/k \ \ a40 - \\� � \ ( � e and- �- , §\ all z » k \ \ oc kq R 2 }§\ _ . . \ ! \ } § ) z ##_ z7E 2 ;!!,#, r;tu.=!fa 22 0 a w a z 0 �o a� z LuU w) �-F z� wQ a- m r YNm m S r F a M N O � N pp OO GG W �qtq q S Y m 0 Q a d gg r O c i gg gg h H Y 4 r N N N N N N � Y N 6 r 6 �}} pppppp Epp�pp pp{{yy M q W � V vNi F p y I-W n gS3�Z.. z wK t�Ja3< aazz n E Y f T d pp 6 "ui r � 3 0 r M M pp 8 O d ~ q N O H H N us Y r d y 8 iiS ur � d d f N Y S g g g g Y C7 � yN N J :R �Nn�OQ�P V H b i�F'g�c3ff E C.m0 x .3� yy < iI ui 2 ;8 a � E � � a z g � 2 m LLJ z R n k w �e 0?? §!! & a §aa )2; !§; J ` !)^� ® - a ; 771;2 \;; §a■ :ƒ gm& /;;; 7 I I k / \} \ } }S/ § \ } k ar ! !)± w ] {B) }\2$ § 0 a a a z 0 d= Wo cn LLJ Z c j LU r � a a W z Z cn vW i C) N L^^U W f<f-3 64 G00 64 m EA EA Z 69 W 63 tLo 69 �M - N N EA rO Efi (6 (6 @ ca Q 0 0 n a a a a m m m cEa 06 06 co m E E XC�IY- w o 6 cr Ir Ir fy co � n>> n� Z)� Z) Of r c a D Z) J J a 07) (6 Li •U CL cn o 0 m c 3 c6 c c S o n V) o cu m ua aa) m O _ � m � N °� W d O Z c O o a > (D Z m IL a)v N c o i� 0 N Q O to CLO O o U Z C U) Z O E 'a "O O C d to CA O C5 -i Q d ry w 0 2 <O!HANSON Engineering ( Architecture I PlanWng I Alfred Services June 22, 2011 Mr. Peter Horton, Airport Director Key West Intl. Airport Monroe County 3491 S. Roosevelt Blvd, Key West, Fh 33040 Hanson Protessiona] Services Ine. .601 UB dere Road. Suite 303 South West Patur Beach, FL 33406 (5611 471-9370 Faso (561) 471 9369 %ti w.hsnsonark.com Sent via email to: horton-peter@monroecounty-fl.gov pearson-april@monroecounty-fl.gov RE: Independent Fee Estimate, FAR Part 150 Noise Study Update Key West International Airport, Key West, FL ear ortvn; As requested, Manson Professional Services Inc. has completed the independent fee estimate for the FAR Part 150 Noise Study Update for Key West Internatit)nal Airport, Key West, FL. The Excel spreadsheets provided were used to estimate labor costs and expenses for both phases of the project, as shown below: Phase 1 —Noise Exposure Maps $278,797.00 Phase 2 —Noise Compatibility Program $143,504.00 Grand Total— Phases 1 & 2 $422,301.00 The detailed spreadsheets are attached for your review. Thank you for allowing Hanson to assist you on this project. Should you have any questions, or need additional information, please give me a call. S incere 0­ 1 ate Sr. Aviation Planner cc: Sheryl Pinkard, P.E. — Hanson aPrinted m recK*d pager uong sVA.1.d irks ^ •R� %'Q^! S'-gBtl�., :17+6g� Rn en YB __ 1{� wRz eo.o. eew eew eee we a � — wwa ewe. ewww .z g - - ww .w.wn a .. %_ www ewe ww we w wee t a ^xz a a c a s Ani Aip In N111 p IIII I I O a z a F F p W Af w LLI F- Lu K A a L y w A Y 7 y A $ ... . 577•.. .... ,.n r.$. . . nose. ...... _ 3 e—. --------- .°c. oo It J1 a 0 93 .. ..n...-- - -- .. ., .. ».... _ ..... .. .. 1 — R R • RHAm,"-i • 3 S c 3 S sja l nila till . fillfill fit I I H 0' O IL x a J a z O } f- a � Z N 4' N H 0 z W x a a } r W Y N l9 a E H U dt O ^� S RR gib^ �44tl^s 4' 3•�4��,R :. $1°F� 4��s6�E. - �Ss�g N'rp'ti.t :i iJ �._ 2Fa- 8 S d � g R SSS» � b R 33333 3» &SRSd3S;: �SSR «» 3$S•. R !� 0 0 ♦ N$ «�` c b O o o a o 0 0 0.. a o 0 o e 3 £ c3 - -- — i Sg S« S ffi nRi»SSS' SANS« 3»M ax3���N a „ z` a � 9 = v"f x�a x� r x&teaa 'o al �3ma A §###E! ^B §f`3[ § „ t a J7(� w .._ 4 N 4 six- liaRk zy - m .- rz«A9 —mppm p _ pepppoa �� as � m e +nn�_ p ' ♦ v+ m m m m 6 m� m !' p � o o a o a o p 0 O O p 0 6 0. i SSa$jR map p m w w � a 0 $$ a o -D H;g 2 2 i €aZ �S fiYi °QQ� Di i u �$ i_�� R -pr � d O °� KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2011 PART 150 STUDY URS Santa Ana Taw rwvc oex�umcw � ;we�rou: oo wmora �wo.ncNsr o>eunow .. z+ u.e�e. revror..me wa u waw ca.ur �wde, w....a uw» KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2011 PART 150 STUDY Landrum and Brown Df--a— M-.W&N— TeYI C"— TOW 'rAM Ve%.M"01/ CM 7i--& in RMY1Y StM WIm $4 $2 se;w scm ".4W M.A.,- uW 1: 62 IS17" s3im ow sl, 12 S2 S2-MG SLOW 24 $4OPND ,20 MAW sm" - OuL , limillill-oll I0i IC INF 11111111 RUN gilill gill Oil Nil KEY WEST INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2011 PART 150 STUDY PERSONNEL RATES TITLE FIRM RATE Project Manager URS Tama $170 Deputy Project Manager URS Tama $105 Sr. Noise Consultant URS Tama $100 Consultant URS Tama $95 GIS Specialist URS Tama $80 Jr. Noise Consultant URS Tama $50 Document Production Specialist URS Tama $55 Administrative Assistant URS Tampa $55 Radar Processing Software Developer URS Santa Ana $156 Radar Data Processing Specialist URS Santa Ana $132 Director of Noise Monitoring Landrum & Brown $225 Manager of Noise Monitoring Landrum & Brown $175 0 Key West International Airport (EYW) Monroe County, Florida Design Services for Baggage Claim System Scope of Services — URS Hunt Valley To: Mil Reisert, URS Miami; December 15, 2010 Scope of the Project URS is pleased to propose Design development, Bidding, and limited Construction Administration services for a baggage claim device at the new terminal of Key West International Airport. URS developed several concepts for the authority and the Preferred Concept layout develops a second claim device as shown in Concept 2-2 of November 23, 2010. This fee proposal includes effort expended to date in developing those concepts, reviewing and modifying them to reach the Preferred Concept. Also included are preparation of a Design Development submittal at approximately 60% for EYW review, preparation of biddable Contract Documents, limited Bid Phase and Construction Phase Support services. Scope of Services Schematic Design Phase (some of these services were provided in November 2010) URS proposes to provide the following services; Attend a kick-off meeting in Key West, to meet with airport authority staff to determine the functional and operational requirements of the proposed equipment. Participate in coordination conference calls. Review project coordination documentation relating to project progress. Create layout sketches in CAD for the Baggage Claim devices. Utilize the CAD backgrounds, sheet layouts and borders, CAD standards from the team, in URS corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 300 Hunt Valley, MD 21030 Tel: 410.785.7220 Fax: 410.7M6818 www.ursr-orp.com Page 2 of 5 keeping with the authority's standards. Study airside conditions for tug traffic. Study passenger movement in and around the proposed claim devices. Generate demand load calculations to support the sizing of the devices. Create a narrative to support the sketches. Study Safety and Security Issues for the baggage operations. Generate budgetary pricing for the concepts Submit the sketches, narrative, and pricing document for the authorities use. Design Development Phase - 60% Develop a detailed conveyor layout in the building confines to understand how the BHS will be placed in the facility; modifying the layout as needed. Develop CAD details of controls for the claim device for a 60% Submittal. Define Motor Control Panel (MCP) layouts. Commence the coordination of detailed BHS electrical load with other disciplines. Develop anticipated power requirement. Survey the existing electrical panels for possible power sources for the BHS. Define BHS equipment requirements / details within architectural spaces (ie BHS fire doors, BHS security doors, BHS rooms, Stainless Steel Trim). Define the interface between the BHS and the Fire Alarm System / Fire Detection System. Commence the coordination with other disciplines. Generate a Basis of Design narrative to represent 60% details. Develop a BHS drawing set for inclusion in a 60% submittal. Develop Electrical drawing set for inclusion in a 60% submittal. Develop Architectural Backgrounds for use by BHS and Electrical disciplines Develop DD level plans showing architectural elements to be demolished and new work. Generate an updated budget summary for all disciplines Page 3 of 5 Provide internal QA/QC reviews prior to the submittal. Participate in a review meeting with the Authority, to discuss progress. Respond to comments from Authority. Contract Documents - '100% Submittal Finalize CAD plans for the claim device for 100% Submittal. Complete CAD details of sample controls for the claim device for 100% Submittal. Update details of system / building interface, as required, for; Electrical Loads for BHS, Motor Control Panel (MCP) for BHS, BHS equipment requirements within architectural spaces BHS and Fire Alarm System / Fire Detection System interface Update the BOD Document to represent 100% details. Generate a Performance Specification for the BHS. Generate technical specifications for architectural and engineering scope of work items Develop necessary bidding documents and front end specifications for FAA procurement. Develop a BHS drawing set for the 100% submittal. Develop an Electrical drawing set for the 100% submittal. Develop and Architectural drawing set for the 100% submittal Generate an updated budget summary for all disciplines Provide internal QA/QC reviews prior to the submittal. Respond to comments from Authority on 100% submittal. Develop conceptual phased contractor security and controlled access plans demarking AOA from non secure areas. Identify site access and lay down areas for contractor as directed by the Client. Provide two design phase site visits to verify and confirm existing conditions for CDs. Page 4 of 5 Attend one 90% review meeting with the Client and implement associated review comments based on the approved DD set. Bid Phase Attend Pre -Bid meeting by conference call. Provide Addendum documents, as required. Provide answers to bidder questions on BHS issues. Participate in Bid Evaluations. Construction Administration Phase Respond to RFI's. Review test plans from BHS contractor. Review shop drawings. Review O+M Manuals from BHS contractor. Provide 4 CA Phase Site Visits (1 person) Provide I final Punch List Site Visit (2 people) Fee URS Hunt Valley proposes to complete the tasks of this Scope of Work for the following Firm Fixed Price; Labor Expense: $ 85,548.00 Other Direct Costs: $ 10,090.00 Total: $ 95,538.00 Assumptions Direct costs are estimated to provide budget limits for EYW, and will not be exceeded without prior written approval. Direct costs will be invoiced at cost and only as authorized by EWY at project notice to proceed. Tills Page 5 of 5 URS receives timely feedback from those making comment on submitted materials. No signage work or BIDS scope is anticipated and no associated design is included in this proposal. No lighting work is anticipated and no associated design is included in this proposal. URS includes no periodic site visits or Punch Lists visits during CA, in this proposal, as it is assumed that these can be provided by EYW staff. URS includes no participation in testing and commissioning of the work in this proposal. These services can be provided under a separate agreement, if desired. Key West . Baggage Claim Project Design Services - Baggage CWm System IWA : URS-Hunt Valley supporting URS-Mlami Teek SW4. PMJed Desipn Ardl M.rlvw Engines Arctlited Ertpkroer CADO T6&mci.n Clwoal Tatw Men liars Man Horan Mw H is Alen Houm Mm Howe Man Howe Man Fbura Men Ho m ArcWaOMaJEngk*WIrg Wks 168.0 106.0 122.0 $1.0 76A 59.4 54.0 Schemed. Dedgn 4 $1. Vidt w dafi- Rrqultomente a; sU t8 0 0 16 ConceptSkatdtes 12 12 COO(doatlorl of 0e01pn with AmWede 12 4 16 8esis of Oe67n Na,Mt,& 2 0 2 4 Cost Ewmte 2 4 4 10 OA R-1— 2 2 1 5 SO,* Det —Nse 1 1 2 summadon of SD 140 r 18 16 ?0 0 8 0 3 65 S 302400 1 1728M 5 2,440.00 1 5 608.00 $ 1 162.00 S 7�u96?.0 Design Davaloprrwrtt 6 814S Effort Respond to Canvrw ds 4 4 2 10 Develop CAD wyou - Mefwed Concept 4 8 2 14 Iraetdisdpikwy C—dnatlon 2 4 e Update 900 Nw1dWe 2 2 4 Update Coal Edkrwte 4 2 6 R.w.. M"N 16 16 CA Review 4 4 SuM11t DelWerahles e 8 2 2 20 A.dW.d-&JfElecftcM Engh—kq Oevebp Floor Pion Uckgrorrda 4 6 2 12 Field Vid/Sha Coordl-Wn w1Ut -"l g mMJae k— 2 20 12 8 2 44 ArONt-1-1 Plan mtra, derryO, newwork 4 16 2 22 Develop Eledrkal power CAD layout far the Concept 4 B 2 14 Intadladpdkwry Coordlrau- 2 2 4 8 Deveop N.—d- for the 000 4 2 2 8 Cost F.0-Ke 4 2 6 OA Review 6 2 1 1 10 Suhn.t Ddfv—M- 8 8 2 2 20 Summaflon of Phaw II Hours 28 52 35 52 31 8 18 224 S 4.704.00 S 5,616.00 $ 4270.00 1 4212.00 S 2.356.00 $ 475,20 S 972,00 1 22,605.20 Contract OOcumapts 6 BHS Gmup Effort Respond to Com n us 4 4 2 10 Finalize CAD lalroula, Daalh% 4 8 2 14 IM*Wis*4-ryC—d4.dlm 2 2 4 Updaio 8oO Nanetivo 2 2 4 Update Coss Estimate 4 2 e swficwt on 24 2 26 OA Rwww 4 4 Submk Dok—ahlos 8 8 2 2 20 AfchladuraMledAoat englneertng Respond to COmmenfs 4 2 6 F-- 4Li Plans, Damolki- f4oteelNew Comhuc6oMnFls 8 12 ArCh600N1e1 specs Ott dra.Mrrga 4 4 2 to Up"a Archlfadural £a6mds 4 4 2 10 Finalize CAD laytade, na d., 4 0 2 14 HM VIVJUe Courdkw4cn W81 eaietkg MIUJs Ion 2 12 4 4 2 24 Ir#ettlladpllrory C4onfina8on 2 2 2 2 8 Update 8oO Nwraave 2 2 4 Update Coat Estimate 4 2 2 2 10 5pedk.ti n 24 2 26 Oevefop FAA Front EndlProcraerner4 Doamenw (MIAMQ 24 24 AttWSeeklflyfComtmdor aocess documen[revfew meeting 12 2 4 2 20 CA Review e 2 8 &tent 11.11 abtea 8 8 2 2 20 Supanrt — of pht 11 Houm 36 102 42 42 32 8 28 290 S 6048.00 S 11,016.00 1 6124.00 S 3,402.00 S 2,432,00 1 47620 S 1,512.00 S 30,009,20 Date Crated : Dec.10. 2010 Data Prklwd: 611CV2011 URS -Hunt Valley Bidding 8erv4ca Btis Group E(fwt Rodpond so 80 Addendum ad Evtkmtmn kmmtdur medrl aw Engi Wkfg Reaped to Bid 0-fione A.ddmdtm Bid Evafueam Surnn Wan of Ph11a 11 Hours forrstnrcllon AdminLtraBon Servk- BNS Group Etfod Reaped to RFf Review Tat PW» Review Stop Dravhge Revew o-M nwwx*a sits vdi.(2) Punch Lk Ardraad,ALeI*drkal Erglr ae Img Raapad to RFf Ra Sh>p 0rarA p SRe vieih (2) Punch Let Summation of Phan a Hotta TOTAL for Design Services and Bidding EXPENSES of Design Phase Air Fare-AWI FM(Pt- W hips) How Meele G,M T.- M. - Phone. Pae4.g CA Rhaae Site Trips (4 - 12 p-n punch Hal) Pdnlhlg, 13- Subtotal Expenses for Documents Phases 3 4 2 1 3 2 4 2 e 2 2 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 10 2 2 4 2 10 2 2 2 2 t 9 10 12 4 12 2 0 9 49 S 1,680.00 i 12W.00 S 488.00 S 972.00 S 162.00 S i 486,00 S 5.074.00 6 8 4 1 13 8 1 9 16 4 1 21 4 4 1 9 24 0 2 26 12 2 14 2 8 4 4 4 2 24 to 4 4 2 2 28 24 2 26 12 1 13 10 132 a 20 8 0 16 191 i 1,880.00 S 14,356,00 i 976.00 i 1,8Z0.00 S 456.00 i 6 810.00 i 1 Imoo 485 448.t10 Tnp 1 Trip 2 . 2 Slaff Trip 3 - 2 Aa8 Trip 4 - 1 sla0 CA Trk1e i 8G0.00 S 1.600.00 $ 1.600.)0 $ 6M,00 $ 1600.00 $ 2a0m $ 400.00 $ 400.00 $ 20000 i 400.00 i 60.00 S 120.00 S 120.00 $ 120.00 S 120.00 $ 150.00 s 150.00 i 180.00 $ 160.00 S 150.00 i 100.00 5 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100,00 i 100.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 1,80000 $ 640.00 $ 750.00 S SM.00 $ 300.00 S 300.00 S 10,090.00 S95 538.B0 Data Cleated : Ooc.10. 2010 URS - Hunt va0ey Bata Printed. Wwol l