Item B2 } B.2
`,
County of Monroe
�y,4 ' �, "tr, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Mayor Michelle Coldiron,District 2
�1 nff `ll Mayor Pro Tem David Rice,District 4
-Ile Flonda.Keys Craig Cates,District 1
Eddie Martinez,District 3
w Mike Forster,District 5
County Commission Meeting
March 31, 2021
Agenda Item Number: B.2
Agenda Item Summary #7935
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Emily Schemper(305) 289-2500
No
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Presentation of existing and potential actions, policies and
programs to address the exhaustion of ROGO allocations and the build-out of the Florida Keys as of
2023 (2026 for Monroe County, after County reduced its annual allocation distribution to extend the
build-out date).
ITEM BACKGROUND: Staff is updating the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) on the
existing and potential actions, policies and programs to address issues the County will face as the
remaining ROGO allocations are exhausted (from the 2010 Census/hurricane modeling) and build-
out approaches, the unknown outcomes of the upcoming 2020 Census/hurricane modeling by the
State and the Florida Keys ACSC jurisdictions running-out of ROGO allocations, currently set for
the year 2023 (note, the County extended ROGO from 2023 to 2026 by splitting the remaining 3-
years'worth of ROGO allocations). The number of ROGO allocations the County receives from the
State of Florida is directly related to the ability to evacuate the Keys in an approaching hurricane.
State law and policy mandates the ability to evacuate within a 24 hour time period.
Previously, on January 30, 2019, the BOCC discussed and provided direction to address the
exhaustion of ROGO allocations and the build out of the Florida Keys as of 2023. The discussion
involved existing and potential actions, policies and programs; as well as ideas for policy changes to
alleviate potential takings liability, if and when the State is no longer able to award ROGO
allocations to the County.
Staff has worked on numerous efforts since the January 2019 meeting and has developed a few more
options to consider. Staff is updating the BOCC on the existing and potential actions, policies and
programs to address issues the County will face as the remaining ROGO allocations are exhausted
and hopes to schedule a future agenda item (future BOCC meeting) to receive direction from the
BOCC to ensure staff implements the current BOCC's direction and prioritization.
Note, the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) and the Division of Emergency Management
(DEM) will run an evacuation model after the compilation of the 2020 Census data. Staff anticipates
Packet,Pg. 20
B.2
this process may take two to three years after the 2020 Census, and will require a new Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) with the DEO, DEM, Marathon, Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony
Beach and Layton. This will be the earliest timeframe that the County and other jurisdictions will be
able to evaluate the results based on any population/vehicle changes, unit occupancy rate changes
and other factors in the inputs and assumptions utilized within the hurricane modeling. Until the
results of the upcoming evacuation modeling are known, the Florida Keys ACSC jurisdictions must
anticipate that building permit allocations may not be authorized beyond the year 2023. This deficit
of building permit allocations could trigger takings suits against both the State, County and cities, if
no additional permits are authorized based on the 2020 Census hurricane modeling.
Currently, unincorporated Monroe County has 281 market rate ROGO allocations available through
July 2026 and a total of 62 moderate affordable ROGO allocations available for award.
Current demand for Market Rate allocations:
The table below shows the ROGO allocations awarded for market-rate units for the previous nine (9)
quarters. The current demand for market rate allocations in all three ROGO subareas outpaces the
availability of allocations. Note, beginning July 13, 2020 (ROGO YR 29), the available market rate
allocations were reduced to 64 from 126 to extend the distribution of ROGO allocations through
2026.
ROGO Allocations Q2 Y27 Q3 Y27 Q4 Y27 Ql Y28 Q2 Y28 Q3 &4 Ql Q2
Y28 Y29*** Y29***
Lower Keys
Available for Allocation 14 14 15 14 14 29 8 7
Total Applications 13 21 20 14 22 30 13 18
Pending
Applications Approved for 13 21* 16 14 14 29 8 7
ROGO
Applications remaining in 0 0 0 1 12
queue
Big Pine Key/No Name Key
Available for Allocation 2 2 2 2 2 4 1 1
Total Applications 28 27 26 25 27 25 21 21
Pending
Applications Approved for 2 2 2 2 2 4 1 1
ROGO
Applications remaining in 26 25 24 23 25 ?1 20 2
ueue - - - - - - -
Upper Keys
Available for Allocation 15 15 16 15 15 31 8 8
Total Applications 21 19 18 21 15 26 14 16
Pending
Applications Approved for 15 15 14* 15 10** 21** 8** 8
ROGO
Packet Pg. 21
B.2
Applications remaining in It 6 4 It� � � It
queue
�
'Includes 7 unused Allocations from Quarters 1 and 2.
"Did not distribute all allocations due to limitation of the number of Tier I properties that may receive an allocation per ROGO year.
"'Beginning July 13, 2020(ROGO YR 29)the available market rate allocations were reduced to 64 from 126 to extend the distribution of ROGO
allocations through 2026
Based on data from 2018, the unincorporated County, after utilizing all ROGO allocations granted
by the State in 2012 (based on the 2010 Census hurricane modeling), will have approximately 7,000
vacant privately owned parcels remaining, with close to 2,800 of those parcels being located in Tier
III.
2018 Inventory of Privately-Owned Vacant Parcels in Florida Keys and Approximate Land Value
2018 ESTIMATED YEARS TO
2018 2018 APPROXIMATE FUNDING GENERATE
LAND VALUE Based on Historic
AREA NO. AVERAGE Rates For THE FUNDS
VACANT PARCEL (December 2018 EQUAL TO THE
PARCELS VALUE*** MC Property Acquisition of TAX ASSESSED
Appraiser data.) Conservation VALUE
Lands
Key West ACSC* 133 $397,235 $52,832,202 $270,000* 196
Unincorporated MC 7,033 $85,858 $603,840,749 302.4'
Marathon 11349 $100,481 $135,548,863 68 4'
Layton 24 $123,928 $2,974,267 $2,000,000 1 -�
Key Colony Beach 81 $347,988 $28,187,020 14 4'
Islamorada 1,070 $158,061 $169,125,630 85 4'
TOTAL PARCELS 9,690 $102,426 $992,508,73,
TOTAL REMAINING 1,421 In 2012, the State authorized 3,550 County wide allocations,including cities,
ALLOCATIONS with 1,970 allocations for unincorporated C.
PARCELSTO
PURCHASE 8,2 9— $102,426*** $846,961,269 S ,000,000 423**
(COUNTYWIDE)
During the S year period of FY 2014-2018, 100% of the Monroe County Land Authorih� expenditures in the Kev West ACSC were for
affordable housing.Previously, the Monroe County Land Authority histor ically allocated approximately 18%($270,000/vr)of the Kev West
ACSC portion of tourist impact tax revenue to the purchase of conservation and recreation lands.$270,000 is used for analysis of Kev West.
**The total vacant parcels(9,690)less the 1,421 allocations available results in 8,269 parcels to purchase. At an average cost of$102,426 it
will take 423 years to acquire these parcels utilizing$2M
***This analysis assumes no growth in pr,oper>h value over time.Note pr,oper(v values could change exponentially.
d Land values for each jurisdiction are divided by the$2LI estimated funding figure.
As demonstrated in table above, at current dedicated funding levels for land acquisition efforts in the
Florida Keys, and the remaining 1,421 allocations for dwelling units through the year 2023 (2026 for
the County), it would take approximately 423 years (302 years for the County) to generate the funds
equal to the tax assessed value and offer to purchase the remaining inventory of private, vacant
parcels in the Florida Keys (unincorporated and incorporated).
Packet,Pg. 22
B.2
At present, there are two recurring dedicated funding sources for purchasing land within the County.
The first is through half of a 1 cent Tourist Impact tax (pursuant to § 125.0108, F.S.), which provides
an annual revenue for the Florida Keys ACSC and the Key West ACSC. The second recurring
revenue is provided through a State Park surcharge.
In anticipation of the significant remaining private, vacant parcels, the Monroe County BOCC
authorized staff in 2016, to commence land acquisition programs to supplement the long standing
efforts of the Monroe County Land Authority and those of the State of Florida.
The funding status of the various acquisition program efforts are included in the table below and
include the efforts by the Land Authority, the County Attorney's Office, the Planning &
Environmental Resources Department, the Building Department and the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection.
Significantly, since passage of the Stewardship Act(2016), Monroe County and the Monroe County
Land Authority have budgeted over $26M combined for land acquisition and spent/encumbered
$19+M, retiring 254.22 development rights (as of February 2021).
Packet,Pg. 23
B.2
3
AIR Q- February 202
r LandAcquisitionFunding -Available rid Potential Balances
ric,m 7'1,116*to,211912.1,
Sa�,c�o,c�o
Saa,c�o,c�o
MC Land Authority&
$10,000,0w Manning Debt. Planning Dept.
$1a,000,000
County Attorneys
59,000,000 QVice&Plattrring fFept.. Stewardship Bill
J6+€£larrd Passed 711116, r
Authority Administered by FUEP Building Dept.
$4,000,000 —
$0
Monroe County NfCLA RCav341 .. ,
Monroe Cotul—M Reseive Fund Total unly L'tiFi'FBa da Keys FN�UD/DE0(D8G-
304/316 FLind Land Autl�tority Fl (Condo Plan FundEng SYese�ardshap Ac t'p Disaster Re�coveiy� FErdll�/DEM H1f4r6P
Keys ALSCFund 101.7.a)
,.Avalta€ie Rafante $0 $3,630,24.2 $3,1.11,92.8 $61,749,170 $15,000,000
®Encumbered or Spent13...,.'33P..,:10�t
Conservadon A
0ensrty Red uctron $1,497,72_2. $7,202,228 5714,69C S4,54°,M
CTF Density Red wflon 5:3,692,899
Affordable Housin6 $1,578,443'' $4,736,122 h.
aPen&ngFun ing $3,578,1,91.
TDRs Retired by Fund 95 159.2.2. :2.54.2.2. 81..89
Toral I D.9s Retired gait]rinds) 336.11
NOTES: a—Thin total includes$990,000 that may be reimbursed by the FHFC GDBG-DR grant for the Conch Trailer Court property
yo—This total includes$1,379,958that may be reimbursed by the FHFC CDBG-DR grant for H'owards Haven and 12,Lower Keys Scattered
Sites properties,and$194,679 representing fifty percent of the Davis judgment that may be reimbursed by the state of Florida
c—"this total includes$269,685 representing fifty percent of the Galleon Bay judgment that may be reimbursed by the State of Florida
Previous Relevant County Actions rmardin2 ROGO allocations:
In 2012, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., DEM and DEO completed the hurricane evacuation
clearance time modeling task and found that with 10 years' worth of building permits, the Florida
Keys would be at a 24 hour evacuation clearance. Based upon the resulting 24 hour evacuation
clearance, DEO determined the remaining allocations for the Florida Keys (3,550 additional permits
countywide, 1,970 of these permits would go to Monroe County - excerpt below). In March 2013,
the Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the State Administration Commission, approved the
recommendation to allocate 10 years' worth of growth to the Florida Keys.
WHEREAS, from among the scenarios provided by DEG at the June 8, 2012, Work Group
meeting, Scenario M5 included the 2010 Census site-built units(43,760 units); the maximum number of
residential building permits for new construction for all Local Governments per year for 10 years
(annually,County 197, Marathon 30, Isla orada 28,Key blest W key Colony Beach 6 and Layton 3);
1,248 mobile home units projected to convert to site-built units;the exclusion of 870 dwelling units on
Packet,Pg. 24
B.2
the.Naval Air Station; as well as two (2) functional evacuation lanes from MM 108-126. Further, the
Work Group recommended Scenario M5 with the provision that the City of Key West would transfer
annually (by July lath) any remaining or unused (90 allocations) allocations to the other focal
Governments based upon the Local Governments' ratio of vacant land.and
WHEREAS, following the June 8,2012. Work Group meeting,technical corrections were made
to the Census site built units revising that number to 43,718 and revising the Key West building permit
allocation to 91, which corrections do not affect the hurricane evacuation clearance time for the
population of the Florida Keys;.and
In 2012, the County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Department of
Economic Opportunity (DEO), the Division of Emergency Management (DEM), Marathon,
Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach and Layton. The MOU provided the distribution of
allocations among the local governments based upon a vacant land analysis (excerpt below).
WHEREAS, DEC)and the Local Governments recognize that significant vacant lands remain in
the Florida Keys: Monroe County with 8,758 vacant parcels�77%of total vacant lands) Marathon with.
1,281 vacant parcels (11%), Isl'arnorada with 1,109 vacant parcels (IONo), Kerr Colony Beach with 92
vacant parcels (0.81%m), Key West with 84 vacant parcels (0.74%), and Layton with 1.3 vacant parcels
(D.i l%),and
On April 13, 2016, the BOCC adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code,
which included a ROGO allocation distribution through the year 2023 (Policy 101.3.2). This policy
also included a re-evaluation of the ROGO allocation distribution schedule, if substantial financial
support was provided by July 12, 2018 for land acquisition to retire development rights.
January 30, 2019: The BOCC discussed and provided direction regarding existing and potential
actions, policies and programs to address exhaustion of ROGO allocations and build out of the
Florida Keys as of 2023 with a substantial number of platted lots remaining. The discussion involved
existing and potential actions, policies and programs; as well as ideas for policy changes to alleviate
potential takings liability, if and when the DEO is no longer able to award ROGO allocations to the
County.
133 The following staff addressed the Beard concerning direction. regarding existing and
potential actions, policies and programs to address exhaustion of ROGO allocations and build
out of the Florida Keys as of 2023 with a substantial number of platted lots remaining: M.s.
Schemper,Mr. Shillinger,Ms. Hurley,Derek Howard, Assistant County Attorney,, Mike:
Roberts, Sr. Administrator, Environmental Resources., Peter vlotTis, Assistant.County Attorney;
and Cynthia Guerra, Sr. Biologist The following individuals addressed the.Board: Alicia Putney,
Stuart Schaffer, representing Sugarloaf Shores and Cudjoe Gardens Homeowner's Association;
and Bill Hunter. Board took no official action.
On January 22, 2020; the BOCC adopted Ord. 005-2020 to extend the remaining market rate
ROGOs out for an additional three (3) years from 2023 to 2026; providing the County additional
time to distribute ROGO allocations while the new evacuation model runs are completed and to
implement other strategies to help transition land into public ownership reducing the potential
takings claims and addressing the future build-out of the Florida Keys. At the time of the County's
Packet,Pg. 25
B.2
reevaluation, the State purchased 135 parcels, at an approximate cost of$2,808,220 and retired 61.49
TDRs.
Staff has developed ideas for policy changes/programs to help alleviate potential takings
liability, if and when the State is no longer able to award ROGO allocations to the County.
The purpose of this item is to present the existing and potential actions, policies and programs
included in the attached ROGO buildout table for future BOCC direction.
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
September 21, 2012: The County approved Resolution 226-2012, entering into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), the Division of
Emergency Management (DEM), Marathon, Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach and Layton
which stipulated to the input variables and assumptions used in the hurricane evacuation model and
provided the distribution of allocations among the local governments based upon a vacant land
analysis.
April 13, 2016: The BOCC adopted the Monroe County Year 2030 Comprehensive Plan, including
Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.3.2 (ROGO distribution policy).
January 30, 2019: The BOCC discussed and provided direction regarding existing and potential
actions, policies and programs to address exhaustion of ROGO allocations and build out of the
Florida Keys as of 2023 with a substantial number of platted lots remaining. The discussion involved
existing and potential actions, policies and programs; as well as ideas for policy changes to alleviate
potential takings liability, if and when the DEO is no longer able to award ROGO allocations to the
County.
January 22, 2020: The BOCC adopted Ord. 005-2020 to extend the remaining market rate ROGOs
out for an additional three (3)years from 2023 to 2026.
January 22, 2020: The BOCC directed staff to prepare an agenda item to discuss and provide
direction on whether to direct staff to process Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code
amendments to: 1) move a portion of market-rate Rate Of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) units to the
affordable housing allocation pool and/or 2) accept the 300 Workforce Housing units offered by the
Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) required to evacuate in Phase 1 of the Hurricane
Evacuation model.
February 19, 2020: The BOCC discussed whether to direct staff to process a comprehensive plan and
land development code amendment to: 1) move a portion of the 378 remaining Market Rate -Rate of
Growth Ordinance (ROGO) units through 2026 to the Affordable Housing allocation pool and/or 2)
accept the 300 Workforce Housing units offered by the Department of Economic Opportunity
(DEO) required to evacuate in Phase 1 of the hurricane evacuation model. The BOCC did not decide
on the potential shifting of market rate allocations to the affordable housing pool but did direct staff
to start the process to accept the 300 workforce housing units.
Packet,Pg. 26
B.2
July 15, 2020: The BOCC discussed potentially shifting market rate allocations to the affordable
housing pool (agenda item I5). The BOCC did not decide on the potential shifting of market rate
allocations to the affordable housing pool but did direct staff to start the process to accept the 300
workforce housing units. The BOCC directed: accept the 300 workforce housing early evacuation
unit building permit allocations to be used in exchange for existing affordable allocations at
multifamily developments (for developers that agree to the early evacuation restriction) and the
affordable housing allocations returned to the County (returned in the exchange) be set aside and
banked for takings cases (bank them within an administrative reliefpool).
January 20, 2021: The BOCC directed staff to not move forward on amendments on potentially
shifting market rate allocations to the affordable housing pool (agenda item J9).
January 20, 2021: The BOCC voted to transmit the proposed amendments to DEO to review the 300
workforce housing early evacuation unit proposal, with the 300 unit amendment being structured as
an exchange program.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Direction on a future BOCC meeting to review this information
again and receive BOCC direction on the existing and future actions,policies and programs
presented.
DOCUMENTATION:
Ex. 1 Land Acquisition Funding Status Feb2021
Ex. 2 ROGO buildout table w BOCC direction from 2019 updated 3.16.2021
Ex. 3 Takings Claims Bill Whitepaper January 2020
Ex. 4 WHITE PAPER_build out_STRATEGIES_POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS_Nov 2020
Ex. 5 AIS_item B3_BOCC 1.30.2019_ROGO buildout options
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
Total Dollar Value of Contract:
Total Cost to County:
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted:
Source of Funds:
CPI:
Indirect Costs:
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing: If yes, amount:
Packet,Pg. 27
B.2
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required: n/a
Additional Details:
REVIEWED BY:
Emily Schemper Completed 03/22/2021 12:45 PM
Assistant County Administrator Christine Hurley Completed
03/22/2021 1:21 PM
Bob Shillinger Completed 03/24/2021 9:53 AM
Purchasing Completed 03/24/2021 9:54 AM
Budget and Finance Completed 03/24/2021 11:11 AM
Maria Slavik Completed 03/24/2021 11:17 AM
Liz Yongue Completed 03/24/2021 1:15 PM
Board of County Commissioners Pending 03/31/2021 10:30 AM
Packet,Pg. 28
Pue ODOU ®4 POWFU saga'10 U014quesaid) LZoZqoj sn4e4S Buipunjg!s'nba p L 'x :4u8ua 3 44
tC N
N
m L
(U
N 00 N d
J 4,c V
G Ln u a
w V) L
O
m u a N L- a..,
Y O co
N N cn
cu O N
N ca > 0 0 J
U U 0 Q N -C -0
G0 w 0 3
Gvi O cn
rW CoL
CU e m v 3
Ln E
W _ -a
m tD O ^ ~ E N
\ -Q U
H \ a cti c' o o
alU
o � 00 _ m +�
3 y H m "' L m
N C d. � ifh L 4-
�n a '� cuo c
M a.J Q NC C L G
CL E
r� (D
r JJJ 0 m (0
fj � m LA co
Lnr� u U > 0
®y U = =
2 lD
� N +, N
N .4.1 `- L
m ate5 >- O
G i rJ Ct -0 N
U N L N u
N 3 L
Q u w �w rn N
L E .Ej
L
N aJ dA
c30 E +� aN
c�
e e 0 "�
rn rl -000rn
Ln L
u oo M � Ln
4 oa; o00
llo
m L.D
G y rn N
p � � cn cn � cn
0 rl 00 1w
ua w c Ln
Ln
c can c c L
u° � o co
O o o Q o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R R R R R R � H H cn
cu
cu � 0 s °- cu06 N
o °1 w
W -o w m cu c O
s v Z
° x 4 cu °ate as as as
t� au s as mv' m nn cu
m u c c ® c
w u 0
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq 000N Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
M
N
m �
a+
ro 54 a ry w
CC,'�8 n _
S .ea
w M 7 ° U
CZ Cd)
N O
d a ou a ti I~ Qd
a ro a
d ro ° ca s aCi CC,
7 Q U N °
° w
Q ji
U O
M U U U \ V � U
�'O N � bA U ':' v %O
oo
.!"�' p O ro N M Oro O �O ;� ' �' y; ❑ N O �M O N Vxi �� � '�:
o m s Pa 3 o ro m �
d
C
O
•y�
A M
U�
U
O
C7
7 Qi Qi N
ti
G b o 0
N
bA
r �
N �o B27 o U c
o UF4U. U cU
O U
F4 > U o w.
N x a
row °
CQ
It °a z a
� �ro
94 ro al v Q f�. U
cc
p,.Y.2 ,., O•Y ro Y '
15
o"o r :o. ro r 5~ .0
C � :a u 0 0 15
F4
y Hai o
cc
w
� o
W ' N x
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
N
m �
a+
aY3i ca .;.j o o 54
a o o O c k p 3
3
w "
o ro q d N
It
d ti o o ro Y T 508 .
o 3 O
U a o o O
° ou o C ° ° N 3 o o o❑❑O o
bq N O N T U
O w iC
b11 Pi O W Q
NC U
C)O
wv Up7 Fw w ro 3N 6n o.-0 F °w
C
O
d�
A M
U�
O
C7
a•� U � �oc�i a.-.
Upy OoG"o� vN °
O
G b o 0
N
wad, c
on
'ou `n v. °'•o•o •O `° °' o �°�. cc. ^ j ° .. �°�. a�.-:ro °�•o wp '.CC
a w o z o o C a�. Me o
q�� � 0 8 z a p��'� � �u a a � z a� o o O � o
�a� o v � � � � W ..� �.=:yam.. � . � ^'.Z � p, y �•F��7,C �' b� . � w
a � o
� '��" � � ^•4' �° w o �j N ,�, s0+ ^ ? cLOi a� .�- '�O.� o�`�..° �N�� °' p +�-' r;
J2tb
Ei
� ° d
o c w W ° aC o 0 3 �.
d o o ro45
Y� °3 � 3oNEj
� � o
o° wO �oo' oo wc0� roU ° moo ° o
� pOro
.a o O ° a o 0 0 ? Y o O
F4
U 0.:= sy U o �. '° � �°: `a �•O v'� .°� � � ° G." °� v G a� sue. P'r '_'
�� Y � � � o ..•� w o � �� o z o � � �'�� o a°'i o o �� o o �o v •o
F4
0 ^tl of�.Q CJ G C 'Q •O
s.
Oa •� hQ�n �� °�, hn �
Asti � A o o g
O
M, a P4
Puel Pue OOON o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6�OZ woa;uo!&oaa!p oo09 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
co
N
m �
a+
It
06 W m p
o �
o o ° o u a, w Nbro �w oro
`, o ro UO
U 3 a Oro a o ° U
3
a o O.
00.N bCQ
P4
Fz M o
U� o
o z
W
ti
G b o 0
N
on
v r•O'� " Y ON.wTi " •° sU. ° O O ''� 'ou N v >, "�" ° N
oa.o }, v w° U 7�
g421 .Y Tda
6 U.Y
Cut CQ
C N � U N '� v O.+.-' a.-•+ ^' �:=.z F�7 by
o_.
owl �'=' � a�
O 'z z a� ° P4
72
�o aUi � a�i
o N o C7 w ou w x U Y o P4 Y w U ° ° P. o 0
°
7
Q O 72
a"
P4
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
co
N
m �
a+
> a
P.
o 0 b tU4 U4
N� W 6L
>
16
U U �ro ° moo q'o Ud ° °CO7 �
N p U m U O. >
o o > ro aw° o a T ti
tiro �,
N Q d U U
m
a to U U C U N O O O
z z z
o U
a� P. �N a� �� a� �� P.
�aP.� QN ��� QN P. QN P. Q
�� o 0
a
:y•�� o 0 0 0 0 '�
z z z z z
wad' o
CZ E
> ; o o to o ~
afro w Yro o � �
o Y p
0
>CZ
z ° o °
a U °
o a a
;?
O 3 U U N > U 6
,i�,.°J sp 7-4 °� v a; Q''O'r~~• �, °o. �°: p,� a� �pu f�'� O �
A °
^?
o Y ro.� •o a o C7 '. O ~ U o o
x ro O o N �
-15
r� M
+ �:b ai +
vc°i P u a� ~
0 0 �16 w.o �oN j Q•o� o � ~ � � o �� � o 0 0
� Y
w ? ?� y d ?� .°�.� �„
° o ° °44a ° A
s.
G+ R d Q Q O R Q O R Q O R R p Q R d bD Q A
Nw �w� as �w as �w cGaaw �w Nail �w o
Puel Pue OOON o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) I•ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6�OZ woa;uo!&oaa!p oo09 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
M
N
m �
a+
o U
a 2 o
o .� .� � m
o 5 ti 5 m a
o Q oq Cn
Pu
A
° a°° 3
m o u U y aoi o o SY ° o o s
roN aCi roU QI � o dc
U21 o U Q tl SY Q °
o a ti a� a so' p P o
.°? aup
croa ro ou •'� U Y o o o Y o ° o
ro � 3 a � � eoo T � hso
��o � � bo ;d� soy •° :tip so^?
U i3 TN m ; 'a
� O
O U
zCa -
~ N
V p
Pr
C�Pr
a
:y•�� o 0 0 0 '�
z z z z
wad' o
a� �5-p �' o '� oo.P � � o •�i
� w o
IT
tro
u o o ° o o P a a I
� N
o ° z o o o ° ro o P4 ° U
o N o
°u°o°°'
.
mow° p
o w Y a F4 � oo O F4o o O
u � z �U U w°P4
C
16
yG S.w Y O ti 'O U P" O'� P..2
u O u v -i5 O >.r v U
z n ro
U U O R ro 0 0 0 U O O 'U" U O ti
A QI �YU... �,.. Q 3 Uro U f� U O 3 UF4'5
ou G� d u u `;���"' G un `. � � �.x•x h�_ °' � d LYi C o °' � h�°' �
ti
Aq
� O
N a F4
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
� M
N
a
5
S33,� > ❑
T4 0a N N
65
14
cf
,��yy a O❑❑U R ou b P4 R a
p
O
r4 P: u ca aCi is v
8n
> .o p 3 '
Q
N
'o
V p
Pr
C�Pr
ti
G b o 0
O N
wad, c
on
° o > a o a Yol
WW
CQ
c� a�io o°u.
mow wo5'U.o ° ° o N o94
.o
CQ
IT
oo c 3 ° our o F3
� � � U O�.fl ON� 'O ..'~7 � ti O i3� T+ i3 .� U Q o Y 'U ad.
-12
U ...
54
o P.
U IS
'� Q z Y. o o al C7 O. .-. c�i r,, f�. • • c� O,al G;O �a a>i u o
A o o° Z $ o ° o°uw a
72
ti R yh a a o�.3
O
v V P4
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
� M
CZ
N
a
d
ai
£
x £,
z
h���•i £t} stir"Y Y����1��1��St!t! r j s ,< �
P....Ui N U U U
Q O ti'O
U � U
U c
A'>
W �
U p.i
ti
G b o 0
O O N
a � z z
72
54
a
.U.
3 U ou V V °o V U o ob u
L1 o. w 1 04 o°u o°u
v
' R
•U� U N G 54 n
Q4 WVJ
1� W C1i
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) I•ZOZ'91'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq 000N Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
� M
N
a
d
m
a
a
m
d
d
U
C
O
d�
A M
U�
O
C7
U c
A'>
P.
U py
ti
G b o 0
N
M
on
So 0 ou 4 o o o CIL E -c a m `D `o.Q o co
toCQ-
a 5
`Q n
c o
C) O
o •o m
a> c Q c c ti
o o c M
Z6
4C6 C6
;Qa 6
'� �; Q' `° p w •o N azi `°,�'°' U o t E `D °'.o c C6
C6 Ea Q�
QC6
x
a" o _ o a> .Q o Q E Q m a o
0 0 > P4 Y v ..Oz o a ` o
�Q'Q " E "o'E Q'3 '�a E c m c c°'i
3Q Q o aai c a m a> m a
P4 5
EexUo-oU E aSm� �� UaQa> moEaa of � eeyaQ��,o�
� P+.� o� .a m � - � �•� w°° Q� E o m� m� � c� m��c`�i a,��`D � a—"i Y x y c o m m -`�`� E m E '�i.
•o
G o.•o �' o w v a•o a' .� Q o m a aai m a> m m a' -oc y o,Q o'`m °a' -�c,a'o U ti °' `�¢ W
Y v ,tQ
` °c �.o
a a ca
C o.n o•o •o ,., � .N P4
g z oU °?o
v .. 2 P. i.-7 ° U U0 a c` o
A v 5 v
Q Y
0
P4
'o
�•u R..~d. N N�� �� �
y Fi
O P4
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
co
N
m �
a+
w
U
ai
qq
v las ,
a N`s fi H`s M€ `m
N r T,
v j
q
w N E
G
3
4f
N
ti
N
O
O N
z
M
0
Z4
N
F4 w U
94
72
o ° M4 U o Z N o o O
..... .., N oC4`��yc4o°�
aA o uu uu
4- R a
o U
is o U
°' o � a� a�¢° m � �• � � x �' ° � � oq a� �.� a�•O�._.. a�'� � o �w,o O o U
16
N w o
s
F4
O
C7 °
R U Q Q
A
O
F4
Puel Pue OOON o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6�OZ woa;uo!&oaa!p oo09 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
raw
MEN
MEN
ou: -�" o. •ti aUi o o o 3
cn
CZ P5
7 a�� •b b �J a0i� � "«,i r`x �;� u R'�� �' O. c� .�� �' � U �'
1-0
U `° �" `�.ti �-� a i' � �'�F" � w'� � rob•ti o 0 0
p CZ o Y
U U
O
C
O
fa M o
O
v ;
A'>
a �
va ,
G b o 0
N
z z m
.54
o sro a
`x 14 5
lg
..y
d ey
� cq
� o
Y!V ti
3 o U o r o R
CT
+'y-
C.O R
v o� ou d C ay o U
�� n.-�b A44
y �.••+• U U .1 U yy � ~ � ~ � ro
O
Q U
A
v
72
w �
0
R _
P4
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
h �
ip
N
sm a
a
s.'O,b oo
C O O' ro O U
�.� N'Y �• � O �00 bA O
CZ 3
O a �
=
w, a
U U O N D r ti
Z CA
O U
V] O �
U
ti
N
O
N
ti
M
M
O
bA
G
� d
d v�
G
R.0
o
... C �� 7 � U p,� a,+ �. � ° O �'O � W° �" a...a .Ui G U •-+
ro
bq u
a °ro N o d on U o
a81 .°° .rr°. �'W G o v
Fu
y
y r
ri GO 7 z, Vi cp �p GO O
h h h h
v
F4
v
ro
0
ro
O
O
F4
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq OOON Z'xg:&uawLjoe&&y
N
d
sx
sa
a
m
d
d
U
yo
fa
A>
�a
�°a o
z z
ct
a4
c^ o o N� ° �' °, u o o
u . > ou *C� aS . o N v U�0 3~ r �' 3'O •3
w o o ° w' U
o N o U o E-, v ° U ou °' '�
N U ° N bb U 00
U.o o z > �a o 'o a Y N U. '" p W
S o u
� � w �
F4 .o
u'O o >,°: , v
A o o Y o o U o w W Y U U S
F4
y� 'R❑ P,
72
� d 7 d Q R Q � �' Q'�p O > Q� •R y� Q,a A
Oa L� 6^O v�C.r z Z G a h q GO i..a b�A h q .7i ate. h GO O
Vr 1� W
Puel Pue 000N o&pa&e!aa seep!JO uoge&uaswd) �ZOZ'9�'£pa&epdn 6WZ woa;uo!&oaa!p 0009 M a!qe&&nop!!nq 000N Z'xg:&uauagoe&&y
N
sm a
d
x;
sa
a
m
d
d
U
C
O
d�
fa M r r r
U
U�
O
v ;
A'>
a �
va
bu b o 0
z , z
Q o m o
o o 5 S o U w 5 W
o o
z Q p s S , o o
q e
�^ Q� 4t o Y o 3 n
W W ti n O
EliW
O p
16
A U ti ^ti a a a z a UO
F4
c 3
'O
y
dC+ .'y47''
o P4
x11h )_1:: 33 B.2.c
MONROE COUNTY
THE FLORIDA KEYS AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN
PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION CHALLENGES
The Florida Keys are designated as an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) by the State Legislature,pursuant to
F.S. 380.05. This designation gives the State oversight authority over development in the Florida Keys and limits the r
number of residential housing permits that Monroe County and its municipalities may issue each year.
The State imposes these growth restrictions in order to provide for the safety of residents in the event of a hurricane
evacuation and to protect the significant natural resources.
As a direct result of State's legislative and administrative growth restriction mandates,the County and municipalities
have adopted local ordinances such as Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) to fairly and competitively allocate the
limited number of permits.
The most recent hurricane modeling completed in 2012 by the Department of Economic Opportunity(DEO),pursuant M
to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., found that no more than 10 more years' worth of building permits (a maximum of 3,550 2
permits) shall be issued for the Florida Keys without exceeding the statutory maximum allowed 24-hour evacuation M
clearance. In March 2013, the Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the State Administration Commission, approved the ;g
recommendation to allocate no more than 3,550 building permits. 0
C
To date, a total 2,129 permits of the 3,550 permits have been allocated, and 1,421 remain to be allocated. The Florida 2
Keys are fast approaching "buildout,"at which point additional permits may not be allocated by the State.
The State of Florida and the local governments of the Florida Keys may face significant liability because the
number of undeveloped, privately-owned parcels in the Florida Keys ACSC far exceeds the remaining permit W
allocations, leaving property owners without rights to build on their properties, as demonstrated in Table 1. N
cv
Table 1:2018 Inventory of Privately-Owned,Vacant Parcels in Florida Keys and Approximate Land Value
2018 2018 2018
AREA
NUMBER OF AVERAGE PARCEL APPROXIMATE
VACANT PARCELS VALUE LAND VALUE*
Key West ACSC 133 $397,235 $ 52,832,202
Unincorporated MC 7,033 $85,858 $603,840,749 —
Marathon 1,349 $100,481 $135,548,863
Layton 24 $123,928 $ 2,974,267
Key Colony Beach 81 $347,988 $ 28,187,020 (n
Islamorada 1,070 $158,061 $169,125,630
TOTAL PARCELS 9,690 $102,426 $992,508,731
y
TOTAL REMAINING ALLOCATIONS 1,421
PARCELS TO PURCHASE AFTER ALLOCATIONS 1 8,269 $102,426 $846,961,269
*Usnig December 2018 Monroe County Property Appraiser data M
REQUEST/NEED:
TO PROTECT PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS AND REDUCE LIABILITY: E
1) SUPPORT KB 587/SB 748 `TAKINGS CLAIMS IN AREAS OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN'
and
2) SUPPORT STATE FUNDING FOR LAND ACQUISITION IN FLORIDA KEYS
($5M a year from Florida Forever, as authorized in the Florida Keys Stewardship Act)
Packet,Pg.43
B.2.c
TAKINGS:CASES,JOINT DEFENSE AND LIABILITY
and the need for
THE FLORIDA KEYS PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION ACT
The State-imposed growth limits have already prompted a number of inverse condemnation and other property rights
related suits when those property owners have been unable to obtain permits to build on undeveloped lots.
rr
Since 2005, Monroe County and the State of Florida have been jointly defending multiple takings cases. The State and
the City of Marathon operated under a similar partnership in the two cases where that City was named as a defendant
along with the State. This partnership provides for mutual litigation support and cooperation in exchange for an
understanding that each entity would bear half of any liability imposed.
The alternative to the joint defense of these cases would be for the State and the local governments to both expend
public resource litigating against each other over the issue of apportionment, which would cause both unnecessary 0
expense to the taxpayer and delay the property owner's receipt of full compensation. Such litigation between the State o
and County would severely undermine the cooperative approach taken to date which has resulted in successful defenses
in twenty-six(26) of the twenty-eight(28) claims.
m
In the two cases where liability was found, the joint defense partnership resulted in much lower damage awards than
the property owners were seeking. In both cases, the Trial Court imposed the liability jointly and severally against
both the State and the County, leaving both entities responsible for the full payment of the judgment.
0
With joint and several liability and given the State's lengthy appropriations process,Florida Keys' property owners who
obtain inverse condemnation and other property-rights related compensation awards may not have their awards timely
paid due to delays in the State's lengthy and onerous appropriations process. For local governments, this might mean
an undue burden of being sued for the entirety of the judgment, or having to pay accruing interest.
cv
CD
The Florida Keys Property Rights Protection Act will: N
• >Provide the property owner whose property a Court has determined has been taken as a result of the
State-imposed growth limits with a more expedient and certain process for recovering the compensation'
guaranteed under the U.S. and Florida Constitutions against both the local government and the State.
Clarify that the State and the local government that share joint and several liability are separately
obligated to pay half of such judgments, including interest, attorneys'fees and costs.
• Permit a local government found liable with the State as a result of claims based upon the State-imposed ` v,
growth limits to satisfy the local government's 5'0%share of that liability to the property owner pursuant to its
own budgetary procedures and cycle.
• Protect the financial interests of the the local government(and its local taxpayers)that shares joint and
several liability with the State from the being sued for the entirety of the judgment, or being negatively 1--
impacted by accruing interest on such judgments due to delays in the State's appropriation process.
• Provide for an efficient and expedient method for the State to reimburse the local government for the
State's half of any money paid by that local government for property rights claims brought in federal court. m
• Have a funding source: the 2014 voter-approved Florida Water and Land Conservation Initiative
(Amendment 1) will generate an estimated $648 million to $1 billion a year for 20 years to fund the Land
Acquisition Trust Fund,which could be used as asource offundingto'pay inverse condemnation awards against
the State.
Packet,Pg.44
B.2.c
LAND ACQUISITION STRATEGIES TO REDUCE TAKINGS LIABILITY
1) STATE LAND ACQUISITION EFFORTS (via Florida Keys Stewardship Act and Florida Forever):
Land acquisition is a key strategy to reduce the future takings liability.Recognizing this,the State legislature passed
the Florida Keys Stewardship Act in 2016 authorizing S5M a year (for 10 years for a total of S50M) for land
acquisition in the Florida Keys under the State's primary land buying program,the Florida Forever Program.
a
U
Since 2016, with the passage of the Stewardship Act, Florida DEP/DSL has spent/encumbered $3.28M, retiring
68.82 development rights. State DSL should aggressively pursue land acquisition in the Florida Keys because:
OVER 3500 PRIVATELY-OWNED VACANT,UNDEVELOPED PARCELS LIE WITHIN THE
FLORIDA FOREVER PROJECT BOUNDARIES (Table 2)
O
Table 2:Analysis of Privately-Owned,Vacant Parcels Within Florida Forever Projects in the Florida Keys
WITHIN THE FLORIDA FOREVER BOUNDARY NOT WITHIN THE FLORIDA FOREVER TOTAL COMBINED
NO. 2018 2018 NO. 2018 2018 NO. 2018 N
AREA OF AVERAGE APPROX OF AVERAGE APPROX OF APPROX
PARCELS PARCEL TOTAL PARCELS PARCEL TOTALLAND PARCELS TOTAL
VALUE LAND VALUE VALUE VALUE LAND VALUE O
Key West 0 $0 $0 133 $397,235 $52,832,202 133 $52,832,202
Unincorp MC
3,039 $14,348 $43,603,716 3,994 $140,270 $560,237,033 7,033 $603,840,749
¢-'
Marathon 414 $10,948 $4,532,519 935 $140,124 $131,016,344 1,349 $135,548,863 N
Layton 4 $98 $392 20 $148,694 $2,973,875 24 $2,974,267
Key Colony 0 $0 $0 81 $347,988 $28,187,020 81 $28,187,020 '✓
Islamorada 77 $202,710 $15,608,696 993 $154,599 $153,516,934 1,070 $169,125,630 tV
CD
3,534 $18,038 $63,745,323 6,156 $150,871 $928,763,408 9,690 $992,508,731 tV
Allocations to be 1,421
applied
After allocations 8,269 $846,961,269 t8
CL
CL
2) COUNTY LAND ACQUISITION STRATEGIES AND COMMITMENT:
A) Local Land Acquisition Program: Monroe County Board of County Commissioners implemented a land
acquisition program to supplement the long standing efforts of the Monroe County Land Authority and those of Ch
the State of Florida. E
Since passage of the Stewardship Act, Monroe County and the Monroe County Land Authority and have U
Ch
budgeted over $19.5M for land acquisition and spent/encumbered to date $10.2M, retiring 203.76
development rights. (County budgeted funds from its infrastructure sales tax fund.)
B Two willingseller programs to retire development rights have been implemented b Monroe Count
p g p g p Y Y�
• Density Reduction Lot acquisition program: Residential property owners sell parcels with development
rights to the County.Density Reduction Lots may later be offered for sale with a deed restriction to prohibit m
the development of the property with new housing units. The revenue derived from the sale of these deed
restricted properties can help replenish the funds necessary to retire more development rights.
• Less Than Fee acquisition program: Residential property owners that own an adjacent vacant property
may sell the development right on that vacant property to the County in exchange for legally allowed
accessory uses on the adjacent parcel such as a pool, open yard or garage (and they retain ownership.)
There are about 700 parcels in this category.
3 � � � <_; � Monroe CoriTi ( t' i� E, c c _2020
Packet,Pg.45
B.2.c
C) County policies that help transition land into public ownership and incentivize development that
eliminates privately owned vacant parcels:
• Incentivize Dedication of Land — County adopted an amendment to encourage additional land
dedication by providing additional points in ROGO/NROGO.
• Discouragement Policy— County adopted an amendment to discourage private applications for FLUM c
amendments that increase density and intensity,as required by Rule 28-20.140,F.A.C.,unless mitigated v�
by providing land(acreage or Improved Subdivision [IS]parcels) to the County. rr
• Created Commercial FLUM category (no residential component) - County adopted an amendment to
provide options to re-designate property for other nonresidential uses (Provides alternative uses of
property). .�
• Revised NROGO to make the process simpler and encourage nonresidential redevelopment and
development. Created the NROGO banks of untilized floor area to make NROGO easier to award.
• Revised Lot Aggregation to encourage additional aggregation by increasing points awarded in ROGO. W
0
• Revised Land Dedication in ROGO to provide additional points and options for dedicating land to the
County.
• Revised transfer procedure for ROGO exemptions to provide the ability to transfer a market rate unit
from one location to another with the provision of affordable housing.
• Adopted an Interim Development Ordinance limiting the transfer of market rate ROGO exemptions to
single-family residential legally platted lots (dispersing development rights and not grouping multiple 0
development rights on a single property). o
• Adopted land acquisition priorities (Policy 102.4.2) to balance growth management,habitat protection,
retirement of development rights,reduction of density&intensity, future build-out of the Florida Keys,
climate change, sea level rise, affordable housing, etc.
cv
LU
cv
r9
Contacts:
• Roman Gastesi, Countv Administrator; 305-292-4441, gastesi-roman@monrocolintv-fl.gov
• Bob Shillinger, ConmyAttorney, 305-292-3470, shillinger-bob@monrocounty fl.gov
• Christine Hurley,Assistant CountvAdministrator, 305-289-2517, hurley-christine@monrocounty fl.gov
• Lisa Tennyson, Legislative Affairs Director, 305-292-4444, tennyson-lisa@monrocotintv-fl.gov
4I 1 - e M o n roe Cor7n ( t' i� c, c c' ,c Nr- A RY 2020
Packet,Pg.46
B.2.d'
�f
MONROE COUNTY ` F s
THE FLORIDA KEYS AREA OF CRITICAL STATE CONCERN q'
BUILD-OUT CHALLENGES FACING THE FLORIDA KEYS
,... 0
0
The Florida Keys are designated as an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) by the State Legislature. A Rate
of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) was implemented in order to provide for the safety of residents in the event of a
hurricane evacuation and to protect the significant natural resources of Monroe County (MC), as required by the
State of Florida. ROGO established a competitive permit allocation system whereby those applications with the
highest scores are awarded building permits.
In 2012, pursuant to Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) completed the C
hurricane evacuation clearance time modeling task and found that with 10 years' worth of building permits, the 2
Florida Keys would be at a 24 hour evacuation clearance. Based upon the resulting 24 hour evacuation
Y p g �
clearance, DEO determined the remaining allocations for the Florida Keys (3,550 additional permits
countywide). In March 2013 the Governor and Cabinet, sitting as the State Administration Commission
approved the recommendation to allocate 10 years' worth of growth to the Florida Keys.
cv
As demonstrated in Table 1, at current dedicated funding levels for land acquisition efforts in the Florida Keys,
and the remaining 1,421 allocations for dwelling units through the year 2023, it would take approximately 423 0
years to generate the funds equal to the tax assessed value and offer to purchase the remaining inventory of zi
private,vacant parcels in the Florida Keys (unincorporated and incorporated).
Table 1: 2018 Inventory of Privately-OwnedVac ant Parcels in Florida Keys and Approximate Land Value
2018 ESTIMATED YEARS TO
2018 2018 APPROXIMATE FUNDING GENERATE
Based on Historic
NO. AVERAGE LAND VALUE THE FUNDS
AREA Rates For VACANT PARCEL (December 2018 EQUAL TO THE
PARCELS VALUE*** MC Property Acquisition n TAX ASSESSED >_
Appraiser data Conservation VALUE U
Lands :3
Key West ACSC* 133 $397,235 $52,832,202 $270,000* 196 CL
�
Unincorporated MC 7,033 $85,858 $603,840,749 302.4) cn�
Marathon 1,349 $100,481 $135,548,863 68 4
Layton 24 $123,928 $2,974,267 $2,000,000 14
Key Colony Beach 81 $347,988 $28,187,020 14 4) �
Islamorada 1,070 $158,061 $169,125,630 85 4) U)
TOTAL PARCELS 9,690 $102,426 $992,508,731
TOTAL REMAINING In 2012, the State authorized 3,550 County wide allocations, including cities, �
ALLOCATIONS 1,421 with 1,970 allocations for unincorporated MC. .i
PARCELS TO
PURCHASE 8,2 9�`.� $102,426*** $846,961,269 S2,000,000 423`
(COUNTYWIDE) CL
* During the 5 year period of FY 2014-2018, 100%of the Monroe County Land Authority expenditures in the Key TVest ACSC were for affordable
housing. Previously, the Monroe County Land Authority historically allocated approximately 18%(5270,000/yr) of the Key TVest ACSC portion of S
tourist impact tax revenue to the purchase of conservation and recreation lands.S270,000 is used for analysis ofKey TVest.
**The total vacant parcels(9,690)less the 1,421 allocations available results in 8,269 parcels to purchase. At an average cost of 5102,426 it will take eY
423 years to acquire these parcels utilizing SM.
***This analysis assumes no growth in property value over tithe.Note property values could change exponentially. uJ
i Land values for each jurisdiction are divided by the S2M estimated funding fagure. F.
Note: The analysis in this paper is limited to tax assessed value of parcels and does not consider: the future willingness of 0)
owners to sell; if the value assumed will be equal to the acquisition price; sufficiency of funds; if the parcels have a
marketable title; the suitability of public ownership of certain parcels; the feasibility and costs of managing parcels; etc.
11 P a '2 e M o nr ot; Cotin N, B0 CC $ oS e1nber ; i
i
Packet,Pg.47
B.2.d'
Unincorporated Monroe County(MC):
The State Administration Commission approved the recommendation to allocate 10 years' worth of growth
(1,970 permits) to MC while maintaining an evacuation clearance time of 24 hours, through the year 2023. The
C7
State of Florida specifically allows the issuance of 197 building permits per year for new residential 0
development(Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C.),within unincorporated MC. c
Table 2 demonstrates the challenges unincorporated MC may face, as there are 7,033 privately owned vacant
parcels (minimum value of$603,840,749). With just 197 permits per year,it would take over 35 years' worth of
annual allocations (at the current rate of 197) to absorb these parcels. This may result in a balance of 6,170
privately held vacant parcels at risk of not obtaining permits in the future (minimum value of $529,745,119.
This deficit of building permit allocations could trigger takings suits against both the State and MC, if no
additional permits are allowed beyond the year 2023. C
c
Table 2: 2018 Analysis of Privately-Owned,Vacant Parcels in Unincorporated Monroe County, Florida Es
2018 NUMBER OF PRIVATE YEARS TO ALLOCATE
TIER VACANT PARCELS PERMITS
No Tier(ORCA, etc. 223
Tier I 3,520 CD
Tier II 292 N
Tier III-A 187 c
Tier III 2,811 v)�
TOTAL 7,033- 35 7
TOTAL REMAINING
ALLOCATIONS 863
POTENTIAL LIABILITY 6,170*
Assumes one (1)unit per parcel and does not take into account additional density potential.
U
Current Land Acquisition Strategies:
Monroe County and the State of Florida could face a significant number of property rights suits due to the large
number of undeveloped privately owned parcels in unincorporated Monroe County's portion of the Florida Keys
Area of Critical State Concern, which far exceeds the number of new residential building permits allocations
authorized by the State. In anticipation of this reality, the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners CL
Ci
authorized staff to commence a land acquisition program to supplement the long standing efforts of the Monroe w
County Land authority and those of the State of Florida.
e(
Since passage of the Stewardship Act, Monroe County and the Monroe County Land Authority and have
budgeted over $26M combined for land acquisition and spent/encumbered to date S 18.9+-Nl, refiring 251.01 v)i
development rights (as of October 2020). This amount does not including purchases for affordable housing. �
0
• Density Reduction Lot acquisition program: Residential property owners sell parcels with .2
development rights to the County. Density Reduction Lots may later be offered for sale with a
deed restriction to prohibit the development of the property with new housing units. The revenue
u.o
derived from the sale of these deed restricted properties can help replenish the funds necessary to
retire more development rights. a.
o The County and Land Authority have spent or encumbered $8,448,484 on the density
reduction program and conservation (inclusive of the County spending or encumbering
$1,407,722 on the density reduction program).
er
• Less Than Fee acquisition program: Residential property owners that own an adjacent vacant
property may sell the development right to build a home on that vacant property to the County in
exchange for legally allowed accessory uses on the adjacent parcel such as a pool, open yard or
garage (and they retain ownership) There are about 700 parcels in this category. E
o The County has spent or encumbered$3,692,899 on the less than fee program.
r
i
Packet,Pg.48
B.2.d11
• The County works with DEP to identify ideal properties that would fit the Florida Forever a
mission, as well as eliminate potential takings liability Since 2016, with the passage of the
Stewardship Act, Florida DEP/DSL has spent/encumbered $4.5+M, retiring 76.82 development 0
rights (as of October 2020). 0
o The State's long-standing acquisition efforts in the Florida Keys is essential to maintain c
to reduce future liability. DEPshould aggressively pursue land acquisition in the Florida 'a
Keys because over 3,500 privately-owned vacant, undeveloped parcels lie within the
Florida Forever project boundaries:
Table 3: Anal sis of Privatel -Owned,Vacant Parcels Within Florida Forever Proects in the Florida Keys
WITHIN THE FLORIDA FOREVER NOT WITHIN THE FLORIDA
BOUNDARY FOREVER TOTAL COMBINED 0
NO. 2018 2018 NO. 2018 2018 NO. 2018 C
OF AVERAGE APPROX OF AVERAGE APPROX OF APPROX
AREA PARCELS PARCEL TOTAL PARCELS PARCEL TOTAL PARCELS TOTAL
VALUE LAND VALUE LAND LAND
VALUE VALUE VALUE
Key West 0 $0 $0 133 $397,235 $52,832,202 133 $52,832,202
CL
Unincorp MC 3,039 $14,348 $43,603,716 3,994 $140,270 $560,237,033 7,033 $603,840,749
N
Marathon 414 $10,948 $4,532,519 935 $140,124 $131,016,344 1,349 $135,548,863 CD
N
Layton 4 $98 $392 20 $148,694 $2,973,875 24 $2,974,267 >
0
Key Colon 0 $0 $0 81 $347,988 $28,187,020 81 $28,187,020
Islamorada
77 $202,710 $15,608,696 993 $154,599 $153,516,934 1,070 $169,125,630 z
3,534 $18,038 $63,745,323 6,156 S150,871 S928,763,408 9,690 $992,508,731
Allocations to be
applied 1,421 a
Z
After allocations 8,269 $846,961,269
At present, there are two recurring dedicated funding sources for purchasing land within the County. The first is
through half of a 1 cent Tourist Impact tax(pursuant to § 125.0108, F.S.), which provides an annual revenue for
the Florida Keys ACSC of approximately S1.8million (5 year average of FY 14-18). This tax also generates �-
approximately $2.3 million annually for the Key West ACSC (5 year average of FY 14-18). The second 2
recurring revenue is provided through a State Park surcharge that generates approximately $470,000 annually 0
(5 year average of FY 14-18). For the total revenue (on average $2.27 million) in the Florida Keys ACSC, CL CLi
during the last 5-year timeframe, the Land Authority spent 89% (approximately S2M) to the acquisition of w
conservation land, with the remainder going towards purchase of parcels for affordable housing, or
occasionally for active recreation areas. These funding sources alone will not be sufficient to meet the land
acquisition needs of MC in the future.
v)
In recognition of the possibility that the inventory of vacant parcels exceeds the permits MC can award, they
BOCC has already adopted some strategies to help transition land into public ownership to reduce the potential 0
takings claims, and address the future build out of the Florida Keys by incentivizing development that eliminates
privately owned vacant parcels and/or provides other development options. These strategies include:
ADOPTED COUNTY STRATEGIES
• Incentivize Dedication of Land —County adopted an amendment to encourage additional land dedication
by providing additional points in ROGO/NROGO.
• Discouragement Policy — County adopted an amendment to discourage private applications for FLUM
amendments that increase density, as required by Rule 28-20.140, F.A.C., unless mitigated by providing
land(acreage or Improved Subdivision [IS]parcels)to the County.
• Created Commercial FLUM category (no residential uses) - County adopted an amendment to provide
options to re-designate property for other nonresidential uses(Provides alternative uses of property).
3I i2 e M o nr ot; C' o tinI :\' B0 C` $ oS e1nber ; i
i
Packet,Pg.49
B.2.d11
• Revised NROGO to make the process simpler and encourage nonresidential redevelopment and
development. Created the NROGO banks of untilized floor area to make NROGO easier to award
additional square footage.
• Revised Lot Aggregation to encourage additional aggregation by increasing points awarded in ROGO.
• Revised Land Dedication in ROGO to provide additional points and options for dedicating land to the c
County. a
• Revised transfer procedure for ROGO exemptions to provide the ability to transfer a market rate unit from
one location to another with the provision of affordable housing.
• Adopted an Interim Development Ordinance limiting the transfer of market rate ROGO exemptions to
single-family residential legally platted lots (dispersing development rights and not grouping multiple
development rights on a single property).
• Revised Transfer of ROGO exemptions criteria for market rate units - to be developed as a single family
detached market rate dwelling unit on a receiver site that is a platted lot, IS or URM zoning, and not a
working waterfront.
• Revised Affordable Housing Incentive Program on the transfer of market rate ROGO exemptions to
single-family platted lots,with IS or URM zoning, and not a working waterfront. W
• Revised ROGO distribution to extend the remaining market rate ROGOs out for an additional three (3)
years from 2023 to 2026 -provides additional time to implement other strategies, such as land acquisition. `V
• Adopted land acquisition priorities (Policy 102.4.2) to balance growth management, habitat protection, >
retirement of development rights, reduction of density & intensity, future build-out of the Florida Keys, c
climate change, sea level rise,affordable housing,etc.
• Continued partnership with Monroe County Land Authority to aggressively purchase lands and retire
development rights. P
• Established a Density Reduction Lot acquisition program. This is a voluntary program to retire
development rights, with the County purchasing property from willing sellers. Density Reduction Lots
may be offered for sale with a deed restriction to prohibit the development of the property with new
housing units. The revenue derived from the sale of these deed restricted properties can help replenish the
funds necessary to retire more development rights.
The County and Land Authority have spent or encumbered$8,448,484 on the density reduction program
and conservation (inclusive of the County spending or encumbering $1,407,722 on the density reduction U
program)..
• Established a County Less than fee acquisition program. This is a voluntary program to retire building i
rights called the "Less than Fee" (LTF) program. For residential property owners that own an adjacent
vacant property, the County will purchase the right to build a house on the vacant property. This willing
seller program allow owners to retain ownership of their vacant property and use it for legally allowed
accessory uses like a pool, open yard or garage in exchange for selling the right to build a home on that
property. U)
The County has spent or encumbered$3,692,899 on the less than fee program.
• Continued partnership with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)to continue to acquire c
lands within the Florida Forever projects with cost share responsibilities(2016 MOA with DEP to acquire :2
&retire development rights). i
Since 2016, Florida DEP has spent/encumbered$4.5+M, retiring 76.82 development rights.
CL
u.o
While these adopted strategies, if utilized, help reduce the potential takings claims (and some off-set the costs CL
for direct acquisition of land), the projected costs outlined in Table 1 (page 1) suggest that these efforts will not
serve to close the gap between the number of vacant parcels that may seek a permit and the number of permits =
the County is currently authorized by the State to issue,based on ROGO.
er
The County staff recognizes the need for ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES aimed at reducing the total inventory of
privately owned vacant land. To that end, MC staff has evaluated potential future policy and program strategies
that could apply within the Florida Keys (see January 30, 2019 BOCC agenda),including:
4 I l r e M I II r o e C, I CI II \' B 0 C` $ o S e m b e r 2 02 (1
i
Packet,Pg. 50
pue O;)ON o&pa&e!ai seep!JO uo!&e&uasaad) OZOZ AON SNOUVONDW WOODN kOIIOd SDjE)Dj NjS &no p!!nq NDd`dd DiIHM b'xg:&uOwLlOe&&
N
`m' a
� N
M N U O
A z z z
x�
O c�
A 'V W U W O U W U W
U �v P. P.OQOo (� Profs Prof
b
N
�O
d�
z z z z
tb
d
w
Y
0.4"
O.`� o O. ° v v 'b7l Y P4
A :0 ` v u,w° •O j, 'v O r N .� .r' .N' .N = j .2
'� Z iG 3ti c P, f�, a� .. O.+'.o a a� • a� a�•O `� o 5
r sue.o 'b v al v w U Y vs5 .o o o
o w N
v
'. n 'O a°
>~ o " ow � O �'o O >w " �' �'' Y o a� a ^'�o.=? � o mow°
Y
Ei
oEj
u
CT I
� N
;y
w v
pue O;)ON o&pa&e!ai seep!JO uo!&e&uasaad) OZOZ AON SNOUVONDW WOODN kOIIOd SDjE)Dj NjS &no p!!nq NDd`dd DiIHM b'xg:&uOwLlOe&&
N
`m' a
Q 'O 16
.. cy
� d
A
'ate
b
d
�o
x� z z z z z z
�d
d�
b
d
w
A � O
R a
F..7 Cy'O i3 v O r w z v v
� OY, �.o °' �'�.� .� °'� `� � � �W�•o�o v � `° sue.
e N _
°:
O N o �' O o O
3 U �P4 N U
N Fti"•n O O �•� �O•� �U3 �'O Y� � � Y.�.0 � O..� O � � ...
O 0 1\ U O
U
n
o.
o P4 0 o P4 0 ou N Y .a V u z I
° o P4 N.2 tut
c�i
Pr.:(�
72
O N ^ N-15
`. N
5 v
Q !i z o o E
�y PG w w o P4 wr o ° a' �
°a ooNeu U'° 3o ° a
o a� Via, o o
P4 °� � o u
W..:V �igUU �iCiUUP4w° a�i �iCiP4 r%iWUQ ° o P 4 4 n�iWCi V coo
w '
pue O;)ON o&pa&e!ai seep!JO uo!&e&uasaad) OZOZ AON SNOUVONDW WOODN kOIIOd SDjE)Dj NjS &no p!!nq NDd`dd DiIHM b'xg:&uOwLlOe&&
N
`m' a
d'
U
o �M
^I
O W
z z o z
A
� d
Ay
'ate
b
d
d�
z z z
d�
b
d
w
Y N N ti x .��. N Pr �' N
Y ti
p, F�j 7Q °p' O 'O •• FU". Uj �J a'_'+ O
U
O...
U ti � U �� O Z� p O N � � r �%O• �U. '..tip+
—
O.
y z
ti bu U O n
-15
v -5 o w, o
U � U ai,> � ° � w � � U..�. -'�Ci v '" Z ,a; Fes"• o � � `� � O.
it
v v
o aS Y o o o o
�o � '� �G�o
y
b
s
a o u o a m o Q m o R a m o
o ~
w
pue O;)ON o&pa&e!ai seep!JO uo!&e&uasaad) OZOZ AON SNOUVONDW WOODN kOIIOd SD10D1`NjS &no p!!nq NDd`dd DiIHM b'xg:&uOwLlOe&&
is �
N
`m' a
ou d
M O
O
z
° z z
z °
U d
Ay
A. d
b
d
o
d�
z z z
b
d
w
N w
> ao ^ ou u
a Y Y
o wN� ca3 � � ° 5 o °o � s s u
a o Q Q Q a
ci
ZZ -
05 ul
coo.a moo ° � 3 Y s 55 >
o N ou r aL .. Y 'gyp 5 o
,o v
~ C '
0
N a 5
t
.,
a�i,� aUi a0i o—u Av -. -. ... F4 - .o S r:
�
v a R o v
u O
00
— mea A 01 polelai_m@ em_ ) o zewma mewwoD iwejmjVNls e mna 2m DiIHM#m, uLlOe;
Ci
@ �
) 2 2
3
\
_
))
E$
}�
Z
§
)
)
)
\
\ } )
/ e
\a �
\\ \ \
\\ \ \
\)
2 ( /
)\ /
k \\ \\/�\
j ; «j2a (] «6
B.2.e
J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
County of Monroe ire �f �ml'PC ��l� Mayor Sylvia Murphy,District 5
The Florida.Keys �r a i�] 1 Mayor Pro Tem Danny Kolhage,District I
J.
Michelle Coldiron,District 2
Heather Carruthers,District 3
David Rice,District 5
County Commission Meetingrr
January 30, 2019
Agenda Item Number: B.3
Agenda Item Summary #5160
0
BULK ITEM: No DEPARTMENT: Planning/Environmental Resources
TIME APPROXIMATE: STAFF CONTACT: Emily Schemper(305) 289-2506
No
AGENDA ITEM WORDING: Discussion and direction regarding existing and potential actions, c
policies and programs to address exhaustion of ROGO allocations and build out of the Florida Keys c
as of 2023 with a substantial number of platted lots remaining
ITEM BACKGROUND: 2
The Monroe County Planning & Environmental Resources Department is requesting direction from :�,
the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) regarding existing and potential actions, policies and
programs to address issues the County will face as we approach buildout and run-out of ROGO
allocations, currently set for the year 2023. The number of ROGO allocations the County receives
from the State of Florida is directly related to the ability to evacuate the Keys in an approaching 0
hurricane. State law and policy mandates the ability to evacuate within a 24 hour time period.
Attached are white papers from July, 2013, outlining the current challenge.
i
Based on data from 2012, the unincorporated County, after utilizing all ROGO allocations granted
by the DEO as of 2023 would have 6198 vacant privately owned lots, with close to 3000 of those
being located in Tier III, which has been designated as appropriate for development in the
Comprehensive Plan.
i
. I
LO
LU
Packet,Pg. 56
B.2.e
Table 1: Analysis of V.tcgnt Parcels in Ulllninroi or'ated Monroe County, Florida
NUMBER OF
ITEAR TO THEORETICAL —
TIL I� AIsL C:ATE
VACANT PARCELS PERMITS DENSITY`R
rr
o Tier(OR CA eta` 3 ?66
Tier I 3.979 4M6
Tier II 393 590
Tier III-A IE-A 260 553
Tier III 3.30I 5.048
TOTAL I 8 016 + 4IE E 11,763
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS 1,97
POTENTIAL LIABILITY 6.198"R c
0
1`_�S57d7nes OFF"e �y,p da,pd't�t 2"��aS7 t;`r�an does not d.a`ke?,nto acct;tJ�°,n �da!7dillt na] ir'td$rg '�€7T€':ddti 7it..
"TXde"3reeiC"S:f'd,?51?t`ana-N-svi.a 7S based 1.h 7!a.�'7Tdnvm Cid€nsJ,, ,
fbi'each Tad ctnegorv. This€ial a L P L°b'ide4 for Vhu5f?'a1hv L2de1G'f sas oF°h'`,con'dirions spec c to the �
g,dc '7f i,f i tcFz'"oe''<1Y?Ca`d t b R a€ i ai` ., e,YPid7 3l97R7ed1 tal 70Yr,gd1 C77"rf Rt7 desigdenio,n and t;:`ber
reg?edlEato?y c ols"IRCA,lL,,:such as,W €0'f37v 6,w 1u),1ad de.Te777R1ni7nt of d".'Y" d 7r7P!'7€?v porenlial.l
0
Staff have developed ideas for policy changes to alleviate potential takings liability, if and when the r-
DEO is no longer able to award ROGO allocations to the County.
In separate agenda items, the BOCC will consider: (1) extending the Rate of Growth Ordinance 2
(ROGO) allocation distribution schedule consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.3.2 and (2) `:'
the State's workforce affordable housing initiative. However, this issue still remains.
The purpose of this item is to discuss other existing and potential actions,policies and programs.
0
PREVIOUS RELEVANT BOCC ACTION:
2012: The County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)with the Department of
Economic Opportunity (DEO), the Division, Marathon, Islamorada, Key West, Key Colony Beach
and Layton which provided the distribution of allocations among the local governments based upon
a vacant land analysis.
April 13, 2016: The County adopted Comprehensive Plan Policy 101.3.2.
i
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT CHANGES:
N/A
. I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Discussion and direction on existing and future actions,policies
and programs presented. LO
DOCUMENTATION:
ROGO_idea_Table_01.16.19
MC SLR lft
Packet,Pg. 57
B.2.e
MC_SLR_2ft
MC SLR 3ft
WHITE PAPER build out land_acquisition_strategies_7_l 1_13
land acquisition request WHITE PAPER 10-17-13 a
acquisition table v2
Military Buffer Acquisition—FINAL 10-22-13
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date: 0
Total Dollar Value of Contract:
Total Cost to County:
Current Year Portion:
Budgeted:
Source of Funds:
CPI:
Indirect Costs:
Estimated Ongoing Costs Not Included in above dollar amounts:
Revenue Producing: If yes, amount:
Grant:
County Match:
Insurance Required:
0
Additional Details:
REVIEWED BY:
Emily Schemper Completed 01/16/2019 2:29 PM
Assistant County Administrator Christine Hurley Completed
O1/17/2019 9:22 AM
Bob Shillinger Completed 01/17/2019 11:11 AM
Steve Williams Skipped 01/16/2019 4:22 PM
Maureen Proffitt Skipped 01/16/2019 4:23 PM
Budget and Finance Completed 01/17/2019 12:13 PM E
Maria Slavik Completed 01/17/2019 12:19 PM
Kathy Peters Completed 01/17/2019 12:47 PM
Board of County Commissioners Pending 01/30/2019 10:00 AM R
LO
U
Packet,Pg. 58
(uo!&!s!nboe puel pue 000N o&pa&elaa seep!;o uORe&ussaad) suogdo&nopl!nq 000N MZ'0£'�0009 £9 wOl! SI`d 5'xg:&usuagoe&&y
12-4
a
d'
U
N
ar:
0
ti
v oq M
c °p
C ri
m m
Q✓ d' 66 2 ti N n
U U_ 00 O U_ 00 U_ 00
--I --I --I O O O �--I --I O
a a o a o o a o a o
U U � U � U � U �
O O O O
LL C }
y"O Q)�"O al C tlp tlp tlp T O
Y O C C C C Y C O C C C
0- E
'C oaEx ° ° o Oc ° E mm 2 �
Q u O 'O C u 'O
o E wO 4,� a
N
°' c °
c al a C C ate+ Y C Y-J Y N N N Q) E O _
O to Q) O
12 'c > O -
c o m o c 0 ' o`o ro u ro up"o �' 'o t v m a�
o c -2 Y a o m a� � a
_ c �_ m .E c m
'O m ob L w w c m
-
aoa 01 o �c1-0 c72 c .E o
a 'cuo o -o o o -o
E c o- a ro a� o Y ro > E c a � c c :Q '� c
0 o v u Y o o .Y r�o 6 2 -o ai E °' .o c °
m LL x a > a a o o c E x _ 'u o .
C = c O N -O ° '- -O u LE
`c° Y a' ° Y aa u `" a, m �' u 'c Y ° E oU w
r-
Q) ° in O T o Q) L O- Q)-0 4dC c Y ° Q)
a Q .
N°c = O m'= o = 3 E s Y o 0 ^ Y
O N N .°C 'V C F C T = to O -0
c c 0 a °' m 3 `O o O 4o o c E -o a
U a 0 m
o m W " m 12
o-°c io o
E 3 c m Y s o a = o m a N c a
Y °' aT+ N a O O C .0 � 'O a_ n O O p c
o..f0c .6 N o o 'o .°c o a f0 c E o —�°� c � > °c° '� a� -o
O � 3 u c o a� c E _ > -oo .E Y af0i
U .o N o co s 4• O N a� a� c a .o c uo Y -o
> > °- o ° c v 3 u Y c LE 0 0. E W `n a m E 3 sue.
.o c v a'o � '`° � � O " .°'c a� O
U 00 N a O i0 a a_ > U � _Q 1 Q) ate+ K v � 2 i p � C ~ C !a
c > E >o Q c o Q o c u Y o s o E a� E o o
a� c ro .c Y o Y a, o- a i, u .Q c a� E E -o ro io a
-o o c r- o -o Y Y a� o o .o E o E Q 3 5 o
:.c o o c a c o 0 o Q up ''a o up °' -�o� -o Y N o f0 aWi $ .c
'O a) ° ° O ° Y N a O N C N >'0 — O c N
•a� :_Y'c^ .:cYco= CmO c E sc0 U o O C a sa+ .� N '00 Ncc vc YcrEo CN> o .-YC°ocf0 YYo>,''=i3oam- Y�N3o-'
Yocctl�mcp'
E
O
O OE1 oY c ` c (7 O c Ec ° a m �° oM � ocom
a E I a. m ° E O
LE 0 LE
` . ° :° N> O u > E ca° o � u 2 m
+ � c ° o cr wc 'o E o E c > a� oQ V
o ` o
Yc o oE o + � ; Cr 12c W m OU — c O _ O v E s ° °1° m W> o c ° O 'ov0 o 0 w 0 E E 0 F
E _
o O E 3 O m > L 2 >U a 0 O W M > x !> Y
W W U YE -o m w =
c o cYY m O o O o
° � oU �• o E UmU
� oc � w a W 0 Wo a
cmoi'oQ3°)
U 3 c ai `c w a `c c -ao ` `
i E a c -o c a a_' "' o `-' a axi .E a�
v °c o y 3 ° o o u`p o o o ° c s w o o :° ° o Q s E a E E
p r- o ro > U ro q u a � Y 2 r- -o c a � a� `� O O� a U Y Q 3 °u m a
c
m
M E
a
0
o c � O �
° O O O > O Fv N al N
y O m a N .� a 0 a 0 a > a
¢Ei ¢Ei aEi c a E i rn
°° u O o u o ° u u o
o T O T T T T O O
O 6 6 C 0
c 6 u0 6 a) 6 6 N
a 0 �1 mU U �1 W In W H W H W Q InW 'j a
O O
• � s
4 N N Y
� O
h: O U
(7 U
W 00
(uo!&!s!nboe puel pue 000N o&pa&elaa seep!;o uORe&ussOJd) suogdo&nopl!nq 000N MZ'0£'�0009 £9 wOl! SI`d 5'xg:&usuagoe&&y
12-4
a
d'
U
N
ar:
0
N
N
C �p
O d
ti
U
0
a
u
O O O O O O
z° z z z z z z
z
ty
LL C }
C C t0 'O U C w 'O Y m c "O m
C YJ O C O C C
=O fl.'O E .N C O. YJN
u o N ° Y E O N E E f0 YJ t0
i
o 3 x a O -c m o axi
c a, E . ro -Oo -c o
1 0 °' `°
Q o 0 0 s - u c u o
a N °
u = E E a ryo
3 O .O .°C CO N C .i u Y ._ O
m i N O N > N
.Q o Y o a- E = E O E _ w
O Y ,0 = — E N E N T U a C "O
o Y m= 3 §,-�O N o -o
a o � up a o = O 0 a E m.�
m ova au u .E m
m E c .Q o o c ti C O O E E �o w N
° O '� `° a a-°'O c Y `° o
E c � w w a o ° m
`o Y
E C N .p E ? NO Y1 CO
= C '> x O = S C
a� o a O c a'O S 6
ro 'c Y
u .c
m c Y E s o 0 a O a U u 0 O m
aci m LL Y oa m .°c oo c a-Ei r-Oo 0
O O p_.O = U N t0 N x C tp >, a O
rao '_^ ° .°c -O c o °' . .o i E N of0n
o , W 0 p N 3 c Y m °' = ° o o aTi a� m ° o 'L
U O +' O Y > E
0 0 z c c u 3 c - L up u u m 3 0 v
E T c = ,o Y E > ro -O x
> o 'F 'o a = ° i w c a: o o O
c Q o c Y E u 3 o E 3 Y y
.0 U1 C O () O O O O N T O > T O a+ .OQ O.-C o f
ro c .! u c a 3 -N m E O o-O c c o ro � a 'c a� Y o N m c u
3 E o o O C7 0 ° m o = o o c o
aE c Y 0 c p � up Y c :Q -c Q T E `c 3 ^� o ..
N aci 3 c °o. ro 0 3 f0 ° _ .= y u :e c c E
0 0 0 E c ° d o fl E O T o " E
'= o up
u ' -=O m u f0 a� c a u a rco u (� c E aEi >, ° o
c aci E o w r`o a `° a r`o o -u
E c O E O o c a ° o ° o o Y ? c c
E O i o u C i W Y N C (D -O O 0 d U
w 0 > O o O ? ° o -O m 0 Y - T w a u -0 'o
N — °' ° N C0 0 W L N '� N N C - U C o
o LP m m o u a OD � c m a a E c .°c .w 0
c 3 O c m e
J -o C7 a' -c-p o c m m '� ai ~ m 'Q'O °'
m >O o c .cW E c 7 E a u u o � m� u W ,
O N C w >,by Y Y .0 U tlp N
tl=p E N N O °>,"O p3j O �tlp c N 0 > m T Y > �_ O
C .4� O O C .0 C N O m C 0 C Y = N T O O a E
O ° N O. u a,_ Y U C N O U N 'E N d 0
C. U N 0 0 c O Oi N N M O u N
U a T N Y N O C 0 3 CO i� O Y C E
O C > .0 = > a._ E
O1 'O O N O c O N O O ° Y u�0 C O O O
a E u o 3 w s o a - u
o w c
'O u E c 'c
o a`
mY m E 3 °: 6 .� m'o a W 3
a; o a; ,� o - -O o -
u 3 (j C7 w E E f0 m-2 � m � N �
c o
O oll
O O Y O C "O = `� Y O Q`0 m N T N 'O 01
49 0 0 2 `° 'E 'Q _ = o E o 1
1= Op = _ i tlp U .00 U N C vUj U p C N m U U U 3 -O U N
A tp Y Y tO C ` Y N a ` c N ` C N E N C Y Y O C = Co O O
c v ro E _ ro O = E o -O -O E ro a `-° �- _ -O
° v O o ¢ o ° _ c m - x ° = a ° E s O O ° E s O ^ c - ° E
a cu � � a ° .c � vu 3 .0 3 a� � Um �' _ 'nwva �' ".o a � wvu ro =o 0 3 � w O
m w a
0
LI1 l0 N
a `O
O u
(7 U
Li 00
m m
(uo!&!s!nboe puel pue 000N o&pa&elaa seep!;o uORe&ussOJd) suogdo&nopl!nq 000N MZ'0£'�0009 £9 wOl! SI`d 5'xg:&usuagoe&&y
12-4
a
d'
t N
a;
0
m
v
c �
o a
t
u
0
a
U 06
O O O
a c z z z
_ z
ty
t�
LL C }
O YJ v O tp v !� > m y Y o U
N Y o O
tp v a U v tp tO N pip
E 72
U1 -O v C v a C i V i1 0 0 N
O ?
O v
C v O. N > > v U i E
O u -O m O = N m S O U 'O > 3 a'C+
N p O opp O C
� Y E v
fp . N fi N 3 — v N O '° Y a v
v E 'o o m -0 3 Y u T a :c Y 3
c a v o w m > c _ >
E .f0c ` > u ip af0i a3i U >'
E u c O N ^ m v N °
v O_ ,� c 'o o. O u Q
o v -O -0 ou U_ O - v � O N 'O O Y
N -O C O > p U E -C N v o O V1 N i
ro 3 S o 3 v a� a o m °' c O
v v > a a O ° o o .E
j, c C E > O N -o 'O > .0 > > > -o E a; ;; Z i
C C t m m N O S N -O u 0 -C N O j, N O
O tp v i C H N O 3 U T.0 m v O a O
U Q a .0 v pp's= "O O .Q .'� m Y d
m
Y .0 p a�' a �' m N a o 3 �' `oo c m
on _ `o = o u m o LEz `°
v f0 u u io °'" -O -°c t'i o o a m rup °' 3 rp
U T C Y C v > C K 12 -O
W, O N v C O U �' O
-6 U O C O N2 v v C O > O o
c a m a
-O o 0 U -O N N O -o N v pi -O �p N m 0 u O
o c `c ow W� Z -o > 3 ip '° E ° 3 `° N a � roo
pn v o v c C N 3 3 x N o o ..
° `o° v f0 - ° w =o Y c0 c c
'> v o 0 3 m a m E a� o °
'u ¢ N i m E E o �, s m m .� o
c m
� E z ma° � V � � � � 0 w z � �
E o c c = ` °c 3 c > N o o E o 0 3 0
v v ° = E
a� i `.° °° f0 v S �n ° N c ° E v a v N = v
U J '>' W W K O U t^ W N U 'w.2O 2 N c O °' N -O N Vl
tp tp W_ .O C v W O
(o ? ° m rco w w S a a f0 3 v v O a; v N ° a
Y c c u-1
C o Y -o .f0c E o' 0- = U o.O O N
m e v ° a > o pp 'g o pp ° o E o = E 0
'up O N N v > N m m N C N .. v C 3 -O E o
v v O. v -O .N o _ v N N O "00 v =
-O E � o. o m v o `� op O
.� O m U ¢ -0 N .O o O = U E w O p°p v S pp _ Q
C CC t0 m a tp N U N E C ? E >, ? O. N Y N .tp N
O
p m i 'O a0+ .O
C °C • v • O C Uv tmp U v -p N mX T C N i N C
O iiO l v
v v EO o p
w [ aS v
O v E O O C
>
u �
i v
E E
F
c > =
m
-2 T m
m D 6
U N Ol
d N N
0
o
1= y U C
"� .O O
Oate+ N v a .p .p 0 a w
a wo ° � � ° mom° '^ o
> a
c w O
I� op .2 �4 N N
Y m Y
a o
3 O u
(7 U
LL 00
m m
(uo!&!s!nboe pue!pue 000N of pa&e!ej seep!;o uORe&ussOJd) suogdo&nop!!nq 000N MZ'0£'�0009 £9 wOl! SI`d 5'xg:&usuagoe&&y
d' w
a,
a
d'
t N
a;
a
v
c �
o a
t
u
0
a
u
O O O
vo > > z > z z
ty
t�
LL C }
N �
N O C N N
y0 N s u Y Y'000 N ~ N O
u m U
a aEi c v ° -v12 o Y .. m `c E v E
O
I v a E o s o Y E 3 m m
U X ? N N C -O
O 3 N N N a+ E .r- N N
Q a
N
a O' U N .00 u ° J � C
-O C > m U o _ N
_ tlp t0 N E Y `� N
O U O
m
T iT E N C 0 6
3 t0 O O. y0 N U
E U N C N 'O N N 'O N -° N m U
'O N E N C N O O "o N 0 "�� O C°.
3Sr
a _ w = c -°c v -o •. 3 E N N o
O' a C 'O N "O 'O a s 00 F O 40 ° C CO C
"O pp j, t0 > N C "O -°C
C O N
Y Y ._ y \ N C C °
a'a+
ro -a-o
C
a = Q 3 E ..
t0 ° C y U O. tO C U O
> `° u ° 3 0CP
Y yu c c vi .0 v
Y N 'O N O Q >, E O 'O N C 'o ,h N
c > °; 2 N M c 3 .o v 0 u v 3 Y O° N .c v
T O c O W W E -vo kz
ma 2 °: o f
= ° ac Er i '� �' ruo .f0c i= a�Ei c Y r`o :° E ° ¢�i m
E w v ° Q v 3 a o a d E N o o c c n
c a �_ f0 w 'o .o v a_ o w Y
2a f0 T N -0 ° i v a=i
Q f0 N v 'i N 0 I� _ O C `�
'� a E -O o f °-.o v Y c o N > u o. ..
m m c a " o '^ a' 3 -o u LZ w 3 0
v o v v v '� a� ;� v c o O C
'Toro a v Y u c
E 0 o ac Y o v . > O o 2m v ° m c 3 0 3 0
o io c v v c _-° v E cL-0 3 O c - c ti a o o 0,1
o N
c c c -o -0 0 a c v `o o :c v In c ° ¢,
w E N O O C -O O O v�i v >''Y E N N
C O c U ° U O .O U U -O C 4 CZ N
tlp N N O T N C Y Y O O C N
o w o aE Y ° c o c E v c a O E c arc a 0 3 0
p a U
N U N Y Q C N 0 N O 'O O N N
m OU 'O O 'O a`+ E " Q O Oi 'O i ti N a
> o a 3 v v m v v v N m = o v E
d X X X O .0 N N .0 T N O
W w 0 0 F- "O a'C+ C a'C+ F- .O 'O a C U U
X
C Y
O N C
Y — tlp p N
O p C N Y 72
C C 0 O
m N N d T U -C O O Y H
i
"O O ° m O � m Ot C °- j N 0 Ol
0 3 = 0 > N U' a O O
1= C _ C Oi O a N ° Oi U a+ U O
a
v a
m O
to 4 i.ti 0 N
� Y
00 O
O u
(7 U
00
m m
mm+boe mm mea m mpaj e*_m @u _m ss#em«im a maMmm�ome _ v,'xg:IuOwLj3ellV
12-4
co
Ln
\ �
§
\}\ � z
}
§
\ �
\
\ \ )
} \
\ \ \ \ \
// E
\ 0 \ 0 >
> _ > � a
) \ � \ \\ [ @ ,
\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \
± )
) §